HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_HARC_09.25.2014Notice of Meeting for the
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Historic and Architectural Review
Commission
of the City of Georgetown
September 25, 2014 at 6:00 PM
at Council and Courts Building, 101 E. 7th Street Georgetown, TX 78626
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the
ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please
contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City
Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose
authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A The Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC), appointed by the Mayor and the
City Council, is responsible for hearing and taking final action on Certificates of Design
Compliance applications based upon the City Council adopted Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines and Unified Development Code. The Commission may, at any time, recess the Regular
Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Director
or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code
Chapter 551.
Welcome and Meeting Procedures:
Staff Presentation
Applicant Presentation (Limited to ten minutes unless stated otherwise by the Commission)
Questions from Commission to Staff and Applicant
Comments from Citizens*
Applicant Response
Commission Deliberative Process
Commission Action
*Those who wish to speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the
recording secretary before the item they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to
address the Commission one time only for a maximum of three minutes.
Legislative Regular Agenda
B Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes from the August 28, 2014 regular meeting.
C Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations and signage for the property located at 1008 Rock Street bearing the legal
description of Lost Addition, Block 63 (PT), .19 acres (CDC-2014-032).
D Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations and signage for the property located at 115 West 7th Street, bearing the legal
description of City of Georgetown, Block 38, Lot 2-3, 1 (PT), .3581 acres (CDC-2014-033).
E Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
demolition for the property located at 321 West 8th Street bearing the legal description of City of
Georgetown, Block 42, Lot 5-3pts, 6pt, Block 43, Lot 1-4, Forest St/pt, 1.239 acres (CDC-2014-
034).
F Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
demolition and exterior alterations for the property located at 1802 South Austin Avenue bearing
the legal description of Lost Addition, Block 80(PT), 0.55 acres (CDC-2014-036).
G Conceptual review for proposed infill construction at 202 College Street
H Conceptual review for proposed project at 1804 South Ash Street
I Conceptual review for proposed exterior alterations at 812 South Main Street
J Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines Training - Renee Hanson
K Update from Sign Subcommittee.
L Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training.
M Staff updates and reminder of future meetings.
Adjournment
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice
of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public
at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2014, at __________, and remained so
posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
____________________________________
Jessica Brettle, City Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
The Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC), appointed by the Mayor and the
City Council, is responsible for hearing and taking final action on Certificates of Design
Compliance applications based upon the City Council adopted Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines and Unified Development Code. The Commission may, at any time, recess the Regular
Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Director
or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code
Chapter 551.
Welcome and Meeting Procedures:
Staff Presentation
Applicant Presentation (Limited to ten minutes unless stated otherwise by the Commission)
Questions from Commission to Staff and Applicant
Comments from Citizens*
Applicant Response
Commission Deliberative Process
Commission Action
*Those who wish to speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the
recording secretary before the item they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to
address the Commission one time only for a maximum of three minutes.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Frost, Recording Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes from the August 28, 2014 regular meeting.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Frost, Recording Secretary
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
HARC Minutes 08282014 Backup Material
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 1 of 4
Meeting: August 28, 2014
City of Georgetown, Texas
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Workshop
Minutes
Thursday, August 28, 2014 at 6:00 p.m.
Council and Courts Building
101 E. 7th Street, Georgetown, TX 78626
Members present: Anna Eby, Chair; Jennifer Brown, Nancy Knight, Vice‐ Chair; David Paul; Richard
Mee, and Mary Jo Winder.
Commissioners in Training present: Barbara Price and Rodolfo Martinez
Commissioners absent: Ty Gibson
Staff present: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner; Andreina Davila, Project Coordinator; Jackson Daly,
Executive Assistant; Tamera Baird, Chief Plans Reviewer; and Karen Frost, Recording Secretary.
A. Call to Order by Eby at 6:01 p.m. with the reading of the meeting procedures.
* Those who speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the recording
secretary before the item that they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to address the
Commission one time only for a maximum of three (3) minutes.
This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose
authorized by the Open Meeting Act, Texas Government Code 551.
Legislative Agenda:
B. Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes from the June 26, 2014 regular meeting.
Motion by Mee to approve the minutes as submitted. Second by Knight. Approved 6 – 0.
C. Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes of the July 24, 2014 Workshop session.
Motion by Knight to approve the minutes as submitted. Second by Mee. Approved 6 – 0.
D. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations for the property located at 114 East 7th Street, bearing the legal description of City
of Georgetown, Block 40, Lot 1, 4, .33 acres (CDC‐2014‐017).
Synatschk presented the staff report. The applicant seeks a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC)
for exterior alterations to the Low Priority historic structure located at 114 East 7th Street. The project
involves altering the south (rear) building façade by removing two historic windows, replacing one
window to match existing windows, installing two new exit doors, and restoring existing windows,
as well as painting the structure with color matched paint (Exhibit 1).
The property owner wishes to divide the interior of the structure in to smaller spaces, requiring the
addition of the secondary doors. The windows proposed for removal are partially shielded from the
public view by the eastern portion of building, reducing the impact on the historic significance of the
structure and character of the district. The windows adjacent to the public right‐of‐way will be
rehabilitated, including restoring the frames and removing the paint from the glass. The Design
Guidelines generally discourage the removal of architectural elements from a façade; however, the
limited visibility reduces the impact on the structure. Additionally, the proposed location for the new
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 2 of 4
Meeting: August 28, 2014
doors has the lowest overall impact on the structure. The wall around the doors will be restored with
new galvanized metal, matching the existing historic material.
The proposed unadorned doors are appropriate for the structure. City staff recommends the
proposed white doors be painted to match the building, further reducing the visual impact of the
exterior alteration. The applicant was not present for comments.
Eby opened the Public Hearing and with speakers coming forth, closed the public hearing.
Motion by Mee to approve the CDC as submitted with the condition that the proposed exterior
doors be painted to match the exterior building color. Second by Winder. Approved 6 – 0.
E. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for an
addition for the property located at 410 South Myrtle Street, bearing the legal description of
Glasscock Addition, Block 14, Lot 8, .16 acres (CDC‐2014‐028).
Synatschk presented the staff report. The proposed project for the Medium Priority historic structure
located at 401 South Myrtle Street adds additional square footage to the rear of the structure, creating
a more useful space for the property owner. The addition is placed at the rear of the structure,
limiting the impact on the historic significance and architectural features. The 350‐square foot
addition creates an increase in square footage of approximately 16%, in conformance with the
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines. Board and batten siding will be utilized to create the
material differentiation between the historic structure and the new construction.
The application was deemed complete by staff and contains sufficient information to review the
proposed project. The proposed project is in compliance with the standards set forth by the Unified
Development Code and the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines. The new addition and roof
do not significantly alter the integrity of the historic structure and are compatible with the
surrounding historic properties.
J. Bryant Boyd, the applicant, was available for questions and comments.
Eby opened the Public Hearing and with speakers coming forth, closed the public hearing.
Motion by Knight to approve CDC‐2014 ‐ 028 as submitted. Second by Mee. Approved 6 – 0.
F. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations for the property located at 713 South Main Street, bearing the legal description of
City of Georgetown, Block 40, Lot 6 (SW/PT), .069 acres (CDC‐2014‐029).
Synatschk presented the staff report. The Escape business located at 713 S. Main Street on the
Courthouse Square wishes to update its business image. The update includes exterior paint and
signage for the structure. Additionally, the windows located on the second floor are proposed to be
restored. New business signage includes a canopy mounted sign, hanging sign, and window and
door signage. The exterior paint and signage design are coordinated to reflect the line of products
available for purchase.
The structure experienced a fire in the 1930’s, at which time the exterior masonry was painted to
cover the scorch marks. Based upon the Design Guidelines, the repainting of the structure is
appropriate. The paint colors are selected to highlight the key architectural features of the structure,
including the character defining storefront components, decorative stonework and windows. The
signs will be mounted on the canopy to prevent the obstruction of architectural elements of the
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 3 of 4
Meeting: August 28, 2014
second floor. Small lights will be installed on the canopy to provide backlighting for the proposed
sign. The proposed project complies with the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines and
allows the property owner to refresh their business, ensuring continued success on the Square.
Len Lester, the applicant/ Owner, was present for questions and stated that after 18 years in business,
they wanted to update and remarket their business.
Knight confirmed that the doors are wood and would remain wood. Lester also confirmed that the
current name and date on the building were painted green and would be changed to a dark blue,
matching the new gutter color. Knight asked if the sign was bigger. Lester explained that the
signage was slightly smaller overall.
Winder asked about the painted finials and exterior. Lester explained that the exterior was painted
after the fire in the late 1930’s. There was further discussion of attempts as removing the painted
exterior to reveal the limestone. Mee commented that he thinks the new paint choices are excellent.
Eby opened the Public Hearing and with speakers coming forth, closed the public hearing.
Winder made comments about the colors being too bold and bright for stone elements, citing Design
Guidelines 11.5, 11.6 and 5.1, explaining that the paint obscures the elements and the owner should
be using more earth tones.
Motion by Mee to approve the CDC as submitted. Second by Paul. Approved 5 – 1. (Winder
opposed.)
G. Discussion and possible action to reduce the development delay for unapproved demolition of a
historic accessory structure at 913 Walnut Street.
Synatschk presented pictures of the property and explained that the contractor for this project had
removed an accessory structure with the plan to rebuild another structure, only bigger, on the same
location. He explained that there was no documentation that indicated this to be an historical
structure, so the assumption is that it is. Since a CDC was not granted for demolition prior to the
demolition, the contractor was issued a stop work order and was ordered to submit a request to
HARC. The UDC process states that a project can be delayed for up to 365 days, or a time that is
deemed appropriate by the Commission.
John Lawton, the applicant/contractor, was present for discussion. He explained that when he took
the walls down, he knew he should have gone to the City, but made the choice to go ahead and
remove the structure. He explained that he did have a permit at the time to rebuild the new structure
and because there were several reasons to keep moving forward, he decided to keep going.
Mee confirmed that the city does not have record that this was a historic structure. Synatschk
explained that the accessory structure was not listed on any survey. Knight confirmed that the city
issued a permit to rebuild the structure and then stopped the work when it was discovered that it
might be historic.
Knight expressed concern that there is a big “disconnect” between demolition of big historic houses
and small non‐historic or decaying shacks and garages in people’s backyards. She wants to reduce
the delay period so citizens will be more inclined to apply for CDC’s and use the process. Winder
expressed concern about the definition of historic versus historically significant.
Motion by Paul to reduce the delay period to 100 days based upon the demolition has limited impact
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 4 of 4
Meeting: August 28, 2014
on the remaining historic significance of the property, and the 365 day delay constitutes a risk to
health, safety and wellness. Second by Eby. Motion failed 2 – 4. (Brown, Mee, Winder and Knight
opposed.)
Motion by Knight to reduce the delay period to 45 days from July 17, with an expiration of August
31, before application for a CDC for demolition, based upon the demolition has limited impact on
the remaining historic significance of the property, and the 365 day delay constitutes a risk to
health, safety and wellness. Second by Mee. Approved 4 – 2. (Paul and Eby opposed.)
H. Conceptual review for 1802 South Austin Avenue.
J. Bryant Boyd, the architect for this propose project presented the concept plan of residential
structure renovation. The house is next door to the Georgian Apartments, for reference. The owners
are proposing to remove the upstairs addition and add additional rooms to the back of the existing
house, taking out a couple of non‐historic structures in the process. They intend to replace some
siding that is decayed, repair that which can be repaired and place new siding on the new areas of the
house. The replaced and new siding will be similar to the current lap siding. Their intent is to
renovate, not restore, while being respectful of the existing structure.
Commissioners did not offer many comments other than this looked like a good project and they look
forward to seeing the full application.
I. Update from Sign Subcommittee.
Knight reported that there is work being done on a new Business Owner brochure that will help
explain the sign regulations.
J. Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines Training ‐ Renee Hanson
This item was postponed until another meeting due to time restraints.
K. Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training.
There were no comments given.
L. Staff updates and reminder of future meetings.
Proposed Downtown Overlay Expansion is going through the public hearing process.
CLG Grant for National Register District update
9th Street streets and sidewalks, west of Austin Ave. are being worked on next.
Tin Barn Alley and 8th Street rehabilitation is ongoing.
Sign Subcommittee Meeting – Sept 9th @ 4:00 (No cases at this time, could be cancelled.)
HARC Meeting – September 25th , 5:30 Sign Subcommittee (tbd) and 6:00 regular meeting.
Adjournment. Eby adjourned the meeting at 7:26 p.m.
________________________________ __________________________________
Approved, Anna Eby, Chair Attest, Nancy Knight
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations and signage for the property located at 1008 Rock Street bearing the legal
description of Lost Addition, Block 63 (PT), .19 acres (CDC-2014-032).
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown is in receipt of a request for a CDC for a new awning and monument
signage for the business located at 1008 Rock Street. According to the submitted letter of intent,
the applicant wishes to install an awning to protect clients from the weather and add additional
signage for the business. The property was previously used as a residence, but was rezoned to the
Mixed Use – Downtown zoning district in September.
Staff recommends approval of the request based on the findings that the request meets the criteria
of Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code (UDC), as outlined in the attached Staff
Report.
The affirmative vote of the majority of the HARC members is required to approve the CDC
request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. The applicant has paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
CDC-2014-032 Staff Report Backup Material
CDC-2014-032 Exhibit 1 Backup Material
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-032 1008 Rock Street Page 1 of 4
Meeting Date: September 25, 2014 Agenda Item: C
File Number: CDC-2014-032
AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations and signage for the property located at 1008 Rock Street bearing the legal
description of Lost Addition, Block 63 (PT), 0.19 acres (CDC-2014-032)
AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
Project Name: Painting With a Twist Exterior Alterations and Signage
Applicant: John Jennings and Ray Shawley
Property Owner: John Jennings
Property Address: 1008 Rock Street
Legal Description: Lost Addition, Block 63 (PT), 0.19 acres
Historic Overlay: Downtown, Area 2
Case History: This is the first CDC public hearing for the case. The property was recently
rezoned from Residential Single Family (RS) to Mixed Use – Downtown (MU-
DT) District
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Date of construction: 1916
Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: 1984 – Medium
2007 - Low
National Register Designation: None
Texas Historical Commission Designation: None
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant requests a CDC to install an awning over the primary entrance to the building, and
signage for the business. The awning measures 10 feet across and projects 4.67 feet from the structure.
The signage includes a freestanding sign in the front yard, a sign mounted on the wall by the primary
entrance, and signage printed on the awning, in accordance with the following details:
Sign Type Awning
Size 4.88 square feet
Materials Vinyl, canvas
Location Printed on the awning
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-032 1008 Rock Street Page 2 of 4
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines:
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
9.1 Consider the building front as part of an overall sign program. Complies
9.3 A primary sign should identify the services or business offered within. Complies
9.5 Freestanding or pole mounted signs may be considered. Complies
9.6 A flush-mounted wall sign may be considered. Complies
9.11 Awning and canopy signs may be considered. Complies
9.19 Use colors for the sign that are compatible with those of the building front Complies
9.25 Signage should have a professional quality and a finished appearance Complies
10.1 An awning compatible in material and construction to the style of the
building is encouraged.
Does not comply
STAFF ANALYSIS
The 1916 Low priority structure was heavily modified by a previous property owner, with
modifications including enclosing the front porch. The loss of the front porch exposes the primary
entrance to the structure to the elements, hampering access for the business clients. The proposed
awning will provide the protection for clients, allowing the business to function more effectively.
The proposed awning is out of character with the original design for the historic structure; however,
the significant alterations to the structure have obscured many of the character defining elements,
allowing for the installation of the awning. The proposed awning is appropriate for the current
condition of the structure, based upon the loss of character defining elements, specifically the front
porch and roof line.
The proposed signs comply with the Design Guidelines. The use of the flush mounted and awning sigs
are appropriate for the structure, and freestanding signs are appropriate for residential structures that
Sign Type Freestanding Monument (2 panels)
Size 48 sq feet (24 per panel)
Materials Vinyl printed on MDO
Location Placed in front yard
Sign Type Flush mounted
Size 6 square feet
Materials Vinyl printed on MDO
Location Mounted next to the primary entrance
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-032 1008 Rock Street Page 3 of 4
have been converted to commercial use with a street setback. The height of the freestanding signage
allows the property to retain its residential character, while allowing the business owner to promote the
business.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the
following criteria:
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and
final action;
The application was deemed complete by
staff on September 3, 2014.
B. Compliance with any design standards of the
Unified Development Code;
The project complies with the design
standards of the Unified Development Code.
C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design
Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time,
specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay
District;
The project complies with the Downtown
and Old Town Design Guidelines, as
outlined in the staff analysis.
D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is
preserved.
The proposed project protects the remaining
integrity of the structure. The awning does
not negatively impact the integrity due to
the previous loss of the character defining
features.
E. New buildings or additions are designed to be
compatible with surrounding historic properties.
No new buildings or additions are
proposed.
F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable
Overlay District is protected.
The proposed project does not have an
adverse effect on the Downtown Overlay
District
G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted
design standards, and are not in character with
the site or landmarks within the Historic or
applicable Overlay District in question will not be
permitted.
The proposed signs comply with the
Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines.
H. The following may also be considered by the
HARC when determining whether to approve a
Certificate for Design Compliance:
1. The effect of the proposed change upon the
general historic, cultural, and architectural
nature of the site, landmark, or District.
2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural
The proposed project complies with the
supplemental criteria by limiting the impact
on the structure and the Downtown Overlay
District. The project protects the remaining
historic integrity of the structure and
preserves the residential feel of Rock Street,
in compliance with the Design Guidelines.
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-032 1008 Rock Street Page 4 of 4
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
features, including parking and loading
spaces, which can be seen from a public street,
alley, or walkway.
3. The general design, arrangement, texture,
material, and color of the building or structure
and the relation of such factors to similar
features of buildings or structures in the
District, contrast or other relation of such
factors to other landmarks built at or during
the same period, as well as the uniqueness of
such features, considering the remaining
examples of architectural, historical, and
cultural values.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of CDC-2014-032 as presented.
As of the date of this report, staff has received no written comments regarding the request.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 – Letter of Intent and specifications
SUBMITTED BY
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations and signage for the property located at 115 West 7th Street, bearing the legal
description of City of Georgetown, Block 38, Lot 2-3, 1 (PT), .3581 acres (CDC-2014-033).
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown is in receipt of a request for a CDC for exterior paint and new signage for
the business located at 115 West 7th Street. According to the submitted letter of intent, the
applicant wishes to paint the structure and reface the existing sign in the same colors.
Staff recommends approval of the request based on the findings that the request meets the
approval criteria of Section3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code (UDC), as outlined in the
attached Staff Report.
The affirmative vote of the majority of the HARC members is required to approve the CDC
request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. The applicant paid the required application fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
CDC-2014-033 Staff Report Backup Material
CDC-2014-033 Exhibit 1 Backup Material
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-033 115 West 7th Street Page 1 of 4
Meeting Date: September 25, 2014 Agenda Item: D
File Number: CDC-2014-033
AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations for the property located at 115 West 7th Street, bearing the legal description of City
of Georgetown, Block 38, Lot 2-3, 1 (PT), 0.3581 acres
AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
Project Name: DIVA – Exterior paint and signage
Applicant: Jeannine Weisbrod
Property Address: 115 West 7th Street
Legal Description: City of Georgetown, Block 38, Lot 2-3, 1 (PT), 0.3581 acres
Historic Overlay: Downtown, Area 1
Case History: This is the first public hearing for this case.
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Date of construction: 1903
Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: High Priority
National Register Designation: Contributing structure in the National Register district
Texas Historical Commission Designation: No state designation
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant requests a CDC to paint the structure in the color scheme outlined in the attached
materials, and reface the existing sign to match the colors selected for the structure.
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines:
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
9.1 Consider the building front as part of an overall sign program. Complies
9.3 A primary sign should identify the services or business offered within. Complies
9.19 Use colors for the sign that are compatible with those of the building front Complies
9.25 Signage should have a professional quality and a finished appearance Complies
11.1 Develop a color scheme for the entire building that coordinates all the
façade elements.
Complies
11.2 Paint colors should enhance individual building elements while creating a
unified, coordinated appearance for the entire structure.
Complies
11.3 A muted color is preferred for the base color of most buildings. Complies
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-033 115 West 7th Street Page 2 of 4
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
11.5 In general, use bright colors for accents only. Complies
11.6 Paint colors should highlight architectural details. Complies
STAFF ANALYSIS
The business located at 115 West 7th Street on the north side of the Courthouse Square wishes to update
its business image. The update includes exterior paint and signage for the structure.
The structure was constructed in 1903 and is listed as a high priority structure on the City’s List of
Priority Structures (aka Historic Resources Survey). Additionally, the structure is a contributing
structure to the Williamson County Courthouse Square National Register District.
Based upon the Design Guidelines, the repainting of the structure is appropriate. The paint colors,
identified as Storm Cloud Gray, Horizon Gray and Old Prairie in Exhibit 1, are selected to highlight the
key architectural features of the structure, including the character defining storefront components,
decorative metalwork and windows. The key architectural features of the structure are preserved and
highlighted with the paint selection.
The sign will remain mounted on the canopy to prevent the obstruction of architectural elements of the
second floor. The sign will use the Storm Cloud Gray for the Background, with the business name
painted in Old Prairie.
The proposed project complies with the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines and allows the
property owner to refresh their business, ensuring continued success on the Square.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the
following criteria:
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and
final action;
The application was deemed complete by
staff on August 20, 2014.
B. Compliance with any design standards of the
Unified Development Code;
The design standards outlined in the UDC
do not apply to this project.
C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design
Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time,
specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay
District;
The proposed project complies with the
Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines as outlined above.
D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is The project preserves the historic integrity of
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-033 115 West 7th Street Page 3 of 4
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
preserved. the structure and enhances the individual
historic components.
E. New buildings or additions are designed to be
compatible with surrounding historic properties.
The proposed project does not include a new
building or addition.
F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable
Overlay District is protected.
The proposed project is in character with the
Downtown Overlay District.
G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted
design standards, and are not in character with
the site or landmarks within the Historic or
applicable Overlay District in question will not be
permitted.
The proposed signage complies with the
Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines.
H. The following may also be considered by the
HARC when determining whether to approve a
Certificate for Design Compliance:
1. The effect of the proposed change upon the
general historic, cultural, and architectural
nature of the site, landmark, or District.
2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural
features, including parking and loading
spaces, which can be seen from a public street,
alley, or walkway.
3. The general design, arrangement, texture,
material, and color of the building or structure
and the relation of such factors to similar
features of buildings or structures in the
District, contrast or other relation of such
factors to other landmarks built at or during
the same period, as well as the uniqueness of
such features, considering the remaining
examples of architectural, historical, and
cultural values.
The proposed project has no adverse effect
on the overall character of the Downtown
Overlay District, and protects the historic
integrity of the individual structure. The
proposed paint scheme and signs are
appropriate for the structure and the district.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of CDC-2014-033 as presented.
As of the date of this report, staff has received no written comments regarding the request.
ATTACHMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-033 115 West 7th Street Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 1 – Applicant’s Letter of Intent, plans and specifications
SUBMITTED BY
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
Storm Cloud Gray Old Prairie Horizon Gray
Proposed Paint scheme for 115 West 7th Street
February 24, 2014
Texas Main Street Center Design Report
Re: 115 W 7th Street/ Diva
City: Georgetown
By: Sarah Blankenship Project Design Assistant and Howard Langner Architect
Not for regulatory approval, permitting, or construction
Howard Langner, Architect, Texas Historical Commission
Prior to making any improvements to the building façade(s), the building owner should perform a thorough review of the major structural components
of the building, including the roof, walls, and foundation. All mechanical and electrical systems should be well maintained in conformity with
applicable codes and ordinances. Building uses and interior arrangements of program spaces should also be in conformity with applicable codes and
ordinances.
Design Request and Existing Conditions
Main Street staff, Sarah Blankenship, visited the building at 115 West Seventh Street on February 20, 2014. The
business owner, Jeannine Weisbrod, would like to change the exterior
façade colors. Ms. Weisbrod conveyed the business would like a cleaner
simpler look and the business is ready to move away from the purple.
Specific colors were provided;
Sherwin Williams 7023 Requisite
Gray, Sherwin Williams 7675
Sealskin, and Benjamin Moore
AF-655 Silhouette.
Current photos
Page 2 of 9
Design Options:
Rendering #1:
The first rendering illustrates the colors requested by Jeanine
Weisbrod both close-up and in context with the neighboring
buildings. The two gray colors selected are very similar and
the difference will be very slight on the renderings, therefore,
only one gray is shown. It is very difficult to get colors
exactly right from one digital format to another. The
renderings presented attempt to show as close as possible the
colors selected in order to visualize what the colors may look
like on the entire building.
Page 3 of 9
Rendering #2:
Also discussed on site visit was the possibility of painting the columns the dark gray color, rendering two illustrates
this option.
Report continues on following page
Page 4 of 9
Rendering #3:
Diva would like to change their signage
in the near future, but have not yet
decided what the new signage will look
like. The logo and type font will remain
the same. One signage example is
shown below that allows visibility of all
the second floor windows is shown.
Signage could be attached to the canopy
in a similar fashion to the Milk + Honey
example seen to the right.
Page 5 of 9
The above color schemes are monochromatic using strictly the grayscale. Color can be a very subjective topic. In
general the goal is to have a color scheme be compatible with the rest of the Main Street City and not be too
overpowering. Thus more muted colors are typically selected for the majority of the building and more vibrant
colors limited to smaller accent areas. The buildings surrounding Diva use more vibrant colors than the proposed
Grays; however, the Palace theatre further south does use a grayscale color scheme.
Diva’s storefront is a Mesker Storefront. This was a company that produced entire pressed metal facades. Pressed
metal was a more cost efficient way to create a storefront with intricate designs than carved stone. Georgetown has
several Mesker storefronts. There have been many approaches to color over the years on pressed metal façades.
One approach was to paint the pressed metal a color of local stone to make the storefront appear like it was actually
carved stone. Another approach used one accent color to pop out some of the detailing. “The painted lady”
approach used multiple colors to accent as many details as possible. No one approach is better than the other, there
is debate, but ultimately a majority of the decision comes down to personal preference.
There is an interesting article titled “Don’t Faint, it’s just Paint” which looks at different colors on Mesker Facades.
It can be found here: http://meskerbrothers.wordpress.com/2011/10/12/dont-faint-its-just-paint/ . Below are
some different color examples from that article.
The renderings on the following pages show additional colors added to the preferred gray color scheme.
Page 6 of 9
Rendering #4: Rendering four suggests adding a little red on the interior window sash and the canopy fascia
Rendering #5: Rendering four suggests adding a little blue on the interior window sash, the canopy fascia, and the
cornice
Page 7 of 9
Rendering #6:
Rendering six uses the carved stone approach by painting all the pressed metal the same color. Accent colors are
left for the signage and canopy fascia.
Rendering #7: Brown and green are used as accent colors in this option.
Page 8 of 9
Rendering #8:
Rendering eight suggests a darker base color with light accents on the detailing. Note how this approach changes
how the building reads against the neighboring buildings.
Rendering #9: This option uses the most colors falling into the “painted lady” approach. Red, gray, blue and
green are shown.
Page 9 of 9
Guidance for Rehabilitation
The Texas Main Street Program helps Texas cities revitalize their historic downtowns and neighborhood
commercial districts by utilizing preservation and economic development strategies. The Secretary of the Interior’s
Standards for Rehabilitation is a list of ten ways to approach rehabilitation on historic buildings. The Texas
Historical Commission uses this list of standards when analyzing and making recommendations for a project. The
standards can be found here: http://www.nps.gov/hps/tps/standguide/rehab/rehab_standards.htm
Rehabilitation is defined as "the process of returning a property to a state of utility, through repair or alteration,
which makes possible an efficient contemporary use while preserving those portions and features of the property
which are significant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values."
Funding
There are many options for funding preservation projects. As part of a designated Main Street community, the
property owner has as a resource the local Main Street manager who can help you research and identify sources of
additional funding.
The THC and TMSP also can make available various documents they have compiled that comprehe nsively identify
many of these avenues for funding and financing. These include “Funding Methods for Main Street
Communities, 2012” and “THC Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 2012”. There are funding
sources at the local, state and federal levels and they are outlined in those documents. The list provides only brief
summaries of potential funding sources, and information including eligibility requirements and application deadlines
that are subject to change without notice. Please contact possible grantors directly for more information on their
programs.
If the scope of work exceeds available sources of funding, the project should be phased accordingly, but these
options for funding can still be utilized.
While the availability of some of these funding sources will vary depending on certain characteristics of your
building or whether your community participates in certain programs, some tools to points out are:
Certified Local Government is a program in the Texas Historical Commission (THC) that has a grants
component. For more information please visit http://www.thc.state.tx.us/grantsincent/graclg.shtml.
Investment Tax Credits are available at the federal level. For more information please see
http://www.nps.gov/hps/tps/tax/index.htm .
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) tax credit/deduction for making ADA improvements. Please see
http://www.ada.gov/taxcred.htm for more information.
Brownfields Site Assessment (BSA) Program and the Targeted Brownfields Assessment (TBA) are for
properties that are being underutilized or where a property transaction is complicated by the real or
perceived presence of contamination, which can include asbestos and lead paint. The Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (TCEQ), in cooperation with local, state, and federal partners, is facilitating cleanup
and revitalization of brownfields properties in Texas through regulatory, tax, and technical assistance. For
more information visit: http://www.tceq.texas.gov/remediation/bsa/bsa.html/ or call 512-239-1000. The
TCEQ works very closely with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) which offers a free Targeted
Brownfields Assessment (TBA). Contact the EPA Region 6 Main Office at 214-665-2760 or 1-800-887-6063
http://www.epa.gov/region6/r6coment.htm
Localized financial tools can include façade grants or other direct assistance programs that come through
sources such as local economic development organizations.
After the owner has had a chance to review the recommended concept, the Texas Main Street Design Center Staff
will work with the owner(s) to help develop their rehabilitation plan for this particular building. It is also
requested that TMSDC be notified when clarification of design elements might prove helpful or when an alternate
scheme is contemplated. Please contact Sarah Blankenship (512) 463-9129/ sarahb@thc.state.tx.us or Howard
Langner (512) 305-9045/ howard.langner@thc.state.tx.us.
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
demolition for the property located at 321 West 8th Street bearing the legal description of City of
Georgetown, Block 42, Lot 5-3pts, 6pt, Block 43, Lot 1-4, Forest St/pt, 1.239 acres (CDC-2014-
034).
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown is in receipt of a request for a CDC for demolition of two non-historic
structures located in Area 2 of the Downtown Overlay District. According to the submitted letter
of intent, the applicant wishes to demolish the structures to develop a parking lot. The demolition
is required as part of the interlocal lease agreement executed between the City of Georgetown and
Williamson County on August 12, 2014.
Staff recommends approval of the request based on the findings that the meets the approval criteria
of Sections 3.13.030 and 3.13.040 of the Unified Development Code (UDC), as outlined in the
attached Staff Report.
The affirmative vote of the majority of the HARC members is required to approve the CDC
request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. The fees were waived for the city project.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
CDC-2014-034 Staff Report Backup Material
CDC-2014-034 Exhibit 1 Backup Material
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-034 321 West 8th Street Page 1 of 5
Meeting Date: September 25, 2014 Agenda Item: E
File Number: CDC-2014-034
AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
demolition for the property located at 321 West 8th Street bearing the legal description of City of
Georgetown, Block 42, Lot 5 – 3-4pts, 6pt, Block 43, Lot 1-4, Forest St/pt, 1.239 acres
AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
Project Name: City of Georgetown 8th & MLK Parking Lot Project
Applicant: City of Georgetown
Property Owner: Williamson County
Property Address: 321 West 8th Street
Legal Description: City of Georgetown, Block 42, Lot 5 – 3-4pts, 6pt, Block 43, Lot 1-4, Forest St/pt,
1.239 acres
Historic Overlay: Downtown, Area 2
Case History: This is the first public hearing for the case.
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Date of construction: 1970 and 1972
Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: Not listed
National Register Designation: Not listed
Texas Historical Commission Designation: Not listed
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant requests a CDC for Demolition to demolish two (2) non-historic buildings located at 321
West 8th Street to facilitate construction of a new city parking lot. The demolition is included in the
interlocal agreement between the City of Georgetown and Williamson County dated August 12, 2014.
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines:
GUIDELINES
The Design Guidelines are not applicable for demolition
STAFF ANALYSIS
The applicant requests approval of a CDC for Demolition to remove two (2) non-contributing
structures and construct a new parking lot to accommodate the parking needs of the Georgetown
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-034 321 West 8th Street Page 2 of 5
Public Library and future City offices. The City of Georgetown and Williamson County executed and
interlocal lease agreement on August 12, 2014 to allow use of the county property by the city. The
agreement included the demolition of the two non-historic structures, which are currently vacant.
In accordance with Section 3.13.D.1 of the UDC, “No building or structure within the Downtown
Overlay District, Old Town Overlay District or any other Historic Overlay District or on the List of
Priority Structures shall be demolished or relocated unless such demolition or relocation is approved
by the Historic and Architectur al Review Commission and a Certificate of Design Compliance for such
demolition has been granted. However, this authority shall not supersede the Building Official’s
authority under Chapter 15.40, “Dangerous Building Ordinance,” of the Georgetown Municipal
Code.” The subject property is located within the Downtown Overlay District, requiring an approved
CDC for Demolition prior to demolition.
UDC Section 3.13.010.D details the applicability requirements for a CDC for Demolition. In accordance
with the UDC, the Demolition Subcommittee was appointed on December 12, 2013. The subcommittee
met with the applicant and conducted a site visit of the subject property on August 14, 2014, to
establish the minimum requirements for application submittal. According to the submitted application,
the applicant is requesting a CDC for Demolition pursuant to Section 3.13.020.D.1.d: The structure is
noncontributing to the historic overlay district and is not historically significant.
The 1970 and 1972 structures are not listed on the 1984 and 2007 Historic Resources Survey. The date of
construction, documented in the Williamson County Appraisal District Tax records included in Exhibit
1, demonstrates that the structures are not eligible for historic designation due to their age.
The request to demolish the two (2) non-historic structures complies with Criterion D.4 of the City’s
Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 3.13.040. The two (2) buildings are non-historic and do not
contribute to the historic significance of the district. Additionally, the structures are less than 50 years
old and the demolition of the structure will not adversely affect the historic character of the property or
the integrity of the historic overlay district.
The request complies with UDC 3.13.040 D (4), based upon the date of construction and the limited
impact on the historic significance of the Downtown Overlay District.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the
following criteria:
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and
final action;
The application was submitted on August
20th and deemed complete on August 25th.
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-034 321 West 8th Street Page 3 of 5
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
B. Compliance with any design standards of the
Unified Development Code;
The design standards of the UDC do not
apply to this case.
C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design
Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time,
specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay
District;
The demolition request is not subject to
review for compliance with the Downtown
and Old Town Design Guidelines
D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is
preserved.
Approval of the demolition will result in the
removal of two (2) non-historic structures.
E. New buildings or additions are designed to be
compatible with surrounding historic properties.
No new buildings or additions are proposed
with this request.
F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable
Overlay District is protected.
The overall character of the Downtown
Overlay District will not be adversely
affected by the demolition of the two (2)
non-historic structures.
G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted
design standards, and are not in character with
the site or landmarks within the Historic or
applicable Overlay District in question will not be
permitted.
No signage is proposed with this request.
H. The following may also be considered by the
HARC when determining whether to approve a
Certificate for Design Compliance:
1. The effect of the proposed change upon the
general historic, cultural, and architectural
nature of the site, landmark, or District.
2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural
features, including parking and loading
spaces, which can be seen from a public street,
alley, or walkway.
3. The general design, arrangement, texture,
material, and color of the building or structure
and the relation of such factors to similar
features of buildings or structures in the
District, contrast or other relation of such
factors to other landmarks built at or during
the same period, as well as the uniqueness of
such features, considering the remaining
examples of architectural, historical, and
cultural values.
The request does not have a significant effect
on the overall character of the Downtown
Overlay District and no new construction is
being reviewed as part of this demolition
request.
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-034 321 West 8th Street Page 4 of 5
In addition to the approval criteria listed above, the HARC must also consider the following criteria for
a request for CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Historic Structure:
SECTION 3.13.040 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The uniqueness of the structure as a
representative type of style of architecture,
historic association, or other element of the
original designation criteria applicable to such
structure or tract;
The structure is not representative of an
architectural style, not associated with
historic events and is not a contributing
structure to the district.
B. The condition of the structure from the standpoint
of structure integrity and the extent of work
necessary to stabilize the structure; and
The structures are non-historic, and do not
retain a significant level of structural
integrity.
C. The status of the structure under Chapter 15 of the
Georgetown City Code containing Building Safety
Standards and rules governing Dangerous
Buildings.
The structures have not been deemed to be a
dangerous building.
D. And make the following findings:
4.a. The current structure is noncontributing to the
historic overlay district.
The current structures are noncontributing
to the historic overlay district, based upon
age and no association to historically
significant events, people or architectural
styles.
4.b. The structure is newer than the period of
significance for the historic overlay district and is
not historically significant.
The structures were built in 1970 and 1972,
as indicated on the WCAD appraisal rolls.
They are not representative of a time period,
architectural style, event or possible
archeological resources that would make
them significant.
4.c. Demolition of the structure will not adversely
affect the historic character of the property or the
integrity of the historic overlay district.
The demolition of the non-historic structures
will not result in the loss of the historic
integrity of the district. The structures are
located in Downtown, Area 2, and
surrounded primarily by non-historic
structures, limiting the impact on the
Downtown Overlay District.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of the CDC-2014-034 as presented.
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-034 321 West 8th Street Page 5 of 5
As of the date of this report, staff has received no written comments regarding the application.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 – Current photos and tax records
SUBMITTED BY
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
August 19, 2014
Dear HARC Commissioners,
The City of Georgetown requests approval for a Certificate of Design Compliance to demolish
two non-historic buildings located within the Downtown Overlay District. The buildings have
construction dates of 1970 and 1972 according to the Williamson County Appraisal District
records.
The demolition of the two buildings allows the City to construct a parking lot at the intersection
of West 8th Street and Martin Luther King, Jr Street, creating additional parking for the
Georgetown Public Library and the Downtown Square.
The current dirt lot is in violation of the City of Georgetown’s Unified Development Code
regarding approved parking surfaces, and requires the construction of an impervious parking
area for visitors to the downtown area.
Current aerial and street level photos are included for your review, along with the Williamson
County Appraisal District Tax Records with dates of construction. We appreciate the
opportunity to present the application to the Commission.
Sincerely,
Matt Synatschk
Historic Planner
City of Georgetown, TX
Proposed demolition
F
O
R
E
S
T
S
T
W 7TH S T
W 8TH S T
±401 West 8th Street & 402 West 7th StreetProposed Demolition
Southeast corner
Southwest corner
Northeast corner
SPTB Description Area Market Ag Value
Type ValueEff YearAreaDescriptionYear Built
Bedrooms
2014 2013 2012 2011
Land Segments
Sales
Situs Address
321 W 8TH ST
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
FlooringRoofInteriorExteriorFoundationConstruction
Current Owner Legal Description Exemptions Market
WILLIAMSON COUNTY (O481671)
710 S MAIN ST STE 301
GEORGETOWN,TX 78626
S3667 - Georgetown City Of, BLOCK 42, Lot 5 - 3-4pts,6pt, Block 43,
Lot 1-4, Forest St/pt, ACRES 1.239
EX
Entities
CGT, GWI, RFM, SGT, T03
Unavailable
Assessed
Unavailable
History Information
Building Attributes
CHCA 1 1970
Improvements
Imp HS
Imp NHS
Land HS
Land NHS
Ag Mkt
Ag Use
Tim Mkt
Tim Use
HS Cap
$0
Assessed
$278,950
$0
$539,170
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$818,120
$0
$276,385
$0
$505,169
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$781,554
$0
$250,403
$0
$485,739
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$736,142
$0
$224,377
$0
$485,739
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$710,116
Date Volume Page Seller Name
Heat/AC Baths Fireplace Year Built Rooms
ISE08 SLB ML UNF GBL CON
CITY OF GEORGETOWN 200505756707/27/2005
TESSCO, GROUP INC895216206/15/1992
TESSCO, INC372 WD1803 (1.239)07/24/1989
EVANS W & REHLER LENA49178112/28/1979
CommercialC
197019704080Main AreaMA
53971.0000FCommercialXV
Page of1 4R041417
2015 08/19/2014Williamson Central Appraisal District
SPTB Description Area Market Ag Value
Type ValueEff YearAreaDescriptionYear Built
Bedrooms
2014 2013 2012 2011
Land Segments
Sales
Situs Address
321 W 8TH ST
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
FlooringRoofInteriorExteriorFoundationConstruction
Current Owner Legal Description Exemptions Market
WILLIAMSON COUNTY (O481671)
710 S MAIN ST STE 301
GEORGETOWN,TX 78626
S3667 - Georgetown City Of, BLOCK 42, Lot 5 - 3-4pts,6pt, Block 43,
Lot 1-4, Forest St/pt, ACRES 1.239
EX
Entities
CGT, GWI, RFM, SGT, T03
Unavailable
Assessed
Unavailable
History Information
Building Attributes
3 1972
Improvements
Imp HS
Imp NHS
Land HS
Land NHS
Ag Mkt
Ag Use
Tim Mkt
Tim Use
HS Cap
$0
Assessed
$278,950
$0
$539,170
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$818,120
$0
$276,385
$0
$505,169
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$781,554
$0
$250,403
$0
$485,739
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$736,142
$0
$224,377
$0
$485,739
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$710,116
Date Volume Page Seller Name
Heat/AC Baths Fireplace Year Built Rooms
ISE08 SLB ML UNF GBL CI
CITY OF GEORGETOWN 200505756707/27/2005
TESSCO, GROUP INC895216206/15/1992
TESSCO, INC372 WD1803 (1.239)07/24/1989
EVANS W & REHLER LENA49178112/28/1979
CommercialC
197219727200Main AreaMA
53971.0000FCommercialXV
Page of2 4R041417
2015 08/19/2014Williamson Central Appraisal District
SPTB Description Area Market Ag Value
Type ValueEff YearAreaDescriptionYear Built
Bedrooms
2014 2013 2012 2011
Land Segments
Sales
Situs Address
321 W 8TH ST
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
FlooringRoofInteriorExteriorFoundationConstruction
Current Owner Legal Description Exemptions Market
WILLIAMSON COUNTY (O481671)
710 S MAIN ST STE 301
GEORGETOWN,TX 78626
S3667 - Georgetown City Of, BLOCK 42, Lot 5 - 3-4pts,6pt, Block 43,
Lot 1-4, Forest St/pt, ACRES 1.239
EX
Entities
CGT, GWI, RFM, SGT, T03
Unavailable
Assessed
Unavailable
History Information
Building Attributes
CHCA 2 1980
Improvements
Imp HS
Imp NHS
Land HS
Land NHS
Ag Mkt
Ag Use
Tim Mkt
Tim Use
HS Cap
$0
Assessed
$278,950
$0
$539,170
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$818,120
$0
$276,385
$0
$505,169
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$781,554
$0
$250,403
$0
$485,739
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$736,142
$0
$224,377
$0
$485,739
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$710,116
Date Volume Page Seller Name
Heat/AC Baths Fireplace Year Built Rooms
ISE08 SLB ML UNF GBL CON
CITY OF GEORGETOWN 200505756707/27/2005
TESSCO, GROUP INC895216206/15/1992
TESSCO, INC372 WD1803 (1.239)07/24/1989
EVANS W & REHLER LENA49178112/28/1979
CommercialC
198019802000Main AreaMA
53971.0000FCommercialXV
Page of3 4R041417
2015 08/19/2014Williamson Central Appraisal District
SPTB Description Area Market Ag Value
Type ValueEff YearAreaDescriptionYear Built
Bedrooms
2014 2013 2012 2011
Land Segments
Sales
Situs Address
321 W 8TH ST
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
FlooringRoofInteriorExteriorFoundationConstruction
Current Owner Legal Description Exemptions Market
WILLIAMSON COUNTY (O481671)
710 S MAIN ST STE 301
GEORGETOWN,TX 78626
S3667 - Georgetown City Of, BLOCK 42, Lot 5 - 3-4pts,6pt, Block 43,
Lot 1-4, Forest St/pt, ACRES 1.239
EX
Entities
CGT, GWI, RFM, SGT, T03
Unavailable
Assessed
Unavailable
History Information
Building Attributes
CHCA 4 1980
Improvements
Imp HS
Imp NHS
Land HS
Land NHS
Ag Mkt
Ag Use
Tim Mkt
Tim Use
HS Cap
$0
Assessed
$278,950
$0
$539,170
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$818,120
$0
$276,385
$0
$505,169
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$781,554
$0
$250,403
$0
$485,739
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$736,142
$0
$224,377
$0
$485,739
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$710,116
Date Volume Page Seller Name
Heat/AC Baths Fireplace Year Built Rooms
ISE08 SLB ML SR GBL CP
CITY OF GEORGETOWN 200505756707/27/2005
TESSCO, GROUP INC895216206/15/1992
TESSCO, INC372 WD1803 (1.239)07/24/1989
EVANS W & REHLER LENA49178112/28/1979
CommercialC
198019807070Main AreaMA
1980198010000AsphaltA
53971.0000FCommercialXV
Page of4 4R041417
2015 08/19/2014Williamson Central Appraisal District
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
demolition and exterior alterations for the property located at 1802 South Austin Avenue bearing
the legal description of Lost Addition, Block 80(PT), 0.55 acres (CDC-2014-036).
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown is in receipt of a request for a CDC for demolition and exterior alterations
for the residence located at 1802 South Austin Avenue. According to the submitted letter of intent,
the applicant wishes to demolish an existing garage, remove a non-historic addition and construct
a new addition to the structure.
Staff recommends approval with conditions of the request based on the findings that the does not
meet the approval criteria of Section3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code (UDC), as
outlined in the attached Staff Report. The conditional approval is contingent upon additional
design work to avoid demolition of the historic garage.
The affirmative vote of the majority of the HARC members is required to approve the CDC
request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. the applicant paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
CDC-2014-036 Staff Report Backup Material
CDC-2014-036 Exhibit 1 Backup Material
CDC-2014-036 Exhibit 2 Backup Material
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-036 1802 South Austin Avenue Page 1 of 5
Meeting Date: September 25, 2014 Agenda Item: F
File Number: CDC-2014-036
AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
residential addition for the property located at 1802 South Austin Avenue, bearing the legal description
of Lost Addition, Block 80(PT), 0.33 acres
AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
Project Name: The Slack Residence Remodel
Applicant: Charley Munro, J Bryant Boyd Design & Build
Property Owner: Terry Slack
Property Address: 1802 South Austin Avenue
Legal Description: Lost Addition, Block 80(PT), 0.33 acres
Historic Overlay: Old Town
Case History: The applicant presented the conceptual project to the HARC on August 28, 2014.
This is the first public hearing for the case.
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Date of construction: Primary Structure – ca. 1925
Accessory Garage – ca. 1930
Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: Primary Structure – 1984 – Medium Priority
2007 – Medium Priority
Accessory Garage – 1984 – Not recorde d
2007 – Medium Priority
National Register Designation: None
Texas Historical Commission Designation: None
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant requests a Certificate of Design Compliance for exterior alterations to the Medium
Priority structure located at 1802 South Austin Avenue. The project includes the demolition of the ca.
1930 accessory garage, the removal of a non-historic two-story addition, and the construction of a new
addition to the primary structure.
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines:
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-036 1802 South Austin Avenue Page 2 of 5
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
7.1 Avoid alterations that would damage historic features. Complies
7.2 Properties designated by the City as a High or Medium Priority Historic
Structure should be preserved and their historic character retained.
Complies
7.6 Design a new addition such that the original character can be clearly seen. Complies
7.7 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to
minimize the visual impacts.
Complies
7.8 Do not obscure, damage, destroy, or remove original architectural details
and materials of the primary structure.
Complies
7.9 An addition shall be compatible in scale, materials, and character with the
main building.
Complies
7.13 Only as a last resort should an historic structure be considered for
demolition.
Complies
STAFF ANALYSIS
The applicant’s request includes the removal of a non-historic two story addition to the rear of the
structure and demolition of the accessory garage. Both steps are necessary to construct the proposed
new addition on the rear of the primary structure. The primary structure and the accessory garage are
both identified as Medium Priority structures on the Historic Resources Survey. The addition to the
primary structure complies with the design guidelines by placing the addition to the rear, utilizing a
modern connector to differentiate the addition and setting the addition to the side. The addition will
not result in the loss of any character defining features on the primary structure.
The current site layout limits the options for placing an addition on the structure while complying with
the design Guidelines. The proposed design protects the existing heritage tree on the lot, while
respecting the original design of the structure. Designing the addition in the proposed linear manner
reduces the impact on the primary structure and allows the applicant to work within the site
constraints.
The new addition requires the demolition of the accessory garage. Design Guideline 7.13 states “Only
as a last resort should an historic structure be considered for demolition.” The guideline also includes
the direction that “demolition of secondary buildings (garages, etc.) 50 years or older may be
appropriate if substantially deteriorated (requiring 50% or more replacement of exterior siding, roof
rafters, surface materials, and structure members). The applicant has provided documentation
regarding the condition of the structure, demonstrating that more than 50% of the materials must be
replaced to restore the structure to working condition (Exhibit 2). The documentation justifies the
applicant’s request to demolish the accessory structure under UDC Section 3.13.020.D.1.c: The structure
poses an imminent threat to public health or safety.
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-036 1802 South Austin Avenue Page 3 of 5
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the
following criteria:
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and
final action;
The application deemed complete by staff
on September 5, 2014.
B. Compliance with any design standards of the
Unified Development Code;
The addition complies with the site design
requirements of the Residential Single
Family (RS) zoning district.
C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design
Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time,
specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay
District;
The project complies with the Downtown
and Old Town Design Guidelines
D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is
preserved.
The addition to the primary structure
preserves the integrity of the building.
E. New buildings or additions are designed to be
compatible with surrounding historic properties.
The new addition is compatible with
surrounding properties.
F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable
Overlay District is protected.
The project does not adversely affect the Old
Town Overlay District.
G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted
design standards, and are not in character with
the site or landmarks within the Historic or
applicable Overlay District in question will not be
permitted.
The proposed project does not include a
request for signage.
H. The following may also be considered by the
HARC when determining whether to approve a
Certificate for Design Compliance:
1. The effect of the proposed change upon the
general historic, cultural, and architectural
nature of the site, landmark, or District.
2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural
features, including parking and loading
spaces, which can be seen from a public street,
alley, or walkway.
3. The general design, arrangement, texture,
material, and color of the building or structure
and the relation of such factors to similar
The proposed project complies with the
supplemental criteria by preserving the
individual structure and limiting the impact
on the surrounding properties.
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-036 1802 South Austin Avenue Page 4 of 5
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
features of buildings or structures in the
District, contrast or other relation of such
factors to other landmarks built at or during
the same period, as well as the uniqueness of
such features, considering the remaining
examples of architectural, historical, and
cultural values.
In addition to the approval criteria listed above, the HARC must also consider the following criteria for
a request for CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Historic Structure:
SECTION 3.13.040 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The uniqueness of the structure as a
representative type of style of architecture,
historic association, or other element of the
original designation criteria applicable to such
structure or tract;
The architecture of the accessory building is
not unique to the structure, and the current
condition of the structure negates any
historic significance.
B. The condition of the structure from the standpoint
of structure integrity and the extent of work
necessary to stabilize the structure; and
The structural integrity of the structure is
compromised due to poor maintenance,
resulting in more than 50% of the materials
requiring replacement to put the structure
back in to use.
C. The status of the structure under Chapter 15 of the
Georgetown City Code containing Building Safety
Standards and rules governing Dangerous
Buildings.
The structure does not have any open code
enforcement complaints and has not been
deemed to be a dangerous structure by the
Building Official.
D. And make the following findings:
The structure is a documented major and imminent
threat to public health and safety
The demolition or removal is required to alleviate the
threat to public health and safety
There is no reasonable way, other than demolition or
removal, to eliminate the threat in a timely
manner
The structural integrity of the structure is
significantly compromised by lack of
maintenance, creating a threat to public
health and safety. The reconstruction of the
structure requires replacement of more than
50% of the existing materials, satisfying the
criteria in the UDC and the Design
Guidelines.
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-036 1802 South Austin Avenue Page 5 of 5
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of CDC-2014-036 as presented.
As of the date of this report, staff has received no written comments regarding the proposed project.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 – Letter of Intent, current photos and plans
Exhibit 2 – Demolition request for accessory structure
SUBMITTED BY
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
James Bryant Boyd, AIA
902 Forest Street Georgetown, Texas 78626
Tel: 512.930.1686 Fax: 512.863.7794 www.jbryantboyd.com
jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com
1
City of GeorgetownPlanning and Development Services/HARCGeorgetown, TX 78626
HARC Submission for CDCthe Slack Residence Addition and Remodel1802 South Austin AvenueGeorgetown, TX 78626
SummaryThis project involves the complete renovation and additions to a low priority historic residence located at 1802 S. Austin Avenue. The residence is located on the property on the South side of the Georgian Apartments. The building is a very poor state of repair and will require extensive work to save the structure from complete deterioration or collapse.
Project Scope1. All existing deteriorated wood siding, trim, fascia boards or any other deteriorated wood will be removed, replaced and painted.
2. The existing 2nd story structure (added in the 1940s or 50s) will be completely removed.
3. The entire house is being renovated in this project. An addition will be added to the rear of the existing structure and will be partially visible to Austin Avenue. See the attached floor plan for location and layout.
4. The existing garage and outbuildings (shed & coop) on the site will be removed completely.
5. The new addition will be siding to match the pattern and scale of the existing structure.
6. A new patio/deck will be added to the rear of the structure.
7. The existing structure and the addition will have new composition roof.
8. All existing windows will be replaced or repaired a much as possible. The new addition will have new windows that will match the window patterns of the older structure.
9. House will have new paint. The wall color will be Filoli Carriage House (6003-1C) and the trim will be Woodlawn Whitewash (6008-1A). Both paint colors are manufactured by Valspar Paint.
10. A new driveway will be constructed to the south of the structure and will be made of material which is appropriate to the historic nature of the neighborhood.
11. The existing style defining detailing of the house will be repaired or restored to its original condition.
We appreciate the opportunity to present this request to HARC.
Sincerely,
J. Bryant Boyd, AIA
September 4, 2014
September 4, 2014
2
Subject Property harc submital for cdc
Slack Residence Addition - 1802 South Austin - Georgetown, Texas
September 4, 2014
3
Existing Floor Plan harc submital for cdc
Slack Residence Addition
1802 South Austin
Georgetown, Texas
upper flor plan
lower floor plan
September 4, 2014
4
Proposed Floor Plan harc submital for cdc
Proposed Floor Plan
September 4, 2014
5
Proposed Elevations harc submital for cdc
West Elevation
East Elevation
September 4, 2014
6
Proposed Elevations harc submital for cdc
North Elevation
South Elevation
Filoli Carriage House
(6003-1C)
Woodlawn Whitewash(6008-1A)
September 4, 2014
7
Paint Colors harc submital for cdc
Woodlawn Whitewash (6008-1A)
Valspar Paint.
Filoli Carriage House (6003-1C)
Valspar Paint.
Filoli Carriage House
(6003-1C)
Woodlawn Whitewash(6008-1A)
Filoli Carriage House
(6003-1C)
September 4, 2014
8
Site Plan harc submital for cdc
AU
S
T
I
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
Proposed Site Plan & Floor Plan
September 4, 2014
9
Satellite Image harc submital for cdc
1802 South Austin Avenue
Georgetown, Texas
James Bryant Boyd, AIA
902 Forest Street Georgetown, Texas 78626
Telephone: 512.930.1686 Facsimile: 512.863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com
To: Historic Architectural Review Commission
City of Georgetown
From: J. Bryant Boyd (for Terry Slack)
902 Forest Street
Georgetown, TX. 78626
To the commission:
We have been hired to design an addition to the existing residence located at:
1802 South Austin Avenue
Georgetown, Texas
It is our professional opinion that the existing garage (which is located to the Northwest
of the existing house) is approximately 60% deteriorated and should be removed from the
property.
Our client is desirous of constructing and addition to the existing residence and there are
several factors that contribute to the decision to raze the current garage structure>
In addition, the City of Georgetown Design Guidelines for Adaptive Re-Use, Additions,
& Alteration states the guidelines for the removal of a secondary structure and we believe
the mitigating factors related to this project meet several of the criteria set forth in
Section 7.13 of that document:
Section 7.13 (page 80)
Demolition of a building that contributes to the historic or architectural
significance of a locally or nationally designated district should not occur, unless:
• Public safety and welfare requires the removal of the building or
structure;
• The building has lost its architectural and historical value/significance
and its removal will improve the viability of the neighborhood.
• The denial of the demolition will result in a substantial hardship on the
applicant as determined by the process outlined in the City’s Unified
Development Code.
• Demolition of secondary buildings (garages, etc.) 50 years or older may
be appropriate if substantially deteriorated (requiring 50% or more
replacement of siding, roof, rafters, surface materials and structure
members).
Photos of the structure follow:
James Bryant Boyd, AIA
902 Forest Street Georgetown, Texas 78626
Telephone: 512.930.1686 Facsimile: 512.863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com
Figure 1 - South Elevation showing roof failure
Figure 2 – East Elevation showing structure racking
James Bryant Boyd, AIA
902 Forest Street Georgetown, Texas 78626
Telephone: 512.930.1686 Facsimile: 512.863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com
Figure 3 – Interior showing structure failure
Figure 4 – Interior showing failed foundation & structure
James Bryant Boyd, AIA
902 Forest Street Georgetown, Texas 78626
Telephone: 512.930.1686 Facsimile: 512.863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com
Factors that contribute to decision to raze the structure:
1. The structure is obsolete in its function. Originally built as a carriage house, it
cannot be used conveniently as a garage.
2. The structure itself is severely racked and would be a considerable cost to
repair it.
3. The existing roof is sagging severely and would necessitate a complete
replacement (structural & roofing).
4. The existing siding is separating at the joints (due to the severe racking of the
structure).
5. The structure, in its present location is approximately 4’-5’ over the (6’
setback line).
6. There is a heritage tree located at the rear of the residence which would
impede the owner’s ability to construct the addition if the current secondary
structure were not removed.
Based on the above criteria and the fact the owner would incur sever financial hardship if
otherwise decided, we respectfully request approval in this matter.
Sincerely,
J. Bryant Boyd, Architect
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Conceptual review for proposed infill construction at 202 College Street
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown has received a request for conceptual review of a proposed infill project
at 202 College Street, currently identified as College Place. The project is the next phase of a
previously approved and constructed multi family development located within the Old Town
Historic District. The applicant is requesting guidance from the Historic and Architectural Review
Commission prior to submitting a formal application for review.
Renderings and the proposed site plan are included for your review. Material boards are on file
with the Planning Department and will be provided at the September 25th HARC meeting.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Exhibit 1 - Proposed Elevations Backup Material
Exhibit 2 - Proposed paint scheme for exisiting structures Backup Material
Exhibit 3 - Proposed Site Plan Backup Material
GE
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
,
TE
X
A
S
CO
L
L
E
G
E
PL
A
C
E
TO
W
N
H
O
M
E
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
M
E
N
T
DA
L
E
IL
L
I
G
A
TO
W
N
H
O
M
E
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FO
R
ARCHITECTS PROJECT NUMBER
DATE
COPYRIGHT ELSASSER
ARCHITECTURAL, INC.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL DESIGNS AND
DRAWINGS ARE THE
SOLE PROPERTY OF
ELSASSER
ARCHITECTURAL, INC.
AND MAY NOT BE
ALTERED OR
REPRODUCED IN ANY
WAY WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT.
CR
T
T
C
E
S
A
LS
R
E
S
I
SA
H
DREE
.
AHC
S
R
I
R D
999
S
T
I
R
EG
LT
A
E
8
TFOE XETA
NO
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
PL
A
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
DESIGN / PLANNING
ARCHITECTURE
ELSASSER
ARCHITECTURAL
INC.
P.O. BOX 833
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS78627
(512) 930-5353, (512) 930-2618 FAX
WWW.EAI-TX.COM
DA
T
E
14009
06/17/14
06/06/14
FOR REVIEW ONLY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
OR PERMITING
2'
-
0
"
8'
-
1
"
1'
-
4
3/
4
"
8'
-
1
"
PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
12
10
10
12
10
12 12
10
(TYPICAL)
COMP. SHINGLE ROOF ON
30# FELT UNDERLAYMENT
MT'L
ROOF
MT'L
ROOF
COMP. SHINGLES
BRICK VENEER
(TYPICAL)
BRICK VENEER
BRICK VENEER
CEMENT FIBER SIDING8
12
(TYPICAL)24" LOUV.
VENT
BRICK VENEER
10
12
MT'L
ROOF
(TYPICAL)
BRICK VENEER
12
10
BRICK VENEER
EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION
EXISTING
BUILDING
PROPOSED
BUILDING
CEMENT FIBER SIDING CEMENT FIBER SIDING
CEMENT FIBER SIDING
2'
-
0
"
8'
-
1
"
1'
-
4
3/
4
"
8'
-
1
"
2'
-
0
"
8'
-
1
"
1'
-
4
3/
4
"
8'
-
1
"
8'
-
1
"
1'
-
4
3/
4
"
8'
-
1
"
PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
12
10
10
12
10
12 12
10
(TYPICAL)
COMP. SHINGLE ROOF ON
30# FELT UNDERLAYMENT
MT'L
ROOF
MT'L
ROOF
COMP. SHINGLES
BRICK VENEER
(TYPICAL)
BRICK VENEER
BRICK VENEER
CEMENT FIBER SIDING8
12
(TYPICAL)24" LOUV.
VENT
BRICK VENEER
10
12
MT'L
ROOF
(TYPICAL)
BRICK VENEER
8
12
8
12
12
10
10
12
10
12 12
10
12
10
BRICK VENEER
EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
EXISTING
BUILDING
PROPOSED
BUILDING
CEMENT FIBER SIDING
8
12
ROOF LOUVERS
COMP. SHINGLE ROOF ON
30# FELT UNDERLAYMENT
(TYPICAL)
CEMENT FIBER
TRIM
(TYP.)
CEMENT FIBER
TRIM
(TYP.)
PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
EXISTING
BUILDING
PROPOSED
BUILDING
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
WEST ELEVATION
SIDING
CEMENT FIBER SIDING
(TYPICAL)
12
8
LOUVERED VENT W/
INSECT SCREEN
8
12
12
8
EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
8
12
INSECT SCREEN
LOUVERED VENT W/
SIDING
BRICK
VENEER
CEMENT FIBER SIDING
CEMENT FIBER SIDING
CEMENT FIBER SIDING
CEMENT FIBER SIDING
COMP. SHINGLE ROOF ON
30# FELT UNDERLAYMENT
(TYPICAL)
COMP. SHINGLE ROOF ON
30# FELT UNDERLAYMENT
(TYPICAL)
A3.0
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"
Sheet
Project Number:22236
Location Map
SITE
NTS
SITE - CONSTRUCTION PLAN (SCP-2014-xxx)
shall revise the design as necessary.
There are existing water pipelines, underground telephone
vicinity of this project. The Contractor shall contact all
cables and other above and below ground utilities in the
appropriate companies prior to any construction in the
area and determine if any conflicts exist. If so, the
Contractor shall immediately contact the Engineer who
COLLEGE PLACE
Warning!
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
SHEET INDEX
DescriptionSheet No.
1 COVER SHEET
2 SITE PLAN
3 GENERAL NOTES
4 DRAINAGE PLAN
5 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS
6 DETAILS
BENCHMARKS:
Georgetown, Texas 78626
1978 South Austin Avenue
July, 2014
RS Residential
DATE:
ZONING:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:
STEGER BIZZELL
Approved for City of Georgetown Unified Development Code requirements:
Andrew Spurgin, Planning Director Date
Georgetown Utility Services
Building Inspections Department
Date
Date
Paul Elkins - Electric System Reviewer
Approved for electric system requirements:
Don Jansen - Fire Plans Examiner
As Owner/Representative of this project, I promise to develop and maintain this property as
described by this plan.
Approved for utility requirements, drainage requirements, and all construction indicated within
public street R.O.W. and public utility and drainage easements:
Planning Department
Planning and Development Services
Date
Date
Date
Approved for Fire Code requirements:
Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner
Reviewed for City of Georgetown Unified Development Code requirements:
David Munk, P.E. Development Engineer
Lots 15 - 20, College Place
Cab. I, Slide 134
Dale Illig, Illig LTD.
UTILITY PROVIDERS:City of Georgetown for Water, Wastewater and electric
OWNER/APPLICANT:
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR:
1.165 AcresSITE AREA:
ARCHITECT:
512-930-9412
SITE PLAN NOTES:
1.This development shall comply with all standards of the Unified Development Code
(UDC), the City of Georgetown Construction Standards and Specifications Manual,
and the Development Manual.
2.This Site Plan shall meet the UDC Stormwater requirements.
3.All signage requires a separate application and approval from the Inspection Services
Department. No signage is approved with the Site Plan.
4.Sidewalks shall be provided in accordance with with UDC.
5.Driveways will require approval by the Development Engineer of the City of
Georgetown.
6.Compliance with Section 7.05 of the UDC for outdoor lighting standards is being met
by submittal of photometric drawings and fixture specifications.
7.Screening of mechanical equipment, dumpsters and parking shall comply with Section
8 of the UDC. The screening is shown on the Landscape and Architectural Plans, as
applicable.
8.The companion Landscape Plan has been designed and plant materials shall be
installed to meet all requirements of the UDC.
9.All maintenance of required landscape shall comply with the maintenance standards
of Chapter 8 of the UDC.
10.A separate Irrigation Plan shall be required at the time of building permit application.
11.Fire flow requirements of 1500 gallons per minute are being met by this plan.
12.Site Construction plans must be in compliance with this Site Plan.
13.Any Heritage Tree as noted on this Site Plan is subject, in perpetuity, to the
maintenance, care, pruning and removal requirements of the Unified Development
Code.
James M. Cummins, P.E.
Submitted By:
Date
07-03-2014
Dale Illig
Illig LTD.
707 Rock St.
Georgetown, TX 78626
Elsasser Architectural, Inc.
P.O. Box 833
Georgetown, Texas 78627
512-930-5353
202 College St.
Georgetown, Texas 78626
202 COLLEGE ST.
APPROVED for the City of Georgetown:
David Munk P.E. Development Engineer Date
NOTE:
1.These construction plans were prepared, sealed, signed, and dated by a Texas
Licensed Professional Engineer. Therefore based on the engineer's concurrence of
compliance, the construction plans for construction of the proposed project are
hereby approved subject to the Standard Construction Specifications and Details
Manual and all other applicable City, State and Federal Requirements and Codes.
2.This project is subject to all City Standard Specifications and Details in effect at the
time of submittal of the project to the City.
3.The site construction plans shall meet all requirements of the approved site plan.
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEBTEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
Traverse nail set on east property line approximately 74'
south of the northeast corner of the subdivision
Elev.=708.41
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
NO.DATEREVISIONBY
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE for
COLLEGE PLACE
Georgetown
Williamson County, Texas
P\22000-22999
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES
P\22000-22999
Xref DWG FILE.
Sheet Number:
Drawing Path:
SCALE:
Project Number:
Project Name:
Project Path:
22236
AS NOTED3-Jul-14
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
JMC
3-Jul-14GAD, JMC
07-03-2014
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES3-Jul-14JMC
3-Jul-14JMC
SCP-2014-----
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
1.165 Acres
No. 48491C0295E dated September 26, 2008.
No 100 year floodplain per F.E.M.A. Flood Insurance Rate Map
SITE AREA:
FLOODPLAIN:
PARKING:
EXIST. IMPERVIOUS COVER: 16,842 S.F. (0.387 Ac.)
30 Existing Parking Spaces
0.387 Ac. / 1.165 Ac. * 100 = 33%
PROP. IMPERVIOUS COVER: 3,185 S.F. (0.073 Ac.)
STORMWATER:The Stormwater requirements are met by this Site Plan
SITE PLAN NOTES:
1.All lighting fixtures shall be designed to completely conceal, fully shield within
opaque housing the light source from visibility from any street right-of-way. The
cone of light shall not cross any adjacent property line. The illumination shall
not exceed two (2) foot candles at a height of three (3) feet at the property line.
Only incandescent, fluorescent, color-corrected high-pressure sodium or metal
halide may be used. All vehicle or pedestrian access shall be sufficiently
lighted to ensure security of property and persons.
2.All roof, wall and ground mounted mechanical equipment must be screened in
accordance with Section 8 of the UDC. If roof and wall mounted equipment of
any type including duct work and large vents is proposed, it shall be shown on
the site plan and screening identified. Screening of mechanical equipment shall
result in the mechanical equipment blending in with the primary building and
not appearing separate from the building and shall be screened from view from
any rights-of-way or adjoining properties.
3.The dumpster enclosures must be one (1) foot above the height of the waste
container. Use protective poles in corners and at impact areas. Fence posts
shall be of rust protected metal or concrete. A minimum 6" slab is required and
must be sloped to drain. The enclosure must have steel framed gates with
spring loaded hinges and fasteners to keep closed. Screening must be on all
four (4) sides by masonry wall or approved fence or screening with opaque
gates.
SITE PLAN
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVER: 20,027 S.F. (0.46 Ac.)
0.46 Ac. / 1.165 Ac. * 100 =40%
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
NO.DATEREVISIONBY
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE for
COLLEGE PLACE
Georgetown
Williamson County, Texas
P\22000-22999
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES
P\22000-22999
Xref DWG FILE.
Sheet Number:
Drawing Path:
SCALE:
Project Number:
Project Name:
Project Path:
22236
AS NOTED3-Jul-14
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
JMC
3-Jul-14GAD, JMC
07-03-2014
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES3-Jul-14JMC
3-Jul-14JMC
SCP-2014-----
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
1. Written construction notification must be given to the appropriate TCEQ regional office no later
than 48 hours prior to commencement of the regulated activity. Information must include the
date on which the regulated activity will commence, the name of the approved plan for the
regulated activity, and the name of the prime contractor and the name and telephone number
of the contact person.
2. All contractors conducting regulated activities associated with this project must be provided with
complete copies of the approved Water Pollution Abatement Plan and the TCEQ letter
indicating the specific conditions of its approval. During the course of these regulated activities,
the contractors are required to keep on-site copies of the approved plan and approval letter.
3. If any sensitive feature is discovered during construction, all regulated activities near the
sensitive feature must be suspended immediately. The appropriate TCEQ regional office must
be immediately notified of any sensitive features encountered during construction. The regulated
activities near the sensitive feature may not proceed until the TCEQ has reviewed and
approved the methods proposed to protect the sensitive feature and the Edwards Aquifer from
any potentially adverse impacts to water quality.
4. No temporary aboveground hydrocarbon and hazardous substance storage tank system is
installed within 150 feet of a domestic, industrial, irrigation, or public water supply well, or other
sensitive feature.
5. Prior to commencement of construction, all temporary erosion and sedimentation (E&S) control
measures must be properly selected, installed, and maintained in accordance with the
manufacturers specifications and good engineering practices. Controls specified in the
temporary storm water section of the approved Edwards Aquifer Protection Plan are required
during construction. If inspections indicate a control has been used inappropriately, or
incorrectly, the applicant must replace or modify the control for site situations. The controls must
remain in place until disturbed areas are revegetated and the areas have become permanently
stabilized.
6. If sediment escapes the construction site, off-site accumulations of sediment must be removed
at a frequency sufficient to minimize offsite impacts to water quality (e.g., fugitive sediment in
street being washed into surface streams or sensitive features by the next rain).
7. Sediment must be removed from sediment traps or sedimentation ponds not later than when
design capacity has been reduced by 50%. A permanent stake must be provided that can
indicate when the sediment occupies 50% of the basin volume.
8. Litter, construction debris, and construction chemicals exposed to stormwater shall be prevented
from becoming a pollutant source for stormwater discharges (e.g., screening outfalls, picked up
daily).
9. All spoils (excavated material) generated from the project site must be stored on-site with proper
E&S controls. For storage or disposal of spoils at another site on the Edwards Aquifer Recharge
Zone, the owner of the site must receive approval of a water pollution abatement plan for the
placement of fill material or mass grading prior to the placement of spoils at the other site.
10. Stabilization measures shall be initiated as soon as practicable in portions of the site where
construction activities have temporarily or permanently ceased, but in no case more than 14 days
after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased.
Where the initiation of stabilization measures by the 14th day after construction activity
temporary or permanently cease is precluded by weather conditions, stabilization measures shall
be initiated as soon as practicable. Where construction activity on a portion of the site is
temporarily ceased, and earth disturbing activities will be resumed within 21 days, temporary
stabilization measures do not have to be initiated on that portion of site. In areas experiencing
droughts where the initiation of stabilization measures by the 14th day after construction activity
has temporarily or permanently ceased is precluded by seasonal arid conditions, stabilization
measures shall be initiated as soon as practicable.
11. The following records shall be maintained and made available to the TCEQ upon request: the
dates when major grading activities occur; the dates when construction activities temporarily or
permanently cease on a portion of the site; and the dates when stabilization measures are
initiated.
12. The holder of any approved Edward Aquifer protection plan must notify the appropriate regional
office in writing and obtain approval from the executive director prior to initiating any of the
following:
A. any physical or operational modification of any water pollution abatement structure(s),
including but not limited to ponds, dams, berms, sewage treatment plants, and
diversionary structures;
B. any change in the nature or character of the regulated activity from that which was
originally approved or a change which would significantly impact the ability of the plan to
prevent pollution of the Edwards Aquifer;
C. any development of land previously identified as undeveloped in the original water
pollution abatement plan.
Austin Regional Office
2800 S. IH35, Suite 100
Austin, Texas 78704
Phone (512) 339-2929
Fax (512) 339-3795
1. The Contractor shall install erosion/sedimentation controls and tree
protective fencing prior to any site preparation work (clearing,
2. The placement of erosion/sedimentation controls shall be in accordance
3. Any significant variation in materials or locations of controls or
fences from those shown on the approved plans must be approved by the
4. The Contractor is required to inspect all controls and fences at weekly
intervals and after significant rainfall events to insure that they
are functioning properly. The person(s) responsible for maintenance
of controls and fences shall immediately make any necessary repairs to
damaged areas. Silt accumulation at controls must be removed when the
5. Prior to final acceptance, haul roads and waterway crossings constructed
for temporary Contractor access must be removed, accumulated sediment
removed from the waterway, and the area restored to the original grade
and revegetated. All land clearing debris shall be disposed of in
6. Field revisions to the EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS
or field inspector with the Texas Commission
(TCEQ) during the course of construction to
Major revisions must be approved by the
approved spoil disposal sites.
(TCEQ).
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL NOTES
grubbing or excavation).
with the EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS
depth reaches six (6) inches.
City Engineer.
TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT PLAN
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
required by the Engineer
on Environmental Quality
correct control inadequacies.
may be
CITY OF GEORGETOWN GENERAL NOTES
1.These construction plans were prepared, sealed, signed and dated by a Texas Licensed
3URIHVVLRQDO(QJLQHHU7KHUHIRUHEDVHGRQWKHHQJLQHHU¶VFRQFXUUHQFHRIFRPSOLDQFHWKH
construction plans for construction of the proposed project are hereby approved subject to the
standard Construction Specifications and Details Manual and all other applicable City, State and
Federal Requirements and Codes.
2.This project is subject to all City Standard Specifications and Details in effect at the time of submittal
of the project to the City.
3.The site construction plans shall meet all requirements of the approved site plan.
4.Wastewater mains and service lines shall be SDR 26 PVC.
5.Wastewater mains shall be installed without horizontal or vertical bends.
6.Maximum distance between wastewater manholes is 500 feet.
7.Wastewater mains shall be low pressure air tested and mandrel tested by the contractor according to
the City of Georgetown and TCEQ requirements.
8.Wastewater manholes shall be vacuum tested and coated by the contractor according to City of
Georgetown and TCEQ requirements.
9.Wastewater mains shall be camera tested by the contractor and submitted to the City on DVD format
prior to paving the streets.
10.Private water system fire lines shall be tested by the contractor to 200 psi for 2 hours.
11.Private water system fire lines shall be ductile iron piping from the water main to the building
sprinkler system, and 200 psi C900 PVC for all others.
12.Public water system mains shall be 150 psi C900 PVC and tested by the contractor at 150 psi for 2
hours.
13.All bends and changes in direction on water mains shall be restrained and thrust blocked.
14.Long fire hydrant leads shall be restrained.
15.All water lines are to be bacteria tested by the contractor according to the City standards and
specifications.
16.Water and Sewer main crossings shall meet all requirements of the TCEQ and the City.
17.Flexible base material for public streets shall be TXDOT Type A Grade 1.
18.Hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement shall be Type D unless otherwise specified and shall be a
minimum of 2 inches thick on public streets and roadways.
19.All sidewalk ramps are to be installed with the public infrastructure.
20.A maintenance bond is required to be submitted to the City prior to acceptance of the public
improvements. This bond shall be established for 1 year in the amount of 25% of the cost of the
public improvements and shall follow the City format.
21.Record drawings of the public improvements shall be submitted to the City by the design engineer
prior to acceptance of the project. These drawings shall be on mylar or on TIFF or PDF disk (300
dpi). If a disk is submitted, a bond set shall be included with the disk.
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1.Prior to beginning construction, the Owner or his authorized representative, shall
convene a Pre-Construction Conference between the City of Georgetown,
Engineer, Contractor, County Engineer (if applicable), Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality Field Office, and any other affected parties. Notify all such
parties at least 48 hours prior to the time of the conference and 48 hours prior to
beginning construction.
2.Any existing utilities, pavement, curbs, and/or sidewalks damaged or removed
shall be repaired by the Contractor at his expense before acceptance of the
project.
3.The location of any existing water, wastewater lines or other utilities shall be
verified by the City of Georgetown & other utility providers prior to construction.
4.Manhole frames, covers, water valve covers, etc., shall be raised to finished
pavement grade at the Contractor's expense by a qualified contractor with City
inspection. All utility adjustments shall be completed prior to final paving
construction.
5.Steger Bizzell has endeavored to design these plans compliant with ADA/TDLR
and other accessibility requirements. However, the contractor shall not be relieved
of any responsibility for constructing these improvements compliant with all
applicable accessibility standards. If the contractor notices any discrepancies
between these plans and accessibility laws/rules, he is to stop work in the area of
conflict and notify Steger Bizzell immediately for a resolution and/or revision to
these plans. Steger Bizzell shall not be held responsible for constructing this site
compliant with accessibility laws/rules regardless of what is shown in these plans.
PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. All disturbed areas shall be restored as noted below:
a. A minimum of four inches of imported sandy loam topsoil or approved equal
shall be placed in all drainage channels (except rock) and on all cleared areas.
b. Grass areas may be sodded, plugged, sprigged or seeded except that solid
sod shall be used in swales or other areas subject to erosion.
The seeding for permanent erosion control shall be applied over areas disturbed by
construction as follows, unless specified elsewhere:
i. From September 15 to March 1, seeding shall be with a combination
of 1 pound per 1,000 square feet of unhulled Bermuda and 7 pounds per 1,000
square feet of Winter Rye with a purity of 95% with 90% germination.
ii. From March 2 to September 14, seeding shall be with hulled Bermuda
at a rate of 3 pounds per 1,000 square feet with a purity of 95% with 85%
germination.
c. Fertilizer shall be slow release granular or pelleted type and shall have an
analysis of 15-15-15 and shall be applied at the rate of 23 pounds per acre once at
the time of planting and again once during the time of establishment.
d. All planted areas shall be provided with a readily available water supply and
watered as necessary to ensure continuous healthy growth and development. The
planted area shall be irrigated or sprinkled in a manner that will not erode the top soil,
but will sufficiently soak the soil to a depth of six inches. The irrigation shall occur at
ten-day intervals during the first two months. Rainfall occurrences of 1/2 inch or
more shall postpone the watering schedule for one week.
e. Mulch type used shall be Mulch, applied at a rate of 1,500 pounds per acre.
1. Call all affected parties at least 48 hours prior to beginning any
construction to schedule a pre-construction conference and secure
2. Install temporary erosion controls prior to any clearing and grubbing.
Note: Other contractors could be working on this site. Coordinate all
all required permits.
Notify the City of Georgetown when installed.
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
activities with the activities of others.
GENERAL NOTES
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
NO.DATEREVISIONBY
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE for
COLLEGE PLACE
Georgetown
Williamson County, Texas
P\22000-22999
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES
P\22000-22999
Xref DWG FILE.
Sheet Number:
Drawing Path:
SCALE:
Project Number:
Project Name:
Project Path:
22236
AS NOTED30-Jun-14
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
JMC
30-Jun-14GAD, JMC
07-03-2014
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES30-Jun-14JMC
30-Jun-14JMC
SCP-2014-----
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
DRAINAGE PLAN
DEVELOPED CONDITIONS
1" = 30'
EXISTING CONDITIONS
1" = 30'
EXISTING DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
DRAINAGE AREA A = 0.00163 SQ. MI.
= 1.04 ACRES
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
COMPOSITE OF PAVEMENT AND LAWN GOOD
HYDROLOGIC GROUP - D
Tlag = 0.10
PAVEMENT - RCN 98
LAWN, GOOD - RCN 80
0.387 AC. IMPERVIOUS COVER
0.387 ACRES / 1.165 AC = 33%
(33% * 98) + (67% * 80) = 86
RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER -86
2 YR RUNOFF = 3 CFS
10 YR RUNOFF = 5 CFS
25 YR RUNOFF = 6 CFS
100 YR RUNOFF = 8 CFS
DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
DRAINAGE AREA A = 0.00163 SQ. MI.
= 1.04 ACRES
DEVELOPED CONDITIONS:
COMPOSITE OF PAVEMENT AND LAWN GOOD
HYDROLOGIC GROUP - D
Tlag = 0.10
PAVEMENT - RCN 98
LAWN, GOOD - RCN 80
0.46 AC. IMPERVIOUS COVER
0.46 ACRES / 1.165 AC = 40%
(40% * 98) + (60% * 80) = 87
RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER -87
2 YR RUNOFF = 3 CFS
10 YR RUNOFF = 5 CFS
25 YR RUNOFF = 6 CFS
100 YR RUNOFF = 8 CFS
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
NO.DATEREVISIONBY
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE for
COLLEGE PLACE
Georgetown
Williamson County, Texas
P\22000-22999
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES
P\22000-22999
Xref DWG FILE.
Sheet Number:
Drawing Path:
SCALE:
Project Number:
Project Name:
Project Path:
22236
AS NOTED1-Jul-14
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
JMC
1-Jul-14GAD, JMC
07-03-2014
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES1-Jul-14JMC
1-Jul-14JMC
SCP-2014-----
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
The Architect/Engineer assumes
responsibility for appropriate
use of this standard.
The Architect/Engineer assumes
responsibility for appropriate
use of this standard.
The Architect/Engineer assumes
responsibility for appropriate
use of this standard.
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS
STABILIZED
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCESILT
FENCE
SILT
FENCE
SANDBAGS FILLED WITH
PEA GRAVEL FOR GRATE
INLET PROTECTION
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
NO.DATEREVISIONBY
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE for
COLLEGE PLACE
Georgetown
Williamson County, Texas
P\22000-22999
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES
P\22000-22999
Xref DWG FILE.
Sheet Number:
Drawing Path:
SCALE:
Project Number:
Project Name:
Project Path:
22236
AS NOTED1-Jul-14
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
JMC
1-Jul-14GAD, JMC
07-03-2014
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES1-Jul-14JMC
1-Jul-14JMC
SCP-2014-----
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
DETAILS
APPROVED BY:DRAWN BY:
SCALE:DATE:
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND DETAILS
The Architect/Engineer assumes
responsibility for appropriate
use of this standard.
APPROVED BY:DRAWN BY:
SCALE:DATE:
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND DETAILS
The Architect/Engineer assumes
responsibility for appropriate
use of this standard.
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Conceptual review for proposed project at 1804 South Ash Street
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown has received a request for conceptual review of a proposed residential
rehabilitation project at 1804 South Ash Street. The project is located within the Old Town
Historic District. The applicant is requesting guidance from the Historic and Architectural Review
Commission prior to submitting a formal application for review.
Current photos and the proposed rendering are included for your review.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Exhibit 1 - Current Photos Backup Material
Exhibit 2 - Proposed Rendering Backup Material
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Conceptual review for proposed exterior alterations at 812 South Main Street
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown has received a request for conceptual review of a proposed project at 812
South Main Street.The applicant is requesting guidance from the Historic and Architectural
Review Commission prior to submitting a formal application for review.
Renderings and the proposed site plan are included for your review.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Exhibit 1 - Proposed Elevations Backup Material
Exhibit 2 - Proposed paint scheme for exisiting structures Backup Material
Exhibit 3 - Proposed Site Plan Backup Material
GE
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
,
TE
X
A
S
CO
L
L
E
G
E
PL
A
C
E
TO
W
N
H
O
M
E
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
M
E
N
T
DA
L
E
IL
L
I
G
A
TO
W
N
H
O
M
E
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FO
R
ARCHITECTS PROJECT NUMBER
DATE
COPYRIGHT ELSASSER
ARCHITECTURAL, INC.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL DESIGNS AND
DRAWINGS ARE THE
SOLE PROPERTY OF
ELSASSER
ARCHITECTURAL, INC.
AND MAY NOT BE
ALTERED OR
REPRODUCED IN ANY
WAY WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT.
CR
T
T
C
E
S
A
LS
R
E
S
I
SA
H
DREE
.
AHC
S
R
I
R D
999
S
T
I
R
EG
LT
A
E
8
TFOE XETA
NO
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
PL
A
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
DESIGN / PLANNING
ARCHITECTURE
ELSASSER
ARCHITECTURAL
INC.
P.O. BOX 833
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS78627
(512) 930-5353, (512) 930-2618 FAX
WWW.EAI-TX.COM
DA
T
E
14009
06/17/14
06/06/14
FOR REVIEW ONLY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
OR PERMITING
2'
-
0
"
8'
-
1
"
1'
-
4
3/
4
"
8'
-
1
"
PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
12
10
10
12
10
12 12
10
(TYPICAL)
COMP. SHINGLE ROOF ON
30# FELT UNDERLAYMENT
MT'L
ROOF
MT'L
ROOF
COMP. SHINGLES
BRICK VENEER
(TYPICAL)
BRICK VENEER
BRICK VENEER
CEMENT FIBER SIDING8
12
(TYPICAL)24" LOUV.
VENT
BRICK VENEER
10
12
MT'L
ROOF
(TYPICAL)
BRICK VENEER
12
10
BRICK VENEER
EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION
EXISTING
BUILDING
PROPOSED
BUILDING
CEMENT FIBER SIDING CEMENT FIBER SIDING
CEMENT FIBER SIDING
2'
-
0
"
8'
-
1
"
1'
-
4
3/
4
"
8'
-
1
"
2'
-
0
"
8'
-
1
"
1'
-
4
3/
4
"
8'
-
1
"
8'
-
1
"
1'
-
4
3/
4
"
8'
-
1
"
PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
12
10
10
12
10
12 12
10
(TYPICAL)
COMP. SHINGLE ROOF ON
30# FELT UNDERLAYMENT
MT'L
ROOF
MT'L
ROOF
COMP. SHINGLES
BRICK VENEER
(TYPICAL)
BRICK VENEER
BRICK VENEER
CEMENT FIBER SIDING8
12
(TYPICAL)24" LOUV.
VENT
BRICK VENEER
10
12
MT'L
ROOF
(TYPICAL)
BRICK VENEER
8
12
8
12
12
10
10
12
10
12 12
10
12
10
BRICK VENEER
EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
EXISTING
BUILDING
PROPOSED
BUILDING
CEMENT FIBER SIDING
8
12
ROOF LOUVERS
COMP. SHINGLE ROOF ON
30# FELT UNDERLAYMENT
(TYPICAL)
CEMENT FIBER
TRIM
(TYP.)
CEMENT FIBER
TRIM
(TYP.)
PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
EXISTING
BUILDING
PROPOSED
BUILDING
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
WEST ELEVATION
SIDING
CEMENT FIBER SIDING
(TYPICAL)
12
8
LOUVERED VENT W/
INSECT SCREEN
8
12
12
8
EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
8
12
INSECT SCREEN
LOUVERED VENT W/
SIDING
BRICK
VENEER
CEMENT FIBER SIDING
CEMENT FIBER SIDING
CEMENT FIBER SIDING
CEMENT FIBER SIDING
COMP. SHINGLE ROOF ON
30# FELT UNDERLAYMENT
(TYPICAL)
COMP. SHINGLE ROOF ON
30# FELT UNDERLAYMENT
(TYPICAL)
A3.0
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"
Sheet
Project Number:22236
Location Map
SITE
NTS
SITE - CONSTRUCTION PLAN (SCP-2014-xxx)
shall revise the design as necessary.
There are existing water pipelines, underground telephone
vicinity of this project. The Contractor shall contact all
cables and other above and below ground utilities in the
appropriate companies prior to any construction in the
area and determine if any conflicts exist. If so, the
Contractor shall immediately contact the Engineer who
COLLEGE PLACE
Warning!
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
SHEET INDEX
DescriptionSheet No.
1 COVER SHEET
2 SITE PLAN
3 GENERAL NOTES
4 DRAINAGE PLAN
5 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS
6 DETAILS
BENCHMARKS:
Georgetown, Texas 78626
1978 South Austin Avenue
July, 2014
RS Residential
DATE:
ZONING:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:
STEGER BIZZELL
Approved for City of Georgetown Unified Development Code requirements:
Andrew Spurgin, Planning Director Date
Georgetown Utility Services
Building Inspections Department
Date
Date
Paul Elkins - Electric System Reviewer
Approved for electric system requirements:
Don Jansen - Fire Plans Examiner
As Owner/Representative of this project, I promise to develop and maintain this property as
described by this plan.
Approved for utility requirements, drainage requirements, and all construction indicated within
public street R.O.W. and public utility and drainage easements:
Planning Department
Planning and Development Services
Date
Date
Date
Approved for Fire Code requirements:
Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner
Reviewed for City of Georgetown Unified Development Code requirements:
David Munk, P.E. Development Engineer
Lots 15 - 20, College Place
Cab. I, Slide 134
Dale Illig, Illig LTD.
UTILITY PROVIDERS:City of Georgetown for Water, Wastewater and electric
OWNER/APPLICANT:
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR:
1.165 AcresSITE AREA:
ARCHITECT:
512-930-9412
SITE PLAN NOTES:
1.This development shall comply with all standards of the Unified Development Code
(UDC), the City of Georgetown Construction Standards and Specifications Manual,
and the Development Manual.
2.This Site Plan shall meet the UDC Stormwater requirements.
3.All signage requires a separate application and approval from the Inspection Services
Department. No signage is approved with the Site Plan.
4.Sidewalks shall be provided in accordance with with UDC.
5.Driveways will require approval by the Development Engineer of the City of
Georgetown.
6.Compliance with Section 7.05 of the UDC for outdoor lighting standards is being met
by submittal of photometric drawings and fixture specifications.
7.Screening of mechanical equipment, dumpsters and parking shall comply with Section
8 of the UDC. The screening is shown on the Landscape and Architectural Plans, as
applicable.
8.The companion Landscape Plan has been designed and plant materials shall be
installed to meet all requirements of the UDC.
9.All maintenance of required landscape shall comply with the maintenance standards
of Chapter 8 of the UDC.
10.A separate Irrigation Plan shall be required at the time of building permit application.
11.Fire flow requirements of 1500 gallons per minute are being met by this plan.
12.Site Construction plans must be in compliance with this Site Plan.
13.Any Heritage Tree as noted on this Site Plan is subject, in perpetuity, to the
maintenance, care, pruning and removal requirements of the Unified Development
Code.
James M. Cummins, P.E.
Submitted By:
Date
07-03-2014
Dale Illig
Illig LTD.
707 Rock St.
Georgetown, TX 78626
Elsasser Architectural, Inc.
P.O. Box 833
Georgetown, Texas 78627
512-930-5353
202 College St.
Georgetown, Texas 78626
202 COLLEGE ST.
APPROVED for the City of Georgetown:
David Munk P.E. Development Engineer Date
NOTE:
1.These construction plans were prepared, sealed, signed, and dated by a Texas
Licensed Professional Engineer. Therefore based on the engineer's concurrence of
compliance, the construction plans for construction of the proposed project are
hereby approved subject to the Standard Construction Specifications and Details
Manual and all other applicable City, State and Federal Requirements and Codes.
2.This project is subject to all City Standard Specifications and Details in effect at the
time of submittal of the project to the City.
3.The site construction plans shall meet all requirements of the approved site plan.
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEBTEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
Traverse nail set on east property line approximately 74'
south of the northeast corner of the subdivision
Elev.=708.41
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
NO.DATEREVISIONBY
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE for
COLLEGE PLACE
Georgetown
Williamson County, Texas
P\22000-22999
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES
P\22000-22999
Xref DWG FILE.
Sheet Number:
Drawing Path:
SCALE:
Project Number:
Project Name:
Project Path:
22236
AS NOTED3-Jul-14
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
JMC
3-Jul-14GAD, JMC
07-03-2014
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES3-Jul-14JMC
3-Jul-14JMC
SCP-2014-----
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
1.165 Acres
No. 48491C0295E dated September 26, 2008.
No 100 year floodplain per F.E.M.A. Flood Insurance Rate Map
SITE AREA:
FLOODPLAIN:
PARKING:
EXIST. IMPERVIOUS COVER: 16,842 S.F. (0.387 Ac.)
30 Existing Parking Spaces
0.387 Ac. / 1.165 Ac. * 100 = 33%
PROP. IMPERVIOUS COVER: 3,185 S.F. (0.073 Ac.)
STORMWATER:The Stormwater requirements are met by this Site Plan
SITE PLAN NOTES:
1.All lighting fixtures shall be designed to completely conceal, fully shield within
opaque housing the light source from visibility from any street right-of-way. The
cone of light shall not cross any adjacent property line. The illumination shall
not exceed two (2) foot candles at a height of three (3) feet at the property line.
Only incandescent, fluorescent, color-corrected high-pressure sodium or metal
halide may be used. All vehicle or pedestrian access shall be sufficiently
lighted to ensure security of property and persons.
2.All roof, wall and ground mounted mechanical equipment must be screened in
accordance with Section 8 of the UDC. If roof and wall mounted equipment of
any type including duct work and large vents is proposed, it shall be shown on
the site plan and screening identified. Screening of mechanical equipment shall
result in the mechanical equipment blending in with the primary building and
not appearing separate from the building and shall be screened from view from
any rights-of-way or adjoining properties.
3.The dumpster enclosures must be one (1) foot above the height of the waste
container. Use protective poles in corners and at impact areas. Fence posts
shall be of rust protected metal or concrete. A minimum 6" slab is required and
must be sloped to drain. The enclosure must have steel framed gates with
spring loaded hinges and fasteners to keep closed. Screening must be on all
four (4) sides by masonry wall or approved fence or screening with opaque
gates.
SITE PLAN
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVER: 20,027 S.F. (0.46 Ac.)
0.46 Ac. / 1.165 Ac. * 100 =40%
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
NO.DATEREVISIONBY
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE for
COLLEGE PLACE
Georgetown
Williamson County, Texas
P\22000-22999
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES
P\22000-22999
Xref DWG FILE.
Sheet Number:
Drawing Path:
SCALE:
Project Number:
Project Name:
Project Path:
22236
AS NOTED3-Jul-14
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
JMC
3-Jul-14GAD, JMC
07-03-2014
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES3-Jul-14JMC
3-Jul-14JMC
SCP-2014-----
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
1. Written construction notification must be given to the appropriate TCEQ regional office no later
than 48 hours prior to commencement of the regulated activity. Information must include the
date on which the regulated activity will commence, the name of the approved plan for the
regulated activity, and the name of the prime contractor and the name and telephone number
of the contact person.
2. All contractors conducting regulated activities associated with this project must be provided with
complete copies of the approved Water Pollution Abatement Plan and the TCEQ letter
indicating the specific conditions of its approval. During the course of these regulated activities,
the contractors are required to keep on-site copies of the approved plan and approval letter.
3. If any sensitive feature is discovered during construction, all regulated activities near the
sensitive feature must be suspended immediately. The appropriate TCEQ regional office must
be immediately notified of any sensitive features encountered during construction. The regulated
activities near the sensitive feature may not proceed until the TCEQ has reviewed and
approved the methods proposed to protect the sensitive feature and the Edwards Aquifer from
any potentially adverse impacts to water quality.
4. No temporary aboveground hydrocarbon and hazardous substance storage tank system is
installed within 150 feet of a domestic, industrial, irrigation, or public water supply well, or other
sensitive feature.
5. Prior to commencement of construction, all temporary erosion and sedimentation (E&S) control
measures must be properly selected, installed, and maintained in accordance with the
manufacturers specifications and good engineering practices. Controls specified in the
temporary storm water section of the approved Edwards Aquifer Protection Plan are required
during construction. If inspections indicate a control has been used inappropriately, or
incorrectly, the applicant must replace or modify the control for site situations. The controls must
remain in place until disturbed areas are revegetated and the areas have become permanently
stabilized.
6. If sediment escapes the construction site, off-site accumulations of sediment must be removed
at a frequency sufficient to minimize offsite impacts to water quality (e.g., fugitive sediment in
street being washed into surface streams or sensitive features by the next rain).
7. Sediment must be removed from sediment traps or sedimentation ponds not later than when
design capacity has been reduced by 50%. A permanent stake must be provided that can
indicate when the sediment occupies 50% of the basin volume.
8. Litter, construction debris, and construction chemicals exposed to stormwater shall be prevented
from becoming a pollutant source for stormwater discharges (e.g., screening outfalls, picked up
daily).
9. All spoils (excavated material) generated from the project site must be stored on-site with proper
E&S controls. For storage or disposal of spoils at another site on the Edwards Aquifer Recharge
Zone, the owner of the site must receive approval of a water pollution abatement plan for the
placement of fill material or mass grading prior to the placement of spoils at the other site.
10. Stabilization measures shall be initiated as soon as practicable in portions of the site where
construction activities have temporarily or permanently ceased, but in no case more than 14 days
after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased.
Where the initiation of stabilization measures by the 14th day after construction activity
temporary or permanently cease is precluded by weather conditions, stabilization measures shall
be initiated as soon as practicable. Where construction activity on a portion of the site is
temporarily ceased, and earth disturbing activities will be resumed within 21 days, temporary
stabilization measures do not have to be initiated on that portion of site. In areas experiencing
droughts where the initiation of stabilization measures by the 14th day after construction activity
has temporarily or permanently ceased is precluded by seasonal arid conditions, stabilization
measures shall be initiated as soon as practicable.
11. The following records shall be maintained and made available to the TCEQ upon request: the
dates when major grading activities occur; the dates when construction activities temporarily or
permanently cease on a portion of the site; and the dates when stabilization measures are
initiated.
12. The holder of any approved Edward Aquifer protection plan must notify the appropriate regional
office in writing and obtain approval from the executive director prior to initiating any of the
following:
A. any physical or operational modification of any water pollution abatement structure(s),
including but not limited to ponds, dams, berms, sewage treatment plants, and
diversionary structures;
B. any change in the nature or character of the regulated activity from that which was
originally approved or a change which would significantly impact the ability of the plan to
prevent pollution of the Edwards Aquifer;
C. any development of land previously identified as undeveloped in the original water
pollution abatement plan.
Austin Regional Office
2800 S. IH35, Suite 100
Austin, Texas 78704
Phone (512) 339-2929
Fax (512) 339-3795
1. The Contractor shall install erosion/sedimentation controls and tree
protective fencing prior to any site preparation work (clearing,
2. The placement of erosion/sedimentation controls shall be in accordance
3. Any significant variation in materials or locations of controls or
fences from those shown on the approved plans must be approved by the
4. The Contractor is required to inspect all controls and fences at weekly
intervals and after significant rainfall events to insure that they
are functioning properly. The person(s) responsible for maintenance
of controls and fences shall immediately make any necessary repairs to
damaged areas. Silt accumulation at controls must be removed when the
5. Prior to final acceptance, haul roads and waterway crossings constructed
for temporary Contractor access must be removed, accumulated sediment
removed from the waterway, and the area restored to the original grade
and revegetated. All land clearing debris shall be disposed of in
6. Field revisions to the EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS
or field inspector with the Texas Commission
(TCEQ) during the course of construction to
Major revisions must be approved by the
approved spoil disposal sites.
(TCEQ).
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL NOTES
grubbing or excavation).
with the EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS
depth reaches six (6) inches.
City Engineer.
TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT PLAN
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
required by the Engineer
on Environmental Quality
correct control inadequacies.
may be
CITY OF GEORGETOWN GENERAL NOTES
1.These construction plans were prepared, sealed, signed and dated by a Texas Licensed
3URIHVVLRQDO(QJLQHHU7KHUHIRUHEDVHGRQWKHHQJLQHHU¶VFRQFXUUHQFHRIFRPSOLDQFHWKH
construction plans for construction of the proposed project are hereby approved subject to the
standard Construction Specifications and Details Manual and all other applicable City, State and
Federal Requirements and Codes.
2.This project is subject to all City Standard Specifications and Details in effect at the time of submittal
of the project to the City.
3.The site construction plans shall meet all requirements of the approved site plan.
4.Wastewater mains and service lines shall be SDR 26 PVC.
5.Wastewater mains shall be installed without horizontal or vertical bends.
6.Maximum distance between wastewater manholes is 500 feet.
7.Wastewater mains shall be low pressure air tested and mandrel tested by the contractor according to
the City of Georgetown and TCEQ requirements.
8.Wastewater manholes shall be vacuum tested and coated by the contractor according to City of
Georgetown and TCEQ requirements.
9.Wastewater mains shall be camera tested by the contractor and submitted to the City on DVD format
prior to paving the streets.
10.Private water system fire lines shall be tested by the contractor to 200 psi for 2 hours.
11.Private water system fire lines shall be ductile iron piping from the water main to the building
sprinkler system, and 200 psi C900 PVC for all others.
12.Public water system mains shall be 150 psi C900 PVC and tested by the contractor at 150 psi for 2
hours.
13.All bends and changes in direction on water mains shall be restrained and thrust blocked.
14.Long fire hydrant leads shall be restrained.
15.All water lines are to be bacteria tested by the contractor according to the City standards and
specifications.
16.Water and Sewer main crossings shall meet all requirements of the TCEQ and the City.
17.Flexible base material for public streets shall be TXDOT Type A Grade 1.
18.Hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement shall be Type D unless otherwise specified and shall be a
minimum of 2 inches thick on public streets and roadways.
19.All sidewalk ramps are to be installed with the public infrastructure.
20.A maintenance bond is required to be submitted to the City prior to acceptance of the public
improvements. This bond shall be established for 1 year in the amount of 25% of the cost of the
public improvements and shall follow the City format.
21.Record drawings of the public improvements shall be submitted to the City by the design engineer
prior to acceptance of the project. These drawings shall be on mylar or on TIFF or PDF disk (300
dpi). If a disk is submitted, a bond set shall be included with the disk.
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1.Prior to beginning construction, the Owner or his authorized representative, shall
convene a Pre-Construction Conference between the City of Georgetown,
Engineer, Contractor, County Engineer (if applicable), Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality Field Office, and any other affected parties. Notify all such
parties at least 48 hours prior to the time of the conference and 48 hours prior to
beginning construction.
2.Any existing utilities, pavement, curbs, and/or sidewalks damaged or removed
shall be repaired by the Contractor at his expense before acceptance of the
project.
3.The location of any existing water, wastewater lines or other utilities shall be
verified by the City of Georgetown & other utility providers prior to construction.
4.Manhole frames, covers, water valve covers, etc., shall be raised to finished
pavement grade at the Contractor's expense by a qualified contractor with City
inspection. All utility adjustments shall be completed prior to final paving
construction.
5.Steger Bizzell has endeavored to design these plans compliant with ADA/TDLR
and other accessibility requirements. However, the contractor shall not be relieved
of any responsibility for constructing these improvements compliant with all
applicable accessibility standards. If the contractor notices any discrepancies
between these plans and accessibility laws/rules, he is to stop work in the area of
conflict and notify Steger Bizzell immediately for a resolution and/or revision to
these plans. Steger Bizzell shall not be held responsible for constructing this site
compliant with accessibility laws/rules regardless of what is shown in these plans.
PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. All disturbed areas shall be restored as noted below:
a. A minimum of four inches of imported sandy loam topsoil or approved equal
shall be placed in all drainage channels (except rock) and on all cleared areas.
b. Grass areas may be sodded, plugged, sprigged or seeded except that solid
sod shall be used in swales or other areas subject to erosion.
The seeding for permanent erosion control shall be applied over areas disturbed by
construction as follows, unless specified elsewhere:
i. From September 15 to March 1, seeding shall be with a combination
of 1 pound per 1,000 square feet of unhulled Bermuda and 7 pounds per 1,000
square feet of Winter Rye with a purity of 95% with 90% germination.
ii. From March 2 to September 14, seeding shall be with hulled Bermuda
at a rate of 3 pounds per 1,000 square feet with a purity of 95% with 85%
germination.
c. Fertilizer shall be slow release granular or pelleted type and shall have an
analysis of 15-15-15 and shall be applied at the rate of 23 pounds per acre once at
the time of planting and again once during the time of establishment.
d. All planted areas shall be provided with a readily available water supply and
watered as necessary to ensure continuous healthy growth and development. The
planted area shall be irrigated or sprinkled in a manner that will not erode the top soil,
but will sufficiently soak the soil to a depth of six inches. The irrigation shall occur at
ten-day intervals during the first two months. Rainfall occurrences of 1/2 inch or
more shall postpone the watering schedule for one week.
e. Mulch type used shall be Mulch, applied at a rate of 1,500 pounds per acre.
1. Call all affected parties at least 48 hours prior to beginning any
construction to schedule a pre-construction conference and secure
2. Install temporary erosion controls prior to any clearing and grubbing.
Note: Other contractors could be working on this site. Coordinate all
all required permits.
Notify the City of Georgetown when installed.
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
activities with the activities of others.
GENERAL NOTES
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
NO.DATEREVISIONBY
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE for
COLLEGE PLACE
Georgetown
Williamson County, Texas
P\22000-22999
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES
P\22000-22999
Xref DWG FILE.
Sheet Number:
Drawing Path:
SCALE:
Project Number:
Project Name:
Project Path:
22236
AS NOTED30-Jun-14
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
JMC
30-Jun-14GAD, JMC
07-03-2014
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES30-Jun-14JMC
30-Jun-14JMC
SCP-2014-----
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
DRAINAGE PLAN
DEVELOPED CONDITIONS
1" = 30'
EXISTING CONDITIONS
1" = 30'
EXISTING DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
DRAINAGE AREA A = 0.00163 SQ. MI.
= 1.04 ACRES
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
COMPOSITE OF PAVEMENT AND LAWN GOOD
HYDROLOGIC GROUP - D
Tlag = 0.10
PAVEMENT - RCN 98
LAWN, GOOD - RCN 80
0.387 AC. IMPERVIOUS COVER
0.387 ACRES / 1.165 AC = 33%
(33% * 98) + (67% * 80) = 86
RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER -86
2 YR RUNOFF = 3 CFS
10 YR RUNOFF = 5 CFS
25 YR RUNOFF = 6 CFS
100 YR RUNOFF = 8 CFS
DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
DRAINAGE AREA A = 0.00163 SQ. MI.
= 1.04 ACRES
DEVELOPED CONDITIONS:
COMPOSITE OF PAVEMENT AND LAWN GOOD
HYDROLOGIC GROUP - D
Tlag = 0.10
PAVEMENT - RCN 98
LAWN, GOOD - RCN 80
0.46 AC. IMPERVIOUS COVER
0.46 ACRES / 1.165 AC = 40%
(40% * 98) + (60% * 80) = 87
RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER -87
2 YR RUNOFF = 3 CFS
10 YR RUNOFF = 5 CFS
25 YR RUNOFF = 6 CFS
100 YR RUNOFF = 8 CFS
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
NO.DATEREVISIONBY
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE for
COLLEGE PLACE
Georgetown
Williamson County, Texas
P\22000-22999
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES
P\22000-22999
Xref DWG FILE.
Sheet Number:
Drawing Path:
SCALE:
Project Number:
Project Name:
Project Path:
22236
AS NOTED1-Jul-14
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
JMC
1-Jul-14GAD, JMC
07-03-2014
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES1-Jul-14JMC
1-Jul-14JMC
SCP-2014-----
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
The Architect/Engineer assumes
responsibility for appropriate
use of this standard.
The Architect/Engineer assumes
responsibility for appropriate
use of this standard.
The Architect/Engineer assumes
responsibility for appropriate
use of this standard.
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS
STABILIZED
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCESILT
FENCE
SILT
FENCE
SANDBAGS FILLED WITH
PEA GRAVEL FOR GRATE
INLET PROTECTION
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
NO.DATEREVISIONBY
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE for
COLLEGE PLACE
Georgetown
Williamson County, Texas
P\22000-22999
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES
P\22000-22999
Xref DWG FILE.
Sheet Number:
Drawing Path:
SCALE:
Project Number:
Project Name:
Project Path:
22236
AS NOTED1-Jul-14
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
JMC
1-Jul-14GAD, JMC
07-03-2014
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES1-Jul-14JMC
1-Jul-14JMC
SCP-2014-----
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
DETAILS
APPROVED BY:DRAWN BY:
SCALE:DATE:
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND DETAILS
The Architect/Engineer assumes
responsibility for appropriate
use of this standard.
APPROVED BY:DRAWN BY:
SCALE:DATE:
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND DETAILS
The Architect/Engineer assumes
responsibility for appropriate
use of this standard.
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines Training - Renee Hanson
ITEM SUMMARY:
Renee Hanson will provide training for the HARC on the utilization of the Design Guidelines as
they apply to Old Town in the decision making process.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Update from Sign Subcommittee.
ITEM SUMMARY:
The Sign Subcommittee Chair will provide an update of recently issued CDCs for business
signage.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Frost, Recording Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Staff updates and reminder of future meetings.
ITEM SUMMARY:
1. Sidewalk Study Open House - Tuesday, September 30th @ 5:30
2. Downtown Overlay Expansion Project
3. Sidewalk Ordinance
4. Downtown Project Updates
5. HARC Sign Subcommittee Meeting - Monday, October 13th @ 4:00
6. HARC Meetings - Thursday, October 23rd @ 5:30 and 6:00
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
-
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Frost, Recording Secretary