Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_HARC_01.13.2022City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review Commission Minutes January 13, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. Council and Courts Building 510 West 91h Street Georgetown, TX 78626 Members Present: Michael Walton, Lawrence Romero; Steve Johnston; Pamela Mitchell; Karalei Nunn; Catherine Morales Staff present: Mima Garcia, Program Manager; Nat Waggoner, Assistant Director; Sofia Nelson, Planning Director Meeting called to order by Chair Walton at 6:00 pm. Public Wishing to Address the Board On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found at the Board meeting. Clearly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak, and present it to the Staff Liaison, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Board considers that item. On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a written request with the Staff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. The request must include the speaker's name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to inform the board and the public. For Board Liaison contact information, please logon to http://govemxnent.georgetown.org/category/boards-commissions/. A. At the time of posting, no persons had signed up to address the Board. Legislative Regular Agenda B. Public Hearing and Possible Action on a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for the demolition of a medium priority historic structure at the property located at 412 E. Th Street, bearing the legal description Lot 1, Glasscock's Second Addition. (2021-64-COA) —Nat Waggoner, Asst. Planning Dir. - Long Range Staff report by Waggoner. Per a deed from April 5,1912, Albert Horton Glasscock, Elizabeth Jane Glasscock Talbott, and Margaret C. Glasscock Boatner, three of Georgetown founder's George Washington Glasscock's children, along with their brother Andrew's heirs, sold Lots 3 & 4 in Block No. 30 of Glasscock's Addition to D. F. Draper for $800. The deed described the property as having improvements. George Glasscock died in 1868, and the historic structure may have been constructed at some point by the Glasscock family, based on ownership history, although if so, it was likely a rental property as the Glasscock family were known to have other residences in Georgetown and in other Texas cities. Per a deed from December 10,1945, the District Court of Williamson County directed the sale of Lots 3 & 4 in Block 30 of Glasscock's Addition in the cause of Annie Bell Singleton, et al vs Marjorie Lynn Woods. A. F. Morris and wife Mary Lessie Morris purchased the property for $1,500 from the court appointed receiver Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 1 of 4 Meeting: January 3, 2022 Dor W. Brown. A mechanic's lien from January 30,1946, was payable to the Belford Lumber Company for the amount of $1,500. The lien release described the improvements as completed according to the plans and specifications, with a sum of $975.32 remaining due. The lien was paid off in April 1947, Per an affidavit from 1977, Anderson Fambrue Morris and Mary Leslie Mitchell Morris were married on December 23,1913, in Winnfield, Louisiana and had nine children. Mary passed away in 1969 in Williamson County and Anderson passed away in 1977. Following their parents' deaths, the Morris children sold the property to Thomas & Betty Davis, and the property passed between they and Timothy Davis until 1988 when it was sold to Federico & Mary Flores after it was replatted as a single lot rather than half of Lots 3 & 4. Jim and Amy Miller purchased the property in 2021. The house at 412 E. 7th Street first appears on the Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps in 1916, four years after the purchase by D. F. Draper. The 1916 map shows a small, one-story wood frame structure with a wide front porch and an accessory structure at the rear of the property. The 1925 and 1940 maps do not show a change to the property, but the house does appear in the corner of an aerial photo from c. 1934 (photo from Southwestern University Special Collections) with an asymmetrical roof, indicating that the structure either had an asymmetrical roof originally, or that the rear addition where the kitchen and living space are currently located was added prior to 1934. By 1964 changes can be seen in the aerial photo from that year, which were likely the alterations and additions made by the Belford Lumber Company in 1946. A driveway art carp, o t on the west side of the S li aclure are visible in the 1964 photo. The 1974 photo shows a similar site layout, with the addition of residential structures on other lots on the block. The 1984 Historic Resource Survey form and photos describe and show a one-story frame dwelling (which was called an I -House plan, not reflected in the current structure) with asbestos siding, a stone chimney, wood windows with 4/4 lights and a porch with Doric (round) columns, as well as an attached carport. The structure today does not reflect historic building materials, which have all been removed and replaced, excepting the porch columns, which appear to be the same as those in the 1984 photos. The current exterior materials are low quality and not durable or contributing to the historic character. The remaining historic materials are the limestone chimney and framing, and the interior finishes are not historic or conducive to salvage. Rear and side additions have been constructed after 1984 which are not of quality construction or materials, and which do not contribute to historic character. At this point the majority of the historic fabric has been removed, with only the form of the house recognizable as historic from the exterior. Based on the current condition of the structure, the potential age of the framing and stone and the form of the house, which is a simple rectangular shape with a steep gable roof and front porch, the HPO recommends that the request for demolition be approved, but that an archive document of the property be provided to the City, and that the historic materials be salvaged to the extent feasible. The applicant, Jim Miller, addressed the Commission and was available to answer questions. Chair Walton opened the Public Hearing. Historic and Architectural Review Commission Wage 2 of 4 Meeting: January 1.3, 2022 Tom Paxton, 1302 S College, owns a house similar to the structure proposed for demolition. His house was in worse shape, but it was fixed. He is opposed to the demolition. John Lawton commented that there is nothing of meaning except for the structure itself. The property can be restored but it would take a lot of money. Liz Weaver,1:221 S Main St., received 3 minutes from Ron Weaver. She is opposed. Chair Walton closed the Public Hearing. Motion to deny Item B (2021-64-COA) by Commissioner Romero. Second by Commissioner Morales. Commissioner Nunn commented that it will be expensive to put in new materials, and these materials won't be true to the historic nature. The shape is the only thing that is left that may be historic. Commissioner Nunn supports demolition. Motion to deny passes 3-2 with Commissioners Johnston and Nunn opposed. C. Public Hearing and Possible Action on a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for a new fence, railing or wall that is inconsistent with the overlay district's characteristics and applicable guidelines at the property located at 1307 S. Myrtle Street, bearing the legal description 0.13-acre in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 558, also being known as the southwest part of Block B, Hughes Second Addition, an unrecorded subdivision. (2021-73- COA) —Nat Waggoner, Asst. Planning Dir. - Long Range Staff report by Waggoner. The subject property has undergone a reconstruction from the foundation and framing during a remodel that was approved for additions a garage enclosure and a new fence in 2020. The low priority historic structure, which had a construction date of 1950 on the 2016 HRS, was shown to have been constructed between 1965 and 1974 based on aerial photos and deed records, with a likely year of 1965. The applicant is requesting HARC approval of anew fence design along the E. 14th Street property line. The proposed fence would be a 6' tall wood privacy fence that would align with the front or southwest corner of the house and enclose the side street and rear yards. The applicant is requesting the approval of a privacy fence to provide additional privacy to the master bedroom, bathroom and a secondary bedroom. In their meeting on May 28th, 2020, HARC approved a 3' tall front yard fence and a 4'-6" tall side street yard fence with the condition that both fence sections be a minimum of 50% transparent. The proposed fence height and lack of transparency do not comply with the Design Guidelines effective September 1, 2021, although the proposed wood materials do comply. In the near vicinity fences are generally lower height and partially transparent, with privacy fences separating properties. A privacy fence enclosing the side yard is not generally compatible with the character of the near vicinity. Staff has determined that the proposed project complies with 0 of the 2 applicable Historic District Design Guidelines in Chapter 3 as detailed below in the Applicable Design Guidelines section below. Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 3 of 4 Meeting: January I3, 2022 The applicant, Cory Shaw, addressed the Commission and further explained the request and was available to answer questions. Chair Walton asked clarifying questions related to the previous approval and this request. Shaw explained that there was a lack of privacy for the bathroom and master bedroom at that area. This would have a horizontal fence as originally planned but made out of wood. Commissioner Romero asked if the fence would meet the guideline for transparency. Waggoner explained he does not know the dimensions between the slats but it does not appear to based on the design. Commissioner Nunn asked if this will be on the property line. Waggoner explained that it is set back 6 feet from the property line. The applicant explained that it is on the property line, and it has 15-foot setback. Chair Walton commented that he would like to know the actual transparency dimensions. Chair Walton opened and closed the Public Hearing as no one signed up to speak. Commissioner Nunn commented that the applicant should provide an accurate representation of their request for the fence, including transparency figures/dimensions. Motion to postpone action on Item C (2021-73-COA) to the January 27,2022 meeting by Commissioner Romero. Second by Commissioner Morales. Approved 5-0. D. Updates, Commissioner questions, and comments. — Sofia Nelson, Planning Director Nelson introduced Meredith Johnson, who will be our interim historic planner while the department fills the position. Adjournment Motion to adjourn by Commissioner Romero. Second by Commissioner Morales. Approved 5-0. Adjourned at 7:46 p.m. A Z rov4, Michael Walton, Chair Attest, Terri Asendorf-Hyde, Secretary Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 4 of 4 Meeting: January 13, 2022