HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda CC 06.27.2012 SpecialNotice of Meeting of the
Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
JUNE 27, 2012
The Georgetown City Council will meet on JUNE 27, 2012 at 5:30 P.M. at City Council Chambers - 101
East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas
If you need accommodations for a disability, please notify the city in advance.
Regular Session
(This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose
authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A Call to Order
A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
B Presentation and training on State Conflict of Interest Laws, the City Ethics Ordinance, Local
Government Code Chapter 176 Disclosure Requirements, Open Meetings Act, and the Public
Information Act -- Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
C Presentation and discussion of the current Procedures Ordinance and proposed revisions -- Bridget
Chapman, Acting City Attorney
D Presentation and discussion of the proposed Governance Policy -- Bridget Chapman, Acting City
Attorney
E Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 2.01 of the City Charter
F Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 2.02 of the City Charter
G Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 2.06 of the City Charter
H Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 2.07 of the City Charter
I Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Sections 2.09 and 2.10 of the City Charter
J Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 2.14 of the City Charter
K Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 2.15 of the City Charter
L Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 3.01 of the City Charter
M Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 3.05 of the City Charter
N Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Sections 5.01 and 5.02 of the City Charter
O Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 5.06 of the City Charter
P Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 5.08 of the City Charter
Q Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
City Charter Article VIII and Section 6 of the City Charter
R Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 9.16 of the City Charter
S Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Lobbying
Adjournment
Certificate of Posting
I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of
Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all
times, on the _____ day of _________________, 2012, at __________, and remained so posted for at least
72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
__________________________________
Jessica Brettle, City Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Call to Order
A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
Cover Memo
Item # A
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Presentation and training on State Conflict of Interest Laws, the City Ethics Ordinance, Local Government
Code Chapter 176 Disclosure Requirements, Open Meetings Act, and the Public Information Act -- Bridget
Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ITEM SUMMARY:
As required by the City Charter, the annual training and review of State Conflict of Interest laws, the City
Ethic’s Ordinance, Local Government Code Chapter 176, Open Meetings Act and the Public Information
Act.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
Cover Memo
Item # B
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Presentation and discussion of the current Procedures Ordinance and proposed revisions -- Bridget Chapman,
Acting City Attorney
ITEM SUMMARY:
Presentation and review of procedures ordinance as well as proposed revisions to the ordinance.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
Cover Memo
Item # C
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Presentation and discussion of the proposed Governance Policy -- Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ITEM SUMMARY:
Presentation and review of the proposed revision to the existing Governance Policy including the specific
revisions recommended by the Ad Hoc Committee regarding City Staff/Council Relations.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
Cover Memo
Item # D
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 2.01 of the City Charter
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council appointed a Charter Review Committee to review, analyze and discuss certain
City Charter provisions, and to provide a report and recommendations back to the City Council no later than
June 1, 2012. The City Attorney was appointed as the Committee Liaison.
The Charter Review Committee met each week from February 9, 2012 through May 3, 2012 to review,
discuss and analyze the City Charter provisions. On May 22, 2012, the Final Report of the Charter Review
Committee was presented to City Council.
In reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, Staff is requesting that City Council make the following
determinations:
1. Should an amendment of this Section to the City Charter be included on a Charter Election Ballot?
2. If so, adopt the Committee’s recommendation or determine exact language to be submitted to the
voters?
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Redline_Section 2.01
Cover Memo
Item # E
Proposed Language:
Sec. 2.01. - Number, selection, and term of office.
The Council shall be composed of seven (7) Councilmembers elected from single -member
districts and a Mayor elected at-large, each of whom unless sooner removed under the
provisions of the Charter, shall serve for three-year terms, from the first meeting of the Council
following the Councilmember's election until the first meeting of the Council following the
election three (3) years later, or until the councilmember's successor has been elected and duly
qualified.
Councilmembers must reside in the districts from which they are elected except that
Councilmembers may complete the terms to which they were elected if district boundaries are
changed during their terms causing their residence s no longer to be within the districts from
which they were elected.
The authority to adopt council district boundaries shall reside in the council. The council may
revise district boundaries from time to time and shall adopt district boundaries within one year
after the publication of each United States decennial census.
Councilmembers and Mayor shall be elected for three-year terms, which shall begin with the
general election to be held in 1995, and the terms shall be staggered such that three Council
members are elected in one year, the Mayor and two Council members are elected in the
following year and two Councilmembers are elected the last year. For the staggering of the
initial three-year terms, the following procedure shall apply:
(1) In 1995, Councilmembers shall be elected for Districts 1, 3, 4 and 5. Following the
election, the Councilmembers shall draw lots to serve either a three-year term (2 members)
or a two-year term (2 members).
(2) In 1996, the Mayor shall be elected for a three-year team, and Councilmembers shall
be elected for Districts 2, 6 and 7. Following the election, the Councilmembers shall draw
lots to serve either a three-year term (2 members) or a two-year term (1 member).
(3) In 1997, the two Districts whose Councilmembers serve two-year terms shall elect
Councilmembers for three-year terms. All succeeding elections shall be to elect
Councilmembers for three-year terms in compliance with this Charter.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 3
Item # E
Redline of changes:
Sec. 2.01. - Number, selection, and term of office.
The Council shall be composed of seven (7) Councilmembers elected from single -member
districts and a Mayor elected at-large, each of whom unless sooner removed under the
provisions of the Charter, shall serve for three-year terms, from the first meeting of the Council
following the Councilmember's election until the first meeting of the Council following the
election two (2) three (3) years later, or until the councilmember's successor has been elected
and duly qualified.
Four (4) members of the Council shall be elected each odd-numbered year and three (3)
members and a Mayor each even-numbered year.
Councilmembers must reside in the districts from which they are elected except that
Councilmembers may complete the terms to which they were elected if distri ct boundaries are
changed during their terms causing their residences no longer to be within the districts from
which they were elected.
The authority to adopt council district boundaries shall reside in the council. The council may
revise district boundaries from time to time and shall adopt district boundaries within one year
after the publication of each United States decennial census.
Councilmembers and Mayor shall be elected for three-year terms, which shall begin with the
general election to be held in 1995, and the terms shall be staggered such that three Council
members are elected in one year, the Mayor and two Council members are elected in the
following year and two Councilmembers are elected the last year. For the staggering of the
initial three-year terms, the following procedure shall apply:
(1) In 1995, Councilmembers shall be elected for Districts 1, 3, 4 and 5. Following the
election, the Councilmembers shall draw lots to serve either a three-year term (2 members)
or a two-year term (2 members).
(2) In 1996, the Mayor shall be elected for a three-year team, and Councilmembers shall
be elected for Districts 2, 6 and 7. Following the election, the Councilmembers shall draw
lots to serve either a three-year term (2 members) or a two-year term (1 member).
(3) In 1997, the two Districts whose Councilmembers serve two-year terms shall elect
Councilmembers for three-year terms. All succeeding elections shall be to elect
Councilmembers for three-year terms in compliance with this Charter.
1994 M, 2, 6, 7
1995 1, 3, 4, 5-draw straws as to terms: 3 yr. terms (2), 2 yr. terms (2)
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 3
Item # E
1996 M, 2, 6, 7 - Mayor = 3 yrs.; draw straws as to terms; 3 yr. terms (2), 2 yr. terms (1)
1997 1995 2 yr. terms (2)
1998
1995 3 yr. terms (2)
1996
2 yr.
term
s (1)
1999
Mayor
1996
3 yr.
term
s (2)
2000 1996 3 yr. terms (2)
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 3
Item # E
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 2.02 of the City Charter
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council appointed a Charter Review Committee to review, analyze and discuss certain
City Charter provisions, and to provide a report and recommendations back to the City Council no later than
June 1, 2012. The City Attorney was appointed as the Committee Liaison.
The Charter Review Committee met each week from February 9, 2012 through May 3, 2012 to review,
discuss and analyze the City Charter provisions. On May 22, 2012, the Final Report of the Charter Review
Committee was presented to City Council.
In reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, Staff is requesting that City Council make the following
determinations:
1. Should an amendment of this Section to the City Charter be included on a Charter Election Ballot?
2. If so, adopt the Committee’s recommendation or determine exact language to be submitted to the
voters?
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Redline_Section 2.02
Cover Memo
Item # F
Sec. 2.02. Qualifications.
a) A candidate for election to office as a Councilmember or Mayor shall be:
1. at least twenty-one (21) years of age;
2. a citizen and qualified voter of the State of Texas and the City of Georgetown; and
3. a resident of the City of Georgetown for a period of twelve (12) months as of the last
legal date for filing.
b) A candidate for election to office as a Councilmember shall also be a resident of the
Council District the candidate would represent for a period of twelve (12) months as of the
last legal date for filing.
c) If district boundaries are changed, a candidate for election to office as a Councilmember
shall be:
1. at least twenty-one (21) years of age;
2. a citizen and qualified voter of the State of Texas and the City of Georgetown;
3. a resident of the City of Georgetown for a period of twelve (12) months as of the last
legal date for filing; and
4. a resident of the Council District the candidate would represent after the district
boundaries are changed as of the last legal date for filing.
d) No member of the Council shall hold any other office or employment under the City
Government while a member of said Council, nor hold any paid employment under the
City Government within two (2) years thereafter. A member of the Council ceasing to
reside in the City shall immediately forfeit that office.
Redline of Changes:
Sec. 2.02. - Qualifications.
a. A candidate for election to office as a At the time of election to office, each
Councilmember and the Mayor shall be
1. at least twenty-one (21) years of age
2. a citizen and qualified voter of the State of Texas and the City of Georgetown and
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # F
3. a resident of the City of Georgetown for a period of twelve (12) months as of the last
legal date for filing; and
b. A candidate for election to office as a Councilmember shall also be a resident of the
Council District the candidate would represent for a period of twelve (12) months as of
the last legal date for filing.
c. If district boundaries are changed, a candidate for election to office as a Councilmember
shall be:
1. at least twenty-one (21) years of age;
2. a citizen and qualified voter of the State of Texas and the City of Georgetown;
3. a resident of the City of Georgetown for a period of twelve (12) months as of
the last legal date for filing; and
4. a resident of the Council District the candidate would represent after the
district boundaries are changed as of the last legal date for filing.
d. No member of the Council shall hold any other office or employment under the City
Government while a member of said Council, nor hold any paid employment under the
City Government within two (2) years thereafter. A member of the Council ceasing to
reside in the City shall immediately forfeit that office.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # F
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 2.06 of the City Charter
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council appointed a Charter Review Committee to review, analyze and discuss certain
City Charter provisions, and to provide a report and recommendations back to the City Council no later than
June 1, 2012. The City Attorney was appointed as the Committee Liaison.
The Charter Review Committee met each week from February 9, 2012 through May 3, 2012 to review,
discuss and analyze the City Charter provisions. On May 22, 2012, the Final Report of the Charter Review
Committee was presented to City Council.
In reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, Staff is requesting that City Council make the following
determinations:
1. Should an amendment of this Section to the City Charter be included on a Charter Election Ballot?
2. If so, adopt the Committee’s recommendation or determine exact language to be submitted to the
voters?
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Redline_Section 2.06
Cover Memo
Item # G
Proposed New Language:
The Mayor shall preside at all meetings of the Council and shall be recognized as head of the
City government for all ceremonial purposes, for the purpose of receiving services of civil
process, for emergency purposes, and for military purposes; but the Mayor shall have no
regular administrative duties. The Mayor, as a member of the Council, shall be entitled to vote
only in case of a tie upon all affairs considered by the Council and shall have no veto power. At
the first Council meeting following each regular election of Councilmembers, the Council shall,
by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council),
designate one Councilmember as Mayor Pro Tem, who shall serve in such capacity unless
replaced by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member
Council) prior to the next annual designation. The Mayor Pro Tem shall act as Mayor during
the absence or disability of the Mayor, and shall have power to perform every act the Mayor
could perform, if present; provided, however, that in all cases the Mayor Pro Tem shall be
entitled to vote.
Redline of Changes:
Sec. 2.06. - Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem.
The Mayor shall preside at all meetings of the Council and shall be recognized as head of the
City government for all ceremonial purposes, for the purpose of receiving services of civil
process, for emergency purposes, and for military purposes; but the Mayor shall have no
regular administrative duties. The Mayor, as a member of the Council, shall be entitled to vote
only in case of a tie upon all affairs considered by the Council and shall have no veto power. At
it’s the first Council meeting following each regular election of Councilmembers, the Council
shall, by election, majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member
Council), designate one of its number a Councilmember as Mayor Pro Tem, who shall serve in
such capacity during the pleasure unless replaced by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at
least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council) prior to the Council next annual designation.
The Mayor Pro Tem shall act as Mayor during the absence or disability of the Mayor, and shall
have power to perform every act the Mayor could perform, if present; provided, however, that
in all cases the Mayor Pro Tem shall be entitled to vote.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 1
Item # G
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 2.07 of the City Charter
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council appointed a Charter Review Committee to review, analyze and discuss certain
City Charter provisions, and to provide a report and recommendations back to the City Council no later than
June 1, 2012. The City Attorney was appointed as the Committee Liaison.
The Charter Review Committee met each week from February 9, 2012 through May 3, 2012 to review,
discuss and analyze the City Charter provisions. On May 22, 2012, the Final Report of the Charter Review
Committee was presented to City Council.
In reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, Staff is requesting that City Council make the following
determinations:
1. Should an amendment of this Section to the City Charter be included on a Charter Election Ballot?
2. If so, adopt the Committee’s recommendation or determine exact language to be submitted to the
voters?
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Redline_Section 2.07
Cover Memo
Item # H
Sec. 2.07 – City Secretary
The Council shall appoint a City Secretary by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4
affirmative votes for 7 Member Council). The City Secretary need not be a resident of the City
when appointed but shall reside in the City after appointment. The City Secretary shall not be
appointed for a definite term but may be removed by the Council by majority vote of all
Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council). The Council shall
determine the compensation the City Secretary shall receive.
The City Secretary shall recommend appointment of Assistant City Secretaries. An Assistant
City Secretary recommended by the City Secretary shall be appointed upon approval by
majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council).
Assistant City Secretaries are authorized to act for and on behalf of the City Secretary. Assistant
City Secretaries may be removed by the Council by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at
least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council).
The City Secretary shall keep the records of the Council, and shall have such other duties and
responsibilities as may be assigned by this Charter and the Council.
Redline of Changes:
Sec. 2.07. - City Secretary.
The Council shall appoint a City Secretary, who shall serve at the pleasure of the Council. by
majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council). The
City Secretary need not be a resident of the City when appointed but shall reside in the City
after appointment. The City Secretary shall not be appointed for a definite term but may be
removed by the Council by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes for
7 Member Council). The Council shall determine the compensation the City Secretary shall
receive.
The City Secretary shall appoint such assistants as may be authorized by the Council. The City
Secretary shall recommend appointment of Assistant City Secretaries. An Assistant City
Secretary recommended by the City Secretary shall be appointed upon approval by majority
vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council). Assistant City
Secretaries are authorized to act for and on behalf of the City Secretary. Assistant City
Secretaries may be removed by the Council by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4
affirmative votes for 7 Member Council).
The City Secretary shall keep the records of the Council, and shall have such other duties and
responsibilities as may be assigned by this Charter and the Council.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 1
Item # H
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Sections 2.09 and 2.10 of the City Charter
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council appointed a Charter Review Committee to review, analyze and discuss certain
City Charter provisions, and to provide a report and recommendations back to the City Council no later than
June 1, 2012. The City Attorney was appointed as the Committee Liaison.
The Charter Review Committee met each week from February 9, 2012 through May 3, 2012 to review,
discuss and analyze the City Charter provisions. On May 22, 2012, the Final Report of the Charter Review
Committee was presented to City Council.
In reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, Staff is requesting that City Council make the following
determinations:
1. Should an amendment of this Section to the City Charter be included on a Charter Election Ballot?
2. If so, adopt the Committee’s recommendation or determine exact language to be submitted to the voters?
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Redline_Section 2.09 & 2.10
Cover Memo
Item # I
Proposed Language:
Sec. 2.09. - Rules of procedure.
The Council shall by ordinance determine its own rules and order of business. The Mayor and a
majority of the members of Council shall constitute a quorum, and in the Mayor's absence, a
majority plus one of the members of Council shall constitute a quorum. Should the Council be
reduced to less than a majority plus one of the members of Council by death, resignation,
nonresidence or for any other reason, the remaining members of the Council shall constitute a
quorum for the purpose of filling vacancies. Should the Council be reduced to less than a
majority plus one of the members of Council by death, resignation, nonresidence, or for any
other reason, the remaining members of the Council shall constitute a quorum for the purpose
of filling vacancies and for the purpose of taking an emergency action to protect the life, health,
safety, property and welfare of the public. Such emergency action shall take effect only upon
the unanimous approval of the then remaining members of the Council. The Council may adopt
such rules, and prescribe such penalties as it may see fit to enforce the attendance of its
members at all regular and called meetings of the Council or its committees. Minutes of all
meetings of the Council shall be taken and recorded in the form and manner required by state
law, and such minutes shall constitute a public record.
Sec. 2.10 Procedure to enact legislation
The Council shall legislate by ordinance, and the enacting clause of every ordinance
shall be: "Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Georgetown." The City Attorney shall
approve all ordinances adopted by the Council, as to the legality thereof, or shall file with the
City Secretary written legal objections thereto. Evidence of approval of an ordinance by the City
Attorney may be by notation on the ordinance itself, or by separate paper or instrument. Every
ordinance enacted by the Council shall be signed by the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or by two (2)
Councilmembers and shall be filed with and recorded by the City Secretary. A proposed
ordinance shall be filed with the City Secretary at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting at
which the ordinance is to be considered. The City Council may require a full reading of the
proposed ordinance or caption prior to adoption. Legislation is enacted by a vote of not less
than a majority of the members of the Council present and qualified to vote at the meeting. All
ordinances, unless otherwise provided by law or by the terms of such ordinance, shall take
effect immediately upon final passage.
The City Council may require a full reading of the proposed ordinance prior to adoption by a
vote of the majority of the Councilmembers present at the meeting. All ordinances, unless
otherwise provided by law or by the terms of such ordinance, shall take effect immediately
upon final passage thereof.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 3
Item # I
Redline of Changes:
Sec. 2.09. - Rules of procedure.
The Council shall by ordinance determine its own rules and order of business. The Mayor and a
majority of the members of Council shall constitute a quorum, and in the Mayor's absence, a
majority plus one of the members of Council shall constitute a quorum. Legislation may not be
enacted unless it is adopted by a vote of not less than a majority of the members of the Council.
Should the Council be reduced to less than a majority plus one of the members of Council by
death, resignation, nonresidence or for any other reason, the remaining members of the Council
shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of filling vacancies. Should the Council be reduced to
less than a majority plus one of the members of Council by death, resignation, nonresidence, or
for any other reason, the remaining members of the Council shall constitute a quorum for the
purpose of filling vacancies and for the purpose of taking an emergency action to protect the
life, health, safety, property and welfare of the public. Such emergency action shall take effect
only upon the unanimous approval of the then remaining members of the Council. The Council
may adopt such rules, and prescribe such penalties as it may see fit to enforce the attendance of
its members at all regular and called meetings of the Council or its committees. Minutes of all
meetings of the Council shall be taken and recorded in the form and manner required by state
law, and such minutes shall constitute a public record.
Sec. 2.10. - Procedure to enact legislation.
The Council shall legislate by ordinance, and the enacting clause of every ordinance shall be:
"Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Georgetown." The City Attorney shall approve
all ordinances adopted by the Council, as to the legality thereof, or shall file with the City
Secretary written legal objections thereto. Evidence of approval of an ordinance by the City
Attorney may be by notation on the ordinance itself, or by separate paper or instrument. Every
ordinance enacted by the Council shall be signed by the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or by two (2)
Councilmembers and shall be filed with and recorded by the City Secretary. All A proposed
ordinances shall be read in open meeting of the Council at two (2) open meetings of the Council
on two (2) separate days; the second such reading shall occur not less than ten (10) days
following the first such reading; provided, that the secondary reading required herein shall be
sufficient if read by descriptive caption only. The actual reading of the ordinance on first
reading may be handled by the reading of the caption if the following provisions of the Charter
have preceded the first reading.
1.The caption of the proposed ordinance has been published in a newspaper of
general circulation within the City for a minimum of seventy-two (72) hours prior to the
meeting; and
2.The proposed ordinance is filed with the City Secretary at least seven (7) days
prior to the meeting at which the ordinance is to be considered. The City Council may
require a full reading of the proposed ordinance or caption prior to adoption. by a vote
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 3
Item # I
of the majority of the Councilmembers present at the meeting. Legislation is enacted by
a vote of not less than a majority of the members of the Council present and qualified to
vote at the meeting. All ordinances, unless otherwise provided by law or by the terms of
such ordinance, shall take effect immediately upon final passage thereof. The
requirements for reading ordinances on two separate days may be dispensed with
where an ordinance relating to the immediate preservation of the public peace, health,
safety or welfare is adopted by the favorable vote of not less than a majority, plus one, of
all the Councilmembers qualified and serving, and contains a statement of the nature of
the emergency.
The City Council may require a full reading of the proposed ordinance prior to adoption by a
vote of the majority of the Councilmembers present at the meeting. All ordinances, unless
otherwise provided by law or by the terms of such ordinance, shall take effect immediately
upon final passage thereof. The requirements for reading ordinances on two separate days may
be dispensed with where an ordinance relating to the immediate preservation of the public
peace, health, safety or welfare is adopted by the favorable vote of not less than a majority, plus
one, of all the Councilmembers qualified and serving, and contains a statement of the nature of
the emergency.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 3
Item # I
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 2.14 of the City Charter
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council appointed a Charter Review Committee to review, analyze and discuss certain
City Charter provisions, and to provide a report and recommendations back to the City Council no later than
June 1, 2012. The City Attorney was appointed as the Committee Liaison.
The Charter Review Committee met each week from February 9, 2012 through May 3, 2012 to review,
discuss and analyze the City Charter provisions. On May 22, 2012, the Final Report of the Charter Review
Committee was presented to City Council.
In reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, Staff is requesting that City Council make the following
determinations:
1. Should an amendment of this Section to the City Charter be included on a Charter Election Ballot?
2. If so, adopt the Committee’s recommendation or determine exact language to be submitted to the
voters?
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Redline_Section 2.14
Cover Memo
Item # J
Sec. 2.14. - Boards, Commissions and Committees.
The Council shall have the power to establish boards, commissions and committees to assist it
in carrying out its duties in accordance with State law.
Members of such bodies shall be recommended by the Mayor and appointed by a vote of the
majority of the Council (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council) in open meeting
unless otherwise provided by law. Should the Mayor fail to recommend and/or the Council fail
to appoint the member(s) recommended by the Mayor, a majority of the Council plus one (at
least 5 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council) may make the appointment(s) without a
recommendation of the Mayor.
Redline of Changes:
Sec. 2.14. - Boards, Commissions and Committees.
The Council shall have the power to establish boards, commissions and committees to assist it
in carrying out its duties in accordance with State law.
Members of such bodies shall be recommended by the Mayor and appointed by a vote of the
majority of the Council (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council) in open meeting
unless otherwise provided by law. Should the Mayor fail to recommend and/or the Council fail
to appoint the member(s) recommended by the Mayor, a majority of the Council plus one (at
least 5 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council) may make the appointment(s) without a
recommendation of the Mayor.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 1
Item # J
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 2.15 of the City Charter
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council appointed a Charter Review Committee to review, analyze and discuss certain
City Charter provisions, and to provide a report and recommendations back to the City Council no later than
June 1, 2012. The City Attorney was appointed as the Committee Liaison.
The Charter Review Committee met each week from February 9, 2012 through May 3, 2012 to review,
discuss and analyze the City Charter provisions. On May 22, 2012, the Final Report of the Charter Review
Committee was presented to City Council.
In reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, Staff is requesting that City Council make the following
determinations:
1. Should an amendment of this Section to the City Charter be included on a Charter Election Ballot?
2. If so, adopt the Committee’s recommendation or determine exact language to be submitted to the
voters?
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Redline_Section 2.15
Cover Memo
Item # K
Sec. 2.15. - Remuneration to Mayor and Council.
The Mayor shall name a committee, composed of qualified voters, whose responsibility will be
to review, at least every two (2) years, the compensation of the Mayor and Councilmembers,
and make recommendations regarding the compensation. The report of the committee shall be
made at a regular Council meeting and shall require an official act by Council to enact, alter or
reject the recommendations by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes
for 7 Member Council). In all cases where Council action increases existing compensation for
Mayor and Councilmembers, the changes in compensation will begin immediately following
the next election of City officials. Council may reduce compensation for Mayor and
Councilmembers at any time by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative
votes for 7 Member Council).
Redline of Changes:
Sec. 2.15. - Remuneration to Mayor and Council.
The Mayor shall name a committee, composed of qualified voters, whose responsibility will be
to review, at least every two (2) years, the salaries compensation of the Mayor and
Councilmembers, and make recommendations regarding those salaries the compensation. The
report of the committee shall be made at a regular Council meeting and shall require an official
act by Council to either enact, alter or reject the recommendations by majority vote of all
Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7 member Council). In all cases where action
alters increases existing salaries compensation for Mayor and Councilmembers, the changes in
salaries compensation will begin immediately following the next election of City officials.
Council may reduce compensation for Mayor and Councilmembers at any time by majority vote
of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council).
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 1
Item # K
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 3.01 of the City Charter
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council appointed a Charter Review Committee to review, analyze and discuss certain
City Charter provisions, and to provide a report and recommendations back to the City Council no later than
June 1, 2012. The City Attorney was appointed as the Committee Liaison.
The Charter Review Committee met each week from February 9, 2012 through May 3, 2012 to review,
discuss and analyze the City Charter provisions. On May 22, 2012, the Final Report of the Charter Review
Committee was presented to City Council.
In reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, Staff is requesting that City Council make the following
determinations:
1. Should an amendment of this Section to the City Charter be included on a Charter Election Ballot?
2. If so, adopt the Committee’s recommendation or determine exactly language to be submitted to the
voters?
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Redline_Section 3.01 Committee Report
Cover Memo
Item # L
City Charter Section 3.01 – General Election
The City Charter currently provides that the regular City election shall be held annually on the
first Saturday in May or on such date as is otherwise required by State law, at which time
officers shall be elected to fill those offices which become vacant that year. A Charter
Amendment has been proposed to change the City general election to November instead of
May.
The Committee thoroughly reviewed and evaluated City election information, including
historical City election statistics. The Committee exhaustively discussed and debated the
advantages and disadvantages of a May election versus a November election.
MAJORITY REPORT
A majority of Committee Members (5 of 8) are of the opinion that the City general election
should be held in May. The primary points in support of this opinion are:
* voters concerned and more informed about local issues
*avoid partisan emphasis in local election
*avoid “information overload” of November campaigns
* May election costs less because limited to local issues
* less expensive to campaign so open to more candidates
* maintain integrity of local election with separate election date
* local issues get “lost” in November election
* comfortable with current process
* no Charter Amendment Election necessary
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # L
MINORITY REPORT
A minority of Committee Members (3 of 8) are of the opinion that the City general election
should be held in November. The primary points in support of this opinion are:
* higher voter participation
* least total election cost due to historical City-wide elections in November
* increased voter interest and attention
* May voters will also vote in November
* less influence of “special interests”
* City bond/tax issues are usually placed on November ballot
* date of the City general election is an issue that the voters should decide
The Minority recommends that the following proposed Charter Amendment to Section 3.01 be
included on the ballot:
The City general election shall be held annually on the state uniform election date in
November, at which time officers shall be elected to fill those offices which become
vacant that year.
CONSENSUS REPORT
The Committee observed that election costs are minimized if ALL City elections are held in May
or November – not both. Historically, the City often holds elections both May and November of the
same year. Given that election costs are minimized if a City election is held only once a year, it is
suggested that to the extent possible, all City issues be included on the general election ballot in May or
November, giving due consideration to the flexibility necessary for bond financing and tax issues.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # L
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 3.05 of the City Charter
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council appointed a Charter Review Committee to review, analyze and discuss certain
City Charter provisions, and to provide a report and recommendations back to the City Council no later than
June 1, 2012. The City Attorney was appointed as the Committee Liaison.
The Charter Review Committee met each week from February 9, 2012 through May 3, 2012 to review,
discuss and analyze the City Charter provisions. On May 22, 2012, the Final Report of the Charter Review
Committee was presented to City Council.
In reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, Staff is requesting that City Council make the following
determinations:
1. Should an amendment of this Section to the City Charter be included on a Charter Election Ballot?
2. If so, adopt the Committee’s recommendation or determine exact language to be submitted to the
voters?
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Redline_Section 3.05
Cover Memo
Item # M
Sec. 3.05. - Notification and Qualification of City Officers.
It shall be the duty of the City Secretary to notify all persons elected or appointed to office of
their election or appointment and to present the officer with a document certifying the official’s
election or appointment to office. An elected or appointed officer must qualify to serve by
signing a statement and taking the oath of office within thirty (30) days; otherwise the office
may be deemed vacant.
Redline of Changes:
Sec. 3.05. - Notification and qualification of City officers.
It shall be the duty of the City Secretary to notify all persons elected or appointed to office of
their election or appointment and to present the officer with a document certifying the official’s
election or appointment to office. all the newly elected or appointed officers may enter upon
their duties. Any officer elected or appointed must qualify by taking and subscribing An
elected or appointed officer must qualify to serve by signing a statement and taking the oath of
office within thirty (30) days; otherwise the office may be deemed vacant.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 1
Item # M
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Sections 5.01 and 5.02 of the City Charter
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council appointed a Charter Review Committee to review, analyze and discuss certain
City Charter provisions, and to provide a report and recommendations back to the City Council no later than
June 1, 2012. The City Attorney was appointed as the Committee Liaison.
The Charter Review Committee met each week from February 9, 2012 through May 3, 2012 to review,
discuss and analyze the City Charter provisions. On May 22, 2012, the Final Report of the Charter Review
Committee was presented to City Council.
In reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, Staff is requesting that City Council make the following
determinations:
1. Should an amendment of this Section to the City Charter be included on a Charter Election Ballot?
2. If so, adopt the Committee’s recommendation or determine exact language to be submitted to the
voters?
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Redline_Section 5.01 & 5.02
Cover Memo
Item # N
Sec. 5.01. - City Manager.
The Council shall appoint a City Manager by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4
affirmative votes for 7 Member Council). The City Manager shall be chosen by the Council on
the basis of executive and administrative training, experience and ability. The City Manager
need not be a resident of the City when appointed but shall reside in the City after appointment.
The City Manager shall not be appointed for a definite term but may be removed by the Council
by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council). The
Council shall determine the compensation the City Manager shall receive.
No member of the Council shall, during the time for which the councilmember is elected or for
two (2) years thereafter, be chosen as City Manager.
Sec. 5.02. - Powers and duties of the City Manager.
The City Manager shall be the chief administrative and executive officer of the City. The City
Manager shall be responsible to the Council for the proper administration of all the affairs of the
City. The powers conferred upon the City Manager include, but shall not be limited by, the
following:
(a) To appoint and remove any officer or employee of the City except those officers and
employees whose appointment or election is otherwise provided for by state law or
this Charter; and
(b) To perform such other duties as may be prescribed by this Charter or required by the
Council not inconsistent with the provisions of this Charter.
Redline of Changes:
Sec. 5.01. - The City Manager.
The Council shall appoint a City Manager who shall be the chief administrative and executive
officer of the City.by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7
Member Council). The City Manager shall be chosen by the Council solely on the basis of
executive and administrative training, experience and ability, and. The City Manager need not,
when appointed, be a resident of the City of Georgetown; however during the tenure of office,
the City Manager shall when appointed but shall reside withinin the City after appointment.
The City Manager shall not be appointed for a definite term but may be removed at the will and
pleasure of the Council by the vote of a majority of all Councilmembers qualified and serving.
The action of the Council in removing the City Manager shall be final, it being the intention of
this Charter to vest all authority and fix all responsibility for such removal in the Council. The
City Manager shall receive such compensation as may be fixed by the Council. by majority vote
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # N
of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council). The Council shall
determine the compensation the City Manager shall receive.
No member of the Council shall, during the time for which the councilmember is elected or for
two (2) years thereafter, be chosen as City Manager.
Sec. 5.02. - Powers and duties of the City Manager.
The City Manager shall be the chief administrative and executive officer of the City. The City
Manager shall be responsible to the Council for the proper administration of all the affairs of the
City. The powers herein conferred upon the City Manager shall include, but shall not be limited
by, the following:
(a) To appoint and remove any officer or employee of the City except those officers and
employees whose appointment or election is otherwise provided for by Sstate law or
this Charter; and
(b) To perform such other duties as may be prescribed by this Charter or required by the
Council, not inconsistent with the provisions of this Charter.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # N
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 5.06 of the City Charter
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council appointed a Charter Review Committee to review, analyze and discuss certain
City Charter provisions, and to provide a report and recommendations back to the City Council no later than
June 1, 2012. The City Attorney was appointed as the Committee Liaison.
The Charter Review Committee met each week from February 9, 2012 through May 3, 2012 to review,
discuss and analyze the City Charter provisions. On May 22, 2012, the Final Report of the Charter Review
Committee was presented to City Council.
In reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, Staff is requesting that City Council make the following
determinations:
1. Should an amendment of this Section to the City Charter be included on a Charter Election Ballot?
2. If so, adopt the Committee’s recommendation or determine exact language to be submitted to the
voters?
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Redline_Section 5.06
Cover Memo
Item # O
Sec. 5.06. - City Attorney.
The Council shall appoint a City Attorney by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4
affirmative votes for 7 Member Council). The City Attorney shall be chosen by the Council on
the basis of legal competence and training, experience and ability. The City Attorney need not
be a resident of the City when appointed but shall reside in the City after appointment;
however, the City Attorney need not reside in the City after appointment if a City employee is
not appointed as City Attorney. The City Attorney shall not be appointed for a definite term
but may be removed by the Council by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4
affirmative votes for 7 Member Council). The Council shall determine the compensation the
City Attorney shall receive.
The City Attorney shall recommend appointment of Assistant City Attorneys. An Assistant
City Attorney recommended by the City Attorney shall be appointed upon approval by
majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council).
Assistant City Attorneys are authorized to act for and on behalf of the City Attorney. Assistant
City Attorneys may be removed by the Council by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least
4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council).
The City Attorney shall be the legal advisor of, and attorney for, all of the offices and
departments of the City, and shall represent the City in all litigation and legal proceedings. The
City Attorney shall draft, approve, or file written objections to every ordinance adopted by the
Council, and shall pass upon all documents, contracts and legal instruments in which the City
may have an interest.
Redline of Changes:
Sec. 5.06. - City Attorney.
The City Council shall appoint a competent attorney who shall have practiced law in the State
of Texas for at least two (2) years immediately preceding the appointment.
The Council shall appoint a City Attorney by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4
affirmative votes for 7 Member Council). The City Attorney shall be chosen by the Council on
the basis of legal competence and training, experience and ability. The City Attorney need not
be a resident of the City when appointed but shall reside in the City after appointment;
however, the City Attorney need not reside in the City after appointment if a City employee is
not appointed as City Attorney. The City Attorney shall not be appointed for a definite term
but may be removed by the Council by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4
affirmative votes for 7 Member Council). The Council shall determine the compensation the
City Attorney shall receive.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # O
The City Attorney shall recommend appointment of Assistant City Attorneys. An Assistant
City Attorney recommended by the City Attorney shall be appointed upon approval by
majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council).
Assistant City Attorneys are authorized to act for and on behalf of the City Attorney. Assistant
City Attorneys may be removed by the Council by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least
4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council).
The City Attorney shall be the legal advisor of, and attorney for, all of the offices and
departments of the City, and shall represent the City in all litigation and legal proceedings. The
City Attorney shall draft, approve, or file written objections to every ordinance adopted by the
Council, and shall pass upon all documents, contracts and legal instruments in which the City
may have an interest.
There shall be such assistant City Attorneys as may be authorized by the Council and appointed
by the City Attorney with the approval of the City Council, and such assistant City Attorneys
shall be authorized to act for and on behalf of the City Attorney. The City Attorney(s) and any
assistant City Attorney(s) serve solely at the will of the Council.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # O
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 5.08 of the City Charter
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council appointed a Charter Review Committee to review, analyze and discuss certain
City Charter provisions, and to provide a report and recommendations back to the City Council no later than
June 1, 2012. The City Attorney was appointed as the Committee Liaison.
The Charter Review Committee met each week from February 9, 2012 through May 3, 2012 to review,
discuss and analyze the City Charter provisions. On May 22, 2012, the Final Report of the Charter Review
Committee was presented to City Council.
In reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, Staff is requesting that City Council make the following
determinations:
1. Should an amendment of this Section to the City Charter be included on a Charter Election Ballot?
2. If so, adopt the Committee’s recommendation or determine exact language to be submitted to the voters?
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Redline_Section 5.08
Cover Memo
Item # P
Sec. 5.08. - Judge of the Municipal Court.
The Council shall appoint a Municipal Court Judge by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at
least 4 affirmative votes for 7 Member Council). The Municipal Court Judge shall be appointed
for a term of two (2) years, from June first in even years until May thirty-first two (2) years later,
or for the portion of such term unexpired at the time of appointment. The Municipal Court
Judge shall be chosen by the Council on the basis of legal competence and training, experience
and ability. The Municipal Court Judge need not be a resident of the City when appointed but
shall reside in the City after appointment. The Council shall determine the compensation the
Municipal Court Judge shall receive. The Municipal Court Judge may be removed in
accordance with State law.
The Municipal Court Judge shall recommend appointment of an Associate Municipal Court
Judge to act in the Municipal Court Judge’s place if the Municipal Court Judge is temporarily
unable to act. An Associate Municipal Court Judge recommended by the Municipal Court
Judge shall be appointed upon approval by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4
affirmative votes for 7 Member Council). An Associate Municipal Court Judge is authorized to
act for and on behalf of the Municipal Court Judge. An Associate Municipal Court Judge may
be removed by the Council by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes
for 7 Member Council).
Redline of Changes:
Sec. 5.08. - Judge of the Municipal Court.
The Council shall appoint a Municipal Court shall be presided over by a magistrate who shall
be known as the Judge by majority vote of the all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes
for 7 Member Council). The Municipal Court.The Judge shall be appointed by the Council for a
term of two (2) years, from June first in even years until May thirty-first two (2) years later, or
for the portion of such term unexpired at the time of his appointment. Except as hereinafter
provided, the Judge of the The Municipal Court Judge shall be a competent attorney who at the
time of the appointment has practiced law for at least two (2) yearschosen by the Council on the
basis of legal competence and who is atraining, experience and ability. The Municipal Court
Judge need not be a resident of the City of Georgetown; if a suitable resident of Georgetown
cannot be found, the Council when appoint but shall have the power to appoint a practicing
attorney reside in the City of Georgetown who resides in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of said
City. In the event an attorney with the above qualifications is not available, a citizen of this City
considered qualified after appointment. The Council shall be appointed by the Council as the
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # P
Judge of the Municipal Court. The Judge of determine the compensation the Municipal Court
Judge shall receive. The Municipal Court Judge may be removed in accordance with State law.
In the event the Judge of the Municipal Court is temporarily unable to act for any reason, the
Council shall appoint a qualified person to act in the Judge's place. The Judge, or anyone acting
in the Judge's place, shall receive such compensation as may be set by the Council.
The Municipal Court Judge shall recommend appointment of an Associate Municipal Court
Judge to act in the Municipal Court Judge’s place if the Municipal Court Judge is temporarily
unable to act. An Associate Municipal Court Judge recommended by the Municipal Court
Judge shall be appointed upon approval by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4
affirmative votes for 7 Member Council). An Associate Municipal Court Judge is authorized to
act for and on behalf of the Municipal Court Judge. An Associate Municipal Court Judge may
be removed by the Council by majority vote of all Councilmembers (at least 4 affirmative votes
for 7 Member Council).
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # P
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding City
Charter Article VIII and Section 6 of the City Charter
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council appointed a Charter Review Committee to review, analyze and discuss certain
City Charter provisions, and to provide a report and recommendations back to the City Council no later than
June 1, 2012. The City Attorney was appointed as the Committee Liaison.
The Charter Review Committee met each week from February 9, 2012 through May 3, 2012 to review,
discuss and analyze the City Charter provisions. On May 22, 2012, the Final Report of the Charter Review
Committee was presented to City Council.
In reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, Staff is requesting that City Council make the following
determinations:
1. Should an amendment of this Section to the City Charter be included on a Charter Election Ballot?
2. If so, adopt the Committee’s recommendation or determine exact language to be submitted to the
voters?
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Charter Art. VIII & Sec. 6.11
Cover Memo
Item # Q
City Charter Article VIII and Section 6.11
The City Charter currently requires all contracts for expenditures involving more than the
amounts which require compliance with the State competitive bidding/purchasing laws to be
expressly approved in advance by the Council. It has been suggested that the Charter be
amended to allow Council to delegate contracting authority for Georgetown Utility System
(GUS) Projects to the GUS Board so long as the Project is within the Council approved budget.
Council would be the appeal authority for contract disputes.
The Committee recommends that the Charter NOT be amended to allow Council delegation of
contracting authority to the GUS Board (or any other person or entity) exceeding the amounts
that require compliance with the State competitive bidding/purchasing laws. The Committee is
of the opinion that the competitive bidding/purchasing law limit is an appropriate “check” on
the amount of contracting authority that should be within Council authority and control. The
Committee also suggests that it is important for consideration, discussion and approval of City
contracts to take place in the Council Meeting with other City business, not requiring the public
to attend more than one meeting to be fully informed.
No amendment recommended.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 1
Item # Q
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Section 9.16 of the City Charter
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council appointed a Charter Review Committee to review, analyze and discuss certain
City Charter provisions, and to provide a report and recommendations back to the City Council no later than
June 1, 2012. The City Attorney was appointed as the Committee Liaison.
The Charter Review Committee met each week from February 9, 2012 through May 3, 2012 to review,
discuss and analyze the City Charter provisions. On May 22, 2012, the Final Report of the Charter Review
Committee was presented to City Council.
In reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, Staff is requesting that City Council make the following
determinations:
1. Should an amendment of this Section to the City Charter be included on a Charter Election Ballot?
2. If so, adopt the Committee’s recommendation or determine exact language to be submitted to the
voters?
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Redline_Section 9.16
Cover Memo
Item # R
City Charter Section 9.16
The City Charter currently requires Council to review the City’s ethics ordinance annually and
to devote at least one work session each year for study of ethics statutes. It has been suggested
that the Charter be amended to provide for consolidation of these studies in one work session.
The Committee is of the opinion that it is not necessary to amend Charter Section 9.16. The
Charter does not currently mandate when the study sessions occur and the Committee does not
believe such a restriction in the Charter is warranted. In other words, the Charter does not
require that the studies be conducted in separate work study sessions nor does the Charter
preclude the studies from being consolidated into one work session.
No amendment recommended.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 1
Item # R
City of Georgetown, Texas
June 27, 2012
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action on the City Charter Review Committee’s recommendation regarding
Lobbying
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council appointed a Charter Review Committee to review, analyze and discuss certain
City Charter provisions, and to provide a report and recommendations back to the City Council no later than
June 1, 2012. The City Attorney was appointed as the Committee Liaison.
The Charter Review Committee met each week from February 9, 2012 through May 3, 2012 to review,
discuss and analyze the City Charter provisions. On May 22, 2012, the Final Report of the Charter Review
Committee was presented to City Council.
In reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, Staff is requesting that City Council make the following
determinations:
1. Should an amendment of this Section to the City Charter be included on a Charter Election Ballot?
2. If so, adopt the Committee’s recommendation or determine exact language to be submitted to the
voters?
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney
Cover Memo
Item # S