HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_P&Z_08.16.2016Notice of Meeting for the
Planning and Zoning Commission
of the City of Georgetown
August 16, 2016 at 6:00 PM
at Historic Light and Water Works Building, 406 W. 8th Street, Georgetown, Texas
78626
The City o f G eo rgeto wn is committed to comp lianc e with the Americans with Dis abilities Ac t (ADA). If yo u
req uire as s is tanc e in participating at a p ublic meeting d ue to a disability, as d efined und er the ADA, reas onab le
as s is tance, ad ap tatio ns , or acc o mmo d ations will b e provid ed up o n req uest. P leas e c o ntact the City Sec retary's
Office, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc hed uled meeting d ate, at (512) 930-3652 o r City Hall at 113 Eas t 8th
Street fo r add itional info rmation; TTY us ers ro ute through Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular S es s io n may, at any time, b e rec es s ed to convene an Exec utive S es s io n fo r any p urpose
authorized b y the Op en Meetings Act, Texas Go vernment Co d e 551.)
A Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Comments from the Chair
- Welcome and Meeting P ro cedures
Action from Executive Session
B As of the d ead line, no persons were signed up to s peak on items other than thos e p o s ted o n the agend a.
Consent Agenda
The Statutory Cons ent Agenda inc ludes non-c o ntro versial and ro utine items that may be acted up o n with one
s ingle vo te. An item may b e pulled from the Cons ent Agenda in o rd er that it b e dis c us sed and acted up o n
individ ually as part of the Regular Agenda.
C Co nsideration and possible actio n o n a Preliminary Final Plat fo r a 0.905 ac re portio n o f the Outlot 12
Division A, lo c ated at 1901 Railroad Avenue kno wn as Railroad Oaks S ubdivis io n (PF P-2016-001) Juan
Enriquez, P lanner
D Co nsideration of the Minutes from the Augus t 2, 2016 P &Z meeting.
E Co nsideration and possible actio n o n a Preliminary Plat for 100.44 ac res lo catio n o n State Highway 29
West, known as the Cole Estates. Jo rd an J. Mad d o x, AICP, P rinc ip al Planner
Legislativ e Regular Agenda
F Public Hearing and possible actio n o n a req ues t to Rezone ap p ro ximately 73 acres in the Jo hn Berry
and Antonio Flores Surveys from the Agric ulture District (AG) to 55.99 ac res o f Res id ential Single-family
Page 1 of 54
Dis tric t (R S), 11.65 acres o f High Density Multifamily Dis tric t (MF-2), and 3.65 acres o f the Loc al
Co mmerc ial Dis tric t (C-1), lo cated at the s outhwes t c o rner o f the inters ec tion of the Georgetown Railro ad
with No rtheas t Inner Loop. (REZ-2016-013, Stillwater) Mike Elab arger, S enior Planner
G Public Hearing and possible actio n o n a req ues t to Rezone 11.5029 ac res in the Barney Low Survey
loc ated at 1070 Wes tingho use Road from the Agriculture (AG) Dis tric t to the Loc al Co mmercial (C-1)
Dis tric t. (REZ-2016-021, C&T Partners hip ) Juan Enriquez, Planner
H Dis cus s ion Items :
Update on the Unified Development C o d e Advis o ry Committee (UDC AC ) meetings .
(Commis s ioner Bargainer)
Update on the Geo rgeto wn Transp o rtatio n Ad visory Board (GTAB) meetings . (Commissioner
Rankin)
Ques tio ns o r c o mments from Commis s io ners-in-Training about the ac tio ns and matters c o nsidered
on this agenda.
Remind er of the next P lanning and Zoning Co mmis s io n meeting will be Septemb er 6, 2016 at the
Counc il C hambers lo cated and 101 Eas t 7th S treet, s tarting at 6:00 p m.
Adjournment
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Shelley No wling, C ity S ecretary fo r the C ity of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , d o hereby c ertify that this Notice of
Meeting was p o s ted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a p lace read ily acc es s ible to the general p ublic at all times ,
on the ______ d ay o f __________________, 2016, at __________, and remained so p o s ted fo r at leas t 72
c o ntinuo us ho urs p receding the sc heduled time o f s aid meeting.
____________________________________
S helley No wling, City Sec retary
Page 2 of 54
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
August 16, 2016
SUBJECT:
Cons id eration and p o s s ib le ac tion on a Preliminary Final Plat for a 0.905 ac re p o rtion of the Outlot 12
Divis io n A, loc ated at 1901 Railro ad Avenue known as Railro ad Oaks Subd ivis ion (P FP -2016-001) Juan
Enriq uez, Planner
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
This p reliminary final p lat creates 3 residential lots . Acc es s to the s ite is off of Railroad Avenue and W.
19th Street. P arkland dedic ation requirements are being met b y a fee-in-lieu. Right-o f-way is b eing
d ed icated along both s treet frontages .
Public Comments:
Pub lic notice is not required for a Preliminary Final P lat ap p licatio n. There have been no inq uiries ab o ut the
p lat.
Recommended motion:
Approve the Preliminary Final P lat fo r Railroad Oaks Sub d ivision
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None studied at this time.
SUBMITTED BY:
Juan Enriq uez, Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, P lanning Directo r
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Cover Memo
Attachment 1 - Location Map Backup Material
Attachment 2 - Preliminary Final Plat Backup Material
Page 3 of 54
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Railroad Oaks Subdivision – Preliminary Final Plat Page 1 of 2
Report Date: August 5, 2016
File No: PFP-2016-001
Project Planner: Juan Enriquez, Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Railroad Oaks Subdivision
Project Address: 1901 Railroad Avenue
Total Acreage: 0.905
Legal Description: Clement Stubblefield Survey .905 ac
Applicant: David Platt, P.E.
Property Owner: Vicki Watts
Contact: David Platt, P.E.
Plat Summary
Proposed Lots: Three (3) single-family lots
Proposed Streets: None
Heritage Trees: Two (2) are located on-site
Site Information
Location:
The property is located within Georgetown’s City limits at the northeast corner of Railroad
Avenue and West 19th Street.
Physical Characteristics:
The property is flat, primarily undeveloped with an existing single-family residence on the
Railroad Avenue side which will remain. The property has approximately 200 feet of street
frontage along West 19th Street and Railroad Avenue. There are two (2) heritage trees on-site
which will also remain.
Background
The subject property was annexed into the City in 1915. The development falls under the current
UDC regulations and the development standards for the RS District. The 2030 Comprehensive
Plan future land use category for the property is Moderate Density Residential. This project is
located within Growth Tier 1A. This plat would normally be reviewed administratively as a
minor plat. However, the applicant is required to provide right-of-way along both street
frontages and therefore requires P&Z approval. Thus, this application is presented to the P&Z for
approval.
Page 4 of 54
Planning Department Staff Report
Railroad Oaks Subdivision – Preliminary Final Plat Page 2 of 2
Utilities
Water, wastewater and electric utilities will be provided by the City of Georgetown. It is
anticipated that there is adequate water capacity at this time to serve this property either by
existing capacity or developer participation in upgrades to infrastructure.
Transportation
The site has public street access from both Railroad Avenue and W. 19th Street. Trip generation
will not be reviewed with the subdivision application since a three lot subdivision will not trigger
the need for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
Parkland Dedication
Parkland dedication requirements are being met by a fee in lieu
Staff Analysis
The proposed Preliminary Final Plat meets all of the requirements of the UDC and is presented
for approval.
Attachments
Attachment 1 – Location Map
Attachment 2 – Preliminary Final Plat
Page 5 of 54
PFP-2016-001
L
E
A
N
D
E
R
S
T
W 18TH ST
HART ST
A
L
L
E
Y
RA
I
L
R
O
A
D
A
V
E
BR
I
D
G
E
S
T
W 19TH ST
PFP-2016-001
Attachment #1
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 250 500Feet
¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
§¨¦35
Leander R d
W University Ave E University Ave
Southw este
r
n
B
l
v
d
S
A
u
s
t
i
n
A
v
e
")1460Site
City Limits
Street
Site
³
Location Map
Page 6 of 54
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY:APPROVED BY:
LOCATION MAP: 1" = 2000'
JOB No.22358 DATE: 9-Dec-15 SHEET 1 of 2
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
Feet
04080
OWNER:
VICKI WATTS
124 LOGAN RANCH ROAD
GEORGETOWN, TX 78628
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR:
STEGER BIZZELL
1978 S. AUSTIN AVE.
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78626
PHONE: 512-930-9412
SITE
Preliminary/Final Plat of
Railroad Oaks Subdivision
a Portion of Outlot 12 Division A,
City of Georgetown
A 0.905 Acre Subdivision situated in the
Clement Stubblefield Survey Abstract No.558
City of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas
GENERAL NOTES:
1. Total Acreage : 0.905 Ac.
2. Number of lots : 3
3. Number of blocks: 1
4.Water, wastewater and electric service are provided by the City of Georgetown.
5. All structures/obstructions are prohibited in drainage easements.
6. There are no areas within the boundaries of this subdivision in the 100-year floodplain as
defined by FIRM Map Number 48491C0295E, effective date of Sept. 26, 2008.
7. In order to promote drainage away from a structure, the slab elevation should be built at least
one-foot above the surrounding ground, and the ground should be graded away from the
structure at a slope of 1/2" per foot for a distance of at least 10 feet.
8. Parkland Dedication requirements are being met by fee in lieu of dedication.
9. Any Heritage Tree as noted on this plat is subject, in perpetuity, to the maintenance, care,
pruning and removal requirements of the City of Georgetown, and approved removal does not
require modification of the plat.
10. A 10-foot Public Utility Easement is reserved along all street frontages within this plat.
11. The monuments of this plat have been rotated to the NAD 83/93 HARN - Texas Central Zone and
NAVD 88.
12. The landowner assumes all risks associated with improvements located in the right-of-way, or
road widening easements. By placing anything in the right-of-way or road widening easements,
the landowner indemnifies and holds the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, their officers,
agents and employees harmless from any liability owing to property defects or negligence not
attributable to them and acknowledges that the improvements may be removed by the City
and/or County and that the owner of the improvements will be responsible for the relocation
and/or replacement of the improvements.
13. The building of all streets, roads, and other public thoroughfares and any bridges or culverts
necessary to be constructed or placed is the responsibility of the owners of the tract of land
covered by this plat in accordance with the plans and specifications prescribed by the City of
Georgetown and/or Williamson County, Texas. Neither the City of Georgetown nor Williamson
County assumes any obligation to build any of the streets, roads, or other public thoroughfares
shown on this plat or of constructing any of the bridges or drainage improvements in connection
therewith. Neither the City of Georgetown nor Williamson County assume any responsibility for
drainage ways or easements in the subdivision, other than those draining or protecting the road
system and streets in their respective jurisdictions.
14. Neither the City of Georgetown nor Williamson County assumes any responsibility for the
accuracy of representations by other parties in this plat. Floodplain data, in particular, may
change depending on subsequent development. It is further understood that the owners of the
tract of land covered by this plat must install at their own expense all traffic control devices and
signage that may be required before the streets in the subdivision have finally been accepted
for maintenance by the City and/or County.
15. Right-of-Way easements for widening roadways or improving drainage shall be maintained by the
landowner until road or drainage improvements are acturally constructed on the property. The
CIty and/or County have the right at any time to take possession of any road widening easement
for construction, improvement, or maintenance of the adjacent road.
16. This plat is subject to the provisions of the City of Georgetown Water Conservation Ordinance.
17. The subdivision subject to this application is subject to the Water Quality Regulations of the
City of Georgetown.
18. A Geologic Assessment, in accordance with the City of Georgetown Water Quality Regulations,
was completed on October 18, 2015. Any springs and streams as identified in the Geologic
Assessment are shown herein.
19. The maximum impervious coverage allowed per residential lot is 2,625 s.f. A Water Pollution
Abatement Plan Amendment shall be required once the impervious cover exceeds this amount, or
20% total impervious cover for the entire 0.905 Ac.
20. Minimum lot size in RS District is 5,500 square feet.
cjc DLP DLPCASE No. PFP-2016-001
LEGEND
- 1/2" IRON REBAR FOUND (UNLESS NOTED)
- 1/2" IRON REBAR SET WITH CAP STAMPED "RPLS 5784"
- MAG NAIL FOUND
- WL - WATER LINE
- WWL - WASTEWATER LINE
- OE - OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE
( ) - RECORD INFO PER DOCUMENT NO.
[ ] - RECORD INFO PER
O.P.R.W.C.T.- OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY TEXAS
FOR REVIEW
THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE
OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF
DAVID L. PLATT, P.E. REG. #115964 ON 7/1/16.
IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT OR
CONSTRUCTION.
BENCHMARK:
CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND
N = 10,201,889.86
E = 3,129,652.76
ELEV. = 756.61
BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON
THE TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATE
SYSTEM, CENTRAL ZONE (4203), NAD 83 (2011
ADJUSTMENT) DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON
ARE SURFACE VALUES REPRESENTED IN U.S.
SURVEY FEET.
HERITAGE TREE LIST
1010 29" LIVE OAK
1025 30" LIVE OAK
REVISION DATE:
"UUBDINFOU1SFMJNJOBSZ'JOBM1MBU
Page 7 of 54
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
DRAWN BY: cjc REVIEWED BY: DLP APPROVED BY: DLPJOB No. 22358 DATE: 9-Dec-15 SHEET 2 of 2
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
STATE OF TEXAS {
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON {
Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Vicki Watts, known to me to be the
person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed
the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL of office this day of ______________________, 2016 .
___________________________________________
Notary Public in and for the State of Texas
My Commission expires on: ____________________
CASE No. PFP-2016-001
STATE OF TEXAS {
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON {
I, Vicki Watts, sole owner of the certain tract of land shown hereon and described in deeds recorded in
Document No. 2015095291 of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas, and do hereby
subdivide said tract as shown hereon, and do hereby consent to all plat note requirements shown hereon, and
do hereby dedicate to the City of Georgetown the streets, alleys, rights-of-way, easements and public places
shown hereon for such public purposes as the City of Georgetown may deem appropriate. This subdivision is
to be known as RAILROAD OAKS.
TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS by my hand this day of , 2016.
Legal Description for Vicki Watts
BEING 0.905 of an acre of land, a portion of Outlot 12, Division A, City of Georgetown, situated in the
Clement Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 558, in Williamson County, Texas, said land being that
certain tract of land, as conveyed to Eugene Zavala, Jr., by deed as recorded in Volume 511, Page 71,
of the Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas. Surveyed on the ground in the month of April,
2015, under the supervision of Travis S. Tabor, Registered Professional Land Surveyor, and being more
particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING at a mag nail found at the intersection of the east line of Railroad Street and the north line
of West 19th Street, being on the west line of the above-referenced Outlot 12, Division A, marking the
Southwest corner of the above-referenced Zavala tract, for the Southwest corner hereof;
THENCE, along the said east line of Railroad Street, being the said west line of Outlot 12, Division A,
N 9°46'45" E, 207.55 feet to a concrete monument found marking the Northwest corner of the said
Zavala tract, being the Southwest corner of Lot 4 of the Final Plat of a Portion of Outlot 12, Division A,
City of Georgetown, a subdivision of record as Document No. 2014023749 of the Official Public
Records of Williamson County, Texas, for the Northwest corner hereof;
THENCE, N 84°23'30" E, at 164.27 feet, pass the Southeast corner of the said Lot 4, being the
Southwest corner of Lot 1, of the said Final Plat of a Portion of Outlot 12, Division A, City of
Georgetown, and continuing along the south line of the said Lot 1, for a total distance of 169.27 feet
to a 1" iron pipe found marking the Northeast corner of the said Zavala tract, being the Northwest
corner of that certain tract of land as conveyed to Alicia Delatorre, a single woman and Isaias
Delatorre, a single man, by deed recorded as Document No. 2001044026 of the Official Public Records
of Williamson County, Texas, for the Northeast corner hereof;
THENCE, along the east line of the said Zavala tract, S 3°24'15" E, 93.27 feet to a 1" iron pipe found
marking the Southwest corner of the said Delatorre tract, being the Northwest corner of that certain
tract of land, called 0.55 of an acre, as conveyed to Guy Martin and Carol Elizabeth Martin, husband
and wife, by deed recorded as Document No. 2014100589 of the Official Public Records of Williamson
County, Texas, and S 4°48'00" E, 112.88 feet to an iron pin found on the said north line of West 19th
Street marking the Southeast corner of the said Zavala tract, being the Southwest corner of the said
Martin tract, for the Southeast corner hereof;
THENCE, along the said north line of West 19th Street, S 85°57'00" W, 219.25 feet to the Place of
BEGINNING and containing 0.905 of an acre of land.
Note: Basis of Bearing GPS Observation Texas Central State Plane
STATE OF TEXAS {
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON {
I, Patrick J. Stevens, Registered Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Texas, do hereby certify that this
plat is true and correctly made from an actual survey made on the ground of the property legally described
hereon, and that there are no apparent discrepancies, conflicts, overlapping of improvements, visible utility
lines or roads in place, except as shown on the accompanying plat, and that the corner monuments shown
thereon were properly placed under my supervision in accordance with the subdivision regulations of the City
of Georgetown, Texas.
TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS my hand and seal at Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas, this
the __________day of _______________, 2016.
________________________________
Patrick J. Stevens
Registered Professional Land Surveyor
No. 5784 State of Texas
STATE OF TEXAS {
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON {
I, David L. Platt, Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Texas, do hereby certify that this
subdivision is in the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone and is not encroached by a Zone A flood area, as
denoted herein, and as defined by Federal Emergency Management Administration Flood Hazard Boundary
Map, Community Panel Number 48491C0295E , effective date September 26, 2008, and that each lot
conforms to the City of Georgetown regulations.
The fully developed, concentrated stormwater runoff resulting from the one hundred (100) year frequency
storm is contained within the drainage easements shown and/or public rights-of-way dedicated by this plat.
TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS my hand and seal at Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas, this
the __________day of _______________, 2016.
__________________________
David L. Platt
Registered Professional Engineer
No. 115964 State of Texas
I, Sofia Nelson, Planning Director of the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify this plat is approved for filing
of record with the County Clerk of Williamson County, Texas.
______________________________ _______________________
Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director Date
Based upon the above representations of the Engineer or Surveyor whose seal is affixed hereto, and after review
of the plat as represented by the said Engineer or Surveyor, I find that this plat complies with the requirements of
Chapter 15.44, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Georgetown Municipal Code. This certification is made solely
upon such representation and should not be relied upon for verifications of the facts alleged. The City of
Georgetown disclaims any responsibility to any member of the public or independent verifications of the
representations, factual or otherwise, contained in this plat and the documents associated with it.
______________________________ _______________________
Dave Hall, Floodplain Coordinator Date
City of Georgetown Floodplain Administrator
This subdivision to be known as RAILROAD OAKS has been accepted and approved for filing of record with the
County Clerk of Williamson County, Texas, according to the minutes of the meeting of the Georgetown Planning
and Zoning Commission on the ____ day of _____________, 2016
____________________________________ ___________________
Josh Schroeder Date
____________________________________ ___________________
Scott Rankin Date
STATE OF TEXAS {
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON {
I, Nancy Rister, Clerk of the County Court of said County, do hereby certify that the foregoing
instrument in writing, with its certificate was filed for record in my office on the_____ day of___________ , 2016,
A.D., at_____o’clock,__ .m. and duly recorded on the_____ day of____________ , 2016 , A.D., at ___ o’clock,
___.m. in the Plat Records of said County in Document No._______________________________.
TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS my hand and seal at the County Court of said County, at my office in
Georgetown, Texas the date last shown above written.
Nancy Rister, Clerk
County Court of Williamson County, Texas
By:_______________________Deputy
FOR REVIEW
THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE
OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF
PATRICK J. STEVENS, R.P.L.S. #5784 ON 7/1/16.
IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT OR
CONSTRUCTION.
FOR REVIEW
THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE
OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF
DAVID L. PLATT, P.E. REG. #115964 ON 7/1/16.
IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT OR
CONSTRUCTION.
Preliminary/Final Plat of
Railroad Oaks Subdivision
a Portion of Outlot 12 Division A,
City of Georgetown
A 0.905 Acre Subdivision situated in the
Clement Stubblefield Survey Abstract No.558
City of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas
Page 8 of 54
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
August 16, 2016
SUBJECT:
Cons id eration o f the Minutes fro m the Augus t 2, 2016 P&Z meeting.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Draft Minutes from Augus t 2, 2016 Cover Memo
Page 9 of 54
Page 1 of 2
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes
Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 6:00 PM
Council Chambers
101 E. Seventh Street, Georgetown, Texas 78626
Commissioners: Josh Schroeder, Chair; Kevin Pitts, Vice-Chair, Scott Rankin, Secretary;
John Marler, Tim Bargainer and Alex Fuller
Commissioner(s) Absent: Andy Webb,
Commissioners in Training: Aaron Albright
Commissioner(s) in Training Absent: Gary Leissner
Staff Present: Sofia Nelson, Planning Director, Juan Enriquez, Planner; Mike Elabarger,
Senior Planner and Stephanie McNickle, Recording Secretary.
A. Chair Schroeder called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Chair Schroeder stated the order of the meeting and that those who speak must turn in
a speaker form to the recording secretary before the item that they wish to address
begins. Each speaker is permitted to address the Commission once for each item, for a
maximum of three (3) minutes, unless otherwise agreed to before the meeting begins.
As of the deadline for this agenda, no persons were signed up to speak on items other
than what was posted on the agenda.
Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that may be
acted upon with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in
order that it be discussed and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda.
C Consideration of the Minutes from the August 2, 2016 P&Z meeting.
Motion by Commissioner Marler to approve the consent agenda including the
minutes from the August 2, 2016, Planning and Zoning meeting. Second by
Commissioner Pitts. Approved. (6-0)
Legislative Regular Agenda
D Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to change approximately 11.65 acres in the Antonio Flores Survey
from the Moderate Density Residential Future Land Use category to the High
Density Residential category, located at the southwest corner of the intersection
of the Georgetown Railroad with Northeast Inner Loop. (CPA-2016-002,
Stillwater) Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner.
Staff report by Sofia Nelson.
Sophia provided an overview of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Application request and description of project.
Page 10 of 54
Page 2 of 2
Chair Schroeder invited the application to speak.
Collen Armstrong, gave a power point presentation explaining the property and
the project.
Discussion between staff and Commissioners regarding water accessibility.
Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward the Public
Hearing was closed.
Motion by Commissioner Marler to recommend to City Council approval for a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change approximately 11.65 acres in the
Antonio Flores Survey from the Moderate Density Residential Future Land Use
category to the High Density Residential category, located at the southwest
corner of the intersection of the Georgetown Railroad with Northeast Inner Loop.
Second by Commissioner Rankin. Approved. (6-0)
E Discussion Items:
Update on the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee (UDCAC)
meetings. (Commissioner Bargainer) NA
Update on the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB) meetings.
(Commissioner Rankin) NA
Questions or comments from Commissioners-in-Training about the actions and
matters considered on this agenda. NA
Reminder of the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on August 16,
2016 at The Historic Lights and Water Works Building located at 406 West 8th
Street, starting at 6:00 pm.
Adjourn at 6:37 p.m.
____________________________________ ____________________________________
Josh Schroeder, Chair Scott Rankin, Commissioner
Page 11 of 54
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
August 16, 2016
SUBJECT:
Cons id eration and p o s s ib le ac tion on a Preliminary Plat fo r 100.44 acres loc ation on S tate Highway 29
Wes t, known as the C o le Es tates . Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner
ITEM SUMMARY:
The p ro p o s ed Cole Es tates p lat cons is ts o f p rimarily s ingle-family lo ts within the ET J, built to s uburb an
s tand ard s and s erved with City utilities. No p ublic no tic e is req uired.
Staff rec o mmend s approval o f the Preliminary P lat
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
.
SUBMITTED BY:
Jordan Maddo x, AIC P, P rinc ip al P lanner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Cole Es tates Plat Backup Material
Staff Report Backup Material
Location Map Backup Material
Page 12 of 54
CO
L
E
E
S
T
A
T
E
S
SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
GE
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
Checked By:
Drawn By:
Project No.:
Issued:
No
.
D
a
t
e
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Re
v
i
s
i
o
n
40
3
0
W
E
S
T
B
R
A
K
E
R
L
A
N
E
,
S
U
I
T
E
4
5
0
AU
S
T
I
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
7
8
7
5
9
-
5
3
5
6
TE
L
(
5
1
2
)
7
7
7
-
4
6
0
0
FA
X
(
5
1
2
)
2
5
2
-
8
1
4
1
TB
P
E
F
I
R
M
#
3
1
2
30938
7/29/2016
TML
JJT III
7/29/2016
00 200'400'
1 OF 4
OVERALL
PRELIMINARY
SITE PLAN
OWNERS:
GLENNA MAE COLE ESTATE
3900 PAWNEE PASS
AUSTIN, TX 78738
ACREAGE: 100.446 ACRES
SURVEYOR:
HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC.
4030 WEST BRAKER LANE, SUITE 450
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78759
NUMBER OF BLOCKS:15
LINEAR FEET OF NEW STREETS: 13,856.88 LF
ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2015
DATE OF PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION APPROVAL:___________
BENCHMARKS:
THE MONUMENTS OF THIS PLAT HAVE BEEN ROTATED
TO THE NAD 83/93 HARN - TEXAS CENTRAL ZONE AND
NAVD 88.
POINT NO. G100 (1/2" IRON ROD " HALFF TRAV")
ELEVATION: 901.42
NORTHING: 10203330.47
EASTING: 3102498.51
POINT NO. G101 (1/2" IRON ROD " HALFF TRAV")
ELEVATION: 909.07
NORTHING: 10203164.77
EASTING: 3103751.76
POINT NO. G102 (1/2" IRON ROD " HALFF TRAV")
ELEVATION: 941.40
NORTHING: 10203453.78
EASTING: 3101498.23
PATENT SURVEY: ISAAC DONAGAN SURVEY,
ABSTRACT No. 178
ENGINEER:
HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC.
4030 WEST BRAKER LANE, SUITE 450
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78759
LOCATION MAP
N.T.S.
EX. PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
EX. RIGHT OF WAY LINE
EX. EDGE OF PAVEMENT
EX. OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE
EX. WATER LINE
EX. CREEK / RIVER CENTERLINE
EX. FENCE LINE
EX. EASEMENT LINE
EX. BENCHMARK
EX. CONTROL POINT
EX. WASTEWATER CLEANOUT
EX. WASTEWATER MANHOLE
EX. FIRE HYDRANT
EX. WATER METER
EX. WATER VALVE
EX. POWER POLE
EX. GUY WIRE
EX. HERITAGE TREE
EX. SURVEY MONUMENT (FOUND IRON ROD)
CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURE BUFFER ZONE
PHASE LIMIT LINE
PARKLAND DEDICATION
MAIL CLUSTER BOX UNIT
Page 13 of 54
CO
L
E
E
S
T
A
T
E
S
SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
GE
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
Checked By:
Drawn By:
Project No.:
Issued:
No
.
D
a
t
e
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Re
v
i
s
i
o
n
40
3
0
W
E
S
T
B
R
A
K
E
R
L
A
N
E
,
S
U
I
T
E
4
5
0
AU
S
T
I
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
7
8
7
5
9
-
5
3
5
6
TE
L
(
5
1
2
)
7
7
7
-
4
6
0
0
FA
X
(
5
1
2
)
2
5
2
-
8
1
4
1
TB
P
E
F
I
R
M
#
3
1
2
30938
7/29/2016
TML
JJT III
7/29/2016
00 100'200'
2 OF 4
PRELIMINARY
SITE PLAN A
EX. PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
EX. RIGHT OF WAY LINE
EX. EDGE OF PAVEMENT
EX. OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE
EX. WATER LINE
EX. FENCE LINE
EX. EASEMENT LINE
EX. BENCHMARK
EX. CONTROL POINT
EX. WASTEWATER CLEANOUT
EX. WASTEWATER MANHOLE
EX. FIRE HYDRANT
EX. WATER METER
EX. WATER VALVE
EX. POWER POLE
EX. GUY WIRE
EX. HERITAGE TREE
EX. SURVEY MONUMENT (FOUND IRON ROD)
CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURE BUFFER ZONE
PHASE LIMIT LINE
MAIL CLUSTER BOX UNIT
Page 14 of 54
CO
L
E
E
S
T
A
T
E
S
SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
GE
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
Checked By:
Drawn By:
Project No.:
Issued:
No
.
D
a
t
e
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Re
v
i
s
i
o
n
40
3
0
W
E
S
T
B
R
A
K
E
R
L
A
N
E
,
S
U
I
T
E
4
5
0
AU
S
T
I
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
7
8
7
5
9
-
5
3
5
6
TE
L
(
5
1
2
)
7
7
7
-
4
6
0
0
FA
X
(
5
1
2
)
2
5
2
-
8
1
4
1
TB
P
E
F
I
R
M
#
3
1
2
30938
7/29/2016
TML
JJT III
7/29/2016
00 100'200'
3 OF 4
PRELIMINARY SITE
PLAN B
EX. PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
EX. RIGHT OF WAY LINE
EX. EDGE OF PAVEMENT
EX. CREEK / RIVER CENTERLINE
EX. FENCE LINE
EX. EASEMENT LINE
EX. BENCHMARK
EX. CONTROL POINT
EX. WASTEWATER CLEANOUT
EX. WASTEWATER MANHOLE
EX. FIRE HYDRANT
EX. WATER METER
EX. WATER VALVE
EX. POWER POLE
EX. GUY WIRE
EX. HERITAGE TREE
EX. SURVEY MONUMENT (FOUND IRON ROD)
PHASE LIMIT LINE
BOUNDARY FOR ZONE AE OF THE 1%
ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD (100-YEAR FLOOD)
PARKLAND DEDICATION
MAIL CLUSTER BOX UNIT
WW FUTURE WASTE WATER LINE
Page 15 of 54
CO
L
E
E
S
T
A
T
E
S
SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
GE
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
Checked By:
Drawn By:
Project No.:
Issued:
No
.
D
a
t
e
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Re
v
i
s
i
o
n
40
3
0
W
E
S
T
B
R
A
K
E
R
L
A
N
E
,
S
U
I
T
E
4
5
0
AU
S
T
I
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
7
8
7
5
9
-
5
3
5
6
TE
L
(
5
1
2
)
7
7
7
-
4
6
0
0
FA
X
(
5
1
2
)
2
5
2
-
8
1
4
1
TB
P
E
F
I
R
M
#
3
1
2
30938
7/29/2016
TML
JJT III
7/29/2016
4 OF 4
NOTES
1. UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE WATER: CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WASTEWATER:
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, AND ELECTRIC: PEDERNALES ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE.
2. ALL STRUCTURES/OBSTRUCTIONS ARE PROHIBITED IN DRAINAGE EASEMENTS.
3. THERE ARE AREAS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THIS SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN ZONE AE OF THE
100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS DEFINED BY FIRM MAP NUMBERS 48491C0275E AND 48491C0460E DATED
SEPTEMBER 26, 2008.
4. NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
FOR LOT 15, BLOCK K.
5. PRIOR TO ANY CHANNEL ALTERATION OR BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, WHICH WILL CHANGE EXISTING
FLOOD PATTERNS OR ELEVATIONS, A LETTER OF MAP AMENDMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY
OF GEORGETOWN FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATOR FOR APPROVAL AND APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY.
6. IN ORDER TO PROMOTE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM A STRUCTURE THE SLAB ELEVATION SHOULD BE BUILT
AT LEAST ONE-FOOT ABOVE THE SURROUNDING GROUND, AND THE GROUND SHOULD BE GRADED
AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE AT A SLOPE OF 1/2" PER FOOT FOR A DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 10 FEET.
7. PARKLAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE BEING MET BY LAND DEDICATION AT THE TIME OF FINAL
PLAT RECORDATION PER APPROVAL OF PARKS BOARD ON FEBRUARY 11, 2016. PRIOR TO
RECORDATION OF FIRST FINAL PLAT PHASE, FISCAL SURETY SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR STREETS
PROVIDING ACCESS TO THE PARKLAND.
8. ANY HERITAGE TREE AS NOTED ON THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT, IN PERPETUITY, TO THE MAINTENANCE,
CARE, PRUNING AND REMOVAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, AND APPROVED
REMOVAL DOES NOT REQUIRE MODIFICATION OF THE PLAT.
9. A 10-FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT IS RESERVED ALONG ALL STREET FRONTAGES WITHIN THIS
PLAT.
10. ALL BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON THE TEXAS COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983,
CENTRAL ZONE. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE SURFACE DISTANCES. THE GRID TO SURFACE
ADJUSTMENT SCALE FACTOR IS 1.00014.
11. THE MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PER RESIDENTIAL LOT IS 45%
12. THE MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PER NON-RESIDENTIAL LOT SHALL BE PURSUANT TO THE UDC
AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN APPLICATION.
13. THE LANDOWNER ASSUMES ALL RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED IN THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY, OR ROAD WIDENING EASEMENTS. BY PLACING ANYTHING IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR
ROAD WIDENING EASEMENTS, THE LANDOWNER INDEMNIFIES AND HOLDS THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN,
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, THEIR OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES HARMLESS FROM ANY LIABILITY
OWING TO PROPERTY DEFECTS OR NEGLIGENCE NOT ATTRIBUTABLE TO THEM AND ACKNOWLEDGES
THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE REMOVED BY THE CITY AND/OR COUNTY AND THAT THE OWNER OF
THE IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RELOCATION AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF THE
IMPROVEMENTS.
14. THE BUILDING OF ALL STREETS, ROADS, AND OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES AND ANY BRIDGES OR
CULVERTS NECESSARY TO BE CONSTRUCTED OR PLACED IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNERS OF
THE TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY THIS PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
PRESCRIBED BY THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN AND/OR WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. NEITHER THE CITY
OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY OBLIGATION TO BUILD ANY OF THE
STREETS, ROADS, OR OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES SHOWN ON THIS PLAT OR OF CONSTRUCTING
ANY OF THE BRIDGES OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. NEITHER THE CITY
OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR DRAINAGE WAYS
OR EASEMENTS IN THE SUBDIVISION, OTHER THAN THOSE DRAINING OR PROTECTING THE ROAD
SYSTEM AND STREETS IN THEIR RESPECTIVE JURISDICTIONS.
15. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR
THE ACCURACY OF REPRESENTATIONS BY OTHER PARTIES IN THIS PLAT. FLOODPLAIN DATA, IN
PARTICULAR, MAY CHANGE DEPENDING ON SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT. IT IS FURTHER
UNDERSTOOD THAT THE OWNERS OF THE TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY THIS PLAT MUST INSTALL AT
THEIR OWN EXPENSE ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNAGE THAT MAY BE REQUIRED BEFORE
THE STREETS IN THE SUBDIVISION HAVE FINALLY BEEN ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE BY THE CITY
AND / OR COUNTY.
16. RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS FOR WIDENING ROADWAYS OR IMPROVING DRAINAGE SHALL BE
MAINTAINED BY THE LANDOWNER UNTIL ROAD OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE ACTUALLY
CONSTRUCTED ON THE PROPERTY. THE CITY AND/OR COUNTY HAVE THE RIGHT AT ANY TIME TO TAKE
POSSESSION OF ANY ROAD WIDENING EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT, OR
MAINTENANCE OF THE ADJACENT ROAD.
17. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WATER CONSERVATION
ORDINANCE.
18. THE SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO THIS APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO THE WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS
OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN.
19. A GEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WATER QUALITY
REGULATIONS, WAS COMPLETED ON AUGUST 6, 2015. ANY SPRINGS AND STREAMS AS IDENTIFIED IN
THE GEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT ARE SHOWN HEREIN.
20. ALL DRAINAGE WAYS, WATER QUALITY SEDIMENTATION, FILTRATION, DETENTION, AND/OR RETENTION
BASIN FEATURES AND RELATED APPURTENANCES SHALL BE SITUATED WITHIN A DRAINAGE EASEMENT
OR DRAINAGE LOT.THE OWNERS, HOA, OR ITS ASSIGNEES OF THE TRACTS UPON WHICH ARE LOCATED
SUCH EASEMENTS, APPURTENANCES, AND DETENTION FACILITIES SHALL MAINTAIN AND BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR MAINTENANCE, ROUTINE INSPECTION AND UPKEEP.
21. ALL ROADWAYS PROPOSED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION ARE TO BE PUBLICLY DEDICATED AND ARE TO
BE PUBLICLY OWNED AND MAINTAINED.
22. SIDEWALKS ARE TO BE MAINTAINED BY EACH OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS.
23. VISTA HEIGHTS DRIVE SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR BEGINNING AT STATE
+,*+:$<$1'(;7(1',1*6287+727+(,17(56(&7,212)5('%(55<3$667+(5,*+72):$<
$/21*7+,66(*0(172)52$':$<6+$//0($685()((7,1:,'7+7+(3$9(0(176(&7,21
WITHIN VISTA HEIGHTS DRIVE ALONG THIS SEGMENT SHALL CONTAIN DIVIDED TRAVEL LANES WITH A
)227:,'(($57+(1&(17(5('0(',$10($685(')520)$&(2)&85%7+(75$9(//$1(6
SHALL BE MEASURED AT FACE OF CURB AND SHALL BE DESIGNED WITH 12-FOOT VEHICULAR LANES
$1')227%,&<&/(/$1(6)25$727$/2))((7)$&(2)&85%72)$&(2)&85%7+(
SIDEWALKS ALONG THIS SEGMENT OF VISTA HEIGHTS DRIVE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5-FOOT FROM
THE BACK OF CURB AND MAY BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT OUTSIDE OF THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY.
24. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF LOTS 1 AND 2 OF BLOCK J, NO DRIVEWAY ACCESS SHALL BE TAKEN OFF OF A
COLLECTOR - LEVEL ROADWAY.
25. A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THE RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITHIN THIS
SUBDIVISION. THE COMMERCIAL LOTS PROPOSED ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF SH 29, DEPENDING ON
THEIR ULTIMATE USE, MAY REQUIRE A TIA FOR THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT. IN SUCH AN INSTANCE,
THE RESIDENTIAL LOTS SHALL BE CONSIDERED BASE TRAIPS WITHIN THE TIA.
26. ON MAY 29, 2007, THE WILLIAMSON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT, ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION,
ADOPTED AGENDA ITEM # 28 REGARDING THE PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY AND CROSS-SECTIONS FOR
VARIOUS PUBLIC ROADWAYS, INCLUDING SH 29 FROM THE BURNET COUNTY LINE TO D.B. WOOD ROAD,
WITH A RECOMMENDED RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 200 FEET.
27. A MINIMUM FIRE FLOW OF 1,500 GPM SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE COMMERCIAL PORTION OF THIS
DEVELOPMENT. MINIMUM FIRE FLOWS FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE THIS DEVELOPMENT
SHALL BE DETERMINED PER THE TABLE BELOW.
ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
I, JOHN J. TEAGUE III, REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF TEXAS,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION IS IN THE EDWARDS AQUIFER RECHARGE
ZONE AND IS NOT ENCROACHED BY A ZONE A FLOOD AREA, AS DENOTED HEREIN, AND
AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION FLOOD HAZARD
BOUNDARY MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBERS 48491C0275E AND 48491C0460E DATED
SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 AND THAT EACH LOT CONFORMS TO THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN
REGULATIONS.
THE FULLY DEVELOPED, CONCENTRATED STORMWATER RUNOFF RESULTING FROM
THE ONE HUNDRED (100) YEAR FREQUENCY STORM IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE
DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHOWN AND/OR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF WAY DEDICATED BY THIS
PLAT.
TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL AT WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
THIS DAY OF , 2016.
_________________________________________
JOHN J. TEAGUE III, P.E.
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
NO. 92770 STATE OF TEXAS
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FOR 100.446 ACRES TRACT
BEING A 100.446 ACRES TRACT SITUATED IN THE ISAAC DONAGAN SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NUMBER 178, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF
CALLED 104.195 ACRES TRACT AS DESCRIBED IN AN APPLICATION TO PROBATE
WILL AND FOR ISSUANCE OF LETTERS TESTAMENTARY AS RECORDED IN
DOCUMENT NO. 2014018804 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON
COUNTY, TEXAS, AND FURTHER DESCRIBED IN VOLUME 588, PAGE 862 OF THE
DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED ³)25(67 RPLS ´
FOUND IN THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 29 (SH29), A 100-FEET
WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY ACCORDING TO TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAP CSJ
NOS. 337-1-2 AND 337-1-5, FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 104.195 ACRES TRACT,
SAME BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A CALLED 168.62 ACRES TRACT AS DESCRIBED
IN A SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED WITH VENDOR'S LIEN TO ZAMIN, L.P. AS RECORDED IN
DOCUMENT NO. 201403274 OF SAID OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY,
TEXAS;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SH29, WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID
104.195 ACRES TRACT, SAME BEING THE WEST LINE OF SAID 168.62 ACRES TRACT, THE
FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES AND DISTANCES:
1.6
´($',67$1&(2))((772$,1&+,52152':,7+3/$67,&&$3
67$03('³)25(6753/6´)281')25$1$1*/(32,17$1'
2.6
´($',67$1&(2)72$,1&+,52152':,7+3/$67,&&$3
67$03('³+$/))$662&,1&´6(7)25$1$1*/(32,17,17+(($67/,1(2)7+(
HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT, SAME BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A CALLED 3.00
ACRES TRACT AS DESCRIBED IN A GENERAL WARRANTY DEED TO SAID ZAMIN, L.P.,
AND RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2015013369 OF SAID OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND FROM WHICH A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD FOUND FOR AN
ANGLE POINT IN SAID EAST LINE OF THE 104.195 ACRES TRACT AND SAID 168.62 ACRES
TRACT, SAME BEING AN ANGLE POINT IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 3.00 ACRES TRACT
%($566
´($',67$1&(2))((7
THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE OF THE 104.195 ACRES TRACT AND SAID WEST LINE OF
THE 168.62 ACRES TRACT, CROSSING SAID 104.195 ACRES TRACT WITH THE WEST LINE OF
SAID 3.00 ACRES TRACT, 6
´: A DISTANCE OF 119.32 FEET TO A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD
FOUND FOR AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID EAST LINE OF THE 104.195 ACRES TRACT AND SAID
WEST LINE OF THE 168.62 ACRES TRACT;
THENCE CONTINUING WITH SAID EAST LINE OF THE 104.195 ACRES TRACT AND SAID WEST
LINE OF THE 168.62 ACRES TRACT THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES AND DISTANCES:
1.6
´:$',67$1&(2))((772$,1&+,52152':,7+3/$67,&&$3
67$03('³%85<3$571(56´)281')25$1$1*/(32,17
2.6
´:$',67$1&(2))((772$,1&+,52152')281')25$1
ANGLE POINT, AND
3.6
´:3$66,1*$7$',67$1&(2))((7$,1&+,52152')281'
AND CONTINUING IN ALL A DISTANCE OF 283.60 FEET TO A POINT IN THE APPROXIMATE
CENTER OF THE SOUTH FORK OF THE SAN GABRIEL RIVER FOR THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID 104.195 ACRES TRACT, SAME BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID 168.62 ACRES TRACT;
THENCE WITH SAID APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF SAID SOUTH FORK OF THE SAN
GABRIEL RIVER THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES AND DISTANCES:
1.1
´:$',67$1&(2))((772$1$1*/(32,17
2.1
´:$',67$1&(2))((772$1$1*/(32,17
3.1
´:$',67$1&(2))((772$1$1*/(32,17
4.1
´:$',67$1&(2))((772$1$1*/(32,17$1'
5.1
´:$',67$1&(2))((772$32,17%(,1*7+(6287+:(67&251(5
OF SAID 104.195 ACRES TRACT, SAME BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A CALLED
68.096 ACRES TRACT AS DESCRIBED IN A WARRANTY DEED WITH VENDOR'S LIEN TO
YOMAC, LTD. AND RECORDED IN VOLUME 2322, PAGE 474 OF SAID DEED RECORDS OF
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE LEAVING SAID APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF SAID SOUTH FORK OF THE SAN
GABRIEL RIVER, WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID 104.195 ACRES TRACT, SAME BEING THE
EAST LINE OF SAID 68.096 ACRES TRACT, THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES AND
DISTANCES:
1.1
´(3$66,1*$7$',67$1&(2))((7$,1&+,52152')281'
AND CONTINUING IN ALL A DISTANCE OF 1,073.12 FEET TO A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD FOUND
FOR AN ANGLE POINT, AND
2.1
´:$',67$1&(2))((772$&2772163,1'/()281',17+(6$,'
SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SH29 FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 104.195
ACRES TRACT, SAME BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 68.096 ACRES TRACT;
THENCE WITH SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SH29, SAME BEING THE NORTH LINE OF
SAID 104.195 ACRES TRACT, 6
´( A DISTANCE OF 1,393.45 FEET TO SAID POINT OF
BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 100.446 ACRES.
BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE TEXAS COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, CENTRAL ZONE 4203
(NAD83/2011). ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE SURFACE AND MAY BE CONVERTED
TO GRID BY USING THE SURFACE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR OF 1.00014. UNITS: U.S. SURVEY
FEET.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR A SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS COLE ESTATES HAS BEEN
APPROVED ACCORDING TO THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE GEORGETOWN
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON THE ____ DAY OF _____________, 20___, A.D.
_______________________________________________________________
CHAIRMAN DATE
_______________________________________________________________
SECRETARY DATE
Page 16 of 54
CO
L
E
E
S
T
A
T
E
S
SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
GE
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
Checked By:
Drawn By:
Project No.:
Issued:
No
.
D
a
t
e
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Re
v
i
s
i
o
n
40
3
0
W
E
S
T
B
R
A
K
E
R
L
A
N
E
,
S
U
I
T
E
4
5
0
AU
S
T
I
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
7
8
7
5
9
-
5
3
5
6
TE
L
(
5
1
2
)
7
7
7
-
4
6
0
0
FA
X
(
5
1
2
)
2
5
2
-
8
1
4
1
TB
P
E
F
I
R
M
#
3
1
2
30938
7/29/2016
TML
JJT III
7/29/2016
1 OF 2
LEGEND
00 100'200'
TREE PRESERVATION
PLAN A
EX. PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
EX. RIGHT OF WAY LINE
EX. EDGE OF PAVEMENT
EX. FENCE LINE
EX. EASEMENT LINE
PHASE LIMIT LINE
EX. HERITAGE TREE
EX. OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE
EX. WATER LINE
EX. WASTEWATER CLEANOUT
EX. WASTEWATER MANHOLE
EX. FIRE HYDRANT
EX. WATER METER
EX. WATER VALVE
EX. POWER POLE
EX. GUY WIRE
CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURE BUFFER ZONE
APPROX 2000. SQUARE FOOT
HOME FOOTPRINT
Page 17 of 54
CO
L
E
E
S
T
A
T
E
S
SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
GE
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
Checked By:
Drawn By:
Project No.:
Issued:
No
.
D
a
t
e
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Re
v
i
s
i
o
n
40
3
0
W
E
S
T
B
R
A
K
E
R
L
A
N
E
,
S
U
I
T
E
4
5
0
AU
S
T
I
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
7
8
7
5
9
-
5
3
5
6
TE
L
(
5
1
2
)
7
7
7
-
4
6
0
0
FA
X
(
5
1
2
)
2
5
2
-
8
1
4
1
TB
P
E
F
I
R
M
#
3
1
2
30938
7/29/2016
TML
JJT III
7/29/2016
2 OF 2
00 100'200'
TREE PRESERVATION
PLAN B
LEGEND
EX. PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
EX. RIGHT OF WAY LINE
EX. EDGE OF PAVEMENT
EX. CREEK / RIVER CENTERLINE
EX. FENCE LINE
EX. EASEMENT LINE
PHASE LIMIT LINE
EX. HERITAGE TREE
EX. WASTEWATER CLEANOUT
EX. WASTEWATER MANHOLE
EX. FIRE HYDRANT
EX. WATER METER
EX. WATER VALVE
EX. POWER POLE
EX. GUY WIRE
BOUNDARY FOR ZONE AE OF THE
1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD
(100-YEAR FLOOD)
APPROX 2000. SQUARE FOOT
HOME FOOTPRINT
WW FUTURE WASTE WATER LINE
Page 18 of 54
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Cole Estates, Preliminary Plat Page 1 of 2
Report Date: August 5, 2016
File No: PP-2015-026
Project Planner: Jordan Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Cole Estates
Project Address: Hwy 29 West
Total Acreage: 100.44 acres
Legal Description: 100.44 acres in the Donagan Survey
Applicant: John Teague, Halff Engineering
Property Owner(s): Glenna Mae Cole Estate
Contact: John Teague, PE
Plat Summary
The proposed project is primarily single-family lots within the ETJ, built to suburban standards and
served with City utilities.
Proposed Lots: 207 single-family lots; 11 acres open space, 6 acres parkland
Proposed Streets: Fifteen (15) new streets (14,635 feet of new street length)
Site Information
Location:
The property is located outside of the city limits west of town on Highway 29. Entrance is directly south
from the Chapparal Estates Subdivision.
Physical Characteristics:
The property is representative of the transition into Hill Country terrain, including heavy tree cover and
many Heritage Trees. The relatively skinny tract of land slopes down to the South San Gabriel river from
29 and includes floodplain along the southern boundary. Partially Recharge Zone and partially
Contributing Zone of the Edwards Aquifer.
History
The subject property has been in the City’s ETJ for many years. This is the first application filed with
the City of Georgetown for development purposes.
Utilities
Water and Wastewater services are provided by the City of Georgetown. Electric service is provided by
Pedernales (PEC). A wastewater agreement will be presented for approval to the City Council in the near
future that will provide for service to the project. With that agreement is included an annexation
provision that the property will be annexed at a later date when the city becomes contiguous.
Transportation
Access to the subdivision will be exclusively from Highway 29 as the development begins. A median-
divided boulevard will be constructed to meet the Fire Code provisions for two fire accessways. Future
street connections will be stubbed to the east and west and several locations, including planned
Page 19 of 54
Planning Department Staff Report
Cole Estates, Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 2
connections to the Crescent Bluff MUD project to the east. A landmark roundabout is centrally located
and will disperse traffic in four directions.
Parkland Dedication
Public parkland was approved by the Parks Board in April for 6 acres along the river, in addition to
HOA-maintained open space. A future regional trail will be constructed in the city parkland tract by
others in the future.
Staff Analysis
The proposed Preliminary Plat meets the requirements of the UDC and is presented for approval.
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Location Map
Exhibit 2 – Preliminary Plat
Page 20 of 54
(R i v e r /S t ream)
PP-2015-026
C
E
D
A
R
H
O
L
L
O
W
R
D
LIM E S T O N E D R
V
I
S
T
A
HEIG
H
T
S
D
R
L O N G F I E L D D R
W SH 29CANTERAWAY
INDIGO
L
N
O X B O W C V
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
VIE
W
D
R
V P R ANCHDR
E
S
T
A
N
C
I
A
W
A
Y
C
H
A
P
A
R
R
A
L
R
D
OLDCREEKSIDE
RD
PP-2015-026
Exhibit #1
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 2,000 4,000Feet ¯
Le ge ndSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
W U n i v e r s it y A v e
¬«29¬«29
Water
OakPkwy
G
a
b
ri
e
l
F
o
r
e
s
t
C
e
d
a
r
H
o
l
l
o
w
Rd
Site
City Limits
Street
Site
³
Page 21 of 54
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
August 16, 2016
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and p o s s ib le ac tion on a reques t to Rezone approximately 73 ac res in the John Berry and
Antonio Flo res Surveys from the Agriculture Dis trict (AG) to 55.99 ac res o f R es id ential S ingle-family
District (RS), 11.65 ac res of High Dens ity Multifamily District (MF-2), and 3.65 ac res of the Lo cal
Commerc ial Dis tric t (C-1), loc ated at the southwes t corner of the intersec tio n o f the Geo rgeto wn Railro ad
with Northeas t Inner Lo o p . (REZ-2016-013, S tillwater) Mike Elabarger, Senio r P lanner
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The ap p licant has reques ted to rezo ne the site fro m the Agric ulture (AG) Dis tric t to three zoning districts :
ap p ro ximately 56 acres o f the Residential Single-Family (RS) District, 11 ac res of the High Density
Multifamily (MF -2) Dis trict, and 3 acres o f Loc al C o mmercial (C-1) Dis tric t. The applic ant has stated the
intentio n to develo p a s ingle-family neighborhood that is buffered , and s upp o rted, by a multifamily
complex and s everal acres o f c o mmercial/s ervic e/retail uses. However, an applic ation to c hange the future
land use d es ignatio n o f 11.65 acres o f the property to High Den sity Residential is currently und er
cons id eration b y City Counc il.
Public Comment:
To d ate, there have b een five (5) p ublic c o mments received , with three in favor, and two in objec tion, citing
concerns over the los s o f green s p ace and ac c es s to ad jacent p ro p erties.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff rec o mmend s approval of the reques t to rezone the p ro p erty to the RS, C -1, and MF -2 Districts .
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None studied at this time.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mike Elabarger, Senio r P lanner and So fia Nels on, CNU-A, Planning Direc to r
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Cover Memo
Attachment 1 - Location Map Backup Material
Attachment 2 - Future Land Us e Map Backup Material
Attachment 3 - Zoning Map Backup Material
Page 22 of 54
Attachment 4 - Propos ed Zoning Dis tricts Backup Material
Attachment 5 - RS Dis trict Us es & Standards Backup Material
Attachment 6 - C-1 Dis trict Us es & Standards Backup Material
Attachment 7 - MF-2 Dis trict Us es & Standards Backup Material
Attachment 8 - Public Comment Backup Material
Page 23 of 54
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Stillwater – Rezoning (AG to RS, C-1, MF-2) Page 1 of 7
Report Date: August 12, 2016
File No: REZ-2016-013
Project Planner: Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Stillwater
Project Address: NE Inner Loop
Location: Southwest corner of the
intersection of the
Georgetown Railroad and
NE Inner Loop
Legal Description: 73 acres in the John Berry and
Antonio Flores Surveys
Existing Use: Vacant/Undeveloped Land
Future Land Use: Moderate Density Residential
(High Density Residential is
proposed with CPA-2016-002
for the area proposed for High
Density Multifamily District)
Existing Zoning: Agriculture (AG)
Proposed Zoning: Residential Single Family District (RS) – 55.99 acres
Local Commercial District (C-1) – 3.65 acres
High Density Multifamily District (MF-2) – 11.65 acres
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant has requested to rezone the site from the Agriculture (AG) District to three zoning
districts: approximately 56 acres of the Residential Single-Family (RS) District, 11 acres of the
High Density Multifamily (MF-2) District, and 3 acres of Local Commercial (C-1) District. The
applicant has stated the intention to develop a single-family neighborhood that is buffered, and
supported, by a multifamily complex and several acres of commercial/service/retail uses.
However, an application to change the future land use designation of 11.65 acres of the property
to High Density Residential is currently under consideration by City Council 1.
Site Information
Location:
The subject property is located on the west side of NE Inner Loop, just south of the Georgetown
Railroad Company railroad tracks. A Georgetown Independent School District (GISD) campus
of Cooper Elementary and Forbes Middle School and the Katy Crossing subdivision are just
1 Per the 2030 Plan, the future land use designation of the site is Moderate Density Residential.
Page 24 of 54
Planning Department Staff Report
Stillwater – Rezoning – AG to RS, C-1, MF-2 Page 2 of 7
north of the site on the west side
of the Inner Loop roadway. The
site is comprised of six existing
properties totaling approximately
73 acres.
Physical Characteristics:
The property is generally flat and
undeveloped with few trees and
shrubs, devoid of any discernible
natural features. Access to the
property at this time is only by NE
Inner Loop.
Surrounding Properties:
Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use
North (RS) Residential
Single-family
Moderate Density Residential /
Institutional
Single-family neighborhood
/ Public Schools
South (AG) Agriculture Moderate Density Residential Self-storage use
East NE Inner Loop Moderate Density Residential NE Inner Loop
West (AG) Agriculture Moderate Density Residential Rural residential / business
Property History
The property was annexed into the City in 2006 (Ordinance 2006-121) as part of a larger
annexation which totaled approximately 209 acres of land in the area south of the railroad tracks
and west of Inner Loop. The subject site remains zoned Agriculture (AG) from the time of
annexation.
Transportation
The subject property’s access is via NE Inner Loop, which is designated a Major Arterial on the
City’s Transportation Plan. This roadway is currently built to only a two-lane design, but
ultimately would be four or more lanes, likely with a median division and designated turn-lanes.
There are no other planned (per the City’s Transportation Plan map) roadways otherwise
affecting this property.
As development occurs, driveways and public streets within the property will be determined
through the subdivision and/or site development plan review processes. A Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA) may be required at a later date based on proposed uses and the daily trips
generated from them.
Page 25 of 54
Planning Department Staff Report
Stillwater – Rezoning – AG to RS, C-1, MF-2 Page 3 of 7
Utilities
The property is in a triple-certified area for electric service between the City of Georgetown and
retail providers Oncor and Pedernales Electric Cooperative (PEC). Three of the properties
comprising the site (those closest to and fronting NE Inner Loop) are in the service area of the
Jonah Water Special Utility District (“Jonah”); the remainder of the site is served by the City
water utility. Wastewater services would be provided by the City of Georgetown. The State
Highway 130 corridor, between FM 971 and University Avenue (State Highway 29), has
wastewater service challenges due to limited regional infrastructure in this area.
The applicant has met with the Systems Engineering Department to discuss possible wastewater
service solutions for this particular site. A semi-permanent solution for wastewater service to
this site has been reached. The applicant is proposing to upsize a wastewater line to facilitate
extension of an area wastewater line to the master plan inceptor line at the San Gabriel River as a
means of providing wastewater service to the subject property.
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use:
The 2030 Future Land Use category for this property is Moderate Density Residential. This land use
category principally comprises single family neighborhoods that can be accomodated at a density
ranging between 3.1 and 6 dwelling units per acre with housing types including small-lot
detached and attached single-family dwellings (such as townhomes). The category can also
support complementary non-residential uses along arterial roadways such as neighborhood-
serving retail, office, institutional, and civic uses.
A portion of the property, commensurate with the area proposed for the High Density
Multifamily (MF-2) District, is subject to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA-2016-002)
request, to establish the category of High Density Residential. As of the writing of this report, the
CPA has received a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission,
and is scheduled for an upcoming public hearing and First Reading of the Ordinance with City
Council on August 23, 2016. The High Density Residential category would support housing types
including duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, apartments, condominiums, life care, and other
multifamily forms of housing. Location for these types of land uses is ideal near major activity
and employment centers and areas suitable for future transit service.
Growth Tier:
The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1B (Developing). Such designated areas
are presently within the City limits and are generally under-served by infrastructure, and are
where such services and facilities will likely be needed to meet the growth needs of the City
once Tier 1A approaches buildout. The 2030 Plan advises the City to provide a full array of
services and facilities with adequate capacities in Tier 1A, prior to initiating additional major
investments in Tier 1B.
Page 26 of 54
Planning Department Staff Report
Stillwater – Rezoning – AG to RS, C-1, MF-2 Page 4 of 7
Due to the utility challenges that may exist in parts of the Tier 1B areas, the 2030 Plan calls for
requests for rezonings, additional infrastructure extensions, and development approvals to be
accompanied by comprehensive assessments of impacts to include both capital and operating
costs associated with water, wastewater, road capacity, police, fire, EMS, and schools. The City
does not currently have a financial model that analyzes the cost to serve a particular project. In
lieu of not using a financial model, careful consideration should be paid to the impact of growth
within the Tier 1B areas.
Proposed Zoning Districts
The applicant has requested the following zoning districts; see Attachment 4 for a graphical
depiction.
Residential Single-Family (RS) – 55.99 acres.
The RS District is intended for areas of medium density with a minimum lot size of 5,500 square
feet. The RS District contains standards for development that maintain single-family
neighborhood characteristics. Attachment 5 contains a list of allowable uses and development
standards.
Local Commercial (C-1) – 3.65 acres.
The C-1 District is intended to provide areas for commercial and retail activities that primarily
serve residential areas. Uses should have pedestrian access to adjacent and nearby residential
areas, but are not appropriate along residential streets or residential Collector roadways. The
District is more appropriate along major and minor thoroughfares and corridors. Typical uses
permitted within this District are general retail, restaurants (including drive-through), hotels,
general and medical or dental offices, etc. Attachment 6 contains a comprehensive list of the
allowable uses and development standards.
High Density Multifamily (MF-2) – 11.65 acres.
The MF-2 District is intended for attached multifamily residential development, such as
apartments and condominiums, at a density not to exceed 24 dwelling units per acre. The District
is appropriate in areas planned as High Density Residential or one of the Mixed Use categories.
Access to major thoroughfares and arterial roads should be provided, with traffic not being
directed through lower density residential areas. The District is appropriate adjacent both
Residential and Non-Residential Districts and may serve as a transition between single-family
districts and more intense commercial districts. Attachment 7 contains a comprehensive list of
the allowable uses and development standards.
Staff Analysis
The Northeast Inner loop corridor, in this vicinity, is a largely undeveloped portion of the city.
The 2030 Future Land Use plan identifies this area to be mostly Moderate Density Residential, but
there are specific areas identified for Institutional uses, High Density Residential, Commercial nodes
Page 27 of 54
Planning Department Staff Report
Stillwater – Rezoning – AG to RS, C-1, MF-2 Page 5 of 7
at major intersections, and Open Space along the San Gabriel River. Historically, this area has
experienced, and continues to experience, wastewater service challenges due to the lack of
infrastructure needed to support development of any kind in this corridor. Given conditions of
limited road access, nearby floodplain, and utility proximity and suppliers, staff believes this is
an area that should be examined closely to ensure the timing of envisioned land uses, enabled by
the requested zoning districts, are implementable.
The property, and those immediately surrounding it, are all zoned Agriculture District,
established with annexation into the City. The general lack of development in this area has
resulted in the initial zoning designation remaining, despite its conflict with the Future Lane use
map designation of Moderate Density Residential.
For this particular property, Staff finds that the proposed RS District is consistent with the
Moderate Density Residential future land use category specifically. Similarly, in the proposed
location, staff finds that the C-1 District is consistent with the Moderate Density Residential,
fulfilling the inclusion of complementary non-residential uses when located along Arterial
roadways. Should the Future Land Use map be successfully amended by the applicant’s request
for the High Density Residential category where the MF-2 District is proposed, that district would
be consistent with that category. Overall, the primary permitted uses and forms of development
achievable under the UDC standards for the three proposed Districts will fulfill the overall
intents of the two Future Land Use categories covering this property.
Below is an analysis of the proposal against several specific goal statements from the 2030 Plan.
• Promote sound, sustainable, and compact development patterns with balanced land uses, a variety
of housing choices, and well integrated transportation, public facilities, and open space amenities.
• Staff Analysis: This property lends itself to be developed with primarily single-family
dwellings, with complementary land uses that will buffer it from a Major Arterial
roadway, all of which can be accomplished by the three Districts as proposed. A
variety of land uses and housing choices would be created, while the property is
inherently lacking in connectivity options, and thus integration of infrastructure may
not result.
• Attract desired forms of balanced development, creating quality urban, suburban, and rural places
that offer a choice of setting and lifestyle.
• Staff Analysis: The property, being inside the Inner Loop, is prime for suburban scale
residential development, with a portion of multifamily, in keeping with the Moderate
Density Residential and High Density Residential land use categories. The
development standards of the Unified Development Code for the requested Districts
result in distinctly suburban style development.
Page 28 of 54
Planning Department Staff Report
Stillwater – Rezoning – AG to RS, C-1, MF-2 Page 6 of 7
• Encourage residential developments that are well-connected to the larger community, planned and
designed to complement the heritage and natural character of the City, and offer a variety of
housing types and price ranges.
• Staff Analysis: The property suffers from an inherent lack of connectivity to other
properties, and so would be limited in this regard no matter the future development.
Unto itself, the proposed mix of zoning districts can offer housing options, while City
character can be complemented by the adopted standards of the UDC.
• Encourage the staged, orderly expansion of contiguous development to coincide with the expansion
of roads and infrastructure.
• Staff Analysis: Development of this property can be looked at as an in-fill
development, through the lens that it is ‘inside’ the Inner Loop roadway that
circumnavigates most of the City. The “island” nature, bounded by the San Gabriel
River, railroad tracks, and the Inner Loop are largely the reasons why the property is
currently underserved by utilities. This proposal neither supports, nor harms, this
goal, and is simply an intrinsic aspect of this property.
Below are the approval criteria for a rezoning request, with specific staff analysis.
UDC Section 3.06.030 establishes the following criteria for zoning changes:
The application is complete and the
information contained within the
application is sufficient and correct
enough to allow adequate review and
final action
An application must provide the necessary information to review and
make a knowledgeable decision in order for staff to schedule an
application for consideration by P&Z and City Council. This application
was reviewed by staff and deemed to be complete.
The zoning change is consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan
The RS and C-1 Districts are consistent with the Moderate Density
Residential category, enabling the request to proceed for review and
consideration. The MF-2 District request was not consistent with the
Moderate Density Residential category, and consideration of that
District required the companion Comprehensive Plan Amendment
application which is in process.
The zoning change promotes the
health, safety or general welfare of the
City and the safe orderly, and healthful
development of the City
The zoning change request would generally neither harm, nor bolster, the
health, safety and general welfare of the City.
The zoning change is compatible with
the present zoning and conforming
uses of nearby property and with the
character of the neighborhood
The proposed rezoning is compatible with the surrounding properties
that have rezoned in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.
Immediately adjacent properties are zoned Agriculture District from the
point of annexation, and are anticipated to rezone in the future to
facilitate higher levels of development.
The property to be rezoned is suitable
for uses permitted by the District that
would be applied by the proposed
amendment.
The proposed districts place land uses in complimentary and appropriate
locations given the landmarks that surround the property, including the
Inner Loop, the railroad tracks, and the San Gabriel River, as well as a
neighboring subdivision (Katy Crossing) and a public school campus.
Page 29 of 54
Planning Department Staff Report
Stillwater – Rezoning – AG to RS, C-1, MF-2 Page 7 of 7
Findings
Based on all the information presented, staff has made the following findings:
1. The Future Land Use category of Moderate Density Residential supports the RS and C-1
Districts at this location, as this category is intended for large tracts of undeveloped open
land where residential uses will complement the future non-residential development
anticipated to front NE Inner Loop, a major Arterial roadway.
2. Should the Future Land Use plan be amended to the High Density Multifamily for the area
proposed for the MF-2 District, then that District would be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
3. Development of the RS District would be buffered from the Northeast Inner Loop by tracts
of multifamily and commercial, which is in general a logical progression of land uses for a
property adjacent a major Arterial.
4. Transportation impacts born by the proposed zoning changes to the property will be
addressed through the Traffic Impact Analysis process at the time of actual development.
5. Aspects of several Comprehensive Plan goals, specifically regarding varieties of residential
options and commercial uses nearby and serving to residential areas, could be fulfilled by
the proposed rezoning.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the applicant’s request based on the above-mentioned findings.
Public Comments
As required by the UDC, all property owners within a 200 foot radius of the subject property that
are located within City limits were notified of the rezoning application (28 notices mailed), a legal
notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper (July 31, 2016) and signs
were posted on-site. To date, staff has received five (5) public comments, three in favor, and two
in opposition, citing concerns regarding access to adjacent properties and loss of green spaces.
Attachments
Attachment 1 – Location Map
Attachment 2 – Future Land Use Map
Attachment 3 – Existing Zoning Map
Attachment 4 – Proposed Zoning Districts
Attachment 5 – RS District Development Standards and Permitted Land Uses
Attachment 6 – C-1 District Development Standards and Permitted Land Uses
Attachment 7 – MF-2 District Development Standards and Permitted Land Uses
Attachment 8 – Public Comment
Page 30 of 54
Lakeway D r
NAustinAve
N Austin Ave
Southw este
r
n
B
l
v
d
E U n i v e r s it y A v e
NE Inner Loop
SE Inner Loop
NColleg e StRiveryBlvd
N A
u
stin Ave
¬«130
¬«130
")971
")971
EMorro w St
N
orth
w
estBlvd
§¨¦35
REZ-2016-013Exhibit #1
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
Location Map
0 0.5 1Mi
Le ge ndSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Page 31 of 54
¬«130
")SPUR158
")971
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan
Exhibit #2
REZ-2016 -013
Legend
Thoroughfare
Future Land Use
Institutional
Regional Commercial
Community Commercial
Em ployment Center
Low Density Residential
Mining
Mixed Use Community
Mixed Use Neighborhood Center
Moderate Density Residential
Open Space
Specialty Mixed Use Area
Ag / Rural Residential
Existing Collector
Existing Freeway
Existing Major Arterial
Existing Minor Arterial
Existing Ramp
Proposed Collector
Proposed Freeway
Propsed Frontage Road
Proposed Major Arterial
Proposed Minor Arterial
Proposed Railroad
High Density Residential
0 ¼½¾Mi
LegendSiteParcelsCity Lim itsGeorgetown ETJ
Page 32 of 54
¬«130
")SPUR158
")971
Zoning InformationREZ-2016-013Exhibit #3
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
Le ge ndSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
¯
0 ¼½¾MiPage 33 of 54
C
C
C
C
W
W
W
W
W
6
9
0
69
0
68
5
6
8
5
680
6
8
0
67
5
67
5
67
5
67
5
67
5
670
(N58°18'20"E)
(N
2
4
°
2
0
'
5
5
"
W
5
6
6
.
5
5
'
)
(
N
4
9
°
1
8
'
5
5
"
W
6
2
3
.
3
1
'
)
(S63°53'53"W 3
8
4
.
4
4
'
)
(S65°57'00"
W
)
(S64°06'00"W 4
3
9
.
7
7
'
)
(S64°06'00"W
2
5
0
.
2
2
)
(N
2
5
°
5
4
'
0
0
"
W
)
(1
6
2
.
7
9
'
)
C-1
3.65 AC.
MF-2
11.65 AC.
RS
56.00 AC.
C
C
C
C
W
W
W
W
W
6
9
0
69
0
68
5
6
8
5
680
6
8
0
67
5
67
5
67
5
67
5
67
5
670
(N58°18'20"E)
(N
2
4
°
2
0
'
5
5
"
W
5
6
6
.
5
5
'
)
(
N
4
9
°
1
8
'
5
5
"
W
6
2
3
.
3
1
'
)
(S63°53'53"W 3
8
4
.
4
4
'
)
(S65°57'00"
W
)
(S64°06'00"W 4
3
9
.
7
7
'
)
(S64°06'00"W
2
5
0
.
2
2
)
(N
2
5
°
5
4
'
0
0
"
W
)
(1
6
2
.
7
9
'
)
ZONING EXHIBIT
CURRENT DESIGNATION - AGRICULTURE
PROPOSED DESIGNATION -
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, GENERAL COMMERCIAL,
HIGH-DENSITY MULTIFAMILY
Page 34 of 54
Minimum Lot Size = 5,500 square feet Front Setback = 20 feet Bufferyard = 10 feet with plantings
Minimum Lot Width = 45 feet Side Setback = 6 feet when non‐residential develops
Maximum Building Height = 35 feet Rear Setback = 10 feet adjacent to residential
Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required
Group Home (<7 residents) Church (with columbarium) Accessory Dwelling Unit
Single‐family Detached Day Care (family home) Activity Center (youth/senior)
Utilities (Minor) Golf Course Bed and Breakfast (with events)
Home Based Business Cemetary/Columbaria/Mausoleum
Nature Preserve/Community Garden Community Center
Neighborhood Amenity Center Day Care (Group)
Park (Neighborhood) Emergency Services Station
School (Elementary) General Office
Single‐family Attached Halfway House
Utilities (Intermediate) Hospice Facility
Wireless Transmission Facility (<41') Rooming/Boarding House
School (Middle)
Residential Single‐Family (RS) District
District Development Standards
Specific Uses Allowed within the District
Page 35 of 54
Maximum Building Height = 35 feet Front Setback = 25 feet Bufferyard = 15 feet with plantings
Maximum Building Size = .5 FAR (0 feet for build‐to/downtown) adjacent to AG, RE, RL, RS, TF, MH,
(only applies to those uses Side Setback = 10 feet MF‐1, or MF‐2 districts
marked with * below) Side Setback to Residential = 15 feet
Rear Setback = 0 feet
Rear Setback to Residential = 25 feet
Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required
Agricultural Sales* Activity Center (youth/senior) Event Facility
Artisan Studio/Gallery* Bar/Tavern/Pub Meat Market
Assisted Living Bed and Breakfast (with events) Multifamily Attached
Automotive Parts Sales (indoor)* Business/Trade School Personal Services Restricted
Banking/Financial Services* Car Wash Private Transport Dispatch Facility
Blood/Plasma Center* Church (with columbarium) Student Housing
Consumer Repair* College/University
Dry Cleaning Service* Commercial Recreation
Emergency Services Station Community Center
Farmer's Market* Dance Hall/Night Club
Fitness Center* Day Care (group/commercial)
Food Catering Services* Fuel Sales
Funeral Home* Live Music/Entertainment
General Retail* Micro Brewery/Winery
General Office* Neighborhood Amenity Center
Government/Postal Office Park (neighborhood/regional)
Group Home (7+ residents) Pest Control/Janitorial Services
Home Health Care Services* Self‐Storage (indoor only)
Hospital School (Elementary, Middle, High)
Hotel/Inn (excluding extended stay) Theater (movie/live)
Integrated Office Center* Upper‐story Residential
Landscape/Garden Sales* Wireless Transmission Facility (<41')
Laundromat*
Library/Museum
Medical Diagnostic Center*
Medical Office/Clinic/Complex*
Membership Club/Lodge*
Nature Preserve/Community Garden
Nursing/Convalescent/Hospice
Parking Lot (commercial/park‐n‐ride)
Personal Services*
Printing/Mailing/Copying Services*
Restaurant (general/drive‐through)*
Rooming/Boarding House
Social Service Facility
Surgery/Post Surgery Recovery*
Urgent Care Facility*
Utilities (Minor/Intermediate/Major)
Veterinary Clinic (indoor only)*
Local Commercial (C‐1) District
District Development Standards
Specific Uses Allowed within the District
Page 36 of 54
Maximum Density = 24 units/acre Front Setback = 25 feet Bufferyard = 15 feet with plantings
Maximum Building Height = 45 feet Side Setback = 15 feet adjacent to RE, RL, RS,TF, or MH
Maximum Units per Building = 24 Side Setback to Residential = 30 feet districts; 10 feet with plantings
Rear Setback = 15 feet adjacent to residences in AG
Rear Setback to Residential = 30 feet
Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required
Assisted Living Church (with columbarium) Activity Center (youth/senior)
Group Home (7‐15 residents) Day Care (family/group/commercial) Bed and Breakfast (with events)
Multifamily Attached Golf Course Emergency Services Station
Nursing/Convalescent Home Nature Preserve/Community Garden Group Home (16+ residents)
Orphanage Neighborhood Amenity Center Halfway House
Rooming/Boarding House Park (Neighborhood) School (Middle)
Utilities (Minor) School (Elementary) Student Housing
Utilities (Intermediate)
Wireless Transmission Facility (<41')
High Density Multifamily (MF‐2) District
District Development Standards
Specific Uses Allowed within the District
Page 37 of 54
Page 38 of 54
Page 39 of 54
Page 40 of 54
Page 41 of 54
Page 42 of 54
Page 43 of 54
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
August 16, 2016
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and p o s s ib le ac tion on a reques t to Rezone 11.5029 acres in the Barney Lo w Survey
lo cated at 1070 Wes tinghous e Ro ad from the Agric ulture (AG) District to the Lo cal Commerc ial (C-1)
District. (REZ-2016-021, C&T Partnership ) Juan Enriq uez, P lanner
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The ap p licant has reques ted to rezo ne the und eveloped 11.5029 ac re tract fro m the Agric ulture (AG)
District, as s igned upon annexation in 2011, to the Loc al Co mmercial (C-1) Dis trict and allow for future
commerc ial d evelopment o f the p ro p erty.
Public Comment:
To d ate, no written or verbal comments have b een received by staff in support or agains t the rezoning
req uest.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff rec o mmend s approval of the reques t to rezone the 11.5029 ac re tract to the C -1 District.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None studied at this time
SUBMITTED BY:
Juan Enriq uez, Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, P lanning Directo r
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Cover Memo
Attachment 1 - Location Map Backup Material
Attachment 2 - Future Land Us e Map Backup Material
Attachment 3 - Zoning Map Backup Material
Attachment 4 - C-1 Dis trict Development Standards and Land Us es Backup Material
Page 44 of 54
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
C&T Partnership Rezoning Page 1 of 6
Report Date: August 16, 2016
File No: REZ-2016-021
Project Planner: Juan Enriquez, Planner
Item Details
Project Name: C&T Partnership Rezoning
Project Address: 1070 Westinghouse Road
Total Acreage: 11.5029 acres
Legal Description: 11.5029 acres of the Barney Low Survey
Applicant: Gerry H. Tucker, C&T Partnership
Property Owner(s): C&T Partnership
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant has requested to rezone the undeveloped 11.5029 acre tract from the
Agriculture (AG) District, assigned upon annexation in 2011, to the Local Commercial (C-1)
District and allow for future commercial development of the property.
Site Information
Location:
The subject site is located south of Westinghouse Road, between Park Central Boulevard and
Teravista Crossing in the southeastern portion of the City.
Physical Characteristics:
The property is 11.5029 acres in size, undeveloped and is generally rectangular. The property is
sited at a higher elevation along Westinghouse Road and slopes downward south towards the
Teravista Subdivision. A tree survey has not been submitted at this stage of the process and
therefore the presence of protected or heritage trees is unknown. The property has public street
access on Westinghouse Road.
Page 45 of 54
Planning Department Staff Report
C&T Partnership Rezoning Page 2 of 6
Surrounding Properties:
Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use
North BP/C-1 Employment Center Undeveloped Commercial Land
South RS Mixed Use Community Undeveloped Residential Land
East ETJ Mixed Use Community Single-Family Residence
West C-1/MF-1 Mixed Use Community Undeveloped Commercial/Residential Land
Property History
The 11.5029 acre property was annexed into the City on December 13, 2011 by Ordinance No.
2011-55. At the time of annexation into the City, the default AG District was assigned. The
property is currently vacant and undeveloped.
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use:
The 2030 Future Land Use category for this subject site is Mixed Use Community. The Mixed Use
Community category is described in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as appropriate for larger scale,
creatively planned communities, where a mix of residential types and densities are
complemented by supporting retail and small to medium scale office development. This category
also encourages more compact, sustainable development patterns that reduce auto trips, increase
connectivity and encourage walking and use of transit.
Growth Tier:
The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 2, which is typically in the City’s ETJ areas
that will likely be needed to serve the City’s growth needs over the next 10-20 years. However,
the City may consider requests for annexation, extension of city services, and rezonings in these
areas.
Transportation
The property has approximately 400 feet of street frontage on along Westinghouse Road, a major
arterial. The property’s primary inbound and outbound access is through Westinghouse Road.
Trip generation will be reviewed with the Site Development Review application, possibly
triggering the need for a TIA at that time.
Utilities
Water/wastewater is served by the City of Georgetown. Electric service is dually-certified by the
City of Georgetown and ONCOR. In June 2014, City Council approved the creation of a Tax
Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) for an area along Westinghouse Road that includes this
property. The TIRZ is intended to facilitate infrastructure improvements to this area.
Page 46 of 54
Planning Department Staff Report
C&T Partnership Rezoning Page 3 of 6
Proposed Zoning District
The C-1 District is intended to provide areas for commercial and retail activities that primarily
serve residential areas. Uses should have pedestrian access to adjacent and nearby residential
areas, but are not appropriate along residential streets or residential collectors. The District is
more appropriate along major and minor thoroughfares and corridors. Typical uses within this
district are general retail, restaurants (including drive-through), gas stations, medical or dental
offices, etc. Attachment 4 contains a comprehensive list of C-1 District allowable uses and
development standards. In the C-1 District, the floor to area ratio of a building cannot exceed 0.5
for certain land uses. Certain land uses have specific design limitations to ensure compatibility
with the surrounding properties.
Staff Analysis
Westinghouse Road is the southern most major arterial in the southeastern portion of the City.
There is a mixture of commercially and residentially zoned property and large agriculturally
zoned properties along this corridor. The agriculturally zoned properties are predominantly an
interim zoning until they are rezoned. In this case, staff determined that the requested zoning of
C-1 meets the intent of the Future Land Use category of the property (Mixed Use Community) and
therefore a Comprehensive Plan Amendment was not required.
As part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the Land Use Element identified a number of land use
goals, policies and actions. The following goals and action statements are the most relevant to
this request:
• The subject property is located within the Future Land Use category of Mixed Use
Community that encourages a mixture of residential and commercial uses within close
proximity to each other. The first land use goal of the 2030 Plan encourages a balanced
mix of residential, commercial, and employment uses to reflect a gradual transition of
development throughout the City. Although mixed use can be integrated vertically, it can
also be accomplished horizontally with adjacent mixes of uses that complement one
another. Commercial development in the mixed use category should complement a mix
of residential types by providing supporting retail and small to medium scale office
development.
Goal 1, Policies and Action 1.A2 states that the City should “reserve and rezone land ideally
suited for long term commercial and employment uses and prevent its use for residential
subdivisions.” The rezoning of this property to the C-1 District for the future commercial
development would support this goal. There is undeveloped low density multifamily
residential land (Vista Pointe Subdivision) to the west and residential single family zoned
property to the south (Teravista Subdivision). C-1 zoning at this location will reserve
land suitable for commercial development along a major arterial.
Page 47 of 54
Planning Department Staff Report
C&T Partnership Rezoning Page 4 of 6
• The land uses permitted in the C-1 District along with the district development standards
directly help to implement the 2030 Plan’s goals of a balance of land uses as well as
ensuring transitions and buffers between residential and commercial uses. As
development continues to extend to the southeast portion of the City, the need for goods
and services closer to residents (both current and future) is necessary in order to achieve
a balanced community as well as incrementally address traffic related concerns.
The proposed rezoning request meets all of the criteria established in UDC Section 3.06.030 for
zoning changes:
Approval Criteria for Rezoning
The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is sufficient and
correct enough to allow adequate review and final
action
An application must provide the necessary
information to review and make a knowledgeable
decision in order for staff to schedule an application
for consideration by P&Z and City Council. This
application was reviewed by staff and deemed to be
complete.
The zoning change is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan
The proposed zoning change is consistent with the
Future Land Use of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The
request is consistent with the goal to direct commercial
development primarily to “nodes” or “corridors”
where the pattern is established or appropriate. The
Mixed Use Community category supports the C-1
District at this location since the district’s allowed uses
include neighborhood serving businesses that would
accommodate the existing and future residential
neighborhoods.
The zoning change promotes the health, safety or
general welfare of the City and the safe orderly,
and healthful development of the City
The zoning change request promotes the health, safety
and general welfare of the City. The location of
commercial development along corridors such as
Westinghouse Road helps satisfy market needs of auto
oriented uses along the frontage of the corridor. The
C-1 District will help facilitate orderly commercial
development along a major arterial roadway.
The zoning change is compatible with the present
zoning and conforming uses of nearby property
and with the character of the neighborhood
The proposed rezoning is compatible with the
surrounding zoning districts and uses. Landscape
buffers will be required, per the UDC, where the
property abuts residential zoning. Additionally, the
property to the west and north are also zoned C-1.
The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses
permitted by the District that would be applied by
the proposed amendment.
The uses allowed in the C-1 District are suitable along
major arterials (Westinghouse Road) and within the
areas of the Future Land Use designated as Mixed Use
Community.
Page 48 of 54
Planning Department Staff Report
C&T Partnership Rezoning Page 5 of 6
General Findings
Based on all the information presented, staff has made the following findings:
1. Westinghouse Road is an arterial roadway and major east-west corridor. Corridors are
most successful and supported by the Comprehensive Plan when commercial development
is coupled with higher density development and when siting and landscape standards are
in place. This corridor is bound by more intense commercial along I-35 to the west of the
property and existing and future high density residential and low density residential
development east of the property.
2. The Future Land Use category of Mixed Use Community supports the C-1 District at this
location since this category is intended for a mixture of land uses where commercial uses
will complement existing and future residential development anticipated in the
surrounding area.
3. Goal 1, Policies and Action 1.A2 states that the City should “reserve and rezone land ideally
suited for long term commercial and employment uses and prevent its use for residential
subdivisions.” The rezoning of this property to the C-1 District for the future commercial
development would support this goal. C-1 zoning at this location will reserve land suitable
for commercial development along a major arterial.
4. The property is located along Westinghouse Road, a major arterial road, and the
transportation network at this location can support the traffic that may be generated by the
uses anticipated in the C-1 District.
5. There are active construction projects that will ensure sufficient capacity within the City
Utility Systems to accommodate the potential commercial development resulting from the
proposed rezoning from the AG to C-1 District at this location.
6. The south Georgetown TIRZ was established for primary non-residential development,
which is supported by the establishment of the C-1 District on this property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the applicant’s zoning request based on the above-mentioned
findings.
Public Comments
As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 200 foot radius of
the subject property that are located within City limits were notified of the rezoning application
(3 notices mailed), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper
(July 31, 2016) and a sign was posted on-site. To date, staff has not received any written or verbal
comments in support or against the zoning request.
Page 49 of 54
Planning Department Staff Report
C&T Partnership Rezoning Page 6 of 6
Attachments
Attachment 1 – Location Map
Attachment 2 – Future Land Use Map
Attachment 3 – Zoning Map
Attachment 4 – C-1 District Development Standards and Permitted Land Uses
Page 50 of 54
§¨¦35
§¨¦35
Westinghou
s
e
R
d
")1460
Tera vi s t a X i n g
Teravista C l u b D r
Westinghou
s
e
R
d
University B
l
v
d
R
a
b
b
it
H
I
l
l
R
d
REZ-2016-021
Attachment#1
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
Location Map
0 0.5 1Mi
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Page 51 of 54
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\
\\\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
WESTING
H
O
U
S
E
R
D
U N I V E R S I T Y B L V D
§¨¦35
")1460
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan REZ-2016-021
Attachment #2
Legend
Thoroughfare
Future Land Use
Institutional
Regional Commercial
Community Commercial
Employment Center
Low Density Residential
Mining
Mixed Use Community
Mixed Use Neighborhood Center
Moderate Density Residential
Open Space
Specialty Mixed Use Area
Ag / Rural Residential
Existing Collector
Existing Freeway
Existing Major Arterial
Existing Minor Arterial
Existing Ramp
Proposed Collector
Proposed Freeway
Propsed Frontage Road
Proposed Major Arterial
Proposed Minor Arterial
Proposed Railroad
High Density Residential
0 ¼½¾Mi
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Page 52 of 54
WESTING
H
O
U
S
E
R
D
U N I V E R S I T Y B L V D
§¨¦35
")1460
Zoning MapREZ-2016-021
Attachment #3
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
¯
0 ¼½¾MiPage 53 of 54
Maximum Building Height = 35 feet Front Setback = 25 feet Bufferyard = 15 feet with plantings
Maximum Building Size = .5 FAR (0 feet for build‐to/downtown) adjacent to AG, RE, RL, RS, TF, MH,
(only applies to those uses Side Setback = 10 feet MF‐1, or MF‐2 districts
marked with * below) Side Setback to Residential = 15 feet
Rear Setback = 0 feet
Rear Setback to Residential = 25 feet
Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required
Agricultural Sales* Activity Center (youth/senior) Event Facility
Artisan Studio/Gallery* Bar/Tavern/Pub Meat Market
Assisted Living Bed and Breakfast (with events) Multifamily Attached
Automotive Parts Sales (indoor)* Business/Trade School Personal Services Restricted
Banking/Financial Services* Car Wash Private Transport Dispatch Facility
Blood/Plasma Center* Church (with columbarium) Student Housing
Consumer Repair* College/University
Dry Cleaning Service* Commercial Recreation
Emergency Services Station Community Center
Farmer's Market* Dance Hall/Night Club
Fitness Center* Day Care (group/commercial)
Food Catering Services* Fuel Sales
Funeral Home* Live Music/Entertainment
General Retail* Micro Brewery/Winery
General Office* Neighborhood Amenity Center
Government/Postal Office Park (neighborhood/regional)
Group Home (7+ residents) Pest Control/Janitorial Services
Home Health Care Services* Self‐Storage (indoor only)
Hospital School (Elementary, Middle, High)
Hotel/Inn (excluding extended stay) Theater (movie/live)
Integrated Office Center* Upper‐story Residential
Landscape/Garden Sales* Wireless Transmission Facility (<41')
Laundromat*
Library/Museum
Medical Diagnostic Center*
Medical Office/Clinic/Complex*
Membership Club/Lodge*
Nature Preserve/Community Garden
Nursing/Convalescent/Hospice
Parking Lot (commercial/park‐n‐ride)
Personal Services*
Printing/Mailing/Copying Services*
Restaurant (general/drive‐through)*
Rooming/Boarding House
Social Service Facility
Surgery/Post Surgery Recovery*
Urgent Care Facility*
Utilities (Minor/Intermediate/Major)
Veterinary Clinic (indoor only)*
Local Commercial (C‐1) District
District Development Standards
Specific Uses Allowed within the District
Page 54 of 54