The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda CC 06.12.2018 WorkshopNotice of M eeting of the Governing B ody of the City of Georgetown, Texas June 1 2, 2 0 1 8 The Ge orgetown City Council will meet on June 12 , 2018 at 2:30 PM at Co unc il Chambers - 101 East 7th Street The City o f Georgetown is committed to co mpliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you re quire assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or ac c ommo datio ns will be provided upo n request. P lease contact the City Se c retary's Office, at least three (3 ) days prio r to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930- 3652 o r City Hall at 113 East 8th Street fo r additional information; TTY use rs ro ute through Relay Texas at 7 11. Policy De ve lopme nt/Re vie w Workshop - A Prese ntation and discussion conc e rning ethics recommendations fro m the Ethics Ad Hoc Committee -- Tim Smith, Chair of the Ethics Ad Hoc Committee B Prese ntation and discussion conc e rning a Neighborhood Traffic Manage ment P olicy -- Octavio Garza, P.E. C Prese ntation and discussion of the Mid-Year FY2018 Budget Amendme nt -- Paul Diaz, Budget Manager D Prese ntation and discussion conc e rning Go Geo Transit Programs re lated to transit advertising po lic y and update on GoGeo operatio ns -- Edward G. Polasek, AICP Exe cutive Se ssion In compliance with the Open Meetings Ac t, Chapter 551, Government Co de , Verno n's Texas Codes, Annotate d, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular se ssio n. E Se c . 55 1.0 71 : Consul tati on wi th Atto rney Advic e from attorney about pending o r contemplated litigation and othe r matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Co uncil, including agenda items Se c . 55 1.0 72 : Del i berati ons about Real Pro perty - Authorization of Negotiations fo r the Do wntown Building Sale - 3 11 East Mo rrow Street - NW Blvd, P arcels 3 & 4 -- Travis Baird, Real Estate Services Coordinator - Rock/8th Streets Se c . 55 1:0 74 : Personnel Matte r s City Manager, City Attorney, City Se c retary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the appointment, employment, evaluatio n, reassignment, duties, discipline, o r dismissal Se c . 55 1.0 87 : Del i berati on regardi ng Eco no mi c Devel opment Ne go ti ati ons - Pro ject Deliver - Pro ject Wire Page 1 of 117 Adjournme nt Ce rtificate of Posting I, Shelley No wling, City S ecretary for the C ity of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , do hereby c ertify that this Notic e o f Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a p lac e read ily acc es s ib le to the general pub lic at all times , o n the _____ day of _________________, 2018, at __________, and remained so p o s ted for at leas t 72 c o ntinuo us ho urs p receding the s cheduled time of s aid meeting. __________________________________ Shelley No wling, City S ecretary Page 2 of 117 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop June 12, 2018 SUBJECT: P resentation and disc ussio n concerning ethics recommendations from the Ethics Ad Ho c Co mmittee -- Tim Smith, Chair of the Ethics Ad Hoc Committee ITEM SUMMARY: At the October 2 4, 2 01 7 City Council Meeting, the City Council took action to amend the City's Ethics Ordinance. They voiced their desire to eliminate possible quorum issues, preventing action fro m being taken o n certain Bo ards and Commissions, when conflicts of interest had been filed. The amended Ordinance fo llowed Te xas statutes and eliminated the Ethics Co mmission. The Council also took actio n that evening to appoint the members o f the standing Ethic s Commission to an Ethics Ad Hoc Committee, tasked with reviewing the City's Ethics Ordinance and making reco mmendations to the City Council for amendments to the ordinance. The Council asked the Ethics Ad Hoc Committee to analyze pro visions to be added bac k to the City's ordinance, one o f which would likely be to re-establish the Ethic s Commission. The Council also gave dire c tion to the Committee to c lear up ambiguous language in the previous ordinanc e . The Ethics Ad Hoc Committee met 6 times and will pre sent their recommendations to the City Council fo r amendments to the City's previo us Ethics Ordinance. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Shelley Nowling, City Secretary ATTACHMENT S: Description Recommended Chap ter 2.20 - Ethic s - Cod e of Ord inances Page 3 of 117 CODE OF ORDINANCES Title 2 - ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 2.20. - ETHICS {00009846 / v6 / CMCNABB / COUNCIL / ETHICS / 5/17/2018} Georgetown, Texas, Code of Ordinances Page 1 CHAPTER 2.20. - ETHICS Sec. 2.20.010. - Declaration of Policy. A. It is the policy of the City that the proper operation of democratic government requires City Officials to be independent, impartial, and responsible; and that no City Official permit any interest, financial or otherwise, direct or indirect, or engagement in any business, transaction, or professional activity to conflict with the proper discharge of duties in the public interest; that governmental decisions and policies be made in the proper channels of the governmental structure; that public office not be used for illegal or improper personal gain; and that City Officials shall at all times strive to avoid even the appearance of impropriety or partisanship. The City Council shall be maintained as a nonpartisan body. B. This Chapter has four purposes: 1. To establish high ethical standards in official conduct by City Officials; 2. To establish guidelines for ethical standards of conduct for all City Officials; 3. To require disclosure by City Officials of private financial or other interests in matters affecting the City; and 4. To provide discipline for those who violate this Chapter. C. The City recognizes that City Officials are also members of society and, therefore, cannot and should not be without any personal and economic interest in the decisions and policies of government; that City Officials retain their rights as citizens to interests of a personal or economic nature and their rights to publicly express their views on matters of general public interest. It is not the intent of this Chapter to diminish the rights of City Officials as citizens of the community. D. The provisions of this Chapter do not apply to political contributions, loans, expenditures, reports, or regulation of political campaigns or to the conduct of candidates in campaigns. E. This Chapter defines two types of conflicts of interest and treats them differently. A "substantial financial interest" follows Section 171.002 of the Texas Local Government Code, and the provisions applicable to local Public Officials who have a "Substantial Financial Interest" are set forth in Chapter 171 of the Texas Local Government Code. This Chapter is intended to go beyond the requirements of Chapter 171 of the Texas Local Government Code by addressing "Substantial Economic Interests." A Substantial Economic Interest is more comprehensive than a "Substantial Financial Interest" and covers various kinds of economic benefits that might accrue to a City Official that are not included in the Texas Statute. Sec. 2.20.020. - Definitions. For the purposes of this Chapter the following definitions apply: Page 4 of 117 CODE OF ORDINANCES Title 2 - ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 2.20. - ETHICS {00009846 / v6 / CMCNABB / COUNCIL / ETHICS / 5/17/2018} Georgetown, Texas, Code of Ordinances Page 2 A. "Business Entity" means a sole proprietorship, partnership, firm, corporation, holding company, joint-stock company, receivership, trust, or any other entity recognized by law. B. "City Official" means the Mayor, every member of the City Council, the City Manager, the City Secretary, the City Attorney, and all members of any commission, committee, or board appointed by the City Council. C. "Confidential Information" means any information that a City Official would be privy to because of the official's position but otherwise is not available to the public under the provisions of the Texas Public Information Act (Tex. Gov. Code ch. 552). D. "Economic Benefit" means any money, Property, contract rights, sale, lease, option, credit, loan, discount, service, or other tangible or intangible thing of value, whether similar or dissimilar to those enumerated. E. "Family Member" means a person who is related to an officer or employee as spouse or as any of the following, whether by marriage, blood or adoption: parent, child, brother, sister, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, grandparent, grandchild, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, step son-in-law, stepdaughter, step daughter-in-law, stepbrother, stepsister, half-brother, half-sister, brother-in-law or sister-in law. For purposes of this Chapter, spouse of a City Official includes a domestic partner, which means an individual who lives in the same household and shares common resources of life in a close, personal, intimate relationship with the City Official if under Texas law the individual would not be prevented from marrying the City Official on account of age, consanguinity, or prior undissolved marriage to another. A domestic partner may be of the same, or opposite, gender as the City Official. F. "Gift" means a favor, hospitality, or Economic Benefit, of a value in excess of $25.00 other than compensation but which does not include campaign contributions reported as required by state law, gifts received if given on account of kinship, or any value received by will, intestate succession, or as a distribution from an inter vivos or testamentary trust. G. "Income" means Economic Benefit received. H. "Property" means real estate, personal items, equipment, goods, crops, livestock, or an equitable right to income from real estate, personal items, equipment, goods, crops, or livestock. I. "Source of Income" means any business entity, employment, investment, or activity which earned or produced income, including salary, fees, interest, dividends, royalties, or rents, which has been paid to or for the credit of a City Official, or family member or which would be taxable to said City Official, or Family Member under the United States Internal Revenue Code, as amended, even though not actually paid or credited. J. "Substantial Economic Interest" may take several forms. It may be established by a legal or equitable interest in Property, which includes but is not limited to the interest of a stockholder, co-owner, or beneficiary. Substantial Economic Interest may also be established by a fiduciary obligation to Property, which includes, but is not limited to, Page 5 of 117 CODE OF ORDINANCES Title 2 - ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 2.20. - ETHICS {00009846 / v6 / CMCNABB / COUNCIL / ETHICS / 5/17/2018} Georgetown, Texas, Code of Ordinances Page 3 the interest of a trustee or executor. Substantial Economic Interest may also be established by a contractual right in property. A City Official and/or Family Member has a Substantial Economic Interest if the City Official and/or Family Member has a legal or equitable interest, fiduciary obligation, or contractual right in Property that is more than minimal or insignificant and would be recognized by reasonable persons to have weight in deciding a case or an issue. Service by a City Official as an officer, director, advisor, or otherwise active participant in an educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organization does not create a Substantial Economic Interest in the Property of that organization. Ownership of an interest in a mutual or common investment fund that holds securities or other assets is not a substantial economic interest in the securities or other assets unless the City Official participates in the management of the fund. A City Official does not have a Substantial Economic Interest in a matter if the economic impact on the City Official is indistinguishable from the impact on the public or on the particular group affected by the matter. K. "Substantial Financial Interest" means: 1. An interest in a Business Entity if: a. A City Official or Family Member owns: i. Ten percent or more of voting stock or shares of the business entity; or ii. Fifteen thousand dollars or more of the fair market value of the Business Entity; or b. A City Official or family member receives funds from the Business Entity, customer or client that are ten percent or more of the person's gross income for the previous year (e.g. receives funds from an employer, customer, or client); or 2. An interest in real Property, if a City Official or family member has a legal or equitable interest in the property with a fair market value of $2,500.00 or more. Sec. 2.20.030. - Standards of Conduct. A. General Provisions. 1. No City Official shall disclose any Confidential Information gained through the official's position concerning Property, operations, policies, or affairs of the City, for gain or advantage in a Substantial Economic Interest or a Substantial Financial Interest of the City Official or the persons identified in Section 2.20.030.C.2.b. of the conflicts of interest section of this Chapter. 2. No City Official shall use the official's position or City-owned facilities, equipment, supplies, or resources of the City for gain in a Substantial Economic Interest or a Page 6 of 117 CODE OF ORDINANCES Title 2 - ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 2.20. - ETHICS {00009846 / v6 / CMCNABB / COUNCIL / ETHICS / 5/17/2018} Georgetown, Texas, Code of Ordinances Page 4 Substantial Financial Interest of the City Official, for a political campaign of the Official, or for any of the persons identified in Section 2.20.030 C.2.b. of the Conflicts of Interest section of this Chapter. 3. No City Official shall, except as specifically authorized by City ordinance, appear before the body of which the official is a member to represent the City Official or any person identified in Section 2.20.030.C.2.b. of the conflicts of interest section of this Chapter. The City Official may designate and be represented by a person of the Official's choice in any such matter. 4. No City Official shall act as surety for any person or Business Entity that has a contract with the City, or as a surety on any bond required by the City for a City Official. 5. No City Official shall acquire an interest in, any contract, transaction, zoning decision, or other matter, if the official knows, or has reason to know, that the interest will be affected by impending official action by the City. 6. No City Official shall enter into an agreement or understanding with any other person that official action by the official will be rewarded or reciprocated by the other person. 7. No City Official shall assert the prestige of the official’s City position for the purpose of advancing private interests. 8. No City Official shall state or imply that he or she is able to influence City action on any basis other than the merits. 9. No City Official, other than a person who is classified as an official only because he or she is an appointed member of a committee, commission, or board, shall represent any person, group, or entity, other than himself or herself, or his or her spouse or minor children, in any litigation to which the City is a party, if the interests of that person, group, or entity are adverse to the interests of the City. 10. No City Official shall intentionally or knowingly assist or induce, or attempt to assist or induce, any person to violate any provision in this Code of Ethics. 11. No City Official shall violate the provisions of this Code of Ethics through the acts of another. 12. These General Provisions do not prohibit a City Official from representing the City Official's interest in the City Official's owner-occupied homestead before any City body, except the body of which the official is a member. B. Gifts. No City Official may solicit or accept any Gift that is offered or given with the intention of influencing the judgment or discretion of such official; or given in consideration of the favorable exercise of the official's judgment or discretion, in the past. Page 7 of 117 CODE OF ORDINANCES Title 2 - ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 2.20. - ETHICS {00009846 / v6 / CMCNABB / COUNCIL / ETHICS / 5/17/2018} Georgetown, Texas, Code of Ordinances Page 5 C. Conflict of Interest. 1. Substantial Financial Interest. No City Official may vote on or participate in any decision-making process on a matter if the official has a Substantial Financial Interest in the outcome of the matter under consideration. 2. Substantial Economic Interest. a. No City Official may vote on or participate in any decision-making process on a matter if the Official has a Substantial Economic Interest in the outcome of the matter under consideration. b. To avoid the appearance and risk of impropriety, a City Official may not take any official action that the Official knows is likely to affect the Substantial Economic Interests of: i. The City Official's Family Member; ii. A Business Entity for which the City Official serves as an officer or director or services in any policy-making position; or iii. A person or Business Entity from whom, within the past 12 months, the City Official or the official's spouse, directly or indirectly, has solicited, received and not rejected, or accepted an offer of employment. D. Disclosure of Interest and Recusal. 1. A City Official who has a Substantial Economic Interest in the outcome of the matter under consideration shall disclose that the official has a Substantial Economic Interest and shall recuse himself/herself from discussion of and voting on the matter. The City Official shall also promptly file an affidavit with the City Secretary disclosing the nature and extent of the conflict, and the affidavit shall be included in the official minutes of the body. 2. A City Official having a Substantial Financial Interest in the outcome of a matter under consideration shall disclose that the official has a Substantial Financial Interest and recuse himself/herself immediately from voting and from the discussion of the matter. The City Official shall also promptly file an affidavit with the City Secretary disclosing the nature and extent of the conflict, and the affidavit shall be included in the official minutes of the body. 3. If abstention would leave City Council or a commission, committee, or board appointed by City Council, with less than a quorum capable of acting, members must disclose their conflicts on the public record, but they may then discuss and vote on the item(s). Sec. 2.20.040. - Ethics Commission. A. Creation of Ethics Commission. 1. This Chapter creates an Ethics Commission that consists of eight members, all of whom must reside within the corporate limits of the City. Each member of the City Council may Page 8 of 117 CODE OF ORDINANCES Title 2 - ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 2.20. - ETHICS {00009846 / v6 / CMCNABB / COUNCIL / ETHICS / 5/17/2018} Georgetown, Texas, Code of Ordinances Page 6 nominate a citizen from his or her district to serve on the Commission, and the Mayor may nominate one citizen from the City at large. Nominations must be confirmed by a vote of the City Council. 2. A vote to reject a nominee requires a super-majority. Members of the Commission may not hold or be a candidate for any City elected or appointed office at the time of their service on the Commission. B. Terms of Service. 1. Except as provided below, members of the Commission shall serve two-year terms. No member may serve more than two consecutive terms. 2. The terms of the initial Commission members shall begin on the day that is one day after the date that the City Council approves the appointment of the first eight Commission members. The terms of the initial eight Commission members shall be staggered by members drawing lots at the first Commission meeting such that four members serve until March 1 of the calendar year that is one year following the calendar year that the Commission members were initially appointed, and four members shall serve until March 1 of the calendar year that is two years following the calendar year that the Commission members were initially appointed. Thereafter, all terms shall be for two years. 3. The second and subsequent appointments of members to the Commission shall be staggered and shall be for terms of two years. C. Commission Vacancies. 1. All vacancies shall be filled for unexpired terms. 2. Members hold office until their successors have been appointed and continue to hold office after a successor has been appointed for the limited purpose of disposing of all complaints unresolved during that member's term. 3. No member may participate in a decision regarding a complaint for which hearings have commenced prior to his or her appointment. D. Removal of Commission Members. In addition to the City Council's powers of removal, members of the Commission may be removed by a majority vote of the City Council for cause. E. Officers. 1. The Commission shall elect a Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson, and Secretary at its annual meeting. 2. The Vice-Chairperson shall conduct meetings in the absence of the Chairperson or in the event of a vacancy in that position. 3. The officers serve one-year terms. F. Quorum. Five or more members of the Commission constitute a quorum, but no action of the Commission shall be of any force or effect unless it is adopted by the favorable vote of five or more members. Page 9 of 117 CODE OF ORDINANCES Title 2 - ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 2.20. - ETHICS {00009846 / v6 / CMCNABB / COUNCIL / ETHICS / 5/17/2018} Georgetown, Texas, Code of Ordinances Page 7 G. Meetings. 1. The Commission shall meet when necessary to carry out its responsibilities, but in any event the Commission shall hold an annual meeting during March to elect officers and review this Chapter. 2. The Chairperson or three members may call a meeting provided that reasonable notice is given to each member. Notice of all Commission meetings shall be posted pursuant to the Texas Open Meetings Act. Sec. 2.20.050. - Role of the Ethics Commission. A. The Ethics Commission has jurisdiction over ethics complaints involving City Officials. B. The Ethics Commission shall have the authority to review and investigate complaints filed in accordance with this Chapter and issue a written finding of the Commission's determination when appropriate. C. Service on the Ethics Commission does not preclude a member from filing a complaint with the Commission. The Commission member filing the complaint must recuse himself/herself from the Commission procedure. D. The Ethics Commission makes recommendations to the City Council regarding revisions and changes to this Chapter. E. The Ethics Commission may seek any necessary assistance from the City Council and City Manager regarding financial support needed to carry out the Commission's duties. F. If warranted, independent legal counsel, a C.P.A., or other professional advisors may be utilized to advise and assist the Commission and take part in hearings. Sec. 2.20.060. - Role of the City Attorney. A. The City Attorney serves as legal counsel to the Ethics Commission. When complaints are filed relating to the Mayor, City Council members, City Manager, City Attorney, or other City Official on a matter in which the City Attorney has served as Ethics Advisor, independent legal counsel may be utilized to advise the Commission and take part in its proceedings. B. The City Attorney serves as Ethics Advisor to City Officials. As Ethics Advisor, the City Attorney is available to respond confidentially to inquiries relating to the Ethics Ordinance (this Chapter) and may render advisory opinions on potential conflicts of interest or violation of this Section at the request of a City Official. The advisory opinion in any subsequent charges concerning the matter may be used as a defense to an alleged violation of this Section unless material facts were omitted or misstated by the person requesting the opinion. C. If a complainant alleges a violation by the City Attorney, the complaint must be filed with the City Secretary, with a copy to the Mayor and the City Manager. Page 10 of 117 CODE OF ORDINANCES Title 2 - ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 2.20. - ETHICS {00009846 / v6 / CMCNABB / COUNCIL / ETHICS / 5/17/2018} Georgetown, Texas, Code of Ordinances Page 8 Sec. 2.20.070. - Complaint Process. A. Filing. 1. Any person who believes that there has been a violation of this Chapter may file a sworn complaint. A complaint alleging a violation of this Chapter must meet the requirements of Section 2.20.070.A.2 and must be filed with the City Secretary. 2. Required Contents of a Complaint. An ethics complaint must be in writing and under oath and must set forth in simple, concise, and direct statements the following: a. The name of the complainant; b. The street or mailing address and the telephone number of the complainant; c. The name of the person who allegedly committed the violation; d. The position or title of the person who allegedly committed the violation; e. The nature of the alleged violation, including, if possible, the specific rule or provision of this Chapter alleged to have been violated; f. A statement of the facts constituting the alleged violation and the dates on which or period of time in which the alleged violation occurred; and must contain the following: i. Documents or other material available to the complainant relevant to the allegation; ii. A list of all documents or other material relevant to the allegation and available to the complainant, but that are not in the possession of the complainant, including the location of the documents, if known; and iii. A list of all documents or other material relevant to the allegation, but unavailable to the complainant, including the location of the documents, if known. g. If the complaint is based on information and belief, the complaint shall state the source and basis of the information and belief. 3. The complaint must be accompanied by an affidavit stating that the information contained in the complaint is true and correct and that the complainant has good reason to believe and does believe that the facts alleged constitute a violation of this Chapter. 4. Upon request, the City Secretary shall provide information to persons about the requirements of a complaint and the process for filing a complaint. B. Confidentiality and Ex Parte Communications. 1. No City Official shall reveal information relating to the filing or processing of a complaint except as required for the performance of official duties. 2. All documents relating to a pending complaint are confidential, unless they are required to be disclosed under the Texas Public Information Act (Tex. Gov. Code Ch. 552). Page 11 of 117 CODE OF ORDINANCES Title 2 - ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 2.20. - ETHICS {00009846 / v6 / CMCNABB / COUNCIL / ETHICS / 5/17/2018} Georgetown, Texas, Code of Ordinances Page 9 3. After a complaint has been filed, and during the consideration of a complaint by the Commission, a member of the Commission may not communicate directly or indirectly with any party or person about any issue of fact or law regarding the complaint, except at a meeting of the Commission. This provision does not prevent a member of the Commission to consult with the City Attorney regarding procedure and legal issues. C. Notification. 1. A copy of a complaint which meets the requirements of this Section shall be promptly forwarded by the City Secretary to the City Attorney, the Ethics Commission, and to the person charged in the complaint. 2. The person alleged in the complaint to have violated this Chapter shall be provided with a copy of the Ethics Ordinance (this Chapter) and informed that: a. Within 14 days of receipt of the complaint, a sworn response must be filed with the City Secretary; b. Failure to file a response does not preclude the City Attorney from processing the complaint; c. A copy of any response to a complaint must be provided by the City Secretary to the complainant, who may within seven days respond by sworn writing filed with the City Secretary, who shall provide a copy of the sworn writing to the person charged in the complaint. Copies of all responses shall also be provided by the City Secretary to the Ethics Commission. 3. City Officials have a duty to cooperate with the City Secretary, the City Attorney, and the Ethics Commission in any proceeding under this Chapter. Sec. 2.20.080. - Hearing Process. A. Preliminary Hearing. 1. As soon as reasonably possible, but in no event later than 60 days after receiving a complaint, the Commission shall conduct a Preliminary Hearing. The purpose of the preliminary hearing is to determine whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that a violation of this Chapter has occurred. 2. The complainant and the City Official named in the complaint have the right of representation by counsel. 3. Statements at a Preliminary Hearing shall be under oath, but there shall be no cross examination or requests for persons or evidence issued for the hearing. 4. The person filing a complaint shall state the alleged violation and describe in narrative form the testimony and other evidence which are presented to prove the alleged violation as stated in the written complaint. 5. The City Official named in the complaint shall have the opportunity to respond but is not required to attend or make any statement. The official may describe in narrative form the Page 12 of 117 CODE OF ORDINANCES Title 2 - ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 2.20. - ETHICS {00009846 / v6 / CMCNABB / COUNCIL / ETHICS / 5/17/2018} Georgetown, Texas, Code of Ordinances Page 10 testimony and other evidence presented to disprove the alleged violation. If the official agrees that a violation has occurred, the Commission may consider the appropriate sanction. 6. Only members of the Commission may question the complainant, the independent counsel for the Commission, or the City Official named in the complaint. 7. At the conclusion of the Preliminary Hearing one of the following actions shall be taken: a. If the Commission does not determine that there are reasonable grounds to believe that a violation of this Chapter has occurred, the complaint shall be dismissed. b. If the Commission determines that there are reasonable grounds to believe that a violation of this Chapter has occurred, it shall schedule a final hearing. c. If the City Official has agreed that a violation has occurred, the Commission may proceed to determine the appropriate sanction. B. Final Hearing. 1. A final hearing shall be held as expeditiously as possible following the determination by the Commission that there are reasonable grounds to believe that a violation of this Section has occurred, but in no event shall it be held more than 30 days after said determination. The Commission may grant two postponements, not to exceed 15 days each, upon the request of the City Official named in the complaint. 2. If a complaint proceeds to a final hearing, the Commission may request witnesses to attend and testify, administer oaths and affirmations, take evidence and request the production of books, papers, records, or other evidence needed for the performance of the Commission's duties or exercise of its powers, including its powers of investigation. Failure to comply with these requests becomes part of the material to be considered by the Commission in making this determination. 3. The issue at a final hearing is whether a violation of this Chapter has occurred. The Commission shall make its determination based on the evidence in the record. All witnesses shall make their statements under oath. If the Commission determines that a violation has occurred, it shall state its findings in writing, identify the particular provision(s) of this Chapter which have been violated, and within five working days deliver a copy of the findings to the complainant, the person named in the complaint, and the City Secretary. The City Secretary shall deliver a copy of the findings to the City Council. Sec. 2.20.090. - Sanctions and Violations. A. If the Commission determines that a violation of this Chapter has occurred, it shall consider appropriate sanctions. The Commission may receive additional testimony or statements before considering sanctions, but is not required to do so. B. If the Commission determines that a violation has occurred, they may impose the following sanctions: Page 13 of 117 CODE OF ORDINANCES Title 2 - ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 2.20. - ETHICS {00009846 / v6 / CMCNABB / COUNCIL / ETHICS / 5/17/2018} Georgetown, Texas, Code of Ordinances Page 11 a. A letter of notification when the violation is clearly unintentional, or when the respondent’s conduct complained of was made in reliance on a public written opinion of the City Attorney. A letter of notification may advise the respondent of any steps to be taken to avoid future violations. b. A letter of admonition when the violation is minor or may have been unintentional, but calls for a more substantial response than a letter of notification. c. A reprimand when the violation has been committed intentionally or through disregard of this article. A reprimand directed to a City Official will also be sent to the City Council. d. A letter of censure when a serious or repeated violation of this article has been committed intentionally or through culpable disregard of this article by a City Official. A letter of censure directed to a City Official will be transmitted by the Commission to the City Secretary, published by the City Secretary in a local newspaper, of general circulation, and sent by the Commission to the City Council. C. If the Commission determines that a serious or repeated violation of this article has been committed intentionally or through culpable disregard of this article by a City Official, the Commission may recommend to City Council the removal from office or suspension from office, including a recommendation for the length of a suspension. The final authority to carry out a recommendation regarding removal of a City Official is the City Council. D. If the Commission determines that a serious or repeated violation of this article has been committed intentionally or through culpable disregard of this article by a City Official, the Commission may recommend the recall of the City Official from office. A recommendation regarding the recall of a City Official will be sent to the local newspaper. The final authority to carry out a recommendation regarding recall of a City Official rests with the citizens. E. A violation of any provision of this Chapter by any City Official as defined above shall constitute a misdemeanor punishable as provided in this Code. F. Copies of all sanction letters issued by the Commission under this Section shall be sent to the City Council. G. In addition, when the seriousness of the violation warrants, the Commission may recommend to the City Council the suspension or removal from office of any official serving in a Council- appointed position. Sec. 2.20.100. - Distribution and Proof of Compliance. A. The City Secretary shall make available to each new City Official designated in this Chapter, a copy of the text of this Chapter 2.20; Chapter 171 of the Texas Local Government Code pertaining to conflicts of interest; the Texas Open Meetings Act (Tex. Gov. Code ch. 551); and the Texas Public Information Act (Tex. Gov. Code ch. 552) (collectively referred to in this Section as the "ethics statutes"). Page 14 of 117 CODE OF ORDINANCES Title 2 - ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 2.20. - ETHICS {00009846 / v6 / CMCNABB / COUNCIL / ETHICS / 5/17/2018} Georgetown, Texas, Code of Ordinances Page 12 B. The City Attorney shall conduct one or more annual seminars devoted to educating City Officials on the meaning and legal significance of the ethics statutes. C. Each City Official shall file with the City Secretary a signed affidavit in which the City Official acknowledges the existence of the ethics statutes. Page 15 of 117 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop June 12, 2018 SUBJECT: P resentation and discussio n concerning a Neighbo rhoo d Traffic Management Policy -- Octavio Garza, P.E. ITEM SUMMARY: Residents thro ughout the City of Georgetown, as well as neighboring jurisdictions, are often concerned about high traffic speeds and/o r vo lumes in residential areas. Speeding ve hicles and unexpe c ted traffic volume s, whethe r perceived or real, may contribute to a sense of uneasiness or create safety co ncerns within a community. City Counc il directed the Public Works Division to take a holistic lo ok at the City’s roadway network and provide guidance on a process which the City of Georgeto wn co uld use to address traffic spe ed and volume co ncerns in residential areas. To this extent, the P ublic Works Division undertoo k traffic monitoring in various are as throughout the City o f Georgetown and conducted research of neighborhood traffic management programs in other cities. The intent of the research was to provide an objective and comprehensive framework to better addre ss mitigation of adverse levels o f speeding and traffic volume in City of Georgeto wn neighborho ods in order to be responsive to citizen concerns with traffic speeds/vo lumes and pe de strian and bicycle movements in residential neighborhoods, including fisc al responsibility o f studies and recommended impro vements. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None SUBMITTED BY: Octavio Garza, PE, Public Works Director ATTACHMENT S: Description NTM Po licy Pres entatio n Draft Traffic Management P o licy Page 16 of 117 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP JUNE 12, 2018 Page 17 of 117 Agenda • Purpose • Neighborhood Traffic Management Policy – Speed – Volume • Application Process • Budget Considerations • Next Steps – City Council Input/Direction – Public Process – Establish Budget for Program Page 18 of 117 Purpose of Neighborhood Traffic Management Policy • Address Traffic Speed & Volume Issues on Local Streets – Applies to Public Streets which are Residential Streets or Minor Collectors • Creates a Process to: – Identify Issues Real or Perceived – Involve the Public in Decision Making Process – Identify Preferred Alternatives to Mitigate Issue(s) – Provide Council Decision Point – Ensure Compliance with City Policies and provide Uniform Citywide Traffic Safety Management – Create an Orderly Capital Budgeting Process to implement preferred alternative(s) Page 19 of 117 1. Speed (Quantitative) •85th percentile speed must be exceeded: For a 24 hour period the average speed must be at least 3 mph over posted speed. • Changes to Speed Limits are a public process. 2. Volume (Qualitative for local streets) • Traffic Control Measures recommended per Policy. Neighborhood Traffic Management Policy Page 20 of 117 Traffic Volume Criteria •Traditional Planning Criteria is based on Level of Service for Major Collectors and Arterials. •Level of Service C for 2 lane undivided roadway is up to 8,200 average daily trips for un-signalized roadways. •Level of Service C for a segment of street is “Stable Flow, but most drivers are restricted in their freedom to select speed or change lanes.”Source: AASHTO 2001 and ITE 1992 •Traditional Planning Criteria does not provide an adequate measure to address “volume“ on local streets. Page 21 of 117 Traffic Volume Identification Considerations in Draft Policy: -Operational problems that could be addressed through traffic control measures; -Special conditions concerning the neighborhood area, including, but not limited to, the location and nature of businesses, schools,parks, churches or other non-residential traffic generators; -Approved neighborhood development plans; -Community support for the project evidencing that the project will enhance and promote public health, safety andwelfare; and, -Existing evidence, studies, data or reports regarding the severity of the existing problem, if any, merit the project. Page 22 of 117 Example of Traffic Control Measures for Speed and Volume Concerns* 7 Enforcement and education Speed reduction Roadway changes - Rumble strips, pavement edge lines, raised crosswalks, speed humps, etc. Narrowing of lanes - Roundabouts, island narrowing, etc. Curb extensions - Bulb outs, chokers, diverter/lateral shifts, etc. One-Way / Do Not Enter conversion Full closure *Appendix A of the Policy Page 23 of 117 Application Process First Step: Pre-submittal conference and application (Appendix B). Second Step: Staff review and determination of potential mitigation measures, funding, maintenance agreement (Appendix C), as applicable, with applicant. Third Step: Conduct public meeting to present a preferred alternative. Notification of the public meeting and preferred alternative will be mailed to addresses within 500 feet of the segment of roadway under consideration (larger area may be necessary if primary access/egress route requires traversing proposed traffic control devices). Page 24 of 117 Application Process Cont’d Fourth Step: Survey affected property owners. 1. 50% response required. 2. Two thirds of the 50% (or greater) response must support preferred alternative. Fifth Step: Staff recommendation prepared for Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board and City Council. Page 25 of 117 Sixth Step: CIP program planning, if required for implementation. Seventh Step: Design (30%). Eighth Step: Public Meeting for design feedback. Ninth Step: Final design, construction, testing/reporting. Application Process Cont’d Page 26 of 117 Timeline Created for orderly budget impacts. 1. Annual fund created in Public Works Division budget for projects requiring traffic engineering analysis. 2. Application process selects projects for study each year. 3. GTAB recommendation and City Council approval required for mitigation measures. Mitigation measures requiring capital improvements will be programmed in next FY CIP. Budget Considerations Page 27 of 117 Next Steps • How to Proceed: – City Council Feedback and Direction – Public Meeting for Input into Draft Policy – City Council Approval – Budget Request to Fund Program • Questions, Comments, Direction Page 28 of 117 Page 29 of 117 Page 30 of 117 Page 31 of 117 Page 32 of 117 Page 33 of 117 Page 34 of 117 Page 35 of 117 Page 36 of 117 Page 37 of 117 Page 38 of 117 Page 39 of 117 Page 40 of 117 Page 41 of 117 Page 42 of 117 Page 43 of 117 Page 44 of 117 Page 45 of 117 Page 46 of 117 Page 47 of 117 Page 48 of 117 Page 49 of 117 Page 50 of 117 Page 51 of 117 Page 52 of 117 Page 53 of 117 Page 54 of 117 Page 55 of 117 Page 56 of 117 Page 57 of 117 Page 58 of 117 Page 59 of 117 Page 60 of 117 Page 61 of 117 Page 62 of 117 Page 63 of 117 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop June 12, 2018 SUBJECT: P resentation and discussio n of the Mid-Year FY2 01 8 Budget Amendment -- Paul Diaz, Budget Manager ITEM SUMMARY: This item is a P owe rP oint Presentation to inform Council and receive direction regarding the planned FY2018 Mid Year budget amendment. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The pro pose d detailed financial exhibit is attached. After receiving Counc il feedback during the workshop, staff will bring the amendment for Council’s vote on first reading at the June 26th Council meeting. SUBMITTED BY: P aul Diaz, Budget Manager ATTACHMENT S: Description F Y2018 Mid Year Mid Year PowerPoint Page 64 of 117 2018 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2018 Amended Budget General Fund Beginning Fund Balance 12,233,596$ 172,123$ 12,405,719$ Revenues Transfer In, Council SRF -$ -$ -$ Sales tax 14,800,500 274,500$ 15,075,000$ Development fees 1,832,500 175,000$ 2,007,500$ Franchise fees 5,203,863 10,000 5,213,863$ Library Revenue 147,972 20,000 167,972$ All Other Revenue 40,045,330 - 40,045,330$ Total Revenues 62,030,165 479,500 62,509,665 Expenses Transfer Out, Council SRF 1,000,000 188,580 1,188,580 Police 11,511,871 448,000 11,959,871 Fire 9,557,895 350,000 9,907,895 Planning 1,685,954 (45,043) 1,640,911 Library 2,554,935 20,000 2,574,935 Communications 400,137 10,000 410,137 City Secretary 920,537 (68,000) 852,537 All Other Expenses 36,730,432 - 36,730,432 Total Expenses 64,361,761 903,537 65,265,298 Ending Fund Balance 9,902,000 (251,914) 9,650,086 Contingency Reserve 8,500,000 - 8,500,000 Benefit Payout Reserve 252,000 (252,000) - Economic Stability Reserve 1,150,000 - 1,150,000 Available Fund Balance -$ 86 86$ 2018 Approved Impact of This 2018 Amended CDBG Grants Beginning Fund Balance 58,184$ (56,831)$ 1,353$ Revenues Transfer In - GCP 30,839$ 30,839$ Original Revenues 108,710$ -$ 108,710$ Total Revenues 108,710 30,839 139,549 Expenses 6th and Scenic 34,314 34,314 Expenses 215,298 (108,710) 106,588 Total Expenses 215,298 (74,396) 140,902 Ending Fund Balance (48,404) 48,404 - Available Fund Balance (48,404)$ 48,404$ -$ 2018 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2018 Amended Budget Main Street Façade Beginning Fund Balance 66,879$ 84,779$ 151,658$ The one proposed amendment in this fund is to increase expenses by 84,779. The funding source is fund balance from unspent funds in FY2017. Due to the interest in the program, it is anticipated these funds will be spent by the end of the fiscal year. Revenues Program Revenues 116,200$ -$ 116,200$ Total Revenues 116,200 - 116,200 Expenses Main Street Façade 183,079 84,779 267,858 Total Expenses 183,079 84,779 267,858 Ending Fund Balance - - - Available Fund Balance -$ -$ -$ 2018 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2018 Amended Budget Cemetery Fund Exhibit A - Mid Year Budget Amendment The proposed amendments in the General Fund includes increased appropriations for Public Safety due to retirement payouts and increased overtime. The increased appropriations will be offset by recognizing additional revenue in sales tax and development fees, and by appropriating the Benefit Payout Reserve. The amendment also includes transfering the $188k year-end balance to the Council Special Revenue Fund, as well as correcting the roll forward amendment in Planning and City Secretary. The proposed amendment also includes recognizing both $20,000 of revenue and expense related to the Library. Lastly, the proposed amendment includes recognizing $10,000 in TV Franchise Fees which will be offset by $10,000 in Communication expenses. The proposed amendment is to reduce appropriation for the Scenic Dr. Sidewalk project to 108,710, and add appropriation of $34,314 for the Scenic and 6th project. Draft Page 65 of 117 Beginning Fund Balance 306,659$ 150,254$ 456,913$ The one proposed amendment in this fund is to increase expenses by 123,625 for the completion of the columbarium. Money was appropriated in a previous fiscal year and is currently in fund balance. Revenues Cemetery Revenues 144,000$ -$ 144,000$ Total Revenues 144,000 - 144,000 Expenses Cemetery Maintenance 94,000 - 94,000 Columbarium - 123,625 123,625 Total Expenses 94,000 123,625 217,625 Ending Fund Balance 356,659 26,629 383,288 Perpetual Reserve 325,000 - 325,000 Available Fund Balance 31,659$ 26,629$ 58,288$ 2018 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2018 Amended Budget Streets Fund Beginning Fund Balance 1,406,676$ 1,517,680$ 2,924,356$ Revenues Revenue 3,297,500$ -$ 3,297,500$ Total Revenues 3,297,500 - 3,297,500 Expenses Street Repair 3,954,176 1,517,680 5,471,856 Total Expenses 3,954,176 1,517,680 5,471,856 Ending Fund Balance 750,000 - 750,000 Arterial Reserve 750,000 - 750,000 Available Fund Balance -$ -$ -$ 2018 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2018 Amended Budget GCP Beginning Fund Balance 30,727,343$ (13,107,585)$ 17,619,758$ Revenues Bond Proceeds 35,450,000 2,300,000$ 37,750,000$ TIA Revenue 25,000 200,000$ 225,000$ Grant Revenue - 200,000$ 200,000$ Interlocal - 675,000$ 675,000$ Transfer in 562,914 185,000$ 747,914$ All Other Revenue 3,668,000 3,668,000 Total Revenues 39,705,914 3,560,000 43,265,914 Expenses Bond Funded Projects 5,810,235 2,061,919 7,872,154 Community Service 6,732,813 200,000 6,932,813 Downtown Masterplan Downtown West 25,990,682 (12,543,885) 13,446,797 Downtown West Parking Expansion 250,000 - 250,000 Downtown West Signage 125,000 - 125,000 Downtown Festival Area 460,000 (460,000) - Municipal Court/CVB Redesign 405,000 (230,000) 175,000 Transportation 27,310,734 844,161 28,154,895 The one proposed amendment in this fund is to increase expenses by 1,517,680 to help implement the street program discussed with Council. Currently this money is in fund balance from a prior fiscal year. The first proposed amendment in the General Capital Project fund is to recognize $2,300,000 in bond proceeds sold in the spring of 2018. $2,000,000 funds the ERP project, with the remaining portion allocated to Fire Station 7. The next proposed amendment is to recognize $200,000 in TIA revenue for the Verde Vista TIA project. Additionally, $200,000 of grant revenue is proposed to be recognized and appropriated for the Katy Trail Crossing project. $675,000 is proposed to be recognized and appropriated for the Inner Loop- Rockride project. The amendment also corrects the Downtown West related projects that had errors in the December roll forward budget amendment. The Facilities efficiency study is reduced by $100,000 after pricing was received. The study is funded by a transfer from the Council SRF. The Public Safety Facility has a proposed increase in appropriations of $61,243 and IT Data Center’s proposed increase totals $100,676. The Old Town Northeast Project’s appropriation will reduce by $30,839 and be transferred to CDBG Fund. Draft Page 66 of 117 Transfer Out 2,099,000 30,839 2,129,839 Original Expenses 500,000 - 500,000 Total Expenses 69,683,464 (10,096,966) 59,586,498 Ending Fund Balance 749,793 549,381 1,299,174 TIA Reserve 153,327 153,327 Available Fund Balance 596,466$ 549,381$ 1,145,847$ 2018 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2018 Amended Budget Council Discretionary Beginning Fund Balance 300,473$ (14,665)$ 285,808$ Revenues Transfer In, General Fund -$ 188,580 188,580 Original Revenue 1,002,000 1,002,000 Total Revenues 1,002,000 188,580 1,190,580 Expenses Transfer Out, Joint Services 75,000 75,000 Transfer Out, GCP 100,000 100,000 Total Expenses - 175,000 175,000 Ending Fund Balance 1,302,473$ (1,085)$ 1,301,388$ 2018 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2018 Amended Budget Library SRF Beginning Fund Balance 407$ 55,717$ 56,124$ The proposed amendment is to recognize more revenue from the Friends of the Library and appropriate an offsetting expense for the purchase of books, materials, and other library equipment. Revenues Original Revenue 90,200 98,500 188,700 Total Revenues 90,200 98,500 188,700 Expenses Original Expenses 90,607 98,500 189,107 Total Expenses 90,607 98,500 189,107 Ending Fund Balance -$ 55,717$ 55,717$ The first proposed amendment is to fund a facilities feasiblity study orginally budgeted in FY2018 funded via certificates of obligation. The second proposed amendment is for a settlement in the Joint Service Funds. The first proposed amendment in the General Capital Project fund is to recognize $2,300,000 in bond proceeds sold in the spring of 2018. $2,000,000 funds the ERP project, with the remaining portion allocated to Fire Station 7. The next proposed amendment is to recognize $200,000 in TIA revenue for the Verde Vista TIA project. Additionally, $200,000 of grant revenue is proposed to be recognized and appropriated for the Katy Trail Crossing project. $675,000 is proposed to be recognized and appropriated for the Inner Loop-Rockride project. The amendment also corrects the Downtown West related projects that had errors in the December roll forward budget amendment. The Facilities efficiency study is reduced by $100,000 after pricing was received. The study is funded by a transfer from the Council SRF. The Public Safety Facility has a proposed increase in appropriations of $61,243 and IT Data Center’s proposed increase totals $100,676. The Old Town Northeast Project’s appropriation will reduce by $30,839 and be transferred to CDBG Fund. Draft Page 67 of 117 2018 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2018 Amended Budget Parkland Dedication Beginning Fund Balance 130,600$ 256,674$ 387,274$ The proposed amendment is to transfers $85,000 to GCP for landscape beautification on the Downtown West Project. Revenues Original Revenue 52,500 - 52,500 Total Revenues 52,500 - 52,500 Expenses Transfer Out, GCP - 85,000 85,000 Original Expenses 169,221 - 169,221 Total Expenses 169,221 - 254,221 Ending Fund Balance 13,879$ 256,674$ 185,553$ 2018 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2018 Amended Budget Joint Service Fund Beginning Fund Balance 302,565$ 408,983$ 711,548$ Revenues Transfers In 5,000.00 75,000$ 80,000 Reimbursbeable Legal - 120,000$ 120,000 Original Revenue 16,432,402 - 16,432,402 Total Revenues 16,437,402 195,000 16,632,402 Expenses Insurance & Legal 705,000 75,000 780,000 Reimbursbeable Legal 75,000 45,000 120,000 Original Expenses 15,959,967 - 15,959,967 Total Expenses 16,739,967 120,000 16,859,967 Ending Fund Balance -$ 483,983$ 483,983$ 2018 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2018 Amended Budget Water Fund Beginning Fund Balance 67,881,131$ 7,077,021$ 74,958,152$ Revenues Original Revenue 48,159,443 - 48,159,443 Total Revenues 48,159,443 - 48,159,443 Expenses Transfer Out, 610 3,264,486 450,000 3,714,486 Water Distribution 2,723,300 (450,000) 2,273,300 Original Expenses 98,609,563 - 98,609,563 Total Expenses 104,597,349 - 104,597,349 Ending Fund Balance 11,443,225 7,077,021 18,520,246 Contingency Reserve 6,000,000 6,000,000 Available Fund Balance 5,443,225$ 7,077,021$ 12,520,246$ There are two proposed amendments in this fund. The first amendment is to recognize $120,000 in revenue for reimbursable legal services. A corresponding expense of $45,000 is proposed. The second proposed amendment is to recognize a $75,000 transfer in from the Council fund for a settlement. The proposed amendment in the Water fund transfers $450,000 to Electric for metering charges. Currently, the expense for meters is budgeted only in the Electric fund. This transfer would be a true up for Water’s portion of the charges. Draft Page 68 of 117 2018 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2018 Amended Budget Electric Fund Beginning Fund Balance 12,824,257$ (6,065,982)$ 6,758,275$ Revenues Transfer In, 660 - 450,000 450,000 Other Grant Revenue - 100,000 100,000 Original Revenue 78,741,393 - 78,741,393 Total Revenues 78,741,393 550,000 79,291,393 Expenses Metering Services 1,278,887 450,000 1,728,887 Resource Management 42,564,215 100,000 42,664,215 Adopted Expenses 35,791,690 - 35,791,690 Total Expenses 79,634,792 550,000 80,184,792 Ending Fund Balance 11,930,858 (6,065,982) 5,864,876 Rate Stabalization Reserve - - - Contingency Reserve 5,125,000 - 5,125,000 Available Fund Balance 6,805,858$ (6,065,982)$ 739,876$ 2018 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2018 Amended Budget GTEC Beginning Fund Balance 22,051,111$ (3,809,430)$ 18,241,681$ Revenues Original Revenue 7,255,201 - 7,255,201 Total Revenues 7,255,201 - 7,255,201 Expenses ROW Acquisition 14,316,210 900,000 15,216,210 Original Expenses 3,694,979 - 3,694,979 Total Expenses 18,011,189 900,000 18,911,189 Ending Fund Balance 11,295,123 (4,709,430) 6,585,693 Contingency 1,643,750 1,643,750 Reserved for Bond Proceeds 4,150,000 (4,150,000) - Available Fund Balance 5,501,373$ (4,709,430)$ 4,941,943$ 2018 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2018 Amended Budget Airport Beginning Fund Balance 436,734$ 373,205$ 809,939$ Revenues Grant Revenuw 35,000 - 35,000 Original Revenue 3,893,003 - 3,893,003 Total Revenues 3,928,003 - 3,928,003 Expenses Runway Rehabiliation - 500,000 500,000 Original Expenses 3,799,024 - 3,799,024 Total Expenses 3,799,024 500,000 4,299,024 Ending Fund Balance 565,713 (126,795) 438,918 Contingency 213,158 - 213,158 Reserved for Bond Proceeds - - - Available Fund Balance 352,555$ (126,795)$ 225,760$ The proposed increase in appropriation for the City's portion of the TXDOT Runway Rehabiliation project. Bonds will be sold at a later date to reimburse this project. The proposed amendment in GTEC is to use fund balance to increase appropriation for Right of Way purchase. The proposed amendments in the Electric Fund increasing appropriation by $450,000 for metering charges, as well as recognizing $100,000 in revenue and expenses for the Bloomberg Project. Draft Page 69 of 117 2018 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2018 Amended Budget Abandoned Vehicles Beginning Fund Balance 12,167$ 46,727$ 58,894$ Revenues Original Revenue - 24,000 24,000 Total Revenues - 24,000 24,000 Expenses Equipment - 3,000 3,000 Original Expenses 12,167 - 12,167 Total Expenses 12,167 - 15,167 Ending Fund Balance -$ 70,727$ 67,727$ The proposed amendment in the Abandon Vehicles is to recognize $24,000 of revenue and increase appropriation by $3,000 to construct a fence around the impound lot. Draft Page 70 of 117 FY2018 Annual Budget Fiscal Year 2018 Budget and Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan Page 71 of 117 Council SRF Fund •Correction for the Transfer Amount •Previously reported that $517,331 will be moved into the SRF •This amount did not include increases for contingency and benefit pay out in FY2018. •Correct amount is $188,580. Page 72 of 117 Original Spending Plan •$375,000 to the General Fund for economic stability reserve. •$75,000 to the Joint Service fund for a settlement. •$100,000 to the GCP for the space needs study. Page 73 of 117 Prevous Plan Same Spending Plan Recommended Beginning Fund Balance 285,808 285,808 285,808 Interest 2,000 2,000 2,000 Transfer in from General - Original 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Transfer in from General - Year End 517,331 188,580 188,580 Total Revenues 1,519,331 1,190,580 1,190,580 Transfers Out, General Fund 375,000 375,000 Transfer Out, Joint Services 75,000 75,000 75,000 Transfers Out, GCP 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total Expenses 550,000 550,000 175,000 Ending Fund Balance 1,255,139 926,388 1,301,388 Page 74 of 117 General Fund •Proposed Amendments: •Move $252,000 from the benefit pay out reserve for four retirements in Police •Recognize additional sales tax and developed fee revenue to offset $350,000 overage in Fire Division from overtime. •Increase Library revenue by $20,000 to offset library expenses relating to public use of copiers and equipment $20,000. Page 75 of 117 General Capital Projects •Proposed Amendments: •Correction of Downtown West Project “pre- roll” and reduce appropriation to correct level. •Recognize bond proceeds and expenses for ERP Project ($2,000,000) Fire Station 7 ($300,000) •Recognizing revenues and expenses from an interlocal agreement for the Inner-Loop Rockride Payment of $675,000. Page 76 of 117 Utility Funds •Proposed Amendments: •Water Fund to transfer out $450,000 to electric for metering charges. Currently the expense is only charged to the electric fund. •Electric Fund: Receive the transfer for metering. Recognize $100,000 in grant revenue and expenses for the Bloomberg Challenge project. Page 77 of 117 Transportation Funds •Proposed Amendment: •Quarter Cent Sales Tax: Use fund balance from FY2017 savings and increase appropriation an addition $1.51 M in FY2018.Total expenses would be $5.47 M in FY2018 and the $750,000 arterial reserve is still in place. •GTEC: Recognize fund balance of $900,000 for ROW Acquisition. GTEC’s budget for Economic Development Projects remains fully funded. Page 78 of 117 Other Funds •Proposed Amendments: •Joint Service Fund: Transfer in from Council SRF for legal settlement $75K •Library SRF: Recognizing revenue from the Friends of the Library & increase expense for books •Airport Fund: Increase expenses by $500,000 for City’s portion of TX Dot project; Bond reimbursement scheduled in FY2019 Page 79 of 117 Other Funds •Proposed Amendments: •Cemetery Fund: Recognizing fund balance of $123,625 for the completion of columbarium. •Main Street Façade Fund: Recognizing fund balance from FY2017 savings, and increasing expenses by $84,779. •CDBG: Update sidewalk projects. •Abandon Vehicle Fund: Recognize revenue and increase appropriation by $3,000 for fence around impound lot. Page 80 of 117 FY2018 Annual Budget Feedback and Questions Next steps: •Bring 1st reading of amendment on June 26 •2nd reading of amendment on July 10 Page 81 of 117 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop June 12, 2018 SUBJECT: P resentation and discussio n concerning GoGeo Transit Pro grams related to transit adve rtising policy and update on GoGeo operatio ns -- Edward G. Polasek, AICP ITEM SUMMARY: In September 2 01 6, City staff presented City Council service parameters for a fixed route bus and paratransit transit system, a strategic framework fo r public-private partnerships, as well as recommendations on the number of routes/sto ps and system performance me asure s. City Co uncil directed staff to finalize and execute an agreement with the George to wn Health Foundation (GHF), finalize and execute an ILA with Capital, Metro, and to continue to develop a pro ject plan for service delivery in August 20 17. In February 2017, staff provided Council an overview of tasks remaining in the 20 17 Transit Project P lan and finalized GoGeo branding and service plan delivery schedules.. In August of 2017, GoGe o launched fixed route transit services. Also, as part o f the approved Go Geo budget, staff was to work to obtain advertising revenue. This is an update o n policy regarding advertising and Go Geo operations. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None SUBMITTED BY: Edward G. Polasek, AICP ATTACHMENT S: Description GoGeo Update Pres entatio n GoGeo Tans it Advertis ing Polic y Ap ril Rid ers hip R ep o rt Go Geo S ervic e Map Page 82 of 117 Transit Operations Update for Georgetown City Council Workshop June 12, 2018 Page 83 of 117 Presentation Overview • GoGeo Program History • Ridership • Budget/Financials • Advertising • Next Steps • Pilot: Rideshare Voucher Program Page 84 of 117 GoGeo Program History Transit Development Plan Goals: Goal 1: Provide a safe, reliable, efficient, and accessible transportation option for residents and visitors of Georgetown. Objective: Improve service efficiency and reliability for existing service by meeting or exceeding established standards of performance. Goal 2: Adequately address the mobility needs of Georgetown residents. Objective: Improve access to employment, healthcare, shopping, and recreation. Page 85 of 117 GoGeo Program History Transit Development Plan Goals: Goal 3: Maximize resource utilization and operational efficiency with respect to system administration and operations. Objective: Maintain capital assets (vehicles and maintenance materials) in State of Good Repair. Goal 4: Develop a local system that operates effectively in the short- term, continues to develop an audience for regional transit options in the mid-term, and will connect the local community to the region in the long-term. Objective: Provide access to activity centers today with an understanding of where future regional transit infrastructure is proposed to be located. Page 86 of 117 Public Transportation Implementation Committee Pilot Program Census Urbanized Area Capital Metro Service Expansion Policy Council Adopts Budget Strategic Goal Completed Transit Feasibility Study Council Decision on Transit Why are we here? 2008 201620152014 Population: 45k Population: 61K 2009 Recommends Fixed Route 2011 No Fed $ for Operations Fed $ for Operations No Local $ to continue 2012 GoGeo Launch 2017 Page 87 of 117 Council Direction on 2/2016 2015 Transit Development Plan Reject Plan Recommendation Amend Plan Cap Metro Board Review Cap Metro Administered Federal Funded Capital Metro Administered Demand Response Amend Plan Georgetown Administered Demand Response Voucher System New Plan No FTA $ Accept Plan Recommendation Fixed Route Bus System in 2017 Implement Full Plan Implement Partial Plan $208K $396K TBD $436K $220K Local Funds Page 88 of 117 Update on Ridership August 21st Launch •August included Free Fares 873 passengers in 10 days, 613 paratransit trips •Reporting started for Performance Measures in September 2017 7 Page 89 of 117 GoGeo Fixed Route Performance Measures (Sept 2017 ‐April 2018) Passengers Per Revenue Hour FY 18 Target Actual Performance Orange & Purple Routes 6 2.66 Blue & Red Routes 6 3.57 Fare Recovery Ratio FY 18 Target Actual Performance Orange & Purple Routes 6% 3.87% Blue & Red Routes 6% 5.39% Cost Per Passenger FY 18 Target Actual Performance Orange & Purple Routes $12 $34.37 Blue & Red Routes $12 $22.07 Page 90 of 117 GoGeo Fixed Route Performance Measures (Sept 2017‐April 2018) Cost Per Revenue Hour FY 18 Target Actual Performance Orange & Purple Routes $75 $84.73 Blue & Red Routes $75 $85.21 On‐Time Performance FY 18 Target Actual Performance Orange & Purple Routes 95% 95.24% Blue & Red Routes 95% 94.65% Total Annual Ridership FY 18 Target Actual Performance Orange & Purple Routes 20,000 5,699 Blue & Red Routes 20,000 7,913 Total Fixed Route 40,000 13,612 Total Paratransit N/A 3,641 Combined Ridership N/A 17,253 Page 91 of 117 1583 1575 1324 1329 1255 1298 1611 Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Nu m b e r of ri d e r s Month Total Ridership September-March (fixed route) 25 se r v i c e d a y s 26 se r v i c e da y s 24 se r v i c e da y s 25 se r v i c e da y s 24 se r v i c e da y s 24 se r v i c e da y s Average = 63/day 60/d 55/d 53/d 52/d 54/d 62/d 26 se r v i c e da y s Page 92 of 117 1243 2209 2704 2192 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 1234 Nu m b e r of ri d e r s Route number Total Passengers 8,348 Route Performance September-March 471 ‐‐Orange Southwestern 472 ‐‐Purple Hospital 473 ‐‐Blue Williams Dr. 474 ‐‐Red Wolf Ranch Pkwy Page 93 of 117 Ridership Citywide Sept-Mar: Route-Weekday Comparisons SW HOSPITAL WILLIAMS WOLF RANCH 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 MTuWThF SaSu 471 472 473 474 Page 94 of 117 Budget FY 2018 Budget and FY 2019 Programmed Budget Service Category Total FY 18 COG FY 2018 COG FY 2019 Service (Cap Metro) $802,927 $537,544 $546,233 Section 5307 ($265,383) Health Foundation Grant ($200,000) ($150,000)* Revenue ($60,000) ($60,000) CIP (Stop Amenities) $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 Education/Planning $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 *Can be raised to $200,000 with additional performance improvements based on discussions with GHF. Page 95 of 117 Financials •FY 2018 budget includes 7,124 hours of fixed route service and 3,562 hours of paratransit service. •Budget included 10,686 Service Hours for the Year. •Current billings total on pace for 10,150 service hours in FY 17. Savings of up to $62,000 ($527K‐$465K) Savings from “dead ‐head” time CARTS Holidays vs. Capital Metro Holidays Saturday Paratransit the first few months •Revenue Collection to date: $11,979.25 Page 96 of 117 Budget (FY 18, projected, net) FY 2018 Budget and FY 2019 Programmed Budget Service Category Budget COG FY 2018 Projected COG FY 2018 Service (Cap Metro) $537,544 $475,000 Health Foundation ($200,000) ($200,000) Revenue ($60,000) ($22,000) CIP (Stop Amenities) $25,000 $0 Education/Planning $5,000 $5,000 Net Local Budget $307,544 $258,000 Page 97 of 117 Advertising Revenue Update • Advertising Policy: establishing rules and rates for advertising. Ad Content Not Accepted: 1. False, misleading, or deceptive 2. Defamatory or ridicule of a person or group of persons 3. Obscene, pornographic, or for sexually-oriented businesses 4. Advocacy of lawlessness, violent action, or illegal activity 5. Promoting alcohol or tobacco products 6. Discriminatory (sex, race, religion, political intolerance) 7. Political ads that advocate for an issue, candidate, political fundraising, political position, or changes to public policy Page 98 of 117 Advertising Revenue Update • Advertising Sizes and Rates Size Rate/month Installation Full Side $800 $1,500 Ultra $600 $1,200 Tail $200 $250 Page 99 of 117 Outreach/Education Gateway Northwest Apartments Resident newsletter Route specific targeted posts on NextDoor in for all 4 routes Mariposa, Cypress Creek Apartments Resident newsletter Page 100 of 117 GoGeo launch video on Facebook GoGeo promo video on YouTube, NextDoor Page 101 of 117 Outreach/Education • City staff participated in Stone Haven Public Housing Ride-Alongs. - 2 events have drawn a total of 20 participants in riding all 4 routes. • Developing Cedar Ridge and San Gabriel Apartments scheduling information release for their residents. • Route specific rack cards in development. • Gathering input for end-users and social service agencies for brochure updates. • SEGCC Ambassadors offering ride-alongs to train users about ridership/fares/destinations on routes. Page 102 of 117 Fixed Route Feedback Challenges with Usage •Evaluation of Routes and Stops an annual process that has begun. Survey of Riders Ridership numbers by stop being collected. •Stops with low usage: Maple St, Morrow St, Wolf Ranch •Stops/Facility access issues identified: Rivery, Lone Star Circle of Care, Wolf Ranch •Stops with issues identified: Benches/Shelters requested because of type of trip –Rivery (Wal‐Mart), Luther/Rockmoor, and Railroad/17th Page 103 of 117 Next Steps Challenges with fare collection •Ideas for improving fare collection ‐OR‐waiving fees •Improve credit card acceptance and locations where tickets can be purchased ‐CARTS/Cap Metro radio system for credit cards ‐HEB Agreement with Cap Metro Challenges with Orange Route Ridership •Southwestern Agreement Page 104 of 117 Challenges with Paratransit •Must provide paratransit service to transit service area at same level of service and efficiency as fixed route (95%). •On‐time performance at 93% in March, some months as low as 86%. •Applications have continued to be approved at an average of 10 month. •Growth in approved paratransit applications since program start in September 46 to 104 approved passengers. •Social Service Providers are requesting assistance with paratransit application and approval for their clients. Page 105 of 117 •Comparisons: •San Marcos: 190 approved passengers, 3 ½ buses daily •Round Rock: 120 approved passengers, 2 ½ buses daily •Georgetown: 104 approved passengers, 1 bus daily Georgetown ADA Paratransit Applications 09/01/17 12/01/17 04/01/18 Received 46 85 109 Approved 27 75 104 Denied 113 Out of UZA 2 Still Processing 18 9 0 Challenges with Paratransit (cont.) Page 106 of 117 Rideshare Voucher Pilot Uber and Lyft •Geo Fencing •Subsidized rides to remain in the City •Data collection will drive future geo‐fences and program recommendations •Challenges ‐Parameters for call‐in for passengers without smart phone ‐ADA: Still need to operate paratransit service Page 107 of 117 Lyft Pilot Program Lyft first rideshare to have draft contract for Pilot Program targeting June kick‐off. •Rider pays $2 fee •Flat rate discount of $8 to $10 •Rider pays any balance over total •Each Users to receive limited number of rides for pilot period •Lyft reporting on usage Page 108 of 117 Questions/Comments/Direction Page 109 of 117 PDFConvert.28777.1.Go_GeoGoGeo Transit Advertising Policy_4_20_2018 Draft Go Geo Transit Advertising Policy April 24, 2018 Page 1 GoGeo Transit Advertising Policy City of Georgetown Effective _Month_Day_, 2018 Purpose The purpose of this policy is to establish the authorization to allow the placement of advertising on GoGeo assets and buses owned by the City of Georgetown, Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Capital Metro) and/or Capital Area Rural Transportation System (CARTS) and primarily intended to provide service to GoGeo operations to maximize return on investment. Background With the establishment of the GoGeo Transit program in August of 2017, the Georgetown City Council approved transit advertising as an additional revenue source for the program. The City uses transit advertising for the dual purpose of promoting public awareness of City and Capital Metro services and generating revenue for the City. Goals/Objectives of Transit Advertising Program Advertising to promote public awareness of City and Capital Metro services includes, but is not limited to, marketing campaigns, information, bus stop boarding instructions, fare descriptions, promotions of City sponsored events or activities and similar information. The City also makes available advertising space, as approved by this policy, to provide revenue to the GoGeo program. In order to realize the maximum benefit from the sale of advertising space, the transit advertising program must be managed in a manner that will produce as much revenue as practicable, while ensuring that the advertising does not discourage the use of the GoGeo transit system, does not diminish the City’s and GoGeo’s reputation in the community it serves or the good will of its patrons, maintains neutrality on public issues, and is consistent with the City’s principal purpose of providing safe, comfortable, efficient and affordable public transportation. To attain these objectives the City has established these regulations for the advertising displayed upon GoGeo vehicles and/or facilities. The City may sell or otherwise provide space on GoGeo equipment and other transit related facilities for the display of commercial advertisements and Public Service Announcements (“PSA”) that meet the above-stated goals and objectives for the Program. The sale or provision of space for commercial advertising, advertising by non-profit and governmental entities, advertising by public and private schools and/or PSAs is not intended to provide a public forum for purposes of communication, but rather to make use of property held in a proprietary capacity in order to generate revenue and foster good will to the City and GoGeo in the community. Standards for Acceptable Advertising The City places the following restrictions on all advertising placed on its equipment and facilities displaying advertising. These Standards for Acceptable Advertising apply to all advertisements, announcements, or any other display for goods or services on GoGeo vehicles or facilities, including (1) commercial advertising, (2) advertising by non-profit and governmental entities, (3) advertising by public or private schools, and (4) Public Service Announcements. The City will not accept ad material, announcements or any other display for goods or services on GoGeo vehicles or facilities that are: 1. False, misleading or deceptive; Page 110 of 117 PDFConvert.28777.1.Go_GeoGoGeo Transit Advertising Policy_4_20_2018 Draft Go Geo Transit Advertising Policy April 24, 2018 Page 2 2. Clearly defamatory or likely to hold up to scorn or ridicule a person or group of persons; 3. Obscene, pornographic, or for sexually-oriented businesses 4. In advocacy of imminent lawlessness or violent action; 5. Promoting alcohol or tobacco products; 6. Discriminatory or advocacy for of sexual, racial, religious, and/or political, or other intolerance; and 7. Political advertisements or ads that advocate for an issue, candidate, political fundraising, political position or changes to public policy. The City reserves the right to approve all advertising, exhibit material, announcements, or any other display and their manner of presentation prior to installation. Electronic versions or hard copies of proposed ads should be provided to the City prior to ad production. Reasonable proof or clarification of statements contained in any advertisement, exhibit material, announcement or any other display may be required by the City before approval. Determinations of the acceptability of ads will be initially made by the Marketing Manager. Appeal Process for Acceptable Advertising A firm and/or organization may appeal the decision of the Marketing Manager on the acceptability of any ad to the City Manager. The decision of the City Manager shall be final. When an advertisement is not accepted by the Marketing Manager the firm and/or organization presenting the advertisement shall be notified of the Marketing Manager or his/her designee’s decision by letter, informing the firm or organization of their right to appeal the decision to the City Manager. Non-Profit and Governmental Entity Discounts In order to generate revenue and foster good will in the community the City discounts the cost of advertising space by 25% for all non-profit 501(c)(3) organizations, a non-profit corporation in accordance with the Texas Business Organizations Code, an unincorporated non-profit association, and Texas governmental entities. Proof of current non-profit status is required prior to the development of the contract. Non-profit and governmental entities are responsible for the print, production and delivery of advertisements to the City under the same standards for size, weight and other physical characteristics detailed in the Transit Advertising Rate Sheet, online at XXXXXXXXXe. Installation and removal costs, carried out by a third party vendor for the City are not discounted. Responsibilities City Manager o Hear and decide appeals related to acceptability of ads o Authorize partnerships in addition to Community Partnership Program. Marketing Manager o Approves advertisements o Jointly approves eligible non-profit organizations Public Works Department o Jointly approves eligible non-profit organizations o Administers the placement and removal of ads Definitions Commercial Advertising Page 111 of 117 PDFConvert.28777.1.Go_GeoGoGeo Transit Advertising Policy_4_20_2018 Draft Go Geo Transit Advertising Policy April 24, 2018 Page 3 o Advertising that has a primary purpose of proposing a commercial transaction Non-profit organization o An organization exempted from Federal taxes under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code o A non-profit corporation in accordance with the Texas Business Organizations Code o An unincorporated non-profit association, Rate Procedure The City will set advertising rates for commercial advertising based on a periodic evaluation performed by the City or a qualified rating organization. Page 112 of 117 Passengers Per Revenue Hour Actual Performance FY 18 Target Orange & Purple Routes 2.66 6 Blue & Red Routes 3.57 6 Fare Recovery Ratio Actual Performance FY 18 Target Orange & Purple Routes 3.87%6% Blue & Red Routes 5.39%6% Cost Per Passenger Actual Performance FY 18 Target Orange & Purple Routes $34.73 $12 Blue & Red Routes $22.07 $12 Cost Per Revenue Hour Actual Performance FY 18 Target Orange & Purple Routes $84.73 $75 Blue & Red Routes $85.21 $75 On-Time Performance Actual Performance FY 18 Target Orange & Purple Routes 95.24%95% Blue & Red Routes 94.65%95% Annual Ridership Actual Performance FY 18 Target Orange & Purple Routes 5,699 20,000 Blue & Red Routes 7,913 20,000 Total Fixed Route 13,612 40,000 Total Paratransit 3,641 N/A Total Fixed Route and Paratransit Ridership 17,253 N/A Average Daily Fixed Route Ridership 61 N/A Observations/Comments: GoGeo Fixed Route Performance Measures (Aug 2017 - Apr 2018) Observations/Comments: Route 1 continues to be the lowest performing route. Once the agreement with Southwestern University is in place and students have been engaged, ridership is expected to increase. Observations/Comments: Fares were not collected in August. This number is based on September - April. Fixed Route ridership is at 34% of targeted yearly ridership. The cost per passenger is higher than targeted because the routes have not had time to develop ridership. Additional public engagement efforts and new outreach campaigns have been initiated. CARTS, Capital Metro and Georgetown staff are coordinating on creation of new outreach material. Revenue is not included in this calculation. Observations/Comments:The cost per revenue hour calculation was adopted before final bus scheduling was complete and without the current operating rate. The resulting target of $75 does not include the cost of hours for the buses to travel to the library in the morning and from the library in the evening. The performance metrics are recommended to be changed to FY18 = $85, FY19 = $87, FY 20 = $89. Observations/Comments: On-time performance is on target. Observations/Comments: Page 113 of 117 Passengers Per Revenue Hour Actual Performance Monthly Target Orange & Purple Routes 2.25 6 Blue & Red Routes 3.63 6 Fare Recovery Ratio Actual Performance Monthly Target Orange & Purple Routes 3.55%6% Blue & Red Routes 5.76%6% Cost Per Passenger Actual Performance Monthly Target Orange & Purple Routes $40.82 $12 Blue & Red Routes $24.23 $12 Cost Per Revenue Hour Actual Performance Monthly Target Orange & Purple Routes $84.72 $75 Blue & Red Routes $85.08 $75 On-Time Performance Actual Performance Monthly Target Orange & Purple Routes 95%95% Blue & Red Routes 93%95% Monthly Ridership Actual Performance Monthly Target Orange & Purple Routes 549 1,667 Blue & Red Routes 891 1,667 Total 1,440 3,333 Average Daily Ridership 58 Paratransit Ridership 381 Total Ridership (Fixed Route and Paratransit)1,821 Paratransit Applications Received 7 Paratransit Applications Approved 6 Paratransit Applications Denied 1 Paratransit On-Time Performance 97% GoGeo April 2018 Performance Measures Page 114 of 117 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 15 21 10 51 3 2 23 21 13 59 4 10 16 22 14 62 5 11 16 28 19 74 6 7 17 26 13 63 7 3 6 17 13 39 8 0 0 0 0 0 9 8 16 27 17 68 10 8 19 22 18 67 11 6 15 19 9 49 12 14 15 26 14 69 13 15 10 16 11 52 14 10 6 15 17 48 15 0 0 0 0 0 16 5 8 19 21 53 17 14 21 19 15 69 18 10 17 27 9 63 19 3 17 22 11 53 20 12 9 17 17 55 21 9 11 10 23 53 22 0 0 0 0 0 23 2 18 19 11 50 24 6 12 23 8 49 25 4 9 15 9 37 26 3 14 17 31 65 27 6 14 25 11 56 28 18 11 34 19 82 29 0 0 0 0 0 30 8 15 26 5 54 31 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly 199 350 533 358 1440 April 2018 Ridership Detail Date 471 Eastside/Southwestern (Orange) 472 Hospital/Leander Rd (Purple) 473 Austin Ave/Williams (Blue) 474 Wolf Ranch (Red) Total Page 115 of 117 ^_!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( ^_ !( !( !(!( ^_!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( ^_ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(Downtown Transfer E 8th/ S Myrtle St E 8th St/ Ash St E 7th St/ Pine St Maple St/ Southwestern Blvd 1 Maple St/ Southwestern Blvd 2 Maple St/ E 13th St Maple St/ E University Ave Maple St/ San Jose Park 1 Maple St/ San Jose Park 2 Quail Valley Dr/ Creekside Ln Long Branch D Rifle Bend Dr W 8th St/ Scenic Dr Scenic Dr/ W University Ave 2Scenic Dr/ W University Ave 1 HEB 2 HEB 1 Wolf Lakes Dr 1 Wolf Ranch Pkwy/ Rivery Drwy Railroad Ave/W 17th St Bridge St/ W 19th StSt David's 1 St David's 2 Scenic Dr/ Post Office 1 Scenic Dr/ Post Office 2 Luther Dr/ Park Apts Luther Dr/ Rockmoor Dr S Austin Ave/ W 5th St 1 S Austin Ave/ W 5th St 2 S Austin Ave/ W 2nd St 1 S Austin Ave/ W 2nd St 2 N Austin Ave/ San Gabriel Vlg Blvd 1 N Austin Ave/ San Gabriel Vlg Blvd 2 W Morrow St/ N Main St River Bend Dr/ Dawn Dr Recreation Center Northwest Blvd/ E Janis Dr River Bend Dr/ Westwood Ln W 17th St/Hart St Sheraton/ Convention Center Wolf Lakes Dr 2 City Lights LONE STARLONE STAR CIRCLECIRCLE OF CAREOF CARE SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITYSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY QUAILQUAIL VALLEYVALLEY HEBHEB WOLF RANCHWOLF RANCH ST DAVIDSST DAVIDS HOSPITALHOSPITAL THOUSAND OAKSTHOUSAND OAKS Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Transit Routes and Stops !!I 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250 Feet This map is a representation of the information currently held by the City of Georgetown Utility Systems. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the product, G.U.S. makes no warranties regarding the veracity or precision of the information depicted or the data from which it was produced and assumes no liability for damages due to errors or omissions. This map is not suitable for survey purposes. Transit Route 471 472 473 474 September, 2017 Page 116 of 117 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop June 12, 2018 SUBJECT: Sec. 551.071: Consul tati on w i th Attorney Advice from attorney abo ut pending or co ntemplated litigation and o ther matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items Sec. 551.072: De l i berati o ns about Real P roperty - Authorization o f Negotiations for the Downtown Building Sale - 311 East Morrow Street - NW Blvd, Parcels 3 & 4 -- Travis Baird, Real Estate Services Coordinator - Rock/8th Stre e ts Sec. 551:074: Personnel Matters City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the appointment, employme nt, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal Sec. 551.087: De l i berati o n regardi ng Economi c Devel opment Negoti ati ons - P roject Deliver - P roject Wire ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Page 117 of 117