The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda CC 05.26.2015 WorkshopNotice of Meeting of the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown, Texas MAY 26, 2015 The Georgetown City Council will meet on MAY 26, 2015 at 3:00 P.M. at the City Council Chambers, 101 E. 7th St., Georgetown, TX The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary's Office, least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Policy Development/Review Workshop - A Overview of 2015 Appraisal Values for Georgetown and Williamson County -- Alvin Lankford, Chief Appraiser, Williamson Central Appraisal District and Mick Rundell, Chief Financial Officer B Overview of Signature Destination Operations and Budget -- Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager C Overview of the 2015/2016 Georgetown Utility Systems (GUS) Business Plan, and Forwarded from the Georgetown Utility Systems Advisory Board (GUS), Capital Budgets -- Jim Briggs, General Manager of Utilities and Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director D Overview of the 2015/2016 Transportation Services Business Plan, Operation and Capital Budgets -- Edward G. Polasek, AICP and Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director Executive Session In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session. E Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney - Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items - Litigation Update- Spencer EEOC Claim - Williams Drive Project- Claim Settlement Sec. 551.074: Personnel Matters - City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal Sec. 551.086: Competitive Matters - Forwarded from the Georgetown Utility Systems Advisory Board (GUS): Presentation and discussion on the 2015-16 Electric Capital Improvement Plan – Wesley Wright, Systems Engineering Director Adjournment Certificate of Posting I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all times, on the _____ day of _________________, 2015, at __________, and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. __________________________________ Jessica Brettle, City Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Agenda May 26, 2015 SUBJECT: Overview of 2015 Appraisal Values for Georgetown and Williamson County -- Alvin Lankford, Chief Appraiser, Williamson Central Appraisal District and Mick Rundell, Chief Financial Officer ITEM SUMMARY: Alvin Lankford, Chief Appraiser for Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD) will present information regarding the Districts services to property owners as well as provide an overview of the City’s 2015 Assessed Valuation. ATTACHMENTS To be provided at the meeting. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None SUBMITTED BY: Becky Huff Cover Memo Item # A City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Agenda May 26, 2015 SUBJECT: Overview of Signature Destination Operations and Budget -- Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Laurie Brewer/jd ATTACHMENTS: Signature Destination Presentation Cover Memo Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget Council Focus Area - Signature Destination May 26, 2015 FY 2015-2016 BUDGET WORKSHOP Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget BUDGET PROCESS DEBT OVERVIEW FOCUS AREA: SIGNATURE DESTINATION FIVE YEAR PLAN UPDATE COMPENSATION, BENEFITS, & SELF INSURANCE FOCUS AREA: UTILITY & CIP BUDGET PARKING LOT FOCUS AREA: TRANSPORTATION & CIP FOCUS AREA: CROSSCUTTING THEMES A NNUAL BUDGET PRESENTATION FOCUS AREA: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & CIP BUDGET PUBLIC HEARINGS FOCUS AREA: PUBLIC SAFETY BUDGET ADOPTION GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FISCAL AND BUDGETARY POLICY Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget Council Focus Areas 1.Pursue the necessary steps to adopt the updated Downtown Master Plan, including the pursuit of a Downtown Civic Center concept, and increased parking opportunities and parking facilities. 2.Identify prioritized projects from the Downtown Master Plan and implement through the Annual Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Downtown Tax Incremental Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) and identify on an annual basis the resources to maintain and expand the Downtown. 3.Establish priorities of our major parks for San Gabriel Park, Garey Park, and the Westside Park by developing detailed business plans that include financial and development timelines. 4.Continue to focus on the maintenance of parks and trails by establishing ongoing maintenance schedules, equipment replacement schedules, and improvements to existing facilities. 5.Conduct a comprehensive review and feasibility report of the impact of current ordinance regulations Downtown, as well as recommended changes to improve the access and appearance of the Central Business District. 6.As part of an Overall Transit Plan, examine the potential implementation of a Trolley Transit System that would connect the Downtown to other key visitor and economic assets in the community. 7.Work with the County and Development Builders on the connection of trails consistent with the City’s adopted Trail Master Plan Program. 8.Conduct annual surveys and outreach to users on the role, interaction, and their experience with the Historical and Architectural Review Commission (HARC) in the Central Business District. 9.Work collaboratively with the private sector to increase the retail and finish out the adopted Rivery concept. Signature Destination (S) Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget AGENDA •Signature Destination – Strategic Plan •Major Capital Improvements •Initiatives and combined efforts •Operational issues – 2016 Budget •Wrap Up and Questions Attachment number 1 \nPage 4 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget SIGNATURE DESTINATION •Signature is something that lasts •The threads of the community that will be enduring •The elements that make Georgetown a special place to live •Authentic •Quality of Life •Staff and Boards working on business plans •Consulting with Boards – Convention & Visitors Bureau/Tourism, Arts and Culture, Main Street, Parks, Historic and Architecture Review Commission, Library Board on work plans/target areas •Partnerships with non-profits to ensure compatibility and synergy Attachment number 1 \nPage 5 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget SIGNATURE DESTINATION Departments/Areas •Parks & Recreation, City Facilities •Public Library •Convention & Visitors Bureau/Tourism •Arts and Culture •Main Street •Housing •Historic Preservation/Architectural review •Downtown Master Plan •Public Information and Marketing Attachment number 1 \nPage 6 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget SIGNATURE DESTINATION Attachment number 1 \nPage 7 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget SIGNATURE DESTINATION Attachment number 1 \nPage 8 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget SIGNATURE DESTINATION OBJECTIVES •Parks Development and Recreation Focus •Downtown Development and Master Plan •Arts, Culture, Entertainment, Food and Lodging enhancement •Marketing and Promotion •Public Information and Communication •Preservation Programs •Workforce Housing •Enhanced Public Facilities and Services Attachment number 1 \nPage 9 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2015 •Parks and Recreation Focus •Garey Park Operations and Maintenance Plan •Playscape Replacement •San Gabriel Park Master Plan •Splash Pad at San Jose Park •Village Park upgrades •VFW Park design •Westside Park planning Attachment number 1 \nPage 10 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2015 •Downtown Development •Parking Study (due to Council June 9) •Parking lot at 8 th and MLK (in progress) •Plan for Downtown West City Center •8th Street improvements •9th Street improvements and sidewalk •Downtown TIRZ expansion Attachment number 1 \nPage 11 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2015 •Arts and Culture •Cultural District Designation by Texas Commission on the Arts •Texas Downtown Association Award for the “Best Public Improvement” for the Art Center 2014 •Mural selection for Saddlery building •Marketing and Promotion (CVB) •Public Relations firm selection •Hiring convention service support staff •TDA Award for “Best Marketing Program” with the Most Beautiful Town Square in Texas campaign •Public Information and Communication •2014 Annual Report •Website Redesign (in progress) •Hiring Multi-Media Specialist •100% Renewable annoucement Attachment number 1 \nPage 12 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2015 •Preservation Programs •Citizens Memorial Cemetery •Preservation month activities •Historic Tax Credits educational program •Historic District review and update •Grace Heritage Center analysis •Workforce Housing •Identification of prime areas •Housing incentives – UDC amendment draft •Gateway Northwest facilitation •Facilities and Services •Commissioning of public safety building •Adoption of multi-hazard mitigation plan Attachment number 1 \nPage 13 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget OBJECTIVE: PARKS DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATIONAL FOCUS •Garey Park Development •Complete West Side Park Master Plan •Begin San Gabriel Park renovations – Phased plan •Complete VFW Park renovations/Sports Tourism •Recreation Programming/Facilities Reservation Software Replacement Attachment number 1 \nPage 14 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget OBJECTIVE: DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AND MASTER PLAN •Downtown West Civic Center (Capital Improvement) •Include Shotgun House in programming •Consider amphitheater/performance area •Wayfinding Signage/Parking Signage (Main Street) •Sidewalk improvements (with Transportation/2015 Bonds) •Traffic Signal/Protected Pedestrian Crossing at Austin & 5th •Grace Heritage Center renovation •Begin marketing city facilities on the square for repurposing •Move Visitor Center to larger location Attachment number 1 \nPage 15 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget OBJECTIVE: ARTS, CULTURE, ENTERTAINMENT, FOOD AND LODGING •Increase library staffing for additional circulation and programming •Promote and support the Sheraton Georgetown Conference Center, including a regular shuttle •Feasibility study for 8th Street Courtyard •Secure source of holiday lighting funding •Funding for Breakfast Bites presenters to train local and prospective businesses •Support small businesses in Downtown through enhanced 3- hour parking enforcement •Increase wayfinding signage Attachment number 1 \nPage 16 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget OBJECTIVE: MARKETING AND PROMOTION •Increase marketing to recognize designation as a Cultural District from the Texas Commission on the Arts •Increase paid staffing for Visitor Center coverage Attachment number 1 \nPage 17 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget OBJECTIVE: PUBLIC INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION •Increase use of video and other methods to encourage citizen participation and increase citizen education •Research innovative ways to engage citizens in the government processes •Conduct citizen survey to use in budgeting and planning processes Attachment number 1 \nPage 18 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget OBJECTIVE: PRESERVATION PROGRAMS •Historic Landmark Incentives •Complete Historic Resource Survey •Historic Home Fair – Historic and Architecture Review Outreach •Implement Old Town residential infill guidelines Attachment number 1 \nPage 19 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget OBJECTIVE: WORKFORCE HOUSING •Conduct public meetings and survey workforce and senior households to collect trend data on housing needs to create a strategic plan to provide workforce housing. •Work with the Planning Department to include workforce housing locations in the 2030 Land Use update. •Review neighborhood housing conditions to proactively target neighborhood improvement and maintain existing housing stock. Attachment number 1 \nPage 20 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget OBJECTIVE: PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES •Downtown West Civic Center – implement public areas •Animal Shelter Master Plan •Public Facilities Element of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan •Future library branches, children and senior programming, pools, animal services, fire stations, other services •Begin implementation of Infor Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) system for facilities and parks maintenance Attachment number 1 \nPage 21 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget Operational Impacts FY2013 Actual FY2014 Actual FY2015 Budget Downtown & Community Services 88.50 90.50 103.50 FTE Count Program FY2011 Actuals FY2012 Actuals FY2013 Actuals FY2014 Actuals FY2015 Budget Downtown & Community Services Admin 90,038 379,758 530,980 597,388 Parks Administration 467,654 314,203 346,325 374,260 386,999 Library 1,653,529 1,615,257 1,702,499 1,856,620 2,072,567 Arts & Culture 79,490 Parks 1,791,229 1,810,966 1,895,814 2,145,218 2,241,420 Recreation 1,843,283 1,880,517 1,965,398 2,027,936 2,280,626 Recreation Programs 1,572,345 1,553,826 1,624,250 1,752,555 1,784,163 Communications Office - 375,745 348,321 General Fund Programs (5 -year trend) Attachment number 1 \nPage 22 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget Operational Impacts – Library/Arts/Culture Budget •Library –Return on investment last year $12,022,994 (559,209) –Circulation per capita = 10.77 (State average 5.33) –Approximately 4,000 reserves waiting to be filled (7 to 1 ratio) –Approximately 2,400 items uncatalogued –20%-25% of circulation comes from new materials (currently at 16%) •Arts and Culture –Marketing the Cultural District Attachment number 1 \nPage 23 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget Operational Impacts – Parks, Recreation, Facilities •Parks and Rec Software replacement –Maintenance on existing Class Software to end 2017 –Tracks all rentals, programs, memberships and revenue •Ballfield Maintenance/Sports Tourism –7 tournament style softball fields; 30-40 teams per weekend; trash, restrooms and field maintenance •Administrative support for programs –Facilities department admin duties; increase in rentals, deposits, cemetery calls, work orders, PO’s, front desk coverage –Last Administrative addition in 2010 –Rentals increased 25% Attachment number 1 \nPage 24 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget Operational Impacts – Other Areas •Workforce Housing Plan – resources for support and research •Parking enforcement •Holiday lighting funding •Historic Resource Survey funding •CVB – move to the Council Chambers •Visitor Center increased staffing Attachment number 1 \nPage 25 of 26 Item # B FY2016 Annual Budget Questions? Attachment number 1 \nPage 26 of 26 Item # B City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Agenda May 26, 2015 SUBJECT: Overview of the 2015/2016 Georgetown Utility Systems (GUS) Business Plan, and Forwarded from the Georgetown Utility Systems Advisory Board (GUS), Capital Budgets -- Jim Briggs, General Manager of Utilities and Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director ITEM SUMMARY: Council to receive overview of the 2015/2016 Georgetown Utility Systems (GUS) Business Plan and Capital Budgets. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Georgetown Utility Systems Capital Improvement Plan. GUS BOARD RECOMMENDATION: The GUS Board unanimously approved the proposed 2015/2016 Capital Improvement Plan at the board meeting held on May 8, 2015. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Please see attached presentation and CIP documentation. SUBMITTED BY: Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director ATTACHMENTS: FY2016 Utility Focus Area and CIP Utilities CIP Packet Cover Memo Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Georgetown Utility Systems Focus Area: Utility Budget and CIP FY2016 City Council May 26, 2015 Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Budget Process DEBT OVERVIEW FOCUS AREA: SIGNATURE DEST. & CIP FIVE YEAR PLAN UPDATE COMPENSATION, BENEFITS, & SELF INSURANCE BUDGET PARKING LOT FOCUS AREA: TRANSPORTATION & CIP FOCUS AREA: CROSSCUTTING THEMES ANNUAL BUDGET PRESENTATION FOCUS AREA: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & CIP BUDGET PUBLIC HEARINGS FOCUS AREA: PUBLIC SAFETY GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET ADOPTION FISCAL & BUDGETARY POLICY FOCUS AREA: UTILITY & CIP Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget AGENDA •FY2015 Accomplishments •Utility Growth Trends •FY2016 Focus Areas Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget FY2015 Accomplishments •Enterprise Level –CTSUD Acquisition and Integration –Major Reorganization •Water Engineering •Electric Engineering and Field Operations •Control Center and Operations Technology –Customer Care/Control Center/Field Operations Integration •8am-5pm One Stop Shop and One Call Resolution Attachment number 1 \nPage 4 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget FY2015 Accomplishments •Business Improvement Program (BIP) Developed –Program Management Function for Projects –Performance Metrics and Benchmarking –Process Improvement Projects –Enterprise Applications Projects –Organizational Change Management •Business Improvement Projects –Major Enterprise Application BIP Projects •EAM Implementation •CIS RFP –Over 15 Other Projects Attachment number 1 \nPage 5 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget FY2015 Accomplishments •Resource Supply –Executed Solar PPA - 100% Renewable in 2017 –Jonah Water Swap •Infrastructure Planning –Updated Water Master Plan & Impact Fees –Updated Wastewater Master Plan & Impact Fees –West Side Service Center – Planning & Design Attachment number 1 \nPage 6 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget FY2015 Accomplishments GUS Development Support •Westinghouse TIRZ - Mixed •Hillwood MUD - Mixed •Pecan Branch - Commercial •Sun City Expansion - Residential •Lively MUD - Residential •Woodhull MUD - Residential •Crescent Bluff MUD - Residential Western District Non-Standard Service Agreements •Caughfield MUD – 1095 •Morningstar Ranch MUD – 315 •Snow Woods – 21 •Ridge at Cross Creek – coming soon, 82 •Clear Water Ranch – coming soon, 351 •Water Oak MUD – in progress •Shadow Canyon – assignment •Highland Meadows MUD – assignment Attachment number 1 \nPage 7 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget FY2015 Accomplishments •Major CIP Projects –Substation Transformers –Leander Road Voltage Conversion –Braun Elevated Storage Tank Refurbishment –SH 138 Water Line –EARZ Inspections and Repairs –Numerous Maintenance & Rehab Projects Attachment number 1 \nPage 8 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget 10 Year Growth Fueled by Growing Development Pipeline July 2013 March 2015 Commercial 10 30 Multi-Family 681 1,165 Planning 5,598 12,782 Developing 1,328 2,015 Building 1,211 2,471 Attachment number 1 \nPage 9 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget 10 Year Water Utility Growth 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 $0 $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 A c t i v e M e t e r s R e v e n u e Water Utility Revenue Active Meters Attachment number 1 \nPage 10 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget 10 Year Water Growth 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 A c r e - F e e t Water Supply and Demand Water Supply Water Demand w/o Conservation Water Demand with Conservation Attachment number 1 \nPage 11 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget 10 Year Wastewater Utility Growth 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 $0 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 C u s t o m e r C o u n t R e v e n u e Wastewater Utility Revenue Customer Count Attachment number 1 \nPage 12 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget 10 Year Electric Utility Growth 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 A c t i v e M e t e r s m W h s Electric Utility Fossil Power Sold Renewable Power Sold Customer Demand Active Meters Attachment number 1 \nPage 13 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget 2015/16 Organizational Focus Areas •Formalize Succession Plans •WSSC Construction and Expansion •Business Improvement Projects (BIP) –Major Enterprise Applications •CIS Selection and Implementation –Other Additional Projects Attachment number 1 \nPage 14 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget 2015/16 Electric Services Focus Areas Retail & Energy •NO Rate Increase •Bring Wind and Solar Resources On-Line •Market Excess Energy and RECs •Manage and Clear Power into ERCOT Market •Leverage Renewable Energy for Economic Development •Provide Power to Some Former CTSUD Facilities Distribution •Final Substation Transformer Purchases •Minor Reorganization - Operations Technology and Engineering Support •Downtown Voltage Upgrade •System Expansion for Sun City •Other Growth Projects •Reliability and Redundancy Projects Attachment number 1 \nPage 15 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget 2015/16 Water Services Focus Areas Water •NO Rate Increase •New Resources & Partnerships •CTSUD CCN Transfer •AMI - Western District •Insource Plant Operations •Major Transmission Infrastructure •NO Rate Increase •Insource Plant Operations •Major Interceptors Waste Water Irrigation •Rate Review •Numerous Expansion Requests Attachment number 1 \nPage 16 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget 2015/16 Environmental Services & Conservation Focus Areas Energy Efficiency •Energy Alerts •Weatherization •Efficient Appliances •Efficient Lighting •Aqua Alerts •Conservation Ordinance •Drought Survivability Study •Landscape Rebates •Irrigation Rebates Water Conservation Solid Waste •NO Rate Increase •Yard Waste Pickup •Downtown Dumpster Sharing •Transfer Station Improvements •Data Warehouse •Data Analytics •Measure Program Performance •Education Programs •Home Audits Energy/Water/Recycling •Shade Tree Give-Away Common Programs Attachment number 1 \nPage 17 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Water/Wastewater Capital Improvement Plan FY 2016 City Council May 26, 2015 Attachment number 1 \nPage 18 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Outline •Capital Improvement Plan process •Funding summary for the Capital Improvement Plan •Water projects (Georgetown and Western District) •Wastewater projects •Electric projects (Executive Session) Attachment number 1 \nPage 19 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Capital Improvement Plan •Starts in January •Includes meetings at department and division level to formulate project lists –Council priorities –Funding –Master Plans –Development –Operations experience –Maintenance history –Regulatory requirements •Recommendations are presented to Boards and the City Council •The Capital Improvements are included in the Annual Operating Plan February Initial Department Meetings formulating projects in CIP March Division Meetings to coordinate projects in CIP April Finalize CIP funding plan and financial recommendations May/June Present CIP to Boards and City Council September Adopted along with Annual Operating Plan Attachment number 1 \nPage 20 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Finance – Summary Water Funding Operating Revenue 17,867$ Utility Revenue Debt 8,010 Total 25,877$ Project Costs Georgetown Utility Systems: Water Services 25,757$ Debt Issuance Cost 120 Total 25,877$ 2016 Summary (000s) Attachment number 1 \nPage 21 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Capital Improvement Plan •Program funding sources: –Operating Revenue (utility rates) –Impact Fees •Capital Improvement Plan addresses need for superior water, wastewater, irrigation service, and electric. •Determined by many factors –Customer base growth –Service improvement –Rehabilitation of aging infrastructure –State and federal requirements –Competitive advantage –Contractual obligations Attachment number 1 \nPage 22 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Finance – 5 Year Water Projects (000s)2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Water Mains 5,602 1,738 1,087 3,882 - Pump and Storage Upgrades 335 7,299 5,697 480 3,230 Water Treatment Plant Upgrade & Expansion - 20 3,712 11,875 11,875 Total 5,937 9,057 10,496 16,237 15,105 Graph $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 $18,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 T h o u s a n d s Attachment number 1 \nPage 23 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Water Services - Georgetown –Water Mains - $5,602,000 •Shell Road Water Line - $4,756,000 –Approximately 4 miles –12”-16” line from Sequoia EST to Hwy 195 to Sun City Blvd –Provide looped feed to Sun City –Provide redundancy to Berry Creek and Serenda areas –Scope reduction on Hwy 195 from CTSUD consolidation •Street Rehab - $846,000 –2nd Street –Pine & Holly –Church, Myrtle, Maple –Sidewalk/ADA –W. 10th & W. 11th Street (FY17) Attachment number 1 \nPage 24 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Water Services - Georgetown •Water Pumping and Storage –Treatment Expansion - $335,000 •Estimated to need 10MG over next 10 years •Preliminary design & planning only •Final design & construction FY 17 •Possible Park WTP expansion •Possible Lake WTP expansion •Purchase treated water Attachment number 1 \nPage 25 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Finance – 5 Year Western District Projects (000s)2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Western District - Mains 5,294 4,296 4,051 4,842 250 Western District - Pump and Storage 2,007 - - - - Totals 7,301 4,296 4,051 4,842 250 Graph $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 T h o u s a n d s Attachment number 1 \nPage 26 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Water Services – Western District –Water Mains - $5,294,000 •Miscellaneous line extensions - $250,000 •Pastor Pump Station connection - $445,000 •CR 200 - $1,186,000 –Undersized line •CR 255 - $3,413,000 –Recurring maintenance issues –Domel Well & Pump Station - $2,007,000 •Complete rehabilitation of existing facilities •Previously completely flooded Attachment number 1 \nPage 27 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Finance – 5 Year Wastewater Projects (000s)2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Pumping Upgrades 568 2,019 2,908 3,799 4,957 Wastewater Interceptors 11,951 4,344 5,369 6,461 7,476 Plant Upgrades - 5,208 5,752 7,104 7,104 Totals 12,519 11,571 14,029 17,364 19,537 Graph $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Th o u s a n d s Attachment number 1 \nPage 28 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Wastewater Services •Wastewater Improvements –Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone (EARZ) 2015 - $2,500,000 •Continuation of existing program •Identification and replacement of damaged sewer lines and manholes –Street Projects - $200,000 •2nd, W. 10th & W. 11th –Pecan Branch Interceptor - $1,957,000 •Economic development – retail center at Lakeway & IH35 –Berry Creek Interceptor - $7,294,000 •Initial phase of construction planned for FY 16 •Segments from Sun City Lift Station to Berry Creek Lift Station (Berry Creek WWTP) •Prevent temporary wastewater solutions and wasted expenditures •Provide permanent full, wastewater capacity to currently unserved areas •Ultimately take Sun City Lift Station offline •Future phases may be expedited by development Attachment number 1 \nPage 29 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Wastewater Services •Lift stations –Westinghouse LS & FM - $318,000 •Design only for FY 16 •Construction in FY 17 •Existing IH35 Lift Station to be decomissioned –Lift Station Upgrades - $250,000 •SSO plan requirements •Redundant power •Electrical/control system upgrades •Lift stations to be identified •Irrigation System –None proposed Attachment number 1 \nPage 30 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Wastewater Services •Plant Upgrades –None proposed in FY 16 –San Gabriel WWTP •Belt Press proposed for FY 17 –Pecan Branch WWTP Expansion •Continue to delay until necessary •Diversion of flow to San Gabriel WWTP •Design approximately 60% complete –Northernlands WWTP •Future (estimated within 5 year plan) •Design could begin as early as FY 17 •1.5 MG plant to serve Ronald Reagan development corridor Attachment number 1 \nPage 31 of 32 Item # C FY2016 Annual Budget Water/Wastewater Capital Improvement Plan FY 2016 City Council May 26, 2015 Attachment number 1 \nPage 32 of 32 Item # C C ITY OF G EORGETOWN, TEXAS C APITAL I MPROVEMENT P LAN U TILITY S ERVICES F ISCAL Y EAR 201 6 Georgetown City Council May 26, 2015 Attachment number 2 \nPage 1 of 26 Item # C Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 01 Utility Operations Water Services Introduction ........................................................................................ 02 Water Projects ................................................................................... 05 Rural W ater Projects ......................................................................... 09 Wastewater Projects .......................................................................... 13 Energy Services Introduction ........................................................................................ 17 Electric Projects ................................................................................. 19 Attachment number 2 \nPage 2 of 26 Item # C Capital Improvement Plan The City of Georgetown annually updates and adopts a five-year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Schedule as part of the operating budget adoption process. Needed capital improvements are identified through system models, repair and maintenance records, and growth. The City uses a team approach to prioritizing capital improvement projects, whereby City staff from all operational areas provide input and ideas relating to each project and its effect on operations, such as: Fire and Police Services staff provides insight into a project’s impact on emergency traffic responses, public lighting issues and other public safety concerns. Planning & Development staff gives direction regarding new development and the infrastructure needs relating to this growth. Other utility departments, such as the Transportation, Energy and Water Services Departments exchange information regarding each project and coordinated timing of many of the related projects in an effort to create less inconvenience for the citizens affected. The timeline for the CIP planning process is outlined below: By using this team approach, the City develops cooperation among the departments, identifies potential problem areas, and prioritizes financing issues. The Capital Improvements Projects (CIP) generally consists of infrastructure and related construction and do not include small capital items such as furniture, equipment and vehicles. Significant maintenance projects, such as line repairs are not included in the capital project schedules. These maintenance type projects are not capitalized as a fixed asset and are always cash funded; therefore, they are considered operational in nature and are included in the departmental operating budget. The CIP schedules consolidate the capital spending priorities for all operating activities of the City, including all governmental and enterprise activities that provide services to the citizens of Georgetown. The CIP Schedules are included as part of the annual operating budget. The first year of the list becomes the capital budget for the approved budget year. The following pages outline the CIP Schedule for each activity and include anticipated projects, current year project location and sources of funding. January Initial Department Meetings formulating projects in CIP February / March Division Meetings to coordinate projects in CIP Finalized funding plan May / June Present CIP to Boards and City Council September Adopted along with Annual Operating Plan Funding Operating Revenue 20,855$ Utility Revenue Debt 10,010 Total Funding 30,865$ Project Costs Georgetown Utility Systems Water Services 25,757$ Energy Services 4,958 Debt Issuance Cost 150 Total Project Cost 30,865$ 2016 Capital Improvement Summary (in thousands) 1 Attachment number 2 \nPage 3 of 26 Item # C Water Services Introduction Georgetown Utility Systems Water Services Utility maintains a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to address the community’s need for superior water, wastewater, and irrigation service. This CIP is determined by many factors including on-going annexation, service improvement, the rehabilitation of aging water and wastewater infrastructure, and the need to meet changing state and federal requirements. The City operates three water treatment plants and five wastewater treatment plants. This table lists each plant with its current capacity. Water Services retains ownership of these plants and contracts for their operation. The City’s current utilization of its water supply is 35% ground water and 65% surface water. Growth Population growth within the Water Utility service area continues to drive the need for capital improvement. The City of Georgetown’s water and wastewater demand is projected to grow by approximately 15% over the next five years. The five year plan includes plans to expand the capacity of the water treatment system to meet peak demand. Wastewater flows are also anticipated to grow by approximately 18% over the next five years. City staff continues to look for ways to improve services within the current infrastructure, and thus delay plant expansions if at all possible. 2 Attachment number 2 \nPage 4 of 26 Item # C Age One of the greatest issues facing Water Services is the replacement of older water and wastewater system mains. The City of Georgetown has been providing water and wastewater service for over one hundred years. Some of the early infrastructure has exceeded its useful life and requires extensive repair or replacement to continue the delivery of reliable service to the community. The Wastewater improvements being recommended continue the rehabilitation of sanitary sewer mains that may be experiencing inflow and infiltration throughout the City. An aggressive sanitary sewer main improvement program eliminates the potential for Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSO) and allows for the delivery of reliable wastewater service to the community. Regulatory Changes The City of Georgetown is subject to requirements of the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone (EARZ) rules because 98% of the City is over the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. The regulatory requirements of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) require testing of at least 20% of the collection system every year, thus testing the entire system every 5 years. The testing is included in the Wastewater CIP program. Once problems are identified, the City has twelve (12) months to make repairs. A significant portion of the capital budget for the Wastewater Utility is dedicated for inspection and repair of existing mains. 3 Attachment number 2 \nPage 5 of 26 Item # C 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (Thousands of dollars) Projected Annual Project Cost Water 5,937$ 9,057$ 10,496$ 16,237$ 15,105$ 56,832$ Rural Water 7,301 4,296 4,051 4,842 250 20,740 Wastewater 12,519 11,571 14,029 17,364 19,537 75,020 Debt Issuance Cost 120 - 246 328 208 902 Sources of Funding Operating Revenue 17,867 24,924 12,396 16,945 21,252 93,384 Utility Revenue Bonds 8,010 - 16,426 21,826 13,848 60,110 In 2010,the City updated its impact fees. The maximum fees are $4,714 for water,$1,694 for wastewater, and $5,240 for wastewater in the South Fork basin. The City Council set the current fees at $3,511 for water,$1,694 for wastewater, and $2,927 for wastewater in the South Fork basin. Impact fees will be reviewed as part of the FY 16 budget process. City of Georgetown, Texas Water Services Capital Improvement Program FY 2016 to 2020 The City’s five year Capital Improvement Program funding comes from a combination of cash, debt funding, and impact fees. Actual amount of debt issues will be determined upon each individual year’s consideration of actual resources available, coverage requirement and other considerations. Operating Revenue Utility Revenue Bonds Combined 5 Year Estimated Funding Sources 4 Attachment number 2 \nPage 6 of 26 Item # C Prior Project Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (Thousands of dollars) Current Projects: Water Mains 1,912$ 5,602$ 1,738$ 1,087$ 3,882$ -$ Pump and Storage Upgrades 1,713 335 7,299 5,697 480 3,230 Water Treatment Plant Upgrade & Expansion - - 20 3,712 11,875 11,875 Totals 3,625$ 5,937$ 9,057$ 10,496$ 16,237$ 15,105$ City of Georgetown, Texas Water Capital Improvement Program FY 2016 to 2020 Projected $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 $18,000 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 20 1 7 20 1 8 20 1 9 20 2 0 Th o u s a n d s Water Capital Project Cost 5 Attachment number 2 \nPage 7 of 26 Item # C ® ® SIH35FWY NB R IV E R B E N D D R L O G A N R ANC H R D E2NDST D A W N D R SEINNE R LOOP CR 150 SU NCIT YBLV D N E INNER LOOP SHELL RD P A T R I O T W A Y SH 1 9 5 C R 1 4 0 F M 9 7 1 C R 1 5 2L U N A T R L S M I T HCREE KRDWOLF RANC H PKW Y DBWOODRD S H 1 9 5 E B R O C K R I D E L N CR 105 W S E Q U O I A S P U R FM 972 S I H 35 S B S I H 3 5 N B M A P L E S T N I H 35 N B L A WHONLN B E L L G I N R D S I H 35 F W Y SB N I H 3 5 S B S A M H O U S T O N A V E S H 1 3 0 T O L L S B S H 1 3 0 N B CR 143CR234 S H 1 3 0 T O L L N B Legend ®CIP Facility project locations CIP Water Lines projects 2015-16 Capital Improvement ProjectsCOG Water Utilities ´ 0 6,0003,000 Feet1 inch = 4,913 feet Shell Rd. Water(H-3) 19th St (Streets Project) E 2nd St (Streets Project)Park WTP PS Expansion Domel PS Improvements(Western District) 6 Attachment number 2 \nPage 8 of 26 Item # C Responsible Division: Water Services Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 1,912 5,602 1,738 1,087 3,882 - 14,221 Description : Funding Sources : Funded by cash from operations. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Water- Street Rehabilitation 846 330 - - - Shell Rd. Water (H-3)4,756 - - - - West Loop (H-1B) Ph I Innerspace to Th. Oaks - 1,408 - - - FM 1460 to Maple Water (H-2)- - 357 915 - Rabbit Hill Water (RH-1)- - 730 2,071 - West University Ave.- - - 896 - Notes: City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Water Mains Projected Project entails replacement of water lines in the service area to improve firefighting capabilities and eliminate aged, undersized lines.Replacement of lines is coordinated with the Street Department CIP program to replace water lines prior to or during street rehabilitation to minimize the impact of maintenance on upgraded streets. Photo / Map Placeholder Subprojects (000): 7 Attachment number 2 \nPage 9 of 26 Item # C Responsible Division: Water Services Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 1,713 335 7,299 5,697 480 3,230 18,754 Description : Funding Sources : Funded by cash from operations. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Park Water Treatment Plant Pump Station Exp 335 5,931 - - - Park Water Treatment Plant Raw Pump Station - 888 5,397 - - Sun City Elevated Storage Tank - - - - 2,750 Tank Rehabilitation - 480 300 480 480 Notes: City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Pump and Storage Upgrades Projected Photo / Map Placeholder Subprojects (000): Elevated & Ground Storage Tank, along with pump station expansions will be constructed to meet current and future system demand. Projects consist of the Park Water Treatment Plant high service pump station improvements. This plant improvement is scheduled for removal because of a regulatory issue. 8 Attachment number 2 \nPage 10 of 26 Item # C Prior Project Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (Thousands of dollars) Future Projects: Western District - Mains -$ 5,294$ 4,296$ 4,051$ 4,842$ 250$ Western District - Pump and Storage - 2,007 - - - - Totals -$ 7,301$ 4,296$ 4,051$ 4,842$ 250$ City of Georgetown, Texas Western District Capital Improvement Program FY 2016 to 2020 Projected $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 20 1 7 20 1 8 20 1 9 20 2 0 Th o u s a n d s Western District Capital Project Cost 9 Attachment number 2 \nPage 11 of 26 Item # C UT UT CR 200 Line Improvements Pastor GST Line Upgrade Domel PS Improvement Park WTP Pump StationExpansion N B E L L B L V D S U S 1 8 3 E P A L M V A L L E Y B L V D N U S 1 8 3 U S 7 9 U S 1 8 3 U S 1 8 3 N B U S 183 SB 183A T O L L R D S H 1 3 0 S B NSH4 5 E S H 4 5 1 8 3 A T O L L R D N B N 1 8 3 A HWY N B SH195 E SH 2 9 NPATTER S O N A V E S H1 95E B WSH29 E U N I V E R S I T Y A V E S P A T T E R S O N A V E SH 138 S H 1 9 5 S B R M 1 4 3 1 W WHIT E S T O N E B L V D NRM620RD L E A N D E R RD R M 2 2 4 3 E W H I T E S T O N E B L V D WILLIAMS D R R M 1 8 6 9 R M 2 3 3 8 S I H 3 5 F W Y NIH35FWYNB N IH 35 F W Y S I H 3 5 F W Y N B F M 1431R D FM 1 3 2 5 RD W F M48 7 SAMBASS RD FM 97 1 F M 1 4 6 0 F M 1 1 0 5 F M 34 0 5 F M972 W P A R M ER LN E FM 2 4 3 E F M 4 8 7 F M 9 7 0 NAW GRIMESBLVD FM 2 8 4 32015-16 Capital Improvement ProjectsRural Water Utilities ´ 1 inch = 14,893 feet 0 2 41 Miles E 2nd St (Streets Project) 19 St (Streets Project) Shell Rd. Water(H-3) CR255 Waterline Replacement(WD 14-2) Shell Rd CR 2 5 5 CR 258 R o n a l d R e a g a n B l v d CR 254 FM 340 5 Legend CIP Facility project UT Western District Water UT COG Water CIP Water Line Projects Western District Water COG Water Georgetown City Limits 10 Attachment number 2 \nPage 12 of 26 Item # C Responsible Division: Water Services Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total - 5,294 4,296 4,051 4,842 250 18,733 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with cash from operations and utility revenue debt. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Miscellaneous Line Extension 250 250 250 250 250 Pastor GST Line Upgrade (H-1a14)445 - - - - CR 200 Line Improvements (CO-1)1,186 - - - - Cr 255 (WD14-2)3,413 2,062 - - - CR 258 (WD14-3)- 1,984 1,831 - - SH 138 (Hoover-2)- - 748 1,922 - CR 248 (WD14-4)- - 642 1,403 - CR 147 (WD14-1)- - 580 1,267 - Notes: City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Western District - Mains Projected Projects include the addition of new water mains and upsizing of existing water mains to improve service and meet the demaind for existing and future growth in the Western district. Photo / Map Placeholder Subprojects (000): 11 Attachment number 2 \nPage 13 of 26 Item # C Responsible Division: Water Services Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total - 2,007 - - - - 2,007 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with cash from operations and utility revenue debt. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Domel Pump Station Improvement 2,007 - - - - Notes: Subprojects (000): City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Western District - Pump and Storage Projected Project includes the rehabilitation of existing pump stations to meet the demands of existing customers and future growth in the Western district. Photo / Map Placeholder 12 Attachment number 2 \nPage 14 of 26 Item # C Prior Project Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (Thousands of dollars) Current Projects: Wastewater Interceptors 5,711$ 11,951$ 4,344$ 5,369$ 6,461$ 7,476$ Pumping Upgrades 3,383 568 2,019 2,908 3,799 4,957 Plant Upgrades - - 5,208 5,752 7,104 7,104 Totals 9,094$ 12,519$ 11,571$ 14,029$ 17,364$ 19,537$ City of Georgetown, Texas Wastewater Capital Improvement Program FY 2016 to 2020 Projected $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 20 1 7 20 1 8 20 1 9 20 2 0 Th o u s a n d s Wastewater Capital Project Cost 13 Attachment number 2 \nPage 15 of 26 Item # C UT L O G A N R ANC H RD R O C K R I D E L N CR 150 W S H29 N E IN NE R LOO P SE INN E R LOO P SH 1 9 5 C R 1 4 0 F M 9 7 1 SIH35FWY NB C R 1 5 2 LEANDER RD R A B B I T H I L L R D WOL F RAN C H PKW Y DBWOODRD CR234 N I H 35 N B SH130SB M A P L E S T B E L L G I N R D S I H 35 F W Y SB N I H 3 5 S B C R 1 1 0 S A M H O U S T O N A V E S H 1 3 0 T O L L S B S H 1 3 0 N B S H 1 3 0 T O L L N B CR 143 WESPARADADR FM 972 S IH35SB SUNCITY LS PECANBRANCHWWTP BERRYCREEK LS Legend UT COG Wastewater Facility Improvements COG Wastewater Line Improvements 2015-16 Capital Improvement ProjectsWastewater Utilities Berry CreekInterceptor (BCI - 4,5,6) Westinghouse LS Upgrade ´ 0 6,0003,000 Feet1 inch = 5,833 feet Pecan Branch Interceptor 14 Attachment number 2 \nPage 16 of 26 Item # C Responsible Division: Water Services Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 5,711 11,951 4,344 5,369 6,461 7,476 41,312 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with cash from operations and utility revenue debt. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 EARZ 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 1,000 Wastewater - Street Projects 200 136 - - - Berry Creek Interceptor (BCI-4)1,489 - - - - Berry Creek Interceptor (BCI-5)1,533 - - - - Berry Creek Interceptor (BCI-6)4,272 - - - - Pecan Branch Interceptor 1,957 - - - - Berry Creek Interceptor (BCI-3)- 2,208 3,869 3,869 - San Gabriel Interceptor (SGI-2)- - - 1,592 6,476 Notes: Photo / Map Placeholder Subprojects (000): City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Wastewater Interceptors Projected Project entails replacement of wastewater lines in the service area to improve flow, add new service, add capacity and eliminate aged, undersized lines to comply with Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone requirements. Replacement of lines is coordinated with the Street Department CIP program to replace wastewater lines prior to or during street rehabilitation to minimize the impact of maintenance on upgraded streets. Also, projects include system expansion to promote operational efficiencies and economic growth. 15 Attachment number 2 \nPage 17 of 26 Item # C Responsible Division: Water Services Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 3,383 568 2,019 2,908 3,799 4,957 17,634 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with cash from operations and utility revenue debt. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Lift Station Upgrades 250 250 250 250 250 Westinghouse Lift Station & Force Main (Rebuild)318 850 - - - Berry Creek Lift Station & Force Main (BCI-LS)- 919 2,658 2,658 - Interceptor Lift Station Decommission (Int-LS)- - - 891 4,707 Notes: Subprojects (000): Project is a multi-year project to upgrade or decommission the City's lift stations (LS). Included are control panel upgrades, SCADA and fiber upgrades, pump upgrades, emergency diesel installation, installation of safety grates, etc. Photo / Map Placeholder City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Pumping Upgrades Projected 16 Attachment number 2 \nPage 18 of 26 Item # C Energy Services Introduction The Energy Services Utility maintains a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to address the community’s need for superior electric service. The CIP is developed by incorporating several factors including service improvement, increased reliability, equipment aging, and extension of service within the certificated service area, regulatory changes, competition within dually certified areas, and support for economic development. The City operates and maintains an energy delivery system including seven substations and 394 miles of distribution lines consisting of both 12.5kV and 25kV. In addition to energy delivery, the Energy Services Utility operates the SCADA system, fiber-optic communications network, and the AMR system. These additional systems support collectively the electric and water utilities. Growth Over the past ten years, the City of Georgetown Electric distribution system has experienced rapid growth, with the addition of several new residential and commercial developments in the system’s service area. The system anticipates a continued growth of 15% in the service area over the next five years. The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes projects over the next five years to add power bank additions at substations along with other substation support and modifications to address growth and reliability. Additionally, the CIP includes new extensions of overhead and underground feeders to new commercial and residential developments, system improvements projects for load and reliability control, as well as the service extensions from the existing distribution system to service new customers. Substations MVA Chief Brady 47.0 East 94.0 Gabriel 55.0 Georgetown 44.0 Glasscock 80.0 Rivery 94.0 South 47.0 Total Capacity 461.0 Distribution lines Electric Lines 394.0 Fiber lines 77.0 Networked AMI Meters 22,636.0 17 Attachment number 2 \nPage 19 of 26 Item # C Age To address the aging of the system, the CIP includes projects to inspect, treat or replace deteriorated poles and rehabilitate aging facilities. In 2008/09, the Utility began a long term project to identify and rehabilitate overhead & underground facilities system wide including phased conversion of its 12.5kV system to 25kV for reliability. Regulatory Changes The City’s electric system is subject to reliability standards of the North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC), operational control and reliability through the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT). Due to the deregulated electric market in Texas, and the City’s status as a non-opt-in municipal retail provider, the City must continue to monitor developments in the Texas market place. The replacement of the AMR system with an AMI system will support regulatory changes related to Smart-Grid. The City has a Conservation and Environmental department to focus on conservation within the electric utility, including the provision for capital investment in conservation-related projects. 18 Attachment number 2 \nPage 20 of 26 Item # C 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (Thousands of dollars) Projected Annual Project Cost 4,958$ 5,296$ 4,608$ 5,268$ 4,673$ 24,803$ Debt issuance cost 30 27 17 27 18 119 Sources of Funding Operating Revenue 2,988 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 16,988 Utility Revenue Debt 2,000 1,823 1,125 1,795 1,191 7,934 Prior Project Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (Thousands of dollars) Current Projects: Substations / Communication 2,453$ 100$ 950$ 600$ 900$ 1,100$ System Improvements 3,460 1,100 1,823 535 1,245 900 Solar 3,270 - - - - - System Expansion - 1,785 600 1,550 1,200 750 Operational System Expansion 1,040 1,973 1,923 1,923 1,923 1,923 Totals 10,223$ 4,958$ 5,296$ 4,608$ 5,268$ 4,673$ City of Georgetown, Texas Electric Services Capital Improvement Program FY 2016 to 2020 Projected $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 20 1 7 20 1 8 20 1 9 20 2 0 Th o u s a n d s Electric Capital Project Cost Attachment number 2 \nPage 21 of 26 Item # C XY XY XY XY XY XY XYRIVERY GABRIEL GLASSCOCK GEORGETOWN CHIEF BRADY GEORGETOWN EAST GEORGETOWN SOUTH C.I.P. 2015-2016Energy Services April 2014 L:\Division\gus\ENGINEERING SUPPORT\PROJECTS\CIP\CIP14-15\GIS\EnergyServices.mxd System ImprovementsSystem ExpansionFiber Network Expansion and ReplacementsElectric System Engineering Energy Services Projects in multiple locations (system wide) U 0 1.50.75 Miles Electric SubstationsXY Electric Dual/Triple Certified Areas Electric Service Boundary Georgetown City Limits 20 Attachment number 2 \nPage 22 of 26 Item # C Responsible Division: Energy Engineering Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 2,453 100 950 600 900 1,100 6,103 Description : Funding Sources : Funded by utility revenue debt. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Substations 100 950 600 900 1,100 Notes: Photo / Map Placeholder City of Georgetown, Texas Electric Services Capital Improvement Program Substations / Communication Projects (000): Projected The cost associated with these projects are for installation of new or replacing existing power banks. This project also provides for engineering, construction and installation of devices related to operating and maintaining the City's electric substations including SCADA upgrades. 21 Attachment number 2 \nPage 23 of 26 Item # C Responsible Division: Energy Engineering Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 3,460 1,100 1,823 535 1,245 900 9,063 Description : Funding Sources : Funded by utility revenue debt. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 System Improvements 1,100 1,823 535 1,245 900 Notes: Photo / Map Placeholder City of Georgetown, Texas Electric Services Capital Improvement Program System Improvements Projects (000): Projected These projects provide for various system improvements and modifications to the existing electric system overhead and underground main and branch feeder circuits. Projects include the replacement and modification of facilities, circuit ties for reliability improvements, voltage conversions, conductor replacement or upgrades, capacitor and sectionialization switches for system performance. Attachment number 2 \nPage 24 of 26 Item # C Responsible Division: Energy Engineering Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total - 1,785 600 1,550 1,200 750 5,885 Description : Funding Sources : Funded by cash from electric utility and utility revenue debt. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 System Expansion 1,785 600 1,550 1,200 750 Notes: Photo / Map Placeholder City of Georgetown, Texas Electric Services Capital Improvement Program System Expansion Projects (000): Projected These projects provide for various system expansions of the existing electric system overhead and underground main and branch feeder circuits.Projects include the line extensions to new developments providing new service to residences, commercial or retail business. 23 Attachment number 2 \nPage 25 of 26 Item # C Responsible Division: Energy Engineering Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 1,040 1,973 1,923 1,923 1,923 1,923 10,705 Description : Funding Sources : Funded by cash from Electric Utility. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Operational System Expansion 1,973 1,923 1,923 1,923 1,923 Notes: This project includes the installation of street lighting facilities for new installations along with service facilities providing electric service to traffic signals.This project will also fund the installation and conversion to energy efficient lighting projects. City of Georgetown, Texas Electric Services Capital Improvement Program Operational System Expansion Projects (000): Photo / Map Placeholder Projected 24 Attachment number 2 \nPage 26 of 26 Item # C City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Agenda May 26, 2015 SUBJECT: Overview of the 2015/2016 Transportation Services Business Plan, Operation and Capital Budgets -- Edward G. Polasek, AICP and Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director ITEM SUMMARY: As part of the 2015/16 Budget Process the Transportation Division is providing an overview of progress related to the 2014/15 Strategic Goals and Transportation Business Plan, as well proposed revisions for the 2015/16 Strategic Goals. Since so much of the work completed by the Division is so closely associated with the Capital Improvement Planning Process (CIP), the proposed CIP for Transportation will be included in the presentation. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Part of the 2015/16 Budget Process. SUBMITTED BY: Ed Polasek - Transportation Services Director ATTACHMENTS: Draft Presentation Capital Improvement Plan - Streets, Drainage, Airport 2016 Cover Memo Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OVERVIEW AND CIP 2015 Policy Discussion May 26, 2015 Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget 2014/15 TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Outline. 1.2014/15 Strategic Goals. 2.2015/16 Transportation Business Plan. 3.Proposed 2015/16 Strategic Goals. 4.Transportation CIP. Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget BUDGET PROCESS DEBT OVERVIEW FOCUS AREA: SIGNATURE DEST. & CIP FIVE YEAR PLAN UPDATE COMPENSATION, BENEFITS, & SELF INSURANCE FOCUS AREA: UTILITY & CIP BUDGET PARKING LOT FOCUS AREA: TRANSPORTATION & CIP FOCUS AREA: CROSSCUTTING THEMES ANNUAL BUDGET PRESENTATION FOCUS AREA: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & CIP BUDGET PUBLIC HEARINGS FOCUS AREA: PUBLIC SAFETY GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET ADOPTION FISCAL & BUDGETARY POLICY Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget 2014/15 STRATEGIC GOALS 1.Conduct and complete a clear and concise Airport Master Plan. 2.Develop a comprehensive plan for a public transit plan both locally and regionally. 3.Explore feasibility of a Trolley to Historic Downtown. 4.Complete the citywide Sidewalk Master Plan. 5.Develop and fund a strategy for Fall 2014 Sales Tax for Street Maintenance Election. 6.Review the possibility of a Road Bond Election. Attachment number 1 \nPage 4 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget 2014/15 STRATEGIC GOALS 1.Conduct and complete a clear and concise Airport Master Plan. •TxDOT Grant Paperwork submitted. TxDOT awaiting award of funding by Transportation Commission. •Staff utilized time to formalize maintenance and business processes. Attachment number 1 \nPage 5 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget 2014/15 STRATEGIC GOALS 2.Develop a comprehensive plan for a public transit plan both locally and regionally. 3.Explore feasibility of a Trolley to Historic Downtown. •Capital Metro partner in planning process utilizing Federal planning funds to reduce local cost, including study of Downtown Trolley System. •Draft Plan will be presented to GTAB by July. Attachment number 1 \nPage 6 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget 2014/15 STRATEGIC GOALS 4.Complete the citywide Sidewalk Master Plan. •Formalized funding strategy approved in 2015 Bond Election. •Set forth ADA transition planning efforts. •Began discussion on long-term cost of ownership. •Regionally recognized planning effort. Attachment number 1 \nPage 7 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget 2014/15 STRATEGIC GOALS 5.Develop a strategy for Fall 2014 Sales Tax for Street Maintenance Election. 6.Review the possibility of a Road Bond Election. •Two Successful elections in FY 14/15. •Street Maintenance passed with 84.5% of vote on November 4, 2014. •$105 Million Road Bond passed with 75.2% of vote on May 9, 2015. Attachment number 1 \nPage 8 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget 2014/15 STRATEGIC GOALS •Street Maintenance. PCI Completed in 2014 is 87.3, 2012 evaluation was 87.7. Cost of Maintenance proposed in pavement management system: Fog Seal $X.XX/sy Chip Seal $X.XX/sy Two Course Chip Seal $6.71/sy Thin Overlay Mix $X.XX/sy Rehab (Cutler) $10.50/sy Attachment number 1 \nPage 9 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget 2014/15 STRATEGIC GOALS •2015 Road Bond 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 AD SWB Leander to WRP Design ROW Utilities Construction AZ1 WRP Design ROW Utilities Construction BC Rivery Design ROW Utilities Construction AE NW Blvd Bridge Design ROW Utilities Construction BJ2 Leander @ SWB Design ROW Utilities Construction AN DBW 29 to Oak Ridge Design ROW Utilities Construction BP SW'n Blvd Design ROW Utilities Construction AF NBFR Williams to Lakeway Design ROW Utilities Construction SIDEWALKS Design Construction INTERSECTIONS Design Construction CS Leander Bridge Design ROW AJ NEIL FM 971 to Stadium Design ROW Utilities CQ Stadium Design ROW Utilities AZ2 SWB WRP to 29 Design ROW AT SH 29 Design ROW Utilities BU SEIL (from 35) Design BG SEIL (to 29) Design AC Williams (Rivery to SBFR) Design AO I 35 SBFR Design HH Shell Rd (Williams to Shell Spur) Design TT DB Wood Oak Ridge to Lake Overlook Design Attachment number 1 \nPage 10 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS PLAN 2015/16 UPDATE I. Goal: Implement the Overall Transportation Plan A. Objective: Continue to maintain a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) above 85. 1. Street Maintenance Crew to maintain PCI. FY ‘17 2. Street Maintenance Equipment for crew. FY ‘17 3. Attenuator and Pad foot roller. completed 4. Bridge De-Icing Program. FY ‘16. 5.Street Maintenance CIP utilizing Street Maintenance Sales Tax. ongoing. Attachment number 1 \nPage 11 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS PLAN 2015/16 UPDATE I. Goal: Implement the Overall Transportation Plan B. Identify funding sources for future improvements 1. Develop Bond Program -- completed 2. Develop Sidewalk Gap Program and Plan -- completed 3. Transit to urban service -- ongoing 4. North Austin Avenue Sidewalk Improvements – completed 5.F.M. 1460 – TxDOT construction letting -- 2015. 6.Austin Avenue Bridges and Downtown Access. FY ’16 Attachment number 1 \nPage 12 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS PLAN 2015/16 UPDATE I. Goal: Implement the Overall Transportation Plan B. Identify funding sources for future improvements 7.CAMPO UPWP Planning – Pedestrian Plan, Regulating Plan and Williams Drive Corridor Study. FY ’16 8.Work with TxDOT, Williamson County and Round Rock to stretch Bond proceeds, connectivity and bring projects to construction quicker. FY ’16 •IH-35 Corridor (frontage roads and crossings) •Leander Road (River Ridge to SW Bypass) •SE Inner Loop (Maple to Belmont Drive) •Mays Street (Oakmont/Rabbit Hill Road) Attachment number 1 \nPage 13 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS PLAN 2015/16 UPDATE II. Implement Airport Master Plan A. Airport Business Plan Staffing Options 1. Increase part time positions for maintenance. FY ’16 2.Business Coordinator and Operations Coordinator split not feasible in current financial model. FY ‘17 or beyond. 3.Office Specialist (GUS Administration). FY ‘18 or beyond. 4.Airport Management Tool (FBO Software). FY ‘16 Attachment number 1 \nPage 14 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS PLAN 2015/16 UPDATE II. Implement Airport Master Plan B. Operational increases – to bring maintenance up to standard 1. Foreign Object Debris Removal. FY ’16 2.Pavement Management Funding. FY ‘16 3.Enhanced Maintenance Program. Ongoing •Budget GL Reorganization to match actual operations. •Program to track /report TCEQ SWPPP Permit. •Empty Hanger Inspection/Maintenance Program. •CPI Adjustments to Land Leases. •Lease rates for Hangers/Tiedowns. •Developing Hanger Preventative Maintenance Program. •Airfield Lighting Upgrade with TxDOT. Attachment number 1 \nPage 15 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS PLAN 2015/16 UPDATE II. Implement Airport Master Plan B. Operational increases – to bring maintenance up to standard 3.(cont.) Enhanced Maintenance Program. Ongoing •E.I.S. Process for fuel farm relocation and ORC Processes. •Asphalt repair to taxi lane between B & C Hanger. •Expanded daily airport inspection criteria. •Weed abatement program. •Monthly airfield pavement maintenance inspections. •Training program for Fuel Attendants. •Electronic Gate preventative maintenance program. •Quarterly Inspection program for FBO fuel trucks. •Implementing Spill Prevention and countermeasures program. Attachment number 1 \nPage 16 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS PLAN 2015/16 UPDATE II. Implement Airport Master Plan C. Capital improvements funding – to continue levels of maintenance 1. TxDOT Planning Grant for Airport Master Plan to update CIP in process. FY ’16 2.Pavement management inspections revealed need for extensive rehab to 18/36 . FY ’17 or beyond Attachment number 1 \nPage 17 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS PLAN 2015/16 UPDATE III. Stormwater Program A. Urban Stormwater Permit Application. 1. MS4 Permit Application Completed, Year 1 in FY ’16. 2. Federal Standards for Georgetown Salamander made permit requirements part of the Water Quality Management Plan for USFWS. Applied MS4 to entire Edwards Recharge. B. Operational increases to address stormwater permit. 1.Program Administrator for Reporting and EAM. FY ’16 2.Mechanical Street Sweeper and Operator. FY ’16 3.Develop Enterprise Asset Management to monitor and track compliance. FY ‘16 Attachment number 1 \nPage 18 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS PLAN 2015/16 UPDATE III. Stormwater Program C.Capital improvements funding – to continue improvements. 1. Continue Watershed Planning. ongoing 2. CIP Program. FY ’16 and beyond D. Staff for Stormwater System Maintenance Improvements 1. Stormwater Maintenance Crew – 2 LEO’s. FY ’17 or beyond 2. Street Sweeper and Operator. FY ‘16 Attachment number 1 \nPage 19 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget FY2016 PROPOSED REVISIONS 1.Public education related to the status of planning and implementation for transportation/ maintenance projects. 2.Develop and fund a strategy for the public education and outreach on the Fall 2014 Sales Tax for Street Maintenance Election. 3.Review the possibility of a Road Bond to include only the highest road project priorities to fully enhance the City’s Road System and Transportation Network. 4.Develop a comprehensive plan for a Public Transit. 5.Explore feasibility of a Trolley to Historic Downtown. 6.Complete the citywide Sidewalk Master Plan to increase pedestrian access from neighborhood to neighborhood, medical facilities, schools, parks and local service retail. 7.Airport Master Plan update. 8.Traffic Operations. 9.Bicycle & Corridor Plans to implement OTP. 10.Stormwater Programs. Attachment number 1 \nPage 20 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Streets/Sidewalks/Drainage/Airport Capital Improvement Plan FY 2016 City Council May 26, 2015 Attachment number 1 \nPage 21 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Outline •Capital Improvement Plan process •Funding summary for the Capital Improvement Plan •Street projects •Sidewalk projects •Stormwater projects •Airport projects Attachment number 1 \nPage 22 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Capital Improvement Plan •Starts in January •Includes meetings at department and division level to formulate project lists –Council priorities –Funding –New development –Operational experience –Maintenance history –Regulatory requirements •Recommendations are presented to boards and the City Council •The Capital Improvements are included in the Annual Operating Plan February Initial Department Meetings formulating projects in CIP March Division Meetings to coordinate projects in CIP April Finalize CIP funding plan and financial recommendations May/June Present CIP to Boards and City Council September Adopted along with Annual Operating Plan Attachment number 1 \nPage 23 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Finance – Summary Sheet Streets Funding Operating Revenue 895$ Street Maintenance Sales Tax 2,800 General Fund 875 Certificates of Obligation Bonds 1,009 Grants 275 Total 5,854$ Project Costs Transportation Services Streets 3,675$ Stormwater Drainage 1,150 Airport 20 Sidewalks 994 Debt Issuance Cost 15 Total 5,854$ 2016 Summary (000s) Attachment number 1 \nPage 24 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Finance – 5 Year Sheet Streets Projects (000s)2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Street Rehabilitation 875 875 875 875 875 Chip Seal 1,620 400 400 500 500 Rejuvenate 350 400 500 500 600 Cutler Process 414 800 900 900 900 Point Repair 416 300 200 300 300 Sidewalks 994 1,111 1,184 1,068 1,091 Arterials Reserves - 500 500 500 500 Totals 4,669 4,386 4,559 4,643 4,766 Transportation GRAPH $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Th o u s a n d s Attachment number 1 \nPage 25 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Transportation Services •Transportation Services manages, maintains, and repairs City streets, sidewalks, drainage facilities, and right of ways. •Additional responsibilities include: –Traffic Control, Emergency Response, Special Events, Regional planning, GTEC •Funding for the street maintenance program comes from the General Fund and the Street Maintenance Sales Tax (reapproved in Nov-14). •Funding for capital improvements comes from tax supported bonds (May election). Attachment number 1 \nPage 26 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Transportation Services •Street Rehabilitation - $549,000 –Pine Street and Holly Street –Downtown rehabilitation will continue in FY 17 with 10th Street, 11th Street, and various sidewalk projects •Traffic Signal –Austin Avenue & 5th Street •Pending bond election for funding •Pending warrant study approval •Arterial Reserves –No contribution anticipated for FY 16 Attachment number 1 \nPage 27 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Transportation Services •Street Maintenance –Rejuvenator – $350,000 •Application of oil to seal small cracks, provide UV protection, guard against oxidation, and restores uniform color after crack sealing •Work primarily will be done in-house in FY 16 •Areas include Quail Valley, NE Downtown, Western Trail, and Sun City –Hot-in Place Recycling - $740,000 •Cutler Process •Single pass, hot in place asphalt recycler •Myrtle and Church (Hwy 29 – 2nd St.) •Maple (north of Hwy 29) Attachment number 1 \nPage 28 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Transportation Services •Street Maintenance (continued) –Chip Seal - $1,620,000 •Oil and rock mixture to provide seal and wear protection •Currently utilizing both single and double course chip seals •Also adding light fog seal to lock in rock and reduce noise •FY 16 areas include: –River Ridge Subdivision –Inner Loop (Churchill Farms to Hwy 29) –DB Wood Road (Public Safety to Georgetown Village) –Williams Drive (DB Wood to Del Webb) –NE Downtown –North Georgetown Addition –Lakeway Drive –Serenada (Luna Trail area) Attachment number 1 \nPage 29 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Transportation Services •Street Maintenance (continued) –Point Repair and Overlay •Thin Overlay Mix – 1” new asphalt •FY 16 Streets include: –Texas Drive –Gabriel View Drive, Kathi Lane, Addie Lane, Brandi Lane, Tiffany Lane Attachment number 1 \nPage 30 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Transportation Services •Sidewalks –Projects contingent upon transportation bond election –Projects for FY 16 include: •Pedestrian signals and curb ramps at existing intersections •Church Street (8th-9th, in advance of Cutler repaving) •8th Street (Church-Myrtle) •Access/entrance routes to city facilities –Initiate design for future year projects including: •Austin Avenue (8th-University) •8th Street (Austin-MLK) •10th Street (Main-Rock) •11th Street (Main-Rock) Attachment number 1 \nPage 31 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Finance – 5 Year Sheet Drainage Projects (000s)2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Curb and Gutter Replacements 500 500 500 800 500 Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades 100 100 100 100 100 San Gabriel Flood Study 550 - - - - Serenada Culvert Improvement - - 500 - - NW Blvd Drainage - - 350 - - Airport Road @ Pecan Branch - - 1,300 - - Totals 1,150 600 2,750 900 600 Stormwater Chart $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Th o u s a n d s Attachment number 1 \nPage 32 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Stormwater Services •Stormwater Drainage Utility manages and maintains stormwater infrastructure operations and facilities. •Daily activities include drainage and flood control, and right of way maintenance. •Currently implementing a five-year Stormwater Management Plan in order to comply with TCEQ MS4 (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System) and Georgetown Salamander habitat protection requirements. Attachment number 1 \nPage 33 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Stormwater Services •Curb and Gutter Replacements –$500,000 annually –Replace deteriorating stand up curbs with new curb and gutter –Proposed for FY 16: San Gabriel Blvd., Ridge Oak, Oakland Drive, Live Oak, Spanish Oaks Attachment number 1 \nPage 34 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Stormwater Services •Infrastructure Improvements - $100,000 –Rehab above and beyond normal maintenance •Regional Flood Study - $550,000 –North & South Forks – San Gabriel River –Pending Texas Water Development Board grant –50 percent reimbursable grant –In partnership with Liberty Hill, Leander, Williamson County, & Burnet County. Attachment number 1 \nPage 35 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Finance – 5 Year Sheet Airport Projects (000s)2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Master Plan 20 - - - - Totals 20 - - - - Airport $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Th o u s a n d s Attachment number 1 \nPage 36 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Airport Services •Manages and repairs the City airport. –Daily activities include inspection of runways for sign repair, pavement management and removal of sight obstructions. –Traffic control, emergency response operations and special events. •Airport services has experienced a growth in demand for maintenance and rehabilitation of the City’s runway system. •All projects are maintenance and rehabilitation in conjunction with TxDOT. Attachment number 1 \nPage 37 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Airport Service •Master Plan –$20,000 – City 10% Share –Remainder funded by TxDOT Attachment number 1 \nPage 38 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget Streets/Sidewalks/Drainage/Airport Capital Improvement Plan FY 2016 City Council May 26, 2015 Attachment number 1 \nPage 39 of 40 Item # D FY2016 Annual Budget 2014/15 STRATEGIC GOALS •Austin Avenue Bridges and Downtown Access. FY ’16. Attachment number 1 \nPage 40 of 40 Item # D C ITY OF G EORGETOWN, TEXAS C APITAL I MPROVEMENT P LAN S TREETS/DRAINAGE/AIRPORT F ISCAL Y EAR 201 6 Georgetown City Council May 26, 2015 Attachment number 2 \nPage 1 of 24 Item # D Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 01 Transportation Division Streets Introduction ........................................................................................ 02 Streets Projects ................................................................................. 05 Stormwater Introduction ........................................................................................ 14 Stormwater Projects .......................................................................... 16 Airport Introduction ........................................................................................ 20 Airport Projects .................................................................................. 21 Attachment number 2 \nPage 2 of 24 Item # D Capital Improvement Plan The City of Georgetown annually updates and adopts a five-year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Schedule as part of the operating budget adoption process. Needed capital improvements are identified through system models, repair and maintenance records, and growth. The City uses a team approach to prioritizing capital improvement projects, whereby City staff from all operational areas provide input and ideas relating to each project and its effect on operations, such as: Fire and Police Services staff provides insight into a project’s impact on emergency traffic responses, public lighting issues and other public safety concerns. Planning & Development staff gives direction regarding new development and the infrastructure needs relating to this growth. Other utility departments, such as the Transportation Department, Electric Department and Water Services Department exchange information regarding each project and coordinated timing of many of the related projects in an effort to create less inconvenience for the citizens affected. The timeline for the CIP planning process is outlined below: By using this team approach, the City develops cooperation among the departments, identifies potential problem areas, and prioritizes financing issues. The Capital Improvements Projects (CIP) generally consists of infrastructure and related construction and do not include small capital items such as furniture, equipment and vehicles. Significant maintenance projects, such as street repairs are not included in the capital project schedules. These maintenance type projects are not capitalized as a fixed asset and are always cash funded; therefore, they are considered operational in nature and are included in the departmental operating budget. The CIP schedules consolidate the capital spending priorities for all operating activities of the City, including all governmental and enterprise activities that provide services to the citizens of Georgetown. The CIP Schedules are included as part of the annual operating budget. The first year of the list becomes the capital budget for the approved budget year. The following pages outline the CIP Schedule for each activity and include anticipated projects, current year project location and sources of funding. January Initial Department Meetings formulating projects in CIP February / March Division Meetings to coordinate projects in CIP Finalized funding plan May / June Present CIP to Boards and City Council September Adopted along with Annual Operating Plan Funding Operating Revenue 895$ Street Maintenance Sales Tax 2,800 General Fund 875 Certificates of Obligation Bonds 1,009 Grants 275 Total Funding 5,854$ Project Costs Transportation Division Streets 3,675$ Stormwater Drainage 1,150 Airport Services 20 Sidewalks 994 Debt Issuance Cost 15 Total Project Cost 5,854$ 2016 Capital Improvement Summary (in thousands) 1 Attachment number 2 \nPage 3 of 24 Item # D Transportation Services Introduction Transportation Services manages, maintains and repairs City streets and right-of-way. Some of the additional responsibilities of the Street Department include traffic control, emergency response operations, special events, and assistance in code enforcement. Daily responsibilities include inspection of roadways for sign repair, pavement management and removal of sight obstructions. Transportation Services has experienced a growth in demand for maintenance and rehabilitation of the City’s roadway system. The Street Department Capital Improvement Budget includes maintenance and rehabilitation of the City’s roadway system and support of new transportation construction projects. Funding for maintenance and rehabilitation from the City’s General Fund is approximately $875,000 annually. Street Maintenance Sales Tax In November 2002, voters passed a quarter-cent sales tax increase that became effective April 1, 2003. Proceeds from the new tax can only be used to make improvements to streets in existence at the time of the election and cannot be used for construction of new streets. Revenues from this tax equal approximately $2 million per year for maintenance and rehabilitation of City streets. The tax was reauthorized by voters in November 2014; the tax will not be brought back to the voters for reauthorization until November 2018. Projects funded by the tax includes but not limited to; Quail Valley Subdivision, Western Trail and Sun City (north and south of Del Webb Blvd.). Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation In May 2001, voters approved a 4B half-cent sales tax for transportation improvements that provide economic benefit to the community. The 4B is known as the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC). GTEC approves projects funded through this sales tax. Overall Transportation Improvement Plan The City adopted its Overall Transportation Plan (OTP) to guide the City’s growth and development, a revision to the OTP is currently underway. It is through this plan that future road construction is projected. As part of this process, The Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB) recommends potential projects to GTEC and the GTEC board approves its annual Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) which includes projects identified in the City’s Overall Transportation Plan that meet the GTEC eligibility requirements. The TIP is a five-year projection and is updated annually with year one being the annual GTEC budget that is approved by the City Council. The GTEC budget is not included in this CIP document. The OTP is reviewed by GTAB which makes recommendations to the City Council. In November 2008, voters authorized $46 million of General Obligation debt to be issued for road improvements. 2 Attachment number 2 \nPage 4 of 24 Item # D 2008 Voter Approved Transportation Bond Issue The City continues to work on two projects related to the 2008 Voter Approved Transportation Improvement Bond program, FM 1460 widening from Quail Valley Drive to University Boulevard and FM 971 Improvements at the intersection of North Austin Avenue. The City has worked with TxDOT, Williamson County and the City of Round Rock to secure outside funding to supplement the bond proposal to complete Right of Way (ROW) acquisitions and construction of the remaining two segments of unimproved two lane rural FM 1460 to a four lane arterial with adequate ROW for the ultimate six lanes. Project design is complete and let for construction by TxDOT, construction to start in 2015 after all utilities have been relocated. FM 971 intersection improvements at North Austin Avenue have been designed to improve access and mobility around the site. Design is nearing completion and the environmental clearances are being sought to make the project ready for construction bidding. Historic Downtown In the past few years, several rehabilitation and maintenance projects have focused on the Historic Downtown Square Area. The City will continue efforts to maintain and rehabilitate Historic Georgetown, as well as keep pace with the growth of our community. GASB 34 – Modified Approach The Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement Number 34 allows for an alternative to depreciation expense for certain infrastructure, termed the modified approach. The following conditions must be met: • The government manages the eligible assets using an asset management system to: o Keep an up-to-date asset inventory, o Perform condition assessments and report the results on a measurement scale, and o Estimate the annual amount to maintain and preserve the eligible infrastructure assets at the condition level established and disclosed by the government • The government must document that the eligible assets are being preserved approximately at or above the condition level established and disclosed by the government. The City completed its inventory and implemented its pavement management information system in February 2005. The initial assessment rated Georgetown’s street condition as “good” with a 90 Pavement Condition Index (PCI). The Council has directed staff to incorporate a policy to maintain a minimum average PCI of 85. Current funding should adequately fund that level of PCI within Georgetown for the near future. The PCI for fiscal year 2011 was 87.7 and the PCI for 2014 was 87.3. Growth factors in housing and new road construction could impact that condition over time. This system will be monitored closely and reviewed in detail again in late 2017. The proposed CIP includes funding for an update of the Pavement Management System in 2018. 3 Attachment number 2 \nPage 5 of 24 Item # D 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (Thousands of dollars) Projected Annual Project Cost 4,669$ 4,386$ 4,559$ 4,643$ 4,766$ 23,023$ Debt Issuance Cost 15 17 18 16 17 83 Sources of Funding Street Maintenance Sales Tax 2,800 2,400 2,500 2,700 2,800 13,200 General Obligation Bonds 1,009 1,128 1,202 1,084 1,108 5,531 General Fund 875 875 875 875 875 4,375 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Capital Improvement Program FY 2016 to 2020 The capital budget includes major rehabilitation of the City's roadway systems.In November 2002, voters first approved a quarter cent sales tax for maintenance of existing City streets.This sales tax revenue provides the majority of funding for street rehabiliation projects. The quarter cent sales tax must be reauthorized by the voters every four years.It will need to be reauthorized in November 2018. Street Maintenance Sales Tax General Obligation Bonds General Fund Combined 5 Year Estimated Funding Sources 4 Attachment number 2 \nPage 6 of 24 Item # D Prior Project Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (Thousands of dollars) Current Projects: Street Rehabilitation 945$ 875$ 875$ 875$ 875$ 875$ Chip Seal 378 1,620 400 400 500 500 Rejuvenate 501 350 400 500 500 600 Cutler Process 1,171 414 800 900 900 900 Point Repair - 416 300 200 300 300 Arterials Reserves Arterials Reserves 575 - 500 500 500 500 Sidewalks Sidewalks - 994 1,111 1,184 1,068 1,091 Road Bonds FM 1460 4,371 - - - - - Totals 7,941$ 4,669$ 4,386$ 4,559$ 4,643$ 4,766$ Projected City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Capital Improvement Program FY 2016 to 2020 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Th o u s a n d s Streets Capital Project Cost 5 Attachment number 2 \nPage 7 of 24 Item # D R IV E R B E N D D R L O G AN R A N C H R D L U N A T R L E XIT 2 60 S B NE I N N E R LO O P SE INNE R LOO P CR 110 SH 1 9 5 N I H35 FWY SB C R1 5 2 LEANDER RD WOL F RAN C H PKW Y S I H 3 5 S B DBWOODRD W SH 29 FM971 R O C K R I D E L N NIH35NB FM 972 CR262 M A P L E S T S H 1 3 0 T O L L N B NIH 35SB S A M H O U S T O N A V E S H 1 3 0 T O L L S B CR 143 RM2243 FM3405 CR 234 S I H 3 5 F W Y S B BIG PROJECTSCHIPSEAL - 1COURSE WITH FOG SEALCHIPSEAL - 2COURSE WITH FOG SEALCUTLERTHINLAY ASPHALT OVERLAY - TOMIN HOUSE PROJECTSCHIP SEAL/POINT REPAIR/CURB & GUTTERREJUVENATOR - COLL AND RES 2015-16 Capital Improvement ProjectsTransportation-Streets Rehabilitation ´ 0 6,0003,000 Feet1 inch = 6,000 feet REJUVENATOR REJUVENATOR REJUVENATOR CHIPSEAL/PR/CG CHIPSEAL/PR/CG CHIPSEAL-1C CHIPSEAL-2C TOM TOM 6 Attachment number 2 \nPage 8 of 24 Item # D Responsible Division: Street Department Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 945 875 875 875 875 875 5,320 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with General Fund 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Pine St & Holly St Rehabilitation 509 - - - - 6th St @ 7th St Improvements 40 175 - - - W. 11th St - 416 - - - W. 10th St - 90 - - - 17th St - 75 350 - - Katherine St - 50 200 - - Hart St - 50 250 - - Main St - - 75 225 - East St Stabilization - - - 450 - Cutler Process 326 19 - 200 875 Notes: Subprojects (000): City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Street Rehabilitation Projected Streets listed as subprojects under "Rehabilitation" were identified as being in most need of repair or rehabilitation because of their asphalt and subgrade failures, drainage problems and deteriorating curbs. Subgrade stabilization, valley gutter installation and curb and gutter addition or replacement are combined with surface treatments to bring the pavement condition back into the high 90s. Photo / Map Placeholder 7 Attachment number 2 \nPage 9 of 24 Item # D Responsible Division: Street Department Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 378 1,620 400 400 500 500 3,798 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with Street Maintenance Sales Tax 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Chip Seal 1,620 400 400 500 500 Notes: Subprojects (000): City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Chip Seal Projected Photo / Map Placeholder Oil and rock maintenance application to provide a seal and wear protection, sealing current cracks and making a self healing barrier for new cracks. Current year's areas are expected to include; River Ridge Dr, Inner Loop (Churchill Farms), DB Wood Rd (Public Safety Operational and Training Center to Georgetown Village), Williams Dr (DB Wood to Del Webb), NE downtown, North Georgetown Addition, Lakeway Dr, and Serenada Dr (Luna Trail area). 8 Attachment number 2 \nPage 10 of 24 Item # D Responsible Division: Street Department Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 501 350 400 500 500 600 2,851 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with Street Maintenance Sales Tax 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Rejuvenator 350 400 500 500 600 Notes: City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Rejuvenate Projected Subprojects (000): Application of asphalt pavement to provide ultraviolet protection and seal minute cracks and pavement flaws. Restores a uniform dark asphalt color to pavement covering the squeegee lines left after crack sealing. This process applied to pavement in moderately good condition can prolong the need for more costly applications. Current year's proposed areas include; River Ridge Dr, Berry Creek Dr, Quail Valley Dr, NE downtown, Western Trail, and Sun City. Photo / Map Placeholder 9 Attachment number 2 \nPage 11 of 24 Item # D Responsible Division: Street Department Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 1,171 414 800 900 900 900 5,085 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with Street Maintenance Sales Tax 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Cutler Process 414 800 900 900 900 Notes: Subprojects (000): Streets listed as subprojects under "Maintenance" were identified as being in most need of surface treatments with only minor repairs to roadways. Roadways are evaluated by history, condition, age and type of previous treatments performed. Current year's projects are expected to include; Maple St, Myrtle St, and Church St (University Ave to 2nd St) Photo / Map Placeholder City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Cutler Process Projected 10 Attachment number 2 \nPage 12 of 24 Item # D Responsible Division: Street Department Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total - 416 300 200 300 300 1,516 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with Street Maintenance Sales Tax 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Point Repair Overlay 416 300 200 300 300 Notes: Subprojects (000): City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Point Repair Projected Pavement has normally reached the end of its life and possibly has at least one overlay. Pavement need to be milled down to or below original flow line. Grade point repairs will be made and then resurfaced with a one and one half inch overlay of existing asphalt. This should extend the pavement's life an additional 10 to 15 years. Current year's areas for thin overlay are expected to include; Texas Dr, Gabriel View Dr, Kathi Ln, Addie Ln, Brandi Ln, and Tiffany Ln. Photo / Map Placeholder 11 Attachment number 2 \nPage 13 of 24 Item # D E MORROW STW MORROW ST L E A N D E R S T W 10TH ST C H A M B E R W A Y WA L N U T S T E 21ST ST WSPRINGST A S H ST H A R T S T E SPRING ST E 1 7 TH1/2 S T E 6TH ST E 18TH ST BRENDONLEE LN W 9TH ST W 18TH S T W 8TH ST E L M S T E 19TH ST E 13TH ST R U C K E R S T W 4TH ST E 3RD ST E 14THST W11T H S T W 13THST SAN J O S E S T E U B A N K S T E 20TH ST E 4TH ST E 10TH ST S M Y R T L E S T E 5TH ST E 11TH ST PA I G E S T W 3RD ST R O C K S T E VA L L E Y S T W5THST E 9 T H S T W 15TH S T F O R E S T S T E 17THST E 19TH 1/2 ST T I M B E R S T W 19THST C A N D E E S T A L L Y STON ECIR W16T HST L O W E R P ARK RD J O H N C A R T E R D R T H O M A S C T R I V E R O A K S CV W A T ERS E D GEC I R P I N E S T B R I D G E S T E 8TH ST W E S T S T BL U E HOLE PARK RD N A U S T I N AV E S C O L L E G E S T M A P L E S T RA I L R O A D AV E SCENI C D R S M A I N S T W U N IV E R S IT Y AV E S IH 3 5 F W Y S B S IH 3 5 F W Y N B E 2ND ST W7THST E 7 T HST W2NDST E 15THST W 17TH ST RIVE R Y BLVD S C H U R C H S T H O L L Y S T S A U S T I N A V E SIH35NB S IH 3 5 S B NCOLLEGEST Legend CIP Sidewalk Rehab 2015-16 Capital Improvement ProjectsTransportation-Sidewalk Rehabilitation ´ 1 inch = 833 feet 0 580 1,160290 Feet 12 Attachment number 2 \nPage 14 of 24 Item # D Responsible Division: Street Department Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total - 994 1,111 1,184 1,068 1,091 5,448 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with Transportation Bonds 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 8th St Church St - Myrtle St 43 - - - - Austin Ave 8th St - University Ave 14 78 - - - Ph 1 Signal and Curb Ramp Improvements 506 - 253 102 - 7th St 56 - - - - 10th St Main St - Rock St 14 80 - - - 8th St Austin Ave - MLK Dr 15 84 - - - Church St 8th St - 9th St 123 - - - - 11th St Main St - Rock St 23 128 - - - Access Route to Government Services 200 - - - - Other Sidewalks as Determined - 741 931 966 1,091 Notes: City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Sidewalks Projected Subprojects (000): Photo / Map Placeholder In 2014, the City completed a review of the pedestrian network within the right of way in the City limits, as well as a comprehensive accessibility review in the downtown district. The study evaluated the condition, presence of pedestrian infrastructure and need as defined by public input, staff recommendations and legal requirements. The study recommends $10 million in improvements to the network including $3.6 million in the downtown district. Recommended improvements support the City's adopted ADA Transition Plan, the Downtown Master Plan, the Parks & Rec Trails Master Plan, the Overall Transportation Plan and the City's Comprehensive Plan. Transportation Services has worked to ensure pedestrian improvements are coupled with street and utility improvements to maximize the City's investment. 13 Attachment number 2 \nPage 15 of 24 Item # D Stormwater Drainage Utility Introduction The Stormwater Drainage Utility manages and maintains stormwater infrastructure operations and facilities. Some of the additional responsibilities of the Stormwater Drainage Utility are assisting other Divisions in City code enforcement. Daily responsibilities include drainage and flood control when needed, right-of-way mowing and cleaning, street sign maintenance and street cleaning operations. The Stormwater Drainage Utility has been focusing on meeting the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Phase II regulations and requirements regarding stormwater control in municipalities. In 2016, the City expects to continue efforts to meet the stormwater control mandates. The FY 2016 Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes projects aimed at improving stormwater drainage, erosion control and the compilation of stormwater assets. The Stormwater department completed the buy-out of eight homes in the Smith Branch area as a mitigation measure against future flood damage. 14 Attachment number 2 \nPage 16 of 24 Item # D 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (Thousands of dollars) Projected Annual Project Cost 1,150$ 600$ 2,750$ 900$ 600$ 6,000$ Debt Issuance Cost - - 18 - - 18 Sources of Funding Operating Revenue 875 600 600 900 600 3,575 Self Supporting CO's - - 2,168 - - 2,168 Grants 275 - - - - 275 City of Georgetown, Texas Stormwater Capital Improvement Program FY 2016 to 2020 The City will be determining a source of revenue to fund the EPA Phase II regulations, the Regional Stormwater Plan, and other requirements regarding stormwater control within municipalities. The most likely revenue source is through a combination of stormwater fees and developer fees paid in-lieu of onsite detention. Operating Revenue Self Supporting CO's Grants Combined 5 Year Estimated Funding Sources 15 Attachment number 2 \nPage 17 of 24 Item # D Prior Project Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (Thousands of dollars) New Projects: Curb and Gutter Replacements 300$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 800$ 500$ Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades 100 100 100 100 100 100 Smith Branch Buy-outs 2,215 - - - - - San Gabriel Flood Study 400 550 - - - - Serenada Culvert Improvement - - - 500 - - NW Blvd Drainage - - - 350 - - Airport Road @ Pecan Branch - - - 1,300 - - Totals 3,015$ 1,150$ 600$ 2,750$ 900$ 600$ Projected City of Georgetown, Texas Stormwater Capital Improvement Program FY 2016 to 2020 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Th o u s a n d s Stormwater Capital Project Cost 16 Attachment number 2 \nPage 18 of 24 Item # D Responsible Division: Stormwater Drainage Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 300 500 500 500 800 500 3,100 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with cash from Drainage Utility 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Curb and Gutter Replacement 500 500 500 500 500 Main Street Drainage - - - 300 - Notes: MAP OR PHOTO City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Curb and Gutter Replacements Subprojects (000): Projected This project will consist of replacing deteriorating stand-up curbs with curb and gutter. Stand-up curbs throughout the City will be evaulated on their condition and their potential to cause damage to roadways. The curbs identified in areas with the poorest drainage are most likely to contribute to road damage. These curbs will be targeted for replacement. These replacements will save the City from having to perform much more costly street rehabilitation. 17 Attachment number 2 \nPage 19 of 24 Item # D Responsible Division: Stormwater Drainage Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with cash from Drainage Utility 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrade 100 100 100 100 100 Notes: Subprojects (000): Rehabilitation of ponds above and beyond monthly mowing and trash or debris removal. Examples may include dredging of ditches, stormwater boxes or water quality / detention ponds; construction of end treatments, fencing and alterations of existing storm drain features; and removal and replacement of filtration devices. City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades Projected MAP OR PHOTO 18 Attachment number 2 \nPage 20 of 24 Item # D Responsible Division: Stormwater Drainage Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 400 550 - - - - - 950 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with cash from Drainage Utility and grants. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 North and South Fork 550 - - - - Notes: Subprojects (000): City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program San Gabriel Flood Study Projected Map of Downtown Ponds Staff has applied for a Texas Water Development Board grant to study the North and South Forks of the San Gabriel River. If approved, this will be in partnership with the Cities of Leander and Liberty Hill and with the Counties of Williamson and Burnett. The grant is a 50/50 share. The State would reimburse $275K and the City would be responsible for the remainder (including in-kind contributions). 19 Attachment number 2 \nPage 21 of 24 Item # D Airport Services Introduction Airport Services manages, maintains and repairs the City’s airport. Some of the additional responsibilities of the airport department include traffic control, emergency response operations and special events. Daily responsibilities include inspection of runways for sign repair, pavement management and removal of sight obstructions. Airport Services has experienced a growth in demand for maintenance and rehabilitation of the City’s runway system. 20 Attachment number 2 \nPage 22 of 24 Item # D 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (Thousands of dollars) Projected Annual Project Cost 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20$ Sources of Funding Operating Revenues 20 - - - - 20 Prior Project Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (Thousands of dollars) Master Plan -$ 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Parallel TW-A & MITL 770 - - - - - Fuel Farm 100 - - - - - Totals 870$ 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Projected City of Georgetown, Texas Airport Capital Improvement Program FY 2016 to 2020 The Airport five year Capital Improvement Program funding comes from a combination of cash contributions and previous year-end excess funds. $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 20 1 7 20 1 8 20 1 9 20 2 0 Th o u s a n d s Capital Project Cost 21 Attachment number 2 \nPage 23 of 24 Item # D Responsible Division: Airport Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total - 20 - - - - 20 Description : Funding Sources: Airport Fund 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Master Plan 20 - - - - Notes: Subprojects : Projected Photo / Map Placeholder Update to the 2005 Airport Master Plan to reaffirm or amend the Century Plan policies, goals and strategies of the plan to the vision and mission statements of the 2030 Plan, and to update the short, intermediate and long term projects / actions related to the continued maintenance and development of the airport. City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Projects Master Plan 22 Attachment number 2 \nPage 24 of 24 Item # D City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Agenda May 26, 2015 SUBJECT: Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney - Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items - Litigation Update- Spencer EEOC Claim - Williams Drive Project- Claim Settlement Sec. 551.074: Personnel Matters - City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal Sec. 551.086: Competitive Matters - Forwarded from the Georgetown Utility Systems Advisory Board (GUS): Presentation and discussion on the 2015-16 Electric Capital Improvement Plan – Wesley Wright, Systems Engineering Director ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Cover Memo Item # E