Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_HARC_05.26.2022Notice of Meeting for the Historic and Architectural Rev iew Commission of the City of Georgetown May 26, 2022 at 6:00 P M at 510 W. 9th Street Georgetown, Texas 78626 Council and Courts B uilding T he C ity of G eorgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require as s is tance in partic ipating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reas onable as s is tance, adaptations , or ac commodations will be provided upon request. P leas e c ontact the C ity S ec retary's O ffic e, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc heduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or C ity Hall at 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626 for additional information; T T Y users route through R elay Texas at 711. P ublic Wishing to Address the B oard O n a s ubjec t that is posted on this agenda: P lease fill out a speaker regis tration form whic h can be found at the Board meeting. C learly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak, and pres ent it to the S taff Liais on, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be c alled forward to speak when the Board cons iders that item. O n a s ubjec t not posted on the agenda: P ersons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a written request with the S taff Liais on no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. T he reques t must include the s peaker's name and the spec ific topic to be addres s ed with sufficient information to inform the board and the public . F or Board Liaison c ontact information, pleas e logon to http://government.georgetown.org/c ategory/boards -commissions /. A At the time of posting, no pers ons had s igned up to address the Board. L egislativ e Regular Agenda B C ons ideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the May 12, 2022, regular meeting of the Historic and Arc hitectural C ommittee - Kimberly S penc er, Development Administration P rogram Manager C P ublic Hearing and possible action on a reques t for a C ertific ate of Appropriatenes s (C O A) for new residential (infill) cons truction for the property loc ated at 510 E. 7th S treet bearing the legal desc ription Lot 1, Bloc k 36, G lassc ock Addition (2021-67-C O A). -- Meredith Johnson, cons ultant D P ublic Hearing and possible action on a reques t for a C ertific ate of Appropriatenes s (C O A) for an addition that creates a new, or adds to an exis ting s treet faç ade for the property located at 709 Main S treet, bearing the legal desc ription of Lot 3 (S /P T ), Bloc k 40, C ity of G eorgetown.--Meredith Johns on, c onsultant E Updates , C ommis s ioner questions, and c omments . -Nat Waggoner, As s t. P lanning Dir. - Long R ange Adjournment Ce rtificate of Posting Page 1 of 140 I, R obyn Densmore, C ity S ecretary for the C ity of G eorgetown, Texas, do hereby c ertify that this Notic e of Meeting was posted at C ity Hall, 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626, a plac e readily acc es s ible to the general public as required by law, on the _____ day of _________________, 2022, at __________, and remained s o posted for at leas t 72 c ontinuous hours prec eding the s cheduled time of said meeting. __________________________________ R obyn Dens more, C ity S ec retary Page 2 of 140 City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review May 26, 2022 S UB J E C T: C onsideration and pos s ible ac tion to approve the minutes from the May 12, 2022, regular meeting of the His toric and Architec tural C ommittee - Kimberly S pencer, Development Adminis tration P rogram Manager IT E M S UMMARY: F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: .N/A S UB MIT T E D B Y: Kimberly S penc er, P rogram Manager AT TAC H ME N T S: Description Type Meeting Minutes Cover Memo Page 3 of 140 Page 1 of 7 Historic and Architectural Review Commission Meeting: May 12, 2022 Members Present: Michael Walton, Chair; Linda C. Burns, Vice-Chair; Lawrence Romero;; Tom W. Davis, Jennifer Powell, Alton Martin, Karalei Nunn. Staff present: Tadd Phillips, Interim Planning Director; Nat Waggoner, Assistant Director; Meredith Johnson; Kimberly Spencer, Dev. Admin. Program Manager Meeting called to order by Chair Walton at 6:02 pm. Public Wishing to Address the Board On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found at the Board meeting. Clearly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak, and present it to the Staff Liaison, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Board considers that item. On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a written request with the Staff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. The request must include the speaker's name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to inform the board and the public. For Board Liaison contact information, please logon to http://government.georgetown.org/category/boards-commissions/. A At the time of posting, no persons had signed up to address the Board. Legislative Regular Agenda B Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the April 28, 2022, regular meeting of the Historic and Architectural Committee - Kimberly Spencer, Development Administration Program Manager Motion to approve item as stated by Commissioner Romero seconded by Commissioner Powell Approved unanimously 7-0 C Conceptual Review of a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for an addition that creates a new or adds to an existing street facing for at the property located at 1503 Elm Street, bearing the legal description of .35 acres, Block 10 (W/PT), Hughes Addition. (2022-3-COA) – Meredith Johnson, consultant Meredith Johnson presented the conceptual review. The applicant is requesting to construct an approximate 1,603 sq. ft. one and one-half story addition to the existing garage and reduce the existing garage sq. ft. from 682 sq. ft. to 439 sq. ft. A portion of the addition is setback from the Page 4 of 140 Page 2 of 7 Historic and Architectural Review Commission Meeting: May 12, 2022 primary façade of the existing garage and creates an overhang of approximately 7’ 8”. The addition has a gabled roof with an actual height of 22’. The addition is proposed to connect to the primary structure by a 20 ft. breezeway. The garage addition includes 5/16in. x 144in Hardibacker lap siding to match the primary structure. The windows are proposed to be twice as tall as they are wide except for the shed dormer windows on the south elevation. At the April 14, 2022, meeting the Commission provided the applicant with feedback on their conceptual plans regarding looming, massing, scale and form, architectural character, and materials. Since the 4.14.22 meeting, the applicant has revised their plans in by the following: reduced the total square footage of the addition from 2,623 sq. ft., to 1, 603 sq. ft., reduced the height of the addition from 25' to 22’, reduced the 2nd story of the addition to a half story and including dormers, include architectural details of the primary structure into the addition such as windows, railing, eave details, and roof forms. At this meeting, the applicant is now seeking the feedback from the Commission before finalizing their design on the following: • Did the design respond to concerns for looming - Design Guideline section 3.4.C.3? • Did the design respond to concerning for massing, scale, and form - Design Guidelines 3.5.C? • Is the addition compatible to the primary structure in terms of architectural character, mass, scale, and materials, particularly the dormer design - Design Guidelines 3.5.K? • Design Guidelines 3.5.3.E.2.b (street facing) and 3.5.E.2.c (side facing) direct size and roof proportions. Are the dormers on the south elevation of the addition street or side facing? Regarding looming, the applicant removed the windows that were in question at the previous HARC meeting. They now are seeking feedback on windows that are fronting East 16th Street that would potentially loom into the 1603 Elm Street property. Regarding architectural design, the applicant intends to include the following architectural details and features that includes eave detail, railing detail, metal roof ridge cap and lighting fixtures. All gable dormers will receive an eave detail consistent with the primary home. Columns of the original home would be added to support the breezeway and in front of the new garage and storage addition. The original Metal Roof ridge cap and end pieces will be added to the new addition ridge line of the roof and lastly, the lighting fixtures on the garage door style of the existing garage will be brought into the new garage addition. Roof lines pitch on hip fruit hip roof will be married into the new addition design. Color of siding and trim the color of the siding and the trim will be married to the existing garage and home. And lastly, window style and size will either be matched or adjusted to relative size of the existing structure. Johnson presented on the approval criteria and shared that staff determined the proposed project complies with 15 of the 33 applicable Historic District Design Guidelines in Chapter 3. In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, HARC must consider the following approval criteria. Staff has determined that the applicant complies with 1 out of 8 of the Page 5 of 140 Page 3 of 7 Historic and Architectural Review Commission Meeting: May 12, 2022 approval criteria. Applicant is present and approached the podium to share his presentation. Randy Stroud (1503 Elm St.). Applicant shared improvements that have been made based on commissioners’ feedback from the April 14, 2022, HARC meeting. Showed a diagram reflecting the reduction in living space, elevation, height of addition, roof pitch, primary street view and garage driveway. Stroud continued sharing a side that showed all the approval/design criteria that have been changed and addressed. Chair Walton reviewed the feedback requested slide Commissioner Nunn shared that the side street is a side street, and the home is facing the side. She expressed confusion by the list of items that partial complies. Shared she would like to consistently see the on the items that partially comply, a notation for what exactly it complies and what exactly doesn't comply so that the item can be better assessed. Nunn continues that share that the newly proposed conceptual plan is better, however she still has concerns regarding the detail since it is creating a false historicism to the existing home. Regarding the issue of the looming windows, Nunn expressed confusion and needed clarification. Johnson pulled up the slide to further clarify and address her question. Johnson clarified the looming guideline and noted that the rear of the applicant’s property extends beyond the rear of the property to the south but is separated by a street that's 20 feet wide with a 16 ft setback from the property line. She shared that while the windows on the second floor of the applicant’s property do extend beyond the rear of the property to the south, it's separated by quite a bit of distance. Commissioner Martin shared his appreciation regarding the applicant’s effort in addressing the commissioners’ concerns. Shared that the way he addressed the dormers is appropriate and the descaling of the structure. Martin shared that the looming adjustments are appropriate and correctly addressed the issues that were present. Commissioner Burns echoed the sentiments of Nunn without further clarification. Walton shared similar feedback and requested clarity on square footage in their next presentation. Overall, Commissioners together expressed that clarity on partially comply items will need to have more detail outlining exactly what it does and doesn’t comply with and would also like more information on materials that will be used. Commissioners also noted that the ornamental features are a choice and not a requirement and that the character of the addition needs to reflect into the new addition but does not require mirrored detail since there needs to be a differentiation on design from old to new. Waggoner summarized feedback and closed on the item. Page 6 of 140 Page 4 of 7 Historic and Architectural Review Commission Meeting: May 12, 2022 No motions on conceptual design items. D Presentation and discussion of the process for determining height in the Old Town and Downtown Overlays – Nat Waggoner, Asst. Planning Dir. – Long Range Waggoner presented item D. The Commission has asked staff to clarify the process for determining height. At this meeting, staff will provide the Commission a presentation on the standards for determining building heights in accordance with UDC Section 6.04.030. Height Building height refers to the vertical distance between lowest finished grade at the edge of the building or the base flood elevation where applicable, and: 1. The average height level between the eaves and ridge line of a gable, shed, hip, or gambrel roof; 2. The highest point of a mansard roof; 3. The highest point of the coping of a flat roof; and 4. Roof parapets, as described in Section 7.04.040.D, may exceed the height limitations of this Code by no more than ten feet. Sec. 4.08.080. - Standards Specific to the Old Town Overlay District. 1. Building Height. 1. Buildings within the Old Town Overlay District shall not exceed 30 feet in height. However, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be approved in accordance with Section 3.13 of the UDC to allow utilization of the height limitation of the underlying zoning district. 2. Maximum building height at the prescribed setback of the underlying base zoning district shall not exceed 15 feet. For each additional three feet of setback from the property line, the building may increase in height by five feet. However, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be approved in accordance with Section 3.13 of this Code to allow building heights in excess of this requirement. Sec. 4.08.070. - Standards Specific to the Downtown Overlay District. 1. Building Height. 1. Building height in the Downtown Overlay District shall not exceed 40 feet, unless a Certificate of Appropriateness is approved by HARC in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 3.13 of this Code. 2. Buildings located along the portion of Austin Avenue that lies within the boundaries of the Downtown Overlay District shall be at least two usable stories in height with an overall building height of not less than 20 feet, subject to compliance with the Courthouse View Protection Overlay District of Section 4.10. Page 7 of 140 Page 5 of 7 Historic and Architectural Review Commission Meeting: May 12, 2022 However, HARC may approve a Certificate of Appropriateness in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 3.13 of this Code. Chair Walton opened the floor to the commissioners for questions. Chair Walton sought clarification on if the buildings on the square flat roof. Waggoner shared that, yes, they have a parapet, and that the height varies. Commissioner Burns sought clarification on height restrictions as it pertains to pier and beam. Waggoner clarified that you start measuring from the lowest finished grade. Commissioner Burns asked for clarification on if you must have a setback of 3 feet in order to gain five more feet of height. Waggoner clarifies the 15 feet that the guidelines would allow would be at that midpoint of the roof, not necessarily at the eave. For example, if the peak of the house was 30 feet and the eave was at 15, you would get a roof height of 15 feet. Commissioner Nunn sought clarification on if there is any overlap with Old Town and Downtown districts. Waggoner shares there is not an overlap. E Presentation and discussion of the role of a subcommittee of the HARC for review of projects - Nat Waggoner, Asst. Planning Dir. - Long Range The HARC Bylaws provide that the Historic and Architectural Review Commission has the express authority to delegate review of specific projects (as defined by majority vote of the Commission) to a Subcommittee of the Commission composed of at least three members. At April 28, 2022 meeting, the Commission provided the following feedback to the on the possible formation of a subcommittee: • The potential role for the Commission could be to review staff work, not to collaborate. • The Commission wants to avoid postponing or denying projects. • Meetings of the Subcommittee should be project specific focus of individual cases. • The Commission does not want to form a standing subcommittee. • If formed, the Commission sees value in using the Subcommittee as a tool to minimize likelihood of rejection or postponement of HARC. • The Commission shared concerns of conflict-of-interest concerns tied to the subcommittee reporting back to HARC. • If a Subcommittee is formed to review specific projects, the Commission would like to establish a clear line separating the roles of the subcommittee from staff. • The full Commission does not recommend that the Subcommittee provide a recommendation or vote on items. • HARC selects members, giving individual expertise consideration collaboration Page 8 of 140 Page 6 of 7 Historic and Architectural Review Commission Meeting: May 12, 2022 During the April 28, 2022, meeting, the Commission asked if this Subcommittee would function a similar manner as the Demolition Subcommittee? The project Subcommittee for project review would differ from the Demolition Subcommittee in two distinct ways: 1) The HARC Bylaws and the City’s Unified Development Code require the formation of a Demolition Subcommittee. The formation of a Subcommittee for the review of specific projects is a discretionary act of the full Commission. 2) The City’s Unified Development Code requires that the Demolition Subcommittee provide a recommendation to the full Commission. Both Subcommittees are similar in that their meetings will require public notification in accordance with State law. In addition to feedback from the Commission, staff has identified additional considerations for the formation of a Subcommittee. The formation of a Subcommittee prior to review of the project by the full Commission will require additional meeting logistics and requirements of the Commission and staff. The Commission and staff agree on the need for the full Commission to have clear criteria to form the Subcommittee. Clear criteria could emerge during the review of a project by the full commission. Lastly, the willingness of an applicant to participate in a Subcommittee review is critical. In reviewing the feedback from the Commission and recognizing the potential value a Subcommittee may provide in review of project specific cases, staff recommends that applicants and the Commission continue to use a Conceptual Review process as part of regularly scheduled meetings of the Commission. If during review a specific project by the full Commission, the Commission finds that focus of a particular aspect of a project by a Subcommittee could benefit the applicant and Commission, the Commission is authorized in the Bylaws form a Subcommittee. Chair Walton opened the floor to discussion by sharing his feedback. Walton agrees that Waggoners summarization is correct. Agrees that a subcommittee can be formed on an as need basis and that it is up to the commissioners to ask for the subcommittee and be aware of that resource should it be needed. Walton also suggested that site visitation should be considered as a part of the subcommittee. Commissioner Davis shared that he does not see a need for it at this moment. Commissioner Romero asked for clarification on the intent of a subcommittee. Waggoner shared that it would be in place to ensure projects do not get delayed with multiple reviews. He continued to share that there is an active application for infill in the downtown involving height and futuristically there will be an application for the downtown parking garage. Commissioners agreed that if there was more clarity on the meaning of partially complies, they do not see a need to form a subcommittee. Page 9 of 140 Page 7 of 7 Historic and Architectural Review Commission Meeting: May 12, 2022 Chair Walton proposed that instead of a subcommittee that staff consider the commissions opportunity to call a special meeting to address concerns as they arise. Waggoner shared that the commission could call a special meeting so long as we are following public meeting procedures. Waggoner summarized that what he heard from the commission is to keep our regularly scheduled meetings of the full commission and continue to emphasize the role that the conceptual design while remembering that the commission has a tool in their toolkit (subcommittee/special meeting) if you find in during deliberations and the conceptual that you feel additional guidance/review is needed. F Updates, Commissioner questions, and comments. -Nat Waggoner, Asst. Planning Dir. - Long Range Waggoner shared that the commissions feedback will be addressed (partially comply and demolition) in a workshop in latter half of June. The workshop is to provide clarification and have an opportunity for discussion on role, purpose, etc. Changes to any criteria would be a separate process. Commissioner Romero requested from Waggoner to be notified of when the demo subcommittee is called to meet. Waggoner agreed that he can do that. No further Questions/Comments. Adjournment Motion to adjourn by Commissioner Romero. Second by Commissioner Davis. Approved unanimously 7-0. The meeting adjourned at 7:43 p.m. Michael Walton, Chair Jennifer Powell, Secretary Page 10 of 140 City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review May 26, 2022 S UB J E C T: P ublic Hearing and pos s ible ac tion on a request for a C ertificate of Appropriateness (C O A) for new res idential (infill) c onstruc tion for the property located at 510 E. 7th S treet bearing the legal des cription Lot 1, Block 36, G las s coc k Addition (2021-67-C O A). -- Meredith Johns on, c onsultant IT E M S UMMARY: Requested Changes: T he applic ant is reques ting to c o nstruc t a new ho use o n a vac ant p arcel. T he new hous e is proposed to be 3,457 s q . ft. that will contain approximately 2,961 s q . ft. o f living s pac e, a 325 s q . ft. attached garage, and 171 s q. ft. of covered patio and porc h s pace. At the April 14, 2022 meeting of the His toric and Architec tural R eview C ommis s ion, the C ommis s ion provided the following feedbac k to the applic ant: 1. Windows do not matc h and the faç ade c omes ac ros s as flat due to the garage placement/aes thetic s . 2. C ons ideration and incorporation of arc hitectural features that support the c harac ter of the dis tric t. S taff's Analysis: S taff has reviewed the reques t in acc o rd anc e with the Unified Develo p ment C ode (UDC ) and other applicable c o d es . S taff has determined that the propos ed request meets 4 of the 6 applicable c riteria es tablished in UDC S ec tion 3.13.030 for a C ertificate of Appropriateness, as outlined in the attac hed S taff R eport. Public Comments: As required b y the Unified Develo p ment C o d e (UDC ), one (1) s ign was posted on-s ite. As of the public ation d ate o f this rep o rt, staff has rec eived 0 written c o mments in favo r and 0 in oppos itio n to the request. F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None. T he applicant has paid the required application fees . S UB MIT T E D B Y: Nat Waggoner, P MP, AI C P AT TAC H ME N T S: Description Type Staff Report Cover Memo Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit Exhibit 2- Letter of Intent Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Plans & Specifications Exhibit Conceptual Staff Report (4.14.22)Cover Memo Exhibit 3a - Conceptual Plans & Specifications (4.14.22)Exhibit Page 11 of 140 Exhibit 3b - Conceptual Material Samples (4.14.22)Exhibit Pres entation Pres entation Page 12 of 140 Historic & Architectural Review Commission Planning Department Staff Report Report Date: May 20, 2022 File Number: 2021-67-COA AGENDA ITEM DETAILS Project Name: 510 E 7th Street - New Home Applicant: Chance Leigh Custom Homes, c/o Chance Leigh Property Owner: Chance Leigh Custom Homes Property Address: 510 7th Street Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 36, Glasscock Addition Historic Overlay: Old Town Overlay Case History: 4/14/22 Conceptual review – The Commission shared concerns of architectural features such as windows not matching and façade coming across as flat due to the garage placement/aesthetics. The Commission recommended the applicant review setbacks and consider opportunities for more creativity in design to fit the character of the District. Prior COA Denials: N/A Prior COA Approvals: N/A Post-Approval Project Amendments (Date): N/A HISTORIC CONTEXT Date of Construction: N/A Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: N/A National Register Designation: N/A Texas Historical Commission Designation: N/A Notable Property Owners/Events: N/A APPLICANT’S REQUEST HARC: ✔ New construction (residential infill) STAFF ANALYSIS Present Property Description: Vacant 6,301 sq. ft. lot Requested Changes: The applicant is requesting to construct a new house on a vacant parcel. The new house is proposed to be 3,457 sq. ft. that will contain approximately 2,961 sq. ft. of living space, a 325 sq. ft. attached garage, and 171 sq. ft. of covered patio and porch space. Page 13 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 2 of 11 Justification for Requests: The applicant owns the property and would like to construct a single-family home. Technical Review: The proposed 3,457 sq .ft. house will be comprised of 1,288 sq. ft. of heated space on the first floor and 1,673 sq. ft. of heated space on the second floor. The attached garage is setback 15’ from the primary façade. The proposed house is within the setbacks and meets height requirements. The block which the subject property is located is comprised of houses with various heights. To the immediate east of the subject property is a Two-story multi-family residence with a rectangular plan, hipped roof, and wood siding; an upper level balcony provides a roof over the lower level entry, which is surrounded by a low wood wall. To the immediate west of the subject property are two (2), 1 and a half story Tudor Revival style homes each with front facing gables. The more approximate Tudor home has two front gables. Further along the block is a full two story, side gabled home which is a noncontributing structure. The materials proposed for the house are compatible with the surrounding homes. The hardie siding will be a smooth finish with a 5” exposure. The shingles on the second-floor gable wall will have a smooth finish and an exposure of 6”. The block is primarily comprised of hardie board and wood horizonal siding. The porch is to be located on the first floor and will be level with the primary entrance and will have full overhead coverage. The adjacent houses have porches that are also level with the primary entry and fully covered by a roof. The proposed simple porch form is also seen across 7th Street and along College Street. The proposed garage is attached to the home and take access off of 7th Street. The driveway is 13’ 8” wide. The garage will be made for a single car. DESIGN GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE Staff has determined that the proposed project complies with 31 of the 38 applicable Historic District Design Guidelines in Chapter 3 as detailed below in the Applicable Design Guidelines section below. APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted Historic District Design Guidelines: GUIDELINES FINDINGS CHAPTER THREE – OLD TOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.3.O Front yard Setback New buildings and additions in Old Town should respect the residential setbacks established over time. Complies The proposed project will meet the setbacks as established by the current UDC. 3.3.P Porches Page 14 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 3 of 11 P.1 Front porches should align with front porches or building fronts on the same block face. Complies The front porch begins right after the setback and will be aligned with the adjacent porches. P.2 Porches should be scaled to the front façade and, where, applicable, side street façade and should be of a style and materials compatible with the architectural style of the structure. Where an architectural style does not typically include a large front porch, the primary entrance should have a characteristic overhang or recessed entrance. Complies The porch is appropriately scaled for this façade and will fit in with the surrounding homes, most of which have porches. The primary entrance is recessed into the porch to have an overhang. 3.4.A Maintain the Established Pattern of Lot Development. A.1 Respect and maintain the traditional relationship of a structure to the street and to neighboring properties. Complies Maintains the distance from the property line to the front of the house as other structures of the block. A.2 Respect and maintain the common orientation of structures, and the established configuration of open space. Complies The proposed house will maintain an orientation that is commonly found throughout Old Town. The house will be situated near the center of the lot and will leave space in the rear and front for yard space, as is common in this neighborhood. The garage is proposed as front facing and contributes to the configuration of open space. 3.4.B Primary Entrances The front door should face the street to maintain the pattern of the neighborhood. Complies The proposed project’s front entrance faces 7th Street. 3.4.C Relationship to Neighbors C.3 Looming guidelines a. When a 2-story addition is added onto the rear or side of an existing home, and the addition extends past the rear wall of an adjacent house there may be no windows placed on the second floor that exceeds the rear of the neighbor's rear wall. The exception Complies The rear addition of the house will not extend beyond the rear of their western neighbor. The sill heights exceed 65”. Page 15 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 4 of 11 is that windows are allowed if the sill height is 65 inches or greater. b. When an addition is made to an existing garage or accessory structure, or a new building added in the rear the new windows and doors must face into the rear yard and not into the side or rear neighbor's property. 3.4.D Location of Garages or Carports D.1 It is preferred that garages/carports be detached at the rear of the property. Does Not Comply The garage will be attached to the house recessed 15’ from the primary facade. D.2 It is preferred with an attached garage or carport that the garage entrance does not face the street. Does Not Comply The proposed attached garage will be added to the street frontage of 7th Street. D.3 If the garage is attached and the garage faces the street in front of the primary elevation they should be located behind the primary façade of the residence. The setback from the front façade should be no less than 15 feet. Complies The proposed attached garage is set back 15’ ½” from the front façade. D.4 Garages typically contain one or two cars in Old Town. When an owner requires more than a two-car garage, the garage should be placed behind the house. Complies The proposed project will not increase the garage capacity beyond two cars. 3.4.E Parking Configuration and Driveways E.3 Driveways are typically single width in Old Town. New driveway should be single width at the curb cut and continue at a single width until one reaches a length suitable for one car to park in front of each garage door or carport space. Complies The proposed driveway is 13’ 8” wide. 3.5.B Infill Design/New Construction The purpose of guidelines for new construction is not to prevent change in the Old Town Overlay District, but to ensure that the District’s architectural and historic character is respected. The height, proportion, roof shape, materials, texture, scale, and the details of the proposed building must be compatible with existing historic buildings in Complies The proposed project is like the existing historic fabric in scale, materials, and form. The proposed house is not a duplicated design from inside the historic district. Page 16 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 5 of 11 the District. However, compatible contemporary designs rather than historic duplications are encouraged. 3.5.C Massing, Scale and Form A variety of building sizes exist in this area. While contemporary design approaches are encouraged, developments should continue to exhibit a variety of sizes, similar to the buildings seen traditionally in the neighborhood. Complies This house will have a full second story. Examples of houses nearby with full second stories includes the house at 706 College Street and the house at 504 E 7th Street. C.1 The overall mass of a new building or addition should convey a sense of human scale. That is floor to floor heights on the ground floor should not exceed 15 feet on the ground floor and 12 feet on the second floor. Building materials should reflect a sense of scale that would appear as if one or two persons could lift the material. Monumental proportions are not appropriate. Complies The proposed house complies with this guideline. The first-floor height is 10’ and the second-floor height is approximately 8’, not including the attic. 3.5.E Roof E.1 Form The primary form should either be a gable end that faces the street or a cross gable that runs parallel to the street. Gable, hipped, pyramidal and gambrel roofs are appropriate. Complies The proposed roof will be a cross gable. E.3 Roof Pitch Primary roof-line should be between 5:12 and 10:12 in slope depending on the style of the house. Complies The proposed roof contains slopes of 5:12. E.4 Materials The following materials may be accepted depending on the building style. ● Dimensional asphalt shingle roofs that emulate wood shingles. Complies The proposed roof material is standing seam metal. Page 17 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 6 of 11 ● Real clay tile roofs ● Slatetiles ● Terra-cottatiles ● Standing seam metal roofs with a double munch or double lock seam, no more than 1.5 inches high, and 18 inch wide pans. E.5 Eaves and Overhangs Overhangs should be between 18 inches and 24 inches to provide shade over windows in summer months. Complies Overhangs is18” all around the home. 3.5.F Porches F.1 Front porches contribute to the ambiance of the street and encourage social interaction. Porches are recommended as a character defining feature. Complies A front porch is a part of this design. F.2 Location Porches should be located and accessible from the first floor of the structure. Complies The porch is located on and accessible from the first floor. F.3 Porch Size Porches should at least cover half of the first- floor façade facing the street horizontally. Does Not Comply The length of the first floor is 38’ 2.5”. One half of this is 19’ 1.25”. The porch measures 18’ 2”. F.4 Depth of Porch The minimum depth of the porch should not be less than six feet and the maximum depth of the porch should not exceed 10 feet. Partially Complies Does not comply in that the deepest part of the porch measures 15’ ½” near the front door entry. Complies in that the majority of the porch is 10’ deep. F.5 Porches Bulk a. Porches should appear to be “added on to the building” rather than cut out of the building. In other words, porches should have their own roof that isn’t integral to the rest of the building. Complies The porch is seamless with the building as it appears to be “carved out” of the first floor. F.6 Porch Roofs A minimum of 60% of the front porch should be covered by a roof or a trellis. Complies The whole porch, 100%, is covered by a roof. F.7 Porch Railings Page 18 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 7 of 11 b. Otherwise railings should be made of wood and should not exceed thirty-six inches in height measured from the floor of the porch. The baluster spacing should be continuous between columns. Balusters should be composed of 50% or less opaque material. Spacing between balusters should be no less than 2”. Complies Dimensions not provided by applicant, however staff has determined approximate measurements Complies - Railings are 36’ in height, balusters are continuous in spacing between columns of no less than 2”. F.9 Open Porch The front porch should be open and not enclosed by any materials except screens. Complies The front porch is open. F.10 Height of Porch Floor The floor of the front porch should be raised above grade and no lower than one step below the first floor. Complies The porch will be above grade on the slab and will no be lower than one step below the first floor. F.11 Porch Roof Height No portion of the eave of a roof or trellis should be more than twelve feet in height when measured from the floor of the porch or exceed the ceiling height of the first floor. Complies The porch roof height is 10’ 1”. F.12 Porch Columns Porch columns should visually be able to support the porch roof. If the porch roof and decorative elements like spindles are thin and delicate then the columns can be thin. If the porch roof is substantial with large beams, then the porch columns need to be more substantial. Complies The proposed columns give the visual impression that they can and do support the second floor and roof. F.13 Porch Foundation a. The porch must be supported by columns or foundation walls affixed to the ground. The columns should be no less than 18 inches by 18 inches. Does Not Comply Columns measure 12”x12”. F.14 Painted Wood All exposed wood used for porches should be painted, not stained. The exception is that floor decking can be stained. Partially Complies The railings will be painted wood, but the floor will be cement and the ceiling will be stained tongue and groove. Staining the wood ceiling does not comply with the guideline, but painting the rest of the wood on the porch does comply with the guideline. 3.5.G.2 Windows Page 19 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 8 of 11 b. The windows should be about twice as tall as they are wide and should have the same sill and head height on each floor of the building. The exception is Modern Ranch houses. c. Windows facing the street should have all the same sill height on each floor of the structure. Accent or feature windows are excepted. d. Windows should be laid out symmetrically in each bay (wall plane) that faces the street. Complies The proposed windows are twice as tall as they are wide and share the same sill and head height. The windows are laid out symmetrically. G.3 Window Materials a. Windows should be made of wood or aluminum-clad wood or fiberglass clad wood. The profiles and jamb conditions shall resemble the original wood windows in detailing and profile thickness. b. Windows with muntins shall have dimensional muntins on the exterior of the glass and with a spacer inserted between the glass in insulated windows. Dimensional muntins on the interior are optional. Does Not Comply The proposed window material is Fibrex, a material that uses wood fiber (sawdust) with thermoplastic polymer (plastic). This is not an approved material. c. Window glass may be insulated and/or low-e glass but shall be clear and not tinted. Complies Low-e glass proposed. 3.5.H Exterior Building Materials H.1 Building materials for new construction should be visually compatible with the predominant materials of this area. Materials for additions should be the same materials as the predominant materials of the existing building. H.2 New materials should relate to the scale, durability, color, and texture of the predominant materials of Old Town and in the case of building additions, to the existing structure. H.3 Wood siding, brick, and stone should be detailed to provide a human scale. Complies The applicant is proposing a smooth-texture Hardie board siding. Houses on the same block have both wood siding and Hardie siding, both are horizontal. One house, 506 7th St, has a brick façade. The new materials relate to the wood used throughout Old Town by mimicking wood siding sizes, spacing, and horizontal orientation. The finish will be smooth for both the siding and the shingles on the second-floor gable wall as opposed to a textured finish. Page 20 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 9 of 11 H.4 New materials should have demonstrated durability in the Central Texas climate. For example, some façade materials used in new construction are more susceptible to weather and simply do not last as long as stone or brick. Vinyl siding is not allowed. H.6 Building Wall Materials The following exterior building materials are appropriate for new construction: a. Horizontal wood or cementitious wood siding with a 4-7 inch exposure (smooth not weathered finish). b. Wood shingle in a vertical pattern with 3” to 7” reveal. c. Stone, brick or other masonry with dimensions that are human scale, that is with the appearance that they could be laid by hand. d. Combinations: Creative combinations of the above are encouraged to recreate natural textures, so long as they meet the overall objective of conveying a sense of permanence, human scale and proportion. e. Use of Wood Shingles: Wood shingles should be used as second story cladding, on attic dormers, gable ends and porch roof gables. Complies The applicant is proposing a Hardie board siding with a smooth finish. The exposure is 5”. The shingles on the second floor gable wall will have a smooth finish and an exposure of 6”. 3.5.I Architectural Details and Features I.1 Architectural details such as columns, lintels, sills, rafters, door surrounds, and decorative gable ends add visual interest to a structure. Complies The applicant is proposing two architectural columns to frame the front entrance of the new home. The columns are similar in design to those that may be found on a Craftsman- style home, as is common throughout Georgetown. Page 21 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 10 of 11 I.2 Use of appropriately scaled details is encouraged. I.3 Details should be consistent with the design and style of the building. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, HARC must consider the following criteria. Staff has determined that the applicant has met 4 out of 6 applicable criteria. SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS 1. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is correct and sufficient enough to allow adequate review and final action; Complies 2. Compliance with applicable design standards of this Code; Complies 3. Compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties to the most extent practicable; Complies The proposed project complies with applicable SOI Standards, which include: 3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 4. Compliance with the adopted Historic District Design Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time, specific to the applicable Historic Overlay District; Partially Complies The proposed home is compatible in siding materials, roof form, and location. Garage Page 22 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 11 of 11 SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS orientation, window materials, and driveway do not comply. 5. The general historic, cultural, and architectural integrity of the building, structure or site is preserved; Not Applicable 6. New buildings or additions are designed to be compatible with surrounding properties in the applicable historic overlay district; Partially Complies The proposed home is compatible with its surroundings in terms of setbacks, height and materials to structures within the block. Does not comply with garage locationMatching context is partial compliance. 7. The overall character of the applicable historic overlay district is protected Complies This proposed house matches the surrounding context through massing, scale, and overall design. The character of the district is not harmed with the addition of this house. 8. The Master Sign Plan is in keeping with the adopted Historic District Design Guidelines and the character of the historic overlay district. Not Applicable STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends APPROVAL of the request. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION As required by the Unified Development Code, (1) one sign was posted on-site. To date, staff has received 0 written comments in favor and 0 in opposition to the request. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Letter of Intent Exhibit 3 – Plans and Specifications SUBMITTED BY Meredith, Johnson, consultant Page 23 of 140 Location 2021-67-COA Exhibit #1 EL M S T E 7TH ST E 8TH ST AS H S T W A L N U T S T P I N E S T S C O L L E G E S T P I N E S T E 9TH ST E 6TH S T WA L N U T S T S M Y R T L E S T E 8TH S T E 9TH S T E 9TH 1/2 ST E 9TH S T 0 200100 Feet ¯ Site Parcels Page 24 of 140 May 20, 2022 Letter of Intent Revised RE: 510 East 7th St Georgetown, Texas 78626 This project consists of constructing a new residential single-family home located on a vacant lot within the Old Town Overlay District at 510 East 7th Street. The neighborhood in which this home will be located contains a mixture of low, medium, and high priority structures. The structure across the street facing College Street is a high priority structure, those East of this location on E 7th are medium priority structures and the last house across the street in the block facing E 7th at Ash St is a low priority structure. The proposed residence has 2,961 SF of conditioned space consisting of 3 Bedrooms, 3 Baths, Study and Single Car Garage. The home is positioned on the lot within all existing building lines and setbacks. As detailed on the Site Plan submitted the Impervious Cover percentage is 37 % and the calculated floor-to- area ratio is .45 all within the standards of Sec.4.08.080 and the UDC guidelines. While within the 30’ maximum height guidelines of Sec.4.08.080.C we are requesting a variance to the maximum height allowed at the setbacks as provided for in Sec. 4.08.080 C.2 . At the boundary this structure is 20’ vs the 15’0” referenced in 4.08.080. The floor-to-floor heights of both the first and second floors at 11-4” and 10’ are still below the allowable 15’ for ground floor and 12’ for second floor as detailed in Chapter 3.5.C.1 of the Old Town Design Guidelines. The two-story design is compatible to the character of the neighborhood in mass and scale as the block on 7th between Ash and College is home to several existing two-story designs. The home next door at 508 E 7th as well as homes at 504 E 7th and the home across the street facing College are all two-story design structures with similar mass and scale as the proposed structure. We have included the existing structure on the adjacent lot southeast of this proposed structure to our presentation to provide some visual input as to the compatibility of the proposed design. Page 25 of 140 We listened to the Commissioners comments at the last meeting and redesigned the structure as follows: One of the major issues was the one-dimensional façade and lack of a set back for the garage entrance. We reduced the garage to a single car design which allowed the 15’ setback to be included while adding more dimension to the front of the structure and enlarging the porch area. The roof was redesigned as a simple double gable roof with 5:12 slope and both gables facing the street as suggested. This also allowed the incorporation of the second gable over the porch area giving the porch its “own roof” as discussed in paragraph 3.5F of the Historic Design Guidelines. The porch railing will be one unique to Old Town that is composed of 4x4 painted wood balustrades spaced 6” apart with top and bottom rails of 2x6’s laid flat. Roofing material will be standing seam metal roofing as detailed in paragraph E.4. of the HDG. Roofing color will be non-reflective period correct that closely approximates the metal roofs of prior periods. All eave widths are the required 18” minimum. On the street facing façade we reimagined the windows to be separate and apart to better convey the neighborhood feel of the structure. Additionally, the upper floor windows were redesigned to be the same size as the lower floor windows and placed symmetrically to reinforce the residential appeal. The windows will be Andersen “Fibrex”, a recycled wood and polymer product in the one over one clear design with profiles and jambs resembling wood windows of the past As this project is a new construction project, we have selected building materials that meet the criteria of H.6, upholding the unique character and visual continuity of the neighborhood while promoting the durability and sustainability demanded by current buyers. To meet these dual mandates, we have selected Hardi smooth cementitious siding and trim material for the exterior of the structure. Siding will be horizontal with a 4”-7” exposure. To add visual interest to the project we have included several architectural details. Metal awnings over the garage entrance and stoops constructed of the same material as the roof, corbels along the eaves and decorative cementitious Hardi shingles in the gable ends facing the street were all added to the design with neighborhood compatibility in mind. Page 26 of 140 We have diligently tried to incorporate the ideas we heard from the Commissioners at our last meeting. Our goal is to build a compatible, and complimentary house for the neighborhood. It should be obvious from the time this lot has remained vacant that this is anything but an easy task. To that end we appreciate your input and ask for your approval of this design which we believe is a better use of the property and a valuable addition to the neighborhood. Chance Leigh Custom Homes Page 27 of 140 REVISION TABLE NUMBER DATE REVISED BY DESCRIPTION SHEET: SCALE: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: DATE: 5/20/2022 Residence 501 E. 7th Street Georgetown,TX Chance Leigh Custom Homes 1952 S. Austin Ave. Georgetown, TX 78626 PRELIMINARY CONTENTS: SITE PLAN C1.0 FLOOR PLANS A1.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.0 ROOF PLAN A3.0 CVR PRELIM X/X/XX Page 28 of 140 N 15' SETBACK C O L L E G E S T R E E T 25' BLDG. LINE25' BLDG. LINE 20' BLDG. LINE 2 0 ' B L D G . L I N E LOT 1LOT 2 7.5' BLDG. LINE 7 . 5 ' B L D G . L I N E 7TH STREET NEW 2 -STORY RESIDENCE EXISTING RESIDENCE 7.5' BLDG. LINE 3 X 3 STOOP 3 X 3 STOOP A/C PAD A/C PAD WATER METER GAS ELECTRIC TRANSORMER REVISION TABLE NUMBER DATE REVISED BY DESCRIPTION SHEET: SCALE: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: DATE: 5/20/2022 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10' Residence 501 E. 7th Street Georgetown,TX Chance Leigh Custom Homes 1952 S. Austin Ave. Georgetown, TX 78626 IMPERVIOUS COVER HOUSE 1784 SQ. FT. DRIVE/WALK 508 SQ. FT. STOOPS (2) 18 SQ. FT. AC PADS (2) 50 SQ. FT. TOTAL 2360 SQ. FT. LOT 6301 SQ. FT. IC = 37.5% C1.0 PRELIMINARY PRELIM X/X/XX Page 29 of 140 3068 2880 3060 SH 8' HDR 3060 SH 8' HDR 2480 3080 3080 FULL LITE 3060FX TEMP 8' HDR 3060 SH 8' HDR 3060 SH 8' HDR 3060 SH 8' HDR 2880 2880 3080 3080 3020 HS TEMP 8' HDR 71180PT 5080 4046FX TEMP 8' HDR 2880 3060 SH 8' HDR 3080 3060DH 3060DH 90803060 SH TEMP 8' HDR UP 4'-3"2'-1 3/8"6'-10"6'-10" 12'-3 1/2"5'-10 1/2"6'-4 3/8"13'-8" 38'-2 1/2" 4'-1 1/2" 33'-6" 2'-1 1/2" 39'-9" 15'-0 1/2" 7'-0 1/2"3'-6"3'-6"3'-6"4'-2"2'-5"7'-9"6'-4" 24'-1 1/2"14'-1" 38'-2 1/2" 24'-9" 4'-7 1/2" 4'-0 1/2" 1'-1" 24'-9" 8'-8" 2'-3 1/2" 11'-4 1/2" 6'-7" 54'-9" 2'-3 1/2" 3'-11" 2'-4 1/2" 1'-6" 2' 2' 1'-6" STUDY / BR 4 2R1S 13' CLG BATH 3 RAIL PORCH ENTRY CLOSET PANTRY GARAGE 3'x3' stoop ws loop LAUNDRY 96" LIN 10' clg 10' clg Trash PO DW FAMILY DINING KITCHEN CNTR DEPTH REF RANGE ENTRY EAVES ARE 18" DN 2480 3080 2480 2630FX 3020 HS TEMP 8' HDR 3020 HS TEMP 8' HDR 15080 2480 2670 3060 SH TEMP 8' HDR 3060 SH TEMP 8' HDR 2461 2880 5080 2880 3060DH 3060DH 2880 3060DH3060DH 2880 2880 3060DH 3060DH 3060DH3060DH3060DH 3060DH 2680 1'-6" 1'-6" 2'-3"8'-11 1/2"6'-10" 2'18'-0 1/2" 1'-8" 2'-2 3/8" 3'-8" 2'-5 1/2" 7'-6 1/2" 1'-11 5/16" 8'-3 7/8" 21'-11 5/16" 39'-9" 5'-1 1/4"3'-9"5'-3 3/4"4'-11 1/2"3'-10"5'-3 1/2" 4'-3"5'-8 1/2"14'-2"14'-1" 38'-2 1/2" 1'-8"2'-6 1/8" 2'-10" 1'-9 1/2" 2'-2 1/2" 3'-2" 5'-4" 2' 11'-9 1/2" 1'-1" 12'-2" 2'-5 1/2" 10" 5'-4 1/8" 4' 8'-6" 13'-9 1/2" 6'-6 7/8" 54'-9" BEDROOM 3 GAME ROOM 0WNER'S SUITE CLOSET OPEN BELOW BATH 3 BEDROOM 2 CLOSET STOARGE CLOSET BATH 2 BENCHBENCH SHWR LIN. SITTING AREA LIN 48" LIN OWNER BATH CLOSET REVISION TABLE NUMBER DATE REVISED BY DESCRIPTION SHEET: SCALE: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: DATE: 5/20/2022 Residence 501 E. 7th Street Georgetown,TX 1/4" = 1'-0" A1.0 FLOOR PLANS Chance Leigh Custom Homes 1952 S. Austin Ave. Georgetown, TX 78626 FLOORPLAN - 2ND FLOOR 2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" PRELIMINARY PRELIM X/X/XX FLOORPLAN - 1ST FLOOR 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SQUARE FOOTAGE AREA FRAMED FIRST FLOOR HEATED 1288 SQ.FT. SECOND FLOOR HEATED 1673 SQ. FT. TOTAL HEATED 2961 SQ.FT GARAGE 325 SQ.FT. FRONT PORCH 171 SQ. FT. TOTAL FRAMED 3457 SQ. FT. TOTAL SLAB 1784 SQ. FT. Page 30 of 140 FRONT ELEVATION1SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 12 5 12 5 10'-1 1/8" 1'-4 3/4" 9'-1 1/8" 26'-8 11/16" TOP RIDGE TOP OF SLAB 10' PLATE/ CLG. SECOND FLOOR TOP PLATE Hardi Shingles ALL EAVES 18"ALL EAVES 18"ALL EAVES 18"ALL EAVES 18" 12 5 12 5 10'-1 1/8" 1'-4 3/4" 9'-1 1/8" TOP OF SLAB 10' PLATE/ CLG. SECOND FLOOR TOP PLATE 12 5 10' 1'-6" 9'-1" 14'-5" 2'-10" 10'-8" TOP OF SLAB 10' PLATE/ CLG. SECOND FLOOR TOP PLATE SECOND FLOOR WINDOW SILL HEIGHT FROM GRADE 4x4 rough cedar standing seam metal 10'-1 1/8" 1'-4 3/4" 9'-1 1/8" 12 5 TOP OF SLAB 10' PLATE/ CLG. SECOND FLOOR TOP PLATE 2'-0" 10' 12 METAL ROOF 4x4 Rough Cedar 5 Fascia Real-Wood Primed GARAGE AWNING DETAIL REVISION TABLE NUMBER DATE REVISED BY DESCRIPTION SHEET: SCALE: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: DATE: 5/20/2022 Residence 501 E. 7th Street Georgetown,TX Chance Leigh Custom Homes 1952 S. Austin Ave. Georgetown, TX 78626 REAR ELEVATION2SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ELEVATIONS 1/4" = 1'-0" A2.0 PRELIMINARY PRELIM X/X/XX RIGHT ELEVATION3SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" LEFT ELEVATION4SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" James Hardie Siding Shingle 6" Exposure 1x4" Real Wood trim around all windows Page 31 of 140 FRONT ELEVATION1SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 12 5 12 5 10'-1 1/8" 1'-4 3/4" 9'-1 1/8" 26'-8 11/16" TOP RIDGE TOP OF SLAB 10' PLATE/ CLG. SECOND FLOOR TOP PLATE Hardi Shingles ALL EAVES 18"ALL EAVES 18"ALL EAVES 18"ALL EAVES 18" 12 5 12 5 10'-1 1/8" 1'-4 3/4" 9'-1 1/8" TOP OF SLAB 10' PLATE/ CLG. SECOND FLOOR TOP PLATE 12 5 10' 1'-6" 9'-1" 14'-5" 2'-10" 10'-8" TOP OF SLAB 10' PLATE/ CLG. SECOND FLOOR TOP PLATE SECOND FLOOR WINDOW SILL HEIGHT FROM GRADE 4x4 rough cedar standing seam metal 10'-1 1/8" 1'-4 3/4" 9'-1 1/8" 12 5 TOP OF SLAB 10' PLATE/ CLG. SECOND FLOOR TOP PLATE 2'-0" 10' 12 METAL ROOF 4x4 Rough Cedar 5 Fascia Real-Wood Primed GARAGE AWNING DETAIL REVISION TABLE NUMBER DATE REVISED BY DESCRIPTION SHEET: SCALE: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: DATE: 5/20/2022 Residence 501 E. 7th Street Georgetown,TX Chance Leigh Custom Homes 1952 S. Austin Ave. Georgetown, TX 78626 REAR ELEVATION2SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ELEVATIONS 1/4" = 1'-0" A2.0 PRELIMINARY PRELIM X/X/XX RIGHT ELEVATION3SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" LEFT ELEVATION4SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" James Hardie Siding Shingle 6" Exposure 1x4" Real Wood trim around all windows Page 32 of 140 7 : 12 7 : 12 7 : 12 7 : 12 5 : 12 5 : 12 5 : 12 5 : 12 5 : 12 5 : 12 5 : 12 5 : 12 1'-6" 1'-6" 1'-6" 1'-11 7/16" 1'-6" 2R1S 13' CLG RAIL 3'x3' stoop ws loop 96" LIN 10' clg 10' clg Trash PO DW CNTR DEPTH REF RANGE EAVES ARE 18" REVISION TABLE NUMBER DATE REVISED BY DESCRIPTION SHEET: SCALE: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: DATE: 5/20/2022 Residence 501 E. 7th Street Georgetown,TX Chance Leigh Custom Homes 1952 S. Austin Ave. Georgetown, TX 78626 1/4" = 1'-0" A3.0 ROOF PLAN ROOF PLAN1SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" PRELIMINARY PRELIM X/X/XX Page 33 of 140 Page 34 of 140 Page 35 of 140 Page 36 of 140 Page 37 of 140 Page 38 of 140 Page 39 of 140 Page 40 of 140 Page 41 of 140 Page 42 of 140 Page 43 of 140 Page 44 of 140 Page 45 of 140 Page 46 of 140 Page 47 of 140 Page 48 of 140 Historic & Architectural Review Commission Planning Department Staff Report Report Date: April 8, 2022 File Number: 2021-67-COA AGENDA ITEM DETAILS Project Name: 510 E 7th Street - New Home Applicant: Chance Leigh Custom Homes, c/o Chance Leigh Property Owner: Chance Leigh Custom Homes Property Address: 510 7th Street Legal Description: .1513 acres, Lot 1, Block 36, Glasscock Addition Historic Overlay: Old Town Overlay Case History: N/A Prior COA Denials: N/A Prior COA Approvals: N/A Post-Approval Project Amendments (Date): N/A HISTORIC CONTEXT Date of Construction: 1960 Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: N/A National Register Designation: N/A Texas Historical Commission Designation: N/A Notable Property Owners/Events: N/A APPLICANT’S REQUEST HARC Conceptual Review: ✔ New construction (residential infill) STAFF ANALYSIS Present Property Description: Vacant 6,301 sq. ft. lot Requested Changes: The applicant is requesting to construct a new house on a vacant parcel. The new house is proposed to be 2,904 sq. ft. that will contain approximately 2,245 sq. ft. of living space, a 444 sq. ft. attached garage, and 215 sq. ft. of covered patio and porch space. Feedback Requested: 1. Does the new house comply with the looming guidelines of 3.4.C.3? 2. Does the house relate to the nearby structures in character and form, and size (massing and scale)? 3. Is there additional information HARC would like at the public hearing? Page 49 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 2 of 9 DESIGN GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE Staff has determined that the proposed project complies with 11 of the 18 applicable Historic District Design Guidelines in Chapters 3.4-3.5 as detailed below in the Applicable Design Guidelines section below. APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted Historic District Design Guidelines: GUIDELINES FINDINGS CHAPTER THREE – OLD TOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.3.O Front yard Setback New buildings and additions in Old Town should respect the residential setbacks established over time. Complies The proposed project will meet the setbacks as established by the current UDC. 3.4.A Maintain the Established Pattern of Lot Development. A.1 Respect and maintain the traditional relationship of a structure to the street and to neighboring properties. Complies Maintains the distance from the property line to the front of the house as other structures of the block. A.2 Respect and maintain the common orientation of structures, and the established configuration of open space. Complies The proposed house will maintain an orientation that is commonly found throughout Old Town. The house will be situated near the center of the lot and will leave space in the rear and front for yard space, as is common in this neighborhood. The garage is proposed as front facing and contributes to the configuration of open space. 3.4.B Primary Entrances The front door should face the street to maintain the pattern of the neighborhood. Complies The proposed project’s front entrance faces 7th Street. 3.4.C Relationship to Neighbors C.3 Looming guidelines a. When a 2-story addition is added onto the rear or side of an existing home, and the addition extends past the rear wall of an adjacent house there may be no windows placed on the second floor that exceeds the Complies The rear addition of the house will not extend beyond the rear of their western neighbor. The sill heights are currently unknown. Page 50 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 3 of 9 rear of the neighbor's rear wall. The exception is that windows are allowed if the sill height is 65 inches or greater. b. When an addition is made to an existing garage or accessory structure, or a new building added in the rear the new windows and doors must face into the rear yard and not into the side or rear neighbor's property. 3.4.D Location of Garages or Carports D.1 It is preferred that garages/carports be detached at the rear of the property. Does Not Comply The garage will be attached to the house. D.2 It is preferred with an attached garage or carport that the garage entrance does not face the street. Does Not Comply The proposed attached garage will be added to the street frontage of 7th Street. D.3 If the garage is attached and the garage faces the street in front of the primary elevation they should be located behind the primary façade of the residence. The setback from the front façade should be no less than 15 feet. Does Not Comply The proposed attached garage is set back 3 feet from the front façade, D.4 Garages typically contain one or two cars in Old Town. When an owner requires more than a two-car garage, the garage should be placed behind the house. Complies The proposed project will not increase the garage capacity beyond two cars. 3.4.E Parking Configuration and Driveways E.3 Driveways are typically single width in Old Town. New driveway should be single width at the curb cut and continue at a single width until one reaches a length suitable for one car to park in front of each garage door or carport space. Does Not Comply The proposed driveway is approximately 16’ wide. 3.5.B Infill Design/New Construction The purpose of guidelines for new construction is not to prevent change in the Old Town Overlay District, but to ensure that the District’s architectural and historic character is respected. The height, proportion, roof shape, materials, texture, scale, and the Complies The proposed project is similar to the historic fabric in scale, materials, and form. The proposed house is not a duplicated design from inside the historic district. Page 51 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 4 of 9 details of the proposed building must be compatible with existing historic buildings in the District. However, compatible contemporary designs rather than historic duplications are encouraged. 3.5.C Massing, Scale and Form A variety of building sizes exist in this area. While contemporary design approaches are encouraged, developments should continue to exhibit a variety of sizes, similar to the buildings seen traditionally in the neighborhood. Partially Complies The neighborhood surrounding the subject property is comprised of a variety of heights for both original structures and additions. C.1 The overall mass of a new building or addition should convey a sense of human scale. That is floor to floor heights on the ground floor should not exceed 15 feet on the ground floor and 12 feet on the second floor. Building materials should reflect a sense of scale that would appear as if one or two persons could lift the material. Monumental proportions are not appropriate. Complies The proposed house complies with this guideline. The first-floor height is 10’ and the second-floor height is about 8’, not including the attic. 3.5.E Roof E.1 Form The primary form should either be a gable end that faces the street or a cross gable that runs parallel to the street. Gable, hipped, pyramidal and gambrel roofs are appropriate. Complies The proposed roof will be a cross gable. E.3 Roof Pitch Primary roof-line should be between 5:12 and 10:12 in slope depending on the style of the house. Complies The proposed roof contains slopes of 4:12, 5:12, and 6:12. E.4 Materials Complies The proposed roof material is composite shingles. Page 52 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 5 of 9 The following materials may be accepted depending on the building style. ● Dimensional asphalt shingle roofs that emulate wood shingles. ● Real clay tile roofs ● Slatetiles ● Terra-cottatiles ● Standing seam metal roofs with a double munch or double lock seam, no more than 1.5 inches high, and 18 inch wide pans. ● Grade A, smooth machine cut, real wood shingles treated with fire-retardant. Shingles should be about 3/8” thick by about 5 inches wide. ● Built-up and membrane roofs are only appropriate on slopes less than 1:10 and should be screened by a low parapet E.5 Eaves and Overhangs Overhangs should be between 18 inches and 24 inches to provide shade over windows in summer months. Does Not Comply The proposed roof overhang appears to be less than the guidelines, but a dimension has not yet been given. 3.5.G.2 Windows b. The windows should be about twice as tall as they are wide and should have the same sill and head height on each floor of the building. The exception is Modern Ranch houses. c. Windows facing the street should have all the same sill height on each floor of the structure. Accent or feature windows are excepted. d. Windows should be laid out symmetrically in each bay (wall plane) that faces the street. Partially Complies Most of the proposed windows are twice as tall as they are wide and appear to share the same sill and head height. The windows are laid out symmetrically. Some proposed windows along the northern, eastern, and western elevations, however, do not meet this guideline. Three windows on the eastern elevation are longer than they are tall. Four windows on the northern elevation, facing 7th Street, are squares, and one window on the eastern elevation facing College Street is wider than it is tall. Page 53 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 6 of 9 The proposed materials for the windows comply at this point in time. 3.5.H Exterior Building Materials H.1 Building materials for new construction should be visually compatible with the predominant materials of this area. Materials for additions should be the same materials as the predominant materials of the existing building. H.2 New materials should relate to the scale, durability, color, and texture of the predominant materials of Old Town and in the case of building additions, to the existing structure. H.3 Wood siding, brick, and stone should be detailed to provide a human scale. H.4 New materials should have demonstrated durability in the Central Texas climate. For example, some façade materials used in new construction are more susceptible to weather and simply do not last as long as stone or brick. Vinyl siding is not allowed. Complies The applicant is proposing a smooth-texture Hardie board siding. H.6 Building Wall Materials The following exterior building materials are appropriate for new construction: a. Horizontal wood or cementitious wood siding with a 4-7 inch exposure (smooth not weathered finish). b. Wood shingle in a vertical pattern with 3” to 7” reveal. c. Stone, brick or other masonry with dimensions that are human scale, that is with the appearance that they could be laid by hand. Complies The applicant is proposing a smooth-texture Hardie board siding. The exposure is not yet provided, but the specs of this material do allow for a 4-7” exposure. Page 54 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 7 of 9 d. Combinations: Creative combinations of the above are encouraged to recreate natural textures, so long as they meet the overall objective of conveying a sense of permanence, human scale and proportion. e. Use of Wood Shingles: Wood shingles should be used as second story cladding, on attic dormers, gable ends and porch roof gables. f. Use of Brick & Block ● Brick is encouraged, but the style of brick should be similar to the brick already found in the neighborhood, and should be no larger than 2 2/3” X 8” with mortar joints no larger than 1/4”. ● Brick should not be used on upper floors unless brick is found on the floors below. ● Concrete masonry units (CMU) or concrete block should not be used as an exposed exterior material. g. Use of Stone ● Native Texas stone is an appropriate exterior material if used in the scale of other stone found in the neighborhood. ● Use of synthetic stone is not appropriate unless the structure already has synthetic stone. h. Non-traditional siding materials are discouraged. ● Typically, artificial stone and brick veneer are not appropriate. ● Asphalt shingles are not appropriate. Page 55 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 8 of 9 ● Aluminum and vinyl are not appropriate. 3.5.I Architectural Details and Features I.1 Architectural details such as columns, lintels, sills, rafters, door surrounds, and decorative gable ends add visual interest to a structure. I.2 Use of appropriately scaled details is encouraged. I.3 Details should be consistent with the design and style of the building. Complies The applicant is proposing two architectural columns to frame the front entrance of the new home. The columns are similar in design to those that may be found on a Craftsman-style home, as is common throughout Georgetown. Additionally, the applicant has proposed an external chimney feature that will run, and exceed, the length of the eastern elevation, facing College Street. This type of chimney placement is common as well throughout Georgetown and adds architectural interest to a non-primary street-facing facade. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, HARC must consider the following criteria. Staff has determined that the applicant has met 4 out of 8 of these criteria. SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS 1. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is correct and sufficient enough to allow adequate review and final action; Partially Complies Dimensional information is needed to confirm height. 2. Compliance with applicable design standards of this Code; Partially Complies Additional information is needed to confirm building heights. 3. Compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties to the most extent practicable; Complies The proposed project complies with applicable SOI Standards, which include: 3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy Page 56 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2021-67-COA – 510 E. 7th Street Page 9 of 9 SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 4. Compliance with the adopted Historic District Design Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time, specific to the applicable Historic Overlay District; Partially Complies The proposed home is compatible in siding materials, roof form, and location. Garage, driveway and window styles do not comply. 5. The general historic, cultural, and architectural integrity of the building, structure or site is preserved; Partially Complies The proposed home is a new build, so it will not be a “historic” asset for another 50 years. However, the proposed structure maintains the original use of the site. 6. New buildings or additions are designed to be compatible with surrounding properties in the applicable historic overlay district; Complies The proposed home is compatible with its surroundings in terms of setbacks, height and materials to structures within the block. 7. The overall character of the applicable historic overlay district is protected Complies The new home is modest in scale and context and will not detract from the other, more authentic homes in the district. 8. The Master Sign Plan is in keeping with the adopted Historic District Design Guidelines and the character of the historic overlay district. Not Applicable No signs are proposed. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Letter of Intent Exhibit 3 – Plans and Specifications Exhibit 4 – Historic Resource Surveys Page 57 of 140 DW WH UP WasherDryer CL R @ 1121 SF 1st FLOOR LIVING 444 SF GARAGE 116 SF FRONT PORCH 99 SF COVERED PATIO 1124 SF 2nd FLOOR LIVING 0000 Room name 150 SF Unbounded Height C.H. A 0000 1 A101 A101 1 11 1 AX.X X 3 A REVISION TAG ELEVATION DETAIL/SECTION WINDOW TAG WALL TAG ROOM TAG DOOR TAG 1 COLUMN GRID SINGLE STEP WINDOW SWINGING DOOR SCREEN DOOR INTERIOR ELEVATION 2 3 4 +2'-0" STAIRS TOILET UP SPIRAL STAIR (WITH TREAD SHADING) DRAFTING GUIDE POCKET DOOR FLR GRILLE USE "PLAN OPENING" INSTANCE PARAMETER TO SHOW DOOR IN OPEN OR CLOSED POSITION P1 ±7 1/2"20 STEP SCALE: PROJECT: NICK SMITH, CPBD NICK@CENTEXBLUEPRINT.COM (512) 409-6819 CENTEX BLUEPRINT ©2021 REVISION DATE THIS CONTENT OF THIS DOCUMENT IS VALID FOR THE PROJECT AS LISTED ON THIS SHEET. ANY USE FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR PROJECT IS ILLEGAL AND STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IS S U E D F O R P E R M I T BU I L D I N G D E S I G N - C O N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S As indicated C: \ U s e r s \ N i c k \ D e s k t o p \ 20 2 2 P r o j e c t s \ C h a n c e L e ig h \ 5 1 0 E 7 t h S t r e e t \ D r a f t 6 . r v t 1/27/2022 1:12:45 PM A0 COVER PAGE CLH 510 E 7th STREET GEORGETOWN TX 78626 SHEET LIST Sheet Name Sheet Number COVER PAGE A0 SITE PLAN A1 1st FLOOR A2 ROOF / SECTIONS A3 ELEVATIONS A4 ELECTRICAL A5 Window Schedule Width Height Sill Height Count Type Comments 2'-0" 2'-0" 4'-8" 4 2020 FX 2'-0" 4'-0" 2 2040 2'-0" 6'-0" 2'-0" 2 2060 FX 3'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 1 3040 SH 3'-0" 5'-0" 1'-8" 7 3050 SH 4'-0" 1'-6" 6'-6" 4 4016 FX 6'-0" 6'-0" 2'-0" 1 6060 FX 6'-0" 5'-0" 3 DBL 3050 Door Schedule Width Height Count Type Comments 2'-8" 6'-8" 1 3 PANEL W/ TRANS. 16'-0" 7'-0" 1 16' X 7' GARAGE DOOR W/ OPENER 2'-4" 6'-8" 5 2468 2'-6" 6'-8" 2 2668 2'-1 1/2" 7'-0" 1 2668 GLASS 2'-8" 6'-8" 4 2868 2'-4" 6'-8" 1 2868 BARN 3'-0" 6'-8" 2 3068 4'-0" 6'-8" 6 4068 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 5080 1/8" = 1'-0"A0 2 1ST FLOOR AREA 1/8" = 1'-0"A0 3 2nd FLOOR AREA CONCRETE BRICK WOOD EARTH STEEL RIGID INSULATION GYP. BD. GYP. SHEATHING BATT INSULATION SUPPLY AIR RETURN AIR ARCHITECTURAL GRAPHIC SYMBOLS GENERAL NOTES ARCHITECTURAL MATERIAL DESIGNATION MECHANICAL NOTES AB ANCHOR BOLT ABOVE ABOVE ACC.ACCESS/ACCESSIBLE ACOUS. ACOUSTICAL A.C.T. ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE ADD ADDENDUM ADJ. ADJUSTABLE A.F.F. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR AGG. AGGREGATE AL. ALUMINUM ALT. ALTERNATE APPROX. APPROXIMATELY ARCH. ARCHITECT AUTO. AUTOMATIC AUX. AUXILIARY AVG.AVERAGE A/C AIR CONDITIONING A/V AUDIO VISUAL BD. BOARD B/F BOTH FACES BET. BETWEEN BITUM. BITUMINOUS BLDG. BUILDING BLK. BLOCKING BM. BEAM BOT. BOTTOM B.O.C. BOTTOM OF CURB B.S. BOTH SIDES B.W. BOTH WAYS CAB CABINET CER. CERAMIC CIP CAST-IN-PLACE CIR. CIRCLE C.J. CONTROL JOINT CLG.CEILING CLG. HT. CEILING HEIGHT CLR. CLEAR(ANCE) CL CLOSET COL.COLUMN CONC. CONCRETE CONST. CONSTRUCTION CONTR. CONTRACTOR CONT. CONTINUOUS CORRU CORRUGATED CTR. CENTER C-C CENTER TO CENTER DBL. DOUBLE D.H. DOUBLE-HUNG DIAG. DIAGONAL DIA. DIAMETER DIM. DIMENSION DN DOWN DR. DOOR DTL. DETAIL DW DISHWASHER DWG. DRAWING EA. EACH ELEC. ELECTRICAL EL. ELEVATION ENCL. ENCLOSURE EQUIP. EQUIPMENT EXH. EXHAUST EXIST. EXISTING EXPO. EXPOSED EXT. EXTERIOR FD FLOOR DRAIN F.F. FINISH FLOOR/FACE FIN. FINISH(ED) FIXT. FIXTURE FIXT. FLOOR FND.FOUNDATION ABBREVIATIONS F.S. FULL SIZE FRPF. FOOTING FT. FOOT/FEET FURN. FURNISH FURR. FURRED/FURRING F.V. FIELD VERIFY GA. GAUGE GAL.GALLON GALV. GALVANIZED GB GARBAGE DISPOSAL G.C. GENERAL CONTRACTOR GD. GUARD GEN.GENERAL GL GLASS GR. GRADE/GRADING GYP.GYPSUM HD. HEAD H.M. HOLLOW METAL HORIZ. HORIZONTAL HR HOUR HT. HEIGHT HVAC HEATING/VENTILATING/AIR CONDITIONING WHOT WATER I.D. INSIDE DIAMETER INCL. INCLUDE(D) INFO. INFORMATION INSUL.A. INSULATION INT. INTERIOR IN INCHES JST. JOIST JT. JOINT LAV. LAVATORY LGTH. LENGTH LH LEFT-HAND LV. LEVEL LIN. LINEAR LT. LIGHT LWT LIGHT-WEIGHT MAS. MASONRY MATL. MATERIAL MAX. MAXIMUM MECH. MECHANICAL MEP MECHANICAL / ELECTRICAL / PLUMBING MFR. MANUFACTURER MIN. MINIMUM MISC. MISCELLANEOUS M.O.MASONRY OPENING MTD. MOUNTED MTG. MOUNTING MTL. METAL MULL. MULLION N.I.C. NOT IN CONTRACT NO. / # NUMBER NOM. NOMINAL N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE OA OVERALL O.C. ON CENTER O.D. OUTSIDE DIAMETER OFF OFFICE OH OVERHEAD OPH. OPPOSITE HAND OPNG. OPENING OPP.OPPOSITE O/A OUTSIDE AIR PART. PARTITION PCF POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT PED. PEDESTAL PERF. PERFORATED PERI. PERIMETER P.L. PROPERTY LINE P.LAM. PLASTIC LAMINATE 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND COORDINATE ALL NEW AND EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AT THE JOB SITE FOR COMPARISON WITH DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING, START OF CONSTRUCTION, AND DURING CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES, INCONSISTANCIES OR OMISSIONS ARE FOUND, THE DESIGNER SHALL BE NOTIFIED, IN WRITING FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH WORK. 2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL RELY ON WRITTEN DIMENSIONS AS GIVEN. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND COORDINATED WITH ALL TRADES. IF DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE DESIGNER IN WRITING FOR CLARIFICATION BEFORE THE COMMENCEMENT OR RESUMPTION OF WORK. 3. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON FLOOR PLANS, SECTIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DETAILS ARE TO FACE OF STUD, MASONRY, OR CONCRETE GRIDLINES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (U.N.O.). 4. FINAL CLEAN UP AND DISPOSAL - REMOVE DEBRIS, RUBBISH AND WASTE MATERIAL FROM THE OWNERS PROPERTY TO A LAWFUL DISPOSAL AREA AND PAY ALL HAULING AND DUMPING COSTS. CONFORM TO PERTAINING FEDERAL STATE AND LOCAL LAWS, REGULATIONS AND ORDERS UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. ALL AREAS SHALL BE LEFT VACUUM- CLEAN AND FREE FROM DEBRIS. CLEAN ALL DUST, DIRT, STAINS, HANDMARKS, PAINTSPOTS, DROPPINGS, AND OTHER BLEMISHES. 5. ANY WORK INSTALLED IN CONFLICT WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDTIONAL EXPENSE TO THE OWNER, DESIGNER, OR CONSULTANTS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL FINISH WORK AND SURFACES FROM DAMAGE DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL REPLACE AND/OR REPAIR ALL DAMAGED SURFACES CAUSED BY CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR PERSONNEL TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER AND DESIGNER. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS. 8. SIZE OF MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PADS AND BASES ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DIMENSIONS WITH RESPECTIVE EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL STIFFENERS, BRACING, BACK-UP PLATES AND SUPPORTING BRACKETS REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ALL CASEWORK, TOILET ACCESSORIES AND OF ALL FLOOR MOUNTED OR SUSPENDED MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 10. THE CONTRATOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BELOW GRADE AND RELATED SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF WATER, ELECTRICAL, GAS, TELEPHONE AND TELEVISION COMPANIES TO VERIFY AVAILABLE FACILITIES AND, IF APPLICABLE, TO ESTABLISH TEMPORARY FACILITIES. 12. CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING AND PAYING FOR ALL PERMITS AND FEES REQUIRED, NOT NORMALLY COVERED BY THE BUILDING PERMITS. 13. DOOR OPENINGS NOT LOCATED BY DIMENSION SHALL BE CENTERED IN WALLS AS SHOWN OR LOCATED 4" FROM FINISH WALL TO FINISH JAMB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 14. ALL WOOD IN CONTACT WITH MASONRY OR CONCRETE SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED WITH AN APPROVED PRESERVATIVE. 15. DOORS AND WINDOWS BETWEEN CONDITIONED AND UNCONDITIONED SPACES SHALL BE DESIGNED TO LIMIT AIR LEAKAGE INTO OR FROM THE BUILDING ENVELOPE 16. GYPSUM BOARD DRYWALL BACKING FOR CERAMIC TILE INSTALLED IN TOILET ROOMS SHALL BE USG W/R (WATER RESISTANT) PANELS OR EQUAL. 17. ONLY NEW FIRST CLASS MATERIALS SHALL BE USED IN CONSTRUCTION UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. THE OWNER SHALL HAVE THE FINAL DECISION IN THE CASE OF QUESTIONABLE CRAFTSMANSHIP. 18. SLOPE GRADE AWAY FROM NEW BUILDING A MINIMUM OF 6" FOR THE FIRST 10 FEET. 19. ALL WORK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ADOPTED CODES, LOCAL AMENDMENTS/RULES AND STATE REGULATIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF REQUIREMENTS. 20. CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONERS AND CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING HEAT PUMPS SHALL HAVE UNIT EFFICIENCY OF 14 SEER MINIMUM PER CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS 10CFR 430.32(c)(3). 21. PERMANENTLY WIRED SMOKE DETECTORS WITH BATTERY BACKUP AND SIGNAL WHEN BATTERIES LOW SHALL BE PLACED IN EACH SLEEPING ROOM AND AT A POINT CENTRALLY LOCATED IN THE CORRIDOR OR AREA GIVING ACCESS TO EACH SEPARATE SLEEPING AREA AND ON EACH STORY. 22. ALL RECESSED CAN LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE SEALED. 23. LIGHT FIXTURES IN TUB & SHOWER ENCLOSURES SHALL BE LABELED SUITABLE FOR DAMP LOCATION. PLAST. PLASTER PLF POUNDS PER LINEAR FOOT PLYWD. PLYWOOD PNL. PANEL PRKG. PARKING PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PR. PAINTED PVMT. PAVEMENT Q.T. QUARRY TILE RCP REFLECTED CEILING PLAN RD ROOF DRAIN REBAR REINFORCING BAR REC. RECESSED REFR. REFRIGERATOR REG.REGULATION REINF. REINFORCED REQ.REQUIRED RES. RESILIENT RET. RETURN REV. REVERSE/REVISION RE REFER TO RFG. ROOFING RH RIGHT-HAND RM ROOM R.O. ROUGH OPENING R.O.W. RIGHT OF WAY RAD.RADIUS S.C. SOLID CORE SCHED. SCHEDULE SECT. SECTION SF SQUARE FOOT/FEET SH. SHELF SHWR. SHOWER SIM. SIMILAR SPEC. SPECIFICATION SPK. SPEAKER SQ. SQUARE S.S. STAINLESS STEEL S.T.C. SOUND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENT STD. STANDARD STL. STEEL STOR STORAGE STRUCT. STRUCTURE / STRUCTURAL SUSP. SUSPENDED SYM. SYMBOL SYS. SYSTEM T TREAD T.C. TOP OF CURB T&G TONGUE AND GROOVE THK. THICK TOL. TOLERANCE T.O.P. TOP OF PAVEMENT T.O.S. TOP OF STEEL / SLAB T.O.W. TOP OF WALL TYP. TYPICAL UC UNDER-COUNTER UL UNDERWRITERS LABORATORY U.N.O. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE UR. URINAL V..T. VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VERT. VERTICAL VEST. VESTIBULE WC WATER CLOSET WDW. WINDOW WD. WOOD WF WIDE FLANGE WP. WATERPROOFING WR. WATER RESISTENT WT. WEIGHT 1. HVAC SPLIT SYSTEM NOMINAL CAPACITY IS ESTIMATED AT 3 TONS (PER UNIT), WITH 1 AIR HANDLING UNIT AND 1 CONDENSING UNIT. SYSTEM DESIGN: MULTI-POSITION BLOWER WITH HEAT PUMP OUTDOOR CONDENSING UNIT. 2. HVAC SYSTEM DUCTWORK CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REINFORCED FOIL FACED SEMI-RIGID GLASS FIBER DUCTS (SQUARE, RECTANGULAR). WITH FLEX DUCT CONNECTIONS AT MOST REGISTERS OR DIFFUSERS. SUPPLY AIR AND RETURN AIR DUCTWORK SHALL BE MINIMUM R-8 INSULATION. FLEX DUCTWORK CONNECTIONS SHALL ALSO BE RATED MINIMUM R-8. 3. PROVIDE ENERGY EFFICIENT AIR HANDLING AND CONDENSING UNITS WITH MINIMUM 14 SEER. COMPLY WITH GOA STANDARDS. 4. HIGH QUALITY RESIDENTIAL SUPPLY DIFFUSERS AND RETURN AIR GRILLES, AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER, SHALL BE PROVIDED. STAMPED METAL GRILLES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. 5. VIBRATION ISOLATION AT THE AIR HANDLING UNIT SHALL BE PROVIDED, UTILIZING MINIMUM OF 4 - 1" THICK RUBBER ISOLATION PADS. 6. MECHANICAL DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS AND PRODUCT DATA INFORMATION, PRIOR TO ORDERING EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS, FOR APPROVAL BY THE OWNER AND ARCHITECT, DESCRIBING ALL OF THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, DUCTWORK, INSULATION, PIPING, DIFFUSERS, GRILLES AND REGISTERS, THERMOSTATS, ACCESSORIES AND OTHER ITEMS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE MECHANICAL SYSTEM WORK. INDICATE ALL DUCTWORK CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, DUCT SIZES AND AIR VOLUME CAPACITIES IN CFM AT ALL DIFFUSERS, GRILLES AND REGISTERS, TURNING VANES, LOCATIONS OF FLEX AND FIXED CONNECTIONS, VIBRATION ISOLATION DEVICES, AND OTHER APPLICABLE INFORMATION. APPLICABLE CODES 2021 International Building Code (IBC) family, which includes: • International Plumbing Code (IPC) • International Mechanical Code (IMC) • International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) • International Residential Code for One and 2018 Two-Family Dwellings (IRC) • International Energy Code (IECC) • International Green Construction Code (IGCC) 2000 International Property Maintenance Code 2017 National Electric Code (NEC) 2012 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code DISCLAIMER Names of materials and manufacturers shown on the Plans do not represent an endorsement or recommendation by the Designer. Final selections of materials are the responsibility of the home Client and/or builder, including, but not limited to proper installation of materials, nailing, gluing, caulking, insulating, flashing, roofing, weatherproofing and many other small items and details not necessarily indicated on the Plans, and over which the Designer has no control or responsibility. The Designer shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or deficiencies in any form by any party whatsoever. Consult all local building codes prior to construction. ©DESIGN CENTEX BLUEPRINT LLC 2021 AREA: 1st FLOOR 1121 2nd FLOOR 1124 GARAGE 444 FRONT PORCH 116 COVERED PATIO 99 TOTAL FRAMED AREA 2904 TOTAL HVAC AREA 2245 TOTAL SLAB AREA 1780 Page 58 of 140 5' 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: THIS SITE PLAN AND EVERYTHING DEPICTED REMAINS SUBJECT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE, THE DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCES AND OTHER ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE GOVORNING MUNICIPALITY. ALL AS HERETOFORE AND HEREAFTER AMENDED ("APPLICABLE REGULATIONS"). APPLICABLE REGULATIONS CHANGE OVER TIME. WORDS AND PHRASES USED IN THIS SITE PLAN HAVE THE SAME MEANINGS AS IN THE CORRESPONDING APPLICABLE REGULATIONS, UNLESS A DIFFERENT MEANING IS CLEARLY INDICATED BY THE CONTEXT. 2. PERMITS & APPROVALS: GENERALLY, CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION OF BUILDINGS OR OTHER FEATURES IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT A PERMIT OR OTHER APPROVAL FROM THE GOVORNING MUNICIPALITY.CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION IS GENERALLY GOVERNED BY APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 3. DEED RESTRICTIONS: NOTHING IN THIS SITE PLAN AMENDS OR REMOVES ANY "DEED RESTRICTIONS" PLAT RESTRICTIONS OR OTHER CONDITIONS, COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, ALL OF WHICH REMAIN IN EFFECT. 4. EFFECT OF APPROVAL: APPROVAL OF THIS SITE PLAN SIGNIFIES ONLY THAT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL DID NOT NOTICE NON-COMPLIANCE. APPROVAL OF THIS SITE PLAN DOES NOT: 1)SIGNIFY THAT ANY AREA, BUILDING, OR OTHER ITEMS COMPLIES WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 2) AUTHORIZE OR EXCUSE ANY NON-COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS WHETHER IN EFFECT NOW OR ADOPTED LATER, OR 3) RELINQUISH OR IMPAIR ANY PROPERTY RIGHT OF THE GOVORNING MUNICIPALITY. NO APPROVAL AND ESPECIALLY NOT A MISTAKEN APPROVAL PRECLUDE SUBSEQUENT ENFORCEMENT ACTION OR ASSERTION OR PROPERTY RIGHTS. RELEASE OF THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A VERIFICATION OF ALL DATA, INFORMATION AND CALCULATIONS SUPPLIED BY THE APPLICANT. THE APPLICANT IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY AND ADEQUACY OF HIS/HER SUBMITTAL, WHETHER OR NOT THE APPLICATION IS REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE BY GOVORNING MUNICIPALITIES ENGINEERS. 5. CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY ALL PROPERTY BOUNDARIES WITH A SEALED SURVEY AND IS TO FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS. N IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE = 36% FLOOR TO AREA RATIO = 35% 10' B.L. 7. 5 ' B . L . 7. 5 ' B . L . 25' B.L. N 89°28'16" E 55.00' S 8 7 °1 9 '5 5 " E 5 5 .0 0 ' N 0 2 ° 2 9 ' 2 1 " E 1 1 3 . 8 4 ' N 0 2 ° 2 5 ' 0 0 " E 1 1 5 . 8 9 ' 7th STREET - 50' R.O.W. C O L L E G E S T R E E T 1786 SF BUILDING FOOTPRINT 492 SF DRIVEWAY 149 SF 5' SIDEWALK 45 SF 5' SIDEWALK 3864 SF LOT AREA 15' UTILITY EASEMENT 25 ' - 5 1 / 2 " SCALE: PROJECT: NICK SMITH, CPBD NICK@CENTEXBLUEPRINT.COM (512) 409-6819 CENTEX BLUEPRINT ©2021 REVISION DATE THIS CONTENT OF THIS DOCUMENT IS VALID FOR THE PROJECT AS LISTED ON THIS SHEET. ANY USE FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR PROJECT IS ILLEGAL AND STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IS S U E D F O R P E R M I T BU I L D I N G D E S I G N - C O N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S 1" = 10'-0" C: \ U s e r s \ N i c k \ D e s k t o p \ 20 2 2 P r o j e c t s \ C h a n c e L e ig h \ 5 1 0 E 7 t h S t r e e t \V 6 D r a f t 1 . r v t 1/27/2022 10:11:45 AM A1 SITE PLAN C.L.H. 510 EAST 7th STREET GEORGETOWN TX 78626 1" = 10'-0"1 SITE PLAN Page 59 of 140 DW WH UP WasherDryer UP A4 PLAN TOP A4 PL A N R I G H T A4 PL A N L E F T A4 PLAN BOTTOM A3 Section 1 22 ' - 6 " 16 ' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 41 ' - 6 " 9'-8 3/4"11'-3 1/4"19'-0" 40'-0" 16 ' - 9 1 / 2 " 22 ' - 8 1 / 2 " 2' - 0 " 20'-0"20'-0" 40'-0" 8'-2"11'-10" 11 ' - 0 1 / 2 " 5' - 3 1 / 2 " 4' - 3 1 / 2 " 2' - 1 " 2468 W.C. 60" VANITY 28 6 8 B A R N 4068 30 6 8 28 6 8 4" 2' - 6 " 1'-4"1'-6" EQ EQ 11 ' - 4 " 5' - 3 1 / 2 " 6' - 1 " 5' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 5' - 1 " 5' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 42" PREFAB F/P 39 ' - 6 " 36" REF. 30 " R A N G E MI C R O . EQEQ SINK W/ DISP. 30" TALL CAB 40 1 6 F X 16' X 7' GARAGE DOOR W/ OPENER 6" 12 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 6" 3 PANEL W/ TRANS. 9'-2"7"1'-0 3/4"8'-10"1'-0 3/4"7" 2060 FX2060 FX 3'-0"5'-8 1/4"5'-8 1/4"3'-0"1'-4" 32 " X 6 0 " T U B W / TI L E S R N D R/S 1'-0"7"7'-2 1/4"11'-6 1/4" 2'-9 1/2"4'-4 1/2"3'-1 1/2"1'-6 1/2" EQ EQ 50805'-11"5'-11" 6"5'-10 1/2"9 3/4" OP T I O N A L C A B . IS L A N D 3 6 " A . F . F . HD R 7 ' - 4 " A . F . F . HD R 7 ' - 4 " A . F . F . HDR 7'-4" A.F.F. 5' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 5' - 6 3 / 4 " 5' - 6 3 / 4 " 5' - 6 3 / 4 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 20 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 2' - 3 1 / 2 " A3 Section 2 C.H. -10'-0" 179 SF FOYER C.H. -10'-0" 121 SF OFFICE C.H. -10'-0" 56 SF GUEST BATH C.H. -10'-0" 57 SF LAUNDRY C.H. -10'-0" 431 SF GARAGE C.H. -10'-0" 143 SF KITCH. C.H. -10'-0" 152 SF DINING C.H. -10'-0" 293 SF LIVING 1'-11"16'-2"1'-11" 16 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 3' - 6 1 / 4 " 4" R @ 7 1 / 4 " 19 3'-2" 5'-0" 2"5 1/2" EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ 40 1 6 F X 40 1 6 F X 4068 4068 PANTRYSTORAGE 8'-10 1/2"7"4'-11 1/2"5'-0" OP T I O N A L C A B . DBL 3050 40 1 6 F X 20 4 0 6060 FX 3040 SH A4 PLAN TOP A4 PL A N R I G H T A4 PL A N L E F T A4 PLAN BOTTOM A3 Section 1 A3 Section 2 2468 3' - 1 " 2468 5' - 3 1 / 2 " 7' - 3 1 / 2 " 3' - 8 " 5' - 2 " 5' - 7 " 3'-3 1/2"3'-6 1/2"3'-9 3/4"3'-8"3'-8"3'-6 1/4"4'-4"3'-5"3'-8"3'-8"3'-5" 6'-10"14'-8"18'-6" 40 6 8 9' - 1 " 3' - 6 " 3050 SH3050 SH3050 SH 8"8" 3050 SH3050 SH3050 SH 3' - 6 " 2468 5'-9 1/2"8'-2 1/2" 30682868 26 6 8 2868 2868 4068 7' - 0 " 1' - 7 " 3' - 8 1 / 2 " 3'-0" X 5'-0" SHOWER 26 6 8 G L A S S 3050 SH EQEQ 1'-7 3/4" 2'-5 1/4" 2'-10"1'-6 1/2" 9' - 6 " 14 ' - 5 " 12 ' - 7 " 36 ' - 6 " W.C. DO U B L E V A N I T Y 8'-2"13'-6"18'-4" 40'-0" 9' - 6 " 14 ' - 1 1 / 2 " 12 ' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 40'-0" R/S R/SR/S R/S R/S 2' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 5' - 1 " 4' - 1 1 1 / 4 " 2' - 0 " 6' - 0 3 / 4 " 6' - 0 3 / 4 " 3'-6"3'-10 1/2"4'-2" 4068 EQEQ R/S MECH. CH I M N E Y 2020 FX2020 FX2020 FX DB L 3 0 5 0 DBL 3050 OPEN TO BELOW C.H. -8'-0" 177 SF MASTER BED C.H. -8'-0" 171 SF MEDIA C.H. -8'-0" 86 SF BED 2 C.H. -8'-0" 124 SF BED 3 C.H. -8'-0" 199 SF COMMON AREA 2668 EQEQ 2' - 0 " R/S 32 " X 6 0 " T U B W / TI L E S R N D W.C. EQ EQ EQ EQ 2'-6" 4" EQEQ W.I.C. W.I.C. CLOSET DBL VANITY 3'-6"7'-9" 5' - 7 " 1' - 6 " 3' - 8 " 1' - 1 0 " 1' - 1 0 " 1' - 6 " 4' - 0 " 1' - 9 1 / 2 " 2' - 6 " 2' - 9 1 / 2 " 3' - 1 " FEILD VERIFY ATTIC ACCESS 2'-9 1/4"4'-1 1/4"7'-6" 6'-9"6'-9"6'-6"11'-10" 3'-3"2'-7 3/4"6'-6 1/2"2'-7 3/4" 10 ' - 4 " 6'-1 1/2"8'-0 1/2"1'-6" 36 ' - 6 " 5' - 5 1 / 2 " 36" PONY WALL 36 " P O N Y W A L L RA I L I N G @ S T A I R S 24 6 8 20 4 0 2020 FX 1/4" = 1'-0"A2 1 1st FLOOR SCALE: PROJECT: NICK SMITH, CPBD NICK@CENTEXBLUEPRINT.COM (512) 409-6819 CENTEX BLUEPRINT ©2021 REVISION DATE THIS CONTENT OF THIS DOCUMENT IS VALID FOR THE PROJECT AS LISTED ON THIS SHEET. ANY USE FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR PROJECT IS ILLEGAL AND STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IS S U E D F O R P E R M I T BU I L D I N G D E S I G N - C O N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S 1/4" = 1'-0" C: \ U s e r s \ N i c k \ D e s k t o p \ 20 2 2 P r o j e c t s \ C h a n c e L e ig h \ 5 1 0 E 7 t h S t r e e t \ D r a f t 6 . r v t 1/27/2022 1:12:50 PM A2 1st FLOOR CLH 510 E 7th STREET GEORGETOWN TX 78626 1/4" = 1'-0"A2 2 2nd FLOOR Page 60 of 140 UP 5' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 1' - 4 " 2' - 4 " 7' - 8 " C.H. - 10'-0" 293 SF LIVING C.H. - 10'-0" 179 SF FOYER C.H. - 8'-0" 199 SF COMMON AREA ATTIC SPACE 2868 2668 19 ' - 4 " 10 ' - 0 " 4" 9' - 0 " 1' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 1' - 4 " 4" 12" 4" 12" 5" 12" 25'-4 1/4" C.H. - 10'-0" 143 SF KITCH. C.H. - 10'-0" 152 SF DINING C.H. - 10'-0" 293 SF LIVING C.H. - 8'-0" 171 SF MEDIA C.H. - 8'-0" 177 SF MASTER BED 3050 SH3050 SH3050 SH3050 SH3050 SH3050 SH3050 SH 2060 FX 2060 FX 3 PANEL W/ TRANS. ATTIC SPACE 6" 12" 6" 12" 27'-4" 8' - 0 " 1' - 4 " 10 ' - 0 " 19 ' - 4 " 6060 FX 3040 SH • GENERAL NOTES: • REFER TO FLOOR PLAN FOR DIMENSIONS • ROOF VENT LOCATIONS ARE NOT SHOWN. COORDINATE WITH OTHER TRADES FOR EXACT LOCATION OF ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS. • ROOF ASSEMBLY: COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF ON 30 LB FELT MIN ON 7/16" O.S.B. MIN ON RAFTERS 18" O.C. • ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS, CURBS, FLUES, VENTS, VENT CAPS, HOODS, FAN HOUSINGS. ECT. SHALL BE FINISHED OR PAINTED TO COMPLIMENT ROOF • PROVIDE FLEXIBLE PIPE FLASHINGS AT ALL PENETRATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE • ALL HARDWARE IN CONTACT WITH PRESERVATIVE PRESSURE TREATED (PPT) LUMBER SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL, DOUBLE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED OR TRIPLE SINC (ZMAX), INCLUDING STRUCTURAL METAL ANCHORS, ANGLES OR TIES, BOLTS, NAILS, LAG SCREWS AND SCREWS • COORDINATE WITH SPAN TABLE FOR ALL ROOF MEMBER SIZING 18" SOFFIT TYP 4" / 1 2 " 4" / 1 2 " 6" / 12" 6" / 12" 6" / 12"6" / 12" 5" / 1 2 " 5" / 12"5" / 12" 4" / 1 2 " 4" / 1 2 " 4" / 1 2 " SCALE: PROJECT: NICK SMITH, CPBD NICK@CENTEXBLUEPRINT.COM (512) 409-6819 CENTEX BLUEPRINT ©2021 REVISION DATE THIS CONTENT OF THIS DOCUMENT IS VALID FOR THE PROJECT AS LISTED ON THIS SHEET. ANY USE FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR PROJECT IS ILLEGAL AND STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IS S U E D F O R P E R M I T BU I L D I N G D E S I G N - C O N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S 1/4" = 1'-0" D: \ D e s k t o p \ 2 0 2 2 P r o j e c t s \ C h a n c e L e i g h \ 5 1 0 E 7 t h S t r e e t \ D r a f t 6 . rv t 4/11/2022 9:00:14 AM A3 ROOF / SECTIONS CLH 510 E 7th STREET GEORGETOWN TX 78626 1/4" = 1'-0"A3 1 Section 2 1/4" = 1'-0"A3 2 Section 1 1/4" = 1'-0"A3 3 ROOF PLAN Page 61 of 140 F.F.E.0" PLT HT 110'-0" Typ Hdr8'-0" 2nd F.F.E. 11'-4" PLT HT 219'-4" 3050 SH 3050 SH3050 SH3050 SH3050 SH3050 SH3050 SH HARDIE PLANK SIDING COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 2060 FX2060 FX 3 PANEL W/ TRANS. 27'-4" 6060 FX 3040 SH 25'-3 1/4" 24'-4 1/2" 12'-6" 9'-1 1/2" 18'-4 1/4" F.F.E.0" PLT HT 110'-0" Typ Hdr 8'-0" 2nd F.F.E. 11'-4" PLT HT 2 19'-4" DBL 3050 HARDIE PLANK SIDING 16' X 7' GARAGE DOOR W/ OPENER5080 HARDIE PLANK SIDING 2020 FX2020 FX2020 FX COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 5" 12" 2020 FX 25'-4 1/4" 24'-4 1/2"23'-3 3/4" 14'-11" 9'-1 1/2" 18'-4 1/4"18'-6 3/4" 9'-1 1/2" F.F.E.0" PLT HT 110'-0" Typ Hdr8'-0" 2nd F.F.E.11'-4" PLT HT 219'-4" COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF DBL 3050 HARDIE PLANK SIDING HARDIE PLANK SIDING 2040 4016 FX 25'-4 1/4" 23'-3 3/4" 14'-11 1/2" 18'-4 1/4" 9'-3" F.F.E.0" PLT HT 110'-0" Typ Hdr 8'-0" 2nd F.F.E.11'-4" PLT HT 2 19'-4" HARDIE PLANK SIDING COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 4016 FX4016 FX4016 FX HARDIE PLANK SIDING 2040 23'-3 3/4" 25'-4 1/4" 14'-11 1/2" 9'-3" 18'-4 1/4" SCALE: PROJECT: NICK SMITH, CPBD NICK@CENTEXBLUEPRINT.COM (512) 409-6819 CENTEX BLUEPRINT ©2021 REVISION DATE THIS CONTENT OF THIS DOCUMENT IS VALID FOR THE PROJECT AS LISTED ON THIS SHEET. ANY USE FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR PROJECT IS ILLEGAL AND STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IS S U E D F O R P E R M I T BU I L D I N G D E S I G N - C O N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S 1/4" = 1'-0" D: \ D e s k t o p \ 2 0 2 2 P r o j e c t s \ C h a n c e L e i g h \ 5 1 0 E 7 t h S t r e e t \ D r a f t 6 . rv t 4/11/2022 9:00:15 AM A4 ELEVATIONS CLH 510 E 7th STREET GEORGETOWN TX 78626 1/4" = 1'-0"A4 1 PLAN TOP 1/4" = 1'-0"A4 2 PLAN BOTTOM 1/4" = 1'-0"A4 3 PLAN RIGHT 1/4" = 1'-0"A4 4 PLAN LEFT Page 62 of 140 DW WH UP WasherDryer TV TV TV GFI GFI GFI GFI TV GFI 2 3 TD GF I GF I GFI GFI TV TV TV TV TV TV G PROVIDE 120V & SWITCH FOR DISP VE R I F Y M I C R O R E Q S S S CATV 120V Duplex Outlet 120V GFI Outlet 220V Outlet Switch Single Switch Double Switch Triple 6" Can Light Exhaust Fan Wall Mount Light 120V Troffer Light Fan/Light Hose Bib Gas Line Smoke Detector ELECTRICAL LEGEND OTHER SYMBOLS Pendant Light Track Light Data Port S S SS S S SCALE: PROJECT: NICK SMITH, CPBD NICK@CENTEXBLUEPRINT.COM (512) 409-6819 CENTEX BLUEPRINT ©2021 REVISION DATE THIS CONTENT OF THIS DOCUMENT IS VALID FOR THE PROJECT AS LISTED ON THIS SHEET. ANY USE FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR PROJECT IS ILLEGAL AND STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IS S U E D F O R P E R M I T BU I L D I N G D E S I G N - C O N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S 1/4" = 1'-0" C: \ U s e r s \ N i c k \ D e s k t o p \ 20 2 2 P r o j e c t s \ C h a n c e L e ig h \ 5 1 0 E 7 t h S t r e e t \ D r a f t 6 . r v t 1/27/2022 1:13:01 PM A5 ELECTRICAL CLH 510 E 7th STREET GEORGETOWN TX 78626 1/4" = 1'-0"A5 1 ELECTRICAL PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" ELECTRICAL LEGEND ELECTRICAL NOTES: 1. LAYOUT SHOWN IS SCHEMATIC ONLY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN AND FURNISH ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IN CONFORMANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES. 2. COORDINATE WITH HVAC INSTALLER TO PROVIDE POWER FOR ALL MECHANICAL UNITS. 3. PROVIDE NEW DISTRIBUTION PANELS AS REQUIRED, COORDINATE LOCATION WITH BUILDING DESIGNER. 4. COORDINATE WITH PLUMBING CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE POWER FOR TANK-LESS WATER HEATER WITH ELECTRIC IGNITION CONTROLS, GARBAGE DISPOSALS, EJECTOR AND OTHER EQUIPMENT WHERE INDICATED OR NOTED. 5. VERIFY POWER REQUIREMENT FOR APPLIANCES WITH ARCHITECT/GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 6. BUILDING SERVICE TO ELECTRICAL PANELS SHALL BE OVERHEAD. 7. CONDUCTORS: COPPER, ROMEX, INSULATED UL APPROVED, PER GOA CODE AND NEC. 8. PANELS, SWITCHGEAR: MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANELS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF CIRCUIT BREAKERS/ PROVIDE MIN. OF FOUR SPARES, BLANK WITHOUT CIRCUIT BREAKERS. 9. PROVIDE DIRECTORY IDENTIFYING ALL CIRCUITS AND ROOM NAMES FOR COMPLETED ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, MOUNTED ON INSIDE FRONT CORNER OF PANEL. 10.OUTLET BOXES AND BOXES FOR LIGHT FIXTURES AND SWITCH BOXES SHALL BE PLASTIC, UL APPROVED, PER GOA CODE, BY PASS AND SEYMOUR OR EQUAL. PROVIDE SPECIAL GALVANIZED METAL BOXES FOR CEILING FANS. PROVIDE GALVANIZED METAL BOXES IN MASONRY OR CEMENT PLASTER WALLS. 11.WIRING DEVICES: SWITCHES AND RECEPTACLES; UL APPROVED BY PASS AND SEYMOUR OR EQUAL. SWITCHES SHALL BE SILENT TYPE, DECORATOR SWITCHES APPROVED BY ARCHITECT. DIMMER SWITCHES, UL APPROVED BY LUTRON, TYPE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT. 12.DEVICE PLATES: PLASTIC, BY PASS AND SEYMOUR OR LUTRON, OR EQUAL, COLOR APPROVED BY ARCHITECT. 13.IN GENERAL, WALL OUTLET BOXES FOR RECEPTACLES SHALL BE MOUNTED AT 15" AFF TO CENTERLINE, TYPICAL AND BOXES FOR SWITCHES AND DIMMERS SHALL BE MOUNTED AT 48" AFF TO CENTERLINE, TYPICAL. 14.FIELD VERIFY AND COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT REGARDING MOUNTING HEIGHTS AND LOCATIONS AND FINISH THICKNESSES FOR OUTLET BOXES AT KITCHEN AND BATHROOM CABINETS AND COUNTERTOPS, BACK AND END SPLASHES, AND OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS. 15.ALL OUTLETS IN ALL LOCATIONS SHOULD BE ARC FAULT PER 210.12 OF NFPA 70 (IBC 2012), UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 16.ALL OUTLETS IN BATHROOMS, LAUNDRY ROOMS, GARAGES, ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND EXTERIOR TO BE GROUND-FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPT. AS WELL AS ALL LOCATIONS IN A KITCHEN THAT SERVICE COUNTERTOP SURFACES AND WITHIN 6FT OF THE EDGE OF SINK, BATHTUB, OR SHOWER STALL. 17.ALL OUTDOOR OUTLETS AND LIGHTS SHOULD BE ON A GROUND FAULT BREAKER. 1/4" = 1'-0"A5 2 2nd F.F.E. Copy 1 Page 63 of 140 Page 64 of 140 Page 65 of 140 Page 66 of 140 Page 67 of 140 Page 68 of 140 Page 69 of 140 Page 70 of 140 Residential Infill at 510 7th St -2021-67-COA Historic & Architectural Review Commission May 26, 2022 Page 71 of 140 2 Item Under Consideration 2021-67-COA Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for a new residential (infill) construction for the property located at 510 E 7th Street bearing the legal description .1513 acres, Lot 1, Block 36, Glasscock Addition. Page 72 of 140 3 4.14.22 Conceptual Feedback 1.Flat façade 2.Window design inconsistent 3.Lacking architectural features compatible with the District Page 73 of 140 4 Primary Facade –Windows 4.14.22 5.26.22 Page 74 of 140 5 Primary Facade –Porch 4.14.22 5.26.22 Page 75 of 140 6 Primary Facade –Garage 4.14.22 5.26.22 Set back 15’ Page 76 of 140 7 Primary Facade –Siding 4.14.22 5.26.22 Page 77 of 140 8 4.14.22 5.26.22 Primary Facade –Roof features Standing seam Page 78 of 140 10 Existing Conditions Page 79 of 140 11 Project Location City GIS Map Page 80 of 140 12 Current Context Page 81 of 140 13 Sanborn Map -1916 Page 82 of 140 14 1964 Aerial Page 83 of 140 15 1974 Aerial Page 84 of 140 20 Proposed Project Drawings/Materials Page 85 of 140 21 Proposed Project Drawings/Materials Right Elevation. Page 86 of 140 22 Proposed Project Drawings/Materials Left Elevation. Page 87 of 140 23 Proposed Project Drawings/Materials Rear Elevation. Page 88 of 140 24 Proposed Project Drawings/Materials First Floor Page 89 of 140 25 Proposed Project Drawings/Materials Second Floor Page 90 of 140 26 Context Page 91 of 140 27 Proposed Project Drawings/Materials Proposed Standing Seam Roof Anderson Fibrex windows proposed. Page 92 of 140 28 Proposed Project Drawings/Materials Proposed Second Floor Shingle Siding Proposed Smooth Hardie Siding Page 93 of 140 29 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.13.030 Criteria Staff’s Finding 1. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is correct and sufficient enough to allow adequate review and final action;Complies 2. Compliance with applicable design standards of this Code;Complies 3. Compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties to the most extent practicable;Complies 4. Compliance with the Historic District Design Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time, specific to the applicable Historic Overlay District; Partially Complies 5. The general historic, cultural, and architectural integrity of the building, structure or site is preserved;Not Applicable 6. New buildings or additions are designed to be compatible with surrounding properties in the applicable historic overlay district; Partially Complies 7. The overall character of the applicable historic overlay district is protected; and Complies 8. The Master Sign Plan is in keeping with the adopted Historic District Design Guidelines and character of the historic overlay district.Not Applicable Page 94 of 140 30 Public Notifications •Number (2) signs posted •To date, staff has received: •0 written comments IN FAVOR •0 written comments OPPOSED Page 95 of 140 31 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for a new residential (infill) construction for the property located at 510 E 7th Street bearing the legal description of .1513 acres, Lot 1, Block 36, Glasscock Addition. Page 96 of 140 32 HARC Motion -2021-67-COA •Approve (as presented by the applicant) •Deny (as presented by the applicant) •Approve with conditions •Postpone Page 97 of 140 City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review May 26, 2022 S UB J E C T: P ublic Hearing and pos s ible ac tion on a request for a C ertificate of Appropriateness (C O A) for an addition that c reates a new, or adds to an existing street façade for the property loc ated at 709 Main S treet, bearing the legal des cription of Lot 3 (S /P T ), Block 40, C ity of G eorgetown.--Meredith Johnson, cons ultant IT E M S UMMARY: Overview of Applicant’s Request: T he applic ant is requesting to reloc ate the exis ting 3’ x 8’ door approximately 8' to the north and to s eparate one large window into two s maller windows . Es s entially, the projec t will change the location of the left-most door from the center of the facade to the left side of the facade and replace the window adjac ent to the door with two smaller windows. T he rightmost door will remain in the same location, i.e. just right of center on the fac ade. T he new s pace between the two doors will be recons tructed to match the existing s torefront through the us e of large picture-window panes and c ustom wood detailing. T he layout of the new spac e between the doors will be s imilar to the re-created storefront found on 707 Main, als o owned by the S un. S taff’s Analysis: S taff has reviewed the request in ac cordance with the Unified Development C ode (UDC ) and other applicable codes. S taff has determined that the proposed request complies with 7 of the 8 criteria es tablished in UDC S ection 3.13.030 for a C ertificate of Appropriateness, as outlined in the attac hed S taff R eport. 1 of the 8 criteria were not applicable to the proposed project. Public Comments: As required by the Unified Development C ode (UDC ), one (1) sign was pos ted on-site. As of the public ation date of this report, s taff has received 0 written comments in favor and 0 in oppos ition to the request. F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None. T he applicant has paid the required application fees . S UB MIT T E D B Y: Nat Waggoner, P MP, AI C P AT TAC H ME N T S: Description Type Staff Report Cover Memo Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Letter of Intent Exhibit Exhibit 3- Plans and Specifications Exhibit Page 98 of 140 Exhibit 4 - His toric Resource Surveys Exhibit Pres entation Pres entation Page 99 of 140 Historic & Architectural Review Commission Planning Department Staff Report Report Date: May 20, 2022 File Number: 2022-21-COA AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for an addition that creates a new, or adds to an existing street façade for the property located at 709 Main Street, bearing the legal description of Lot 3 (S/PT), Block 40, City of Georgetown. AGENDA ITEM DETAILS Project Name: Williamson County Sun Building Door Relocation Applicant: Elsasser Architectural Inc, c/o Richard Elsasser Property Owner: Linda Scarbrough Property Address: 709 Main Street Legal Description: Lot 3 (S/PT), Block 40, City of Georgetown Historic Overlay: Old Town Case History: N/A Prior COA Denials: N/A Prior COA Approvals: N/A HISTORIC CONTEXT Date of Construction: 1889 Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: High National Register Designation: Williamson County Courthouse District Texas Historical Commission Designation: N/A Notable Property Owners/Events: Williamson County Sun Newspaper, Built by C.A.D Clamp APPLICANT’S REQUEST HARC: ✓ Renovation to a street-facing facade of a contributing structure STAFF ANALYSIS Present Property Description: The subject property is located on the eastern side of the Williamson County Courthouse along Main Street addressed at 709 S Main. The property, as well as its neighbor at 707 S Main St., are both owned by the newspaper company, the Williamson County Sun. Page 100 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2022-21-COA – 709 S Main Street Page 2 of 7 The newspaper has occupied the buildings at 707-709 Main Street since 1936. According to the Sun’s website: “The latest issue is the most recent of a series that has now continued, without interruption, for 144 years. At first, the Sun rented space on the third floor of the first courthouse built on the Square. Two more courthouses have been built since then. In 1881, the Sun moved into the stone building at 711 Main Street on the east side of the Square. In 1936 the newspaper bought and moved into the 2-story building next door where the paper is still printed today.” The 1984 Historic Resource Survey identifies the buildings at 707 and 709 S Main as the C.A.D. Clamp buildings. The Texas Historical Commission plaque at 705 S Main details the life and contributions of C.A.D Clamp. “Christian Augustus Daniel Clamp was born in Thorn, Prussia (now Torun, Poland). He came to Texas in 1846 and moved to Georgetown in 1851, a year after his marriage to Asenath C. Davis (d. 1917). A skilled carpenter and cabinetmaker, Clamp became one of the city’s earliest builders and developers. His work included residences as well as commercial, religious, and governmental buildings. He also owned a furniture business in this block for many years. An active Presbyterian and civic leader, Clamp served as mayor of the city from 1878 to 1880. He is buried in the I.O.O.F. Cemetery.” Both buildings by Clamp were early departures from the local tradition of limestone, as these buildings feature imported brick facades accented by cast iron columns attributed to F. Heireman, an Austin metalwork company. Originally each featured identical metal hood molds over the windows and crowning metal cornices. A stepped brick parapet later replaced the cornice on 709 Main. The façade of the building at 709 S Main currently consists of two identical entry doors positioned in the middle of the façade, flanked by structural steel columns. On either side of the double entry doors are two identical storefront windows. Requested Changes: The applicant is requesting to relocate the existing 3’ x 8’ door approximately 8' to the north and to separate one large window into two smaller windows. Essentially, the project will change the location of the left-most door from the center of the facade to the left side of the facade and replace the window adjacent to the door with two smaller windows. The right- most door will remain in the same location, i.e. just right of center on the facade. The new space between the two doors will be reconstructed to match the existing storefront through the use of large picture-window panes and custom wood detailing. The layout of the new space between the doors will be similar to the re-created storefront found on 707 Main, also owned by the Sun. Page 101 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2022-21-COA – 709 S Main Street Page 3 of 7 Justification for Requests: Over the last three decades, newspaper publication has shifted from large printing presses to a more compact digital printing process. Some newspapers have decided to skip the printing process completely in favor of digital publication. Though the Sun will still provide both print and digital publications, the space needed to house its printing system can now be reduced. The renovation will allow the first and second floors of the 709 Main building to have separate entrances for future tenants. Technical Review: At 709 Main, the left-most door measures 3’ by 8’. There is a structural column that is used to break the storefront into thirds. The new windows will be on either side of the column. The northern window will measure 3’ 8” wide and 5’ tall. The window to the south, to replace the door, will measure 4’ by 5’. The wood frames around the new windows and the relocated door will be constructed out of Southern Yellow Pine. The frames and kickplates will be customized with the same material to match the existing profiles, which are 2.5” at their widest point. The symmetry of the 709 Main facade will be interrupted due to the steel columns that protrude out from the face of the buildings, as they also do on the 707 Main building. The existing façade uses the steel columns to divide the storefront into thirds. The door relocation will break up this symmetry. The process of moving a door to create a separated entrance for an upper level is a common alteration that has occurred in Georgetown many times as buildings change uses, tenants, and owners. Evidence of a similar, and successful, storefront renovation can be found at 707 Main. Here, the left-most door was moved from the center of the facade to the left-most edge with the new space (created between the new location of the left door and the untouched right-most door) was also filled with custom woodwork that matched the existing storefront. DESIGN GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE Staff has determined that the proposed project complies with 8 of the 10 applicable Historic District Design Guidelines in Chapter 1 as detailed below in the Applicable Design Guidelines section below. APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted Historic District Design Guidelines: Page 102 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2022-21-COA – 709 S Main Street Page 4 of 7 GUIDELINES FINDINGS CHAPTER ONE – DOWNTOWN AREA ONE 1.5.H Storefronts H.1 If a storefront is altered, restoring it to the original design is preferred. a. If evidence of the original design is missing and no evidence of its character exists, a new design that uses traditional elements may be considered. Use a simplified interpretation of similar storefronts. The storefront should be designed to provide interest to pedestrians. b. In some cases, an original storefront may have been altered early in the history of the building, and may itself have taken on significance. Such alterations should be preserved. See also Preservation Briefs #11: Rehabilitating Historic Storefronts, published by the National Park Service Does Not Comply The door relocation project alters the storefront, which is assumed to be original due to the symmetry of the structural columns that divide the faced into thirds. A similar pattern exists on the neighboring 707 Main building. The two buildings appear to have been renovated as a pair in the early 20th Century, according to the 1900 Sanborn Map. During the renovation, both buildings doubled in length, which could have led to the protruding structural columns on each façade. It is possible that the 1900 storefront is likely the same storefront seen today. H.5 Display Windows a. A contemporary interpretation of a traditional display window, which is similar in scale and overall character to those seen historically, may be considered if the historic display windows are missing or have been altered in a manner inconsistent with the style of the building. b. Display windows in Area 1 shall be large windows with no dividers. Moduled windows with square or rectangular mullions are not in keeping with the existing character. c. Display windows should use clear glass and be transparent. Partially Complies The proposed windows meets criteria H.5.a in that they match the overall character of display windows seen in Georgetown’s Square. The new windows do not meet criterion H.5.b because the two new windows, previously one whole window on the northern ⅓ of the building, will be split across a load-bearing column. The application meets criteria H.5.c as the new panes on the first floor will be clear glass and fully transparent. H.7 Kick Plates Page 103 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2022-21-COA – 709 S Main Street Page 5 of 7 a. The kick plate, located below the display window, adds interesting detail to the street scape and should be preserved. Complies The kickplates below the remaining large display window will be preserved. The kickplates under the two new windows will be designed to match the existing kickplate. c. If the original kick plate is missing, develop a compatible design. Complies Original kickplate would be removed from the left side of the building when the door is moved. The re-created kickplates match the remaining kickplates under the untouched right-side window. d. Wood is an appropriate material for kick plates on most styles. However, ceramic tile and masonry may also be considered when appropriately used with the building style. Complies Kickplate to be constructed of southern yellow pine wood. e. Kick plates should align with historic kick plates on the block face. They should generally be no higher than 30 inches, a 24 inch height is preferred. Complies Kick plates on both the proposed door and proposed storefront are aligned with those of the block and are no higher than 30”. H.8 Entrances and Doors a. Building entrances should appear similar to those used historically in the block. They should either be centered with windows on either side or located to one side with storefront windows taking up the rest of the façade. Entrances should be clearly defined, and obvious to pedestrians. Complies The re-located door will be located on one side of the façade with windows taking up the rest of the façade until they meet the centered door (to remain in place). The entrances will be clearly defined with the reconfigured windows. d. A contemporary interpretation of a traditional building entry, which is similar in scale and overall character to those seen historically, may be considered if the historic storefront is missing or has been altered in a manner inconsistent with the style of the building. Complies The relocated entry will be similar in size and scale to the entry that is remaining in place as well as the entries on the 707 Main building. f. Secondary public entrances to the upper floors can be a part of the storefront configuration. Complies The relocated door will be a secondary public entrance to the upper floors. g. Designs may need to comply with other regulations, including door width, direction of swing, and construction. In some cases, entries must comply with accessibility requirements of the Americans with Complies Applicant’s letter of intent describes that relocation and reconstruction will enable compliance with Building Code requirements. Page 104 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2022-21-COA – 709 S Main Street Page 6 of 7 Disabilities Act. Note, however, that some flexibility in the application of these regulations is provided for historic properties. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, HARC must consider the following criteria. Staff has determined that the applicant has met 7 out of 8 of these criteria. SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS 1. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is correct and sufficient enough to allow adequate review and final action; Complies 2. Compliance with applicable design standards of this Code; Complies 3. Compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties to the most extent practicable; Complies 4. Compliance with the adopted Historic District Design Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time, specific to the applicable Historic Overlay District; Partially Complies Divided window, altered storefront not returning to original configuration. 5. The general historic, cultural, and architectural integrity of the building, structure or site is preserved; Complies 6. New buildings or additions are designed to be compatible with surrounding properties in the applicable historic overlay district; Complies 7. The overall character of the applicable historic overlay district is protected; and Complies 8. The Master Sign Plan is in keeping with the adopted Historic District Design Guidelines and character of the historic overlay district. Not Applicable A Master Sign plan is not part of this project’s scope. Page 105 of 140 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2022-21-COA – 709 S Main Street Page 7 of 7 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends APPROVAL of the request. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION As required by the Unified Development Code, (1) one sign was posted on-site. To date, staff has received 0 written comments in favor and 0 in opposition to the request. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Letter of Intent Exhibit 3 – Plans and Specifications Exhibit 4 – Historic Resource Surveys SUBMITTED BY Meredith, Johnson, consultant Page 106 of 140 Location 2022-21-COA Exhibit #1 W 7TH ST W 8TH ST S A U S T I N A V E S M A I N S T S C H U R C H S T E 8TH ST E 7TH ST 0 10050 Feet ¯ Site Parcels Page 107 of 140 Ms. Sofia Nelson City of Georgetown Planning Department 406 W. Eighth Street Georgetown, Texas 78626 RE: Letter of Intent Williamson County Sun (C.A.D. Clamp Building) 709 Main Street Georgetown, Texas 78626 The following items are proposed for reconstruction, alterations, and changes applicable to a street facing façade to a contributing structure located in the Town Square Historic District, Area 1, located at 709 Main Street. This Letter of Intent is submitted as a part of the submittal requirements to obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) from the Historic Preservation Officer (HPO). Two original structures were built in 1889, known as the C.A.D. Clamp Building located on 707 and 709 Main Street. Although, an architectural style has not been substantiated, detailing and features are reminiscent of the Victorian Style, which was prevalent in Georgetown from 1870's to the early 1900's. The Scope of this project follows: 1. Alteration: The Williamson County Sun, wishes to create two individual tenant lease options for the main level (street level) and second level (upper level). The existing structure at present, has two separate entrances, adjacent to each other centered on 709 Main Street. The sister building, 707 Mainstreet has the example façade, with existing door locations representing this alteration. Both facades will be the same, with similar symmetry. The intent is to relocate the one entrance door at Street level to the North on Main Street approximately 8'-0", thus isolating the door for the purpose of ingress and egress to the tenants of the second-floor business. Two structural steel columns, wrapped in painted southern pine wood shall be maintained, while dividing the adjacent fixed glass into two almost equal sizes. Symmetry is maintained not only in the 709 Mainstreet Structure but will match the 707 Main Street sister building. The existing wood door shall be re-used in the new location with custom stock wood of southern yellow pine, which shall be painted with the same existing colors and effects. This addition meets Design Guidelines by providing materials and colors matching the original structure and replicating the periods architectural design and style. This addition also provides enhancement to life/safety requirements and barrier free accessibility requirements, while coordinating accessibility with the City of Georgetown proposed street improvements. Page 108 of 140 2. Signage: A new building address sign for the upper level shall be painted on the fixed glass transom above the door. The new address signage meets the required sizes, areas, types, styles, and colors. The placement of the signage meets the City of Georgetown Fire Department requirements. Sincerely, Richard Elsasser, NCARB Elsasser Architectural, Inc. ELSASSER ARCHITECTURAL INC. 4112 Williams Drive, Ste. 104 P.O. BOX 833 PH. (512) 930-5353 GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78628 E-MAIL relsasser@eai-tx.com Page 109 of 140 DESIGN / PLANNING ARCHITECTURE ELSASSER ARCHITECTURAL INC. ARCHITECT: ELSASSER ARCHITECTURAL INC. P.O. BOX 833 GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78627 PHONE: (512) 930-5353 SHEET INDEX: ARCHITECTURAL: COVER SHEET A1.0 SITE PLAN A2.0 FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR PLANS, DEMOLITION FLOOR PLAN A2.2 FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR RCP PLANS A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, CROSS SECTIONS AND ROOM FINISH SCEDULE A4.0 ADA/TAS CR T T C E S A LS R E S I SA H DREE . AHC S R I R D 999 S T I R EG LT A E 8 TFOE XETA WILLIAMSON COUNTY SUN 707 Main Street Georgetown, TX 78628 (512) 930-4824 OWNER: FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR RENOVATION OF 709 MAIN STREET GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78628 WILLIAMSON COUNTY SUN Building Code: 2015 International Building Code, 2015 Fire, Plumbing and Mechanical code, 2015 IECC, and 2017 National Electric Code. Type of Construction : Occupancy Type: 1st Floor Space size: Req. Egress: 5B Group B-Business None Required 2,200 sq. ft. Gross (1) 30 Door - Provided- 2(30)00 Req. Separation: Zoning Classification: Occupancy: (B-Business: 100/1)43 OCC. Overlay District: None 2nd Floor Space size:2,059 sq. ft. Gross Total Space size:4,259 sq. ft. Gross Historic District: Downtown NRHP District: Wiliamson County Courthouse MU-DT Mixed Use Downtown Page 110 of 140 ARCHITECTS PROJECT NUMBER DATE COPYRIGHT ELSASSER ARCHITECTURAL, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF ELSASSER ARCHITECTURAL, INC. AND MAY NOT BE ALTERED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT. NO . DE S C R I P T I O N PL A N RE V I S I O N S DESIGN / PLANNING ARCHITECTURE ELSASSER ARCHITECTURAL INC. P.O. BOX 833 GEORGETOWN, TEXAS78627 (512) 930-5353, (512) 930-2618 FAX WWW.EAI-TX.COM DA T E 21030 03/01/22 CR T T C E S A LS R E S I SA H DREE . AHC S R I R D 999 S T I R EG LT A E 8 TFOE XETA 03/01/2022 RE N O V A T I O N 70 9 MA I N ST R E E T GE O R G E T O W N , TE X A S 78 6 2 6 WI L L I A M S O N CO U N T Y SU N 48 ' - 0 " 1' - 6 " 22 ' - 6 " 6"14'-3"5"6'-3"5"10'-0"5"6'-6"5"6'-3"5"9'-0"5"12'-10"5"6'-8"5" 7'-8" EXISTING SKYLIGHT TO REMAIN EXISTING SKYLIGHT TO REMAIN EXISTING SKYLIGHT TO REMAIN EXISTING STAIR TO BE RELOCATED LOCATION OF NEW STAIRS SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SECOND FLOOR 200 E E E E E E E EXISTING WINDOWS TO REMAIN NOTE: SECOND FLOOR AREA TO REMAIN UNCHANGED. EXISTING DOORS AND WINDOW TO REMAIN AS IS. 1' - 6 " 22 ' - 6 " 1' - 6 " 25 ' - 6 " 6'-8"14'-3" 16'-4 5/8"5'-11 5/8" 2' - 9 " 25'-4 1/2"8'-3 1/2"13'-9 1/2" 25'-4"13'-11 1/2" 3' - 1 1 " 14'-0" 7'-8" 22'-6" EXISTING STAIRS TO REMAIN EXISTING LIFT TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING DOOR TO BE REMOVED EXISTING WALL TO BE REMOVED EXISTING SINK TO BE RELOCATED EXISTING COUTER TO BE REMOVED EXISTING WINDOW TO BE REPLACED (SEE FLOOR PLAN) EXISTING DOOR TO BE RELOCATED (SEE FLOOR PLAN) DEMOLITION FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" E E E E 3070 E E EXISTING WINDOW TO BE REMOVED EXISTING STUD WALL TO REMAIN NEW 2X4 STUD WALL EXISTING DOOR TO BE REMOVED EXISTING STUD WALL TO BE REMOVED 24'-10 1/2"3'-6"27'-6"14'-8"5'-4"16'-11 1/2"5'-8" 48 ' - 0 " 1' - 6 " 22 ' - 6 " 1' - 6 " 5' - 8 " 25 ' - 6 " 25 ' - 6 " 22 ' - 6 " 25'-0 3/4"20'-7 1/4"5"24'-5 1/2"5'-4"22'-7 1/2" 6'-8"14'-3" 16'-9 3/8"5'-11 5/8" 2' - 9 ' 25'-4 1/2"8'-3 1/2"13'-9 1/2" 4 3/4"21'-7 3/4" 3' - 1 1 " 14'-0" 7'-8" 22'-6" 9'-6" 14'-8"10'-4 3/4"4 3/4" 25'-4"13'-11 1/2"7'-10 3/4" 3' - 4 1/ 4 " 9'-8" 6' - 6 " 6'-0" 6' - 1 1 3/ 4 " 2" 3'-0" 4' - 0 " 8" 3' - 8 " 3' - 0 " 4" 5' - 4 " EXISTING BEAMS IN CEILING TO REMAIN EXISTING STAIRS TO REMAIN EXISTING STAIRS TO REMAIN EXISTING LIFT TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN INFILL WALL WITH 8" CMU BLOCK INFILL WALL WITH 8" CMU BLOCK NEW LOCATION EXISTING DOOR TO BE RELOCATED NEW CUSTOM WOOD WINDOW TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE 2 (2X4 STUD WALL) EXISTING STAIRS TO BE REMOVED NEW STAIRS AND LANDING TO BE ADDED PHASE 2 (WALLS TO BE REMOVED OFFICE DOOR, WINDOW AND COUNTER TO BE REMOVED AND SPACE OPENED UP FOR LEASE SPACE) EXISTING JANITORS SINK TO BE ADJUSTED TO NEW ORIENTATION PLASTIC LAMINATE COUNTER AND BASE PORTION OF COUNTER TO BE 36" A.F.F. EXISTING MECH. ROOM FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" RECEPTION UNISEX TOILET 01 A3.0 02 A3.0 100 104 STAIR 102 STAIR 105 E 3070 E E 01 A3.0 01 A3.0 LEASE SPACE 103 UP 25 RISERS 3070 3070 3070 UP 10 EQ . RI S E R S TO NE W LA N D I N G OFFICE 101 100A E 3040 FI X E D A1.0 Page 111 of 140 ARCHITECTS PROJECT NUMBER DATE COPYRIGHT ELSASSER ARCHITECTURAL, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF ELSASSER ARCHITECTURAL, INC. AND MAY NOT BE ALTERED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT. NO . DE S C R I P T I O N PL A N RE V I S I O N S DESIGN / PLANNING ARCHITECTURE ELSASSER ARCHITECTURAL INC. P.O. BOX 833 GEORGETOWN, TEXAS78627 (512) 930-5353, (512) 930-2618 FAX WWW.EAI-TX.COM DA T E 21030 03/01/22 CR T T C E S A LS R E S I SA H DREE . AHC S R I R D 999 S T I R EG LT A E 8 TFOE XETA 03/01/2022 RE N O V A T I O N 70 9 MA I N ST R E E T GE O R G E T O W N , TE X A S 78 6 2 6 WI L L I A M S O N CO U N T Y SU N EXISTING BEAMS IN CEILING TO REMAIN EXISTING STAIRS TO REMAIN EXISTING STAIRS TO REMAIN EXISTING LIFT TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN INFILL WALL WITH 8" CMU BLOCK INFILL WALL WITH 8" CMU BLOCK EXISTING SKYLIGHT TO REMAIN EXISTING SKYLIGHT TO REMAIN EXISTING SKYLIGHT TO REMAIN EXISTING STAIR TO BE RELOCATED LOCATION OF NEW STAIRS GYPSUM BOARD CEILING ELECTRICAL KEY 2' x 2' LED SURFACE MOUNTED FIXTURE 2' x 4' LED RECESSED FIXTURE 2' x 2' ACOUSTIC CEILING TILES EXISTING BEADED BOARD CEILING TO REMAIN A2.0 SECOND FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" FIRST FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Page 112 of 140 ARCHITECTS PROJECT NUMBER DATE COPYRIGHT ELSASSER ARCHITECTURAL, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF ELSASSER ARCHITECTURAL, INC. AND MAY NOT BE ALTERED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT. NO . DE S C R I P T I O N PL A N RE V I S I O N S DESIGN / PLANNING ARCHITECTURE ELSASSER ARCHITECTURAL INC. P.O. BOX 833 GEORGETOWN, TEXAS78627 (512) 930-5353, (512) 930-2618 FAX WWW.EAI-TX.COM DA T E 21030 03/01/22 CR T T C E S A LS R E S I SA H DREE . AHC S R I R D 999 S T I R EG LT A E 8 TFOE XETA 03/01/2022 RE N O V A T I O N 70 9 MA I N ST R E E T GE O R G E T O W N , TE X A S 78 6 2 6 WI L L I A M S O N CO U N T Y SU N 16 ' - 7 " 7' - 9 " 28 ' - 1 1 " 28 ' - 1 1 " EXISTING VENEER AND CORNICE TO REMAIN EXISTING WINDOWS TO REMAIN EXISTING AWNING TO REMAIN EXISTING WINDOW TO REMAIN NOT IN CONTRACT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION EXISTING ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING TO REMAIN EXISTING DOOR TO REMAIN EXISTING WINDOW TO BE REMOVED EXISTING DOOR (100A) TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCTED NEW WOOD WINDOW TO MATCH EXISTING TO BE ADDED EXISTING STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMNS WRAPPED WITH WOOD (TO REMAIN ) 13 ' - 1 0 " 9" 10 ' - 0 " 28 ' - 1 1 " 13 ' - 1 0 " 11 ' - 2 " 3' - 5 " 7" 10" EXISTING FLOORING AND STRUCTURE TO REMAIN NEW SUSPENDED ACOUSTICAL CEILING EXISTING LIFT TO REMAIN NOT IN CONTRACT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION NEW STAIR, TREAD AND RAILING TO MATCH EXISTING NEWSPAPER EQUIPMENT ROOM LEASE SPACE EXISTING DOUBLE WYTH ROCK WALL TO REMAIN ADD 2X4 ON EDGE AT 2'-0" O/C ADD 5/8" GYP. BOARD 9'-6" 3' - 0 " 1'-6" 4' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 1'-0"3'-6" 2' - 5 " 5" 3' - 4 " 1'-3" 5'-4" 4' - 0 " WATER RESISTANT GYP. BD. WITH EPOXY PAINT FINISH ADA/TAS S.S. GRAB-BARS CERAMIC TILE TO 4'-0" A.F.F. 1'6" X 3'0" MIRROR PROVIDE ADA DRAIN COVERS TOILET 01 A1.0 02 A1.0 PA I N T E D GY P S U M BO A R D CA R P E T TI L E S STAIRS REMARKSBASE/TRIMCEILINGFLOOR TI L E BA S E TI L E FL O O R (A) PA I N T E D GY P S U M BO A R D CE I L I N G RM. NO.ROOM NAME ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE WA I N S C O T CE R A M I C WA L L TI L E WALLS 4" RU B B E R WA L L BA S E 105 200 TY P E A (2'X4' LA Y -IN CE I L I N G TI L E ) NO BA S E OFFICE101 ENTRY/RECEPTION 103 LEASE SPACE 100 SE A L E D CO N C R E T E SECOND FLOOR STAIRS102 EXISTING TO REMAIN (NO CHANGES) EXISTING TO REMAIN (NO CHANGES) UNISEX RESTROOM104 MATCH EXISTING TREADS RAILING 16 ' - 7 " 7' - 9 " 28 ' - 1 1 " 8' - 0 " NEW CUSTOM WOOD WINDOW TO MATCH EXISTING NOT IN CONTRACT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION NEW CUSTOM WOOD WINDOW TO MATCH EXISTING NEW LOCATION OF EXISTING DOOR 100A EXISTING STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMNS WRAPPED WITH WOOD (TO REMAIN ) 13 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 7 " 7' - 9 " 28 ' - 1 1 " NOT IN CONTRACT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION 707 MAIN STREET 709 MAIN STREET EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED ELEVATION A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 01 CROSS SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" (PROPOSED)(EXISTING) PHOTO OF EXISTING CONDITION Page 113 of 140 Future-oriented performance for warmer climates Guardian ClimaGuard 53/23 is triple-silver coated glass designed for warmer climates. With 53% light transmission and a solar heat gain coefficient of 0.23, this glass helps control heat, glare, and AC costs — without sacrificing natural light. Consider ClimaGuard 53/23 for your premium windows and doors today, and keep using it as standards get more stringent. Product Information Substrate Base Glass/Thickness Clear Float/2.3 mm (3/32") - 5 mm (13/64") Applications Windows / Doors / Skylights Manufacturing options Tempered / Laminated / Heat Soaked / Heat Strengthened / Annealed Recommended Coating Positions Double glazed: #2 or #3 surface Triple Glazed: #2 and/or #5 surface Maximum Size <100"x144" (2540x3658mm) Edge Deletion Yes Glass type Low E Glass functions Solar Control U-Value Benefit Fabrication options Must be used in Insulating Glass Units Appearance Neutral ClimaGuard® ClimaGuard 53/23 Page 114 of 140 Published Date:22-Apr-2022All trademarks noted are owned by, licensed to or used with permission by Guardian Glass. ©2021 Guardian Glass, LLC 1-855-58-GLASS (45277) 2300 Harmon Road, Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326 www.guardianglass.com Double Glazed Triple Glazed Visible Light Ultraviolet Solar Energy Thermal Properties Light to Solar Gain (LSG) Transmittance Reflectance General ColorRenderingIndex (Ra) Trans UV(τuv %) Transmittance Reflectance Absorptance Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) Shading Coefficient (sc) U-Value Visible(τv %)pv % out pv % in Solar (τe %)ρe % out ρe % in Solar (αe %)Winter Night(Btu/hr·ft²·F)Summer Day(Btu/hr·ft²·F) Double Glazed: 3-12.7-3 ClimaGuard® ClimaGuard 53/23 on Clear Float #2, Clear Float, 90% Argon fill 53 13 13 92.8 11 20 41 48 38 0.23 0.27 0.242 0.213 2.28 Triple Glazed: 3-12.7-3-12.7-3 ClimaGuard® ClimaGuard 53/23 on Clear Float #2, Clear Float, Clear Float, 90% Argon fill 48 16 19 92.1 9 19 42 44 39 0.21 0.24 0.182 0.175 2.27 The performance values shown are nominal and subject to variations due to manufacturing tolerances. Spectra-photometric values according to NFRC 2010 / US Standard. The products in this publication are sold subject to Guardian‘s standard terms and conditions of sale and any applicable written warranties (available at www.guardianglass.com or from your local Guardian representative upon request). It is the responsibility of the purchaser to confirm that the products are suitable for their intended application in compliance with the applicable laws and regulations. Please contact your local Guardian representative to obtain any applicable handling and fabrication guides and for the most current product information. Page 115 of 140 TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Properties Documented with the THC Form in 2007 and/or 1984 That Have Not Changed Preservation Priority County Williamson Local District:Downtown District Address:709 S Main St 2016 Survey ID:124962 City Georgetown 2016 Preservation Priority:High SECTION 1 Basic Inventory Information WCAD ID:R041390Property Type:Building Structure Object Site District Date Recorded 3/2/2016Recorded by:CMEC EstimatedActual Source:2007 surveyConstruction Date:1889 Two-part commercial block Bungalow Other: Center Passage ShotgunOpen2-roomModified L-plan Rectangular T-plan Four Square L-plan Irregular Plan* International Ranch No Style Post-war Modern Commercial Style Other: Pueblo Revival Prairie Art Deco Spanish Colonial Craftsman Moderne Gothic Revival Neo-Classical Mission Tudor Revival Beaux Arts Monterey Shingle Folk Victorian Renaissance Revival Romanesque Revival Colonial Revival Exotic Revival Log traditional Italianate Eastlake Greek Revival Second Empire Queen Anne Stylistic Influence(s)* General Notes:707-709 S. Main Street was recorded as a single property in 1984 and 2007. Per the owner, the building has been used by the Williamson County Sun since c.1935. Also per the owner, the Sun is the oldest continuously operating business in the county. High Medium Priority: Low High Medium Low ID:692 ID:458 *Photographs and Preservation Priority have been updated in 2016, and the year built date has also been reviewed. However, the plan and style data are sourced directly from the 2007 survey. 2007 Survey 1984 Survey Current/Historic Name The williamson county sun/None ID:124962 2016 Survey High Medium Low Explain:Excellent and/or rare example of its type or style, and/or has significant associations; retains sufficient integrity Latitude:30.637081 Longitude -97.676862 None Selected None Selected Photo direction: East Page 116 of 140 TEXAS HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY FORM-TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION (rev. 8-82) 1. County Wj 1 1 j amson ~ 5 . USGS Quad No. 3097-313 Site No. _ ___.:4.;;:;5..:;:;8 __ _ l:=::GLJ UTM Sector ___ ___:6"-'2o...l6~-;:..S.ioo3~8.~....9::__ __________ _ City/Rural Georgetown 2 . Name C. A.D. Clamp BuUdings 6. Date: Factual 1889 Est. _______ _ Address :CA€) 709 1 /2 Ma j n 7~7-109 7 . Architect/Builder Whj ttl e & Harl....l.J.de~;;;.1.~.-______ _ Contractor ------------- '" Owner Se•=> page 2 8 . Style/Type------------------- Address 9. Original Use _.J..c.J..aw.mLWmu:::e.J..r.l..c..Li .o.a..1.l ------------- 4. Block/Lot OTS /BJ k 4 0 Present Use ..~.c..~.oiJ.Lmw.m~,.~;;e.J..r.l..c..Lj.aa..LJ ___ ---:-_________ _ 10. Description Two-story 1 oad-beari ng commercj al b11j ldi ng of lj mes t one w/ brick veneer: glat roof w/ bJtilt-up tar and gravel coverio~: wood sash double-hung w/ 1 /1 lights; two donhle door entrances w/ transom Other noteworthy fe atqres i n clue ABA ABA facade: cor bel t: brj c l, cprnj cp QD ) pft; pressed meta J COrDj co QD rj ght; tri angnJ ar pedj men ted Wj ndOWS 2 nd > 11. Present Condition good;._ ..... r.....,e...._h,..,au.b,....iw~.lw~.i..;.t~a...~.t~e~d_....l 9"""8o.~..2"--------------------------- 12. Significance __ :...Cuoni.J.t.L..r.~-J.J.... hUJ!u..J t~..-1~-.~· O.LLn_..s:l.....Lt..~..o~..-~.t .... h~,.~;;e;.....LJh..Lj .ws.J..t.u.o.~..r.J..j ._c ---'c._bU.Ja~rua:l.lc...Jt:.se;;..&r--.~.o,uf--.~.t.J.hu;e;.....~Jd...a.i.-.scJ.t.J..r..L.i.~.ocJ..t _________ _ 13. Relationship to Site: Moved Date _____ or Original Site x (describe) ______________ _ 14. Bibliography __ G .... H'""So.L..-f.~e.J.~e.. J~...~e...,s~-------15 . Informant--:-------------------- 16. Recorder -l.I.B.J..TL.../HU.JHMu.u.. ______ _ Date ____ 1.._9...,8.,5....__ DESIGNATIONS PHOTO DATA TN R IS No . ld THC Code-----B&W 4x5s ---------Slides ________ _ 0 RTHL 0 HABS (no.) TEX·---35mm Negs. NR: 0 Individual []:Historic District YEAR DRWR ROLL FRME Other --0-T-Nh-~-~-~-~~-cN_a_m_e_O_M_uw_l~-~~-~1_-:+-;=,..,~-t-tou.,..~++c,..,.e '"""'..,.,-----[ __ +__ I 24 I 351 :~ Co1;1:t tlto1\ct<=> t ± _ = _ _ ROLL FRME rn ,,_ .. :-' ~. . . ' .. CONTINUATION PAGE No._L_of_2_ TEXAS HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY FORM-TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION (rev. 8-82) l. Coun~villiamson Ci~/Ru~1 Georgetown 2 _ Name C.A.D. Clamp [Ejs. USGS Quad No. 3097-313 Site No. ------=4~5~8..___ Buildings #10. Description (cont'd): level; cast iron picastres (Heirman); canopy. # 3. Owners:709i--Linda Scarborough 709--anna Scarborough Josey ' Page 117 of 140 Williamson County Sun Door Relocation at 709 Main St -2022-21-COA Historic & Architectural Review Commission May 26, 2022 Page 118 of 140 2 Item Under Consideration 2022-21-COA •Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA)for an addition that creates a new,or adds to an existing street façade for the property located at 709 Main Street,bearing the legal description of Lot 3 (S/PT),Block 40,City of Georgetown Page 119 of 140 Insert GIS Location Map (Use reference point/landmarks for orientation if applicable) Historic Courthouse Page 120 of 140 4 Current Context Page 121 of 140 5 Current Context Page 122 of 140 6 History Image taken 1948 Page 123 of 140 7 Image taken 1989 History Page 124 of 140 8 Sanborn Maps -1885 Page 125 of 140 9 Sanborn Maps -1900 Page 126 of 140 10 c. 1934 SU Special Collections Photos Page 127 of 140 11 1964 Aerial Photo Page 128 of 140 12 1974 Aerial Photo Page 129 of 140 13 1984 HRS Photo Page 130 of 140 14 Current Photo Page 131 of 140 15 Interior Condition Page 132 of 140 16 Printing Equipment Page 133 of 140 17 Proposed Project Existing Proposed Page 134 of 140 18 Proposed Project Page 135 of 140 19 Similar Project: 707 Main Page 136 of 140 20 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.13.030 Criteria Staff’s Finding 1. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is correct and sufficient enough to allow adequate review and final action;Complies 2. Compliance with applicable design standards of this Code;Complies 3. Compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties to the most extent practicable;Complies 4. Compliance with the Historic District Design Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time, specific to the applicable Historic Overlay District; Partially Complies 5. The general historic, cultural, and architectural integrity of the building, structure or site is preserved;Complies 6. New buildings or additions are designed to be compatible with surrounding properties in the applicable historic overlay district;Complies 7. The overall character of the applicable historic overlay district is protected; and Complies 8. The Master Sign Plan is in keeping with the adopted Historic District Design Guidelines and character of the historic overlay district.Not Applicable Page 137 of 140 21 Public Notifications •Number (1) signs posted •To date, staff has received: •0 written comments IN FAVOR •0 written comments OPPOSED Page 138 of 140 22 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for an addition that creates a new, or adds to an existing street façade for the property located at 709 Main Street, bearing the legal description of Lot 3 (S/PT), Block 40, City of Georgetown. Page 139 of 140 23 HARC Motion -2022-21-COA •Approve (as presented by the applicant) •Deny (as presented by the applicant) •Approve with conditions •Postpone Page 140 of 140