HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda CC 06.27.2006Notice of Meeting of the
Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
The Georgetown City Council will meet on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 at 06:00:00 PM at the City Council
Chambers, 101 E. 7th Street, at the northeast corner of Seventh and Main Streets, Georgetown, Texas
If you need accommodations for a disability, please notify the city in advance.
An agenda packet, containing detailed information on the items listed below, is distributed to the Mayor,
Councilmembers, and the Georgetown Public Library no later than the Saturday preceding the council
meeting. The library's copy is available for public review.
Please Note: This City Council Meeting will be video taped live without editing and shown on the
local cable channel.
Executive Session
Regular Session to convene and continue Executive Session, if necessary
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes,
Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the
regular session that follows.
A Sec.551.071: Consultation with Attorney
- Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has
a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items
B Sec.551.086 Competitive Matters
- Consideration of Power Supply options for calendar year December 2006 -December 2007 — Jim Briggs,
Assistant City Manager for Utility Operations
C Sec.551.087: Deliberations Regarding Economic Development Negotiations
- Discussions or deliberations regarding commercial or financial information that the governmental body has received
from a business prospect that the City Council seeks to have locate, stay or expand in or near the territory of the City
and with which the City Council is conducting economic development negotiations; or to deliberate the offer of a
financial or other incentive to a business prospect that the City Council seeks to have locate, stay or expand in or near
the territory of the City and with which the City Council is conducting economic development negotiations.
Regular Session - To begin no earlier than 06:00 PM
(Council may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of
the Mayor, a Councilmember, or the City Manager for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act,
Texas Government Code Chapter 551.)
D Call to Order
E Pledge of Allegiance
F Comments from the dais
- Welcome to Audience and Opening Comments — Mayor Gary Nelon
Review of procedure for addressing the City Council
Announcement of vacancies on Convention and Visitors Bureau Board and Building Standards Commission
G Announcements and Comments from City Manager
H Public Wishing to Address Council
City Council Agenda/June 27, 2006
Page 1 of 4 Page
As of the deadline, there were no persons who requested to address the Council on items other than already posted on
the Agenda.
I Action from Executive Session
Statutory Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that Council may act on with
one single vote. A councilmember may pull any item from the Consent Agenda in order that the council
discuss and act upon it individually as part of the Regular Agenda.
J Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the Council Workshop on Monday, June 12,
and the Council Meeting on Tuesday, June 13, 2006 — Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary
K Consideration of an award of the annual bid for office supplies to Corporate Express in the estimated
amount of $48,000.00 -- Marsha Iwers, Purchasing Manager and Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and
Administration
L Consideration and possible action to approve a resolution approving an agreement with JP Morgan Chase
to serve as the City's depository for the two years beginning September 1, 2006 — Leticia Zavala,
Accounting Manager and Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and Administration
M Consideration and possible action to approve a Letter of Understanding with Brockway, Gersbach,
McKinnon & Niemeier, P.C. to perform the independent audit of City accounts for fiscal year ended
September 30, 2006 — Leticia Zavala, Accounting Manager & Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and
Administration
N Consideration and possible action to approve a Final Plat to be known as the Repiat of Lots 17-32, Block A,
Briarwood, Section Four, located on the eastern end of Algerita Drive — Melissa McCollum, AICP, and
Bobby Ray, AICP, Director of Planning and Development
O Consideration and possible action to approve a Preliminary Plat for 35.58 acres in the William Roberts
Survey to be known as the Grace Academy Subdivision, located 1/2 mile southeast of Shell Road on
State Highway 195 -- Melissa McCollum, AICP, and Bobby Ray, AICP, Director of Planning and
Development
P Consideration and possible action to approve a Public Review Final Plat for 32.5897 acres in the Joseph
Fish, Leroy B. Lord, and William Roberts Surveys to be known as Georgetown Village Planned Unit
Development, Section Six, located along Village Commons Boulevard — Cada Benton, Development
Planner and Bobby Ray, AICP, Director of Planning and Development
Legislative Regular Agenda
Council will individually consider and possibly take action on any or all of the following items:
Q Presentation and discussion on the City's current Public Smoking Ordinance, Chapter 8.32 of the Code of
Ordinances, and possible action and direction to staff — Paul E. Brandenburg, City Manager
R Consideration and possible action to approve an Emergency Services contract between the City of
Georgetown and Williamson County Emergency Services District #8 to provide fire and emergency
services — Anthony Lincoln, Fire Chief and Paul Brandenburg, City Manager
S Consideration and possible action for the award of the annual bid for janitorial and floor cleaning
services to Capitol City Janitorial, Inc. in the estimated amount of $208,910.00 -- Terry Jones, Support
Services Construction Manager and Micki Rundell, Director of Finance & Administration
T Consideration and possible action to approve a resolution expressing official intent to reimburse costs
associated with the removal of excess spoils and brush from the City's old landfill, not to exceed $560,000
with proceeds from bonds that will be issued at a later time — Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and
Administration
U Consideration and possible action to approve an Agreement with Texas Landfill Management (TLM,) an
City Council Agenda/June 27, 2006
Page 2 of 4 Page
affiliate of Texas Disposal Systems (TDS) to begin site cleanup of the closed landfill for a cost not to
exceed $560,000 — Kathy Ragsdale, Utility Office Manager and Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and
Administration
V Consideration and possible action to amend the development agreement with 500 South Austin Avenue,
LP, to extend the construction commencement date by 30 days -- Paul E. Brandenburg, City Manager
W Consideration and possible action to direct staff to look into traffic calming devices, such as speed and
v� cloud bumps; and also to look into the issues and cost of decreasing the speed limit from 30 to 25 mph in
u residential areas — Gabe Sensing, Counciimember District 2
X Forwarded from Georgetown Utility System (GUS) Board
1. Consideration and possible action to award the annual bid for flexible base material, sand rock, and
sandy loam to Georgetown Transportation of Jarrell and DSD Trucking of Georgetown, in the
estimated total amount of $113,525.00 — Marsha Iwers, Purchasing Manager and Jim Briggs, Assistant
City Manager for Utility Operations
2. Consideration and possible action to approve the renewal of the annual Electric Utility Services
W(((III Agreement between LCRA and GUS Electric — Michael Mayben, Energy Services Manager and Jim
Briggs, Assistant City Manager for Utility Operations
3. Consideration and possible action to award the bid to Austin Filter System of Austin for construction of
the Downtown Storm Water Quality Ponds, in the amount of $764,611.00 — Mark Miller,
Transportation Manager and Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager for Utility Operations
4. Consideration and possible action to award a contract to Shelton & Shelton Plumbing, L.P. of Killeen
for the construction of the West Loop Water Line Improvement and to establish a project budget of
$656,295.90 -- Glenn Dishong, Water Services Manager and Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager for
Utility Operations
5. Consideration and possible action to award a contract to insitufonn Technologies, Inc. of Houston for
the EARZ Phase III Remediation and to establish a project budget of $202,725.60 — Glenn Dishong,
Water Services Manager and Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager for Utility Operations
6. Consideration and possible action to replace the existing BRA system water contract for Alliance water
originating out of the LCRA Basin with a system water contract originating out of the Brazos Basin
with an additional cost of no more than $40,000 for the remainder of this fiscal year — Glenn Dishong,
Water Services Manager and Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager for Utility Operations
Y Second Readings
1. Second Reading of an Ordinance amending the 2005/06 Annual Operating Plan Element (Budget)
for public safety compensation — Laurie Brewer, Assistant Director of Finance and Administration and
Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and Administration
2. Second Reading of an Ordinance amending Chapter 8.20 of the Code of Ordinances relating to
nuisances -- Dave Hall, Inspection Services Director and Tom Yantis, Assistant City Manager
3. Second Reading of an Ordinance on a voluntary annexation into the City for 650.22 acres, more or
less, in the Frederick Foy Survey and Daniel Moore Survey, located south of the future Ronald Reagan
Boulevard and west of Sun City Boulevard, for Sun City Northern Land — Edward G. Polasek, AICP,
Principal Planner and Bobby Ray, AICP, Director Planning and Development
4. Second Reading of an Ordinance on a voluntary annexation into the City for 0.892 acres of Right of
Way, more or less, in the Joseph P. Pulsifer Survey and Clement Stubblefield Survey, for CR 265
Right of Way— Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Principal Planner and Bobby Ray, AICP, Director Planning
and Development
5. Second Reading of an Ordinance on a voluntary annexation into the City for 5.772 acres of Right of
Way, more or less, in the Joseph P. Pulsifer Survey, for Wolf Ranch Parkway Right of Way— Edward
G. Polasek, AICP, Principal Planner and Bobby Ray, AICP, Director Planning and Development
City Council Agenda/June 27, 2006
Page 3 of 4 Page
PubliaHearings/First Readings
1. First Reading of an ordinance providing for the abandonment by quitclaim deed of a portion of CR 265
and providing for the terms and conditions of such abandonment — Tem Glasby Calhoun, Paralegal
and Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager for Utility Operations
2. First Reading of an ordinance ordering the dismissal of ATMOS Energy Corporation, Mid -Tex Division's
Application for an Interim Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program Adjustment for calendar year 2005 —
Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager for Utility Operations and Patricia E. Cads, City Attorney
3. Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance Rezoning approximately 2.91 Acres in the
Nicholas Porter Survey, Abstract No. 497, from RS, Residential Single-family District to IN, Industrial
District for the property located at 215 Royal Drive — Bobby Ray, AICP, Director of Planning and
Development
4. Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance Rezoning approximately 29.11 Acres in the
William Roberts Survey, Abstract 524 from RS, Residential Single-family District with a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Overlay District to RS, Residential Single-family District for Berry Creek, Section 5,
Phase 2 — Bobby Ray, AICP, Director of Planning and Development
5. First Reading of an Ordinance for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change to Future Land Use
from Business Park to Commercial, Multi Family, Light Industrial and Business Park and to change the
Intensity Level from Level 3 to Level 5 for 370.893 acres in the David Wright Survey, also known as the
Buie Tract, located east of Airport Road — Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Principal Planner and Bobby
Ray, AICP, Director Planning and Development
6. First Reading of an Ordinance for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to modify the Century Plan
Overall Transportation Plan related to the Transportation Improvement Plan Process — Edward G.
Polasek, AICP, Principal Planner and Bobby Ray, AICP, Director Planning and Development
AA Appointments
1. Consideration and possible action to approve the appointment of William Mateja to the Parks and
Recreation Advisory Board to fill a position that expires in February, 2007 — Mayor Gary Nelon
2. Consideration and possible action to elevate Linda McCalla from Alternate to Regular position on the
Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC) — Mayor Gary Nelon
Certificate of Posting
I, Sandra Lee, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of
Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all
times, on the day of , 2006, at , and remained so posted for at
least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
Sandra Lee, City Secretary
City Council Agenda/June 27, 2006
Page 4 of 4 Page
Council Meeting Date: June 27, 2006 Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET C�FDENT1Al
EXECUTIVE SESSION
SUBJECT:
Consideration of Power Supply options for calendar year
December 2006 - December 2007.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Each year we discuss our power supply options for the coming
calendar year with' the board. The last twelve years we have
participated in the "Market Pricing Option" plan offered by our
contract with the LORA. This year due to last year's hurricane season
in the gulf, we were unable to negotiate a contract outside of LORA for
our MPO, and were a 100% customer of LORA.
This year wholesale energy costs and natural gas prices have settled
back down to a level that has allowed our aggregate group to complete
the RFP process. Once again, we will be able to aggregate other LCRA
customers' blocks of energy to possibly assist us in increasing our MPO
share. Our discussion with the Board will center on our current options
and where we think that we should lock our energy for next year. We
will need a recommendation from the board out of executive session
authorizing staff to proceed with the "Market Pricing Option" for
calendar year 2006-2007. If, prior to our election date of September 1,
2006, we are able to aggregate a larger load amount from other
customers, staff will inform the board that the percentages will be
different all within the Market Pricing Option authorization.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
NONE
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NONE
COMMENTS:
NONE
ATTACHMENTS:
Information on this item will be presented in executive session
during the meeting due to its confidential nature.
Submitted By:
Utility
Manager
cod`
Confidential
Market Purchase Option Savings for LCRA's Customers
LCRA has recently published Price $elect 2007 indicative rates. These are listed
below in Table 1. Shown is the difference between the 100% Load Scenario and the
90% Load Scenario. The 100% load scenario represents LCRA serving the entire
native load. The 90% Load Scenario represents LCRA serving the remaining load
when the Customers provide 10% through the Market Purchase Option (MPO). The
MPO allows customers to purchase up to 10% of their load through an outside
supplier. The 90% scenario assumes that all of the eligible MPO is developed by the
customers. If this occurred the relative rate reduction would create a savings to the
load served by LCRA of $30 to $50 Million depending on the price of gas.
Why Do These Saving Occur?
Normally fixed costs become a smaller and smaller fraction of the total costs as
production rises. But LCRA's has a fixed amount of low cost generation assets and
must purchase higher cost supplies to serve their load over a certain level of output.
This incremental supply that is purchased in the market is more expensive than the
base generation costs. For instances, average coal costs for LCRA are approximately
$10 per MWh. But market purchases of gas based generation in ERCOT are
approximately $75 per MWh. So when LCRA allows ten percent of its load to find its
own outside supply, it avoids costs that are significantly higher than its average
production costs. LCRA saves: fuel costs, capacity costs, ERCOT reserve margins,
and power purchase costs when it serves a smaller load. Although some fixed costs
must be spread over a smaller load adding to rates; but this increase is much smaller
than the overall savings. Overall the rate reduction ranges in reducing load served is
from 4.7% to 8.6%, see Table 1.
What is important for the Customers to know is that the 10% outside supplier can be
purchased at a higher rate than LCRA, but still produce overall savings. The LCRA
rate reduction applies to the large fraction of supply, i.e. the remaining 90%. The total
costs are reduced even with a higher cost outside supplier because this is a smaller -
fraction only 10%. This can be seen in Table 2. The Example Customer has a load of
1,000,000 MWhs. Its LCRA rates are reduced and as a result the 10% MPO can be
higher and still produce an overall savings. The breakeven rate of the outside supplier
is given in Table 2. Note that any outside supplier price lower than 40% to 60% above
LCRA's rates still create a net savings.
Table 1.
1,000,000
MWhs
Gas Price
$ 7.50
Gas Price
$
7.50
$
8.80 1
$
10.50
1per MMBtu
100% Load Scenario
Firm Rate
$ 0.054
$ 0.059
$
0.066
per kWh
Firm Rate
$
0.054
$
0.059 1
$
0.066!per
kWh
Interruptible Rate
$
0.045
$
0.050 1
$
0.056
1 per kWh
LCRA Load
90% Load Scenario
per kWh
12,800,000 1
MWhs
MWhs
MWhs
Firm Rate
$
0.051
$
0.055 1
$
0.061]per
kWh
Interruptible Rate
$
0.042 1
$
0.046 1
$
0.051
per kWh
LCRA Load
11,800,000
MWhs
Reduction in Rates Due to MPO
Firm
$
0.0025
$
0.0035
$
0.0043
per kWh
Interruptible
$
0.0034 1
$
0.0042
$
0.0048
per kWh
Firm Rate % Reduction
Interruptible Rate % Reduction
4.7%1
7.5%1
5.9%1
8.4%1
6.6%
8.6%
Table 2.
Example Customer Load
1,000,000
MWhs
Gas Price
$ 7.50
$ 8.80
$
10.50
er MMBtu
Firm Rate
$ 0.054
$ 0.059
$
0.066
per kWh
Cost
$ 53,600,000
$ 58,900,000
$
65,500,000
Customer Uses Outside Supplier
Firm Rate
$ 0.051
$ 0.055
$
0.061
per kWh
Example Customer's Load
MPO Load
900,000
100,000
MWhs
MWhs
LCRA Cost 90%
$ 45,990,000
$ 49,860,000
$
55,080,000
MPO Incremental Breakeven Rate
for 10%
$ 0.076
$ 0.090
$
0.104
per kWh
Breakeven Rates Above LCRA's
42.0%
53.5%
59.10/
Council Meeting Date: June 27, 2006 Item No. X
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to award the annual bid for
flexible base material, sand, rock, and sandy loam to Georgetown
Transportation, of Jarrell, TX and DSD Trucking, of Georgetown, TX, in
the estimated total amount of $113,525.00.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Bids were received to provide the City with standard flex base,
washed manufactured sand, sandy loam and 3/8" rock to be used in the
construction and maintenance of the City streets, and water and
electric distribution systems. The base is used primarily for
repairing street cuts and new construction, and the sand and rock are
used for bedding pipe before burying. The staff recommendation is to
award this bid to the low bidders responding, Georgetown
Transportation of Jarrell and DSD Trucking of Georgetown, as
designated on the attached bid tabulation.
The unit prices bid includes delivery and stock piling of the
material at our facility. The using departments will order materials
on as needed basis.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
None
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Total estimated amount of this bid is $113,525.00. Funds for this
expenditure were budgeted in maintenance of streets and in water and
electric maintenance.
GUS BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
This bid was approved by the GUS Board at the June 20, 2006
meeting,
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommendation is to award this bid to the low bidders
responding, Georgetown Transportation of Jarrell and DSD Trucking of
Georgetown, as designated on the attached bid tabulation.
COMMENTS:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. $id Tabulation
tted By: Marsha Iwers
Purchasing Manager
n r1
to ity Manager
for Uti ity Operations
FLEXIBLE BASE MATERIAL, A"-- -AND
& 3/8" ROCK & SANDY L
July 1, 2006 -June 30,
BID NO. 26023
I ccnpnarnwu
DESCRIPTION Unit
Lot 1
Standard Flex Base to meet
specifications for Texas Highway
Dept. No. 247. Type A, Grade 1 Ton
Delivery of Flex Base - Grade 1 Ton
Subtotal Grade 1
Standard Flex Base to meet
specifications for Texas Highway
Dept No. 247, Type A. Grade 2 Ton
Delivery of Flex Base - Grade 2 Ton
Subtotal Grade 2
Total Lot 1, Grades 1 & 2
Lott
Washed Manufactured Sand
TCS #270 specifications Ton
Delivery of Sand Ton
Total Lot 2
Lot 3
3/8' Rock, Type F, TCS Material
#265 specifications Ton
Delivery of Rock Ton
Total Lot 3
Lot
Sandy Loam Ton
Delivery of Sandy Loam Ton
Total Lot 4
ESTIMATED GRAND TOTAL $113,525.00
SIIPFRIr1R TEXAS
EST, CITY
5,000
DSDTRUCK
TRANSPORTATION
CRUSHED STONE
CRUSHED STONE
4.60
5.00
8.25
4.90
5,000
4.05
2.50
1 9.251
no bid denvm
Material & Delivery
2,500
8.65
43,250.00
4.20
7.50
37,500.00
5.00
17.50
87,500.00
8.00
did �t mem suet's
4.70
2,500
4.05
2.50
9.00
no ad deny
Material & Delivery
8.25
20,625.00
63,875.00
7.50
18,750.00
•56 250.00
17.00
42,500.00
130,000.00
did nM meet space
da not meet s
3,000
7.65
7.90
8.50
8.10
3,000
4.05
2.50
9.50
rw bM delNery
Material & Delvery
11.70
35 100.00
10.408
31,200.00
_()0
54,000.00
m mt meet a
2,000
7.65
7.90
10.75
8.10
2,000
4.05
2.50
11.75
r,o cid e
Material & Delivery
11.70
23,400.00
10.40
20,80(1
22.50
45,000.
did not meets 's
500
6.50
NO BID
9.50
NO BID
500
4.05
NO BID
9.50
NO BID
Material & Delivery
10.55
5,275.00,
NO BID
NO BID
19.00
9,500.00
NO BID
'Awarded Vendors
'Lot 1, 2, 3 - Georgetown Transportation, Georgetown, TX
"Lot 4 - DSD Trucking, Georgetown, TX
TX Crushed Stone - did not meet specifications (no delivery available)
No response
Austin Bridge & Road
Austin Crushed Stone
Capitol Aggregates
Centex Materials
Pope Materials
RTI Materials
Travis Aggregates
6/6/2006260230exbasetab
Council Meeting Date: June 27, 2006
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
Item No. Y -a
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to approve the renewal of
the annual Electric Utility Services Agreement between LORA and GUS
Electric.
ITEM SUMMARY:
This agreement allows GUS Electric to continue to use the
services of the LCRA Technical Services group for items ranging
from Equipment Testing, Environmental Services, Engineering
Services, Protective and Diagnostic Equipment Testing, and
Technical and Operational Services. In 2004 Electric Distribution
Construction Services were added as a service that will be
available to all LCRA customers
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This agreement formerly known as the Technical Services
Agreement has been in effect since 1979, and has served both
utilities well.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Funds not to exceed $150,000.00 are to be paid from the
electric capital improvement project accounts only as required.
GUS BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
GUS Board recommended approval at the June 20, 2006 meeting. Approved 7-0
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
COMMENTS:
GUS Electric is currently working with the LORA on a SPCC plan
for the electrical storage yards, Substation integration plan, and
Substation inspections
ATTACHMENTS:
None 11---7
Submitted By: Mike OtSyben J m ri
Energy Services sta t ity Manager
Manager for Utility Operations
Agenda Item Check List
Agenda Item:
Agenda Item Subject:
Is this a Capital Improvement
Project:
Council Date:
ff
Financial Impact
Renewal of annual electric utility services agreement with LCRA
Renewal of annual electric utility services agreement with LCRA
• Yes O No
06/27/2006
link to Agenda database => Q
Need Help?
Was it budgeted? 0 Yes O No
Is it within the approved budgeted amount? • Yes O No
If not, where is the money coming from?
G/L Account Number Various CIP Accounts
Amount Going to Council $ 150,000.00
Is there something (budgeted) that won't get O Yes 0 No
done because you are spending these funds?
If so, please explain.
Will this have an impact on the next year's O Yes 0 No
budget?
If so, please explain.
Does this project have future revenue - Yes 0 No
impact?
Year: Department:
If so, how?
Identify all on-going costs (i.e., insurance,
annual maintenance fees, licenses,
operational costs, etc...).
Estimated staff hours:
Cross -divisional impact: Yes 0 No
If so, what division(s)?
Prepared by: Mike Mayben Date: 06/16/2006
Agenda Item Checklist: Approved on 06/16,2006
ApproversrAnalyst
signed
Notified
Received
Status Changed
Status
Jim Briggst
City
06/16/2006
06/16/2006
6/16/2006
06/16/2006
Approved
Jose Lara
06/16/2006
06/16/2006
6/16/2006
06/16/2006
Approved
nancial
Approval Cycle Settings
Council Meeting Date: June 27, 2006
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
Item No. Y, - s
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to award the bid to Austin Filter System of Austin,
Texas for construction of the Downtown Storm Water Quality Ponds, in the amount of
$764,611.00.
ITEM SUbDWY:
Bids were taken on May 25, 2006 at 2:00 P.M. for the construction of the Downtown Storm
Water Quality Ponds. Four contractors picked up plans and two bids were received to construct the
ponds.
The low bid was received from Austin Filter System Inc. The consulting engineer, Raymond
Chan & Associates, Inc. has evaluated and compared the two bids received. Based on the review of
the bids and the findings that Austin Filter System has satisfactorily performed work of similar
nature, the engineer believes the low bid to be the best bid.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This project will be funded out of the Storm Water Utility Capital Fund
Account# 641-101-6617-00
GUS BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
GUS Board recommended approval at the June 20, 2006 meeting. Approved 7-0
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
COMMENTS:
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Engineer's Letter of recommendation
2. Bid Sheet comparison
Submitted By: Mark Miller, J' B ig s
Transportation Services A ' tani y Manager
Manager for Utility Operations
RAYMOND CHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Civil Engineers
4319 James Casey Street • Austin, Texas 7874)
Office: (512) 480-8155 • Fax: (512) 480-8811
June 13, 2006
Mr. Michael Hallmark
Senior Construction Technician
City of Georgetown
300 Industrial Avenue
Georgetown, TX 78626
Re: Downtown Overlay District Regional Water Quality Ponds
Engineer's Recommendation for Bid Award
Dear Mr. Hallmark:
Raymond Chan & Associates, Inc (RC&A) has reviewed the bids received for the referenced
project. Attached is a line item bid tab comparison between the two contractors who bid on the
project, Austin Filter System and Joe Bland Construction.
Based upon our review of the bids received, Austin Filter System appears to be the low bidder.
Austin Filter System has satisfactorily performed work of similar nature and therefore we believe
this is the lowest and best bid.
RC&A recommends for the City of Georgetown to enter into a contract with Austin Filter
System to construct the proposed improvements as detailed in the construction documents.
Please feel free to contact us should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
RRAYYMM/O'ND7CHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Tom Curran, P.E.
Associate
City c rgetown
Downtow :rlay Project
Bid Comparison
Austin Filter System
Joe Bland Construction
A-1
100%
LS
Mobilization, Bond & Insurance
$
15,000.00
$
15,000.00
$
30,000.00
$
30,000.00
Control Plan for Vehicular &
A-2
100%
LS
Pedestrian Traffic
$
4,000.00
$
4,000.00
$
1,000.00
$
1,000.00
For Barricades, Traffic Control
A-3
1005
LS
Plan Implementation
$
8,000.00
$
8,000.00
$
3,000.00
$
3,000.00
B-1
243
LF
Silt Fence
$
1.90
$
461.70
$
1.50
$
364.50
B-2
26
LF
Rock Berm
$
23.00
$
598.00
$
15.00
$
390.00
B-3
50
LF
Inlet Protection
$
6.00
$
300.00
$
6.00
$
300.00
B-4
375
LF
Protective Tree Fencing
$
4.00
$
1,500.00
$
2.00
$
750.00
Orange Mess Construction
B-5
336
LF
Fencing
$
3.50
$
1,176.00
$
1.50
$
504.00
B-6
1
EA
Stabilized Construction Entrance
$
3,356.10
$
3,356.10
$
1,200.00
$
1,200.00
B-7
0.75
AC
Clearing and Grubbing
$
40,000.00
$
30,000.00
$
1,530.00
$
1,147.50
B-8
97
CY
Excavation with on-site re -use
$
16.00
$
1,552.00
$
13.00
$
1,261.00
B-9
2,267
CY
Excavation with off-site disposal
$
8.00
$
18,136.00
$
20.00
$
45,340.00
B-10
8640
SF
Clay liner
$
1.00
$
8,640.00
$
3.00
$
25,920.00
City ( )rgetown
Downtov erlay Project
Bid Comparison
B-11
0
CY
Borrow
$
50.00
$
B-1�_
133
CY
Top Soil
$
27.00
$
3,591.00
$
9.00
$
1,197.00
Limestone Boulder Block Wall
B-13
3845
SF
(face foot)
$
37.00
$
142,265.00
$
42.00
$
161,490.00
B-14
47
LF
18 -Inch RCP
$
71.00
$
3,337.00
$
55.00
$
2,585.00
B-15
88
LF
36 -Inch RCP
$
165.00
$
14,520.00
$
95.00
$
8,360.00
B-16
1
Each
Splitter Box
$
16,000.00
$
16,000.00
$
8,100.00
$
8,100.00
B-17
1
Each
Outlet Riser Structure
$
7,200.00
$
7,200.00
$
2,300.00
$
2,300.00
B-18
1
Each
Storm Drain Outlet Headwall
$
3,300.00
$
3,300.00
$
1,800.00
$
1,800.00
Storm Drain Outlet Apron, with
B-19
1
Each
plantings
$
2,600.00
$
2,600.00
$
3,200.00
$
3,200.00
B-20
7028
SF
Erosion Control Blanket
$
0.20
$
1,405.60
$
1.30
$
9,136.40
B-21
480
LF
4 -ft High Aluminum Fencing
$
47.50
$
22,800.00
$
42.00
$
20,160.00
B-22
1
EA
12' Wide Aluminum Double Gate
$
1,000.00
$
1,000.00
$
2,000.00
$
2,000.00
B-23
14,753
SF
Grass Rrevegetation
$
0.20
$
2,950.60
$
0.25
$
3,688.25
1 -Gallon Native Grasses, Variety
B-24
87
EA
(Bluestem, Muhlys etc.)
$
14.00
$
1,218.00
$
13.00
$
1,131.00
City orgetown
Downto, erlay Project
Bid Comparison
B-25
2
EA
5 -Gallon Mountain Laurel
$
38.00
$
76.00
$
42.00
$
84.00
B-26
1
EA
2 -inch caliper Texas Pistachio
$
400.00
$
400.00
$
42.00
$
42.00
B-27
2
EA
5 -gallon Flameleaf Sumac
$
38.00
$
76.00
$
42.00
$
84.00
B-28
10
CY
Rock Riprap (18" D50)
$
83.00
$
830.00
$
62.00
$
620.00
D-4
1
EA
subtotal
$
3,191.40
$
316,289.00
$
1,200.00
$
337,154.65
C-1
100%
LS
Mobilization, Bonds & Insurance
$
22,000.00
$
22,000.00
$
30,000.00
$
30,000.00
Control Plan for Vehicular &
C-2
100%
LS
Pedestrian Traffic
$
4,000.00
$
4,000.00
$
1,000.00
$
1,000.00
Barricades, Traffice Control Plan
C-3
100%
LS
Implementation
$
8,000.00
$
8,000.00
$
3,000.00
$
3,000.00
D-1
685
LF
Silt Fence
$
1.90
$
1,301.50$
1.50
$
1,027.50
D-2
79
LF
Rock Berm
$
23.00
$
1,817.00
$
15.00
$
1,185.00
Orange Mesh Construction
D-3
330
LS
Fencing
$
3.50
$
1,155.00
$
1.50
$
495.00
D-4
1
EA
Stabilized Construciton Entrance
$
3,191.40
$
3,191.40
$
1,200.00
$
1,200.00
D-5
2.75
AC
Clearing and Grubbing
$
10,000.00
$
27,500.00
$
1,530.00
$
4,207.50
City i xgetown
Downtov erlay Project
Bid Comparison
D-6
3,116
CY
Excavation, with on-site re -use
$
10.00
$
31,160.00
$
13.00
$
40,508.00
Excavation, with off-site disposal
D -7a
2,938
CY
of earthen material
$
18.00
$
52,884.00
$
20.00
$
58,760.00
Excavation, with off-site disposal
D -7b
2,937
CY
of construction debris
$
26.00
$
76,362.00
$
27.00
$
79,299.uu
D-8
47,925
SF
Clay Liner
$
0.50
$
23,962.50
$
3.00
$
143,775.00
D-9
1
CY
Borrow
$
50.00
$
50.00
D-10
740
CY
Top Soil
$
24.00
$
17,760.00
$
9.00
$
6,660.00
Limestone Boulder Block Wall
D-11
925
SF
(face foot)
$
42.00
$
38,850.00
$
42.00
$
38,850.00
D-12
292
LF
18 -inch RCP
$
71.00
$
20,732.00
$
55.00
$
16,060.00
D-13
52
LF
36 -inch RCP
$
130.00
$
6,760.00
$
95.00
$
4,940.00
D-14
1
LS
Splitter Box
$
30,000.00
$
30,000.00
$
8,100.00
$
8,100.00
D-15
2
EA
Outlet Riser Structure
$
7,500.00
$
15,000.00
$
2,300.00
$
4,600.00
D-16
2
EA
Storm Drain Outlet Headwall
$
3,300.00
$
6,600.00
$
1,800.00
$
3,600.00
Storm Drain Outlet Apron, with
D-17
2
EA
Plantings
$
2,600.00
$
5,200.00
$
3,200.00
$
6,400.00
D-18
56,055
SF
Erosion Control Blanket
$
0.20
$
11,211.00
$
0.25
$
14,013.75
City orgetown
Downton erlay Project
Bid Comparison
D-19
220
LF
4 -ft High Aluminum Fencing $
D-20
92,668
SF
Grass Revegetation $
9,240.00
0.20
1 -gallon Native Grasses, Variety
D-21
193
EA
(Bluestem, Muhly's etc) $
D-22
10
EA
2 -inch caliper Bald Cypress $
D-23
92
CY
Rock Riprap (18" D50) $
subtotal:
46.50
$
10,230.00$
42.00
$
9,240.00
0.20
$
18,533.60
$
0.25
$
23,167.00
14.00
$
2,702.00
$
13.00
$
2,509.00
400.00
$
4,000.00
$
42.00
$
420.00
80.00
$
7,360.00
$
62.00
$
5,704.00
$
448,322.00
$
508,720.75
GRAND TOTAL: $ 764,611.00 M $ 845,875.40
Council Meeting Date: June 27, 2006
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
Item No. �1
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to award a contract to Shelton & Shelton Plumbing, L.P. of
Killeen, Texas for the construction of the West Loop Water Line Improvement and to establish a
project budget of $656,295.90.
ITEM SUMMARY:
This construction project installs a 24" water line along D. B. Wood Road from Mesa Ranch
Drive to Hwy 29. The new water line continues the existing West Loop water line and will provide
for transmission of water from the Lake Water Treatment Plant to the southern part of the water
service area. The project is part of the Water Master Plan.
There were thirteen plan holders and eight bids received for this project. The engineering
firm responsible to review the bids, Kasberg, Patrick, and Associates (KPA), has recommended the
award of the bid to the low bidder, Shelton & Shelton Plumbing L.P., 584 W. Stagecoach Rd. Killeen,
Texas 76542 for the bid of $596,632.64. Staff recommends establishing a project budget of
$656,295.90.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This project will be funded out of the Water Capital Improvements Fund 661-101-6617-04.
GUS BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
GUS Board recommended approval at the June 20, 2006 meeting. Approved 7-0
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Staff recommends awarding the bid to Shelton & Shelton Plumbing L.P., and
establishing a project budget of $656,295.90.
COMMENTS:
NONE
ATTACHMENTS:
Letter of recommendation for Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP
Bid Tabulation.
Bid Receipt Sur
Submitted By:
Water Services
Manager
Jim Briggs,
Assistant City Manager
for Utility Operations
KASBERG, PATRICK & ASSOCIATES, LP
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
One Sm1b Main
Tempe, Texas 76501 (254) 773-3731 Fax (254) 773-6667 mailQa kpaenpneea.wm
RICK N. KASBERG, P.E.
R. DAVID PATRICK, P.E.
THOMAS D. VALLE, P.E.
May 18, 2006
Mr. Thomas R. Benz, P.E.
Manager of Systems Engineering
City of Georgetown
300 Industrial Avenue
Georgetown, Texas 78626
Re: City of Georgetown
West Loop Water Line Improvements
Dear Mr. Benz:
Attached is the Bid Tabulation for the bids received at 2:00 PM on Tuesday, May 16, 2006 for the
above referenced project.
There were twelve plan holders and eight bids received for this project as shown on the attached
tabulation sheets. The low bid in the amount of $596,632.64 was submitted by Shelton & Shelton
Plumbing, LP, 584 W. Stage Coach Road, Killeen, Texas 76542.
We have reviewed the current workload and construction history of Shelton & Shelton Plumbing, LP
as well as checked references and financials. Shelton & Shelton Plumbing has successfully completed
projects for us in the past and is currently under construction on a 2T' trunk sewer project with us. As
a result of our findings and previous experiences, we recommend that a contract be awarded to Shelton
& Shelton Plumbing, LP for the total base bid in the amount of $596,632.64. If you have questions,
please call.
Sincerely,
err P.E.
GRT/
2005-102-30
I 1LATION
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS
West Loop Wale, Line Improvement,
May 16, 20116 2:08 PM
JW bdrunul Avenue; Grorgeto,vn, TX 78626
i00Y1u4o
\� W.aani
I hereby certify Wt dill Is a correct and we ubulaner, of LI bids removed
roger olben, P.E. ( ps(c
Kuhrg, Patrick & Assrciates. LP
Indlenes a discrepancy in d,c unit prwc aM rhe ea¢Med annum
,apiatra
BIDDER IN DATION
MeU. Cotmructbu, Lad
Ben Coeton, Ire.
"n
Letds Contranars, Ire.
flo,nky Cmwuuic,atiou, IAd
P. O. Boa 10739
7082 W. Rq 190
P. O. Baa
1623
15" S. Bryaot Blvd.
Item
Unit
Rid Dai
Kalem, TX 765P7
Ecken, TX 76513
Bertram, TX 76605
San Angeb, TX 76%3
NO
'
ad
gruil
Detrrl tion
Unix
F}Irdd
UNr
&Mdd
Va.
Esrendid
Unna
£ Badd
1
100%
!S
Mobiliratbn Bods & Insurnce rot-w<ated 3% of lbC TOW Amoum Bid
Pnee
5
Amoanr
Pn'eI
A--.,
Prirr
A.
PAce
Amount
2
3 ]"
LF
Provide Labor i mens Tools & Su rvisiM w Com leen Pr 'on er the ROW
34 333.00 S
4.80
34,553.00
16.00D.08
16 000.00 5
73 000.00
25100.08
28 000.08
28 WO 00
3
100%
LS
Vid.T in P. Si s before Sun of Cotwrrction an the Pm'ect
1103.00
17,990.40
15.06
%411.68
5.00
18.740.00
15.00
56 220.00
4
100%
LS
P are Trench $af Plan in Conlon $tile Law and OSHA
970.00
1403.00
SW.W
800.00
151)0.00
1.500.00
1308.08
1500.08
S
J 71
Ian (wiN
1 kment and Follow Twrch Saf Plan Pi
920.00
1 700.00
1 700-00
1 OOOAO
I M.00
5,00D.00
5 000.00
6
1 000
SF
1 lm su Follow Trach Saf Plan Bore Piu and Structures
0.90
3,373.20
1.30
48'2.40
LOO
3,748.00
210
7,496 M
7
100%
&
Prcpart & Submit a Naive of Irrcn1(NOry b d1e TCEQ and Comply w/All Swsmwater
0.90
90(110
2.23
2230.00
0.10
100. W
1.00
1." w
Diehar a Re ulau.na
312.00
512.08
7,108.08
],100.00
1,300.00
I.500.OD
1.5(0.00
I,50D.D0
B
100%
LS
PER. Barricade SI tun & Traf/ic Safe Plan VeLiwlar and Pedla rian
t.524.00
1 524,08
760.08
760.08
7000.00126
9
I %
Im l -a & Adrtdnisur Barrie 5i & Traf , Safe Plan epic liv & Wan
17 607,00
1] 607.00
S (00.00
S 600.00
3 OW.000.00
0.08
1.100.00
1300.00
1
100%
LS
Pmride Pro' I ReLOrd D... s As Banns
1100010
11.250.00
11 230.00
11
718
LF
Provide &Insall 24• Class 200 pato Iron Pi irclW in Fitd Thtue Fenrdm
107.60
5.000
394,544.80
3000. W
S 000.00
S 000.00010
S 000.00
5000.00
12
d
5A
Famish & Imu1121-irch Gm Valve
110.00
/12 280.00
113.000.00
110.00
524 720.00
13
EA
21-irch Water U.
Co,vnie
17 559.00
54 .236.00
13,100M
32 408.08
IJ 308. W0.00
12,000.00
M 000.00
14
3
5
FA
nd lemall
Provide ad lmWl Ductile lmn4 rte Bmdz 2<-imb Diameter
184900
2267.00
73%.00
I1433.W
8.908.W
35600.08
4 .00.00
4000.00
16000.00
IS
EA
Provide ad lmWl Ducri41mn 22-I2 rev Bads 20-ircM1 Di
19".00
11664.08
I4W.W
12 M.00
2mom.08
2200.00
11 OOD.W
1
12
1
EA
Provbe ad ImWI Motile Iron 11-1/d de rte Bends 24 -inch Di
24W.W
14408.08
2710.00.08
2,W0AW
12000.00
17
1
EA
Famish & 1 W I 0 -inch a 20 ircM1 Reducer
1924+00
23 088.08
2 308.00
27 600. W
2200.08,1)0
1 900.00
0
72 B08.W
14
EA
Famish&In ull4-irch Aire ValveA bl
I T18.08
1 278.08
7400.08
3100.00
2 108.08.08
1 9
SY
Piaci I.oanin &Sadin includui unimn. 'n
550000
22008.08
3900.W
23600.08
7MO.08O.W
IOM00
08000.08
330
47500.00
4.25
33125.08
4,00OD
0.00
410
30000.00
$Y
Corcme Drivcwe Re air
49.00
86008
1950
273008
100.08
14000.0)
IW.00
11700.00
Misullanmus Clsss'A' rcrt
6110
18300.00
16.85
5055.00
IOD
30000.08
/O,0)
2
F25�
,,annemove Rock Berm ss rryuiM intk$wnllwiwPollution
143.00
11700.08
38.00
3808.00
150.00
15000.00
310.08
34.01
LF
Pmention Plan
9.00
1,350.08
14.40
2.160.00
20.08
3.080.08
23.00
3.730.00
IF
Famish Ito 1 Maintain &Remove Sila Force ss ird in the Smrmwmer Pollution
1.40
5 1%.00
1.80
6 678.08
2.00
IF
Provide Clean -u a0) FirW Gradin Abn F1W Pi lire Route
2.00
7d%.002.08
7.CMAX
5.00
18,550.00
LS
Fumidl All Materials, Equipment, Tools & Labor Naessary for P.. Twang Waw Pipe
7 4%08
2. W
7 4%.08
2. W
7196.00
Ineltsding Any Necenary airs
2,278.08
2,Yl8. W
1,7110.08
1.2w.00I.3W.
3.808. W
3.808.005.618,0D
5,618.08
7TITAL B/D AMOUM
(Harris
1-16)
S
7M,702." 1
1 $
762,351.28
$
M,124.08 1
5
931000,00
I hereby certify Wt dill Is a correct and we ubulaner, of LI bids removed
roger olben, P.E. ( ps(c
Kuhrg, Patrick & Assrciates. LP
Indlenes a discrepancy in d,c unit prwc aM rhe ea¢Med annum
,apiatra
BID R_ __IPT SUMMARY
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
WEST LOOP WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS
BID OPENING
Tuesday May 16, 2006 2:00 PM
300 Industrial Avenue Georgetown, TX 78626
BIDDER
TOTAL BID
AMOUNT
Shelton & Shelton Plumbing, L.P.
$596,632.64
Austin Engineering Co., Inc.
$647,057.80
Royal Vista
$675,412.00
Central Road and Utility
$698,888.00
McLean Construction, Ltd
$702,702.40
Bell Contractors, Inc.
$762,351.28
Lewis Contractors, Inc.
$784,124.00
Houseley Communications
$950,000.00
Lupe Rubio Construction, Inc.
Received 2:07 pm (remains unopened)
F. T. Woods Construction
No Bid
H. Deck Construction
No aid
Joe Bland Construction, LP
No Bid
Qro-Mex Construction Co., Inc.
No Bid
2005-102-40 Wlp
Agenda item Check List
rr
_.......... .
WMVM
Financial Impact
Agenda Item: West Loop Water Line - Mesa Ranch to Hwy 29
Agenda Item Subject: Consideration and possible action to award a contract to Shelton and
Shelton Plumbing, L.P. of Killeen, Tx for the construction of the West
Loop Water Line Improvement and to establish a project budget of
$656,295.90.
Is this a Capital Improvement • Yes O No
Project:
Council Date:
Was it budgeted?
06/27/2006
link to Agenda database =>
Need Help?
Is it within the approved budgeted amount?
If not, where is the money coming from?
G/L Account Number
Amount Going to Council
Is there something (budgeted) that won't get
done because you are spending these funds?
If so, please explain.
Will this have an impact on the next year's
budget?
If so, please explain.
Does this project have future revenue
impact?
Year:
If so, how?
• Yes O No
OYes 0No
Project savings from N Austin Water Line
661-101-6617-04
$ 656,295.90
O Yes 0 N0
O Yes • No
O Yes • No
Department:
Identify all on-going costs (i.e., insurance,
annual maintenance fees, licenses,
operational costs, etc...).
Estimated staff hours:
Cross -divisional impact: O Yes 0 No
If so, what division(s)?
Prepared by: Glenn DishongDate: 06/20/2006
Agenda Item Checklist: In Process Y�
Approvers
Title
Assigned
Notified
Received
Status Changed
Status
Jim Briggs
Assistant City
06/20/2006
06/20/2006
6/21/2006
06/21/2006
Approvetl
Laude Brewer
Manager
06/21/2006
06/21/2006
6/21/2006
-
Micki Rundell
Assistant Director
_
of Finance &
Adminstration
Director of Finance
and Administration
Approval Cycle Settings
Council Meeting Date: June 27, 2006
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT:
Item No. X - S
Consideration and possible action to award the contract to Insituform Technologies, Inc. of Houston
Texas, for the EARZ Phase III Remediation and to establish a project budget of $202,725.60.
ITEM SUMMARY:
This project implements the necessary repairs to the wastewater system in the Gabriel View area
based upon the results of the EARZ Phase III testing.
There were five plan holders and three bids received for this project. The engineering firm
responsible to review the bids, Kasberg, Patrick, and Associates (KPA), has recommended the award of the
bid to the low bidder, Insituform Technologies, Inc., 8121 Broadway, Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77061, for
the bid of $184,296.00. Staff recommends establishing a project budget of $202,725.60.
PECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This project will be funded out of the Wastewater Capital Improvements Fund 651-101-6618-04.
GUS BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
GUS Board recommended approval at the June 20, 2006 meeting. Approved 7-0
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Staff recommends awarding the bid to Insituform Technologies, Inc, and establishing a project
budget of $202,725.60.
COMMENTS:
ATTACHMENTS:
Letter of recommendation for Kasber atrick & Associates, LP
Bid Tabulation
ltted By: Glenn Dishong
Water Services
Manager
As.s-±—stanVCWy Manager
for Utility Operations
KASBERG, PATRICK & ASSOCIATES, LP
KA CONgULTING ENGINEERS
One South Main
Temple, Texas 76501 (254) 773-3731 Fax (254) 773-6667 mail®kpaengim rs.com
RICK N. KASBERG, P.E.
R. DAVID PATRICK, P.E.
THOMAS D. VALLE, P.E.
June 14, 2006
Mr. Michael Hallmark
CIP Project Manager
City of Georgetown
300 Industrial Avenue
Georgetown, Texas 78626
Re: City of Georgetown
EARZ III Project
Dear Mr. Hallmark:
Bids were received by the City of Georgetown until 2:00 P.M. on Tuesday, June 13, 2006 for the
above referenced project. There were three bids received and a detailed bid tabulation of these bids
is attached.
The low, successful bidder is Insituform Technologies, Inc. with a total base bid of $184,296.00.
The opinion of probable cost for this project was $300,000.00. The bids received for the project
ranged from $184,296 to $329,675.
We have reviewed the current workload and construction history of Insituform Technologies as well
as checked references. As a result of our findings and with the submitted bid being within the
Engineer's estimate and City's budget, we recommend that a contract be awarded to Insituform
Technologies, Inc. for the total base bid in the amount of $184,296.00. If you have questions,
please call.
Sincerely,
R. David Patrick, P.E.
RDP/
xc: Mr. Thomas R. Benz, P.E., City of Georgetown
2005-141-30
BI[ 15TION 051410
CITY OF G ------'TOWN, TEXAS
Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone RchabWtalion
Phase m
Jam 13, 2006 2:00 PM
3001nd,atrial Avenue; Gmr9d., TX 78626
Did Bidder Acknowkd Addenda No. 17 i YES i YES i YES
IDW Rxidu =Iude do CvuFwam of Rmlution and A ril?
I herz0y rani/fy flttt Zhu isFa Lmnect sd sive UMalion of all bids nmivd
Rasberg. Pautck & A mom LP
Idwams a diwne y in the un4 pros and do exwooW a nt Exudd uneunt las hen mre:,d.
BIDDER INP'ORMATI N
Iwkuform TerMok ins. Inc.
Coker Plpcllne RehabBlutlon, Ix.
H. Dern CoMruuloo
702 Spirit Q Pork IMve
P. O. Box 719
1601 Oxford Blvd
ChodrD W, MO 63005
Scdtavllk, TX 75688
Round Bak, TX 78661
AM
Eraneed
UW
RWDWO
Und
f"I.W
Uw
Emendd
Unit
Eue,ded
NO.
Guonrit,
Derr tion
Prin
Amowv
Prlcr
Annum
Pace
Amount,
1
100%
IS
Mobdbatiun Bolls&I..
f 681..W
6800OD
5000.00
5000.00
25 OOO.OD
s7' 250.W
2
100%
1S
For Dove all Fu a Trench Ssfory flan
7511.00
750.00
100.00
100.00
5,000.W
5,000.00
3
500
SF
Trtab Wm M memation m tinea omscdo. all mira over 5 0
001
5.00
LOD
300.00
5.00
2.500,W
Rebab0iutlon of Existing &tach Wasuwater l.iue by O red-m-Kwc medW iocludbsg pe
RWIIc110n video of pipe InlRgr. W 16C9my tl vmwn, m mruds, appumnaMes
4
1,211
LF
cquiprttm. ry4 lo dl existing servke on.n0ns, traffic mono] pays) ad znplaocnulmm
37.00
N,807.00
28.50
• 34.51330
MM
78.7 15 W
bypass pumping of all flows, mkrlor fool munenl, erosion mmrol, all appliabk terms anci
Inn closed cbmit video toren all mm leion
Reinbdiutnn of Exiting 8 -inch Wsmewamr Lire by Crud -in Plain melmd inch ng pe
rwr tion vidoo of pipe irurior, ail m:essary excavation, uuvlials, appune,urces
5
1.719
LF
oqupraU. ly v lo W exitu,g mrvec comcctioms, uaffc mmol pkn(s) all lmpk[=MfiO%
36.00
61,884.00
27.50
47,22.50
40.00
68.711) W
bypau p roping of di flows, buerior root ueaunern, erosion awuol, all applicable toting snd
inspection by closd curt u Vi curer sfer mmpkuoo
6
1
EA
Reforming/ Replacing Manbole Beech and Invert to allow Proper Flow Rusin. prior to Cost
1.000.00
1.000.00
450.OD
450.00
3.00D.W
3.000.0
7
VF
Soiling Mallok I,uoior wish Q..&. in amnNvaz wiW Tsh,dcal Speifcauon WW6
120.00
I.IO0.00
170.00
1100.00
700.00
2.000.00
10
iacluding applicable by-Paa pu^pW ad traRu mmol pW utl Mplvnenution
.Pkuly Coating Mmhok Im r with Ravin in acoNamce wah Tmbnlcal Spec
80,00
3,2W.00
205.00*4.5W.0DJ,500.0D
00
5,400.(1
8
40
VF
00 6. ucldu,g applcabk by-pass pumping and umffc an fol pW ad hnpl non
RebabBiutiom of exiai,y Manhole by CL,d-io-Place mednd, lo acoNace wish TarJmioal
9
80
VF
Spreifcmion W W6. inch ling Wplirahie pepu . of irueior a faces. by -p." .p4 sod
650.00
52.000.00
767.0000
68,8W.W
vaR,c mmol ad' tion
10
1
EA
Prettue W Ex' Manhole b trnmve debris and residue
150.00
150.00
250.00W
1 .W
I I
1
FA
Ad Manbok R' and Cover m Grade
1,000.00
1000.00
450.000
1 .W
Furmshuy all Mkteiala. Equiprocru. Tools ad (Aber nectuM for Hydreank (or Vacuum
100.00
1.500.00
300.00
22,5W.00
12
15
EA
wing Rrlubiliuled (Repkmd/Reformd Inverts) Mamholo4 iwhAm ury Naeary RePain
13
5
BA
Pow Repaln ase to perform T, hku Reh.U,mt... ivchvfiq reaming eroud over
1,500.00
7.5W.OO
4,750.00
23,750.00
5.500.00
27,5W.00
14
1.00D
Sy
b stdit . Fa,a Imhtn " Maiwininx Bermuda or A. Au awc Gran Sod
1.00
1
0.50
500.00
5.00
5.0D0,00
IS
2,000
SY
Plat' ,Eaubltd,in adM l i sodScdin
0.23
ll'o
SOD.00
0.25
500.00
4.00
8000.00
Vidor [.v.t Pro' Si s Before the Sun of Cp ctmn on Nc l
1,000,001
1 M.00
I 315W.00
3,500M
5,00Q,00
5,000.00
ir/TAE
BID AAJOUN (Iters
l-16)
8 384,296.00
1
5 192,016.00
I
$ 329,675.00
Did Bidder Acknowkd Addenda No. 17 i YES i YES i YES
IDW Rxidu =Iude do CvuFwam of Rmlution and A ril?
I herz0y rani/fy flttt Zhu isFa Lmnect sd sive UMalion of all bids nmivd
Rasberg. Pautck & A mom LP
Idwams a diwne y in the un4 pros and do exwooW a nt Exudd uneunt las hen mre:,d.
Agenda Item Check List
tri , __..
Financial Impact
Agenda Item: EARZ Phase III Repairs Bid Award
Agenda Item Subject: Consideration and possible action to award a contract to Insituform
Technologies, Inc. of Houston, TX for the EARZ Phase III Remediation
and set a project budget of $202,725.60.
Is this a Capital Improvement 0 Yes O No
Project:
Council Date: 06/27/2006
link to Agenda database => Q
Need Help?
Was it budgeted? • Yes O No
Is it within the approved budgeted amount? • Yes O No
If not, where is the money coming from?
G/L Account Number 651-101-6618-04
Amount Going to Council $ 202,725.60
Is there something (budgeted) that won't get O Yes 0 No
done because you are spending these funds?
If so, please explain.
Will this have an impact on the next year's O Yes 0 No
budget?
If so, please explain.
Does this project have future revenue O Yes • No
impact?
Year: Department:
If so, how?
Identify all on-going costs (i.e., insurance,
annual maintenance fees, licenses,
operational costs, etc...).
Estimated staff hours:
Cross -divisional impact: O Yes • No
If so, what division(s)?
Prepared by: Glenn DishongDate: 06/20/2006
Agenda Item Checklist. Approved on 06/21/2006
Approvers
1ritle
Assigned
Notified
Received
Status Changed
Status
JimBriggs
Assistant City
06/2012006
06/20/2006
6/21/2006
06/21/2006
Approved
Jose Lara
Manager
06/21/2006
06/21/2006
6/21/2006
06/21/2006
Approved
Utility Financial
Analyst
Approval Cycle Settings
Council Meeting Date: June 27, 2006
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
Item No. Y—to—
SUBJECT:
Discussion and possible action to replace the existing BRA system water contract for
Alliance water originating out of the LCRA basin with a system water contract originating out of
the Brazos basin with an additional cost of no more than $40,000 for the remainder of this Fiscal
Year.
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown has long-term contracts for 100% of its supply of surface water from
the Brazos River Authority. A portion of the water is available via transfer from the Colorado River
basin, under the control of the Lower Colorado River Authority. The BRA has notified us that
additional water is available from the Brazos River basin, and the BRA will allow us to release our
Colorado River basin water. Replacement of Colorado River basin water with Brazos River basin
water will: 1) increase the total supply of surface water available to Georgetown; 2) eliminate the
cost associated with infrastructure improvements needed to transport water from the Colorado
River basin; 3) eliminate the cost uncertainty associated with the Colorado River basin water related
to the "No Net Loss" provisions of HB 1437.
Staff recommends the acquisition of up to 10,000 acre -ft per year of additional BRA water
rights through a system water contract with the BRA, and also recommends the release of water
rights originating in the Colorado River basin.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The cost of the additional water supply (approx. $40,000 for the remainder of this FY) will
be paid out of the Water Operations Fund (660-105-5313-00). The additional supply will also result
in the purchase of additional capacity in the Williamson County Raw Water Line.
GUS BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
GUS Board recommended approval at the June 20, 2006 meeting. Approved 7-0
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
COMMENTS:
ATTACHMENTS:
BRA letter
Submitted By: Glenn Dishong, Jim Briggs
Water Services Assistant City Manager
Manager for Utility Operations
" azosRiver Authority
August 18, 2005
Mr. Jim Briggs
Assistant City Manager for Utility Operations
City of Georgetown
P.O. Box 409
Georgetown, TX 78627
Mr. Ken Hall
General Manager
Jonah Water Special Utility District
40 County Road 126
Georgetown, TX 78626
Re: Sale of Additional System Water
QUALITY • CONSERVATION • SERVICE
Mr. Don Rauschuber
General Manager
Chisholm Trail Special Utility District
P.O. Box 249
Florence, TX 76527
Mr. Mike Taylor
General Manager
Brushy Creek Municipal Utility District
16318 Great Oaks Drive
Round Rock, TX 78681
Dear Mr. Briggs, Mr. Rauschuber, Mr. Hall, and Mr. Taylor:
Over the past few years, the Brazos River Authority (Authority) has worked with entities from
Williamson County to better understand water challenges facing the region. With the purchase
and on-going expansion of the East Williamson County Regional Water System, the Authority
has taken the first step to ensure long-term treated water to meet the County's growth.
Our next aim is to maximize the regions existing water and infrastructure resources. With that in
mind, I am pleased to inform you of the Authority's Board of Directors recent action that will be
of interest to the owners of the Williamson County Raw Water Line. In short, the resolution
authorizes the implementation of systematic management of the Little River and San Gabriel
River watersheds.
System management of the lakes in the two watersheds will provide significant additional water
for all customers diverting water from Lakes Belton, Stillhouse, and Georgetown. In fact, up to
20,000 acre-feet of additional water can be provided to Williamson County with a diversion
point of Lake Stillhouse, which would maximize the capacity of the raw water line. The
resolution acknowledges the commitment of the Authority to connect Lakes Belton and
Stillhouse when necessary, which will assure the availability of the water through the 2060
planning horizon.
As you are aware, the Authority is also finalizing a study to determine the feasibility of
constructing a water treatment plant on the south side of Lake Georgetown. The focus of this
study has been to provide a long-term, affordable treatment water solution for Williamson
4600 Cobbs Drive • P.O. Box 7555 • Waco, Texas 76714-7555
254-761-3100 9 FAX 254-761-3215
Mr. Jim Briggs, Mr. Don Rauschuber, Mr. Ken Hail, and Mr. Mike Taylor August 18, 2005
Page 2
County entities. Preliminary results indicate the average cost of treated water from that plant
would be $1.30 per 1,000 gallons, including the cost of raw water. In addition, the Authority is
planning on leasing groundwater that will be available to Williamson County when needed. That
process is expected to begin this fall.
We appreciate this opportunity to discuss the availability of this system water. Mr. David
Collinsworth will be contacting you to discuss or arrange a meeting. Should you have any
questions, please feel free to call him at (254) 761-3165.
Sincerely,
i4 4�
PHILLIP J. FORD
General Manager/CEO
PJF:kld
rloentral basinVound rocklwilliamson county customers 8.2..doc
Council Meeting Date: Tune 27.2006 Item No. 3 — k
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT:
First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown providing for
the abandonment by quitclaim deed of a portion of CR 265; providing for the terms and
conditions of such abandonment; providing a conflict and severability clause and
establishing an effective date.
ITEM SUMMARY:
In July 2004, as part of the widening of SH 29 West, the Council entered into an agreement
with the Wolf Family concerning its donation of right-of-way along SH 29 to facilitate the
project. As part of that agreement, the City agreed to abandon the eastern portion of CR
265 from the proposed CR 265E to IH -35 to the Wolf Family, as it owns property adjacent
thereto on both sides. The attached ordinance effectuates the abandonment pursuant to the
City's July 23, 2004 agreement with the Wolf Family concerning the abandonment.
ATTACHMENTS:
CR 265 Abandonment Ordinance
Survey map of portion of CR 265 to be abandoned
Submitted By: Terri Glasby Calhoun, Paralegal Jtm l'gssistant City Manager
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT BY
QUITCLAIM DEED OF A PORTION OF CR 265; PROVIDING
FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
ABANDONMENT; PROVIDING A CONFLICT AND
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND ESTABLISHING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on July 23 2004, as part of the State Highway 29 West
Widening Project, the City Council of the City of Georgetown, entered into an
agreement with the Wolf Family to abandon the easternmost portion of CR 265
adjacent to Wolf property as described by metes and bounds attached to the
proposed quitclaim deeds attached hereto as Exhibits "A `B" and "C", and as
shown on accompanying sketch attached hereto as Exhibit "D".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN TEXAS:
SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this
ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are
incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied
verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance implements the
following policy of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element(s):
Growth and Physical Development Focus End 3.00, which states:
"Citizens, business owners and organizations enjoy the benefits of
well-planned land usage in which conflicting needs are balanced";
and
Economic Development Focus End 1.01, which states: "Existing
undeveloped sites in Georgetown are put to beneficial use"; and
The City Council further finds that the passage of this ordinance is not
inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by
Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan.
Ordinance No.
Abandonment of East Portion of CR 265
Page 1 of 3
SECTION 2. That the following described portion of CR 265, as described
in the proposed quitclaim deeds attached hereto Exhibits "A". 'B" and "C" and
shown on accompanying sketch attached hereto as Exhibit "D". and made a part
of this ordinance for all purposes, be, and the same is hereby abandoned, vacated
and closed insofar as the right, title or easement of the public is concerned, SAVE
AND EXCEPT, the utility easements described therein, which shall be reserved
by the City.
SECTION 3. That said portion of CR 265 is not needed for public
purposes and it is in the best interest of the citizens of the Georgetown to
abandon said described portion CR 265.
SECTION 4. That the abandonment provided for herein shall extend only
to the public right, title and interest in and to the tracts of land described in
SECTION 2 of this ordinance, and shall be construed only to that interest the
governing body of the City of Georgetown may legally and lawfully abandon.
SECTION 5. The City Attorney is hereby authorized to issue and the
Mayor authorized to execute quitclaim deeds in the forms attached hereto as
Exhibits "A", 'B" and "C" and the City Secretary is authorized to attest thereto
on behalf of the City of Georgetown.
SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be and is hereby declared to be
cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Georgetown, and this ordinance
shall not operate to repeal or affect any of such other ordinances, except insofar
as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions
of this ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any in such other
ordinance or ordinances are hereby superseded.
SECTION 7. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any
person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the
other provisions, or application thereof, of this ordinance which can be given effect
without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this
ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
SECTION 8. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordirtance and the
City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force
and effect in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of
Georgetown.
Ordinance No.
Abandonment of East Portion of CR 265
Page 2 of 3
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the _ day of June 27,
PO .
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the _ day of July 11,
2006.
ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN
Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Patricia E. Carls, Brown & Carls, LLP
City Attorney
Ordinance No.
Abandonment of East Portion of CR 265
Page 3 of 3
By:
Gary Nelon, Mayor
EXHIBIT "A"
[FORM OF QUITCLAIM DEED]
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE A NATURAL
PERSON, YOU MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING
INFORMATION FROM THIS INSTRUMENT BEFORE IT IS FILED FOR
RECORD IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER.
DATE:
2006
GRANTOR: City of Georgetown, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation
GRANTOR'S Mailing Address (including County): P.O. Box 409, Georgetown, Williamson County,
Texas78627
GRANTEE: Judy W. Hindelang, Jane W. Robertson, Jay L. Wolf, Jr., Iva Wolf McLachlan and
James David Wolf, as our sole and separate property.
GRANTEE'S Mailing Address (including County): c/o Iva Wolf McLachlan, 520 Wolf Road,
Georgetown, Texas 78628
CONSIDERATION: Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration
PROPERTY:
Being 0.11 of acre of land situated in the CLEMENT STUBBLEFIELD SURVEY,
Abstract No. 558, in Williamson County, Texas, being a portion of that certain tract of
land called 5.252 acres, as conveyed to the City of Georgetown by deed recorded in
Document No. 2005080398 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, said
0.11 acre tract being more particularly described by metes and bounds in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto (the "Property").
For the consideration, GRANTOR has released and quitclaimed, and by these presents does release and
quitclaim unto GRANTEE all of GRANTOR'S right, title, and interest in and to the above described Property, to
have and to hold it unto GRANTEE, GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns, forever. Neither GRANTOR, not
GRANTOR'S successors and assigns, shall have, claim or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of
it, SAVE AND EXCEPT for the easement for public utility purposes herein reserved.
There is hereby excepted and reserved unto Grantor, its successors and assigns, an EXCLUSIVE
easement and right of way (the "Easement"), over, under and across the following described real property, all or
part of which is contained within the above-described Property, to wit:
Public Utility Easement
Being 0.49 acre of land situated in the CLEMENT STUBBLEFIELD SURVEY, Abstract
No. 558, Williamson County, Texas, for a Public Utility Easement, said 0.49 acre tract
being more particularly described by metes and bounds in Exhibit "B^ attached hereto
(the "Easement Area").
Quitclaim Deed abandoning east portion of CR ROW
Page 1 of 2
The Easement shall be for the purposes of constructing, laying, maintaining, operating,
repairing and replacing water, wastewater, storm water or drainage, electric, telephone, gas and/or
cable television lines and related facilities and equipment, together with the right of ingress and
egress upon and across the Property for the purposes of maintaining, operating, repairing and
replacing said lines and related equipment and facilities.
The Easement, and the rights and privileges granted herein, are EXCLUSIVE to Grantor, and
Grantor's successors and assigns, and Grantee covenants that Grantee shall not convey any other
conflicting easement or license to the area (or any portion of the area) covered by this grant.
EXECUTED this the _ day of
GRANTOR
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
By:
Gary Nelon, Mayor
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
2006.
ATTEST:
Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this date personally Gary Nelon, Mayor of the City of
Georgetown, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed
to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and
consideration therein expressed, as the act and deed of said municipality, and in the capacity therein stated.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this _day of , 2006.
Notary Public, State of Texas
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Patricia E. Carts, Brown & Carls, LLP
City Attorney
AFTER RECORDING, RETURN TO:
Iva Wolf McLachlan
520 Wolf Road
Georgetown, Texas 78628
Quitclaim Deed abandoning east portion of CR ROW
Page 2 of 2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR JUDY W. HINDELANG, JANE W. ROBERTSON, JAY L -
WOLF, JR, IVA WOLF McLACHLAN, AND JAMES DAVID WOLF
BEING 0.11 of an acre of land, situated in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 558, in
Williamson County, Texas, being a portion of that certain tract of land, called 5.252 acres, as
conveyed to the City of Georgetown, by deed recorded as Document No. 2005080398 of the
Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, Surveyed on the ground in the months of
December, 2003 and March, 2006, under the supervision of Brian F. Peterson, Registered
Professional Land Surveyor, and being more particularly described a follows;
BEGINNING at an iron pin found on the south line of the above -referenced 5.252 acre City of
Georgetown tract, marking the Northeast comer of that certain tract of land, called 1.78 acres, as
conveyed to Judy W. Hindelang, Jane W. Robertson, Jay L. Wolf, Jr., Iva Wolf McLachlan, and
James David Wolf, by deed recorded as Document No. 2003053281 of the Official Records of
Williamson County, Texas, being the Northwest corner of that certain tract of land, called 1.89
acres, as conveyed to Iva Wolf McLachlan, Jay Wolf, Jr., Jane Wolf Robertson, and Judy Wolf
Hindelang, by deed recorded as Document No. 2003124147 of the Official Records of
Williamson County, Texas, for the Southeast comer hereof;
THENCE, along the said south line of the 5.252 acre City of Georgetown tract, being the north
line of the said 1.78 acre Judy W. Hindelang, et al, tract, N 620 49' W, 170.98 feet to an iron pin
set for the Northeast comer of that certain Tract II, called 0.634 acres, as conveyed to the City of
Georgetown by deed recorded as Document No. 2004068070 of the Official Records of
Williamson County, Texas, for the Southwest comer hereof;
THENCE, N 00 54''E, 26.34 feet to a point for the Northwest comer hereof,
THENCE, S 64° 56' 30" B, 171.53 feet to a point for the Northeast comer hereof;
THENCE, S 6° 39' 15" W, 32.01 feet to the Place of BEGINNING and containing 0.11 of an
acre of land.
STATE OF TEXAS }
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF WILLL4MSON }
I, Brian F. Peterson, Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that this survey
was made on the ground of the property legally described hereon and is correct, to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
To certify which, witness my hand and seal at Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas, this the
G44day of 2006, A.D.
nal Land Surveyor, No. 3967
of Texas
2006-1
EXHIBIT
F. Peterson
STEGEFIZZELL
1978 $ Ausi n Ave
Georgetown. Tx 78626
(5121930-9412
BEING 0.49 of an acre of land, situated in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 558, in
Williamson County, Texas, being a por0on of County Road No. 265. Surveyed on the ground in the month
of December, 2003, ander the supervision of Don H. Buell, Registered Professional Land Surveyor, and
being more particularly described a follows;
BEGINNING at an iron pin set at the intersection of the Northwest line of Interstate Highway No. 35 and the
north line of State Highway No. 29, for the most easterly Southeast corner hereof;
THENCE, along the said north line of State Highway No. 29, S 89' 54' 30" W, 66.85 feet to an iron pin
found at the intersection of the said north line of State Highway No. 29 and the south line of County Road
No. 265, marking the most easterly corner of that certain tract of land, called 1.89 acres, as conveyed to Iva
Wolf McLachlan, Jay Wolf, Jr., Jane Wolf Robertson, and Judy Wolf Hindelang, by deed recorded as
Document No. 2003124147 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, for a comer hereof;
THENCE, along the north line of the said 1.89 acre McLachlan, et al, tract, being the south line of County
Road No. 265, N 71° 02' W, 1.66 feet to a point for the most easterly Southwest comer hereof;
THENCE, N 4° 32' E, 32.65 feet to a point for an interior comer hereof;
THENCE, N 75" 09' 30" W, 19.24 feet to a point; N 73° 11' 30" W, 205.13 feet to a point;
N 69" 17' 30" W, 70.88 feet to a point; N 66° 50' 45" W, 130.69 feet to a point and N 63" 58' W, 448.85
feet to a point for the most westerly Southwest comer hereof; said point being N 62' 49' W, 170.98 feet and
N 0' 54' E, 30.59 feet from the most westerly Northwest comer of the said 1.89 acre McLachlan, at at, tract;
THENCE, N 0' 54' E, 22.09 feet to an iron pin set on the north line of County Road No. 265, being the
south line of that certain Tract I, called 202.149 acres, as conveyed to Jay L. Wolf by deed as recorded in
Volume 1997, Page 953, of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, for the Northwest corner
hereof; said point being S 66" 50' 45" E, 138.87 feet from an iron pin found;
THENCE. S 63' 58' E, 457.71 feet to a point; S 66° 50' 45" E, 129.78 feet to a point; S 69" 17' 30' E, 69.77
feet to a point and S 73° 11' 30' E,185.39 feet to a point for an interior comer hereof;
THENCE, N 16" 42' 45" E, 12.82 feet to a point on the north line of County Road No. 265, being the south
line of the said 202.149 acre Wolf Tract 1, for the most easterly Northwest comer hereof;
THENCE, along the said north fine of County Road No. 265, being the south line of the said 202.149 acre
Wolf Tract L S 730 17' 15" E, 20.00 feet to a point for the Northeast corner hereof;
THENCE, S 16° 42' 45" W, 12.81 feet to a point for an interior comer hereof;
THENCE, S.95" 09' 30" E, 122.20 feet to a point on the said Northwest line of Interstate Highway No. 35,
for the most easterly comer hereof; said point being S 57° 42' 15" W, 11.68 feet from a concrete monument
found;
THENCE, along the said Northwest line of Interstate Highway No. 35, S 57° 42' 15" W, 47.77 feet to the
Place of BEGINNING and containing 0.49 of an acre of land.
STATE OF TEXAS 1
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON }
1, fon H. Bi=ll, Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that this survey was made on the
ground of the property legally described hereon and is correct, and that there are no apparept discrepancies,
conflicts, overlapping of improvements, visible utility lines or roads in place, except as shown on the
accompanying plat, and that said property has access to and from a dedicated roadway, to the best of my
knowledge and belief. - '
To .certify 'ch, witness my- ian and seal at Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas, this the
day of , 2004, A.D.
7
Registered Prot
20377-Id-attacl
EXHIBIT
Iii
EXHIBIT "B"
(FORM OF QUITCLAIM DEEDI
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE A NATURAL
PERSON, YOU MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING
INFORMATION FROM THIS INSTRUMENT BEFORE IT IS FILED FOR
RECORD IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER
DATE:
2006
GRANTOR: City of Georgetown, a Texas hone: -rule municipal corporation
GRANTOR'S Mailing Address (including County): P.O. Box 409, Georgetown, Williamson County,
Texas78627
GRANTEE: Bettie M. Wolf, Judy W. Hindelang, Jane W. Robertson, Jay L. Wolf, Jr., Iva Wolf
McLachlan (nee Iva June Wolf) and Jaynes David Wolf, as our sole and separate property.
GRANTEE'S Mailing Address (including County): c/o Iva Wolf McLachlan, 520 Wolf Road,
Georgetown, Texas 78628
CONSIDERATION: Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration
PROPERTY:
Being 0.68 of acre of land situated in the CLEMENT STUBBLEFIELD SURVEY,
Abstract No. 558, in Williamson County, Texas, being a portion of that certain tract of
land called 5.252 acres, as conveyed to the City of Georgetown by deed recorded in
Document No. 2005080398 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, said
0.68 acre tract being more particularly described by metes and bounds in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto (the "Property").
For the consideration, GRANTOR has released and quitclaimed, and by these presents does release and
quitclaim unto GRANTEE all of GRANTOR'S right, title, and interest in and to the above described Property, to
have and to hold it unto GRANTEE, GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns, forever. Neither GRANTOR, nor
GRANTOR'S successors and assigns, shall have, claim or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of
it, SAVE AND EXCEPT for the easement for public utility purposes herein reserved.
There is hereby excepted and reserved unto Grantor, its successors and assigns, an EXCLUSIVE
easement and right of way (the "Easement"), over, under and across the following described real property, all or
part of which is contained within the above-described Property, to wit:
Public Utility Easement
Being 0.49 acre of land situated in the CLEMENT STUBBLEFIELD SURVEY, Abstract
No. 558, Williamson County, Texas, for a Public Utility Easement, said 0.49 acre tract
being more particularly described by metes and bounds in Exhibit "B" attached hereto
(the "Easement Area").
Quitclaim Deed abandoning east portion of CR ROW
Page I of 2
The Easement shall be for the purposes of constructing, laying, maintaining, operating,
repairing and replacing water, wastewater, storm water or drainage, electric, telephone, gas and/or
cable television lines and related facilities and equipment, together with the right of ingress and
egress upon and across the Property for the purposes of maintaining, operating, repairing and
replacing said lines and related equipment and facilities.
The Easement, and the rights and privileges granted herein, are EXCLUSIVE to Grantor, and
Grantor's successors and assigns, and Grantee covenants that Grantee shall not convey any other
conflicting easement or license to the area (or any portion of the area) covered by this grant.
EXECUTED this the _ day of 2006.
GRANTOR ATTEST:
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
By:
Gary Nelon, Mayor Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary
STATE OF TEXAS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this date personally Gary Nelon, Mayor of the City of
Georgetown, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed
to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and
consideration therein expressed, as the act and deed of said municipality, and in the capacity therein stated.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this _day of , 2006.
Notary Public, State of Texas
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Patricia E. Carls, Brown & Carls, LLP
City Attorney
AFTER RECORDING, RETURN TO:
Iva Wolf McLachlan
520 Wolf Road
Georgetown, Texas 78628
Quitclaim Deed abandoning east portion of CR ROW
Page 2 of 2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR JAY L. WOLF
BEING 0.68 of an acre of land, situated in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 558, in
Williamson County, Texas, being a portion of that certain tract of land, called 5.252 acres, as
conveyed to the City of Georgetown, by deed recorded as Document No. 2005080398 of the
Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, Surveyed on the ground in the months of
December, 2003 and March, 2006, under the supervision of Brian F. Peterson, Registered
Professional Land Surveyor, and being more particularly described a follows;
BEGINNING at an iron pin set at the intersection of the west line of Interstate Highway No. 35
and the new north line of State Highway No. 29, for the most easterly line of the above -
referenced 5.252 acre City of Georgetown tract, being the Southeast comer of that certain Tract I,
called 202.149 acres, as conveyed to Jay L. Wolf by deed as recorded in Volume 1997, Page 953,
of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, for the most easterly comer hereof;
THENCE, along the said new north line of State Highway No. 29, N 890 09' 45" W, 116.67 feet
to a point for the Southeast comer hereof;
THENCE, N 72° 09' W, 156.54 feet; N 68° 57' 30" W, 260.04 feet; N 65° 1l' W, 274.23 feet;
and N 640 56' 30" W, 180.63 feet to a point for the Southwest comer hereof;
THENCE. N 00 54' E, 26.34 feet to an iron pin set on the north line of the said 5.252 acre City of
Georgetown tract, being the south line of the said 202.149 acre Wolf Tract 1, for the Northwest
comer hereof;
THENCE, along the north line of the said 5.252 acre City of Georgetown tract, being the south
line of the said 202.149 acre Wolf Tract I, S 660 50' 45" E, 722.38 feet to an iron pin found and
S 73° 17' 15" E, 267.59 feet to the Place of BEGINNING and containing 0.68 of an acre of land.
STATE OF TEXAS )
COUNTY OF WII,I,IAMSON
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
}
I, Brian F. Peterson, Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that this survey
was made on the ground of the property legally described hereon and is correct, to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
To certify which, witness m hand and al at Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas, this the
Gs �r day of iC' 2006, A.D.
Brian F. Peterson
Re ' fessioml Land Surveyor, No. 3967
State
f,=
20377 -1d -March 2006-2
EXHIBIT
STEGEob-ZZELL
1978 S. Austin Ave
Georgetown. Tx 78626
(512)930-9412
BEING 0.49 of an acre of land, situated in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 558, in
Williamson County, Texas, being a potdon of County Road No. 265. Surveyed on the ground in the month
of December, 2003, under the supervision of Don H. Bizzell, Registered Professional Land Surveyor, and
being more particularly described a follow3;
BEGINNING at an iron pin set at the intersection of the Northwest line of Interstate Highway No. 35 and the
north line of State Highway No. 29, for the molt easterly Southeast comer hereof;
THENCE, along the said north line of State Highway No. 29, S 89' 54' 30" W, 66.85 feet to an iron pin
found at the intersection of the said north !me of State Highway No. 29 and the south line of County Road
No. 265, marling the most easterly comer of that certain tract of land, called 1.89 acres, as conveyed to Iva
Wolf McLachlan, Jay Wolf, Jr., Jane Wolf Robertson, and Judy Wolf Hindelang, by deed recorded as
Document No. 2003124147 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, for a corner hereof;
THENCE, along the north line of the said 1.89 acre McLachlan, et al, tract, being the south line of County
Road No. 265, N 71' 02' W, 1.66 feet to a point for the most easterly Southwest comer hereof;
THENCE, N 4' 32' E, 32.65 feet to a point for an interior corner hereof;
THENCE, N 75' 09. 30" W, 19.24 feet to a point; N 73' 11' 30" W, 205.13 feel to a point;
N 69' 17' 30" W, 70.88 feet to a point; N 66' 50' 45" W, 130.69 feet to a point and N 63.58' W, 448.85
feet to a point for the most westerly Southwest comer hereof, said point being N 62.49' W,170.98 feet and
N 0' 54' E, 3059 feet from the most westerly Northwest corner of the said 1.89 acre McLachlan, et al, tract;
THENCE, N 0' 54' E, 22.09 feet to an iron pin set on the north line of County Road No. 265, being the
south line of, that certain Tract L, called 202.149 acres, as conveyed to Jay L. Wolf by deed as recorded in
Volume 1997, Page 953, of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, for the Northwest comer
hereof-, said point being S 66' 50' 45" E, 138.87 feet from an imn pin found;
THENCE, S 63' 58' E, 457.71 feet to a point; S 66' 50' 45" E, 129.78 feet to a point; S 69' 17' 30' E, 69.77
feet to a point and S 73' 11' 30' E, 18539 feet to a point for an interior comer hereof,
THENCE, N 16' 42' 45" E, 12.82 feet to a point on the north line of County Road No. 265, being the south
line of the said 202.149 acre Wolf Tract 1, for the most easterly Northwest corner hereof;
THENCE, along the said north line of County Road No. 265, being the south line of the said 202.149 acre
Wolf Tract 1, S 73' 1T 15" E, 20.00 feet to a point for the Northeast comer hereof;
THENCE, S 16.42' 45" W, 12.81 feet to a point for an interior comer hereof;
THENCE, S45' 09' 30" E, 12220 feet to a point on the said Northwest line of Interstate Highway No. 35,
for the most easterly comer hereof; said point being S 57' 42' 15" W, 11.68 feet from a concrete monument
found;
THENCE, along the said Northwest line of Interstate Highway No. 35, S 57' 42' 15" W, 47.77 feet to the
Place of BEGINNING and containing 0.49 of an acre of land.
STATE OF TEXAS I
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OFWILLIAMSON )
1, Don M Bizzell, Registered Professional land Surveyor, do hereby certify that this survey was made on the
ground of the property legally described hereon and is correct, and that there are no apparent discrepancies,
conflicts, overlapping of improvements, visible utility lines or roads in place, except as shown on the
accompanying plat, and that said property has access to and from a dedicated roadway, to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
To certify 'ch, witness an and seal at Georgetown, Williamson
day of , 2004, A.D.
Registered Prot
20377-Id-attacl
County, Texas, this the
1EXHIBIT
u6�t
EXHIBIT "C"
[FORM OF QUITCLAIM DEED]
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE A NATURAL
PERSON, YOU MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING
INFORMATION FROM THIS INSTRUMENT BEFORE IT IS FILED FOR
RECORD IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER.
DATE:
F111TIR
GRANTOR: City of Georgetown, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation
GRANTOR'S Mailing Address (including County): P.O. Box 409, Georgetown, Williamson County,
Texas 78627
GRANTEE: Iva Wolf McLachlin„ Jay L. Wolf, Jr., Jane W. Robertson, Judy W. Hindelang, as our
sole and separate property.
GRANTEE'S Mailing Address (including County): c/o Iva Wolf McLachlan, 520 Wolf Road,
Georgetown, Texas 78628
CONSIDERATION: Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration
PROPERTY:
Being 0.49 of acre of land situated in the CLEMENT STUBBLEFIELD SURVEY,
Abstract No. 558, in Williamson County, Texas, being a portion of that certain tract of
land called 5.252 acres, as conveyed to the City of Georgetown by deed recorded in
Document No. 2005080398 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, said
0.49 acre tract being more particularly described by metes and bounds in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto (the "Property").
For the consideration, GRANTOR has released and quitclaimed, and by these presents does release and
quitclaim unto GRANTEE all of GRANTOR'S right, title, and interest in and to the above described Property, to
have and to hold it unto GRANTEE, GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns, forever. Neither GRANTOR, nor
GRANTOR'S successors and assigns, shall have, claim or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of
it, SAVE AND EXCEPT for the easement for public utility purposes herein reserved.
There is hereby excepted and reserved unto Grantor, its successors and assigns, an EXCLUSIVE
easement and right of way (the "Easement"), over, under and across the following described real property, all or
part of which is contained within the above-described Property, to wit:
Public Utility Easement
Being 0.49 acre of land situated in the CLEMENT STUBBLEFIELD SURVEY, Abstract
No. 558, Williamson County, Texas, for a Public Utility Easement, said 0.49 acre tract
being more particularly described by metes and bounds in Exhibit "B" attached hereto
(the "Easement Area").
Quitclaim Deed abandoning east portion of CR ROW
Page l of 2
The Easement shall be for the purposes of constructing, laying, maintaining, operating,
repairing and replacing water, wastewater, storm water or drainage, electric, telephone, gas and/or
cable television lines and related facilities and equipment, together with the right of ingress and
egress upon and across the Property for the purposes of maintaining, operating, repairing and
replacing said lines and related equipment and facilities.
The Easement, and the rights and privileges granted herein, are EXCLUSIVE to Grantor, and
Grantor's successors and assigns, and Grantee covenants that Grantee shall not convey any other
conflicting easement or license to the area (or any portion of the area) covered by this grant.
EXECUTED this the _ day of 2006.
GRANTOR ATTEST:
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
By:
Gary Nelon, Mayor
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this date personally Gary Nelon, Mayor of the City of
Georgetown, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed
to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and
consideration therein expressed, as the act and deed of said municipality, and in the capacity therein stated.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this _day of , 2006.
Notary Public, State of Texas
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Patricia E. Carls, Brown & Carls, LLP
City Attorney
AFTER RECORDING, RETURN TO:
Iva Wolf McLachlan
520 Wolf Road
Georgetown, Texas 78628
Quitclaim Deed abandoning east portion of CR ROW
Page 2 of 2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR IVA WOLF MCLACHLAN, JAY WOLF, JR., JANE
WOLF ROBERTSON AND JUDY WOLF HINDELANG
BEING 0.49 of an acre of land, situated in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 558, in
Williamson County, Texas, being a portion of that certain tract of land, called 5.252 acres, as
conveyed to the City of Georgetown, by deed recorded as Document No. 2005080398 of the
Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, Surveyed on the ground in the months of
December, 2003 and March, 2006, under the supervision of Brian F. Peterson, Registered
Professional Land Surveyor, and being more particularly described a follows;
BEGINNING at an iron pin found on the south line of the above -referenced 5.252 acre City of
Georgetown tract, marking the Northwest corner of that certain tract of land, called 1.89 acres, as
conveyed to Iva Wolf McLachlan, Jay Wolf, Jr., Jane Wolf Robertson, and Judy Wolf Hindelang,
by deed recorded as Document No. 2003124147 of the Official Records of Williamson County,
Texas, being the Northeast corner of that certain tract of land, called 1.78 acres, as conveyed to
Judy W. Hindelang, Jane W. Robertson, Jay L. Wolf, Jr., Iva Wolf McLachlan, and James David
Wolt; by deed recorded as Document No. 2003053281 of the Official Records of Williamson
County, Texas, for the Southwest corner hereof;
THENCE, N 6° 39' 15" E, 32.01 feet to a point for the Northwest comer hereof;
THENCE, S 64° 56' 30" E, 9.10 feet; S 65° 11' E, 274.23 feet; S 68° 57' 30" W, 260.04 feet;
and S 720 09' E, 156.54 feet to a point on the new north line of State Highway No. 29, for the
most easterly comer hereof;
THENCE, along the said new north line of State Highway No. 29, N 890 09' 45" W, 102.43 feet
to an iron pin set on the north line of the said 1.89 acre Iva Wolf McLachlan, et al, tract, for the
Southeast comer of the said 5.252 acre city of Georgetown tract, and the Northeast comer of that
certain tract of land, called 0.506 of an acre, as conveyed to the City of Georgetown by deed
recorded as Document No. 2004068073 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas,
for the Southeast comer hereof;
THENCE, along the said south line of the 5.252 acre City of Georgetown tract, being the north
line of the said 1.89 acre Iva Wolf McLachlan, et al, tract, N 710 02' W, 321.83 feet to an iron
pin found and N 63° 31' 30' W, 274.58 feet to the Place of BEGINNING and containing 0.49 of
an acre of land.
STATE OF TEXAS }
COUNTY OF WII,LIAMSON
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
}
I. Brian F. Peterson, Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that this survey
was made on the ground of the property legally described hereon and is correct, to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
To certify which, witness my hand and seal at Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas, this the
G7 ti day of /%%iC- � 2006, A.D.
Brian F. Peterson
Reo' ssional Land Surveyor, No. 3967
State of Texas
20377 -1d -March 2006-3
EXHIBIT
�I rr n
STEGE IZZELL
1978 S. Austin Ave
Georgetown, TX 78626
(512)930-9412
BEING 0.49 of an acre of land, situated in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 558, in
Williamson County, Texas, being a portion of County Road No. 265. Surveyed on the ground in the month
of December, 2003, under the supervision of Don H. Bizzell, Registered Professional Land Surveyor, and
being more particularly described a follows;
BEGINNING at an iron pin set at the intersection of the Northwest line of Interstate Highway No. 35 and the
north line of State Highway No. 29, for the most easterly Southeast corner hereof;
THENCE, along the said north tine of State Highway No. 29, S 89' 54' NY' W, 66.85 fed to an iron pin
found at the intersection of the said north line of State Highway No. 29 and the south line of County Road
No. 265, marking the most easterly corner of that certain tractof land, called 1.89 acres, as con4eyed to Iva
Wolf McLachlan, Jay Wolf, Jr., Jane Wolf Robertson, and Judy Wolf Hindelang, by deed recorded as
Document No. 2003124147 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, for a corner hereof;
THENCE, along the north One of the said 1.89 acre McLachlan, et al, tract, being the south line of County
Road No. 265, N 71' 02' W, 1.66 feet to a point for the most easterly Southwest comer hereof;
THENCE, N 4' 32' E, 32.65 feet to a point for an interior comer hereof;
THENCE, N 75' 09' 30" W, 19.24 feet to a point; N 73' 11' 30" W, 205.13 feet to a point;
N 69' 17' 30" W, 70.88 feet to a point; N 666 50' 45" W, 130.69 feet to a point and N 63' 58' W, 448.85
feet to a point for the most westerly Southwest comer hereof; said point being N 62' 49' W, 170.98 feet and
N 0' 54' E, 30.59 feet from the most westerly Northwest corner of the said 1.89 acre McLachlan, et al, tract;
THENCE, N 0' 54' E, 22.09 feet to an iron pin set on the north line of County Road No. 265, being the
south One of that certain Tract I, called 202.149 acres, as conveyed to Jay L. Wolf by deed as recorded in
Volume 1997, Page 953, of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, for the Northwest corner
-hereof; said point being S 66' 50' 45" E,138.87 feet from an iron pin found;
THENCE, S 63' 58' E, 457.71 feet to a point; S 66' 50' 45" E, 129.78 feet to a point; S 69.17' 30' E, 69.77
feet to a point and S 73' 11' 30' E, 185.39 feet to a point for an interior corner hereof;
THENCE, N 16' 42' 45" E, 12.82 fed to a point on the north line of County Road No. 265, being the south
line of the said 202.149 acre Wolf Tract L for the most easterly Northwest comer hereof;
THENCE, along the said north tine of County Road No. 265, being the south line of the said 202.149 acre
Wolf Tract L S 73' 17' 15" B, 20.00 feet to a point for the Northeast comer hereof,
THENCE, S 16' 42' 45" W, 12.81 feet to a point for an interior comer hereof;
THENCE, 5.95' 09' 30" E, 12220 fed to a point on the said Northwest line of Interstate Highway No. 35,
for the most easterly comer hereof; said point being S 57' 42' 15" W, 11.68 feet from a concrete monument
found;
THENCE, along the said Northwest line of Interstate Highway No. 35, S 57' 42' 15" W, 47.77 feet to the.
Place of BEGINNING and containing 0.49 of an acre of land.
STATE OF TEXAS }
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF WI LIAMSON }
1, Don 1L Bizzeti, Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that this survey was made on the
ground of the property legally described hereon and is correct, and that there are no apparent discrepancies,
conflicts, overlapping of improvements, visible utility lines or roads in place, except as shown on the
accompanying plat, and that said property has access to and from a dedicated roadway, to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
To .certy 'ch, witness my,,An5k my-,Anand seal at Georgetown, Williamson
` day of 2004, A.D.
7
Registered Prot
20377 -Id -attach
County, Texas, this the
4 40 -'Ri
ck a to I R
06}Ge69010 A P,O:
+ I
� � rr•..p ass.
\
�i
1.78 ACRES ¢I
PHILL MOCKFORD, TRUSTEE $
199933589 n
nyl
1.78 ACRES I
Judy W. Hlndelanq. Jane W. Rohertsoq
Jay L. Wolf, Jr., Ivo Wolf McLachlan
and James David Waif I
2003053281
I
5ti50e o;g9r
01 08
Gay 2005
/ I TRACY I
202.149 .ACRES
JAY L. WOLF
1997/953
a
1.89 ACRES
WA WOLF MCLACHLAN,
JAY WOLF, JR., JANE WOLF
ROBERTSON and JUDY WOLF
HINDELANO
DOC.12003124147
6$ NO
0
\ate.
b
\ •qty,\�
x.49 L
C.
i
I
SCALE -40'
�+ssrryZ
=1r \ \
•Rt �4���\$�
— — —o •'•,
aea.er — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — sevss•4ow
m.ss•
C y 0., rsn•uw auiv u
d� C00 1c.
0191 afowa
Council Meeting Date: June 27, 2006 Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT:
FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS
ORDERING THE DISMISSAL OF ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION, MID-TEX DIVISION'S
APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM
ADJUSTMENT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2005; FINDING THAT THE MEETING COMPLIED
WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS
RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Atmos filed for a $12 million interim GRIP adjustment on March 31, 2006. On May 31, 2006
Atmos filed a general rate case with the City Secretary for $72 million, including $12 million for the
interim GRIP adjustment. The Texas Legislature authorized interim GRIP adjustments between
general rate cases. The GRIP statute was never intended to permit a request for an interim
adjustment while a general rate case was pending. Further, the City instituted a show cause
proceeding pursuant to GURA § 104.151. Under that statute the City has the authority to dismiss
the pending interim GRIP adjustment request.
It is wasteful of money and resources to have two proceedings pending before the City in
which Atmos is requesting recovery of GRIP 2005. There is no need for an interim rate adjustment
when the same infrastructure projects are currently being reviewed as part of a full blown rate case.
Under Texas law Atmos may request GRIP only if it has had its rates set as part of a general
rate case within two years prior to making the request for an interim GREP adjustment. Atmos Mid -
Tex did not exist before October 2004. It has never had its rates set as part of a general rate case.
While it is true that TXU Gas had its rates set in 2004, Atmos Mid -Tex has never undergone such a
review. On a cost or ratemaking basis the two utilities are as different as night and day. Atmos did
not step into the shoes of TXU Gas. In fact, TXU Gas as a corporate entity still exists today.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
NONE
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NONE
NONE
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance
Submitted
for Utilities
Trish Carts
City Attorney
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS ORDERING THE DISMISSAL
OF ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION, MID-TEX
DIVISION'S APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM GAS
RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM
ADJUSTMENT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2005; FINDING
THAT THE MEETING COMPLIED WITH THE OPEN
MEETINGS ACT; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND
PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT, AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, on or about March 31, 2006 the Atmos Energy Corporation's Mid -
Tex Division ("Atmos Energy" or "Atmos") filed an application with the City of
Georgetown, Texas ("City") to increase gas rates for its Gas Reliability Infrastructure
Program ("GRIP") for calendar year 2005; and
WHEREAS, the GRIP 2005 adjustment, if adopted, would result in an increase in
rates of approximately $12 million; and
WHEREAS, on or about May 31, 2006 Atmos filed a Statement of Intent to
increase rates system -wide by $72 million, including a request to recover the $12 million
for GRIP 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Statement of Intent also included a request to recover the $12
million for GRIP 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature never intended to allow Atmos to be able to
request an interim 2005 GRIP adjustment while a general rate case or Statement of Intent
is pending before local and state regulatory authorities.
Ordinance No.
ATMOS — GRIP Denial
Page 1 of 3
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS THAT:
Section 1. That the statements set out in the preamble to this ordinance are
hereby in all things approved and adopted. The City Council hereby finds that this
Ordinance implements the Utility Policy Statement 11.00 of the Century Plan - Policy
Plan Element, which states: "City owned, sponsored or managed utilities are competitively
priced and provide safe, adequate and reliable services to all customers." and further finds that
the adoption of this Ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century
Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy
Plan.
Section 2. It is not appropriate for Atmos Energy to request recovery of an
interim GRIP adjustment while a general rate case is pending.
Section 3. The application for an interim GRIP adjustment for calendar year
2005 is in all respects dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Section 4. The City Secretary shall notify Atmos Energy of this ordinance by
sending a copy of same to Mr. Richard Reis, Atmos Energy Corporation, 5420 LBJ
Freeway, Suite 1823, Dallas, Texas 75240-2601 and ATM shall be notified by sending a
copy of this ordinance to Mr. Jim Boyle, Special Counsel for the ATM cities, by fax to
(512) 474-2507.
Section 5. The meeting at which this ordinance was approved was in all
things conducted in strict compliance with the Texas Open Meetings act, Texas
Government Code, Chapter 551.
Ordinance No.
ATMOS — GRIP Denial
Page 2 of 3
Section 6. All ordinances and resolutions that are in conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed and all other
ordinances and resolutions of the City not in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 7. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any
person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other
provisions, or application thereof, of this ordinance which can be given effect without
the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are
hereby declared to be severable.
Section 8. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the
City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective in accordance with the
provisions of the Charter of the City of Georgetown.
PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING on the day of June, 2006.
PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING on the day of July, 2006.
ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
Sandra Lee, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Patricia E. Carls
BROWN & CARLS, LLP, City Attorney
Ordinance No.
ATMOS — GRIP Denial
Page 3 of 3
Gary Nelon, Mayor