The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda CC 02.11.2020 WorkshopN otice of M eeting of the Governing B ody of the C ity of Georgetown, Texas F ebruary 11 , 20 20 The Georgetown City Council will meet on February 11, 2020 at 2:00 P M at City Council Chambers, 510 W 9th Street Georgetown, TX 78626 The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (AD A). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the AD A, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. P lease contact the City Secretary's Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 808 Martin Luther King J r. Street, Georgetown, TX 78626 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. R E V I S E D A G E N D A Policy De ve lopme nt/Re vie w Workshop - A P resentation and discussion regarding the City’s Debt P rogram -- Leigh Wallace, Finance Director and P aul Diaz, Budget Manager B P resentation, update, and discussion regarding the Transportation Capital Improvement P lan (C IP ) and Road Bond P rograms -- Wesley Wright, P E, Systems Engineering Director and Ray Miller, P ublic Works Director C P resentation and discussion regarding the P arks, Recreation and Open Space Master P lan Update -- Kimberly Garrett, P arks and Recreation Director D P resentation and discussion regarding the P arks and Recreation Cost Recovery P olicy Development -- Kimberly Garrett, P arks and Recreation Director E P resentation and review re garding the do wntown parking garage project and discussion of options for further review of additional sites -- David Morgan, City Manager Exe cutive Se ssion In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session. F Sec. 551.071: Consul tati on w i th Attorney Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items - Litigation Update - P E C Franchise - Election Code Opinion Sec. 551.086: Certai n P ubl i c P ow er Uti l i ti es: Competi ti ve M atters - Mercuria IS D A Amendment - Third Amendment to the Bluejay Next Interconnection Agreement Sec. 551.087: Del i berati on Regardi ng Economi c Devel opment Negoti ati ons Page 1 of 103 - P roject Tortilla Sec. 551.076: Del i berati ons Regardi ng Securi ty Devi ses or Securi ty Audi ts: Cl ose Meeti ng - Update on Cyber Security and Continuity P lan -- J ames Davis, IT Operations Manager Sec. 551:074: P ersonnel Matters City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal J udge: Consideration of the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal - Municipal Court J udge Adjournme nt Ce rtificate of Posting I, R obyn Densmore, C ity S ecretary for the C ity of G eorgetown, Texas, do hereby c ertify that this Notice of Meeting was pos ted at C ity Hall, 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626, a plac e readily ac cessible to the general public as required by law, on the _____ day of _________________, 2020, at __________, and remained so pos ted for at leas t 72 c ontinuous hours prec eding the s cheduled time of said meeting. __________________________________ R obyn Dens more, C ity S ec retary Page 2 of 103 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop February 11, 2020 S UBJEC T: P resentation and discussion regarding the City’s Debt P rogram -- Leigh Wallace, Finance Director and P aul Diaz, Budget Manager I T EM S UMMARY: This annual overview of current and proposed debt obligations is a requirement of the City’s Fiscal and Budgetary P olicy. The purpose is to review the debt management program, outstanding debt, and a preview of the 2020 debt sale. The review includes Revenue bonds, General Obligation bonds, Certificate of Obligation bonds, and Self-Supporting obligations. The P roposed Debt Issue discussed in the presentation will be finalized during an action item on the February 25th Council meeting agenda. F I NANC I AL I MPAC T: N/A S UBMI T T ED BY: Leigh Wallace, Finance Director and P aul Diaz, Budget Manager AT TAC HMENT S : Description Debt Amounts as of 2.4.20 P resentation Page 3 of 103 FY2020 (Multiple Items) Row Labels Sum of FY2020 2008 GO Regional Trail Development 1,275,000.00 San Gabriel Park 600,000.00 2008 GO Total 1,875,000.00 2015 GO 2015 Road Bond Priority 1 - Downtown Sidewalks 1,000,000.00 Intersection Improvements 1,400,000.00 Leander Road (Norwood to South West Bypass)3,200,000.00 Northwest Blvd Bridge 750,000.00 Southwestern Blvd.2,650,000.00 2015 GO Total 9,000,000.00 CO ADA Transition Plan 150,000.00 Body Cameras 800,000.00 Cardiac Monitors 225,000.00 Construct Airport Maintenance / Equipment Storage Facility 750,000.00 Curb and Gutter 650,000.00 Fuel Station 550,000.00 GMC Remodel 250,000.00 Neighborhood Park Development 250,000.00 Parks Master Plan 200,000.00 Public Safety Vehicles - Fire 2,200,000.00 Public Safety Vehicles - Police 740,200.00 Public Safety Vehicles - Police New 246,000.00 Radio Replacement 129,000.00 SCBA Replacement 290,000.00 SE Inner Loop 4,700,000.00 Tennis Center Pool Demolition 70,000.00 Westinghouse & Scenic Lake Traffic Signal 600,000.00 CO Total 12,800,200.00 REV Carriage Oaks Transmission 500,000.00 Consultant Engineer 150,000.00 CR262 Waterline 500,000.00 Feeders 160,000.00 Fiber Optic 50,000.00 Hoover Pump Station 750,000.00 LWTP Raw Water Intake Rehabilitation 8,000,000.00 Miscellaneous Line Upgrades 250,000.00 New Development 3,500,000.00 Power Quality Imp 50,000.00 Round Rock Supply Line 300,000.00 Round Rock Supply Pump Station and Ground Storage Tank 1,000,000.00 Sectionalization Imp 100,000.00 South West Bypass Water (H24-1)1,800,000.00 Southside Water Treatment Plant Rehab 2,250,000.00 Stonewall Ranch PS Improvements 2,500,000.00 Tank Rehabilitation 750,000.00 REV Total 22,610,000.00 Grand Total 46,285,200.00 Page 4 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Annual Debt Overview Fiscal Year 2020 Budget And Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan Page 5 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Debt Planning •Budget development includes the capital plan and the debt plan •2020 Budget included proposed debt with estimated tax impacts (for the following year) –Refine the 2020 debt plan as project timing and costs are updated Page 6 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Debt Policies •Provide debt update annually •Balance needs of the City between pay as you go and debt financing –Stability of tax rate •Explore all funding options for a capital item •Finance a capital item over its useful life –Intergenerational equity •Method of sale –competitive, unless market conditions are favorable to select negotiated Page 7 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Types of Debt General Obligation Bonds -Used for large projects, such as Southwestern Blvd, the Southwest Bypass, the Northwest Blvd Bridge, & San Gabriel Park -Approved by the voters -Repaid with property taxes over long terms Page 8 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Types of Debt Certificates of Obligation -Tax Backed –Used for required or routine items, such as Fire Stations, Public Safety Vehicles, and other City facilities –Public notice required –Repaid with property taxes –Term over the life of the asset Page 9 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Types of Debt Certificates of Obligation -Self Supporting –Used for various projects, such as but not limited to: Stormwater, GTEC, GEDCO, and TIRZ –Public notice required –Repaid with revenue other than general property tax –Sales tax –Drainage fees –TIRZ property taxes –Term over the life of the asset Page 10 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Types of Debt Revenue Bonds –Used for large electric and water projects –Repaid with utility revenue over life of asset Page 11 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Types of Debt Refunding Bonds –This is an option when the call date is reached on any bond type –The call date is typically 10 years after a 20 year bond is sold –Options are reviewed with Bond Advisor to see if it’s in the best interest of the City –This option is selected to refinance with a lower interest rate and receive a savings on the debt balance Page 12 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Current Bond Ratings •Independent review of City’s management and financial condition to determine creditworthiness •Impacts the interest rate of the bond •Standard & Poor’s 2019 Rating –General obligation AA+ –Revenue bonds AA- Page 13 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Debt Coverage Ratio •For revenue bonds •Combined water and electric •Number of times net operating revenue can cover debt service –Bond covenants 1.35x –Fiscal and Budgetary Policy 1.5x –FY20 budgeted coverage is 2.93x Page 14 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Current Tax Rate •Total 42 cents per $100 assessed valuation –Interest & Sinking 22.453 cents –Operations & Maintenance 19.547 cents •Agreement with the voters –2015 Transportation Bond •No increase more than 10 cents total •No increase more than 2 cents in one year •City has retained the same tax rate for 3 years --FY20/0.42 --FY19/0.42 --FY18/0.42 Page 15 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Current Tax Obligation Not Including Self Funded Obligations Other City Facilities 21% Parks/Rec & Facilities 13% Public Safety 30% Streets and Transportation 36% General Government Tax Supported Debt $169M Other City Facilities Parks/Rec & Facilities Public Safety Streets and TransportationPage 16 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget 5 Year Tax Supported Debt Not Including Self Funded Obligations 0 20,000,000 40,000,000 60,000,000 80,000,000 100,000,000 120,000,000 140,000,000 160,000,000 180,000,000 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 CO's GO's Dol l a r s Page 17 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Debt per Capita $1,859 $2,124 $2,187 $2,501 $2,508 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 Total Tax Supported Debt per Capita Page 18 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Enterprise Obligations Electric 32% Irrigation 1% Stormwater Drainage 4% Water 30%Airport 2% Wastewater 31% Enterprise Debt $99.6M Electric Irrigation Stormwater Drainage Water Airport Wastewater Page 19 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget 5 Year Enterprise Debt, Including Self Supported Debt 0 20,000,000 40,000,000 60,000,000 80,000,000 100,000,000 120,000,000 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 Water/WW/Irrigation Electric Stormwater/Airport Page 20 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Debt Per Customer $843 $883 $1,051 $960 855 $1,233 $1,166 $1,320 $1,414 $1,158 $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 Outstanding Debt per Utility Customer W/WW Debt Per Customer Electric Debt Per Customer Page 21 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Historical Assets Net of Debt $- $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Millions City Assets Net of Related Debt General Utility Page 22 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Tax Impact Analysis •Updated each year, the Five Year Debt Model is a tool to better understand the impacts of issuing debt. •Allows for scenario testing and the adjustment of multiple variables including assessed value, sales tax, tax rate distribution, and debt service requirements. •Reviewed with Council each summer. Page 23 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget How the Model Works Projected Tax Increase Page 24 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Assumptions •Small changes can have big results •Use Current I&S Tax Rate: 22.453 cents •Use Current O&M Tax Rate: 19.547 cents •Use Current Ratio of 53/47 for tax ceiling revenue. •Base growth of 4.5% in FY2021, decreasing to 3.25% by 2024. Tax ceiling revenue growing at a constant 3.5%. Page 25 of 103 FY2019 Annual Budget 5 Year Tax Backed CIP 5 Year CIP Schedule FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Beyond 5 Years CO General Capital Projects Facilities 800,000 0 0 0 0 49,825,000 Fleet 3,315,200 4,108,278 3,564,000 2,341,500 1,974,400 13,215,000 GTEC 4,700,000 Parks 670,000 400,000 400,000 250,000 4,250,000 38,900,000 Public Safety 1,315,000 515,000 300,000 0 0 0 Streets 1,600,000 0 0 7,000,000 0 0 General Capital Projects Total 12,400,200 5,023,278 4,264,000 9,591,500 6,224,400 101,940,000 CO Total 12,400,200 5,023,278 4,264,000 9,591,500 6,224,400 101,940,000 2008 GO General Capital Projects Parks 1,875,000 3,000,000 2,250,000 1,500,000 250,000 11,700,000 Streets 0 0 0 0 0 5,550,000 General Capital Projects Total 1,875,000 3,000,000 2,250,000 1,500,000 250,000 17,250,000 2008 GO Total 1,875,000 3,000,000 2,250,000 1,500,000 250,000 17,250,000 2015 GO General Capital Projects Streets 9,000,000 9,700,000 12,000,000 5,400,000 2,000,000 20,750,000 General Capital Projects Total 9,000,000 9,700,000 12,000,000 5,400,000 2,000,000 20,750,000 2015 GO Total 9,000,000 9,700,000 12,000,000 5,400,000 2,000,000 20,750,000 Grand Total 23,275,200 17,723,278 18,514,000 16,491,500 8,474,400 139,940,000 Page 26 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Forecast •No tax impact in the five year model based on assumptions mentioned. –Strong and consistent growth in our community. –Council’s action during the budget process in recent summers to limit capital project spending is helping ($18-$20 million capacity per year for the next 5 years). Page 27 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Bond Authorization Remaining General Obligation Debt Authorized by the Voters 2008 Roads 2008 Parks 2015 Roads Total Amount Authorized by the Voters 46,000,000 35,500,000 105,000,000 186,500,000 Year & Issue 2009 1,175,000 1,175,000 2010 1,365,000 1,365,000 2010A 9,435,000 2,500,000 11,935,000 2012 0 2012A 0 2013 5,000,000 5,000,000 2014 4,800,000 4,800,000 2015 4,375,000 4,375,000 2015A 1,710,000 10,075,000 11,785,000 2016 3,000,000 10,000,000 13,000,000 2017 6,500,000 2,635,000 9,135,000 2018 3,900,000 4,000,000 16,550,000 24,450,000 2019 5,330,000 5,330,000 Total Issued 25,050,000 22,710,000 44,590,000 92,350,000 Authorization Remaining 20,950,000 12,790,000 60,410,000 94,150,000 *Includes allocated premium which counts towards the voter authorization. Page 28 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget FY 2020 Proposed Debt Tax Supported -General Obligation 2020 Debt Issue FY2020 2008 GO Tax Supported Regional Trail Development 1,275,000.00 San Gabriel Park 600,000.00 Tax Supported Total 1,875,000.00 2008 GO Total 1,875,000.00 2015 GO Tax Supported 2015 Road Bond Priority 1 -Downtown Sidewalks 1,000,000.00 Intersection Improvements 1,400,000.00 Leander Road (Norwood to South West Bypass)3,200,000.00 Northwest Blvd Bridge 750,000.00 Southwestern Blvd.2,650,000.00 Tax Supported Total 9,000,000.00 2015 GO Total 9,000,000.00 Grand Total 10,875,000.00 Page 29 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget FY 2020 Proposed Debt Tax Supported -Certificate of Obligation 2020 Debt Issue FY2020 CO Tax Supported ADA Transition Plan 150,000.00 Body Cameras 800,000.00 Cardiac Monitors 225,000.00 Fuel Station 550,000.00 GMC Remodel 250,000.00 Neighborhood Park Development 250,000.00 Parks Master Plan 200,000.00 Public Safety Vehicles -Fire 2,200,000.00 Public Safety Vehicles -Police 740,200.00 Public Safety Vehicles -Police New 246,000.00 Radio Replacement 129,000.00 SCBA Replacement 290,000.00 Tennis Center Pool Demolition 70,000.00 Westinghouse & Scenic Lake Traffic Signal 600,000.00 Tax Supported Total 6,700,200.00 CO Total 6,700,200.00 Grand Total 6,700,200.00 Page 30 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget FY 2020 Proposed Debt Self Supported -Certificate of Obligation 2020 Debt Issue FY2020 CO Self Supported Construct Airport Maintenance / Equipment Storage Facility 750,000.00 Curb and Gutter 650,000.00 SE Inner Loop-GTEC 4,700,000.00 Self Supported Total 6,100,000.00 CO Total 6,100,000.00 Grand Total 6,100,000.00 Page 31 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Supporting the Debt •The current Stormwater and Airport rates can support the issuing of more debt in these funds. •Due to continued strong sales tax collections, the GTEC debt can be supported. Page 32 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget FY 2020 Proposed Debt Electric/Water –Revenue Bonds 2020 Debt Issue FY2020 REV Electric Consultant Engineer 150,000.00 Feeders 160,000.00 Fiber Optic 50,000.00 New Development 3,500,000.00 Power Quality Imp 50,000.00 Sectionalization Imp 100,000.00 Electric Total 4,010,000.00 Water Carriage Oaks Transmission 500,000.00 CR262 Waterline 500,000.00 Hoover Pump Station 750,000.00 LWTP Raw Water Intake Rehabilitation 8,000,000.00 Miscellaneous Line Upgrades 250,000.00 Round Rock Supply Line 300,000.00 Round Rock Supply Pump Station and Ground Storage Tank 1,000,000.00 South West Bypass Water (H24-1)1,800,000.00 Southside Water Treatment Plant Rehab 2,250,000.00 Stonewall Ranch PS Improvements 2,500,000.00 Tank Rehabilitation 750,000.00 Water Total 18,600,000.00 REV Total 22,610,000.00 Grand Total 22,610,000.00 Page 33 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Supporting the Debt •Current rates for Water and Electric can support the issuing of new debt. •Staff will be reviewing water rates in the spring as part of Water Infrastructure Planning and development of the FY2021 Budget and Five Year CIP. Page 34 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget FY 2020 Refunding Option •2010 Utility revenue bonds are callable; $6.5M principal remaining •Estimated interest rate change from 4% to 1.6% •Estimated savings $717,000 over 10 years –Depends on actual sale in April Page 35 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Takeaways •The City continues to aggressively implement infrastructure improvements to match the voter approved projects. •The debt correlates to population growth and voter approved projects to improve services and quality of life. •The City continues to experience strong economic growth. •Economic forecast shows the City can fund the current CIP plan within the current tax and utility rates. •Water infrastructure decisions coming to Council this spring/summer with future rate impacts. Page 36 of 103 FY2020 Annual Budget Next Steps •February 25 Council Agenda –Authorize Financial Advisors to proceed with bond sale schedule and documents –Approve Notice of Intent to issue Certificates of Obligation •March –Offering Statements reviewed by staff –Staff meet with bond rating agency •April 28 Council Agenda –Approve results of competitive sale •May 21–Closing and receive proceeds Page 37 of 103 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop February 11, 2020 S UBJEC T: P resentation, update, and discussion regarding the Transportation Capital Improvement P lan (CIP ) and Road Bond P rograms -- Wesley Wright, P E, Systems Engineering Director and Ray Miller, P ublic Works Director I T EM S UMMARY: Attached is a pre sentatio n updating Co unc il o n the current Transportatio n C IP projects as well as both the 2008 and 2015 Road Bond P rograms. Staff is seeking direction from Council on a possible future road bond election. F I NANC I AL I MPAC T: Various project financials are included in the attached presentation and spreadsheet. S UBMI T T ED BY: Wesley Wright AT TAC HMENT S : Description C I P & R oad Bond P res entation 2015 R oad Bond Map 2015 R oad Bond S ummary S heet Page 38 of 103 Road Bond Update Road Bond & Transportation CIP Update City Council WorkshopFebruary 11, 2020 Ray Miller, Public Works DirectorWesley Wright, PE, Engineering Director Page 39 of 103 Road Bond UpdatePurpose •Status of the 2008 &2015 Road Bond Programs •Review of Williamson County 2019 Road Bond Program •CAMPO Supported Projects •TxDOT Supported Projects •Seek the Council’s input and direction –Future Road Bond Initiative? Page 40 of 103 Road Bond Update2008 Road Bond Financials •$46MM total package •$25MM debt issued ($8MM cash available) •$21MM authorized, but not issued Completed Projects •SE1/Maple/Sam Houston •DB Wood/Williams Intersection •SH29 Bypass Routing Study Anticipated/Remaining Expenditures •FM 1460 –Completed (Est. $1MM final true-up) •FM 971 –TxDOT letting mid 2020 (Est. $4MM)(Austin Ave to Gann St.) •Berry Creek Drive (Airport –195) –TBD (Est. $4MM) Page 41 of 103 Road Bond Update2015 Road Bond Financials •$105MM total package •$54MM debt issued (or soon to be issued thru Spring 2020) •$51MM authorized, but not issued (future) Completed Projects –$30.4MM •Southwest Bypass/Wolf Ranch Parkway (SH29/FM2243) ($20.1MM) •Various Priority 1 Sidewalks ($4MM) •Rivery Blvd ($5.6MM) •Bond Funds From Completed Projects ($0.7MM) Under construction -$12.8MM •Northwest Blvd –Est. Completion Early 2021 ($11.3MM) •Various Priority 1 Sidewalks ($1.5MM) Page 42 of 103 Road Bond Update2015 Road Bond Remaining Projects •Under Design -$12.7MM –Southwest Bypass (Wolf Ranch Parkway –SH29 connection) ($0.7MM design) –Williams & Lakeway Intersection ($1.4MM) –Leander Road (River Ridge to SW Bypass) ($5.2MM 2015 Road Bond) •Design & ROW April 2019, Construction 2021 (Add’l $4.5MM CAMPO Funds) –Southwestern Blvd (Raintree to Inner Loop) ($4.2MM 2015 Road Bond) •Design March 2019, Construction early 2020 –Inner Loop (Austin to 1460) ($1.2MM 2015 Road Bond) •Design February 2019, Construction early 2020 (GTEC Funded -$7.2MM) •Future Design & Const. -$23.1MM –DB Wood (SH29-Oak Ridge) ($18.4MM) (FY21-22) –Remainder Priority 1 Sidewalks (Downtown & SH29) ($4.7MM) (FY21-23) Page 43 of 103 Road Bond Update2015 Road Bond Remaining Projects (cont’d) •Future Design ONLY -$14.4MM –Stadium Dr. & NE Inner Loop ($2.1MM) –SH29 (Haven Lane to SH130) ($4.1MM) –Remainder Intersection Improvements ($3.7MM) –Remainder Future Projects ($4.5MM) •Williams, Shell, Inner Loop, DB Wood, IH35 SB Frontage •TxDOT Projects -$11.6MM –TxDOT Funded Going Forward –IH35 NB Frontage Road ($7MM) –Leander Road Bridge Design ($4.6MM) Page 44 of 103 Road Bond Update2015 Road Bond Summary $30.4MM –Completed (prior years) $12.8MM -Under Construction (current) $12.7MM -Under Design (current) $23.1MM -Future Design & Const. (FY21-22) $14.4MM -Future Design ONLY (TBD) $11.6MM -TxDOT Projects (not planned) $105MM –Total 2015 Road Bond Program **By 2022 the City of will have substantially completed projects listed in the 2008 &2015 Road BondsPage 45 of 103 Road Bond Update2015 Road Bond 2020 2021 2022 NW Blvd SE Inner Loop Southwestern Sidewalks Sidewalks Sidewalks Intersections Intersections Intersections DB Wood DB Wood Page 46 of 103 Road Bond UpdateWilco 2019 Road Bond In preparing for the Wilco 2019 Road Bond call for projects,the City of Georgetown selected and submitted the following projects with a proposed local match: •Southwest By-Pass Extension:From current terminus to SH-29. Estimated Construction Cost is $5.5 million with a local match of $2.0 million •SE Inner Loop /Sam Houston Extension:From current terminus of Sam Houston at Patriots Way,northeast to SH-29. Estimated Construction Cost is $22.5 million with a local match of $4.0 million •Westinghouse Road :From FM 1460 to SH-130.Estimated Construction Cost is $20.2 million with a local match of $8.2 million.Page 47 of 103 Road Bond UpdateCAMPO Supported Projects Lakeway & Williams •Project will add additional turn lanes on both •Estimated Construction cost is $800,000 (Federal =$500,000) Leander Road Expansion •From Norwood Drive to Southwest By-Pass •Construct a 4-lane divided roadway •Improved sidewalks along the north side of the roadway •Construction is estimated to begin in Late 2022 •Estimated construction cost is $8.8 million (Federal = $3,600,000)Federal $$ = 3,600,000 Page 48 of 103 Road Bond UpdateCAMPO Supported Projects Austin Avenue Bridges •Project will Rehab the Austin Avenue Bridge over the San Gabriel River between Morrow and 2nd Street. •Improve the support structures of the bridges decks;maintain concrete under the bridge and columns;remove the sidewalks;resurface the decks; added wider travel lanes. •Estimated Construction cost is $8.7 million (based on the original estimate and AFA .(Federal =$1.3 million) SH-29 & DB Woods •Project will add additional turn lanes on both SH-29 and DB Woods •Install a raised concrete median along SH-29 with a few “hooded”left hand turns •Install new drainage structures at the intersection •Estimated Construction cost is $5.7 million Page 49 of 103 Road Bond UpdateCAMPO Supported Projects 2045 Regional Transportation Plan (DRAFT) •A Recent call for Projects to be included in the new Regional Transportation Plan that will have a Horizon Year of 2045. •Over $45 Billion in potential Projects were submitted •CAMPO currently estimates that $38 Billion would be available for funding •If a future project is to be eligible for Federal or State Funding through CAMPO them that project must be listed within the long-range Regional Transportation Plan. The following projects were submitted: •Williams Drive from Austin Avenue to Jim Hogg •NE Inner Loop from IH-35 to SH-29 •SE Inner Loop from SH-29 to IH-35 •Westinghouse Road from FM 1460 to SH-130 •Shell Road from SH-195 to Williams •DB Woods from Williams to Cedar Breaks •FM 971 from Gann Street to City of Georgetown Water Treatment FacilityPage 50 of 103 Road Bond UpdateTxDOT Supported Projects IH-35 & Williams Drive •A Reconstruct the Williams Drive interchange to a diverging diamond intersection (DDI) •Construct north and southbound intersection bypass lanes under Williams Drive bridge •Extend the northbound I-35 frontage road from Williams Drive to the Lakeway Drive exit ramp •Construction is estimated to begin late 2020 –early 2021 and anticipated completion would be late 2023. IH-35 &Leander Road (RM 2243) •Replace the existing bridge at RM 2243 with a taller,wider bridge that includes 3 additional turn-lanes •Improve existing southbound frontage road to SE Inner Loop •Add braided entrance and exit ramps along the southbound frontage road to SE Inner Loop. •Construction is estimated to begin late fall of 2023 with anticipated completion the fall of 2025Page 51 of 103 Road Bond UpdateTxDOT Supported Projects IH-35 & Westinghouse •Remove existing bridge and construct new bridge •Construct a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) •Improve existing southbound frontage road from Inner Loop to RM 1431 •Reverse entrance and exit ramps between SE Inner Loop and RM 1431 •Construction is estimated to begin spring 2023 and anticipated completion would be winter of 2025 IH-35 &SH-29 •Reconstruct Bridge to improve turning movements and increase mobility through the intersection. •Intersection BY -PASS Lanes •Construction is estimated to begin late 2023 dependent on Funding Page 52 of 103 Road Bond Update Looking Forward –FY21 •DB Wood Road •Design & ROW (FY21) -$4MM •Construction (FY22) -$14MM •Priority 1 Sidewalks •Downtown -$1MM •Intersection Improvements •Location and Dollars –TBD •Aviation Drive •GTEC –Economic Development •Airport Road to IH35 SB Frontage Road Page 53 of 103 Road Bond Update Intersection Improvements Criteria for Selection •Traffic Counts on all approach legs of an intersection •Number of Traffic Accidents at the intersection •Peak Hour Volumes •Turning Movement Counts •Pedestrian Traffic •Proposed new growth in close proximity to the intersection •Etc… Intersections under review (to name just a few) •SE Inner loop and Rockride •Sam Houston and Rockride •Stadium Drive and NE Inner Loop •Williams and Estrella Crossing •Shell Road and Verde Vista •Austin Avenue and San Gabriel Village Blvd Page 54 of 103 Road Bond Update Looking Forward Future Bond Elections? Nov 2020? Future Projects? •Memorial Drive •Rock Ride •Shell Road •Inner Loop •Williams Drive •Others… Impact Fees –Committee Consideration Feb. 25th Financial Rules of Thumb •$1.5MM per lane-mile new construction •1 cent property tax = ~$9MM CapitalPage 55 of 103 Road Bond Update Summary •The City of Georgetown has substantially completed the projects listed in the 2008 and is close with 2015 Road Bond Programs. •The City of Georgetown continues to partner with other agencies such as Williamson County,CAMPO and TxDOT on various transportation related projects. •The City will create a listing of important intersections and will develop criteria for ranking these intersections for needed improvements. •Council Direction –Road Bond Committee? •November 2020 Election? Page 56 of 103 Road Bond Update Comments / Questions? Page 57 of 103 Georgetown City Council &Bond Committee Project List I I §¨¦35 §¨¦35 ¬«29 ¬«195 ¬«29 RM 2243 FM 971 FM 1460 AZ-2 W ILLIA M S D R INNER LOOP U N I V E R S I T Y A V E D B W O O D R D AIRPORT RD S U N C IT Y B L V D S H E L L R D D E L W E B B B L V D N A W G R I M E S B L V D BU HH AT TT AN BG BC AZ-1 AF AJ BP AO CQ BJ-2 AC CS AD AE F Legend Build Design Planning I Seperator Georgetown 0 1 20.5 MilesPath: G:\0573.009.000\07.00 CADD\GIS\Overall_Exhibit-11x17_noBound.mxd * Currently anticipated project list. Projects may vary based on future economic market and other conditions.* Currently anticipated project list. Projects may vary based on future OTP Project Identifier Roadway Project * AE Northwest Blvd Bridge - Fontana Dr To Austin Ave AD Rivery Blvd Extension - Williams Dr To Northwest Blvd AF IH 35 NB Frontage Road - Williams Dr To Lakeway Bridge AZ1 Southwest Bypass - Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Leander Rd BC Wolf Ranch Pkwy - DB Wood Dr To Southwest Bypass -Intersection/Capital Pool CS Leander Rd Bridge @ IH 35 -Sidewalk, Safety and ADA Accessibility Pool AJ NE Inner Loop - Stadium Dr To FM 971 CQ Stadium Dr (CR 151) - Austin Ave To NE Inner Loop BP Southwestern Blvd - Raintree Dr To SE Inner Loop AT SH 29 (Haven Lane to SH130) BJ2 Leander Rd (RM 2243) - 400ft W of SWBypass to River Ridge Dr AN DB Wood Dr - SH 29 To Oak Ridge Dr AZ2 Southwest Bypass- Wolf Ranch Pkwy To SH29 Preliminary Engineering to begin developing Projects from original Bond List to shovel ready: AC, AO, BU, BG, HH, TT AC Williams Dr - Rivery Blvd. to Frontage Rd AO IH 35 SB Frontage Rd - Williams Dr To Rivery Blvd BU SE Inner Loop - IH 35 To Southwestern Blvd BG SE Inner Loop - Southwestern Blvd To SH 29 HH Shell Rd - Williams Dr to Shell Spur Rd TT DB Wood Dr - Oak Ridge Dr To Lake Overlook Dr. Page 58 of 103 Project Name Dollars Budgeted as of FY20 2015 Road Bond Funds Remaining Project Status Northwest Blvd Bridge Fontana Dr To Austin Ave 11,250,000$ 1,147,500$ Under Construction - Anticipated Completion Q1 2021 Rivery Blvd Extension Williams Dr To Northwest Blvd 5,611,358$ 1,034,018$ COMPLETED Southwest Bypass/Wolf Ranch Pkwy SH29 To Leander Rd 18,322,090$ 463,160$ Completed - Open to Traffic $20,075,000 issued debt $2,265,410 ($1,752,910 + 512,500) available for connection to SH29 Southwest Bypass Wolf Ranch Pkwy To SH29 706,992$ (194,492)$ Coordinating design scope with County as part of their Road Bond - Aquirrie Fields Task Order $706,991.75 Southwestern Blvd Raintree Dr To SE Inner Loop 4,200,000$ -$ Under Design, Anticipate Bidding Late 2020 Leander Rd (RM 2243) SWBypass to River Ridge Dr 5,200,000$ 31,250$ Under Design - need ROW and TxDOT Environmental (2 years) Intersection/Capital Pool 1,400,000$ 3,725,000$ Williams/Lakeway FY20 ($1,400,000) under design Sidewalk, Safety and ADA Accessibility Pool 6,000,000$ 4,250,000$ Approximately 50% of Priority 1 sidewalks are designed or completed NE Inner Loop Stadium Dr To FM 971 -$ 1,025,000$ Future Year - Design Funding Only Stadium Dr (CR 151) Austin Ave To NE Inner Loop -$ 1,025,000$ Future Year - Design Funding Only SH 29 Haven Lane To SH130 -$ 4,100,000$ Future Year - Design & ROW Funding Only DB Wood SH 29 To Oak Ridge Dr -$ 18,360,000$ Future Year - Design and Construction (FY21 Budget?) Leander Rd Bridge @ IH 35 -$ 4,612,500$ Design Anticipated to Start 2020 - TxDOT Funded IH 35 NB Frontage Road Williams Dr To Lakeway Bridge -$ 7,023,375$ Future TxDOT Funded Project - No city funding contribution expected Preliminary Engineering to begin developing Projects from original Bond List to shovel ready 1,200,000$ 4,518,875$ SE Inner Loop (Southwestern-IH35) Under Design,Williams Dr (Rivery-Frontage Rd), IH 35 SB Frontage Rd (Williams-Rivery), SE Inner Loop (SH29- Southwestern), Shell Rd (Williams-Shell Spur), DB Wood (Oak Ridge-Lake Overlook) Totals 53,890,439$ 51,121,186$ $ 105,000,000 Page 59 of 103 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop February 11, 2020 S UBJEC T: P resentation and discussion regarding the P arks, Recreation and Open Space Master P lan Update -- Kimberly Garrett, P arks and Recreation Director I T EM S UMMARY: Funds were approved in the FY 20 20 budge t to update the P arks, Recreatio n and Ope n Space Maste r P lan. The current master plan was adopted by City Council in 2009. Since that time, the City has seen tremendous growth. In addition, many of the priorities in the master plan have been accomplished. The master plan process will assess our c urre nt parks and recreation system and allow citizens to voice desires and concerns through a public engagement process of surveys, public meetings and workshops. Based on the citizen input and a needs analysis, a set of priorities and recommendations including cost estimates will be developed to help guide staff and elected officials over the next 10 years. A Request for P roposals from interested firms will be issued in the next 30-45 days. The master plan process is proposed to take 12 months with a summer 2021 adoption. This workshop will provide a presentation regarding the update of the P arks, Recreation and Open Space Master P lan. F I NANC I AL I MPAC T: N A S UBMI T T ED BY: Kimberly Garrett, P arks and Recreation Director AT TAC HMENT S : Description P resentation Page 60 of 103 Parks, Recreation & Open Space Master Plan Update City Council Workshop February 11, 2020 City of GeorgetownPage 61 of 103 Agenda •Current Master Plan •Goals of a Parks Master Plan •Current Conditions •Process •Next Steps/Timeline •Questions Page 62 of 103 Current Master Plan •Started summer 2007; adopted early 2009 •Basis for the 2008 Parks Bond Package •10 year planning horizon •Many priorities accomplished Page 63 of 103 Priorities | Accomplishments •Park Development –San Gabriel Park Renovations (Phases 1 & 2) –Garey Park –New Neighborhood Parks Developed City of GeorgetownPage 64 of 103 Priorities | Accomplishments •Land Acquisition –Acquired 90 acres for a northwest community park –Purchased land on the South SG River near VFW Park –Preservation of river corridors for trails City of GeorgetownPage 65 of 103 Priorities | Accomplishments •Improvements to Existing Parks –ADA and upgrades to current park design standards Old Town Park Edwards Park San Jose Park Chautauqua Park Geneva Park Emerald Springs Park City of GeorgetownPage 66 of 103 Priorities | Accomplishments •Recreation Facilities –Hike and Bike Trail Expansions One mile trail extension along Scenic Dr. ½ mile trail extension from SG Park to Katy Crossing –Splash pads San Jose & Rabbit Hill Park Downtown Art Center Lakeside Park City of GeorgetownPage 67 of 103 Priorities | Accomplishments Recreation Facilities –Playgrounds Creative Playscape Neighborhood Parks –Picnic Pavilions –New Restrooms –Art in the Park Program Worked with Arts and Culture Board to place art in San Gabriel Park and at the Recreation Center City of GeorgetownPage 68 of 103 Goals of a Parks Master Plan •Assessment of the current system •Allows citizens to voice desires and concerns •Provide a set of recommended Parks and Recreation priorities to guide staff and elected officials •Develops framework for future funding options Page 69 of 103 Current Conditions •Funding in FY 2020 budget •Tremendous growth since last master plan –2008 population @47,500; now @74,000 –60% growth •2030 Comp plan survey –Maintain & add to existing quality Parks & Rec •Current master plan needed | TPWD grants City of GeorgetownPage 70 of 103 Process •Public Input/Community Engagement –Surveys –Public Meetings & Workshops •Evaluate current level of service •Conduct demand/needs analysis •Develop priorities and recommendations including cost estimates over 10 years City of GeorgetownPage 71 of 103 Next Steps/Timeline •Issue RFP within next 30 -45 days •Firm selected –Selection committee will score and interview proposals •Approval process Spring 2020 –Parks Board Recommendation –Council Approval •Estimated Adoption Summer 2021 City of GeorgetownPage 72 of 103 Questions City of GeorgetownPage 73 of 103 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop February 11, 2020 S UBJEC T: P resentation and discussion regarding the P arks and Recreation Cost Recovery P olicy Development -- Kimberly Garrett, P arks and Recreation Director I T EM S UMMARY: This workshop presentatio n will introduce the topic of cost recovery. During the 2020 fiscal year, staff will work to develop a policy on cost recovery. A po lic y is important to ensure fiscal responsibility and financial stability of programs and services. In the City’s Fiscal and Budgetary P olicy, cost recovery is briefly mentioned under Revenue Management, but there are no details on ho w fees should be set and if specific programs or services should have different cost recovery goals. Through this process, we will be asking the questions of “who benefits” and “who should pay”. The industry best practice is to have a tiered appro ach related to the amount of subsidy a pro gram should have based on who benefits, the community o r the individual. In addition, there are different costs to consider when developing a policy, including direct costs, indirect costs and capital costs. All or some of the costs should be considered in develo ping the policy. This policy development process will be going on simultaneously with the master plan update and will be included in the community engagement and outreach process for that plan. Staff will develop a draft policy for review by City Council. F I NANC I AL I MPAC T: N A S UBMI T T ED BY: Kimberly Garrett, P arks and Recreation Director AT TAC HMENT S : Description P resentation Page 74 of 103 Parks & Recreation Cost Recovery Policy Development City Council Workshop February 11, 2020 City of GeorgetownPage 75 of 103 Agenda •What is Cost Recovery? •Why a policy is important •Current Fiscal & Budgetary Policy •Creating a Policy •Next Steps •Questions Page 76 of 103 What is cost recovery? •Cost recovery is the amount of the annual operating budgeted expense that can be offset by funding from sources other than general taxpayer investment such as property tax. City of GeorgetownPage 77 of 103 Why a policy is important •Ensures fiscal responsibility and financial stability of programs and services •Creates citizen & staff awareness of all associated costs and price structure •Required as part of the Commission for Accreditation for Parks and Recreation Agencies (CAPRA) City of GeorgetownPage 78 of 103 Current Fiscal & Budgetary Policy •Addressed under Revenue Management –Equity | Minimize subsidies •Recognize benefit tax payers contribute to City programs and services •States resident rates should be 75% of non resident rates for membership –Revenue Adequacy | Willingness & Ability to pay •Target operational cost recovery is between 50-60% City of GeorgetownPage 79 of 103 Process of creating a policy •Questions to ask? –“Who benefits” and “who should pay” •Taxpayers | Individuals | Both •Involve key stakeholders –City Council, Parks Board, user groups, and staff •Industry best practice -a tiered approach based on who benefits: Community Individual Page 80 of 103 What costs to include? •Direct cost –Expenses directly related to the operation of the program or service (instructor, supplies, equipment, etc) •Indirect Costs –Costs incurred with or without the service provided (utilities, maintenance, janitorial, administration and fleet costs) •Capital Costs Page 81 of 103 Benefits Model | Tier Approach City of GeorgetownPage 82 of 103 Next Steps •Master Plan RFP includes an add alternate for assistance with this policy •Utilize public input/community engagement process in conjunction with master plan •Establish draft policy for City Council Review City of GeorgetownPage 83 of 103 Questions City of GeorgetownPage 84 of 103 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop February 11, 2020 S UBJEC T: P resentation and review regarding the downtown parking garage project and discussion of options for further review of additional sites -- David Morgan, City Manager I T EM S UMMARY: This workshop is to pro vide background fo r the current work on the proposed downtown parking garage at 6th and Main and to discuss options for council direction on analysis of different sites. F I NANC I AL I MPAC T: T he funding for the current garage was included in the F Y 2019 B udget at $5 million. A contract for $348,000 was approved in N ovember 2019 with Wantman Group for the architectural and engineering design on the proposed structure. S UBMI T T ED BY: David Morgan, City Manager AT TAC HMENT S : Description Downtown P arking P resentation P arking S pac es Downtown Worksheet Page 85 of 103 Downtown Parking Garage February 11, 2020 Page 86 of 103 Purpose of Workshop •Provide background for current parking garage site and downtown parking –Define the changes driving demand for additional parking •Discuss options for council direction on analysis of other sites –Engagement from stakeholders –Identify goals and criteria for decision making Page 87 of 103 Background on Downtown Parking Page 88 of 103 Public Parking Changes since 2015 East Side of Austin •8 spaces gained on 9th St by GHC due to bus stop moving •(20) Spaces lost due to Watkins •(12) Spaces lost due to City Hall sale West Side of Austin •138 Phase 1 Lot at 8th and MLK (County partnership) •67 Phase 2 Lot at 8th and MLK (County partnership) •13 Blue Hole Parking (coming soon) City of GeorgetownPage 89 of 103 Why 6th and Main •Sale of City buildings increased intensity of use in the area •Additional development in this area will increase demand for parking •A smaller garage could be funded within city’s budget in the shorter term, alleviating parking pressures to delay the larger and more expensive garage •Smaller garage proposed in FY18 for FY19 Budget City of GeorgetownPage 90 of 103 Downtown Development Timeline 2017-current Page 91 of 103 City-owned lot County-owned lot Garage Site Page 92 of 103 Parking Demands •Availability of public parking in downtown was the driver for the development code reducing parking that would be required in other parts of city •For 2019 Downtown Development Projects –691 would be required if not located in Downtown –108 added or identified through alternative plans City of GeorgetownPage 93 of 103 New businesses •Watkins (office & restaurant) •Hitch Hall •Golden Rule •600 Market Place •Heritage Court (office & restaurant) •Rock Street Lofts •Blue Corn Harvest •Wish Well •City Post (3 levels) •Mango Tango •Barrel and Amps •Stromberg Hoffman (front) •Lamppost Coffee •Lark and Owl Bistro/Bookstore •Wag Heaven •309 Coffee City of GeorgetownPage 94 of 103 MLK Development in Downtown Downtown Overlay Area 1 district 3 hour parking Free Public Parking New construction or substantial redevelopment Reuse or planned reuse of existing building with more intense use Page 95 of 103 Area 1 Reuse or planned reuse of existing building with more intense use New construction or substantial redevelopment Downtown Development Parking Analysis parking requirement if use located outside downtown overlay 33 spaces 110 spaces 29 spaces 155 spaces 32 spaces 63 spaces 23 spaces 25 spaces 30 spaces 22 spaces 104 spaces 16 spaces 49 spaces Page 96 of 103 Area 1 Reuse or planned reuse of existing building with more intense use New construction or substantial redevelopment Downtown Development Analysis opportunities for new development Undeveloped platted lots Page 97 of 103 Next Steps -Opportunities Page 98 of 103 Summary -Verification •Consensus –Additional public parking is needed –Parking structures should be considered –More public input should be initiated •Feedback –Other sites should be studied City of GeorgetownPage 99 of 103 Expand Scope of Study •Pause on 6th and Main Lot •Utilize existing consultant to expand study •Review other sites –Based upon updated development and parking demands City of GeorgetownPage 100 of 103 Expand Scope of Study •Establish Criteria for review/evaluation •Potential criteria –Fiscally responsible –Consistent with Downtown Master Plan •Design criteria –Location where it serves the highest need •Accessibility •Alleviate immediate pressures short/mid-term City of GeorgetownPage 101 of 103 Next Steps •Feedback on revised approach from Council •Discussion with Design Committee –Meeting on 2/13/20 •Next Steps –Return to Council with scope changes and contract change for consultant –Proposed public engagement process City of GeorgetownPage 102 of 103 Development Parking Requirement outside of downtown No. of Parking Spaces (outside of downtown) Parking Requirement (Downtown) No. of Parking Spaces (downtown) Watkins Building (office/ restaurant ) (office )1 per 300 ft 2 GFA/ (restaurant) 1 per 100 ft 2 of designated seating area/entertainment area + 4 additional spaces 33 No off-street parking requirement in Area 1 0 Hitch Hall 1 per 100 ft 2 of designated seating area/entertainment area + 4 additional spaces 63 No off-street parking requirement in Area 1 0 Golden Rule 1 per 100 ft 2 of designated seating area/entertainment area + 4 additional spaces 32 No off-street parking requirement in Area 1 0 114 E. 7th Street (mango tango/ 600 market place) (Mango Tango)1 per 100 ft 2 of designated seating area/entertainment area + 4 additional spaces / (600 Market place )1 per 250 ft 2 GFA for first 20,000 ft 30 No off-street parking requirement in Area 1 0 City Post (basement/ 1st floor restaurant/ event center) (basement/ and 1st floor restaurant) 1 per 100 ft 2 of designated seating area/entertainment area + 4 additional spaces / (event facility ) 1 per 400 ft 2 GFA + 1 additional per 4 capacity seating 155 No off-street parking requirement in Area 1 0 Heritage Court (restaurant/ office) (restaurant) 1 per 100 ft 2 of designated seating area/entertainment area + 4 additional spaces / (office) 1 per 300 ft 2 GFA 110 1 per 500 sq. ft GFA 32 Lamppost Coffee 1 per 100 ft 2 of designated seating area/entertainment area + 4 additional spaces 22 No off-street parking requirement in Area 1 0 Rock Street Lofts (retail/ residential) (retail)1 per 250 ft 2 GFA for first 20,000 ft 2 GFA,/ (residential) 1.5 per 1-bedroom unit 2 per 2-bedroom unit 2.5 per 3-bedroom unit + additional 5% of total spaces for visitor use 23 1 per 500 sq. ft GFA/ 1 space per unit (alternative parking plan) 14 Blue Corn Harvest 1 per 100 ft 2 of designated seating area/entertainment area + 4 additional spaces 29 No off-street parking requirement in Area 1 0 Wish Well 1 per 400 ft 2 GFA + 1 additional per 4 capacity seating 104 50% of the following: 1 per 400 ft 2 GFA + 1 additional per 4 capacity seating 52 Stromberg Hoffman Building - 718 S. Austin Avenue and 209 8th Street (street front restaurant space/ Barrel and Amps/ 2nd floor yoga studio) (restaurant) 1 per 100 ft 2 of designated seating area/entertainment area + 4 additional spaces / (yoga studio) 1 per 250 ft 2 GFA for first 20,000 ft 2 GFA, 49 No off-street parking requirement in Area 1 0 205 W. 6th Street (Lark and Owl Bistro/Bookstore/ Wag Heaven) (Bistro) 1 per 100 ft 2 of designated seating area/entertainment area + 4 additional spaces / (Bookstore and Wag Heaven) 1 per 250 ft 2 GFA for first 20,000 ft 2 GFA, 25 1 per 500 sq. ft GFA 8 309 Coffee 1 per 100 ft 2 of designated seating area/entertainment area + 4 additional spaces 16 1 per 500 sq. ft GFA 2 * specific area dedicated to seating space has not been determined. The area of the entire space dedicated to the use has been used for parking estimates TOTAL 691 108 Page 103 of 103