HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_P&Z_08.05.2014Notice of Meeting for the
Planning and Zoning Commission
of the City of Georgetown
August 5, 2014 at 6:00 PM
at City Council Chambers, 101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, TX
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the
ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please
contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City
Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose
authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Comments from the Chair
- Welcome and Meeting Procedures
Action from Executive Session
Public Wishing to Address the Board
On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be
found at the Board meeting. Clearly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak,
and present it to the Staff Liaison, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called
forward to speak when the Board considers that item.
On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a
written request with the Staff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. The request
must include the speaker's name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to
inform the board and the public. For Board Liaison contact information, please logon to
http://government.georgetown.org/category/boards-commissions/.
B - As of the deadline, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than what was posted on
the agenda.
Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that may be acted upon
with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and
acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda.
C Consideration of the Minutes from the July 15, 2014, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting.
D Subject: Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat of 77.27 in the Joseph
Thompson Survey, to be known as Bluffview Subdivision (previously known as Weir Ranch),
located on Leander Road (FM 2243) west of Riverview Drive.
E Subject: Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat of 24.075 acres in the Joseph
Fish and William Roberts Surveys, to be known as Georgetown Village Oaks, located on Shell
Road.
Legislative Regular Agenda
F Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning of .19 acres of the Lost Addition, Block 63
(PT), from Residential (RS) District to Mixed Use – Downtown (MU-DT) District, located at
1008 Rock Street. REZ-2014-010 (Matt Synatschk)
G Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning of a portion of .704 acres at S3667 -
Georgetown City Of, BLOCK 2, Lot 5-7, (Pt) 8 & Abandoned Road, from Residential (RS)
District to Mixed Use – Downtown (MU-DT) District, located at 109 West 2nd Street. REZ-2014-
013
H Public Hearing and possible action on a Final Plat of a Replat of Woods of Fountainwood,
Section 6, Block A, Lot 11, located at 213 Gunn Ranch Road.
I Subject: Public Hearing and possible action on a Final Plat of a Replat of Woods of
Fountainwood, Section 5, Block A, Lot 6, located at 133 Tuscany Way.
J Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning of 2.81 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey,
from the Residential Single-family (RS) District to the Local Commercial (C-1) District, located at
1502 Williams Drive. REZ-2014-014 (Valerie Kreger)
K Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning of 92.61 acres in the Barney C. Low Survey,
from the Agriculture (AG) District to 6.03 acres of the Local Commercial (C-1) District, 13.02
acres of the Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District, and 73.56 acres of the Residential Single-
family (RS) District, located along the south side of Westinghouse Road, just east of Park Central
Boulevard. REZ-2014-015 (Valerie Kreger)
L Consideration and possible action regarding suggested Unified Development Code (UDC)
amendments to include in the 2014-2016 UDC amendment process.
M Discussion Items:
Update on the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee (UDCAC) meetings. (Chair
Horne)
Update on the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB) meetings. (Commissioner
Rankin)
Questions or comments from Commissioners-in-Training about the actions and matters considered
on this agenda.
Reminder of the August 19, 2014, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.
Adjournment
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice
of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public
at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2014, at __________, and remained so
posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
____________________________________
Jessica Brettle, City Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Consideration of the Minutes from the July 15, 2014, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Draft Minutes from July 15, 2014 Meeting Cover Memo
Page 1 of 4
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes
Tuesday, July 15, 2014 at 6:00 PM
Hewlett Room, Georgetown Public Library
402 w. 8th Street, Georgetown, Texas 78626
Commissioners: John Horne, Chair; Scott Rankin, Vice-chair; Bob Brent, Secretary; Andy
Webb, Alex Fuller, Kaylah McCord and Kevin Pitts
Commissioners in Training: N/A
Commissioner(s) Absent: N/A
Commissioner(s) in Training Absent: N/A
Staff Present: Michael Elabarger; Planner, Carla Benton, Planner; Jordan Maddox; Principal
Planner; David Munk, Development Engineer and Stephanie McNickle, Recording Secretary.
Chair Horne called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Chair Horne stated the order of the meeting and that those who speak must turn in a speaker
form to the recording secretary before the item that they wish to address begins. Each speaker
is permitted to address the Commission once for each item, for a maximum of three (3)
minutes, unless otherwise agreed to before the meeting begins.
B. As of the deadline for this agenda, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than
what was posted on the agenda.
Consent Agenda
The Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that the Commission may
act on with one single vote. A Commissioner or any member of the public may request that
any item from the Consent Agenda be pulled in order that the Commission discuss and act
upon it individually as part of the Regular Agenda. The Planning and Zoning Commission's
approval of an item on the Consent Agenda will be consistent with the staff recommendation
described in the report, unless otherwise noted.
C. Consideration of the Minutes of the June 17, 2014, meeting of the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
D. Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary/Final Plat Combo of 2.26 acres in the F.
Foy Survey, to be known as Wellspring Subdivision, located on East Red Bud Meadow. PFP-
2014-004 (Carla J. Benton)
E. Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat of 29.079 acres in the William Roberts
Survey, to be known as The Arbors at Georgetown Village, located on Shell Road north of the
Sycamore Drive intersection. PP-2013-012 (Carla J. Benton)
Page 2 of 4
F. Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat of 9.937 acres in the M.A. Lewis, L.B.
Lord and Wm. Roberts Surveys, to be known as Creekside at Georgetown Village 2, located at
the extensions of Crown Anchor Bend and Slip Drive. PP-2014-011 (Carla J. Benton)
Motion by Commissioner Fuller to approve the consent agenda including the minutes from
the June 17, 2014 Planning and Zoning meeting. Second by Commissioner Webb. Approved.
(7-0)
Regular Agenda
G. Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning of 38.33 acres in the D. Wright Survey
from the Agriculture (AG) District to 2.13 acres of the General Commercial (C-3) District,
6.59 acres of the Local Commercial (C-1) District, and 29.61 acres of the Residential Single-
family (RS) District, located at 3816 Williams Drive. REZ-2014-007 (Mike Elabarger)
Staff report given by Mike Elabarger. Mike Elabarger provided an overview of the
Rezoning request, description of project and recommend for approval.
Chair Horne invited the applicant to address the commissioners. The applicant gave a brief
presentation and stated they will be glad to answer questions.
Chair Horne Opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward, the Public Hearing was
closed.
Motion by Commissioner Webb to recommend to City Council approval for Rezone of
38.33 acres in the D. Wright Survey from the Agriculture (AG) District to 2.13 acres of the
General Commercial (C-3) District, 6.59 acres of the Local Commercial (C-1) District, and
29.61 acres of the Residential Single-family (RS) District, located at 3816 Williams Drive.
Second by Commissioner Pitts. Approved. (7-0)
H. Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning of 20.02 acres in the William Roberts
Survey, Abstract No. 524, from the Agriculture (AG) District to 4.75 acres of Low Density
Multifamily District (MF-1), 10.22 acres of Neighborhood Commercial District (CN), and
5.05 acres of Residential Single Family District (RS), located at 2700 Shell Road. REZ-2013-
021 (Mike Elabarger) Staff report given by Mike Elabarger. Mike Elabarger provided an
overview of the Rezoning request, description of project and recommend for approval.
Staff addressed questions from Commissioners regarding the street construction and
developments in the agricultural zone properties.
Chair Horne invited the applicant to address the commissioners. The applicant presented a
brief history and presentation and stated they will be glad to answer questions.
Chair Horne Opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward, the Public Hearing was
closed.
Motion by Commissioner Fuller to recommend to City council approval for Rezone of
20.02 acres in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 524, from the Agriculture (AG)
District to 4.75 acres of Low Density Multifamily District (MF-1), 10.22 acres of
Neighborhood Commercial District (CN), and 5.05 acres of Residential Single Family
District (RS), located at 2700 Shell Road. Second by Commissioner Pitts. Approved. (7-0)
Page 3 of 4
I. Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning of Mercedes Benz of Georgetown, Lot
1, from the Agriculture (AG) District to the General Commercial (C-3) District, to be known
as Mercedes Benz of Georgetown, located at 7401 Kelley Drive. REZ-2014-006 (Mike
Elabarger) Staff report given by Mike Elabarger. Mike Elabarger provided an overview of
the Rezoning request, description of project and recommend for approval.
Chair Horne invited the applicant to address the commissioners. The applicant stated he
will be glad to answer questions. Chair Horne Opened the Public Hearing. No one came
forward, the Public Hearing was closed.
Motion by Commissioner Brent to recommend to City Council approval for Rezone of
Mercedes Benz of Georgetown, Lot 1, from the Agriculture (AG) District to the General
Commercial (C-3) District, to be known as Mercedes Benz of Georgetown, located at 7401
Kelley Drive. Second by Commissioner Fuller. Approved. (7-0)
J. Public Hearing and possible action on a Special Use Permit of Mercedes Benz of
Georgetown, Lot 1, to permit an Automotive Sale, Rental, or Lease Facility, in the General
Commercial (C-3) District, to be known as Mercedes Benz of Georgetown, located at 7401
Kelley Drive. SUP-2014-002 (Mike Elabarger) Staff report given by Mike Elabarger. Mike
Elabarger provided an overview of the Special Use Permit request, description of project
and recommend for approval.
Chair Horne invited the applicant to address the commissioners. The applicant stated he
will be glad to answer questions. Chair Horne Opened the Public Hearing. No one came
forward, the Public Hearing was closed.
Motion by Commissioner Pitts to recommend to City Council approval of a Special use
Permit for Mercedes Benz of Georgetown, Lot 1, to permit an Automotive Sale, Rental, or
Lease Facility, in the General Commercial (C-3) District, to be known as Mercedes Benz of
Georgetown, located at 7401 Kelley Drive. Second by Commissioner Fuller. Approved. (7-
0)
K. Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning of 11.363 acres in the Isaac Donegan
Survey, from Multifamily (MF) District to Residential Single Family (RS) District, being
developed as Shadow Canyon, located on State Highway 29 West. REZ-2014-008 (Carla
Benton) Staff report given by Carla Benton.
Carla Benton provided an overview of the Rezoning request, description of project and
recommend for approval.
Chair Horne invited the applicant to address the commissioners. The applicant stated he
will be glad to answer questions. Chair Horne Opened the Public Hearing. No one came
forward, the Public Hearing was closed.
Motion by Commissioner Brent to recommend to City Council approval for Rezone of
11.363 acres in the Isaac Donegan Survey, from Multifamily (MF) District to Residential
Single Family (RS) District, being developed as Shadow Canyon, located on State Highway
29 West. Second by Commissioner Fuller. Approved. (7-0)
Page 4 of 4
L. Public Hearing and possible action on a Consent Agreement for an in-city Municipal Utility
District (MUD) covering 301.50 acres in the Addison and Stubblefield Surveys to be known
as Woodhull, located at Sam Houston Avenue and Rockride Lane. DA-2013-004 (Jordan
Maddox) Staff report given by Jordan Maddox.
Jordan Maddox provided an overview of the Development Agreement request, description
of project and recommend for approval.
Chair Horne invited the applicant to address the commissioners. The applicant stated he
will be glad to answer questions. Chair Horne Opened the Public Hearing. No one came
forward, the Public Hearing was closed.
Motion by Commissioner Brent to recommend to City Council approval on a Consent
Agreement for an in-city Municipal Utility District (MUD) covering 301.50 acres in the
Addison and Stubblefield Surveys to be known as Woodhull, located at Sam Houston
Avenue and Rockride Lane. Second by Commissioner Webb. Approved. (7-0)
M. Update on the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee (UDCAC) Meetings.
(Chair Horne) Chair Horne gave a brief update regarding July 1st UDCAC meeting.
Update on the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB) Meetings.
(Commissioner Rankin) Commissioner Rankin gave a brief update regarding the July
GTAB meeting.
Questions or comments from Commissioners-in-Training about the actions and matters
considered on this agenda. NA
Reminder of the August 5, 2014, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.
Adjourn: Motion to Adjourn at 7:09p.m.
_____________________________________ __________________________________
John Horne, Chair Bob Brent, Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Subject: Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat of 77.27 in the Joseph Thompson
Survey, to be known as Bluffview Subdivision (previously known as Weir Ranch), located on
Leander Road (FM 2243) west of Riverview Drive.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background: The applicant proposes to develop 77.027 acres as a residential subdivision with
136 residential lots, 6 drainage, PUE and landscape lots, 1 public parkland lot, 2 private parkland
lots and 2 commercial lots that are located at the entry along Leander Road (FM 2243). The public
parkland for the development proposes to provide 14.94 acres along the South San Gabriel River
connecting to the existing Lyndoch Park to the east.
Public Comments: Public notice is not required for a preliminary plat application. There have
been no public comments received at the time of this report.
Recommended Motion: Approval of a Preliminary Plat of 77.27 in the Joseph Thompson Survey,
to be known as Bluffview Subdivision.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The applicant has paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Carla J. Benton
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Cover Memo
Report Exhibit 1 Backup Material
Report Exhibit 2 Backup Material
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Bluffview Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 1 of 3
Report Date: July 22, 2014
File No: PP-2014-005
Project Planner: Carla Benton, Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Preliminary Plat of Bluffview Subdivision
Project Address: Leander Road
Location: RM 2243 approx. 2 miles west of IH35 (See Exhibit 1)
Total Acreage: 77.27 acres
Legal Description: 77.27 acres in the Joseph Thompson Survey
Applicant: Hence Distal, HP Engineering, Inc.
Property Owner: Bobby Fredrickson
Contact: Hence Distal, HP Engineering, Inc.
Proposed Lots: 136 residential lots, 6 drainage, PUE and landscape lots, 2 commercial
lots, 1 public parkland lot and 2 private parkland lots
Streets Proposed: 9,656 linear feet
Parkland: Parkland requirements were met by dedication of 14.94 acres along the
South San Gabriel River.
Heritage Trees: There are 56 Heritage Trees on this plat
Existing Use: Undeveloped lot
Existing Zoning: Located in the extra-territorial jurisdiction (ETJ); no zoning
Growth Tier: Tier 1A
Applicant’s Request
The applicant proposes to develop 77.027 acres as a residential subdivision with 136 residential lots,
6 drainage, PUE and landscape lots, 1 public parkland lot, 2 private parkland lots and 2 commercial
lots that are located at the entry along Leander Road (FM 2243). The public parkland for the
development proposes to provide 14.94 acres along the South San Gabriel River connecting to the
existing Lyndoch Park to the east.
Site Information
Location:
The property is located on Leander Road west of Riverview Estates Subdivision. (see Exhibit 1)
Physical Characteristics:
The tract is treed, undeveloped tract, containing 56 Heritage Trees. It’s location along the South San
Gabriel River provides opportunity for extending the City’s parkland.
Planning Department Staff Report
Bluffview Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 3
History
On June 10, 2008, the City Council approved the rezoning of this tract to RS, Residential Single-
Family for the residential portion and C-1, Local Commercial for the commercial lots fronting on
RM 2243. On July 26, 2005, the City Council approved an ordinance for a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment for the entire 898.03 acres known as the Weir Charitable Trust Project. Several parcels
of land were rezoned to clean up the boundary lines of the districts as approved by City Council on
February 28, 2014 in Ordinance #2014-12. Additionally, a rezoning of small remaining tracts
between this development and the Southwest Bypass right-of-way was approved by City Council on
May 27, 2014 by Ordinance #2014-29. Previously approved Preliminary Plats for this property,
known as Weir Ranch, have expired.
2030 Plan Conformance
The proposed Preliminary Plat is in conformance with the 2030 Plan land use designation of
Moderate Density Residential, providing for a density ranging between 3.1 and 6 dwelling units per
gross acre, Open Space that will encompass the San Gabriel River corridor, and Community
Commercial that would allow retail, professional office and service-oriented business activities for
neighborhood-serving commercial. More specifically, the San Gabriel River corridor is planned to
provide a continuous park and trail system that will eventually connect to San Gabriel Park. The
proposed plat provides a desireable segment of that plan. The 2030 Plan land use designations are
compatible with the proposed residential subdivision, parkland and commercial uses.
The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1A, that portion of the city where infrastructure
systems are in place, or can be economically provided and where the bulk of the city’s growth should
be guided over the near term.
Utilities
Electric, water, and wastewater are served by the City of Georgetown. It is anticipated that there is
adequate capacity to serve this property either by existing capacity or developer participation in
upgrades to infrastructure.
Transportation
The access to this project is provided via Leander Road. The future subdivision will provide
connectivity to the existing Riverview Subdivision and potentially to the future development to the
west.
Future Application(s)
The following applications will be required to be submitted:
• Final Plat is to be processed administratively;
• Construction Plans will be processed administratively;
• Site Plans for the commercial areas will be processed administratively; and Building
permits for construction.
Planning Department Staff Report
Bluffview Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 3 of 3
Staff Analysis
Staff Recommendation and Basis:
This development is providing an extension to the existing Lyndoch Park that provides a link in the
connectivity of the parks and trail system for the community as identified in the Unified
Development Code and 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
The commercial lots proposed along Leander Road, contain 13 Heritage Trees and numerous
protected trees that will be reviewed with the Site Plan application. The residential lots contain 43
Heritage Trees with 6 trees to be removed with site development.
Staff supports the Preliminary Plat as it meets the requirements of the City’s UDC and
Comprehensive Plan.
Special Consideration:
None
Interdepartmental, Governmental and Agency Comments
None
Public Comments
Public notice is not required for a preliminary plat application. There have been no public comments
received at the time of this report.
Proposed Meetings Schedule
August 5, 2014 – Planning and Zoning Commission
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Location Map
Exhibit 2 – Preliminary Plat
CIT Y O F
G E O R G E T O W N
C
I
T
Y O
F
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
C I T Y O F
G E O R G E T O W N
CITY OFGEORGETOWN
(
R
i
v
e
r
/
Strea m)
(
River/Strea m )
G e o r g e t o w n E T J
Georgeto w n E TJ
G
e
o
r
g
e
t
o
w
n
E
T
J
S U N S H I NEDR
L E A N D E R R D
F O X H O L L O W DR
W O O D V I E WDR
R
I
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
D
R
K
R
I
S
T
I
N
A
D
R
NORWOOD
D
R
R I D G E OAKDR
G R E E N L E E D R
LITTLEBEND DR
RIVE
R
R
I
D
G
E
D
R
R
I
D
G
E
R
U
N
C
T
O
A
K
W
O
O
D
D
R
R I V E R W OODDR
W E I R RANCHRD
R I V E R DOWN RD
R I M R O C KDR
I
N
N
W
O
O
D
DR
RIDGEWOODDR
S
H
A
D
Y
O
A
K
D
R
S U S A N A D R
D
E
E
P
W
O
O
D
D
R
T
A
L
L
W
O
O
DDR
T
I
P
P
I
T
D
V
PP-2014-005
Exhibit #1
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 2,300 4,600Feet ¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
L e a n d er R d
§¨¦35
W UniversityAve
D
.
B
.
W
o
o
d
R
d
Site
City Limits
Street
Site ³
PP-2014-005
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Subject: Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat of 24.075 acres in the Joseph
Fish and William Roberts Surveys, to be known as Georgetown Village Oaks, located on Shell
Road.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background: The applicant proposes to develop 24.076 acres as a senior living facility, 2
parkland lots and 2 commercial lots that are located at the entry at Shell Road.
Public Comments: Public notice is not required for a preliminary plat application. There have
been no public comments received at the time of this report.
Recommended Motion: Approval of a Preliminary Plat of 24.075 acres in the Joseph Fish and
William Roberts Surveys, to be known as Georgetown Village Oaks.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The applicant has paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Carla J. Benton
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Cover Memo
Report Exhibit 1 Backup Material
Report Exhibit 2 Backup Material
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Georgetown Village Oaks Preliminary Plat Page 1 of 3
Report Date: July 22, 2014
File No: PP-2014-010
Project Planner: Carla Benton, Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Preliminary Plat of Georgetown Village Oaks
Project Address: 359 Village Commons Boulevard
Location: Shell Road west of Sycamore Street (See Exhibit 1)
Total Acreage: 24.076 acres
Legal Description: 24.076 acres in the Joseph Fish and William Roberts Surveys
Applicant: Bryant Bell, P.E., KBGE Engineering
Property Owner: Lifecare Company, LLC
Contact: Bryant Bell, P.E., KBGE Engineering
Proposed Lots: 2 commercial lots, 1 senior living facility lot and 2 parkland/open space
lots
Streets Proposed: none
Parkland: Parkland requirements are being met in accordance with the Planned Unit
Development (PUD)
Existing Use: Undeveloped lot
Existing Zoning: PUD with a C-1, Local Commercial base district
Growth Tier: Tier 1A
Applicant’s Request
The applicant proposes to develop 24.076 acres as a senior living facility, 2 parkland lots and 2
commercial lots that are located at the entry at Shell Road.
Site Information
Location:
This property is located south of the intersection of Sycamore Street and Shell Road, east of the
existing Village Pool and southeast of Village Elementary School. (See Exhibit 1)
Physical Characteristics:
The 24.076-acre tract is centrally located within the existing Georgetown Village development.
The property is fairly level with 13 Heritage Trees to be saved and extensive existing tree
coverage.
History
Georgetown Village was approved as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) with the original Concept
Planning Department Staff Report
Georgetown Village Oaks Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 3
Plan, last revised in March 2000. PUDs were allowed as an Alternative Form of Subdivision under
the Subdivision Regulations (Section 29010) in effect at the time of the Concept Plan approval. The
subject property was annexed into the City by Ordinance 2007-81 with the initial zoning of
Agriculture (AG) District. A rezoning from AG to PUD with a C-1 base district was approved by
City Council on May 27, 2014.
2030 Plan Conformance
The proposed Preliminary Plat is in conformance with the 2030 Plan land use designation of Mixed
Use Community and Moderate Density Residential, which applies to areas that include residential,
retail and office uses integrated with open spaces.
The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1A (Developed, Redeveloping), which is the
portion of the City where infrastructure systems are in place, or can be economically provided, and
where the bulk of the City’s growth should be guided over the near term.
Utilities
Electric, water, and wastewater are served by the City of Georgetown. It is anticipated that there is
adequate capacity to serve this property either by existing capacity or developer participation in
upgrades to infrastructure.
Transportation
The access to this project is provided via Leander Road. The future subdivision will provide
connectivity to the existing Riverview Subdivision and potentially to the future development to the
west.
Future Application(s)
The following applications will be required to be submitted:
• Final Plat is to be processed administratively;
• Construction Plans will be processed administratively;
• Site Plans for the commercial areas will be processed administratively; and Building permits
for construction.
Staff Analysis
The development of Lots 1 and 2 as open space/parkland will provide a passive use public area for
the community and residents.
Lot 3 is proposed as the senior living facility with Lot 4 being a private driveway. Lots 5 and 6 will
be developed as commercial lots along Shell Road. All the proposed development is consistent with
the PUD Development Plan.
Planning Department Staff Report
Georgetown Village Oaks Preliminary Plat Page 3 of 3
Staff Recommendation and Basis:
Staff supports the Preliminary Plat as it meets the requirements of the City’s UDC and
Comprehensive Plan.
Special Consideration:
None
Interdepartmental, Governmental and Agency Comments
None
Public Comments
Public notice is not required for a preliminary plat application. There have been no public comments
received at the time of this report.
Proposed Meetings Schedule
August 5, 2014 – Planning and Zoning Commission
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Location Map
Exhibit 2 – Preliminary Plat
CITY OF
GEORGETOWN
Georgetown ETJ
GREENSIDE LN
VILLAGECOMMONSBLVD
TASCATEST
WESTBURY LN
SHELL
RD
SYCAMOREST
ROSEBUD LN
VILLAGE PARK DR
BELLAIREDR
BLUEH A W DR
VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD
SUMMERS GREEN
CEDARELMLN
W
E
S
T
B
U
R
Y
L
N
FAI RFIELDCT
HICKORY LN
PP-2014-010
PP-2014-010Exhibit #1
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 500 1,000Feet ¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
S hell R dWilliams Dr
D e l Web b Blvd
Site
City Limits
Street
Site ³
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning of .19 acres of the Lost Addition, Block 63
(PT), from Residential (RS) District to Mixed Use – Downtown (MU-DT) District, located at 1008
Rock Street. REZ-2014-010 (Matt Synatschk)
ITEM SUMMARY:
The applicant is requesting to rezone .19 acres of Block 63 of the Lost Addition from Residential
Single Family (RS) to Mixed Use-Downtown (MU-DT) to facilitate additional uses for the
property. The property is located within the Downtown Overlay District, which is primarily zoned
MU-DT to support the variety of uses typically seen historically.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
REZ-2014-010 Staff Report Backup Material
REZ-2014-010 Location Map Backup Material
REZ-2014-010 Future Land Use Backup Material
REZ-2014-010 Zoning Map Backup Material
REZ-2014-010 Aerial Backup Material
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
1008 Rock Street - Rezoning Page 1 of 3
RS to MU-DT
Report Date: July 29, 2014
File No: REZ-2014-010
Project Planner: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
Item Details
Project Name: 1008 Rock Street
Project Address: 1008 Rock Street
Location: North west corner of intersection of Rock and 11th Streets (See Exhibit 1)
Total Acreage: .19 acres
Legal Description: .19 acres of the Lost Addition, Block 63 (PT)
Applicant: John Jennings
Property Owner: John Jennings
Contact: John Jennings
Existing Use: Residential
Existing Zoning: Residential Single Family (RS)
Proposed Zoning: Mixed Use – Downtown (MU-DT) District
Future Land Use: Specialty Mixed Use Area
Growth Tier: Tier 1A
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant has requested to rezone one parcel of land from the Residential Single-family (RS) District
to Mixed Use – Downtown (MU-DT) District. The Future Land Use designation for this area is Specialty
Mixed Use Area, and the proposed district is generally consistent with that category. The MU-DT district
is reserved for properties located within the Downtown Overlay District and allows for a mix of
commercial and residential uses, consistent with the historical growth of the downtown area.
Site Information
Location:
The property is located at the intersection of Rock and 11th Streets, inside the Downtown Overlay District.
See Exhibits 1 and 4.
Physical Characteristics:
The property is currently developed, with structures including a primary residential unit and an accessory
garage building.
Surrounding Properties:
The surrounding properties include single-family residential structures, small residential structures
converted to offices, and local commercial structures along Austin Avenue. See Exhibit 3
Property History
The property is currently developed, with a structure and an accessory garage located on the site. The Low
priority historic structure was constructed in 1916 and has been modified to include and enclosed porch
and other exterior alterations. The property was added to the Downtown Overlay District in 2001, with the
adoption of Ord 2001-048.
Planning Department Staff Report
1008 Rock Street - Rezoning Page 2 of 3
RS to MU-DT
2030 Plan Conformance
Land Use:
The proposed rezoning is in conformance with the 2030 Plan land use designation of Specialty Mixed Use
Area, providing for a variety of uses consistent with the historical development of the downtown core. The
land use designation generally supports the proposed Mixed Use – Downtown zoning district. The
surrounding development pattern is very similar, if not identical, to that which could be developed in
accordance with the proposed district.The proposed zoning district is also consistent with the Downtown
Master Plan, adopted by City Council in 2014.
Growth Tier:
The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1A, which is that portion of the city where
infrastructure systems are in place, or can be economically provided and where the bulk of the city’s
growth should be guided over the near term.
Proposed Zoning Districts
As shown in Exhibit 3, the applicant is seeking to rezone the subject property Mixed Use – Downtown
(MU-DT) District, which is intended for areas located within the Downtown Overlay District and supports
multiple uses, including residential, commercial office and retail.
Utilities
The existing electric service and water and wastewater service are provided by the City of Georgetown. No
utility changes are required for the property.
Transportation
The subject property will not generate a significant increase in traffic and a traffic impact analysis is not
required with this application.
Future Application(s)
The following applications will be required to be submitted:
• Certificate of Design Complaince for signage and exterior alterations
• The site may require a plat if determined to not be a legal lot
• Site Plans for the commercial development will be processed administratively; and
• Building permits for interior and exterior changes.
Staff Analysis
Staff is supportive of the requested rezoning for the following reasons:
1. The Future Land Use designation of Mixed Use – Downtown (MU-DT) supports the proportion and
location of the proposed district.
2. The existing zoning and use pattern of the surrounding area matches that of the proposed district.
3. The Downtown Master Plan and the 2030 Comprehensive Plan designate the property for mixed use
development, ensuring the continued success of the Downtown Overlay District.
Inter Departmental, Governmental and Agency Comments
None
Planning Department Staff Report
1008 Rock Street - Rezoning Page 3 of 3
RS to MU-DT
Public Comments
A total of 25 notices were sent out to property owners within 200 feet of the proposed rezoning. Public
notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on July 16th, 2014. As of the writing of this report, no written
comments have been received.
Meetings Schedule
August 5, 2014 – Planning and Zoning Commission
August 26, 2014 – City Council First Reading
September 9, 2014 – City Council Second Reading
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Location Map
Exhibit 2 - Future Land Use Map
Exhibit 3 – Zoning Map
Exhibit 4 – 2014 Aerial Map
W 9 T H S T
W 1 0 T H S T
W11T H ST
W U N I V E R S I T Y AV E
S
A
U
S
T
I
N
AV
E
T
I
N
B
A
R
N
A
LY
ROCK
ST
M
A
R
TIN
L
U
T
H
E
R
K
I
N
G
J
R
S
T
F
O
R
E
S
T
S
T
TIM
B
ER
S
T F
O
R
E
S
T
S
T
REZ-2 014-010
REZ-2014-010Exhibit #1
Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 250 500Feet ¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
S
Austin
Ave
§¨¦35
Site
City Lim its
Street
Site
³
W Univer sity Ave
W 9 T H S T
W 1 0 T H S T
W11THST
W U N I V E R S I T Y AV E
S A
U
S
T
IN
AV
E
T
I
N
B
A
R
N
A
LY
F
O
R
E
S
T
S
T
ROCK
ST
MARTIN
L
U
T
H
E
R
K
I
N
G
J
R
S
T
TIM
B
ER
S
T F
O
R
E
S
T
S
T
REZ-2
014-010
0 250 500Feet
Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan
Exhibit #2REZ-2014-010
Legend
Thoroughfare
Future Land Use
Institutional
Regional Com mercial
Community Com mercial
Employment Center
HIgh Density Residential
Low Density Residential
Mining
Mixed Use Com munity
Mixed Use Neighborhood Center
Moderate Density Residential
Open Space
Specialty Mixed Use Area
Ag / Rural Residential §¨¦35
S Austin Ave
W Univ ers ity Av e
Site
³
City Lim its
Street
Site
Existing Collector
Existing Freeway
Existing Major Arterial
Existing Minor Arterial
Existing Ramp
Proposed Collector
Proposed Freeway
Propsed Frontage Road
Proposed Major Arterial
Proposed Minor Arterial
Proposed Railroad
REZ-2 014-010
W11THST
W U N I V E R S I T Y AV E
S
A
U
S
T
I
N
AV
E
T
I
N
B
A
R
N
A
LY
ROCK
ST
W 1 0 T H S T
W 9 T H S T
TIM
BER
S
T
F
O
R
E
S
T
S
T
M
A
R
T
I
N
L
U
TH
ER
KIN
G
J
R
S
T
0 200 400Feet
Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJREZ-2014-010Zoning Information
Exhibit #3
W University Ave
S Au
s
ti
n
A
ve
§¨¦35
§¨¦35
³
City Limits
Street
Site
Site
REZ-2014-010
W 9 T H S T
W 1 0TH S T
W 11TH ST
T
I
N
B
A
R
N
A
LY
W U N I V E R S I T Y AV E
M
A
R
T
I
N
L
U
T
H
E
R
K
I
N
G
J
R
S
T
F
O
R
E
S
T
S
T
ROCK
ST
S
A
U
S
T
I
N
AV
E
TIM
BER
S
T
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
0 250 500Feet
Exhibit #4REZ-2014-010
§¨¦35
Site
City Lim its
Street
Site ³
W Univ ers ity Av e
S Austin Ave
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning of a portion of .704 acres at S3667 -
Georgetown City Of, BLOCK 2, Lot 5-7, (Pt) 8 & Abandoned Road, from Residential (RS)
District to Mixed Use – Downtown (MU-DT) District, located at 109 West 2nd Street. REZ-2014-
013
ITEM SUMMARY:
The applicant is requesting to rezone a portion .704 acres of Block 2 of the City of Georgetown
from Residential Single Family (RS) to Mixed Use-Downtown (MU-DT) to facilitate additional
uses for the property. The property is located within the Downtown Overlay District, which is
primarily zoned MU-DT to support the variety of uses typically seen historically.
The property was zoned C-2 Downtown (later renamed MU-DT) in 2004. In 2006, the City of
Georgetown sold the abandoned 1st Street ROW to the property owner, but the current RS zoning
was not changed at that time.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. The applicant has paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
REZ-2014-013 Staff Report Backup Material
REZ-2014-013 Location Map Backup Material
REZ-2014-013 Future Land Use Map Backup Material
REZ-2014-013 Current Zoning Map Backup Material
REZ-2014-013 Aerial Image Backup Material
REZ-2014-013 Ordinance 2004-43 Backup Material
REZ-2014-013 City Council Resolution 102406 Backup Material
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
109 West 2nd Street - Rezoning Page 1 of 3
RS to MU-DT
Report Date: July 31, 2014
File No: REZ-2014-013
Project Planner: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
Item Details
Project Name: 109 West 2nd Street Rezoning
Project Address: 109 West 2nd Street
Location: Northeast corner of South Austin Avenue and 2nd Street (See Exhibit 1)
Total Acreage: .08 acres
Legal Description: .08 acres of the Lost Addition, Block 63 (PT)
Applicant: Austin Pfiester
Property Owner: WAAPF Properties, LLC
Contact: Austin Pfiester
Existing Use: Residential
Existing Zoning: Residential Single-family (RS)
Proposed Zoning: Mixed Use – Downtown (MU-DT) District
Future Land Use: Specialty Mixed Use Area
Growth Tier: Tier 1A
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant has requested to rezone a portion of a parcel of land from the Residential Single-family (RS)
District to Mixed Use – Downtown (MU-DT) District. The Future Land Use designation for this area is
Specialty Mixed Use Area, and the proposed district is consistent with that category (see Exhibit 2). The
MU-DT district is reserved for properties located within the Downtown Overlay District and allows for a
mix of commercial and residential uses, consistent with the historical growth of the downtown area.
Site Information
Location:
The property is located at the intersection of South Austin Avenue and 2nd Street, inside the Downtown
Overlay District. (See Exhibits 1 and 4).
Physical Characteristics:
The property was previously developed and recently cleared for future development.
Surrounding Properties:
The surrounding properties include single-family residential structures, small residential structures
converted to offices, and local commercial structures along Austin Avenue. (See Exhibit 3)
Property History
The property was previously developed and recently cleared for future development. The previous use was
residential, with a single story structure and one accessory building located on the parcel. The property was
added to the Downtown Overlay District in 2001, with the adoption of Ord 2001-048. In 2004, the existing
parcel was rezoned to C-2 Downtown, the predecessor to the Mixed Use – Downtown zoning district (see
Exhibit 5). In 2006, as part of a City initiated land swap, the partial parcel was deeded to the property
owner, with City Council direction to rezone the property to Mixed Use – Downtown (see Exhibit 6).
Planning Department Staff Report
109 West 2nd Street - Rezoning Page 2 of 3
RS to MU-DT
2030 Plan Conformance
Land Use:
The proposed rezoning is in conformance with the 2030 Plan land use designation of Specialty Mixed Use
Area, providing for a variety of uses consistent with the historical development of the downtown core. The
land use designation generally supports the proposed Mixed Use – Downtown zoning district. The
surrounding development pattern is very similar, if not identical, to that which could be developed in
accordance with the proposed district.The proposed zoning district is also consistent with the Downtown
Master Plan, adopted by City Council in 2014.
Growth Tier:
The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1A, which is that portion of the city where
infrastructure systems are in place, or can be economically provided and where the bulk of the city’s
growth should be guided over the near term.
Proposed Zoning Districts
As shown in Exhibit 3, the applicant is seeking to rezone the subject property Mixed Use – Downtown
(MU-DT) District, which is intended for areas located within the Downtown Overlay District and supports
multiple uses, including residential, commercial office and retail.
Utilities
The existing electric service and water and wastewater service are provided by the City of Georgetown. No
utility changes are required for the property.
Transportation
The subject property will not generate a significant increase in traffic and a traffic impact analysis is not
required for this application.
Future Application(s)
The following applications will be required to be submitted:
• Subdivision Plat;
• Certificate of Design Complaince for infill construction;
• Site Plans; and
• Building permits for interior and exterior changes.
Staff Analysis
Staff is supportive of the requested rezoning for the following reasons:
1. The Future Land Use designation of Mixed Use – Downtown (MU-DT) supports the proportion and
location of the proposed district.
2. The existing zoning and use pattern of the surrounding area matches that of the proposed district.
3. The Downtown Master Plan and the 2030 Comprehensive Plan designate the property for mixed use
development, ensuring the continued success of the Downtown Overlay District.
Inter Departmental, Governmental and Agency Comments
None
Planning Department Staff Report
109 West 2nd Street - Rezoning Page 3 of 3
RS to MU-DT
Public Comments
A total of 5 notices were sent out to property owners within 200 feet of the proposed rezoning. Public
notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on July 16th, 2014. As of the writing of this report, no written
comments have been received.
Meetings Schedule
August 5, 2014 – Planning and Zoning Commission
August 26, 2014 – City Council First Reading
September 9, 2014 – City Council Second Reading
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Location Map
Exhibit 2 - Future Land Use Map
Exhibit 3 – Zoning Map
Exhibit 4 – 2014 Aerial Map
Exhibit 5 – ORD 2004-043
Exhibit 6 – City Council Resolution 102406
(R i v e r /S t r e a m )
E 3 R D S T
E 2N D S T
W 3 R D S T
BLUE
H
O
L
E
PARK
R
D
N
A
U
S
T
I
N
AV
E
S
A
N
G
A
B
R
I
E
L
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
B
L
V
D
R
OC
K
S
T
S M
A
IN
ST
S
C
H
U
R
C
H
S
T
W 2 N D S T
REZ-2 014-013
REZ-2014-013
Exhibit #1
Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 250 500Feet ¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
§¨¦35
Site
City Lim its
Street
Site ³
N
A
u
s
t
i
n A
v
e
C
ol
l
e
g
e
S
t
E Morrow St
(R i v e r /S t r e a m )
E 3 R D S T
E 2N D S T
R
OC
K
S
T
SAN G A B R I E L V I L L A G E B L V D
S M
A
IN
S
T
S
C
H
U
R
C
H
S
T
W 3 R D S T
N
A
U
S
T
I
N
AV
E
BLUE HOLEPARKRD
W 2 N D S T
REZ-2 014-013
0 250 500
Feet
Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan
Exhibit #2REZ-2014-013
Legend
Thoroughfare
Future Land Use
Institutional
Regional Com mercial
Community Com mercial
Employment Center
HIgh Density Residential
Low Density Residential
Mining
Mixed Use Com munity
Mixed Use Neighborhood Center
Moderate Density Residential
Open Space
Specialty Mixed Use Area
Ag / Rural Residential
N Austin Ave
§¨¦35
Co
l
le
g
e
St
Morrow St
Site
³
City Lim its
Street
Site
Existing Collector
Existing Freeway
Existing Major Arterial
Existing Minor Arterial
Existing Ramp
Proposed Collector
Proposed Freeway
Propsed Frontage Road
Proposed Major Arterial
Proposed Minor Arterial
Proposed Railroad
(R i v e r /S t r e a m )
REZ-2 014-013
E 3 R D S T
E 2N D S T
R
OC
K
S
T
S M
AIN
S
T
SAN G A B R I E L V I L L A G E B L V D
S
C
H
U
R
C
H
S
T
W 3 R D S T
N
A
U
S
T
I
N
AV
E
BLUE HOLEPARKRD
W 2 N D S T
0 250 500Feet
Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJREZ-2014-013Zoning Information
Exhibit #3
§¨¦35³
City Limits
Street
Site
Site
E M o rro w S t
N Austin Ave
REZ-2014-013
N
A
U
S
T
I
N
AV
E
E 3 R D S T
E 2N D S T
R
OC
K
S
T
THOMAS CT
S M
AIN
S
T
S A N G A B R I E L V I L L A G E B L V D
BLUE HOLEPARK RD
W 3 R D S T
S
C
H
U
R
C
H
S
T
W 2 N D S T
S
A
U
S
T
I
N
AV
E
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
0 250 500Feet
Exhibit #4
REZ-2014-013
EMorrowSt
§¨¦35
N Austin Ave
Site
City Lim its
Street
Site ³
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a Final Plat of a Replat of Woods of Fountainwood,
Section 6, Block A, Lot 11, located at 213 Gunn Ranch Road.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background: The applicant proposes to Replat Woods of Fountainwood, Section 6, Block A, Lot
11 to adjust a drainage easement located on this lot.
Public Comments: A total of 4 notices were sent out to property owners within 200 feet of the
original platted lots. Public notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on July 20th, 2014. As of the
writing of this report, no comments have been received.
Recommended Motion: Approval of a Final Plat of a Replat of Woods of Fountainwood, Section
6, Block A, Lot 11, located at 213 Gunn Ranch Road.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The applicant has paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Carla J. Benton
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Cover Memo
Report Exdhibit 1 Backup Material
Report Exhibit 2 Backup Material
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Replat of Woods of Fountainwood, Sec. 6, Blk A, Lot 11 Page 1 of 3
FP-2014-025
Report Date: July 22, 2014
File No: FP-2014-025
Project Planner: Carla Benton, Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Replat of Woods of Fountainwood, Section 6, Block A, Lot 11
Project Address: 213 Gunn Ranch Road
Location: 213 Gunn Ranch Road (see Exhibit 1)
Total Acreage: 1.870 acres
Legal Description: Woods of Fountainwood, Section 6, Block A, Lot 11
Applicant: Tim Haynie, P.E., Haynie Consulting
Property Owner: Bobby Fredrickson
Contact: Tim Haynie, P.E., Haynie Consulting
Proposed Lots: 1 existing residential lot
Streets Proposed: None
Parkland: Parkland requirements were met by original plat
Heritage Trees: There are no Heritage Trees on this plat
Existing Use: Undeveloped lot
Existing Zoning: Located in the extra-territorial jurisdiction (ETJ); no zoning
Growth Tier: Tier 3
Applicant’s Request
The applicant proposes to Replat Woods of Fountainwood, Section 6, Block A, Lot 11 to adjust a
drainage easement located on this lot.
Site Information
Location:
The property is located on Gunn Ranch Road off of County Road 262 (Russell Park Road).
Physical Characteristics:
The tract is an undeveloped lot, located in the Extra-territorial Jurisdiction of the city.
History
The Woods of Fountainwood, Section 6 was recorded in the Official Plat documents of Williamson
County on January 31, 2011.
Planning Department Staff Report
Replat of Woods of Fountainwood, Sec. 6, Blk A, Lot 11 Page 2 of 3
FP-2014-025
2030 Plan Conformance
The proposed Final Plat is in conformance with the 2030 Plan land use designation of Low Density
Residential. This land use category comprises single family neighborhoods that can be
accommodated at a density ranging between 1.1 and 3 dwelling units per gross acre.
This project is located within Tier 3 of the City’s Growth Tier Plan. Tier 3 lies outside the city limits,
but within the City’s Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). This area is not anticipated to be needed to
serve the city’s growth needs for 20 years.
Utilities
Utilities will be provided by Pedernales Electric, Chisholm Trail SUD for water and septic is
provided on-site. Public utility easements were dedicated with the original plat according to the City
of Georgetown standards. An adjusted drainage easement is being dedicated with this plat.
Transportation
This lot is accessed from Gunn Ranch Road via County Road 262.
Future Application(s)
No additional applications with the City of Georgetown will be required for this development.
Staff Analysis
Staff Recommendation and Basis:
Staff supports the Final Plat as it meets the requirements of the City’s Unified Development Code.
The original plat, on the left, provided a drainage easement through this lot and it has been
determined that the new plat, on the right, will provide a better design for this area.
Original Plat Proposed redesigned easement
Planning Department Staff Report
Replat of Woods of Fountainwood, Sec. 6, Blk A, Lot 11 Page 3 of 3
FP-2014-025
Special Consideration:
None
Interdepartmental, Governmental and Agency Comments
None
Public Comments
A total of 4 notices were sent out to property owners within 200 feet of the original platted lots.
Public notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on July 20th, 2014. As of the writing of this report,
no comments have been received.
Proposed Meetings Schedule
August 5, 2014 – Planning and Zoning Commission
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Location Map
Exhibit 2 – Final Plat
R E E F L N
H
EL
M
L
N
T
I
L
L
E
R
L
N
BRANTD R
H A R B O R D R
R
E
D
B
I
R
D
T
R
L
F M 3 4 0 5
C A P S T A N L N
A
N
C
H
O
R
D
R
SANMARIN
O
T
R
L
B
U
O
Y
D
R
VENEZIACIR
S P R A Y L N
B E L L A V I S TA
D
E
C
K
D
R
T U S C A N Y W A Y
W
O
O
D
C
R
E
S
T
R
D
HIGHLANDSPRINGLN
CR
262
C
R
2
6
2
S
H
O
A
L
D
R
J
I
B
C
I
R
M A R Q U E S A T R L
MARQUESATR
L
W
H
I
T
N
E
Y
W
OODS C I R
PORTO A F I N O LN
FP-2014-025
FP-2014-025
Exhibit #1
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 1,000 2,000Feet ¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
3405
2338
Site
City Limits
Street
Site
³
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Subject: Public Hearing and possible action on a Final Plat of a Replat of Woods of
Fountainwood, Section 5, Block A, Lot 6, located at 133 Tuscany Way.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background: The applicant proposes to Replat Woods of Fountainwood, Section 5, Block A, Lot
6 to adjust a drainage easement located on this lot.
Public Comments: A total of 6 notices were sent out to property owners within 200 feet of the
original platted lots. Public notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on July 20th, 2014. As of the
writing of this report, no comments have been received.
Recommended Motion: Approval of a Final Plat of a Replat of Woods of Fountainwood, Section
5, Block A, Lot 6.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The applicant has paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Carla J. Benton
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Cover Memo
Report Exhibit 1 Backup Material
Report Exhibit 2 Backup Material
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Replat of Woods of Fountainwood, Sec. 5, Blk A, Lot 6 Page 1 of 3
FP-2014-026
Report Date: July 22, 2014
File No: FP-2014-026
Project Planner: Carla Benton, Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Replat of Woods of Fountainwood, Section 5, Block A, Lot 6
Project Address: 133 Tuscany Way
Location: 133 Tuscany Way (see Exhibit 1)
Total Acreage: 1.12 acres
Legal Description: Woods of Fountainwood, Section 5, Block A, Lot 6
Applicant: Tim Haynie, P.E., Haynie Consulting
Property Owner: Bobby Fredrickson
Contact: Tim Haynie, P.E., Haynie Consulting
Proposed Lots: 1 existing residential lot
Streets Proposed: None
Parkland: Parkland requirements were met by original plat
Heritage Trees: There are no Heritage Trees on this plat
Existing Use: Undeveloped lot
Existing Zoning: Located in the extra-territorial jurisdiction (ETJ); no zoning
Growth Tier: Tier 3
Applicant’s Request
The applicant proposes to Replat Woods of Fountainwood, Section 5, Block A, Lot 6 to adjust a
drainage easement located on this lot.
Site Information
Location:
The property is located on Tuscany Way off of Marquesa Trail, Highland Spring Land and Diamond
Trail west of Jim Hogg Road.
Physical Characteristics:
The tract is an undeveloped lot, located in the Extra-territorial Jurisdiction of the city.
History
The Woods of Fountainwood, Section 5 was recorded in the Official Plat documents of Williamson
County on June 21, 2012.
Planning Department Staff Report
Replat of Woods of Fountainwood, Sec. 5, Blk A, Lot 6 Page 2 of 3
FP-2014-026
2030 Plan Conformance
The proposed Final Plat is in conformance with the 2030 Plan land use designation of Low Density
Residential. This land use category comprises single family neighborhoods that can be
accommodated at a density ranging between 1.1 and 3 dwelling units per gross acre.
This project is located within Tier 3 of the City’s Growth Tier Plan. Tier 3 lies outside the city limits,
but within the City’s Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). This area is not anticipated to be needed to
serve the city’s growth needs for 20 years.
Utilities
Utilities will be provided by Pedernales Electric, Chisholm Trail SUD for water and septic is
provided on-site. Public utility easements were dedicated with the original plat according to the City
of Georgetown standards. An adjusted drainage easement is being dedicated with this plat.
Transportation
This lot is accessed from Tuscany Way via Jim Hogg Road, off of RM 2338.
Future Application(s)
No additional applications with the City of Georgetown will be required for this development.
Staff Analysis
Staff Recommendation and Basis:
Staff supports the Final Plat as it meets the requirements of the City’s Unified Development Code.
The original plat, on the left, provided a smaller drainage easement through this lot and it has been
determined that the new plat, on the right, will provide a better design for this area.
Original Plat Proposed redesigned easement
Planning Department Staff Report
Replat of Woods of Fountainwood, Sec. 5, Blk A, Lot 6 Page 3 of 3
FP-2014-026
Special Consideration:
None
Interdepartmental, Governmental and Agency Comments
None
Public Comments
A total of 6 notices were sent out to property owners within 200 feet of the original platted lots.
Public notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on July 20th, 2014. As of the writing of this report,
no comments have been received.
Proposed Meetings Schedule
August 5, 2014 – Planning and Zoning Commission
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Location Map
Exhibit 2 – Final Plat
C
R
2
6
2
MARQUESA TRL
R E E F L ND
E
C
K
D
R
A
N
C
H
O
R
D
R
G U N N R A N C H R D
C A P S T A N L N
SAN MARINO TRL
B E L L A V I S T A
S P R A Y L N
VENEZIACIR
H
E
L
M
L
N
T U S C A N Y W A Y
FP-2014-026Exhibit #1
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 500 1,000Feet ¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
3405
2338
Site
City Limits
Street
Site
³
FP-2014-026
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning of 2.81 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey,
from the Residential Single-family (RS) District to the Local Commercial (C-1) District, located at
1502 Williams Drive. REZ-2014-014 (Valerie Kreger)
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The applicant has requested to rezone the undeveloped 2.81 acre tract from Residential Single-
Family (RS) District, assigned upon annexation in 1954, to Local Commercial (C-1) District to
allow for future commercial development of the property.
Public Comment:
As of the writing of this report, no public comment has been received regarding this rezoning
request.
Recommended Motion:
Recommend to City Council approval of the request to rezone 2.81 acres in the N. Porter Survey
from Residential Single-family (RS) to Local Commercial (C-1).
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The applicant has paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Valerie Kreger
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Cover Memo
Exhibit 1 - Zoning Map Exhibit
Exhibit 2 - Future Land Use Map Exhibit
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
1502 Williams Drive Rezoning Page 1 of 4
Report Date: July 31, 2014
File No: REZ-2014-014
Project Planner: Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner
Item Description
Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning of 2.81 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey, from
the Residential Single-family (RS) District to the Local Commercial (C-1) District, located at 1502
Williams Drive.
Item Details
Project Name: 1502 Williams Drive Rezoning
Location: 1502 Williams Drive (See Exhibit 1)
Total Acreage: 2.81 acres
Legal Description: 2.81 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey
Applicant: Ken Brown, Brown & Ortiz, P.C.
Property Owner: Georgetown Alamo Investors, LLC
Existing Use: Undeveloped
Existing Zoning: Residential Single-Family (RS)
Proposed Zoning: Local Commercial (C-1)
Future Land Use: Specialty Mixed Use
Growth Tier: Tier 1A
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant has requested to rezone the undeveloped 2.81 acre tract from Residential Single-
Family (RS) District, assigned upon annexation in 1954, to Local Commercial (C-1) District to allow
for future commercial development of the property.
Site Information
Location:
This property is located along the south side of Williams Drive between Rivery Boulevard and
Morris Drive, just west of IH 35.
Physical Characteristics:
The site is relatively flat along Williams Drive, with the river at the rear of the property. The site
appears to have significant tree coverage, however, a tree survey has not yet been completed to
determine species and size of the trees.
Surrounding Properties:
The surrounding properties include a bank, a retail development, and undeveloped property, as well
as city parkland.
Planning Department Staff Report
1502 Williams Drive Rezoning Page 2 of 4
Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use
North (across
Williams Dr.) C-1 Specialty Mixed Use Advanced Auto Parts
South C-3 Open Space Rivery Park
East RS Specialty Mixed Use Undeveloped
West C-1 Specialty Mixed Use Extraco Bank
(See Exhibits 1 and 2)
Property History
The City annexed the subject property in May of 1954 (Ordinance #54-A2) and the property was
assigned the default zoning at that time, residential. No development has occurred on the property
since its annexation.
2030 Plan Conformance
The 2030 Plan land use designation of Specialty Mixed Use is designed to accommodate large-scale
mixed-use developments that are mostly commercial. This designation supports centers with a
variety of complementary uses, with an emphasis on retail, offices, and entertainment activities.
While this tract in itself is not large enough to accommodate a large-scale mixed-use development,
it’s proposed commercial uses can contribute to the larger concept of mixed-use development
planned for this area.
The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1A, which is the portion of the City where
infrastructure systems are in place, or can be economically provided, and where the bulk of the City’s
growth should be guided over the near term.
Planning Department Staff Report
1502 Williams Drive Rezoning Page 3 of 4
Proposed Zoning District
The Local Commercial (C-1) district provides for areas of commercial and retail activities that
primarily serve residential areas. The District is more appropriate along major or minor
thoroughfares and corridors including Westinghouse Road. Allowed uses include, but are not limited
to, restaurants, offices, retail sales, and personal services.
Utilities
The City of Georgetown provides water, wastewater, and electric services at this location.
Transportation
The site is located along Williams Drive, a major arterial. The subject property has approximately 230
feet of frontage on Williams Drive. Access to the property is provided via a shared driveway to
Williams Drive.
Future Application(s)
Development of this property will require the following applications:
• If the tract is not determined to be a legal lot, a subdivision plat will be required
• Site Plan processed administratively; and
• Building Permit processed administratively.
Staff Analysis
Staff Recommendation and Basis:
This application proposes a rezoning from Residential Single-Family (RS) District to Local
Commercial (C-1) District. Staff is supportive of the proposed request for rezoning based on the
following:
1. The request is consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Specialty Mixed Use Category,
which supports the proposed commercial development when viewed in context with the larger
overall area.
2. The surrounding properties are either developed or developing with commercial uses as the
residential uses directly along Williams Drive in this area redevelop.
3. The transportation network supports the proposed rezoning as the property is located on a
major arterial road.
Inter Departmental, Governmental and Agency Comments
None
Public Comments
Nine notices were sent out to owners of property within 200 feet of the proposed rezoning. Public
notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on July 20th, 2014. As of the writing of this report, no
public comment has been received.
Planning Department Staff Report
1502 Williams Drive Rezoning Page 4 of 4
Special Considerations
None
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Zoning Map
Exhibit 2 – Future Land Use Map
Meetings Schedule
August 5, 2014 – Planning and Zoning Commission
August 26, 2014 – City Council First Reading
September 9, 2014– City Council Second Reading
(River/Stre
a
m
)
REZ-2014-014
WO
O
D
L
A
W
N
A
V
E
W O L F RA NCH P K WY
HINTZ RD
PARKW
A
Y
S
T
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
D
R
COUNTRYCLUBRD
RANC
H
R
D
M
E
S
Q
U
I
T
E
L
N
P
A
R
K
L
N
MCC
O
Y
L
N
SHANNONLN
EXIT261SB
E JA
N
I
S
D
R
MORRI
S
D
R
CEDAR
D
R
WILLIAMSDRTNNB
W C E N TR AL DR
O
A
K
L
N
ADAMS ST
RIVE
R
Y
B
L
V
D
HIGHKNOLL L N
RIVER
S
I
D
E
D
R
W JA
N
I
S
D
R
0 500 1,000Feet
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJREZ-2014-014Zoning Information
Exhibit #1
B o oty'sCrossingRd
Willia
m
s
Dr
Lake way Dr
EMorrow St§¨¦35
R
i
v
e
ry
Blvd
³City Limits
Street
Site
Site
(River/Stre
a
m
)
WOODLAWN AVE
W O L F R A N C H P K WY
HINTZ RD
P A R K W A Y S T
W
IL
LIA
M
S D
R
COUNTRYCLUBRD
M
E
S
Q
UIT
E L
N
R A N C H R D
P
A
R
K L
N
WILLIAMS D R
SHANNON LN
EXIT 261 SB
E JANIS DR
PARKLN
M O R RIS D R
C E D A R D R
WILLIAMS DR TN NB
W C E N T R AL DR
O
A
K L
N
RIVERY BLVD
A D A M S S T
HIGHKNOLL L N
RIV E R SID E D R
W JANIS DR
REZ-2 014-014
0 500 1,000Feet
Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan
Exhibit #2REZ-2014-014
Legend
Thoroughfare
Future Land Use
Institutional
Regional Com mercial
Community Com mercial
Employment Center
HIgh Density Residential
Low Density Residential
Mining
Mixed Use Com munity
Mixed Use Neighborhood Center
Moderate Density Residential
Open Space
Specialty Mixed Use Area
Ag / Rural Residential Williams Dr
§¨¦35
Lake way Dr
N
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
B
l
v
d
Booty's CrossingRd
Rive
r
y
Blvd
§¨¦35
Co
ll
e
g
e
S
t
Site
³
City Lim its
Street
Site
Existing Collector
Existing Freeway
Existing Major Arterial
Existing Minor Arterial
Existing Ramp
Proposed Collector
Proposed Freeway
Propsed Frontage Road
Proposed Major Arterial
Proposed Minor Arterial
Proposed Railroad
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning of 92.61 acres in the Barney C. Low Survey, from the
Agriculture (AG) District to 6.03 acres of the Local Commercial (C-1) District, 13.02 acres of the Low
Density Multifamily (MF-1) District, and 73.56 acres of the Residential Single-family (RS) District,
located along the south side of Westinghouse Road, just east of Park Central Boulevard. REZ-2014-015
(Valerie Kreger)
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The applicant requests to rezone approximately 92.61 acres currently zoned Agriculture to 6.03 acres of
the Local Commercial (C-1) District, 13.02 acres of the Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District, and
73.56 acres of the Residential Single-family (RS) District. The intent is to create a mix of uses and
housing products, locating the more intense commercial development along Westinghouse Road with
single-family located adjacent to the Teravista neighborhood (in Round Rock's ETJ) and the detached
multifamily product acting as a buffer between the commercial and single-family uses.
This property is part of the Westinghouse Road Development Group (WRDG) bringing wastewater
improvements to Westinghouse Road in conjunction with a Utility Agreement with the City approved by
City Council on June 10, 2014. Also on June 10th, City Council approved creation of a Tax Increment
Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) that includes this property and will help facilitate infrastructure
improvements to this area. This is the first property within the WRDG and the TIRZ to move forward
with development applications.
Public Comments:
As of the writing of this report, one public comment has been received in support of the request.
Recommended Motion:
Recommend to City Council approval of the request to rezone 92.61 acres in the Barney C. Low Survey,
from Agriculture (AG) to Local Commercial (C-1), Low Density Multifamily (MF-1), and Residential
Single-family (RS).
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The applicant has paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Valerie Kreger
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Cover Memo
Exhibit 1 - Zoning Map Exhibit
Exhibit 2 - Future Land Use Map Exhibit
Exhibit 3 - Proposed Zoning Boundaries Exhibit
Exhibit 4 - Public Comment Exhibit
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Vera Anderson Tract Rezoning Page 1 of 5
Report Date: July 31, 2014
File No: REZ-2014-015
Project Planner: Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner
Item Description
Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning of 92.61 acres in the Barney C. Low Survey, from
the Agriculture (AG) District to 6.03 acres of the Local Commercial (C-1) District, 13.02 acres of the
Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District, and 73.56 acres of the Residential Single-family (RS)
District, located along the south side of Westinghouse Road, just east of Park Central Boulevard.
Item Details
Project Name: Vera Anderson Tract Rezoning
Location: 1050 Westinghouse Rd. (See Exhibit 1)
Total Acreage: 92.61 acres
Legal Description: 92.61 acres in the Low Survey
Applicant: David Singleton
Property Owner: Vera Anderson, Trustee
Existing Use: Undeveloped
Existing Zoning: Agriculture (AG)
Proposed Zoning: Local Commercial (C-1), Low Density Multifamily (MF-1), Residential
Single-Family (RS)
Future Land Use: Mixed Use Community
Growth Tier: Tier 2
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant requests to rezone approximately 92.61 acres currently zoned Agriculture to 6.03 acres
of the Local Commercial (C-1) District, 13.02 acres of the Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District,
and 73.56 acres of the Residential Single-family (RS) District. The intent is to create a mix of uses
and housing products, locating the more intense commercial development along Westinghouse Road
with single-family located adjacent to the Teravista neighborhood (in Round Rock’s ETJ) and the
detached multifamily product acting as a buffer between the commercial and single-family uses.
This property is part of the Westinghouse Road Development Group (WRDG) bringing wastewater
improvements to Westinghouse Road in conjunction with a Utility Agreement with the City
approved by City Council on June 10, 2014. Also on June 10th, City Council approved creation of a
Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) that includes this property and will help facilitate
infrastructure improvements to this area. This is the first property within the WRDG and the TIRZ to
move forward with development applications.
Planning Department Staff Report
Vera Anderson Tract Rezoning Page 2 of 5
Site Information
Location:
This property is located in the southeast portion of the City backing up to Round Rock’s ETJ. The
site is situated along the south side of Westinghouse Road, approximately 100 feet east of the
intersection of Park Central Boulevard and Westinghouse Road.
Physical Characteristics:
The property is fairly flat with a mild slope towards the southwest corner, where the majority of the
limited tree coverage is located. A tree survey has not yet been completed to determine species and
size of the trees. There are several small water features spread across the site, as well as various
insignificant agriculture structures.
Surrounding Properties:
The surrounding properties include undeveloped or industrial properties in the city limits and
residences in Round Rock’s ETJ.
Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use
North (across
Westinghouse Rd.) IN, BP Employment Center Ferguson Waterworks,
Undeveloped
South Round Rock ETJ Round Rock ETJ Teravista Subdivision
East AG,
Round Rock ETJ
Mixed Use Community,
Round Rock ETJ
Undeveloped,
Teravista Subdivision
West AG, MF-2 Employment Center,
High Density Residential
Toolman Corporation,
Undeveloped
(See Exhibits 1 and 2)
Planning Department Staff Report
Vera Anderson Tract Rezoning Page 3 of 5
Property History
The subject property was annexed into the city in December of 2011 (Ordinance #2011-55) and was
zoned Agriculture, the default zoning for annexation. No development has occurred on the property,
it remains vacant except for agricultural activities.
2030 Plan Conformance
The proposed rezoning is in conformance with the 2030 Plan land use designation of Mixed Use
Community, which is intended for large tracts of undeveloped land. This category supports larger
scale, creatively planned communities where a mix of residential types and densities are
complemented by supporting retail and small to medium scale office development.
The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 2, which is typically the City’s ETJ areas that
will likely be needed to serve the city’s growth needs over the next 10-20 years. However, the city
may consider requests for annexation, extension of city services, and rezonings in these areas.
Proposed Zoning District
As shown in Exhibit 3, the applicant is seeking to rezone the subject properties into the following
three zoning districts:
1. Local Commercial (C-1) District (6.03 acres) – The C-1 district provides for areas of
commercial and retail activities that primarily serve residential areas. The District is more
appropriate along major or minor thoroughfares and corridors including Westinghouse Road.
Allowed uses include, but are not limited to, restaurants, offices, retail sales, and personal
services.
2. Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District (13.02 acres) – The MF-1 district is intended for
attached and detached multifamily residential development at a density not to exceed 14
dwelling units per acre. This district is appropriate in areas envisioned as mixed-use on the
Future Land Use Plan and may serve as a transition zoning between single-family and
commercial districts.
3. Residential Single-Family (RS) District (73.56 acres) – The RS district is intended for areas of
medium density with a minimum lot size of 5,500 square feet and contains standards that
maintain single-family neighborhood characteristics.
Utilities
The City of Georgetown is the water and wastewater provider for this tract, while the tract is split
between the TXU electric service area and the Georgetown and TXU joint electric service area. This
property is part of the Westinghouse Road Development Group (WRDG) bringing wastewater
improvements to Westinghouse Road in conjunction with a Utility Agreement with the City
approved by City Council on June 10, 2014. Also on June 10th, City Council approved creation of a
Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) that includes this property and will help facilitate
infrastructure improvements to this area. This is the first property within the WRDG and the TIRZ to
move forward with development applications. The uses currently proposed for this project meet the
expectations of the 2030 Plan future land use designation of Mixed Use Community and are therefore
within the wastewater capacity assumptions calculated for this area.
Planning Department Staff Report
Vera Anderson Tract Rezoning Page 4 of 5
Transportation
The property is located along Westinghouse Road, a major arterial. The subject property has
approximately 735 feet of frontage on Williams Drive. The applicant proposes a new roadway that will
carry traffic through the property, although specific access points, including connectivity to
neighboring properties, will will be determined during platting and site plan review. A Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA) will be required when this property is subdivided.
Future Application(s)
Development of this property will require the following applications:
• Preliminary Plat(s) processed through the Planning and Zoning Commission;
• Final Plats processed administratively;
• Construction Plans for public infrastructure processed administratively;
• Site Plan(s) processed administratively (excluding single-family development); and
• Building Permits processed administratively.
Staff Analysis
Staff Recommendation and Basis:
This application proposes a rezoning from Agriculture (AG) District to Local Commercial (C-1)
District, Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District, and Residential Single-family (RS) District. Staff
is supportive of the proposed request for rezoning based on the following:
1. The request is consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Mixed Use Community
Category, which supports mixed residential types and densities complemented by supporting
retail.
2. The surrounding area within the City’s jurisdiction is predominantly undeveloped; however,
the area outside the City’s jurisdiction, in Round Rock’s ETJ, is developed with single-family
homes (Tervista). The arrangement of the proposed uses is appropriate given the adjacent
residential development.
3. The transportation network supports the proposed rezoning as the property is located along a
major arterial roadway.
Inter Departmental, Governmental and Agency Comments
None
Public Comments
Seven notices were sent out to owners of property within the city limits and within 200 feet of the
proposed rezoning. Public notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on July 20th, 2014. As of the
writing of this report, one public comment has been received in support of the request.
Special Considerations
None
Planning Department Staff Report
Vera Anderson Tract Rezoning Page 5 of 5
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Zoning Map
Exhibit 2 – Future Land Use Map
Exhibit 3 – Proposed Zoning Boundaries
Exhibit 4 – Public Comment
Meetings Schedule
August 5, 2014 – Planning and Zoning Commission
August 26, 2014 – City Council First Reading
September 9, 2014– City Council Second Reading
CITY OF
GEORGETOWN
CITY OF
GEORGETO
W
N
CITY OF
GEORGETOW
N
Georgetown ETJ
G e o r g e t o w n E T J
Georgetown
E
T
J
REZ-2014-015
W E S T I N G H O US E R D
TERAVISTA
XIN
G
B E N T W O O D P L
T E R A V I S T A
P K W Y
CENTERB
R
O
O
K
P
L
S U M M E R A Z U R E S T
M
EAD
O
W
V
I
S
T
A
L
N
COMMERC
E
B
L
V
D
L
O
N
E
T
R
E
E
PAT
H
R
A
B
B
I
T
H
I
L
L
R
D
P
A
R
K
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
B
L
V
D
C
E
R
V
I
N
I
A
DR
T E R A V I S T A C L U B D R
GREATVIEWDR
WIN DIN G CREEK P L
MONTEROSALN
B
L
U
E A G A V E L N
GREENSIDEDR
SAN
S
O
N
E
D
R
CALDWELL P A L M C I R
0 1,000 2,000Feet
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
REZ-2014-015Zoning Information
Exhibit #1
Westinghou
s
e
R
d
University B
l
v
d
.
§¨¦35³
City Limits
Street
Site
Site
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\
\\\
\\\
\\\
\\\
\\\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\
\\\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
C I T Y O F
G E O R G E T O W N
C I T Y O F
G E O R G E T O W N
C I T Y O F
G E O R G E T O W N
G e o r g e t o w n E T J
G e o r g e t o w n E T J
G e o r g e t o w n
E T J
G e o r g e t o w n E T JW E S T I N G H O U S E R D
TERA
V
I
S
T
A
X
I
N
G
T E R A V I S T A
P K W Y
C E N T E R B R O O K P L
PARKVISTA T R L
MEAD
O
W
V
I
S
T
A
L
N
P
L
A
C
I
D
C
R
E
E
K
W
A
Y
S U M M E R A Z U R E ST
M
ON T E ROSALOOP
C O M M E R C E B L V D
W E S T I N G H O U S E R D
C O U R M A YEURCT
L
O
N
E
T
R
E
E
P
A
T
H
R
A
B
B
I
T
H
I
L
L
R
D
P
A
R
K
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
B
L
V
D
T E R A V I S T A C L U B D R
C
E
R
V
I
NIA
DR
W IN DING CREEK P L GREATVIEW
DR
M O N T E R O S A L N
B
L
U
EA G A V E L N
PEA R L C R E S C E N T L N
GREENSIDED
R
SANSONE DR
CALDWELLPA LM C I R
REZ-2 014-015
0 1,000 2,000Feet
Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan
Exhibit #2REZ-2014-015
Legend
Thoroughfare
Future Land Use
Institutional
Regional Com mercial
Community Com mercial
Employment Center
HIgh Density Residential
Low Density Residential
Mining
Mixed Use Com munity
Mixed Use Neighborhood Center
Moderate Density Residential
Open Space
Specialty Mixed Use Area
Ag / Rural Residential
W e s ti n g h o u s e R d§¨¦35
U n i v e r s it y B l v d .
Site
³
City Lim its
Street
Site
Existing Collector
Existing Freeway
Existing Major Arterial
Existing Minor Arterial
Existing Ramp
Proposed Collector
Proposed Freeway
Propsed Frontage Road
Proposed Major Arterial
Proposed Minor Arterial
Proposed Railroad
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action regarding suggested Unified Development Code (UDC)
amendments to include in the 2014-2016 UDC amendment process.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
Planning & Zoning consideration and recommendation of this item is the second step in the
process of setting forth a list of suggested amendments to consider to the Unified Development
Code (UDC). Over the next couple of years this group of items will serve as a “to do list” for staff
to work from to draft potential text changes and updates to the UDC for City Council
consideration.
Between 2012 and 2013 City Council reviewed the existing UDC amendment process. The
changes City Council identified were to separate proposed amendments to the UDC into different
groups for purposes of processing. One of those groups was a “general” group of amendments that
would be grouped into a list approved by City Council. The potential amendments from that list
would be reviewed by an appointed committee, with public input, over a two year period.
The Unified Development Code Advisory Committee (UDCAC) was created in November of
2013, first appointments made in March 2014, with the primary responsibility of reviewing and
making recommendations regarding UDC amendments included as part of the General
Amendments List. The UDCAC also reviews and makes recommendations on the General
Amendments List itself. The proposed General Amendments List was considered by the UDCAC
on July 1st, 2014 and is now ready for Planning & Zoning Commission review and
recommendation prior to City Council consideration and final action.
The list of requested General Amendments (see Exhibit 1) consists of items requested by city staff,
items requested by the public, and items requested by members of the UDCAC. The list is grouped
by topics generally following the chapters of the UDC with the specific amendments list
separately followed by a description, a corresponding UDC chapter or section reference, and the
role of the requesting party (staff, public, or UDCAC). This list does not include any amendments
that will be prepared/ reviewed outside of the General Amendment review process, such as
Executive Amendments (incorporation of recently adopted ordinances, etc.) or those approved by
City Council to be reviewed separately from the standard review process (review of historic
related processes and requirements, etc.).
The 2014-2016 list of requested amendments is lengthy at 68 items. The majority are items
identified by staff, resulting from experiences applying the UDC where clarification or even
simplification is needed or where the UDC does not reflect actual practice. Also, staff has found
that certain regulations have become difficult to meet or are not producing the intended results.
The public requested three amendments either through applications, staff contact, or public
meeting input. The public amendment requests include creating a new district that would
accommodate a “micro lot” residential product or reducing the required Planned Unit
Development (PUD) district size; allowing Contractor Services Limited and General and Office
Warehouse uses in the General Commercial (C-3) district; and limiting uses in the Downtown
Overlay in order to create a transition zone adjacent the Old Town Overlay. Two items resulted
from UDCAC discussion including reduction of the 25,000 square foot building limitation in the
Local Commercial (C-1) district, and reduction of the required setbacks in the Industrial (IN)
district.
The new UDC amendment process discussed with City Council sets out that the General
Amendments List will be reviewed and adopted by City Council every two years, with adoption of
the UDC amendments themselves following the same schedule. While not codified into the UDC
yet at this time, the increase from a once a year UDC update to a once every two year update was
intended to reduce the frequency of UDC changes the public and staff must track. A contributing
factor to the number of requested amendments with this review cycle is the fact that the last group
of amendments, excepting special out-of-cycle amendments such as the recent multifamily
revisions, was completed in March of 2012 due to staff not proceeding forward with the annual
amendment process during the review of the process. The UDCAC expressed concern at their July
1st meeting with having all items on the proposed amendment list wait the two year period for City
Council adoption, and recommended items be allowed to be expedited and brought forward
periodically during the cycle as they are needed and completed. With this said, staff is requesting
to process and bring forward UDC revisions addressing some of the current amendment requests
in an earlier time frame than the proposed two years in order to address some items that need a
more timely review. These first items could coincide with other UDC amendments not included in
the General Amendments List, such as the Executive Amendments and/or “Emergency” historic
amendments that will be brought to the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council in the
upcoming months. The items that staff feels are in need of the earlier review cycle are marked on
the list of requested General Amendments (Exhibit 1) with a star. By timing the potential adoption
of these early items with the other forthcoming amendments, there would not be an additional
update of the UDC beyond what would have occurred anyway.
The goal today is to provide the public an additional opportunity to provide input as well as have
the Planning & Zoning Commission review the list of suggested amendments and provide a
recommendation to City Council regarding action on the list, including any amendments that
should be added, removed or modified. Following the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting,
the requested General Amendments List will be presented to the City Council at their August 12th
workshop and based on feedback, presented for final action at the May 26th City Council meeting.
Unified Development Code Advisory Committee Recommendation:
At their July 1st, 2014, meeting, the UDCAC recommended unanimously (7-0) approval of the
proposed list.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
-
SUBMITTED BY:
Valerie Kreger
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Exhibit 1 - Proposed 2014-2016 General Amendment List Exhibit
Requested General Amendments for the 2014-2016 Review Period
General Topic Requested Amendment Amendment Description UDC Section Requester
1 Update the requirements of the Pre-application Process to reflect
updates in current practice.Update the requirements of the Pre-application Process to reflect updates in current practice. 3.02.010 Staff
2 Update the provisions related to the Development Manual process
to reflect updates in current practice.Update the provisions related to the Development Manual process to reflect updates in current practice. 1.11 Staff
3 Create a process to address requests for vesting determinations.
Vesting claims have been presented to the city occasionally over the past few years, but with no defined procedures for addressing.
These requests will likely increase over the next few years as the city has adopted new regulations that will apply to some existing
developments.
Chapter 3 Staff
4 Review the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Development Plan
requirements for review.
There is a very detailed list of items to be included in the Development Plan required for consideration of a PUD. Not all of these
details are always needed or applicable. Staff proposes we look at this list and consider whether all are needed or appropriate.3.06 & 4.06 Staff
7 Create a UDC section acknowledging the city’s current annexation
process.Formalize existing process, in keeping with State Law and the City Charter. Chapter 3 Staff
8 Review the criteria for approval used when evaluating rezoning
requests.
Assist P&Z and City Council with consistent approval criteria lessen subjectivity and potential for challenge of arbitrary or
unreasonable findings.3.06.030 Staff
10 Consider withholding or limiting approval on applications when the
property owner has unresolved City Code violations.
Existing language in Chapter 15 is unclear if additional entitlements may be withheld for violations of City Code, even when there is a
serious life, health, safey violation on a property.15.03.040 Staff
13 Reconsider the current three acre minimum PUD size requirement.Consider smaller PUDs in certain circumstances or consider various levels of requirements and/or scrutiny based on size. Chapter 4 Staff
15 Reconsider how the current Gateway Overlay districts are being
used.
Currently, the Gateway Overlay districts only provide for additional landscaping along the frontages of these roads. Staff would like to
explore utilizing these districts to address other issues that have presented over the last couple of years such as land uses or design.4.13 Staff
Consider allowing small scale residential cottage product by-right, something with "micro lots", maybe just in an infill situation or
allow for small residential PUDS.Chapter 5 Public
Reconsider allowing "Contractor Services Limited", "Contractor Services General", and "Office Warehouse" Specific Uses in the C-3
zoning district.Chapter 5 Public
16 Consider whether the minimum acreage size for Industrial and
Business Park zoning should be lessened.
17 Consider updating the list of Specific Uses in Chapter 5 to include
various uses that are not currently listed.
18 Consider changes to the zoning districts various Specific Uses may
be permitted in.
Over time new uses are presented to staff that are not specifically addressed in the UDC. Examples include self-service machines
(ice) and storage yards.
5
6
11
12
14
Land Uses Staff is regularly presented with questions regarding the possibility of allowing different uses in districts they are not otherwise
allowed in and would like to address some of these through the public process in the next round of updates to the UDC. Examples
include allowing stand-alone medical offices in the Industrial district and whether recreational vehicles (RVs) should be allowed as
primary quarters in the Agriculture district.
For larger tracts, consider a preliminary process such as a concept plan that creates long-term expectations for utilities,
transportation, public facilities, parks, etc. without requiring plat-level engineering and detail. Consider minimum acreage sizes for
preliminary plats and/or concept plans. Protect street connectivity between subdivisions by having more global plans.
3.08.070
Staff
Staff
Staff
StaffChapter 5
StaffChapter 5
The existing minimum acreage sizes for Industrial and Business Park present challenges in certain areas where the zoning would be
appropriate. Reconsider when and if the minimum size is appropriate.7.03 Staff
Zoning/ Overlay
Districts
Review Courthouse View Protection Overlay district requirements
for clarity and completeness.
The Courthouse View Overlay provisions should be reviewed to make sure they are complete, that there are no missing steps, and
that the specifics of how to apply this overlay are clear.4.12
Subdivision/
Platting
Review current exemptions to platting requirements for clarity.Update subdivision language to reflect case law, attorney general opinions and correct confusion between 3.08.020 and 3.08.010 E
relative to division of land for the purposes sale versus division of land for development.3.08.020
Review and update Preliminary Plat phasing provisions based on
experience.
Application
Processes and
Requirements
Review the Special Use Permit (SUP) Conceptual Site Plan
requirements for review.
There is a very detailed list of items to be included on the Conceptual Site Plan required for consideration of an SUP. Not all of these
details are needed or applicable to all types of SUPs. Staff proposes we look at this list and consider whether all are needed or
appropriate.
3.07 Staff
Expand development agreement language establishing clear
requirements and processes.
Upcoming policies for procedures and consideration of special districts and development agreements are anticipated and would
require UDC amendments to implement.3.2 Staff
Staff3.09
Requested General Amendments
9 Update the Site Plan provisions to provide clarity regarding
revisions and to reflect updates in the process.
Update the Site Plan provisions to provide clarity regarding revisions, as there is some confusion regarding when something should
be handle as an Amendment to a Site Plan or a Minor Site Plan, and to reflect updates in the process including Site Plans
incorporating Construction Plans.
Page 1of 4
General Topic Requested Amendment Amendment Description UDC Section Requester
Reconsider the 25,000 square foot building limitation for retail and medical uses in the C-1 zoning district. Chapter 5 UDCAC
21 Acknowledge mobile food trailers as a use within the UDC and
outline appropriate regulations governing.Mobile food trailers have increased in popularity and the city’s codes should be updated to address them. 3.11 & 5.08 Staff
22 Review the current accessory dwelling unit regulations regarding
garage apartment rental.
Accessory dwelling units have become more and more popular and accepted in other cities around the area and country. Staff has
been approached many times by citizens interested in having a garage apartment either for personal reasons such as elder care or
for rental purposes. Clarification is needed regarding what may constitute rental as well as a fresh look at the concerns or challenges
of the rental of accessory dwelling units.
5.02.020.B Staff
23
Review provisions and definitions related to Sexually Oriented
Businesses (SOB) for consistency with the City’s Code of
Ordinances.
The City Code of Ordinances has provisions governing SOBs in addition to the UDC’s provisions. Some of the regulations within each
document are inconsistent with each other and need clarification and revision.5.04 & 16.04 Staff
24
Provide better clarification regarding when a use is considered an
accessory use and when it is considered an additional primary
use.
There has been some question in the past when more than one use is proposed on the same property or with the same business as
to whether the use should be treated as an accessory use to the primary use or whether it should be handled as another primary use
on the property. Also, clarity with regards to the standards that the accessory use must adhere to should be provided as well.
5.01.020 Staff
28 Review and update Conservation Subdivision standards to
encourage usage.
Update conservation subdivision section to relax restrictions and incentivize its use. Consider in light of salamander listing and water
conservation ordinance standards.11.06 Staff
Consider reducing the required setbacks in the Industrial District. Chapter 7 UDCAC
31 Address pedestrian connectivity between building entry and public
sidewalk.Ensure that buildings that are open to the public have reasonable, direct pedestrian access from the street / sidewalk. 7.04.040.E Staff
32 Clarify how setbacks are applied when right-of-way is dedicated or
reserved.
Review setback provisions to ensure the requirements are clear as to where the setback is measured from when right-of-way is to be
dedicated or reserved with a new development.7.03.030.B Staff
33 Provide more alternative site design options through the
Administrative Exception process.
The Administrative Exception process has successfully provided opportunities for alternative flexibility in certain aspects of the
development process. Consider if there are additional provisions that could fall under the Administrative Exception purvue to allow for
more flexible solutions.
Chapter 7 Staff
35 Review current requirements for screening of mechanical
equipment for options or exceptions.There are difficulties in applying the screening requirements in every situation. More exemptions or options are needed. 8.04.070.C Staff
34 Provide more specification regarding current lighting
requirements.
Portions of the section regarding lighting requirements for nonresidential developments are subjective or vague. Additional clarity is
needed.
20 Reconsider some of the limitations applied to specific uses.
30
Review required setbacks for districts and consider expanding
what may be allowed in the setbacks, particularly regarding
parking.
Review required setbacks for nonresidential district to determine if they are still appropriate in all cases, particularly when adjacent to
other nonresidential districts or within the same development. Also consider expanding what features may be allowed in the
setbacks and when, particularly regarding parking.
19 Add or amend standard conditions of approval for Special Use
Permits required for specific uses.
Staff proposes adding standard conditions of approval to Special Use Permits that currently do not have any and possibly refining
some of the conditions for those that do in order to provide better direction to applicants.
Based on experience applying certain limitations listed within Chapter 5, some need further clarification or need to be reconsidered.
These include civic use street access restrictions and building size limitations for retail and medical uses.
Staff
Staff7.05.010
Staff
Staff
Chapter 7
StaffChapter 5
StaffChapter 5
Staff
Staff
Staff
Staff7.04
36
Allow development standard alternatives that will incentivize work force housing without requiring a variety of housing types and
expand incentives to include multifamily housing.6.07.020
25
37
Landscaping Clarify application and calculation of landscaping requirements.
Based on experience with the provisions, staff has recognized the need to clarify the application of the street yard landscaping
requirements to projects located a great distance from the street as well as phased projects since, as written street yard landscaping
applies to yards defined by buildings, not areas. Additionally, clarification is needed regarding what areas are to be included or not
included in various landscape calculations.
8.04.030
Review current nonresidential landscaping requirements with
regard to the city’s water conservation efforts.
Consider updates to the nonresidential landscaping requirements to address the ongoing drought conditions and incorporate
provisions to address water conservation efforts.8.04
Residential
Standards
Review the current accessory structure requirements for clarity
and consider adding exceptions.
Staff has run into some challenges applying and interpreting the residential accessory structure requirements, particularly with
regard to the height and size limitations.6.06.010
Review the list of features currently allowed within the setbacks on
residentially zoned properties to determine if additional features
should be allowed.
Reconsider setback features, including certain patios in front yards which many homeowners are seeking in age-restricted
subdivisions. Also, consider features in light of water conservation requirements. Clarification of driveway placement in setbacks,
including circular drives.
6.05
Revise Housing Diversity standards and separate attainability
(affordability) separate from diversity.
26
27
29 Clarify applicability of and consider expanding exemptions to
building design standards.
Review the applicability of the nonresidential building design requirements for clarity and reconsider exemptions to the section,
including revising the exemption related to industrial uses in the Industrial District.
Nonresidential
Standards
Land Uses, Cont'd
Page 2of 4
General Topic Requested Amendment Amendment Description UDC Section Requester
39
Reconsider the residential fence street setback requirements
and/or consider grandfathering allowances for replacement of
existing fences.
The street setback requirement for residential fences has created issues in existing neighborhoods where fence lines are not
consistent and locational conflicts when replacing existing fences.8.07 Staff
40 Consider additional alternative parking space design options.
Consider updating the parking space design options to allow for alternative designs that have been considered since the last update
to this section.9.03.020 Staff
41 Review the paved surfaces currently approved for parking lots and
consider additional surfaces.
Consider an updated review of the materials or products that may be acceptable to meet the requirements for paved surfaces for
parking lots.Chapter 9 Staff
42 Consider expanding the roadway types on which high profile
monument signs may be located.
High Profile Monument signs are currently allowed only on I-35, 195 and 130. Other regional roadways that will be high-speed with
expanded rights-of-way (e.g. 29 west, 1460, Bypass/Sam Houston) may also warrant taller, architecturally sound identification
signage.
10.06 Staff
43 Clarify application of maximum sign area in Table 10.06.010.
The current language in Table 10.06.010 has caused some applicants to believe the maximum sign area is per sign, with no limit on
the number of signs.10.06.010 Staff
45 Consider increasing Subdivision Entry Sign size and height on
major thoroughfares
The City’s subdivision entry sign regulations require small entry signs. On high-speed major thoroughfares (SH 29, 2243, 195, etc.)
large residential subdivisions are asking for taller and larger signage for identification.10.06 Staff
47 Reconsider maximum height for monument signs when
landscaping is incorporated.Consider allowing an increase in maximum height permitted for monument signs when landscaping is incorporated at the base. 10.06 Staff
48 Update UDC regarding temporary signs for open house and model
homes as may be necessary now that they are being enforced.
Updates to the regulations governing Temporary Off-Premise Signs for Open Houses and Model Homes may be necessary to address
any changes in current city operations since the regulations were written.10.07.050 Staff
Impervious
Coverage 49 Consider bonuses for rain collection and other non-runoff
alternatives.Explore new alternatives and waivers for residential and non-residential for rain collection, etc. Chapter 11 Staff
50 Update the UDC based on the pending updates to the Overall
Transportation Plan.Update various provisions of the UDC as may be necessary based on pending updates to the Overall Transportation Plan. Chapter 12 Staff
54 Review access requirements on numbered county roads. Review access requirements on numbered county roads to determine if any additional provisions should be considered. 13.04.030 Staff
55 Address naming policies related to private streets and drives
internal to multi-tract developments.
Consider applying the city’s street naming requirements for public streets to private driveways/streets that serve more than one
internal tract in order to address 911 issues identifying emergency locations.12.03 & 12.04 Staff
Staff
Staff
Staff
Staff
Staff
56
44
46
When implementing new OTP (pending) and Fire Code (approved), consider new standard, alternative and contextual street cross
sections that account for public safety needs, traffic requirements and needs of private property in relation to public streets. Also,
there are current inconsistencies between current OTP design standards and the current UDC design standards. Additionally, the
city’s standards should be reviewed against Williamson County’s standards to address inconsistencies, especially related to any HB
1445 Agreement issues or potential updates.
Chapter 12,
Sections 13.04,
11.06
Review sidewalk extension and design provisions.Review sidewalk extension and design provisions and consider updates as may be necessary regarding upcoming Sidewalk Master
Plan and Public Facility Access Audit. Additionally, the residential sidewalk fund provisions should be reviewed.12.02
Transportation
Review and consider updates to the City’s provisions related to
connectivity (subdivision access points) between neighboring
developments.
Connectivity (subdivision access points) is extremely important to the function of our public safety and transportation network. In
process, design, and implementation, the City has not received adequate connection points and homeowners complain when streets
are connected. We need to globally reconsider the ratio, design, locations, and exemption process to protect traffic movement, public
safety access and ability to use street facilities as planned.
Chapter 12
Clarify what triggers the requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis
(TIA) and when an appeal may be made and review the
improvements that are considered or required.
The City needs to ensure we are adequately preparing for future roadways with plats, dedications and reservations. Clarification is
needed regarding when Traffic Impact Analyses are required and appealed, and how right-of-way is being planned to implement the
City’s Overall Transportation Plan, for example, adequate intersection right-of-way.
Chapter 12
Consider updates to street standards to address current and
pending inconsistencies between different agencies and
documents.
51
52
53 Staff
Staff
Parking
Signs
Review temporary banner regulations to update event banner
provisions, address temporary banner approval, and consider
subdivision banners.
Review temporary banner regulations to update event banner provisions as they are no longer allowed across streets, to address
temporary banner approval downtown, and to consider internal subdivision banners.10.07
Consider updates to address whether various attention seeking
devices or structures are signage, including subdivision entry
features.
Provide some clarification as to when certain features or devices should be considered signage and to what extent. More and more
residential subdivisions (and some non-residential) are seeking to identify their development through architectural features and
monuments (e.g. stone towers, windmills, cisterns, walls, etc.). Additionally, there are regularly new methods of attracting attention to
a location that have been presented to staff that need clarification within the code as to whether it is signage or not.
10.03
Fences
Consider additional exceptions to fence height and assign
Administrative Exception action to the Building Official.
Expand the built-in exceptions for fence height to additional circumstances to allow more flexibility for residential fences. Additionally,
the Building Official should be authority on further exceptions to fence standards as permits for fences are handled directly through
the Inspections Department.
8.0738
Page 3of 4
General Topic Requested Amendment Amendment Description UDC Section Requester
58 Remove the Georgetown Utility System Advisory Board from the
approval process for allowing septic systems during.
Currently, a request to utilize a septic system in lieu of tying on to a public wastewater system must go to the Georgetown Utility
System Advisory Board for recommendation prior to City Council consideration. This amendment would remove this recommendation
step and instead send these requests directly to City Council.
13.06.030.A.4 Staff
Special Districts 60 Review special district procedures and approval criteria
The City is currently reconsidering its policy on special districts in light of an overwhelming number of requests and unique situations.
Update 13.10 to reflect new policies and procedures.13.10 and 3.20 Staff
61 Refine the UDC regulations regarding abandonment of a
nonconforming situation.Based on experiences with the provisions, staff would like to provide better clarity regarding the determination of abandonment. 14.01.060 Staff
62 Refine the UDC regulations regarding expansion of a
nonconforming structure.
Consider refining provisions applicable to the expansion of buildings that do not conform to current requirements for clarification and
flexibility.14.04.080 Staff
Alternative Energy/
Green Building
Provisions
65
Update codes to provide provisions for green building strategies
and ensure regulations do not unintentionally prohibit such
strategies
The UDC should be reviewed to ensure there are not unintentional barriers to utilization of sustainable energy, such as requiring solar
energy panels to be screened.Various Staff
66 Update various provisions of the UDC as may be necessary based
on updates to the Downtown Master Plan.Update various provisions of the UDC as may be necessary based on updates to the Downtown Master Plan. Various Staff
67 Consider adding limitations to certain uses to create a "transition
zone" between the Downtown and Old Town overlays.
Consider adding limitations to certain uses along the edge of the Downtown Overlay that are adjacent to residential uses outside the
overlay to create a "transition zone" between the Downtown and Old Town overlays.Chapter 5 Public
Zucker Systems
Study 68
Update various provisions of the UDC as may be necessary based
on a pending recommendations from the consultant’s study of city
operations.
Update various provisions of the UDC as may be necessary based on a pending recommendations from the consultant’s study of city
operations.Various Staff
Downtown Master
Plan
57
59
63
64
Nonconforming
Define process for determining nonconforming status and
consider if there are additional existing situations to exempt.
Staff currently receives requests for determination of nonconforming status, particularly abandonment status, and the process for
this determination should be clarified and included in the UDC.Chapter 14
Definitions Revise various definitions for clarity or add new definitions as
needed.
Staff has come across several definitions that need clarity or definitions that are needed to provide clarity in other sections of the
UDC. Examples include clarification of street yard definition and consideration of the current contractor services, limited definition.
In addition this would include any revisions to definitions needed for other revisions made to the UDC.
Chapter 16
Staff
Staff
Parkland
Update provisions governing parkland dedication based on
forthcoming recommendations by the Parks & Recreation Board
subcommittee review.
A subcommittee of the Parks & Recreation Board has been created that is tasked with reviewing and providing recommended
changes regarding the city’s parkland provisions and policies.13.05
Utilities
Review and update of Chapter 13 provisions related to water and
wastewater improvements and extension requirements.
General review of language regarding utility improvements which have not been updated in some time, including extension policy for
plats and site plans. Review for updates, clarification of current policy and terminology. Includes Rural Residential Subdivision criteria
and standards. Also, update any regulations affecting provision of water in order to implement any changes that may result from the
potential merger with Chisholm Trail Special Utility District.
Chapter 13
Staff
Staff
Page 4of 4