HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda CC 11.10.2015
Notice of Meeting of the
Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
November 10, 2015
The Georgetown City Council will meet on November 10, 2015 at 6:00 PM at Council Chambers,
101 E. 7th St., Georgetown, Texas
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined
under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon
request. Please contact the City Secretary's Office, least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting
date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users
route through Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any
purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A Call to Order
Invocation
Pledge of Allegiance
Comments from the Mayor
- Welcome and Meeting Procedures
- Proclamation for Small Business Saturday
- Proclamation for National Hospice Month
- Brookwood in Georgetown - Council Appreciation
City Council Regional Board Reports
Announcements
- Downtown Georgetown Holiday Hours
- Ladies Nite Out
- Boards & Commissions Application Process
Action from Executive Session
Statutory Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that may be acted upon
with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed
and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda.
B Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the Workshop and Regular
Meeting held on Tuesday, October 27, 2015 – Shelley Nowling, City Secretary
C Consideration and possible action to approve of the City’s Quarterly Financial Report,
Page 1 of 180
which includes the Investment Reports for the City of Georgetown, Georgetown
Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC), and the Georgetown Economic
Development Corporation (GEDCO) for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 -- Laurie
Brewer, Assistant City Manager and Lisa Haines, Controller
D Consideration and action on a First Amendment to the Amended and Restated
Development Agreement concerning the Water Oak Subdivision -- Bridget Chapman, City
Attorney and Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director
E Forwarded from the Americans with Disabilities Accessibility Advisory Board ADA):
Consideration and possible action to approve a Resolution adopting the City of Georgetown's
Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan as amended for 2015 -- Nat Waggoner,
PMP®, Transportation Analyst, Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director and
Bridget Chapman, City Attorney
Legislative Regular Agenda
F Consideration and possible action to approve Resolution finding public convenience and
necessity and authorizing eminent domain proceedings, if necessary, for the acquisition of
real property from Inner Peace, LLC to effectuate certain public road and utility
infrastructure improvements on Southeast Inner Loop at FM 1460 -- Edward G. Polasek,
AICP, Transportation Services Director, and Terri Glasby Calhoun, Real Estate Services
Coordinator (Record Vote)
G Consideration and possible action to approve a Resolution casting City of Georgetown votes
for the election of the Williamson Central Appraisal District Board of Directors -- David
Morgan, City Manager
H Second Reading of an Ordinance to Rezone 52.48 acres in the Hudson, Patterson, Addison
and Robertson Surveys located at the northeast corner of F.M. 1460 and Westinghouse
Road (C.R. 111), known as the Wheeler Tract, from a Planned Unit Development (PUD)
zoning with Local Commercial (C-1) and High Density Multifamily (MF-2) base Districts to
19.67 acres of Local Commercial (C-1) District, 10.81 acres of General Commercial (C-3)
District, 11.00 acres of Low-density Multifamily (MF-1) District, and 11.00 acres of High-
density Multifamily (MF-2) District -- Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner and Sofia Nelson,
CNU-A, Planning Director (action required)
Project Updates
I Project updates and status reports regarding current and future transportation and traffic
project; street, sidewalk, and other infrastructure projects; police, fire and other public safety
projects; economic development projects; city facility projects; and downtown projects
including parking enhancements and possible direction to city staff – David Morgan, City
Manager
Public Wishing to Address Council
On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be
found on the table at the entrance to the Council Chamber. Clearly print your name and the letter of
the item on which you wish to speak and present it to the City Secretary on the dais, preferably prior
to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Council considers that item.
On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future City Council agenda by
contacting the City Secretary no later than noon on the Wednesday prior to the Tuesday meeting,
with the subject matter of the topic they would like to address and their name. The City Secretary
can be reached at 512/930-3651.
J - As of the deadline, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than what was posted
on the agenda
Executive Session
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes,
Page 2 of 180
Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the
regular session.
K Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney
- Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which
the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items
- Litigation Update - Stephanie Hoskins Brown v. The City of Georgetown
- Public Safety Operations and Training Facility - Project Report
Sec. 551.074: Personnel Matters
- City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the
appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal
Sec. 551.087: Deliberation Regarding Economic Development Negotiations
- Project Voyager
Adjournment
Certificate of Posting
I, Shelley Nowling, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify
that this Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily
accessible to the general public at all times, on the _____ day of _________________,
2015, at __________, and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding
the scheduled time of said meeting.
__________________________________
Shelley Nowling, City Secretary
Page 3 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
November 10, 2015
SUBJECT:
Call to Order
Invocation
Pledge of Allegiance
Comments from the Mayor
- Welcome and Meeting Procedures
- Proclamation for Small Business Saturday
- Proclamation for National Hospice Month
- Brookwood in Georgetown - Council Appreciation
City Council Regional Board Reports
Announcements
- Downtown Georgetown Holiday Hours
- Ladies Nite Out
- Boards & Commissions Application Process
Action from Executive Session
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
Page 4 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
November 10, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the Workshop and Regular Meeting held on
Tuesday, October 27, 2015 – Shelley Nowling, City Secretary
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
Regular Meeting Minutes from 10.27.15
Workshop Meeting Minutes from 10.27.15
Page 5 of 180
The Georgetown City Council will meet on Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 6:00 PM at the Council Chambers at 101
E. 7th St., Georgetown, Texas
The city of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you
require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable
assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary’s
Office, at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th
Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose authorized by
the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
Mayor Ross called the meeting to order at 6:05 PM. Councilmember Gipson was not in attendance.
A. Call to Order
Invocation
Pledge of Allegiance
Comments from the Mayor
- Welcome and Meeting Procedures
- Proclamation for World Stroke Day
- Proclamation for Flying Vikings Day
- City of Georgetown Salamander Recognition
- City of Georgetown Planning Awards Recognition
- Project 1460 Groundbreaking Recognition
City Council Regional Board Reports
Councilmember Jonrowe spoke on a recent meeting with the Clean Air Coalition. She provided information about
an upcoming CAPCOG meeting. Jonrowe mentioned that the focus is changing to health outcomes and poor air
quality. Efforts will be on the ability to engage and educate the public.
Announcements
- Downtown Georgetown Holiday Hours
- Shop Small Business Saturday
- Ladies Nite Out
- Best of Georgetown Results November 6, 2015
- Boards & Commissions Application Process
Councilmember Eby spoke on the recent visit from Valtteri Bottas, a Formula 1 Driver, ranked 5th in the world.
Bottas came to Georgetown where he tested his skills on the driving track for training police officers. Eby thanked
Police Captain Evelyn McClain and her staff for the excellent job they did hosting the event. Eby mentioned that
Georgetown will be unique in having the track record on our police course set by a Formula 1 driver.
Action from Executive Session
Motion by Brainard, second by Hesser to approve the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation’s
action authorizing acquisition of the Laubach Trust Property for the Southwest Bypass Project on the terms
discussed in Executive Session
Approved 6-0 (Gipson absent)
Notice of the Minutes of the
Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Page 6 of 180
Motion by Brainard, second by Hesser to approve the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation’s
action authorizing staff to send initial offers to acquire the following properties for the Rivery Extension Project on
the terms discussed in Executive Session: Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 19, 20, 21 and 22.
Approved 6-0 (Gipson absent)
Councilmember Hesser requested that Item J be pulled from the Statutory Consent Agenda and placed on the
Legislative Regular Agenda.
Statutory Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that may be acted upon with one single
vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and acted upon individually as
part of the Regular Agenda.
B. Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the Workshop and Regular Meeting held on
Tuesday, October 13, 2015 – Shelley Nowling, City Secretary
C. Consideration and possible action to appoint Robyn Densmore as a Deputy City Secretary with authorization to
post agendas – Shelley Nowling, City Secretary
D. Consideration and possible action to appoint Councilmember John Hesser to the Georgetown Utility
Systems Advisory Board, replacing Councilmember Ty Gipson – Mayor Dale Ross
E. Forwarded from the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC):
Consideration and possible action to approve the deposit of the difference ($385,500) in the amount previously
tendered to the landowner for possession and use ($814,500) and the amount of the Award of Special
Commissioners ($1,200,000) in Cause No. 15-0496-CC2, the City of Georgetown vs. W.W. Laubach Trust,
Wilburn Bernard Laubach and Carol Ann Laubach, Trustees, et. Al; Condemnation Proceeding in County Court at
Law No. 2, Williamson County, Texas in connection with the Southwest Bypass Road Project – Terri Glasby
Calhoun, Real Estate Services Coordinator and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director
F. Forwarded from the Georgetown Utility Advisory Board (GUS):
Consideration and possible action to approve task orders for professional engineering services: Task Order
MEI-16-001 for Electric System & Planned Capital Improvement Projects in the amount of $750,000.00, Task
Order MEI-16-002 for Electric System Engineering Planning and Engineering in the amount of $400,000.00,
and Task order MEI-16-003 for New Development Engineering and Design in the amount of $550,000.00 with
McCord Engineering, Inc., of College Station, Texas -- Jimmy Sikes, Electric Engineering Manager and Wesley
Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director
G. Forwarded from the Georgetown Utility Advisory Board (GUS):
Consideration and possible action to approve a Utility Relocation and Joint Use Agreement between
Williamson County and the City of Georgetown for the relocation of a waterline on County Road 258 -- Wesley
Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director and Michael Hallmark, CIP Manager
H. Forwarded from the Georgetown Utility Advisory Board (GUS):
Consideration and possible action to approve the contract for the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone (EARZ) –
2014-2015, Wastewater Rehabilitation to T Construction, LLC of Houston, Texas, for the amount of
$959,176.00 – Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director/Michael Hallmark, CIP Manager
I. Forwarded from the Georgetown Utility Advisory Board (GUS):
Consideration and possible action to approve Task Order KPA-16-001 with Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP of
Georgetown, Texas, for professional services related County Road 255 Waterline Improvements in the amount
of $909,380.00 -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director and Michael Hallmark, CIP Manager
J. Consideration and possible action to approve the Lease and authorize Mayor Dale Ross to sign the Lease
Agreement between Georgetown Heritage Society and the City of Georgetown for the Grace Heritage Center,
located at 811 Main Street – Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner and Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager
Item J was Moved to Legislative Regular Agenda by Councilmember Hesser.
Motion by Fought, second by Eby to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Item J, which was moved
to the Legislative Regular Agenda.
Approved 6-0 (Gipson absent)
Page 7 of 180
Legislative Regular Agenda
J. Consideration and possible action to approve the Lease and authorize Mayor Dale Ross to sign the Lease
Agreement between Georgetown Heritage Society and the City of Georgetown for the Grace Heritage Center,
located at 811 Main Street – Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner and Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager
Laurie Brewer spoke on the Lease Agreement with Georgetown Heritage Society.
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Eby to approve the lease agreement with Georgetown Heritage Society
Hesser explained that he pulled the item because GGAF has recently agreed to take a good look at the needs and
conditions of all city owned buildings.
Hesser motioned to amend the motion to postpone the lease until GGAF looks at the deferred maintenance of all
City properties, second by Brainard.
Jonrowe asked how this decision would help. Hesser expressed that there are concerns about the maintenance
costs of the building. Mayor Ross said that he would like to see the item postponed. Gonzalez said that the GGAF
would be meeting on November 17th and suggested the item be brought back to Council on November 24, 2015.
Eby said she is not in favor unless it is specifically the lease that restricts what the City can do. She said that it was
not appropriate to change or postpone the lease.
Hesser suggested keeping the Heritage Society on a month to month lease, as they are currently.
Gonzalez said that if there were big problems with the building, the City might not want to take on the burden.
Fought asked how the Heritage Society would be harmed by the delay.
Jonrowe mentioned that this is cruel and unusual territory. She asked how many times the City should ask the
Heritage Society to show up again.
Motion by Hesser, second by Gonzalez, amending the amended motion and directing staff to bring Item J,
regarding the Lease Agreement with Georgetown Heritage Society, to the November 24th agenda with input from
GGAF from their meeting on November 17, 2015.
Approved 4-2 (Eby and Jonrowe opposed)
K. Consideration and possible action to authorize the Environmental Services staff to apply for a Capital Area
Council of Governments (CAPCOG) FY 2016/17 Regional Solid Waste Management Grant program. The
Grant will cover the purchase of one (1) secure metal medication collection box, to be located at the Public Safety
and Training and Operations Building, and additional ancillary expenses such as advertisement, and medication
disposal, all of which will meet or exceed EPA, TCEQ, and DEA medication destruction requirements -- Jordan
Fengel, B.S., Environmental Services Coordinator and Mike Babin, Deputy General Manager of Utilities
Mike Babin spoke regarding the request to apply for a grant with the Capital Area Council of Governments
(CAPCOG). The grant would be for a secure metal medication collection box which Babin explained would be for
the collection of discarded prescription drugs and the service to pick them up and discard them properly.
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Fought to approve item K and the Resolution that represents it.
Approved 6-0 (Gipson absent)
Jonrowe thanked Jordan for his work on the project and asked how much of the grant could be used on
advertisement and raising awareness of the project. Jordan said that he was not sure of the exact percentage but
that it is a percentage that is reasonable for advertisement and awareness.
Page 8 of 180
L. Forwarded from the Georgetown Utility Advisory Board (GUS):
Consideration and possible action to amend the contract with CH2M HILL for the management, operation and
maintenance of the City’s water and wastewater treatment facilities for the period starting October 1, 2015
through September 30, 2016 for a total combined operating budget of $3,377,222.69 -- David W. Thomison,
Water Services Manager/Glenn W. Dishong, Utility Director
Glenn Dishong spoke on the amended contract and explained how it will pave the way for the City to bring water
and wastewater treatment in house.
Motion by Fought, second by Eby to approve Item L.
Approved 6-0 (Gipson absent)
M. First Reading of an Ordinance Authorizing the Issuance of City of Georgetown, Texas General Obligation
Bonds, Series 2015A; Authorizing the Levy of an Ad Valorem Tax in Support of the Bonds; Approving an Official
Statement, a Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement and Other Related Documents; Awarding the Sale of the Bonds
and Authorizing Other Matters Relating to the Bonds -- Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager (action required)
Brewer spoke on the bonds for adoption of the budget. She explained that they were previously approved by
Council in a CIP Plan. This is the first tier of the process. Brewer explained that the actual numbers obtained
today were slightly different from the numbers in the agenda packet because things went well at the market sale.
Jennifer Douglas of Specialized Public Finance Inc. passed out copies of the day’s bid summary. She explained
that the City hit the market at a good time because the bond market was very good. The City received 10 bids
from 20 different firms. The lower rate obtained will save the City $1 million in debt service. She recommended
approval at this rate and mentioned that the AA Plus bond rating had also been approved.
Motion by Brainard, second by Gonzalez to approve Item M
Approved 6-0 (Gipson absent)
N. Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance to Rezone 52.48 acres in the Hudson, Patterson, Addison
and Robertson Surveys located at the northeast corner of F.M. 1460 and Westinghouse Road (C.R. 111),
known as the Wheeler Tract, from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning with Local Commercial (C-1) and
High Density Multifamily (MF-2) base Districts to 19.67 acres of Local Commercial (C-1) District, 10.81 acres of
General Commercial (C-3) District, 11.00 acres of Low-density Multifamily (MF-1) District, and 11.00 acres of
High-density Multifamily (MF-2) District -- Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning
Director (action required)
Sofia Nelson spoke on the rezoning and described the property. She then read the Ordinance Caption.
Mayor Ross opened the Public Hearing at 6:48 PM. No speakers were present. Mayor Ross closed the Public
Hearing at 6:49 PM
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Gonzalez to approved Item N.
Approved 6-0 (Gipson absent)
O. Second Reading of an Ordinance Rezoning 12.57 acres in the D. Wright Survey located at 2150 IH 35 from
Agriculture (AG) to 5.92 acres of General Commercial (C-3) and 6.65 acres of Industrial (IN) -- Carolyn Horner,
AICP, Planner and Sophia Nelson, CNU-A, Director (action required)
Sofia Nelson spoke regarding the rezoning and read the Ordinance Caption.
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Brainard to approve Item O.
Approved 6-0 (Gipson absent)
P. Second Reading of an Ordinance Rezoning 353.45 acres in the Stubblefield Survey near the intersection of
Rockride Lane and Sam Houston Ave, to be known as Saddlecreek, from Agriculture (AG) to Planned Unit
Development (PUD) -- Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director
(action required)
Sofia Nelson spoke regarding the rezoning and read the Ordinance Caption
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Brainard to approve item P.
Approved 6-0 (Gipson absent)
Page 9 of 180
Q. Second Reading of an Ordinance establishing the classifications and number of positions (Strength of
Force) for all the City of Georgetown Fire Fighters and Police Officers pursuant to Chapter 143 of the Texas
Local Government Code pertaining to Civil Service – Tadd Phillips, Human Resource Director (action required)
Tadd Phillips spoke on the Strength of Force Ordinance and read the Ordinance Caption.
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Brainard to approve Item Q.
Approved 6-0 (Gipson absent)
R. Consideration and possible direction to Staff to develop a plan to remove Chip Seal from selected residential
streets in Georgetown and repave with a Cutler process surface – Steve Fought, Councilmember, District 4
Motion by Fought, second by Hesser to approve Item R as stated.
Discussion followed. Fought spoke on why chip seal is appropriate for some streets but not for others. He listed
reasons why chip seal is sometimes not appropriate. He used Sun City Blvd. as an example but said that other
streets are affected also. Fought said that there is significant cost to replace the chip seal and said that it could
potentially take years. He suggested possibly waiting until after the normal life of the chip seal occurs. Fought
would like Council to see the cost effectiveness analysis. He wants to know how these choices are made. He
would like to have it determined which streets are appropriate for chip seal and which are not. Fought made a
point to say that he has no fault with the Transportation Department. He would like to see staff recommendations
on which streets get chip seal and require that the recommendations need Council approval. Fought said that
Council needs to understand which standards need to be followed and take a serious look at how we maintain our
streets.
Three speakers signed up to speak on Item R: Dr. Bob Glandt, Mr. Peter Garner and Mr. Gregory Hughes. They
each spoke on the problems with chip seal, damages that have occurred, stone damage to vehicles and golf carts
and compromised bicycle safety. Pictures of damage were provided by Mr. Garner.
Jonrowe asked if fog seal had been applied to the Chip Seal on Sun City Blvd. Mark Miller answered that a
different oil had been used on Sun City Blvd. Jonrowe then asked about the noise level at different speeds. Miller
said that he and Ed Polasek had used an app on their phone for noise levels and determined that there is a slight
rise in noise with more speed.
Miller went on to say that the aggregate is the size of the chip seal. He said that he could hire someone to
analyze the noise level with council direction. He said that the City now has better equipment for picking up the
gravel that was being thrown. In the past, contractors have done 60% of the work. The Transportation
Department is trying to bring more of the work in house. He would suggest looking at better maintenance options
before ripping up a street or road.
Gonzalez said the streets are of poor quality in Summer Crest also. He said that the oil that was used there was
expected to last from 5 to 7 years. He said that specifications have been approved and life expectancy has been
raised to 7 or 8 years recently. Gonzalez said that meant that there would be approximately 3 more years of life
on the poorly constructed original chip seal streets. He suggested that it would not be worth ripping it up and the
City should wait until the useful life has expired. Gonzalez asked if there would be a mid-point solution. Gonzalez
added that the recent new chip seal is a better product that the initial Sun City Blvd. and Summer Crest product.
Mayor Ross suggested that Council give direction to staff or vote as written.
Eby asked about the selected streets and how they are determined.
Fought suggested that Council give direction to staff to develop a plan and then allow Council to analyze it at that
time. He would like to see a comprehensive plan which includes all road maintenance and street plans.
Brainard agreed that a plan is needed. He said that either the chip seal is the problem or the application is the
problem. He said the City should spend additional money to find a solution. It is an issue that needs to be
resolved.
Hesser added that the application process is a problem. He mentioned that he could not understand how Del
Webb Blvd. was laid without quality control or City involvement. He asked that staff come back to Council with
how this will be monitored and controlled in the future.
Amended Motion by Fought, second by Brainard to direct staff to develop a plan that will get the chip seal
problems rectified throughout Georgetown.
Approved 6-0 (Gipson absent)
Page 10 of 180
Project Updates
S. Project updates and status reports regarding current and future transportation and traffic project; street, sidewalk,
and other infrastructure projects; police, fire and other public safety projects; economic development projects; city
facility projects; and downtown projects including parking enhancements and possible direction to city staff --
David Morgan, City Manager
Public Wishing to Address Council
On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found on the
table at the entrance to the Council Chamber. Clearly print your name and the letter of the item on which you wish
to speak and present it to the City Secretary on the dais, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be
called forward to speak when the Council considers that item.
On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future City Council agenda by contacting the
City Secretary no later than noon on the Wednesday prior to the Tuesday meeting, with the subject matter of the
topic they would like to address and their name. The City Secretary can be reached at 512/930-3651.
T. - Aaron Kemkaran from Red Silo Studios will address the Council regarding construction on Second Street
- Bruce Barton would like to speak on the linkage between single-family residential permits, limited commercial
zoning and traffic congestion in Northwest Georgetown
- Ercel Brashear would like to speak on the linkage between single-family residential permits, limited commercial
zoning and traffic congestion in Northwest Georgetown
Josh Saenz spoke for Red Silo Studios in Aaron Kemkaran’s absence. He said that they have spoken to several
City officials regarding the economic hardship placed on the business because of the construction on Second
Street. He said that they have lost so much business and revenue that they will be forced to close the business
and asked for the City’s help. Josh was thankful for the help from the Economic Development Department with
advertisement on the City of Georgetown Facebook Site and help from the Transportation Department on signage
redirection. He mentioned the loss of jobs that are a direct result of the street construction.
Ercel Brashear provided a Power Point presentation on the linkage between single-family residential permits,
limited commercial zoning and traffic congestion, specifically in Northwest Georgetown. He mentioned that there
is growth and development of 74% West of I35. He gave suggestions on traffic control and commercial
development.
Mayor Ross announced a Recess to Executive Session under Section 551.071 at 7:32 PM.
The City Council returned to the Regular Council Meeting at 7:50 PM
Motion by Brainard, second by Hesser, to authorize the filing of a petition for review in the Texas Supreme Court
of the Third Court of Appeals’ decision in Case No. 03-14-00231-CV; Stephanie Hoskins Brown v. The City of
Georgetown.
Approved 6-0 (Gipson absent)
Motion to adjourn by Fought, second by Hesser.
Executive Session
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon’s Texas Codes, Annotated, the
items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session.
U. Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney
- Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the
City Council, including agenda items
- Litigation Update – Stephanie Hoskins Brown v. The City of Georgetown, et al.
Sec 551.072: Deliberation Regarding Real Property
- Acquisition of real property owned by the WW Laubach Trust in connection with the Southwest Bypass project
- Deliberation concerning the approval of appraised values of multiple parcels in connection with the Rivery Blvd. Extension
Project
Sec. 551.074: Personnel Matters
- City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the appointment, employment, evaluation,
reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal
Sec. 551.087: Deliberation Regarding Economic Development Negotiations
- Project Voyager
Page 11 of 180
Meeting Adjourned at 7:52 PM
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Approved by the Georgetown City Council on _____________________________
Date
_____________________________ _____________________________
Dale Ross, Mayor Attest: City Secretary
Page 12 of 180
Notice of a Minutes of a Workshop Meeting of the
Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
The Georgetown City Council will meet on Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 3:00 PM at the Council Chambers, at 101
E. 7th St., Georgetown, Texas
The city of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you
require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable
assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary’s
Office, at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th
Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Policy Development/Review Workshop – Call to order at 3:00 PM
Mayor Ross called the meeting to order at 3:00 PM
All Councilmembers in attendance with the exception of Ty Gipson, District 5.
A. Overview and discussion regarding proposed revisions to the Unified Development Code (UDC) related to
accessory dwelling units, accessory structures and workforce housing -- Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director,
Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner and Jennifer bills, AICP, Housing Coordinator
Sofia Nelson began the presentation and explained that this was a follow-up workshop from the Public Hearing
on the UDC amendments from Council’s request to bring it back.
Nelson said she would be speaking on staff suggestions and resolutions. She explained accessory structures
and current standards in detail and spoke on set-back and impervious cover regulations. The presentation
showed calculations of maximum size and limitations for accessory structures.
Nelson spoke in length about accessory dwelling units, current rental regulations, proposed rental regulations
and special use permit regulations.
Nelson went on to explain the significance of a kitchen in an accessory structure as a rental dwelling and the
necessity of special use permits. She also spoke on parking space limitations and the regulations that require
both the primary structure and the accessory structure to remain on the same water and electric bill. Additional
parking would also be required to use an accessory structure as a rental.
Nelson explained that structures prior to the UDC remain without the regulations enforced for structures
constructed after the UDC. Those structures constructed after the UDC must have specific use permits.
Nelson said that the Planning & Zoning Commission had approved the proposed rental changes and they were
also approved by the City Council at the Public Hearing.
Nelson said that the Planning Department has received public input and concerns regarding accessory rentals
and potential overcrowding in neighborhoods.
Nelson clarified that special use permit provisions are still in place and would need to receive approval from the
Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. Nelson said the process itself would prohibit rentals from
popping up everywhere.
Jonrowe asked about the 45% impervious cover regulations. Nelson said that 45% is the standard everywhere
in Georgetown. Jonrowe then asked about the maximum height requirements. Nelson explained that an
accessory structure’s height is capped at the height of the principal structure. Jonrowe said it would make more
sense to have the accessory structure on a smaller scale. Jonrowe asked about family members living in
accessory structures and if the same requirements would apply. Nelson answered that a special use permit is
only required if there is a kitchen in the accessory unit. It is currently proposed to remove this regulation if the
unit is not used as a rental; the burden for reporting is placed on the property owner. Nelson explained that the
new construction is, of course, easier to regulate during the building permit stage.
Page 13 of 180
Gonzalez said that if this problem is not identified, everyone can claim the accessory structure as family use.
Nelson said that the development of a kitchen is triggers the potential for a rental. The best attempt to control is
through the regulation that both structures are required to be on the same utilities. It is also required that if an
accessory unit is going to be a rental, a kitchen must be constructed.
Jonrowe suggested a rental registration in the City. Nelson said that special use permits are already tracked.
Jonrowe is in favor. She mentioned families expressing their concern for a relative back home or a college
student who may need to be accommodated. She said the process can sometimes take time.
Mayor Ross asked Nelson if most Home Owners Associations (HOAs) regulate these types of situations. Nelson
was not sure but added that it is generally handled through deed restrictions.
Mayor Ross asked Nelson if an elderly, surviving spouse, in need of a caregiver, would need to get a special use
permit. Nelson explained that if the structures already existed, it would be legal and non-conforming. If there
was new construction involved, there would be a special use permit requirement. Even a modification would
trigger the current requirements. Mayor Ross asked how the percentages were set. Nelson said that the
percentages used are consistent with other cities.
Brainard said that he would imagine there are accessory dwelling units that are not identified or authorized.
Nelson agreed. Brainard said some are likely illegal, but getting away with it. Nelson said she would imagine
most of those would be structures constructed prior to the UDC regulations which would still be legal and
nonconforming.
Brainard asked about the maximum height allowance. Valerie Kreger spoke to clarify. Kreger explained that the
maximum height allowance to be the same as the principal structure provides for additions connected to the
principal structure such as an attached garage or a breezeway.
Eby asked for clarification that the proposed changes only apply to new construction. Nelson confirmed that this
was correct. Eby said she would like to see something in place to be able to track violations or enforce
regulations. Nelson said that a preliminary plan is in the works but is not part of this presentation.
Mayor said that there could be a great cost to regulating this.
Gonzalez reminded everyone that Councilmember Eason had discussed this when the City Council was
discussing home businesses. The cost of regulating was huge and a large burden on the City.
Jonrowe said that the Council was talking about the protection of the tenant. She would like to explore the
options. Jonrowe said that if the principal structure is occupied by the owner, there is generally much better
maintenance of the property.
Jonrowe asked Nelson if an owner had a requirement that his tenant could not have a car, would the extra
parking space still be a requirement. Nelson explained that the issue could be worked out during the special use
permit process. Jonrowe then asked if the number of people in a unit is regulated. Nelson said that the limitation
is always no more than 4 unrelated people in one unit.
David Morgan added that the definition is part of Code Enforcement. He said that he will look into the health and
safety regulations and will report back to Council.
Mayor Ross said that prior to making additional regulations, it is necessary to get everyone into compliance.
Compliance is more of a burden with time and money. He said that it can be a slippery slope by creating
additional regulations.
Hesser asked Nelson if the City had looked at HOA’s and if they are responsible for regulations. Nelson said
that she did not have any results currently, but could do the research and bring the results back to Council.
Hesser inquired about registration for all rentals. Nelson said that they are currently looking at accessory units
but would do whatever Council directs. Hesser said that is important not to fill up the streets with vehicles. He
added that usually an HOA can control the street parking through deed restriction. The City cannot enforce.
Fought agreed that deed restrictions are the solution. In most cases no accessory units are allowed. David
Morgan agreed that HOAs can control parking with covenants and restrictions. It is then the HOAs job to
enforce.
Jennifer Bills spoke on housing diversity and workforce housing standards. She spoke on the current
requirements and the proposed amendments.
Page 14 of 180
Developers are encouraged to include 3 different types of housing in each development. This encourages
attainable housing. The allowances for reduced requirements are currently in conflict with the UDC
The proposed primary change would separate mixed units and affordable housing, adding some incentives for
single family housing.
Bills said that in August 2014, the Housing Advisory Board recommended 3 revisions: 1. Increasing the amount
of units per structure (maximum was 40) 2. Decreasing front setback to a minimum of 15 ft. (was 25 ft.)
3. Increasing impervious cover.
There is a proposed fee waiver. Impact fees cannot be waived. Reduced review costs have also been
considered. Bills said the City could budget this annually. No developer would receive incentives over $100
thousand dollars or would receive more than 50% in fee waivers.
Removing street pavement standards was also considered but is no longer an option because of emergency
vehicles.
Developers would be required to maintain the development for 10 years.
Mayor Ross asked about the street pavement regulations. Bills said they had attempted to take 32 feet of
pavement to 28 feet. They were told it would be an issue with fire code. The Transportation Department has
reviewed this also. Mayor asked that the City continue to look at this.
Jonrowe asked if this only applied to multifamily housing. Bills clarified that it also applies to single family
housing. She mentioned that to clear the three types of housing in one development has created no interest.
Nelson asked for Council direction.
Gonzalez asked that breezeway and height regulation be reviewed. He asked if the height affected the
impervious cover regulations. He asked Nelson if this was in effect for Sun City and River Ridge. Nelson
clarified that the regulations apply across the City. She specified that an HOA could have different regulations.
Brainard asked about the rear setback. Nelson said that rear setback is currently 10 ft. Brainard voiced concern
about a 35 foot structure that could be 10 feet from the neighbor’s home.
Nelson asked about a possible public workshop. She also asked for Council direction.
Mayor Ross said that there have already been multiple workshops. Jonrowe asked how many concerns have
been received from citizens. Nelson said she has received approximately 15 emails. Gonzalez asked how many
of the concerned citizens have attended one of the multiple workshops. Gonzalez said there have been enough
workshops.
B. Presentation and discussion of service parameters and system finance planning considerations of possible fixed
route bus service in 2017 -- Nat Waggoner, Transportation Analyst and Edward G. Polasek, AICP,
Transportation Services Director
Ed Polasek spoke regarding past attempts to finance fixed route bus service in 2004 and 2007. The plans were
not funded. He explained that now through Cap Metro we must comply.
Brainard asked why this was required. Polasek said in order to receive money from Cap Metro, a City must have
a transit development plan. Georgetown has the option of doing nothing, but would receive no money. Polasek
said that the City currently pays $200 thousand dollars to Carts and receives matching money. To continue to
receive these matching funds we must develop the plan.
Nat Waggoner spoke on the ongoing plan and the strategic goals to fund the program. The three goals of the
presentation were 1. What we agreed to 2. The cost of this function 3. To understand direction from Council
and whether to go forth with the plan or not.
Michelle Meaux , the Regional Coordinator Planner from Cap Metro, spoke about the history of these projects
and the Cap Metro service expansion plan policy. Cap metro pays 80% of a project and the local jurisdiction
pays 20%. She said the estimate for Georgetown would be $16 thousand dollars and the plan must be
completed in 8 months. Meaux said that public involvement would wrap up in May. She explained that in order
for plans to comply they must be reviewed by a regional committee. Cap Metro approves a plan and the plan
must also be approved by CAMPO and CARTS. Meaux said that current service is demand response service, or
curb to curb service, through CARTS. Passengers reserve seats in advance. Last year CARTS provided 8,000
Page 15 of 180
rides to citizens of Georgetown. The rides were mostly medical and social services, followed by shopping at
HEB and Wolf Ranch. 75% of the riders reside in the 78626 and 78628 zip codes. Operating costs are currently
$66.95 per hour.
Meaux listed the Implementation Requirements:
Only projects from transit development plans can receive funding
Current service would be continued while implementing the new plan
Plan recommends 4 routes – A Sun City and Convention Center feeder route and 4 Core Routes
Phase in other services
Implement 2 Core Routes at a time
Continue demand response
Meaux said that FTA and ADA require other services for those who cannot take fixed route service.
The cost per year for the fixed route service will be $510,000. At maturity, or 90,000 rides, the price per
passenger will be $6 per passenger. Meaux said that the current service is costly at $36 per passenger.
Brainard asked about the $36 per passenger cost. Michelle explained that it is for a one way trip and is actually
$72 per passenger for a round trip.
Meaux spoke on the proposed routes. She explained that the highest demand areas would be first. The cost will
initially be $431,000 per year for the 4 core routes. At 80,000 riders the cost per rider is $5. Implementation of
two core routes would be reduced service at $257,000 per year for 40,000 riders at $6 per rider
Mayor Ross asked how the numbers and routes were decided and whether the costs include staff and
advertising. Meaux said that it did include the advertising costs and one staff member at an estimated salary of
$45,000.
Gonzalez asked if it included the cost of the buses. Meaux stated that the buses are included in the contract and
are owned and maintained by Cap Metro.
Gonzalez asked if CVB was contributing. Meaux answered yes – from the CVB fund.
Hesser asked if the $431,000 cost for 80,000 ridership is fixed. Meaux said that is not fixed. The plan
recommends $1.50 fare. She then said that the agreement with Cap Metro would have language that would
include “up to” costs and “not to exceed” costs.
Brainard said that our receipt of federal funds requires us to implement the plan. If this is not done we will lose
funding.
Mayor Ross would like to see true figures if the federal funding went away and added that Choice B would be
slightly over $300,000 with 4 core routes.
Gonzalez said that the City would not know what the ridership would be. He asked about continuing with
demand response service. Meaux said that it is not in this plan and not the recommendation of the TDP. The
intent is for a fixed route she said. Gonzalez was not pleased that the City is told we must do this. He said that
there are other options. He would like discussion on why there are no other options.
Jonrowe said that she was under the understanding that the City was moving in this direction. She said that
demand response service is not efficient.
Fought said his objection to CARTS is that even if a person is picked up on time they might not reach their
destination in time. Fixed route service would solve that. He also voiced concern about one stop drop off. He
gave the example of Wolf Ranch. If someone with mobility problems was dropped off at Wolf Ranch, they would
still need help getting around the complex. Fought then asked how many Uber vouchers could be issued to
citizens before the cost reached this high. He said this would also get the people to where they want to go on
time.
Nat Waggoner spoke to correct some of the figures that had been presented. He corrected the $412,000 total
because 50% would be federal funding.
Fought asked that the planners give serious thought to the vouchers. Waggoner mentions concerns with liability.
He also mentioned that you could not ride Uber from Sun City to downtown for $4. Fought questioned how costs
could go from $72 per round trip to $6 per round trip in 4 years.
Mayor Ross suggested that the presentation continue and then to get feedback from Council.
Page 16 of 180
Waggoner continued the presentation, showing the implementation of responsibilities, mostly falling to Cap Metro
and CARTS. Waggoner said that he will rework the figures, subtract the rider fees, and bring it back to Council.
He said the next steps would be feedback from Council and the Implementation Option.
Gonzalez said that none of the routes came near his district and no route seems to include the airport. He said
the City is not ready for a fixed route system
Jonrowe said that she has been to many public meetings where people who need service reside. She suggests
going forward whole hog.
Fought said the City should start with small routes.
Hesser said he wants more credibility. The numbers need to be correct. He said that he is owed an objective of
what is expected to be achieved in ridership and cost per rides. He wants to know what basis decisions are
made.
Brainard added that if the City created vouchers, there would be Uber vehicles and taxis come to Georgetown.
He said that overall it would be less expensive and more efficient.
Eby said that staff needs to be more detailed and accurate with their numbers, maturity and financial impact .
Jonrowe said she wants a true cost per year. She would like to still provide CARTS for people who cannot take
the bus. Waggoner said flexibility will be considered in the transition. Provisions will be made for those with
severe mobility problems. Waggoner agreed that there needs to be more study.
Mayor Ross said that there is a need for all types of services in Georgetown and that the City should provide
service wherever the needs exist. He said that increasing mobility in Georgetown is the goal.
Mayor asked David Morgan when this could be brought back to Council. David said that he and staff would do
additional research and bring it back to Council in January.
C. Overview of the adopted interim municipal utility district (MUD) policy and update on approved and pending MUD
applications -- David Morgan, City Manager, Sofia Nelson, Planning Director and Wesley Wright, Systems
Engineering Director
Sofia Nelson presented the Municipal Utility District (MUD) presentation. She said that it is an update from a
year ago. She spoke about an overview of a MUD request for Kasper Development and the interim MUD policy.
She provided a review of past approved MUD developments and said that she would be requesting feedback
from Council on whether a MUD is suitable for the Kasper Development.
Nelson provided maps and concept plans and described the property, the development plans and the major
access points. The development would have 726 units with 40 ft. wide to 60 ft. wide lots, which would be smaller
than usual lots in Georgetown. Nelson explained that the lots would have assessed values of an average of
$250,000 per lot. Utilities would be Jonah for water, Encore for electric and Georgetown for wastewater. The
overall tax rate would be $2.89258.
Nelson presented and discussed the Georgetown adopted MUD Policy and master plan. She showed the
comparison to ultimate City Limit boundaries and raised the question if the development would be in the
extension of City of Limits or farther out. For approval with UDC, the MUD request must have a “unique” factor.
To grant a MUD request the City must determine if it is feasible, practical and beneficial. ESD, Fire Service and
Sheriff Service must be evaluated. The cost of utility movement goes to the developer.
Nelson said that there is a need for additional review with the applicant to review debt and soft costs.
Nelson showed maps of previously approved MUDs and listed the unique reasons provided for previously
approved MUDs.
Nelson explained that staff believes the Kasper MUD is not necessary.
Hesser asked how much of MUD tax goes back to the City. Nelson said that City would not receive any monies
since the property is in the ETJ.
Page 17 of 180
Nelson showed a slide on the overall sewer basin for the Woodhull Saddlecreek MUD and described the utilities
requirements. She explained that there would be an increase to the size of the lift station, with the opportunity to
service an area outside of the development tract.
Nelson asked Council if the MUD is suitable. Does it have the unique factor? She asked Council to guide staff
with other options. She said that staff had identified some other options that they will be working on. She said
that the approval of the consent agreement still needs work and will be brought to the Planning & Zoning
Commission and the Council. The developer will be asked to reexamine the proposal.
She again added that staff thinks the MUD is not necessary.
Hesser mentioned Hillwood. He said there is not a need for more donut holes. The City needs to start closing
those.
David Morgan said that David Nairne, from Sentinel Land was here for questions. Mr. Nairne said that his
company had developed Woodhull and completed the work on the sewer line. $10 million dollars in sewer costs
have been covered by the developer. Nairne said that over a year ago he asked staff about compliance for a
MUD. He is hoping to keep the development affordable. If he is forced to raise home prices, the project would
not sell well. A MUD allows the developer to pass on a better development to the homeowners over a period of
20 years. Nairne said he has read the MUD Policy from the City. He said that Parkland doubles what is
required. There are tough design guidelines. Nairne said they will need the assistance of a MUD to develop.
The intention is to connect Woodhull to Kasper. Kasper is surrounded by commercial properties. They will not
have commercial development in Kasper. Nairne said that his proposal also included payment to the City from
MUD proceeds.
Hesser said that he is confused by the City MUD Policy. He asked if it was possible to lay two entities side by
side.
Brainard asked when the property would be incorporated. It was explained that it would be when the City pays
off the bond proceed or around the 16th year. He mentioned that there would be no electricity from Georgetown
and the lift station would cost $3.5 million dollars.
Jonrowe questioned the main road running through the development. She asked if it wouldn’t be a loss of profit
if not developed on both sides.
Mayor Ross asked Council for their direction.
Hesser would like to see the Hillwood development and the Kasper development side by side.
David Morgan said that the developer would like to have clear direction from Council. Morgan asked if it meets
the unique factor in order to keep working on it.
Gonzalez said if it is financially not feasible the Council would need to consider what the MUD does. It will
eventually be part of the City. He asked if oversize lots were necessary. He said it would make sense to make
this a part of the City sooner than later. If it is a $26 million dollar MUD, shave $5 million dollars for a quicker
turn to the City, Gonzalez continued. Gonzalez said to consider this as an in City MUD that is viable.
Hesser agreed.
Brainard asked staff to prepare the side by side comparison.
David Morgan agreed.
Meeting recessed to Executive Session under Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.074 and 551.087 at 5:10 PM.
Page 18 of 180
Executive Session
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon’s Texas Codes, Annotated, the
items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session.
D. Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney
- Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise
the City Council, including agenda items
- Litigation Update – Stephanie Hoskins Brown v. The City of Georgetown, et al.
Sec 551.072: Deliberation Regarding Real Property
- Acquisition of real property owned by the WW Laubach Trust in connection with the Southwest Bypass project
- Deliberation concerning the approval of appraised values of multiple parcels in connection with the Rivery Blvd. Extension
Project
Sec. 551.074: Personnel Matters
- City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the appointment, employment,
evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal
Sec. 551.087: Deliberation Regarding Economic Development Negotiations
- Project Voyager
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Approved by the Georgetown City Council on _______________________________________
Date
_____________________________ _____________________________
Dale Ross, Mayor Attest: City Secretary
Page 19 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
November 10, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to approve of the City’s Quarterly Financial Report, which includes the
Investment Reports for the City of Georgetown, Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation
(GTEC), and the Georgetown Economic Development Corporation (GEDCO) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2015 -- Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager and Lisa Haines, Controller
ITEM SUMMARY:
The Quarterly Financial Report to Council is attached. An executive summary is included to highlight
variances with regards to the revenues and an overview of the investment portfolio as of September 30, 2015.
The Financial Report shows a comparison of current YTD revenues compared to the prior year for the fourth
quarter of the fiscal year on all major funds.
Activity for the quarter primarily related to maturing of four CDs, purchasing four new CDs, paying
principal and interest on our debt service, and paying our annual water contracts with Brazos River
Authority. Bond balances will be used in the coming months to fund related capital projects.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATION
The investment activity and strategies described in the investment report are in compliance with the City’s
Investment Policy and state law. This report meets the quarterly reporting requirements mandated by the
Public Funds Investment Act.
COMMENTS
Valley View, L.L.C., has prepared the attached investment reports. One component of our new investment
advisory services contract includes Valley View preparing the quarterly investment reports on behalf of the
City.
ATTACHMENT
Quarterly Financial Report
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager and Lisa Haines, Controller - BH
ATTACHMENTS:
Quarterly Report 09.30.2015
Page 20 of 180
Page 21 of 180
1Page 22 of 180
2Page 23 of 180
3Page 24 of 180
4Page 25 of 180
5Page 26 of 180
6Page 27 of 180
7Page 28 of 180
8Page 29 of 180
9Page 30 of 180
10Page 31 of 180
11Page 32 of 180
12Page 33 of 180
13Page 34 of 180
14Page 35 of 180
15Page 36 of 180
16Page 37 of 180
17Page 38 of 180
18Page 39 of 180
19Page 40 of 180
20Page 41 of 180
21Page 42 of 180
22Page 43 of 180
23Page 44 of 180
24Page 45 of 180
25Page 46 of 180
26Page 47 of 180
27Page 48 of 180
28Page 49 of 180
29Page 50 of 180
30Page 51 of 180
31Page 52 of 180
32Page 53 of 180
33Page 54 of 180
34Page 55 of 180
35Page 56 of 180
36Page 57 of 180
37Page 58 of 180
38Page 59 of 180
39Page 60 of 180
40Page 61 of 180
41Page 62 of 180
42Page 63 of 180
43Page 64 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
November 10, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and action on a First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Development Agreement
concerning the Water Oak Subdivision -- Bridget Chapman, City Attorney and Wesley Wright, P.E.,
Systems Engineering Director
ITEM SUMMARY:
The original Water Oak Agreement (aka Laredo WO) was approved in November 2006 and has been
amended and restated several times over the past decade. Among other things, the developer is responsible
for constructing an extension of the South San Gabriel Interceptor (SSGI) wastewater line by August 2016.
Design of that line is now essentially complete and construction is ready to begin in January 2016.
In 2006, when the original agreement was developed, that wastewater line was anticipated to be 30" in
diameter. However, over the years, as development has occurred, the drainage basin has been analyzed in
closer detail. Our Wastewater Master Plan only now requires a 24" diameter line to meet our projected
service area.
The primary reason for the reduction is the development and permitting of a plant farther upstream along the
San Gabriel River that will serve much of the Leander and Liberty Hill area. Even with a 24" wastewater
line, at build out, the SSGI will have excess capacity capable of serving higher flows than expected from the
undeveloped tracts in the area. Also the line will be capable of accepting flow from the existing Cimarron
Hills Wastewater Treatment Plant, if necessary.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approving the proposed amendment and allow the SSGI extension to be constructed per
our master plan with a 24" diameter pipe.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There are no direct costs to the city. The entire cost of design and construction is the responsibility/liability
of the developer.
SUBMITTED BY:
Wesley Wright
ATTACHMENTS:
First Amendment to Amend and Restate Dev Agree Water Oak v1
First Amended Exhibit M
Page 65 of 180
Page 1 of 7
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
§
§
§
§
FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
CONCERNING THE
WATER OAK SUBDIVISION
(F/K/A ABG SUBDIVISION)
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“First Amendment”) is by and between THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation (“City”), and Laredo WO,
LTD., a Texas limited partnership (“Developer”), entered into pursuant to the authority
granted to the City by its powers as a home-rule municipal corporation.
WHEREAS, the City and Developer originally entered into that certain
Development Agreement concerning the Property dated as of November 14, 2006 and
recorded in the Official Records of Williamson County as Document No. 2007040905
(the “Original Development Agreement”), which has been amended by that certain
“First Amendment to Development Agreement” dated as of June 7, 2007 and recorded
in the Official Records of Williamson County as Document No. 2007054 980(the “First
Amended Development Agreement”), and by that certain “Second Amendment to
Development Agreement” dated as of August 28, 2007 and recorded in the Official
Records of Williamson County as Document No. 2007100744 (the “Second Amended
Development Agreement”), and by that certain “Third Amendment to Development
Agreement” dated as of December 11, 2007 and recorded in the Official Records of
Williamson County as Document No. 2008004457 (the “Third Amended Development
Agreement”), and by the “Fourth Amendment to Development Agreement” dated as of
January 18, 2008 and recorded in the Official Records of Williamson County as
Document No. 2008006094 (the “Fourth Amended Development Agreement”)
(collectively the “Prior Development Agreement Amendments”) (the Original
Development Agreement, as amended by the Prior Development Agreement
Amendments, are referred to collectively herein as the “Development Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, simultaneously with the foregoing, the City and the Developer also
entered into that certain “Offsite Utility Construction and Cost Reimbursement
Agreement” dated as of November 14, 2006 and recorded in the Official Records of
Williamson County as Document No. 2007040906 (the “Original Offsite Utility
Agreement”), which has been amended by that certain “First Amended Offsite Utility
Construction and Cost Reimbursement Agreement” dated as of June 7, 2007 and
recorded in the Official Records of Williamson County as Document No. 2007054979
Page 66 of 180
Page 2 of 7
(the “First Amended Offsite Agreement”), and by that certain “Second Amendment to
the Offsite Utility Construction and Cost Reimbursement Agreement” dated as of
December 11, 2007 and recorded in the Official Records of Williamson County as
Document No. 2008004456 (the “Second Amended Offsite Agreement”), and by that
certain “Third Amendment to the Offsite Utility Construction and Cost Reimbursement
Agreement” dated as of December 9, 2008 and recorded in the Official Records of
Williamson County as Document No. 2009002693 (the “Third Amended Offsite
Agreement”) (collectively the “Prior Offsite Agreement Amendments”) (the Original
Offsite Agreement, as amended by the Prior Offsite Agreement Amendments, are
referred to collectively herein as the “Offsite Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, in 2012 the City and the Developer mutually agreed to amend and
restate the Development Agreement and the Offsite Agreement due to changed
conditions in the real estate and financial markets to, among other things, de -annex
certain property from the corporate boundaries of the City limits, reduce the amount of
land subject to the agreement, modify the development standards, and revise the utility
capacity and service commitments; and
WHEREAS, the resulting “Amended and Restated Development Agreement
Concerning the Water Oak Subdivision (f/k/a ABG Subdivision)” was made to be
effective on March 14, 2012, is recorded in the Official Records of Williamson County as
Document No. 2012027844 (the “Original A&R Development Agreement”), and wholly
supersedes and replaces the Development Agreement and the Offsite Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Original A&R Development Agreement provides that Phase C -2
of the South San Gabriel Interceptor must be 30 inches in diameter; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that the size of Phase C-2 of the South San
Gabriel Interceptor can be reduced from 30 inches in diameter to 24 inches in diameter;
and
WHEREAS, the Developer is preparing to construct Phase C -2 of the South San
Gabriel Interceptor as required by Section 5.02 of the Original A&R Development
Agreement and has requested that the references to the required diameter of that line in
the Original A&R Development Agreement and the Exhibits thereto be modified to be
consistent with the City’s determination that Phase C-2 can consist of a wastewater line
that is 24 inches in diameter rather than 30 inches in diameter.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the promises and the mutual
agreements set forth herein, the City and Developer hereby agree as follows:
Page 67 of 180
Page 3 of 7
Section 1. The following definitions in the Original A&R Development
Agreement are hereby amended to read as follows:
“South San Gabriel Interceptor” shall mean that certain wastewater
gravity collection main of various diameters beginning at its inception at
the Wolf Ranch Lift Station west of IH-35 and extending to the western
boundary of the Property consisting of four segments: the Simon Segment
(Phase A South), the Harvard Segment (Phase B South), and the ABG
Segment (Phase C-1 and Phase C-2) as generally shown by sketch on First
Amended Exhibit M.
“South San Gabriel Interceptor – Phase C-2” That portion of the South
San Gabriel Interceptor beginning at the western terminus of Phase C -1
and extending westward to the westernmost boundary of the Property and
being 24” in diameter, as generally shown on First Amended Exhibit M.
Section 2. Exhibit M to the Original A&R Development Agreement is hereby
deleted and replaced with the First Amended Exhibit M, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Section 3. To facilitate execution, this First Amendment may be executed in
any number of counterparts, and it will not be necessary that the signatures of all
parties be contained on any one counterpart. Additionally, for purposes of facilitating
the execution of this First Amendment: (a) the signature pages taken from separate,
individually executed counterparts of this Amendment may be combined to form
multiple fully executed counterparts; and (b) a facsimile or electronic copy of a
signature will be deemed to be an original signature for all purposes. All executed
counterparts of this First Amendment will be deemed to be originals, but all such
counterparts, when taken together, will constitute one and the same instrument.
Section 4. All terms delineated with initial capital letters in this First
Amendment that are defined in the Original A&R Development Agreement have the
same meanings in this First Amendment as in the Original A&R Development
Agreement. Other terms have the meanings commonly ascribed to them.
Section 5. Except as specifically provided in this First Amendment, the terms
of the Original A&R Development Agreement continue to govern the rights and
obligations of the parties, and all terms of the Original A&R Development Agreement
Page 68 of 180
Page 4 of 7
are reinstated, ratified and confirmed and, as so reinstated, ratified and confirmed, will
remain in full force and effect. If there is any conflict or inconsistency between this First
Amendment and the Original A&R Development Agreement, this First Amendment
will control and modify the Original A&R Development Agreement.
Section 6. The effective date of this First Amendment shall be the latest date
accompanying the signature lines below for the City, Developer, and Hillcrest Bank, a
division of HBH Bank, N.A.
List of Exhibits:
First Amended Exhibit M South San Gabriel Interceptor
[Signature Pages to Follow]
Page 69 of 180
Page 5 of 7
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, a Texas
home rule municipality
By:
Dale Ross, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Shelley Nowling, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Bridget Chapman, City Attorney
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON §
This instrument was acknowledged before me the ____ day of ________________,
2015, by Dale Ross, Mayor of the City of Georgetown, Texas, a home-rule city, on behalf
of the City.
________________________________
Notary Public Signature
Printed Name:
My Commission Expires:
Page 70 of 180
Page 6 of 7
LAREDO WO, LTD., a Texas limited
partnership
By: ABG Enterprises, Ltd., a Texas
limited partnership, its General
Partner
By: GALO, INC., a Texas corporation,
its General Partner
By:
Name: A. Bradford Galo
Title: CEO
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF BEXAR §
This instrument was acknowledged before me the ____ day of ____________,
2015, by A. Bradford Galo, CEO of Galo Inc., the general partner of ABG Enterprises,
Ltd., which is the general partner of Laredo WO, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, on
behalf of Laredo WO, Ltd.
By: ________________________________
Printed Name:
My Commission Expires:
Page 71 of 180
Page 7 of 7
Consent of Lender
Pursuant to that certain “Estoppel and Consent Agreement” dated to be effective on
January 29, 2013 by and between the City of Georgetown, Texas, Laredo WO, Ltd., and
Hillcrest Bank, a division of NBH Bank, a national banking association (“Hillcrest
Bank”), by the signature of its duly authorized representative below, Hillcrest Bank
hereby confirms that it has reviewed the foregoing “First Amendment to the
Development Agreement Concerning the Water Oak Subdivision (f/k/a ABG
Subdivision)” and consents to the terms and conditions thereof.
HILLCREST BANK, a division of NBH BANK,
N.A., a national banking association
By:
Name:
Title:
STATE OF KANSAS §
§
COUNTY OF JOHNSON §
This instrument was acknowledged before me the ____ day of ____________,
2015, by ________________________, ______________________________ of Hillcrest
Bank, a division of NBH BANK, N.A., a national banking association.
By: ________________________________
Printed Name:
My Commission Expires:
Page 72 of 180
Page 73 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
November 10, 2015
SUBJECT:
Forwarded from the Americans with Disabilities Accessibility Advisory Board ADA):
Consideration and possible action to approve a Resolution adopting the City of Georgetown's Americans
with Disabilities Act Transition Plan as amended for 2015 -- Nat Waggoner, PMP®, Transportation
Analyst, Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director and Bridget Chapman, City Attorney
ITEM SUMMARY:
In March 2014, the City Council approved Resolution No. 032514-L adopting an ADA Transition Plan for
the City of Georgetown. In May 2015, as part of the City’s budget process, staff provided City Council an
overview of the work completed in FY 2015 and activities budgeted for FY 16. Staff has amended the City’s
ADA Transition Plan to include items approved in the FY 16 budget. These amendments were presented to
the City’s ADA Accessibility Advisory Board in July 2015, with the Board recommending adoption by City
Council. Staff will present to City Council the revised ADA Transition Plan, as recommended by the ADA
Accessibility Advisory Board for adoption.
ADA BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
This item was unanimously recommended by the ADA Board for Council approval at the July 8, 2015 ADA
Board meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of the City of Georgetown Transition Plan, as amended for FY 2016 and reviewed during City
Council Workshop 10/13/2015.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
Exhibit A - ADA Transition Plan - revised 11.4.2015
ADA Workshop Presentation - 10.13.2015
ADA Transition Plan - revised 3.26.2014
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
All financial impacts for FY16 are included in the budget approved September 2015.
SUBMITTED BY:
Nat Waggoner, PMP®
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution - ADA Transition Plan
Exhibit A - ADA Transition Plan
ADA Transition Plan from 10_13_15 Workshop
ADA Transition Plan_3.26.2014
Page 74 of 180
Resolution No. _________________ Page 1 of 2
Description: ADA Transition Plan
Date Approved:
RESOLUTION NO. ______________________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, ADOPTING THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN’S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES
ACT TRANSITION PLAN AS AMENDED FOR 2015.
WHEREAS, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was enacted on July 26, 1990 and
provides comprehensive rights and protections for individuals with disabilities; and
WHEREAS, Title II of the ADA requires state and local governments to make their
programs and services accessible to persons with disabilities; and
WHEREAS, on March 25, 2014, the City Council passed Resolution No. 032514-L
adopting an ADA Transition Plan for the City of Georgetown; and
WHEREAS, the ADA Transition Plan is reviewed annually, and amended as necessary;
and
WHEREAS, the ADA Accessibility Advisory Board reviewed the ADA Transition Plan
and recommends adoption of the 2015 Amended ADA Transition Plan attached hereto as Exhibit
“A”; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to amend the ADA Transition Plan as
recommended by the ADA Accessibility Advisory Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS THAT:
Page 75 of 180
Resolution No. _________________ Page 2 of 2
Description: ADA Transition Plan
Date Approved:
SECTION 1. VERIFICATION OF FACTS. The facts and recitations contained in the
preamble of this resolution are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are
incorporated by reference herein and· expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim.
SECTION 2. APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED ADA TRANSITION
PLAN FOR 2015. The City Council finds it necessary to amend the ADA Transition Plan as
recommended by the ADA Accessibility Advisory Board and adopts the City of Georgetown’s
ADA Transition Plan as amended for 2015, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit “A.”
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon
its approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this ______ day of ________________, 2015 by the City
Council of the City of Georgetown.
ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
__________________________ ______________________________
Shelley Nowling, City Secretary Dale Ross, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Bridget Chapman, City Attorney
Page 76 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 1 of 23
City of Georgetown, Texas
Americans with Disabilities Act Title II
Transition Plan
Page 77 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 2 of 23
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW .................................................................................... 3
1.1 Federal Accessibility Requirements for Public Entities – TITLE II ............................. 3
1.2 Definitions ........................................................................................................................... 4
2.0 COMPLIANCE WITH ADA TITLE II REQUIREMENTS ................................................ 4
2.1 Notice under the Americans with Disabilities Act ....................................................... 4
2.2 ADA Coordinator .............................................................................................................. 4
2.3 ADA Advisory Board ........................................................................................................ 4
2.4 Accommodations and Modifications .............................................................................. 4
2.5 ADA Grievance Procedure ............................................................................................... 5
3.0 PLAN ELEMENTS .................................................................................................................. 6
3.1 Public Pedestrian Rights-of-Way and Facilities ............................................................ 6
3.2 Public Safety ....................................................................................................................... 8
3.3 Effective Communication ................................................................................................. 9
4.0 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION FOR FY 2015/2016 ............................................................. 10
4.1 Self-Assessment and Transition Plan ............................................................................. 10
4.2 Public Pedestrian Right-of-Way ..................................................................................... 11
4.3 Public Buildings and Parking Lots ................................................................................ 11
4.4 Parks and Recreation Facilities ...................................................................................... 11
5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NEXT ANNUAL REVIEW ............................................ 11
5.1 Annual Review of ADA Transition Plan ....................................................................... 11
5.2 City Department ADA Representatives ....................................................................... 11
5.3 Administrative Budget .................................................................................................... 11
5.4 Data Collection and Organization ................................................................................. 11
5.5 Self-Assessment for Additional Plan Elements ........................................................... 12
5.6 Effective Communication ............................................................................................... 12
Appendix A ................................................................................................................................... 13
Appendix B ................................................................................................................................... 15
Appendix C ................................................................................................................................... 17
Appendix D ................................................................................................................................... 20
Page 78 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 3 of 23
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was enacted on July 26, 1990 and provides
comprehensive rights and protections for individuals with disabilities in the areas of
employment, public accommodations, state and local government services, and
telecommunications. The ADA covers individuals with physical or mental impairments that
substantially limit a major life activity, persons with a record of such impairment, and persons
regarded or perceived as having such impairment. The law was designed to ensure that
persons of all abilities have equality of opportunity, economic self-sufficiency, full participation
in American life, and independent living.
1.1 Federal Accessibility Requirements for Public Entities – TITLE II
To ensure that the fundamental goal of the American with Disabilities Act is met, Title II of the
ADA requires state and local governments to make their programs and services accessible to
persons with disabilities. This requirement extends not only to physical access at government
facilities, programs, and events, but also to policy changes that governmental entities must
make to ensure that all people with disabilities can take part in, and benefit from, the programs
and services of the state and local governments. In addition, governmental entities must ensure
effective communication, including the provision of necessary auxiliary aids and services, so
that individuals with disabilities can participate in civic life.
Title II requires city governments to ensure that each of its programs, services and activities,
when viewed in their entirety, are accessible to people with disabilities. This emphasis on
access to programs, as opposed to access to buildings or facilities, distinguishes the
requirements for public entities from those for private places of public accommodation.
Program Access covers the entire range of city services and programs, including as an example
appropriate access along sidewalks and at intersections in the public right of way, access to a
city building or facility such as City Council Chambers, the ability to pay a utility bill, or to
access a Parks and Recreation Facility.
Program Access may be achieved in a variety of ways: city governments may choose to make
structural changes to existing facilities to achieve access; or it can pursue a variety of non-
structural alternatives to achieve program accessibility. For example, city governments may
choose to renovate a non-accessible building, relocate services to an accessible level of a
building or to another building that is fully accessible, or to deliver services in an alternate
accessible manner. When choosing among possible methods of achieving program access,
however, city governments must give priority to the choices that offer programs, services and
activities in the most integrated setting appropriate.
Page 79 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 4 of 23
1.2 Definitions
For the purposes of this Plan, please refer to the Americans with Disabilities Act for the full text
of definitions and explanations (http://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.htm#12102).
2.0 COMPLIANCE WITH ADA TITLE II REQUIREMENTS
2.1 Notice under the Americans with Disabilities Act
The City of Georgetown is committed to ensuring that its programs, services and activities are
accessible to persons with disabilities. The City will not discriminate against qualified
individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability in providing programs, services, or
activities. The City informs individuals that protections against discrimination are provided by
the ADA, that reasonable accommodation will be provided, and of the existence and location of
accessible services, activities, and facilities to interested persons, including persons with
impaired vision or hearing. This information appears on the City’s Internet home page
(www.georgetown.org), in public meeting notices, agendas, and City publications. The City
will not place a surcharge on a particular individual with a disability or any group of
individuals with disabilities to cover the cost of providing auxiliary aids/services to
accommodate participation in programs, services, or activities.
2.2 ADA Coordinator
The City of Georgetown has designated a responsible employee to coordinate its efforts to
comply with the requirements of Title II. The City’s ADA Coordinator is the Transportation
Services Director or their designee:
Transportation Services Director
300-1 Industrial Ave
Georgetown, Texas 78626
Telephone: (512) 930-2544
Email: ADA@georgetown.org
2.3 ADA Advisory Board
The City has established an ADA Advisory Board. The ADA Advisory Board directly informs
the City Council concerning Title II issues applicable to the City and provides ongoing
recommendations concerning implementation and amendment of the ADA Transition Plan as
necessary for compliance with the ADA. Meetings of the ADA Advisory Board allow for
regular public participation from citizens and other interested persons, including individuals
with disabilities or organizations representing individuals with disabilities.
2.4 Accommodations and Modifications
The City of Georgetown will make reasonable accommodations and modifications to ensure
that people with disabilities have an equal opportunity to enjoy its programs, services, and
activities. The ADA does not require the City to take any action that would fundamentally alter
the nature of any program, service or activity that would create a hazardous condition to the
Page 80 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 5 of 23
participant or others, or that would impose an undue financial or administrative burden.
Whether a particular modification or accommodation will impose an undue financial or
administrative burden is determined on a case-by-case basis based on an evaluation of all
resources available to the City. The following factors shall be considered in determining
whether a program accommodation and modification would create an undue burden: the
nature and cost of the modification; the financial resources of the City available to make the
modification; the impact the expense of the accommodation will have on the affected City
operation; and the permanence of the alterations affecting the site.
If cost of a modification or accommodation is determined to be an undue burden, and no
funding is available , the City must give the person with a disability the opportunity to provide
the accommodation or modification or to pay for that portion of the accommodation or
modification that constitutes an undue burden. If a particular modification or
accommodation is determined to cause an undue burden to the City, the City must consider
other options that would not pose such a burden to ensure that people with disabilities are
provided access to the benefits and services of the program or activity.
2.5 ADA Grievance Procedure
The City of Georgetown has established a grievance procedure for prompt and equitable
resolution of complaints alleging discrimination on the basis of disability in the provision of
City services, activities, or programs in violation of Title II. Complaints shall be in writing.
Alternative means of filing a complaint to accommodate a person with a disability, such as a
personal interview or a tape recording, will be made available on request. Complaints shall
contain at a minimum the following information:
The name, address and telephone number of the person making the complaint;
The date and time of the incident or condition observed or experienced;
A statement in sufficient detail to define and explain the incident or condition
and the alleged violation;
Suggested recommendations to adequately resolve the incident or condition
and the alleged violation; and
Any other written information or documentation (such as photos, maps,
diagrams) to completely explain the incident or condition and the alleged
violation.
A complaint form is available on the City’s Accessibility web page (ada.georgetown.org) and
is attached to this Transition Plan in Appendix A. A complaint should be submitted as soon
as possible but no later than 60 calendar days after the incident or condition observed as an
alleged violation. The complaint should be sent to the ADA Coordinator.
Within 15 calendar days after receipt of a complaint, the ADA Coordinator, or their designee
will acknowledge receipt of the complaint and may, at his/her discretion, meet with the
complainant to discuss the complaint. Within 30 calendar days after receipt of a complaint,
Page 81 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 6 of 23
the ADA Coordinator will respond to the complaint in writing or, if requested, in an
alternative format such as large print or audio tape, to accommodate a disability. The
response will explain the position of the City and offer options for substantive resolution of
the complaint, or advise the complainant that additional time is necessary to provide a
complete response.
If the options offered by the ADA Coordinator do not satisfactorily resolve the complaint, the
complainant may file an appeal with the City Manager within 15 calendar days after receipt of
the ADA Coordinator’s final response. The appeal should be in writing and sent to:
City Manager
PO Box 409
Georgetown, Texas 78627-0409
Within 15 calendar days after receipt of the written appeal, the City Manager, or designee, will
acknowledge receipt of the appeal and may, at his/her discretion, meet with the complainant to
discuss the complaint and the ADA Coordinator’s response. Within 30 calendar days after
receipt of the appeal, the City Manager, or designee, will provide a final response to the
complaint in writing or, if requested, in an alternative format such as large print or audio tape,
to accommodate a disability.
Written complaints received by the ADA Coordinator, appeals to the City Manager, and
written responses to complaints will be retained by the City for a period of at least three
years from the date of final resolution of the complaint or the date of the last written
response from the City.
3.0 PLAN ELEMENTS
3.1 Public Pedestrian Rights-of-Way and Facilities
New construction in the City of Georgetown shall be in accordance with the applicable ADA
Standards for Accessible Design. The City will maintain equipment and features that are
required to provide access to individuals with disabilities in working order in compliance with
ADA requirements.
Title II requires public entities having responsibility for or authority over facilities, streets,
roads, sidewalks, and/or other areas meant for public use to develop a Transition Plan to meet
the standards for program accessibility. A Transition Plan transitions inaccessible public areas
into environments that are accessible to and functional for individuals with disabilities.
The Transition Plan is required to identify physical obstacles in the City that limit accessibility
to its programs or activities to individuals with disabilities; describe in detail the methods that
will be used to make all public facilities accessible; specify the schedule for taking the steps
Page 82 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 7 of 23
necessary to achieve compliance in making the facilities accessible; and indicate the official
responsible for implementation of the plan.
This Transition Plan combines the findings of facility surveys, public rights-of-way surveys,
policy assessments, and program evaluations to address renovations or modifications required
to achieve program accessibility. Facilities include buildings, parks, and their related grounds.
Public pedestrian rights-of-way include sidewalks and curb ramps in front of City-owned
facilities and City-owned parking lots.
Public Pedestrian Rights-of-Way Sidewalks, Curb Ramps, and Demand CARTS Service
The City of Georgetown is committed to evaluating on-street parking for ADA compliance and
to investigate and act on opportunities to improve access to public walkways and facilities on
all Capital Improvement projects. The City recognizes that pedestrian walkways or sidewalks
play a key role in providing access to government programs and services and to the goods and
services offered to the public by private businesses. When walkways cross a curb at
intersections, a ramp or sloped surface is needed. Curb ramps allow people with mobility
impairments to gain access to the sidewalks and to pass through center islands in streets.
All newly constructed or repaired curb ramps are designed and constructed in compliance with
the applicable standards. When the City constructs new roads or alters existing roads, it is
committed to installing curb ramps where public walkways cross curbs at intersections.
Without the required curb ramps, sidewalk travel in Georgetown may be difficult and in some
cases impossible for people who use wheelchairs, scooters and other mobility aids to navigate.
Likewise, when new sidewalks or walkways are built or altered, the City is committed to
ensuring that curb ramps or sloped areas are provided wherever they intersect with streets or
roads.
At existing roads and sidewalks that are not being altered, the City may choose in some cases to
construct curb ramps at every point where a pedestrian walkway intersects a curb, or it may
choose to provide curb ramps at only select corners or at other locations if equal access to the
programs served by these walkways can be ensured. Alternative routes to buildings that make
use of existing curb ramps may be acceptable when people with disabilities must only travel a
marginally longer route.
The City has partnered with the Capital Area Rural Transit System (CARTS) to provide general
public demand response service throughout the City ("curb to curb"). This service complies with
the ADA. This demand response contract provides para-transit services for Georgetown
residents; enabling retail and community services access. On average, City funded demand
response provides 8,664 passengers trips a year. The yearly cost to provide service is $312,000,
of which $156,000 is funded directly by the City.
Page 83 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 8 of 23
Facilities - Public Buildings and Parking Lots
Georgetown Inspection Services ensures accessibility compliance of all new construction,
remodels, renovations and alterations of public buildings and public parking areas.
Georgetown Inspection Services is committed to maintaining public buildings and public
parking for ADA compliance and to investigate and act on opportunities to improve access to
public facilities on all Capital Improvement Projects.
Facilities - Parks, Recreation Facilities and Programs
Georgetown Parks and Recreation is committed to providing access to recreational areas and
programs for individuals with disabilities. The Parks and Recreation Department’s Capital
Improvement Plan identifies park renovation projects to provide ADA compliance.
Additionally, the City will ensure facilities are in compliance as they are altered or replaced.
Georgetown Parks and Recreation operates programs and activities when viewed in their
entirety are accessible and usable to individuals with disabilities. The City achieves this through
redesign of equipment, reassignment of programs to accessible sites, alteration of existing
facilities and construction of new facilities. The City shall give priority to methods that provide
the most integrated setting for individuals with disabilities.
3.2 Public Safety
Access to 9-1-1 Services
The City of Georgetown provides direct access via TTY (text telephone) or computer-to-
telephone emergency services, including 9-1-1 services for persons who use TTY’s and personal
computers.
Emergency Management
The City of Georgetown Emergency Management works with Williamson County to develop,
maintain and facilitate the all- hazard Emergency Operations Plan as required by Local, State
and Federal statutes and laws. During all emergency planning (Mitigation, Planning, Response,
Recover y) the City is committed to be in compliance with the ADA requirements as outlined in
Title II Chapter 7 of the ADA. The Office of Emergency Management ensures that all parties
with responsibilities under the Georgetown Emergency Operation Plan (EOP) are aware of
ADA requirements and that all programs, documentation, and third party agreements are also
in compliance with ADA through the review of the EOP every five (5) years. Annually
Georgetown Emergency Management reviews individual select appendices of the Plan for ADA
compliance. The Office of Emergency Management utilizes Federal, State, Regional, County,
and Local resources to educate, to provide emergency warning and notifications, and to keep
informed those persons with disabilities within the City. These systems were developed and
continue to be modified after numerous disasters throughout the country and the lessons
learned. Georgetown relies on both voluntary registration and multi prong methods as listed:
(EAS) Emergency Alert System (Federal)
Relay Texas (State)
Outdoor Warning Sirens (Local)
Page 84 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 9 of 23
3.3 Effective Communication
The City of Georgetown works to ensure that all communication is as effective as possible to all
audiences. To accomplish this, the City strives to use communication methods proven to be
openly accessible, and , upon request, provide appropriate aids and services leading to effective
communication for persons with disabilities so they may participate equally in the City's
programs, services, and activities. The City uses its website, social media, and other
communication tools to increase outreach and reduce barriers to accessing City services and
information. Below are some of the ways that online services are providing access to City
information and services.
City Council Meetings: In 2009, the City began streaming City Council meetings live on
Georgetown.org and GTV channel 10. City Council meetings are replayed on GTV at set days
and times and are available at any time for replay on Georgetown.org using a computer or
mobile device. Additionally, the City Council Chambers is equipped with a hearing loop
system. All members of the public who use a hearing aid are able to switch to a channel that
will pick up the audio being transmitted through the PA system. He or she can pick up the
sounds spoken into the PA system’s microphone instead of the hearing aid’s internal
microphone. This results in improved speech understanding because the listener receives a clear
signal without any background noise. If a member of the general public require s other
assistance in attending a City Council meeting or any other public meeting, he or she may
contact the City Secretary’s office at least four days prior to the meeting date so that
accommodations can be made.
Online Payments: City utility bills, municipal court tickets, some permits, and some kinds of
event tickets can be paid online via Georgetown.org.
City Records: Agendas and minutes for City Council meetings and boards & commissions
meetings are available at Georgetown.org. Many other records such as current and past city
ordinances and the local unified development code are also available through the City website.
The City records archival system utilizes a technology called Optical Character Recognition
(OCR) which is able to extract text out of graphic files which makes more City documents open
to the visually impaired and easier to locate through search engines.
City News and Information: City news releases and City project information is posted to
Georgetown.org and to City Facebook sites such as www.facebook.com/CityofGeorgetown and
www.facebook.com/LivePlayGeorgetown. The City uses other communication tools such as the
weekly email newsletter and monthly City Reporter newsletter in the utility bill as well as
monthly ads in the Williamson County Sun to provide information on City news and initiatives.
Postcards mailed to customers are used for certain messages such as water restrictions or
information about City elections.
Page 85 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 10 of 23
Video: The City provides some messages and information via the City YouTube channel and on
GTV channel 10 and on Georgetown.org. The Public Communications Department seeks to
expand video programming in order to increase exposure to City information and programs.
Website Accessibility: In designing websites for City departments, the Public Communications
Department has avoided using technologies and formatting that are not ADA
compliant/friendly.
Webpage: The City has created an ADA page on the City’s website located at
ada.georgetown.org.
Through all of these means, the City provides outreach to the community in a variety of ways
for those who may have mobility impairments or difficulty in using certain kinds of electronic
or print media.
Future Communication Projects
The City’s IT Steering Committee has formed a Subcommittee to evaluate ADA considerations
with City wide technology systems. The Subcommittee will make recommendations to inform
the IT Master Plan annual update and future decisions to acquire and implement new
technology systems. The City is in process of implementing a Spanish translation service to
most *.georgetown.org websites. The City will be purchasing JAWS assistive screen reader
software to help with an accessibility audit for text to voice technology of City websites. Public
Communications is currently reviewing costs and other obstacles to providing closed
captioning for our meeting broadcasts.
3.4 Employment
The City of Georgetown does not discriminate on the basis of disability in its hiring or
employment practices and complies with all regulations promulgated by the U.S. Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission under Title I of the ADA. The City has guidelines in
place to eliminate discrimination, against any individuals that may have a disability, in relation
to application procedures, hiring process, compensation, training, advancement and other
terms, conditions, and privileges of employment. In conjunction with these anti-discrimination
guidelines, there are also adopted procedures in place to both determine and provide
reasonable accommodations upon request. These guidelines are conveyed through our internal,
city-wide, “Americans with Disabilities” policy. The City’s ADA Employment Policy governs
employment-related complaints of disability discrimination.
4.0 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION FOR FY 2015/2016
4.1 Self-Assessment and Transition Plan
Title II requires the City to conduct a self-assessment to evaluate the City’s current policies
and practices to identify and correct those policies and practices that are inconsistent with
Title II requirements. In 2015, the City of Georgetown conducted a self-assessment process
Page 86 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 11 of 23
for assessment of facilities and public pedestrian rights-of-way to identify any physical or
program barriers to accessibility that might be present. This Transition Plan provides a
schedule that indicates a projected time for resolution and the department responsible for
implementation.
4.2 Public Pedestrian Right-of-Way
In 2015 Transportation Services completed a self-assessment of the pedestrian network in the
public right-of-way. See Plan Appendix D for recommendations and improvement scheduling.
4.3 Public Buildings and Parking Lots
In 2015 the Facilities Department completed a self-assessment of facilities and programming.
Existing facilities, constructed or altered after January 26, 1992, were reviewed for accessibility
compliance and to document deficiencies. They were then ranked by the City’s ADA Task
Force (now the ADA Advisory Board). The facility ranking was determined by the volume of
public interactions. Facilities that serve the greatest number of citizens received a higher
ranking than facilities that primarily serve employees. The ADA Task Force also took into
account facilities that are currently planned for renovations or that will be returned to the
private sector. See Plan Appendix B for recommendations and improvement scheduling.
4.4 Parks and Recreation Facilities
In 2015 the Parks and Recreation Department completed a self-assessment of facilities and
programming. See Plan Appendix C for recommendations and improvement scheduling.
5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NEXT ANNUAL REVIEW
5.1 Annual Review of ADA Transition Plan
The ADA Transition Plan is a living document that will be reviewed, updated, and revised
annually in conjunction with the City’s Capital Improvement Process which begins in February
and the subsequent annual Budget Process. The City’s ADA Coordinator will coordinate
meetings of the ADA Advisory Board, other Advisory Boards as necessary, and City staff, for
annual review of the ADA Transition Plan so that recommendations may inform the CIP and
Budget Processes.
5.2 City Department ADA Representatives
Identify a City staff representative for each department for contact and coordination of ADA
issues, as necessary.
5.3 Administrative Budget
Develop an administrative budget to facilitate and support management of the Transition Plan
as well as unplanned contingencies, such as special public accommodation requests.
5.4 Data Collection and Organization
Evaluate data collection and organization needs for Transition Plan annual review.
Page 87 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 12 of 23
5.5 Self-Assessment for Additional Plan Elements
Evaluate the City’s current policies and practices to identify and correct inconsistencies with
Title II requirements for the following plan elements. Scope and tentatively schedule self
assessments, to the extent funds are available.
Human Resources
Police
Fire
Finance-Purchasing
Municipal Court
Library
City Secretary
Signage
Website
5.6 Effective Communication
Continue development of the ADA webpage as an effective and meaningful resource for City
residents with disabilities. Develop a policy establishing minimum standards and
recommendations for future procurement of website/digital communication technology.
Page 88 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 13 of 23
Appendix A
The City of Georgetown
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)
GR.IEVANCE FORM
Title II of the Americans with Disability Act Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Name of Complainant: ____________________________________________________
Name of Agent/Representative: ___________________________
Address of Complainant: _______________________________
Telephone of Complainant ( ) ______________Email of Complainant__________
DESCRIPTION OF GRIEVANCE
This grievance as it relates to a City of Georgetown: service _________ activity program________
benefit_______ practice_____ or policy______
Provide the date(s) the incident occurred: ___________________________________
Which City of Georgetown Department, if any, is alleged by you to have failed compliance with
the ADA Law?
City Department: _____________________________________________________
Address: _____________________________________________________________
Telephone: ( ) ______________________________________________________
Please identify the names of all City of Georgetown agents, representatives or employees, if any, whom you contend
were involved. (Use additional paper if necessary)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 89 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 14 of 23
APPENDIX “A” - CONTINUED
Give a brief description of incident that made the basis of your grievance. Include in your response the identity
of the service, activity, program or benefit you contend your access has been denied or any other manner you
contend you have been subjected to discrimination. Please also provide in your description specific dates, times
and places as well as the names, addresses and telephone numbers of any and all persons who may have
witnessed or been involved in the act or basis of your complaint. (Attach additional information if needed).
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________
Please provide a suggested outcome for resolution:
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Signature of Complainant/Representative Printed Name of Complainant/Representative
Date: ___________________________________
Complaints shall be submitted in writing to the office of the ADA Coordinator:
Transportation Services Director
PO Box 409
Georgetown, Texas 78627-1458
OR
Email at –ADA@georgetown.org
Page 90 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 15 of 23
Appendix B
Capital Improvements Planned, City Buildings FY 15-18
Priority List
Total Notes
1 Library $ 31,875
2 Parks Admin $ 38,450
3 GMC $ 26,600
4 Parking lots (various) $ 9,800
5 CVB $ 16,900
6 Community Center $ 14,450
7 Rec Center $ 56,800
8 Animal Shelter $ 19,850
9 Art Center $ 247,375
10 Airport $ 6,800
11 Fire 1 $ 13,900
12 Fire 2 $ 8,750
13 Fire 3 $ 21,900
14 Fire 4 $ 11,750
15 Fire 5 $ 19,350
16 Fire 5 TT $ 18,200
17 Council/Court $ 16,600
18 City Hall $ 52,050
19 GCAT $ 34,200
20 Grace Heritage $ 16,800
21 Tennis Center $ 23,500
As Reported $ 705,900
YEAR ONE PROPOSED - 15/16 - For budgeting purposes
Total Notes
1 Library $ 31,875
2 Parks Admin $ 38,450
3 GMC $ - remodel planned; include in scope
4 Parking lots (various) $ 9,800
5 CVB $ - move to council building/sell
6 Community Center $ 14,450
7 Rec Center $ 56,800
8 Animal Shelter $ -
master plan/study planned; include in
scope
Total 2015/16 $ 151,375
Page 91 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 16 of 23
YEAR TWO 2016/17
Total Notes
9 Art Center $ 47,375
200K for elevator if required: Evaluate
after we move staff.
If no staff elevator won’t be needed?
exemption for historic bldg?
10 Airport $ 6,800
11 Fire 1 $ 13,900
12 Fire 2 $ 8,750
13 Fire 3 $ 21,900
14 Fire 4 $ 11,750
15 Fire 5 $ 19,350
16 Fire 5 TT $ 18,200
Total 2016/17 $ 148,025
YEAR THREE 2017/18
Total Notes
17 Council/Court $ 16,600 remodel planned/TBD (leave in)
18 City Hall $ - will be sold/city hall moved
19 GCAT $ - will be addressed in remodel
20 Grace Heritage $ - consider in renovation
21 Tennis Center $ 23,500 facilities master plan - long range
Total 2017/18 $ 40,100
possibly if moving is longer than 5-10
years
Page 92 of 180
City of Georgetown
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 17 of 23
Appendix C
Capital Improvements Planned Parks, FY 14- 18
Priority List
Total Notes
1 McMaster $ 114,169
2 Village Pool $ 106,573
3 Emerald Springs $ 36,537
4 Booty's Road $ 33,937
5 San Gabriel River Trail $ 497,289
6 San Gabriel Park Trail $ 71,555
7 Rivery $ 38,984
8 Bark $ 43,413
9 Kelley $ 35,818
10 Meadows $ 9,466
11 Woodlake $ 25,552
12 University $ 8,155
13 Raintree $ 8,635
14 Bedford $ 4,592
15 Summercrest $ 13,751
16 Windridge $ 22,546
17 Pinnacle $ 20,147
18 Berry Creek $ 22,466
19 Chandler $ 16,630
20 Edwards $ 8,954
21 Old Town $ 1,919
22 Geneva $ 2,079
23 Katy Crossing $ 3,518
24 Blue Hole $ 48,322
25 Skate Park $ 6,476
$ 1,201,482
Current Year
Total Notes
1 McMaster $ 114,169
2 Village Pool $ 106,573
3 Emerald Springs $ 36,537
Total Current $ 257,279
Page 93 of 180
City of Georgetown
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 18 of 23
YEAR ONE PROPOSED -
15/16
ADA Parks Plan
Total Notes
4 Booty's Road $ 33,937
5 San Gabriel River Trail $ 116,063
Total 2015/16 $ 150,000
YEAR TWO PROPOSED -
2016/17
Total Notes
5 San Gabriel River Trail $ 150,000
Total 2016/17 $ 150,000
YEAR THREE PROPOSED -
2017/18
Total Notes
5 San Gabriel River Trail $ 150,000
Total 2017/18 $ 150,000
YEAR FOUR PROPOSED -
2018/19
Total Notes
5 San Gabriel River Trail $ 81,220
6 San Gabriel Park Trail $ 71,555
Total 2018/19 $ 152,775
YEAR FIVE PROPOSED -
2019/20
Total Notes
7 Rivery $ 38,984
8 Bark $ 43,413
9 Kelley $ 35,818
10 Meadows $ 9,466
11 Woodlake $ 25,552
Total 2019/20 $ 153,232
YEAR SIX PROPOSED -
2020/21
Total Notes
12 University $ 8,155
Page 94 of 180
City of Georgetown
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 19 of 23
13 Raintree $ 8,635
14 Bedford $ 4,592
15 Summercrest $ 13,751
16 Windridge $ 22,546
17 Pinnacle $ 20,147
18 Berry Creek $ 22,466
19 Chandler $ 16,630
20 Edwards $ 8,954
21 Old Town $ 1,919
22 Geneva $ 2,079
23 Katy Crossing $ 3,518
Total 2020/21 $ 133,392
YEAR SEVEN PROPOSED -
2021/22
Total Notes
24 Blue Hole $ 48,322
25 Skate Park $ 6,476
Total 2021/22 $ 54,798
Page 95 of 180
City of Georgetown
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 20 of 23
Appendix D
Capital Improvements Completed and Planned, Pedestrian
Network FY 14-19
Future Fiscal Years
Expenditures
In Thousands (000)
Project name Project
Limits Improvement 15/
16
16/
17
17/
18
18/
19
19/
20 Total
Northwest
Blvd
New Curb Ramps 12
1 Ped Bridge
New Sidewalk -1.6K LF
Rivery Blvd
Railroad Ave
Ash St
SE Inner Lp &
Belmont
Churchhill
Farms Dr.
Carriage Hills
Dr.
Keenland Dr.
Lancaster Dr.
Praire Dunes
Dr.
Katy Crossing
Dr.
Praire Springs
Cv
Quail Valley
Rd
West Bury Ln
9th Street Austin - Rock
Tin Barn Alley
Benold Middle
School
Northwest
Blvd
New Sidewalk-300 LF
New Curb Ramps- 2
Page 96 of 180
City of Georgetown
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 21 of 23
Mitchell
Elementary
Safe Routes
Rockride-
Belmont
New Sidewalk-4.5K LF
New pedestrian bridge
New Curb Ramps-3
Rivery Blvd
Rivery Blvd
& Country
Club
New Curb Ramp
8th Street Church-
Myrtle
New Sidewalk-12K LF
New Curb Ramp-126 EA
Sidewalk Repairs-6K LF
Curb Ramp Repairs-174
EA
Protruding Objects-174
EA
43
-
-
-
-
43
Austin Ave 8th-
University
14
78
-
-
-
92
Ph 1-Signal &
Curb Ramp
Impr
Citywide
506
-
253
102
-
861
7th Street
56
-
-
-
-
56
10th St. Main-Rock
14
80
-
-
-
94
8th Street Austin-MLK
15
84
-
-
-
99
Church Street 8th-9th
123
-
-
-
-
123
11th St. Main-Rock
23
128
-
-
-
151
Remaining
Downtown
Repairs
Downtown
District Wide
-
671
504
168
-
1,343
Access Rte to
Government
Services
Citywide-23
Facilities
Parking Lots to Front
Doors
200
-
-
-
-
200
Austin Ave SH29-
FM2243
New Sidewalk-2.5K LF
New Curb Ramp-16 EA
Sidewalk Repairs-80 LF
Curb Ramp Repairs-1 EA
-
70
300
-
-
370
Old Town
Northeast
Myrtle- Holly
5th-8th
New Sidewalk-9.85K LF
New Curb Ramp-48 EA
Sidewalk Repairs-500 LF
Curb Ramp Repairs-20 EA
-
-
-
192
960
1,152
Page 97 of 180
City of Georgetown
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 22 of 23
2nd St. Austin-
College
New Sidewalk-3K LF
New Curb Ramp-10 EA
Sidewalk Repairs-0 LF
Curb Ramp Repairs-1 EA
-
-
-
-
-
-
Old Town
Southeast
University to
Leander
Railroad-
Austin
New Sidewalk-11.9K LF
New Curb Ramp-68 EA
Sidewalk Repairs-150 LF
Curb Ramp Repairs-41 EA
-
-
-
-
-
-
SH 29 IH 35- SH 130
New Sidewalk-14K LF
New Curb Ramp-44 EA
Sidewalk Repairs-1.4K LF
Curb Ramp Repairs-26 EA
-
-
-
-
-
-
994
1.1
M
1.2
M
1.1
M
1.1
M 5.5M
Page 98 of 180
City of Georgetown
2015 ADA Transition Plan
Page 23 of 23
Page 99 of 180
Americans with Disabilities Act
Transition Plan Update
Workshop
Oct 13, 2015
ADA Transition Plan
Page 100 of 180
Agenda
City of Georgetown
•ADA Review
•Recent Accessibility Efforts
•ADA Transition Plan FY 14/15
•ADA Transition Plan FY 15/16
•Proposed Amendments
•Next Steps and Questions
Creative Playscape –Completed in 2014 and built
as an accessible facility
ADA Transition Plan
Page 101 of 180
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
•Enacted in 1990 to provide comprehensive rights and
protections for individuals with disabilities
•Designed to ensure that persons of all abilities have equality of
opportunity,economic self-sufficiency,full participation in
American life and independent living
ADA Title II
•Requires State and local governments to make programs and
services accessible to persons with disabilities
City of Georgetown
ADA Transition Plan
Page 102 of 180
Recent Accessibility Efforts
•2014 –Initial adoption of the Transition Plan
•2014/2015 –Transportation, Facilities and Parks Self-
Assessments Completed
•2015 –Successful Bond Referendum with 1st Line Item
Dedicated to Pedestrian Accessibility
•2015 –1st budget with ADA Line Items funded
•2015 –Amendment to Transition Plan Completed
City of Georgetown
ADA Transition Plan
Page 103 of 180
ADA Transition Plan
FY 14/15 Results
•Created City ADA Resource Webpage, Grievance Form, and
Public Right of Way Improvements Request Form
•Revisions to initial Transition Plan Recommended for Adoption
by ADA Advisory Board
•Self-Assessments Completed and Work Schedules Developed
–Public Right-of-way
–Public facilities
–Parks and Recreation
City of Georgetown
ADA Transition Plan
Page 104 of 180
ADA Transition Plan FY 15/16
•Capital Improvements Funded
•Staff Training
Department Budget
Transportation $994K
Facilities $242K
Parks and Rec $150K
City of Georgetown
ADA Transition Plan
Page 105 of 180
Summary of Proposed Amendments
to the Transition Plan
•Includes findings from 2014/2015 Self-Assessments
•Includes recommendations accomplished in 2014/2015
•Includes Plan Implementation for 2015/2016 and approved budget items for FY16
•Includes recommendations for next annual review, including:
–Identifying department staff representatives for ADA issues
–Developing an administrative budget for the Transition Plan
–Evaluating data collection/organization needs for annual review of Plan
–Scheduling, scoping, and completing self-assessments for other Transition Plan elements
as funding is available
–Continuing to review the Effective Communication plan element including further
development of the ADA webpage and development of minimum standards for
procurement of website/digital communication technology
ADA Transition Plan
Page 106 of 180
Next Steps
•Council Approval of Amended Transition Plan
–November 10 Council Meeting
•Evaluate and Report on Recommendations for
next annual review to ADA Advisory Board and
City Council
•Develop ADA Transition Plan proposed Budget
for FY16/17 Implementation
City of Georgetown
ADA Transition Plan
Page 107 of 180
Questions and Guidance
City of Georgetown
Nat Waggoner
Transportation Analyst
512.930.8171
nat.waggoner@georgetown.org
ADA Transition Plan
Page 108 of 180
Americans with Disabilities Act
Title II
Standards for State and Local Governments
City of Georgetown, Texas
ADA Transition Plan
Page 109 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
ADA Transition Plan - 3.26.2014
Page 2
PART I - INTRODUCTION TO THE ADA
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was enacted on July 26, 1990 and provides
comprehensive rights and protections for individuals with disabilities in the areas of
employment, public accommodations, state and local government services, and
telecommunications. The ADA covers individuals with physical or mental impairments that
substantially limit a major life activity, persons with a record of such impairment, and persons
regarded or perceived as having such impairment. The law was designed to ensure that
persons of all abilities have equality of opportunity, economic self-sufficiency, full participation
in American life, and independent living.
To ensure that the fundamental goal of the American with Disabilities Act is met, Title II of the
ADA requires state and local governments to make their programs and services accessible to
persons with disabilities. This requirement extends not only to physical access at government
facilities, programs, and events, but also to policy changes that governmental entities must
make to ensure that all people with disabilities can take part in, and benefit from, the programs
and services of the state and local governments. In addition, governmental entities must ensure
effective communication, including the provision of necessary auxiliary aids and services so
that individuals with disabilities can participate in civic life.
The Title II regulations cover “public entities.” Public entities include any state or local
government and any of its departments and agencies. All activities, services, and programs of
public entities are covered, including activities of state legislatures and courts, town meetings,
police and fire departments, motor vehicle licensing, and employment.
PART II - CITY COMPLIANCE WITH THE ADA
Title II requires city governments to ensure that each of its programs, services and activities,
when viewed in their entirety, are accessible to people with disabilities. This emphasis on
access to programs, as opposed to access to buildings or facilities, distinguishes the
requirements for public entities from those for private places of public accommodation. In
providing access, city governments are not required to take any action that would result in a
fundamental alteration to the nature of any program, service or activity or that would result in
undue financial and administrative burdens. If an action would result in such an alteration or
such burdens, the City must take any other action it can to ensure that people with disabilities
receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
Program Access covers the entire range of city services and programs, including as an example
appropriate access along sidewalks and at intersections in the public right of way, access to a
city building or facility such as City Council Chambers, the ability to pay a utility bill, or to
access a Parks and Recreation Facility. Program Access may be achieved in a variety of ways:
city governments may choose to make structural changes to existing facilities to achieve access;
or it can pursue a variety of non-structural alternatives to achieve program accessibility. For
Page 110 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
ADA Transition Plan - 3.26.2014
Page 3
example, city governments may choose to renovate a non-accessible building, relocate services
to an accessible level of a building or to another building that is fully accessible, or to deliver
services in an alternate accessible manner. When choosing among possible methods of
achieving program access, however, city governments must give priority to the choices that
offer programs, services and activities in the most integrated setting appropriate.
The City of Georgetown is committed to ensuring that its programs, services and activities are
accessible to persons with disabilities in compliance with Title II. The City of Georgetown will
not discriminate on the basis of disability regarding employment and services or programs
provided by the municipality. Additionally, the City of Georgetown will inform individuals
that reasonable accommodation will be provided and that protections against discrimination
are provided by the Americans with Disabilities Act.
PART III - TRANSITION PLAN ELEMENTS
New construction in the City shall be constructed in accordance with the applicable ADA
Standards for Accessible Design. This Transition Plan addresses renovations or modifications
required to achieve Program Accessibility. The Transition Plan is required to identify physical
obstacles in the City that limit accessibility to its programs or activities to individuals with
disabilities; describe in detail the methods that will be used to make all public facilities
accessible; specify the schedule for taking the steps necessary to achieve compliance in making
the facilities accessible; and indicate the official responsible for implementation of the plan.
SIDEWALKS, CURB RAMPS, INTERSECTIONS AND STREETS
The City of Georgetown recognizes that pedestrian walkways or sidewalks often play a key role
in providing access to government programs and services and to the goods and services offered
to the public by private businesses. When walkways cross a curb at intersections, a ramp or
sloped surface is needed. Curb ramps allow people with mobility impairments to gain access to
the sidewalks and to pass through center islands in streets.
All newly constructed or repaired curb ramps are designed and constructed in compliance with
the applicable ADA Standards for Accessible Design. When the City constructs new roads or
alters existing roads, it is committed to installing curb ramps where public walkways cross
curbs at intersections. Without the required curb ramps, sidewalk travel in Georgetown may be
dangerous, difficult, and in some cases impossible for people who use wheelchairs, scooters and
other mobility aids to navigate. Likewise, when new sidewalks or walkways are built or
altered, the City is committed to ensuring that curb ramps or sloped areas are provided
wherever they intersect with streets or roads.
At existing roads and sidewalks that are not being altered, the City may choose in some cases to
construct curb ramps at every point where a pedestrian walkway intersects a curb, or it may
chose to provide curb ramps at only select corners or at other locations if equal access to the
Page 111 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
ADA Transition Plan - 3.26.2014
Page 4
programs served by these walkways can be ensured. Alternative routes to buildings that make
use of existing curb ramps may be acceptable when people with disabilities must only travel a
marginally longer route.
Transportation Services is committed to evaluating on-street parking for ADA compliance and
to investigate and act on opportunities to improve access to public walkways and facilities on
all Capital Improvement projects. A City Sidewalk Study was conducted in 2001. Since that
time, significant improvements have been made to miles of sidewalks, countless curb ramps,
street parking and intersections throughout the City to facilitate accessibility and access to
persons with disabilities. Current and planned improvement projects include:
x Austin Avenue Sidewalk from Georgetown High School and the Recreation Center
x CDBG Annual Parking Program
x Street Maintenance Ramp Upgrade/Installation
x Street Parking Around the Courthouse after Resurfacing
x 6th Street Sidewalk Improvements
x 9th Street Sidewalk Improvements
x Tin Barn Alley Sidewalk Improvements
The City also currently accommodates requests for unplanned curb ramps and sidewalks and
for emergency repairs. A dedicated budget should be developed and funded for such
unplanned contingencies.
The City is currently planning a 2014 Sidewalk Study. The Sidewalk Study will include
identification of sidewalk conditions that are not in compliance with Title II.
PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND PARKING LOTS
Georgetown Support Services ensures application of ADA Standards for Accessible Designs to
all new construction, remodels, renovations and alterations of public buildings and public
parking areas. In addition, public buildings and public parking areas are maintained for ADA
compliance. Examples include:
x An ADA ramp on the sidewalk at the City Council Chambers was installed 8 years ago.
x An accessible door was installed in the GMC Building lobby last year.
x The Tennis Center locker room area is being remodeled this year. The sidewalks going
down to the court have been identified as a future project for compliance.
x Buildings that do not have automatic door openers meet the ADA pull requirements.
Page 112 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
ADA Transition Plan - 3.26.2014
Page 5
x Public and facility parking lots are maintained to ensure that stripping and signage is
visible for accessibility.
Georgetown Support Services is committed to maintaining public buildings and public parking
for ADA compliance and to investigate and act on opportunities to improve access to public
facilities on all Capital Improvement Projects. The Feasibility Study will identify any public
facility and public parking deficiencies.
PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
Georgetown Parks and Recreation is committed to providing access to recreational areas and
programs for persons with disabilities. The Parks and Recreation Department’s Capital
Improvement Plan identifies park renovation projects to provide ADA compliance.
Additionally, the City will ensure facilities are in compliance as they are altered or replaced.
Current Projects (2013/2014)
x Creative Playscape Replacement
x River Ridge Pool Renovations
x San Gabriel Trail Additions
x Chautauqua Park Renovations
x San Jose Park Renovations
x Rowan Park Development
x Madrone Park Development
x Old Town Park Renovations (Completed)
Future Projects (Proposed 2014/2015)
x VFW Renovations
x Williams Drive Park Renovations
x Emerald Springs Park Renovations
x San Gabriel Park Renovations
EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION
The City is committed to maintaining an effective means of communication with the public
through public media, public meetings and project notification. Twenty years ago, interactions
with the City often required a physical trip to a City facility to make a payment, request
information, or attend a meeting. The City now uses its website, social media, and other
communication tools to increase outreach and reduce barriers to access City services and
information. Below are some of the ways that online services are providing access to City
information and services for those with mobility limitations.
City Council Meetings: The City began broadcasting meetings on tape delay in 1996 on local
access cable channel 10. In 2009, the City began streaming City Council meetings live on
Page 113 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
ADA Transition Plan - 3.26.2014
Page 6
Georgetown.org and GTV channel 10. City Council meetings are also replayed on GTV and are
available at any at any time for replay on Georgetown.org using a computer or mobile device.
Online Payments: City utility bills, municipal court tickets, some permits, and some kinds of
event tickets can be paid online via Georgetown.org. The Public Communications Department
continues to seek ways to improve and expand online payments in order to reduce the need to
visit City offices.
City Records: Agendas and minutes for City Council meetings and board and commission
meetings are available at Georgetown.org. Many other records such as current and past city
ordinances and the local unified development code are available on the City website.
City News and Information: City news releases and City project information is posted to
Georgetown.org and to City Facebook sites such as www.facebook.com/CityofGeorgetown and
www.facebook.com/LivePlayGeorgetown. These social media sites allow anyone with a
computer or mobile device to stay informed about City events and projects or ask questions of
City staff.
Video: The City provides some messages and information via the City YouTube channel and
on GTV channel 10 and on Georgetown.org. The Public Communications Department seeks to
expand video programming in order to increase outreach of City information and programs to
people of all abilities in the community.
Website Accessibility: In designing websites for City departments, the Public Communications
Department has avoided using Flash animation and some dynamic features that are not ADA
compliant. The webmaster also has implemented responsive design on many of the key
website pages which optimizes web content based on the type of device accessing the website.
Such technology improves readability of webpages for those with visual acuity limitations.
Improvements in screen reader technology will expand the options for web design in the future.
As the City redesigns its websites in 2014, ADA compliance for City webpages as well as
webpages from vendors that are providing City services will be a priority. The City will be
developing a policy to verify that all digital communications are accessible through assistive
technology such as screen readers and audio technology by following the guidelines below:
x Adopt a City policy that requires all webpages, including those purchased from
third party services, to meet the following 508c3 standards:
Provide at least one mode of operation and information retrieval that does not
require user vision, or support for assistive technology used by people who are
blind or visually impaired.
Page 114 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
ADA Transition Plan - 3.26.2014
Page 7
Provide at least one mode of operation and information retrieval that does not
require visual acuity greater than 20/70 in audio and enlarged print output
working together or independently, or support for assistive technology used by
people who are visually impaired.
Provide at least one mode of operation and information retrieval that does not
require user hearing, or support for assistive technology used by people who are
deaf or hard of hearing.
Where audio information is important for the use of a product, provide at least
one mode of operation and information retrieval in an enhanced auditory
manner, or support for assistive hearing devices.
Provide at least one mode of operation and information retrieval that does not
require user speech, or support for assistive technology used by people with
speech disabilities.
Provide at least one mode of operation and information retrieval that does not
require user fine motor control or simultaneous actions and that is operable with
limited reach and strength.
x Train all webpage content creators so that they understand alternate tags,
descriptions, and captions. Minimize the use of portable document format (pdf) or
non-text documents for the conveyance of information, and when pdfs are necessary,
train content creators how to make such documents accessible.
x Ensure that all pages and documents include an easy to find contact phone number
or email address so that users with disabilities have alternate ways to receive
information.
x Minimize the use of tables for formatting, ensure all form elements are tagged, do
not rely on graphics for the conveyance of information, and explain the content of
maps in an alternate way when that map is being used to convey critical content.
x Routinely run digital services through online ADA check tools to ensure compliance.
The City uses other communication tools such as the monthly City Reporter newsletter in the
utility bill as well as monthly ads in the Williamson County Sun to provide information on City
news and initiatives. Postcards mailed to customers are used for certain messages such as
water restrictions or information about City elections. Through all these means, the City
provides outreach to the community in a variety of ways for those who may have mobility
impairments or difficulty in using certain kinds of electronic or print media.
Page 115 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
ADA Transition Plan - 3.26.2014
Page 8
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL
The official responsible for implementation of the City’s ADA Transition Plan is the Building
Official with Inspection Services in Georgetown Utility Systems, 300-1 Industrial Avenue
Georgetown, Texas, 78626.
The City will adopt and publish grievance procedures providing for prompt and equitable
resolution of complaints alleging violations of Title II. Complaints of alleged noncompliance
and grievances concerning violations of Title II and Program Access in the City of Georgetown
should be directed to:
Dave Hall, Building Official
300-1 Industrial Ave
Georgetown, Texas 78626
Telephone: (512) 930-2547
Email: dave.hall@georgetown.org
BUDGET
The financial cost to fully implement the ADA Transition Plan in compliance with Title II
should be included in the City’s annual budget each year. Each affected City Department,
including Transportation (street parking and sidewalks), Facilities (public buildings and public
parking lots), Parks and Recreation and Public or Effective Communications (to include the
City’s web page) should allocate funds in the respective budgets for inclusion in the City
Budget.
PART IV – RECOMMENDATIONS
FEASIBILITY STUDY. The City should conduct a feasibility study to obtain an analysis and
evaluation for proposed projects to determine if the projects are technically feasible and to
provide an estimated cost for project prioritization and budgeting. The Feasibility Study will
provide recommendations for implementation of the ADA Transition Plan, including
prioritization of projects, scheduling and integration of those projects into the City CIP and City
Budget. The Feasibility Study has been included in the scope of services for the 2014 Sidewalk
Study proposal. Once the Feasibility Study is complete it will be presented to the ADA
Advisory Committee for review and recommendation to the City Council.
ADA ADVISORY COMMITTEE. The City should establish an ADA Advisory Committee.
Membership on the Committee should include City Staff (including transportation, street
parking and sidewalks), parks and recreation, facilities (public buildings and public parking
lots), public or effective communication (to include the city’s web page) and legal and citizen
representatives with ADA mobility limitations, as well as the sight and hearing impaired. The
ADA Advisory Committee would inform the City Council concerning Title II issues applicable
Page 116 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
ADA Transition Plan - 3.26.2014
Page 9
to the City and provide ongoing recommendations concerning implementation and amendment
of the ADA Transition Plan as necessary for compliance with the ADA. The ADA Advisory
Committee would also allow for regular public participation from citizens and other interested
persons, including individuals with disabilities or organizations representing individuals with
disabilities.
DATA ORGANIZATION. Data should be collected and organized in a form to be included in
the City’s Asset Management System or other database to organize project data, including
inspections and construction.
WEB PAGE. The City has created an ADA page on the City’s website located at
ada.georgetown.org. City Staff will work with the ADA Advisory Committee to develop the
ADA page as an effective and meaningful resource for City residents with disabilities.
Page 117 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
November 10, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to approve Resolution finding public convenience and necessity and
authorizing eminent domain proceedings, if necessary, for the acquisition of real property from Inner
Peace, LLC to effectuate certain public road and utility infrastructure improvements on Southeast Inner
Loop at FM 1460 -- Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director, and Terri Glasby Calhoun,
Real Estate Services Coordinator (Record Vote)
ITEM SUMMARY:
A resolution finding public convenience and necessity (“PCN Resolution”) authorizing the acquisition of the
necessary land rights for road and drainage improvements on Southeast Inner Loop by either negotiation or
condemnation was passed by Council on August 11, 2015. However, it has since been determined that the
property to be acquired from Inner Peace, LLC was incorrectly described in the initial PCN Resolution. The
purpose of the proposed resolution is to correct the property description.
Accordingly, the attached resolution, if approved, will authorize the acquisition of the real property described
therein by negotiation or eminent domain, if necessary.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Terri Calhoun
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution declaring public convenience and necessity
Page 118 of 180
Page 119 of 180
Page 120 of 180
Page 121 of 180
Page 122 of 180
Page 123 of 180
Page 124 of 180
Page 125 of 180
Page 126 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
November 10, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to approve a Resolution casting City of Georgetown votes for the election
of the Williamson Central Appraisal District Board of Directors -- David Morgan, City Manager
ITEM SUMMARY:
On October 13, 2015, the City Council, by Resolution No. 101315-D, nominated Harry Gibbs and Deborah
Hunt as Directors for the Williamson Central Appraisal District. The Appraisal District is asking the City to
cast its votes in accordance with the Texas Property Tax Code.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Letter from Alvin Lankford, Chief Appraiser, Williamson County Appraisal District
2. Official Ballot for the Williamson County Board of Directors
3. Proposed Resolution
The City Council is asked to consider the selection of the nominee(s) for whom it will vote for and cast its
115 votes by Resolution for the election of the Williamson County Appraisal District Board of Directors. The
City Council has historically equally divided its allotted votes between both of its nominees, which this year
would be 57.5 votes for each Harry Gibbs and Deborah Hunt.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Shirley J. Rinn on behalf of David S. Morgan, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Election Procedure Letter and Ballot
WCAD Vote Resolution
Page 127 of 180
Board of Directors Harry Gibbs, Chairman Chief Appraiser Alvin Lankford
Deborah Hunt, Vice-Chairman alvinl@wcad.org
Cecilia M. Crowley, Secretary
Rufus Honeycutt
Charles Chadwell
625 F.M. 1460, Georgetown, Texas 78626
(512) 930-3787 www.wcad.org
October 22, 2015
Dale Ross, Mayor
City of Georgetown
P.O. Box 409
Georgetown,TX 78627-0409
Dear Mayor Ross:
Enclosed is the official ballot listing all nominees timely submitted for the Board of
Directors for the Williamson Central Appraisal District in accordance with Section 6.03 of
the Texas Property Tax Code.
According to Section 6.03 of the Texas Property Tax Code each taxing unit must
determine their vote by resolution and submit it to the Chief Appraiser before December
15, 2015.
Please find enclosed an Election Votes listing showing the final number of votes to which
each unit is entitled. The enclosed ballot reflects your correct number of votes.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call.
With Kindest Regards,
Alvin Lankford
Chief Appraiser
ARL/cam
Enclosures
We will provide quality service with the highest standards of
professionalism, integrity and respect. We will uphold these
standards while providing an accurate, fair and cost-effective
appraisal roll in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas.”
Page 128 of 180
Williamson Central Appraisal District
Board of Directors Nominees
Official Ballot 2015
INSTRUCTION NOTE:
Indicate your vote for the candidate or candidates of your choice by placing
the number of votes in the blank beside the candidate or candidates name.
ENTITY City of Georgetown NUMBER OF VOTES 115
CHADWELL, CHARLES ___________________
CROWLEY, CECILIA M. ___________________
GIBBS, HARRY ___________________
HONEYCUTT, RUFUS ___________________
HUNT, DEBORAH M. ___________________
ATTEST:
__________________________________________
Signature
__________________________________________
Date
Page 129 of 180
Williamson Central Appraisal District Vote
Resolution No. _________
Page 1 of 2 Pages
RESOLUTION NO. ____________
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Georgetown, Texas, to Cast Votes in the Election of
the Williamson Central Appraisal District Board.
WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown is a voting entity in the Williamson Central
Appraisal District; and
WHEREAS, a ballot has been furnished asking for votes to be cast by resolution and
returned to the Appraisal District by December 15, 2015; and
WHEREAS, according to the distribution of allowable votes to the entities of Williamson
County Central Appraisal District, the City of Georgetown is entitled to cast a total of 115 votes
for any one or a number of the candidates listed on the ballot.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this resolution
are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference
herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim.
SECTION 2.
The City of Georgetown hereby casts its 115 votes in the following manner:
Candidate Votes Allotted
Chadwell, Charles
Crowley, Cecilia
Gibbs, Harry
Honeycutt, Rufus
Hunt, Deborah
Page 130 of 180
Williamson Central Appraisal District Vote
Resolution No. _________
Page 2 of 2 Pages
SECTION 3.
The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute, and the City Secretary to attest thereto this
resolution on behalf of the City of Georgetown.
SECTION 4.
This resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.
RESOLVED this _______ day of November, 2015.
Attest: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
Shelley Nowling By: Dale Ross
City Secretary Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Bridget Chapman
City Attorney
Page 131 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
November 10, 2015
SUBJECT:
Second Reading of an Ordinance to Rezone 52.48 acres in the Hudson, Patterson, Addison and Robertson
Surveys located at the northeast corner of F.M. 1460 and Westinghouse Road (C.R. 111), known as the
Wheeler Tract, from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning with Local Commercial (C-1) and High
Density Multifamily (MF-2) base Districts to 19.67 acres of Local Commercial (C-1) District, 10.81 acres of
General Commercial (C-3) District, 11.00 acres of Low-density Multifamily (MF-1) District, and 11.00 acres
of High-density Multifamily (MF-2) District -- Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A,
Planning Director (action required)
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The applicant has requested to rezone six unplatted parcels of land from a Planned Unit Development (PUD)
zoning of Local Commercial (C-1) and High Density Multifamily (MF-2) Districts to 19.67 acres of the
Local Commercial (C-1) District, 10.81 acres of the General Commercial (C-3) District, 11.00 acres of Low
Density Multifamily (MF-1) District, and 11.00 acres of the High Density Multifamily (MF-2) District, as
shown in Exhibit 3. This current zoning of the tract of land dates to 2007, and the property was annexed into
the City in 2006 (Ordinance 2006-139).
Public Comment:
As of the date of this report, no written public comments have been received.
Planning and Zoning Commission:
At their October 6th, 2015 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) of
the rezoning request. There were no speakers at the public hearing.
City Council Meeting - First Reading:
At their October 27th, 2015 meeting, the City Council approved (6-0) the First Reading of the Ordinance,
with no discussion. There were no speakers during the public hearing.
Recommended Motion:
Recommend to the City Council Approval of the Second Reading of an Ordinance to rezone 52.48 acres in
the Hudson, Patterson, Addison and Robertson Surveys to 19.67 acres of Local Commercial (C-1) District,
10.81 acres of General Commercial (C-3) District, 11.00 acres of Low-density Multifamily (MF-1) District,
and 11.00 acres of High-density Multifamily (MF-2) District.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. The applicant has paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director
ATTACHMENTS:
Staff Report
Exhibit 1 - Future Land Use / Transportation Map
Exhibit 2 - Zoning Map
Exhibit 3 - Proposed Zoning Districts
Page 132 of 180
Ordinance
Ordinance Exhibit A - Location Map
Ordinance Exhibit B - Legal Description
Page 133 of 180
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Wheeler Tract - Rezoning Page 1 of 5
C-1 and MF PUD to C-1, C-3, MF-1 and MF-2
Report Date: October 1, 2015
File No: REZ-2015-004
Project Planner: Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Wheeler Tract
Project Address: 2211/2311/2319 Westinghouse Road; 2931/2951/2991 FM 1460
Location: Northeast corner of Westinghouse Road and FM 1460 (See Exhibit 1)
Total Acreage: 52.48 acres
Legal Description: 52.48 acres in the Francis Hudson, William Addison, Joseph Robertson, and
J.S. Patterson Surveys
Applicant: Michael Fisher, Pape-Dawson Engineers
Property Owner: John Avery Jr., PDC Land & Cattle, LTD.
Contact: Michael Fisher, Pape-Dawson Engineers
Existing Use: Undeveloped land
Existing Zoning: Local Commercial (C-1) and High Density Multifamily (MF-2) Planned Unit
Development (PUD) per Ordinance 2007-98
Proposed Zoning: Local Commercial (C-1) District, General Commercial (C-3) District, Low-Density
Multifamily (MF-1) District, and High-Density Multifamily (MF-2) District (see
Exhibit 3)
Future Land Use: Community Commercial (node), Moderate Density Residential
Growth Tier: Tier 1B
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant has requested to rezone six unplatted parcels of land from a Planned Unit Development
(PUD) zoning with Local Commercial (C-1) and High Density Multifamily (MF-2) base Districts to 19.67
acres of the Local Commercial (C-1) District, 10.81 acres of the General Commercial (C-3) District, 11.00
acres of Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District, and 11.00 acres of the High Density Multifamily (MF-
2) District, as shown in Exhibit 3. This current zoning of the tract of land dates to 2007, and the property
was annexed into the City in 2006 (Ordinance 2006-139).
Site Information
Location:
This property is located on the northeast corner of Westinghouse Road and FM 1460; See Exhibit 1.
Physical Characteristics:
The property is a mostly cleared, vacant, rather flat piece of ground in a generally square shape.
Surrounding Properties:
The surrounding properties include Municipal Utility District (Teravista MUD) residential, undeveloped
land both in the City and in the City’s ETJ, and a property in the City operating a warehousing and/or
storage business. (See Exhibits 1 & 2, aerial)
Page 134 of 180
Planning Department Staff Report
Wheeler Tract - Rezoning Page 2 of 5
C-1 and MF PUD to C-1, C-3, MF-1 and MF-2
Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use
North ETJ Moderate Density Residential Residential, undeveloped land
South AG, Agriculture Community Commercial; Moderate
Density Residential
Undeveloped land, Single family
residential
East AG, Agriculture Moderate Density Residential Warehouse/Storage, and
Undeveloped land
West ETJ Community Commercial; Moderate
Density Residential
Single family residential (Teravista
MUD across FM 1460)
Property History/Zoning Entitlement
The property was annexed in 2006 (Ordinance 2006-139) and then rezoned to a Planned Unit Development
(PUD) in 2007 (Ordinance 2007-98) consisting of approximately 29 acres of Local Commercial (C-1)
zoning and 26 acres of Multifamily (MF) zoning. The express intent of this PUD zoning was to create a
“compact, pedestrian friendly center that provides retail goods and services to a local customer base, while
having minimal impact on the surrounding residential uses.” Mixed use development incorporating
Page 135 of 180
Planning Department Staff Report
Wheeler Tract - Rezoning Page 3 of 5
C-1 and MF PUD to C-1, C-3, MF-1 and MF-2
vertically integrated mixed-use buildings, along with a stand-alone high density residential development,
were envisioned. A maximum of 830 multifamily units were approved, as well as a minimum of 90,000
square feet of retail, commercial, and/or office uses, along with some locationally based restrictions on
those uses.
The property is currently housing several dozen temporary/portable buildings in a nonconforming,
unregulated fashion (not parked on approved surfaces, no stormwater detention, etc.).
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Land Use:
The 2030 Plan has a node of the Community Commercial future land use designation at the intersection of
FM 1460 and Westinghouse Road/CR 111. Community Commercial generally applies to areas that
accommodate retail, profesional office, and service-oriented business activities that serve more than one
residential neighborhood. They are generally configured as nodes at the intersection of arterial roadways
(this subject property), or arterial and collector roadways. Neighborhood-serving commercial uses such as
restaurants, specialty retail, and mid-box stores and shopping centers are typical. Civic-oriented uses such
as churches, schools, or parks are also appropriate.
The Commercial node encompasses only about 6 acres of the subject property, at the hard corner of the two
roadways, whereby the majority of the property is in the Moderate Density Residential land use category.
This category calls for residnetial densities of between 3.1 and 6 dwelling units per acre, but also supports
complementary non-residential uses along arterial roadways such as neighborhood-serving retail, office,
institutional, and civic uses.
Growth Tier:
The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1B, Developing, which is usually areas within the City
limits but are underserved by infrastructure. An annexation service plan is in place for this property, along
with a utility agreement related to commercial development.
Proposed Zoning Districts
The Local Commercial (C-1) District provides for areas of commercial and retail activities that primarily
serve residential areas. Uses should have pedestrian access to adjacent and nearby residential areas, but are
not appropriate along residential streets or residential collectors, being more appropriate along major and
minor thoroughfares and corridors.
The General Commercial (C-3) District provides for general commercial and retail activities that serve the
entire community and its visitors. Uses may be large in scale and generate substantial traffic, making C-3
Districts appropriate along freeways and major arterials.
The Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District is intended for attached and detached multi-family
residential development, such as apartments, condominiums, triplexes, and fourplexes, at a density not to
exceed 14 dwelling units per acre. It can be appropriate in the Moderate Density Residential future land
use category based on the particular location, surrounding uses, and infrastructure impacts. Convenient
access to major roadways should be present, and the district can be proximate to both residential and non-
residential districts, with the ability to serve as a transition between those two.
The High Density Multifamily (MF-2) District is intended for attached multifamily residential
development, such as apartments and condominiums, at a density not to exceed 24 dwelling units per acre.
Page 136 of 180
Planning Department Staff Report
Wheeler Tract - Rezoning Page 4 of 5
C-1 and MF PUD to C-1, C-3, MF-1 and MF-2
The District is appropriate in areas planned as High Density Residential or one of the Mixed Use
categories. Access to major thoroughfares and arterial roads should be provided, with traffic not being
directed through lower density residential areas. The District is appropriate adjacent both Residential and
Non-Residential Districts and may serve as a transition between single-family districts and more intense
commercial districts.
Utilities
Water and wastewater are served by the City of Georgetown; electricity is provided by TXU Energy. A
utility evaluation was required with this proposal, as those previously conducted were both for different
concepts of development, and vastly out-of-date. It was determined that capacity could be provided upon
development.
Transportation
The access to this property will be provided by Westinghouse Road and FM 1460; exact locations of
driveways will be determined at the time of Site Development Plan review. It is anticipated that a primary
access point will be via FM 1460 opposite Teravista Crossing, where a median-break cross-over is planned.
Property subdivision may also dictate driveway access points. Both Westinghouse Road and FM 1460 are
classified as Major Arterial roadways. Near this property, right-of-way widths reach 215’ for FM 1460 and
135’ for Westinghouse Road; additional right-of-way may be required at time of subdivision. Traffic
impacts will be vetted at subdivision and/or Site Plan review, and requirements for a Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA) determined. On and off-site improvements would be built as warranted.
Future Application(s)
The following applications would be required to be submitted for the property to develop:
• Preliminary Plat to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission;
• Construction Plans (public infrastructure) will be processed administratively;
• Final Plat(s) to be processed administratively;
• Site Development Plans for commercial development, processed administratively; and
• Building permits for construction.
Staff Analysis
Staff is supportive of the requested rezoning for the following reasons:
1. The Future Land Use designations of Community Commercial at the hard corner, and Moderate
Density Residential on the balance of the site, supports commercial uses fronting the two arterial
roadways, with a transition of intensity of multifamily uses toward the north and east and abutting the
two adjoining properties.
2. The existing zoning situation of C-1 and MF-2 districts under a restrictive PUD ordinance that
demands integration of uses best accomplished through a unified development across the entire
property has not been executed, leaving the property undeveloped.
3. The existing zoning situation of the surrounding area is moving toward the creation of a commercial
node at the corners of this intersection. Commercial uses are being developed on the northwest
corner within Teravista (in the ETJ), and the southwest corner (approx. 9 acres, Teravista
Commercial, zoned C-3 and C-1). The southeast corner (in the City) does not yet have commercial
zoning, but it would be consistent with the 2030 Plan.
Page 137 of 180
Planning Department Staff Report
Wheeler Tract - Rezoning Page 5 of 5
C-1 and MF PUD to C-1, C-3, MF-1 and MF-2
4. The surrounding developed uses include the large Teravista MUD residential community across FM
146), a GISD elementary school and small retail area to the west (Teravista), and a large amount of
(undeveloped) Agriculture District zoned land to the south across Westinghouse Road. The large and
growing consumer base, and commercial uses either constructed or approved through zoning support
like commercial development.
At the time of this request, this intersection consists of, essentially, two two-lane roadways. In the near
future, FM 1460 will undergo a reconstruction to enlarge it to a divided 4-lane facility that will include turn
lanes at this intersection. Westinghouse Road was improved by Williamson County to a 5-lane facility
(continuous center-turn lane) for the majority of the segment between IH-35 and FM 1460; it narrows to a
3-lane section right at the intersection. Opposite FM 1460, the road continues as C.R. 111 in a two-lane
road section; this stretch will eventually be enlarged as well with traffic demand and/or development
projects. The total of these improvements, and the impacts of these major roadways in the near future,
facilitate the appropriateness of C-3 zoning on this property, and at this intersection.
Inter Departmental, Governmental and Agency Comments
None
Public Comments
A total of 4 notices were sent out to property owners, within the City limits, within 200 feet of the proposed
rezoning. Public notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on September 20, 2015. As of the writing of this
report, no written comments have been received.
Meetings Schedule
October 6, 2015 – Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing
October 27, 2015 – City Council First Reading and Public Hearing
November 10, 2015 – City Council Second Reading
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Future Land Use Map
Exhibit 2 – Zoning Map
Exhibit 3 – Proposed Zoning Districts
Page 138 of 180
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\\\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
G
e
o
r
g
e
t
o
w
n
E
T
J
G
e
o
r
g
e
t
o
w
n
E
T
J
G
e
o
r
g
e
t
o
w
n
E
T
J
Georgetown
E
T
J
Georgetown
E
T
J
REZ-2015-004
C
L
E
A
R
W
I
N
G
C
I
R
D
AY
L
I
LY
L
O
O
P
W E S T I N G H O U S E R D
COA C H LI G H T D R
C
R
E
S
T
E
D
B
U
T
T
E
W
A
Y
SCENICLAKEDR
TERAVISTA XING
M
A
N
C
O
S
D
R
S
U
M
M
I
T
H
I
L
L
D
R
LA CONT
E
R
R
A
B
L
V
D
R
O
C
K
M
I
L
L
L
N
B R IARPARKDR
SUNN
Y
MEA D OWSL
O
OP
APRILMEADOWS L OOP
R
O
C
KM I L L L O O P
CEDAR SA
G
E
L
N
G
R
ANDEMES A D R
FIREW
H
E
E
L
X
I
N
G
V
A
L
L
E
C
I
T
O
D
R
TELLURI D E D R
SUN
N
Y
T
R
A
I
L
D
R
COLONY
G
L
E
N
L
N
CULEBRA
D
R
FM
1
4
6
0
MIDNIGHT
L
N
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan
Exhibit #2
REZ-2015-004
Legend
Thoroughfare
Future Land Use
Institutional
Regional Commercial
Community Commercial
Employment Center
Low Density Residential
Mining
Mixed Use Community
Mixed Use Neighborhood Center
Moderate Density Residential
Open Space
Specialty Mixed Use Area
Ag / Rural Residential
Westingho
u
s
e
R
d
SE Inner Lo
o
p
S amHoustonAve
South
w
e
st
e
r
n
B
l
v
d
")1460
Tera vis t a Xin g
Westingho
u
s
e
R
d
R
a
b
bit
H
Ill
R
d
SAustinAve
S E InnerLoop
Site
³
City Limits
Street
Site
Existing Collector
Existing Freeway
Existing Major Arterial
Existing Minor Arterial
Existing Ramp
Proposed Collector
Proposed Freeway
Propsed Frontage Road
Proposed Major Arterial
Proposed Minor Arterial
Proposed Railroad
High Density Residential
Page 139 of 180
C I T Y O F G E O R G E T O W N
Georgetown
E
T
J
REZ-2015-004
M
A
N
C
O
S
D
R
B RIARPARKDR
CL
E
A
R
W
I
N
G
C
I
R
WESTINGH
O
U
S
E
R
D
W E S T I N G H O U S E R D
COA C H LI G H T D R
TERAVISTA XING
SCENIC
LAK E D R
SUN
N
Y
T
R
A
I
L
D
R
SCENICLAKEDR
V
A
L
L
E
C
I
T
O
D
R
R
O
C
K
M
I
L
L
L
N
LA CONT
E
R
R
A
B
L
V
D
CEDAR SA
G
E
L
N
G
R
ANDEMES A D R
FIREW
H
E
E
L
X
I
N
G
COLONYGL
E
N
L
N
FM
1
4
6
0
MIDNIGHT
L
N
Zoning InformationREZ-2015-004Exhibit #2
¯
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 1,000 2,000Feet
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Westingho
u
s
e
R
d
SE Inner Lo
o
p
S amHoustonAve
")1460
Tera vis t a Xin g
R
a
b
b
it
H
I
ll
R
d
³
Site
City Limits
Street
Site
Page 140 of 180
1
LOCATION MAP
WHEELER TRACT
Ä
5'
2
6
'
/
$
'
4
-/
4
-/
4
1
DA
T
E
JO
B
N
O
.
DE
S
I
G
N
E
R
CH
E
C
K
E
D
D
R
A
W
N
SH
E
E
T
O
F
REVISIONS:
LE
G
E
N
D
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
L
O
C
A
L
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
(
C
-
1
)
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
H
I
G
H
D
E
N
S
I
T
Y
M
U
L
T
I
-
F
A
M
I
L
Y
(
M
F
-
2
)
PA
R
C
E
L
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
(
C
-
3
)
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
L
O
W
D
E
N
S
I
T
Y
M
U
L
T
I
-
F
A
M
I
L
Y
(
M
F
-
1
)
WITH ACCESS POINTS
Page 141 of 180
Ordinance Number: ___________________ Page 1 of 2
Description: Rezone 52.48 acres in the Hudson, Patterson, Addison, Robertson Surveys Case File #: REZ-2015-004
Date Approved: __________________ Exhibits A-B Attached
ORDINANCE NO. _____________________
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas,
amending part of the Official Zoning Map to rezone 52.48 acres in the
Hudson, Patterson, Addison and Robertson Surveys from a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) District to 19.67 acres of Local Commercial (C-1)
District, 10.81 acres of General Commercial (C-3) District, 11.00 acres of
Low-density Multifamily (MF-1) District, and 11.00 acres of High-density
Multifamily (MF-2) District, to be known as Wheeler Tract; repealing
conflicting ordinances and resolutions; including a severability clause; and
establishing an effective date.
Whereas, an application has been made to the City for the purpose of amending the
Official Zoning Map, adopted on the 12th day of June, 2012, for the specific Zoning District
classification of the following described real property ("The Property"):
52.48 acres in the Hudson, Patterson, Addison and Robertson Surveys, as recorded
in Document Number 2007033369 and 2007033370 of the Official Public Records of
Williamson County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "The Property"; and
Whereas, the City Council has submitted the proposed amendment to the Official
Zoning Map to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its consideration at a public hearing
and for its recommendation or report; and
Whereas, public notice of such hearing was accomplished in accordance with State Law
and the City’s Unified Development Code through newspaper publication, signs posted on the
Property, and mailed notice to nearby property owners; and
Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a meeting on October 6, 2015, held
the required public hearing and submitted a recommendation of approval to the City Council
for the requested rezoning of the Property; and
Whereas, the City Council, at a meeting on October 27, 2015, held an additional public
hearing prior to taking action on the requested rezoning of the Property.
Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas,
that:
Section 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this Ordinance are
hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and
expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this
Ordinance implements the vision, goals, and policies of the Georgetown 2030 Comprehensive
Plan and further finds that the enactment of this Ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with
Page 142 of 180
Ordinance Number: ___________________ Page 2 of 2
Description: Rezone 52.48 acres in the Hudson, Patterson, Addison, Robertson Surveys Case File #: REZ-2015-004
Date Approved: __________________ Exhibits A-B Attached
any other policies or provisions of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the City’s Unified
Development Code.
Section 2. The Official Zoning Map, as well as the Zoning District classification(s) for the
Property is hereby amended from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) District (Local
Commercial (C-1) and High Density Multifamily (MF-2) base districts) to the Local Commercial
District (C-1), General Commercial District (C-3), Low Density Multifamily District (MF-1), and
High Density Multifamily District (MF-2), in accordance with the attached Exhibit A (Location
Map) and Exhibit B (Legal Description) and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in
conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
Section 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or
circumstance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or
application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be
severable.
Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary
to attest. This ordinance shall become effective in accordance with the provisions of state law
and the City Charter of the City of Georgetown.
APPROVED on First Reading on the 27th day of October, 2015.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED on Second Reading on the 10th day of November, 2015.
THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: ATTEST:
______________________ _________________________
Dale Ross Jessica Brettle
Mayor City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________
Bridget Chapman
City Attorney
Page 143 of 180
C I T Y O F G E O R G E T O W N
Georgetown
E
T
J
G
e
o
r
g
e
t
o
w
n
E
T
J
GeorgetownETJ
Georgetown
E
T
J
G
e
o
r
g
e
t
o
w
n
E
T
J
REZ-2015-004
M I R A V A L LOOP
WESTERNLAKE
D
R
W
I
L
D
F
L
O
W
E
R
P
A
R
K
D
R TERAVISTA XING
D A Y L I L Y L OOP
W E S T I N G H O U S E R D
W E S T I N G H O U S E R D
COA C H LI G HT DR
T
E
R
A
V
I
S
T
A
X
I
N
G
P
O
P
P
Y
C
T
SCENICLAKEDR
SACHENST
W A N D E R I N G V I N E T R L
S
U
M
M
I
T
H
I
L
L
D
R
C H E S T N U T M E A D O W S B N D
R
O
C
K
M
I
L
L
L
N
CEDAR SA
G
E
L
N
SCENIC
L
A
K
E
D
R
FIREW
H
E
E
L
X
I
N
G
PECAN
W
O
O
D
C
T
DR E S D E N C V
LIL Y
T
U RFCV
S U M M E R A Z U R E ST
B R I A R PARKDR
SUN
N
Y
T
R
A
I
L
D
R
CANYON SAGE
P
A
T
H
C H E R O K E E R O S E C I R
COLONYG
L
E
N
L
N
MONTEROSA LN
HERITAGEWELLLN
FM
1
4
6
0
MIDNIGHT
L
N
REZ-2015-004
Exhibit A
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 1,000 2,000Feet ¯
Legend
SiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Westingho
u
s
e
R
d
SE Inner Lo
o
p
SamHoustonAve
")1460
R
o
c
k
r
i
d
e
L
n
Tera vis t a Xin g
Westingho
u
s
e
R
d
")1460
Site
City Limits
Street
Site ³
Page 144 of 180
Page 145 of 180
Page 146 of 180
Page 147 of 180
Page 148 of 180
Page 149 of 180
Page 150 of 180
Page 151 of 180
Page 152 of 180
Page 153 of 180
Page 154 of 180
Page 155 of 180
Page 156 of 180
Page 157 of 180
Page 158 of 180
Page 159 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
November 10, 2015
SUBJECT:
Project updates and status reports regarding current and future transportation and traffic project; street,
sidewalk, and other infrastructure projects; police, fire and other public safety projects; economic
development projects; city facility projects; and downtown projects including parking enhancements and
possible direction to city staff – David Morgan, City Manager
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City Council has requested regular updates regarding the status of projects, as well as the ability to
discuss these projects as a collective.
The City Council has also indicated that they would like to receive more information and have discussion
regarding the following specific items:
Downtown Facilities
Downtown Parking
- MLK/8th Street Surface Parking
- Street Study and Design for Additional Parking Facility Downtown
Lease Agreements related to City-Owned Property
ATTACHMENTS
1. Project Updates as noted above
2. GEDCO Project Update
3. GTEC Project Report and Status
4. GTAB Project Update
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUBMITTED BY:
Shirley J. Rinn on behalf of David S. Morgan, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Downtown Parking
Downtown Facilities
Lease Agreements related to City-Owned Property
GEDCO Project Log
GTEC Project Reports
GTEC Project Status
GTAB Project Update
Page 160 of 180
Downtown Parking
November 10, 2015
Project Scope Addressing concerns regarding parking in the downtown overlay district.
Purpose To ensure sufficient parking downtown to support continued economic vitality in and
around the downtown overlay district.
Staff Contact Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager
Element Status
Surface Lot at Martin Luther
King Drive and 8th Street
Key Accomplishment
• Finalized interlocal agreement to use County’s property for 10-years
• Completed demolition of metal structures
• Council approved construction contract
• Began construction (90-days to complete)
Upcoming Tasks
• Keeping residents and businesses informed of progress
• Addressing overnight parking in city-owned lots
Challenges
• Lighting and landscaping for new lot
• Sidewalk connections from new lot to downtown
• Limiting parking in neighborhood
• Potential to expand agreement with County when EMS moves to new facility
Downtown Parking Study Key Accomplishment
• Parking Study and recommendations adopted by Council
Upcoming Tasks
• Presenting in-depth parking analysis for Downtown West
• Executing short-term recommendations found in Parking Study
• Update to Council regarding Structured Parking plan
Challenges
• Determining timing and need for parking structure
• Highlighting public parking that is currently available and creating awareness of available parking spots (over
1400 downtown) and enforcing 3-hour parking zone
3-Hour Parking Zone Key Accomplishment
• New ordinance and signage in place
• Parking Enforcement Increased from 11 to 25 hours per week.
Upcoming Tasks
• Purchase technology to improve parking enforcement
Challenges
• Ensuring sufficient enforcement for 3-hour zone
Page 161 of 180
Downtown Facilities
November 10, 2015
Project Scope Redeveloping and relocating downtown city facilities to a central campus (see photos)
Purpose To ensure highest and best use of existing city buildings. To leverage and capitalize on
proximity and economies of scale as city staff is relocated and centralized. To return
some of existing inventory to tax rolls.
Staff Contact Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager
Element Status
Redesign GCAT for
Municipal Court (510 W.
9th Street)
Key Accomplishment
• Feasibility studies completed by Winter & Co. and Ron Hobbs Architects
• Secured buy-in for 8,500 square foot expansion to accommodate dais and
courtroom
• Programming Kick-off and Two Public Meetings (7/15 & 8/12)
• Existing office/needs assessment with staff
Upcoming Tasks
• Council workshop on November 24th and potential action on December 8th related
to the programming document
• 6-8 week needs assessment and programming process to collect stakeholder input
for entire campus (including Historic Power & Light Building and Park Space)
• Developing scope of work to ensure project satisfies court’s needs for foreseeable
future
• Issuing RFP for Construction Manager at-Risk
Challenges
• Completing environmental assessments with existing resources
• Developing multi-purpose space that can accommodate teen court, as well as
A/V for public meetings
Rehabilitate Old Library as
new City Hall (808 Martin
Luther King Street)
Key Accomplishment
• Secured funding from Council for design and construction
• Securing architect (same as GCAT Redesign)
Upcoming Tasks
• Developing scope of work to ensure project satisfies City Hall’s needs for
foreseeable future (10 years)
• Developing programming and city staff to be relocated
Challenges
• Timing the sale of current City Hall to fund construction
101 E. 7th Street Key Accomplishment
• Approval to move Municipal Court to GCAT
Geotechnical Testing for 1987 Library
Page 162 of 180
• Secured direction to retain 101 E. 7th Street
Upcoming Tasks
• Developing business plan for CVB to fully utilize building
Challenges
• Managing potential retail incubator space
• Relocating DGA
• CVB covering costs associated with purchasing and renovating the building
• Continuing to host Council in 101 E. 7th Street until Council Chambers is
programmed elsewhere
City Park Area Key Accomplishment
• Reviewed concept with City Council
• Master Signage Plan in RFQ for GCAT and Old Library
o Including Red Poppy Café canopy in RFQ for GCAT and Old Library
Upcoming Tasks
• Secure Council funding for park area in FY 2016/2017
Challenges
• Determine scope, which tentatively includes:
o Festival Street
o Park and Play Area
o Plaza
o Amphitheater
o Tensile Structures
• Secure buy-in from downtown stakeholders to host new special events in park
area
• Ensuring continuity of design throughout development
• Focused and appropriately scaled, professional programming of City Park
• Neighborhood buy-in for Park space
• Net-neutral impact to parking when Park is developed
Old Power and Light
Building (809 Martin
Luther King Street)
Key Accomplishment
• Completed phase I environmental assessment
• Police department vacated building
• Secured approval to move staff on a temporary basis to building
• Included building in architect’s scope of work and completing concept design
Upcoming Tasks
• Completing deferred maintenance and moving-in temporary staff
o Staff to relocate – Downtown Community Services, Economic
Development, Planning, Public Communications
Challenges
• Funding for rehabilitation
o Potential to sell historic tax credits when building is rehabilitated
• Determining long-term programming and use
113 E. 8th Street (current
City Hall) and 103 W. 7th
Street (current CVB)
Key Accomplishment
• Secured preliminary buy-in to sell 113 E. 8th Street and 103 W. 7th Street to fund
downtown west project
Upcoming Tasks
• Developing economic development projects for 113 and 103
• Securing funding to effectively market and execute economic development project
Challenges
• Avoiding pitfalls generally seen when municipalities sell buildings
• Allowing sufficient time to market building to cash fund improvements.
Page 163 of 180
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Lease Agreements related to City-Owned Property
Project Sponsor/Manager:
Bridget Chapman, City Attorney
Shirley Rinn, Executive Assistant to the City
Date of Report
November 10, 2015
Project Scope Statement:
Compilation of Lease Agreements and terms
related to City-Owned Property
Key Accomplishments:
• Copies of Lease Agreements provided to
the City Council.
• Summary Report regarding Lease Terms
for each Lease Agreement provided to the
City Council, including WCAD valuation of
land and improvements.
• Summary Report of other In-Kind Services
provided to non-profits by the City of
Georgetown provided to the City Council.
Upcoming Tasks:
• Complete and update survey with regional
and like-sized cities regarding their policies
related to leasing city-owned property and
social service funding
• Determination of Fair Market Leasehold
Values
• Report to Council
Issues:
• Long-Term Leases on City-Owned
Property, including some on dedicated
Parkland.
Page 164 of 180
Project Project Description
Approved by
Council Funded Monitoring Compliance Closed
Citigroup
$1.3 Million Grant for wastewater infrastructure disbursed in April
2008. 12/12/2006 Funded April 2008
Approved and
completed; Monitoring
Compliance No
Radix BioSolutions, Ltd.
Provided grant to assist with the work and future plans of Radix
BioSolutions at the TLCC. Agreement approved by GEDCO on
February 9, 2010 and Council approved the Agreement at its March
9, 2010 Meeting. Radix paid back $47K on 3/15/15.3/9/2010 Funded May 13, 2010
Yes, Final compliance
date is March 2018 No
Lone Star Circle of Care
Provided a grant not to exceed $387,000 for Qualified Expenditures
for future site improvements at 205 East University Avenue,
Georgetown, Texas. Loan Agreement and Promissory Note have
not been executed. Agreement approved by GEDCO on June 23,
2011 and Council approved the Agreement at its June 28, 2011
Meeting. 6/28/2011
Funded November and
December 2011
Yes, Final Compliance
Date is July 28, 2016 No.
Grape Creek
Provide a grant not to exceed $447,000 for Qualified Expenditures
for the lease/purchase and future site improvements at 101 E. 7th
Street and 614 Main Street for the operation of a winery on the
Downtown Square in Georgetown Agreement approved by GEDCO
on July 25, 2011 and Council approved the Agreement at its August
23, 2011 Meeting. Fourth Amended Performance Agreement, Lease
Agreement, and Promissory Note was approved by GEDCO on
August 20, 2012 and by the City Council on August 28, 2012. TIRZ
Agreement for $60,000 approved by City Council on 9-11-12. 8/23/2011 Funded
Yes, Final Compliance is
March 2018.No
Georgetown Winery
Provide a grant not to exceed $70,000 for Qualified Expenditures
described as equipment for wine production and an agreement to
maintain and operate the existing winery in Georgetown. Agreement
approved by GEDCO on July 25, 2011 and Council approved the
Agreement at its August 23, 2011 Meeting. 8/23/2011 Funded
Yes, Final Compliance
Date is June 30, 2016 No
DiFusiion Technologies
Provide a grant not to exceed $92,000 for Qualified Expenditures
described as an ICP Spectrometer to be purchased by TLCC to be
leased to Dufusion under the terms of the Performance Agreement.
Qualified Expenditure to remain the Property of GEDCO unless
transferred to DiFusion per the terms of the Performance
Agreement.Agreement approved by GEDCO on October 17, 2011
and November 21, 2011 and Council approved the Agreement at its
December 13, 2011 Meeting. The GEDCO Board approved
additional requirements for the Performance Agreement on May 21,
2012. Approved by Council on July 10, 2012.7/10/2012 Funded
Yes, Final Compliance
Date is July 31, 2015 No
GEDCO PROJECT UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT
August 17, 2015
Page 165 of 180
Project Project Description
Approved by
Council Funded Monitoring Compliance Closed
GEDCO PROJECT UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT
August 17, 2015
Georgetown Indpendent School District
Provided a grant not to exceed $200,560 for the purchase of
qualified expenditures related to the equipment for the Engineering
Program and Laboratories at Georgetown and East View High
Schools. GISD will offer the MSSC Certifications, implement a Job
Placement Program, provide and annual report and annual tour of
the facilities to the GEDCO Board. Agreement was approved by
GEDCO on September 17, 2012 and the City Council on September
25, 2012. The GEDCO Board approved the GISD request to amend
the Performance Agreement to allow the purchase different
equipment than outlined in the original agreement on November 18,
2013.9/17/2012 Partially Funded.
Yes. Final Compliance
based on life of
equipment. No
Texas Life Sciences Collaboration Center
(3)
Provide a grant of $150,000 for the maintenance of the TLCC.
Performance Agreement approved by GEDCO on 10/17/14. 11/11/2014 Funded Dec. 2014
Yes. Final Compliance
October 31, 2015 No.
The Rivery at Summit Conference Center
Provide a grant not to exceed $4.5 Million for Public Infrastructure
Improvements. Approved by the GEDCO Board on November 18,
2013. Approved by the City Council on December 10, 2013. 12/10/2013 Not Funded
Yes.Construction
Deadline is September
30, 2015. No.
TASUS Texas Corporation
Provide a grant of $67,500 for job creation related to expansion of
manufacturing facilities. Approved by the City Council on February
25, 2014 and approved by the GEDCO Board on February 17, 2014 2/25/2014 Not Funded
Yes. Final Compliance
May 31, 2017 No.
Radiation Detection Corporation
Provide a grant of $320,000 for job creation related to the relocation
of the corporate offices to Georgetown. Approved by City Council
and GEDCO on July 23, 2013. 7/23/2013 Funded
Yes. Final Compliance
December 31, 2021 No
DisperSol
Provide a grant of $250,000 for job creation related to expansion of
manufacturing facilities. Approved by the GEDCO Board on August
18, 2014. Company earned $50K (= 10 eligible positions at
$10/job). Check delivered 4/17/15 to company. 10/16/2014 Partially Funded
Yes. Final Compliance
February 15, 2019 No.
Page 166 of 180
FM 1460
(Quail Valley Drive to University Drive)
Project No. 5RB TIP No. BO & CD
Rights‐of‐Way Acquisition and Utility Relocation
October 2015
Unchanged
Project Description Acquisition of ROW and relocation of utilities for the FM 1460 Project (Quail Valley Drive
to University Drive).
Purpose To have all ROWs cleared and utilities prior to TxDOT letting the project foe construction.
Project Managers Ed Polasek, AICP, and Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Brown and Gay Engineers, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Complete
Environmental/
Archeological
Complete
Rights of Way
As of October 16th, the City has obtained
Possession and Use Agreements or have
closings completed or planned for all the
remaining FM 1460 parcels.
Condemnation hearings have been set.
Section: North South
Acquired: 34 8
Pending: 0 ‐
Condemnation: 2 ‐
Total: 36 8
Utility Relocations Ongoing
Construction TxDOT and the Contractor (OHL USA, Inc.) have signed the Construction
Contract.
OHL has requested “that a Pre‐con be held on October 20th 2015, with an
anticipated start date of November 2nd 2015.”
Other Issues Two known change orders pending – first is due to items from ROW negotiations;
second is due to proposed intersection redesign.
Page 167 of 180
Mays Street Extension
(Teravista Parkway in Round Rock to Westinghouse Road)
Project No. 5RI TIP No. CK
October 2015
Project Description Extend Mays Street northward from Teravista Parkway to the existing intersection with
Westinghouse Road at Rabbit Hill Road. The widening along Westinghouse Road and
Rabbit Hill Road will also be included in the schematic for additional turning lanes
to/from Westinghouse Road. Preliminary layouts for future signals and roadway
illumination will also be included. The project length along the anticipated alignment is
approximately 1.0 miles.
Purpose To complete the schematic design, define rights‐of‐way requirements and complete 30%
design.
Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer CP&Y, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Engineer has submitted 60% plans for review. Staff has met with Round rock
staff to discuss progress
Engineer is completing the ROW documents for Mays Street south of
Westinghouse Road and the alignment and ROW documents for Rabbit Hill Road
north of Westinghouse Road.
Environmental/
Archeological
TBD
Rights of Way Will match City of Round Rock standard of 100 ft. within RR’s City Limits; City of
Georgetown standard of 112 ft. within our City Limits.
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction TBD
Other Issues None.
Page 168 of 180
NB Frontage Road
(SS 158 to Lakeway Drive)
Project No. 5QX TIP No. AF
October 2015
Unchanged
Project Description Design and construct a portion of an IH‐35 NB Frontage Road from Williams Drive to
Northwest Boulevard Bridge of a proposed NB FR which would ultimately extend to
Lakeway Drive.
Purpose To relieve congestion in the Williams Drive/Austin Avenue intersection by providing a NB
alternate, interim route to FM 971 and Georgetown High School. This project is the only
remaining portion of IH 35 in Central Texas without a frontage road existing, under
construction or being designed.
Project Manager Bill Dryden
Engineer Klotz Associates
Element Status / Issues
Design Staff and Engineer has met with TxDOT personnel at both the local Area Office and
District Environmental Division.
Environmental/
Archeology
TBD
Rights of Way None identified
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction TBD
Other Issues Staff is working with TxDOT to develop the AFAs required to complete the project.
Page 169 of 180
Northwest Boulevard Overpass
(Fontana Drive to Austin Avenue)
Project No. 5QX TIP No. AF
October 2015
Unchanged
Project Description Construction of overpass and surface roads to connect Northwest Boulevard with
Austin Avenue and FM 971.
Purpose This project will relieve congestion at the Austin Avenue/Williams Drive
intersection and provide a more direct access from the west side of IH 35 corridor to
Georgetown High School and SH 130 via FM 971.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Klotz Associates
Element Status / Issues
Design Engineer is coordinating design with the design for Rivery Boulevard in moving
towards construction PS&E for both projects to minimize overlap work between
these two projects.
Environmental/
Archeological
Concurrent with preliminary engineering and schematic design.
Rights of Way TBD
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction Tentatively scheduled to begin early FY 2019.
Other Issues Paper work has been submitted to TxDOT to create an AFA for design and
environmental reviews of the bridge over I 35.
Page 170 of 180
Rivery Boulevard Extension
(Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard @ Fontana Drive)
Project No. 5RM TIP No. AD
October 2015
Project
Description
Develop the Rights‐of‐Way Map, acquire ROW, address potential environmental
issues and complete construction plans specifications and estimate (PS&E) for the
extension of Rivery Boulevard from Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard at
Fontana Drive in anticipation of future funding availability.
Purpose To provide a route between Williams Drive and Northwest Boulevard serving the
Gateway area, providing an alternate route from Williams Drive to the future
Northwest Boulevard Bridge over IH 35, to provide a route between the hotels in the
Gateway area and the proposed Conference Center near Rivery Boulevard and Wolf
Ranch Parkway.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Kasberg Patrick and Associates
Element Status / Issues
Design Engineer is coordinating design with the design for Northwest Boulevard in moving
towards construction PS&E for both projects to minimize overlap work between
these two projects.
Environmental/
Archeology
TBD
Rights of Way Property appraisals are being submitted for City
review; once all the appraisals are in then offers will be
extended to the property owners.
Total Parcels: 22
Appraised: 15
Offers: 0
Acquired: 0
Pending: 0
Condemnation: 0
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction Tentatively scheduled to begin mid FY 2018.
Other Issues TBD
Page 171 of 180
Snead Drive Project
(SE Inner Loop to Airborn Circle)
Project No. 5QZ TIP No. BM
October 2015
Project Description Develop Construction Plans Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) for the widening
of Snead Drive from S.E. Inner Loop to 600 feet north of Cooperative Way,
including appurtenant waste water improvements.
Purpose This project has been identified as GTEC eligible project and will provide
necessary infrastructure for ongoing economic development in the area.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Steger Bizzell
Element Status / Issues
Design Complete
Environmental/
Archeological
Complete
Rights of Way Easement has been acquired for water quality pond.
Utility Relocations Utility relocations either complete or are part of the construction contract.
Construction Construction on‐going for the installation of the sewer line.
Other Issues None
Page 172 of 180
Current Capital Improvement Projects TIP
No.
Project
No.
Update On Schedule/
Or Behind
Project
Budget
Project
Cost
Available Current Year
Projected
Current Year
Cost
Current Year
Available
Lakeway Drive Overpass #10 5QL Project Complete.
Complete 2,500,000 2,500,000 0 0 0
Southeast Arterial 1 (Sam Houston Avenue)#12 5QG Project Complete.
Complete 12,995,625 10,478,499 2,517,126 0 0
Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension (SW Bypass to DB
Wood Road)
#14A 5QW Project Complete.
Complete 1,330,000 1,111,233 218,767 283,350 0 283,350
Southwest Bypass (SH29 to RR2243)#14B 5QC Project Complete.
Complete 7,756,432 3,225,132 4,531,300 4,539,107 5,787 4,533,320
Northwest Blvd Overpass #QQ 5QX Engineer is coordinating design with the design for
Rivery Boulevard in moving towards construction
PS&E for both projects to minimize overlap work
between these two projects.
Construction tentatively scheduled to begin early
FY 2019.
In-process
Unchanged
1,136,178 1,099,076 37,102 571,178 479,588 91,590
NB Frontage Road (SS 158 to Lakeway)#QQ 5QY Staff and Engineer has met with TxDOT personnel
at both the local Area Office and District
Environmental Division.
In-process
Unchanged
613,822 613,822 0 382,822 382,822 0
ROW - 1460 #EEa
#EEb
#EEc
5RB TxDOT and the Contractor (OHL USA, Inc.) have
signed the Construction Contract. OHL has
requested “that a Pre‐con be held on October 20th
2015, with an anticipated start date of November
2nd 2015.”
Utility relocations - ongoing.
As of October 16th, the City has obtained PUAs or
have closings completed or planned for all the
remaining FM 1460 parcels.
In-process 11,788,230 5,348,470 6,439,760 6,727,539 2,315,896 4,411,643
TCS/RR Easement 5RD Project Complete.
Complete 1,500,000 1,503,148 -3,148 0 0
FM 971 / Washam 5RE Project Complete.
Complete 100,000 0 100,000 0 0
Rivery Road 5RF Project Complete.
Complete 779,000 29,000 750,000 750,000 0 750,000
Rivery Boulevard 5RM Engineer is coordinating design with the design for
Northwest Boulevard in
moving towards construction PS&E for both
projects to minimize overlap work
between these two projects.
Property appraisals have been completed for
15 of 22 parcels and are being review by City.
Upon completion of review; offers will be
extended to the property owners.
Construction tentatively scheduled to begin mid FY
2018
On Schedule
Snead Drive 5QZ Construction on‐going for the installation of
the sewer line.
Easement has been acquired for the water
quality pond.
On Schedule 825,100 87,000 738,100 825,100 87,000 738,100
Mays Street Extension 5RI Engineer has submitted 60% plans for review.
Engineer is completing the ROW documents
for Mays Street south of Westinghouse Road
and the alignment and ROW documents for
Rabbit Hill Road north of Westinghouse Road.
In Process 196,000 196,000 0 196,000 196,000 0
IH 35/ Hwy 29 Intersection 5RJ TBD 650,000 0 650,000 650,000 0 650,000
GTEC PROJECT UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT
October 2015
Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14)
L:\Global\CIP Agenda Form\GTEC Status Report\2015\GTEC - Project Status - 2015-10.xlsx Page 1 of 2 10/6/2015Page 173 of 180
Current Capital Improvement Projects TIP
No.
Project
No.
Update On Schedule/
Or Behind
Project
Budget
Project
Cost
Available Current Year
Projected
Current Year
Cost
Current Year
Available
GTEC PROJECT UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT
October 2015
Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14)
Current Economic Development Projects Project
Type
Project
No.
Update On Schedule/
Or Behind
Project
Budget
Project
Cost
Available Current Year
Budget
Current Year
Cost
Current Year
Available
100 S. Austin Ave Eco Devo
Project
5RA In-process 507,000 507,000 0 0
Williams Drive Gateway 5RC Engineer working on schematic design alternatives
and preliminary cost estimates.
On Schedule 65,000 61720 3,280 0 0
Economic Development Projects 1,137,500 1,137,500 1,137,500 0 1,137,500
16,062,596 3,467,093 12,595,503
Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14)
L:\Global\CIP Agenda Form\GTEC Status Report\2015\GTEC - Project Status - 2015-10.xlsx Page 2 of 2 10/6/2015Page 174 of 180
Austin Avenue Bridges
(North and South San Gabriel Rivers)
Project No. TBD TIP Project No. N/A
November 2015
Project
Description
Develop 30% plans for the replacement of the North and South San Gabriel Rivers
Bridges as the Northern Gateway into the City’s Downtown District. The project will
involve several phases and will include participation from various elements
stakeholders in the ultimate project – interested citizens, residents, community
businesses, engineering and landscaping professionals, Parks Department,
Transportation Services Department and City Council.
Schedule Phase Activity Completion
1 Forensic testing to determine the extent of failure December 2015
2 Public involvement and alternative analyses,
evaluating 4 alternatives for feasibility and costs, etc. May 2016
3 Develop geometric layouts and preliminary
construction estimates for two alternatives June 2016
4 Selection of alignment by Council July 2016
5 Develop schematic and 30% plans. March 2017
Proj. Mgrs Ed Polasek, AICP; Bill Dryden, P.E.; Nat Waggoner, PMP®
Engineer Aguirre & Fields, LP
Element Status/Issues
Design The Task Order has been issued for the first phase – forensic testing of the
existing bridges to determine the extent of failure of the existing structures.
Surveying TBD
Environmental TBD
Rights of Way Exist. ROW from N. of 2nd to Morrow; Additional ROW may be required 3rd to
N. of 2nd.
Utility Relocations TBD (future)
Construction TBD
Other Issues
Page 175 of 180
CDBG Sidewalk Improvements Project
MLK/3rd Street (Scenic Dr. to Austin Ave.)
Project No. None TIP No. None
November 2015
Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for sidewalk
improvements along MLK/ and 3rd streets from Scenic Drive to Austin Avenue.
Purpose To provide ADA/TDLR compliant sidewalks in the area.
Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Steger Bizzell
Element Status / Issues
Design Engineer has completed 95% review.
Environmental/
Archeological
TBD
Rights of Way N/A
Utility Relocations N/A
Construction On hold pending construction funding from WilCo CDBG
Other Issues Awaiting construction funding approval from WilCo CDBG Coordinator.
Page 176 of 180
CDBG Sidewalk Improvements Project
University Avenue (SH 29) (I 35 to Hart St.)
Project No. None TIP No. None
November 2015
Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for
sidewalk improvements along University Avenue (SH 29) from I 35 to Hart Street.
Purpose To provide ADA/TDLR compliant sidewalks in the area.
Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Steger Bizzell
Element Status / Issues
Design Design is 95% plans; Engineer is completing the Bidding and Contract
Documents.
Environmental/
Archeological
N/A
Rights of Way Existing
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction TBD
Other Issues Project has been submitted to TxDOT for coordination.
Project has been submitted for T.A.S./TDLR compliance review.
The original design firm Baker‐Aicklen has closed its doors.
City has engaged the firm of Steger Bizzell to complete Construction
Documents and to provide Construction Administration services.
Council has approved a Multiple Use Agreement with TxDOT to install new
sidewalk within TxDOT ROW; paperwork has been submitted; process will
require approximately 2½ months for TxDOT to complete.
Page 177 of 180
FM 971 at Austin Avenue
Realignment Intersection Improvements
Project No. 1BZ TIP No. AG
November 2015
Unchanged
Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the widening
and realignment of FM 971 at Austin Avenue, eastward to Gann Street.
Purpose To provide a new alignment consistent with the alignment of the proposed Northwest
Boulevard Bridge over IH 35; to allow a feasible, alternate route from the west side of I 35 to
Austin Avenue, to Georgetown High School, to San Gabriel Park and a more direct route to
SH 130.
Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Klotz Associates, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Preliminary Engineering complete;
Engineer working on 60% design submittal
Environmental/
Archeological
10/2015
Rights of Way Complete
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction 10/2016
Other Issues Staff has submitted the paperwork to TxDOT to develop an Advance Funding
Agreement for plans review and construction administration.
Page 178 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
November 10, 2015
SUBJECT:
- As of the deadline, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than what was posted on the agenda
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
Page 179 of 180
City of Georgetown, Texas
City Council Agenda
November 10, 2015
SUBJECT:
Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney
- Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has
a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items
- Litigation Update - Stephanie Hoskins Brown v. The City of Georgetown
- Public Safety Operations and Training Facility - Project Report
Sec. 551.074: Personnel Matters
- City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the appointment,
employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal
Sec. 551.087: Deliberation Regarding Economic Development Negotiations
- Project Voyager
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
Page 180 of 180