HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_P&Z_05.03.2016Notice of Meeting for the
Planning and Zoning Commission
of the City of Georgetown
May 3, 2016 at 6:00 PM
at 101 E. Sev enth Street, Georgetown, Texas 78626
The City o f G eo rgeto wn is committed to comp lianc e with the Americans with Dis abilities Ac t (ADA). If yo u
req uire as s is tanc e in participating at a p ublic meeting d ue to a disability, as d efined und er the ADA, reas onab le
as s is tance, ad ap tatio ns , or acc o mmo d ations will b e provid ed up o n req uest. P leas e c o ntact the City at leas t
fo ur (4) d ays prior to the sc heduled meeting d ate, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for
ad d itional informatio n; TTY users ro ute thro ugh Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular S es s io n may, at any time, b e rec es s ed to convene an Exec utive S es s io n fo r any p urpose
authorized b y the Op en Meetings Act, Texas Go vernment Co d e 551.)
A Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Comments from the Chair
- Welcome and Meeting P ro cedures
Action from Executive Session
Public Wishing to Address the Board
On a sub ject that is pos ted on this agend a: Pleas e fill out a speaker regis tration form which c an b e found at the
Bo ard meeting. C learly p rint yo ur name, the letter o f the item o n which yo u wis h to s p eak, and present it to the
Staff Liais o n, p referab ly p rio r to the s tart of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Board
cons id ers that item.
On a sub ject not pos ted on the agend a: Pers ons may add an item to a future Bo ard agenda b y filing a written
req uest with the S taff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. T he req uest mus t inc lude the
s p eaker's name and the s p ecific to p ic to b e ad d res s ed with sufficient information to info rm the b o ard and the
p ublic . For Board Liais on c o ntact info rmatio n, pleas e lo gon to
http://go vernment.georgetown.o rg/category/b o ard s -commissions /.
B As of the d ead line, no persons were signed up to s peak on items other than thos e p o s ted o n the agend a.
Consent Agenda
The Statutory Cons ent Agenda inc ludes non-c o ntro versial and ro utine items that may be acted up o n with one
s ingle vo te. An item may b e pulled from the Cons ent Agenda in o rd er that it b e dis c us sed and acted up o n
individ ually as part of the Regular Agenda.
Page 1 of 115
C Co nsideration of the Minutes from the Ap ril 5, 2016 P &Z meeting.
D Co nsideration and possible actio n o n a Preliminary Plat for River Bend at Northwes t, being 7.74 ac res
out o f the N. Porter S urvey, lo cated at 422 Northwo o d Drive. (PP-2015-022, River Bend at No rthwes t)
Juan Enriq uez, P lanner
E Co nsideration and possible actio n o n a Preliminary Plat Amendment fo r S age Creek S ubdivis io n, b eing
39.9233 ac res , c o mp ris ed o f 29.2 acres o ut o f the A.H. P o rter Survey and 10.80 acres out o f the L.
Do nagan Survey lo cated at 4888 and 4890 S tate Highway 29. (P P-2016-005, S age Creek) Mike
Elab arger, S enior Planner
Legislativ e Regular Agenda
F Public Hearing and possible actio n o n a Final Plat of Lot 9, 10, 11, and 12, Blo ck B, Rep lat o f
Fred ricks on R anc h o n Lake Georgetown, and Lot 29, Bloc k B, Fredric ks o n Ranch on Lake Geo rgetown,
loc ated on Eagle Point Drive, to b e known as the Rep lat o f Lo t 29, Bloc k B, Fredric kson Ranc h o n Lake
Georgetown and Lo ts 9, 10, 11, and 12, Bloc k B, Replat of a Po rtion o f F red ricks o n Ranch on Lake
Georgetown. (F P-2015-045) Mike Elabarger, Senio r P lanner
G Public Hearing and possible actio n o n a req ues t to Rezone ap p ro ximately 278.21 acres o f the Is aac
Do nagan and Jo s ep h T hompson Surveys , lo c ated at 2951 Hwy 29 Wes t, from the Res id ential Single-
Family (R S) Dis trict to P lanned Unit Develo p ment (P UD) Dis tric t with a b as e zoning district of
Res id ential Single-F amily. (REZ-2016-002, Shad o w Canyon) Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner
H Dis cus s ion and pos s ible actio n to nominate a rep res entative to the Williams Drive S tud y Wo rking Group -
Jo rd an Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner, Nat Waggo ner, Trans p o rtation Analys t, and Andreina Dávila-
Quintero , P ro ject Co o rd inato r
I Pres entatio n o f the Planning Department 2015 End o f the Year Rep o rt. Pres entatio n and Disc ussion
regard ing d evelopment trend s , growth pro jec tio ns and a review o f signific ant p ro jects in 2015. So fia
Nels o n, Planning Direc tor
J Dis cus s ion Items :
Update on the Unified Development C o d e Advis o ry Committee (UDC AC ) meetings .
(Commis s ioner Bargainer)
Update on the Geo rgeto wn Transp o rtatio n Ad visory Board (GTAB) meetings . (Commissioner
Rankin)
Ques tio ns o r c o mments from Commis s io ners-in-Training about the ac tio ns and matters c o nsidered
on this agenda.
Remind er of the next P lanning and Zoning Co mmis s io n meeting on May 17, 2016 in the Co uncil
Chamb ers loc ated at 101 East 7th Street, s tarting at 6:00 p m.
Adjournment
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Shelley No wling, C ity S ecretary fo r the C ity of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , d o hereby c ertify that this Notice of
Meeting was p o s ted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a p lace read ily acc es s ible to the general p ublic at all times ,
on the ______ d ay o f __________________, 2016, at __________, and remained so p o s ted fo r at leas t 72
c o ntinuo us ho urs p receding the sc heduled time o f s aid meeting.
____________________________________
S helley No wling, City Sec retary
Page 2 of 115
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
May 3, 2016
SUBJECT:
Cons id eration o f the Minutes fro m the Ap ril 5, 2016 P&Z meeting.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Draft copy April Minutes Cover Memo
Page 3 of 115
Page 1 of 4
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes
Tuesday, April 5, 2016 at 6:00 PM
Council Chambers
101 E. Seventh Street, Georgetown, Texas 78626
Commissioners: Josh Schroeder, Chair; Kevin Pitts, Vice-Chair, Scott Rankin, Secretary
Andy Webb, Alex Fuller John Marler
Commissioner(s) Absent: Tim Bargainer
Commissioners in Training: Thomas Burlew, Tiffany McLendon, Gary Leissner
Commissioner(s) in Training Absent:
Staff Present: Sofia Nelson, Planning Director; Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner; Juan
Enriquez, Planner and Stephanie McNickle, Recording Secretary.
A. Chair Schroeder called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Chair Schroeder stated the order of the meeting and that those who speak must turn in
a speaker form to the recording secretary before the item that they wish to address
begins. Each speaker is permitted to address the Commission once for each item, for a
maximum of three (3) minutes, unless otherwise agreed to before the meeting begins.
As of the deadline for this agenda, no persons were signed up to speak on items other
than what was posted on the agenda.
Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that may be acted
upon with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be
discussed and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda.
B Election of Vice-chair and Secretary for the 2016-2017 Planning and Zoning Commission.
Motion by Commission Webb to continue with Commissioner Pitts serving as Vice-chair and
Commissioner Rankin serving as Secretary for the year 2016-2017. Second by Commissioner
Fuller. Approved 6-0.
C Consideration of the Minutes from the March 1, 2016 P&Z meeting.
D Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat of 247.49 acres in the Burrell Eaves
Survey, Abstract No. 216, located on State Highway 195, south of Sun City Boulevard, to be
known as Sun City Neighborhoods 83-87.
E Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat of 34.77 acres out of the L.P. Dyches
Survey, located on Ronald Reagan Boulevard, to be known as Somerset Ranch.
Page 4 of 115
Page 2 of 4
F Consideration and possible action on a Final Plat of 20.679 acres in the Orville Perry Survey,
located on the west side of Wolf Ranch Parkway, to be known as Wolf Ranch West Section 1A
Phase 1. (FP-2016-006) Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner
Motion by Commissioner Webb to approve the consent agenda including the minutes from the
March 1, 2016, Planning and Zoning meeting. Second by Commissioner Webb. Approved. (6-0)
Legislative Regular Agenda
G Public Hearing and possible action on a request to Rezone 278.21 acres of the Isaac Donagan
and Joseph Thompson Surveys, located at 2951 Hwy 29 West, from the Residential Single-
Family (RS) District to Planned Unit Development (PUD) District with a base zoning district of
Residential Single-Family. (REZ-2016-002) Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner
Item postponed.
H Public Hearing and possible action on a Special Use Permit at 215 West 3rd Street, bearing the
legal description of City of Georgetown, Block 9, Lot 5-6, 7-8 (W/PTS), for a first floor
residential project in the Mixed Use-Downtown (MU-DT) District. (SUP-2016-001) Matt
Synatschk, Historic Planner
Staff report by Matt Synatschk. Matt provided an overview of the Special Use Permit
request, description of project and recommended approval. He also stated the applicant
will be glad to answer questions.
Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing.
Pam Mitchell stated she is a little concerned about the height, but loves the design.
Larry Olsen stated he supports the design and will work well with Georgetown.
Chair Schroeder closed the Public Hearing.
Motion by Commissioner Marler to recommend to city Council approval for the Special
Use Permit at 215 West 3rd Street, bearing the legal description of City of Georgetown, Block 9,
Lot 5-6, 7-8 (W/PTS), for a first floor residential project in the Mixed Use-Downtown (MU-DT)
District. Second by Commissioner Fuller. Approved. (6-0)
I Public Hearing and possible action on a request to Rezone 5.240 acres in the Ephraim Evans
Survey, located at 211 Westinghouse Road and known as Georgetown Mercedes Benz, from the
Residential Single-family (RS) District to the General Commercial (C-3) District. (REZ-2016-009)
Carolyn Horner, AICP, Planner
Staff report by Carolyn Horner. Carolyn provided an overview of the Special Use Permit
request, description of project and recommended approval. She also stated the
applicant will be glad to answer questions.
Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward, the Public Hearing
was closed.
Motion by Commissioner Pitts to recommend to City Council approval for a Rezone of
5.240 acres in the Ephraim Evans Survey, located at 211 Westinghouse Road and known as
Georgetown Mercedes Benz, from the Residential Single-family (RS) District to the General
Commercial (C-3) District. Second by Commissioner Fuller. Approved. (6-0)
Page 5 of 115
Page 3 of 4
J Motion by Commissioner Fuller to move item J. after item M. Second by Commissioner Webb.
Approved. (6-0)
K Public Hearing and possible action on a request to Rezone approximately 184 acres of the
William Addison Survey located at 1821 SE Inner Loop from the Agriculture (AG) District to the
Public Facility (PF) District. (REZ-2016-005) Juan Enriquez, Planner
Juan Enriquez provided an overview of the Rezone request, description of project and
recommended approval.
Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing.
Jena Walker stated she is concerned with flooding and asked for impervious coverage
to be reviewed. Staff stated impervious coverage will be reviewed in the Site Plan when
submitted.
Chair Schroeder closed the Public Hearing.
Motion by Commissioner Pitts to recommend to City Council approval of Rezoning
approximately 184 acres of the William Addison Survey located at 1821 SE Inner Loop from the
Agriculture (AG) District to the Public Facility (PF) District. Second by Commissioner Marler.
Approved. (6-0)
L Public Hearing and possible action on a request to Rezone approximately 54.13 acres of the
William Addison Survey located at 2910 SE Inner Loop from the Agriculture (AG) District to the
Public Facility (PF) District. (REZ-2016-006) Juan Enriquez, Planner
Juan Enriquez provided an overview of the Rezone request, description of project and
recommended approval.
Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward, the Public Hearing
was closed.
Motion by Commissioner Pitts to recommend to City Council approval of Rezoning
approximately 54.13 acres of the William Addison Survey located at 2910 SE Inner Loop from
the Agriculture (AG) District to the Public Facility (PF) District. Second by Commissioner
Rankin. Approved. (6-0)
M Public Hearing and possible action on a request to Rezone approximately 63.09 acres of the
William Addison Survey located at 3151 SE Inner Loop from the Agriculture (AG) District to the
Public Facility (PF) District. (REZ-2016-007) Juan Enriquez, Planner
Juan Enriquez provided an overview of the Rezone request, description of project and
recommended approval.
Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward, the Public Hearing was
closed.
Motion by Commissioner Pitts to recommend to City Council approval of Rezone
approximately 63.09 acres of the William Addison Survey located at 3151 SE Inner Loop from
the Agriculture (AG) District to the Public Facility (PF) District. Second by Commissioner
Fuller. Approved. (6-0)
At this time Chair Schroeder recused himself from the dais.
J Public Hearing and possible action on a request to Rezone 1.00 acre of the L.J. Dyches Survey
located at 1000 FM 1460 from the Agriculture (AG) District to the Low Density Multifamily
(MF-1) District. (REZ-2016-012) Juan Enriquez, Planner
Page 6 of 115
Page 4 of 4
Juan Enriquez provided an overview of the Rezone request, description of project and
recommended approval.
Vice-chair Pitts opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward, the Public Hearing was
closed.
Motion by Commissioner Fuller to recommend to City Council approval of the Rezoning 1.00
acre of the L.J. Dyches Survey located at 1000 FM 1460 from the Agriculture (AG) District to the
Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District. Second by Commissioner Marler. Approved. (5-0)
N Discussion Items:
Update on the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee (UDCAC) meetings.
(Commissioner Bargainer) Commissioner Bargainer gave a brief report.
Update on the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB) meetings. (Commissioner
Rankin) NA
Questions or comments from Commissioners-in-Training about the actions and matters
considered on this agenda. NA
Reminder of the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on April 19, 2016 in the
Council Chambers located at 101 East 7th Street, starting at 6:00 pm.
Adjournment at 6:32
__________________________________ _______________________________
Josh Schroeder, Chair Scott Rankin, Secretary
Page 7 of 115
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
May 3, 2016
SUBJECT:
Cons id eration and p o s s ib le ac tion on a Preliminary Plat fo r River Bend at No rthwest, b eing 7.74 acres
o ut of the N. P o rter Survey, loc ated at 422 No rthwood Drive. (P P-2015-022, R iver Bend at Northwes t)
Juan Enriq uez, Planner
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
This p reliminary p lat creates 25 res id ential lo ts and 1 water quality lot. Ac ces s to the s ite is off Northwo od
Drive and River Bend Drive. P arkland dedic atio n req uirements are being met by a fee-in-lieu.
Public Comments:
Pub lic notice is not required for a Preliminary Plat applic ation. There have b een no inquiries about the plat.
Recommended motion:
Approve the Preliminary Plat for River Bend at Northwes t.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Juan Enriq uez, Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, P lanning Directo r
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Cover Memo
Exhibit 1 - Location Map Backup Material
Exhibit 2 - Preliminary Plat Backup Material
Page 8 of 115
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
River Bend at Northwest Subdivision, Preliminary Plat Page 1 of 2
Report Date: April 25, 2016
File No: PP-2015-022
Project Planner: Juan Enriquez, Planner
Item Details
Project Name: River Bend at Northwest Subdivision
Project Address: 422 Northwood Drive
Total Acreage: 7.74 acres
Legal Description: 7.74 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey
Applicant: John J. Gavurnik, Kibo Contractors, LLC
Property Owner: Jeffrey M. Stokes
Contact: Ryan Irion, Noble Surveying & Engineering Works, LLC
Plat Summary
Proposed Lots: Twenty-five (25) residential lots; One (1) water quality lot
Proposed Streets: Two (2) new streets
Heritage Tree(s): None are located on-site
Parkland Dedication: Requirement is being met by paying a fee-in-lieu
Site Information
Location:
The property is located within the City limits, east of River Bend Drive and south of Lakeway Drive.
Physical Characteristics:
There is an existing single family dwelling that will be demolished. The remainder of the lot is relatively
flat and there are no heritage trees on-site.
History
The property was annexed in 2013 with Ordinance No. 2013-53 and zoned Two Family Residential (TF) in
2015 with Ordinance No. 2015-13. The development falls under the current UDC regulations and the
development standards for the TF District. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan future land use category for the
property is Moderate Density Residential. This project is located within Growth Tier 1A.
Utilities
Electric, Water and Wastewater services are provided by the City of Georgetown.
Transportation
This development’s primary access will be along River Bend Drive with a second means of access along
Northwood Drive. Right-of-way dedication along Northwest Boulevard is being provided in accordance
with the City of Georgetown’s Overall Transportation Plan.
Staff Analysis
The proposed Preliminary Plat meets the requirements of the Unified Development Code and TF District
development standards, and is presented for approval.
Page 9 of 115
Planning Department Staff Report
River Bend at Northwest Subdivision, Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 2
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Location Map
Exhibit 2 – Preliminary Plat
Page 10 of 115
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
Georgetown ETJ
GeorgetownETJ
PP -2 01 5-0 22
W
EST
W
OOD LN
T H O R N T O N C V
G O L D E N O A K S D R
T H O R N T O N L N
RIVER BEND DR
DA
W
N DR
NORTHWESTBLVD
WHISPEROAKS L N
NORTHWOODDR
S H A D Y H O L L O W D R
PP-20 15-022Exhibit #1
Co ord inate Sys tem: Texas S tat e P lane/C entral Zone/NAD 83 /US FeetCartographic Data For Genera l Planning Purposes Onl y 0 500 1,000Fee t ¯
Le ge nd
SiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Willia
msDr
Lakew ay Dr
Lakeway D r
NAustinAve
N Austin Ave
RiveryBlv d
")971
EMorro w St
N
orth
w
estBlvd
Lakew ay Dr
Lakew ay Dr
§¨¦35
Site
City Lim its
Str eet
Si te ³
Page 11 of 115
Page 12 of 115
Page 13 of 115
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
May 3, 2016
SUBJECT:
Cons id eration and p o s s ib le ac tion on a Preliminary Plat Amendment for Sage Creek Sub d ivisio n, b eing
39.9233 ac res , comprised o f 29.2 ac res out o f the A.H. P o rter Survey and 10.80 acres out o f the L.
Donagan Survey loc ated at 4888 and 4890 S tate Highway 29. (PP-2016-005, S age Creek) Mike Elabarger,
Senio r Planner
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The ap p lic ant proposes to d evelo p 39.9233 ac res o f undevelo p ed land in the Extraterritorial Juris d ictio n of
the C ity o f Georgetown into 30 residential lo ts , with 5 o p en spac e lots , and 4 environmental lots (kars t
limes tone features regulated b y the S tate TCEQ. A total of 3,882 linear feet o f a single loc al s treet (50’
right-of-way wid th) is b eing c reated and d ed icated with this plat. Parkland ded ic atio n will be ac complished
with a payment in lieu o f land dedic ation at the time of Final P lat recordation.
Through the F inal P lat (F P-2015-033) review proc es s , the applic ant d etermined that fo ur (4) ad d itional
res id ential lo ts could b e d eveloped on the property. T his inc reas e in the number o f lo ts (15%) exc eeded
the allo wance for a Majo r Deviation (no g rea ter than a 10% increase or d ecrea se in num b er of lots) from
the approved Preliminary Plat per UDC Sec tio n 3.08.080.B.c.ii.d. Therefore, a Preliminary Plat Amend ment
was required per UDC Sec tion 3.08.070.F., and the P lanning and Zoning Commission must c ons id er and
take final ac tio n o n this plat.
Public Comment:
Pub lic notice is not required for a Preliminary Plat Amend ment. As o f the date of this report, no written
p ublic c o mments have been rec eived.
Recommended Motion:
Approval o f the P reliminary P lat Amendment for Sage Creek Sub d ivision.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Not applic able.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mike Elabarger, Senio r P lanner and So fia Nels on, CNU-A, Planning Direc to r
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Cover Memo
Exhibit 1 - Location Map Backup Material
Exhibit 2 - Propos ed Preliminary Plat AMendment Backup Material
Page 14 of 115
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Sage Creek Preliminary Plat Amendment - PP-2016-005 Page 1 of 2
Report Date: April 26, 2016
File No: PP-2016-005
Project Planner: Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Preliminary Plat Amendment of Sage Creek Subdivision (PP-2014-020)
Project Address: 4888 and 4890 West State Highway 29
Location: North side of SH 29 just east of Vista Heights Drive (see Exhibit 1)
Total Acreage: 39.9233 acres
Legal Description: 39.9233 acres, comprised of 29.2 acres out of the A.H. Porter Survey, Abstract
No. 490, and 10.80 acres out of the L. Donagan Survey, Abstract No. 178
Applicant/Contact: Kevin Sawtelle, P.E., Land Dev Consulting LLC
Property Owner: MA Partners LLC
Plat Summary
Proposed Lots: 30 Residential / 5 open space / 4 critical environmental feature buffer lots
Proposed Streets: 3,882 linear feet – one 50’ ROW Local Street
Heritage Trees: 46 Heritage Trees are located within this plat
Parkland dedication: Parkland dedication requirements are proposed to be met by Fee-in-lieu
payment
NOTE: This is a Preliminary Plat Amendment to the original Preliminary Plat (PP-2014-020),
approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on July 7, 2015 for 26 residential lots.
Through the Final Plat (FP-2015-033) review process, the applicant determined that four (4)
additional residential lots could be developed on the property. This increase in the number of
lots (15%) exceeds the allowance for a Major Deviation (no greater than a 10% increase or
decrease in number of lots) from the approved Preliminary Plat per UDC Section
3.08.080.B.c.ii.d. Therefore, a Preliminary Plat Amendment is required per UDC Section
3.08.070.F., and the Planning and Zoning Commission must consider and take final action on
this plat.
Site Information
Location:
The property is located within the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City, on the north side of State
Highway 29, approximately 5 miles west of Interstate 35. The Oaks at San Gabriel Municipal Utility
District (MUD) subdivision is under development just west and north of this proposed subdivision. The
more established Cimarron Hills subdivision lies a bit further west, also on the north side of SH 29.
Physical Characteristics:
The subject property is a long and narrow rectangle, generally flat and moderately tree covered throughout.
A natural drainage way creates 100-year floodplain on the northeast corner of the property. Four (4) karst
limestone environmental features exist on the property and are preserved per State requirements. The plat
was designed in conjunction with the City Urban Forester to ensure buildable areas within each residential
lot that provide protection to the identified Heritage Trees that will be preserved. These lots, being served
by on-site septic systems, are all over one acre in size to meet the Williamson Cities and County Health
District regulations.
Page 15 of 115
Planning Department Staff Report
Sage Creek Preliminary Plat Amendment - PP-2016-005 Page 2 of 2
History
There is no known history to the property. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan designates this area as a Low
Density Residential future land use category, which supports single family detached neighborhoods at a
density of between 1 and 3 dwelling units per acre. This project is located within Tier 3 (Long-term
Growth Area) of the current City Growth Tier Map; infrastructure facilities will be the responsibility of the
developer to serve the property.
Utilities
The Georgetown Utility System (GUS) Western District will be providing water to the subdivision. Each
lot will obtain a septic system permit from the Williamson Cities and County Health District. Electric is
provided by Pedernales Electric Cooperative (PEC). Public utility easements are being dedicated with this
plat according to the City of Georgetown standards.
Transportation
This plat proposes a single “spine” roadway, consisting of a 50’ right-of-way (ROW) from State Highway
29 to where it connects with Vista Heights Drive - the roadway tapers from a 50’ ROW to the 65’ ROW –
as it enters the Oaks at San Gabriel subdivision. Vista Heights Drive is classified as a residential collector
in the Oaks at San Gabriel subdivision, but the traffic impact analysis (TIA) for that project indicated that
the roadway would not have to maintain that dimension when it was eventually connected back to SH 29
(through this subject property). This plat, by itself, did not trigger a TIA.
All lots would front off of this roadway, with no minimum separation requirements. The road will have a
design speed of either 25 or 30 miles per hour. The proposed roundabouts have demonstrated that their
radiuses will allow emergency vehicles clear access around them.
Staff Analysis
The proposed Final Plat meets all of the requirements of the City’s Unified Development Code, and is
presented for approval. The Plat Waiver for block length considerations (WAV-2015-003), which was
originally conceived and approved relative to the original Preliminary Plat (PP-2014-020), still applies to
this Amendment, as demonstrated by the roundabouts which act to break up the block length and meet the
intent of UDC Section 6.02.040.B.
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Location Map
Exhibit 2 – Proposed Preliminary Plat (3 sheets)
Page 16 of 115
W U n i v e r s it y A v e
¬«29
L e a n d e r R d
WilliamsDr
D
B
W
o
o
d
R
d
Booty'sCrossingRd
L e a n d e r R d
¬«29¬«29
R
o
n
a
l
d
W
R
e
a
g
a
n
B
l
v
d
W U n iv e r s it y A v e
Water
OakPkwy
G
a
b
ri
e
l
F
o
r
e
s
t
C
e
d
a
r
H
o
l
l
o
w
Rd
R
onald
W
Reag
an
B
l
v
d
(River/Stream)
(River/Strea
m
)
PP-2016-005Exhibit #1
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
Location Map
0 0.5 1 1.5 2Mi
Le ge ndSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Page 17 of 115
88
0
88
2
884
8
6
8
8
6
8
87
0
87
2
87
4
87
6
87
8
87
0
87
2
8
9
0
9
0
0
8
8
8
8
9
2
8
9
4
89
6
8
9
8
9
0
2
90
4
88
2
8
8
4
8
8
6
8
8
8
88
8
8
6
4
8
9
2
896
898
L
1
C1
L2
C2
L3
C
3
L
4
C4
L5
C5
88
2
88
4
88
6CE
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
C
U
R
V
E
T
A
B
L
E
CU
R
V
E
C1
C2C3C4C5C6C7C8
DE
L
T
A
32
°
2
1
'
2
0
"
29
°
1
0
'
0
0
"
28
°
2
5
'
0
0
"
42
°
3
3
'
4
0
"
38
°
5
8
'
3
0
"
49
°
1
2
'
0
0
"
31
°
5
5
'
1
0
"
30
°
3
4
'
0
0
"
RA
D
I
U
S
25
3
.
4
5
'
22
8
.
1
1
'
35
0
.
0
0
'
34
0
.
0
0
'
60
0
.
0
0
'
25
0
.
0
0
'
40
0
.
0
0
'
31
0
.
0
0
'
LE
N
G
T
H
14
3
.
1
2
'
11
6
.
1
2
'
17
3
.
6
0
'
25
2
.
5
7
'
40
8
.
1
5
'
21
4
.
6
7
'
22
2
.
8
4
'
16
5
.
3
8
'
TA
N
G
E
N
T
73
.
5
3
'
59
.
3
5
'
88
.
6
2
'
13
2
.
4
3
'
21
2
.
3
3
'
11
4
.
4
6
'
11
4
.
3
9
'
84
.
7
1
'
CH
O
R
D
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
N4
°
4
4
'
0
0
"
W
N0
°
5
0
'
0
0
"
W
N2
9
°
3
7
'
3
0
"
W
N2
2
°
3
3
'
1
0
"
W
N2
0
°
4
5
'
3
0
"
W
N1
5
°
3
8
'
5
0
"
W
N7
°
0
0
'
3
0
"
W
N7
°
4
1
'
0
0
"
W
CH
O
R
D
D
I
S
T
.
14
1
.
2
3
'
11
4
.
8
7
'
17
1
.
8
2
'
24
6
.
8
0
'
40
0
.
3
3
'
20
8
.
1
4
'
21
9
.
9
7
'
16
3
.
4
3
'
CE
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
L
I
N
E
T
A
B
L
E
LI
N
E
#
L1
L2L3L4L5L6L7L8L9
LE
N
G
T
H
29
.
1
4
'
19
.
2
8
'
43
1
.
6
1
'
46
1
.
2
4
'
39
6
.
8
9
'
18
9
.
7
8
'
18
8
.
5
2
'
57
8
.
6
2
'
90
.
4
5
'
DI
R
E
C
T
I
O
N
N2
0
°
0
2
'
0
2
"
W
N1
3
°
4
5
'
0
2
"
E
N1
5
°
2
4
'
5
8
"
W
N4
3
°
5
0
'
0
3
"
W
N1
°
1
6
'
1
8
"
W
N4
0
°
1
4
'
5
0
"
W
N8
°
5
7
'
0
6
"
E
N2
2
°
5
8
'
0
2
"
W
N7
°
3
6
'
0
0
"
E
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
P
L
A
T
A
M
E
N
D
M
E
N
T
(P
P
-
2
0
1
6
-
0
0
5
)
SA
G
E
C
R
E
E
K
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
BE
I
N
G
3
9
.
9
2
3
3
A
C
R
E
S
,
C
O
M
P
R
I
S
E
D
O
F
2
9
.
2
A
C
R
E
S
O
U
T
O
F
T
H
E
A
.
H
.
PO
R
T
E
R
S
U
R
V
E
Y
A
B
S
T
R
A
C
T
N
O
.
4
9
0
,
A
N
D
1
0
.
8
0
A
C
R
E
S
O
U
T
O
F
T
H
E
L
.
DO
N
A
G
A
N
S
U
R
V
E
Y
A
B
S
.
N
O
.
1
7
8
,
I
N
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
,
B
E
I
N
G
TH
E
S
A
M
E
T
R
A
C
T
S
D
E
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
I
N
V
O
L
.
5
5
0
,
P
G
.
2
3
0
,
O
F
T
H
E
WI
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
D
E
E
D
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
.
T3
8
NO
T
T
O
S
C
A
L
E
LE
G
E
N
D
PRELIMINARY PLAT
AMENDMENT
OP
E
N
S
P
A
C
E
1/
2
"
I
R
O
N
P
I
N
F
O
U
N
D
1/
2
"
I
R
O
N
P
I
N
S
E
T
CO
N
C
.
H
W
Y
M
O
N
U
M
E
N
T
F
O
U
N
D
NA
I
L
F
O
U
N
D
LI
G
H
T
/
P
O
L
E
P
O
W
E
R
PO
L
E
G
U
Y
W
I
R
E
WI
R
E
F
E
N
C
E
OV
E
R
H
E
A
D
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
L
I
N
E
RE
C
O
R
D
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
CR
I
T
I
C
A
L
E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
(C
.
E
.
F
.
)
R
A
D
I
U
S
P
O
I
N
T
F
O
R
3
0
0
'
NO
N
-
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
A
R
E
A
HE
R
I
T
A
G
E
T
R
E
E
AD
J
A
C
E
N
T
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
FE
M
A
1
0
0
Y
R
.
F
L
O
O
D
P
L
A
I
N
(S
T
R
E
A
M
B
U
F
F
E
R
)
CA
L
C
U
L
A
T
E
D
1
%
F
L
O
O
D
P
L
A
I
N
(S
T
R
E
A
M
B
U
F
F
E
R
)
RO
W
P.
U
.
E
.
LO
T
L
I
N
E
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
T
R
E
A
M
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
N
P:\Marlin Atlantis\MAG15002_SH29 40 Acres\03_ACAD\Plans\PRELIM\Sage Prelim Plat.dwg, Plat 1, April 15, 2016, 10:38 AM, Rachel Ruder
of
3
SH
E
E
T
NO.REVISION BY DATE
consulting, llc
5508 HIGHWAY 290 WEST, SUITE 215
AUSTIN, TX ∙78735
OFFICE:512.872.6696
FIRM NO. 16384
1
O.
S
.
10
0
Y
R
F
P
U.
S
.
H
W
Y
2
9
CEDAR HOLLOW RD
OLD
C
R
E
E
K
S
I
D
E
R
D
.
GABRIEL F
O
R
E
S
T
ESTANCIA WAY
CHAPARRAL RD.
SI
T
E
N
LO
T
L
I
N
E
T
A
B
L
E
LI
N
E
LE
N
G
T
H
BE
A
R
I
N
G
L1
16
.
3
7
N0
8
°
5
7
'
0
6
"
E
L2
3.
0
0
N0
8
°
5
7
'
0
6
"
E
L3
1.
9
1
N0
8
°
5
7
'
0
6
"
E
L4
19
.
9
5
S0
7
°
3
6
'
0
0
"
W
L5
34
.
9
8
S0
7
°
3
6
'
0
0
"
W
L6
35
.
3
4
N5
2
°
3
6
'
0
0
"
E
L7
54
.
4
7
N6
8
°
5
4
'
1
7
"
E
L8
15
6
.
4
7
N6
7
°
0
1
'
5
8
"
E
L9
17
3
.
3
8
N6
7
°
0
1
'
5
8
"
E
L1
0
43
.
5
2
S7
1
°
0
5
'
1
7
"
W
L1
1
12
6
.
0
8
S7
4
°
2
7
'
1
8
"
W
L1
2
58
.
0
2
N2
7
°
3
3
'
4
9
"
W
L1
3
36
.
7
9
N2
7
°
5
6
'
3
5
"
W
L1
4
92
.
1
4
S2
5
°
2
0
'
1
9
"
E
L1
5
38
.
2
3
S8
1
°
0
2
'
5
4
"
E
L1
6
39
.
6
4
S8
1
°
0
2
'
5
4
"
E
L1
7
20
.
8
6
S4
9
°
2
9
'
0
0
"
W
L1
8
8.
0
3
S6
9
°
3
7
'
3
0
"
E
L1
9
17
9
.
0
8
N6
9
°
5
6
'
3
6
"
E
L2
0
20
2
.
4
6
S7
4
°
3
3
'
0
2
"
W
L2
1
25
1
.
0
3
S7
4
°
3
3
'
0
2
"
W
L2
2
93
.
9
3
S6
4
°
3
9
'
1
4
"
W
L2
3
55
.
5
2
S6
3
°
2
6
'
0
6
"
W
L2
4
12
.
6
5
S5
7
°
1
3
'
3
9
"
W
L2
5
14
.
7
4
N8
9
°
5
6
'
0
6
"
W
L2
6
16
.
3
7
S6
0
°
1
5
'
1
8
"
W
L2
7
16
.
5
9
S5
0
°
2
7
'
5
0
"
W
L2
8
54
.
0
2
N6
2
°
5
5
'
3
7
"
E
L2
9
65
.
3
1
N6
5
°
3
6
'
2
1
"
E
L3
0
10
3
.
7
5
N4
7
°
5
9
'
4
5
"
E
L3
1
10
6
.
4
4
N4
7
°
5
9
'
4
5
"
E
L3
2
4.
3
7
N2
0
°
0
5
'
4
9
"
W
L3
3
20
.
6
7
N1
4
°
5
0
'
4
4
"
E
L3
4
20
.
3
6
N1
5
°
2
4
'
5
8
"
W
L3
5
12
5
.
0
2
N1
5
°
2
4
'
5
8
"
W
L3
6
12
4
.
9
8
N1
5
°
2
4
'
5
8
"
W
L3
7
12
5
.
0
0
N1
5
°
2
4
'
5
8
"
W
L3
8
37
.
0
6
N1
5
°
2
4
'
5
8
"
W
L3
9
28
.
5
6
N4
3
°
5
0
'
0
3
"
W
L4
0
12
5
.
0
3
N4
3
°
5
0
'
0
3
"
W
L4
1
16
5
.
0
0
S4
3
°
5
0
'
0
3
"
E
L4
2
14
2
.
6
6
N4
3
°
5
0
'
0
3
"
W
L4
3
95
.
1
0
N5
5
°
1
5
'
4
7
"
E
L4
4
21
.
2
9
N0
8
°
5
7
'
0
6
"
E
L4
5
15
4
.
3
7
S6
7
°
0
1
'
5
8
"
W
L4
6
15
1
.
0
0
N6
7
°
0
1
'
5
8
"
E
L4
7
75
.
7
0
S1
6
°
1
6
'
0
7
"
E
L4
8
58
.
4
4
N2
6
°
4
6
'
0
7
"
W
L4
9
65
.
0
9
N0
9
°
1
0
'
5
6
"
W
L5
0
61
.
7
0
N0
4
°
3
4
'
1
8
"
W
L5
1
41
.
8
1
N5
0
°
5
1
'
1
1
"
E
L5
2
12
.
1
9
N2
2
°
4
4
'
0
8
"
E
L5
3
53
.
1
6
N2
8
°
0
2
'
3
5
"
W
L5
4
87
.
8
8
N6
2
°
1
8
'
5
4
"
E
L5
5
16
.
7
7
N4
6
°
0
9
'
5
7
"
E
L5
6
85
.
3
3
N6
2
°
1
8
'
5
4
"
E
L5
7
34
.
7
2
N5
9
°
3
8
'
0
5
"
E
L5
8
43
.
9
5
N5
9
°
3
8
'
0
5
"
E
L5
9
14
7
.
3
3
N6
9
°
5
6
'
3
6
"
E
L6
0
9.
9
7
N4
5
°
2
5
'
4
7
"
E
L6
1
23
.
0
2
N6
0
°
4
4
'
2
2
"
E
L6
2
19
2
.
6
4
N7
0
°
4
2
'
4
4
"
E
L6
3
63
.
2
6
N1
6
°
0
5
'
2
9
"
W
L6
4
10
.
3
4
N4
2
°
0
0
'
3
8
"
E
L6
5
34
.
4
7
N2
1
°
5
4
'
4
0
"
E
LO
T
C
U
R
V
E
T
A
B
L
E
CU
R
V
E
LE
N
G
T
H
RA
D
I
U
S
BE
A
R
I
N
G
CH
O
R
D
C1
67
.
8
0
31
8
.
0
0
N1
4
°
1
2
'
0
4
"
W
67
.
6
8
C2
76
.
9
6
20
0
.
0
0
N0
2
°
5
5
'
5
2
"
E
76
.
4
9
C3
12
8
.
1
6
25
0
.
0
0
S0
0
°
4
3
'
4
9
"
E
12
6
.
7
6
C4
10
5
.
2
5
37
5
.
3
6
S2
3
°
2
8
'
0
7
"
E
10
4
.
9
0
C5
80
.
7
5
37
5
.
3
6
S3
7
°
3
9
'
5
1
"
E
80
.
5
9
C6
5.
5
4
31
5
.
0
0
N4
3
°
1
9
'
4
8
"
W
5.
5
4
C7
11
.
0
1
10
.
0
0
N1
1
°
1
6
'
4
4
"
W
10
.
4
6
C8
10
1
.
7
6
56
.
0
0
S3
1
°
4
7
'
2
3
"
E
88
.
3
3
C9
2.
0
9
56
.
0
0
S8
4
°
5
4
'
5
4
"
E
2.
0
9
C1
0
1.
8
8
10
.
0
0
N8
0
°
3
4
'
5
9
"
W
1.
8
8
C1
1
9.
1
3
10
.
0
0
N4
9
°
0
2
'
1
0
"
W
8.
8
1
C1
2
11
8
.
8
5
31
5
.
0
0
N1
2
°
0
4
'
5
0
"
W
11
8
.
1
5
C1
3
10
7
.
5
0
62
5
.
0
0
S0
6
°
1
1
'
5
7
"
E
10
7
.
3
7
C1
4
97
.
3
9
62
5
.
0
0
S1
5
°
3
5
'
2
6
"
E
97
.
2
9
C1
5
97
.
3
9
62
5
.
0
0
S1
5
°
3
5
'
2
6
"
E
97
.
2
9
C1
6
13
3
.
2
9
62
5
.
0
0
S2
6
°
0
9
'
5
1
"
E
13
3
.
0
4
C1
7
56
.
9
7
62
5
.
0
0
S3
4
°
5
3
'
0
6
"
E
56
.
9
5
C1
8
30
.
0
1
62
5
.
0
0
S3
8
°
5
2
'
1
8
"
E
30
.
0
0
C1
9
19
3
.
2
0
22
5
.
0
0
N1
5
°
3
8
'
5
2
"
W
18
7
.
3
2
C2
0
10
.
1
2
10
.
0
0
N3
7
°
5
6
'
1
9
"
E
9.
6
9
C2
1
11
3
.
3
3
56
.
0
0
S0
8
°
5
7
'
0
6
"
W
94
.
9
5
C2
2
10
.
1
2
10
.
0
0
N2
0
°
0
2
'
0
7
"
W
9.
6
9
C2
3
90
.
4
9
42
5
.
0
0
S0
2
°
5
1
'
0
8
"
W
90
.
3
2
C2
4
42
.
0
4
42
5
.
0
0
S0
6
°
0
4
'
5
2
"
E
42
.
0
2
C2
5
10
4
.
2
3
42
5
.
0
0
S1
5
°
5
6
'
2
8
"
E
10
3
.
9
7
C2
6
99
.
7
6
18
7
.
0
0
N0
7
°
4
1
'
0
1
"
W
98
.
5
9
C2
7
10
6
.
9
8
60
.
3
1
N1
9
°
3
1
'
2
3
"
E
93
.
4
9
C2
8
10
6
.
9
8
60
.
3
1
N1
9
°
3
1
'
2
3
"
E
93
.
4
9
C2
9
24
6
.
4
4
75
.
9
5
S6
7
°
4
3
'
0
7
"
W
15
1
.
7
0
C3
0
54
.
9
8
60
.
0
0
N1
4
°
1
9
'
3
6
"
E
53
.
0
8
C3
1
94
.
9
3
60
.
0
0
N8
6
°
5
4
'
0
5
"
W
85
.
3
4
C3
2
54
.
9
8
60
.
0
0
N1
4
°
1
9
'
3
6
"
E
53
.
0
8
C3
3
15
1
.
0
0
25
0
.
0
0
N0
2
°
2
7
'
2
8
"
W
14
8
.
7
2
C3
4
10
6
.
9
9
20
0
.
0
6
S0
0
°
0
5
'
3
5
"
E
10
5
.
7
2
C3
5
16
1
.
2
0
32
5
.
0
0
S2
9
°
3
7
'
3
0
"
E
15
9
.
5
5
C3
6
12
.
6
7
36
5
.
0
0
N4
2
°
5
0
'
2
3
"
W
12
.
6
7
C3
7
9.
3
5
10
.
0
0
S6
8
°
3
8
'
2
5
"
E
9.
0
2
C3
8
12
2
.
3
3
56
.
0
0
N3
2
°
5
1
'
2
7
"
W
99
.
4
2
C3
9
9.
3
5
10
.
0
0
S0
2
°
5
5
'
3
2
"
W
9.
0
2
C4
0
2.
0
1
36
5
.
0
0
N2
3
°
4
2
'
4
4
"
W
2.
0
1
C4
1
14
1
.
9
5
36
5
.
0
0
N1
2
°
2
4
'
4
8
"
W
14
1
.
0
6
C4
2
84
.
9
6
57
5
.
0
0
S0
5
°
3
0
'
1
6
"
E
84
.
8
8
C4
3
24
3
.
0
6
57
5
.
0
0
S2
1
°
5
0
'
4
9
"
E
24
1
.
2
5
C4
4
63
.
1
3
57
5
.
0
0
S3
7
°
0
6
'
0
7
"
E
63
.
1
0
C4
5
26
.
4
2
27
5
.
0
0
N3
7
°
2
9
'
4
2
"
W
26
.
4
1
C4
6
20
9
.
7
2
27
5
.
0
0
N1
2
°
5
3
'
4
4
"
W
20
4
.
6
7
C4
7
10
.
1
2
10
.
0
0
S2
0
°
0
2
'
0
7
"
E
9.
6
9
C4
8
11
3
.
3
3
56
.
0
0
N0
8
°
5
7
'
0
6
"
E
94
.
9
5
C4
9
10
.
1
2
10
.
0
0
S3
7
°
5
6
'
1
9
"
W
9.
6
9
C5
0
20
8
.
9
1
37
5
.
0
0
S0
7
°
0
0
'
2
8
"
E
20
6
.
2
2
C5
1
22
2
.
1
6
49
.
8
7
S1
8
°
2
6
'
4
0
"
E
79
.
0
2
C5
2
75
.
2
3
65
5
.
0
0
S1
4
°
0
8
'
2
8
"
E
75
.
1
9
SAGE CREEK
U.S. HIGHWAY 29
georgetown, williamson county tx
OW
N
E
R
S
:
MA
P
A
R
T
N
E
R
S
L
L
C
.
,
15
4
4
3
K
N
O
L
L
T
R
A
I
L
D
R
I
V
E
,
S
U
I
T
E
1
3
0
DA
L
L
A
S
,
T
E
X
A
S
7
5
2
4
8
AC
R
E
A
G
E
:
3
9
.
9
2
3
3
A
C
R
E
S
PA
T
E
N
T
S
U
R
V
E
Y
:
T
H
E
A
.
H
.
P
O
R
T
E
R
S
U
R
V
E
Y
A
B
S
T
R
A
C
T
N
O
.
4
9
0
A
N
D
T
H
E
L.
D
O
N
A
G
A
N
S
U
R
V
E
Y
A
B
S
T
R
A
C
T
N
O
.
1
7
8
NU
M
B
E
R
O
F
B
L
O
C
K
S
:
6
AC
R
E
A
G
E
B
Y
L
O
T
T
Y
P
E
:
TO
T
A
L
=
3
9
.
9
2
3
3
A
C
R
E
S
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
=
3
2
.
3
7
1
0
A
C
R
E
S
R.
O
.
W
.
=
4
.
7
5
6
9
A
C
R
E
S
OP
E
N
S
P
A
C
E
=
0
.
3
5
3
0
A
C
R
E
S
(
I
N
C
L
U
D
I
N
G
R
O
U
N
D
A
B
O
U
T
S
)
0
.
2
6
2
9
A
C
R
E
S
(
W
I
T
H
O
U
T
R
O
U
N
D
A
B
O
U
T
S
)
RO
U
N
D
A
B
O
U
T
S
=
0
.
0
9
0
1
A
C
R
E
S
C.
E
.
F
.
B
U
F
F
E
R
=
1
.
5
3
5
4
A
C
R
E
S
NU
M
B
E
R
O
F
L
O
T
S
B
Y
T
Y
P
E
:
3
0
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
L
O
T
S
4
C
R
I
T
I
C
A
L
E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
B
U
F
F
E
R
(
C
.
E
.
F
.
)
L
O
T
S
5
O
P
E
N
S
P
A
C
E
L
O
T
S
(
2
O
F
W
H
I
C
H
A
R
E
R
O
U
N
D
A
B
O
U
T
S
)
SU
R
V
E
Y
O
R
:
C
R
I
C
H
T
O
N
A
N
D
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
,
I
N
C
.
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
K
E
V
I
N
S
A
W
T
E
L
L
E
,
P
.
E
.
LI
N
E
A
R
F
E
E
T
O
F
N
E
W
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
:
LO
C
A
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
(
5
0
'
R
O
W
)
:
V
I
S
T
A
H
E
I
G
H
T
S
D
R
I
V
E
:
3
,
8
8
2
F
E
E
T
DE
S
I
G
N
S
P
E
E
D
:
3
0
M
P
H
BE
N
C
H
M
A
R
K
:
I
R
O
N
R
O
D
F
O
U
N
D
F
O
R
T
H
E
S
O
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
T
H
I
S
SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
,
E
L
E
V
.
=
9
0
9
.
0
4
FI
E
L
D
N
O
T
E
S
F
O
R
3
9
.
9
2
3
3
O
U
T
O
F
T
H
E
A
.
H
.
P
O
R
T
E
R
S
U
R
V
E
Y
AB
S
T
R
A
C
T
N
O
.
4
9
0
A
N
D
T
H
E
L
.
D
O
N
A
G
A
N
S
U
R
V
E
Y
,
A
B
S
T
R
A
C
T
N
O
.
1
7
8
I
N
WI
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
B
E
I
N
G
T
H
E
S
A
M
E
T
R
A
C
T
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
D
I
N
DO
C
.
N
O
.
2
0
0
7
0
1
6
9
9
3
,
O
F
T
H
E
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
D
E
E
D
RE
C
O
R
D
S
.
S
A
I
D
T
R
A
C
T
B
E
I
N
G
M
O
R
E
P
A
R
T
I
C
U
L
A
R
L
Y
D
E
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
B
Y
ME
T
E
S
A
N
D
B
O
U
N
D
S
A
S
F
O
L
L
O
W
S
:
BE
G
I
N
N
I
N
G
A
T
A
½
”
I
R
O
N
P
I
N
F
O
U
N
D
O
N
T
H
E
N
O
R
T
H
R
.
O
.
W
.
O
F
U
.
S.
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
2
9
A
T
T
H
E
S
O
U
T
H
W
E
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
A
4
.
7
2
2
8
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
CO
N
V
E
Y
E
D
T
O
S
A
U
N
G
Z
I
N
P
A
R
K
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
D
I
N
D
O
C
.
N
O
.
2
0
0
9
0
3
8
8
9
8
O
F
TH
E
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
F
O
R
T
H
E
SO
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
T
H
I
S
T
R
A
C
T
A
N
D
T
H
E
P
O
I
N
T
O
F
B
E
G
I
N
N
I
N
G
.
TH
E
N
C
E
N
8
2
º
2
4
'
0
0
”
W
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
N
O
R
T
H
R
.
O
.
W
O
F
U
.
S
.
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
29
,
5
1
7
.
6
9
F
E
E
T
T
O
A
½
”
I
R
O
N
P
I
N
F
O
U
N
D
A
T
T
H
E
S
O
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
OF
A
5
.
2
2
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
C
O
N
V
E
Y
E
D
T
O
N
I
C
K
&
J
U
L
I
E
M
O
O
R
E
I
N
D
O
C
.
N
O
.
20
1
3
0
1
6
7
9
6
,
O
F
T
H
E
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
FO
R
T
H
E
S
O
U
T
H
W
E
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
T
H
I
S
T
R
A
C
T
.
TH
E
N
C
E
N
1
5
º
2
7
'
5
9
”
W
,
9
9
8
.
8
9
F
E
E
T
T
O
A
½
”
I
R
O
N
P
I
N
A
T
T
H
E
NO
R
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
S
A
I
D
5
.
2
2
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
A
L
S
O
B
E
I
N
G
T
H
E
SO
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
A
3
.
0
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
C
O
N
V
E
Y
E
D
T
O
E
D
W
A
R
D
&
IN
D
I
A
L
U
K
E
I
N
D
O
C
.
N
O
.
2
0
1
3
0
3
3
6
3
9
O
F
T
H
E
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
TE
X
A
S
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
.
TH
E
N
C
E
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
E
A
S
T
L
I
N
E
O
F
S
A
I
D
3
.
0
0
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
T
H
E
FO
L
L
O
W
I
N
G
T
W
O
(
2
)
C
O
U
R
S
E
S
:
1)
N
1
5
º
3
3
'
1
7
”
W
,
3
6
0
.
4
0
F
E
E
T
T
O
A
½
”
I
R
O
N
P
I
N
F
O
U
N
D
.
2)
N
1
5
º
2
3
'
0
2
”
W
,
1
7
9
.
7
7
F
E
E
T
T
O
A
½
”
I
R
O
N
P
I
N
F
O
U
N
D
A
T
T
H
E
NO
R
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
S
A
I
D
3
.
0
0
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
A
L
S
O
B
E
I
N
G
TH
E
S
O
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
A
1
.
6
3
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
C
O
N
V
E
Y
E
D
TO
D
O
U
G
L
A
S
G
.
D
A
V
I
S
I
N
D
O
C
.
N
O
.
2
0
1
3
0
3
3
6
3
9
O
F
T
H
E
WI
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
.
TH
E
N
C
E
N
1
5
º
2
6
'
5
8
”
W
P
A
S
S
I
N
G
A
T
A
D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
O
F
2
9
7
.
4
0
F
E
E
T
TH
E
N
O
R
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
S
A
I
D
1
.
6
3
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
A
L
S
O
B
E
I
N
G
T
H
E
SO
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
A
1
.
0
A
C
R
E
C
O
N
V
E
Y
E
D
T
O
B
I
L
L
I
E
G
A
R
R
E
T
T
FU
L
L
I
N
G
I
M
I
N
V
O
L
.
7
8
2
,
P
G
.
1
0
0
,
O
F
T
H
E
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
OF
F
I
C
I
A
L
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
,
A
N
D
P
A
S
S
I
N
G
A
T
A
D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
O
F
4
7
7
.
0
5
F
E
E
T
T
H
E
NO
R
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
T
H
E
S
A
I
D
1
.
0
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
,
S
A
M
E
B
E
I
N
G
T
H
E
SO
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
A
2
.
2
6
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
C
O
N
V
E
Y
E
D
T
O
T
.
L
A
N
D
SA
M
M
Y
S
U
L
T
E
M
E
I
E
R
I
N
V
O
L
.
1
3
0
1
P
G
.
2
1
0
O
F
T
H
E
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
CO
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
I
N
A
L
L
A
D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
O
F
8
8
4
.
5
4
F
E
E
T
TO
A
½
”
I
R
O
N
P
I
N
F
O
U
N
D
A
T
T
H
E
N
O
R
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
S
A
I
D
2
.
2
6
AC
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
A
L
S
O
B
E
I
N
G
T
H
E
S
O
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
A
2
.
6
4
A
C
R
E
TR
A
C
T
C
O
N
V
E
Y
E
D
T
O
R
O
B
E
R
T
W
A
Y
N
E
S
U
G
G
S
S
R
.
I
N
D
O
C
.
2
0
1
3
0
2
4
2
1
1
OF
T
H
E
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
.
TH
E
N
C
E
N
1
5
º
2
6
'
5
8
”
W
,
4
7
1
.
4
2
F
E
E
T
T
O
A
½
”
I
R
O
N
P
I
N
F
O
U
N
D
B
E
I
N
G
TH
E
N
O
R
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
S
A
I
D
2
.
6
4
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
A
L
S
O
B
E
I
N
G
T
H
E
SO
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
A
2
.
7
8
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
C
O
N
V
E
Y
E
D
T
O
M
A
R
I
E
A
N
D
HU
G
H
H
A
M
I
L
T
O
N
I
N
V
O
L
.
9
5
9
P
G
.
9
5
3
O
F
T
H
E
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
TE
X
A
S
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
TH
E
N
C
E
N
1
5
º
2
4
'
5
8
”
W
P
A
S
S
I
N
G
T
H
E
N
O
R
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
S
A
I
D
2.
7
8
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
A
N
D
T
H
E
S
O
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
A
1
.
7
9
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
CO
N
V
E
Y
E
D
T
O
J
U
A
N
F
R
A
N
C
O
J
R
.
I
N
D
O
C
.
N
O
.
2
0
0
6
0
6
4
4
8
8
O
F
T
H
E
WI
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
,
I
N
A
L
L
A
D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
OF
8
2
5
.
5
3
F
E
E
T
T
O
A
½
I
R
O
N
P
I
N
F
O
U
N
D
A
T
T
H
E
N
O
R
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
OF
S
A
I
D
1
.
7
9
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
A
L
S
O
B
E
I
N
G
O
N
T
H
E
S
O
U
T
H
L
I
N
E
O
F
A
2
7
4
.
5
3
AC
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
C
O
N
V
E
Y
E
D
T
O
R
O
T
H
E
L
L
F
A
M
I
L
Y
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
P
A
R
T
N
E
R
S
H
I
P
I
N
VO
L
.
2
5
2
7
P
G
.
2
8
O
F
T
H
E
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
RE
C
O
R
D
S
F
O
R
T
H
E
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
T
H
I
S
T
R
A
C
T
.
TH
E
N
C
E
N
6
9
º
0
1
'
1
8
”
E
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
S
O
U
T
H
L
I
N
E
O
F
S
A
I
D
2
7
4
.
5
3
A
C
R
E
TR
A
C
T
,
4
3
2
.
5
7
F
E
E
T
T
O
A
½
”
I
R
O
N
P
I
N
F
O
U
N
D
A
T
T
H
E
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
CO
R
N
E
R
O
F
A
1
2
.
9
2
A
C
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
C
O
N
V
E
Y
E
D
T
O
M
A
R
K
A
N
D
A
N
N
WI
T
C
H
E
R
I
N
D
O
C
.
N
O
.
1
9
9
8
0
5
8
5
2
5
O
F
T
H
E
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
OF
F
I
C
I
A
L
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
F
O
R
T
H
E
N
O
R
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
T
H
I
S
T
R
A
C
T
.
TH
E
N
C
E
S
1
6
º
0
5
'
0
9
”
E
,
1
5
7
4
.
4
3
f
e
e
t
t
o
a
½
”
i
r
o
n
p
i
n
f
o
u
n
d
a
t
t
h
e
So
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
s
a
i
d
1
2
.
9
2
a
c
r
e
t
r
a
c
t
,
a
l
s
o
b
e
i
n
g
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
a
9.
1
6
a
c
r
e
t
r
a
c
t
c
o
n
v
e
y
e
d
t
o
O
b
a
r
r
R
.
&
C
h
e
r
y
l
A
.
R
o
s
t
i
n
D
o
c
.
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
0
9
8
0
4
3
of
t
h
e
W
i
l
l
i
a
m
s
o
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
T
e
x
a
s
O
f
f
i
c
i
a
l
R
e
c
o
r
d
s
.
TH
E
N
C
E
S
1
6
º
0
5
'
2
9
”
E
,
8
5
2
.
2
2
f
e
e
t
t
o
a
½
”
i
r
o
n
p
i
n
f
o
u
n
d
a
t
t
h
e
So
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
s
a
i
d
1
2
.
9
2
a
c
r
e
t
r
a
c
t
a
l
s
o
b
e
i
n
g
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
a
14
.
2
9
a
c
r
e
t
r
a
c
t
c
o
n
v
e
y
e
d
t
o
J
a
m
e
s
R
o
p
p
o
l
o
i
n
V
o
l
.
9
1
0
P
g
.
2
3
4
o
f
t
h
e
Wi
l
l
i
a
m
s
o
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
T
e
x
a
s
O
f
f
i
c
i
a
l
R
e
c
o
r
d
s
.
TH
E
N
C
E
S
1
6
º
0
6
'
3
4
”
E
,
1
0
6
4
.
0
1
f
e
e
t
t
o
a
½
”
i
r
o
n
p
i
n
f
o
u
n
d
a
t
t
h
e
So
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
s
a
i
d
1
4
.
2
9
a
c
r
e
t
r
a
c
t
,
a
l
s
o
b
e
i
n
g
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
sa
i
d
4
.
7
2
2
8
a
c
r
e
t
r
a
c
t
.
TH
E
N
C
E
S
1
6
º
1
6
'
0
7
”
E
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
W
e
s
t
l
i
n
e
o
f
s
a
i
d
4
.
7
2
2
8
a
c
r
e
t
r
a
c
t
,
4
7
4
.
5
4
fe
e
t
t
o
t
h
e
P
O
I
N
T
O
F
B
E
G
I
N
N
I
N
G
a
n
d
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
3
9
.
9
2
3
3
a
c
r
e
s
m
o
r
e
o
r
l
e
s
s
.
PP
-
2
0
1
6
-
0
0
5
SC
A
L
E
:
1
"
=
1
0
0
'
(
2
4
"
x
3
6
"
)
Page 18 of 115
9
0
0
8
8
8
8
9
4
89
6
8
9
8
90
2
90
4
8
9
2
900
910
920
896
898
902
904
906
908
912
914
916
918
92
2
924
926
93
0
92
8
93
2
934
93
6
920
914
916
91
8
92
2
924
9
1
2
L5
C5
L
6
C6
L7
C7
L
8
C8
L9
9
3
8
88
2
88
4
88
6
EX
.
1
5
'
W
A
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
E
S
M
T
VO
L
6
6
9
,
P
G
.
5
8
2
,
W
.
C
.
D
.
R
.
&
DO
C
.
N
O
.
2
0
0
7
0
5
5
3
5
5
,
W
.
C
.
O
.
P
.
R
.
T3
8
LE
G
E
N
D
PRELIMINARY PLAT
AMENDMENT
OP
E
N
S
P
A
C
E
WI
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
D
E
E
D
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
WI
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
P
U
B
L
I
C
RE
C
O
R
D
S
1/
2
"
I
R
O
N
P
I
N
F
O
U
N
D
1/
2
"
I
R
O
N
P
I
N
S
E
T
CO
N
C
.
H
W
Y
M
O
N
U
M
E
N
T
F
O
U
N
D
NA
I
L
F
O
U
N
D
LI
G
H
T
/
P
O
L
E
P
O
W
E
R
PO
L
E
G
U
Y
W
I
R
E
WI
R
E
F
E
N
C
E
OV
E
R
H
E
A
D
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
L
I
N
E
RE
C
O
R
D
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
CR
I
T
I
C
A
L
E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
(C
.
E
.
F
.
)
R
A
D
I
U
S
P
O
I
N
T
F
O
R
3
0
0
'
NO
N
-
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
A
R
E
A
HE
R
I
T
A
G
E
T
R
E
E
AD
J
A
C
E
N
T
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
FE
M
A
1
0
0
Y
R
.
F
L
O
O
D
P
L
A
I
N
(S
T
R
E
A
M
B
U
F
F
E
R
)
CA
L
C
U
L
A
T
E
D
1
%
F
L
O
O
D
P
L
A
I
N
(S
T
R
E
A
M
B
U
F
F
E
R
)
RO
W
P.
U
.
E
.
LO
T
L
I
N
E
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
T
R
E
A
M
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
N
2
O.
S
.
10
0
Y
R
F
P
P:\Marlin Atlantis\MAG15002_SH29 40 Acres\03_ACAD\Plans\PRELIM\Sage Prelim Plat.dwg, Plat 2, April 15, 2016, 10:38 AM, Rachel Ruder
of
3
SH
E
E
T
NO.REVISION BY DATE
consulting, llc
5508 HIGHWAY 290 WEST, SUITE 215
AUSTIN, TX ∙78735
OFFICE:512.872.6696
FIRM NO. 16384
1)
2
6
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
2)
2
9
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
3)
3
4
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
4)
3
4
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
5)
3
5
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
6)
3
7
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
7)
3
5
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
8)
3
3
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
9)
3
5
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
10
)
3
4
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
11
)
2
8
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
12
)
2
6
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
13
)
4
4
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
14
)
4
0
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
15
)
3
3
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
16
)
3
0
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
17
)
3
6
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
18
)
2
5
"
P
O
S
T
O
A
K
19
)
3
2
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
20
)
3
6
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
21
)
4
5
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
22
)
3
6
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
23
)
2
5
"
P
O
S
T
O
A
K
24
)
5
2
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
25
)
2
9
"
E
L
M
26
)
2
9
"
E
L
M
27
)
3
3
"
,
1
8
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
28
)
2
6
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
29
)
3
0
"
E
L
M
30
)
4
9
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
31
)
2
7
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
32
)
2
8
"
P
O
S
T
O
A
K
33
)
2
6
"
P
O
S
T
O
A
K
34
)
4
8
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
35
)
3
3
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
36
)
3
1
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
37
)
2
7
"
P
O
S
T
O
A
K
38
)
2
8
"
P
O
S
T
O
A
K
39
)
2
7
"
P
O
S
T
O
A
K
40
)
2
8
"
P
O
S
T
O
A
K
41
)
2
6
"
P
O
S
T
O
A
K
42
)
2
9
"
P
O
S
T
O
A
K
43
)
3
0
"
E
L
M
44
)
2
9
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
45
)
2
9
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
46
)
2
6
"
L
I
V
E
O
A
K
TA
G
N
O
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
TA
G
N
O
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
HE
R
I
T
A
G
E
T
R
E
E
S
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
P
L
A
T
A
M
E
N
D
M
E
N
T
(P
P
-
2
0
1
6
-
0
0
5
)
SA
G
E
C
R
E
E
K
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
BE
I
N
G
3
9
.
9
2
3
3
A
C
R
E
S
,
C
O
M
P
R
I
S
E
D
O
F
2
9
.
2
A
C
R
E
S
O
U
T
O
F
T
H
E
A
.
H
.
PO
R
T
E
R
S
U
R
V
E
Y
A
B
S
T
R
A
C
T
N
O
.
4
9
0
,
A
N
D
1
0
.
8
0
A
C
R
E
S
O
U
T
O
F
T
H
E
L
.
DO
N
A
G
A
N
S
U
R
V
E
Y
A
B
S
.
N
O
.
1
7
8
,
I
N
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
,
B
E
I
N
G
TH
E
S
A
M
E
T
R
A
C
T
S
D
E
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
I
N
V
O
L
.
5
5
0
,
P
G
.
2
3
0
,
O
F
T
H
E
WI
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
D
E
E
D
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
.
SAGE CREEK
U.S. HIGHWAY 29
georgetown, williamson county tx
LO
T
1
,
BL
O
C
K
C
D
E
T
A
I
L
SC
A
L
E
1
"
=
4
0
'
N
PP
-
2
0
1
6
-
0
0
5
SC
A
L
E
:
1
"
=
1
0
0
'
(
2
4
"
x
3
6
"
)
W.
C
.
D
.
R
.
W.
C
.
O
.
P
.
R
.
Page 19 of 115
PRELIMINARY PLAT
AMENDMENT
P:\Marlin Atlantis\MAG15002_SH29 40 Acres\03_ACAD\Plans\PRELIM\Sage Prelim Plat.dwg, Plat 3, April 15, 2016, 10:38 AM, Rachel Ruder
of
3
SH
E
E
T
NO.REVISION BY DATE
consulting, llc
5508 HIGHWAY 290 WEST, SUITE 215
AUSTIN, TX ∙78735
OFFICE:512.872.6696
FIRM NO. 16384
SAGE CREEK
U.S. HIGHWAY 29
georgetown, williamson county tx3
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
P
L
A
T
A
M
E
N
D
M
E
N
T
(P
P
-
2
0
1
6
-
0
0
5
)
SA
G
E
C
R
E
E
K
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
BE
I
N
G
3
9
.
9
2
3
3
A
C
R
E
S
,
C
O
M
P
R
I
S
E
D
O
F
2
9
.
2
A
C
R
E
S
O
U
T
O
F
T
H
E
A
.
H
.
P
O
R
T
E
R
SU
R
V
E
Y
A
B
S
T
R
A
C
T
N
O
.
4
9
0
,
A
N
D
1
0
.
8
0
A
C
R
E
S
O
U
T
O
F
T
H
E
L
.
D
O
N
A
G
A
N
S
U
R
V
E
Y
AB
S
.
N
O
.
1
7
8
,
I
N
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
,
B
E
I
N
G
T
H
E
S
A
M
E
T
R
A
C
T
S
DE
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
I
N
V
O
L
.
5
5
0
,
P
G
.
2
3
0
,
O
F
T
H
E
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
D
E
E
D
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
.
ST
A
T
E
O
F
T
E
X
A
S
§
CO
U
N
T
Y
O
F
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
§
KN
O
W
A
L
L
M
E
N
B
Y
T
H
E
S
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
S
:
I
M
A
P
A
R
T
N
E
R
S
L
L
C
.
,
A
C
T
I
N
G
H
E
R
E
I
N
T
H
R
O
U
G
H
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
S
O
L
E
O
W
N
E
R
O
F
TH
E
C
E
R
T
A
I
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
F
L
A
N
D
S
H
O
W
N
H
E
R
E
O
N
A
N
D
D
E
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
I
N
A
D
E
E
D
RE
C
O
R
D
E
D
I
N
D
O
C
U
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
,
O
F
T
H
E
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
O
F
WI
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
,
(
A
N
D
D
O
H
E
R
E
B
Y
S
T
A
T
E
T
H
A
T
T
H
E
R
E
A
R
E
N
O
L
I
E
N
HO
L
D
E
R
S
O
F
T
H
E
C
E
R
T
A
I
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
F
L
A
N
D
)
,
A
N
D
D
O
H
E
R
E
B
Y
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
D
E
S
A
I
D
TR
A
C
T
A
S
S
H
O
W
N
H
E
R
E
O
N
,
A
N
D
D
O
H
E
R
E
B
Y
C
O
N
S
E
N
T
T
O
A
L
L
P
L
A
T
N
O
T
E
RE
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
S
H
O
W
N
H
E
R
E
O
N
,
A
N
D
D
O
H
E
R
E
B
Y
D
E
D
I
C
A
T
E
T
O
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
CO
U
N
T
Y
T
H
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
,
A
L
L
E
Y
S
,
R
I
G
H
T
S
-
O
F
-
W
A
Y
,
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
S
A
N
D
P
U
B
L
I
C
P
L
A
C
E
S
SH
O
W
N
H
E
R
E
O
N
F
O
R
S
U
C
H
P
U
B
L
I
C
P
U
R
P
O
S
E
S
A
S
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
M
A
Y
D
E
E
M
AP
P
R
O
P
R
I
A
T
E
.
T
H
I
S
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
S
T
O
B
E
K
N
O
W
N
A
S
F
I
N
A
L
P
L
A
T
O
F
:
S
A
G
E
C
R
E
E
K
SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
.
TO
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
W
H
I
C
H
,
W
I
T
N
E
S
S
B
Y
M
Y
H
A
N
D
T
H
I
S
D
A
Y
O
F
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
MA
P
A
R
T
N
E
R
S
L
L
C
.
,
ST
A
T
E
O
F
T
E
X
A
S
§
CO
U
N
T
Y
O
F
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
§
KN
O
W
A
L
L
M
E
N
B
Y
T
H
E
S
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
S
:
BE
F
O
R
E
M
E
,
T
H
E
U
N
D
E
R
S
I
G
N
E
D
A
U
T
H
O
R
I
T
Y
,
O
N
T
H
I
S
D
A
Y
P
E
R
S
O
N
A
L
L
Y
A
P
P
E
A
R
E
D
MA
P
A
R
T
N
E
R
S
L
L
C
.
,
A
C
T
I
N
G
H
E
R
E
I
N
T
H
R
O
U
G
H
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
K
N
O
W
N
T
O
M
E
T
O
B
E
TH
E
P
E
R
S
O
N
W
H
O
S
E
N
A
M
E
I
S
S
U
B
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
T
O
T
H
E
F
O
R
E
G
O
I
N
G
I
N
S
T
R
U
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
AC
K
N
O
W
L
E
D
G
E
D
T
O
M
E
T
H
A
T
T
H
E
Y
E
X
E
C
U
T
E
D
T
H
E
S
A
M
E
F
O
R
T
H
E
P
U
R
P
O
S
E
S
AN
D
C
O
N
S
I
D
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
T
H
E
R
E
I
N
E
X
P
R
E
S
S
E
D
,
I
N
T
H
E
C
A
P
A
C
I
T
Y
T
H
E
R
E
I
N
S
T
A
T
E
D
.
GI
V
E
N
U
N
D
E
R
M
Y
H
A
N
D
A
N
D
S
E
A
L
O
F
O
F
F
I
C
E
T
H
I
S
_
_
_
_
_
D
A
Y
O
F
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
,
2
0
_
_
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NO
T
A
R
Y
P
U
B
L
I
C
I
N
A
N
D
F
O
R
T
H
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
T
E
X
A
S
MY
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
E
X
P
I
R
E
S
O
N
:
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
ST
A
T
E
O
F
T
E
X
A
S
§
CO
U
N
T
Y
O
F
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
§
I,
H
E
R
M
A
N
C
R
I
C
H
T
O
N
,
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
E
D
P
R
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
L
A
N
D
S
U
R
V
E
Y
O
R
I
N
T
H
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
TE
X
A
S
,
D
O
H
E
R
E
B
Y
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
T
H
A
T
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
T
I
S
T
R
U
E
A
N
D
C
O
R
R
E
C
T
L
Y
M
A
D
E
F
R
O
M
A
N
AC
T
U
A
L
S
U
R
V
E
Y
M
A
D
E
O
N
T
H
E
G
R
O
U
N
D
O
F
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
E
G
A
L
L
Y
D
E
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
HE
R
E
O
N
,
A
N
D
T
H
A
T
T
H
E
R
E
A
R
E
N
O
A
P
P
A
R
E
N
T
D
I
S
C
R
E
P
A
N
C
I
E
S
,
C
O
N
F
L
I
C
T
S
,
OV
E
R
L
A
P
P
I
N
G
O
F
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
,
V
I
S
I
B
L
E
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
L
I
N
E
S
O
R
R
O
A
D
S
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
.
E
X
C
E
P
T
AS
S
H
O
W
N
O
N
T
H
E
A
C
C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
I
N
G
P
L
A
T
,
A
N
D
T
H
A
T
T
H
E
C
O
R
N
E
R
M
O
N
U
M
E
N
T
S
S
H
O
W
N
TH
E
R
E
O
N
W
E
R
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
L
Y
P
L
A
C
E
D
U
N
D
E
R
M
Y
S
U
P
E
R
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
N
A
C
C
O
R
D
A
N
C
E
W
I
T
H
TH
E
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
R
E
G
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
O
F
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
O
F
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
.
TO
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
W
H
I
C
H
,
W
I
T
N
E
S
S
M
Y
H
A
N
D
A
N
D
S
E
A
L
A
T
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
,
(
C
I
T
Y
)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
(
C
O
U
N
T
Y
)
,
T
E
X
A
S
,
T
H
I
S
_
_
_
_
_
D
A
Y
O
F
_
_
_
_
_
_
,
2
0
_
_
.
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HE
R
M
A
N
C
R
I
C
H
T
O
N
,
R
P
L
S
N
O
.
4
0
4
6
D
A
T
E
:
CR
I
C
H
T
O
N
A
N
D
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
64
4
8
E
.
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
2
9
0
,
S
U
I
T
E
B
-
1
0
5
AU
S
T
I
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
7
8
7
2
3
(5
1
2
)
2
4
4
-
3
3
9
5
06
_
2
6
6
PL
A
T
N
O
T
E
S
:
1.
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
R
S
F
O
R
T
H
I
S
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
A
R
E
W
A
T
E
R
:
C
I
T
Y
O
F
GE
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
W
A
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
/
S
E
P
T
I
C
:
S
E
P
T
I
C
SY
S
T
E
M
,
A
N
D
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
:
P
E
D
E
R
N
A
L
E
S
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
C
O
O
P
E
R
A
T
I
V
E
.
2.
AL
L
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S
/
O
B
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
A
R
E
P
R
O
H
I
B
I
T
E
D
I
N
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
S
.
3.
PO
R
T
I
O
N
S
O
F
T
H
I
S
T
R
A
C
T
L
I
E
W
I
T
H
I
N
Z
O
N
E
"
A
E
"
A
R
E
A
S
D
E
S
I
G
N
A
T
E
D
A
S
IN
S
I
D
E
T
H
E
1
0
0
-
Y
E
A
R
F
L
O
O
D
P
L
A
I
N
,
A
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
F
I
E
D
B
Y
T
H
E
U
.
S
.
F
E
D
E
R
A
L
EM
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
G
E
N
C
Y
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
M
A
P
(
F
L
O
O
D
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
R
A
T
E
M
A
P
)
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
P
A
N
E
L
N
U
M
B
E
R
4
8
4
9
1
C
0
2
7
5
E
,
EF
F
E
C
T
I
V
E
D
A
T
E
S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R
2
6
,
2
0
0
8
,
F
O
R
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
TE
X
A
S
.
4.
A
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
O
F
C
O
M
P
L
I
A
N
C
E
I
S
H
E
R
E
B
Y
I
S
S
U
E
D
F
O
R
A
L
L
L
O
T
S
WI
T
H
I
N
T
H
I
S
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
E
X
C
E
P
T
F
O
R
L
O
T
S
1
1
T
H
R
O
U
G
H
1
9
.
T
H
I
S
CE
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
I
S
V
A
L
I
D
U
N
T
I
L
S
U
C
H
T
I
M
E
A
S
F
E
M
A
R
E
V
I
S
E
S
O
R
N
E
W
L
Y
AD
O
P
T
S
F
L
O
O
D
P
L
A
I
N
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
I
E
S
I
N
T
H
I
S
A
R
E
A
.
A
F
L
O
O
D
P
L
A
I
N
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
E
R
M
I
T
M
A
Y
B
E
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
F
R
O
M
T
H
E
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
CO
U
N
T
Y
F
L
O
O
D
P
L
A
I
N
A
D
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
O
R
F
O
R
L
O
T
S
1
1
T
H
R
O
U
G
H
1
9
,
P
R
I
O
R
TO
A
N
Y
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
O
F
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
.
5.
PR
I
O
R
T
O
A
N
Y
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
A
L
T
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
O
R
B
R
I
D
G
E
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
,
WH
I
C
H
W
I
L
L
C
H
A
N
G
E
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
F
L
O
O
D
P
A
T
T
E
R
N
S
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
,
A
LE
T
T
E
R
O
F
M
A
P
A
M
E
N
D
M
E
N
T
M
U
S
T
B
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
E
D
T
O
T
H
E
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
CO
U
N
T
Y
F
L
O
O
D
P
L
A
I
N
A
D
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
O
R
F
O
R
A
P
P
R
O
V
A
L
A
N
D
A
P
P
R
O
V
A
L
BY
T
H
E
F
E
D
E
R
A
L
E
M
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
G
E
N
C
Y
.
6.
IN
O
R
D
E
R
T
O
P
R
O
M
O
T
E
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
A
W
A
Y
F
R
O
M
A
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
,
T
H
E
S
L
A
B
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
H
O
U
L
D
B
E
B
U
I
L
T
A
T
L
E
A
S
T
O
N
E
-
F
O
O
T
A
B
O
V
E
T
H
E
SU
R
R
O
U
N
D
I
N
G
G
R
O
U
N
D
,
A
N
D
T
H
E
G
R
O
U
N
D
S
H
O
U
L
D
B
E
G
R
A
D
E
D
A
W
A
Y
FR
O
M
T
H
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
A
T
A
S
L
O
P
E
O
F
1
/
2
"
P
E
R
F
O
O
T
F
O
R
A
D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
OF
A
T
L
E
A
S
T
1
0
F
E
E
T
.
7.
A
1
0
-
F
O
O
T
P
U
B
L
I
C
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
I
S
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
D
A
L
O
N
G
A
L
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
S
W
I
T
H
I
N
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
T
.
8.
TH
E
M
O
N
U
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
T
H
A
V
E
B
E
E
N
R
O
T
A
T
E
D
T
O
T
H
E
N
A
D
8
3
/
9
3
HA
R
N
-
T
E
X
A
S
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
Z
O
N
E
A
N
D
N
A
V
D
8
8
.
9.
TH
E
M
A
X
I
M
U
M
I
M
P
E
R
V
I
O
U
S
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
F
O
R
T
H
E
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
S
2
0
%
PE
R
C
E
N
T
.
T
H
E
R
E
I
S
A
N
A
V
A
I
L
A
B
L
E
5
.
4
6
1
4
A
C
R
E
S
O
F
I
M
P
E
R
V
I
O
U
S
C
O
V
E
R
AV
A
I
L
A
B
L
E
F
O
R
T
H
E
3
0
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
L
O
T
S
(
~
7
,
9
3
0
S
Q
U
A
R
E
F
E
E
T
P
E
R
LO
T
)
.
T
H
E
H
O
M
E
O
W
N
E
R
S
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
I
O
N
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
I
B
L
E
F
O
R
TR
A
C
K
I
N
G
A
C
T
U
A
L
I
M
P
E
R
V
I
O
U
S
C
O
V
E
R
A
S
T
H
E
L
O
T
S
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
.
10
.
TH
E
L
A
N
D
O
W
N
E
R
A
S
S
U
M
E
S
A
L
L
R
I
S
K
S
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
D
W
I
T
H
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
L
O
C
A
T
E
D
I
N
T
H
E
R
I
G
H
T
-
O
F
-
W
A
Y
,
B
Y
P
L
A
C
I
N
G
A
N
Y
T
H
I
N
G
IN
T
H
E
R
I
G
H
T
-
O
F
-
W
A
Y
,
T
H
E
L
A
N
D
O
W
N
E
R
I
N
D
E
M
N
I
F
I
E
S
A
N
D
H
O
L
D
S
T
H
E
CI
T
Y
O
F
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
,
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
H
E
I
R
O
F
F
I
C
E
R
S
,
A
G
E
N
T
S
AN
D
E
M
P
L
O
Y
E
E
S
H
A
R
M
L
E
S
S
F
R
O
M
A
N
Y
L
I
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
O
W
I
N
G
T
O
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
DE
F
E
C
T
S
O
R
N
E
G
L
I
G
E
N
C
E
N
O
T
A
T
T
R
I
B
U
T
A
B
L
E
T
O
T
H
E
M
A
N
D
AC
K
N
O
W
L
E
D
G
E
S
T
H
A
T
T
H
E
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
M
A
Y
B
E
R
E
M
O
V
E
D
B
Y
T
H
E
CI
T
Y
A
N
D
/
O
R
C
O
U
N
T
Y
A
N
D
T
H
A
T
T
H
E
O
W
N
E
R
O
F
T
H
E
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
WI
L
L
B
E
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
I
B
L
E
F
O
R
T
H
E
R
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
A
N
D
/
O
R
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
O
F
TH
E
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
.
11
.
TH
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
O
F
A
L
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
,
R
O
A
D
S
,
A
N
D
O
T
H
E
R
P
U
B
L
I
C
TH
O
R
O
U
G
H
F
A
R
E
S
A
N
D
A
N
Y
B
R
I
D
G
E
S
O
R
C
U
L
V
E
R
T
S
N
E
C
E
S
S
A
R
Y
T
O
B
E
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
E
D
O
R
P
L
A
C
E
D
I
S
T
H
E
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
O
F
T
H
E
O
W
N
E
R
S
O
F
TH
E
T
R
A
C
T
O
F
L
A
N
D
C
O
V
E
R
E
D
B
Y
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
T
I
N
A
C
C
O
R
D
A
N
C
E
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
PL
A
N
S
A
N
D
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
P
R
E
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
B
Y
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
O
F
GE
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
A
N
D
/
O
R
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
.
N
E
I
T
H
E
R
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
OF
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
N
O
R
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
A
S
S
U
M
E
S
A
N
Y
O
B
L
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
TO
B
U
I
L
D
A
N
Y
O
F
T
H
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
,
R
O
A
D
S
,
O
R
O
T
H
E
R
P
U
B
L
I
C
TH
O
R
O
U
G
H
F
A
R
E
S
S
H
O
W
N
O
N
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
T
O
R
O
F
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
N
G
A
N
Y
O
F
TH
E
B
R
I
D
G
E
S
O
R
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
I
N
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
I
O
N
TH
E
R
E
W
I
T
H
.
N
E
I
T
H
E
R
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
O
F
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
N
O
R
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
CO
U
N
T
Y
A
S
S
U
M
E
A
N
Y
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
F
O
R
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
W
A
Y
S
O
R
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
S
I
N
T
H
E
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
,
O
T
H
E
R
T
H
A
N
T
H
O
S
E
D
R
A
I
N
I
N
G
O
R
PR
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
G
T
H
E
R
O
A
D
S
Y
S
T
E
M
A
N
D
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
I
N
T
H
E
I
R
R
E
S
P
E
C
T
I
V
E
JU
R
I
S
D
I
C
T
I
O
N
S
.
12
.
NE
I
T
H
E
R
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
O
F
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
N
O
R
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
AS
S
U
M
E
S
A
N
Y
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
F
O
R
T
H
E
A
C
C
U
R
A
C
Y
O
F
RE
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
B
Y
O
T
H
E
R
P
A
R
T
I
E
S
I
N
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
T
.
F
L
O
O
D
P
L
A
I
N
D
A
T
A
,
IN
P
A
R
T
I
C
U
L
A
R
,
M
A
Y
C
H
A
N
G
E
D
E
P
E
N
D
I
N
G
O
N
S
U
B
S
E
Q
U
E
N
T
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
.
I
T
I
S
F
U
R
T
H
E
R
U
N
D
E
R
S
T
O
O
D
T
H
A
T
T
H
E
O
W
N
E
R
S
O
F
T
H
E
TR
A
C
T
O
F
L
A
N
D
C
O
V
E
R
E
D
B
Y
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
T
M
U
S
T
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
A
T
T
H
E
I
R
O
W
N
EX
P
E
N
S
E
A
L
L
T
R
A
F
F
I
C
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
D
E
V
I
C
E
S
A
N
D
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
T
H
A
T
M
A
Y
B
E
RE
Q
U
I
R
E
D
B
E
F
O
R
E
T
H
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
I
N
T
H
E
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
H
A
V
E
F
I
N
A
L
L
Y
BE
E
N
A
C
C
E
P
T
E
D
F
O
R
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
B
Y
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
A
N
D
/
O
R
C
O
U
N
T
Y
.
13
.
PL
A
T
W
A
I
V
E
R
(
W
A
V
-
2
0
1
5
-
0
0
3
)
W
A
S
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D
B
Y
T
H
E
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
A
N
D
ZO
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
O
N
J
U
L
Y
7
,
2
0
1
5
,
F
O
R
A
W
A
I
V
E
R
F
R
O
M
U
N
I
F
I
E
D
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
C
O
D
E
(
U
D
C
)
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
6
.
0
2
.
0
4
0
(
B
.
)
R
E
L
A
T
E
D
T
O
B
L
O
C
K
LE
N
G
T
H
,
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
P
R
O
V
I
S
I
O
N
O
F
T
W
O
(
2
)
R
O
U
N
D
A
B
O
U
T
S
A
T
N
E
A
R
EQ
U
A
L
I
N
T
E
R
V
A
L
S
O
F
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
~
3
9
0
0
L
I
N
E
A
R
F
E
E
T
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
.
PL
A
T
N
O
T
E
S
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
E
D
:
TH
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
T
E
X
A
S
§
CO
U
N
T
Y
O
F
T
R
A
V
I
S
§
I,
K
E
V
I
N
S
A
W
T
E
L
L
E
,
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
E
D
P
R
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
T
H
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
T
E
X
A
S
,
D
O
HE
R
E
B
Y
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
T
H
A
T
T
H
I
S
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
S
I
N
T
H
E
E
D
W
A
R
D
S
A
Q
U
I
F
E
R
R
E
C
H
A
R
G
E
ZO
N
E
A
N
D
I
S
E
N
C
R
O
A
C
H
E
D
B
Y
A
Z
O
N
E
A
E
F
L
O
O
D
A
R
E
A
A
S
D
E
N
O
T
E
D
H
E
R
E
I
N
,
A
N
D
A
S
DE
F
I
N
E
D
B
Y
F
E
D
E
R
A
L
E
M
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
D
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
M
A
P
,
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
PA
N
E
L
N
U
M
B
E
R
48
4
9
1
C
0
2
7
5
E
,
E
F
F
E
C
T
I
V
E
D
A
T
E
S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R
2
8
,
2
0
0
8
,
A
N
D
T
H
A
T
E
A
C
H
LO
T
C
O
N
F
O
R
M
S
T
O
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
O
F
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
R
E
G
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
.
TH
E
F
U
L
L
Y
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
E
D
,
C
O
N
C
E
N
T
R
A
T
E
D
S
T
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
R
U
N
O
F
F
R
E
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
F
R
O
M
T
H
E
ON
E
H
U
N
D
R
E
D
(
1
0
0
)
Y
E
A
R
S
T
O
R
M
I
S
C
O
N
T
A
I
N
E
D
W
I
T
H
I
N
T
H
E
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
S
S
H
O
W
N
A
N
D
/
O
R
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
I
G
H
T
S
-
O
F
-
W
A
Y
D
E
D
I
C
A
T
E
D
B
Y
T
H
I
S
PL
A
T
TO
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
W
H
I
C
H
,
W
I
T
N
E
S
S
M
Y
H
A
N
D
A
N
D
S
E
A
L
A
T
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
,
(
C
I
T
Y
)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
(
C
O
U
N
T
Y
)
,
T
E
X
A
S
,
T
H
I
S
_
_
_
_
_
D
A
Y
O
F
_
_
_
_
_
_
,
2
0
_
_
.
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
KE
V
I
N
S
A
W
T
E
L
L
E
D
A
T
E
:
LA
N
D
D
E
V
C
O
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
,
L
L
C
.
55
0
8
H
W
Y
2
9
0
W
E
S
T
,
S
T
E
.
2
1
5
AU
S
T
I
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
7
8
7
3
5
(5
1
2
)
8
7
2
-
6
6
9
6
14
.
TH
I
S
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
S
I
N
T
H
E
E
X
T
R
A
-
T
E
R
R
I
T
O
R
I
A
L
J
U
R
I
S
D
I
C
T
I
O
N
(
E
T
J
)
O
F
TH
E
C
I
T
Y
O
F
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
.
15
.
TH
I
S
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
S
S
U
B
J
E
C
T
T
O
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
O
F
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
W
A
T
E
R
QU
A
L
I
T
Y
R
E
G
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
F
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
O
V
E
R
T
H
E
E
D
W
A
R
D
S
A
Q
U
I
F
E
R
RE
C
H
A
R
G
E
Z
O
N
E
.
16
.
AN
Y
H
E
R
I
T
A
G
E
T
R
E
E
A
S
N
O
T
E
D
O
N
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
T
I
S
S
U
B
J
E
C
T
,
I
N
P
E
R
P
E
T
U
I
T
Y
,
TO
T
H
E
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
,
C
A
R
E
,
P
R
U
N
I
N
G
A
N
D
R
E
M
O
V
A
L
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
OF
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
O
F
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
,
A
N
D
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D
R
E
M
O
V
A
L
D
O
E
S
N
O
T
RE
Q
U
I
R
E
M
O
D
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
T
H
E
P
L
A
T
.
17
.
TH
I
S
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
S
S
U
B
J
E
C
T
T
O
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
O
F
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
W
A
T
E
R
CO
N
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N
O
R
D
I
N
A
N
C
E
,
A
D
O
P
T
E
D
A
P
R
I
L
2
2
,
2
0
1
4
A
S
O
R
D
I
N
A
N
C
E
20
1
4
-
0
2
3
.
18
.
PA
R
K
L
A
N
D
D
E
D
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
A
R
E
B
E
I
N
G
M
E
T
B
Y
P
A
Y
M
E
N
T
O
F
FE
E
-
I
N
-
L
I
E
U
A
T
T
H
E
T
I
M
E
O
F
R
E
C
O
R
D
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
F
I
N
A
L
P
L
A
T
.
19
.
PR
I
O
R
T
O
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
A
N
D
R
E
C
O
R
D
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
F
I
N
A
L
P
L
A
T
,
A
F
E
M
A
LE
T
T
E
R
O
F
M
A
P
R
E
V
I
S
I
O
N
T
O
A
D
J
U
S
T
T
H
E
F
E
M
A
F
L
O
O
D
P
L
A
I
N
W
I
L
L
B
E
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
.
I
N
T
H
E
E
V
E
N
T
T
H
A
T
T
H
E
F
E
M
A
F
L
O
O
D
P
L
A
I
N
L
I
N
E
C
A
N
N
O
T
B
E
CO
R
R
E
C
T
E
D
T
O
T
H
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
I
N
D
I
C
A
T
E
D
,
C
I
T
Y
S
T
A
F
F
M
A
Y
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
A
RE
V
I
S
E
D
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
P
L
A
N
T
O
B
E
P
R
O
C
E
S
S
E
D
T
H
R
O
U
G
H
T
H
E
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
AN
D
Z
O
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
I
F
A
N
Y
L
O
T
S
A
R
E
D
E
E
M
E
D
U
N
B
U
I
L
D
A
B
L
E
.
20
.
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
A
N
D
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
A
D
J
U
S
T
M
E
N
T
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
A
L
L
O
W
E
D
I
N
T
H
E
F
I
E
L
D
T
O
WO
R
K
A
R
O
U
N
D
H
E
R
I
T
A
G
E
T
R
E
E
S
I
N
A
C
C
O
R
D
A
N
C
E
W
I
T
H
C
I
T
Y
RE
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
.
I
F
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
AC
C
O
R
D
I
N
G
L
Y
.
21
.
RI
G
H
T
O
F
W
A
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
S
F
O
R
W
I
D
E
N
I
N
G
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
S
O
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
I
N
G
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
E
D
B
Y
T
H
E
L
A
N
D
O
W
N
E
R
U
N
T
I
L
R
O
A
D
O
R
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
A
C
T
U
A
L
L
Y
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
E
D
O
N
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
.
TH
E
C
I
T
Y
A
N
D
/
O
R
C
O
U
N
T
Y
H
A
V
E
T
H
E
R
I
G
H
T
A
T
A
N
Y
T
I
M
E
T
O
T
A
K
E
PO
S
S
E
S
S
I
O
N
O
F
A
N
Y
R
O
A
D
W
I
D
E
N
I
N
G
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
,
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
,
O
R
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
O
F
T
H
E
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
T
R
O
A
D
.
22
.
TH
E
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
F
O
R
L
O
T
1
B
L
O
C
K
A
&
L
O
T
2
B
L
O
C
K
B
S
H
A
L
L
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
T
O
VI
S
T
A
H
E
I
G
H
T
S
D
R
I
V
E
A
N
D
N
O
T
D
I
R
E
C
T
L
Y
T
O
S
H
2
9
.
PP
-
2
0
1
6
-
0
0
5
A
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
P
L
A
T
F
O
R
A
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
T
O
B
E
K
N
O
W
N
A
S
"
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
P
L
A
T
O
F
S
A
G
E
CR
E
E
K
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
"
H
A
S
B
E
E
N
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D
A
C
C
O
R
D
I
N
G
T
O
T
H
E
M
I
N
U
T
E
S
O
F
T
H
E
ME
E
T
I
N
G
O
F
T
H
E
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
A
N
D
Z
O
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
O
N
T
H
E
_
_
_
_
_
D
A
Y
OF
_
_
_
_
_
_
,
2
0
_
_
,
A
.
D
.
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
D
A
T
E
:
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
,
C
H
A
I
R
M
A
N
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
D
A
T
E
:
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
,
S
E
C
R
E
T
A
R
Y
Page 20 of 115
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
May 3, 2016
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and p o s s ib le ac tion on a Final Plat o f Lo t 9, 10, 11, and 12, Bloc k B, Replat of
Fredric kson Ranc h on Lake Geo rgeto wn, and Lo t 29, Blo ck B, F red ricks on R anc h o n Lake Georgetown,
lo cated on Eagle P o int Drive, to be kno wn as the Replat of Lot 29, Bloc k B, F red ricks o n Ranch on Lake
Geo rgeto wn and Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12, Bloc k B, R ep lat o f a Portio n o f Fredric ks on Ranc h o n Lake
Geo rgeto wn. (FP -2015-045) Mike Elab arger, S enior Planner
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The ap p lic ant proposes to resub d ivide 12.556 acres , whic h are currently p latted as five (5) res id ential lots ,
and create eight (8) lots out o f them, all o f whic h will b e greater than one ac re and served by ind ividual on-
s ite s ep tic sys tems . No new s treets are proposed, and the three newly c reated lots will c o ntrib ute fees-in-
lieu o f parkland dedic ation.
The s ubdivis io n is sub ject to single-family res id ential res trictio ns, and per UDC Sec tion 3.08.080.D.3. and
4. and Texas Lo c al Go vernment Co d e Section 212.015, a pub lic hearing is req uired and no tific atio n letters
s ent to property owners within 200 feet of the b o und ary o f the p ro p erty to b e replatted.
Public Comment:
Pub lic notice is not required for a Rep lat (Final Plat) of this nature. As o f the date of this report, no written
p ublic c o mments have been rec eived.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. The applic ant paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mike Elabarger, Senio r P lanner and So fia Nels on, CNU-A, Planning Direc to r
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Cover Memo
Exhibit 1 - Location Map Backup Material
Exhibit 2 - Propos ed Final Plat Backup Material
Page 21 of 115
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Fredrickson Ranch Resubdivision Final Plat - FP-2015-045 Page 1 of 2
Report Date: April 26, 2016
File No: FP-2015-045
Project Planner: Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Replat of Fredrickson Ranch on Lake Georgetown
Project Address: Eagle Point Drive
Location: West of D.B. Wood Road, via Cedar Breaks and Crockett Gardens Roads (see
Exhibit 1)
Total Acreage: 12.556 acres
Legal Description: 12.556 acres in the Joseph Fish Survey, Abstract No. 232
Applicant/Contact: Tim Haynie, P.E., Haynie Consulting, Inc.
Property Owners: Bobby Fredrickson, Patti Witte
Plat Summary
Proposed Lots: 8 Residential
Proposed Streets: None
Heritage Trees: 6 are identified for preservation.
Parkland dedication: Fee-in-lieu for the 3 newly created lots; see Plat note 6.
NOTE: This Replat (a Final Plat) is subject to single-family restrictions per Document #2013027022.
Per UDC Section 3.08.080.D.3. and 4. and Texas Local Government Code Section 212.015,
written notice of a Public Hearing in accordance with UDC Section 3.03.010.C. must be
provided, and the Planning and Zoning Commission shall have final action on the replat.
Site Information
Location:
The property is located on the west side of D.B. Wood Road, accessed via Cedar Breaks Road and then
Crockett Gardens Road. It is located within the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City, but is
bounded on the north, south, and west by property within the City limits (that being the Lake Georgetown
Army Corps of Engineer property).
Physical Characteristics:
The subject property is generally flat and moderately tree covered. Six (6) Heritage Trees (1 single-trunk,
5 multi-trunks) were surveyed and are represented on the plat for preservation. The plat was designed in
conjunction with the City Urban Forester to ensure buildable areas within each residential lot provide
protection to the identified Heritage Trees.
History
The property is subject to the original subdivision of the property, Fredrickson Ranch (FP-2012-012)
recorded in Document # 2013027022, and a later resubdivision that affected the original Lot 29 (FP-2013-
039, Document # 2014059388). The property was originally part of the Joseph Fish Survey, Abstract No
232.
The 2030 Comprehensive Plan designates this area as the Low Density Residential future land use
category. This project is located within Tier 2 (Intermediate Growth Area) of the current City Growth Tier
Map; infrastructure facilities will be the responsibility of the developer to serve the property.
Page 22 of 115
Planning Department Staff Report
Fredrickson Ranch Resubdivision Final Plat - FP-2015-045 Page 2 of 2
Utilities
The Georgetown Utility System (GUS) will be providing water, where on-site septic systems will address
wastewater services on a per lot basis. The Pedernales Electric Cooperative (PEC) will provide electricity.
Public utility easements are being dedicated with this plat according to the City of Georgetown standards.
Transportation
This plat proposes no new streets and utilizes the existing street network established with the original
Fredrickson Ranch subdivision.
Staff Analysis
The proposed Final Plat meets all of the requirements of the City’s Unified Development Code, and is
presented for approval.
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Location Map
Exhibit 2 – Proposed Final Plat (3 sheets)
Page 23 of 115
C I T Y O F G E O R G E T O W N
G
e
o
r
g
e
t
o
w
n
E
T
J
Ge orgetown ETJ
Georgetown ETJ
G e o r g e t o w n E T J
FP-2 015-045
CEDARHOL L O W R D
W E S T L A K E P K W Y
W AYC R O SS D R
JI M B O W IE D R
FAWN GLEN
EAGL E P O INTD
R
W I N D R I D G E C V
W E S T L A K E P K W Y
L
O
S
T
R
I
V
E
R
R
D
R
A
N
C
H
O
B
U
E
N
O
D
R
BLUEQUAIL
D
R
C R O C K E T T G A R D E N S R D
FP-2015-045
Ex hib it #1
Coordi nate System : Texas State Plane/Centr al Zone/N AD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For G eneral Plann ing Purpo ses Only 0 2,000 4,000Fee t
¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Site
City L im its
Stre e t
Site
³
Location Map
E agle
P
oint
D
r
C
e
d
a
r
Ho
l
l
o
w
R
d
G
a
b
ri
e
l
F
o
r
e
s
t
R
d
Page 24 of 115
Page 25 of 115
Page 26 of 115
Page 27 of 115
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
May 3, 2016
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and p o s s ib le ac tion on a reques t to Rezone approximately 278.21 ac res of the Isaac
Donagan and Jos eph Tho mp s o n Surveys , loc ated at 2951 Hwy 29 Wes t, fro m the Residential Single-
Family (RS) Dis tric t to Planned Unit Development (PUD) District with a bas e zo ning d is tric t o f Res id ential
Single-Family. (REZ-2016-002, Shad o w Canyo n) Valerie Kreger, AICP, Princ ip al P lanner
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The Shad o w C anyo n p ro p erty is lo cated between SH 29 and the So uth San Gab riel River at the wes tern
ed ge o f the city limits . T he ap p licant has reques ted a rezoning of the 278 ac res to a P lanned Unit
Develo p ment (PUD) d is tric t with a base d is tric t of RS to develo p a 600 lot res idential s ubdivis io n in
conjunctio n with a Municipal Utility Dis tric t (MUD), whic h is c urrently under review b y the City. The
d evelopment s tandards p ro p o s ed with the PUD provid e for varying sizes of res id ential product, 83 ac res
o f open spac e, and 22 acres o f parkland along the river, includ ing c o nstruc tio n o f approximately a mile of
p ublic trail.
Public Comment:
As o f the d ate of this report, no written public c o mments have b een received.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff has reviewed the req ues t, p ro vided comments to the applic ant and has worked with the ap p licant to
p rep are the P UD proposal fo r cons id eration. Sho uld the commission rec o mmend ap p ro val of the req ues t
s taff is rec o mmending the following conditio ns be added (s trike through id entifies language to be removed
and und erline identifies language to be ad d ed):
· Parkland/Trails/Op en Spac e/Amenity C enter. The proposed parkland d ed icatio n and
impro vements id entified in this s taff report and P UD full-fill the p arkland req uirements o f the
property s ho wn on the d evelopment plan. T he ap p licant is reques ting the p arkland requirements
also full-fill the p arkland requirements fo r lots that were part of the o riginal s ub d ivision of this
property but are no t s ubjec t to this PUD (lo ts 1, 2, and 4). Sinc e the additio nal lo ts are no t p art of
this PUD applic ation and the p ro p erty o wners of the additio nal p roperty are no t a party to this PUD
applic atio n, reference to this property is not permitted in this applic atio n. S taff is rec o mmending the
following language:
o As illus trated on Exhib it D to the PUD Ord inance, Open Spac e S ummary, the Concept
Plan requires at least 22 acres of p ublic parkland/o p en s p ac e to be lo cated along the So uth
San Gabriel River, and for a p ublic trail (the San Gabriel River Trail) to b e loc ated in the
p arkland . This 22 acre p ublic p arkland and assoc iated San Gab riel River Trail, will, when
d ed icated and c o nstruc ted, fully s atis fy the City’s parkland dedic ation requirements for the
Property, as well as the p ro perty c omprising lo ts 1, 2 and 4, Bloc k F, within the Shadow
Canyon P reliminary Plat ap proved on December 15, 2004, as amended. T he entirety of the
22 ac res of p arkland shall be dedic ated to the City, along with pub lic right-of-way, no later
than the rec o rd ing of the first Final P lat fo r any p o rtion of the Property containing
res id ential lots .
ADA Ac cessib ility of the San Gab riel Trail . ADA ac cessibility of all pub lic fac ilities is regulated b y
Page 28 of 115
the Texas Acc es s ib ly Standards (TAS ). TAS are adminis tered through the state o f Texas and are no t
s tand ards that can b e waived at the loc al level. TAS d o es allo w varianc es and alternative c o mp lianc e
d ue to a variety o f c hallenging circ ums tanc es , ho wever the reviewing agenc y is the Texas Department
o f Licens ing and Regulatio n not the C ity of Geo rgeto wn. Staff is rec o mmending the following
changes :
The trail s hall be ap p ro ximately 5,266 linear feet in length cons truc ted alo ng the entire length of
the South S an Gab riel River as it travers es the P ro p erty, be ten fo o t (10)’ wide, and be made
of c o nc rete. It mus t be lo cated within the d ed icated parkland o r the open s pac e in the general
loc ation s hown on Exhib it D to the PUD Ord inance. The trail trailhead lo catio ns shall be
c o ns truc ted to meet Texas Ac ces s ib ility S tand ard s (TAS).
Timing o f Trail. Due to the regional impac t of the p ro pos ed S an Gabriel R iver trail s taff is
recommending trail c o ns truc tion take plac e all at onc e rather than “p hased s egments o cc urring with
the ad jacent lo t d evelo p ment”. The overall c o nc ern is that if the develo p ment o f the trail is to take
p lace b as ed o n the adjac ent lot develo p ment, what oc curs when there is not an adjac ent develo p able
lo t o r there is a gap in develo p ing a partic ular lot. Staff is recommending the following c hanges:
The trail s hall be cons tructed in it’s entirety on the earlier o f: (a) Prior to final ac c eptanc e of
any lo t in Parc el 2, 6 o r 7 sho wn o n Exhibit D to the PUD Ordinanc e, however the trail may
be c o mp leted in phas ed segments oc curring with the adjac ent lot develo p ment; or (b) 180
days after the C ity provid es written no tic e via the means s tated in the Cons ent Agreement
s tating that d es ign or cons truction of any adjac ent sec tion of the trail (o n p ro p erty east or wes t
of the P ro p erty) has c o mmenc ed. F inal acc eptanc e of any lo t shall b e defined as final
ac c eptanc e of the s ubd ivis ion improvements s erving any p art parc el 2, 6, or 7 s ho wn o n
exhibit D. Sho uld fisc al be p o s ted to allow the rec o rd atio n of the s ub d ivis ion p lat fo r one of
the ab o ve mentioned parc els the posted fis cal instrument s hall no t be releas ed until the trail is
c o mp lete.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None studied at this time.
SUBMITTED BY:
Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner, and S o fia Nels o n, CNU-A, Planning Direc tor
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Attachment 1 - Location Map Backup Material
Attachment 2 - Future Land Us e Map Backup Material
Attachment 3 - Zoning Map Backup Material
Attachment 4 - Aerial Map Backup Material
PUD Backup Material
s taff report Backup Material
Page 29 of 115
W U n i v e r s i t y A v e
¬«29
W U n i v e r s i t y A v e
Wa
t
e
r
O
akPkwy
G
a
b
ri
e
l
F
o
r
e
s
t
CI T Y O F G E O R G E T O W N (R i v e r /S t r e a m )
(R i v e r/Strea m )
Georgetown ETJ
G e o r g e t o w n
E T J
Georg
etown
ETJ
GeorgetownETJ
Georgeto w n E TJ
W S H 2 9
W UNIVERSITY AVE
REZ-2016-002
Exhibit #1
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 0.5 1Miles
¯
Le ge ndSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Location Map
REZ-2016-002
Page 30 of 115
W U n i v e r s i t y A v e
¬«29
L e a n d e r R d
Leander R d
W U n i v e r s i t y A v e
Wa
t
e
r
OakPkwy
G
a
b
ri
e
l
F
o
r
e
s
t
C
e
d
a
r
H
o
l
l
o
w
R
d
(
Riv e r /S tream)
(River/Strea
m
)
Georgetown ETJ
Georg
etown ETJ
GeorgetownETJ
Georgeto w n E TJ
G e o r g e t o w n E T J
0 0.5 1 Miles
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯
Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan
Exhibit #2REZ-2016 -002
LegendSiteParcelsCity Lim itsGeorgetown ETJ
Legend
Thoroughfare
Future Land Use
Institutional
Regional Commercial
Community Commercial
Em ployment Center
Low Density Residential
Mining
Mixed Use Community
Mixed Use Neighborhood Center
Moderate Density Residential
Open Space
Specialty Mixed Use Area
Ag / Rural Residential
Existing Collector
Existing Freeway
Existing Major Arterial
Existing Minor Arterial
Existing Ramp
Proposed Collector
Proposed Freeway
Propsed Frontage Road
Proposed Major Arterial
Proposed Minor Arterial
Proposed Railroad
High Density Residential
REZ-2016-002
Page 31 of 115
W U n i v e r s i t y A v e
¬«29
Wa
t
e
r
O
akPkwy
G
a
b
ri
e
l
F
o
r
e
s
t
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
CITY
O
F
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
C
I
T
Y
O
F
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
(R i v e r /S t r e a m )
(R i ver/Stream)
Zoning InformationREZ-2016-002Exhibit #3
¯
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
0 0.5 1
Miles
Le ge ndSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
REZ-2016-002
Page 32 of 115
W U n i v e r s i t y A v e
¬«29
Wa
t
e
r
O
akPkwy
G
a
b
ri
e
l
F
o
r
e
s
t
C
e
d
a
r
H
o
l
l
o
w
R
d
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
0 0.5 1Miles
Exhibit #4REZ-2016-002 Le ge ndSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
REZ-2016-002
Page 33 of 115
Shadow Canyon
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Development Plan
January 25, 2016
Revised: March 21, 2016
Revised: April 27, 2016
Applicant: 278 Georgetown, Inc.
4408 Spicewood Springs Road
Austin, Tx 78759
Prepared by: SEC Planning
4201 W. Parmer Lane
Building A, Suite 220
Austin, Tx 78727
Page 34 of 115
Page 1 of 29 Shadow Canyon - Planned Unit Development
Exhibit A to PUD Ordinance
Development Plan
Shadow Canyon Planned Unit Development (the “PUD”)
A. Purpose and Intent
The boundaries of the PUD are the 278.21 acres described in Exhibit B (Field Notes) (the
“Property”), attached to the PUD Ordinance. The development of the Property is as a high
quality, residential community with a variety of lot sizes and preserved open space.
The contents of this Development Plan explain and illustrate the overall appearance and
function desired for the Property.
B. Applicability and Base Zoning
The development of the Property shall comply with the version of the Georgetown Unified
Development Code (UDC) in effect as of October 15, 2015, and other applicable provisions
in the City’s Code of Ordinances, except as modified within this Development Plan or the
Exhibits attached to the PUD Ordinance.
The base zoning district for the Property is RS – Residential Single Family
All neighborhoods within the Property must comply with this Development Plan. If this
Development Plan does not specifically address a development requirement, the
Georgetown Unified Development Code shall apply. In the event of a conflict between
this Development Plan and the base zoning district, this Development Plan shall control.
C. Concept Plan
Exhibit C attached to the PUD Ordinance for the Property is a Concept Plan for the
Property. Because the Property comprises a significant area and its development will occur
in phases over a number of years, modifications to the Concept Plan may become desirable
due to changes in market conditions or other factors. The Property owner may request
modifications to the Concept Plan.
Modifications of the Concept Plan pertaining to (a) roadway and trail alignments; (b)
changes in the density of specific sections or phases shown on the Concept Plan that do not
increase the overall density of development on the Land, and (c) changes of less than twenty
percent (20%) in the size of any section or phase shown on the Concept Plan, shall be
considered “Minor Modifications” over which the City’s Planning Director has final review
and decision-making authority. In addition, the City may request modifications to the
Concept Plan relating to roadway and trail alignments if necessary to due to topography,
Page 35 of 115
Page 2 of 29 Shadow Canyon - Planned Unit Development
terrain, floodplains and floodways, alignment with connections to adjoining portions of
roadways, trails, or utilities on adjacent properties, and similar situations, all of which shall
be considered Minor Modifications over which the City’s Planning Director has final
review and decision-making authority.
All other changes to the Concept Plan that are not Minor Modifications shall be considered
“Major Modifications.” Major Modifications to the Concept Plan must be approved as an
amendment to this Development Plan, PUD Ordinance, and Consent Agreement pertaining
to creation of a municipal utility district on the Property by the City Council. After approval
by the City in accordance with these requirements, all Minor Modifications and Major
Modifications to the Concept Plan shall be recorded by the City at the Property owner’s
expense in the Official Records of Williamson County, and thereafter, all references in this
Development Plan to the Concept Plan shall mean and refer to the then most current
approved and recorded Concept Plan.
Minor Modifications to the Concept Plan allowed by this Development Plan shall not be
deemed to be changes to the Project under Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government
Code. All Major Modifications to the Concept Plan shall be deemed to be changes to the
Project under Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code, and the provisions of the
UDC and all other applicable laws and regulations in effect at the time of such Major
Modifications shall apply unless the City agrees otherwise.
Approval of this Development Plan does not constitute plat or site plan approval, and all
development related approvals required by the UDC are still required.
D. Allowable / Prohibited Uses
The residential component of uses on the Property must include a mix of various single
family detached products, together with a cohesive network of open spaces, parks, habitat
and karst preserves, greenbelts, water quality areas, trails, and a resident’s amenity center.
The uses within the Property shall comply with the list of allowed and prohibited uses
defined in the Georgetown UDC, Chapter 5 Zoning Use Regulations, except that single-
family attached products are not permitted.
E. Residential Development Standards
The residential areas on the Property shall be developed according to the following
standards as well as the standards listed in Table E.1 below.
The following unit count parameters and design standards have been established:
1. Maximum Number of Residential Units:
The residential unit count on the Property shall not exceed 600 units.
Lot Width:
The minimum lot width shall be 45 feet.
Page 36 of 115
Page 3 of 29 Shadow Canyon - Planned Unit Development
In order to ensure product diversity, the following percentages shall apply to the
Property:
A maximum of 20% of the total lots may have lot widths less than 50 feet
A minimum of 30% of the total lots shall have lot widths of 60 feet or larger
2. Masonry Requirements:
At least 85% of the exterior surface area of all front elevations, all street facing
elevations, and all elevations facing public parkland shall consist of brick, stone or
stucco (exclusive of windows, doors or other openings). The side and rear elevations
not facing a public right-of-way shall consist of at least 85% brick, stone or stucco on
the first floor (exclusive of windows, doors or other openings) and brick, stone, stucco
or cement based siding on the second floor.
Homes that back onto or are adjacent to Road 1 or Road 2 on Exhibit C to the PUD
Ordinance shall consist of 85% brick, stone or stucco on all four elevations (exclusive
of windows, doors or other openings).
3. Front Facade Requirements:
The front elevation of all homes shall contain wall plane articulation. No elevations
shall be a single wall plane across the entire width of the front elevation. Each front
elevation shall contain a minimum of two of the following elements, to be identified
on the architectural plans submitted for building permit:
A minimum of two wall planes on the front elevation, offset a minimum of 18
inches
Covered front porch or patio with a minimum size of 60 square feet
A side-entry or swing-in garage entry (for garage doors that do not face the
front street)
A garage door recessed from the primary front façade a minimum of four feet
(for garage doors that face the front street)
Enhanced garage door materials (wood, ornamental metal, decorative door,
window inserts and hardware, painted or stained to match house)
Shed roof or trellis (at least 18” deep) above garage door for additional
architectural detail
A combination of at least two roof types (e.g., hip and gable) or two different
roof planes of varying height and/or direction
Two or more masonry finishes to compliment the architectural style of the
home
The addition of one or more dormers on the front elevation to compliment the
architectural style of the home
4. Driveways:
Residential driveways on corner lots shall be spaced a minimum of 60 feet from Road
1 and Road 2 shown on Exhibit C to the PUD Ordinance and 50 feet from a local
street, both as measured from the back of curb to the center of the driveway.
Page 37 of 115
Page 4 of 29 Shadow Canyon - Planned Unit Development
Residential driveways are not allowed on Road 1 or Road 2 shown on Exhibit C to
the PUD Ordinance.
Road 3 may have driveways spaced as needed to accommodate the lots fronting onto
Road 3.
5. Additional Development Standards:
The following additional development standards set forth in Table E-1, below, shall
apply to the Property.
Setbacks shall be measured from the outside of the exterior surface of the home.
Eaves and overhangs are permitted to encroach within the setbacks a maximum of 18
inches.
Table E.1 – Development Standards
RESIDENTIAL USES Base District RS
Lot Width
Minimum 45 ft. 1
Exception: Minimum for Corner
Lots 50 ft
Exception: Minimum for Lots with
side lot lines on Road 1 or Road 2 55 feet
Front Setback
Minimum 20 ft.
Exception: Minimum for air-
conditioned living areas, covered
patios or porches or side entry or
swing in garages, IF adequate area
is maintained for planting required
front yard landscaping trees outside
of the 10 foot PUE
15 ft
Side Setback
Minimum 5 ft.
Exception: Minimum for side
setback adjacent to a street 10 ft
Page 38 of 115
Page 5 of 29 Shadow Canyon - Planned Unit Development
Exception: Minimum for garage
accessed from a side street 20 ft.
Rear Setback
Minimum 10 ft.
Exception: Minimum for a lot that
backs to the collector roads labeled
Road 1 or Road 2
15 ft
Building Height
(maximum) 35 ft.
Lot Area
(minimum) 5,500 s.f.
Impervious Cover
Overall Property Maximum (excluding
the Major Collector) 45 %
Individual Residential Lot Up to 60%, provided that 45% overall maximum is not exceeded1.
1 The Final Plat for each phase of development must call out in either a plat note or a
table the specific impervious cover maximum allocated for the lots within the plat.
F. Parkland/Trails/Open Space/Amenity Center
As illustrated on Exhibit D to the PUD Ordinance, Open Space Summary, the Concept
Plan requires at least 22 acres of public parkland/open space to be located along the
South San Gabriel River, and for a public trail (the San Gabriel River Trail) to be
located in the parkland. This 22 acre public parkland and associated San Gabriel River
Trail, will, when dedicated and constructed, fully satisfy the City’s parkland dedication
requirements for the Property, as well as the property comprising lots 1,2 and 4, Block
F, within the Shadow Canyon Preliminary Plat approved on December 15, 2004, as
amended. The entirety of the 22 acres of parkland shall be dedicated to the City, along
with public right-of-way, no later than the recording of the first Final Plat for any
portion of the Property containing residential lots.
In addition to the foregoing public parkland dedication, approximately 83 additional
acres of open space area and habitat/karst buffer area must be maintained on the
Property, consisting of wildlife habitat, karst buffers, slopes, landscape buffers and
drainage areas.
A private, three (3) acre amenity center for residents of the Property must be provided
in close proximity to the dedicated public parkland along the river. The private amenity
center may contain a private residents-only swimming pool, pool building, playground,
Page 39 of 115
Page 6 of 29
and trails. The parking lot shall be a public parking lot and must also serve as a trailhead
parking lot for visitors to access the San Gabriel River Trail.
The San Gabriel River Trail Property shall meet the following specifications:
The trail shall be approximately 5,266 linear feet in length constructed along
the entire length of the South San Gabriel River as it traverses the Property, be
ten foot (10)’ wide, and be made of concrete. It must be located within the
dedicated parkland or the open space in the general location shown on Exhibit
D to the PUD Ordinance. The trailhead locations shall be constructed to meet
Texas Accessibility Standards (TAS).
If topographic constraints restrict any area along the river, the trail shall be
routed internally, as necessary, and in coordination with the Parks Department.
The trail shall be constructed on the earlier of: (a) Prior to final acceptance of
any lot in Parcel 2, 6 or 7 shown on Exhibit D to the PUD Ordinance, however
the trail may be completed in phased segments occurring with the adjacent lot
development; or (b) 180 days after the City provides written notice via the
means stated in the Consent Agreement stating that design or construction of
any adjacent section of the trail (on property east or west of the Property) has
commenced.
Additionally, pedestrian connectivity must be provided throughout the Property as
follows:
Trailheads with signage at key pedestrian access points to the community trail
system, as indicated on Exhibit D to the PUD Ordinance.
A pedestrian connection linking Parcel 2 and Parcel 4.
Site sensitive, mulch or decomposed granite nature trails within the central
ravine as indicated on Exhibit D to the PUD Ordinance.
8-foot and 5-foot wide sidewalks along Road 2 (as described in Section G below
shown on Exhibit G to the PUD Ordinance).
All facilities utilized as “credit” toward the City’s parkland dedication requirements
shall be open to the public. All developer installed facilities as well as open space areas
shall be maintained by a Property Owners Association to the same or better standards
as the City’s standards for similar improvements and areas.
G. Street Design
Roadway circulation and right of way classification must be consistent with the
Concept Plan attached as Exhibit C to the PUD Ordinance. Roadway design standards
shall be governed by the Georgetown UDC, Section 12.03, Streets, unless specifically
modified by this Development Plan.
The primary entry to the Property is via a Residential Collector from Highway 29 on
the northern edge of the Property (shown as “Road 1” on Exhibit C to the PUD
Page 40 of 115
Page 7 of 29
Ordinance). Road 1 shall be a 65’ wide Residential Collector right of way with 30’ of
pavement measured face of curb to face of curb with no parking on either side of the
road. A landscape median may be allowed at the intersection with Highway 29, pending
design approval. Exhibit F to the PUD Ordinance depicts the proposed design of Road
1. A masonry wall must be installed between the roadway and any homes that back or
side onto Road 1.
Road 1 intersects with an internal Major Collector (shown as “Road 2” on Exhibit C to
the PUD Ordinance). Road 2 shall be a 73’ wide right of way with ultimate plans for
45’ of pavement, measured face of curb to face of curb. The ultimate design and
construction of Road 2 shall be in compliance with the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
Should the TIA find that two (2) lanes of the ultimate four (4) lanes of Road 2 must be
constructed with 30’ of pavement face of curb to face of curb, the standards and
specifications set forth in Exhibit G to the PUD Ordinance shall be followed.
Additionally, an eight (8)-foot wide sidewalk must be constructed on one side of Road
2 with a five (5) foot wide sidewalk on the other in the event that only 2 lanes are
constructed.
65 feet of right of way for Road 1 and 73 feet of right of way for Road 2 shall be
dedicated to the City, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, at the time of final
plat.
Road 2 must be stubbed out at the Property line for a future connection to the tract west
of the Property and shall continue to the south property line at the South San Gabriel
River. No parking or residential driveways shall be allowed on Road 2. A masonry
wall must be installed between the roadway and any homes that back or side onto Road
2.
Internal Local Streets within the Property shall be designed and constructed having a
50’ wide right of way with 28’ width of pavement measured from face of curb to face
of curb. On-street parking shall be restricted to one side of the street with bump-outs
at the intersections on the street side with parking. Signs must be placed on the non-
parking side of the street at each end of a block and one in the middle of the block
stating that parking is restricted to one (1) side of the street. The final sign language
and locations must be mutually agreed to by the City’s Planning Director and Applicant
prior to installation, and shall be consistent with the sign design and content specified
in the 2012 IFC Section D103.6. Exhibit E to the PUD Ordinance depicts the approved
design of Internal Local Streets
Street Connectivity: A minimum of six (6) access points to adjacent properties or
existing or planned roadways shall be provided and shall be in the locations generally
depicted in Exhibit C to the PUD Ordinance. Additionally, at least two (2) of the six
(6) access points must be completed prior to the submission of a final plat application
for a plat having the 31st residential lot on the Property. One of these access points
must be a permanent roadway meeting the standards referenced above and in Exhibit E
to the PUD Ordinance for internal local streets; the second of these access points may
Page 41 of 115
Page 8 of 29
be a temporary 26-foot emergency all-weather access drive until an alternate permanent
second access point is constructed.
Block Length: Block lengths of up to 3,000 feet or 60 lots are allowed along any open
space, parkland, habitat/karst buffer or where any natural barriers exist as shown on
Exhibit C to the PUD Ordinance.
Landscape Islands: Trees and vegetation shall be planted in medians in public right-
of-ways. A Property Owners Association must be responsible for landscape
maintenance and irrigation within landscape lots and rights of way. Landscape within
the right-of-way shall require a license agreement with the City. Shade trees are not
allowed within a public utility easement or within ten (10) feet of water or wastewater
lines.
H. Tree Protection and Mitigation
Approximately 35% of the entire project acreage must be preserved as open space,
including preservation of the Heritage Trees located within the open space preserves
(see Exhibit D to the PUD Ordinance). The heavily wooded open space preserves must
be maintained in their native, undisturbed condition with the exception of the following:
Water Quality facilities as necessary to serve the Property
Trails and trail heads
Underbrush or remove invasive vegetative species or brush and/or mitigate any
health/safety issues
Due to the restricted amount of unconstrained, upland property, removal of certain
Heritage Trees in the developable uplands may be unavoidable. As such, the following
Heritage Tree Removal and Pruning standards shall apply:
A Tree Preservation Plan, including a survey of all Heritage Trees, must be
provided with all final plat applications and must indicate all Heritage Trees to
be preserved and those Heritage Trees which may not be able to be preserved.
A tree mitigation table must be provided on the Tree Preservation Plan to
illustrate the mitigation requirements based on the number of inches to be
removed. The mitigation table format and content shall be consistent with the
UDC Development Manual.
Applicant shall remove a maximum of 45 Heritage Trees, approximately 25%
of the 176 total Heritage Trees surveyed on the property. Any removal of a
Heritage Tree beyond the 45 trees allowed for removal will require approval
from the City’s Urban Forester.
Any Heritage Tree that is removed shall be mitigated in a method as outlined in
UDC 8.02.040 in place at the time of the City Council’s approval of the PUD
Ordinance (attached as Exhibit H to the PUD Ordinance).
The City’s Urban Forester shall approve all permits for the removal or pruning
of any Heritage Tree up to the maximum 45 total trees. Heritage Tree removal
Page 42 of 115
Page 9 of 29
permits for a maximum of 45 trees will be submitted for the sole purpose of
documenting mitigation for the removed caliper inches and not require
justification for the removal or evaluation of tree condition.
I. Residential Landscaping
Residential landscaping shall be in accordance with UDC Section 8.03 and the City’s
Water Conservation Ordinance codified in Chapter 13.15 of the City Code of
Ordinances.
J. Environmental
A Section 10(a)(1)(B) incidental take permit from the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service currently applies to the Property. The approved Section 10(a)(1)(B) permit
supersedes the Georgetown Water Quality Management Plan and Appendix A, Federal
Environmental Standards for Occupied Sites, as included in the Georgetown UDC.
Eighty-five percent (85%) of total suspended solids for the entire Property must be
removed from storm water run-off through water quality control best management
practices.
K. Signage
Exhibit H to the PUD Ordinance illustrates the location of signage within the Property.
General
These size modifications shall replace the size restrictions described in Chapter 10 of
the Unified Development Code.
Signage shall not be located in the sight-triangle of an intersection.
Subdivision Entry Signs
A Primary subdivision entry monument sign shall be located along Highway 29 at the
Residential Collector road intersection, as illustrated on Exhibit H to the PUD
Ordinance. The sign shall either be located in a sign easement or be located on a
separate lot. The sign may be allowed off-site within the Shadow Canyon Commercial
Section 1 Final Plat recorded in Document 2008045660, subject to the approval of the
property owner of the lot on which the signage will be placed as evidenced by a
perpetual easement in favor of the Property Owners Association recorded in the
Official Public Records of Williamson County.
The sign area including the base and sign face shall not exceed 280 square feet, or 8
feet in height and the sign face encompassing only the surface for the sign letters and
logo shall not exceed 120 square feet. Surrounding architectural features such as
Page 43 of 115
Page 10 of 29
towers and walls shall not count against the sign square footage and shall not exceed
25 feet in height.
The signs shall be located a minimum of 20’ from the right of way of Highway 29 and
10 feet from the residential collector entry road. A license to encroach will be required
for any signage extending into a public utility easement.
A minimum of 1,000 s.f. of landscape plant bed shall be provided around the
Subdivision Entry Sign. Plant material should be of a native and/or adapted species.
Plants should be selected from the booklet titled, Native and Adapted Landscape
Plants, an earthwise guide for Central Texas, 5th Edition, 2013, created by the Texas
Cooperative Extension, Grow Green and the Ladybird Johnson National Wildflower
Center. All signage as well as landscaping area shall be privately maintained by
Property Owners Association.
Residential Neighborhood Monument Signs
Neighborhood signs may be located throughout the Property as noted on Exhibit H to
the PUD Ordinance. The signs shall either be located in a sign easement or be located
on a separate platted lot. Neighborhood signs shall not block sight distances nor be
located in a public utility easement and shall be setback a minimum of 5 feet from
adjacent rights of way. The sign area including the base and sign face shall not exceed
50 square feet, or 6 feet in height and the sign face encompassing only the surface for
the sign letters and logo shall not exceed 25 square feet.
A minimum of 100 square feet of landscape plant bed shall be provided around each
Residential Neighborhood Monument Sign. Plant material should be of a native and/or
adapted species. Plants should be selected from the booklet titled, Native and Adapted
Landscape Plants, an earthwise guide for Central Tex as, 5th Edition, 2013, created by
the Texas Cooperative Extension, Grow Green and the Ladybird Johnson National
Wildflower Center. All signage as well as landscaping area shall be privately
maintained by a Property Owners Association.
K. Miscellaneous Provisions
Amendments: Except as otherwise provided herein, Amendments to this PUD shall
follow the amendment process outlined in the UDC.
Exhibits. All exhibits described herein and attached to the PUD Ordinance are fully
incorporated into this Development Plan by this reference for all purposes.
Page 44 of 115
Page 11 of 29
Exhibit B to PUD Ordinance - Field Notes
Page 45 of 115
Page 12 of 29
Page 46 of 115
Page 13 of 29
Page 47 of 115
Page 14 of 29
Page 48 of 115
Page 15 of 29
Page 49 of 115
Page 16 of 29
Page 50 of 115
Page 17 of 29
Page 51 of 115
Page 18 of 29
Page 52 of 115
Page 19 of 29
Page 53 of 115
Page 20 of 29
Page 54 of 115
Page 21 of 29
EXHIBIT C
Page 55 of 115
Page 22 of 29
EXHIBIT D
Page 56 of 115
Page 23 of 29
EXHIBIT E
Page 57 of 115
Page 24 of 29
EXHIBIT F
Page 58 of 115
Page 25 of 29
EXHIBIT G
Page 59 of 115
Page 26 of 29
EXHIBIT H
Page 60 of 115
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Shadow Canyon PUD – REZ-2016-002 Page 1 of 10
Report Date: April 28, 2016
File No.: REZ-2016-002
Project Planner: Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Shadow Canyon
Project Address: 2951 Hwy 29 West (see Exhibit 1)
Location: South side of SH 29, at the western edge of the city’s limits
Total Acreage: 278.21 acres
Applicant: Mark Baker, SEC Planning
Property Owner: 278 Georgetown, Inc.
Existing Use: Undeveloped Property
Existing Zoning: Residential Single-Family (RS) District
Proposed Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) District with a base district of RS
Future Land Use: Moderate Density Residential and Open Space
Parks Board action:
Land dedication: 22 acres of public parkland shall be dedicated along the South San Gabriel
River
Approximately 5,266 feet of the San Gabriel River Trail (10’ concrete) shall be constructed
within the parkland
Public parking shall be provided to serve as a trailhead for visitors to access the San Gabriel
River Trail (also will serve as amenity center parking)
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The Shadow Canyon property is located between SH 29 and the South San Gabriel River at the
western edge of the city limits. The applicant has requested a rezoning of the 278 acres to a Planned
Unit Development (PUD) district with a base district of RS to develop a 600 lot residential
subdivision in conjunction with a Municipal Utility District (MUD), which is currently under review
by the City. The development standards proposed with the PUD provide for varying sizes of
residential product, 83 acres of open space, and 22 acres of parkland along the river, including
construction of a mile of public trail.
Site Information
Physical Characteristics:
The land is heavily treed with substantial elevation changes. The southern portion of the property
fronts on the South San Gabriel River with a portion of the property located within the floodplain.
Several environmentally sensitive features exist on the property including a Georgetown salamander
site along the western edge of the property and a karst feature along SH 29.
Page 61 of 115
Planning Department Staff Report
Shadow Canyon PUD – REZ-2016-002 Page 2 of 10
Surrounding Properties:
The subject property is located on the western edge of the city’s limits along SH 29. The surrounding
zoning and land uses are as follows:
Property History
The subject property was annexed into the City of Georgetown in December 2003 (Ordinance #2003-
84) and assigned the default zoning of Agriculture (AG). The original rezoning (Ordinance #2004-
81) and Preliminary Plat of Shadow Canyon were approved by City Council on December 14, 2004.
The zoning was changed from AG to Residential Single-family (RS), Multifamily (MF), and General
Commercial (C-3). The 2004 rezoning and Preliminary Plat included the multifamily and
commercial tracts fronting SH 29 to the north of this property.
Utilities
The property is in the City of Georgetown wastewater service area and City of Georgetown –
Western District water service area. Electric is served by Pedernales Electric Coop (PEC).
Transportation
The subject property has approximately 290 feet of frontage on SH 29. The Overall Transportation
Plan (OTP) identifies a collector roadway extending through the property from the south. The
Unified Development Code (UDC) requires full dedication and construction of thoroughfares
adjacent and/or internal to a property.
2030 Comprehensive Plan
This property is designated as Moderate Density Residential on the 2030 Plan-Future Land Use Map.
This category includes the city’s predominantly single-family neighborhoods that can be
accommodated at a density between 1.1 and 3 dwelling units per gross acre.
In order to stage contiguous, compact, and incremental growth of the city over the next two decades,
the 2030 Comprehensive Plan establishes a tiered growth framework. The subject property is located
in the Tier 1B Growth area. Tier 1B is typically inside the city limits, but is generally under-served
Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use
North
High Density Multifamily
(MF-2), General Commercial
(C-3), Local Commercial (C-
1), Outside of the city limits
(across SH 29)
Moderate Density
Residential
Undeveloped, SH 29,
Quarry (across SH 29)
South Outside of the city limits
(across San Gabriel River)
Open Space, Low Density
Residential, Mixed Use
Community
San Gabriel River, Quarry
East Residential Single-family (RS) Moderate Density
Residential Undeveloped (Hillwood)
West Outside of the city limits Low Density Residential Undeveloped, Rural
Residential
Page 62 of 115
Planning Department Staff Report
Shadow Canyon PUD – REZ-2016-002 Page 3 of 10
by infrastructure, and will be needed to meet the City’s growth necessay over the next 10 years as
Tier 1A approaches build-out.
Zoning Districts
Residential Single-Family District (RS)
The Residential Single-family (RS) District is intended for areas of medium density with a minimum
lot size of 5,500 square feet. The RS District contains standards for development that maintain
single-family neighborhood characteristics. The District may be located within proximity of
neighborhood-friendly commercial and public services and protected from incompatible uses.
Planned Unit Development District (PUD)
A PUD is designed to be used in conjunction with a designated base zoning district. An application
for PUD zoning shall specify the base district(s) and the uses proposed. If no base zoning exists, the
base zoning shall be that zoning designation that is most similar to or compatible with the uses
proposed for the PUD. Any uses not permitted in the base district shall be specifically identified. The
standards and requirements of the specified base district shall apply unless specifically superseded by
the standards and requirements of the PUD Development Plan.
Proposed PUD Development Plan Standards:
Development
Standard UDC Standard PUD Standard
Maximum
Units
N/A 600 units
Permitted Uses Single Family Residential attached
and detached
Single-family detached. Single-family
attached units are not permitted.
Minimum Lot
Size
5,500 square feet 5,500 square feet
Minimum Lot
Frontage
45 feet Typical: 45 feet
Corner Lot: 50 feet
Corner Lot adjacent Rd 1/Rd 2: 55 feet
(Maximum 20% of lots may be less than 50 ft
wide. Minimum 30% of lots shall be 60 ft
wide or larger)
Setbacks Front: 20 feet
Side: 6 feet; 10 feet adjacent street; 20
feet for side entry garage
Rear: 10 feet
Front: 15 feet; 20 feet for front entry garage
Side: 5 feet; 10 feet adjacent street; 20 feet
for side entry garage
Rear: 10 feet; 15 feet adjacent Rd 1/Rd 2
Maximum
Height
35 feet 35 feet
Masonry
Requirement
N/A (currently there is not a minimum
requirement for masonry on single
family homes)
Homes not adjacent to Rd 1/Rd 2:
Front, street, and/or park facing elevations:
85% brick, stone, or stucco
Other: 85% brick, stone, or stucco on 1st
floor, and 85% brick, stone, stucco, or
cement based siding on 2nd floor
Homes adjacent to Rd 1/Rd 2:
Page 63 of 115
Planning Department Staff Report
Shadow Canyon PUD – REZ-2016-002 Page 4 of 10
85% brick, stone, or stucco on all
elevations
Front Façade
Enhancement
N/A (there are similarity restrictions
but no individual façade requirements)
Front elevation shall contain at least 2:
2+ wall planes offset 18”+
Covered porch/patio 60+ sf
Side-entry/swing-in garage
Garage set back 4’ from primary façade
Enhanced garage door materials
Shed roof/trellis above garage door
Combination 2+ roof types/planes
2+ masonry finishes
1+ dormers
Driveways On local streets, no driveway closer
to a corner than 50’
Driveways allowed on residential
collector when spaced 125’ apart
On corner, set back at least 50’ from a
local street and 60’ from Rd 1/Rd 2
No driveways allowed on Rd 1/Rd 2
(residential and major collectors)
Driveways allowed on Rd 3 (residential
collector) when spaced 125’ apart
Impervious
Cover
45% of the overall property 60% on individual lots provided the overall
property (excluding major collector ROW)
stays below 45%
Parkland/Trails Land dedication requirement: One
acre of parkland dedication
required for each 50 units:
600 units = minimum land
dedication of 12 acres
Park improvement requirement:
The UDC does not currently have a
park improvement requirement,
however, improvements can be
approved by the parks board to
meet overall parkland dedication
requirement.
Parks Board approval:
Land dedication: 22 acres of public
parkland shall be dedicated along the
South San Gabriel River
Approximately 5,266 feet of the San
Gabriel River Trail (10’ concrete) shall be
constructed within the parkland
Public parking shall be provided to serve
as a trailhead for visitors to access the San
Gabriel River Trail (also will serve as
amenity center parking)
Amenity Center N/A 3-acre residents-only amenity center
Private Open
Space
The subject property is an “occupied
site” consisting of a protected
salamander site, as well as karst and
recharge features. Water quality
requirements require specified buffers
and limitations on land disturbance in
and around the environmentally
sensitive areas.
Approximately 35% of the entire project
acreage (83 acres) must be set aside as open
space area and habitat/karst buffer area
(separate from parkland), consisting of
wildlife habitat, karst buffers, slopes,
landscape buffers and drainage areas, and
must be maintained in their native,
undisturbed condition with the exception of:
Water quality facilities
Trails and trail heads
Underbrush or invasive vegetation
removal
Page 64 of 115
Planning Department Staff Report
Shadow Canyon PUD – REZ-2016-002 Page 5 of 10
Pedestrian
Connectivity
5’ sidewalks on both sides of street Community trail system including nature
trails within the central ravine
Pedestrian linkage between Ph 6 and Ph 2B
8’ and 5’ wide sidewalks along Rd 2
Trailheads/signage at key access points
Tree
Preservation
All Heritage Trees shall be
preserved except as otherwise
approved by the Urban Forester or
City Council
Mitigation for removed Heritage
Tree shall be 3:1 for total inches
removed
Tree Survey is required with a
PUD
176 Heritage Trees have been surveyed
on the property, excluding open spaces
Heritage Trees located within the open
space shall be preserved
Up to 45 Heritage Trees (approx. 25% of
the 176 surveyed) within the non-open
space area may be removed without
Urban Forester or City Council approval
(although review is still required)
Removal of a Heritage Tree beyond the
45 trees allowed for removal will require
approval from the City’s Urban Forester
Heritage Tree mitigation shall meet the
UDC requirements at 3:1 for total inches
removed
Roadway
Dedication,
Design and
Improvement
TIA is required with a PUD
The OTP shows a proposed
collector level roadway extending
internally through this property.
Right-of-way dedication and
construction is required by the
developer for all internal roadways.
Major Collectors
o Must reflect OTP and connect to
another major collector level
road or higher or stub to
adjacent properties
o 73’ of ROW
o 45’ of pavement
o 2 lanes interim and 4 lanes
ultimate
o On-street parking allowed with
2 lanes, no on-street parking
with 4 lanes
o Residential driveways
prohibited
o 5’ sidewalk both sides
o Masonry wall (residential
boundary wall) required
Residential Collectors
o Must connect to another
residential collector level road
or higher or stub to adjacent
A TIA has been completed for this
subdivision. An updated TIA may be
required to determine the development’s
proportional share for the major collector
roadway and determine dedicated lanes at
the entrance of the subdivision.
Residential Collector – Road 1
o Primary entry road extending from
Hwy 29 at the north property line to
Rd 2
o 65’ of ROW
o 30’ of pavement
o 2 lanes with landscape median allowed
(not required) at Hwy 29
o On-street parking prohibited
o Residential driveways prohibited
o 5’ sidewalk both sides
o Masonry wall required against homes
Major Collector – Road 2
o Extends from south property line at
South San Gabriel River to west
property line for future extension in
both directions
o 73’ of ROW
o Ultimate design for 45’ of pavement
o 2 or 4 lanes, depending on TIA
o On-street parking prohibited
Page 65 of 115
Planning Department Staff Report
Shadow Canyon PUD – REZ-2016-002 Page 6 of 10
properties
o 65’ of ROW
o 37’ of pavement (in a housing
diversity development the
pavement may be reduced to 30’
with only one side parking)
o 2 lanes with no median
o On-street parking allowed
o Residential driveways allowed
o 5’ sidewalk both sides
o Masonry wall (residential
boundary wall) not required
Local Streets
o 50’ of ROW
o 28’ of pavement - one side
parking identified by signs at
entrance to subdivision
o 30’ of pavement - two side
parking
o 5’ sidewalks both sides
o Residential driveways prohibited
o 8’ sidewalk on one side with 5’
sidewalk on the other (if 2 lanes)
o Masonry wall required against homes
Residential Collector – Road 3
o Shall meet standard UDC requirements
for residential collectors
Local Streets
o 50’ of ROW
o 28’ of pavement
o On-street parking restricted to one side
with bump-outs at the intersections on
the street side with parking. Signs must
be placed on the non-parking side of
the street at each end of a block and
one in the middle of the block stating
that parking is restricted to one side of
the street.
Street
Connectivity
5 street connection points to
existing or future public roads
6 street connection points to existing or
future public roads
Block Length Maximum 20 lots or 1,320 ft
Exception: Where parks/open
spaces exist with 100’+ of street
frontage (no maximum)
Maximum 20 lots or 1,320 ft
Exception: Where open space, parkland,
habitat/karst buffer or natural barriers
exist, may increase to 60 lots or 3,000 ft
Signage Subdivision entry signs
o Maximum 1 sign
o May not be located off-site
o Limited to monument sign
o Maximum sign face: 40 sf
Maximum height: 6 feet
o Setback: 5 feet from ROW
o Landscape plant bed equal to
twice the sign face required
Directional signs in RS district
o Maximum sign face: 2 sf
Maximum height: 4 feet
o Setback: 2 ft from ROW
Subdivision entry sign
o Primary subdivision entry sign shall be
located at Hwy 29/Rd 1 intersection
o Sign may be allowed off-site within
adjacent commercial lot
o Monument sign
o Maximum overall size: 280 sf
Maximum sign face: 120 sf
Maximum height: 8 feet
o Setbacks: 20 ft from Hwy 29; 10 ft
from Rd 1
o Minimum 1,000 sf of landscape plant
bed shall be provided
o Architectural features such as towers
and walls shall not count against sign
size and shall not exceed 25’ in height
Residential neighborhood signs
o Maximum overall size: 50 sf
Maximum sign face: 25 sf
Maximum height: 6 feet
o Setback: 5 feet from ROW
o Minimum of 100 sf of landscape plant
Page 66 of 115
Planning Department Staff Report
Shadow Canyon PUD – REZ-2016-002 Page 7 of 10
bed shall be provided
Staff Analysis
Section 3.06 of the Unified Development Code (UDC) establishes criteria to consider when
evaluating a zoning change as well as Planned Unit Development District (PUD). Staff’s evaluation
of each approval criteria is identified below in italics.
Rezoning Criteria:
1. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and
correct enough to allow adequate review and final action;
The application is complete and adequate for review.
2. The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan;
The PUD application is consistent with the Future Land Use component of the comprehensive
master plan as well as the Overall Transportation Plan.
3. The zoning change promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly,
and healthful development of the City;
It appears the PUD application is consistent with this criteria statement. The proposed
development is a greenfield subdivision that is located in a sector of the community that is
largely developing residentially. It does not appear that development will negatively affect the
health, safety, and general welfare of the community.
4. The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property
and with the character of the neighborhood; and
It appears the PUD application is consistent with this criteria statement. The proposed
development backs up to the San Gabriel River (and trail corridor) and is adjacent to a portion
of the Hillwood development.
5. The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the district that would be applied by
the proposed amendment.
It appears the PUD application is consistent with the above criteria statement. The property to
be rezoned appears to be suitable for a single family residential development and is consistent
with the future land use designation for the property.
PUD Criteria:
1. A variety of housing types, employment opportunities, or commercial services to achieve a
balanced community;
The proposed PUD is inconsistent with the goal of providing a variety of housing types,
employment opportunities or commercial services. The proposed development is exclusively a
single family development with 3 single family lot sizes. Commercial services have not been
Page 67 of 115
Planning Department Staff Report
Shadow Canyon PUD – REZ-2016-002 Page 8 of 10
proposed as part of this PUD request. However, there is a multi-family and commercial tract
adjacent to this property.
2. An orderly and creative arrangement of all land uses with respect to each other and to the entire
community;
It appears that the proposed PUD is neutral with respect to meeting this criteria statement. The
proposed development is a conventional single family development. The developer is proposing a
maximum of 600 units, 22 acres of parkland, and 83 acres of open space. The current PUD
property does not provide additional land uses.
3. A planned and integrated comprehensive transportation system providing for a separation of
pedestrian and vehicular traffic, to include facilities such as roadways, bicycle ways, and
pedestrian walkways;
It appears that the proposed PUD is consistent with this criteria statement. UDC required
sidewalks along the primary roadway will provide pedestrian connectivity. Additionally, the
subdivision will include internal trails within the open spaces that will connect neighborhoods
within the development.
4. The provisions of cultural or recreational facilities for all segments of the community;
It appears the proposed PUD is consistent with this criteria statement. The Shadow Canyon
PUD Concept Plan illustrates approximately 22 acres of public parkland/open space including a
trail corridor. Trails within the development as well as an amenity center contribute to the
recreational facilities offered.
5. The location of general building envelopes to take maximum advantage of the natural and
manmade environment; and
Building envelopes and grading plan have not been included in the development plan. Staff is
unable to determine if the building envelopes will take maximum advantage of the natural
environment. While efforts have been made in this plan to protect sensitive features, the heritage
tree preservation proposed is less than the current UDC requirements. Due to the size of some of
the proposed lots at 45’ in width and the proposed impervious cover limitations of 60% per lot it
appears a significant amount of grading and tree removal may be necessary.
6. The staging of development in a manner which can be accommodated by the timely provision of
public utilities, facilities, and services.
The phasing plan proposed for the development has not been provided. Parkland dedication
requirements for the property, including roadway access to, are required to be dedicated to the
City no later than the recording of the first final plat for any portion of the property containing
residential lots. The construction phase of the San Gabriel river trail is as stated: “The trail shall
be constructed on the earlier of: (a) Prior to final acceptance of any lot in Parcel 2, 6 or 7 shown
on Exhibit D to the PUD Ordinance, however the trail may be completed in phased segments
occurring with the adjacent lot development; or (b) 180 days after the City provides written
notice via the means stated in the Consent Agreement stating that design or construction of any
adjacent section of the trail (on property east or west of the Property) has commenced”. Due to
the regional connectivity of this trail staff recommends this trail not be constructed in phases.
Page 68 of 115
Planning Department Staff Report
Shadow Canyon PUD – REZ-2016-002 Page 9 of 10
Additionally, defining “final acceptance of any lot” is a recommended condition of approval of
this application.
Staff Recommendation
Staff has reviewed the request, provided comments to the applicant and has worked with the
applicant to prepare the PUD proposal for consideration. Should the commission recommend
approval of the request staff is recommending the following conditions be added (strike through
identifies language to be removed and underline identifies language to be added):
Parkland/Trails/Open Space/Amenity Center. The proposed parkland dedication and
improvements identified in this staff report and PUD full-fill the parkland requirements of
the property shown on the development plan. The applicant is requesting the parkland
requirements also full-fill the parkland requirements for lots that were part of the original
subdivision of this property but are not subject to this PUD (lots 1, 2, and 4). Since the
additional lots are not part of this PUD application and the property owners of the
additional property are not a party to this PUD application, reference to this property is
not permitted in this application. Staff is recommending the following language:
o As illustrated on Exhibit D to the PUD Ordinance, Open Space Summary, the
Concept Plan requires at least 22 acres of public parkland/open space to be located
along the South San Gabriel River, and for a public trail (the San Gabriel River
Trail) to be located in the parkland. This 22 acre public parkland and associated
San Gabriel River Trail, will, when dedicated and constructed, fully satisfy the
City’s parkland dedication requirements for the Property, as well as the property
comprising lots 1, 2 and 4, Block F, within the Shadow Canyon Preliminary Plat
approved on December 15, 2004, as amended. The entirety of the 22 acres of
parkland shall be dedicated to the City, along with public right-of-way, no later
than the recording of the first Final Plat for any portion of the Property containing
residential lots.
ADA Accessibility of the San Gabriel Trail. ADA accessibility of all public facilities is
regulated by the Texas Accessibly Standards (TAS). TAS are administered through the state
of Texas and are not standards that can be waived at the local level. TAS does allow
variances and alternative compliance due to a variety of challenging circumstances, however
the reviewing agency is the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation not the City of
Georgetown. Staff is recommending the following changes:
o The trail shall be approximately 5,266 linear feet in length constructed along the
entire length of the South San Gabriel River as it traverses the Property, be ten foot
(10)’ wide, and be made of concrete. It must be located within the dedicated
parkland or the open space in the general location shown on Exhibit D to the PUD
Ordinance. The trail trailhead locations shall be constructed to meet Texas
Accessibility Standards (TAS).
Timing of Trail. Due to the regional impact of the proposed San Gabriel River trail staff is
recommending trail construction take place all at once rather than “phased segments
occurring with the adjacent lot development”. The overall concern is that if the development
Page 69 of 115
Planning Department Staff Report
Shadow Canyon PUD – REZ-2016-002 Page 10 of 10
of the trail is to take place based on the adjacent lot development, what occurs when there is
not an adjacent developable lot or there is a gap in developing a particular lot. Staff is
recommending the following changes:
o The trail shall be constructed in it’s entirety on the earlier of: (a) Prior to final
acceptance of any lot in Parcel 2, 6 or 7 shown on Exhibit D to the PUD Ordinance,
however the trail may be completed in phased segments occurring with the adjacent
lot development; or (b) 180 days after the City provides written notice via the means
stated in the Consent Agreement stating that design or construction of any adjacent
section of the trail (on property east or west of the Property) has commenced. Final
acceptance of any lot shall be defined as final acceptance of the subdivision
improvements serving any part parcel 2, 6, or 7 shown on exhibit D. Should fiscal be
posted to allow the recordation of the subdivision plat for one of the above mentioned
parcels the posted fiscal instrument shall not be released until the trail is complete.
Public Comments
As required by the Unified Development Code, property owners within a 200-foot radius of the
subject property and within the city limits were notified (5 notices mailed) of the rezoning
application, a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper on April
17th, and signs were posted on-site. No written comments in support or against the applicant’s
rezoning proposal have been received by the Planning Department staff.
Attachments
Attachment 1 – Location Map
Attachment 2 – Future Land Use Map
Attachment 3 – Zoning Map
Attachment 4 – Aerial Map
Attachment 5 – PUD Development Plan
Page 70 of 115
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
May 3, 2016
SUBJECT:
Disc ussion and p o s s ib le ac tion to no minate a repres entative to the Williams Drive Study Working Group -
Jordan Maddo x, AIC P, P rinc ip al P lanner, Nat Waggoner, Transportation Analys t, and And reina Dávila-
Quintero, Projec t Coordinator
ITEM SUMMARY:
The Capital Area Metro p o litan P lanning Organization (CAMP O) and the City of Geo rgeto wn have s elected
a qualified c ons ultant to c o nduct a s tud y and develo p a p lan fo r the Williams Drive corridor, s tretching
fro m Aus tin Ave to Jim Ho gg Rd . The Plan will further the go als of CAMPO ’s P latinum Planning Program
and the City o f Georgetown’s 2030 Co mp rehens ive P lan, includ ing the Overall Trans portation P lan (OTP)
and Future Land Us e Map. In additio n, it will ad d res s the immed iate and future mobility is s ues that s tem
fro m populatio n growth and develo p ment pres s ures . This plan will rec o mmend projec ts and
imp lementatio n p lans that enhanc e multi-mod al trans portation safety, mo b ility and connec tivity, enhance
econo mic d evelo p ment potential, and es tablis h the area as a p remier gateway into Geo rgeto wn.
As p art o f this plan, a Working Group will be es tab lis hed b y CAMPO and the City o f Georgetown to guide
the study. The Working Group will have repres entatio n fro m CAMPO, City of Geo rgeto wn, TxDOT, and
o ther stakeholders . The CAMP O Pro ject Manager and City of Geo rgeto wn rep res entatives will review and
ap p ro ve all meeting materials p rio r to their delivery to the members o f the Working Group .
Projec t s taff believes that c reation, ad o p tion and imp lementation of the final p lan will req uire s upport from
the City’s trans p o rtatio n and land use p lanning b o d ies , as well as regional p ro jec t partners s uc h as TxDOT
and CAMPO. Geo rgeto wn staff is s eeking no minatio n o f ind ividuals from Georgetown Trans p o rtatio n
Advis o ry Board (GTAB) and the P lanning and Zoning Co mmis s io n (P&Z).
The id eal repres entative will have a signific ant interes t in the future redevelopment o f Williams Drive, have
es tablished ties to p ro p erty along the c o rridor, the ability to attend working group meetings , s upport
o utreach efforts , the ab ility to look beyo nd to d ay's current c o nditio ns and c o ns ider lo ng-term p o s s ib ilities ,
and the ability to wo rk collaboratively.
Staff rec o mmend s And y Web b as the Planning Commission's Williams Drive S tud y Wo rking Gro up
rep res entative. We b elieve his experience o n the Planning Commission, exp erienc e as a sc hool b o ard
rep res entative at a time when the s cho o l distric t is a s ignificant s takeholder in the corridor, and interes t in
the future of Williams Drive allows him to be a valuab le additio n to the technic al working gro up.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
Jordan Maddo x, P rinc ip al P lanner, and Andreina Davila-Quintero , Projec t C o o rd inato r
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Page 71 of 115
Scope of Work Backup Material
Interlocal Agreement with CAMPO Backup Material
Page 72 of 115
SCOPE OF WORK
CAMPO Platinum Planning
Project Name: Georgetown, TX Williams Drive Study
CAMPO is seeking services from a qualified consultant to conduct a study and develop
a plan to further the goals of CAMPO’s Platinum Planning Program and the City of
Georgetown’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan, including the Overall Transportation Plan
(OTP) and Future Land Use Map, as well as address the immediate and future mobility
issues that stem from population growth and development pressures. The Consultant
will develop a plan that applies the elements of the Platinum Planning Program to the
study area, and recommends projects and implementation plans that enhance multi-
modal transportation safety, mobility and connectivity, enhance economic development
potential, and establish the area as a premier gateway into Georgetown.
CAMPO’s Platinum Planning Program seeks to generate comprehensive and detailed
multimodal transportation planning at the local level that will generate regionally
significant benefits through projects and policies. The program aligns local and regional
planning through a progressive, integrated, and inclusive process. Plans completed as
part of this program meet shared goals and are inclusive of state of the practice
elements consistent with CAMPO’s 2040 Regional Transportation Plan goals.
Specifically, these plans will outline synergies between transportation, land use, and
other planning areas to better understand how the system performs. Recommendations
from plans completed through this program will inform future iterations of the Regional
Transportation Plan and be eligible for future Federal funding allocated by CAMPO. The
Platinum Planning Program includes three spatial areas: Subregions, Corridors, and
Centers.
Georgetown, Texas, is a rapidly growing community about 30 miles north of Austin.
The city has a population of over 50,000 people and serves as the county seat for
Williamson County. Georgetown is known for its walkable, historic downtown, family
oriented neighborhoods, and as a retirement destination. The city also serves as the
northern gateway for the Capital Area. This study seeks to help Georgetown and the
region manage its growth challenges by creating environments that provide for an
efficient, effective and reliable system for moving people and goods through multiple
travel options, enhance economic development and housing options near high-quality
transportation investments, and position Williams Drive to become a premier gateway
for the City of Georgetown and the Austin region.
Williams Drive is a four-lane roadway with continuous center turn lanes. More than
29,000 cars access this major arterial daily, and the trend is expected to grow with the
City’s expanding population. The City of Georgetown and TxDOT have identified
projects and committed funding within the corridor before 2025 that will inform and
impact development and mobility patterns as part of the recently approved 2015
Transportation Bond program. Key projects that will be completed in the area as a result
of the 2015 Bond include:
1
Page 73 of 115
• The Northwest Boulevard Bridge extension;
• The Rivery Boulevard extension;
• Improvements to the Interstate 35 southbound service road including the addition
of a dedicated right-turn lane from Williams Drive; and
• Improvements to the Interstate 35 northbound service road from Williams Drive
to Lakeway Drive.
The City envisions a transportation bond election in 2025 that may include
recommendations from this study. In addition, the City accepted a Master
Redevelopment Plan for a portion of the Corridor in 2006, and established a special
taxing district designed to further the development within the district limits in accordance
with this plan. To further this effort, the City also designated this area with a Specialty
Mixed Use Future Land Use designation, as well as created a new zoning district, the
Mixed-Use district, with the intent of drafting and adopting a mixed-use Regulating Plan
for the area.
CAMPO has identified a portion of the Corridor as a Growth Center in its 2040 Plan.
The Williams Drive Study will recommend policy, programming, projects and an
implementation plan for the study area that address and enhance mobility, safety, and
livability.
The Williams Drive Plan includes two Platinum Planning spatial area types:
1. Corridor Plan – Development of a context-sensitive corridor plan for several miles
on Williams Drive, which addresses access management strategies, multi-modal
transportation elements, safety and operational improvements, and
recommendations for a private realm built-form that supports different modes of
transportation and a sense of place.
2. Centers Plan – Development of a plan for a vibrant mixed-use center and
gateway along Williams Drive from an area south of Austin Avenue to Lakeway
Drive, consistent with the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan and special taxing
district and land use overlays. This includes development concepts for a mixed-
use catalytic project on the Georgetown ISD site.
In order to better respect the context of the City of Georgetown, key words used in this
scope are defined as below:
1. Multimodal – design and policy that ensures the safe, efficient, effective, reliable
and comfortable accommodation of various modes of travel including cars,
pedestrians, cyclists, and where/if appropriate, transit.
2. Mixed-use – the appropriate combination and mixture of land uses and density
that can produce a feasible amount of origins, destinations, and trip generators
(jobs, housing, services) that allow communities and the region gain the biggest
benefits/use from multi-modal transportation investments. Mixed-use may include
uses mixed vertically, or complimentary single uses adjacent to one another.
Section 500 – Scope of Work
Page 74 of 115
3. Equity – Ensuring robust engagement of all segments of the population,
minimizing any adverse impacts of plan recommendations, and increasing
access to opportunity for all members of the community.
The consultant should have experience and knowledge in planning for implementation
consistent with the Platinum Planning Program elements:
1. Multimodal and Mixed-Use – Create connections to housing, jobs, and services
through the establishment of dynamic mixed-use environments, well-connected
street grids, high-quality transit options, as well as safe and useful pedestrian/bicycle
accommodations.
2. Housing – Develop a mix of housing types and price points appropriate for the study
area context that provides living options that can accommodate a variety of incomes,
abilities, and familial types.
3. Environment – Create a healthy environment that proactively protects and enhances
air, water, land, and people.
4. Economic Development – Promote the economic competitiveness of the study area
to yield positive impacts on the local tax base, high-quality jobs, and community
services.
5. Equity – Create positive social, economic, and environmental outcomes for all
residents and stakeholders in the study areas while minimizing adverse impacts.
Section 500 – Scope of Work
Page 75 of 115
Study Area (See below for the study area maps)
The focus of the Williams Drive study is inclusive of the corridor from an area east of
Austin Avenue, just north of downtown, to the Georgetown City Limits. As stated
previously, this study includes two areas of focus:
• Corridor Plan Focus Area - Williams Drive from Lakeway Drive on the south, to
the Georgetown City Limits on the north. This area of Williams Drive is four lanes
with a center turn lane, discontinuous sidewalks, and a lack of streetscaping.
Land use along this section of the corridor includes mostly strip malls, retail
power centers at major nodes, some multi-family uses, and an overall auto-
centric low-density built form.
Corridor Plan Focus Area Map
Section 500 – Scope of Work
Page 76 of 115
• Centers Plan Focus Area - San Gabriel River on the south and east, Rivery
Boulevard, Oak Lane and Mesquite Lane on the West, and San Gabriel Park,
Apple Creek Drive, Northwest Boulevard and Lakeway Drive on the north. This
area includes some low-density commercial uses, single-family homes, and a
new mixed use area off Rivery Boulevard. The area is also bisected by Interstate
35, and includes a mix of a disjointed traditional street grid on the southern
portion, and a curvilinear suburban street system in the northern portion.
Downtown Georgetown
Centers Plan Focus Area Map
Section 500 – Scope of Work
Page 77 of 115
Schedule
Work is to begin upon the execution of a Notice to Proceed from CAMPO and is
expected to take nine (9) months to complete. CAMPO reserves the right to extend this
timeline, subject to the approval of the Transportation Policy Board.
Our Scope of Services is presented in five stages (Tasks 0– 4):
Task 0. Public and Stakeholder Engagement
Task 1. Existing Conditions and Needs Assessment
Task 2. Concept Plan
Task 3. Draft Project, Policy Recommendations, Implementation Plan and
Project Prioritization
Task 4. Final Report
Project Budget
The budget for the project is not to exceed $250,000.00.
Project Management
CAMPO’s Long-Range Planning Manager, or his designee, will serve as the CAMPO
Project Manager, and the City of Georgetown will serve as the local partner for this
study. The consulting firm's Project Manager will serve as the primary point of contact
for all communication between CAMPO and the consulting team. The CAMPO Project
Manager will serve as the liaison between the local partners and the consultant team.
The consulting team may not change team membership or organizational structure
without the written approval of the CAMPO Executive Director.
Effective two-way communication is essential on a project of this complexity and
importance. The Consultant will schedule bi-weekly (or more frequent, if directed by
CAMPO) meetings with CAMPO staff and local partners with ad hoc meetings as
needed. On-line conference calls will be scheduled with screen sharing, as needed or
as directed by CAMPO, to go over issues and maintain communication in the most
efficient way.
Progress Reports and Invoices
The Consultant will prepare and submit detailed narrative progress reports and itemized
invoices to the Project Manager. Invoices will include all work performed during the
reporting period only. Detailed narrative progress reports shall include:
• A brief description of work accomplished for each task.
• The percentage of completion of the overall work project and each task.
• Changes in the estimated value (budget) of each work task.
• Special problems or delays encountered or anticipated.
• The anticipated work activities for the next work period.
• Log of communication associated with study that includes the person and entity
contacted, reason, date, and time (includes phone calls, emails, etc.)
• Additional information as directed by the CAMPO Project Manager.
Section 500 – Scope of Work
Page 78 of 115
The progress reports must include work performed by all sub-consultants associated
with the consultant team. The Consultant will be required to submit to the CAMPO
Project Manager one consolidated progress report for review, accompanied by
supporting documentation for each reimbursement request.
Sub-Consultant Management and Meetings
The consultant will prepare contracts for any sub-consultant(s), monitor sub-consultant
staff activities, ensure sub-consultant(s) adherence to the project schedule, and review
and recommend approval of sub-consultant invoices.
Quality Assurance and Quality Control:
The Consultant will provide continuous quality assurance and quality control throughout
the life of the study. CAMPO may refuse to process invoices for payment until work,
deliverables and related project management tasks are completed to CAMPO’s
satisfaction.
Consultant shall deliver to CAMPO:
• Copies of sub-consultant contracts, within 30 days of contract execution.
• Monthly invoices and detailed narrative progress reports (including travel related
expense receipts, and any equipment purchase receipts, time-sheets and other
direct expense receipts). All receipts and documentation shall be maintained at
the billing site for contract monitoring/audit purposes. The consultant is also
required to submit a project schedule and timeline which includes important tasks
and milestones for review and approval by the CAMPO project manager.
TASK 0. Public and Stakeholder Engagement
The Consultant will work with CAMPO staff and the City of Georgetown to develop a
robust and inclusive public participation plan that will lead to meaningful participation of
various stakeholders. The stakeholder participation plan shall include but is not limited
to the following subtasks:
0.1- Steering Committee Meetings (Minimum of Three)
A Steering Committee will be established by CAMPO and the City of Georgetown to
guide the study. This committee will have representation from CAMPO, City of
Georgetown, TxDOT, and other stakeholders. Prior to each project meeting or activity,
the Consultant shall prepare agenda and agenda support materials for the next
upcoming Steering Committee meeting. The CAMPO Project Manager and City of
Georgetown representative will review and approve all meeting materials prior to their
delivery to the Steering Committee members.
At least one public meeting shall be held as part of each task (1-4) in the planning
process. A project kick-off meeting shall be held with the CAMPO and the City of
Georgetown to develop draft study goals that are consistent with both the City’s 2030
Comprehensive Plan and CAMPO’s Platinum Planning Program elements.
Section 500 – Scope of Work
Page 79 of 115
0.2 - Public Meetings (Minimum of Three)
Public meetings will be held at integral points during the study pursuant to a schedule
proposed by the Consultant within 10 business days of contract execution and approved
by the CAMPO Project Manager. The purpose of the public meetings is to gain the
perspective of local residents, key Homeowner Associations, Business Leaders,
Community Leaders, and other entities or specific groups recommended by the Steering
Committee. This planning process shall be conducted in close coordination with
CAMPO and the City of Georgetown.
Through the public outreach processes, people will have the opportunity to comment on
the plan and planning efforts via email, social media, post mail, or in person at
meetings. The Consultant team shall collaborate with CAMPO’s Public Outreach Group
and Georgetown Project Team to broaden the channels of communications with the
public. The Consultant shall facilitate and provide support personnel and exhibits for
the outreach meetings. The Consultant shall collaborate with the CAMPO Public
Outreach personnel and Georgetown Project Team to coordinate necessary logistics for
the meetings. The public meeting schedule shall be revised, to include scheduling
additional public meetings, as directed by the CAMPO Project Manager.
Throughout the project, if CAMPO and the City of Georgetown determines there is a
need for public outreach materials to be advertised or produced in a language other
than English, the consultant shall produce print and generate electronic materials in
multiple languages (prevalent in the study area) as directed by the CAMPO Project
Manager.
0.3 - Project Web Site and Other Methods
CAMPO will develop and host a project web site throughout the duration of the
study effort. The Consultant shall be responsible for submitting deliverables and
other content as directed by the CAMPO Project Manager for posting to the project
web site. As part of Task 0, the consultant may suggest to CAMPO, and upon
approval, develop additional outreach methods relevant to the study area; such as
through social media, online town hall meetings, apps, webinars, focus groups, etc.
Consultant shall deliver to CAMPO:
1. Public Participation Plan, including a proposed public meeting schedule.
2. Surveys, questionnaires, or comment cards for public meeting participants
to fill out, including an electronic version to post on the CAMPO study
website.
3. Meeting materials including, but not limited to, informational hand-outs,
written materials, sign-in sheets, the printing of meeting hand-outs, and
the preparation and production of meeting display boards in high
resolution color.
4. Documentation of the meetings shall include: photographs of each event,
copies of informational displays, the number of people in attendance at
each meeting, copies of handouts and questionnaires distributed at the
meetings, comment cards and letters received, attendance sheets from
Section 500 – Scope of Work
Page 80 of 115
each meeting, and the contact information used in mailings.
5. Meeting summaries of each meeting in Microsoft Word format within 10
business days of the meeting date.
6. An appropriate range of exhibits and displays for all meetings. The
Consultant shall produce additional exhibits and displays for any and all
meetings as directed by the CAMPO Project Manager. The quality and
content of exhibits and displays shall be subject to review and approval as
required by the CAMPO Project Manager. The CAMPO Project Manager
may direct edits and revisions to exhibits and displays for any scheduled
public meeting.
The Consultant shall be responsible for submitting content and deliverables to
the CAMPO Project Manager for posting on the project website.
Task 1. Existing Conditions and Needs Assessment
1.1 - Comprehensive Review of Existing Studies, Plans, and Reports
This task involves the review and evaluation of current local, state, and regional
documents and policies relevant to transportation and supportive land use planning.
The following documents will be provided for review by the City of Georgetown:
City of Georgetown Williams Drive Corridor Study (2003)
City of Georgetown Williams Drive Gateway Redevelopment Plan (2006)
City of Georgetown Travel Demand Model (TDM)
City of Georgetown 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Overall Transportation Plan including the approved 2015 Road Bond
Public Safety Plan
Housing Plan
Parks and Trails Master Plan
Utility Master Plan
Downtown Master Plan
Airport Master Plan
Future Land Use Plan
My35 Plans and Projects List
Sidewalk Master Plan
City of Georgetown Unified Development Code
City of Georgetown ADA Transition Plan
City of Georgetown Data Files – Most recent Geographic Information System
(GIS) files from the City and other databases, including aerial mapping and
associated data files that shows the location of City limits property lines, street
curbs, street names, sidewalks, trails, MPO boundary, topography, known
environmental features, land use, zoning and other features
Traffic Counts
Signal Timing Plans
City of Georgetown Trails Map
Central Texas Greenprint for Growth
Other previous studies relevant to the project
Section 500 – Scope of Work
Page 81 of 115
1.2 - Existing conditions
The Consultant shall collect any other data necessary to evaluate existing
transportation, demographic, market, and land use conditions relevant to the Platinum
Planning Program elements within the corridor and center areas. This effort shall
include, at a minimum, an evaluation of the existing street network and connectivity
(specifically across Interstate 35 and connections to Williams Drive from adjacent
areas); access management, mode split, and any impediments to the use of alternative
modes of transportation; an inventory of existing land uses and a supportive built
environment; and any other data requested by the CAMPO Project Manager.
The data collection will pay particular attention to the use of various multimodal
transportation related items such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities, streetscapes and
street sections, and branding and wayfinding/signage traffic operations, parking, safety,
and land use related items such as market trends, existing built form and building types,
infill development, adaptive reuse, public spaces and the opportunities for economic
development, and housing. Specific tasks that shall be examined as part of both the
Centers and Corridor components of this study include, but shall not be limited to:
• Parking analysis
• Traffic counts and operations analysis
• Driveway and access assessment
• Street grid connectivity and barriers analysis
• Vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle safety analysis
• Traffic signal analysis
• Intersection analysis
• Roadway design and loading
• Sidewalk inventory
• Pedestrian and bicycle safety analysis
• Fiscal impact analysis
• Land suitability analysis
• Land use susceptibility to change analysis
• Public health Impacts
• Additional tasks for examination deemed necessary by the CAMPO Project
Manager
The Consultant shall complete a housing and retail market conditions analysis as part of
the centers component of the study.
1.3 – Revision of Goals and Objectives
The Consultant shall work with CAMPO, City of Georgetown and the Steering
Committee to revise the study goals and objectives as needed.
Consultant to Deliver to CAMPO:
• Existing Conditions and Needs Assessment Report
Section 500 – Scope of Work
Page 82 of 115
Task 2: Develop Concept Plan
The Consultant shall prepare draft conceptual plans that are specific for both the
corridor and centers components of the study based on the existing conditions and
needs assessment. Although the study has two components, the concepts for both
component shall be complimentary. This concept plan shall identify relevant projects
and policies to improve the transportation network and supportive land uses that, if
implemented, will enhance mobility, connectivity, safety, and various multimodal travel
options; support economic development in the area with minimal impact on the
environment; provide for a housing mix that meets the needs of the community; and
enhance a sense of place.
Specifically, the study shall provide an analysis of the current and potential system
network and future land use mix within the study area. This analysis should propose
specific improvements to transportation infrastructure that will improve multimodal
transportation safety, connectivity and access. The analysis shall also identify possible
investment strategies and policies to leverage the desired land use and housing mix,
and development types in accordance with the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan, as well
as analyze the market feasibility of the improvements.
2.1A - Concept Plan for the Corridor Component
• Corridor Performance – Develop concepts that will improve and optimize the
transportation network’s performance and safety in the corridor through an
efficient, effective and reliable system. This includes development of access
management concepts, traffic signal timing plans, intersection improvements,
roadway cross-sections and streetscaping concepts that balance the needs of a
variety of users/modes (pedestrians, cyclist, and cars), and enhance traffic flow,
environmental quality and economic development.
• Land Use, Private Realm, and the Transect – Develop land use and built form
recommendations that are supportive and complementary to an effective
transportation corridor. This should include concepts for development pattern
intensities that may change and transition along Williams Drive from the centers
area on the south end to the more suburban areas on the north end. All concepts
shall include recommendations that will be conducive to and promote mobility, as
well as address the placement and supply of parking. In addition,
recommendations shall include strategies on how the corridor should develop
and redevelop to become an effective multimodal transportation corridor and
iconic gateway into Georgetown over time. Development of a specific transect for
this corridor shall be included.
• Connections to Subdivisions – Develop concepts that identify ways to better
connect the subdivisions along Williams Drive to the corridor and one another.
Section 500 – Scope of Work
Page 83 of 115
2.1B - The Concept Plan for the Centers Component shall include:
• Circulation and Connectivity - Develop a multimodal connectivity plan. The
concept shall address:
o Identifying transportation opportunities and specific needs for all modes of
transportation in the corridor and center. The potential for multimodal
transportation connections between the study area and Downtown
Georgetown, the Rivery Park Development, San Gabriel Park, and
adjacent neighborhoods. Specific attention shall be given to connectivity
across Interstate 35 and the San Gabriel River, as well as the intersection
of Austin Avenue, Williams Drive and Interstate 35.
o Strategies for parking management, including on-street, shared parking
(public and private), and other arrangements.
o Improvements to the pedestrian and bicycle realm, appropriate sidewalks
and bikeways, streetscapes, pedestrian crossings, intersection
improvements signals and other supportive infrastructure.
o Identifying opportunities and specific needs for transit in the area, where
and if appropriate.
o Other strategies that will help balance the needs of users traveling thru the
centers area, as well as those destined to the centers. Addressing street
grid connections and redundancy, as well as mode shift will be crucial in
this analysis.
• Economic and Urban Development - Identify opportunities for context
sensitive, mixed-use infill, grayfield/brownfield redevelopment, and new
greenfield development (both vertical and horizontal) that creates a multimodal,
safe, comfortable, and vibrant environment, destination, and investment
opportunity.
o Concept shall include provisions for additional retail, services,
entertainment and other amenities that will enhance the neighborhoods;
make the area attractive and provide basic services for its residents and a
unique experience for visitors; complimenting services and amenities
offered in the downtown district; complimenting and ancillary services for
the City’s and Capital Area’s business/employment centers.
o A catalytic project concept should be developed to examine the
redevelopment of the Georgetown ISD site that is conducive to multi-
modal transportation investment. This may include mixed-use or housing
components. Pro formas, maps, renderings, and other pertinent
information, shall be developed as part each case study project.
o Potential opportunities for public/private partnerships should be explored
as part of this task.
• Housing - Identify concepts and strategies for inclusion of an appropriate mix of
housing types (including price points and typology) that serves the needs of the
community and properly utilizes and leverages the local and regional
transportation investments in the area.
Section 500 – Scope of Work
Page 84 of 115
• Environment and Place
o Infrastructure Design – Develop concepts for infrastructure design that
minimize impacts to the natural environment, including construction
materials, storm water infrastructure, water quality, landscaping, scenic
roadway design, etc.
o Public and Green Space – Concept should identify the areas of
opportunity for high-quality public/gathering spaces, green space, and
areas that should be considered for preservation or limited development.
o Place-making – Develop concepts and visuals that demonstrate elements
of high-quality aesthetics in both the public and private realm through
streetscaping, greenery, public art, architecture, and view sheds. The
place-making concept shall include provisions for wayfinding and branding
of the area.
o Environmental Justice - Provide guidance on policies and projects that will
benefit and minimize adverse impacts to vulnerable populations.
Consultant shall deliver to CAMPO:
1. Completed concept plan report narrative with graphics and methodology inclusive of
parking and connectivity strategies.
2. Catalytic project case study narrative, maps, pro formas, and rendering.
3. Corridor Transect for Williams Drive
TASK 3: DRAFT RECCOMENDATIONS, IMPLEMENTATION
STRATEGIES, AND PRIORITIZATION
3.1 - Recommendations
The consultant shall create near-, short-, medium - and long-term projects, and policy
recommendations that are tailored to the needs of the stakeholder/implementing entities
in the study area. Timeframes for the recommendations and implementation strategies
are defined as:
• Near-Term – 1 Year or Less
• Short - Term – 2 to 4 years
• Medium-Term – 5 – 10 years
• Long-Term – 11 years or more
Recommendations and strategies shall include, but shall not be limited to:
• Maps, renderings, and drawings of proposed improvements and concepts
• Recommended roadway sections/schematics
• Recommended mobility management solutions to include traffic flow, signal
timing, access management
• Proposed changes or additions to the infrastructure design criteria
• Cost Estimates and funding sources for proposed improvements (separated
by implementer(s))
• Draft final fiscal impact analysis
• Description of tools and partnerships needed for housing economic
development concepts
Section 500 – Scope of Work
Page 85 of 115
• Proposed Unified Development Code language or zoning map changes, this
should include recommendations on parking, consistent with the City’s 2030
Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map.
• Proposed changes to local and regional thoroughfare maps
• Proposed economic development agreement and partnership language (as
needed)
3.2 - Evaluation Categories and Measures of Effectiveness
The Consultant shall develop a set of criteria to assist in evaluating each improvement
concept. The broad categories of transportation efficacy, safety, VMT, travel times,
right-of-way, socio-economic impacts, urban design, health impacts, environmental
impacts, and pedestrian/bicyclist impacts and cost effectiveness will be further defined
into evaluation criteria. These criteria shall be written so that it may be included in the
CAMPO Transportation Improvement Program and Regional Transportation Plan
project selection criteria, if so desired.
3.3 - Evaluation of Cost-Effectiveness, Impacts, and Priorities
The Consultant shall evaluate cost-effectiveness to determine if the improvements
cause sufficient user benefits to justify the investment. The Consultant shall evaluate
cost effectiveness by determining the monetary benefits associated with the reduction
in vehicle delay due to short- term improvements, as well as compare the benefit to the
implementation cost. Benefits shall be determined using the results of the peak hour
model and converting the hourly delay values to estimated daily and annual delays,
which will then be multiplied by an average cost per hour of delay to achieve annual
benefits (dollar-value). Projects and policies shall also be evaluated based on the
metrics outlined in Task 3.2.
The consultant shall develop a prioritized list of projects and policies based on the
outcomes of the evaluation.
Consultant shall deliver to CAMPO:
1. A summary of current and planned transportation projects and near, short,
medium, and long-term project recommendations that will impact the study
area.
2. Proposed cost estimates, funding sources, policy changes or additions, and
partnership(s) needed to implement study recommendations.
3. Draft catalytic project and centers implementation strategy and marketing brief
(not to exceed two pages).
4. Prioritized list of projects and policies.
5. Draft environmental justice analysis.
6. Draft health impact assessment.
7. Draft final fiscal impact analysis.
8. Draft ordinance and design manual changes or amendments.
9. Draft interlocal and economic development agreement language.
10. Traffic modeling data and analysis
Section 500 – Scope of Work
Page 86 of 115
TASK 4: FINAL REPORT WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
The Consultant shall prepare and deliver a final report at the conclusion of the study.
The report will be reviewed by CAMPO staff, City of Georgetown and the Steering
Committee. The report, executive summary, and visuals must be approved by
CAMPO before going to print.
The report shall include:
• Documentation of public and stakeholder input across all project stages,
overview of the planning process, existing conditions report, concept plan, and
final recommendations/implementation report;
• Discussion of any concepts considered but eliminated for not addressing the
study goals and objectives;
• Description of the study effort associated with identification, definition,
development, and refinement of urban design and multimodal transportation
improvement concepts;
• Explanation of methodology and evaluation criteria used;
• Summary of recommended transportation and land use projects along with
project descriptions, costs, benefits, and potential funding sources for each of the
implementing entities;
• Catalytic project and centers implementation strategy and marketing document;
• Corridor Transect that includes concepts for both the public and private realm;
• Complete fiscal impact analysis for the concept plan methodology;
• Narrative on air quality benefits;
• List of recommended projects prioritized in cooperation with the Steering
Committee and the stakeholders;
• Narrative on impacts and benefits to Environmental Justice populations;
• Health impact assessment;
• Sample ordinances, design manual, and agreement language needed for
implementation, as applicable (include in appendix);
• GISD Catalytic project proformas (include in appendix);
• Any additional content deemed necessary by the CAMPO Project Manager.
Consultant shall deliver to CAMPO:
1. Recommended concept for future development with integrated transportation
concepts.
2. A minimum of five ground level and/or bird's eye level artistic renderings and/or
computer generated photo simulations of (transportation) improvement concepts
to help the public visualize recommended improvements of significance.
3. Suggested strategies to influence development toward achieving the concept
plan.
4. Recommended near-, short-, medium - and long-term transportation projects to
improve mobility in the study area.
5. Benefit cost analysis for each recommended project.
6. Identify potential funding sources for each project recommended.
7. Base maps showing the location, layout, and typical sections for each concept
Section 500 – Scope of Work
Page 87 of 115
considered (one high resolution, reproducible digital copy).
8. Executive Summary of the study report with its high resolution, reproducible
digital copy, not to exceed five pages. (Word and PDF format).
9. Catalytic project and centers implementation marketing brief with its high
resolution, reproducible digital copy, not to exceed two pages (Word and PDF
format) for use in private realm development efforts.
10. All associated supporting documents located in the appendices.
11. Twenty-five (25) Hard Color Copies of the Final Report, Fifty (50) Hard Color
Copies of the Executive Summary and Ten (10) Hard Color Copies Appendices.
Final Report should be in 8.5’ X 11’ format.
12. All GIS, Photoshop, InDesign, Illustrator, MSWord, MS Excel, photo, graphics
and other associated files.
Section 500 – Scope of Work
Page 88 of 115
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (CAMPO)
AND
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
FOR
WILLIAMS DRIVE STUDY
TillS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made by and between the CAPITAL
AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION, a metropolitan planning
organization, ("CAMPO") and the CITY OF GEORGETOWN, a Texas Home Rule
Municipal Corporation in Williamson County, ("the City") pursuant to the authority granted
and in compliance with the provisions of the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791, Texas
Government Code.
WHEREAS, the Texas Interlocal Cooperation Act, Texas Government Code Chapter
791 (the "Act"), provides that any one or more public agencies may contract with each other for
the performance of governmental functions or services for the promotion and protection of the
health and welfare of the inhabitants of this State and for the mutual benefit of the parties; and
WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of Texas has designated CAMPO (formerly the
Austin Transportation Study), acting through its Transportation Policy Board, to be the
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Austin urbanized area(s), and the lead agency
for the region's Metropolitan Planning process; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Planning process addresses requirements under state and
Federal law that promote efficient system management and operation; and
WHEREAS, CAMPO's Platinum Planning Program seeks to generate comprehensive
and detailed multimodal planning at the local level that will generate regionally significant
benefits through projects and policies; and
WHEREAS, CAMPO's Platinum Planning Program translates federal and state
transportation guidelines into actions that are consistent and appropriate for our region's and
local communities' context; and
WHEREAS, Williams Drive is one of the City's major arterials with more than 29,000
vehicles accessing it daily, a figure which is expected to grow with the City's expanding
population, and mobility issues that impede the potential growth and further development of this
corridor as planned in the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to partner with CAMPO to complete a study of Williams
Drive, in accordance with CAMPO's Platinum Planning Program, to address the historic and
emerging mobility and economic development issues along this corridor, and recommend
projects and implementation plans that enhance multi-modal transportation, safety, mobility and
connectivity, enhance economic development potential, and establishes the area as a premier
Georgetown Williams Drive Study
Page 89 of 115
gateway into Georgetown and the Region ("Williams Drive Study"), as further described in the
Scope of Work (Attachment
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration covenants promises made by the
and the City hereby agree as follows:
I. PAYMENT
CAMPO's and the payment are payable and from funds
aotlrotmated by the City Council the of Georgetown and the CA1\1PO Transportation
Policy Board, respectively ("Appropriated funds") and the purpose purchase.
The absence of appropriated funds-orother lawfully available funds-sha:H-render-this-Agreement,------
null void to the extent are not appropriated or Within days
adoption of budget or CA1\1PO's Unified Planning Work
applicable party shall provide the other party failure of the party's ..... ..,.,,,.,.,,,,a
body to make appropriation any fiscal to pay the amounts due under this
Agreement, or of any appropriation to an amount to permit the
applicable party to obligation under this Agreement
ll. OBLIGATIONS OF CAMPO
A. CAMPO shall support the inclusion City's Comprehensive the
Transportation Plan and Future Land Use as part of the Williams Drive Study.
B. CAMPO agrees to actively work the development of the
Williams Drive with Atltaclrun~ent
C. CAMPO will form a steering committee that includes other
stakeholders to guide planning process of the Williams
D. CAMPO will manage all phases of and administration of a consultant contract,
mcJlUOJ:ng, but not limited procurement, contract review and approval of
deliverables, contract terms and conditions, payment of invoices, contract
mose-t:mt. CAMPO will and partner the City throughout the process to
ensure that the the needs of the goals of the City's 2030
Comprehensive Plan,
CAMPO will coordinate the City of Georgetown on any proposed and/or necessary
changes to the Schedule, Public Plan, other related prior
to <>n .. ,,.,...,""'
F. CAMPO pay an amount not to exceed $200,000 or 80% of the total p:roiect costs of
$250,000 to cover planning services described under in Attachment A -Scope of Services.
Georgetown Williams Drive Study
Page 90 of 115
G. CAMPO shall include all required deliverables identified in Attachment A-Scope of Work
in the executed agreement with the consultant hired to complete the Williams Drive Study:
H. CAMPO will submit the completed Williams Drive Study for possible acceptance by the
Transportation Policy Board.
ID. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY
A. The City supports the inclusion of CAMPO's Platinum Planning Program elements as part of
the Williams Drive Study as detailed in Attachment B.
B. The City will actively work with CAMPO in the development of the Williams Drive Study
consistent with Attachment A -Scope of Work.
C. The City will remit to CAMPO $50,000, or 20% of the $250,000 total project cost as the
local match for this study, within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Agreement or
the date CAMPO executes the Advanced Funding Agreement with the Texas Department of
· Transportation for the Williams Drive Study.
D. The City will participate in the consultant selection process and the planning process of the
Williams Drive Study.
E. The City will present the Williams Drive Study to its local decision making bodies for review
and possible adoption and implementation.
F. Upon completion of the Williams Drive Study, the City will track and report to CAMPO on
plan implementation activity such as transportation investments, new development projects,
public and private dollars invested, new policies established or amended, etc.
IV. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. This Agreement is effective on the date of the last party to sign, provided that the obligations
of the Parties shall be subject to CAMPO executing the Advanced Funding Agreement with
the Texas Department of Transportation for the Williams Drive Study. The Agreement
terminates on March 31,2017, unless otherwise terminated pursuant to this Agreement.
B. If either party defaults in the performance of any terms or conditions of this Agreement the
defaulting party shall have 30 days after receipt of written notice of such default within which
to cure such default. If such default is not cured within such period of time then the offended
party shall have the right without further notice to terminate this Agreement.
C. This Agreement may be terminated, in whole or in part, by either party whenever such
termination is found to be in the best interest of either party. Either party shall provide
written notification to the other party at least thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date
Georgetown Williams Drive Study
Page 91 of 115
of the termination. AU notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed given when either
delivered in person or deposited the United States mail, postage prepaid, mail,
return receipt requested, addressed to the appropriate at the following address:
IftoCAMPO: Ashby Johnson
Executive
CAMPO
Post Office Box 1088
Austin, Texas 78767
a copy to: Kelly
----------------------~smr~tirrrodru~tmm~----------~------------------------
CAMPO
Post Office Box 1088
Austin, Texas 78767
the City: Ed
Transportation Services
City of Georgetown
300-1 Industrial
with a copy to: Nat Waggoner
Transportation Services
City of Georgetown
300-1 Industrial Ave
Gec,rge~toVIm Texas 78626
V. RESTRICTION ON LOBBYING
In accordance with 31 USC Section CAMPO and the hereby certify no Federal
aptlfOJ)ria.ted funds have been or paid by or on behalf CAMPO and/or the to any
uu,, ... .., •• .., ... "" or attempting to influence an or employee any agency, a member
of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress connection with the awarding of Federal
contract, making of any grant or the entering into agreement,
and the extension, continuation, amendment, or modification of Federal contract, grant,
loan or cooperative agreement. If any funds Federal funds have been
paid or will be any person for influencing or to influence an n'IT''"""r
employee of any agency, a of Congress, an officer or of '-''""''A"'-L"""
corme1ctxcln with this grant, loan, or cooperative CAMPO and/or the
shaH complete submit "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying", in
accordance it instructions. CAMPO and/or the City shall that the language this
certification be included the all sub-awards at all tiers and that
Georgetown Williams Drive Study
Page 92 of 115
subcontractors shall certify and disclose accordingly. CAMPO and its subcontractors shall
require that the language of this certification be included in any subcontract exceeding $100,000
by any tier in that any such subcontractor shall certify and disclose accordingly.
VI. INSPECTION OF WORK AND RETENTION OF DOCUMENTS
A. CAMPO when federal funds are involved, shall grant the U.S. Department of Transportation,
the Texas Department of Transportation and any authorized representative thereof, the right
at .all reasonable times to inspect or otherwise evaluate the work performed or being
performed hereunder and the premises in which it is being performed.
B. All records or materials required by or produced under this Agreement, including records
produced by any subcontractor to CAMPO and/or the City, shall be maintained for at least
four ( 4) years after CAMPO and/or the City payment under this Agreement or the termination
or expiration of this Agreement.
VII. PROCURE:MENT
In accordance with the Interlocal Cooperation Act, it is mutually agreed that all parties hereto
shall conduct all procurements and award all contracts necessary to this Agreement in accordance
with federal and state laws and regulations, including Federal Transit Administration Circular
4220.1D, if federal funds are used to execute procurement and award of services. No officer,
employee, independent consultant, or elected official of either party who is involved in the
development, evaluation, or decision-making process of the performance of any procurement
related to this Agreement shall have a financial interest, direct or indirect, in the Agreement
resulting from the procurement.
VIII. LEGAL CONSTRUCTION
If any of the prov1s1ons contained in this Agreement are for any reason held to be
unconstitutional, void, or invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such
unconstitutionality, invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect the remaining
portions of the Agreement; and this Agreement shall be construed as if such unconstitutional,
void, or invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein.
IX. LAW AND VENUE
The laws of the State of Texas govern all matters arising out ofthis Agreement, and venue shall
lie in the state courts of Travis County, Texas. The parties acknowledge and agree that each party
shall be responsible for any attorney's fees incurred by that party relating to this Agreement
X. NON-DISCRIMINATION
It is mutually agreed that all parties hereto are bound by the provisions of Title 49, Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 21, which was promulgated to effectuate Title VI of the Civil Rights
Georgetown Williams Drive Study
Page 93 of 115
of Federal Regulations, 710.40S(b), and Executive Order 11246
Employment as amended Executive 11375 · as
u...,~~~"'~'u"'lllL<;iu in Department of Labor Regulations CFR Part 60).
XI. INTERPRETATION OF LAWS AND AUTHORITIES
CAMPO is responsible for the settlement of all and administrative issues arising out
of procurement into in support of the contract work.
XII. ALTERATION, AMENDMENT, OR MODIFICATION
alterations, amendments, or modifications must
B. Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between CAMPO and the City. No other
agreement, statement or promise relating to the subject matter of that is not
contained the Agreement is valid or binding
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
Dale Ross,
Mayor
Date: o, /O?to ('do lv
ATTEST:
-~~0~
Title:___..,.,.....!....l...!oo.-~~...::L-~~::.L..:-+--
Approved as to form
Georgetown Williams Drive Study
Ashby Johnson,
Executive uu~ect1or
Page 94 of 115
Georgetown Williams Drive Study
ATTACHMENT A
SCOPE OF WORK
Page 95 of 115
Georgetown Williams Drive Study
Page 96 of 115
SCOPE OF WORK
CAMPO Platinum Planning
Project Name: Georgetown, TX Williams Drive Study
CAMPO is seeking services from a qualified consultant to conduct a study and develop
a plan to further the goals of CAMPO's Platinum Planning Program and the City of
Georgetown's 2030 Comprehensive Plan, including the Overall Transportation Plan
(OTP) and Future Land Use Map, as well as address the immediate and future mobility
issues that stem from population growth and development pressures. The Consultant
will develop a plan that applies the elements of the Platinum Planning Program to the
study area, and recommends projects and implementation plans that enhance multi-
modal transportation safety, mobility and connectivity, enhance economic development
potential, and establish the area as a premier gateway into Georgetown.
CAMPO's Platinum Planning Program seeks to generate comprehensive and detailed
multimodal transportation planning at the local level that will generate regionally
significant benefits through projects and policies. The program aligns local and regional
planning through a progressive, integrated, and inclusive process. Plans completed as
part of this program meet shared goals and are inclusive of state of the practice
elements consistent with CAMPO's 2040 Regional Transportation Plan goals.
Specifically, these plans will outline synergies between transportation, land use, and
other planning areas to better understand how the system performs. Recommendations
from plans completed through this program will inform future iterations of the Regional
Transportation Plan and be eligible for future Federal funding allocated by CAMPO. The
Platinum Planning Program includes three spatial areas: Subregions, Corridors, and
Centers.
Georgetown, Texas, is a rapidly growing community about 30 miles north of Austin.
The city has a population of over 50,000 people and serves as the county seat for
Williamson County. Georgetown is known for its walkable, historic downtown, family
oriented neighborhoods, and as a retirement destination. The city also serves as the
northern gateway for the Capital Area. This study seeks to help Georgetown and the
region manage its growth challenges by creating environments that provide for an
efficient, effective and reliable system for moving people and goods through multiple
travel qptions, enhance economic development and housing options near high-quality
transportation investments, and position Williams Drive to become a premier gateway
for the City of Georgetown and the Austin region.
Williams Drive is a four-lane roadway with continuous center turn lanes. More than
29,000 cars access this major arterial daily, and the trend is expected to grow with the
City's expanding population. ·The City of Georgetown and TxDOT have identified
projects and committed funding within the corridor before 2025 that will inform and
impact development and mobility patterns as part of the recently approved 2015
Transportation Bond program. Key projects that will be completed in the area as a result
of the 2015 Bond include:
1 Page 97 of 115
• Northwest Boulevard Bridge extension;
• Rivery Boulevard ov1·"'""''"''"'''"'"
• Improvements to the Interstate southbound service road including the addition
of a dedicated right-tum lane Williams and
• to the Interstate 35 northbound service road from Williams Drive
to Lakeway Drive.
The a transportation bond election 2025 that may include
recommendations from In City accepted a Master
Redevelopment Plan for a portion of Corridor 2006, and established a special
taxing district designed further development within the district limits in accordance
with this plan. To further this City also this area a Specialty
Mixed Use Future Land Use designation, as well as a new district, the
----Mixed=tlse-district;-with the intent of drafting and adopting-a-mixed-tlse-Regtrlating-Pian~---
for the area.
CAMPO has identified a portion the Corridor as a Growth Center 2040 Plan.
The Williams Study will recommend projects and an
implementation the study area address and enhance safety, and
livability.
The Williams Drive Plan includes Platinum Planning spatial area types:
1. Corridor Plan -Development of a context-sensitive corridor for several
on Williams Drive, which access management strategies, multi-modal
transportation elements, safety and operational improvements, and
recommendations for a realm built-form that supports different modes
transportation and a sense of ~,~,Q"'"'·
Centers -Development a plan for a mixed-use and
gateway along Williams Drive an area south Austin Avenue to Lakeway
Drive, consistent the City's 2030 Comprehensive special taxing
district and land use This includes development concepts a mixed-
use catalytic project on Georgetown
In order to better respect
scope are defined as neuow:
context the City Georgetown, key words used in this
1. Multimodal -design policy that ensures
2.
comfortable accommodation of various
cyclists, and lllln.cr&>rn
that can produce a feasible
(jobs, that
multi-modal transportation
or complimentary
Section 500-Scope
safe, efficient, effective,
of including
Page 98 of 115
3. Equity -Ensuring robust engagement of all segments of the population,
minimizing any adverse impacts of plan recommendations, and increasing
access to opportunity for all members ofthe community.
The consultant should have experience and knowledge in planning for implementation
consistent with the Platinum Planning Program elements:
1. Multimodal and Mixed-Use -Create connections to housing, jobs, and services
through the establishment of dynamic mixed-use environments, well-connected
street grids, high-quality transit options, as well as safe and useful pedestrian/bicycle
accommodations.
2. Housing -Develop a mix of housing types and price points appropriate for the study
area context that provides living options that can accommodate a variety of incomes,
abilities, and familial types.
3. Environment-Create a healthy environment that proactively protects and enhances
air, water, land, and people.
4. Economic Development -Promote the economic competitiveness of the study area
to yield positive impacts on the local tax base, high-quality jobs, and community
services.
5. Equity -Create positive social, economic, and environmental outcomes for all
residents and stakeholders in the study areas while minimizing adverse impacts.
Section 500-Scope of Work
Page 99 of 115
Study Area (See below for the study area maps)
focus of the Williams study is inclusive of the corridor from an area east of
Austin Avenue, just north downtown, to the Georgetown Limits. As stated
previously, this study includes areas of focus:
• Corridor Plan Focus Area -Williams Drive from south, to
the City Limits on the north. This area of Williams four lanes
a center tum lane, discontinuous a lack streetscaping.
use this section the corridor includes mostly strip malls, retail
power centers at major nodes, some multi-family uses, and an overall
l"'on•Trrl"' low-density built form.
Section 500-Scope of Work
Page 100 of 115
• Centers Plan Focus Area -San Gabriel River on the south and east, Rivery
Boulevard, Oak Lane and Mesquite Lane on the West, and San Gabriel Park,
Apple Creek Drive, Northwest Boulevard and Lakeway Drive on the north. This
area includes some low-density commercial uses, single-family homes, and a
new mixed use area off Rivery Boulevard. The area is also bisected by Interstate
35, and includes a mix of a disjointed traditional street grid on the southern
portion, and a curvilinear suburban street system in the northern portion.
Centers Plan focus Area Map
Section 500-Scope of Work
Page 101 of 115
Schedule
Work is to begin upon the execution of a Notice Proceed from CAMPO and is
expected to nine months to complete. CAMPO reserves the right to extend this
timeline, subject to the approval of the Transportation Policy ~-o~ ..... .,. .. r~
Our Scope of Services is presented in five stages (Tasks 0-4):
Task Public and Stakeholder Engagement
Task 1. Existing Conditions and Needs As!sessment
Concept Plan
Task Draft Project, Recommendations, Implementation Plan and
Project Prioritization
Task 4. Final Report
Project Budget
The budget for the project is not to exceed $250.000.00.
Project Management
CAMPO's Long-Range Planning Manager, or his designee, will serve as
Project Manager, and the City of Georgetown will serve as local .... .,.r'l' ... .,
study. The consulting firm's Manager serve as. the primary contact
all between and The CAMPO
Manager will serve as liaison between the local and the team.
The consulting team may not change membership or organizational structure
without the approval of the CAMPO ~.-"'"''""uu
Effective two-way communication is essential on a project of this complexity and
importance. will schedule bi-weekly (or more frequent, if by
CAMPO) meetings with CAMPO staff and local partners with ad meetings as
needed. On-line conference calls will be scheduled screen as needed or
as directed by CAMPO, over and communication in the most
way.
Progress Reports and Invoices
The Consultant will prepare and submit detailed progress reports and itemized
•nu, .... ,,...c)C! to the Project Manager. will include work performed during
reporting period only. Detailed narrative progress reports shall include:
• A brief description of work accomplished for each task.
• The percentage of completion overall work and each task.
• Changes in estimated value (budget) of each work task.
• Special problems or delays encountered or anticipated.
• anticipated work activities for the next work period.
• Log of communication associated with study that includes the person and entity
contacted, reason, date, and (includes phone calls, emails, etc.)
• Additional information as directed by the CAMPO Project Manager.
Section -Scope ofWork
Page 102 of 115
The progress reports must include work performed by ali sub-consultants associated
with the consultant team. The Consultant will be required to submit to the CAMPO
Project Manager one consolidated progress report for review, accompanied by
supporting documentation for each reimbursement request.
Sub-Consultant Management and Meetings
The consultant will prepare contracts for any sub-consultant(s), monitor sub-consultant
staff activities, ensure sub-consultant(s) adherence to the project schedule, and review
and recommend approval of sub-consultant invoices.
Quality Assurance and Quality Control:
The Consultant will provide continuous quality assurance and quality control throughout
the life of the study. CAMPO may refuse to process invoices for payment until work,
deliverables and related project management tasks are completed to CAMPO's
satisfaction. ·
Consultant shall deliver to CAMPO:
• Copies of sub-consultant contracts, within 30 days of contract execution.
• Monthly invoices and detailed narrative progress reports (including travel related
expense receipts, and any equipment purchase receipts, time-sheets and other
direct expense receipts). All receipts and documentation shall be maintained at
the billing site for contract monitoring/audit purposes. The consultant is also
required to submit a project schedule and timeline which includes important tasks
and milestones for review and approval by the CAMPO project manager.
TASK 0. Public and Stakeholder Engagement
The Consultant will work with CAMPO staff and the City of Georgetown to develop a
robust and inclusive public participation plan that will lead to meaningful participation of
various stakeholders. The stakeholder participation plan shall include but is not limited
to the following subtasks:
0.1-Steering Committee Meetings (Minimum of Three)
A Steering Committee will be established by CAMPO and the City of Georgetown to
guide the study. This committee will have representation from CAMPO, City of
Georgetown, TxDOT, and other stakeholders. Prior to each project meeting or activity,
the Consultant shall prepare agenda and agenda support materials for the next
upcoming Steering Committee meeting. The CAMPO Project Manager and City of
Georgetown representative will review and approve all meeting materials prior to their
delivery to the Steering Committee members.
At least one public meeting shall be held as part of each task (1-4) in the planning
process. A project kick-off meeting shall be held with the CAMPO and the City of
Georgetown to develop draft study goals that are consistent with both the City's 2030
Comprehensive Plan and CAMPO's Platinum Planning Program elements.
Section 500-Scope of Work
Page 103 of 115
0.2 -Public Meetings (Minimum of Three)
Public meetings will be held at integral points during study pursuant a schedule
proposed by Consultant within 1 0 business days of contract execution and approved
by the CAMPO Project Manager. The purpose of the public meetings is to gain
perspective of local residents, key Homeowner Associations, Business
Community Leaders, and other entities or specific groups recommended by the Steering
Committee. This planning process shall be conducted close coordination with
CAMPO and the City of Georgetown.
Through the public outreach processes, people will have the opportunity to comment on
the plan and planning efforts via email, social media, post mail, or in person at
meetings. Consultant team shall collaborate with CAMPO's Public Outreach Group
----and-Georgetow~ject-=ream-to-broaden-the-channeiS-OLcomm•anications_wwithW-Uth_u;;e._ __ _
Consultant shall facilitate and provide support and for
the outreach The Consultant collaborate with the CAMPO
Outreach personnel Georgetown Project to coordinate necessary logistics for
the meetings. The meeting schedule shall be revised, to include scheduling
additional public meetings, as directed by the CAMPO Project Manager.
Throughout the project, if CAMPO and the City Georgetown determines there a
need for public outreach materials to be advertised or produced in a language other
than English, consultant shall produce and generate electronic materials
multiple languages (prevalent in the study as directed by the CAMPO
Manager. ·
-Project Web Site and Other Methods
CAMPO will develop and host a project web site throughout the duration
study The Consultant shall be responsible submitting deliverables and
other as directed by the CAMPO Project Manager for posting to project
web As part of Task the consultant may suggest to CAMPO, and
approval, additional outreach methods relevant to the study area; such as
online hail meetings, apps, webinars, focus groups, etc.
Consultant shall deliver to CAMPO:
Public Plan, including a proposed meeting schedule.
Surveys, questionnaires, or comment cards for public meeting participants
to fill out, including an version to post on CAMPO study
website.
Meeting materials including, but not limited to, informational hand-outs,
written materials, sign-in sheets, the printing of meeting hand-outs,
the preparation and production of meeting display boards in high
color.
4. Documentation of the meetings shall include: photographs of each event,
copies informational displays, number of people in attendance at
each meeting, copies of and questionnaires distributed at the
comment cards and received, attendance sheets from
Section 500-Scope of Work
Page 104 of 115
each meeting, and the contact information used in mailings.
5. Meeting summaries of each meeting in Microsoft Word format within 1 0
business days of the meeting date.
6. An appropriate range of exhibits and displays for all meetings. The
Consultant shall produce additional exhibits and displays for any and all
meetings as directed by the CAMPO Project Manager. The quality and
content of exhibits and displays shall be subject to review and approval as
required by the CAMPO Project Manager. The CAMPO Project Manager
may direct edits and revisions to exhibits and displays for any scheduled
public meeting.
The Consultant shall be responsible for submitting content and deliverables to
the CAMPO Project Manager for posting on the project website.
Task 1. Existing Conditions and Needs Assessment
1.1 • Comprehensive Review of Existing Studies, Plans, and Reports
This task involves the review and evaluation of current local, state, and reg{onal
documents and policies relevant to transportation and supportive land use planning.
The following documents will be provided for review by the City of Georgetown:
111 City of Georgetown Williams Drive Corridor Study (2003)
111 City of Georgetown Williams Drive Gateway Redevelopment Plan (2006)
111 City of Georgetown Travel Demand Model (TOM)
• City of Georgetown 2030 Comprehensive Plan
• Overall Transportation Plan including the approved 2015 Road Bond
• Public Safety Plan
111 Housing Plan
• Parks and Trails Master Plan
11 Utility Master Plan
111 Downtown Master Plan
• Airport Master Plan
111 Future Land Use Plan
• My35 Plans and Projects List
• Sidewalk Master Plan
• City of Georgetown Unified Development Code
111 City of Georgetown ADA Transition Plan
• City of Georgetown Data Files-Most recent Geographic Information System
(GIS) files from the City and other databases, including aerial mapping and
associated data files that shows the location of City limits property lines, street
curbs, street names, sidewalks, trails, MPO boundary, topography, known
environmental features, land use, zoning and other features
• Traffic Counts
• Signal Timing Plans
11 City of Georgetown Trails Map
• Central Texas Greenprint for Growth
111 Other previous studies relevant to the project
Section 500-Scope of Work
Page 105 of 115
1.2 -Existing conditions
Consultant shall collect any other data necessary to evaluate existing
transportation, demographic, market, land use conditions relevant
Program elements within the corridor and center areas. effort shall
include, at a minimum, an evaluation of existing street network and connectivity
(specifically across Interstate and connections to Williams Drive from adjacent
areas); access management, mode split, and any impediments to the use alternative
modes of transportation; an inventory of existing land uses and a supportive built
environment; and any other data requested by CAMPO Project Manager.
-----Ihe-data-collectiOO-WiU pay particular-attention-tO-the use of various multimad .... a._l ___ _
transportation related items such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities, streetscapes and
street sections, and branding and wayfinding/signage traffic operations, parking, safety,
and land use such as market trends, existing built and building types,
development, adaptive reuse, public spaces and the opportunities for
development, and housing. tasks that shall be examined as part of both
Centers and Corridor components of this study include, but shall not be limited to:
• Parking analysis
• Traffic counts and operations analysis
• Driveway and access assessment
• grid and barriers analysis
• Vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle analysis
• signal analysis
• Intersection analysis
• Roadway. design and loading
• Sidewalk inventory
• Pedestrian and bicycle safety analysis
• impact analysis
• land suitability analysis
• land use susceptibility to change analysis
• Public health Impacts
• Additional tasks for examination deemed necessary by the CAMPO Project
Manager
Consultant shall complete a housing and market analysis as part of
component of the study.
1 -Revision of Goals and Objectives
The Consultant shall work with CAMPO, City of Georgetown and the Steering
Committee to revise the study goals and objectives as needed.
Consultant to Deliver to CAMPO:
• Existing Conditions and Needs Assessment
Section 500-Scope Work
Page 106 of 115
Task 2: Develop Concept Plan
The Consultant shall prepare draft conceptual plans that are specific for both the
corridor and centers components of the study based on the existing conditions and
needs assessment. Although the study has two components, the concepts for both
component shall be complimentary. This concept plan shall identify relevant projects
and policies to improve the transportation network and supportive land uses that, if
implemented, will enhance mobility, connectivity, safety, and various multimodal travel
options; support economic development in the area with minimal impact on the
environment; provide for a housing mix that meets the needs of the community; and
enhance a sense of place.
Specifically, the study shall provide an analysis of the current and potential system
network and future land use mix within the study area. This analysis should propose
specific improvements to transportation infrastructure that will improve multimodal
transportation safety, connectivity and access. The analysis shall also identify possible
investment strategies and policies to leverage the desired land use and housing mix,
and development types in accordance with the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan, as well
as analyze the market feasibility of the improvements.
2.1A -Concept Plan for the Corridor Component
• Corridor Performance -Develop concepts that will improve and optimize the
transportation network's performance and safety . in the corridor through an
efficient, effective and reliable system. This includes development of access
management concepts, traffic signal timing plans, .intersection improvements,
roadway cross-sections and streetscaping concepts that balance the needs of a
variety of users/modes (pedestrians, cyclist, and cars), and enhance traffic flow,
environmental quality and economic development
• Land Use, Private Realm, and the Transect -Develop land use and built form
recommendations that are supportive and complementary to an effective
transportation corridor. This should include concepts for development pattern
intensities that may change and transition along Williams Drive from the centers
area on the south end to the more suburban areas on the north end. All concepts
shall include recommendations that will be conducive to and promote mobility, as
well as address the placement and supply of parking. In addition,
recommendations shall include strategies on how the corridor should develop
and redevelop to become an effective multimodal transportation corridor and
iconic gateway into Georgetown over time. Development of a specific transect for
this corridor shall be included.
• Connections to Subdivisions -Develop concepts that identify ways to better
connect the subdivisions along Williams Drive to the corridor and one another.
Section 500-Scope of Work
Page 107 of 115
2.1 B -The Concept Plan for the Centers Component shall include:
• Circulation and Connectivity -Develop a multimodal connectivity plan.
concept shall address:
o Identifying transportation opportunities and specific needs for all modes of
transportation in the corridor and center. The potential for multimodal
connections between the study area Downtown
Georgetown, the Rivery Park Development, San Gabriel Park, and
adjacent neighborhoods. attention shall be to connectivity
across Interstate 35 the San Gabriel River, as well as the intersection
of Austin Avenue, Williams Drive and Interstate
o Strategies for parking management, including on-street, shared parking
(public and private), and other arrangements.
--------e--~:!mprovements-ro-the-pedesmaA-and-bicycle-reatm,appropf-iatasidewalk,..,_ __ _
bikeways, streetscapes, pedestrian crossings,
improvements signals and other supportive infrastructure.
o Identifying opportunities and specific needs for transit in the where
and if appropriate.
o Other strategies that will help balance the needs users traveling the
area, as well as those destined the centers. Addressing street
connections and redundancy, as well as mode shift will be crucial in
this analysis.
• Economic and Urban Development -Identify opportunities context
sensitive, mixed-use infill, grayfield/brownfield redevelopment, and new
greenfield development vertical and horizontal) creates a multimodal,
safe, and vibrant environment, destination, and investment
opportunity.
o Concept shall include provisions for additional services,
entertainment other amenities that will enhance the neighborhoods;
make the area attractive and provide basic services for its and a
unique experience for visitors; complimenting services and amenities
offered in the downtown district; complimenting and ancillary services for
the and Capital Area's business/employment centers.
o A catalytic project concept should be developed to examine the
redevelopment of the Georgetown lSD site that is conducive to multi-
modal transportation investment. This include mixed-use or housing
components. formas, maps, renderings, and other pertinent
information, be developed as part each case project.
o opportunities public/private partnerships should be explored
as part of this task.
• Housing -concepts and strategies an appropriate mix of
housing types (including price points and typology) that serves needs of the
community and properly utilizes and leverages the local and
transportation investments the area.
500 Scope of Work
Page 108 of 115
• Environment and Place
o Infrastructure Design -Develop concepts for infrastructure design that
minimize impacts to the natural environment, including construction
materials, storm water infrastructure, water quality, landscaping, scenic
roadway design, etc.
o Public and Green Space -Concept should identify the areas of
opportunity for high-quality public/gathering spaces, green space, and
areas that should be considered for preservation or limited development.
o Place-making -Develop concepts and visuals that demonstrate elements
of high-quality aesthetics in both the public and private realm through
streetscaping, greenery, public art, architecture, and view sheds. The
place-making concept shall include provisions for wayfinding and branding
of the area.
o Environmental Justice -Provide guidance on policies and projects that will
benefit and minimize adverse impacts to vulnerable populations.
Consultant shall deliver to CAMPO:
1. Completed concept plan report narrative with graphics and methodology inclusive of
parking and connectivity strategies.
2. Catalytic project case study narrative, maps, pro formas, and rendering.
3. Corridor Transect for Williams Drive
TASK 3: DRAFT RECCOMENDATIONS, IMPLEMENTATION
STRATEGIES, AND PRIORITIZATION
3.1 -Recommendations .
The consultant shall create near-, short-, medium -and long-term projects, and policy
recommendations that are tailored to the needs of the stakeholder/implementing entities
in the study area. Timeframes for the recommendations and implementation strategies
are defined as:
• Near-Term -1 Year or Less
• Short -Term - 2 to 4 years
• Medium-Term--5-10 years
• Long-Term -11 years or more
Recommendations and strategies shall include, but shall not be limited to:
• Maps, renderings, and drawings of proposed improvements and concepts
• Recommended roadway sections/schematics
• Recommended mobility management solutions to include traffic flow, signal
timing, access management
• Proposed changes or additions to the infrastructure design criteria
• Cost Estimates and funding sources for proposed improvements (separated
by implementer(s))
• Draft final fiscal impact analysis
• Description of tools and partnerships needed for housing economic
development concepts
Section 500-Scope of Work
Page 109 of 115
• Proposed Unified Development Code language or zoning
should include recommendations on parking, consistent
Comprehensive and Future Land Use Map.
.. Proposed changes to local and thoroughfare maps
• Proposed economic development agreement and
needed)
3.2 -Evaluation Categories and Measures Effectiveness
changes, this
City's 2030
language (as
The Consultant shall develop a set of criteria to assist in evaluating each improvement
concept. The broad categories transportation efficacy, safety, VMT, travel
right-of-way, socio-economic impacts, urban design, health impacts, environmental
impacts, and pedestrian/bicyclist impacts and effectiveness will further defined
____ _..in, .... t.uo_..e .... v.cualuafion criteria. These criteria shallbe written so that it may be included in the
CAMPO Transportation Improvement Program and Regional Transportation Plan
project selection criteria, if so desired.
3.3 -Evaluation Cost-Effectiveness, Impacts, and
The shall evaluate cost-effectiveness to determine if improvements
cause sufficient user benefits to justify the investment. The Consultant shall
cost effectiveness by determining benefits associated with the reduction
in vehicle delay due to short-term improvements, as well as compare the benefit to the
implementation cost. Benefits shall determined using the results of the peak hour
model and converting the hourly delay values to estimated daily and annual delays,
will then be multiplied by an cost per hour of delay to achieve annual
benefits (dollar-value). Projects and policies shall also be evaluated based on the
metrics outlined in Task
The consultant shall develop a prioritized list of projects and policies based on the
outcomes of evaluation.
Consultant shall deliver to CAMPO:
1. A summary of current and planned transportation projects and near, short,
medium, and long-term recommendations that will impact the study
area.
Proposed cost estimates, funding sources, policy changes or additions, and
partnership(s) needed implement study recommendations.
3. Draft catalytic project and centers implementation strategy and marketing
(not exceed two pages).
Prioritized list of policies.
5. Draft environmental justice analysis.
6. Draft health impact assessment.
Draft final fiscal impact analysis.
8. Draft ordinance and design manual changes or amendments.
9. interlocal and economic development agreement language.
1 0. Traffic modeling data and analysis
Section 500-Scope of Work
Page 110 of 115
TASK 4: FINAl REPORT WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
The Consultant shall prepare and deliver a final report at the conclusion of the study.
The report will be reviewed by CAMPO staff, City of Georgetown and the Steering
Committee. The report, executive summary, and visuals must be approved by
CAMPO before going to print. ·
The report shall include:
.. Documentation of public and stakeholder input across all project stages,
overview of the planning process, existing conditions report, concept plan, and
final recommendations/implementation report;
• Discussion of any concepts considered but eliminated for not addressing the
study goals and objectives;
• Description of the study effort associated with identification, definition,
development, and refinement of urban design and multimodal transportation
improvement concepts;
.. Explanation of methodology and evaluation criteria used;
.. Summary of recommended transportation and land use projects along with
project descriptions, costs, benefits, and potential funding sources for each of the
implementing entities;
.. Catalytic project and centers implementation strategy and marketing document;
• Corridor Transect that includes concepts for both the public and private realm;
.. Complete fiscal impact analysis for the concept plan methodology;
.. Narrative on air quality benefits;
.. List of recommended projects prioritized in cooperation with the Steering
Committee and the stakeholders;
• Narrative on impacts and benefits to Environmental Justice populations;
.. Health impact assessment;
.. Sample ordinances, design manual, and agreement language needed for
implementation, as applicable (include in appendix);
.. GISD Catalytic project proformas (include in appendix);
.. Any additional content deemed necessary by the CAMPO Project Manager.
Consultant shall deliver to CAMPO:
1. Recommended concept for future development with integrated transportation
concepts.
2. A minimum of five ground level and/or bird's eye level artistic renderings and/or
computer generated photo simulations of (transportation) improvement concepts
to help the public visualize recommended improvements of significance.
3. Suggested strategies to influence development toward achieving the concept
plan.
4. Recommended near-, short-, medium -and long-term transportation projects to
improve mobility in the study area.
5. Benefit cost analysis for each recommended project.
6. Identify potential funding sources for each project recol'!lmended.
7. Base maps showing the location, layout, and typical sections for each concept
Section 500-Scope of Work
Page 111 of 115
high resolution, reproducible digital copy).
8. Summary of the study report with its high resolution, reproducible
not to exceed five pages. (Word and format).
9. Catalytic project implementation brief with its high
resolution, reproducible digital copy, not to exceed two pages (Word and
for use in private realm development efforts.
All associated supporting documents located in the appendices.
Twenty-five (25) Hard Color Copies of the Final Fifty (50) Hard ·Color
Copies of the Executive Summary and Ten 0) Color Copies Appendices.
Report should 8.5' 11' format.
12. All Photoshop, lnDesign, Illustrator, MSWord, MS Excel, photo, graphics
and other associated
500-Scope Work
Page 112 of 115
ATTACHMENTB
PLATINUM PLANNING ELEMENTS
The Platinum Planning Program provides an organized structure for CAMPO's Long-Range Planning
work. The program seeks to generate comprehensive and detailed multimodal planning at the local level
that will generate regionally significant benefits through projects and policies. The program aligns local
and regional planning through a progressive, integrated, and inclusive process. Plans completed as part of
this program meet shared goals and are inclusive of state of the practice elements consistent with 2040
Regional Transportation Plan goals. Specifically, these plans will outline synergies between
transportation, land use, and other planning areas to better understand how the system performs.
Recommendations from plans completed through . this program will inform future iterations of the
Regional Transportation Plan.
The Platinum Planning Program includes three spatial areas:
Subregions-Focuses on large areas across jurisdictional boundaries and travel sheds. These plans
will emphasize development of land use and transportation network scenarios that yield to a shared
vision across communities in the study area. Subregional efforts will also be inclusive of analysis and
recommendations for multiple corridors and centers (as described below), as well as other interstitial
areas.
Corridors-Focuses on mostly linear corridors and facilities across jurisdictional boundaries. These
plans will focus on projects specific to a principle corridor but also take into account adjacent and
intersecting facilities. Corridor planning will consider not only the context, form, and function of the
corridor but also how each corridor should perform as part of the larger system; specifically its
effectiveness at providing safe and efficient multimodal mobility between and access with-in centers.
Centers -Focuses on districts and areas of typically one square mile or less, but may also include
elements of corridor planning, particularly as corridors connect nodes. Centers plans will provide
clear guidance on how to develop vibrant mixed-use environments that possess the density, diversity
and design attributes that produce lower VMT, and support transit, bicycling, and walking ..
Platinum Planning seeks to integrate:
1. Multi-modal and Mixed-use -Create connections to housing, jobs, and services through, the
establishment of dynamic mixed-use environments, well-connected street grids, high-quality transit
options, as well as safe and useful pedestrian/bicycle accommodations.
2. Housing -Develop a mix of housing types and price points appropriate for the study area context
that provides living options that can accommodate a variety of incomes, abilities, and familial
types.
3. Environment-Create a healthy environment that proactively protect and enhance air, water, land
and people.
4. Economic Development -Promote the economic competitiveness of the study area to yield
positive impacts on the local tax base, high-quality jobs, and community services.
5. Equity -Create positive social, economic, and environmental outcomes for. all residents and
stakeholders in the study areas while minimizing adverse impacts.
Georgetown Williams Drive Study
Page 113 of 115
Page 114 of 115
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
May 3, 2016
SUBJECT:
Presentatio n of the P lanning Dep artment 2015 End of the Year Report. Pres entation and Dis cus s io n
regarding d evelo p ment trends, gro wth p ro jec tions and a review of s ignificant projec ts in 2015. Sofia
Nelson, Planning Directo r
ITEM SUMMARY:
Presentatio n by s taff.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUBMITTED BY:
Sofia Nelson, C NU-A, P lanning Directo r
Page 115 of 115