HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_HARC_07.21.2016Notice of Meeting for the
Historic and Architectural Rev iew Commission
of the City of Georgetown
July 21, 2016 at 6:00 PM
at Council and Courts Building 101 E. 7th Street Georgetown, TX 78626
The City o f G eo rgeto wn is committed to comp lianc e with the Americans with Dis abilities Ac t (ADA). If yo u
req uire as s is tanc e in participating at a p ublic meeting d ue to a disability, as d efined und er the ADA, reas onab le
as s is tance, ad ap tatio ns , or acc o mmo d ations will b e provid ed up o n req uest. P leas e c o ntact the City Sec retary's
Office, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc hed uled meeting d ate, at (512) 930-3652 o r City Hall at 113 Eas t 8th
Street fo r add itional info rmation; TTY us ers ro ute through Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular S es s io n may, at any time, b e rec es s ed to convene an Exec utive S es s io n fo r any p urpose
authorized b y the Op en Meetings Act, Texas Go vernment Co d e 551.)
A The His to ric and Architec tural Review Commis s ion, ap p o inted by the Mayo r and the City Counc il, is
respons ible fo r hearing and taking final ac tion on applic ations , b y is s uing C ertific ates o f Appropriatenes s
based upo n the C ity Co uncil ad o p ted Do wntown Design Guidelines and Unified Development Code.
Co mmis s ion may, at any time, rec es s the R egular S es s io n to convene an Executive S es s io n at the reques t
of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Direc to r or legal counsel fo r any p urp o s e autho rized by the Op en
Meetings Ac t, Texas Government Code C hapter 551.
Welcome and Meeting Procedures:
Staff P res entation
Applic ant P res entation (Limited to ten minutes unles s stated otherwis e by the Commission.)
Q ues tio ns fro m Co mmis s io n to S taff and Ap p licant
Comments fro m Citizens *
Applic ant Res p o nse
Commis s ion Delib erative Pro ces s
Commis s ion Ac tion
* Tho s e who s peak mus t turn in a speaker fo rm, lo cated at the b ack of the ro o m, to the rec o rd ing
sec retary b efo re the item they wish to add res s begins. Each speaker will b e permitted to ad d res s the
Co mmis s ion one time only fo r a maximum o f three minutes.
Legislativ e Regular Agenda
B Co nsideration and possible actio n to approve the minutes o f the June 23, 2016 regular meeting.
C Public Hearing and p o s s ib le action o n a req uest for a Certific ate o f Appropriateness (COA) fo r exterior
alterations to the his toric s tructure lo cated at 1003 S o uth Aus tin Avenue, b earing the legal desc rip tion of
Lo s t Ad ditio n, Bloc k 13, Lot 3-4, 7-8. 0.6611 acres
D Public Hearing and pos s ib le ac tion on a req ues t for a C ertific ate o f Appropriateness fo r an addition to a
c o mmercial s truc ture for the property lo cated at 1104 South Ro ck Street b earing the legal d es cription of
Stanley Additio n, Bloc k 1, Lo t 1, 0.45 ac res
Page 1 of 48
E Public Hearing and possible ac tion o n a req ues t for a Certificate o f Ap p ro p riatenes s (COA) infill
c o nstruc tio n fo r the property lo cated at 215 Wes t 3rd S treet, bearing the legal d es crip tion o f City of
Georgetown, Blo ck 9, Lot 5-6, 7-8 (W/PTS )
F Co mments o r Ques tions by Co mmis s ioners -in-Training.
G Up d ate on Adminis trative Certificates of Appropriateness is s ued d uring the p revious month
H His toric Res ource Survey P ro ject Up d ate.
I Up d ates on c urrent p ro jects and future meetings
Adjournment
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Shelley No wling, C ity S ecretary fo r the C ity of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , d o hereby c ertify that this Notice of
Meeting was p o s ted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a p lace read ily acc es s ible to the general p ublic at all times ,
on the ______ d ay o f __________________, 2016, at __________, and remained so p o s ted fo r at leas t 72
c o ntinuo us ho urs p receding the sc heduled time o f s aid meeting.
____________________________________
S helley No wling, City Sec retary
Page 2 of 48
City of Georgetown, Texas
Historic and Architectural Review
July 21, 2016
SUBJECT:
Cons id eration and p o s s ib le ac tion to approve the minutes of the June 23, 2016 regular meeting.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
na
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Fro s t, Rec o rd ing S ecretary
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
HARC Minutes 06.23.2016 Backup Material
Page 3 of 48
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 1 of 2
Meeting: June 23, 2016
City of Georgetown, Texas
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
Minutes
Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 6:00 p.m.
Council and Courts Building
101 E. 7th Street Georgetown, TX 78626
Members present: Lee Bain, Chair; Nancy Knight, Vice-Chair; Shawn Hood; Richard Mee and Lawrence
Romero.
Commissioners in Training present: Jan Daum, Michael Friends and Lynn Williams
Commissioners absent: Justin Bohls; Patty Eason
Staff present: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner; Jordan Maddox, Principal Planner; and Karen Frost,
Recording Secretary.
Call to Order by Chair Bain at 6:00 p.m. with the reading of the meeting procedures.
Regular Session
A. Welcome and Meeting Procedures
Legislative Regular Agenda
B. Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the May 26, 2016 meeting.
Motion by Mee to approve the minutes as submitted. Second by Knight. Approved 5 – 0 – 2
(Bohls and Eason absent).
C. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for
exterior alterations for the property located at 701 East University Avenue bearing the legal
description of Snyder Addition, Block 2 (SW/PT), 0.13 acres.
Synatschk presented the case and the material samples that were provided by the applicant. Mr.
McIntosh, the applicant was available for questions.
Chair Bain opened and closed the Public Hearing with no comments from the public.
Motion by Mee to approve the application as submitted. Second by Romero.
The Commissioners discussed the project. Knight does not feel the project is compatible with the
character of the area, has a minimal amount of design and that the gateway deserves a better
looking building. Mee agrees that he does not care for the design but agrees that it meets the
intent of the Design Guidelines. Bain pointed out that Mr. McIntosh has presented what the
commission asked for, sticking with the 1950’s design and preserving the brick from the adjacent
building and staying with the original architecture. Hood stated Mr. McIntosh had provided a
good project considering what he had to work with.
Motion approved 4 – 1 - 2 (Knight opposed, Bohls and Eason absent.)
D. Presentation regarding a proposed project for the historic structure located at 1302 College Street
– J. Bryant Boyd, AIA. This item was pulled by the applicant.
E. Historic Resource Survey Project Update
Synatschk reported that the consultant will be ready to present their findings and report to the
Page 4 of 48
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 2 of 2
Meeting: June 23, 2016
Commission in October and to City council in December. They have reduced the project timeline
from two years down to 12 months.
F. Update on Administrative Certificates of Appropriateness issued during the previous month.
Synatschk reported that he approved two administrative COA’s for signage at Papa Frank’s
Barbershop at 216 S. University and for Morales, Huie and Sparks, PLLC located at 824 S. Austin
Ave.
G. Comments or Questions by Commissioners-in-Training
There were no comments by the Commissioners-in-Training
H. Updates on current projects and future meetings.
• The Austin Avenue Bridges Public second Meeting will be held June 29 at 6:00 p.m. in the
Community Center
• Staff is looking into a driving tour for the Commission in the near future.
• The Main Street Board’s lunch will be hold on the third Monday, July 18th at 11:30 p.m.,
location to be determined.
• The next HARC meeting will be Thursday, July 12th at 6:00 p.m.
Motion by Hood, second by Romero to adjourn at 6:28 p.m. Approved 5 – 0 – 2 (2 absent).
________________________________ _______________________________
Approved, Lee Bain, Chair Attest, Lawrence Romero, Secretary
Page 5 of 48
City of Georgetown, Texas
Historic and Architectural Review
July 21, 2016
SUBJECT:
Pub lic Hearing and p o s s ib le ac tion o n a reques t fo r a Certific ate of Appro p riatenes s (C OA) fo r exterior
alteratio ns to the his toric s truc ture lo cated at 1003 South Aus tin Avenue, bearing the legal d es c rip tion of
Lost Addition, Blo c k 13, Lo t 3-4, 7-8. 0.6611 ac res
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City o f G eo rgeto wn is in receipt of a req ues t for a COA for exterio r alteratio ns and an ad d ition to the
Med ium Priority s truc ture loc ated at 1003 South Aus tin Avenue. Ac cording to the s ubmitted letter of intent,
the applic ant wis hes to remove the awnings , add ad d itional windows and do o rs , and cons truct a s mall
ad d ition at the rear o f the s tructure.
Staff rec o mmend s approval of the reques t bas ed o n the find ings that the reques t meets the approval c riteria
o f S ectio n3.13.030 of the Unified Develo p ment Code (UDC), as o utlined in the attached S taff Report.
The affirmative vote of the majority o f the HAR C memb ers is req uired to approve the COA req uest.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatsc hk, His toric P lanner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
COA-2016-017 Plans and Specifications Backup Material
COA-2016-017 Staff Report Backup Material
Page 6 of 48
ARCHITECTS PROJECT NUMBER
DATE
COPYRIGHT ELSASSER
ARCHITECTURAL, INC.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL DESIGNS AND
DRAWINGS ARE THE
SOLE PROPERTY OF
ELSASSER
ARCHITECTURAL, INC.
AND MAY NOT BE
ALTERED OR
REPRODUCED IN ANY
WAY WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT.
NO
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
PL
A
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
DESIGN / PLANNING
ARCHITECTURE
ELSASSER
ARCHITECTURAL
INC.
P.O. BOX 833
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS78627
(512) 930-5353, (512) 863-5555 FAX
WWW.EAI-TX.COM
DA
T
E
AU
S
T
I
N
AV
E
N
U
E
GE
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
,
TE
X
A
S
KE
L
L
E
R
WI
L
L
I
A
M
S
16004
03/01/16
FOR REVIEW
ONLY NOT
FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION
R
E
A
L
T
Y
8'
-
0
"
8"
1'
-
0
"
11
'
-
4
"
1'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
1'
-
0
"
8'
-
8
"
1'
-
0
"
15
'
-
8
"
7'
-
4
"
8'
-
8
"
1'
-
0
"
5'
-
1
0
"
11
'
-
4
"
1'
-
0
"
3'
-
0
"
8'-0"
8'-0"10'-0"8'-0"8'-0"
20'-8"1'-0"22'-8"1'-0"20'-8"
8'-0"8'-0"
8'
-
0
"
1'
-
0
"
2'-8"1'-4"2'-8"
3'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
8"
1'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
2'-8"1'-4"2'-8"
8'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
81'-2"
6'-0"
7'
-
4
"
5'-0"
2'
-
9
"
5'-0"
2'
-
9
"
'
132'-9"
81'-2"
2'
-
9
"
5'-0"
2'-8"1'-4"2'-8"
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
EXISTING LIMESTONE
,MASONRY
REPLACE NEW STOREFRONT DOOR
SIDELIGHT AND TRANSOM WITH CLEAR
FINSHED ANODIZED 1 3/4" x 4 1/2" FRAMES,
INSULATED LOW-E GLAZING, TEMPERED
AS REQUIRED, AND INSULATED GLAZED
DOOR
EXISTING MASONRY
MARQUIS TOWER
TO REMAIN
EXISTING ELECTRIC
METERS AND SWITCHGEAR
TO BE UPDATED AS
REQUIRED
EXISTING GEORGETOWN
UTILITIES ELECTRIC
TRANSFORMER
NEW FIXED INSULATED
FIXED GLAZING IN ALUMINUM
CLEAR ANODIZED FRAMES
PATCH CRACK,HOLES
IN CEMENT PLASTER
COATING AND RE-PAINT
PATCH CRACK,HOLES
IN CEMENT PLASTER
COATING AND RE-PAINT
LINE OF
NEW ADDITION
FOR MECHANICAL
ROOM (PROVIDE
REINFORCED CONTROL
JOINT)
NEW MASONRY
MECHANICAL ROOM
MATCH EXISTING EXTERIOR
PLASTER COATING AND
PAINT
EXISTING WINDOW
TO REMAIN
EXISTING DOOR TO
REMAIN, NEW PAINT
EXISTING ELECTRIC
METERS AND SWITCHGEAR
TO BE UPDATED AS
REQUIREDEXISTING DOOR TO
REMAIN
PATCH CRACK,HOLES
IN CEMENT PLASTER
COATING AND RE-PAINT
COMMON FIREWALL AT
PROPERTY LINE NEW MASONRY
MECHANICAL ROOM
MATCH EXISTING EXTERIOR
PLASTER COATING AND
PAINT
EXISTING MASONRY
MARQUIS TOWER
TO REMAIN
EXISTING ELECTRIC
METERS AND SWITCHGEAR
TO BE UPDATED AS
REQUIRED
REMOVE EXISTING CANVAS,
REFINISH EXISTING METAL,
SIZE TO NEW DIMENSIONS,
PROVIDE NEW MOUNTING
SUPPORTS , WITH 1" THREADED
HANGING RODS, AND TURNBUCKLES
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
PROVIDE NEW PREFINISHED
BLACK PARAPET COPING
PROVIDE NEW PREFINISHED
BLACK PARAPET COPING
NEW CANOPIES
W/PLATE STEEL ESCUTCHEONS,
HANGING RODS AND FRAMES
WITH SHEET METAL FASCIAS
NEW LASER CUT
ALUMINUM LETTERS
(13.75 SQ. FT. )
NEW CANOPIES
W/PLATE STEEL ESCUTCHEONS,
HANGING RODS AND FRAMES
WITH SHEET METAL FASCIAS
REFINISHED AND RESIZED CANOPY
SHEET METAL FASCIA
EXISTING ALUMINUM FRAMES AND
GLAZING TO BE REPLACED WITH
TRIPLE GLAZED LOW-E GLAZING
AND CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM
FRAMES
EXISTING ALUMINUM FRAMES AND
GLAZING TO BE REPLACED WITH
TRIPLE GLAZED LOW-E GLAZING
AND CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM
FRAMES
PROVIDE NEW PREFINISHED
BLACK PARAPET COPING
NEW LASER
CUT ALUMINUM
LETTERS (13.75 SQ. FT. )
REMOVE EXISTING CANVAS,
REFINISH EXISTING METAL,
SIZE TO NEW DIMENSIONS,
NEW LASER CUT
ALUMINUM LETTERS
(13.75 SQ. FT. )81 SQ. FT. OF AVAILABLE SIGNAGE
81 SQ. FT. OF AVAILABLE SIGNAGE
132 SQ. FT. OF AVAILABLE SIGNAGE
NEW CANOPIES
W/PLATE STEEL ESCUTCHEONS,
HANGING RODS AND FRAMES
WITH SHEET METAL FASCIAS
NORTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
SIGNAGE TABULATION:
MAIN STOREFRONT ELEVATION: 81 LINEAR FEET
NORTH ELEVATION: 27.50 SQ. FT.
EAST ELEVATION: 13.75 SQ. FT.
WEST ELEVATION: 13.75 SQ. FT.
SOUTH ELEVATION: 4.65 SQ. FT.
TOTAL SIGNAGE USED THROUGHT 59.65 SQ. FT.
kwKELLERWILLIAMS
REALTY
A3.0
HARC
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
O
N
S
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
O
N
S
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
O
N
S
7/13
/16
7/08
/16
6/15
/16
Page 7 of 48
ARCHITECTS PROJECT NUMBER
DATE
COPYRIGHT ELSASSER
ARCHITECTURAL, INC.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL DESIGNS AND
DRAWINGS ARE THE
SOLE PROPERTY OF
ELSASSER
ARCHITECTURAL, INC.
AND MAY NOT BE
ALTERED OR
REPRODUCED IN ANY
WAY WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT.
NO
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
PL
A
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
DESIGN / PLANNING
ARCHITECTURE
ELSASSER
ARCHITECTURAL
INC.
P.O. BOX 833
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS78627
(512) 930-5353, (512) 863-5555 FAX
WWW.EAI-TX.COM
DA
T
E
AU
S
T
I
N
AV
E
N
U
E
GE
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
,
TE
X
A
S
KE
L
L
E
R
WI
L
L
I
A
M
S
16004
03/01/16
FOR REVIEW
ONLY NOT
FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION
R
E
A
L
T
Y
HARC
A7.0
Page 8 of 48
Planning Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
COA‐2016‐017 1003 South Austin Avenue Page 1 of 4
Meeting Date: July 21, 2016
File Number: CDC‐2016‐017
AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for exterior
alterations to the historic structure located at 1003 South Austin Avenue, bearing the legal description
of Lost Addition, Block 13, Lot 3‐4, 7‐8. 0.6611 acres
AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
Project Name: Keller Williams Office Renovation
Applicant: Rich Elsasser
Property Owner: Keller Williams
Property Address: 1003 South Austin Avenue
Legal Description: Lost Addition, Block 13, Lot 3‐4, 7‐8. 0.6611 acres
Historic Overlay: Downtown Overlay District
Case History: This is the first review for the project
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Date of construction: ca. 1950
Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: 1984 – Not recorded
2007‐ Medium
National Register Designation: None
Texas Historical Commission Designation: None
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness to make exterior alterations to the Medium
Priority historic structure located at 1003 South Austin Avenue. The alterations include the removal of
the existing fabric awning on the west façade to expose the existing canopy, installation of windows
and a door in the north façade and construct an addition on the east façade.
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines:
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
7.1 Avoid alterations that would damage historic features. Complies
7.2 Properties designated by the City as a High or Medium Priority Historic Structure
should be preserved and their historic character retained.
Complies
7.3 An addition shall be compatible in scale, materials, and character with the main
building.
Complies
Page 9 of 48
Planning Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
COA‐2016‐017 1003 South Austin Avenue Page 2 of 4
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
7.4 An addition shall not damage or obscure architecturally important features. Complies
7.7 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize
the visual impacts.
Complies
10.2 A fixed metal canopy may be considered Complies
6.12 Preserve the position, number, size, and arrangement of historic windows and
doors in a building wall.
Does not
comply
6.21 Maintain the historic ratio of window and storefront openings to solid wall Does not
comply
STAFF ANALYSIS
The proposed project at 1003 South Austin Avenue includes the removal of the existing cloth awnings,
which are mounted to brackets underneath the canopy. The canopy will remain in place, with no other
changes to the Austin Avenue façade. The awnings are not a historic feature and their removal will not
result in the loss of character defining elements of the building.
The project also includes a small addition to the east façade of the structure, allowing for a more
efficient use of the interior space. The addition does not impact the historic character of the structure
and will be differentiated by the materials.
The proposed project is converting a retail space in to office uses. This new use will incorporate offices
and conference rooms in to a space that is primarily open space. The new offices will include windows
and a door in the north wall. The windows and doors will each be covered by a new tie rod canopy,
mimicking the canopy of the Austin Avenue façade, but using new materials to achieve the
differentiation. The Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines state that new windows and doors
should not be added to a historic structure and the ratio of solid wall to windows and doors should
remain consistent. Staff supports the proposed changes because it helps break up the long expanse of
blank wall, contributing to the pedestrian environment of the district. Additionally, the new windows
and door will not result in the loss of any character defining features for the structure.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the
following criteria:
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and
final action;
The application is deemed to be complete.
B. Compliance with any design standards of the The proposed project complies with the
Page 10 of 48
Planning Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
COA‐2016‐017 1003 South Austin Avenue Page 3 of 4
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
Unified Development Code; UDC design standards.
C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design
Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time,
specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay
District;
The proposed project complies with the
Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines, with the exception noted in the
staff analysis.
D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is
preserved.
The proposed project does not adversely
impact the historic structure.
E. New buildings or additions are designed to be
compatible with surrounding historic properties.
The small addition to the rear of the
structure is compatible with the
surrounding
F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable
Overlay District is protected.
The proposed project does not negatively
impact the Downtown Overlay District.
G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted
design standards, and are not in character with
the site or landmarks within the Historic or
applicable Overlay District in question will not be
permitted.
The proposed signage complies with the
design guidelines.
H. The following may also be considered by the
HARC when determining whether to approve a
Certificate of Appropriateness:
1. The effect of the proposed change upon the
general historic, cultural, and architectural
nature of the site, landmark, or District.
2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural
features, including parking and loading
spaces, which can be seen from a public street,
alley, or walkway.
3. The general design, arrangement, texture,
material, and color of the building or structure
and the relation of such factors to similar
features of buildings or structures in the
District, contrast or other relation of such
factors to other landmarks built at or during
the same period, as well as the uniqueness of
such features, considering the remaining
examples of architectural, historical, and
cultural values.
The proposed project incorporates a new use
in to an existing building without
significantly impacting the structure. The
exterior of the structure is clad in stucco, so
the alterations do not result in the loss of
character defining features and can be
restored in the future if a property owner
wants to return it to its original condition.
The new exterior features will not impact the
historic integrity of the structure and the
removal of the awnings will allow a historic
feature to become more prominent.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of the proposed project.
Page 11 of 48
Planning Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
COA‐2016‐017 1003 South Austin Avenue Page 4 of 4
As of the date of this report, staff has received no comments regarding this request.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 – Letter of Intent
Exhibit 2 – Plans and Specifications
SUBMITTED BY
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Page 12 of 48
City of Georgetown, Texas
Historic and Architectural Review
July 21, 2016
SUBJECT:
Pub lic Hearing and p os s ible ac tio n o n a reques t fo r a Certificate of Appropriateness fo r an additio n to a
commerc ial s tructure fo r the property loc ated at 1104 So uth Ro ck Street b earing the legal d es criptio n of
Stanley Addition, Blo ck 1, Lot 1, 0.45 ac res
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City o f G eo rgeto wn is in receipt of a req ues t for a COA for an ad d ition to the Medium P rio rity
s tructure lo cated at 1004 Ro ck S treet. Acc ording to the sub mitted letter o f intent, the applic ant wis hes
cons truct a s mall ad d ition at the rear of the s truc ture.
Staff rec o mmend s approval of the reques t bas ed o n the find ings that the reques t meets the approval c riteria
o f S ectio n 3.13.030 o f the Unified Development C o d e (UDC), as outlined in the attac hed Staff Rep o rt.
The affirmative vote of the majority o f the HAR C memb ers is req uired to approve the COA req uest.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatsc hk, His toric P lanner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
COA-2016-019 Staff Report Backup Material
COA-2016-019 Plans and Specifications Backup Material
Page 13 of 48
Planning Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
COA‐2016‐019 1104 Rock Street Page 1 of 4
Meeting Date: July 21, 2016
File Number: COA‐2016‐019
AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for an addition to a
commercial structure for the property located at 1104 South Rock Street bearing the legal description of
Stanley Addition, Block 1, Lot 1, 0.45 acres
AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
Project Name: 1104 South Rock Street Commercial Addition
Applicant: J. Bryant Boyd, AIA
Property Owner: Christopher Stanley
Property Address: 1104 South Rock Street
Legal Description: Stanley Addition, Block 1, Lot 1, 0.45 acres
Historic Overlay: Downtown Overlay District
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Date of construction: ca. 1925
Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: 1984 – Low Priority
2007 – Medium Priority
National Register Designation: None
Texas Historical Commission Designation: None
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
This application is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness for an addition to a Medium Priority
historic structure. The addition will consist of extending the North upper exterior wall approximately
40” in order to align the upper and lower exterior walls. In addition to moving the Northern exterior
wall, the roof over the rear portion of the structure will be raised approximately 12”‐ 16” in order to
match the height of the existing roof of the upper level. The roofing material for both structures will be
metal and the main exterior color will match the existing color of the structure.
Page 14 of 48
Planning Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
COA‐2016‐019 1104 Rock Street Page 2 of 4
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines:
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
7.1 Avoid alterations that would damage historic features. Complies
7.2 Properties designated by the City as a High or Medium Priority Historic
Structure should be preserved and their historic character retained.
Complies
7.3 An addition shall be compatible in scale, materials, and character with the main
building.
Complies
7.4 An addition shall not damage or obscure architecturally important features. Complies
7.7 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to
minimize the visual impacts.
Complies
7.8 Do not obscure, damage, destroy, or re‐ move original architectural details and
materials of the primary structure.
Complies
7.9 An addition shall be compatible in scale, materials, and character with the main
building.
Complies
7.10 The roof form of a new addition shall be in character with that of the primary
building.
Complies
STAFF ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness for exterior alterations to a ca. 1925 historic
structure. The Craftsman style structure was originally constructed as a residence, but is currently used
for professional offices. The 2nd floor of the structure is asymmetrical, with the north wall setback from
the first floor wall. The setback creates a challenge for interior space, limiting the configurations for the
current use.
The proposed project for 1104 South Rock Street has minimal impact on the historic character of the
structure. The alterations are located at the rear of the structure, limiting the visual impact from the
street. In addition, the alterations do not result in the loss of character defining features for the
structure, nor do they create any conjectural features to the structure. The addition is compatible in
scale and materials with the existing structure. The project has no impact on the primary street facing
façade. The roof alteration is at the rear of the structure and will not impact the street facing façade.
The materials of the existing wall we be repurposed on the addition and retain the existing stylistic
elements.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the
following criteria:
Page 15 of 48
Planning Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
COA‐2016‐019 1104 Rock Street Page 3 of 4
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and
final action;
The application is deemed complete by staff.
B. Compliance with any design standards of the
Unified Development Code;
The proposed project is in compliance with
the design standards of the UDC.
C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design
Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time,
specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay
District;
The project complies with the Downtown
and Old Town Design Guidelines, as
outlined in the staff analysis.
D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is
preserved.
The proposed project does not have an
adverse effect on the historic integrity of the
structure. No character defining features
will be removed or altered, maintaining the
integrity of the structure.
E. New buildings or additions are designed to be
compatible with surrounding historic properties.
The addition is compatible with the
surrounding properties.
F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable
Overlay District is protected.
The proposed project does not have an
adverse effect on the Downtown Overlay
District. The massing, scale and materials for
the project are appropriate for the district
and do not impact the overall character of
the district.
G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted
design standards, and are not in character with
the site or landmarks within the Historic or
applicable Overlay District in question will not be
permitted.
No signage is proposed with this project.
H. The following may also be considered by the
HARC when determining whether to approve a
Certificate of Appropriateness:
1. The effect of the proposed change upon the
general historic, cultural, and architectural
nature of the site, landmark, or District.
2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural
features, including parking and loading
spaces, which can be seen from a public street,
alley, or walkway.
3. The general design, arrangement, texture,
material, and color of the building or structure
and the relation of such factors to similar
The proposed project is designed to limit the
impact of the addition to the rear and side
façades, reducing its visibility from the
public right of way. The design is
compatible with the design characteristics
along Rock Street. No parking or other
features are proposed with this project.
Page 16 of 48
Planning Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
COA‐2016‐019 1104 Rock Street Page 4 of 4
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
features of buildings or structures in the
District, contrast or other relation of such
factors to other landmarks built at or during
the same period, as well as the uniqueness of
such features, considering the remaining
examples of architectural, historical, and
cultural values.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of the proposed project.
As of the date of this report, staff has received no comments regarding this request.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 – Letter of Intent, Plans and Specifications
SUBMITTED BY
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Page 17 of 48
Page 18 of 48
Page 19 of 48
Page 20 of 48
-
Page 21 of 48
Page 22 of 48
City of Georgetown, Texas
Historic and Architectural Review
July 21, 2016
SUBJECT:
Pub lic Hearing and p o s s ib le actio n on a req uest fo r a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) infill
cons tructio n for the property loc ated at 215 West 3rd Street, b earing the legal des c rip tion o f City of
Geo rgeto wn, Bloc k 9, Lo t 5-6, 7-8 (W/PTS)
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City o f G eo rgeto wn is in receipt of an applic ation for a Certific ate o f Ap p ro p riatenes s for infill
cons tructio n loc ated at 215 Wes t 3rd Street. Ac c o rd ing to the letter of intent, the ap p licant wishes to
cons truct a multifamily infill rpojec t o n a vac ant parc el.
Staff rec o mmend s approval of the reques t bas ed upon the findings tht the ap p lic atio n meets the c riteria of
Unified Develo p ment Co d e Chapter 3.13.
The affirmative vote of the majority o f HARC members is required for ap proval.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatsc hk, His toric P lanner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
COA-2016-020 Staff Report Backup Material
COA-2016-020 Plans and Specifications Backup Material
Page 23 of 48
Planning Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
COA‐2016‐020 215 West 3rd Street Page 1 of 4
Meeting Date: July 21, 2016
File Number: COA‐2016‐020
AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) infill
construction for the property located at 215 West 3rd Street, bearing the legal description of City of
Georgetown, Block 9, Lot 5‐6, 7‐8 (W/PTS)
AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
Project Name: 3rd & Rock Multifamily infill project
Applicant: Austin Pfiester
Property Owner: San Gabriel River Place Foundation
Property Address: 215 West 3rd Street
Legal Description: City of Georgetown, Block 9, Lot 5‐6, 7‐8 (W/PTS)
Historic Overlay: Downtown Overlay District
Case History: The project was presented for conceptual review at the March 24, 2016 HARC
meeting.
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Date of construction: NA
Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: NA
National Register Designation: NA
Texas Historical Commission Designation: NA
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a 14 unit
multifamily courtyard complex located at the intersection of 3rd and Rock Streets.
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines:
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
13.1 Locate a new building at the front property line. Complies
13.4 Building heights of larger projects should provide variety. Complies
13.8 Masonry materials that convey a sense of scale are preferred. Complies
13.9 A simple material finish is encouraged for a large expanse of wall plane. Complies
13.10 Traditional building materials such as wood, brick, and stone are encouraged. Complies
13.11 Use roof materials that appear similar to those seen traditionally. Complies
13.15 Minimize the number of entrances along a street edge Complies
Page 24 of 48
Planning Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
COA‐2016‐020 215 West 3rd Street Page 2 of 4
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
13.16 Place parking areas to the rear of a site when feasible or disburse
throughout the site.
Complies
STAFF ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing a courtyard style multifamily infill project located at the northeast corner of
3rd and Rock Streets. The parcel is currently vacant, so no demolition or other site preparation is
required.
The project consists of a 14 unit multifamily complex, with a total height of 35 feet. The units will be
built at the lot lines along 3rd and Rock Streets, enhancing the street edge and creating a more cohesive
pedestrian environment. The parking and service area will be located along the interior lot lines,
minimizing the visibility from the street.
The majority of the structure is two stories in height, with a third story on the northeast corner. The
additional 3rd story and the roof line articulation help break the building in to smaller bays, maintaining
the historic building dimensions.
The project incorporates a mix of materials, including a metal roof, hardie siding and limestone. The
diversity of materials provides addition articulation for the structure, while utilizing materials found
throughout the district.
The property will take one way drive access from 3rd Street, with an exit on to Rock Street. The use of a
one way drive aisle allows for a narrower entrance and exit, minimizing the visibility of the parking
areas. Sidewalk improvements will include additional curb landings, further reducing the impact of the
drive aisles.
The architectural style of the structure creates a compatible structure for the Downtown Overlay
District, while maintaining a modern feel. The design protects the character of the district, but also
allows the project to be identified as new construction, which is appropriate for the district.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the
following criteria:
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and
final action;
The application is deemed complete by staff.
B. Compliance with any design standards of the The proposed project complies with the
Page 25 of 48
Planning Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
COA‐2016‐020 215 West 3rd Street Page 3 of 4
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
Unified Development Code; design standards of the UDC.
C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design
Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time,
specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay
District;
The proposed project complies with the
Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines.
D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is
preserved.
There is no existing structure on the site.
E. New buildings or additions are designed to be
compatible with surrounding historic properties.
The new structure will have limited impact
on the surrounding structures. The site is
located in a section of the Downtown
Overlay District that is mostly comprised of
modern construction.
F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable
Overlay District is protected.
The project will not have an adverse effect
on the Downtown Overlay District based on
its design, and location.
G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted
design standards, and are not in character with
the site or landmarks within the Historic or
applicable Overlay District in question will not be
permitted.
No signage is proposed with this project.
H. The following may also be considered by the
HARC when determining whether to approve a
Certificate for Design Compliance:
1. The effect of the proposed change upon the
general historic, cultural, and architectural
nature of the site, landmark, or District.
2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural
features, including parking and loading
spaces, which can be seen from a public street,
alley, or walkway.
3. The general design, arrangement, texture,
material, and color of the building or structure
and the relation of such factors to similar
features of buildings or structures in the
District, contrast or other relation of such
factors to other landmarks built at or during
the same period, as well as the uniqueness of
such features, considering the remaining
examples of architectural, historical, and
cultural values.
The proposed project is located in a section
of the district mostly comprised of modern
structures. The overall design and materials
are compatible with those found in the
district. The project utilizes a unique style to
differentiate the structure from the historic
structures found throughout the Downtown
Overlay District.
Page 26 of 48
Planning Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
COA‐2016‐020 215 West 3rd Street Page 4 of 4
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of the project.
As of the date of this report, staff has received comments regarding the request.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 – Letter of Intent
Exhibit 2 – Plans and Specifications
SUBMITTED BY
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Page 27 of 48
Page 28 of 48
Page 29 of 48
Page 30 of 48
Page 31 of 48
Page 32 of 48
Page 33 of 48
Page 34 of 48
Page 35 of 48
Page 36 of 48
Page 37 of 48
Page 38 of 48
Page 39 of 48
Page 40 of 48
Page 41 of 48
Page 42 of 48
Page 43 of 48
Page 44 of 48
Page 45 of 48
Page 46 of 48
Page 47 of 48
City of Georgetown, Texas
Historic and Architectural Review
July 21, 2016
SUBJECT:
Updates on c urrent projec ts and future meetings
ITEM SUMMARY:
1. HARC Tour
2. 3rd Monday Main S treet Lunch - August 15 @ 11:30
3. HARC Meeting - August 25 @ 6:00
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatsc hk, His toric P lanner
Page 48 of 48