Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda CC 09.12.2017 WorkshopNotice of M eeting of the Governing B ody of the City of Georgetown, Texas September 1 2, 2 01 7 The Ge orgetown City Council will meet on September 12, 2017 at 3:00 PM at Co uncil Chambers - 101 East 7th Street The City o f Georgetown is committed to co mpliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you re quire assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or ac c ommo datio ns will be provided upo n request. P lease contact the City Se c retary's Office, at least three (3 ) days prio r to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930- 3652 o r City Hall at 113 East 8th Street fo r additional information; TTY use rs ro ute through Relay Texas at 7 11. Policy De ve lopme nt/Re vie w Workshop - A Discussion of Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board recommendation of the City of Georgetown’s P avement Management P rogram -- Octavio A. Garza, P.E. C.P.M, P ublic Works Director B Update and discussion on the five (5 ) year extension to the solid waste co ntract. – Mike Babin, Deputy General Manager, Utilities C Update o n Co lumbarium in IOOF Ce metery -- Kimberly Garrett, Parks and Recreation Director D Update and discussion regarding the Downto wn Parking Manageme nt Pro gram and possible transitio n of program from the curre nt co ntract service delivery mo de l to an in-house approach through the P olice Department -- Wayne Reed, Assistant City Manager E Re vie w o f Visioning Process -- Keith Hutchinson, Communications Manager, and Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager F City Co uncil Ethics Training Workshop -- Charlie McNabb, City Atto rne y Exe cutive Se ssion In compliance with the Open Meetings Ac t, Chapter 551, Government Co de , Verno n's Texas Codes, Annotate d, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular se ssio n. G Se c . 55 1.0 71 : Consul tati on wi th Atto rney - Advice fro m attorney about pending or co ntemplated litigation and o ther matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Co uncil, including agenda items Se c . 55 1.0 72 Del i berati on about Real P roperty - Fire Station 7 Site Consideratio n - F orw arded from the Georgetow n Transpo rtati on Enhancement Corporati on (G TEC): Parc e l 1 (NEC of Lakeway Dr. and Airpo rt Road), P arcel 3 (2301 Airpo rt Road), P arcel 4 (SEC Airpo rt Rao d and Aviation Dr.), and Parcel 6 (106 Halmar Cove) -- Travis Baird, Real Estate Se rvices Coo rdinator Se c . 55 1.0 74 : Personnel Matter s - City Manager, City Attorney, City Se c retary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the Page 1 of 96 appointment, employment, evaluatio n, reassignment, duties, discipline, o r dismissal - Appro val o f appointment of Assistant City Attorney - City Manager Evaluation Se c . 55 1.0 87 : Del i berati on Regardi ng Eco nomi c Devel opment Ne go ti ati ons - Tamiro Plaza II Adjournme nt Ce rtificate of Posting I, Shelley No wling, City S ecretary for the C ity of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , do hereby c ertify that this Notic e o f Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a p lac e read ily acc es s ib le to the general pub lic at all times , o n the _____ day of _________________, 2017, at __________, and remained so p o s ted for at leas t 72 c o ntinuo us ho urs p receding the s cheduled time of s aid meeting. __________________________________ Shelley No wling, City S ecretary Page 2 of 96 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop Se pte mber 12, 2017 SUBJECT: Discussion of Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board recommendation of the City of Georgetown’s P avement Management P rogram -- Octavio A. Garza, P.E. C.P.M, P ublic Works Director ITEM SUMMARY: City Management directed staff to work with the Geo rgeto wn Transportation Adviso ry Board in a comprehensive re vie w of the City’s Pavement Manage ment Program. The Georgetown Transportation Adviso ry Board identified a Paveme nt Management Program Review Committee, which was approved by City Council on March 14, 2017. The Paveme nt Management Program Review Co mmittee met monthly to review and examine the City’s pavement manage ment program history; pro ject se lectio n proc e ss; deterioration curves; soil types; pavement maintenance and rehabilitatio n me tho ds; technical specifications; funding levels; deferred maintenance; and, a communicatio n plan and made a re commendation to the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board o n August 11, 2017. The Georgetown Transportation Advisory Bo ard confirmed the Committee's recommendation unanimo usly, also on August 11, 2017 . FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Octavio Garza, PE, CP M, Public Works Director ATTACHMENT S: Description P avement Management Program Page 3 of 96 City of Georgetown Pavement Management Page 4 of 96 City of Georgetown Pavement Management Program Review •Summer 2016 –City Council requests review of the City’s pavement management program during budget discussions •Winter 2016 –GUS reorganized Transportation Services and created Public Works Department •January 2017 –Public Works Department Director hired •March 2017 –City Council approves formation and staffing of a pavement management program review committee comprised of GTAB Board Members: Steve Johnston Mark Allen Ron Bindas Donna Courtney Troy Hellmann John Marler •Technical Team –Trae Sutton, PE, Reuben William, PE, Omar Elbagalati, PhD, PE, Mark Miler, Wes Wright, PE, and Octavio Garza, PE Page 5 of 96 City of Georgetown Pavement Management Program Pavement Management Program Committee Scope of Work*: 1.Historical approach to managing the city’s most expensive asset 2.Pavement deterioration curves 3.Soils 4.Project selection 5.Technical specifications 6.Pavement maintenance and rehabilitation methods 7.Funding levels 8.Deferred maintenance Committee met: March 10th, April 14th, May 12th June 9th, July 14th, August 11th *Communication added March 2017 Page 6 of 96 Communication ht t p s : / / t r a n s p o r t a t i o n . g e o r g e t o w n . o r g / 2 0 1 7 - st r e e t -ma i n t e n a n c e -pr o j e c t s . Page 7 of 96 City of Georgetown Pavement Management Program Review 1.Historical approach to managing the city’s most expensive asset: -Basics of pavement preservation. -Pavement maintenance categories, e.g, regular maintenance, preservation maintenance, light/medium/heavy rehabilitation, full depth reclamation, and full depth reconstruction. 2. Pavement deterioration curves Pa v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n Time More costly rehab, shorter life spans Page 8 of 96 Pavement Preservation Graph (Current City Street Maintenance Treatments) Page 9 of 96 Georgetown area soils Rock / Rock Outcrop Silty Clay / Silty Clay Loam Clay / Clay Loam Houston Black Clay Quarry 29 35 195 130 3. Soils Page 10 of 96 Pavement Deterioration Curves 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 5 10 15 20 25 PC I Age Low PI 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 5 10 15 20 25 PC I Age High PI Page 11 of 96 City of Georgetown 4. Project selection 5. Technical specifications Pavement Cost ($/Lane Mile) Crack Sealing $1,000 Rejuvenator $3,520 Pavement Seal $11,700 Microsurfacing $23,000 Single Chip Seal w/Fog Seal $25,000 Double Chip Seal w/Fog Seal $42,000 Ultra-Thin Friction Course (Novachip)$55,000 Hot In Place Recycled Pavement (HIPR)$110,000 Mill & Overlay $127,500 Rehabilitation (Point Repair with Chip Seal, HIPR, or Mill & Overlay)$141,000 Page 12 of 96 6. Pavement maintenance and rehabilitation methods Scenario 1 –Crack Seals Pavement Seals Single Coarse Surface Treatment (Residential and Minor Collector) Double Coarse Surface Treatment Hot-In Place Recycling Rehabilitation Scenario 2 –Crack Sealing Pavement Seals Double Coarse Surface Treatment (Residential and Minor Collector) Double Coarse Surface Treatment Hot-In Place Recycling Rehabilitation Scenario 3 –Crack Sealing Pavement Seals Ultra-Thin Bonded Wearing Coarse (Residential and Minor Collector) Double Coarse Surface Treatment Hot-In Place Recycling Rehabilitation Scenario 4 –Crack Sealing Pavement Seals Ultra-Thin Bonded Wearing Coarse (Residential and Minor Collector) Ultra-Thin Bonded Wearing Coarse Hot-In Place Recycling Rehabilitation Scenario 5 –Crack Sealing Pavement Seals Hot-In Place Recycling (Residential and Minor Collector) Hot-In Place Recycling Rehabilitation Page 13 of 96 8. Deferred Maintenance CS CS CS CS CS Rejuv Pav. Seal Pav. Seal Pav. Seal Pav. Seal Pav. Seal Dbl. C. ST Res and Minor Collector UTBWC Res and Minor Collector UTBWC Res and Minor Collector HIPR Res and Minor Collector Sing. C ST Res and Minor Collector Dbl. C. ST Dbl. C. ST UTBWC HIPR Dbl. C. ST HIPR HIPR HIPR HIPR YR Series 1 Series 2 Series 3 Series 4 Series 5 0 83 83 83 83 83 1 84 84 84 84 84 2 83 82 82 83 82 3 81 81 81 81 81 4 80 79 79 80 79 5 78 77 78 78 78 6 77 76 76 77 76 7 75 74 74 75 74 8 74 72 73 73 72 9 72 71 71 72 71 10 71 69 70 71 69 11 70 68 68 69 67 12 69 66 67 68 65 13 68 65 66 67 63 14 67 63 65 66 61 15 65 62 63 65 59 16 64 61 62 64 57 17 63 59 61 64 55 18 61 58 60 63 54 19 60 56 59 62 52 20 59 55 58 61 51 SECTIONS 378 336 321 307 276 12-ft LM 79 70 67 64 58 Page 14 of 96 7. Funding Levels Year Local ST Double Coarse Crack Seal Hot In-Place Recycling Preservation Rehabilitation Total PCI 1 $ 1,040,000 $ 300,000 $ 106,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 800,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 5,846,000 85 2 $ 1,040,000 $ 300,000 $ 106,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 800,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 5,846,002 85 3 $ 1,040,000 $ 300,000 $ 106,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 800,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 5,846,000 84 4 $ 1,040,000 $ 300,000 $ 106,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 800,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 5,846,000 84 5 $ 1,040,000 $ 300,000 $ 106,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 800,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 5,846,000 84 6 $ 1,040,000 $ 300,000 $ 106,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 800,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 5,846,000 84 7 $ 1,040,000 $ 300,000 $ 106,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 800,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 5,846,000 84 8 $ 1,040,000 $ 300,000 $ 106,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 800,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 5,846,000 84 9 $ 1,040,000 $ 300,000 $ 106,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 800,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 5,846,000 83 10 $ 1,040,000 $ 300,000 $ 106,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 800,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 5,846,000 83Page 15 of 96 Staff Recommendation 1.Continue to use Pavement Rejuvenation, Pavement Seals, Single Coarse Surface Treatments, aka, “Chip Seals” as historically defined by the City of Georgetown on Collector and Arterial Streets, Double Coarse Surface Treatments and Hot-In Place Recycling. 2.Add high performance single coarse surface treatments option, e.g., Ultra-Thin Bonded Wearing Coarse, Scrub Seals, etc. for use in residential areas that protect the investment in pavement infrastructure and have community support. 3.Increase funding Option A -At 9% budget increase per year for 10 years. PCI degrades to 75 over 10 years. Note: Deferred maintenance increases. Option B -At $5,846,000 per year for 10 years to maintain network PCI at current levels and also addresses deferred maintenance backlog (PCI < 40) and pre-failure roadways (40 < PCI < 50). Page 16 of 96 City of Georgetown Questions Thank You Page 17 of 96 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop Se pte mber 12, 2017 SUBJECT: Update and disc ussio n on the five (5 ) year extension to the solid waste c ontract. – Mike Babin, Deputy General Manage r, Utilities ITEM SUMMARY: The current solid waste services c ontract with TDS became effec tive in October 20 12 , with an initial 5 year term and the option o f 3 additional five -year extensions. The current contrac t term expires Se ptember 30, 2017. In October 2 01 6, TDS re que sted a re ne wal of the contract. In November 20 16 Council directed Staff to negotiate and e valuate alternative pricing and term structures fo r a contrac t rene wal. In August 201 7 Council directe d Staff to finalize a co ntrac t amendment to exte nd the co ntract for an additional 5 year term under terms discussed in Co uncil Workshop. The e xtensio n of the contract provides updated rates for services, adds commercial recycling services, eliminate s reference to Tier III customers, changes the indices and percentage s used in annual price adjustments, increases the annual price adjustment cap to 4% and modifies post-annexatio n transition to reflect c hanges in State Law. P rices adjustme nts under the extension will not be c ome effective until November 1, 2 01 7 and the contract will extend a 5 year term from that date ending October 31, 202 2. STAF F RECOMMENDATIONS: It is Staff ’s re c ommendation that the extensio n of the contract for Solid Waste, Recycling, Yard Trimmings and Bulky Waste Collectio n, Disposal and P rocessing Services with Texas Disposal Systems (TDS) for a second 5 year term be authorized for executio n. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for the increased cost from price adjustments and new services would be realized as a pass through to custome rs, as an increase in their monthly Solid Waste Dispo sal (Garbage) se rvic e charge. The increase in annual who lesale se rvic e s cost for curre nt customer service counts will be $908,449. This represents an average increase s of 1 3.3 % fo r residential service and 19.3 % for co mmercial services. SUBMITTED BY: Mike Babin, De puty General Manager, Utilities/Chris Foster, Manager of Resourc e P lanning & Integration/Jordan Fe ngal, Solid Waste/Recycling Coo rdinator (ca) ATTACHMENT S: Description Third Amendment to the TDS Contrac t Co mmercial C o ntainer Rate Co mp aris o n P res entation Page 18 of 96 STATE OF TEXAS § THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE § SOLID WASTE, RECYCLING, YARD § TRIMMINGS, AND BULKY WASTE COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § SERVICES CONTRACT WITH § TEXAS DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, INC. This is the Third Amendment to the to the Contract for Solid Waste, Recycling, Yard Trimmings, and Bulky Waste Services ("Third Amendment") entered into on August 14, 2012, by and between the City of Georgetown, a Texas home rule city, (the "City"), and Texas Disposal Systems, Inc., ("TDS"). RECITALS WHEREAS, on August 14, 2012, the City and TDS entered into the Contract for Solid Waste, Recycling , Yard Trimmings, and Bulky Waste Services to provide various waste management services, which was amended by the First and Second Amendments, (the "Contract"); and WHEREAS, the City and TDS seek to amend the Contract to extend the term of the Contract for five years and provide for updates rates; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration for the mutual benefits to be derived by the parties from this Third Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the City and TDS agree to amend the Contract as follows: NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises contained herein, and other valuable consideration the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Capitalized Terms. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized tenns shall have the meanings afforded same in the Contract. 2. Exhibit A of the Contract is hereby amended to include Exhibit A-1 attached hereto. 3. Exhibit B of the Contract is hereby deleted and replaced with Exhibit B attached hereto. 4. The term of the Contract is hereby extended to include an Additional Term beginning on October 1, 2017 and ending on October 31 , 2022. 5. Sections 1.20, 1.24, 1.57, 1.58, and 1.59 of the Contract are hereby deleted and replaced with the following: Page 19 of 96 1.20 Contract Area. Consists of the Exclusive Service Area plus the areas or locations outside the Exclusive Service Area where there are Tier JI Customers. 1.24 Customer(s). An occupant of a Residential Unit or a Non-residential Unit in the Contract Area and who is a Tier I Customer(s) or Tier II Customer(s) .. 1.57 Tier I Customer(s). Customers located inside the corporate boundaries of the City, as those boundaries may change from time to time . 1.58 Tier II Customer(s). Customer located outside the corporate boundaries and inside the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the City. Tier II Customers include customers located in special districts (e.g., Municipal Utility Districts) that are contractually obligated to use the City 's solid waste provider. As a courtesy , the City shall provide a copy of executed Municipal Utility District Consent Agreement in which the district is required to use the City 's solid waste provider to Contractor within ninety (90) days of execution . Failure to do so does not waive the district contractual obligation to use the City's solid waste provider. 1.59 Intentionally Omitted . 6. Article IV of the Contract are hereby deleted and replaced with the following: IV. NATURE OF CONTRACT 4 .01 Subject to the provisions of the City Charter and the City 's Code of Ordinances , and except as otherwise provided in this Contract, City hereby grants Contractor the sole and exclusive right under Texas Health and Safety Code Chapter 364 to provide the services listed below for the term of this Contract, unless sooner terminated , and the unexclusive right to operate its vehicles on, over, along , and across the present and future streets and alleys for the purpose of providing the following services: 1. Residential Services for Tier I Customers ; 11. Solid Waste and Recycling Services for Tier I Non-Residential Units ; 111. City Services for City Facilities, City Events , and Community Recycling Units; and v. Walden Drive Services. 4.02 The City grants the Contractor a nonexclusive right and privilege along with other Page 20 of 96 nonexclusiv e service providers to have , use , operate, and provid e : 4.02.1 Residential Services for Tier II Customers , 4 .02.2 Non-Residential Units Solid Waste Services for Tier 11 Customers , 4.02.3 City Services for Dewatered Biosolids. 7. Section 5.03 is hereby deleted in its entirety. 8. Article VI of the Contract are hereby deleted and replaced with the following : VI. NON-RESIDENTIAL SERVICES 6 .0 l Upon request of a Non-Residential Unit, Contractor shall provide the following services in compliance with the terms and conditions of this Contract: 6.01. l Solid Waste Services. A Customer may request that Contractor provide Solid Waste Services . Upon Contractor 's receipt of request from a Customer for Solid Waste Services , Contractor shall collect on a frequency mutually agreed to by the Customer and Contractor, from one ( 1) time every week up to seven (7) times per week , on a scheduled Collection day(s) of the number and size of Solid Waste Carts , Dumpsters, or Roll-off Compactors as specified by the Customer. 6.01.2 Recycling Services. A Customer may request that Contractor provide Recycling Services. Upon Contractor's receipt ofrequest from a Customer for Recycling Services , Contractor shall collect on a frequency mutually agreed to by the Customer and Contractor, from one ( 1) time every week up to seven (7) times per week, on a scheduled Collection day(s) of the number and size of Recycling Catts , Dumpsters, or Roll-off Compactors as specified by the Customer. 9. Section 17 .03 of the Contract are hereby deleted and replaced with the following : 17.03 Newly Annexed Areas . For Units in the Contract Area annexed into the City prior to November 30 , 2017 , the Customers shall have the choice of immediately switching to the Contractor, or continuing to use vendors other than the Contractor for a period of two (2) years after the annexation unless exempted by the Director. For such areas , the City shall notify the Contractor of the address of Units to add for services under this Contract during Page 21 of 96 the two (2) year period. After the two (2) year period , the Contractor shall provide services under this Contract for all Units in such areas unless exempted by the Director. For Units in the Contract Area annexed into the City after December 1, 2017, no services shall be offered to Customers unless a privately owned solid waste management service provider is unavailable for a period of two (2) years after the annexation. After the two (2) year period , the Contractor shall provide services under this Contract for all Units in such areas. 10. Section 27 .08 of the Contract are hereby deleted and replaced with the following: 27.08 Annual Rate Adjustments. 27 .08.1 All rates shown on Exhibit A shall remain fixed from the effective date of this Contract through September 30, 2018. 27.08.2 After September 30, 2018, annual rate adjustments are subject to City Council approval as part of the City's budget process for each fiscal year. The proposed annual rate adjustment will be based on the following formula: (i) Core CPI-17 percent The Core CPI adjustment shall be based on the percent change from February of the year of the last approved rate adjustment to February of the current year of the Core National Consumer Price Index-U (excludes food and energy) by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Unadjusted Series ID: CUUROOOOSAOL 1 E. (ii) Diesel Fuel #2 price index by the Bureau of Labor Statistics-6 percent The Diesel Fuel#2 price index by the BLS adjustment shall be based on the percent change from February of the year of the last approved rate adjustment to February of the current year of the Diesel Fuel price index published by the BLS, Series ID: WPU05730302 (iii) Repair and Maintenance-29 percent The Repair and Maintenance adjustment shall be based on the percent change from February of the year of the last approved rate adjustment to February of the cunent year of the Repair and Maintenance price index published by the BLS, Series ID: PCU333924333924 (iv) Labor Costs-Direct and Fringe-38 percent The Labor Costs adjustment shall be based on the percent change from the first quarter of the year of the last approved rate adjustment to the first Page 22 of 96 quarter of the current year of the Employment Cost price index published by the BLS , Series ID : CIU201S0000005201 (v) Vehicle and Equipment Replacement-10 percent The Vehicle and Equipment Replacement adjustment shall be based on the percent change from February of the year of the last approved rate adjustment to Fe bruary of the current year of the Vehicle and Equipment Replacement price index published by the BLS , Series ID: WPU141301 (vi) The calculated adjustment shall be calculated by taking the weighted average based on the weights above of the percentage difference between the six indices most recent February, or first quarter end, values and the corresponding values for th e prior February, or first quarter end, value and adding the result to 1.0. The calculated adjustment shall not exceed 4 .0 0% annually, or be less than 0 .00%, and shall be rounded to two decimal places as in the example below. Example: Assume that the indexes have the values for February 2018 and February 2019 (Qi to QI for the Employment Cost Index as shown in the below table: Weight Index Series ID % 2018 2019 PPI Diesel WPU05730302 6.00% 412 .1 428.5 Core CPI CUUROOOOSAOLlE 17 .00% 227 .865 232.432 PPI truck bodies WPU141301 10.00% 227.2 228 .9 ECI Service Providing CIU201S0000005201 38 .00% 115.8 117.8 PPI Ind . Truck MFG PCU333924333924 29 .00% 215 .8 221.3 ((428.5-4]2.J)/4]2.J) X 0.06 0.239% then {(232.432-227.865)/227.865) X 0.]7 = 0.34]% ((228.9-227.2)/227.2) X 0.]0 = 0.075% Page 23 of 96 11. ((}17.8-115.8)!1J5.8) X 0.38 = 0.656% then ((221.3-215.8)/2]5.8) X 0.29 = 0.739% 0.239% + 0.341% + 0.075% + 0.656% + 0. 739% = 2.05% Rounded, tlte calculated adjustment is 2.05%. This is above tlte minimum calculated adjustment of 0.00%, and below tlte maximum allowed calculated adjustment of 4.00%, so tlte final calculated adjustment is 2.05% 27 .08.3The calculated adjustment will be applied only to the rates shown on Exhibit 11. to determine the proposed annual rate adjustment. 27.08.4Contractor shall provide the calculated adjustment and the proposed annual rate adjustment to City for review and agreement prior to City Stafrs presentation to City Council for consideration. 27.08.5The City Council reserves the right to deny or modify any proposed annual rate adjustment, but modification of the proposed rate by City Council shall be limited to a reduction of the proposed increase . If an annual rate adjustment is approved by City Council , Exhibit A shall be amended as necessary to reflect the City Council action. Full Force and Effect. The parties hereto reaffirm and ratify each and every provision of the Contract (as amended hereby) and confirm that the same remains in full force and effect as of the date of this Amendment. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the Contract, the terms of this Amendment shall govern and control in all respects . 12 . Entire Contract. The Contract, as amended by this Amendment, constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties hereto relating to the subject matter hereof and all prior agreements , proposals, negotiations, understandings and correspondence between the parties in this regard, whether written or oral , are hereby superseded and merged herewith. 13. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously in counterpaits (by Page 24 of 96 facsimile , PDF or otherwise), each of which shall be deemed an original , but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The use of electronically transmitted signatures, whether by facsimile, PDF and /or email, in place of original signatures on this Amendment is expressly allowed. The Parties intend to be bound by the signatures on such electronically transmitted document, are aware that the other party will rely on the electronically transmitted signatures, and hereby waive any defenses to the enforcement of the terms of this Amendment based on the form of signature. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment to be effective upon the date this Amendment is signed by both Parties. /Signature Pages Follow] List of Exhibits Exhibit A-1 Exhibit B Page 25 of 96 APPROVED AS TO FORM: By:---------- Charlie McNabb , City Attorney CITY: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, A Texas home-rule municipality By:-------------- Dale Ross , Mayor ATTEST: By:-------------- Shelley Nowling, City Secretary ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of Texas § § County of Williamson § This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2017, by Dale Ross, Mayor of the City of Georgetown , Texas, a Texas home-rule municipality , on behalf of the City of Georgetown , Texas . Notary Public , State of Texas Page 26 of 96 Texas Disposal Systems, Inc. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON ) ) ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 5 '/-t.>day of ~ ,2017,by *6 ·~ H"AAL~ ,inhiscapacityas COO/CFO of Texas Disposal Systems, Inc., a Texas corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public, State of Texas !~~. HILDIAP.PENA i°t.11(/J MY COMMISSION EXPIRES '-l-····,i~-July 7 2019 ·,,i_.w. •• , • Page 27 of 96 EXIIIBIT A-1 The following rates shall be effective on November 1, 2017 and shall remain effective unless modified pursuant to the Agreement: Residential Solid Waste Services Tier I Tier II Service Trash Service Recycle Service Bulky Collection -2X per year Seasonal Yard Trimmings Total $15 .87 ** ** $22.15 Please see amendment 1 to Exhibit A for 5 year residential pricing. Trash Service: -Cart Only Extra Cart -Trash or Recycle Additional Trash Service -sticker Additional Yard Trimming -sticker revenue accrues to the City Additional Bulky Waste Collection -$ each Oversized Bulky Waste Collection -per CY $8.50 $5 .00 $5.00 $28.00 $28 .00 $8.50 $5 .00 ** $28 .00 $28 .00 Cart size change -container swap fee each residential address for initial contract term 1'1 Cart exchange fee 2nd and subsequent cart exchange fee No Charge $34.00 each Extra sticker ** N ot in c luded in base se rvi ce. Ra tes to be negotiated betwee n Contractor a nd Out-of-C ity Cu stome r. Page 28 of 96 City of Georgetown, Texas Commerc i al Solid Waste Services Pickups Per Week # Carts 1 2 3 4 5 1 $ 23.47 $ 46 .95 $ 70.42 $ 93 .90 $ 117 .37 2 $ 46 .95 $ 9 3.90 $ 140.84 $ 187 .79 $ 234 .74 3 $ 70.42 $ 140 .84 $ 211.26 $ 281.69 $ 352.11 4 $ 93 .90 $ 187 .79 $ 281.69 $ 375 .58 $ 469.48 5 $ 117.37 $ 234 .74 $ 352 .11 $ 469 .48 $ 586.85 Note : Multiple frequency available in central business district only Commerci al Recycling Service Pickups Per Week # Carts EOW 1 2 3 4 1 $ 11 .74 $ 22 .30 $ 56.34 $ 91.55 $ 126.76 2 $ 44 .60 $ 112 .67 $ 183.10 $ 253.52 3 $ 66 .90 $ 169 .01 $ 274 .64 $ 380 .28 4 $ 89.20 $ 225 .35 $ 366.19 $ 507 .03 -- Note : Multiple frequency ava i lable in central business district only Commercial Containe rs Pickups Per Week Size 1 2 3 4 5 2CY $ 67 .88 $ 135 .76 $ 203 .63 $ 271.51 $ 339.39 3CY $ 76.41 $ 152 .82 $ 229 .22 $ 305.63 $ 382.04 4CY $ 84 .94 $ 169 .87 $ 254 .81 $ 339 .75 $ 424 .69 6CY $ 102 .00 $ 203 .99 $ 305 .99 $ 407.98 $ 509 .98 8CY $ 119 .06 $ 238 .11 $ 357 .17 $ 476 .22 $ 595 .28 lOCY $ 136.11 $ 272 .23 $ 408 .34 $ 544.46 $ 680 .57 Commercial containers -City Discount 10 % 5 $ 173 .71 $ 347 .41 $ 521.12 $ 694.82 6 7 $ 407.27 $ 475 .15 $ 458 .45 $ 534 .85 $ 509 .62 $ 594.56 $ 611.98 $ 713.97 $ 714 .33 $ 833.39 $ 816 .69 $ 952 .80 Page 29 of 96 City of Georgetown, Texas Commercial Container Recycling Size 1 2 2CY $ 65.16 $ 130.33 3CY $ 73.35 $ 146.71 4CY $ 81 .54 $ 163 .08 6CY $ 97.92 $ 195.83 8CY $ 114.30 $ 228.59 lOCY $ 130.67 $ 261.34 Commercial -Additional Services locking device -installation locking device $ $ $ $ $ $ Pickups Per Week 3 195.48 $ 220.05 $ 244 .62 $ 293.75 $ 342 .88 $ 392.01 $ 4 5 260.65 $ 325 .81 293.40 $ 366 .76 326.16 $ 407 .70 391.66 $ 489.58 457 .17 $ 571.47 522 .68 $ 653 .35 $96 one -time charge $ 23 per month Casters -for non -residential containers $ 34 per month Unscheduled Extra Pickups 2 CY $52 each 3 CY $65 each 4CY $71 each 6 CY $77 each 8 CY $84 each 10 CY $110 each 6 $ 390.98 $ 440 .11 $ 489 .24 $ 587.50 $ 685.76 $ 784.02 Fl Compactors -Service rates and rental costs to be negotiated between TDS & Customer 7 $ 456.14 $ 513.46 $ 570.78 $ 685 .41 $ 800.05 $ 914 .69 Page 30 of 96 City of Georgetown, Texas Roll Off Comi::1actors Roll-Off Size 20 CY -- 30 CY 35 CY 40CY 42 CY Roll Off Containers Roll-Off Size 14 CY 20 CY 30 CY 40 CY Collection Rate $510 $552 $576 $600 $600 Collection Rate $303 $385 $468 $495 Disposal Rate Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) DisQosal Rate Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Included , 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Over weight charge will apply on over 10 ton loads as determined by Contractor Discount from collection & disposal rates above for City Miscellaneous Fees Roll -off delivery-one time charge Roll-off open top rental fees Compactor rental fees Transfer Station Host Fees City Host Fee 10% $105 per delivery $100 per month Varies depending on equipment, age, Condition, options , services, contract term, etc. Municipal solid waste transferred through transfer station and transported to TDS Landfill by TDS transfer trailers for disposal as reported to TCEQ on annual Transfer Station Report. Page 31 of 96 $1.75 per MSW ton transferred at Georgetown transfer station and transported to TDS landfill site for disposal. This fee does not apply to recycle materials such as commercial and curbside recycling, green waste, compost, recycled wood , green builder recycle materials, other recycle materials, etc . City of Georgetown, Texas Collection Station Operation Annual cost to provide collection services Minimum charges -Automobile and pickup truck No fee to City No greater than 90% of gate rate of Williamson County Landfill Other Fees Set by Contractor based on market to include landfill gate rates fees at Travis and Williamson County landfills plus transportation fees to TDS facility in South Travis County . These fees will be set based on a combination of cubic yardage and tonnage fees as set by Contractor. Freon Removal Removal of Dead Animals -under 100 lbs . Closed Landfill Maintenance Fee City of Georgetown -City Event Trash Collection Carts Roll-off Delivery Service Pickup and clean 20 CY 30 CY 40 CY $45 each appliance $60 each No charge $20 each $25 each $25 each Delivery $105 $105 $105 Haul/Disp $350 $425 $450 No Charge No Charge No Charge Page 32 of 96 Frontload City of Georgetown, Texas Other Services Delivery Service-normal hours Service-after hours Final Pickup and cleaning Additional Collection Station Hours Roll-off Storm Cleanup · Rearload Storm Cleanup Delivery Haul fee w/disposal Rental $80 each $122 each $168 each $122 each $120 per hour $125 each $575 each $5 per day $183 per hour, plus disposal Page 33 of 96 EXHIBIT B Residential Solid Waste Services Tier I Tier II Service Trash Service Recycle Service Bulky Collection -2X per year Seasonal Yard Trimmings Total $15.87 ** ** $22.15 Please see amendment 1 to Exhibit A for 5 year residential pricing. Trash Service: -Cart Only Extra Cart -Trash or Recycle Additional Bulky Waste Collection -$ each Oversized Bulky Waste Collection -per CY $8 .50 $28 .00 $28.00 $8.50 $28.00 $28.00 Cart size change -container swap fee each residential address for initial contract term 1'1 Cart exchange fee No Charge 2nd and subsequent cart exchange fee $34.00 each ** Not included in base service. Rates to be negotiated between Contractor and Out-of-City Customer. Page 34 of 96 City of Georgetown, Texas Commercial Solid Waste Services # Carts 1 2 1 $ 23.47 $ 46.95 2 $ 46 .95 $ 93.90 3 $ 70.42 $ 140.84 4 $ 93.90 $ 187.79 5 $ 117.37 $ 234.74 Pickups Per Week 3 4 $ 70.42 $ 93 .90 $ 140.84 $ 187 .79 $ 211.26 $ 281.69 $ 281.69 $ 375.58 $ 352 .11 $ 469 .48 Note: Multiple frequency available in central business district only Commercial Recycling Service Pickups Per Week # Carts EOW 1 2 3 5 $ 117.37 $ 234 .74 $ 352.11 $ 469.48 $ 586.85 4 1 $ 11.74 $ 22.30 $ 56.34 $ 91.55 $ 126.76 2 $ 44.60 $ 112.67 $ 183.10 $ 253.52 3 $ 66.90 $ 169.01 $ 274.64 $ 380.28 4 $ 89.20 $ 225.35 $ 366 .19 $ 507.03 Note: Multiple frequency available in central business district only Commerci al Containers Pickups Per Week Size 1 2 3 4 5 2CY $ 67.88 $ 135.76 $ 203.63 $ 271.51 $ 339 .39 3CY $ 76.41 $ 152.82 $ 229.22 $ 305.63 $ 382.04 4CY $ 84.94 $ 169.87 $ 254.81 $ 339 .75 $ 424 .69 6CY $ 102 .00 $ 203.99 $ 305.99 $ 407 .98 $ 509 .98 8CY $ 119.06 $ 238.11 $ 357.17 $ 476.22 $ 595.28 lOCY $ 136.11 $ 272 .23 $ 408.34 $ 544 .46 $ 680.57 Commercial containers-City Discount 10% 5 $ 173 .71 $ 347.41 $ 521.12 $ 694 .82 6 7 $ 407.27 $ 475 .1 5 $ 458.45 $ 534 .85 $ 509.62 $ 594 .56 $ 611.98 $ 713.97 $ 714 .33 $ 833 .39 $ 816.69 $ 952 .80 Page 35 of 96 City of Georgetown, Texas Commerc ial Container Recycling Size 1 2 2CY $ 65 .16 $ 130.33 3CY $ 73 .35 $ 146.71 4CY $ 81.54 $ 163.08 t------ 6CY $ 97.92 $ 195.83 8CY $ 114.30 $ 228.59 10CY $ 130.67 $ 261.34 Commercial -Additional Services Locking device -installation Locking device $ $ $ $ $ $ Pickup s Per Week 3 195.48 $ 220 .05 $ 244.62 $ 293 .75 $ 342 .88 $ 392 .01 $ 4 5 260 .65 $ 325 .81 293 .40 $ 366 .76 326 .16 $ 407 .70 391.66 $ 489.58 457 .17 $ 571.47 522 .68 $ 653 .35 $96 one-tim e charge $ 23 per month Casters -for non -residential containers $ 34 per month Unscheduled Extra Pi ckups 2 CY $52 each 3 CY $65 each 4 CY $71 each 6 CY $77 each 8 CY $84 each 10CY $110 each 6 $ 390 .98 $ 440 .11 $ 489 .24 $ 587.50 $ 685 .76 $ 784 .02 FL Compactors -Service rates and rental costs to be negotiated between TDS & Customer 7 $ 456 .14 $ 513 .46 $ 570 .78 $ 685 .41 $ 800.05 $ 914 .69 Page 36 of 96 City of Georgetown, Texas Roll Off Com12actors Roll-Off Size 20 CY 30 CY 35 CY 40CY 42 CY Roll Off Containers Roll-Off Size 14 CY 20 CY 30 CY 40 CY Collection Rate $510 $552 $576 $600 $600 Collection Rate $303 $385 $468 $495 Dis12osal Rate Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Included , 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Dis12osal Rate Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Included, 10 Ton Maximum (legal weight) Over weight charge will apply on over 10 ton loads as determined by Contractor Discount from collection & disposal rates above for City Miscellaneous Fees Roll-off delivery-one time charge Roll-off open top rental fees Compactor rental fees Freon Removal Removal of Dead Animals -under 100 lbs. 10% $105 per delivery $100 per month Varies depending on equipment, age, Condition, options, services, contract term, etc . $45 each appliance $60 each Page 37 of 96 Page 38 of 96 Texas Disposal Systems Solid Waste Contract Extension City Council 12 September, 2017 1Page 39 of 96 Agenda •Contract Changes •Impact to Rates •Updated Annual Price Adjustment Index •Communication Plan •Next Steps Time Line 2Page 40 of 96 Contract Changes •Updates rates •Adds commercial recycling services •Eliminates reference to Tier III customers •Changes indices for annual price adjustments •Increases annual price adjustment cap to 4% •Modifies post-annexation transition 3Page 41 of 96 Impact to Rates From Contract Only Service Current New $ inc % inc Residential IN $16.50 $18.37 $1.87 11.33% Residential OUT $22.70 $25.30 $2.60 11.45% Comm Cart $23.70 $26.59 $2.89 12.19% 4 YD @ 2/wk $159.50 $191.51 $32.01 20.07% 6 YD @ 4/wk $387.90 $459.46 $71.56 18.45% 8 YD @ 1/wk $123.50 $135.56 $12.06 9.77% Page 42 of 96 Impact to Rates in Total Service Current New $ inc % inc Residential IN $16.50 $18.80 $2.30 13.94% Residential OUT $22.70 $26.40 $3.70 16.30% Comm Cart $23.70 $28.20 $4.50 18.99% 4 YD @ 2/wk $159.50 $202.80 $43.30 27.15% 6 YD @ 4/wk $387.90 $486.60 $98.70 25.44% 8 YD @ 1/wk $123.50 $143.50 $20.00 16.19% Page 43 of 96 Wholesale Rates Remain Competitive Source: TDS $14.00 $15.28 $15.87 $16.48 $16.66 $17.07 $17.11 $17.61 $19.78 $19.93 $20.42 $25.34 $42.85 96 gal cart, Standard Residential Service 6 * Cedar Park includes a price adjustment for City owned carts Page 44 of 96 Retail Rate Peer Comparison $15.90 $16.01 $16.50 $16.66 $17.61 $17.95 $18.80 $19.97 $20.25 $23.61 $25.09 $42.85 96 gal cart, Standard Residential Service Page 45 of 96 Updated Annual Price Adjustment Index •Refuse Rate Index (RRI) –17%–Core CPI –BLS CPI –6% –Diesel Fuel #2 –BLS PPI –29%–Repair & Maintenance –BLS PPI –38%–Labor Cost –BLS ECI –10% –Vehicle & Equipment Replacement –BLS PPI 8Page 46 of 96 Communication Plan •Targeted information to Customers –Residential -bill insert –Commercial –Work with them to evaluate current services •Create a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document for internal and external use 9Page 47 of 96 Next Steps Time Line •Sep 2017 –Contract Extension, Retail Rate Ordinance •Oct 2017 –Communicate New Rates •Nov 2017 –New Rates Effective •Oct-Nov 2017 –Roll-Off Franchise Fee Ordinance •Jan 2018 –Roll-Off Franchise Fee Effective •Nov 2017-Apr 2018 –Master Plan and Transfer Station 10Page 48 of 96 Questions 11Page 49 of 96 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop Se pte mber 12, 2017 SUBJECT: Update on Columbarium in IOOF Cemetery -- Kimbe rly Garrett, P arks and Recreation Directo r ITEM SUMMARY: P resentation on propo sed co lumbarium in IOOF Ce metery FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Kimberly Garrett, Parks and Recreation Director ATTACHMENT S: Description P res entation Page 50 of 96 Update on Columbarium in IOOF Cemetery City Council Workshop September 12, 2017 City of GeorgetownPage 51 of 96 Agenda •Why a Columbarium? •Budget •Schematic Design •Timeline / Next Steps City of GeorgetownPage 52 of 96 Why a Columbarium ? •Discussions date back to 2012 •Cremations in Texas are over 30% of all burials •Created in ground urn area in 2007, low sales, requests for columbarium •Creates options in addition to traditional burial and in ground urn area •More efficient use of land City of GeorgetownPage 53 of 96 Budget •Cemetery Fund established in FY 2013 to help offset long term maintenance •$150,000 allocated in the FY 2017 budget from the Cemetery SRF for design and construction of a columbarium •As niches are sold at market rate, the fund is reimbursed with the ability to grow to help with increasing maintenance costs City of GeorgetownPage 54 of 96 Schematic Design •Design allows for phasing based on demand and budget •Initial phase estimated to have 120 niches •Parks Board on August 10, 2017 –Very favorable comments •Allows for the in ground urn area still to be an option City of GeorgetownPage 55 of 96 City of GeorgetownPage 56 of 96 City of Georgetown Ex Existing in ground urn burial area Page 57 of 96 City of GeorgetownPage 58 of 96 City of GeorgetownPage 59 of 96 City of GeorgetownPage 60 of 96 Timeline / Next Steps •Move forward with construction documents •Staff to develop Fee Schedule and Policy Guidelines •Prepare to bid as early as November 1st •Begin construction early 2018 •Estimated completion Spring 2018 City of GeorgetownPage 61 of 96 Questions ? City of GeorgetownPage 62 of 96 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop Se pte mber 12, 2017 SUBJECT: Update and disc ussio n regarding the Downtown Parking Management P rogram and po ssible transition of program from the current contrac t service delivery model to an in-ho use approach through the Police Department -- Wayne Reed, Assistant City Manager ITEM SUMMARY: Staff is seeking direction from Council on ho w to pro ceed with the Downtown P arking Management Program. City Council c an direct staff to continue to use an outsourced mo del or to bring the program in-ho use. The fo llowing pro vide s a history of the program and a high level overview of how the program could be managed by the Police Department within the existing FY18 appro ved funds. Background The City implemented a Downto wn Parking Management Program in 2004 to better manage the on-street parking on and around the Downtown Square to encourage turnover o f parking spaces to improve access to co nvenient parking for customers and visitors. Through this program, the City o ffers free three (3) hour parking in Downto wn between 9 AM and 5 P M Monday through Friday (see A Parking Guid e to Downtown Georgetown). Also , free all-day parking is available at several, c onvenient locations near the Do wntown Square fo r the general public, including employees of downto wn businesses. The 3 hour parking zone has been modified o ver the years to adjust to customer demands as Downtown has grown into a destinatio n for shoppers and more busine sses have opened. The Downto wn Master P lan recognizes the importanc e of parking to support a thriving business environment. A successful downto wn will find its most conveniently located parking in high demand be cause the activities and busine sse s attract visitors. The Do wntown Master Plan update in 2 01 4 states it is important to “assure that the existing parking resources are being use d to the ir maximum efficiency” through availability, co nvenience, and management; it instructs us to “think of parking as a utility, not a land use (i.e., it provides a service that custo mers use)…. This also means se tting limits on its use, either through time limits or charging for this service.” The City has so ught to manage this “utility” through a 3 hour parking zo ne and by providing fre e , all-day parking within one and two blo cks o f the Downtown Square. The Downtown P arking Management Program has had varied success managing this “utility” over the years using an outsourced model of service delivery. The quality of custome r service and consistency in enforcement has pro ven difficult through the contract model given the level of funding. The City has co ntracted the servic e fo ur times over the past fo urteen years thro ugh competitive bidding selecting a new contractor eac h time. Here is a brief histo ry of the program: Downto wn parking enforcement began in 2004 using volunteers. Unfo rtunately, the volunteer approach proved to be unreliable to provide consistent e nforcement. Records available to staff indicate that the volunte e rs dropped out of the program, forcing the CVB Office to use staff to enforce parking restrictio ns. In 2 00 5 the City hired its first co ntrac to r, The Security Connection, at an annual cost of $5,000. In 2 00 6, Sentry Security was awarded the contract for an annual cost o f $1 5,0 00 . In 2 011 , the City contracted with Alle giance Security. In 2 01 5, Protection Coalition of Texas was awarded the contract with a maximum annual budget of $37 ,00 0. In-House Mode l An alternative to outsourcing the Do wntown Parking Management Program is to have the Police Department oversee the program. Within the FY1 8 adopted budget of $3 7,0 00 , this wo uld involve part-time, nonswo rn positions mo nitoring use of parking in the 3 hour parking zone. Coverage would range between 30 and 40 hours per week depending on ho urly rate, weather, and shopping seasons. The assigned staff would be trained to be ambassadors of Downtown. The ir responsibilities wo uld include enforcing parking restric tions and issuing parking violations as required; distributing parking guides and informing visitors of designate d free all-day parking lots; and informing visitors of public amenitie s, such as the Visitors Center, public restroo ms, library, County fac ilities, and so on. Unifo rms would be attractive polo shirts and khakis o r similar attire to create a friendly and pro fessional appearance. This appro ach would require a budge t amendment to move the FY18 funds from the Main Street P rogram to the P olice Page 63 of 96 Department. It would require the hiring and training of new part-time e mployees. The Police Department could be gin coverage sometime in December of this year or January 20 18 , depending on the hiring process. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City has been funding the Do wntown Parking Management P rogram at $3 7,000 annually for the past se veral years in the Main Street Pro gram’s budget. The pro posed transition to have the P olice Departme nt manage the program as described above would use the same funding with no inc rease. The remaining FY17 funds would be used fo r c apital expenses, such as unifo rms, radios, and other equipme nt. SUBMITTED BY: Wayne Reed, Assistant City Manager ATTACHMENT S: Description P arking Guid e to Do wntown Geo rgeto wn Page 64 of 96 FREE 3-hour downtown parking available for customers. FREE all-day parking is available in the designated lots near the Square. For a FREE customer hospitality parking pass, stop by the Vistors Center at 103 West 7th Street. For additional information: 809 Martin Luther King Jr. St. 512.930.2027 MainStreetGeorgetown.com P A PARKING GUIDE TO DOWNTOWN GEORGETOWN PARK & WALK Page 65 of 96 9TH ST 8TH ST 7TH ST VISITORS CENTER CHURCH ST MAIN ST AU STIN AVE ROCK ST FO R EST S T WEST S T 6TH ST 5TH ST 4TH ST FREE ALL-DAY PARKING LOTS FREE ALL-DAY PARKING LOTS (COUNTY OWNED) THREE HOUR ZONE N P PARKING GARAGE Page 66 of 96 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop Se pte mber 12, 2017 SUBJECT: Review of Visio ning Pro cess -- Keith Hutchinson, Communications Manager, and Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manage r ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: n/a SUBMITTED BY: Robyn Densmo re ATTACHMENT S: Description Visioning Pres entatio n Page 67 of 96 Vision for Georgetown City Council workshop September 12, 2017 Page 68 of 96 Current City Council Vision •Georgetown is a safe, healthy, happy, connected, and truly diverse community where people can live, learn, work, retire, and play in an environment where we have ready access, throughout our lives, to arts, culture, essential services, and the natural environment. •Our educated and skilled population, fiscally responsible governance, excellent infrastructure, and the beauty of our natural and man-made environments, attract new residents and businesses and enable us to create balanced and diverse employment centers and economic levels. Our strong sense of community connects us regardless of our cultural, age, ethnic, or economic differences. Page 69 of 96 Vision Statement •Current City Council vision has 93 words. •A vision statement of 5 –20 words can be memorable and repeatable. •A shorter vision statement is more focused. Page 70 of 96 Strategy # 10: Improve communications and advertising Tactic: Gain clarity on the City organization’s branding strategy City Council Strategies Page 71 of 96 Vision Statement What is a vision statement? •A picture of where we are going •Future-oriented: 10 –20 years and beyond •Inspirational, aspirational •For City Council, City employees, community •Big, but achievable •Short and memorable: 5 –20 words •Not a laundry list Page 72 of 96 Vision Statement •A vision statement is a phrase or group of words, not a logo. •Not changing the City logo. •Visioning involves words and ideas, not design or colors. Page 73 of 96 Vision Statement Visioning objectives: •City Council and community alignment on vision for Georgetown •Building block for City Council goal-setting •First step in future branding initiatives and work on update of the comprehensive plan Page 74 of 96 Vision Development contract •Working with Freese and Nichols Urban Planning and Design Group •Experience with visioning and comprehensive planning with more than 100 cities in Texas •Wendy Shabay, project manager •Chelsea Irby, assistant project manager Page 75 of 96 Vision Statement examples •The City That Works: Diverse, Vibrant, Progressive –Dallas •Opportunity. Diversity. Community. Home. –Houston •Together we build our future in a friendly place to live, work, play, learn and worship. –Friendswood Page 76 of 96 Vision Development Process Project initiation and research Sept.5 -23 Workshop with City Council Sept. 12 Survey #1 via SurveyMonkey Sept. 18 -23 Page 77 of 96 Vision Development Process Survey #1 via SurveyMonkey to community: •Online survey with targeted outreach to boards and commission members, business community, Georgetown ISD, nonprofits, Southwestern •Questions: •Describe Georgetown •Georgetown in the future? •Words in a vision statement? •Outcome: List of buzz words or phrases Page 78 of 96 Vision Development Process Project initiation and research Sept.5 -23 Workshop with City Council Sept. 12 Survey #1 via SurveyMonkey to community Sept. 18 -23 Use Survey #1 results in meetings with City Council members and community workshop Sept. 27 Page 79 of 96 Vision Development Process Survey #2 via SurveyMonkey Sept. 30 -Oct.4 Survey #2 via SurveyMonkey to community: •Online survey with targeted outreach to boards and commission members, business community, Georgetown ISD, nonprofits, Southwestern •Feedback on 10 words or phrases for vision statement Page 80 of 96 Vision Development Process Survey #2 via SurveyMonkey Sept. 30 -Oct.4 Survey #2 results:list of 10 words or phrases narrowed to top 3 or 4 Oct.5-9 Workshop with City Council to write vision statement Oct. 10 Workshop to finalize vision statement and start on Council goals Nov.1 & 2 Page 81 of 96 Vision Development Process Questions and feedback Page 82 of 96 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop Se pte mber 12, 2017 SUBJECT: City Council Ethic s Training Workshop -- Charlie Mc Nabb, City Attorney ITEM SUMMARY: This Workshop ite m is devoted to the study of the e thics statutes as required by the City Charter, Section 9.16. Included in this presentation are the following: 1. State Laws 2. City of Georgetown Ethics Rules 3. City Council Go vernance P olicy FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. SUBMITTED BY: Rachel Saucier, Exe c utive Assistant ATTACHMENT S: Description 2017 Counc il Ethic s Training Page 83 of 96 THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN CITY COUNCIL ETHICS PRESENTATION Presented by: Charlie McNabb City Attorney September 2017 Page 84 of 96 GEORGETOWN CITY CHARTER SECTION 9.16 – ETHICS REVIEW The Council shall adopt an ethics ordinance and provide for an annual review thereof; there shall also be a minimum of one (1) work session per year devoted to the study of ethics statutes. (Ord. No. 86-12, Amend. No. 35, 2-25-86) Page 85 of 96 GEORGETOWN CODE OF ORDINANCES SEC. 2.20.100. - DISTRIBUTION AND PROOF OF COMPLIANCE A. The City Secretary shall make available to each new City Official designated in this Chapter, a copy of the text of this Chapter 2.20; Chapter 171 of the Texas Local Government Code pertaining to conflicts of interest; the Texas Open Meetings Act (Tex. Gov. Code ch. 551); and the Texas Public Information Act (Tex. Gov. Code ch. 552) (collectively referred to in this Section as the "ethics statutes"). B. The City Attorney shall conduct one or more annual seminars devoted to educating City Officials on the meaning and legal significance of the ethics statutes. C. Each City Official shall file with the City Secretary a signed affidavit in which the City Official acknowledges the existence of the ethics statutes. (Ord. No. 2012-09, § 1) Page 86 of 96 CITY OF GEORGETOWN GOVERNANCE POLICY COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING The City Manager shall coordinate and facilitate the orientation of new Councilmembers. Continuing education and training of Council is a priority. The Mayor and Councilmembers are encouraged to attend continuing education and training programs focusing on city/county/regional/state/national issues, policy and governance. The City Manager, City Secretary and City Attorney shall coordinate and facilitate the continuing education and training of Councilmembers. Page 87 of 96 TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION Relevant State Statutes City of Georgetown Ethics Ordinance City Council Governance Policy Page 88 of 96 STATE STATUTES Texas Penal Code Chapter 36: Bribery and Corrupt Influence Chapter 39: Abuse of Office Texas Government Code Chapter 551: Open Meetings Chapter 552: Public Information Texas Local Government Code Chapter 171: Conflicts of Interest of Officers Chapter 176: Disclosure of Certain Relationships Page 89 of 96 CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATE LAW Chapter 171 of the Texas Local Government Code prohibits you from: Discussing and participating in a vote on a matter Involving a business entity or real property In which you (or certain people you are closely related to) Have a substantial interest Page 90 of 96 CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATE LAW DEFINITIONS -SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST In a Business Entity: You or your relative own 10% or more of the voting stock or shares of the business entity; or You or your relative own either 10% or $15,000 or more of the fair market value of the business entity; or Funds received by you or your relative from the business entity exceed 10% of your gross income for the previous year. In Real Property: You or your relative own an equitable or legal interest in real property with a fair market value of $2,500 or more. Page 91 of 96 CITY ETHICS ORDINANCE TYPES OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Substantial Financial Interest: o Follows state law Substantial Economic Interest: o More comprehensive o Governed by City Ethics Ordinance o Includes an interest that is: more than minimal or insignificant; and would be recognized by reasonable persons to have weight in deciding a case or an issue Page 92 of 96 CITY ETHICS ORDINANCE SUBSTANTIAL ECONOMIC INTEREST — INTERESTS IMPUTED You will be deemed to have an Economic Interest in a matter if any of these people or entities have an Economic Interest in the matter: 1.Relatives 2.Business entity 3.Job offers 4.Business negotiations Page 93 of 96 GOVERNANCE POLICY Governance Guidelines and Principles Mayor’s Role City Council’s Role City Manager’s Role Communication Between Council and Staff Council Relations with City Attorney and City Secretary News Media Relations Page 94 of 96 Questions? Page 95 of 96 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop Se pte mber 12, 2017 SUBJECT: Sec. 551.071: Consul tati on w i th Attorney - Advice from attorney about pending o r co ntemplated litigation and other matters o n which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items Sec. 551.072 De l i berati o n about Real Proper ty - Fire Station 7 Site Consideration - Forwarded fro m the G eo rgetown Transportati on Enhancement Corporati o n (G TEC): P arcel 1 (NEC o f Lake way Dr. and Airport Road), P arcel 3 (2 30 1 Airport Ro ad), P arcel 4 (SEC Airpo rt Raod and Aviation Dr.), and Parce l 6 (10 6 Halmar Cove) -- Travis Baird, Real Estate Services Coordinator Sec. 551.074: Personnel Matters - City Manager, City Attorney, City Sec re tary and Municipal Judge: Consideratio n of the appointment, employme nt, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal - Approval of appo intment of Assistant City Attorney - City Manager Evaluation Sec. 551.087: De l i berati o n Regardi ng Economi c Devel opment Negoti ati ons - Tamiro Plaza II ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Shelley Nowling, City Secretary Page 96 of 96