HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_HARC_08.28.2014Notice of Meeting for the
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
of the City of Georgetown
August 28, 2014 at 6:00 PM
at Council and Courts Building, 101 E. 7th Street Georgetown, TX 78626
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the
ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please
contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City
Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose
authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A The Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC), appointed by the Mayor and the
City Council, is responsible for hearing and taking final action on Certificates of Design
Compliance applications based upon the City Council adopted Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines and Unified Development Code. The Commission may, at any time, recess the Regular
Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Director
or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code
Chapter 551.
Welcome and Meeting Procedures:
Staff Presentation
Applicant Presentation (Limited to ten minutes unless stated otherwise by the Commission)
Questions from Commission to Staff and Applicant
Comments from Citizens*
Applicant Response
Commission Deliberative Process
Commission Action
*Those who wish to speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the
recording secretary before the item they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to
address the Commission one time only for a maximum of three minutes.
Legislative Regular Agenda
B Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes from the June 26, 2014 regular meeting.
C Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes of the July 24, 2014 Workshop session.
D Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations for the property located at 114 East 7th Street, bearing the legal description of
City of Georgetown, Block 40, Lot 1, 4, .33 acres (CDC-2014-017).
E Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
an addition for the property located at 410 South Myrtle Street, bearing the legal description of
Glasscock Addition, Block 14, Lot 8, .16 acres (CDC-2014-028).
F Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations for the property located at 713 South Main Street, bearing the legal description
of City of Georgetown, Block 40, Lot 6 (SW/PT), .069 acres (CDC-2014-029).
G Discussion and possible action to reduce the development delay for unapproved demolition of a
historic accessory structure at 913 Walnut Street.
H Conceptual review for 1802 South Austin Avenue
I Update from Sign Subcommittee.
J Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines Training - Renee Hanson
K Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training.
L Staff updates and reminder of future meetings.
Adjournment
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice
of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public
at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2014, at __________, and remained so
posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
____________________________________
Jessica Brettle, City Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
The Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC), appointed by the Mayor and the
City Council, is responsible for hearing and taking final action on Certificates of Design
Compliance applications based upon the City Council adopted Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines and Unified Development Code. The Commission may, at any time, recess the Regular
Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Director
or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code
Chapter 551.
Welcome and Meeting Procedures:
Staff Presentation
Applicant Presentation (Limited to ten minutes unless stated otherwise by the Commission)
Questions from Commission to Staff and Applicant
Comments from Citizens*
Applicant Response
Commission Deliberative Process
Commission Action
*Those who wish to speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the
recording secretary before the item they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to
address the Commission one time only for a maximum of three minutes.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Frost, Recording Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes from the June 26, 2014 regular meeting.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
na
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Frost, Recording Secretary
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Minutes from June 26, 2014 Backup Material
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 1 of 2
Meeting: June 26, 2014
City of Georgetown, Texas
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Meeting
Minutes
Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 6:00 p.m.
Council and Courts Building
101 E. 7th Street, Georgetown, TX 78626
Members present: Anna Eby, Chair; Jennifer Brown; Ty Gibson; Nancy Knight; Richard Mee, and David
Paul.
Commissioners in Training present: Rodolfo Martinez and Barbara Price
Commissioners absent: Mary Jo Winder
Staff present: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner; Andreina Davila, Project Coordinator; Karen Frost,
Recording Secretary.
A. Call to Order by Eby at 6:03 p.m. with the reading of the meeting procedures.
* Those who speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the recording
secretary before the item that they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to address the
Commission one time only for a maximum of three (3) minutes.
This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose
authorized by the Open Meeting Act, Texas Government Code 551.
Legislative Agenda:
B. Consideration and possible approval of the minutes of the May 22, 2014 regular meeting.
Motion by Paul to approve the minutes as written. Second by Mee. Approved 6 – 0.
C. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
Demolition for the structure located at 1012 South Church Street bearing the legal description of
Eubank Addition, Block 7, Lots 1 & 2 (PT), .15 acres (CDC‐2014‐022)
Synatschk presented the application and recommends approval of the demolition, reminding
commissioners that infill projects in the Old Town district do not need to provide information for the
new project when applying for the demolition CDC permit.
Eby opened the public hearing at 6:08 p.m. and with no speakers coming forth, closed the hearing.
Motion by Mee to approve CDC‐2014‐022, a request for a CDC for Demolition to demolish the
structure located at 1912 South Church Street, based on the findings that the request meets the
criteria outlined in UDC Section 3.13.040.D.1 in that the existing structure has lost all historic
significance, making it a non‐contributing structure to the historic overlay district, and any new
construction will be built in accordance with the Old Town Overlay District UDC standards, as
intended by the applicant. Second by Knight. Approved 6 – 0.
D. Conceptual design review for the historic structure located at 401 South Myrtle Street.
Synatschk introduced Bryant Boyd, the applicant for this project, who then proceeded to give an
overview of the additions. Commissioners gave comments. Knight commented that the applicant
can replace the windows with all new windows, but the preference would be to repair the old
windows. Other commissioners commented that the design matched the requirements of both the
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 2 of 2
Meeting: June 26, 2014
Design Guidelines and the UDC wand was well designed. This application will return to a future
meeting for official action.
E. Conceptual design review for the historic structure located at 302 East 7th Street.
Synatschk introduced the applicant, Charles Hill. He explained that the purpose of the renovation is
to improve the living conditions of the owner by bumping out the wall on the front porch and adding
a master bath in that area. He explained that there were limitations on the lot that did not allow them
to increase the square footage of the house.
Commissioners gave several comments and asked clarification on many items. Summarized, the
commissioners have concerns about the roofline and the lack of drawings to indicate the proposed
change. There should be details in the application and drawings that clearly define what is being
changed. They want the addition to look like an addition, as per the guidelines. They want the
applicant to work with staff to clarify the “only case” scenarios and provide other alternatives to the
front façade change. Synatschk explained to the applicant that different materials should be used on
the new portion of the structure to provide differentiation, so you tell the history of the structure and
not give a false history. There were also concerns that removing the front porch would change the
character of the house, which is against the guidelines. There were suggestions that the applicant and
owner consider other alterations to the back of the structure and possible ask for exceptions to the
Design Guidelines and other UDC regulations.
F. Update from Sign Subcommittee. Knight listed signs that had been approved recently, including
signs for the Fowler Law Firm, the Beauty Escape, and Paint with Me. Last month, signage was
approved for Skye Realty on Austin Avenue.
G. Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training. No comments were given.
H. Staff updates and reminder of future meetings.
I. Synatschk listed several projects and meetings being held.
a. Staff is taking the expansion of the Downtown Overlay to city council to incorporate the city
owned properties on 2nd Street and the area behind El Monumento.
b. 9th Street and sidewalks are being widen and resurfaced between Main Street and Rock Street.
c. Tin Barn Alley and 8th Street are being rehabilitated and underground utilities and stormwater
are being redone.
d. The CLG Grant for National Historic Districts update focuses on commissions and is a good
resource article to read.
e. The next Sign Subcommittee will meet on July 14, 204, will review two cases.
f. The next Downtown Lowdown will be held on July 16 at 8:30 a.m. in Roots Bistro on the
Square.
g. The next regular HARC Meeting will be held on July 24th. Times will be determined once
cases and workshop items are defined.
Adjourn.
Eby adjourned the meeting at 6:58 p.m.
________________________________ __________________________________
Approved, Anna Eby, Chair Attest, Nancy Knight
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes of the July 24, 2014 Workshop session.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
na
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Frost, Recording Secretary
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Minutes of July 24, 2014 Workshop Backup Material
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 1 of 2
Meeting: July 24, 2014
City of Georgetown, Texas
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Workshop
Minutes
Thursday, July 24, 2014 at 6:00 p.m.
Council and Courts Building
101 E. 7th Street, Georgetown, TX 78626
Members present: Anna Eby, Chair; Nancy Knight, Vice‐ Chair; David Paul; Richard Mee, Ty Gibson,
and Mary Jo Winder.
Commissioners in Training present: Barbara Price
Commissioners absent: Rodolfo Martinez (CIT), Jennifer Brown
Staff present: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner; Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager; Andreina
Davila, Project Coordinator; Jackson Daly, Executive Assistant; Karen Frost, Recording Secretary.
A. Call to Order by Eby at 6:04 p.m. with the explanation that this is a Workshop Forum meeting and
there commissioners are allowed to discuss items with the presenters. There will not be any open
public discussions, since there will not be any action taken at this meeting.
This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose
authorized by the Open Meeting Act, Texas Government Code 551.
Legislative Agenda:
B. Historic Architecture and Adaptive Re‐use: A Case Study ‐ Howard Langner, Main Street Architect,
Texas Historical Commission
Mr. Langner started the presentation by stating the Georgetown Design Guidelines were well written
and a very good Guide for the Commission to use. He also discussed differentiation and what was
compatible was not always appropriate. All cases are not black and white. He explained it was up to
the Commissioners to look at the Guidelines, which are backed by the law, and to make the hard
choices. There decisions could not be politically based, but based on what was determined to be best
for the city while staying with the Guidelines. He explained that it was not always easy to not be
swayed by what the applicants are describing as a hardship, but they must stick to the facts. Their
interpretations are not always based on black and white facts, but use history and physical evidence
for guidance. He stated they were doing an excellent job. The presentation and discussion ended at
7:15 p.m.
C. Discussion and possible direction regarding the Unified Development Code review process
Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager gave some history of the current commission and the
direction the City Council gave in regards to the commission. The Historic and Architecture Review
Commission was established in 2001 to review certain projects in the Downtown and Old Town
Overlay Districts. Its predecessor, the Historic Preservation Commission, was created in 1975 to
“preserve & protect historic and cultural areas, places and buildings.” HARC is comprised of 7
members and reviews plans for changes to buildings, sites, and signage within the Historic Overlay
Districts prior to those changes being made. The Commission issues Certificates of Design
Compliance for approved modifications consistent with the Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 2 of 2
Meeting: July 24, 2014
This Commission also makes recommendations to City Council on the designation of historic sites or
districts, acts and assists the City Council in formulating design guidelines and other supplemental
materials relevant to the historic preservation or design review. Additionally, the Commission
renders advice and guidance upon the request of property owners or occupants on new construction
or the restoration, alteration or maintenance of any historic resource or other building within the
District, and performs any other functions requested by the City Council.
On May 27th City Council adopted Resolution 052714‐N directing staff to conduct a comprehensive
review to determine possible amendments to the HARC process, the Unified Development Code and
other city regulations to ensure a continued balance between historic preservation and economic
development.
Brewer went on to state that staff has been working on a timeline to review the commission and the
UDC Standards. She distributed the draft version of that timeline. She reviewed it briefly, stating
that there needs to be a notification process for the Historic Resource Survey revisions coming up.
They are looking at the demolition process in the UDC and Andreina was looking at the current
processes and expectations of staff and council. They are also looking at timing issues that have been
raised by downtown business owners and are discussing ways to make the process easier for
business owners. All these items will come before the commission before going to city council for
review and adoption.
Knight commented that she felt the processes currently in place were good ones, just not always
followed. She also expressed concern over the demolition process, and wants the concept review
process to be reexamined.
Winder also expressed concern over the demolition process and that it seems unfair to the applicants
and does not achieve what was intended. It should save the important buildings, not the
insignificant ones also. She suggested defining significant and insignificant.
Brewer responded that the Council seems to agree with this train of thought and that updating the
Resource Survey should help with some of the issues, by identifying levels of significance of
structures. She also stated the HPC President is working with the city’s Home Repair Program to
avoid those demolitions that occur because of neglect.
Gibson stated he felt the commission was doing the right things but felt a disconnect in
communicating that to the city council and the community. He suggested a Homeowner’s
Association for Old Town.
Brewer thanked everyone for their time and comments.
Adjournment Eby adjourned the meeting at 7:40 p.m.
________________________________ __________________________________
Approved, Anna Eby, Chair Attest, Nancy Knight
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations for the property located at 114 East 7th Street, bearing the legal description of
City of Georgetown, Block 40, Lot 1, 4, .33 acres (CDC-2014-017).
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown is in receipt of a request for a CDC for exterior alterations to the historic
structure located at 114 East 7th Street. According to the submitted letter of intent, the applicant
wishes to remove a window to install two exit doors on the south facade of the building, restore
one window on the south facade and paint the structure.
Staff recommends approval with conditions of the request based on the findings that the request
meets the approval criteria of Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code (UDC), as
outlined in the attached Staff Report. Staff recommends approval of the CDC, with the condition
that the exit doors in the south facade be painted to match the primary color of the building.
The affirmative vote of the majority of the HARC members is required to approve the CDC
request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. The applicant paid the required application fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
CDC-2014-017 Staff Report Backup Material
CDC-2014-017 Plan Review Backup Material
Georgetown Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC‐2014‐017 114 East 7th Street Page 1 of 4
Meeting Date: August 28, 2014 Agenda Item: D
File Number: CDC‐2014‐017
AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC)
for exterior alterations for the property located at 114 East 7th Street, bearing the legal
description of City of Georgetown, Block 40, Lot 1, 4, .33 acres.
AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
Project Name: 114 East 7th Street Exterior Alterations
Applicant: Kenney Nguyen
Project Address: 114 East 7th Street
Relative Location: Southwest corner of East 7th Street and Church Street
Legal Description: City of Georgetown, Block 40, Lot 1, 4, .33 acres
Historic Overlay: Downtown, Area 1
Case History: This is the first public hearing for this case.
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
Applicant requests a Certificate of Design Compliance for the following:
1) Remove two windows to facilitate the installation of doors for secondary egress
2) Install new window on the rear of the structure
3) Restore existing windows on the rear of the structure
4) Paint the structure with color matched paint
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Date of construction: ca. 1910
Historic Resources Survey Priority: 1984 ‐ Low
2007 ‐ Low
National Register Designation: Non Contributing Structure in NR District
Texas Historical Commission Designation: No State Designation
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines:
Georgetown Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC‐2014‐017 114 East 7th Street Page 2 of 4
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
5.1 Maintain existing wall materials and textures Complies
5.2 Repair deteriorated primary building materials by patching,
piecing‐in, consolidating or otherwise reinforcing the materials
Complies
5.6 Historic building materials or features shall not be covered Complies
6.12 Preserve the position, number, size and arrangement of historic
windows and doors in a building wall
Does not comply, but
HARC may allow the
change if no
alternative exists
6.20 When window or door replacement is necessary, match the
replacement to the original design as closely as possible
Complies
STAFF ANALYSIS
The applicant seeks a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for exterior alterations to the
Low Priority historic structure located at 114 East 7th Street. The project involves altering the
south (rear) building façade by removing two historic windows, replacing one window to
match existing windows, installing two new exit doors, and restoring existing windows, as
well as painting the structure with color matched paint (Exhibit 1).
The property owner wishes to divide the interior of the structure in to smaller spaces,
requiring the addition of the secondary doors. The windows proposed for removal are
partially shielded from the public view by the eastern portion of building, reducing the impact
on the historic significance of the structure and character of the district. The windows adjacent
to the public right‐of‐way will be rehabilitated, including restoring the frames and removing
the paint from the glass. The Design Guidelines generally discourage the removal of
architectural elements from a façade; however, the limited visibility reduces the impact on the
structure. Additionally, the proposed location for the new doors has the lowest overall impact
on the structure. The wall around the doors will be restored with new galvanized metal,
matching the existing historic material.
The proposed unadorned doors are appropriate for the structure. City staff recommends the
proposed white doors be painted to match the building, further reducing the visual impact of
the exterior alteration.
Georgetown Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC‐2014‐017 114 East 7th Street Page 3 of 4
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the UDC, the HARC shall determine whether to grant a
CDC based on the following criteria:
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and
final action;
The application complies with this criterion.
B. Compliance with any design standards of the
Unified Development Code;
The design criteria of the UDC are not
applicable in this case.
C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design
Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time,
specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay
District;
The proposed project complies with the
Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines as outlined above.
D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is
preserved.
With the condition that the new doors be
painted to match the color of the building
walls, the proposed project maintains the
historic integrity of the structure.
E. New buildings or additions are designed to be
compatible with surrounding historic properties.
Not applicable
F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable
Overlay District is protected.
The proposed project does not have an
adverse effect on the Downtown Overlay
District.
G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted
design standards, and are not in character with
the site or landmarks within the Historic or
applicable Overlay District in question will not be
permitted.
The applicant is not proposing any signage
at this time. Future signs will require a
Certificate of Design Compliance.
H. The following may also be considered by the
HARC when determining whether to approve a
Certificate for Design Compliance:
1. The effect of the proposed change upon the
general historic, cultural, and architectural
nature of the site, landmark, or District.
2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural
features, including parking and loading
spaces, which can be seen from a public street,
alley, or walkway.
3. The general design, arrangement, texture,
material, and color of the building or structure
The proposed project will not have an
adverse effect on the Downtown Overlay
District, and will restore some of the
previously removed or altered historic
features, while allowing the building to be
put back in to use, creating a more
pedestrian friendly street presence on 7th
Street.
Georgetown Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC‐2014‐017 114 East 7th Street Page 4 of 4
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
and the relation of such factors to similar
features of buildings or structures in the
District, contrast or other relation of such
factors to other landmarks built at or during
the same period, as well as the uniqueness of
such features, considering the remaining
examples of architectural, historical, and
cultural values.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of CDC‐2014‐017 with the
following condition:
The proposed secondary egress doors shall be painted to match the exterior of the
building.
As of the date of this report, no public comments have been received by the City.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 ‐ Applicant’s Letter of Intent, Floor plans and Elevations
SUBMITTED BY
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
LETTER OF INTENT FOR PROPOSED CHANGE (REVISED)
SUBJECT: THE REMOVAL OF TWO BACK WINDOWS IN SUITE 112
AND 110 AND THE INSTALLATION OF TWO NEW BACK DOORS
AND REPLACEMENT OF ONE WINDOW IN SUITE 110.
1) REMOVAL OF TWO BACK WINDOWS – the decision to remove was
that the back wall of each suite 112 and 110 would be the location of future
“cook hood” area. We thought it would be good for the following reasons:
A) It would be the best location to connect the hood’s “exhaust fan”
and “fresh air intake”. Windows behind the permanent close-in
structure are not needed.
B) It also the best location for fire safety location. If fire was to
happen , it would affect only the back wall but not the adjoined
tenant.
C) Exterior wall cover with non-similar metallic is temporary cover.
We are going to remove an unapproved galvanized, exterior wall
cover and replace with matching existing galvanized metal as
shown in the revise plan.
2) INSTALLATION OF TWO NEW BACK DOORS – each Suite 110 and
Suite 112 would need this back door for future tenant per building code
safety egress requirements.
3) PAINTING OF EXTERIOR WALLS – Repainting of existing exterior
walls. The color we provided is a color-matching paint. It only has its
mixing formula but not a specific name. The color shown here is the
existing color that had been applied approximately 7 years ago.
4) REPLACING WINDOW ON SUITE 110 WITH NEW WINDOW TO
MATCH EXISTING - Old window was completely rotted by termite. The
window glass was separated from the wood frame, and was about to fall
apart.
5'-0" x 7'-2 3/16"3'-7 1/2" x 8'-2"3'-7 1/2" x 8'-2"5'-11" x 7'-2 3/16"
3'-7 1/2" x 8'-2"11'-11" x 7'-2 3/16"11'-10 1/2" x 7'-2 3/16"3'-7 1/2" x 7'-3"3'-7 1/2" x 8'-2"11'-1 1/2" x 7'-2 3/16"
16'-11 1/4"
7'-0 1/2" x 4'-8"
3'-8 3/4"
4'-2 1/2"
7'-4" x 4'-8"3'-7 1/2" x 8'-2"3'-7 1/2" x 8'-2"
3'-8" x 7'-2 3/16"3'-8" x 7'-2 3/16"
3'-8" x 7'-2 3/16"
5'-0" x 7'-2 3/16"
5'-0" x 7'-2 3/16"
3'-2" x 5'-10"
3'-3" x 5'-10"
3'-3" x 5'-10"
3'-3" x 5'-10"
3'-3" x 5'-10"
3'-3" x 5'-10"
114 EAST 7TH STREET
CHURCH STREET
6'-2 1/2" x 7'-2 3/16"3'-7 1/2" x 8'-2"3'-7 1/2" x 8'-2"6'-5 1/2" x 7'-2 3/16"
3'-0" x 8'-2"
30'-5"
21'-6"22'-11"23'-3"
107'-4"
111'-8"
40'-3"
117'-5"
23'-9"
8'-6"
14'-9"
39'-10"
STE 112STE 115 STE 110 STE 105
1883 SF2600 SF4723 SF
Existing
Dia Thai
Existing
Beauty Escape
Salon
GECO ENGINEERING & DESIGNS
TBPE REGISTRATION #: F8819
6024 RR 2338, STE 101
GEORGETOWN, TX 78633
PHONE: (512) 863-6462
CONTRACTOR:
THE TURNKEY CONSTRUCTION
404 S LYNNWOOD TRAIL
CEDAR PARK, TX 78613
(512) 775-3767
Info@TheTurnkeyConstruction.com
PROJECT NAME:
REPLACEMENT
WINDOWS &
DOORS
114 E 7TH ST.
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
A.1 FLOOR PLAN
(SCALE 1/8" = 1')
REPLACEMENT OF WINDOWS AND DOORS
114 EAST 7TH STREET, STE 110,112
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
PROJECT SYNOPSIS:
PROJECT CONTACT: THE TURNKEY CONSTRUCTION
KENNEY NGUYEN
404 SOUTH LYNNWOOD TRAIL
CEDAR PARK, TX 78613
(512) 775-3767
Info@TheTurnkeyConstruction.com
ZONING: DOWNTOWN COMMERICAL GR
USE & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: GENERAL RETAIL (GR)
EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TYPE: III
SCOPE OF WORK:
- REPLACING STE 110 WINDOW TO MATCH EXISTING WINDOWS.
-INSTALL TWO NEW BACK DOORS PER CODE REQUIREMENT
-REMOVE UNAPPROVED GALVANIZED, EXTERIOR WALL COVER AND
REPLACE WITH MATCHING EXISTING GALVANIZED METAL.
CITY ADOPTED CODES:
INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2003
Locations of NEW WINDOW to be replaced.
3062 SF
4'-0"4'-0"
SOUTH (REAR) ELEVATION
114 E 7TH ST
REPLACE WINDOW
TO MATCH EXISTING
EXISTING WINDOWS TO BE RESTORED
TO ORIGINAL CONDITION, INCLUDING
REMOVAL OF PAINT FROM GLASS REPLACE WINDOWS
WITH NEW DOORS
EXISTING METAL
BUILDING
NEW GALVANIZED METAL TO
MATCH EXISTING
REPAINT EXISTING EXTERIOR
WALLS WITH COLOR-
MATCHING PAINT
107’-4”
21’-6” 23’-3” 39’-10” 22’-11”
17
’
‐
8”
16
’
12
’
‐
1”
6’
‐
7.
5
”
6’
‐
8”
6’
‐
8”
6’
‐
7.
5
”
2’-9” 2’-9”
3’ 3’
7’ - 0.5”
Tool & Truck Rental Installation Services and Repair Gift Cards Help
Georgetown #6538 (Change)
Your Store:
SPECIFICATIONS
JELD-WEN Model # 710586 Internet # 202036369 Store SKU # 663624
Write a Review(2)
/ each
IN STOCK AT YOUR SELECTED STORE
Georgetown #6538
Georgetown, TX 78626
Change Pick Up Store
3 In Stock
Aisle 28, Bay 011
PRODUCT OVERVIEW
Model # 710586 Internet # 202036369 Store SKU # 663624
The JELD-WEN 36 in. x 80 in. Steel White Prehung Right-Hand Inswing Entry Door helps add energy efficiency and durability to your home. This white entry door is made from
rust-resistant galvanized steel and features a 1-piece polystyrene core that provides reliable insulation. This inswing entry door is Energy Star compliant and also Prehung to help
make installation easier. This right-hand entry door also features a light-brass hinge finish for an elegant touch.
California residents: seeProposition 65 information
Consult your local building code official for applicable codes and regulations
Not all products are suitable for locations that experience severe weather
1-Piece polystyrene core provides long-lasting insulation
Made of rust-resistant galvanized steel
Weather stripping for added draft protection
Flush design for a minimalist look
2-Coat primer enables easier finishing
Light-brass hinge finish adds an elegant touch
Requires a 38-1/2 in. x 82-1/2 in. rough opening for a secure fit
Prehung door includes frame for easier installation
Energy Star Compliant
From outside, opens toward the inside of the home with the hinges on the left
Note: Product may vary by store
JELD-WEN Flush Primed White Steel Entry Door-710586 at The Home Depot http://www.homedepot.com/p/JELD-WEN-Flush-Primed-White-Steel-Entry-Door-710586/202036369
1 of 2 8/8/2014 10:07 AM
Assembled Depth (in.) 4.5625 in Assembled Height (in.) 81.75 in
Assembled Width (in.) 37.5 in Color Family White
Color/Finish White Primer Commercial No
Door Configuration Single Door Door Handing Right-Hand/Inswing
Door Size (WxH) in. 36 x 80 Door Style Classic
Door Thickness (in.) 1.75 in Door Type Exterior Prehung
Energy Star Qualified North-Central,Northern,South-
Central,Southern Features Weatherstripping
Finish Type Primed Fire rating None
Hinge Finish Bronze Included Hardware
Jamb Size (in.) 4-9/16" Manufacturer Warranty 10-Year Limited Warranty
Material Steel Number of Hinges 3
Panel Type 1 Panel Product Weight (lb.) 85 lb
Returnable 90-Day Rough Opening Height 82.5 in
Rough Opening Width 38.5 in
SHIPPING OPTIONS
Store Exclusive. This item is available for purchase in select stores only.
JELD-WEN Flush Primed White Steel Entry Door-710586 at The Home Depot http://www.homedepot.com/p/JELD-WEN-Flush-Primed-White-Steel-Entry-Door-710586/202036369
2 of 2 8/8/2014 10:07 AM
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
an addition for the property located at 410 South Myrtle Street, bearing the legal description of
Glasscock Addition, Block 14, Lot 8, .16 acres (CDC-2014-028).
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown is in receipt of a request for a CDC for exterior addition to the residential
structure located at 410 South Myrtle Street. According to the submitted letter of intent, the
applicant wishes to construct an addition to the house, to create additional living space.
Staff recommends approval of the request based on the findings that the request meet the approval
criteria of Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code (UDC), as outlined in the attached
Staff Report. The applicant presented the project for conceptual review at the June 26, 2014
HARC meeting.
The affirmative vote of the majority of the HARC members is required to approve the CDC
request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. The applicant has paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
CDC-2014-028 Staff Report Backup Material
CDC-2014-028 Plan Review Backup Material
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-028 401 South Myrtle Street Page 1 of 4
Meeting Date: August 28, 2014 Agenda Item: E
File Number: CDC-2014-028
AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for an
addition for the property located at 410 South Myrtle Street, bearing the legal description of Glasscock
Addition, Block 14, Lot 8, 0.16 acres.
AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
Project Name: 401 South Myrtle Residential Addition
Applicant: J. Bryant Boyd
Property Owner: Matthew Elliot
Property Address: 401 South Myrtle Street
Legal Description: Glasscock Addition, Block 14, Lot 8, .16 acres
Historic Overlay: Old Town Overlay District
Case History: The case was presented for conceptual review at the June 26, 2014 HARC
meeting. This is the first public hearing for this case.
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Date of construction: 1913
Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: 1984 – Medium Priority
2007 – Medium Priority
National Register Designation: None
Texas Historical Commission Designation: None
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Design Compliance to construct a 350 square foot addition
to accommodate a new master suite and utility room. The project will also include the removal of two
decks on the rear of the structure and general maintenance items including leveling the foundation,
replacing/reconstructing deteriorated materials and adding a driveway (Exhibit 1).
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-028 401 South Myrtle Street Page 2 of 4
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines:
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
7.1 Avoid alterations that would damage historic features Complies
7.2 Properties designated by the City as a High or Medium Priority
Historic Structure should be preserved and their historic character
retained.
Complies
7.3 An addition shall be compatible in scale, materials, and character
with the main building.
Complies
7.4 An addition shall not damage or obscure architecturally important
features.
Complies
7.6 Design a new addition such that the original character can be
clearly seen.
Complies
7.7 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the
front to minimize the visual impacts.
Complies
7.8 Do not obscure, damage, destroy, or re- move original architectural
details and materials of the primary structure.
Complies
7.9 An addition shall be compatible in scale, materials, and character
with the main building.
Complies
7.10 The roof form of a new addition shall be in character with that of
the primary building.
Complies
STAFF ANALYSIS
The proposed project for the Medium Priority historic structure located at 401 South Myrtle Street adds
additional square footage to the rear of the structure, creating a more useful space for the property
owner. The addition is placed at the rear of the structure, limiting the impact on the historic
significance and architectural features. The 350-square foot addition creates an increase in square
footage of approximately 16%, in conformance with the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines.
Board and batten siding will be utilized to create the material differentiation between the historic
structure and the new construction.
The application was deemed complete by staff and contains sufficient information to review the
proposed project. The proposed project is in compliance with the standards set forth by the Unified
Development Code and the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines. The new addition and roof
do not significantly alter the integrity of the historic structure and are compatible with the surrounding
historic properties.
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-028 401 South Myrtle Street Page 3 of 4
The proposed project was submitted for HARC Conceptual review at the June 26th meeting, and the
applicant received positive feedback from the Commission and was encouraged to move forward.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the
following criteria:
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and
final action;
The application was deemed complete by
staff in accordance with the submission
requirements.
B. Compliance with any design standards of the
Unified Development Code;
The proposed project complies with the
UDC standards for the underlying
Residential Single Family (RS) zoning
district.
C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design
Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time,
specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay
District;
The proposed project is in compliance with
the Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines as outlined above.
D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is
preserved.
The proposed project does not significantly
alter the historic integrity of the structure.
E. New buildings or additions are designed to be
compatible with surrounding historic properties.
The proposed addition is compatible with
the surrounding historic properties and the
Old Town Overlay District.
F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable
Overlay District is protected.
The proposed project does not have an
adverse effect on the Old Town Overlay
District.
G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted
design standards, and are not in character with
the site or landmarks within the Historic or
applicable Overlay District in question will not be
permitted.
The proposed project does not include
signage.
H. The following may also be considered by the
HARC when determining whether to approve a
Certificate for Design Compliance:
1. The effect of the proposed change upon the
general historic, cultural, and architectural
nature of the site, landmark, or District.
2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural
features, including parking and loading
The proposed project is in compliance with
all requirements for the Certificate of Design
Compliance. The project will have limited
impact on the structure, and is compatible
with the surrounding properties and the Old
Town Overlay District. The project will
comply with the site design requirements of
the Unified Development Code.
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-028 401 South Myrtle Street Page 4 of 4
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
spaces, which can be seen from a public street,
alley, or walkway.
3. The general design, arrangement, texture,
material, and color of the building or structure
and the relation of such factors to similar
features of buildings or structures in the
District, contrast or other relation of such
factors to other landmarks built at or during
the same period, as well as the uniqueness of
such features, considering the remaining
examples of architectural, historical, and
cultural values.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of CDC-2014-028 as proposed by the
applicant.
As of the date of this report, staff has received no written comments regarding the proposed project.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 – Letter of Intent and plans
SUBMITTED BY
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
James Bryant Boyd, AIA
902 Forest Street Georgetown, Texas 78626
Tel: 512.930.1686 Fax: 512.863.7794 www.jbryantboyd.com
jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com
1
City of GeorgetownPlanning and Development Services/HARCGeorgetown, TX 78626
HARC Submission for CDCthe Elliot Residence Addition and Remodel401 South Myrtle StreetGeorgetown, Texas 78626
Summary
This project involves a 1,802 square foot historic residence located at 401 South Myrtle Street. The residence is located at the southeast corner of South Myrtle and East 4th Streets.
Project Scope
• All existing deteriorated wood siding, trim, fascia boards or any other deteriorated wood will be removed, replaced and painted as indicated on the elevations.
• A 350 square foot addition will be constructed on the southwest corner of the existing house. This addition will include a new Master Bedroom and bath, a new Utility Room, a small covered stoop and a covered porch.
• New addition will be board & batten to differentiate between existing and new.
• Two new decks are added in the rear of the structure.
• Existing and addition will have composition roof.
• The foundation skirt will be stucco board (same color as the body of the house).
• The back (rear) portion of the garage will be raised to match the taller part. Roof will be corrugated metal to match existing. A portion of the west wall nearest the addition and the south wall will be removed to create an outdoor living space. The corner will be held up with new beams and wood posts.
• All windows will be replaced and will match the uneven sash (most prevalent) in the existing house - no divided lights.
• House will have new paint (colors included in packet)
• A new driveway will be constructed of material which is appropriate to the historic nature of the neighborhood.
• Front porch will have new railing painted the color of trim.
We appreciate the opportunity to present this request to HARC.Sincerely,
J. Bryant Boyd, AIA
July 25, 2014
July 25, 2014
2
Subject Property harc submital for cdc
Elliot Remodel & Addition - 401 S. Myrtle - Georgetown, Texas
West elevation - Entry
Rear / East Elevation view Garage view from street
Rear / East Elevation view Rear / East Elevation viewFront Porch
South Elevation view from street
Front Elevation view from streetFront / West elevation
July 25, 2014
3
Proposed Floor Plan harc submital for cdc
4th Street
40
1
S
.
M
y
r
t
l
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
Proposed Floor Plan
New addition area
highlighted in red.
July 25, 2014
4
Existing Floor Plan harc submital for cdc
4th Street
40
1
S
.
M
y
r
t
l
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
Existing Floor Plan
July 25, 2014
5
Proposed Elevations harc submital for cdc
Proposed Front Elevation
Proposed Rear Elevation
All windows
to match
this style.New Work
July 25, 2014
6
Proposed Elevations harc submital for cdc
Proposed North Elevation
Proposed South Elevation
New Work
New Work
SW 6437 - Haven
SW 6168 -
Moderne White
July 25, 2014
7
Site Plan harc submital for cdc
4th Street
40
1
S
.
M
y
r
t
l
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
Proposed Site Plan & Floor Plan
Building setback line
July 25, 2014
8
Garage Elevation harc submital for cdc
Matching existing
corrugated metal roof.
CMU WallExisting BRD & BATT
Siding to remain.
Re-use existing door in
new location.
view from street
Existing walls will be
removed in this section.
July 25, 2014
9
Satellite Image & Paint Samples harc submital for cdc
401 S. Myrtle St.
Satellite View
White line around
property.
Sherwin Williams color:
SW 6437 - Haven
(walls)
Sherwin Williams color:
SW 6168 - Moderne White
(trim)
Paint Samples
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations for the property located at 713 South Main Street, bearing the legal description
of City of Georgetown, Block 40, Lot 6 (SW/PT), .069 acres (CDC-2014-029).
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown is in receipt of a request for a CDC for exterior paint and new business
signage. According to the submitted letter of intent, the applicant wishes to repaint the exterior of
the structure and install new signage as part of a re-branding campaign for the business.
Staff recommends approval of the request based on the findings that the request meets the
approval criteria of Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code (UDC), as outlined in the
attached Staff Report.
The affirmative vote of the majority of the HARC members is required to approve the CDC
request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. The applicant has paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
CDC-2014-029 Staff Report Backup Material
CDC-2014-029 Plan Review Backup Material
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-029 713 South Main Street Page 1 of 4
Meeting Date: August 28, 2014 Agenda Item: F
File Number: CDC-2014-029
AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations for the property located at 713 South Main Street, bearing the legal description of
City of Georgetown, Block 40, Lot 6 (SW/PT), 0.069 acres.
AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
Project Name: The Escape – Exterior paint and signage
Applicant: Len Lester
Property Owner: Len Lester
Property Address: 713 South Main Street
Legal Description: City of Georgetown, Block 40, Lot 6 (SW/PT), 0.069 acres
Historic Overlay: Downtown, Area 1
Case History: This is the first public hearing for this case.
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Date of construction: 1902
Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: High Priority
National Register Designation: Contributing structure in the National Register district
Texas Historical Commission Designation: No state designation
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant is proposing to repaint the upper and lower floors of the structure, install new signage
and perform maintenance work on the structure. The proposed signage will be in accordance with the
following details:
Sign Type Canopy
Size 25.25 sq feet
Materials Carved wood, stained glass
Location Mounted on the canopy
Sign Type Hanging
Size 4.75 sq feet
Materials Carved wood, acrylic
Location Mounted under canopy at primary
entrance
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-029 713 South Main Street Page 2 of 4
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines:
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
9.1 Consider the building front as part of an overall sign program. Complies
9.2 A sign shall be subordinate to the overall building composition. Complies
9.3 A primary sign should identify the services or business offered within. Complies
9.8 A window sign may be considered. Complies
9.9 A hanging sign may be considered Complies
9.11 Awning and canopy signs may be considered. Complies
9.15 A sign should not in any way obscure or compete with architectural details
of an historic building facade
Complies
9.19 Use colors for the sign that are compatible with those of the building front Complies
9.25 Signage should have a professional quality and a finished appearance Complies
11.1 Develop a color scheme for the entire building that coordinates all the
façade elements.
Complies
11.2 Paint colors should enhance individual building elements while creating a
unified, coordinated appearance for the entire structure.
Complies
11.3 A muted color is preferred for the base color of most buildings. Complies
11.5 In general, use bright colors for accents only. Complies
11.6 Paint colors should highlight architectural details. Complies
11.9 Where brick has been painted historically it should remain painted. Complies
STAFF ANALYSIS
The Escape business located at 713 South Main Street on the Courthouse Square wishes to update its
business image. The update includes exterior paint and signage for the structure. Additionally, the
windows located on the second floor are proposed to be restored. New business signage includes a
canopy mounted sign, hanging sign, and window and door signage. The exterior paint and signage
design are coordinated to reflect the line of products available for purchase.
The structure experienced a fire in the 1930’s, at which time the exterior masonry was painted to cover
the scorch marks. Based upon the Design Guidelines, the repainting of the structure is appropriate. The
paint colors are selected to highlight the key architectural features of the structure, including the
character defining storefront components, decorative stonework and windows. The signs will be
Sign Type Door
Size 0.54 sq feet
Materials Cut vinyl mounted on interior window
Location Window in the primary entrance door
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-029 713 South Main Street Page 3 of 4
mounted on the canopy to prevent the obstruction of architectural elements of the second floor. Small
lights will be installed on the canopy to provide backlighting for the proposed sign.
The proposed project complies with the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines and allows the
property owner to refresh their business, ensuring continued success on the Square.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the
following criteria:
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and
final action;
The application was deemed complete by
staff.
B. Compliance with any design standards of the
Unified Development Code;
The design standards outlined in the UDC
do not apply to this project.
C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design
Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time,
specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay
District;
The proposed project complies with the
Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines as outlined above.
D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is
preserved.
The project preserves the historic integrity of
the structure and enhances the individual
historic components.
E. New buildings or additions are designed to be
compatible with surrounding historic properties.
The proposed project does not include a new
building or addition.
F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable
Overlay District is protected.
The proposed project is in character with the
Downtown Overlay District.
G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted
design standards, and are not in character with
the site or landmarks within the Historic or
applicable Overlay District in question will not be
permitted.
The proposed signage complies with the
Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines.
H. The following may also be considered by the
HARC when determining whether to approve a
Certificate for Design Compliance:
1. The effect of the proposed change upon the
general historic, cultural, and architectural
nature of the site, landmark, or District.
2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural
features, including parking and loading
The proposed project has no adverse effect
on the overall character of the Downtown
Overlay District, and protects the historic
integrity of the individual structure. The
proposed paint scheme and signs are
appropriate for the structure and the district.
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-029 713 South Main Street Page 4 of 4
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
spaces, which can be seen from a public street,
alley, or walkway.
3. The general design, arrangement, texture,
material, and color of the building or structure
and the relation of such factors to similar
features of buildings or structures in the
District, contrast or other relation of such
factors to other landmarks built at or during
the same period, as well as the uniqueness of
such features, considering the remaining
examples of architectural, historical, and
cultural values.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of CDC-2014-029 as proposed by the
applicant.
As of the date of this report, staff has received no written comments regarding the request.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 – Applicant’s Letter of Intent, plans and specifications
SUBMITTED BY
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
TO: HARC Commissioners
FROM: Len Lester, The Escape, 713 S. Main Street
DATE: August 31, 2014
SUBJECT: Paint and Sign changes for The Evans Building, 713 S. Main Street
We are in the process of updating our business image, logo and store colors. As part of this update we
would like to change our current exterior building colors as well as change our business sign above our
awning. Additionally, we would like to add a coordinating hanging sign below the awning.
We are proposing to repaint the entire building façade; this would include both the stone and the wood
store front. The stone will be repainted a cream color with the upper architectural features painted a
shade darker. The lower wood store front will be painted two shades of blue. The darker blue will be
also used to highlight the building name and date, upper horizontal ledge and upper windows. Please
see the attached rendering for actual color placement.
We are also proposing to change the main business sign above the awning and add a secondary hanging
sign below the awning. The upper main sign will be constructed of wood and stained glass. The base
portion of the sign will be dark blue and will be made of wood. The business name will be carved into
the wood and the letters will be painted a contrasting white. A round medallion will be made from
stained glass. This portion will incorporate dark blue glass along with shades of green glass. The
medallion will be encased in a metal rim for structural support. The rim will have attachment points to
the wood base. The lower hanging sign will also be made of wood. We will incorporate the round
medallion on both sides of this sign using clear acrylic. Please see attached rendering for colors,
placement and scale.
Thank you for your consideration,
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Discussion and possible action to reduce the development delay for unapproved demolition of a
historic accessory structure at 913 Walnut Street.
ITEM SUMMARY:
The applicant for 913 Walnut Street demolished an accessory structure without a Certificate of
Design Compliance from the Historic and Architectural Review Commission. The demolition took
place during the week of July 14, 2014 and a stop work order was placed on the property at that
time.
Per UDC Section 3.13.010 D (3), the demolition or removal of a structure without CDC approval
results in a 365 day delay on HARC review and all building permits. A property owner or
applicant may request a reduction from the HARC based upon the following circumstances:
1. The 365-day delay places an undue hardship on the property owner.
2. Only a portion of the structure was demolished.
3. The structure demolished was not historic.
4. The remaining portions of the structure need to be secured or strengthened to protect it from
further deterioration.
5.Construction work is required to make the structure habitable.
To approve a reduction in the 365-day delay for the issuance of a building permit, HARC must
determine that the demolition has limited impact on the remaining historic significance of the
property, and that the reduced waiting period is appropriate based on either health, safety, and
welfare or that to continue with the delay would place an undue hardship on either the property or
property owner.
Infill construction in the Old Town Overlay District does not require a Certificate of Design
Compliance from the HARC, limiting this review to the demolition delay. Demolition of the
structure resulted in the loss of its legal non-conforming status, and any new construction will
have to meet the current site design requirements for the underlying Residential Single-Family
zoning district. The applicant has requested a setback modification from the Zoning Board of
Adjustment, and no further work can be completed on the site prior to the decision. The case is on
schedule for the October 21st ZBA meeting.
The demolition requires an approved CDC, which will be presented to the HARC at the first
available meeting following the expiration of the development delay.
A majority vote of Commissioners present at the meeting is required to approve a reduction in the
delay.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Applicant's request to reduce the demolition delay Backup Material
Staff photos and documentation Backup Material
My name is John Lawton, new owner of Green Earth Builders LLC. I have operated in
Georgetown and surrounding area for over thirty five years. when I started the project at 9L3 walnut I
found that the entire shed had rotted into the ground at least 6inches. There was no bottom ptate and
the studs were rotted and termite damaged up another 5 Inches. Taking the structure down was a slow
process for safety reasons' I had the wall up by itself. lthen proceeded to take the tin off with
understanding that the rust and holes in the tin were a produce that needed to be extracted and did so.
The carport only had three 2" X 4"s running to 4'X 4" post which I had to extract because of setback
from 9 % st' when I took the tin off of the shed it had mold and water damage as well as termite
damage across 80 percent of the siding. The siding had a paper like quality and all nails were exposed.
There was about L6" of space between our shed and the neighbors shed which had a rack for storing
wood built on the overhand of the shed. My guys were brushing against the wall with rusty nails so, I
dropped the wall for safety' we took the siding off and put the wail back but started thinking about my
foundation guys and they wouldn't have room to work. Nor would they be able to trench out my special
depth footing needed forthis area. lslid the walloverto pourthe slab. Looking back in hind sight lknow
I should have contacted Jeff or Matt from taking the tin off to moving the wall. I have taken over a
company which is something I have been working towards my whole life. I have been overwhelmed with
the business side of a company that when I came to dealing with the city for permits and the entire
process I blanked' I am a carpenter out right and learning the best I can on the business part, growing
each day' I hired my daughter to help with the process and making it possible for me to move forward
for work' I have never made any bad decisions in my 35 years and to make the mistake like I did is very
outofcharacterforme' lhaveanA+gradeforqualityofworksecondtonone. lhavealwaysgivenmy
client above standard structural materials. I upgrade on all member and over engineer all footings and
piers' My clients know me to be honest and fair. I come to you today with the hope that you understand
that I meant only the best product for my client and the safety of my crew. I made the worst decisions of
my life consecutively' I promise I learned from my mistake and I hope that you would have the leniency
not to punish the home owner for my mistakes. My whole life I have always made decisions dealing with
any type of trouble shooting. I am learning to change throughout this process. I pran to be working in
the Georgetown area for ten rnore years if god willing. t have three jobs in old town in the works as of
today' I never meant for this to happen and for me to be negligent in my actions. This is not me or my
work ethic' I pray that you can have the compassion and let me proceed with the project.
Thank you for your time,
John LaMon
psslr-
200
A
.*t
Jr
Fi.
60
2'-31/2'
16'_0"
7',-8 1i2"
(Dc)
ON
Cn
]!t
\)o
f\)a
A
\
(N
N
(\
\.^1-
N\
oo
a\
Qo
9t ail
ilA.
i{
(D. i:
!,bq-)
-\
Cd-::x:c-\:o
,R8
<b
v=ov
@a
TI
cD-5o
16',-0'
o
ro
x:
. g'rg
12
" 8'rg
a
3\l
ro
rr)
ii
f 'E'
I;
s&
*
't
?
.t
__ffi'{)sA"*^aa,.tc
- tA6^^r{Ac^/
? +" g[lvs
lb"O.C-,
1o"6*n qT L t+"
!f..1sutAt/b^ll- 3/+osoar.oo\i
r^r.d.rfu,l
th)'>ryvaU-
Ard :tu> s
isr4"+lef'+2?^\L
f.kR$ t'{u-r
th'
l3'
SeolD F16oC,
5:ro€lA€
l{Ev cox5TaucTrc>q
EAsr 6111-1_
v$
(-tr
-rb Ba reKr* \
,o.tlc o" serg*;
FRom Sreie;
exntrrue
Gr**<eE'
+:'rbeAq€
BsrqlAlt_
a-fg:w-
913 South Walnut Accessory Building DemoliƟon
Google Street View photos
913 South Walnut Accessory Building DemoliƟon
Post demoliƟon photos
GIS Aerial of property
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Conceptual review for 1802 South Austin Avenue
ITEM SUMMARY:
The property owner at 1802 South Austin Avenue is requesting conceptual review for a residential
remodel project, per Sections 2.03.010.C.1 and 2, and 3.13.020.B of the Unified Development
Code. Staff is forwarding the request to the HARC for review. The conceptual review provides
guidance and feedback to the applicant on the conceptual plans and applicable Design Guidelines.
As no CDC application has been submitted with the city, no formal action will be taken by HARC
in accordance with the UDC. The applicant may submit an application for a Certificate of Design
Compliance upon completion of the conceptual review process, basing the design on guidance
from the HARC.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
1802 South Austin Avenue Plans Backup Material
The Slack Remodel
1802 South Austin Avenue,
Georgetown, Texas
08.13.14
14060
REVIEW SET
NOT FOR
REGULATORY
PERMITTING OR
CONSTRUCTION
CM
08.20.14
A1
PROPOSED PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'0"
A1
1 PROPOSED TOTAL LIVING AREA:2984
EXISTING LIVING AREA:1672
APPROX. IMPERVOUS CVRG:27%
DBL. CARPORT25'8" X 22'8"
10'6 CLG.
BDRM. 312'0" X 14'0"
9'0 CLG.
BDRM. 212'0" X 14'0"
9'0 CLG.
BA.29'0 CLG.
PDR.9'0 CLG.
HALL9'0 CLG.
UTILITY10'0" X 12'7"
9'0 CLG.HALL9'0 CLG.
STUDY10'4" x 5'8"
9'0 CLG.
BRKFST.12'7" X 10'0"
9'0 CLG.
KITCHEN21'0" X 15'8"
9'0 CLG.
DINING13'8" X 18'4"
9'0 CLG.
STUDY13'5" X 13'4"
9'0 CLG.
LIVING RM.22'9" X 15'5"
9'0 CLG.
MSTR. BDRM.17'8" X 16'4"
9'0 CLG.
COV'D
PORCH5'0" x 18'1"
9'0 CLG.
MSTR. BA.9'0 CLG.W.I.C.8'0" X 9'0"
9'0 CLG.
COV'D. PORCH26'5" X 7'2"
SLOPED CLG.
COV'D.
PORCH7'2" X 21'2"
SLOPED CLG.
REPLACE WINDOW
DISP.DISP.
36" REF.
DBL. SINK D.W.
SEATING @ 36" HGT.
36" COOKTOP
VENT HOODCBNT.CBNT.
DBL. OVENS
SHELVES
LAV. LAV.
PDSTL. TUB
60"X42"
SHOWER SEATW.C.
SHELF W/ 2 RODS
SHELF W/ 2 RODS
SHELF W/ 1 ROD
SHLVS.
CHEST
DESK
SHELVES
5' SLDR.
TUB / SHWR.
W.C.
W.C.
LAV.
LAV.
LINEN
SHELF W/
HOOKS
W.H.SHELF W/ 1 ROD
SHELF W/ 1 ROD
SINK SHLVS.
CABNETS
WASH. DRY.
SHELVES
SEATING @ 42" HGT.
ENTERTAINMENT
ROOM11'10" X 16'11"
9'0 CLG.
PAN.4'4" X 4'4"
9'0 CLG.
SHELVES
COURTYARD AREA
30" PECAN
TREE
15' CRITICAL ROOT ZONE
15' CRITICAL ROOT ZONE
WIC9'0 CLG.
SHELVES
LAV.
BENCH OR
KNEE SPACE
The Slack Remodel
1802 South Austin Avenue,
Georgetown, Texas
08.13.14
14060
REVIEW SET
NOT FOR
REGULATORY
PERMITTING OR
CONSTRUCTION
CM
08.20.14
A2
EXISTING PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'0"
A2
1
SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20'
A2
2
PROPOSED
LOC. FOR
GARAGE
PAVED
DRIVEWAY
APRON
PAVED
DRIVEWAY
APRON
PAVED DRIVE
GRAVEL DRIVE
GRAVEL DRIVE
The Slack Remodel
1802 South Austin Avenue,
Georgetown, Texas
08.13.14
14060
REVIEW SET
NOT FOR
REGULATORY
PERMITTING OR
CONSTRUCTION
CM
08.20.14
A3
EAST ELEV.
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'0"
A3
1
WEST ELEV.
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'0"
A3
2
NORTH ELEV
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'0"
A3
3
SOUTH ELEV.
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'0"
A3
4
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Update from Sign Subcommittee.
ITEM SUMMARY:
The Sign Subcommittee Chair will provide an update of recently issued CDCs for business
signage.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines Training - Renee Hanson
ITEM SUMMARY:
Renee Hanson will provide training for the HARC on the utilization of the Downtown and Old
Town Design Guidelines in the decision making process.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
MCS
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Staff updates and reminder of future meetings.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Staff updates and reminder of future meetings
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
MCS
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
-
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Frost, Recording Secretary