Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda CC 02.08.2011 WorkshopNotice of Meeting of the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown, Texas FEBRUARY 8, 2011 The Georgetown City Council will meet on FEBRUARY 8, 2011 at 3:30 P.M. at Council Chambers at 101 E. 7th Street If you need accommodations for a disability, please notify the city in advance. Policy Development/Review Workshop - A Overview of the City’s current outstanding and proposed debt obligations -- Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer B Presentation and discussion on construction delivery methods by David Bowlin with Broaddus & Associates -- Terry Jones, Support Services Construction Manager and Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer C Presentation of City Council Video Production and Streaming Equipment and Services from SwagIt Productions, LLC -- Mike Peters, Information Technology Director and Keith Hutchinson, Public Information Officer Executive Session In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session. D Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney - Advice from attorney about pending litigation that has been filed against the City or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including but not limited to this week's agenda items E Sec. 551.072: Deliberations about Real Property - To discuss the value of land as it pertains to public safety facilities, GUS Satellite Service Center - To discuss the value of land as it pertains to acquisition of right of way for Southwest Bypass - Discussion concerning the proposed acquisition and value of real property from Richard W. Bunte and wife, Virginia E. Bunte, in connection with the FM 971/N.E. Innerloop Intersection Improvements Project -- Terri Calhoun, Real Estate Services Coordinator and Thomas R. Benz, P.E., Systems Engineering Director F Sec. 551.087: Deliberation Regarding Economic Development Negotiations - Discussions or deliberations regarding commercial or financial information that the governmental body has received from a business prospect that the City Council seeks to have locate, stay or expand in or near the territory of the City and with which the City Council is conducting economic development negotiations; or to deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect that the City Council seeks to have locate, stay or expand in or near the territory of the City and with which the City Council is conducting economic development negotiations - Project Lincoln - To discuss incentives as it pertains to 200 South Austin Avenue, San Gabriel River Place Partners - To discuss incentives as it pertains to Summit at the Rivery - To discuss incentives as it pertains to Water Oaks Development Adjournment Certificate of Posting I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all times, on the _____ day of _________________, 2011, at __________, and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. __________________________________ Jessica Brettle, City Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas February 8, 2011 SUBJECT: Overview of the City’s current outstanding and proposed debt obligations -- Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer ITEM SUMMARY: Each year in preparation of the annual bond issuance process, staff prepares an overview of the City’s current outstanding debt obligations, as well as, a preview of the upcoming bond issue that the Council will consider in April 2011. This overview will include Revenue Bonds related to the City’s utilities, as well as, both self-supporting and taxable general debt obligations. FINANCIAL IMPACT: SUBMITTED BY: Micki Rundell ATTACHMENTS: 2011 Debt Overview Presentation Cover Memo Item # A City of Georgetown Debt Overview February 8, 2011 Item # A Debt Update • Types of Debt –General Obligation –Certificates of Obligation • Limited Tax Notes –Leases –Revenue Bonds • Current City Debt Conditions • Upcoming Debt Issues Item # A Types of Debt Item # A General Obligation Debt • Tax Supported – City issues 20 Year Bonds – Can be extended to match life of capital asset • Building amortize 30 years • Voter Approved • City GO debt includes amounts approved from November 2004 & November 2008 bond elections Item # A Certificates of Obligation • Allowed under State Law – Considered “routine” – Public Notice required • Generally considered “Tax Supported” • Majority - 20 year bonds – Maturities match life of asset • City issues self-supporting CO debt – City saves on interest cost by issuing CO debt rather than revenue bonds • Repaid through fees or rates Item # A Self-supporting CO Debt • Interest savings by issuing CO debt rather than revenue bonds can be 1% or greater –GTEC - funded thru sales tax revenue –Stormwater Drainage Utility - funded thru user fees –Airport - funded thru user fees –Utility Funds – funded through rates • Electric and/or Water/Sewer Item # A Other Tax Supported Debt • Limited Tax Notes – Used in 2009 for Electric debt • Cost savings > $75,000 annually • Will be refinanced once proceeds have been expended • Certificates of Participation – Usually 3 year notes – Previously used to fund public safety vehicles – City currently has no outstanding Certificates of Participation Item # A GO/CO Debt Outstanding As of December 31, 2010: • $ 68,987,618- Tax Supported – Includes: • $14,570,000– 2004 Authorization – All issued • $14,430,000– 2008 Authorization – $34,025,000 authorized not issued - Roads – $33,000,000 authorized not issued - Parks • $26,217,382 - Self-supporting – $15,474,689 - GTEC – $3,690,008 - Stormwater – $1,102,685 – Airport – $5,950,000 – Electric LTN Item # A CO Debt – Historical Self-supported includes GTEC Fiscal Year Tax Supported Self-Supported 1998/99 $16,378,878 $5,166,122 1999/00 $16,948,092 $5,056,908 2000/01 $21,170,615 $4,939,385 2001/02 $20,065,626 $4,734,374 2002/03 $19,092,455 $7,639,031 2003/04 $20,792,386 $16,663,851 2004/05 $28,140,892 $20,675,095 2005/06 $37,583,855 $21,111,145 2006/07 $52,326,112 $21,068,888 2007/08 $54,293,528 $20,661,472 2008/09 $57,412,475 $25,692,525 2009/10 $68,987,618 $26,217,382 Item # A General Debt Capacity • Allowable Levy - $1.50 per $100 valuation • Current levy - $0.13635 • Percentage of Allowable used – 9.1% Item # A Item # A GO/CO Debt - Historical Item # A Revenue Bonds • Funds the City’s utility infrastructure – Issued on Electric/Water/Wastewater system • Currently 20 year bond – level debt service – Supported through system revenue – “Coverage” required • 1.35 times - bond covenants • 1.5 times - City Fiscal & Budgetary Policy • Outstanding balances: – $24,882,157- Electric Fund – $37,977,843- Water Services Fund (W/WW) Item # A Utility Revenue Bond Coverage Item # A Revenue Debt - Historical Fiscal Year Water Electric Services Services 1999/00 $22,663,452 $9,426,548 2000/01 $22,115,101 $9,959,899 2001/02 $20,658,178 $9,346,822 2002/03 $25,224,894 $9,273,620 2003/04 $28,845,175 $10,058,588 2004/05 $30,195,976 $9,868,036 2005/06 $28,076,208 $17,808,792 2006/07 $27,268,155 $23,801,845 2007/08 $32,655,050 $24,624,950 2008/09 $30,359,178 $23,280,822 2009/10 $37,977,843 $24,882,157 Item # A Revenue Debt - Historical Item # A Current City Debt Conditions Item # A Bond Ratings • Rating Agencies review financial and management conditions • Determine “Credit Worthiness” • Impacts cost of issuance and funds • City’s Current Bond Rating: –Moody’s • A2 General Obligation & Revenue –Standard & Poors • AA+ General Obligation • AA Revenue Item # A Population Growth Item # A Total Tax-Guaranteed Debt Per Capita (Includes Self-supporting Debt) Item # A Total Tax Supported Debt per Capita (Funded through Property Tax) Item # A Assessed Valuation Item # A Total Tax Supported Debt Compared to General Sales Tax Revenue Growth Item # A City Assets Net of Related Debt Item # A Debt to Assessed Valuation Comparison Item # A Utility Customer Growth Item # A Outstanding Utility Debt per Customer Item # A Total Electric Debt Compared to Electric Assets Item # A Total Water Service Debt Compared to Water Service Assets Item # A Upcoming Debt Issues Item # A 2011 Bond Issue Total Net Proceeds = $7.27 M • Tax Supported Bonds: –CO Bonds - $4,170,000 • Security System • Public Safety ISF vehicles/Fire vehicle Station 5 • Construction of Fire Station 5 • Land for Public Safety Facilities • Madellia Hilliard improvements – NET Tax Impacts - $0.0077based on 2010 values Item # A 2011 Bond Issue (con’t) • Self-Supporting Bonds: –CO Bonds - $3,100,000 • Williams Drive Widening – Payment to Williamson County – 1st five years debt service paid by GTEC • Purchase land for west side GUS facility – Funded through utility revenues and GTEC sales taxes Item # A Next Steps Debt Issuance Process • Council authorizes SPFI to proceed with bond documents – Feb 8, 2011 • Council approved “NOTICE OF INTENT” to issue CO Debt – March 8, 2011 – “Not to Exceed” amount finalized • Offering documents finalized • Rating Agency presentation • April 12 - Bond Sale – Council adopts Bond Ordinances • April 25 - Bond Closing – City receives bond proceeds Item # A QUESTIONS? Item # A City of Georgetown, Texas February 8, 2011 SUBJECT: Presentation and discussion on construction delivery methods by David Bowlin with Broaddus & Associates -- Terry Jones, Support Services Construction Manager and Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer ITEM SUMMARY: Broaddus & Associates was founded in 2000 by James A. Broaddus, Ph.D., P.E. The firm provides consulting and project management services on projects throughout the State of Texas and abroad. It was created after Dr. Broaddus recognized a need for assistance among a large number of owners in managing complex major capital construction programs. He has also served as Associate Director of the Construction Industry Institute, a national research center dedicated to improving quality and cost effectiveness on construction projects, and was appointed to the Board of Directors of the National Institute of Building Sciences, an organization that serves as an interface between government and the private sector and focuses on improving the building regulatory environment. Broaddus & Associates has previously conducted construction delivery method training to Councilmembers in 2007. FINANCIAL IMPACT: SUBMITTED BY: Micki Rundell Cover Memo Item # B City of Georgetown, Texas February 8, 2011 SUBJECT: Presentation of City Council Video Production and Streaming Equipment and Services from SwagIt Productions, LLC -- Mike Peters, Information Technology Director and Keith Hutchinson, Public Information Officer ITEM SUMMARY: Staff developed requirements and solicited proposals for a City Council video production and streaming solution that will: · Produce live video via Suddenlink Channel 10 and via the City website; · Produce scheduled video for Suddenlink Channel 10 at other times · Allow on-demand viewing of historical Council meeting content via the City website Of the seven proposers that responded, three were selected for additional short list review. Those three proposers included two proposals that involved in-house production of the Council meetings using local equipment, and one proposal that involved outsourced (remote) production of each meeting. Staff determined that the outsourced approach (from SwagIt Productions, LLC) was both cost effective and required very minimal staff resources to operate, and as such was a superior solution to the in-house proposals. SwagIt Productions, LLC has numerous City and County governments as clients, both within Texas and elsewhere in the US and Canada. Several of their clients have existing integrations with the MuniAgenda product used by Council. Staff recommends approval of the SwagIt Productions, LLC solution. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Total first year project costs (both one-time and ongoing) are estimated as follows: SwagIt Productions, LLC $52,900 Suddenlink $ 7,000 Total $59,900 This project was budgeted in account 570-5-0641-52-101 for $48,000. In addition, we expect savings from termination of the current Matthew & Co. contract for the balance of the fiscal year to realize an additional $7,500 in savings. The remaining $4,500 will be funded by the IT Internal Services Fund via account 570-5- 0641-52-330. SUBMITTED BY: Micki Rundell ATTACHMENTS: Presentation Cover Memo Item # C City of Georgetown, Texas February 8, 2011 SUBJECT: Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney - Advice from attorney about pending litigation that has been filed against the City or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including but not limited to this week's agenda items ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: SUBMITTED BY: RES Cover Memo Item # D City of Georgetown, Texas February 8, 2011 SUBJECT: Sec. 551.072: Deliberations about Real Property - To discuss the value of land as it pertains to public safety facilities, GUS Satellite Service Center - To discuss the value of land as it pertains to acquisition of right of way for Southwest Bypass - Discussion concerning the proposed acquisition and value of real property from Richard W. Bunte and wife, Virginia E. Bunte, in connection with the FM 971/N.E. Innerloop Intersection Improvements Project -- Terri Calhoun, Real Estate Services Coordinator and Thomas R. Benz, P.E., Systems Engineering Director ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: SUBMITTED BY: RES Cover Memo Item # E City of Georgetown, Texas February 8, 2011 SUBJECT: Sec. 551.087: Deliberation Regarding Economic Development Negotiations - Discussions or deliberations regarding commercial or financial information that the governmental body has received from a business prospect that the City Council seeks to have locate, stay or expand in or near the territory of the City and with which the City Council is conducting economic development negotiations; or to deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect that the City Council seeks to have locate, stay or expand in or near the territory of the City and with which the City Council is conducting economic development negotiations - Project Lincoln - To discuss incentives as it pertains to 200 South Austin Avenue, San Gabriel River Place Partners - To discuss incentives as it pertains to Summit at the Rivery - To discuss incentives as it pertains to Water Oaks Development ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: SUBMITTED BY: RES Cover Memo Item # F