HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda CC 07.14.2015
Notice of Meeting of the
Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
July 14, 2015
The Georgetown City Council will meet on July 14, 2015 at 6:00 PM at the City Council Chambers,
101 E. 7th St., Georgetown, Texas
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined
under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon
request. Please contact the City Secretary's Office, least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting
date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users
route through Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any
purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A Call to Order
Invocation
Pledge of Allegiance
Comments from the Mayor
- Welcome and Meeting Procedures
- Proclamation for National Parks & Recreation Month
- Proclamation for National Breastfeeding Month
- Recognition Award presented to the Georgetown Fire Department for their assistance during
the Memorial Day flooding – Presented by Marty Herrin, Williamson County
City Council Regional Board Reports
Announcements
- A Public Meeting for the Downtown West Project will be held at the Georgetown Public
Library Hewlett Room on Wednesday, July 15, 2015 at 5:30 pm.
Action from Executive Session
Statutory Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that may be acted upon
with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed
and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda.
B Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the Workshop and Regular
Meeting held on Tuesday, June 23, 2015 -- Jessica Brettle, City Secretary
Legislative Regular Agenda
Page 1 of 86
C Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance for the Rezoning of 3.37 acres in the
Nicholas Porter (Abstract No. 497) and William Addison (Abstract No. 21) Surveys, more
specifically described as 0.245 acre in the Nicholas Porter Survey (Abstract No. 497) and a
3.125 acre part of Block 14 of Outlot Division C, located at 179 Holly Street, from the
Residential Single-family District (RS) to the Low-Density Multifamily District (MF-1) --
Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner and Jordan Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner (action
required)
D Consideration and possible action to approve a Resolution finding public convenience and
necessity and authorizing eminent domain proceedings, if necessary, for the acquisition of
real property from A. C. Weir Properties, Ltd. to effectuate certain public road and
utility infrastructure improvements in connection with the SW Bypass Road Project --
Terri Glasby Calhoun, Real Estate Services Coordinator and Edward G. Polasek, AICP,
Transportation Services Director
E Consideration and possible action to appoint three (3) councilmembers to the HARC/UDC
Evaluation Subcommittee -- Rachael Jonrowe, Councilmember District 6
F Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas
(“City”) amending Chapter 9.13 of the Code of Ordinances relating to the Juvenile Curfew,
making such other findings and provisions related to the subject and declaring an effective
date -- Wayne Nero, Chief of Police and Bridget Chapman, City Attorney (action required)
Project Updates
G Project Update and Status regarding American with Disabilities Act (ADA), Downtown
Facilities, Downtown Parking, Lease Agreements related to City-Owned Property; 2015/16
Annual Budget Update; EMS Transition Update; Project Updates for the Georgetown
Economic Development Corporation (GEDCO), the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement
Corporation (GTEC), and the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB), and
Possible Direction to staff – David Morgan, City Manager
Public Wishing to Address Council
On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be
found on the table at the entrance to the Council Chamber. Clearly print your name and the letter of
the item on which you wish to speak and present it to the City Secretary on the dais, preferably prior
to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Council considers that item.
On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future City Council agenda by
contacting the City Secretary no later than noon on the Wednesday prior to the Tuesday meeting,
with the subject matter of the topic they would like to address and their name. The City Secretary
can be reached at 512/930-3651.
H - Jill Fussell will present a petition regarding Tornado Sirens to the City Council
Executive Session
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes,
Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the
regular session.
I Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney
- Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which
the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items
Sec. 551.074: Personnel Matters
- Discussion with the City Manager regarding City Council goals for him in the upcoming
year
- City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the
appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal
Adjournment
Page 2 of 86
Certificate of Posting
I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify
that this Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily
accessible to the general public at all times, on the _____ day of _________________,
2015, at __________, and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding
the scheduled time of said meeting.
__________________________________
Jessica Brettle, City Secretary
Page 3 of 86
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
July 14, 2015
SUBJECT:
Call to Order
Invocation
Pledge of Allegiance
Comments from the Mayor
- Welcome and Meeting Procedures
- Proclamation for National Parks & Recreation Month
- Proclamation for National Breastfeeding Month
- Recognition Award presented to the Georgetown Fire Department for their assistance during the Memorial
Day flooding – Presented by Marty Herrin, Williamson County
City Council Regional Board Reports
Announcements
- A Public Meeting for the Downtown West Project will be held at the Georgetown Public Library Hewlett
Room on Wednesday, July 15, 2015 at 5:30 pm.
Action from Executive Session
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Page 4 of 86
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
July 14, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the Workshop and Regular Meeting held on
Tuesday, June 23, 2015 -- Jessica Brettle, City Secretary
ITEM SUMMARY:
Please see attached for the draft minutes.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
June 23, 2015 DRAFT Workshop Minutes
June 23, 2015 DRAFT Regular Meeting Minutes
June 23, 2015- Hugh Norris Statement
June 23, 2015- Nancy Zenner Statement
Page 5 of 86
Notice of a Meeting of the
Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
The Georgetown City Council will meet on Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 3:00 PM at the Council Chambers, at 101 E.
7th St., Georgetown, Texas
The city of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you
require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable
assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary’s
Office, at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th
Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Policy Development/Review Workshop – Call to order at 3:00 PM
A Overview of the City’s Internal Service Funds and related capital maintenance for the City’s facilities, parks, fleet
and technology services to be included in the 2015/16 Annual Budget. Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer
Mayor called the meeting to order at 3:00PM.
With a Powerpoint Presentation, Rundell spoke about Internal Service Funds (ISFs) and what they entail. She
said ISF funds capital replacement and maintenance for non-enterprise city assets. She said the city uses three
major internal service funds, including fleet ISF, facilities ISF and technology ISF. She spoke about what each ISF
covers. She said each ISF has a “replacement schedule” and it determines the lease payments for each asset.
She said each department has a budget line item for ISF lease costs. She spoke about how ISF allocations are
managed thru transfers within the budget. She said the ISF activity is allocated in the CAFR. She said all non-
scheduled projects/maintenance are submitted as budget requests. She spoke about the recent growth in the
Fleet ISF. She spoke about the facilities ISF and technology ISF in great detail. She described the 2015/16 park
maintenance plan. She said the replacement schedules are maintained by departments. She spoke about the
major 2015/16 ISF operating variances. She said, under the fleet ISF, there are additional expanses for TRVs
and western district. She said, under the technology ISF, there is an increase to on-going software maintenance
as well as an increase in major hardware replacements. She reviewed the major related budget requests Council
will see regarding ISFs, including an additional mechanic at VSC, replacing the parks and recreation software,
customer information system, meter asset management system and contract management software. She said, in
conclusion, ongoing maintenance and replacement ensures cost effective asset management. She added all ADA
compliance issues will be addressed in the CIP and department budgets.
Brainard said he was surprised to see airport costs in the ISF because he thought airport was its own enterprise.
Rundell said it is in the ISF but the airport fund pays for its own technology, it has wireless communication and
network abilities. Brainard asked about the basis for the allocation of public safety equipment and playground
equipment replacement cost. Rundell said the public safety equipment costs come from the chiefs and parks fund
is based on the replacement needs of parks. She said the city is not addressing the parks ISF 100% due to new
ADA requirements. Brainard asked and Rundell said the only property the city leases is the parking lot across
from the library. Fought asked about the ISF and maintenance for Garey Park and Rundell said that would be
treated separately. Hesser asked and Rundell confirmed the pool maintenance is also in the ISF funds.
B Presentation and Discussion of the San Gabriel Park Master Plan Update -- Barbara Austin, Vice President and
Director of Park Planning & Design for RVi., Kimberly Garrett, Parks and Recreation Director and Laurie Brewer,
Assistant City Manager
Garrett spoke about the plan and how the city has been working with RVI to look at opportunities and constraints
in San Gabriel Park and create a master plan for the park. She introduced Barbara Austin, who presented the
master plan to the City Council. Austin spoke about how a master plan for this kind of park is also a business
plan. She spoke about the steps they went through in the creation of the plan. She summarized the project goals
including preserving and enhancing the natural environment, preserve and enhance park activities and strengthen
community ties to the park. She showed Council a site analysis of San Gabriel Park and the information they usd
while they developed the plan. She spoke about what they discovered could be improved or updated at San
Gabriel Park, including the trails and areas around the river. She should Council a map of the Master Plan for the
park. She said they looked a lot at circulation of traffic and movement throughout the park and said it seemed
important to keep Morrow Street where it is currently located. Brainard asked and Austin said the trees in the park
could be 200 years old.
Page 6 of 86
She said they do recommend a reforestation program so there will continue to be shade and so it replaces the
trees that are lost. She continued to speak about the master plan. She spoke about bringing the spring back to its
more natural habitat. She said she wants to be sure to add signage and information so people can learn why it is
important. Jonrowe asked and Austin said this plan doesn’t go to the other side of the river but it is good to
consider what that would look like. She spoke about the plans for the play areas in the park. She spoke about the
community center and how, in order to complete the space, they would like to bring a large group bar-b-que area
or a pavilion for rentals and events. Jonrowe asked and Austin said this would not replace the sunken gardens in
that same vicinity. Gipson asked and Austin spoke about the parking in the area and said they reorganized it and
ended up with a net gain in parking. She spoke about the big central green and their proposed plan for that area.
She said they are proposing a big central green where various events can occur. Austin spoke about the
implementation of the park and how they looked at phasing. She noted they split the implementation into four
major pieces. Brainard asked and Austin spoke about current leases in the park. There were many questions
about the timing of the project as well as other parks projects in the city. Morgan spoke about how those issues
will be discussed at the visioning sessions where long range planning can be determined. He said all projects will
be tied together financially as well, so Council can see the full picture. Hesser asked about the amphitheater idea
that has been discussed in the past. Austin said they are proposing this big central green be created in lieu of an
amphitheater. Brainard asked and Garrett spoke about when the leases in the park are up. Brainard said in his
view the location of this park is extraordinary. He said he loves what has been proposed here today and he hopes
we can do it sooner rather than later. Jonrowe agreed with Brainard’s statements. Gonzalez asked and Garrett
said there is $28.5 million remaining in the parks bond. There was much discussion.
C Presentation and discussion on the City's annual year-end external audit on the Airport Fund for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2014 and Financial Analysis and Process Review Report for the Georgetown Municipal
Airport -- Russ Volk, Airport Manager, Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer and Edward G. Polasek, AICP,
Transportation Services Director
Rundell began the presentation and introduced Adam Sanford to the Council, who presented the results of the
financial audit of the airport. He reviewed the various elements of the audit including the assets, statement of
revenues, cash on hand, expenses and changes in net position of the airport for year ended September 30, 2014.
He said the non-operating revenues were bigger than they had been in the past. There were many questions
about fixed assets. Brainard asked to see a ten year schedule of transfers into the airport. Gonzalez asked
questions about what generates the revenue for the income and how it is important to see those types of
statistics. There was much discussion about the financial audit.
He introduced Alyssa Martin, who summarized the results of the business operations audit. She said her report
has three key components, including people, process and technology. She said since the release of the CH2M
Hill Repot, the City has made efforts to improve each of the three components. She said the city hired a new
Airport Manager in January of 2014 and they started their process three weeks later. She said they focused on
five areas, including inventory management, sales and accounts receivable, contract management and
compliance, internal financial and operation reporting and regulatory compliance and reporting. Gonzalez asked
and Martin confirmed there is no SOP at the Airport. Fought said his concern has always been that the Council did
not know the financial state of the airport until recently. Jonrowe said the issue was that a lot of the maintenance
that should have been happening was not happening. She said she is glad there is a manager on board now to
get this issue sorted out and have it be a professional organization. Mayor asked about who approves transfers
from the general fund to the enterprise fund. She summarized the process review results including the nine
various observations and related short term and long term recommendations. There were many questions and
discussion of the results of the audit. She said, in conclusion, it is anticipated that the City of Georgetown Airport
will have expenditures in excess of revenues through at least the 2019 fiscal year. Martin added the airport does
not have the fundamental processes and technology in place and the city should establish a timeline to push the
Airport Master Plan forward.
Meeting recessed to Executive Session under Sections 551.071 and 551.074 of the Local Government Code—
5:16PM
Executive Session
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon’s Texas Codes, Annotated, the
items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session.
D Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney
- Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the
City Council, including agenda items
Sec. 551.074: Personnel Matters
- City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the appointment, employment, evaluation,
reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal
Adjournment – Meeting adjourned at 6:00pm
Page 7 of 86
The Georgetown City Council will meet on Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 6:00 PM at the Council Chambers at 101 E.
7th St., Georgetown, Texas
The city of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you
require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable
assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary’s
Office, at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th
Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose authorized by
the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A Call to Order – Mayor called the meeting to order at 6:00PM
Invocation
Pledge of Allegiance
Comments from the Mayor
- Welcome and Meeting Procedures
- Proclamation in honor of Eastview High School Soccer Team
- Proclamation in honor of Georgetown High School Baseball Team
City Council Regional Board Reports
Announcements
Independence Day Holiday Hours and Trash Collection
32nd Annual Sertoma 4th of July Celebration
Fireworks Regulations
Action from Executive Session
There was no action out of Executive Session.
Statutory Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that may be acted upon with one single
vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and acted upon individually as
part of the Regular Agenda.
B Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the Workshop and Regular Meeting held on
Tuesday, June 9, 2015 -- Jessica Brettle, City Secretary
C Consideration and possible action to approve the appointment of Tom Milburn as a member of the Library
Advisory Board to fill a vacancy – Mayor Dale Ross
D Consideration and possible action to approve a cooperation agreement with Williamson County to continue
participation as part of the Urban County Entitlement for the Community Development Block Grant Program
for FY2016-2018 -- Jennifer C. Bills, AICP, Housing Coordinator, and Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager
Brainard pulled this item to the Regular Agenda.
Notice of a Meeting of the
Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
Page 8 of 86
E Forwarded from the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB):
Consideration and possible action to allow the City Manager to submit Letter of Interest for additional Airport
Capital Improvement item to TxDOT Aviation for Runway 18/36 repairs and maintenance -- Russ Volk, C.M.,
Airport Manager and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director
Mayor pulled this item to the Regular Agenda.
F Consideration and possible action on a License to Encroach for City of Georgetown, Block 41, Lot 2-3 (pts),
located at 212 West 7th Street, for an accessible ramp to encroach five feet into a public sidewalk -- Mike
Elabarger, Senior Planner
G Consideration and possible action to approve a Resolution amending the bylaws for the Historic and
Architectural Review Commission -- Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner; Andreina Dávila-Quintero, Project
Coordinator and Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager
Motion by Fought, second by Jonrowe to approve the consent agenda, with the exception of items D and E,
which were pulled to the Legislative Regular Agenda by Brainard and Mayor, respectively. Approved 7-0
Legislative Regular Agenda
D Consideration and possible action to approve a cooperation agreement with Williamson County to continue
participation as part of the Urban County Entitlement for the Community Development Block Grant Program
for FY2016-2018 -- Jennifer C. Bills, AICP, Housing Coordinator, and Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager
Brainard spoke about an initiative by the Obama Administration whereby Department and Housing and Urban
Development would be able to assert authority over local zoning laws. He said the agency would be able to
determine what types of home could be built and where. He said it is imperative that Georgetown retain its ability
to determine its own zoning standards within statutory guidelines maintained by the state. He said he encourages
the city council, city staff and Williamson County remain vigilant on this issue.
Motion by Brainard, second by Jonrowe to approve the agreement. Approved 7-0
E Forwarded from the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB):
Consideration and possible action to allow the City Manager to submit Letter of Interest for additional Airport
Capital Improvement item to TxDOT Aviation for Runway 18/36 repairs and maintenance -- Russ Volk, C.M.,
Airport Manager and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director
Polasek described the item and said, as part of Volk’s routine maintenance program, he identified some
deficiencies in the runway and some lateral cracking and surface deterioration that has caused quite a bit of
foreign object debris that comes up through the pavement. He said this letter would be to move forward with the
runway repairs and maintenance.
Speaker, Hugh Norris, read a statement into the record, which is attached to the final version of these minutes.
Speaker, Nancy Zenner, read a statement into the record, which is attached to the final version of these minutes.
Motion by Fought, second by Jonrowe to approve the submission of the letter of interest.
Gipson referred to the 2004 document the speaker mentioned and Polasek described the document. He said it
contains runway clear zones that TxDOT recommends. He said the properties acquired over the last five years
have been in response to that plan. Gipson asked and Polasek said Texas has a state CIP available and projects
like those are placed in that CIP. He added, however, there are no Georgetown projects in that CIP for the next
five years. Gipson asked and Polasek confirmed the City of Georgetown has zero plans for expansion of the
airport. Mayor asked and Polasek said nothing will be lengthening the runway or allowing bigger aircraft. Mayor
asked and Polasek said this will just be improving the pavement and runway quality. There was much discussion.
Vote on the motion: Approved 7-0
H Final Report to the City Council regarding the financial results of the 2015 General Obligation Refunding Bond
and 2015 Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bond sale completed on June 4, 2015 -- Micki Rundell, Chief
Financial Officer
Members of Specialized Public Finance presented the result s of the recent general obligation and sales tax
revenue refunding bond sales. Jennifer Douglas said the savings incurred from the GO refunding bond sale is
$467,000 and the savings from the sales tax revenue refunding bond sale is $355,000. Brainard thanked them for
their good work. There was no action on this item.
Page 9 of 86
I Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas
amending Chapter 9.13 of the Code of Ordinances relating to the Juvenile Curfew; making such other findings
and provisions related to the subject; and declaring an effective date -- Wayne Nero, Police Chief and Bridget
Chapman, City Attorney (action required)
Nero described the item and said this is the juvenile ordinance which is reviewed every three years. He said the
city only receives about 10-15 related calls for service each year and added they only issue about 5-15 citations
per year. Jonrowe asked and Nero said, in Texas, age 17 is considered an adult.
Public Hearing opened at 6:46PM
No persons were present to speak.
Public Hearing closed at 6:46PM
Nero read only the caption of the Ordinance on first reading after having satisfied the requirements of the City
Charter.
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Fought to approve the Ordinance on first reading. Approved 7-0
J Forwarded from the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB):
Consideration and possible action to award the 2nd Street Rehabilitation Contract to Joe Bland Construction of
Austin, Texas in the amount of $1,945,100.00 -- Mark Miller, Transportation Services Manager and Edward G.
Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director
Polasek described the item for Council and spoke about what the base bid for this includes.
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Hesser to approve the contract.
Brainard asked and Polasek said the city does not offer financial incentive for early completion. He said GTAB
has asked staff to look into that process. Vote on the motion: Approved 7-0
K Forwarded from the Georgetown Utility Advisory Board (GUS):
Consideration and possible action to set a Public Hearing date for public comment(s) regarding proposed
changes to the Utility Impact Fees for Water and Wastewater -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering
Director
Wright described the item and said, in order to consider an amendment to the impact fees, a public hearing must
be held. He said staff is considering August 11th as a date for a public hearing. He said a related impact fee study
packet was provided to Council and is the result of the Impact Fee Review committee meetings. Wright described
the impact fee review process.
Motion by Fought, second by Gonzalez to hold the public hearing on August 11 as recommended by staff.
Fought said he was at the GUS meeting where the presentation and analysis was made and he was impressed
with it. Fought said Council deserves to see more details than what council has seen so far. He said this is a
$140 million project.
Motion by Fought, second by Gonzalez to amend the motion to also direct the staff to accomplish the following
before the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee proposal is brought back to Council for consideration:
Provide each of the developers of the projects we have recently approved the opportunity to review and
comment upon the analysis and the recommendations contained in the report;
Assure that we are not placing one framework for development at an advantage, or a disadvantage, over
other frameworks (at a minimum, a list of developments which are "grandfathered" to the existing rates and
those who would be impacted would be appropriate);
Account for contributions already made under existing development agreements (at a minimum, developers
should be asked to submit a list of "contributions" they have made which should be considered as part of the
impact assessment);
Confirm that "idle" or latent demands have been taken into account in determining the requirements (at a
minimum, a list of standing obligations which includes actual use would be appropriate);
Request the Housing Advisory Board review and comment on the proposal.
Page 10 of 86
Vote on the amendment: Approved 7-0
Vote on the motion as amended: Approved 7-0
L Second Reading of an Ordinance for a Rezoning of 33.77 acres in the Joseph Fish and David Wright Surveys,
from 11.7 acres of the Local Commercial District (C-1), 20.7 acres of the High-Density Multifamily District (MF-2),
and 1.3 acres of the Office District (OF), to Planned Unit Development (PUD), with a base zoning district of Low-
Density Multifamily (MF-1), located at 410 Shell Road, to be known as Gardens at Verde Vista -- Carolyn
Horner, AICP, Planner and Sofia Nelson, Interim Planning Director (action required)
Horner said there are no changes since the last meeting and she read only the caption of the Ordinance on
second reading.
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Eby to approve the Ordinance on second reading. Approved 7-0
M Second Reading of an Ordinance amending Chapter 2.50 of the City Code relating to the powers and duties
of the Historic and Architectural Review Commission (“HARC”), and its authority to delegate review to a
subcommittee and delegation of a demolition subcommittee -- Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner, Andreina Dávila-
Quintero, Project Coordinator, and Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager (action required)
Davila-Quintero said there have been no changes since the first reading. She read only the caption of the
Ordinance on second reading.
Motion by Gonzalez, second by Gipson to approve the Ordinance on second reading. Approved 7-0
N Consideration and possible action to approve a Resolution recognizing the Georgetown Fire Fighters
Association as the sole and exclusive bargaining agent for the City’s firefighters in accordance with Texas
Local Government Code, Chapter 142, Subchapter C -- Tadd Phillips, Human Resources Director
Philips said, on Monday June 1, City Secretary’s office received a petition in order for the Fire Fighter’s
Association to be recognized for purposes of meeting and conferring with the City. He said since 76% of the
department signed the petition, staff recommends council grants recognition.
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Gonzalez to approve the Resolution. Approved 7-0
O Consideration and possible action to order a certification election to determine which police officers
association represents a majority of covered officers in accordance with Texas Local Government Code,
Chapter 142, Subchapter B -- Tadd Phillips, Human Resources Director
Phillips described the item and said, on Wednesday June 3rd, City Secretary’s Office received a valid signed
petition with 37 signatures requesting the Police Benevolent Association of Georgetown be recognized as the sole
and exclusive bargaining agent for meet and confer. He said the Council may recognize the change provided by
the petition or order a certification election. He said it is staff’s recommendation to order a certification election.
Speakers Robert McCabe, Tom Tatum, Wyatt Raley and Dwight Tiller expressed their opinions on this issue. To
hear full comments, please visit the city’s website at http://www.georgetown.org/gtv.
Motion by Fought, second by Jonrowe to direct a certification election and that it be done expeditiously in
accordance with procedures. Approved 7-0
Project Updates
P - Project Update and Status regarding American with Disabilities Act (ADA), Downtown Facilities, Downtown
Parking, Lease Agreements related to City-Owned Property; 2015/16 Annual Budget Update; 2015 Bond Issue
Update; EMS Transition Update; Texas Legislative Update; West Texas Wind Farm Project Update; Texas
Legislative Update; Project Updates for the Georgetown Economic Development Corporation (GEDCO), the
Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC), and the Georgetown Transportation Advisory
Board (GTAB), and Possible Direction to staff – David Morgan, City Manager
The City Manager had no additional updates for the City Council.
Public Wishing to Address Council
On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found on the
table at the entrance to the Council Chamber. Clearly print your name and the letter of the item on which you wish
Page 11 of 86
to speak and present it to the City Secretary on the dais, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be
called forward to speak when the Council considers that item.
On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future City Council agenda by contacting the
City Secretary no later than noon on the Wednesday prior to the Tuesday meeting, with the subject matter of the
topic they would like to address and their name. The City Secretary can be reached at 512/930-3651.
Q - As of the deadline, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than what was posted on the agend
Executive Session
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon’s Texas Codes, Annotated, the
items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session.
R Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney
- Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the
City Council, including agenda items
Sec. 551.074: Personnel Matters
- City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the appointment, employment, evaluation,
reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal
MEETING ADJOURNED at 7:17PM
Page 12 of 86
STATEMENT TO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 2015
ITEM “E”- Request New Airport CIP- Runway 18/36
Good evening Mr. Mayor, members of city council, city staff, ladies and gentlemen. My name is
Hugh C. Norris, Jr. My wife and I reside at 4400 Luna Trail. I am a member of the Airport
Concerned Citizens (ACC) and appear before you tonight for comments related to Item “E” of
this evening's agenda.
This item, authorizes the city manager to sign a letter of interest to the Texas Department of
Transportation Aviation Division for new 90% federal grants totaling $3,475,000 for fiscal years
2016 and 2017 for repairs and maintenance for Runways 18/36 and 11/29. $3,140,000 of this total
cost is designated for repair and maintenance of Runway 18./36. The ACC opposes approval of
this item by the city council. It was not properly vetted for the general public by the GTAB.
These new grants, if approved by TxDOT AVN, would be a continuum of numerous airport
federal grants that have never been properly reviewed pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA). This item requires return to the GTAB for proper and full public vetting.
Everyone knows that maintenance is something done to extend the useful life of something
already existing. What is proposed for Runway 18/36 is not just repair and maintenance of the
existing pavement strength currently capable of supporting 30,000 pounds of single-wheel loads,
but strengthening and modifying the existing pavement to accommodate 60,000 pounds of single-
wheel loads. By so doing a whole new family of larger, heavier, and noisier aircraft will be
accommodated for daily routine aviation operations at the airport. This is an example of
expanding aviation operations that has continuously been opposed by the ACC.
Over the past 18 months the ACC has made clear its opposition to the city's plans for expansion
of aviation operations. City leaders and staff have pretended ignorance of the terminology and
responded with comments of “we're not expanding anything; just doing some safety and
maintenance, we're not expanding airport property”. Cumulatively this project is yet one more
of a long history of programs for maintenance, operations and property expansion of a
problematic airport which entails significant social, economic and environmental impacts.
Over the years the city has accomplished a series of aviation operations expansions with federal
grants without NEPA reviews. The city has acquired multiple private properties by threat of
condemnation over the years for relocation of Lakeway Drive to accommodate the extension of
Runway 18-36, properties at the ends of the runways and even now acquisition of almost 13 acres
for Runway 11-29.
The city has, in fact, expanded airport property and potentially plans to expand the airport
property to the East as part of the new 20 year, 2025-2045 Airport Master Plan. The current
Airport Master Plan Plan Appendix C-ALP, identifies many of the houses and properties along
the streets of Toledo, Vortac, etc. that are to be acquired by “fee or easement”.
In his presentation of this item to the GTAB at its June 12, 2015 meeting, Mr. Volk, advised that
strengthening Runway 18-36 from its current 30,000 pound single-wheel load design to 60,000
pound single-wheel load design was necessary to accommodate larger aircraft identified in their
airport projections and to factor in the airport's design category of CII. He never disputed that
the proposed improvements to Runway 18/36 would accommodate a whole new family of larger,
Page 13 of 86
heavier and nosier aircraft for routine daily airport aviation operations service. He did not
describe what else is included in “their airport projections” nor whether these projections are
part of the new 20 year (2025-2045) Airport Master Plan. He did not explain or identify the
spectrum of aircraft by type size and weight that encompass a CII design category. He did not
explain the meaning of “the airport's design CII category”. He did not explain or demonstrate
where in the spectrum of category CII aircraft are located the lines of demarcation designating
the current 30,000 pound, proposed 60,000 and still heavier poundage single-wheel loading
aircraft. He did not explain why doubling the weight of this new heavier family of
accommodated aircraft was necessary at this time rather than a program proposed in the new 20
year master plan. He did not provide or refer to any FAA documentation of necessity for this
action to meet any FAA requirements.
It is obvious to all that this runway strengthening has nothing to do with repair or maintenance
It is totally an action to expand aviation operations by expanding airport air fleet capacity.
One question a GTAB member asked Mr. Volk was “In case of emergency, would one of these
larger aircraft be allowed to land at the airport?” Mr. Volk answered “Yes!” And with a shrug of
resignation the GTAB unanimously approved staff's request. A professional and proper response
by Mr. Volk should have been “Yes, but that's because it would be better than see it crash into
homes, schools or churches that surround the airport. An emergency is one thing. It's quite
another to allow these type aircraft routine service because their wheel loads would destroy our
runways in short order!”.
There are added reasons for referring this item back to the GTAB for proper public vetting.
These include recognition that the airport, by a well documented history of public opposition to
increased operations, is an environmental problematic facility. Even maintenance can not be
categorically excluded from NEPA reviews; that each of the past, current and future federal
grant funded airport improvements are part of an overall huge maintenance and expansion
program which have significant cumulative adverse impacts; this new program will require a
new Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study; and the cumulative adverse impacts of the overall
federally funded program for our airport will demand preparation of an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) and consideration of all practicable alternatives.
Mr. Mayor, I welcome any questions and/or comments from the City Council.
Page 14 of 86
Page 15 of 86
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
July 14, 2015
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance for the Rezoning of 3.37 acres in the Nicholas Porter
(Abstract No. 497) and William Addison (Abstract No. 21) Surveys, more specifically described as 0.245
acre in the Nicholas Porter Survey (Abstract No. 497) and a 3.125 acre part of Block 14 of Outlot Division C,
located at 179 Holly Street, from the Residential Single-family District (RS) to the Low-Density
Multifamily District (MF-1) -- Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner and Jordan Maddox, AICP, Principal
Planner (action required)
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The applicant has requested to rezone two parcels of land from Residential Single-family to Low Density
Multifamily to facilitate a low density form of multifamily development. Site constraints, economic factors,
and development standards will keep the unit count low, with townhouse style residences most likely to be
developed.
Planning and Zoning Commission:
On July 7th, 2015, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the request, with two
speakers, who asked questions regarding future development impacts on surrounding properties. Staff made a
presentation of the application, and there was discussion between Staff and Commission members regarding
the development standards that would govern the property. Specifically, items such as parking, impervious
cover, building height, drainage, and tree preservation were touched on. The Commission then voted 7-0 to
recommend approval of the request to City Council.
Public Comment:
Three (3) written comments from notified property owners, within the City jurisdiction, were received as of
the writing of this item, all in opposition to the proposal. See Exhibit 3.
Recommended Motion:
Recommend to City Council approval of the Ordinance rezoning 3.37 acres, being 0.245 acres in the N.
Porter Survey and 3.125 acres of Block 14 of Outlot Division C, from the Residential Single-family (RS)
District to the Low-Density Multifamily (MF-1) District.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. The applicant paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner and Jordan Maddox, Acting Planning Director
ATTACHMENTS:
Staff Report
Exhibit 1 - Future Land Use / Transportation Map
Exhibit 2 - Zoning Map
Exhibit 3 - Public Comments
ORDINANCE
Ordinance Exhibit A - Location Map
Ordinance Exhibit B - Legal Description
Page 16 of 86
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Holly Street Multifamily - Rezoning Page 1 of 4
RS to MF-1
Report Date: May 28, 2015
File No: REZ-2015-002
Project Planner: Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Holly Street Multifamily
Project Address: 179 Holly Street
Location: Holly Street, just north of Second Street (See Exhibits 1 and 2)
Total Acreage: 3.37 acres
Legal Description: Outlot Division C, Block 14 (PT), 3.125 ac.
Nicholas Porter Survey, AW0497, 0.245 acre
Applicant: Bobby Frederickson
Property Owner: Thomas and Edleeta B. Shands
Contact: Tim Haynie, P.E., Haynie Consulting, Inc.
Existing Use: Undeveloped land
Existing Zoning: Residential Single-family (RS)
Proposed Zoning: Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District
Future Land Use: Moderate Density Residential
Growth Tier: Tier 1A
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant has requested to rezone two parcels of land from Residential Single-family to Low Density
Multifamily to facilitate a low density form of multifamily development. Site constraints, economic
factors, and development standards will keep the unit count low, with townhouse style residences most
likely to be developed.
Site Information
Location:
This property is on the east side of Holly Street in the 100 block, just south of the large City landholdings
which house many community facilities, including the animal shelter and baseball/softball park. It is
immediately adjacent to, but geographically separated from (steep slopes), the Windridge Village
subdivision that was platted in 2002 and constructed shortly thereafter. (See Exhibit 1, excerpt next page)
Physical Characteristics:
The property is undeveloped with a mix of heavily treed and cleared areas. It’s assumed it was once part of
the large pecan orchard which still exists just north of the property (City dog park). A steep slope exists on
the south border adjacent the neighboring subdivision.
Surrounding Properties:
The surrounding properties include residential, City parkland, commercial (Suddenlink), and undeveloped
land. (See Exhibits 1 & 2)
Page 17 of 86
Planning Department Staff Report
Holly Street Multifamily - Rezoning Page 2 of 4
RS to MF-1
Property History
The property was annexed into the City in 1915, and there is no known development having occurred.
The property pre-dates the adoption of any zoning regulations but has likely always been a residentially
zoned property. The adoption of the Unified Development Code (UDC) in 2003 redefined the zoning of
the property to the Residential Single Family (RS) District.
2030 Plan Conformance
Land Use:
The proposed rezoning is in conformance with the 2030 Plan land use designation of Moderate Density
Residential, which calls for densities of between 3.1 and 6 dwelling units per acre, and supports attached
single-family dwellings such as townhouses. It also describes the appropriateness of in-fill development at
greater densities where the property and associated aspects allow it. The Low Density Multifamily district
allows the Specific Use of ‘Multifamily Detached and Attached Units’, whereby structures can house
anywhere from one unit up to twelve.
Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use
North RS, Residential Single-family Parks and Open Space City parkland (dog park)
South RS, Residential Single-family Moderate Density Residential Single-family residential
East RS, Residential Single-family Parks and Open Space Undeveloped land
West C-3, General Commercial Employment Center Commercial and undeveloped
Page 18 of 86
Planning Department Staff Report
Holly Street Multifamily - Rezoning Page 3 of 4
RS to MF-1
Growth Tier:
The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1A, that portion of the city where infrastructure
systems are in place, or can be economically provided and where the bulk of the city’s growth should be
guided over the near term.
Proposed Zoning District
The Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District is intended for attached and detached multi-family
residential development, such as apartments, condominiums, triplexes, and fourplexes, at a density not to
exceed 14 dwelling units per acre. It can be appropriate in the Moderate Density Residential future land
use category based on the particular location, surrounding uses, and infrastructure impacts. Convenient
access to major roadways should be present, and the district can be proximate to both residential and non-
residential districts, with the ability to serve as a transition between those two.
Utilities
Electric, water, and wastewater are served by the City of Georgetown. It is anticipated that there is adequate
capacity to serve this property either by existing capacity or developer participation in upgrades to
infrastructure.
Transportation
The access to this property would be provided via Holly Street. No other roadway connections are
envisioned for this property, given surrounding development and environmental constraints. The level of
development expected on the property can be served by one means of access, but will ultimately be
determined through the Site Plan review process with City staff.
Future Application(s)
The following applications will be required to be submitted:
• Preliminary Plat to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission;
• Final Plat to be processed administratively;
• Construction Plans will be processed administratively;
• Site Plan for multifamily development will be processed administratively; and
• Building permits for construction.
Staff Analysis
Staff is supportive of the requested rezoning for the following reasons:
1. The Future Land Use designation of Moderate Density Residential supports the proposed low density
multifamily zoning.
2. The existing zoning situation of the surrounding area is primarily RS, with the majority of that being
City owned open space.
3. The surrounding developed uses include residential properties to the south, parkland to the north, and
a low intensity commercial use to the west.
Inter Departmental, Governmental and Agency Comments
None
Page 19 of 86
Planning Department Staff Report
Holly Street Multifamily - Rezoning Page 4 of 4
RS to MF-1
Public Comments
A total of 32 notices were sent out to property owners within 200 feet of the proposed rezoning. Public
notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on May 17, 2015. As of the writing of this report, no written
comments have been received.
Meetings Schedule
June 2, 2015 – Planning and Zoning Commission
June 23, 2015 – City Council First Reading
July 14, 2015 – City Council Second Reading
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Future Land Use Map
Exhibit 2 – Zoning Map
Page 20 of 86
(River
/Strea m )
REZ-2015-002
MCKENZIE DR
E VALLEY ST
M
A
P
L
E
S
T
BRENDON LEE LN
E 4TH ST
E 5TH ST
E 6TH ST
E 7TH ST
E 8TH ST
C
H
A
M
B
E
R
W
AY
H
O
L
L
Y
S
T
E M O R R O W ST
TAYLO R RD
O
L
I
V
E
S
T
P
I
N
E
S
T
E 9TH ST
S M I T H C R E E K R D
S
M
Y
R
T
L
E
S
T
E 2ND ST
E
L
M
S
T
E 3 R D S T
WA
L
N
U
T
S
T
E 9TH 1/2 ST
N
M
Y
R
T
L
E
S
T
S
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
S
T
A
S
H
S
T
SOUTHWESTERN BLVD
N CO L L E G E S T
W E SLEY
A
N
D
R S E R V I C E R D
J
O
H
N
C
A
R
T
E
R
D
R
THOMAS CT
SIER R A R OSELO
O
P
L O W E R PARK RD
W
L
W
A
L
D
E
N
D
R
0 940 1,880
Feet
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan
Exhibit #2REZ-2015-002
Legend
Thoroughfare
Future Land Use
Institutional
Regional Commercial
Community Commercial
Employment Center
Low Density Residential
Mining
Mixed Use Community
Mixed Use Neighborhood Center
Moderate Density Residential
Open Space
Specialty Mixed Use Area
Ag / Rural Residential §¨¦35
W University Ave E University Ave
N
A
u
s
t
i
n
A
v
e
NAustinAve
N
A
u
s
t
i
n
A
v
e
Southw este
r
n
B
l
v
d
NColleg e StRiveryBlvd
N
A
u
s
t
i
n
A
v
e
S
A
u
s
t
i
n
A
v
e
E Morro w St
Site
³
City Limits
Street
Site
Existing Collector
Existing Freeway
Existing Major Arterial
Existing Minor Arterial
Existing Ramp
Proposed Collector
Proposed Freeway
Propsed Frontage Road
Proposed Major Arterial
Proposed Minor Arterial
Proposed Railroad
High Density Residential
Page 21 of 86
REZ-2015-002
(River/Stream)
MCKENZIE DR
W
A
L
N
U
T
S
T
M
A
P
L
E
S
T
E VALLEY ST
E 3 R D S T
BRENDON LEE LN
E 3RD ST
E 4TH ST
E 5TH ST
C
H
A
M
B
E
R
W
AY
E 6TH ST
E 7TH ST
H
O
L
L
Y
S
T
E 8TH ST
H
O
L
L
Y
S
T
E M O R R O W ST
E MOR R O W S T
O
L
I
V
E
S
T
P
I
N
E
S
T
P
I
N
E
S
T
E 9TH ST
S M I T H C R E E K R D
S
M
Y
R
T
L
E
S
T
E 2ND ST
E
L
M
S
T
E 3 R D S T
WA
L
N
U
T
S
T
E 9TH 1/2 ST
N
M
Y
R
T
L
E
S
T
S
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
S
T
A
S
H
S
T
TAYLOR RD
E 9 T H S T
SOUTHWESTERN BLVD
N C O L L E G E S T
W E S L EYAN
D
R
S E R V I C E R D
E R U T E R SVILLEDR
J
O
H
N
C
A
R
T
E
R
D
R
E 8TH ST
T H O M A S C T
L O W E R PA R K R D
W
L
W
A
L
D
E
N
D
R
Zoning InformationREZ-2015-002Exhibit #2
¯
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 1,000 2,000Feet
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
§¨¦35
W University Ave E University Ave
N
A
u
s
t
i
n
A
v
e
N
A
u
s
t
i
n
A
v
e
Southw este
r
n
B
l
v
d
NColle g e St
N
A
u
s
t
i
n
A
v
e
S
A
u
s
t
i
n
A
v
e
EMorro w St
³
Site
City Limits
Street
Site
Page 22 of 86
Page 23 of 86
Page 24 of 86
Page 25 of 86
Page 26 of 86
Ordinance Number: ___________________ Page 1 of 2
Description: 3.37 ac. in Porter and Addison Surveys Case File Number: REZ-2015-002
Date Approved: __________________ Exhibits A-B Attached
ORDINANCE NO. _____________________
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas,
mending part of the Official Zoning Map to rezone 3.37 acres in the
Nicholas Porter (Abstract No. 497) and William Addison (Abstract No. 21)
Surveys, more specifically described as 0.245 acre in the Nicholas Porter
Survey (Abstract No. 497) and a 3.125 acre part of Block 14 of Outlot
Division C, from the Residential Single-family District (RS) to the Low-
Density Multifamily District (MF-1); repealing conflicting ordinances and
resolutions; including a severability clause; and establishing an effective
date.
Whereas, an application has been made to the City for the purpose of amending the
Official Zoning Map, adopted on the 12th day of June, 2012, for the specific Zoning District
classification of the following described real property ("The Property"):
3.37 acres of the Nicholas Porter (Abstract No. 497) and William Addison (Abstract
No. 21) Surveys, more specifically described as 0.245 acre in the Nicholas Porter
Survey (Abstract No. 497) and a 3.125 acre part of Block 14 of Outlot Division C, as
recorded in Document Number 2008056586 of the Official Public Records of
Williamson County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "The Property"; and
Whereas, the City Council has submitted the proposed amendment to the Official
Zoning Map to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its consideration at a public hearing
and for its recommendation or report; and
Whereas, public notice of such hearing was accomplished in accordance with State Law
and the City’s Unified Development Code through newspaper publication, signs posted on the
Property, and mailed notice to nearby property owners; and
Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a meeting on July 7, 2015, held the
required public hearing and submitted a recommendation of approval to the City Council for
the requested rezoning of the Property; and
Whereas, the City Council, at a meeting on July 14, 2015, held an additional public
hearing prior to taking action on the requested rezoning of the Property.
Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas,
that:
Section 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this Ordinance are
hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and
expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this
Page 27 of 86
Ordinance Number: ___________________ Page 2 of 2
Description: 3.37 ac. in Porter and Addison Surveys Case File Number: REZ-2015-002
Date Approved: __________________ Exhibits A-B Attached
Ordinance implements the vision, goals, and policies of the Georgetown 2030 Comprehensive
Plan and further finds that the enactment of this Ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with
any other policies or provisions of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the City’s Unified
Development Code.
Section 2. The Official Zoning Map, as well as the Zoning District classification(s) for the
Property is hereby amended from the Residential Single-family District (RS) to the Low Density
Multifamily District (MF-1), in accordance with the attached Exhibit A (Location Map) and
Exhibit B (Legal Description) and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in
conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
Section 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or
circumstance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or
application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be
severable.
Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary
to attest. This ordinance shall become effective in accordance with the provisions of state law
and the City Charter of the City of Georgetown.
APPROVED on First Reading on the 14th day of July, 2015.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED on Second Reading on the 28th day of July, 2015.
THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: ATTEST:
______________________ _________________________
Dale Ross Jessica Brettle
Mayor City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________
Bridget Chapman
City Attorney
Page 28 of 86
(River/St
r
e
a
m
)
REZ-2015-002
N C O L L E G E S T
MCKENZIE DR
W
A
L
N
U
T
S
T
E VALLEY ST
M
A
P
L
E
S
T
PIR A T E D R
E 3 R D S T
BRENDON LEE LN
E 3RD ST
E 4TH ST
E 5TH ST
E 6TH ST
E 7TH ST
C
H
A
M
B
E
R
W
AY
E 8TH ST
H
O
L
L
Y
S
T
H
O
L
L
Y
S
T
E M O R R O W ST
E
M
OR R O W S T
O
L
I
V
E
S
T
P
I
N
E
S
T
P
I
N
E
S
T
E 9TH ST
S M I T H C R E E K R D
S
M
Y
R
T
L
E
S
T
E 2ND ST
E
L
M
S
T
E 3 R D S T
WA
L
N
U
T
S
T
E 9TH 1/2 ST
N
M
Y
R
T
L
E
S
T
S
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
S
T
A
S
H
S
T
E 9 T H S T
SOUTHWEST ERN BLVD
W E S L EYAN
D
R
S E R V I C E R D
J
O
H
N
C
A
R
T
E
R
D
R
E 8TH ST
T H O M A S C T
E R U T E R S VILLEDR
L O W E R PA RK R D
W
L
W
A
L
D
E
N
D
R
REZ-2015-002Exhibit A
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 1,000 2,000Feet ¯
Legend
SiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
§¨¦35
W University Ave E University Ave
N
A
u
s
t
i
n
A
v
e
NAustinAve
N
A
u
s
t
i
n
A
v
e
Southw este
r
n
B
lv
d
NColleg e StRiveryBlvd
N
A
u
s
t
i
n
A
v
e
S
A
u
s
t
i
n
A
v
e
EMorro w St
")971
Site
City Limits
Street
Site ³
Page 29 of 86
Page 30 of 86
Page 31 of 86
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
July 14, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to approve a Resolution finding public convenience and necessity and
authorizing eminent domain proceedings, if necessary, for the acquisition of real property from A. C.
Weir Properties, Ltd. to effectuate certain public road and utility infrastructure improvements in
connection with the SW Bypass Road Project -- Terri Glasby Calhoun, Real Estate Services Coordinator
and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director
ITEM SUMMARY:
Staff is in the process of acquiring right-of-way for the Southwest Bypass Road Project.
A resolution finding public convenience and necessity (“PCN Resolution”) authorizing the acquisition of the
necessary land rights by either negotiation or condemnation is necessary to insure that the acquisition process
complies with eminent domain law and to avoid delays in acquiring the right of way, if the parties are unable
to reach agreement on compensation through negotiation. The attached resolution, if approved, will authorize
the acquisition of the subject property for the SW Bypass by negotiation or eminent domain, if necessary.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Terri Calhoun
ATTACHMENTS:
Weir PCN Resolution
Page 32 of 86
Page 33 of 86
Page 34 of 86
Page 35 of 86
Page 36 of 86
Page 37 of 86
Page 38 of 86
Page 39 of 86
Page 40 of 86
Page 41 of 86
Page 42 of 86
Page 43 of 86
Page 44 of 86
Page 45 of 86
Page 46 of 86
Page 47 of 86
Page 48 of 86
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
July 14, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to appoint three (3) councilmembers to the HARC/UDC Evaluation
Subcommittee -- Rachael Jonrowe, Councilmember District 6
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Page 49 of 86
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
July 14, 2015
SUBJECT:
Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas (“City”) amending
Chapter 9.13 of the Code of Ordinances relating to the Juvenile Curfew, making such other findings and
provisions related to the subject and declaring an effective date -- Wayne Nero, Chief of Police and Bridget
Chapman, City Attorney (action required)
ITEM SUMMARY:
On July 10, 2012, the City Council adopted Ordinance No-2012-45 amending Chapter 9.13 and establishing
a juvenile curfew. Texas Local Government Code Sec 370.002 requires the governing body of a home-rule
municipality to review a juvenile curfew ordinance at least every three years; and to conduct a public hearing
to review the juvenile curfew ordinance’s effects on the community and on the problems the juvenile curfew
ordinance was intended to remedy.
After conducting the public hearing required by Texas Local Government Code Section 370.002, the City
Council should make a determination if it would be in the best interest of the community to readopt the
juvenile ordinance. The proposed ordinance is attached.
Attachments:
Ordinance
Exhibit A
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Wayne Nero, Chief of Police; Bridget Chapman, City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance
Exhibit A
Page 50 of 86
Ordinance Number: ____________ Page 1 of 2
Description: Juvenile Curfew Ordinance Exhibit A
Date Approved: _________________
ORDINANCE NO. ___________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS (“CITY”) AMENDING CHAPTER 9.13 OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING TO THE JUVENILE CURFEW;
MAKING SUCH OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE
SUBJECT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council to protect the public health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide for the public safety by re-adopting a curfew to
regulate the movements or actions of persons under 17 years of age; and
WHEREAS, on July 10, 2012, the City Council adopted Ordinance No- 2012-45 amending Chapter
9.13 and establishing a juvenile curfew; and
WHEREAS, Texas Local Government Code Sec 370.002 requires the governing body of a home-rule
municipality to review a juvenile curfew ordinance at least every three years; and
WHEREAS, Texas Local Government Code Sec 370.002 requires the governing body to conduct a
public hearing to review the juvenile curfew ordinance’s effects on the community and on the
problems the juvenile curfew ordinance was intended to remedy; and
WHEREAS, after conducting the public hearing required by Texas Local Government Code Section
370.002 on June 23, 2015, the City Council found and determined that it would be in the best interest
of the community to readopt the juvenile ordinance as set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS THAT
Section 1. The meeting at which this ordinance was approved was in all things conducted in
compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551.
Section 2. Chapter 9.13 of the Code of Ordinances is amended as shown on Exhibit A.
Page 51 of 86
Ordinance Number: ____________ Page 2 of 2
Description: Juvenile Curfew Ordinance Exhibit A
Date Approved: _________________
Section 3. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance
shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of
this ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end
the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
Section 4. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest.
This ordinance shall become effective in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of
Georgetown.
PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING on the ______ day of__________, 2015.
PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING on the ______ day of ________, 2015.
ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
________________________________ _____________________________________
Jessica Brettle, Dale Ross,
City Secretary Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Bridget Chapman, City Attorney
Page 52 of 86
Ordinance Number: ____________, Exhibit A Page 1 of 3
Description: Juvenile Curfew Ordinance
Date Approved: _________________
CHAPTER 9.13. - JUVENILE CURFEW
Sec. 9.13.010. - Definitions.
"Curfew hours" means:
(1) 11:00 p.m. until 6:00 a.m. on any Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday;
(2) 12:00 a.m. until 6:00 a.m. on any Friday or Saturday.
"Emergency" means an unforeseen combination of circumstances or the resulting state that calls for
immediate action. The term includes, but is not limited to, a fire, natural disaster, an automobile
accident, or any situation requiring immediate action to prevent serious bodily or loss of life.
"Establishment" means any privately owned place of business operated for profit which the public is
invited, including but not limited to any place of amusement or entertainment.
"Guardian" means:
(1) A person who, under court order, is the guardian of the person or minor; or
(2) A public or private agency with whom a minor has been placed by a court.
"Minor" means a person under 17 years of age.
"Operator" means any individual, firm, association, partnership, or corporation operating, managing,
or conducting any establishment. The term includes the members or partners of an associate or
partnership and the officers of a corporation.
"Parent" means a person who is:
(1) A natural parent, adoptive parent, or step-parent of another person; or
(2) At least 18 years of age and authorized by a parent or guardian to have the care and custody
of a minor.
"Public place" means any place to which the public or a substantial group of the public has access and
includes, but is not limited to, streets, highways, and the common areas of schools, hospitals,
apartment houses, office buildings, transport facilities, and shops.
"Remain" means to:
(1) Linger or stay; or
Page 53 of 86
Ordinance Number: ____________, Exhibit A Page 2 of 3
Description: Juvenile Curfew Ordinance
Date Approved: _________________
(2) Fail to leave the premises when requested to do so by a police officer or the owner, operator,
or any other person in control of the premises.
"School activity" means a field trip or other educational activity organized and chaperoned by the
minor's school, or by the minor's parent if the minor is home-schooled.
"Serious bodily injury" means bodily injury that creates a substantial risk of death or that causes death,
serious permanent disfigurement, or protracted loss of impairment of the function of any bodily
member or organ.
Sec. 9.13.020. - Offenses.
A. A minor commits an offense if he remains, walks, runs, stands, drives or rides about in or upon
any public place or on the premises of any establishment within the City during curfew hours. A
culpable mental state is not required for a commission of an offense under this Section.
B. A parent or guardian of a minor commits an offense if he knowingly or intentionally permits, or
by insufficient control allows, the minor to remain in any public place or on the premises of any
establishment within the City during curfew hours.
C. The owner, operator, or any employee of an establishment commits an offense if he knowingly or
intentionally allows a minor to remain, walk, run, stand, drive or ride about in or upon the premises of
the establishment during curfew hours.
Sec. 9.13.030. - Defenses.
A. It is a defense under Section 9.13.020 that the minor was:
(1) Accompanied by the minor's parent or guardian, or by his or her spouse who is 18 years of
age or older;
(2) On an errand at the direction of the minor's parent or guardian, without any detour or stop;
(3) In a motor vehicle involved in interstate travel;
(4) Engaged in an employment activity, or going or returning home from an employment
activity, without any detour or stop;
(5) Involved in an emergency;
(6) Attending an official school activity, or a religious, or other recreational activity sponsored
by the City of Georgetown, a civic organization, or a similar entity that takes the responsibility for
the minor going to or from the event, without any detour or stop;
(7) Exercising First Amendment rights protected by the Unites States Constitution, such as free
exercise of religion, freedom of speech, and right of assembly; or
Page 54 of 86
Ordinance Number: ____________, Exhibit A Page 3 of 3
Description: Juvenile Curfew Ordinance
Date Approved: _________________
(8) Married or had been married or had disabilities of minority removed in accordance with
Texas Family Code Ch. 31.
B. It is a defense to prosecution under Section 9.13.020 C. that the owner, operator, or employee of an
establishment promptly notified the police department that a minor was present on the premises
during the curfew hours and refused to leave.
Sec. 9.13.040. - Enforcement.
A. Before taking any enforcement action under this Chapter, a police officer shall ask the apparent
offender's age and reason for being in a public place. The officer shall not issue a citation or make an
arrest under this Chapter unless the officer reasonably believes that an offense has occurred and that,
based on any response and the totality of the circumstances, no defense under Section 9.13.030 is
present.
B. The police department shall adopt procedures in compliance with Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure Article. 45.059 (pertaining to children taken into custody for violation of juvenile curfew)
and Texas Family Code Ch. 52 (pertaining to proceedings before and including referral to juvenile
court), as the same may be amended from time to time.
Sec. 9.13.050. - Penalties.
A. A person who violates a provision of this Chapter is guilty of a class C misdemeanor, and shall be
punishable by a fine of not to exceed $500.00.
B. When required by the Texas Family Code § 51.08, as amended, the municipal court shall waive
original jurisdiction over a minor who violates Section 9.13.020 A. of this Chapter and refer the minor
to juvenile court.
Sec. 9.13.060. -Review.
A. City council review. Before the third anniversary of the date of the adoption of this section, and
every third year thereafter, the city council shall:
(1) Review the section's effects on the community and on the problems the section was
intended to remedy;
(2) Conduct public hearings on the need to continue the section; and
(3) Abolish, continue or modify the section.
B. Sunset provision. Failure by the City Council to act in accordance with Section 9.13.060 (A) shall
cause this section to expire at 12:01 a.m. July 14, 2018.
Page 55 of 86
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
July 14, 2015
SUBJECT:
Project Update and Status regarding American with Disabilities Act (ADA), Downtown Facilities,
Downtown Parking, Lease Agreements related to City-Owned Property; 2015/16 Annual Budget Update;
EMS Transition Update; Project Updates for the Georgetown Economic Development Corporation
(GEDCO), the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC), and the Georgetown
Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB), and Possible Direction to staff – David Morgan, City Manager
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City Council has requested regular updates regarding the status of projects, as well as the ability to
discuss these projects as a collective.
The City Council has also indicated that they would like to receive more information and have discussion
regarding the following specific items:
American with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Downtown Facilities
Downtown Parking
- MLK/8th Street Surface Parking
- Street Study and Design for Additional Parking Facility Downtown
Lease Agreements related to City-Owned Property
2015/16 Annual Budget Update
EMS Transition Update
ATTACHMENTS
1. Project Updates as noted above
2. GEDCO Project Update
3. GTEC Project Report and Status Update
4. GTAB Project Update
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This is an Update Report
SUBMITTED BY:
Shirley J. Rinn on behalf of David S. Morgan
ATTACHMENTS:
ADA Update to Council
Downtown Facilities
Downtown Parking
Lease Agreements related to City-Owned Property
2015-16 budget update
EMS
GEDCO Project Log
GTEC Project Status
GTEC Project Update
GTAB Project Updates
Page 56 of 86
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Project Sponsor/Manager:
Dave Hall, Building Official
Nathaniel Waggoner, Transportation Analyst
Date of Report
July 7, 2015
Project Scope Statement:
In conformance with the ADA Transition Plan
approved by City Council in March of 2014 and the
2014 Sidewalk Master Plan, a feasibility study is
being conducted to analyze, evaluate, and prioritize
all public access for sidewalks, City programming
and facilities. Once the Feasibility Study is
completed, it will be presented to the ADA Advisory
Board for review and recommendation to Council.
City Staff will work with the ADA Advisory Board to
develop an ADA Webpage as an effective and
meaningful resource for City Residents with
Disabilities along with any required City ordinances
needed to ensure ADA compliance.
Key Accomplishments:
• A full facility (buildings) audit has been
completed as of November, 2014.
• The self-assessment for Parks and Recreation
has been completed as of March 10, 2015.
• Sidewalk Master Plan findings are complete. The
Plan was adopted March 10, 2015.
• On February 24, 2015 the Task Force voted to
recommend to City Council to adopt a Sidewalk
Accessibility Ordinance for downtown. Council
adopted the Ordinance March 10, 2015.
Upcoming Tasks:
• Staff updated the current Transition Plan and is
reviewing the draft.
• Staff has been working on a proposed schedule
of implementation and prioritization of the
facilities and downtown sidewalks audit from
the intent of the Transition Plan.
• A full update report was brought to the City
Council in May 2015.
• The first public meeting of the ADA Advisory
Board was held on March 31st.
• Staff will take an amended ADA Transition Plan
to the ADA Advisory Board on July 8th, 2015 and
the amended plan will be taken to City Council
on September 8th, 2015.
Issues:
• Staff has created budget line items for ADA
related programs for upcoming FY 2015/2016
which is reflected in the amended plan.
Page 57 of 86
Downtown Facilities
July 14, 2015
Project Scope Redeveloping and relocating downtown city facilities to a central campus (see photos)
Purpose To ensure highest and best use of existing city buildings. To leverage and capitalize on
proximity and economies of scale as city staff is relocated and centralized. To return
some of existing inventory to tax rolls.
Staff Contact Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager
Element Status
Redesign GCAT for
Municipal Court (510 W.
9th Street)
Key Accomplishment
• Feasibility studies completed by Winter & Co. and Ron Hobbs Architects
• Secured buy-in for 8,500 square foot expansion to accommodate dais and
courtroom
• Made offer to Project Manager
• Council approval for City Center Architect
Upcoming Tasks
• 6-8 week needs assessment and programming process to collect stakeholder
input for entire campus (including Historic Power & Light Building and
Festival Space) – Public meetings on 7/15 and 8/12.
• Developing scope of work to ensure project satisfies court’s needs for
foreseeable future
• Selecting Construction Manager at-risk
Challenges
• Determining whether or not court room will be shared space
• Developing multi-purpose space that can accommodate teen court, as well
as A/V for public meetings
Rehabilitate Old Library as
new City Hall (808 Martin
Luther King Street)
Key Accomplishment
• Secured funding from Council for design and construction
• Securing architect (same as GCAT Redesign)
Upcoming Tasks
• Developing scope of work to ensure project satisfies City Hall’s needs for
foreseeable future
• Developing programming and city staff to be relocated
Challenges
• Timing the sale of current City Hall to fund construction
101 E. 7th Street Key Accomplishment
• Approval to move Municipal Court to GCAT
Page 58 of 86
• Secured direction to retain 101 E. 7th Street
Upcoming Tasks
• Developing business plan for CVB to fully utilize building
Challenges
• Managing potential retail incubator space
• Relocating DGA
• CVB covering costs associated with purchasing and renovating the building
Festival Area Key Accomplishment
• Reviewed concept with City Council
• Master Signage Plan in RFQ for GCAT and Old Library
o Including Red Poppy Café canopy in RFQ for GCAT and Old
Library
Upcoming Tasks
• Secure Council funding for festival area in FY 2016/2017
Challenges
• Determine scope, which tentatively includes:
o Festival Street
o Park and Play Area
o Plaza
o Amphitheater
o Tensile Structures
• Secure buy-in from downtown stakeholders to move some special events
to festival area
• Ensuring continuity of design throughout development
• Focused and professional programming of festival area
Old Power and Light
Building (809 Martin
Luther King Street)
Key Accomplishment
• Completed phase I environmental assessment
• Police department vacated building
• Secured approval to move staff on a temporary basis to building
Upcoming Tasks
• Completing deferred maintenance and moving staff
• Including building in architect’s scope of work and completing design
Challenges
• Funding for rehabilitation
o Potential to sell historic tax credits when building is rehabilitated
• Determining long-term programming and use
113 E. 8th Street (current
City Hall) and 103 W. 7th
Street (current CVB)
Key Accomplishment
• Secured preliminary buy-in to sell 113 E. 8th Street and 103 W. 7th Street to
fund downtown west project
Upcoming Tasks
• Developing economic development projects for 113 and 103
• Securing funding to effectively market and execute economic development
project
Challenges
• Avoiding pitfalls generally seen when municipalities sell buildings
• Allowing sufficient time to market building to cash fund improvements.
Page 59 of 86
Downtown Parking
July 14, 2015
Project Scope Addressing concerns regarding parking in the downtown overlay district.
Purpose To ensure sufficient parking downtown to support continued economic vitality in
and around the downtown overlay district.
Staff Contact Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager
Element Status
Surface Lot at Martin
Luther King Drive and 8th
Street
Key Accomplishment
• Finalized interlocal agreement to use County’s property for 10-years
• Completed demolition of metal structures
• Council approved construction contract
Upcoming Tasks
• Begin construction on July 15
Challenges
• Business owner fatigue with public works projects downtown
o Rolled 10th and 11th Street improvements to 16/17
• Lighting and landscaping for new lot
• Sidewalk connections from new lot to downtown
Downtown Parking Study Key Accomplishment
• Completed stakeholder survey, with 561 responses
• Completed two site visits with consultant and one public meeting
• Third site-visit during Red Poppy
• Update to Council
Upcoming Tasks
• Funding to improve existing parking inventory
• Adoption of parking study by Council
Challenges
• Determining timing and need for parking structure
• Coordinating parking study with on-going Downtown West discussions, sidewalk master plan,
and ADA task force
• Highlighting public parking that is currently available and creating awareness of available parking
spots (over 1400 downtown) and enforcing 3-hour parking zone
Expanding 3-Hour Parking Key Accomplishment
• New ordinance and signage in place
Upcoming Tasks
• Improved marketing and wayfinding for existing parking
Challenges
• Ensuring sufficient enforcement for 3-hour zone
Page 60 of 86
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Lease Agreements related to City-Owned Property
Project Sponsor/Manager:
Bridget Chapman, City Attorney
Shirley Rinn, Executive Assistant to the City
Date of Report
July 15, 2015
Project Scope Statement:
Compilation of Lease Agreements and terms
related to City-Owned Property
Key Accomplishments:
• Copies of Lease Agreements provided to
the City Council.
• Summary Report regarding Lease Terms
for each Lease Agreement provided to the
City Council, including WCAD valuation of
land and improvements.
• Summary Report of other In-Kind Services
provided to non-profits by the City of
Georgetown provided to the City Council.
Upcoming Tasks:
• Complete and update survey with regional
and like-sized cities regarding their policies
related to leasing city-owned property and
social service funding
• Determination of Fair Market Leasehold
Values
• Report to Council
Issues:
• Long-Term Leases on City-Owned
Property, including some on dedicated
Parkland.
Page 61 of 86
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
2015/16 ANNUAL BUDGET UPDATE
Project Sponsor/Manager:
David S. Morgan, City Manager
Micki Rundell, CFO
Date of Report
July 15, 2015
Project Scope Statement:
Presentation and Adoption of the 2015/16 Annual
Budget
Key Accomplishments:
• Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Review by GGAF on
March 25; Council approval on April 28th
• GUS and Transportation CIP budgets have been
reviewed by their respective Advisory Boards and
will be presented to Council on May 26th
• GCP Budget and financing plan is in development
with the draft planned for GGAF consideration next
month
• ISF budgets are being finalized and the update to
Council is on track for next month
• 1st round review of base budgets, service levels and
program requests have been completed.
• City Manager review of base budgets, service levels
and program requests are in process.
Upcoming Tasks:
• GCP presentation to GGAF/Council in July
• 2015/16 Revenue Review to be included in Council
budget retreat planned for July 16-17
• Council budget retreat planned for July 16-17 with
City Manager to review, gather feedback and
address “parking lot” concerns
• Action to review Proposed Budget, set proposed
maximum tax rate and schedule public hearing
process scheduled for July 28th
Page 62 of 86
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Project Manager/Sponsor:
John Sullivan, Fire Chief
Date of Report:
July 14, 2015
Project Scope Statement:
Paramedic Program
Key Accomplishments:
• EMS License Application was filed with the Department of State Health Services
(DSHS) on May 29, 2015.
• Paramedic recruits successfully graduated the Fire Academy and obtained their
fire certifications from the Texas Commission on Fire Protection (TCFP).
• Twelve paramedics participated in our 120-hour intensive EMS training academy
from June 1 thru June 19.
• TRV order finalized with Frazer and we anticipate delivery of two additional units
in August, 2015.
• EMS Franchise Ordinance was finalized and approved by Council.
• Medical Transport Services (MTS) Agreement has been completed and
solicitation of interest began on June 14, 2015.
Upcoming Tasks:
• Review MTS application and present recommendations to Council in July.
• Pursuing clinical affiliation agreements to expand professional development
opportunities and collaboration.
• Prepare for State audit for EMS license.
• EMS academy for newly licensed Paramedics and GFD members.
• Recruitment process/hire process for 6 – 7 additional Paramedics
• DEA License for controlled drugs and CLIA waiver for field labs (blood samples)
• Amend fee schedule and coordinate billing with 3rd party vendor
• Deploy Station Alerting Software to improve dispatch efficiencies
• Certification classes for paramedics (May – Sep)
- Advanced Cardiac Life Support
- Pediatric Advanced Life Support
- Geriatric Emergency Medical Services
- Pre-hospital Trauma Life Support
- Tactical Combat Casualty Care
Issues:
• No new issues reported.
Page 63 of 86
Project Project Description
Approved by
Council Funded
Monitoring
Compliance Closed
Citigroup
$1.3 Million Grant for wastewater infrastructure disbursed in April
2008. 12/12/2006 Funded April 2008
Approved and
completed; Monitoring
Compliance No
Airborn II
Provided a $300,000 grant for job creation and retention and capital
investment based on new 50,000 sq. ft. manufacturing facility at
Georgetown South Commercial Park. Amending Performance
Agreement to extend the construction completion date to May 2010.
Extension was approved by GEDCO on January 25, 2010 and the
City Council on January 26, 2010. Construction of Facility
completed May 2010. They didn't meet the number 490 for the final
year of the agreement, therfore no incentive was earned or paid.
Their headcount in Georgetown as of 3/12/15 is 460.
9/25/2007and
1/26/2010
Partially Funded. First
Annual payment made
February 2011
Yes. Final compliance
date is 12/31/2014.
yes (pending
formal letter to
company)
Radix BioSolutions, Ltd.
Provided grant to assist with the work and future plans of Radix
BioSolutions at the TLCC. Agreement approved by GEDCO on
February 9, 2010 and Council approved the Agreement at its March
9, 2010 Meeting. They paid back $47K on 3/15/15.3/9/2010 Funded May 13, 2010
Yes, Final compliance
date is March 2018 No
Lone Star Circle of Care
Provided a grant not to exceed $387,000 for Qualified Expenditures
for future site improvements at 205 East University Avenue,
Georgetown, Texas. Loan Agreement and Promissory Note have
not been executed. Agreement approved by GEDCO on June 23,
2011 and Council approved the Agreement at its June 28, 2011
Meeting. 6/28/2011
Funded November and
December 2011
Yes, Final Compliance
Date is July 28, 2016 No.
Grape Creek
Provide a grant not to exceed $447,000 for Qualified Expenditures
for the lease/purchase and future site improvements at 101 E. 7th
Street and 614 Main Street for the operation of a winery on the
Downtown Square in Georgetown Agreement approved by GEDCO
on July 25, 2011 and Council approved the Agreement at its August
23, 2011 Meeting. Fourth Amended Performance Agreement, Lease
Agreement, and Promissory Note was approved by GEDCO on
August 20, 2012 and by the City Council on August 28, 2012. TIRZ
Agreement for $60,000 approved by City Council on 9-11-12. 8/23/2011 Funded
Yes, Final Compliance is
March 2018.No
Georgetown Winery
Provide a grant not to exceed $70,000 for Qualified Expenditures
described as equipment for wine production and an agreement to
maintain and operate the existing winery in Georgetown. Agreement
approved by GEDCO on July 25, 2011 and Council approved the
Agreement at its August 23, 2011 Meeting. 8/23/2011 Funded
Yes, Final Compliance
Date is June 30, 2016 No
GEDCO PROJECT UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT
June 1, 2015
Page 64 of 86
Project Project Description
Approved by
Council Funded
Monitoring
Compliance Closed
GEDCO PROJECT UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT
June 1, 2015
DiFusiion Technologies
Provide a grant not to exceed $92,000 for Qualified Expenditures
described as an ICP Spectrometer to be purchased by TLCC to be
leased to Dufusion under the terms of the Performance Agreement.
Qualified Expenditure to remain the Property of GEDCO unless
transferred to DiFusion per the terms of the Performance
Agreement.Agreement approved by GEDCO on October 17, 2011
and November 21, 2011 and Council approved the Agreement at its
December 13, 2011 Meeting. Performance Agreement and Lease
Agreement have not been executed. The GEDCO Board approved
additional requirements for the Performance Agreement on May 21,
2012. Approved by Council on July 10, 2012.7/10/2012 Funded
Yes, Final Compliance
Date is July 31, 2015 No
Georgetown Indpendent School District
Provided a grant not to exceed $200,560 for the purchase of
qualified expenditures related to the equipment for the Engineering
Program and Laboratories at Georgetown and East View High
Schools. GISD will offer the MSSC Certifications, implement a Job
Placement Program, provide and annual report and annual tour of
the facilities to the GEDCO Board. Agreement was approved by
GEDCO on September 17, 2012 and the City Council on September
25, 2012. The GEDCO Board approved the GISD request to amend
the Performance Agreement to allow the purchase different
equipment than outlined in the original agreement on November 18,
2013.9/17/2012 Partially Funded.
Yes. Final Compliance
based on life of
equipment. No
Texas Life Sciences Collaboration Center
(3)
Provide a grant of $150,000 for the maintenance of the TLCC.
Performance Agreement approved by GEDCO on 10/17/14. 11/11/2014 Funded Dec. 2014
Yes. Final Compliance
October 31, 2015 No.
The Rivery at Summit Conference Center
Provide a grant not to exceed $4.5 Million for Public Infrastructure
Improvements. Approved by the GEDCO Board on November 18,
2013. Approved by the City Council on December 10, 2013. 12/10/2013 Not Funded
Yes.Construction
Deadline is September
30, 2015. No.
TASUS Texas Corporation
Provide a grant of $67,500 for job creation related to expansion of
manufacturing facilities. Approved by the City Council on February
25, 2014 and approved by the GEDCO Board on February 17, 2014 2/25/2014 Not Funded
Yes. Final Compliance
May 31, 2017 No.
Radiation Detection Corporation
Provide a grant of $320,000 for job creation related to the relocation
of the corporate offices to Georgetown. Approved by City Council
and GEDCO on July 23, 2013. 7/23/2013 Funded
Yes. Final Compliance
December 31, 2021 No
DisperSol
Provide a grant of $250,000 for job creation related to expansion of
manufacturing facilities. Approved by the GEDCO Board on August
18, 2014. Company earned $50K (= 10 eligible positions at
$10/job). Check delivered 4/17/15 to company. 10/16/2014 Partially Funded
Yes. Final Compliance
February 15, 2019 No.
Page 65 of 86
Current Capital Improvement Projects TIP
No.
Project
No.
Update On Schedule/
Or Behind
Project
Budget
Project
Cost
Available Current Year
Projected
Current Year
Cost
Current Year
Available
Lakeway Drive Overpass #10 5QL Project Complete.
Complete 2,500,000 2,500,000 0 0 0
Southeast Arterial 1 (Sam Houston Avenue)#12 5QG Project Complete.
Complete 12,995,625 10,478,499 2,517,126 0 0
Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension (SW Bypass to DB
Wood Road)
#14A 5QW PS&E complete, less construction documents and
environmental permitting.
The current Task Order will be closed and final
payment made to the Engineer.
The Engineer will prepare a new Task Order for
Final PS&E and environmental permitting
documents. This project will be combined with
Southwest Bypass for a single construction
contract.
In-process
Unchanged
1,330,000 1,111,233 218,767 283,350 0 283,350
Southwest Bypass (SH29 to RR2243)#14B 5QC PS&E complete, less construction documents and
environmental permitting.
The current Task Order will be closed and final
payment made to the Engineer.
The Engineer will prepare a new Task Order for
Final PS&E and environmental permitting
documents. This project will be combined with
Wolf Ranch Parkway for a single construction
contract.
Weir Trust property - Condemnation pending.
Guy/Knight property – Acquisition complete.
Wolf property –Acquisition complete
In-process
Unchanged
7,756,432 3,225,132 4,531,300 4,539,107 5,787 4,533,320
Northwest Blvd Overpass #QQ 5QX Engineer has presented the Preliminary
Engineering Report and has begun final PS&E
design efforts.
Engineer is developing ROW strip map and
In-process
Unchanged
1,136,178 1,099,076 37,102 571,178 479,588 91,590
NB Frontage Road (SS 158 to Lakeway)#QQ 5QY Staff and Engineer has met with TxDOT personnel
at both the local Area Office and District
Environmental Division.
In-process
Unchanged
613,822 613,822 0 382,822 382,822 0
ROW - 1460 #EEa
#EEb
#EEc
5RB TxDOT and the Contractor have signed the
Contract;
construction is expected to begin in 45 – 60
days (July 2015)
Utility relocations - ongoing.
As of October 16th, the City has obtained
Possession and Use Agreements or have closings
completed or planned for all the remaining FM
1460 parcels.
On Schedule 11,788,230 5,348,470 6,439,760 6,727,539 2,315,896 4,411,643
TCS/RR Easement 5RD Project Complete.
Complete 1,500,000 1,503,148 -3,148 0 0
FM 971 / Washam 5RE Project Complete.
Complete 100,000 0 100,000 0 0
Rivery Road 5RF Project Complete.
Complete 779,000 29,000 750,000 750,000 0 750,000
Rivery Boulevard 5RM Engineering is 30% complete.
Surveyor completing ROW map and individual
parcel documents.
Property appraisals are underway.
On Schedule
GTEC PROJECT UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT
June 2015
Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14)
L:\Global\CIP Agenda Form\GTEC Status Report\2015\GTEC - Project Status - 2015-07.xlsx Page 1 of 2 7/1/2015Page 66 of 86
Current Capital Improvement Projects TIP
No.
Project
No.
Update On Schedule/
Or Behind
Project
Budget
Project
Cost
Available Current Year
Projected
Current Year
Cost
Current Year
Available
GTEC PROJECT UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT
June 2015
Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14)
Snead Drive 5QZ Bids were received May 4th; Construction
Contract on today’s agenda and
Council agenda for June 9th.
Contractor has requested a NTP effective July
6th.
Agreement has been reached for the property need
to install a water quality pond; paperwork
pending.
On Schedule
Unchanged
825,100 87,000 738,100 825,100 87,000 738,100
Mays Street Extension 5RI GTEC and Council have approved the Task
Order with CP&Y for Final PS&E.
In Process 196,000 196,000 0 196,000 196,000 0
IH 35/ Hwy 29 Intersection 5RJ TBD 650,000 0 650,000 650,000 0 650,000
Current Economic Development Projects Project
Type
Project
No.
Update On Schedule/
Or Behind
Project
Budget
Project
Cost
Available Current Year
Budget
Current Year
Cost
Current Year
Available
100 S. Austin Ave Eco Devo
Project
5RA In-process 507,000 507,000 0 0
Williams Drive Gateway 5RC Engineer working on schematic design alternatives
and preliminary cost estimates.
On Schedule 65,000 61720 3,280 0 0
Economic Development Projects 1,137,500 1,137,500 1,137,500 0 1,137,500
16,062,596 3,467,093 12,595,503
Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14)
L:\Global\CIP Agenda Form\GTEC Status Report\2015\GTEC - Project Status - 2015-07.xlsx Page 2 of 2 7/1/2015Page 67 of 86
FM 1460
(Quail Valley Drive to University Drive)
Project No. 5RB TIP No. EEa, EEb & EEc
Rights‐of‐Way Acquisition and Utility Relocation
May 2015
Project Description Acquisition of ROW and relocation of utilities for the FM 1460 Project (Quail Valley Drive
to University Drive).
Purpose To have all ROWs cleared and utilities prior to TxDOT letting the project foe construction.
Project Managers Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Brown and Gay Engineers, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Complete
Environmental/
Archeological
Complete
Rights of Way
As of October 16th, the City has obtained
Possession and Use Agreements or have
closings completed or planned for all the
remaining FM 1460 parcels.
Section: North South
Acquired: 34 8
Pending: 0 ‐
Condemnation: 2 ‐
Total: 36 8
Utility Relocations Ongoing
Construction We have heard that TxDOT and the Contractor have signed the Contract;
construction is expected to begin in 45 – 60 days (July 2015)
Other Issues AFA amendment pending reallocating authorized funding for [City] relocation
work.
Two known change orders pending – first is due to items from ROW negotiations;
second is due to proposed intersection redesign.
Page 68 of 86
Mays Street Extension
(Teravista Parkway in Round Rock to Westinghouse Road)
Project No. 5RI TIP No. None
May 2015
Project Description Extend Mays Street northward from Teravista Parkway to the existing intersection with
Westinghouse Road at Rabbit Hill Road. The widening along Westinghouse Road and
Rabbit Hill Road will also be included in the schematic for additional turning lanes
to/from Westinghouse Road. Preliminary layouts for future signals and roadway
illumination will also be included. The project length along the anticipated alignment is
approximately 1.0 miles.
Purpose To complete the schematic design, define rights‐of‐way requirements and complete 30%
design.
Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer CP&Y, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design GTEC and Council have approved the Task Order with CP&Y for Final PS&E.
Environmental/
Archeological
TBD
Rights of Way Will match City of Round Rock standard of 100 ft. within RR’s City Limits; City of
Georgetown standard of 112 ft. within our City Limits.
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction TBD
Other Issues None.
Page 69 of 86
NB Frontage Road
(SS 158 to Lakeway Drive)
Project No. 5QX TIP No. QQ
May 2015
Unchanged
Project Description Design and construct a portion of an IH‐35 NB Frontage Road from Williams Drive to
Northwest Boulevard Bridge of a proposed NB FR which would ultimately extend to
Lakeway Drive.
Purpose To relieve congestion in the Williams Drive/Austin Avenue intersection by providing a NB
alternate, interim route to FM 971 and Georgetown High School. This project is the only
remaining portion of IH 35 in Central Texas without a frontage road existing, under
construction or being designed.
Project Manager Bill Dryden
Engineer Klotz Associates
Element Status / Issues
Design Staff and Engineer has met with TxDOT personnel at both the local Area Office and
District Environmental Division.
Environmental/
Archeology
TBD
Rights of Way None identified
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction TBD
Other Issues Staff is working with TxDOT to develop the AFAs required to complete the project.
Page 70 of 86
Northwest Boulevard Overpass
(Fontana Drive to Austin Avenue)
Project No. 5QX TIP No. QQ
May 2015
Unchanged
Project Description Construction of overpass and surface roads to connect Northwest Boulevard with
Austin Avenue and FM 971.
Purpose This project will relieve congestion at the Austin Avenue/Williams Drive
intersection and provide a more direct access from the west side of IH 35 corridor to
Georgetown High School and SH 130 via FM 971.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Klotz Associates
Element Status / Issues
Design Engineer has presented the Preliminary Engineering Report and has begun final
PS&E design efforts.
Environmental/
Archeological
Concurrent with preliminary engineering and schematic design.
Rights of Way Engineer is developing ROW strip map and individual parcel plats and documents.
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction TBD
Other Issues Staff met with TxDOT to develop an AFA for TxDOT review of the bridge crossing
of I 35 and its frontage roads.
Page 71 of 86
Rivery Boulevard Extension
(Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard @ Fontana Drive)
Project No. 5RM TIP No. None
May 2015
Project Description Develop the Rights‐of‐Way Map, acquire ROW, address potential environmental
issues and complete construction plans specifications and estimate (PS&E) for the
extension of Rivery Boulevard from Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard at
Fontana Drive in anticipation of future funding availability.
Purpose To provide a route between Williams Drive and Northwest Boulevard serving the
Gateway area, providing an alternate route from Williams Drive to the future
Northwest Boulevard Bridge over IH 35, to provide a route between the hotels in
the Gateway area and the proposed Conference Center near Rivery Boulevard and
Wolf Ranch Parkway.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Kasberg Patrick and Associates
Element Status / Issues
Design Engineering is 30% complete.
Environmental/
Archeology
TBD
Rights of Way Surveyor completing ROW map and individual parcel documents.
Property appraisals are underway.
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction TBD
Other Issues TBD
Page 72 of 86
Snead Drive Project
(SE Inner Loop to Airborn Circle)
Project No. 5QZ TIP No. None
May 2015
Project Description Develop Construction Plans Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) for the widening
of Snead Drive from S.E. Inner Loop to 600 feet north of Cooperative Way,
including appurtenant waste water improvements.
Purpose This project has been identified as GTEC eligible project and will provide
necessary infrastructure for ongoing economic development in the area.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Steger Bizzell
Element Status / Issues
Design Complete
Environmental/
Archeological
Complete
Rights of Way Agreement has been reached for the property needed to install a water quality
pond; paperwork pending.
Utility Relocations Utility relocations either complete or are part of the construction contract.
Construction Bids were received May 4th; Construction Contract on today’s agenda and
Council agenda for June 9th.
Contractor has requested a NTP effective July 6th.
Other Issues None
Page 73 of 86
Southwest Bypass Project
(SH 29 to RM 2243)
Project No. 5QC TIP No. 14b
May 2015
Project Description Develop a Design Schematic for the Southwest Bypass from Leander Road (RM
2243) to SH 29 and Construction Plans Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) for the
construction of approximately 1.3 miles of 2‐lane interim roadway with bridges
from Leander Road to its intersection with Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension (TIP
Project No. 14A.
Purpose This project is identified as needed in the OTP and GTEC TIP. This project, in
coordination with Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension, will provide access from
Leander Road to DB Wood Road south of SH 29, allowing alternate access from
southwest to west areas of the City, relieving the increasing traffic demand along
the IH 35 corridor.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer HDR Engineering, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design PS&E complete, less construction documents and environmental permitting.
The current Task Order will be closed and final payment made to the Engineer.
The Engineer will prepare a new Task Order for Final PS&E and environmental
permitting documents. This project will be combined with Wolf Ranch
Parkway for a single construction contract.
Environmental/
Archeological
Draft Report detailing the environmental, geotechnical and historical issues has
been completed and submitted to the Williamson County Conservation
Foundation for determination of issues to be mitigated.
Rights of Way Weir Trust property – Condemnation pending;
Guy/Knight property – Acquisition complete;
Wolf property – Acquisition complete.
Utility Relocations None identified at this time.
Construction Construction will begin FY 2016.
Other Issues None pending.
Page 74 of 86
Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension Project
(SW Bypass to DB Wood Road)
Project No. 5QV TIP No. 14a
May 2015
Project Description Design Schematic and Plans Specifications & Estimate for the construction of a
roadway from Southwest Bypass (TIP Project # 14B) to DB Wood Road south of
SH 29. The project is planned as a major arterial.
Purpose This project is identified as needed in the OTP and the TIP. This project, in
coordination with Southwest Bypass (#14B), will provide access from Leander
Road to DB Wood Road south of SH 29, allowing alternate access from southwest
to west areas of the City, relieving the increasing traffic demand along the IH‐35
corridor.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer HDR, Engineering, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design PS&E complete, less construction documents and environmental permitting.
The current Task Order will be closed and final payment made to the Engineer.
The Engineer will prepare a new Task Order for Final PS&E and environmental
permitting documents. This project will be combined with Southwest Bypass
for a single construction contract.
Environmental/
Archeological
Final report concerning the environmental, geotechnical and historical issues has
been submitted for review.
Rights of Way Complete.
Utility Relocations None identified at this time.
Construction Construction will begin FY 2016.
Other Issues None pending.
Page 75 of 86
Austin Avenue – Bridge Evaluations
(North and South San Gabriel Rivers)
Project No. TBD TIP Project No. N/A
July 2015
Project
Description
Evaluate the repairs necessary to restore full structural capacity to the Austin Avenue
bridges over the North and South San Gabriel Rivers. The process will involve several
phases – I) determination of testing needed, II) structural testing, analyses and
evaluation of test data to determine/recommend corrective measures and a project
budget, III) develop construction plans, specifications and contract documents,
estimates of probable construction costs and, last, IV) construction administration.
Purpose To extend the structural life of the two bridge and provide long‐term vehicular capacity
and pedestrian safety along Austin Avenue.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Aguirre & Fields, LP
Element Status / Issues
Design Staff met with Engineer and discussed potential courses of action. There are four basic
paths to consider: Do Nothing. Short Term Temporary Fix. Medium Term Fix. Replace
Structure.
Engineer has developed 2 potential conceptual alignments for the proposed
reconstruction of the bridge.
Surveying TBD
Environmental TBD during Phase II
Rights of Way Prop. ROW from 3rd Street to N. of 2nd; Exist. ROW from N. of 2nd to Morrow Street.
Utility Relocations TBD (future)
Construction TBD
Other Issues Project submitted for CAMPO funding;
Project eligible for TxDOT Off‐System Bridge Replacement Program.
Meeting schedules July 6th to discuss Project Scope and Planning.
Page 76 of 86
CDBG Sidewalk Improvements Project
Madella Hillard Center to MLK Blvd.
Project No. None TIP No. None
July 2015
Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for
sidewalk improvements around the Madella Hilliard Center and continuing along
the north side of 8th street to MLK Boulevard.
Purpose To provide ADA/TDLR compliant sidewalks in the area.
Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Steger Bizzell
Element Status / Issues
Design Complete.
Environmental/
Archeological
Complete.
Rights of Way N/A
Utility Relocations N/A
Construction Project complete; final walk through July 2nd.
Other Issues None.
Page 77 of 86
CDBG Sidewalk Improvements Project
MLK/3rd Street (Scenic Dr. to Austin Ave.)
Project No. None TIP No. None
July 2015
Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for sidewalk
improvements along MLK/ and 3rd streets from Scenic Drive to Austin Avenue.
Purpose To provide ADA/TDLR compliant sidewalks in the area.
Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Steger Bizzell
Element Status / Issues
Design A design kick‐off meeting with Engineer was held on June 24th.
Environmental/
Archeological
TBD
Rights of Way N/A
Utility Relocations N/A
Construction TBD
Other Issues None.
Page 78 of 86
CDBG Sidewalk Improvements Project
University Avenue (SH 29) (I 35 to Hart St.)
Project No. None TIP No. None
July 2015
Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for sidewalk
improvements along University Avenue (SH 29) from I 35 to Hart Street.
Purpose To provide ADA/TDLR compliant sidewalks in the area.
Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Baker‐Aicklen
Element Status / Issues
Design Engineer had submitted the 99% plans (couple of minor corrections) and the
Contract Documents for staff review.
Environmental/
Archeological
N/A
Rights of Way Existing
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction Bid opening scheduled for July 27th; GTAB August 14th and NTP for second
week of September.
Other Issues Project has been submitted to TxDOT for coordination.
Project has been submitted for T.A.S./TDLR compliance review.
The City has been notified that the firm of Baker‐Aicklen has closed its doors.
Former B‐A personnel (one principal and several employees) have been hired by
Peal & Associates, Inc., of Round Rock. P&A staff has stated it is willing to
complete the project; Staff is reviewing the details of costs of completion and
P&A proposed team’s qualifications.
Page 79 of 86
FM 971 at Austin Avenue
Realignment Intersection Improvements
Project No. 1BZ TIP No. AG
July 2015
Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the widening
and realignment of FM 971 at Austin Avenue, eastward to Gann Street.
Purpose To provide a new alignment consistent with the alignment of the proposed Northwest
Boulevard Bridge over IH 35; to allow a feasible, alternate route from the west side of I 35 to
Austin Avenue, to Georgetown High School, to San Gabriel Park and a more direct route to
SH 130.
Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Klotz Associates, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Preliminary Engineering complete;
Engineer working on 60% design submittal
Environmental/
Archeological
10/2015
Rights of Way Complete
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction 10/2016
Other Issues Staff has submitted the paperwork to TxDOT to develop an Advance Funding
Agreement for plans review and construction administration.
Page 80 of 86
FM 1460
Quail Valley Drive to University Drive
Project No. 5RB TIP No. BO & CD
July 2015
Project Description Design and preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the widening and
reconstruction of FM 1460. Project will include review and update to existing Schematic,
Right‐of‐Way Map and Environmental Document and completion of the PS&E for the
remaining existing roadway.
Purpose To keep the currently approved environmental documents active; purchase ROW, effect
utility relocations/clearance and to provide on‐the‐shelf PS&E for TxDOT letting not later
than August 2013, pending available construction funding.
Project Managers Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Brown and Gay Engineers, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Complete
Environmental/
Archeological
Complete
Rights of Way As of October 16th, the City has obtained Possession and
Use Agreements or have closings planned for all the
remaining FM 1460 parcels.
Acquired: 34
Pending: 0
Condemnation: 2
Total: 36
Utility Relocations Ongoing
Construction Bid opened August 2014
Construction scheduled to commence Summer 2015.
Other Issues Two task order amendments were approved by Council April 28th.
Engineer preparing Change Orders for construction contract.
Page 81 of 86
Southwest Bypass Project
(RM 2243 to IH 35)
Project No. 1CA Project No. BK
July 2015
Project Description Develop a Design Schematic for the Southwest Bypass from Leander Road (RM 2243) to IH
35 in the ultimate configuration and Construction Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E)
for construction of approximately 1.5 miles of interim 2‐lane roadway from Leander Road
(RM 2243) to its intersection with the existing Inner Loop underpass at IH 35. The portion
from Leander Road to the east property line of Texas Crushed Stone is a GTAB Project; from
the east line to the existing Inner Loop underpass at IH 35 is being funded by GTEC.
Purpose To extend an interim portion of the SH 29 Bypass, filling in between Leander Road (RM
2243) to IH 35 Southbound Frontage Road.
Project Manager Williamson County
City Contact: Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer HDR, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Williamson County
Project Status
The next project status meeting is anticipated to be held on 5/27/15. A project status
meeting was held 5/13/15. A kickoff meeting was held on 4/6/15. NTP was issued on
3/18/15. Meetings with the City of Georgetown to discuss the interchange of
Southwest Bypass and IH 35 were held on 8/5/14 and 8/12/14. An ILA between the
City and County was approved by Georgetownʹs City Council on 1/25/11 and by the
Court on 2/15/11.
Rights of Way PUAs have been obtained for the final two parcels of property; condemnation
hearings have been (re)scheduled.
Other Issues None
Page 82 of 86
Transit Study
as Requested by City Council
Project No. None Project No. None
July 2015
Unchanged
Project
Description
Council Motion: Discussion and possible direction to the City of Georgetownʹs Transportation
Advisory Board (GTAB) to conduct an analysis and make a recommendation to the City Council
no later than June 24, 2014 ,regarding the Cityʹs potential future participation in State and
Regional Transportation Organizations including the benefits, conditions, and justification which
would prompt the Cityʹs participation in Project Connect, Lone Star Rail and any other relevant
State and Regional Transportation Organizations that the City should be involved with ‐‐ Steve
Fought, Councilmember, District 4
Amended Motion:
1. The City Manager to determine what time and effort staff have available to conduct this type
of study over the next year. If it is not in the Transportation Division, Planning Department,
Finance Department and/or City Manager’s Office work program, as outlined in the current
draft budget, can it be adequately staffed to complete this level of work over the next year?
2. Is the challenge to research Federal, State and Regional transportation organizations or is it
transit programs? This direction to staff is assuming it is transit programs.
3. Narrow the specific analysis to programs that are actually authorized to receive Federal
formula and discretionary funding programs found within the current Federal Transit
Administration. However, that would narrow the field down to three agencies or programs.
Capital Metro, Lone Star Rail and the State of Texas through the Texas Department of
Transportation. CARTS is only a contractor to Capital Metro and provides certain 5310
transit opportunities to persons outside of the Capital Metro Service Area in our jurisdiction.
CAMPO, Project Connect, Project Connect North and My35 are simply planning programs
that include staff from Capital Metro, Lone Star Rail District, and TxDOT and representatives
from local governments.
4. The analysis should be based on how those planning programs will lead to funding through
the project delivery agencies. (Fought amended to include financial risk and benefits to the
City)
5. The Council should provide the Board and staff specifics on what type of economic analysis
data will lead to an ultimate decision by the City Council.
6. Finally, some people ‘can’t see what the final project would look like’ or ‘can’t see what a
Transit Oriented Development would look like.’ Years ago, when the City was looking at
transportation options and creating a TOD ordinance, there was a field trip to perform some
on the ground research. Members of the City Council, Planning and Zoning, and staff
(GTAB was not in existence at the time) went and stayed at a TOD to see for themselves. We
should have at least one field trip during this study. Since it has been about 8 years or so
since that first and only field trip, it should be extremely informative to do it again and see
what a TOD looks like today and how the project has performed over the years.
Vote on the original motion as amended: Approved (6‐1) (Hesser opposed)
Project
Manager
Ed Polasek, AICP
Engineer TBD
Project Status Workplan Under Development
Page 83 of 86
Transportation Services Operations
CIP Maintenance
July 2015
Project Description 2014‐2015 CIP Maintenance of roadways including, Chip seal, Cutler Overlays,
Fog seal applications and Engineering design of future rehabilitation projects.
Purpose To provide protection and maintain an overall pavement condition index of
85%.
Project Manager Mark Miller
Engineer/Engineers KPA, Steger Bizzell, Halff Assoc.
Task Status / Issues
2nd Street
Construction
(KPA) 2nd St. to College St. Neighborhood preconstruction meeting held with
residents went well. Construction to begin Monday, July 6th following the 4th
of July fireworks event.
9th Street
(Main to Rock)
(KPA) (Patin Construction)
Punch‐list items being completed.
Chip Seal 2015 Currently working with contractor to determine start date. Estimating
completion by August 30th.
Fog Seal 2015 Fog sealing in‐house suspended until cooler temperatures in the fall.
HIPR/overlay 2015 Cutler expected to mobilize end of July. Curb and gutter work ahead of
this project is currently under way. Repaving estimated to be complete by
October 1st.
Page 84 of 86
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
July 14, 2015
SUBJECT:
- Jill Fussell will present a petition regarding Tornado Sirens to the City Council
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
To be determined
SUBMITTED BY:
Page 85 of 86
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
July 14, 2015
SUBJECT:
Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney
- Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has
a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items
Sec. 551.074: Personnel Matters
- Discussion with the City Manager regarding City Council goals for him in the upcoming year
- City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the appointment,
employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
To be determined
SUBMITTED BY:
Page 86 of 86