The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda CC 11.12.2019 WorkshopN otice of M eeting of the Governing B ody of the C ity of Georgetown, Texas N ovember 12 , 20 19 The Georgetown City Council will meet on November 12, 2019 at 2:00 P M at City Council Chambers, 510 W 9th Street Georgetown, TX 78626 The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (AD A). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the AD A, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. P lease contact the City Secretary's Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 808 Martin Luther King J r. Street, Georgetown, TX 78626 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Policy De ve lopme nt/Re vie w Workshop - A P resentation and discussion regarding the first year of Garey P ark -- Kimberly Garrett, P arks and Recreation Director B P resentation and discussion regarding the Energy Risk Management P olicy -- Daniel Bethapudi, General Manager of the Electric Utility C P resentation, update, and discussion regarding the 2030 P lan and introduction to the Future Land Use Map -- Sofia Nelson, P lanning Director Exe cutive Se ssion In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session. D Sec. 551.071: Consul tati on w i th Attorney Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items - P roposed settlement in The City of Georgetown, Texas v. S teele Georgetown LIH T C, L L C - P roposed P ossession and Use Agreement in The City of Georgetown, Texas v. Forster & Giles, a partnership - Litigation update regarding The City of Georgetown v. Buckthorn Westex L L C - LH IS D Waterline Easement - Nemir - P E C Franchise - Industrial District Agreement with Texas Crushed Stone Sec. 551.086: Certai n P ubl i c P ow er Uti l i ti es: Competi ti ve M atters - P urchase P ower Update - P ortfolio Manager RFP - Energy Risk Management P olicy Sec. 551.087: Del i berati on Regardi ng Economi c Devel opment Negoti ati ons - P roject Antler Sec. 551.072: Del i berati ons about Real P roperty - Sale of P roperty - Riverplace - 2nd and Austin -- Travis Baird, Real Estate Service Manager Page 1 of 102 Sec. 551:074: P ersonnel Matters City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal J udge: Consideration of the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal - City Manager Work P lan Review Adjournme nt Ce rtificate of Posting I, R obyn Densmore, C ity S ecretary for the C ity of G eorgetown, Texas, do hereby c ertify that this Notice of Meeting was pos ted at C ity Hall, 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626, a plac e readily ac cessible to the general public as required by law, on the _____ day of _________________, 2019, at __________, and remained so pos ted for at leas t 72 c ontinuous hours prec eding the s cheduled time of said meeting. __________________________________ R obyn Dens more, C ity S ec retary Page 2 of 102 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop N ovember 12, 2019 S UBJEC T: P resentation and discussion regarding the first year of Garey P ark -- Kimberly Garrett, P arks and Recreation Director I T EM S UMMARY: Workshop presentation will include an update on the first year of Garey P ark. Information will be presented on operational data including visitation and budget, lessons learned and successes. Included as an attachment are the current fees for the park. F I NANC I AL I MPAC T: N A S UBMI T T ED BY: Kimberly Garrett, P arks and Recreation Director AT TAC HMENT S : Description P resentation G arey House R ental F ees G arey P ark R ental F ees G arey P ark Entranc e F ees Page 3 of 102 A look at the First Year of Garey Park City Council Workshop November 12, 2019 City of GeorgetownPage 4 of 102 Agenda •Park Overview •Operational Data –Visitation Information –Budget Information •Lessons Learned/Changes Made •Successes –Partnerships, Programs and Volunteers •Questions Page 5 of 102 Grand Opening | June 2018 City of GeorgetownPage 6 of 102 Park Overview City of GeorgetownPage 7 of 102 Monthly Visitation City of GeorgetownPage 8 of 102 Visitation in FY19 | 95,355 •70% non-resident, originally at 75% –Location based •Free Tuesdays and Weekends –Peak Visitation •Splash Pad extended dates March 1st – October 31st -only splash pad in the area with longer hours •Weather Permitting City of GeorgetownPage 9 of 102 Visitation by day of week City of GeorgetownPage 10 of 102 Budget Information for 2019 Pro Forma-Year 1 *FY 2019 Budget FY 2019 Actual Expense $884,024 $948,290 $777,412 Revenue $405,172 $500,000 $379,813 Subsidy $478,852 $448,290 $397,599 Recovery %45.8%44.8%48.9 % * Estimate for first full year of operations. City of GeorgetownPage 11 of 102 Budget Detail FY 2019 Budget FY 2019 Actual FY 2020 Budget Personnel $450,615 $421,118 $463,713 Operations $386,200 $244,819 * $358,500 ISF Vehicles 0 0 $38,117 ISF Building $111,475 $111,475 $144,857 Total Expense $948,290 $777,412 $1,005,187 Revenue $500,000 $379,813 $400,000 *Savings in utilities,program expense (yr 1), & contract staff City of GeorgetownPage 12 of 102 Revenues Month by Month City of GeorgetownPage 13 of 102 Revenue Breakdown by Area City of GeorgetownPage 14 of 102 Revenue Breakdown Resident vs. Non Resident Revenue by Residency Service Resident Nonresident Total Daily Admission $24,314 $115,430 $139,744 Annual Passes $10,643 $37,652 $48,295 Pavilion Rentals $19,300 $46,635 $65,935 Total $54,257 $199,717 $253,974 City of GeorgetownPage 15 of 102 Garey House Rentals •2019 -55 events booked –Typically see bookings out one year or more at these types of venues; used introductory pricing in 2018 to attract short term rentals •House rental fees reviewed, benchmarked and increased annually •Seasonal bookings; capacity low 130-150 •Bridal Open Houses -18 bookings City of GeorgetownPage 16 of 102 Lessons Learned | Changes •Procedures and Processes –Continually improving and evaluating services, educating patrons, and reviewing marketing material and target audience •Free Tuesdays = BUSY –Adjusted from September 1st –May 31st to October 1st –March 31th in line with fall/winter hours –extra staff City of GeorgetownPage 17 of 102 Lessons Learned | Changes •Pricing/Fees –High demand for weekend pavilion rentals, rates were increased due to demand –Garey House fees increased to align with market •Equestrian –Mostly non residents/weekend trail riders –Arena not designed to host large events, 20 trailer parking spots City of GeorgetownPage 18 of 102 Lessons Learned | Changes •Events/Programming –Free entry events –parking issues and traffic back ups; need pre-registration –Meadow events conflict with Garey House Rentals –one or the other –Continue to look at third party rentals, revenue impacts, overall impacts to the park – such as Victory Cup. City of GeorgetownPage 19 of 102 Partnerships •Partnered with the Good Water Master Naturalist on Wildlife Nature Viewing Blind •Partnered with Williamson County Astronomy Club on Star Gazing Night City of GeorgetownPage 20 of 102 Programs •NRPA Bio Blitz •Nature Fest •Hay Day City of GeorgetownPage 21 of 102 Volunteers •Volunteer program -growing City of GeorgetownPage 22 of 102 Questions ? City of GeorgetownPage 23 of 102 RENTAL SPACE DAY OF THE WEEK SEASON 2018 PRICE 2019 PRICE 2020 PRICE NOTES Full Venue - 10 Hour Monday-Thursday Any $1,200 $1,500 $2,000 Full Venue - 10 Hour Friday & Sunday Low $1,700 $2,200 $2,500 Full Venue - 10 Hour Saturday Low $2,700 $3,200 $3,500 Full Venue - 10 Hour Friday & Sunday High $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 Full Venue - 10 Hour Saturday High $3,000 $3,500 $4,000 Full Venue - 10 Hour Holiday Any $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Full Venue - 6 Hour (old)Monday-Thursday Any $800 X X Corporate/Social ONLY Full Venue - 5 Hour (new)Monday-Thursday Any X $1,000 $1,250 Corporate/Social ONLY Full Venue - 5 Hour (new)Friday & Sunday Low X $1,350 $1,500 Corporate/Social ONLY Full Venue - 5 Hour (new)Saturday Low X $1,850 $2,000 Corporate/Social ONLY Full Venue - 5 Hour (new)Friday & Sunday High X $1,500 $1,750 Corporate/Social ONLY Full Venue - 5 Hour (new)Saturday High X $2,000 $2,250 Corporate/Social ONLY The Hall - 8 hour Monday-Thursday Any $600 X X Corporate/Social ONLY The Hall - 4 hour Monday-Thursday Any $300 X X Corporate/Social ONLY Additional Hour (limit 2)$75 per hour The Hall - 4 hour Monday-Thursday Any X $500 Corporate ONLY The Hall+Courtyard - 4 hour Monday-Thursday Any X $800 Social ONLY Meeting Room - 2 hour (old)Monday-Thursday Any $75 X Corporate/Social ONLY Additional Hour $25 per hour X Meeting Room - 4 hour Monday-Thursday Any X $200 Additional Hour X $50 per hour Elopement Ceremonies Any Any $100 per hour $300 per hour Booked no earlier than 60 days out Limit 10 guests Limit 30 guests Booked no earlier than 60 days out Photo Shoot (old)Any Any $75 per hour X X Photo Shoot - Grounds Any Any X $30 per hour Photo Shoot - Interior Any Any X $50 per hour GAREY HOUSE RENTAL FEES Page 24 of 102 Resident Rental Fees Half Day $75.00 Half Day $100.00 Half Day $200.00 Full Day $150.00 Full Day $150.00 Full Day $300.00 Half Day $90.00 Half Day $120.00 Half Day $240.00 Full Day $180.00 Full Day $180.00 Full Day $360.00 Half Day $20.00 Half Day $40.00 Half Day $60.00 Full Day $40.00 Full Day $80.00 Full Day $120.00 Regular Rate $30.00 Per Half-Day $20.00 Event Rate $35.00 Interior $50.00 Holiday Rate $50.00 Grounds $30.00 Per Hour $25.00 32 Capacity 64 Capacity 192 Capacity Pavilion Weekday Resident Rates Heritage of Gold, Derby, Belmont, Preakness 1/3 Triple Crown Full Triple Crown Pavilion Weekend Resident Rates Increased 20% as of 10/1/2019 32 Capacity 64 Capacity 192 Capacity Heritage of Gold, Derby, Belmont, Preakness 1/3 Triple Crown Arena Rental Fees Memorial Day, Independence Day, and Labor Day *Fees include entry for 2 participants + photographer Resident *Allowed M-Th ONLY Open Play Field Resident Rates 32 Capacity 64 Capacity 192 Capacity *3-hour max per renter Garey House Photo Fees Per Hour *Two hour minimum *no residency Food Truck Rental Fees *no residency *Holiday Rates apply on Full Triple Crown Heritage of Gold, Derby, Belmont, Preakness 1/3 Triple Crown Full Triple Crown Round Pen Rental Fees Resident Page 25 of 102 Nonresident Rental Fees Half Day $100.00 Half Day $125.00 Half Day $250.00 Full Day $200.00 Full Day $185.00 Full Day $375.00 Half Day $120.00 Half Day $150.00 Half Day $300.00 Full Day $240.00 Full Day $222.00 Full Day $450.00 Half Day $25.00 Half Day $50.00 Half Day $75.00 Full Day $50.00 Full Day $100.00 Full Day $150.00 Regular Rate $30.00 Per Half-Day $25.00 Event Rate $35.00 Interior $50.00 Holiday Rate $50.00 Grounds $30.00 Per Hour $30.00 *3-hour max per renter Arena Rental Fees Nonresident Memorial Day, Independence Day,*Fees include entry for 2 *Allowed M-Th ONLY and Labor Day participants + photographer 32 Capacity 64 Capacity 192 Capacity Nonresident Open Play Field Nonresident Rates Heritage of Gold, Derby, Belmont, Preakness Pavilion Weekday Nonresident Rates Pavilion Weekend Nonresident Rates Increased 20% as of 10/1/2019 32 Capacity 64 Capacity 192 Capacity 32 Capacity 64 Capacity *no residency *Holiday Rates apply on Garey House Photo Fees Per Hour *Two hour minimum *no residency Food Truck Rental Fees 1/3 Triple Crown Full Triple Crown Heritage of Gold, Derby, Belmont, Preakness 1/3 Triple Crown Full Triple Crown 192 Capacity Round Pen Rental Fees Heritage of Gold, Derby, Belmont, Preakness 1/3 Triple Crown Full Triple Crown Page 26 of 102 Garey Park Entrance Fees Fee Type Resident Nonresident First 2 People $5.00 $10.00 Additional Person $2.00 $2.00 3 Years and Under $0.00 $0.00 Fee Type Resident Nonresident Per Rider $8.00 $12.00 Additional Non-Riders $2.00 $2.00 All Residency $35 Fee Type Resident Nonresident Individual Pass $100.00 $150.00 Additional Pass $20.00 $25.00 Fee Type Resident Nonresident Rider Pass $175.00 $250.00 Additional Rider Pass $75.00 $100.00 Equestrian Annual Pass Passenger Vehicle Daily Entrance Equestrian Rider Daily Entrance Bus Daily Entrance Individual Annual Pass Page 27 of 102 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop N ovember 12, 2019 S UBJEC T: P resentation and discussio n regarding the Energy Risk M anagement P o lic y -- Daniel Bethapudi, General M anager of the Electric Utility I T EM S UMMARY: On October 8, 2019, staff presented the Schneider Rick Management P olicy and received Council feedback. On November 12, 2019 staff will present the most recent updates to the Risk Management P olicy. F I NANC I AL I MPAC T: N/A S UBMI T T ED BY: Daniel Bethapudi - General Manager of the Electric Utility AT TAC HMENT S : Description Energy R isk Management P olic y P res entation Page 28 of 102 Energy Risk Management Policy Daniel N Bethapudi GM-Georgetown Electric 11/12/2019 Page 29 of 102 Energy Risk -Background •Energy Markets are extremely volatile •Power prices can change dramatically over the course of hours as evidenced by real time prices in the ERCOT market in summer 2019. •Natural Gas has ranged from less than $2 to $7 in the last 8-10 years. (Macrotrends.net) Page 30 of 102 ERCOT REAL TIME MARKET ON 9/22/2019 (Source: ERCOT, Non-Settlement Grade) Page 31 of 102 NATURAL GAS PRICE MOVEMENTS (2009-2017) (Source: macrotrends.net) Page 32 of 102 Energy Risk Management Policy -Purpose •The City of Georgetown is exposed to the risks associated with purchased power - Energy Risk. •Poorly managed Energy Risk can have a significant impact on the overall financial performance of the electric utility and the City and affect the ability to provide economic and reliable service to its customers. •To manage and control the energy risks associated with purchased power activities it is necessary to establish Energy Risk Management Policy. •Other reasons for Risk Management Policy •Improve predictability and stability of purchased power costs •Good risk management practices can help in credit ratings •ERCOT protocols require comprehensive risk management policies. Page 33 of 102 Energy Risk Management Policy -Purpose •Energy Risk Management Policy outlines a planned and pro-active approach to energy risk management versus passive approach. •The purpose of this policy is to clearly identify the risk management framework and elements that will help manage the energy risk and enhance the financial performance of the Georgetown Electric Utility and the City of Georgetown. •The risk management policy identifies the following to ensure that the energy risk exposures are properly identified, managed and reported on a pro-active and consistent basis. •Organizational Structures •The Risk Management Process •Management Responsibilities •Approved Risk Management Tools, Transactions And Activities •Operating Procedures •Reporting Requirements Page 34 of 102 Energy Risk Management Policy -Scope •This Policy governs all purchase power and related activities that may impact the Energy Risk profile of Georgetown Electric Utility. Activities that fall within the scope of this Policy include, but are not limited to, the following: –Wholesale Transactions (PPA, Bilateral Trades) –Independent System Operator (ISO)/ERCOT Market Transactions (DAM/RTM/AS/CRRs) –Energy hedging activities involving physical and financial energy products –Basis hedging activities involving energy products –All energy commodity trading –Counterparty contracting and credit management Page 35 of 102 Energy Risk Management Policy -Scope All transactions will be accomplished through hedging, not speculation. Hedging A hedge is used to reduce the physical product price fluctuation associated with its normal business activity of buying and selling electricity or natural gas. For example, a commodity hedge locks in a product price. As the price rises, the hedge will have an offsetting gain or, as price declines, the hedge will have an offsetting loss. Speculation Speculation is a bet on the future direction of price movements of assets. A key motivation to speculate is that the risk of loss is offset by the possibility of a huge gain. Speculation does not reduce the risk associated with normal business activities. Page 36 of 102 Energy Risk Management Policy Key Considerations and Limitations •The standards and requirements specified in this Policy constitute only a subset of the overall managerial and technical elements that are required to successfully manage and control energy risk. •The implementation of the risk management policy and its elements, by itself, will not guarantee a particular level of financial performance or energy risk control. •The efficacy of the risk management policy is contingent on the quality of execution and compliance. •Adverse and unprecedented conditions can produce more extreme levels of financial performance than forecasted using commonly-applied risk analysis methodologies. (Risk Elimination vs. Risk Management) •The implementation of the risk management policy or elements of the policy may create new sources of risk that may not have existed prior to the implementation of the policy. Page 37 of 102 Risk Types Covered by this Policy Risk is the uncertainty in Georgetown Electric and the City of Georgetown’s financial performance due to the following types of market conditions: •Market Risk is the due to uncertain commodity market prices (i.e. commodity price risk) and uncertain price relationships (basis risk). •Credit Risk is due to the chance of non-performance in payment or delivery (either physical or financial) by counterparties. •Volumetric Risk is due to the variability in native load peak demand and energy volumes, and in the quantity of energy deliveries under variable off-take energy contracts and/or option contracts. Page 38 of 102 Risk Types Covered by this Policy •Outage Risk is due to variability in the availability, curtailments, forced and/or planned outage rates of the facilities that Georgetown Electric has contractual entitlements. •Model Risk is due to the use of insufficiently accurate models for portfolio management decision making resulting in adverse financial outcomes. •Execution Risk is due to the lack of speed or accuracy of the transaction execution. •Operational Risk is due to inadequate or failed internal processes, people, internal systems, or from external events. Operational risk can also be exacerbated by inadequate or ineffective: –Internal controls –Transaction and/or strategy risk assessment –Segregation of duties –Management oversight –Staff resources, expertise and/or training –Protections against fraudulent actions by employees or third-parties Page 39 of 102 Energy Risk Management Organization Structure •Overall Policy Oversight Provided by City Council and GTEB •Independent 3rd Party provides Risk Management Compliance reporting to GTEB and City Council Page 40 of 102 Georgetown Electric Board(Proposed) (Proposed alternate to current GUS board) •Overall Policy Oversight Provided by City Council and GTEB •Receives Monthly Risk Management Policy updates from ROC/RMC •Independent 3rd Party provides Risk Management Compliance reporting Page 41 of 102 Risk Oversight Committee(ROC) •Approval and Compliance of Transaction and risk limits. •Provide inputs to the risk management strategy. •Receives weekly/monthly Risk Management updates from RMC. Page 42 of 102 Risk Management Committee(RMC) •Implement the risk management strategy approved by the ROC. •Review existing and potential transactions, monitor proximity to limits, and help support the responsibilities of the ROC. •Responsible for the day-to-day execution and management of transactions. Page 43 of 102 Page 44 of 102 Page 45 of 102 Next Steps •Receive Feedback and Direction •Develop Energy Risk Management Policy •Develop Energy Risk Management Procedures in conjunction with the Energy Manager/QSE. •Energy Risk Management Policy to be adopted during December 2019 council meeting Page 46 of 102 Questions? Page 47 of 102 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Workshop N ovember 12, 2019 S UBJEC T: P resentation, update, and discussion regarding the 2030 P lan and introduction to the Future Land Use Map -- Sofia Nelson, P lanning Director I T EM S UMMARY: P urpose of P resentation The 20 30 Comprehensive P lan Land Use Element is the launching point for other comprehensive plan elements (parks, transportation, etc.) and serves as a key input in the City’s master planning fo r utilities. At the 10/22 meeting an overview of the land use element was provided. The purpose of this presentation is summarized to include 4 main elements: To provide an overview of the role the fiscal impact model had in preparing the future land use map; To provide an overview of public outreach conducted since the 10/22 city council workshop; To provide the recommendation of the steering committee on the land use element; and To seek feedback from the City Council on the below questions. Feedback we are seeking on 11/12/19 Land Use P olicy: Do you seek additional information or amendments to the drafted land use policies? Future Land Use Categories: Do the descriptions for each category accurately depict the desired development? Do you support the recommended percentage of residential to non-residential development for each category? Future Land Use Map: Does the map reflect the goals and land use policies of the land use element? Do you seek additional information or amendments to the proposed map? F I NANC I AL I MPAC T: n/a S UBMI T T ED BY: Sofia Nelson, P lanning Director AT TAC HMENT S : Description P resentation P resentation 10/22 C ity C ounc il workshop Draft Land Use P olicies Draft F uture Land Use C ategories Draft F uture Land Use Map Page 48 of 102 Land Use Plan City Council Workshop November 12, 2019 Page 49 of 102 Presentation Outline I.Accomplishments since the 10.22. 2019 workshop II.Overview of the fiscal impact analysis III.Land Use Scenarios IV.Overview of Steering Committee Analysis Page 50 of 102 PART I. Accomplishments since the 10.22. 2019 workshop Page 51 of 102 Accomplishments since the 10.22. 2019 workshop •Planning and Zoning Commission review of Future Land Use Map •Outreach Efforts: •Mailed letters 400+ •Email distribution •300+ views on Facebook •Online map viewer •Individual meetings •Public Meeting on 10.30 •Steering Committee Meetings (2) Page 52 of 102 Planning & Zoning Commission Feedback 1.Modify Community Commercial percentage share of residential and non-residential land uses. 2.As we allow for greater density, continue to support open space. 3.Adjust density ranges upward, no need for an additional category. 4.Growth in mining is concerning and is impacting adjacent subdivisions. Page 53 of 102 Public Outreach Feedback 1.Additional commercial node needed at Williams Drive/Ronald Reagan. 2.Growth in mining is concerning and is impacting adjacent subdivisions. 3.Vision needed for infrastructure that is tied in with land use. Page 54 of 102 PART II. Overview of the fiscal impact analysis 2030 Land Use Goals Financial Impact Development Trends & Growth Scenarios Page 55 of 102 FISCAL IMPACT MODEL •Multiple scenarios allow testing and comparing •Property values •Timing •Type of land uses •Inform land use decisions and test “what if” alternatives •Test and compare potential financial incentives •Plan for short-and long-term operational and capital improvement impacts •Not an economic impact model Page 56 of 102 MODEL INPUTS & OUTPUTS •Inputs •Housing Units •Jobs •Population •Nonresidential acreage •Outputs •Nonresidential square feet •Residential taxable property value •Nonresidential taxable property •Net Fiscal Impact Page 57 of 102 PART III. Growth Scenarios Page 58 of 102 SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT Scenario 1: 2008 Plan Buildout Scenario 2: Citywide Trends Scenario 3: Steering Committee Table 1 Scenario 4: Steering Committee Table 2 Scenario 5: Combined Steering Committee Scenario 6: Citywide trend -commercial, increase residential Scenario 7: Citywide trends -residential, increase commercial Scenario 8: 2019 draft mapPage 59 of 102 SCENARIO –CITYWIDE TRENDS + Characteristic Existing Trend Steering Committee +20% Residential +15% Commercial Housing Units Population Jobs Commercial sq.footage Net Fiscal Impact Ratio of Revenue to Expenditure $1.04 $1.05 $1.01 $1.04 +++ = Page 60 of 102 PART IV. Overview of Steering Committee Analysis Page 61 of 102 What work have you done to update the FLUM? •Renamed and refined land use categories. •Divided parks and recreation and open space into separate categories. •Adjusted densities within categories. •Created Community Commercial and Regional Center categories. •Planned for land use with the use of legos •Added residential and non-residential ratios. •Utilized the fiscal impact model. Page 62 of 102 What are the benefits of the updates to the FLUM? •It helps citizens and developers understand the vision for the city as they plan for development of their property. •Expansion of mixed density opportunities •Greater integration of MF & Commercial •Addresses concerns of too much MF development •Increased and spread out opportunities for commercial nodes-this will help with traffic node and opportunities for amenities nearby. •Outlines possible densities •Created Regional Commercial and Community Commercial nodes . •Included ratios for non-residential and residential development •Helps to plan out infrastructure. Page 63 of 102 What concerns you about the updates to the FLUM? •Does the map reflect current infrastructure? Infrastructure drives development . •Clarity needed on how residential ratio were developed. •Understanding how the FLUM will be implemented. •Within nodes how will ratios be implemented ? •What is guidance vs. what will require a map amendment? Page 64 of 102 What concrete changes are needed, if any? •Clarify language regarding mix density residential. •Establish a priority land use for each category. Page 65 of 102 What final changes do you want to make, if any? Page 66 of 102 Land Use Element City Council Workshop –October 22, 2019 Page 67 of 102 MEETING PURPOSE The 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element is the launching point for other comprehensive plan elements (parks,transportation,etc.)and serves as a key input in the City’s master planning for utilities.Given the importance of the Land Use Element this presentation is the 1st of 2 presentations (2nd presentation is set for 11/12). The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of the update to the Land Use Element and allow you time to digest,review,and ask for additional information should it be necessary. Page 68 of 102 Presentation Outline I.Recap changes to land use policies II.Review proposed updates to the Future Land Use Plan, to include: a)Growth scenario development b)Factors of change c)Steering Committee guidance d)Land use category changes e)Key Future Land Use Plan changes III.Overview of next steps. Page 69 of 102 Feedback we are seeking on 11/12 •Policy: •Do you seek additional information or amendments to the drafted land use policies? •Future Land Use Categories: •Do the descriptions for each category accurately depict the desired development? •Do you support the recommended percentage of residential to non- residential development for each category? •Future Land Use Map: •Does the map reflect the goals and land use policies of the land use element? •Do you seek additional information or amendments to the proposed map? Page 70 of 102 LAND USE ELEMENT COMPONENTS Land Use Goal “Promote development patterns with balanced land uses that provide a variety of well- integrated housing…” Land Use Policy “Promote more compact, higher density, well- connected development within appropriate infill locations” Land Use Category Action: Modify density ranges in appropriate residential categories Growth Scenarios Action: Propose densities in anticipated or desired locations FLU Map Action: Compare results. Revise map & categories as needed Complete In progress In progress In progress In progress Page 71 of 102 I-Policies Recap and Update Page 72 of 102 HOW WE DRAFTED POLICIES Evaluated progress of 2008 policies Reviewed 2008 policies against 2030 updated goals and public input Sought input on land use issues: P&Z SC SC evaluated issues against goals, recommended solutions Revised where solution was present, drafted new policies where solutions did not exist Page 73 of 102 II. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN (FLUP) Growth scenario development, land use categories, key updates, and map Page 74 of 102 SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT Scenario 1: 2008 Plan Buildout Scenario 2: Citywide Trends Scenario 3: Steering Committee Table 1 Scenario 4: Steering Committee Table 2 Scenario 5: Combined Steering Committee Scenario 6: Citywide trend -commercial, increase residential Scenario 7: Citywide trends -residential, increase commercial Page 75 of 102 FACTORS FOR LAND USE CHANGE •Existing development patterns •Existing land use •Current zoning •Public input •2008 Future Land Use Plan •Retail recruitment •Target industries •Growth scenarios & fiscal impact Page 76 of 102 STEERING COMMITTEE GUIDANCE •Desire for vibrant, mixed use areas •Desire for mixed low-and moderate-density neighborhoods, but still a need a designation for only single-family neighborhoods •Desire to integrate limited higher-density housing with mixed use and commercial developments •Support findings from previous studies (Target Industry Analysis, Market Assessment, etc.) •Ensure intentional infrastructure planning to promote sustainability and fiscal responsibility Page 77 of 102 EXISTING LAND USE Page 78 of 102 (2008) FUTURE LAND USE Page 79 of 102 HOW WE DRAFTED LAND USECATEGORIES Community input and 2008 Plan Updated 2030 goals Updated 2030 policies to reflect goals Updated FLU categories to reflect policies Updated FLU map with revised categories Page 80 of 102 LAND USE CATEGORIES Residential Categories Nonresidential Categories Rural Residential –23.9%Neighborhood –22.2% Mixed-Density Neighborhood –17.8%Mixed Use Center –1.1% Community Center –3.2%Regional Center –3.5% Employment Center –5.3%Institutional –1.6% Parks and Recreation –1.1%Open Space –12.5% Mining –7.6% Page 81 of 102 KEY UPDATE #1 –CATEGORY DESCRIPTIONS Improved narratives Page 82 of 102 KEY UPDATE #2-RESIDENTIAL CATGEORIES Categories (proposed)Density Target Ratio of Land Use Mix Rural Residential ≤1.0 DUA 5% non-residential, 95% residential Neighborhood ≤ 5.0 DUA 10% non-residential, 90% residential Mixed-Density Neighborhood ≤14.0 DUA . 20% non-residential, 80% residential Page 83 of 102 KEY UPDATE #3-NON-RESIDENTIAL CATEGORIES 2008 FLU Categories (existing) 2030 Plan Update Categories (proposed) Intent Target Ratio of Land Use Mix Special Area Mixed Use Mixed Use Center Accommodate traditional mixed-use developments that create a center of activity not only in the day, but also at night and on weekends. 60% non-residential, 40% residential Mixed Use Community Community Center Create areas which accommodate local retail, professional office, and service- oriented businesses that serve the residents of Georgetown. Moderate and high density residential is appropriate if/when supporting existing commercial or as part of a planned development. 80% non-residential, 20% residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Community Commercial High Density Residential Page 84 of 102 KEY UPDATE #3-NON-RESIDENTIAL CATEGORIES 2008 FLU Categories (existing) 2030 Plan Update Categories (proposed) Intent Target Ratio of Land Use Mix High Density Residential Regional Center Accommodate commercial uses that serve or draw regional market. Moderate and high density residential is appropriate if/when supporting existing commercial or as part of a planned development. 75% non-residential, 25% residentialRegional Commercial Employment Center Employment Center Facilitate development of well planned, large-scale employment and business activities, as well as supporting secondary uses, which may include moderate and high density residential options. 90% non-residential, 10% residential Page 85 of 102 KEY UPDATE #3-NON-RESIDENTIAL CATEGORIES 2008 FLU Categories (existing) 2030 Plan Update Categories (proposed) Intent Target Ratio of Land Use Mix Parks, Recreation, Open Space Parks and Recreation Parks, trails, and other recreational amenities should be integrated into and easily accessible from residential neighborhoods and developments. 100% non-residential Open Space Floodplains and other natural areas that are preserved as open space. 100% non-residential Page 86 of 102 KEY UPDATE #4 Refinements to the Rural Residential/Neighborhood boundaries 2008 Page 87 of 102 KEY UPDATE #5 Transitioned Mixed Use Community to Neighborhoods/ Mixed Density Neighborhoods 2008 Page 88 of 102 KEY UPDATE #6 Refinement of Regional and Community Nodes 2008 Page 89 of 102 KEY UPDATE #7 Refinement of Employment Center locations 2008 Page 90 of 102 KEY UPDATE #8 Mixed Use Center to identify locations appropriate for master planning 2008 Page 91 of 102 PROPOSED FLUP Page 92 of 102 CURRENT VS. PROPOSED FLUP Current FLUP Proposed FLUP Page 93 of 102 III. NEXT STEPS Page 94 of 102 REMAINING STEPS Fall and Winter 2019 •10/22: City Council workshop on Land Use Element (1st of 2) •10/30: Public meeting to review draft Future Land Use Map and Land Use policies •11/7: Steering Committee 1st presentation on Implementation •11/12: City Council Workshop on Land Use Element (2nd of 2) •11/21: Steering Committee 2nd presentation on Implementation •12/10: City Council Workshop on Implementation (1st of 2) January-February 2020: •January 14th : City Council Workshop on Implementation (2nd of 2) •Public Outreach on 2030 Plan Update DRAFT •Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing to consider recommendation of 2030 Plan Update •City Council public hearings to consider adoption of 2030 Plan Update Page 95 of 102 Draft as of 10/11/2019 1 #Policy Public Input Technical Studies Possible Tools Specific Example Solution Group Outcome Role 2030 Goal 1: Promote development patterns with balanced land uses that provide a variety of well-integrated housing and retail choices, transportation, public facilities, and recreational options in all parts of Georgetown. 1.A. Encourage a balanced mix of residential, commercial, and employment uses at varying densities and intensities, to reflect a gradual transition from urban to suburban to rural development. "A well balanced mixture of housing and commercial enterprises." (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) "Maintain existing neighborhoods and downtown areas. Expand with mixed-use and a variety of housing types/sizes." (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) Overlays, transition zones (Downtown Master Plan), Corridor Plans (Williams Drive) UDC amendments Ensure proper transitions and buffering between established neighborhoods and adjacent commercial and manufacturing areas. Flexibility in Development Patterns Diversify tax base and concentrate development; Balance Supportive Uses Lead 1.B. Promote more compact, higher density, well- connected development within appropriate infill locations. "Higher density, new urbanistic downtown that is walkable and fully developed..." (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) Land Use element - FLU map and categories Future Land Use Categories and UDC amendments - improved standards for commercial development Establish standards appropriate for new residential development pertaining to lot sizes, open space, buffers, road connectivity, etc. Ensure that development is compatible in character with the surrounding context. UDC amendments for buffering adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Apply neighborhood conservation strategies, such as code enforcement, housing rehabilitation, and support for urban homesteading for first time buyers. Intentional Infrastructure Transportation Mapping Strategies Use infrastructure to promote desired development patterns Lead 2030 Goal 2: Reinvest in Georgetown’s existing neighborhoods and commercial areas to build on previous City efforts. 2.A.Remove barriers to Encourage redevelopment in target areas. "I think current businesses should be updated, like the old HEB on University and 35 is gross, moldy, and a huge health concern." (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) Land Use element UDC amendments Utility Master Plan Small Area Planning Capital Improvement Planning Review standards for impervious cover, parking, height Incentivize redevelopment in target areas through infrastructure Intentional Infrastructure Utilize existing infrastructure and support vibrant places Lead 2.C. 2.B. Identify potential opportunities and selectively target, plan, and promote development/reuse initiatives. "Revitalized neighborhoods continued, beautification and community pride increased." (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) CIP, Williams Drive, Housing Element Small Area Planning Special Districts (Business Improvement Districts/Tax Increment Reinvestment Zones- TIRZs) Identified areas could qualify for additional infrastructure improvements, development/renovation incentives, additional flexibility in development regulations to encourage redevelopment. Economic Development Preserve and enhance existing neighborhoods LeadDRAFT Page 96 of 102 Draft as of 10/11/2019 2 #Policy Public Input Technical Studies Possible Tools Specific Example Solution Group Outcome Role 2030 Goal 3: Provide a development framework that guides fiscally responsible growth, protects historic community character, demonstrates stewardship of the environment, and provides for effective provision of public services and facilities. 2.D. 3.A. Continue to promote diversification of uses while strengthening the historic character and supporting the existing historic neighborhoods. "Keep Georgetown's historic style while improving the city." (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) "A community with diverse options for housing, transportation, and work. Maintain small town feel where possible." (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) Downtown Master Plan; Vision Statement - "Georgetown: A caring community honoring our past and innovating for the future" FLU categories, zoning, incentives Review permitted uses in downtown to ensure sufficient variety Economic Development Mapping Strategies Support existing neighborhoods Lead New 3.B Strengthen Georgetown’s image and indentity as a small town quality feel within enhanced gateways and commercial corridors. "I would hope that it still has a small town feel." (2030 Plan Update Survey) "If you're concerned about gateways, keep Georgetown's appearance that of a small town." (Gateways MQ) Williams Drive Study, Gateways, CIP Special Districts Development Agreements Zoning Small Area Planning Implement landscaping and other design regulations to improve corridor aesthetics. - Add/increase funding for beautification of specific areas along Gateways through WilCo Master Gardeners, scout groups, etc. - Renegotiate TxDOT ROW beautification Agreement to ensure better maintenance and standards - Designate 5% of project cost of all new roadway improvements associated with the gateway corridors to be applied to landscape and road frontage beautification Economic Development Intentional Infrastructure Support Georgetown's unique identity Lead New 3.C Proactively support existing and recruit new employers and incentivize development that is consistent with Georgetown's target industries and that support diversification of the City's tax base and promote economic development. Protect and promote land uses that support Georgetown’s target industries, support diversification of the City’s tax base and enhance economic development through intentional infrastructure planning, recruitment and the land use entitlement process. "...diversity of business (large and small), include industry for local employment, cater to start ups and innovative research and development…" (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) "I would like see Georgetown become the scouting city for major employers…" (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) Target Industry Analysis - target industries and potential partners; ED Strategic Plan - Strategic Goal 1: Support existing businesses and industries.; Strategic Goal 2: Enhance targeted recruitment of identified industries.; Strategic Goal 3: Diversify workforce development and recruitment initiatives. Business Improvement Districts Small Area Planning Utility Master Plan 4a & 4B sales tax initiatives Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Coordination of Land use plan & Georgetown Economic Development Corporation (GEDCO) Strengthen relationship with Georgetown Development Alliance Economic Development Collaboration Intentional Infrastructure Diversify tax base and provide employment Partner New 3.D Adopt development practices that promote economic development and preserve and enhance the environment. "A city that prioritizes the environment with rich renewable energy incentives (residential and commercial) and land/wildlife preservation." (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) Water Conservation Plan - "The City of Georgetown has a long standing commitment to water conservation and the efficient use of our natural resources." Water Conservation Plan Stormwater Master Plan Solid Waste Master Plan Construction Standards and Specifics Manual Educational and incentive programs; UDC amendments Low Impact Development Standard Water conservation, energy conservation, air/water quality, compact/walkable development, urban heat island, support existing initiatives. Intentional Infrastructure Green Space Reduce environmental impact Lead DRAFT Page 97 of 102 Draft as of 10/11/2019 3 #Policy Public Input Technical Studies Possible Tools Specific Example Solution Group Outcome Role New 3.E Develop and apply approval standards for annexation and creation of special districts. Support the City’s growth and development using a decisional framework that promotes fiscal health, safety and quality of life for our current and future residents. “Please do not listen to the naysayer, and do not limit growth! Be progressive in your growth, but use good zoning in the process.” – Survey 1 “I know that we are going to grow, but I don't want that growth to eclipse the character that we enjoy now.” – Survey 1 “Strongly continue this small town environment, not to grow so large with what appears to be adhoc development like Round Rock and Cedar Park.” – Survey 1 “It's growing so fast. Hate to lose the small town feel.” – Survey 1 “W hile growth is inevitable, I’d like to see it balanced with larger considerations of overall quality of State of the City - expansion of city limits & ETJ acreage since 2008 Fiscal Impact Model (Cost to serve) MUD/PID Policies Utility Master Plan - waste water requirement UDC Criteria for Annexation Outside of existing development pattern, are we accepting annexation proposals that meet specific City objectives? Density and development cannot happen without utility provision, primarily waste water. Intentional Infrastructure Collaboration Intentional growth that meets land use and economic development strategies Lead DRAFT Page 98 of 102 Draft as of 10/11/2019 4 #Policy Public Input Technical Studies Possible Tools Specific Example Solution Group Outcome Role 2030 Goal 6: Ensure access to diverse housing options and preserve existing neighborhoods, for residents of all ages, backgrounds and income levels. 1.E. 6. A Expand regulatory provisions and incentives to Encourage innovative forms of compact, pedestrian friendly development and a wider array of affordable housing choices through provisions and incentives. "Enhance walkability with wider sidewalks or independent bike trail integration." (RoundTable - Stakeholder Feedback) "We have a need for affordable housing. People are moving here and we need to ensure everyone is welcome. Right now, that is not the case." (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) Williams Drive Study, Land Use Element, Housing Element Mixed uses in FLU categories Zoning standards (UDC amendments) Sidewalk Master Plan Small Area Planning Adopt ratios of preferred land use mixes Housing Diversity Intentional Infrastructure Green Space Provide more housing options and support vibrant places Lead 2030 Goal 7: Maintain high-quality infrastructure, public safety services, and community facilities. New 7.A Support public safety services and community facilities infrastructure to ensure that Georgetown continues to be a safe, family- friendly welcoming community which that serves all residents. "Continue providing safety thru the fire and police departments." (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) OTP - pedestrian and bike planning; GUS mission statement - "To provide safe, reliable, efficient and cost-effective utility services to customers in order to enhance the quality of life of the community" Georgetown Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Plan Public Safety Plan Emergency Management Plan Stormwater Master Plan CIP/annual budget; ensure that public safety services funding increases with population growth Update Emergency Management Plan to reflect new organizational structure, update to meet new community needs Complete a So Evaluate emergency response staffing as a function of growth Intentional Infrastructure Maintain quality of life Lead 2030 Goal 8: Actively partner with GISD, Williamson County, other governmental agencies, and local organizations to leverage resources and promote innovation. New 8.A Promote development decisions that serve the needs of Georgetown Independent School District and Williamson County our interlocal government partners. "Wider sidewalks near Gtown high school leading into downtown (6-8 ft.)" (Downtown RoundTable) Alignment; GISD Strategic Plan - "Collaborative environments that give voice and offer ownership to stakeholders are essential to meeting current and future needs."; Citizen Participation Plan: "Goal 3: Enhance our relationships and communication with community organizations" Incorporate Institutional Facilities on FLU. Include in special districts and development agreements. Trigger for coordinated discussion with GISD (see San Antonio for subdivisions of 200 lots or greater) Joint Use Agreements, connectivity to/from the school Collaboration Intentional Infrastructure Maximize resources and foster effective partnerships Partner 2030 Goal 9: Maintain and add to the existing quality parks and recreation. New 9.A Ensure that the subdivision and development process includes consideration of the way in which residential lots relate to parks and open space, emphasizing adjacency and accessibility to parks and open space. "Strong, robust parks system for families to enjoy." (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) "Walkable, lots of trails connecting parks and neighborhoods, access to shopping for walkers and bicyclists, great schools, prioritizing green space." (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) Parks, Rec, and Trails Master Plan - incorporate in future update UDC amendments Prohibit lots from backing to public/shared open space; single-loaded streets are more desirable for access and to reduce risk of creek erosion into private property. Green Space Intentional Infrastructure Maximize parks and open spaces and support property values Lead 2030 Goal 10: Improve and diversify the transportation network. 2.B. 10.A Proactively plan investments in transportation and other infrastructure to leverage partnerships with the business community and interested neighborhood organizations and maintain the level of service as the City continues to grow. "I would love to see much improvement and planning of traffic patterns." (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) "With the expected growth in Georgetown there needs to be related expansion of the transportation infrastructure . Continue to bring in restaurants, larger hotels and entertainment." (2030 Plan Update Survey #1) ED Strategic Plan - Strategic Goal 4: Encourage speculative development OTP, Utilities Master Plan, CIP; GUS mission statement - "To provide safe, reliable, efficient and cost-effective utility services to customers in order to enhance the quality of life of the community." CIP/annual budget Project funding prioritized in targeted areas/ED purposes Intentional Infrastructure Transportation Utilize infrastructure as an economic development tool Lead DRAFT Page 99 of 102 Draft as of 11/8/2019 2008 FLU Categories (existing)Intent Character Target Ratio of Land Use Mix Example Image Considerations Agricultural Rural Residential Rural Residential ≤1.0 DUA Retain rural character and ʺsmall town feelʺ Facilitate low‐intensity development in areas where utilities do not exist and are not planned These large lot, low‐density areas should preserve the rural atmosphere of Georgetown. Homes should be traditional, single‐family residences with large front yard setbacks from roadways and large side yard setbacks separating homes to reinforce the rural openness. Supporting non‐residential uses may be located along major thoroughfares with large setbacks and natural buffers from neighboring residential. 5% non‐residential, 95% residential No major changes recommended. Low Density Residential Neighborhood ≤ 5.0 DUA Facilitate traditional single‐family development. Neighborhood character should focus on maintaining a suburban atmosphere. Conservation subdivisions (also referred to as “clustering”) should be encouraged to preserve open space and environmentally‐sensitive areas. Development standards should ensure adequate open space and efficient roadway and pedestrian connectivity to schools, neighborhood amenities and parks. Supporting non‐residential uses should be similar in scale to the residential properties, include appropriate landscaping and buffering and be located on major thoroughfares. 10% non‐residential, 90% residential Increased density better reflects recent development trends (18% of lots are smaller than the current 3.0 DUA). Supports policies of housing variety and more compact development. Potential for community concern on increased densities. Moderate Density Residential Mixed‐Density Neighborhood ≤ 14.0 DUA Enable a variety of low and medium density housing types and supporting nonresidential uses. Create flexibility in residential land uses to accommodate City housing policies. Use zoning regulations to ensure compatibility. Medium density housing options should be consistent with and complementary to the traditional single‐family neighborhood with emphasis on connectivity and access to neighborhood amenities including schools and parks. Development standards for medium density housing and any non‐residential uses should be in place to ensure this compatibility through increased setbacks for taller buildings, architectural designs that are consistent with the neighborhood, and enhanced landscaping. Additionally, any non‐residential uses should be located primarily at larger intersections, and should include appropriate buffering and pedestrian orientation to support the surrounding residents. 20% non‐residential, 80% residential Increased density better aligns with actual density of mixed density neighborhoods. Increased density supports policies through allowing a mix of single‐family, duplexes, and townhomes. Duplexes and townhomes may not be appropriate or desirable in all neighborhoods designated as MDN. Potential for land use incompatibility or conflicts with traditional single‐family homes. Special Area Mixed Use Mixed Use Center Accommodate traditional mixed‐use developments that create a center of activity not only in the day, but also at night and on weekends. This category encourages the creation of planned areas that integrate a variety of complementary uses, with an emphasis on retail, offices, and entertainment activities. These centers should be unique destinations with emphasis on building design, landscaping and the inclusion of public plazas, green spaces and areas for the public to gather. As the most walkable land use category, these areas should be designed in a pattern of pedestrian‐oriented, storefront‐style shopping streets, with shared parking and strong pedestrian linkages to the surrounding areas. Consideration should be given to adjacent residential uses to ensure compatibility and minimize impacts on neighborhoods. Development Specific No major changes recommended. Mixed Use Community Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Community Commercial High Density Residential High Density Residential Regional Commercial Note that these categories now include high‐ density residential/multi‐family. Encourages reservation & integration of MF into commercial developments, supports policies of housing variety and compactness. May need to limit amount of MF to avoid losing key potential retail locations. 2030 Plan Update Categories (proposed) 75% non‐residential, 25% residential 14.0+ DUA Accommodate commercial uses that serve or draw regional market. Moderate and high density residential is appropriate if/when supporting existing commercial or as part of a planned development. Developments may be configured as major shopping centers, stand‐alone big‐box retailers, or large‐scale mixed‐use developments, as well as supporting flex office space and office/warehouse development. Well integrated residential developments, which encourage the interaction of residents and businesses, are appropriate and vertical mixed use encouraged. These developments are typically automobile‐oriented with convenient access from major transportation routes and highway interchanges, however internal pedestrian connectivity should be maximized and include opportunities for pedestrian activity. 75% non‐residential, 25% residentialRegional Center Community Center 14.0+ DUA Create areas which accommodate local retail, professional office, and service‐oriented businesses that serve the residents of Georgetown. Moderate and high density residential is appropriate if/when supporting existing commercial or as part of a planned development. These areas are typically configured as “nodes” of smaller scale at the intersection of arterial roads, or at the intersection of arterials and collectors. These developments provide local retail, professional office, and service‐oriented businesses that serve the residents of Georgetown. While typically auto‐oriented, pedestrian connections to the surrounding neighborhoods should be provided. Well integrated residential developments, which encourage the interaction of residents and businesses, are appropriate and vertical mixed use encouraged. To promote the interaction of integrated and adjacent residential development, these areas should emphasize quality building and site design, such as enhanced architectural features, landscaping, and prominent pedestrian facilities. Page 100 of 102 Draft as of 11/8/2019 2008 FLU Categories (existing)Intent Character Target Ratio of Land Use Mix Example Image Considerations 2030 Plan Update Categories (proposed) Employment Center Employment Center 14.0+ DUA Facilitate development of well planned, large‐scale employment and business activities, as well as supporting secondary uses, which may include moderate and high density residential options. These uses should support quality employment uses with environments that support heightened economic activity through quality architectural design and well‐integrated supporting uses such as retail, restaurants. The inclusion of high density residential is appropriate as a supporting use to these areas of commerce and employment. Because these areas often act as a transition between more intensely developed industrial uses and residential neighborhoods, standards should be developed to ensure that development of these activities is compatible with the character of the surrounding area. Care should be taken to protect adjacent uses from adverse impacts potentially associated with existing industrial uses (commercial traffic, outside storage, etc.), using buffering and/or performance‐based development standards. 80% non‐residential, 20% residential No major changes recommended. Institutional Institutional Uses that serve the community These facilities should project a positive image of the community and should be located to provide ample public access.100% non‐residential No major changes recommended. Parks and Recreation Public parks and recreational areas Parks, trails, and other recreational amenities should be integrated into and easily accessible from residential neighborhoods and developments.None No major changes recommended. Open Space Preserved natural areas Floodplains and other natural areas that are preserved as open space. None No major changes recommended. Mining Mining Current mining operations Care should be taken to protect adjacent uses from adverse impacts associated with these activities.None No major changes recommended. Parks, Recreation, Open Space Page 101 of 102 C R1 0 5 M A Y S DEL WEBB F M 1 4 6 0 F M 971 W O L F R A N C H J I M H O G G CR 105 RIVERY W OLF R A NCH F M97 2 AUSTIN R M 2 3 3 8 C R17 6 BERR YCREEK I N N E R I N NER INNER CR262 AUSTIN SH 195 C R 1 0 0 S T A D I U M F M 3405 N O R T H W E S T R O N A L D W R E A G A N S H 2 9 U N I V E R S I T Y C R 2 6 1 F M 1 4 60 C R 1 0 3 S O U T H W E S T PATRIOT R O N A L D W R E A G A N D B W O O D C R 1 4 0 C R 2 4 5 C R 1 1 0 S A M H O U S T O N R O N A L D W R E A G A N SH 29 S H E L L C R O S S C R EEK CR 234 LAK E WAY RM 2338 I N D I A N S P R I N G S C R 1 0 5 F M 9 7 1 O L D 195 C R 1 4 1 C R 2 4 1 L E A N D E R S O U T H W E S T CR 1 0 6 C R 1 5 2 C R 1 4 3 C R 1 5 0 §¨¦35 §¨¦35 UV29 UV195 UV29 UV130 Working Future Land Use MapNovember 7, 2019 Land Uses Rural Residential Neighborhood Mixed Density Neighborhood Community Center Special Area Regional Center Em ployment Center Institutional Mining Parks and Recreation Open Space Georgetown City Limits Georgetown ETJ Created By Freese and Nichols, Inc.Job No.: GEO18240Location: H:\URBAN_PLANNING\working\PlanningMapFlup2019Nov7.mxdUpdated: Thursday, November 7, 2019 7:35:11 AM Note:A comprehensive plan shall notconstitute zoning regulations orestablish zoning district boundar ie s. 0 1 20.5 Miles ® Page 102 of 102