HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD 2025-40 - Amending Code Chapter 13.32 for Water and Wastewater Impact FeesORDINANCE NO. 2 -
AN •r
AMENDINGGEORGETOWN TEXAS ("CITY")
CODE OF ORDINANCES AND WASTEWATER
AMENDIMPACT FEES TO THE r r THE LAND USE
AMEND THE IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN FOR WATER ► WASTEWATER AMEND THE
SERVICE AREA;AMEND THE COMPUTATION IMPACT
AMEND THE WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE AMOUNTS;
AMEND THE ASSESSED WATER AND WASTEWATER FEE HISTOR
INCLUDING,; CONFLICTIN
ORDINANCES AND • AND ESTABLISHING
DATE.EFFECTIVE
WHEREAS, the City first adopted water and wastewater impact fees in 1996, and last
updated those fees in February 2023; and
WHEREAS, in 2023, the Impact Fee Committee,Water Advisory Board, and City
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS, the Utility Impact Fee Report sets forth the updated land use assumptions,
capital improvements plan, service area, impact fee calculations, and the maximum assessable
impact fees amounts for City of Georgetown's water and wastewater service area; and
WHEREAS, on May 27, 2025, the City Council adopted an order establishing a public
hearing date of July 22, 2025 to consider the land use assumptions and capital improvement plan
for the designated service area contained in the Utility Impact Fee Report; and
WHEREASon • f, .i . 395 of • ,l Government Code
Subject:
fees at less than the maximum amount calculated in the final report; recommendations are
published in the meeting minutes for the June 10, 2025 Impact Advisory Committee meeting;
i no additional written cfiled;and
WHEREAS, in accordance - •..: 395.055 of • Local GovernmentCode,• ..
of a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the land use assumptions, capital
Monday, June 16, 2025, the Marble Falls Highlander on Friday, June 20, 2025, and Williamson
County Sun on Sunday, June 22, 2025; and the draft and final Utility Impact Fee Report was
also wasmade ,... as 1 i the f • and
WHEREAS, a public hearing to discuss the proposed amendments to the land use
assumptions, capital improvements plan, and impact fees was held by the City Council on July
i d
WHEREAS, after consideration of Utility Impact Fee Report, public testimony, and
,jither data presented to • desires to amend the land use assumptions,
impact.•ital improvements plan,.• ` water and wastewater
impact fee amounts, and impact fee implementation schedule as set forth herein.
NOW THEREFOREORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN TEXAS, THAT:
� • i • .•r i "+ • r -s
Section 2. The facts 1 recitations contained in the preamble of ordinance are hereby
found and declared to be true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly
made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim.
Section 3. The City Council hereby approves and adopts Utility Impact Fee Report
attached to this ordinance as Attachment 2, which includes updated land use assumptions, water
f wastewater capital1 • plan, • maximum assessable water and
wastewater impact fee i
Sectioni hereby approves the am- r to Chapter of
Section 5. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the service area map attached to
Attachment I as Exhibit A.
attached
Section 7. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the Historical Impact Fee
Information attached to Attachment 1 as Exhibit C-1 (service area) and Exhibit C-2 (amounts).
Ordinance No.
11 ill IllIlIgll1�llqIl lljql�l�l 11
`111lif I Ili I •I•W..
of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 9. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance,
shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this
ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the
f�rovisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
Section 10. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secreta i
to attest. This ordinance shall become effective on August 31, 2025 in accordance with t1i
[�rovisions of the Charter of the City of Georgetown.
CITY OF/qEORGETOWNJeE
in, O$M � =City Secretary
By: 't
Sk*yeMasso-n, ity �Attom�ey
Ordinance No. 2025--qo--
D
0%•
i t
A. Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is toensure the provision ofadequate water and/or wastewater
facilities to serve new development by requiring new development to pay a share of the costs of such
improvements necessitated by and attributable to such new development .
B. Applicability. This chapter shall be applicable uniformly to new development within the corporate limits of
the City and within the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction. The City may also contract toprovide water and/or
wastewater capital improvements to an area outside its corporate boundaries and extraterritorial
jurisdiction, and if so, will assess and collect impact fees as set forth in this Chapter.
C. Contracts for service outside the City's corporate boundaries and extraterritoriaijurisdiction. PeoonsvVho
request water or wastewater service for land situated outside of the City's corporate boundaries and outside
of the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction, are deemed to have entered into a contract to pay water and/or
wastewater impact fees (as applicable): (1) at the time a developer utility service agreement or similar is
executed, or (2) at the time of filing a utility connect application if no developer utility service agreement or
similar isexecuted.
D. Authority. This chapter is adopted pursuant to the authority of the Texas Local Government Code ("TLGC")
Chapter 395 and the City Charter. The provisions of this chapter shall not be construed to limit the power of
the City to adopt an impact fee pursuant to any other source of local authority nor to limit the utilization of
any other methods or powers otherwise available for accomplishing the purposes set forth herein either in
substitution orinconjunction with this Chapter. The assessment and collection ufawater and/or
wastewater impact fee shall be additional and supplemental to, and not in substitution of, any other tax, fee,
charge' orassessment which is lawfully imposed by the City on and due against new development.
E. QamelopmentAppoovo/. No application for new development shall be approved within the City's jurisdiction
without assessment of impact fees pursuant to this article, and no water and wastewater tap shall be issued
and no building permit shall be issued unless the applicant has paid the impact fees imposed by and
ca|cu|atedhereinunder.
F. Definitions. As utilized inthis Chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them herein
below:
Adopting Ordinance means Ordinance No. 2025-40and all attachments thereto, which was passed and
approved by the City Council on August 12, 2025.
Apartments has the meaning given in the UDC.
Assisted living has the meaning given in the UDC.
Assessment means a determination of the amount of the water impact fee and wastewater impact fee per
service which can becharged tonew development pursuant tuthis Chapter. The amount of the
assessment per SUE is a measure of the impact on the City's water and/or wastewater system created by
the new development.
Assessment Date means the date ufassessment pursuant toSection 13.32.070.
Capital improvement means any of the following facilities that have a life expectancy of three or more years
and are owned and operated byoronbehalf ofthe City: water supply, treatment, and distribution facilities;
wastewater collection and treatment facilities whether or not they are located within the service area.
City means the City ofGeorgetown Texas.
COG Western District orWestern District Service Area means the service area designated assuch
which isgenerally shown on the Historical Service Area Map attached to the Adopting Ordinance.
Page zofzz
Developer Utility Service Agreement means and includes anagreement between the City and a
developer or property owner pertaining to the provision of water and/or wastewater service to an area
outside of the City's corporate boundaries and extraterritorial jurisdiction.
Development authorization means a plat, plan, permit, legal lot determination, utility connection
approval, or any other authorization issued by the City associated with new development.
Development unit means the expression ofthe magnitude ofthe water and/or wastewater demand
created by each land use planned within a particular new development and is used to compute the
number of service units caused or consumed by each individual land use application.
Duplex has the meaning given in the UDC.
Dwelling unit has the meaning given inthe UDC.
Facility expansion means the expansion of the capacity of an existing facility that serves the same
function as an otherwise necessary new capital improvement, in order that the existing facility may serve
new development. The term does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an
existing facility to better serve existing development,
Historical Service Area Mop means the map attached as showing the formerly designated
COG Western District Service Area and the South San Gabriel Service Area.
Hotel has the meaning given in the UDC.
Impactfee means a charge or assessment of money imposed by the City pursuant to this Chapter
against new development to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of water and/or
wastewater capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by or attributable to new
development. The term does not include the items listed in TLGC Section 395.001(4)(A)-(D). The term also
does not include do not include fiscal security obligations required by the UDC, or payments for "site -
related facilities." The term also does not include dedication of rights -of -way or easements or
construction or dedication of improvements if the dedication or construction is required by the UDC and
is necessitated by and attributable to the new development.
Impact Fee Schedules means, collectively, Schedule 13.32.061(A), Schedule 13.32.061(B), and
Schedule 13.32.061(C), as the same may be amended from time to time by the City. When singular the
term means one of them. The Impact Fee Schedules are attached as Uhliagand are incorporated into
this Chapter by this reference as if set forth in full.
Land use assumptions means the description of the service area(s) and projections of changes in
land uses, densities, intensities and population in the service area over at least a ten-year period, which is
included in the Utility Impact Fee Report, as may be amended from time to time, upon which the Utility
Impact Fee CIP is based. .
Maximum assessable impactfees means the maximum assessable water and wastewater impact fee
amounts calculated on a per SUE basis in accordance with TLGC Section 395.015. The maximum
assessable water and wastewater impact fee amounts are set forth on Schedule 13.32.060. The
maximum assessable water and wastewater impact fees will be implemented over time per the Utility
Impact Fee Schedules. The maximum assessable water and wastewater impact fees may amended by the
City Council from time to time as provided in TLGC Chpater 395.
Motel has the meaning given in the UDC.
Multifamily means the use of a single lot or parcel for five (5) or more dwelling units with each
dwelling unit located inabuilding containing five (5)ormore dwelling units.
New development means a subdivision of land; the construction, reconstruction, redevelopment,
conversion, structural alteration, relocation, or enlargement of any structure; or any use or extension of
the use ofland, any ofwhich increases the number ofservice units.
Page 3 of 21
Recreational Vehicle: has the meaning given in Texas Water Code Section 13.087, as the definition
may be amended from time to time.
Service Area means the area(s) served or to be served by the water and/or wastewater capital
improvements or facilities expansions specified in the Utility Impact Fee CIP
Service unit means a standardized measure of consumption, use, generation, or discharge
attributable to an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted
engineering or planning standards and based on historical data and trends applicable to the City in which
the individual unit of development is located during the previous 10 years. In this Chapter, one service
unit for water and wastewater is a %-inch water meter, which is the typical water meter used for a
detached single-family residence.
Service unit equivalent or SUE means the standard unit of measurement used to quantify the impact
of different types of land uses on the City's water system and wastewater system calculated for various
uses in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards and based on historical
data and trends applicable to the City in which the individual unit of development is located during the
previous 10 years and based on the estimated impact of those uses on the City's water and wastewater
systems relative to the demand associated with one detached single-family residence.
Singlefamily residential means use for one principal dwelling unit, other than arecreational vehicle.
A use involving more than one detached dwelling unit on one legal lot is a single family residential use for
the purpose of this Chapter.
Site-relatedfacility means a water or wastewater facility or facility expansion which is primarily used
by or primary benefits a new development and which is not included in the Utility Impact Fee CIP, and for
which the developer or property owner is responsible for constructing or funding under the UDC or the
[ity's other development regulations or policies orunder and agreement with the City. "Site -related
facility" may include a water or wastewater improvement located outside of, within, or on the perimeter
ofanew development site.
South Fork Son Gabriel RiverService Area means the service area designated as such described in
and generally shown onthe historical service area map attached aa .
Systemfacility means a water facility, wastewater facility, or facility expansion which is designated
in the Utility Impact Fee C|P and which is not "site -related facility."
Townhome has the meaning given inthe UDC.
UDC means the City's Unified Development Code, as the same may be amended by the City from
time totime.
Utility connect application means an application submitted to the City for authorization to receive
water and/or water service from the City.
Utility connection means a connection via a water meter to the City's water utility system,
connection via a sewer tap to the City's wastewater utility system, or one or both of such connections.
` Utility impactfee capital improvements plan or utility impactfee CIP means the plan identifying the
capital improvements or facility expansions, and their associated costs, necessitated by or attributable to
new development, assaid plan may beamended from time totime.
Utility Impact Fee Report means the "Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Report" dated July 2025,
prepared by NewGen Strategies and Solutions, LILC and CDM Smith approved by the City Council and
attached tothe Adopting Ordinance as Attachment 2.
Page 4of2z
Wastewater facility means acapital improvement or facility expansion used or to be used by the
City for providing wastewater service including but not limited to land or easements, wastewater
treatment facilities, lift stations, collection lines, force mains, and interceptor mains. The term does not
indude"sitene|atedfaci|ities.°Theterm'^wmstewaterfaciU1ies^a|yodoesnotindudededicahonof
easement or rights -of -way or easements or construction or dedication of wastewater improvements
required bythe UDC and necessitated byand attributable tonew development.
Waterfacility means a capital improvement or facility expansion used or to be used by the City for
providing water service including but not limited to land or easements, water supply facilities, water
treatment facilities, pumping facilities, storage facilities, distribution lines, and transmission mains. The
term does not include ~sitene|atedfaci|bies." The term does not include dedication ofhght*of-wayor
easements or construction or dedication of water improvements required by the UDC and necessitated by
and attributable tonew development.
Wholesale Customer means an entity that purchases water or wastewater services from the City for
the purpose ofre-selling the semice(s)toits own retail customers.
Sec. l3.32.020.Land use assumptions adopted.
A. The land use assumptions inthe Utility Impact Fee Report attached a opdng
Ordinance are hereby adopted and incorporated into this Chapter byreference as ifset forth infull.
B. The City will update its land use assumptions when and as provided in TLGC Chapter 395.
Sec. 13.32.030. Water and wastewater service areas established.
A. The water service area and wastewater service area described in the Utility Impact Fee Report attached to
the Adopting Ordinance as and also attached asExhibit Ac-1and are hereby adopted
and incorporated into this Chapter by this reference as if set forth in full.
The City formerly designated the "South Fork Service Area" and the "COG Western District Service Area,"
which are depicted onthe Historical Service Area Map attached as Lxhibit C. Those two service areas are no
longer separate service areas as of the effective date of the Adopting Ordinance .
C. The City may revise its service area boundaries when and as provided in TLCG Chapter 395.
A. The Utility Impact Fee CIP attached to the Utility Impact Fee Report attached to the Adopting Ordinance as
Attachment 2 ishereby adopted and incorporated into this Chapter bythis reference as ifset forth infull.
B. The City will update the Utility Impact Fee CIP when and as provided in TLGC Chapter 39S.
A. General. Service units and service unit equivalents (SUEs) are established in accordance with generally
accepted engineering and planning standards. Service units shall becalculated based onservice units
equivalent as determined by land use or the size of the water meter(s) for the development as set forth
in this Section; or alternatively, as approved by the City as a result of an engineering report prepared by
aqualified professional enQineer|icensedtoperformsuchpnofessiona|engineehngsemices inthe State
of Texas, which demonstrates that the number of SUEs of service for the new development will be
different than those indicated bythe size ofthe water meter. The Tables are based upon the
relationship of the continuous duty maximum flow rate in gallons per minute for a water meter of a
given size and type compared to the continuous duty maximum flow rate in gallons per minute for a
inch diameter water meter.
10,09111MIll
B. Residential SUE Calculations —The number of SUEs for both water and wastewater for the types of
residential uses listed in Table 1332.050(B)shaU
as follows:
TABLE13.32.050(B)
Type of Use
SUE
Single family residential having
0.667 per dwelling unit
up to 1,200 square feet of air
conditioned/heated space, with
no automatic landscape irrigation
system
-Single family residential
1.0 per dwelling unit
Duplex—
1.0 per dwelling unit
Townhouse
1.0 per dwelling unit
Apartment
0.667 per dwelling unit
Hotel/Motel
0.250 per guest room
—Assisted Living---
0.667 per resident room
Recreational Vehicle
0.125 per recreational vehicle
Recreational Vehicle Park
0.125 per recreational vehicle space
Multifamily
0.667 per dwelling unit
C. Non -Residential SUE Calculations.
The number ofservice units for non-residential uses for both water
and wastewater service (including irrigation) isdetermined by the size and type of the water meter in
accordance with Table Il32.O5O(C):
TABLE 13.32.05D(C)-6UEsFOR NON RESIDENTIAL USES (INCLUDING IRRIGATION)
Water Meter Size (Inc�_)_
Continuous Duty Service Unit EquivaleW__
Maximum Rate
Water Meter (gpm)
D. Adjustmentfor pnssureAnomu0e5. Ifthe City agrees that alarger orsmaller water meter isrequired
due solely to on -going abnormally low orhigh pressure in the relevant City water main' the City may
adjust calculations pertaining to SUEs to more accurately reflect the demand on the system.
E� Revision qfSUE Tables. The City Council may revise the Tables inthis Section from time totime based on
meter types, historical data, and trends applicable tuthe City.
A. Multiple detached dwelling units onone legal lot—|fthereammore+hanone dwelling units on one legal
lot, each dwelling unit within the legal lot must have a separate water meter.
B. City bnot the water service provider— If the City is not the water service provider, wastewater SUE
calculations will be based on the type of use (for residential uses) or the size of the water meter required
or installed by the authorized water service provider (for non-residential and irrigation uses).
C. No waterservice — If no water service is being provided by the City or any other public water service
provider (e.g., water service is via a private groundwater weU), awastewater SUE calculation must be
prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Texas in accordance with generally accepted
engineering or planning standards and based on historical data and tends applicable tothe land use. The
wastewater SUE calculations submitted with the utility connect application and must beapproved in
writing bythe City.
D. Larger water meter required solely/brfine flow —ifanapplicant for autility connect application
demonstrates to the City's satisfaction that the size of water meter needed to service the new
development is larger than standard for the new development due solely to the need to satisfy fire flow
requirements, the SUEs attributable solely to fire flow will be subtracted from the SUEs associated with
the new development for the purposes of this Chapter. However, if the fire protection capacity is
routinely used for non -fire control purposes as evidenced by the consumption recorded on the City's
meter -reading and billing systems, the current owner of the property shall be assessed the impact fees in
effect at the time such conversion of use is established by the City for the fire protection capacity which
has been converted to domestic capacity by its routine usage as non -fire protection capacity.
E. Separate irrigation meter required — All irrigation systems other than those serving asing|e-fami|y
residential dwelling unit must have a separate water meter for the irrigation system.
A. The City hereby adopts the maximum assessable impactfeesperSVEintheamoumsshownonSchedule
13.32.060which isattached asExhibit Band incorporated into this Chapter bythis reference asifset forth
in full.
B. The maximum assessable impact fee per SUE (post credit) set forth on Schedule 13.32.060that is assessed
to new development is declared to be the roughly proportionate measure of the impact(s) generated by a
new unit of development on the City's water and wastewater systems. To the extent that the impact fee per
SUE collected is less than the maximum assessable impact fee per SUE, such difference is hereby declared to
be founded on policies unrelated to the measurement of the actual impacts of the development on the City's
water and wastewater system. The maximum assessable impact fee per SUE may be used in evaluating any
claim by an applicant, developer, or property owner that the dedication, construction, or contribution of
capital improvement imposed as a condition of development approval pursuant to the City's regulations is
not roughly proportionate to the impact(s) of the new development on the City's water and wastewater
system.
C. The City has determined that the maximum assessable impact fee per SUE (post credit) established under
Section l332.O6Oand set forth onSchedule 13.32.06Qwill bephased inover time asset forth inSection
13.32.061, but in no event will the amount of an impact fee under Section 13.32.061 be greater than the
maximum assessable impact fee per SUE established under Section 13.32.060 and set forth on Schedule
13.32.Q6Owithout following the procedures set forth inTLG[Chapter 395.
line r4iff-aniF1
Page 7ufz1
A. Phase1: Assessment Date between August 3l'2O25and August 30,2D2G,inclusive ofbeginning and
ending dates the water and wastewater impact fees shall beassessed inthe amount set forth on
Schedu|e13.32.061(A).
B. Phase 2: Assessment Date between August 31, 2026 and August 30, 2027, inclusive of beginning and ending
dates - the water and wastewater impact fees shall be assessed in the amount se{ forth on Schedule
C. Phase3: Assessment Date after August 31, 2O27,inclusive ofthe beginning date the water and wastewater
impact fees shall be assessed in the amount forth on Schedule 13.32.061(C).
D. The Impact Fee Schedules may be amended from time to time by the City Council by ordinance to any
amount less than the maximum assessable impact fee per service unit adopted bySection 13.32.060 and
set forth on Schedule 13.32.060.
E. Earlier Assessment Dates — Impact fees for new development having an Assessment Date before August
31, 2025 shall be assessed in the amounts set forth in the applicable historical ordinance.
A~ The assessment of the water and wastewater impact fees for new development shall be made as of the
applicable Assessment Date as follows:
1. For new development requiring a preliminary plat under the City's UDC , assessment shall be on
the date that an application for a preliminary plat containing the utility connection is determine
to be administratively complete by the City Planning Director, or designee, in accordance with
the substantive and procedural provisions of the UDC pertaining to application completeness
2. For new development within the City's corporate boundaries or extraterritorial jurisdiction but n1l.
requiring a preliminary plat under the City's UDC, assessment shall be the date of submittal of t
utility connect application to the City.
3. For new development with an expired or dormant City -approved preliminary plat assessment
shall be on the date an application for a new (or resubmitted) preliminary plat containing the
water or wastewater connection is determined to be administratively complete by the City
Planning Director, or his or her designee, in accordance with the substantive and procedural
provisions of the UDC pertaining to application completeness.
4. For new development located or to be located within the boundaries of a municipal utility district
for which the City has approved a consent agreement pursuant to Chapter 54 of the Texas Water
Code, unless otherwise agreed to in a consent agreement between the City and a municipal
utility district assessment shall be on the date that that the final plat containing the water or
wastewater connection is recorded in the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas,
5. For new development located or to be located within the boundaries of a public improvement
district, unless otherwise agreed to in an agreement governing the public improvement district,
assessment shall be on the date that that the final plat containing the water or wastewater
connection is recorded in the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas.
6. For new development located outside of the City's corporate boundaries and outside of the
City's extraterritorial jurisdiction that is platted in accordance with Subchapter A, Chapter 212 of
the Local Government Code, assessment shall be on the date that the final plat containing the
water or wastewater connection is recorded in the Official Public Records of Williamson County,
Page oofzz
T For new development located outside mf the Oty'scorporate boundaries and outside ofthe
[it/s extraterritorial jurisdiction that occurs or is proposed to occur without platting, assessment
shall be on the date of submittal of the utility connect application to the City.
B. Preliminary Plat Expiration. A Preliminary Plat for a single-phase development expires twenty-four
months after approval unless a Final Plat is recorded within that time. A Preliminary Plat with an
approved Phasing Plan expires twenty-four months after approval unless aFinal Plat for the first phase is
recorded in the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas. Recording of the Final Plant for the
first phase extends the expiration for the rest of the Preliminary Plat by twenty-four months from the
recordation date. Each subsequent Final Plat recorded within twenty-four months extends the
expiration by another twenty-four months.
C. Preliminary Plat Application Dormancy. Anapplication for aPreliminary Plat isdeemed dormant ifthe
applicant takes no action on the application for more than one -hundred eighty days.
D. Assessment shall be in the amount per SUE shown on the applicable Impact Fee Schedule or in the
historical impact fee ordinance, as applicable.
E. Following the expiration or dormancy of a preliminary plat ' a new assessment of the impact fees per service
unit shall be calculated as of the date that a new or resubmitted application for a preliminary plat is
determined to be administratively complete by the City Planning Director, or his or her designee, in
accordance with the substantive and procedural provisions of the UDC pertaining to application
F. Following assessment of an impact fee the amount of the impact fee per service unit cannot be increased,
unless there is a subsequent increase in the number of service units associated with the development, in which
case the amount of the new assessments will be calculated at the then current applicable impact fee amounts.
G. The City Manager or designee shall determine whether the new development is eligible for offsetsasofthe
applicable Assessment Date. If an offset is due, the impact fee shall be reduced by the amount of the offset.
The total amounts of impact fees for the new development and the amount of any offset shall be attached to
the development application asacondition ofapproval.
H. An application for an amended plat made pursuant to Texas Local Government Code Section 212.016 or the
UDC isnot subject toareassessment ofawater orwastewater impact fee.
Sec. 13.32.080.Computation of impact fees.
A. The City shall compute the amount of the water and/or wastewater impact fee per SUE in the manner
described inbelow atthe time ofautility connect application asfollows:
Schedule 13.32.061(A), 13.32.061(B), or 13.32.061(C), as applicable; and
1 All applicable offsets per SUE allowable under this Chapter for water or wastewater service shall b
subtracted from the product derived under subsection B.2. of this Section. I
13� The amount of impact fees due for new development shall not exceed the amount computed by multiplying
the applicable impact fee amount set forth on Schedule 13.32.061(A), 13.32.061(B), or 13.32.061(C), as
applicable, by the total number of SUEs generated by the development.
C. Whenever a developer or property owner proposes to increase the number of SUEs for a development, th7
additional impact fees collected for such new service units shall be determined by using the applicable the
applicable impact fee amount set forth on Schedule 13.32.061(A), 13.32.061(B), or 13.32.061(C) then in
effect and such additional fee shall be collected at the times prescribed by this Chapter.
Page gof 21
Cu Payment of an impact fee in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Chapter shall entitle the payor
to receive an offset for same to be used in the event the tap for the property for which the fee is paid expires
and must berepurchased; provided, however, that the impact fee isnot refundable uponexpinadonofthe
tap.
EIf the tap or building permit for the property on which an impact fee is paid has expired and a new
application is thereafter filed for the identical property and the number of service units, the impact fee
previously paid satisfies the requirements of this Chapter.
F. The impact fee shall attach to the property for which the impact fee was paid and shall not be transferable to
other properties orservice units.
G. No request to connect to the water and wastewater system shall be granted and no building permit or
certificate of occupancy shall be issued if the applicant cannot verify payment of the appropriate impact fee
and other applicable fees, or if existing facilities do not have actual capacity to provide service to the new
connection(s).
A. Impact fees shall be collected at the time of issuance by the City of a building permit, except as provided
in subsection (B) through subsection (F).
B. For land platted outside the corporate or extraterritorial jurisdictional boundaries of the City, impact fees
shall be collected at the time an application for connection to the City's water or wastewater system is filed by thc
property owner or someone on behalf of the property owner.
C. If the City lacks authority to issue building permits in the area where the impact fee applies, impact fees
shall be collected at the time an application is filed for connection to the City's water or wastewater system by the
property owner or someone on behalf of the property owner.
D. Wholesale customers are responsible for paying the Otyswater and/or wastewater impact fees per the
terms of the wholesale agreement with the City.
E. The City reserves the right to enter into an agreement with a developer or property owner for a different
time and manner ofpayment ofimpact fees, inwhich case the agreement shall determine the time and manner of
payment.
Sec. 13.32.100. Reserved.
Sec. 13.32.110,
The City Council first adopted an ordinance establishing water and wastewater impact fees on January 9, 1996
(Ordinance No. 96-01). The City Council amended the impact fee ordinance in 2003 (Ordinance No. 2003-39), 2005
2018-48), and 2023 (Ordinance No. 2023-08). For property which has received the relevant development or utility
connect approval (depending on the event triggering the Assessment Date) before the effective date of the
Adopting Ordinance and for which the approval has not expired, and replatting is not required, and the LUEs have
not increased, the impact fees assessed and collected shall be those in effect under the relevant historical impact
fee ordinance, which amounts are summarized in the Historical Impact Fee Schedule attached as,ftft�";
Sec. 13.32.120. Exceptions and exemptions.
A� Reuse water meters. The owner of a meter used to monitor reuse Water, or Water that is utilized exclusively
for consumptive purposes and/or that cannot enter the City wastewater system, will not be charged the
wastewater impact fee.
�B. Fire Flow Only-Meteoare required onfire hydrants orother connections used to supply water for fire flow
purposes only. However, no impact fees will be assessed or collected for fire hydrants or other connections
used tosupply water solely for fire control purposes.
[� Wholesale Customers - Nothing in the Chapter shall be construed to alter the terms of a contract with a
wholesale customer of the City regarding the payment of impact fees and shall not be construed to authorize
the payment of impact fees in installments in areas encompassed by such a contract for wholesale service.
Wholesale customers shall assess and collect impact fees on behalf of the City in accordance with the terms
and conditions oftheir wholesale contracts.
D. Exchange. A tap may be exchanged before any water or wastewater service has been received for another
tap without collection of the impact fees established in this chapter if the exchange will result in an
equivalent or lesser number of service units to be utilized on the property for which the tap was originally
purchased. The number of service units to be exchanged shall be determined in accordance with Section
13.32.050 and shall not be based on the number of units at the time of initial purchase.
Sec. 13'32.130'Establishment of accounts'
A. The City's Division of Finance and Administration shall establish separate i nterest-bea ring accounts clearly
identifying the category of capital improvement (i.e., water facilities and wastewater facilities) within the
service area for which the impact fee iscollected.
B�, Interest earned by each account shall be credited to the account on which it is earned and shall be used
solely for the purposes specified for impact fees as authorized hereinbelow.
C. The City's Division of Finance and Administration shall establish adequate financial and accounting controls
to ensure that impact fees disbursed from the account are utilized solely for the purposes authorized in this
chapter. Disbursement of funds shall be authorized by the City at such times as are reasonably necessary to
carry out the purposes and intent of this chapter; provided, however, that any fee paid shall be expended
within a reasonable period of time, but not to exceed ten years from the date the fee is deposited into the
account.
D. The City's Division of Finance and Administration shall maintain and keep adequate financial records for each
such account, which shall show the source and disbursement of all revenues, which shall account for all
moneys received, the number of service units for which the moneys are received, and which shall ensure
that the disbursement of funds from each account shall be used solely and exclusively for the provision of
projects specified in the impact fee capital improvements plan as system -related capital projects. The City's
Division of Finance and Administration shall also maintain such records as are necessary to ensure that
refunds are appropriately made inaccordance with this chapter.
Sec- 13-32.140- Use of proceeds ofimpact fee accounts.
A. The impact fees collected pursuant to this chapter may be used for the purposes authorized by Section
]95O1ZofTLG[Chapter 395.
B. The impact fees collected pursuant to this chapter may not be used for the purposes
described by Section 395.013 of TLCG Chapter 395.
Sec. 13'32'150.Refunds.
Ay Any impact fee or portion thereof collected pursuant to this chapter which has not been expended within
ten years from the date ofpayment, shall berefunded, uponapp|ication'totheecordo*nerofthe
property at the time the refund is paid, or, if the impact fee was paid by another governmental entity, to
such governmental entity, together with interest calculated from the date of collection to the date of refund
at the statutory rate as set forth in Tex. Local Gov. Code g 395.025' orany successor statute.
Page 11 of 21
B. If a refund is due pursuant to subsection A of this Section, the refund of unexpended fee payments, including
interest from the date of payment, shall be made to the current record owner or governmental entity.
C. Upon completion of all the capital improvements or facilities expansions identified in the capital
improvements plan upon which the fee was based, the City shall recalculate the maximum impact fee per
SUE using the actual costs for the improvements or expansions. If the maximum impact fee per SUE based on
actual cost is less than the impact fee per SUE paid, the City shall refund the difference if such difference
exceeds the impact fee paid by more than ten percent. The refund to the record owner or governmental
entity shall be calculated by multiplying such difference by the number of service units for the development
for which the fee was paid, and interest due shall be calculated upon that amount.
D. 1.Upon the request of an owner of the property on which an impact fee has been paid, the City shall refund
such fees if:
a. Existing service is available and service is denied; or,
b. Service was not available when the fee was collected and the City has failed to commence
construction of facilities to provide service within two years of fee payment; or,
C. Service was not available when the fee was collected and has not subsequently been made
available within a reasonable period of time considering the type of capital improvement or
facility expansion to be constructed, but in any event no later than five years from the date of the
payment.
2. A refund pursuant to this subsection shall also result in cancellation of the tap permit and the refund of
all building permit fees and/or connection fees previously collected.
3. If the holder of a building permit for property for which a building permit has been obtained
relinquishes the building permit for a refund, a canceled building permit must be presented before the
refund can be made.
E. The City shall refund an appropriate proportion of impact fee payments in the event that a previously
purchased but uninstalled water meter for which the impact fee has been paid is replaced with a smaller
meter, in the amount of the difference between the amount of the impact fee originally paid for the larger
meter and the amount due for the smaller meter, calculated as of the date the amount for the larger meter
was originally paid.
F. A petition for refund under this section shall be submitted to the City on the form provided by the City for
such purpose. Within one month of the date of receipt of a petition for refund, the City must provide the
petitioner, in writing, with a decision on the refund request, including the reasons for the decision. If a
refund is due to the petitioner, the City Division of Finance and Administration will issue a refund payment to
the petitioner.
Sec. ..1 . Updates.
The City shall review the land use assumptions and impact fee capital improvements plan for water and
wastewater facilities when required or as allowed by TLCG Chapter 395.
Sec. 13.32.170. Useother financing mechanisms.
A. In addition to the use of impact fees, the City may finance water and wastewater capital improvements or
facilities expansions designated in the impact fee capital improvements plan through the issuance of bonds,
through the formation of public improvements districts or other assessment districts, or through any other
authorized mechanism and with any other authorized funds, in such manner and subject to such limitations
as may be provided by law.
Page 12 of 21
B. Except as otherwise provided herein, the assessment and collection of a impact fee shall be additional and
supplemental to, and not in substitution of, any other tax, fee, charge or assessment which is lawfully
imposed on and due against the property.
Sec. 13.32.180. Impact fees as additional and supplemental regulation.
A. Impact fees established by this chapter are additional and supplemental to, and not in substitution of, any
other requirements imposed by the City on the development of land or the issuance of building permits or
the sale of water or wastewater taps or the issuance of certificates of occupancy. Such fees are intended to
be consistent with and to further the policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan, impact fee capital
improvements plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations and other City policies, ordinances and
resolutions by which the City seeks to ensure the provision of adequate public facilities in conjunction with
the development of land.
B. This chapter shall not affect, in any manner, the permissible use of property, density of development, desig
and improvement standards and requirements, or any other aspect of the development of land or provisio
of public improvements subject to the zoning and subdivision regulations or other regulations of the City,
which shall be operative and remain in full force and effect without limitation with respect to all such
development.
Sec. 13.32.190. Relief procedures.
A. Any person who has paid an impact fee or an owner of land upon which an impact fee has been paid may
petition the Council to determine whether any duty required by this chapter has not been performed within
the time so prescribed. The petition shall be in writing and shall state the nature of the unperformed duty
and the request that the act be performed within 60 days of the request. If the Council determines that the
duty is required pursuant to this chapter and is late in being performed, it shall cause the duty to commence
within 60 days of the date of the request and to continue until completion.
B. Any person who has been assessed an impact fee under this chapter may appeal that assessment by written
application to the City Manager. The City Council may enforce, reduce or modify the assessment, after
providing a public hearing with due notice and opportunity to be heard, if it determines that the assessment
is unwarranted or in error.
C. Existing platted properties with an approved development plan that are extended municipal water and
wastewater service will be assessed the then -applicable impact fee at time of utility connect permit
application.
D. The Council may grant a variance or waiver from any requirement of this chapter, upon written request by a
developer or owner of property subject to this chapter, following a public hearing, and only upon finding that
a strict application of such requirement would, when regarded as a whole, result in extreme hardship to the
applicant and that the grant of the waiver or variance is in the best interest of the City.
E. If the Council grants a variance or waiver to the amount of the impact fees due for new development under
this section, it shall cause to be appropriated from other City funds the amount of the reduction in the
impact fees to the amount in which the fees would have been deposited.
Page 13 of 21
EXHIBIT A-1— WATER SERVICE AREA MAP
1
Fl +r
„ga «pt}• HIH
^i w 91?dP.EY�+.V6i
85 @
0 1 2 4 6 a Exhibit-1 -Water Se ice
us Area
'9aa HERE Gsraro t"4 tit".P.ltr tMapwnaeti.@¢^.es aW[w UieG -u cranl-ai dy
Page14 of 21
Page 15 of 21-
1
i�t,n?br
I
!ExEhibit:A-2 t tr
Service Area
0 05 1 2 3 d n m miy r rm-K
Em HFQE vaar: m oq Gp�v BL-ekM.p mntnbs t� erd d;ic: d34"- aa..:u amui,u gy
Page 16 of 21
EXHIBIT B — WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE SCHEDULES
Schedule 13.32.060
Maximum Assessable Impact Fees
Water $ 13,835 per SUE
Wastewater $ 13,577 per SUE
Schedule 13.32.061(A)
PHASE 1 WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
Assessment Date between August 31, 2025 and August 30, 2026, inclusive of beginning and ending dates
Item Impact Fee per Service Unit Equivalent
Water
SUPPIY $6,932.00
Treatment $2,027.00
Pumping $690.00
Ground Storage $191.00
Elevated Storage $188.00
Transmission $965.00
Impact Fee Study $7.00
TOTAL Water Impact Fee $11,000.00
Wastewater
Treatment $5,199.00
Pumping $466.00
Interceptors $1,334.00
Impact Fee Study $1.00
TOTAL Wastewater Impact Fee $7,000.00
. ....... . ....
..... . ..........
Total Combined Water and Wastewater $18,000.00
Page 18 of 21
Assessn
Schedule 13.32.061()
PHASE 2 WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
Schedule 13.32.061(C
ig dates
EXHIBIT C-1
EXHIBIT C-2
ASSESSED
WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT
FEE HISTORY TABLE
(PER SERVICE UNIT)
Assessment Date
Land Use Type Combined
Combined
Combined
Combined South F
Water
Western District
Wastewater
Service Area*
Impact Fee
Service Area *
Impact Fee
Wastewater Impa
Amount
Water Impact Fee
Amount
Fee
Amount
Amount
Before September 30, 2003
Page zoof21
After October 11, 2005 and
All
$3,324
$1,8811$3,114through
November 5, 2010
After November 5, 2010
All
$3,511
$1,6942,927
through September 30, 2015
After October 1, 2015 and
All
$5,139
$2,997
$4,452
through September 30, 2016
After October 1, 2016 and
All
$6,139
$2,997
$4,452
before October 1, 2017
After October 1, 2017 and
All
$7,039
$2,997
$4,452
before ..-2022
After October r, ,
- i ib- 1After October 1, 2023 and
$3,115 $4,348
$6,129 N/A
NOTES:
The South Fork Service Area is defined and described in Ordinance No. 2005-61 (October 11, 2005) and 2010-42
(November 9, 2010), which are on file with the City Secretary.
The Western District Service Area (aka "COG Western District CCN") is defined and described in Ordinance No.
2015-42 (August 25, 2025), which is on file with the City Secretary.
Page 21 of 21
�i�i'1�%'Te►'73i�i
Georgetown Impad Fee
(DM Smithl of Georgetown, T
Prepared by:
NewGen
Strategies
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
List of Tables.......................................................................... ............. ......................-.i
List of Figures........ ..i
Section 1 Introduction and Methodolgy ........... ......... ......... .................. .................1-1
Introduction ........... .1-1
Section 2 Land Use Assumptions :. .................. ......... ......... .................. .................2-1
Compliance--,.,,,,..,,.,,,,,,,,, ..... _ ,.........».................... ........... . ........ ....<. .2-1
Systemwide Area Service Units,..,.... ...2-1
Section 3 Capital Improvement Projects..... ...... ....................-..............................3-1
Compliance... .......... . ....:.. .......: ........ . ...... : .................. ........, .... __.......3
Impact Fee Capital Improvement Projects .................................... 3-2
Section 4 Financial Assumptions and Calculations ................... ......... ............................ 4-1
Compliance... . ........ ....>..., ..... ...,...,... », .......... .. , -4-1
Financial Assumptions........: .4-1
Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Determination.. 4-2
Executive Summary Tabled Maximum Fee Per Service Unit ..................................................... ES-1
Table 2-1 Ten -Year Water and Wastewater Service Unit Growth ..... . ___ ...... ..- 2-1
Table 3-1 Water Impact Fee CIP Project Listing ............................ ........ ......... .........<„>...;3-3
Table 3-2 Wastewater Impact Fee CIP Project Listing.....,. .3-5
Table 4-1 Borrowing Rate Per Year of Issuance .... ......... ....._ ........ ......... ..,,....;,,... ..:4-2
Table 4-2 Current Assessed Fee Per Service Unit (3/4" Meter = 1 LUE).; _ ... 4-2
Table 4-3 Maximum Impact Fee Per Service Unit (3/4" Meter = 1 LUE) ..4-3
Figure 2-1 Water Service Area with Land Use Assumptions ....... .......:. ......<: ............,....2-2
Figure 2-2 Water Connection and Population Growth 2025-2045.........................................2-3
Figure 2-3 Wastewater Service Area with Land Use Assumptions .. -2-4
Figure 2-4 Wastewater Flow and Population Growth to Buildout . .., ....2-5
Figure 3-1 Water Systemwide Impact Fee CIP Map................................................................3-4
Figure 3-2 Functional Breakdown of Water CIP ............................ ............ ..... ...... ..........µ,......3-4
Figure 3-3 Wastewater Systemwide Impact Fee CIP Map ............ ......... ......... .................3-6
Figure 3-4 Functional Breakdown of Wastewater CIP ................................... ............. ...
3-6
08 ' Solutions
Economics I Strategy I Stakeholders I Sustainability
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
NevvGen Strategies and Solutions, LLC (NewGen) was retained by CDM Smith (CDM) on behalf of the City
of Georgetown, Texas (City) to conduct a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update Study (Study).
Concurrently, CDM Smith was updating the Water and Wastewater Masterplans, which have served as
the primary source for engineering inputs to this Study. The goal of this engagement was to update the
calculations of water and wastewater impact fees for the City of Georgetown based on a methodology
that satisfies the requirements of the Texas Local Government Code (Code) Chapter 395.
The Code specifically defines Impact Fees (Fees) as "...a charge or assessment imposed by a political
subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of
capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development."
The anticipated costs of capital improvements and facility expansion attributable to growth are projected
over a period not to exceed ten (10) years.' The costs represent the amount of new investment required
for the utility to meet new demand in the area it serves!
The Code requires the formation of a Capital Improvements Advisory Committee, which has been referred
to as the Impact Fee Advisory Committee (IFAC). The IFAC met three (3) times from May to June 2025,
where it reviewed the Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvement Projects and the Resulting Maximum
Assessable Fee as allowed by the Code.
The City has grown very rapidly, and it is expected this trend will continue through the ten-year impact
fee planning period. Water service units are expected to grow by approximately 56,600 new service units.
Wastewater services are provided to a smaller service area and are expected to serve 30,000 new
wastewater service units.
Given the City's rapid growth, substantial capital investment will need to be made to provide continuous
and safe water and wastewater services. While the City may have existing capital that requires
maintenance or even expansions to serve existing demands, only those portions of capital improvement
projects that are required for growth are included in the impact fee calculations. For water, this total is
over $825M and $392M for wastewater.
Executive Summary Table 1
Maximum Fee Per Service Unit
Service Area Water Wastewater
Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee $ 783,663,534 $ 407,312,590
Divided by Additional Service Units Added During Planning Period 56,643 30,000
Maximum Assessable Fee $13,835 $13,577
This report discusses the method and results of NewGen's Study. Service area, projected land use and
capital project maps produced by CDM Smith are included as Appendices. As this Study relies heavily on
the Masterplans for each system, those documents may also serve as a helpful supplement for project -
level specifics. Lastly, the complete financial calculations have been included as appendices for each
system, including a breakdown of the total impact fees by functional system components.
' Texas Local Government Code§ 395.001(5), 395.014(6).
z Texas Local Government Code § 395.001(7, 9).
M& Solutions
Economics I Strategy I Stakeholders I Sustainability ES-1
Section 1
rr; r r rrr
Introduction
NewGen Strategies and Solutions, LLC (NewGen) was retained by CDM Smith (CDM) on behalf of the City
of Georgetown, Texas (City) to conduct a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update Study (Study).
Concurrently, CDM Smith was updating the Water and Wastewater Masterplans, which have served as
the primary source for engineering inputs to this Study. This engagement updates the impact fees for
water and wastewater based on a methodology that satisfies the requirements of the Texas Local
Government Code (Code) Chapter 395. The City last updated Water and Wastewater Impact Fees in 2022.
The Code defines Impact Fees (Fees) as "...a charge or assessment imposed by a political subdivision
against new development to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements
or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development. The term includes
amortized charges, lump -sum charges, capital recovery fees, contributions in aid of construction, and any
other fee that functions as described by this definition."' Generally, the Fees enable municipalities to
recover infrastructure costs associated with future growth from developers. The anticipated costs of
capital improvements and expansions are projected over a period not to exceed ten (10) years.' The costs
represent the amount of investment required for the utility to meet new demand in the area it serves.5
The Code also requires the formation of a Capital Improvements Advisory Committee to advise, review,
and monitor Land Use Assumptions, Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plans (CIP), and Impact Fees, file
reports/comments to City Council and advise on the need for updates. In Georgetown, this committee
has been referred to as the Impact Fee Advisory Committee (IFAC). IFAC must include a member of the
extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) since the service and impact fee areas extend beyond City limits. The IFAC
met three times from May to June 2025, where it reviewed the Land Use Assumptions, Capital
Improvement Projects and the Resulting Maximum Assessable Fee as allowed by the Code. The Project
Team and City Staff appreciate the valuable feedback and participation of IFAC members.
I Texas Local GovemmentCode 004
4 Texas Local Govemment•.
. rr
i,. ..•. rr
aSolutions
Economics i
Section
LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
The Code stipulates that land use assumptions must include a description of the service area served by
the Facility and the projected changes in land uses, population densities, and the intensity of demand
over a minimum ten (10)-year period.' The Code further describes the requirements that systemwide
land use assumptions, which were used in the preparation of this study, must address in order to justify
imposing Fees':
(a) In lieu of adopting land use assumptions for each service area, a political subdivision may,
except for storm water, drainage, flood control, and roadway facilities, adopt systemwide land
use assumptions, which cover all of the area subject to the jurisdiction of the political subdivision
for the purpose of imposing impact fees under this chapter.
Systemwide Area Service Units
t f � f •'. - f' • i
61 lot
Table 2-1
Ten -Year Water and Wastewater Service Unit Growth
Service
2025
lien -Year
2035
Area
Service Units
Service Unit Growth
Service Units
Water
79,934
56,643
136,577
Wastewater
44,125
30,000
74,125
To arrive at these service units estimates, a number of assumptions were made, including:
Single-family development at a rate of 3.5 dwelling units per acre with 2.5 people per unit.
Multi -family development at a rate of about 6.5 dwelling units per acre with 1.9 people per unit.
Each person will demand 180 gallons per day.
Commercial development will demand an average of 1,000 gallons per day per acre.
-
1.9 maximum day demand (MDD) factor for 2025, falling to 1.85 in 2030, and 1.8 by 2035.
Both population and demand projections rely on a numberof factors, including planned developments
that are already underway. NewGen relied on CDM Smith and the Masterplans for both land use and
service population estimates. Additional details related to the hydraulic modeling and more in-depth
engineering assumptions can be found within the Masterplans.
Figures 2-1 through 2-4 illustrate expected growth and related impact on service demands for the next
ten years and beyond. Additional, higher resolution maps can be found in the Appendices to this report.
' Texas Local Government Code §395.001(5).
' Texas Local Government Code §395.0455.
M& Solutions
Economics I Strategy I Stakeholders I Sustainability 2-1
W8*r&WW&s1tWP4A5
'Water Developmentssumtions
Figure 2-1
Water Service Area withLand Use Assumptions
2-2 Georgetown Impact Fee Report
Land Use Assumptions
KHM"THANWHINT1 M,
r,(kl,OCrj
5CY0,00,C)
200,000
ICC),O()O
0
2025 2027 2029 2031 2033 2 G-J, 5 2037 2039 2041 2043 2045
—6—Connecrim; —0—Popflation
Figure 2-2
Georgetown W_WW Impact Fee Report 202507-02-2025Final 2-3
Section 2
The Wastewater service area for the City is much smaller than the water service area. Nonetheless,
population growth and wastewater demands will continue to grow steadily, expecting to more than
double the service units over the next ten (10) years.
Figure 2-3
Wastewater Service Area with Land Use Assumptions
2-4 Georgetown W_WW Impact Fee Report
Land Use Assumptions
N
200,000
0
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Year
1M
O
60
50 re
40
30 M
20
ro
MN
0
2060 2070 2080 2090
— 2022 WWMP Population 2018 WWMP Population
— — — 2022 WWMP ADWF —,2018WWMPADWF
Figure 2-4
Georgetown W_WW Impact Fee Report 202507-02-2025Final 2.5
Section 3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
The Code defines the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) as a plan that identifies capital improvements or
facility expansions for which impact fees may be assessed.$ The CIP is required to specifically address
each of the following items:'
1) a description of the existing capital improvements within the service area and the costs to upgrade,
update, improve, expand, or replace the improvements to meet existing needs and usage and stricter
safety, efficiency, environmental, or regulatory standards, which shall be prepared by a qualified
professional engineer licensed to perform the professional engineering services in this state;
2) an analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and commitments for usage of capacity of
the existing capital improvements, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer
licensed to perform the professional engineering services in this state;
3) a description of all or the parts of the capital improvements or facility expansions and their costs
necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on the approved land
use assumptions, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform the
professional engineering services in this state;
4) a definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation, or
discharge of a service unit for each category of capital improvements or facility expansions and an
equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses,
including residential, commercial, and industrial;
5) the total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development
within the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated in accordance
with generally accepted engineering or planning criteria;
6) the projected demand for capital improvements or facility expansions required by new service units
projected over a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 10 years; and
7) a plan for awarding:
a) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service
units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the
payment of debt, which are included in the capital improvements plan; or
b) in the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the
capital improvements plan.
Economics I Strategy I Stakeholdersr
asolutions
0
Section 3
Impactital Improvement Projects
The cost of some, but not all, capital improvements maybe recovered through impact fees. Types of
project costs that fall within the guidelines of both recoverable and non -recoverable costs are defined
below.
Recoverable
The Code states that a cost is recoverable through an impact fee if it is both incurred by a proper impact
fee facility and is a permissive cost for the facility. The CIP and facility expansion for new development
in the City's water and wastewater utilities generally satisfy the criteria for proper impact fee facilities. It
should be noted that these costs do not include maintenance, repairs, or expansion of existing facilities
to improve service to an existing development. Permissive, or recoverable, costs for the impact fee
include:
Construction
Surveying and Engineering
Land Acquisition and Associated Costs
Projected Interest Charges and Other Finance Costs
Engineering Costs Associated with Land Use/Capital Improvements Planning and/or Financial
Consulting Associated with Developing Impact Fees (Not Employed by the City)
Nonrecoverable Costs
The Code identifies the following costs as nonrecoverable by an impact fee:
Capital Improvement Projects NOT Identified in the Impact Fee CIP
Operations and Maintenance Costs
Improvements Associated with Existing Deficiencies
Administrative and Operational Costs of the City
Non -Impact Fee CIP Debt Service
The City and CDM Smith provided NewGen with a CIP project listing for existing and planned CIP, along
with the allocated costs and capacity for growth, using the previously discussed land use assumption
figures.
Tables 3-1 and 3-2 below list each of the Impact Fee CIP Projects for Water and Wastewater, respectively.
Figures follow each of the project listings showing general project locations on a map, as well as the
functional totals for each system. More detailed maps are in the appendices of this report.
Additional information on funding for each new project is outlined in more detail in the financial schedules
section of the appendices. Full details, including timing, materials and more granular estimates for new
projects will be available in the City's Masterplan documents.
3-2 Georgetown W WW Impact Fee Report
Capital Improvement Projects
Table 3-1
Project Name or Description
Project Total Cost
Impact Fee Eligible
EVVCSupply (3GT Pumping, Transmission)
45,978,660
19,100,896
Recharge Groundwater Supply
470.857.645
199.639.843
Circleville 0nRattlesnake Transmission
520.841.948
217.143.457
South Lake VVTP
197.203.999
91.038.996
Aquifer Storage Recovery Treatment
20.400.000
26.400.000
Groundwater Treatment (Rott|eenohe)
20.266.120
8.352.985
Groundwater Pumping (Ratt|eonahe)
80.238.103
31.953.957
Groundwater Ground Storage (RuU|eunake)
24'696.000
11.397.400
Braun 1248Elevated Storage Tank
8.500.000
6.800.000
Daniels Mountain 30''(Daniels 0oCR255)
3.584.000
8'290.118
State Hwy 130Upgrade
3.585.935
0.548.707
Shell Road and Shell Spur (Shell Road)
2.016.325
1.735.871
Country Road 228Upgrade
6.180.000
5.504.312
Ronald Reagan &Santa Rita 0mBraun (Loup)
6.180.000
5.504.312
NEInner Loop
3.347.500
2.981.502
GEInner Loop
1.850.000
1.047.731
Rattlesnake Transmission
82.507'254
73.486.350
Daniels Mountain Vo US 183 (Daniels to183)
8.337.507
7.425.928
Ronald Reagan 0n135
8.523.271
7.591'382
State Hwy 1S5Ronald Reagan hoOak Branch
4.545'744
4.048.787
Southwest Bypass Leander Road to|'35
3.824.545
3'406.389
County Road 245
2.214.215
1.972.123
Ronald Reagan 233O
3.844'848
3.424'473
U8183'CR2O7toFM 3405(Tnanaminoiun)
5.067.080
4.513.073
Rabbit Hill Road
3.382.153
3.012.367
UG183'FM34O5tmHighway 28(Tnonamioaiun)
15.049.229
13.403.826
Existing Water Supply
23.726.206,
-
Existing Water Treatment
71.016.797
_
Existing Pumping
57.451.826
21.114.688
Existing Ground Storage
10.481.423
13.597
Existing Elevated Storage
22.943.159
7.316.033
Existing Transmission
111.872'090
15.285.470
Water Impact Fee Update
425.000
'
425.000
TOTAL WATER IMPACT FEE C|P
$ 1.905.893,257
$ 825.232.932
Georgetown vv_vxvvImpact Fee Report 3-3
Section 3
SH 113,11 Upgrade
f-COR, 229 Upgrade'l
SH 196 RR to Oak Branch
A,
RR 2338
Daniels to 2551
CR 246
t
Daniels to 193 k Shell Road
Reagan to 19
163 Transmission
A
of
Braun 00 Loop
NE Inner Los,,
LBraun, 1240 EST SE Inner Loop
Legend
Capital Projects SIN- as
-2030
205 Rabbit Hi0 Rd
0,
Figure 3-1
Water Systemwide Impact Fee CIP Map
Water Transmission,
$282,031,695 tgmx�
LT,TF=
WaterTreatment,
$315,005,922
Figure 3-2
3-4 Georgetown W_WW Impact Fee Report
Capital Improvement Projects,
Table 3-2
Project Name or Description
Project Total Cost
Impact Fee Eligible
Sunny Trail Rediect
2.631.650
2.210.586
San Gabriel Interceptor
17.787.058
4.983.344
Cowan Creek 1
14'212.877
4.405.992
Cowan Creek 7
9.431.401
3.112.362
Dry Berry Creek G1
38.811.090
1.915.584
Dry Berry Creek G3
5.623.839
281'182
ManhinoBasin 5
7.483.548
1.708.451
Tunnel
108.704.074
28.253'059
San Gabriel Diversion
3.143.776
157.188
Northlands
27.381.103
1.859.555
Northlands
0'997.499
349'875
Berry Cnmok2a
3.582.859
1.827.150
Berry Creek Interceptor
74.312.559
20'004.391
Cimarron Hills Lift Station
5.245.000
3.770.400
Cowan Creek Lift Station
19.522.000
5.927.040
San Gabriel Lift Station
37.629.428
10.538.240
ManhinuLift Station West
7.376.835
1.106.504
Northlands Lift Station
9.365.450
2.990.944
Saddle Creek Lift Station
1.750.000
1.750.000
Northlands VVVVTP(3MGD)
181.000.000
90.500.000
Three Forks VYVxTP(7MGD)
378.000.800
200'340.000
Wastewater Impact Fee Update
425.000
425'000
TOTAL WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE c|P
$ 964'482.706
$ 392.882.054
Georgetown W_WWImpact Fee Report 3-5
Section
1 f,
f
V
7
a.
$fY t v 4
m
�.i9Ylld �6§
{
fY +U
�x� 1
"f dvx Y.w gxR
.� 11, y.,
� �x B � •i fu ��3Vw�M WMmwii kx.n GYrTAxCUVM'i'bn �. a _s it ✓x.,,i � sv ..x.� xrIFNNSA USA F14l hbvc:.*,i1A
Georgetown 2025 Impact Fee
TrMith P Projeds 0 05 1 2 Nmm 3 4Mlles
}
Figure -3
Wastewater Systemwide Impact Fee CIP Map
Figure
Functionali i of
3-6 Georgetown WW Impact Fee Report
Section I
The impact fee determination method employed by NewGen Strategies and Solutions, LLC is developed
through a financial based model, which fully recognizes the requirements of the Code, including the
recognition of cash and/or debt financing, interest earnings, fund balances, and applicable credits. The
Code states that interest earnings are funds of the impact fee account and are to be held to the same
restrictions as impact fee revenues.
The Code requires a plan for awarding either a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and/or utility
service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that are used for payment of
improvements that are included in the Water Impact Fee CIP and Wastewater Impact Fee CIP. As an
alternative, a credit equal to 50% of the total cost of implementing the Water Impact Fee CIP and
Wastewater Impact Fee CIP may be used. The City has elected to calculate a credit based on a portion of
utility service revenues.
The assumptions employed in the maximum assessable impact fee determination provide a reasonable
basis for forecasting; however, it must be emphasized that these assumptions may not necessarily reflect
actual future conditions. To address this, Chapter 395 requires the monitoring of impact fees through the
Impact Fee Advisory Committee and allows for the option to update or revise impact fees to reflect the
actual implementation of the impact fee program.
Financial 1 s
In developing the components of the financial model, several assumptions must be made, including the
following:
Financing
Method of financing (i.e., cash or debt financing)
The level of financing (e.g., 65% debt funding)
Cost of financing
Debt repayment structure
Timing and Level of Expenditures and Revenues
Interest Earnings
Once the cost of capacity added that is attributable to growth is determined, it must then be decided how
the cost will be financed: cash and/or debt. Unless specific funding has already been determined, it is
assumed that the City will debt finance 65% of the future impact fee eligible project costs. For debt
financing, the cost of financing is based on an assumed 30-year debt term with interest rates each year
based on Table 4-1 below. Debt was assumed to be issued the first year of a project with proceeds being
spent over the next three years to closely emulate actual projects from design to construction. Debt
service payments for each future debt issue are assumed to be a level annual payment over the issue's
term.
Ma Solutions
Economics I Strategy I Stakeholders I Sustainability 4-1
Section
Table 4.1
Fiscal Year Interest Rate
2027
S&
2028
5%
2029
g%
2030
5%
2031
5%
2032
5%
2033
S%
2034
5%
2035
5%
It in currently assumed that any existing fund balances are already encumbered. Because debt |s issued
assuming athirty (3O)'yearterm and impact fees developed herein are tube charged over aten (1O)'year
period, sufficient fund balance must be generated to
meet the future debt service obligations.
/norder torecognize that interest earnings are used bzfund only these specific Water Impact Fee Capital
Improvement Plan (OP)projects and Wastewater Impact Fee OPprojects, interest earnings are credited
against the costs recoverable through impact fees. It should be noted that Chapter 3Q5 does not require
the upfront recognition of interest earnings in the impact fee determination; however, in an effort to
acknowledge the time value of the impact fee payers' monies, interest earnings have been credited.
Interest is assumed to be earned at an annual rate of 2.50%, per discussions with City staff.
The timing and annual level ofservice unit growth over the ten (IO)-yearprogram period isindeterminate
at the present time. As such, it is assumed that service unit growth will be consistent over the ten (10)'
yearomrecast.
Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Determination
The net result of this Study is the determination of the maximum allowable impactfee for the City based
on the engineering estimates of growth, land uses and capital needs. This calculation sets the upper limit,
according to the Code, of what the City Council may elect to approve as the impact fee assessment. The
current fees are below inTable 4'2.
Table 4-2
Current Assessed Fee Per Service Unit (3/4'Meter =1LUE)
Service Area Water Wastewater
The resulting, updated maximum fees per service unit are summarized hnTable 4-3below. Further detail
4-2 Georgetown W_WW Impact Fee Report
Financial Assumptions and Calculations
Table 4-3
irrla�
Service Area
Water
Wastewater
Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs
$ 825,232,932
$ 392,082,054
Add: Financing Costs
413,623,182
241,353,348
Less: Interest Earnings
(198,619,478)
(94,118,223)
Pre -Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee
$ 1,040,236,636
$ 593,317,180
Less: Credit for Utility Revenues
(256,573,103)
(132,004,590)
Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee
$ 783,663,534
$ 407,312,590
Divide: Additional Service Units Added During Planning Period
56,643
30,000
Maximum Assessable Fee
$13,835
$13,577
Georgetown W_WVV Impact Fee Report 4-3
124
\\1E
Water & Wastewater Impact Fees
SUMMARY OFWATER IMPACT FEE DETERMINATION
Water Service Area
Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs 825,232,932 Per CDIVI Smith
Financing Cost 413,623,182 See Detail Below
..�xisfing Fund Balance. - Water Appen!1i page 4
Interest Earninas _____Sl�8�,619,47�8 Water Appendices - page 6
Pre Credit Recoverable Cost $ 1,040,236,636 Sum of Above
dredit -for Utility Revenues (256,573,1112aJJ4���dices - page 9
Represents the portion of capital improvement costs that are eligible for funding through impact mos. Reference is the
CDIVI Smith Impact Fee Study.
Represents the interest costs associated with debt financing the new impact fee project costs. Interest costs are derived
from existing debt issues and forecasted debt issues.
New Annual Debt Service $ 830.056.074 Water Appendices ' page 5
Existing Annual Debt Service 114.e90.117 Water Appendices pagoo
Principal Component (New and Existing Debt) Water Appendices page
Financing Costs $ 413.623.102
fix
Represents impact fee revenue collected but not yet expended. Assuming all existing fund balance ioalready encumbered
for projects from prior impact fee studies. Reference is page 4 of Water Appendices.
Represents the interest earned on cash flows and assumes a 3.00% annual interest rate. The Impact Fee Statute
states that interest earnings are funds of the impact fee account and are held to the same restrictions as impact fee
revenues. Therefore in order to recognize that interest earnings are used to fund capital improvements, interest earnings
are credited against the recoverable costs. Reference is the sum of Accumulated Interest on page 6 of Water Appendices.
RLe_Qr&4Ji_Rqgqverab1e Cost for Impact Fee.
' Represents Recoverable Impact Fee opCosts plus Financing Costs less Existing Fund Balance and Interest Earnings,
Credit for Utility Revenues�
In 2001, the Local Government Code Chapter 395 was amended to include a credit for ad valorem and/or utility revenues
generated bynew service units during the ten-year Umoframe that are used 0ofund impact fee eligible projects for which the
new service units were charged animpact fee. The intent afthis amendment iuvnavoid double -charging the new service
units for impact fee capital improvements. The credit recognizes utility revenues used to fund impact fee eligible projects.
Reference iopage 9ofWater Appendices.
Represents Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee less Credit for Utility Revenues. This is the maximum cost that
can berecovered through impact fees.
2025 Water Impact Fee Study
City of -• •- •wn - 2025 Waterp. •
Capital Improvement Plan for Impact Fees
Impact •l
Water Service t
rea
0
Existing Fund Balances Available
$
1
Existing Number of Service Units
79 934
,
2
Total Number of Services Units for Planning Period
136,577
Additional Service Units Added During Planning Period
3
Line 2 - Line 1),
56,643
4
Total Cost of the Water Impact Fee CIP
1,905,893,256
5
Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee Planning Period
$
825,232,932
Percent Recoverable for Water Impact Fee Planning Period
6
Line 5 / Line Al43.30%
Financing Costs
7
From Financial Analysis)
$
413,623,182
Interest Earnings
R-
From Financial Analysis)
$
(198,619,478)
Recoverable Cost of Water Impact Fee and Financing Costs
9
(Line 5 + Line 7 + Line 8 - Line 0)
$
1,040,236,636
Pre -Credit Maximum Fee
10
Line 9 / Line 3
$
18,365
Credit for Utility Revenues
11
From Financial Analysis)
$
(256,573,103)
Recoverable Cost of Water Impact Fee and Financing
12
Line 9 + Line 11
$
783,663,534
Maximum Assessable Fee
13
11 ine 12 Line 3
$
=13,
2025 Water Impact Fee Study
City of Georgetown, Texas Page 2 of 9 Water Appendices
U-
M+ Q} _C
(� LL w
EL U
C a LL
D E U (6
�P- a
L LLy
C
:)
cy E co
a w
c ° N
3 E
® _� o
Q> U
m a
//0 U LL
V
O
>1
p
:+
m
ai
do
m
N
an
N
rn
m
an
®s
m
No
ve
®
m
.a io
mN m m
m ®
m ® Ln ao
^� lo H
aP m"
�
Oe
n
l0
l0
rrt
Vf'
+n
V8'
O
O:
vt vs +n
ui
q
an vs vt cn
aJ1
q
N
®
Ol
6(1
1p
4D
n
cl
O '
a
n N I n
'
E
c
r
On1'
lD
16
ve
H
®
w
®
mof
to
r4
N' rt9
o n m
M HN'
o q
m
ro
:.
It
n
M:
*ti
M.
®
ct
^ n
r rm
q^
rci
ro
a
w
OD
O
4n
T
01
Oi
P
+lY
O
1p
VI
N
'q
P^•'
v4
O
O
v-I'
an as uT
ry
M V1
m
+n n N va
q m m a-i
ry o
q
O'
�
c
v4
Qs
ll1
lD
pt
w
al
W
n ` O
Nq Oi
O
ro O w
N
a
�
10f1
SO
aD'
ry
H
O
m
u1
a
iD rn„ o
co ry to
N �y SO
Oq1
o M
®y VI
v
v
'
m
®
o
o
q
ID
m
lo m
n ti
N N N
�? q
a
A
3
�
4l}
U?
VT V! Vp
VF tf? VT VT
?
O..
O
.:
q
�
chn
n
m
a-1
M
alit
rn
ti
.O-1
rl
ay
-
o
6l1
o\
®
6
'.
N p s1
I °fl 11
q
"
o el
q
rt ® W
c r9 O
N �D en
® ® n
n n
9!
3
O
®
.0)Oy
Wtw
N O
_
It
C
U
U
a
a
d
C
to
_
G
G
_
O
G
C
�
2
®
ate:
E
LL=
c cc
3m v c t; 'i;
m
•C
c
u
u a c a a
E J a a J
c
o
_
J
m
o
,u u`m E
x E
5
LL. ?i
a o i� 5 c o c
z_
®
®
E;= E®
J.
u _ E o E
.x
x
m
®
a
v
'2
„
u
o
U
a
m
a
>
O O„
u
°a °D O w.
a a
v
w
v
U
E
—
o
v
a
a
z
c
r
o
a
u
a
`m
>a
v
o
o
.-a
N
q.
m
q
i
W
City of Georgetown - 2025 Water Impact Fee Study
Capital Improvement Plan for Impact Fees
Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions
Water Service Area
I. General Assumptions
Annual Interest Rate on Deposits
f i 3.00%
Annual Service Unit Growth (2)
1E
5.664`
Existing Fund Balance (3)
Portion of Projects Funded by Existing
Debt (4) $ 106,089,797
Non -debt Funded Project Cost tsi
293,809,923
New Project Cost Funded Through
New Debt tsi
425,333;211'
Total Recoverable Project Cost
Pl $
825,232,932
II. New Debt Issues Assumptions
Year rtrtcl t# I
er I s
Term
17E�
500%
30
2 -52
5.00%
30339383
5:00%
30'
4 9,780,230
5;00%
30
5
5.00%
30
6 1,281,880
5,00%
30
7- 2,225,907
5.00%
30`
8: 3,200,672
5.009/6
30
9 8,712,487
5.00%
30
10
5.009/6
.30
Total $ 425,333,217
Ill. Capital Expenditure Assumptions
Annual
Capital
Year,
Ex enditur s t'Dt
1
$ 54,829.369
2
3,649,613
3
214,065,382
4
146.069.551
5
136,.637.422
6
135,068,381
7
4,885,936
8
5,421.753
9
6,9277492
10
4.713.022
11
3,971,053
12
2.904.162
13
Total
719,143,135
(1) Per discussions with City Staff
(2) Per CDM Smith
(3) Assumes all existing fund balances are already encumbered
(4) Per discussions with City Staff
(5) This assumes 35 % of new project costs funded through sources other than debt, unless specified otherwise
(6) This assumes 65 % of new project costs funded through new debt issues, unless specified otherwise
(7) Per CDM Smith
(8) Assumes new debt issued based on schedule from CDM Smith
(9) Per discussions with City Staff
(10) Assumes new debt proceeds expended over a 3-year timeframe
Non -debt funded capital expenditures allocated per discussions with City Staff
2025 Water Impact Fee Study
City of Georgetown, Texas Page 4 of 9 Water Appendices
City of Georgetown - 2025 Water Impact Fee Study
Capital Improvement Plan for Impact Fees
Debi Service and Expense Summary
Water Service Area
Total
Annual
Saris. and.. Bad- Sed.. Sen.. Series Sea.. Sarl.. Uri.. Sao- No. Dab
rear IN i 3 i A A T s 9 it
servlce-
440,909
440,909
440,909
25,580,254
26,029,163
440,909
25,580,254
636,218
26,665s81
440,909
25,580,254
636,218
HAMM
440,909
25,500,254
636,218
83,308
26,748,769
• 440r909
25,580,254
636,218 n
83,388
144,798
-
26,893,566
440,909
25,588,254
636,216
83,388
144,790
208,208
27,101,776
440,909
25,588,254
636,218
83,386
144,798
208,200
566,760
27.66%536
440,909
25,588,254
636,210
83,308
144,790
208,208
566,760
27,660,536
440,909
25,588,254
636,218
03,380
144,798
208,208
566,760
27,668,536
440,909
25,588,254
636218
83,388
144,798
20Bs08
566,760
27,66B,536
440,909
25,568,254
635,218
83,388
144,799
208,208
566,760
27,660,536
440,909
25,588,254
636218
83,386
144,790
208,208
566,760
27,660,536
440,909
25,5BB,254
636,210
83,388
144,798
208,208
566,760
27,66B,536
440,909
25,588,254
636,210
83,388
144,798
208,20E
566,760
27,668,536
• 440,909
25,508,254
636,218
83,30B
144,790
208,200
566,760
27,669,536
440,9D9
25,508,254
636,210
83,38B
144,790
208,200
566,760
27,668,536
440,909
25,508,254
636,210
03,388
144,798
208,208
566,760
27,668,536
440,909
25,508,254
636215
03,388
144,798
268,209
566,760
27,66%536
440,909
25,508,254
636,218
03,388
144,798
208,200
566,760
27,668,536
440,909
25,508,254
636,218
83,388
144,798
208,208
566,760
27,66B,536
440,909
26,506,254
636,218
63,388
144.798
208,208
566,760
27,6613,536
440,909
25s8a254
636,218
03,38B
144,798
208,208
566,760
27,668,536
440,909
25,588,254
636216
03,385
144,798
208,20B
566,760
27,66B,536
440,909
25,500,254
636,216
03,380
144,798
208,208
566,760
27,660,536
440,909
25,588,254
636,21B
03,388
144,798
208,200
566,760
27,66B,536
440,909
25,588,254
636,218
83,388
144,798
208,208
566,760
27,66B,536
440,909
25,58B,254
636,210
83,388
144J98
208200
566,760
27,668,536
440,909
25,580254
636,21E
83,38E
144,798
208,208
568,760
27,668,536
440,909
25,5813,254
636,215
83,386
144,798
208,208
566,760
27,668,536
25,588,254
636216
03,380
144,798
206,209
566,760
27,227,627
636:218
83,38E
144,798
208,200
566,760
1,639,373
03,388
144,798
208,200
566,760
1,003,155
83,38B
144,798
208200
566760
1,003155
144:798
208:200
566:760
919:767
208,208
566,760
774,968
•
566,760
566,760
IN. Summary of Annual Expenses
No.
VA¢*�
Annual
Annual Annual
Annual
Debt
Capital Bond
Debt
Annual
Total
YM
Assidse
fA"Uodme aw"de-
AIMMT
QMMI!2
E,p,n,
t
$ .
$ 54,029,369 S .
S 3,955,279 S
(261,734) It
58,522,913
2
440,909
3,64%613 (6,777,652)
4,162,632
(571 A49)
903,852
1
26,0291 3
2141065E382 (393E354,11KI)
4,174,438
(5,295221)
(154,380,420)
4
26,665:6 381
146,069,551 (%780230)
4,19022
(6,815,378)
160,333,646
a
26E665581
136,637,422
4,210,361
(8,077,667)
159,435517
6
26,748,769
135106BE381 (1 E261 850)
4,224,907
(9,240,445)
155,519,732
t
26,893,568
4,8135,936 (2,225,907)
4,176,286
(10,301,770)
23,42al 12
4
27,101,776
5,421,753 (3,200,672)
4,197,905
(11,324,151)
22,196,611
9
27,666,536
6,927E492 (8.712,4B7)
4,221,411
(12,418,307)
17,686,645
11
27:161:131
4:71'EI21
4E244E585
(13,235,475)
23,390E669
99
27668535
3971 053
4,196,361
(12,52BE524)
23,309E426
12
27,668,536.
2 , 904 :162
4,130,505
(11,648,935)
22,854,269
13
27668 5 6
4 E13DE643
(11,231,273)
20,567,905
14
27 6 8:536
4,117,399
(10,641,328)
21,144E607
15
27,668,536
7, 68, 36
4,118,276
(IU86,828)
21,699,994
16
27,668538
4,118,947
(9,501,173)
22,226,310
17
27, 60:536
4,117,901
(9,062,440)
22,723,997
18
27,668,536UO2,984
(8,626,840)
23,144579
19
27E66B536
3,795,580
(0,136,534)
23,327501
20
27, 66B 536
3,400,650
(7,794,040)
23,275,146
21
27,660:53
3,205,347
(7,582,110)
23,291,773
22
27,66B,536
3,001,205
(7,373,522)
23,296,219
23
27,668,536
''
3,001,725
(7,210,524)
23,451,736
24
27,668,536
3,009 616
(7,066,640)
23,603,512
25
27,668,636
3:234
(6,917,809)
23,751 Ease
20
27,668,536
3,002,106
(6,772,547)
23,890,095
27
27,668,536
3,001,354
(6,629,907)
24,039,963
20
27,668,536
3E002,143
(6,502,946)
24,167,732
29
27 , 668536
269,742
(5,810,026)
22,128,251
30
27E 6685 6
112,034
(6,666,452)
22.114 117
31
27, 668:536
10,671
(5,537,521)
22,141,686
32
27 '227 , 627
(5E342,729)
21 E8B4EBqa
33
1,639,373
(315,517)
1E323,856
34
4,003,155(109,367)
813,780
35
1,003,155
(185,735)
817,419
36
919,767
(167,031)
752E735
37
774 968
1138,037)
636,931
35
565:760
(99,086)
467,673
39
PTO
� 1 VV,1a,Ap-n0-M SSWimI
2�pa
ge
(a) FAIgN. �"`di`g d1M ft,ndW pvqWd�md s as . perce,d d lppd limasannuals MgMannual - debt s, IndudiN FcMM- -To- () ze
14, W.v,ApWdkcx _ page 9
2025 Water Impact Fee Study
City of Georgetown, Texas Page 5 of 9 Water Appendices
City of '• •' •wn - 2025 Water•. •
Capital• • for •
Revenue Test
Water Service Area
Impact
Net
Estimated
Impact Service Fee
Annual
Accumulated
Fund
Year
Fee Units RIMMMUO
9"o-s-esSub-Total
Interest
Balance
Initial
$
1
$ 13,835 5,664 $ 78,366,353
$ 58,522,913
$ 19,843,440
$ 297,652
20,141,091
2
13,835 5,664 78,366,353
903,852
77,462,501
1,766,170
99,369,763
3
13,835 5,664 78,366,353
(154,380,420)
232,746,773
6,472,294
338,588,831
4
13,835 5,664 78,366,353
160,333,646
(81,967,293)
8,928,156
265,549,694
5
13,835 5,664 78,366,353
159,435,517
(81,069,164)
6,750,453
191,230,984
6
13,835 5,664 78,366,353
155,519,732
(77,153,378)
4,579,629
118,657,234
7
13,835 5,664 78,366,353
23,428,112
54,938,241
4,383,791
177,979,266
8
13,835 5,664 78,366,353
22,196,611
56,169,743
6,181,924
240,330,933
9
13,835 5,664 78,366,353
17,686,645
60,679,708
8,120,124
309,130,765
10
13,835 5,664 78,366,353
23,390,669
54,975,684
10,098,558
374,205,007
11
23,309,426
(23,309,426)
10,876,509
361,772,090
12
22,854,269
(22,854,269)
10,510,349
349,428.170
13
20,567,905
(20,567,905)
10,174,327
339,034,592
14
21,144,607
(21,144,607)
9,853,869
327,743,853
15
21,699,984
(21,699,984)
9,506,816
315,550,685
16
- -
22,226,310
(22,226,310)
9,133,126
302,457,501
17
-- -
22,723,997
(22,723,997)
8,732,865
288,466,369
18
23,144,679
(23,144,679)
8,306,821
273,628,511
19
23,327,581
(23,327,581)
7,858,942
258,159,871
20
23,275,146
(23,275,146)
7,395,669
242,280,394
21
23,291,773
(23,291,773)
6,919,035
225,907,656
22
-
23,296,219
(23,296,219)
6,427,786
209,039,224
23
23,451,736
(23,451,736)
5,919,401
191,506,889
24
23,603,512
(23,603,512)
5,391,154
173,294,530
25
23,751,880
(23,751,880)
4,842,558
154,385,208
26
- -
23,898,095
(23,898,095)
4,273,085
134,760,198
27
-
24,039,983
(24,039,983)
3,682,206
114,402,421
28
24,167,732
(24,167,732)
3,069,557
93,304,246
29
22,128,251
(22,128,251)
2,467,204
73,643,198
30
22,114,117
(22,114,117)
1,877,584
53,406,665
31
-
22,141,686
(22,141,686)
1,270,075
32,535,054
32
-
21,884,898
(21,884,898)
647,778
11,297,934
33
1,323,856
(1,323,856)
319,080
10,293,159
34
813,788
(813,788)
296,588
9,775,959
35
817,419
(817,419)
281,017
9,239,558
36
752,735
(752,735)
265,896
8,752,718
37
• - - -
636,931
(636,931)
253,028
8,368,815
38
-
467,673
(467,673)
244,049
8,145,191
39
244,356
8,389,546
PTD
-
8,389,546
(8,389,546)
-
0
$ 783,663,533
$ 982,283,011
$ 198,619,478
2025 Water Impact Fee Study
City of Georgetown, Texas Page 6 of 9 Water Appendices
City of Georgetown = 2025 Water Impact Fee Study
Capital Improvement Plan for Impact Fees
Impact Fee Calculation
Water Service Area
Future Value Escalation
Number of Interest Recovery
Years to Rate Fee Annual Service Units Net Annual Expense
Year End of Period Factor Factor Actual Escalated Actual Escalated
1
39
3.1209
1.0000
5,664
17,678
$ 58,522,913
$ 182,644,467
2
38
3.0300
1.0000
5,664
17,163
903,852
2,738,677
3
37
2.9418
1.0000
5,664
16,663
(154,380,420)
(454,148,987)
4
36
2.8561
1.0000
5,664
16,178
160,333,646
457,924,179
5
35
2.7729
1.0000
5,664
15,706
159,435,517
442,096,174
6
34
2.6921
1.0000
5,664
15,249
155,519,732
418,677,822
7
33
2.6137
1.0000
5,664
14,805
23,428,112
61,234,267
8
32
2.5376
1.0000
5,664
14,374
22,196,611
56,325,710
9
31
2.4637
1.0000
5,664
13,955
17,686,645
43,574,082
10
30
2.3919
1.0000
5,664
13,549
23,390,669
55,948,468
11
29
2.3222
1.0000
-
-
23,309,426
54,130,235
12
28
2.2546
1.0000
22,854,269
51,527,425
13
27
2.1889
1.0000
20,567,905
45,021,913
14
26
2.1252
1.0000
21,144, 607
44, 936,194
15
25
2.0633
1.0000
--
21,699,984
44,773,273
16
24
2.0032
1.0000
22,226,310
44,523,528
17
23
1.9448
1.0000
22,723,997
44,194,652
18
22
1.8882
1.0000
23,144,679
43,701,760
19
21
1.8332
1.0000
23,327,581
42,764,190
20
20
1.7798
1.0000
23,275,146
41,425,306
21
19
1.7280
1.0000
-
23,291,773
40,247,475
22
18
1.6776
1.0000
23,296,219
39,082,676
23
17
1.6288
1.0000
23,451,736
38,197,649
24
16
1.5813
1.0000
--
23,603,512
37,325,106
25
15
1.5353
1.0000
23,751,880
36,465,753
26
14
1.4906
1.0000
23,898,095
35,621,586
27
13
1.4471
1.0000
24,039.983
34,789,396
28
12
1.4050
1.0000
24,167,732
33,955,600
29
11
1.3641
1.0000
22,128,251
30,184, 597
30
10
1.3243
1,0000
22,114,117
29,286,716
31
9
1.2858
1,0000
w -
22,141,686
28,469,152
32
8
1.2483
�0000
21,884,898
27,319,399
33
7
1.2120
10000
1,323,856
1,604,464
34
6
1.1767
10000
813,788
957,554
35
5
1.1424
1.0000
817,419
933,812
36
4
1.1091
1.0000
752,735
834,872
37
3
1.0768
1.0000
-
-
636,931
685,856
38
2
1.0455
1.0000
467,673
488,929
39
1
1.0150
1.0000
PTD
1.0000
1.0000
-
-
8,389,546
,8,389,546,
155,319
$ 2,148,853,470
Annual Interest Rater
Total Escalated Expense for Entire Period
Total Escalated Service Units
Maximum Assessable Impact Fee for Water Service Area
3.00%
$ 2,148,853,470
155,319
$ 13,835
2025 Water Impact Fee Study
City of Georgetown, Texas Page 7 of 9 Water Appendices
z 9
m
I
MIN
in
oltmQwoW 4Dm M M 0 — M M 'r M M M cD W U) 0 M
0 u I M 0 0 1- CN Cl) CN N 00 Lr) M w �,- Cl) Lf) 0 N
Ci . . N.I . C� , cq C� (q L'i IQ LQ N G� (7) C CN! Lq LQ cf- rl-� q cy�
WOM Orc)MLOM
N N It ow CON NO wm "m 0,- ry W a) (D w N C)
P- N-� R CCli c3i ID! co q v! N-� 'q! c 'q! (D IQq0 coCli Lr� Cli V, R
w CD 0) (D N- 0) MM Lo N cq Cr r� Nko m
CD rl Cl) cli CY)
ONWI- CDON mmw w
0 w 0) It 0 N 0 P- N C� 0) N Wa 0) co . . .
Cli pl� oc� Cl! q CL C) - k q Ci Cli cq Woi "t CNL
(N 0) W) Cl) D) 0) C) 00 rl 04 r- (D m m
(D Lo (D r-- a N. (D CD Lo C', I- MC', m 'D
Ci pl-i V: Lq CNL Gi rl-� 0) w N� cli Cli Gi CN rll� Ma, (D 0 P- M N (N N N N co Lo
N V C14
Lco, CD (o
0 N �t 00 0) r-
0 (o 00 0 Cl) Cf) 4 Lo a)
On I (D cl� N LQ R - q pl-�
a O (D Lo 04 Il- N 14" co Lo N 0)
N 0 0) a) P% Lq Cli CLo co P- N Lo 14- co
cq C,! L
CO
Lr) r
U3,
(rJ W Cn r- W C) (O n 00 C) CD N CN �; C) W N P- M M M M CC co N m to 0 NGo C) 'r w W0 co Lo Q 0 (D mM MLr0 r� w N w M 00 N t- (D CNJ 0) MN Q M
ai ac� 't WCL WU: ll*� q t�i Cli (3i cvi P-: cvi 't 0% cFi CR
�2 !m Lor)) Ncc.4
W(D M M cyi Cli W Cli - pli Vi Ui - (Q V: VL - q IqL D)i VL m N �r C'�
�; ;: W M mLr) Lo NM N N lqt Cl) M M Lo
NP, CN
co
W M M M 0 N Cl) N 0 0 W M �t 't �; N W W) CO (D N �t �4 M
en F m ;I co to an Lo 0, 0 0 0 0 0 g co CN g c, N N 0
m
0
04 N 04 04 CD W (0 CD CD 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) a) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) M 0) — N �r CD
.t -t t -4* -q- -4- '�t It 00 OD 00 OD CD 00 00 00 00 OD CD 00 00 00 OD OD OD OD CS 0 IM, 'Ci Cn l—, —1
zm-
a (n M M 0 M M a C) 0 Lo Lo 0 a 0 0 't r- ;z "t Lo MM 0 M M (D P- to M a) 0 0
9 N�? N04 �
lc� IQ C� R ::� q C� c3i Cli C� C� LQ C� CIL L'i - Lq aci C9i - cl� cl� pl�. oci I-L CL q
OD P- M C) (D 00 (D 0 �t 10 (D 0 0 r- 0 r- t- M LO :t C4 D - C) C4 'r) 0 W CO (0 M 0) 0 0) 0) �; 02 V A ID 0 cv) CV CN 10 SO It C04 �l C
c7i CCL C, 'q- W- IN C,
N VL CN� N (q LQ CQ Lq - - - cQ LQ Cli kq C(i V� q cvi C� cx� Nt
M W) 00 Q r- CD 0 0) �t 00 M a) C-4 CD (D Cl) — (14 00 00 M N M Lf) Ce) !g m I- V ;Z ,
m +T P- N �2 N N w N 00 CN Lo N
't Lo
Ml
.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .9 .0 .9 0 .0 .9 .2 .0 .0 .0
.
M ID
c Im 0) .N
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E-a 12 E
S2 0 c c
E Z, Z, 2� E w 0 w w co w w 0 w 0 0 0 vi
a- I I -Z� c
CaL CR Cat a' "Z6 'Z5 0 E .2 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c m E 0
U) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 CO
�t iL F- F- F- F- U) F- 0- -GO)
T T T
0 >
Lo
Lo
04 0
.0
o
.0
a)
cc Z, :wl
c:
c
E 2
a
E 0 c?
E o
F-
o
u)
c In Jall Lo
C c
N m c
o o
So' m
o) mo
am
,u a
- b ,- �j
lu
E E 0
F-
(a -11 .-
w n, cc (1) w
z "n
0) ca m
E m, c a
E 'D 6 m (D
C E 0
'o
0 0 c,
lau)
a) U) m E m> "n
D.(D 4) :j ffi o 'm
m
CD (n u) a)
cl-, -a c3 .- 0
C - E
Z) n F- EL -c: ca - - Ft f ul o
2 1 3: a) W c:
cq m, A 'E, c u) u-
=
co 6) m 6 0 0 - �Ll L
oj CL (D E c) o_ m o o o
U. -ld -Z -
E > c
u- m D 2 q) m
3: d- (D m c,
u) ca a) co
co o oo fn
z (a w c: ca Lo
cn D) qm cD a) cD cD
o c" m cq
ID 2 2 2 2 T- m x c Lu Lu m co m =3
M A M A m
Uj US
c < M co L) z CD w 0 w U) U) o R
:3 � 5 Lu uj Lu Lu Lu w
m
I.
City of Georgetown - 2025 Water Impact Fee Study
Capital Improvement Plan for Impact Fees
Credit Determination
Water Service Area
Eligible Debt Annual Growth in Credit for Annual
Eligible Revenue Annual Service Service per Service Units utility
Year Funded Cost Units (3) Service Unit Xurnufative v nues I RgktR1A_
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
3,955,279
4,603,541
30,203,601
30,859,703
30,875,762
30,973,676
31,069,854
31,299,681
31,889,947
31,913,121
31,864,897
31,799,041
31,799,178
31,785,935
31,786,812
31.787,483
31,786,437
31,771,520
31,464,115
31,069,186
30,873,883
30,669,741
30,670,260
30,670,152
30,669,770
30,670,642
30,669,890
30,670,679
27,938,278
30
27,780,570
31
27,679,206
32
27,227,627
33
1,639,373
34
1,003,155
35
1,003,155
36
919,767
37
774,968
38
566,760
39
-
Total
656,644
2025 Service Units (2)
Ten Year Growth in Service Units(z)
Annual Growth in Service Units
Credit Amount
85,598 $
46.21
91,262
50.44
96,926
311.61
102,591
300.80
108,255
285.21
113,919
271.89
119,584
259.82
125,248
249.90
130,912
243.60
136,577
233.66
144,088
221.15
152,013
209.19
160,374
198.28
169,194
187.87
178,500
178.08
188,318
168.80
198,675
159.99
208,609
152.30
219,039
143.65
225,795
137.60
230,647
133.86
235,603
130.18
240,666
127.44
245,838
124.76
251,121
122.13
256,518
119.57
262,030
117.05
267,153
114.81
272,375
102.57
277,700
100.04
283,129
97.76
288,664
94.32
294,307
5.57
300,061
3.34
305,927
3.28
311,908
2.95
318,006
2.44
323,990
1.75
330,086
-
79,934
56,643
10 years
5,664
$
256,573,103
(1) Water Appendices - page 5 Section 11
(2) Per CDM Smith
(3) Per CDM Smith Master Plan and State Water Plan Projections
5,664 $
261,734
11,329
571,449
16,993
5,295,221
22,657
6,815,378
28,322
8,077,667
33,986
9,240,445
39,650
10,301,770
45,314
11,324,151
50,979
12,418,307
56,643
13,235,475
56,643
12,526,524
56,643
11,848,935
56,643
11,231,273
56,643
10,641,328
56,643
10,086,828
56,643
9,561,173
56,643
9,062,440
56,643
8,626,840
56,643
8,136,534
56,643
7,794,040
56,643
7,582,110
56,643
7,373,522
56,643
7,218,524
56,643
7,066,640
56,643
6,917,889
56,643
6,772,547
56,643
6,629,907
56,643
6,502,948
56,643
5,810,026
56,643
5,666,452
56,643
5,537,521
56,643
5,342,729
56,643
315,517
56,643
189,367
56,643
185,736
56,643
167,031
56,643
138,037
56,643
99,086
56,643
-
$
256,618,103
2025 Water Impact Fee Study
City of Georgetown, Texas Page 9 of 9 Water Appendices
y
i
eY SY,fr�
� 5
w
f
4yy}
S
}
Water & Wastewater Impact Fees.
DevelopmentWater
-
�
. �
Water & Wastewater Impact Fees
Water & Wastewater Impact Fees
SUMMARY OF WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE DETERMINATION
Wastewater Service Area
Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs $ 392,082,054 Pe CCDM Smith
Financing Cost 241,353,348 See Detail Below
Existn Fund Balance - Wastewater Appendices - Daqe 4
Interest Earnings (94,118,223) Wastewater Appendices - pa e 6
Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee 539,317,180 Sum of Above
('r—C flit fnr t itility P,-v,-nI 11 411 4') and t onl nn O
maxlmum Mcoverapie GOst Tor lm act Fee $ 407,312,590
R y r l I t F Cl C ts::
Represents the portion of capital improvement costs that are eligible for funding through impact fees. Reference is the
CDM Smith Impact Fee Study.
Figw iri Costar
Represents the interest costs associated with debt financing the new impact fee project costs. Interest costs are derived
from existing debt issues and forecasted debt issues.
New Annual Debt Service $ 444,611,878 Wastewater Appendices- page 5
Existing Annual Debt Service 61,872,362 Wastewater Appendices - page 5
Principal Component (New and Existing Debt) _ (265,130,892) Wastewater Appendices - page 4
Financing Costs $ 241,353,348
gx4tinq Fund Balance.
Represents impact fee revenue collected but not yet expended. Assuming all existing fund balance is already encumbered
for projects from prior impact fee studies. Reference is page 4 of Wastewater Appendices.
a
Represents the interest earned on cash flows and assumes a 3.00% annual interest rate. The Impact Fee Statute
states that interest earnings are funds of the impact fee account and are held to the same restrictions as impact fee
revenues. Therefore in order to recognize that interest earnings are used to fund capital improvements, interest earnings
are credited against the recoverable costs. Reference is the sum of Accumulated Interest on page 6 of Wastewater Appendices,
emlqe it Recoveral l C t f r Orr s c Fee:
Represents Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs plus Financing Costs less Existing Fund Balance and Interest Earnings.
Credit for U011 t ' Revenues:
In 2001, the Local Government Code Chapter 395 was amended to include a credit for ad valorem and/or utility revenues
generated by new service units during the ten-year timeframe that are used to fund impact fee eligible projects for which the
new service units were charged an impact fee. The intent of this amendment is to avoid double -charging the new service
units for impact fee capital improvements. The credit recognizes utility revenues used to fund impact fee eligible projects.
Reference is page 9 of Wastewater Appendices.
I't�axil�°stl€n Recover rate Co f r Im t Fee:.
Represents Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee less Credit for Utility Revenues. This is the maximum cost that
can be recovered through impact fees.
2025 Wastewater lrnpact Fee Study
City of Georgetown, Texas Page 1 of 9 Wastewater Appendices
City of Georgetown - 2025 Wastewater Impact Fee Study
Capital Improvement Plan for Impact Fees
Impact Fee Summary Table
Wastewater Service Area
0
Existing Fund Balances Available
$
1
Existing Number of Service Units
44125
,
2
Total Number of Services Units for Planning Period
74 125
Additional Service Units Added During Planning Period
3
(Line 2 - Line 1)
30,000
4
Total Cost of the Wastewater Impact Fee CIP
$
964,482,705
5
Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee Planning Period
$
392,082,054
Percent Recoverable for Wastewater Impact Fee Planning Period
6
(Line 5 / Line 4)
40.65%'
Financing Costs
7
(From Financial Analysis)
241,353,348
Interest Earnings
8
(From Financial Analysis)
(94,118,223)
Recoverable Cost of Wastewater Impact Fee and Financing Costs
9
(Line 5 + Line 7 + Line 8 - Line 0)
$
539,317,180
Pre -Credit Maximum Fee
10
Line 9 / Line 3
$
17,977
Credit for Utility Revenues
11
(From Financial Analysis)
$
(132,004,590)
Recoverable Cost of Wastewater Impact Fee and Financing
12
(Line 9 + Line 11)
$
407,312,590
Maximum Assessable Fee
13
Line_12 Line 3
$
13,577
2025 Wastewater Impact Fee Study
City of Georgetown, Texas Page 2 of 9 Wastewater Appendices
I
U
t.
N
ei
N
ri
0.
o
o
h
c
m
°7 m w h O m
M ry N 01 Mm
I®
m
fQ
d'
n
m
90
Do
tn
m � 'n-1 H o aN-1
wmi
F
a
N Qiv
M
m H
+.
m
N
m
N
O
Q
o
o
O
o
O
o
c
-zr
O
>",
h
O
m
®
O
o 0
N
N
N N
+
m
an
N
O
O
O
o
O
a`
In lf4
to N m ry O
O p O O N
N
12
eN-9
I-tO
p
m O
O
cOc
dam' :
h
m
4
o
o
N a -I ^ ',,. 6dy O
PO.
ai
o
M Q N
.
6n
!A
N
V4
m oo
rl lD+ t 01 m
V1 up in In : qn V?
V}
0...
h
NN
o...
ID
m yy It oo h H N
oo
H
O
a
:
J
:
wi
vi
n
O
o
In
m
oo
co
n
r9
cn
o
N
w
w
N
m
m m N � W
O Q �
o N m : h H
m N
a1
4/4
1!A
In : in N : ilP ilf
: .y}
'^N
r
o
ti
c
,. o
w N r a o ^
m
Q...
:. m
w
N
h
Q1
V 1p .v-/ M m N
o oo N VJ
N
(u :
V
v
G
e-1
Lr
N
m
V
N
l0'
si
in
V4
tw
4A V} V}
-v?
-a
p
- :
N
o
tll
: 0.
'D
o
c
C
-D 73
C
G
G
C
C
f6
._
oj
y
G
CcL
:: d
E
IV N
--. a N ..-. 0_
- y� J •�
'�'
: v
6i
.L
®
J r1
v
01
:QI
�" W
fO 00 (0 4J E m > aq w
®D
M
fD
Od
�W
0 O
y�
lJe
a Q N O G m
u:
N W
,,,,
'a
p
_
6J J
3
19
SU ®.
pq f0 f9 IO W X J >' N w
U H
lL
d
v
U_
:.a N
Q d
N
Em:�
C C O C G aV = C C~
m
=
Z
..q�_e
a
C 6L QJ 11 ® C. C O LL Q 6Y
J.
J C
E G C 6L., u Y r
C J
W
h9
G
®
a
V
Q
®
u
® ® O ®J -a a ®
6.L 6L u LL u
X
PO
'X
6L1
E
m
u
®.
N fp
Z
c
Q
m
a
�.
O a
70
F
:
cu
U u
v
w
u
1r w
4
a
d
F7NT�aii�-
a1 O r( N
M
l
City of Georgetown 2025 Wastewater Impact Fee Study
Capital Improvement Plan for Impact Fees
Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions
Wastewater Service Area
L General Assumptions
Annual Interest Rate on Deposits t'D
3.00%
Annual Service Unit Growth t21
3„000
Existing Fund Balance (3)
Portion of Projects Funded by Existing
Debt tai $ 37,305,081
Non -debt Funded Project Cost tsl
126,951,162
New Project Cost Funded Through New
Debt (6)
227,825,811
Total Recoverable Project Cost (7)
$
392,082,054
II. New Debt Issues Assumptions
Year P'd I t t
titer s� i €
Ter-
1 $ 183„381,380
5.00%
30
2 1,436,881
5.00%
30
3 18,152,627
5.00%
30
4 821,400
5.00%
30
5_
6 _ 2,596.891
5,00%
30
7
5.00%
30
B
5.00%
30
9 18,370;988
5.00%
30
10 3,065,643
5.00%
30
Total $ 227,825,811
Ill. Capital Expenditure Assumptions
Annual
Capital
Year.9moftmin::
1 $
-103,019,545
2
61,900,832
3
71.380.578
4
68,099,255
5
6,803„636
6 ____L.723.002
7
11139,431
8
865.630
9
10,757,701
10
7,774,394
11
7.145544
12
- 7,145.544
13
1.021,881
Total
354,776,973
(1) Per discussions with City Staff
(2) Per CDM Smith
(3) Assumes all existing fund balances are already encumbered
(4) Per discussions with City Staff
(5) This assumes 35% of new project costs funded through sources other than debt, unless specified otherwise
(6) This assumes 65 % of new project costs funded through new debt issues, unless specified otherwise
(7) Per CDM Smith
(8) Assumes new debt issued based on schedule from CDM Smith
(9) Per discussions with City Staff
(10) Assumes new debt proceeds expended over
a 3-year timeframe
Non -debt funded capital expenditures allocated per discussions with
City Staff
2025 Wastewater Impact Fee Study
City of Georgetown, Texas Page 4 of 9 Wastewater Appendices
v -illflITIAR'
Capital Improvement Plan for Impact Fees
Debt Service and Expense Summary
Wastewater Service Area
290"I"M
T.t.1 Annual
Series Seri- Bad.. Sen.. Bad.. S.'1- Bar.. Sarl.. Berle. Sari.® No. Debt
Y'RaT I a i i I I i I A 10 99-1---
I $ 11,929,222 $
I $
. $
. 6
1 $
$ 11 ,929,222
2 11,929,222
93471
52,022s93
3 11,929,222
93,471
1,180,854
13,203,548
4 11,929,222
93A71
MMOM
53,433
$3,256,951
5 1 is2%222
93,471
1,180,054
53,433
13,256,981
6 11,929,222
93,471
1,180,054
63,433
168,931
13,425,912
7 11,929,222
93,471
1,18%054
53,433
165c31
13,425,912
a 11,929,222
93,471
1,180,854
53,433
168,931
13,425,912
9 11 ,929,222
93,471
1,180,054
53,433
160,931
11195,059
14,620,971
10 11,929,222
93,471
1,180,054
63,433
160,931
1,195,059
199A24
14,820,396
11 11,929,222
93,471
1,180,854
53,433
160,931
1,195,059
199,424
14,820,396
12 11,929,222
93,471
1,160,654
53,433
160,931
1,195,059
199A24
14,520,396
11 1 921222
13,471
1,150,854
53133
160,931
1,195,059
199,424
14,620,396
4 , 929,222
93,471
1,160,864
53,433
168,931
1,195,059
199,424
14,820,396
11 11:12%122
11,471
1,180,1,180,854BO4
13AM
160,931
1,195,059
199,424
14,020,396
16 11,929,222
93,471
1,160,854
53,433
160,931
1,195,059
199,424
14,620,396
17 i1,829,222
93,475
�:111
53,433
1,935,059
119:414
K121,111
9929,
a 2 22
,
347
:154
8'0 054
533433
6093,
195059
599424
14,920,396
19
93A71
1,180A14
53A13
168,931
1,195c59
199A24
14,620,396
'I:IM122
20 929,222
93,471
1,150,854
53,433
168,931
1,195,059
199,424
14,820,396
21 11,929,222
93,471
1,180,854
53,433
« 168,931
1,195,059
199,424
14,620,396
21 11,929,222
11,471
1,111,11
11,113
168,931
1,195,059
199,424
14,820,396
23 ":1 9291:222
222
93,471
1,180,854
53,433
168,931
1,195,059
199,424
14,020,396
24 19,929,222
13A71
1.111,11
13A11
168,931
1,995,059
199A24
14,020,396
25 ":1 9299:222
222
93,471
1,180,854
53,433
168,931
1'195,059
199,424
14,820,395
26 11,929,222
93,471
1,180,854
53,433
160,931
1,195,059
199,424
14,820,396
27 19,929,222
93A71
1,180,854
53,433
168c31
1,195,059
19%424
14,820,396
20 11:121:222
1"IA71
�:�11:11
13:433
168,931
1,195,059
199,424
14,820,396
29 29222
"q
9 �47 1
80054
53433
168,931
1,195,059
199,424
14,820,396
30 11,92%222
93,471
1
53,43314,020,396i68,93l
1'195,059
199,424
14,0296
31
93,471
'11:11
80854
53,433
168,931
1,195,059
199,424
2,891,174
32
1,180,854
53,433
168,931
1,195c59
199,424
2,797,703
33
53,433
166,931
1,195,059
199,424
1,616,648
3
168,931
1'995'050
199,424
1,563,415
35
166,931
1,195,059
199,424
1,563,415
36
1,195,059
199,424
1,394,484
37
9,195,059
199,424
1,394A84
30
«
1,195,059
199,424
1,394,484
39
-
M 424
M'414
11. Summary of Annual Expenses
No.
Existing
Annual
Annua
AnnualAnnual
Debt
Capita:
Bond
Debt
A. -I
Total
YRN
foulpe",
aggglude,
22ndmT
Credit!)
EMAM
1
1 929222
$ 11,929,222
$103019545
$(103,381,300) $
1,493,623
(854,505)
(67,793,495)
2
12:()22:693
61:900:832
(1,436,881)
2,699,384
(9,762,244)
73,423,784
3
1 3 203,,W
71,3B%576
(18,152,627)
2,734,972
(2,700,173)
66,466,298
4
13:256 901
60,09%255
(821,400)
2,772,937
(3,427,332)
79,080,441
5
13,256,901
3,25 901
6
2:803:865
18,789,W
3,425912
7�'72"3:'0'02
(2,596,891
2,887,436
�4:074:633)
4726604)
16,712,855
7
1 25,912
'l 39 , 4 1
1,139,431
2571,111
(5,158,349)
11,978,105
8
1'3:'425,912
865,630'1
2:660,963
(5,667,303)
11,285,203
9
14620,971
462 971
10,757JOI
(18,370,908)
2,756,808
(6,596,037)
3J67,655
10
14:8200:396
7,774,394
(3,065,643)
2,622,439
(7j,10,439)
15,211,147
11
14,820,396
7,145,544
2,691,366
(6,794,635)
16,062,671
12
1 4:820 3'6
71 5,544
2,854,782
(6,427,097)
18,393,604
13
j4S20:396
1:4 021,681
2,852,470
(6,001,250)
12,603,497
14
14, 820,396
2,557,327
(5,677,276)
11,700,447
15
14,820395
4,'203 5
«
2,559,302
(5,381,907)
11,997,791
16
14, 620:39B
2,557,006
(5,100,658)
12,276,744
17
14 , '20 3 6
2,557,927
(4,835,01)
12,543,312
16
14, '20:396
2,557,681
(4,604,705)
12,773,372
19
14,820,396
2,5 874
5
(4,305,695)
12,993,441
20
14, 520396
2,191:0 228
(4,164,519)
12,847,105
21
14,820,396
4, 820 3 F
1,652,853
(3,947,084)
12,525,365
22
14, '20:396
485,858
(3,591,273)
11,715,979
23
14,820,396
487,492
(3,515,868)
11,792,020
24
14, 620396
480,427
(3,442,113)
11,866,710
25
14,B20396
467,612
(3,36%521)
11,938,488
26
14, 820:396
407,840
(3,298,683)
12,009,552
27
14 620396
407,512
(3,229,210)
12,078,690
28
14, '20:396
487,608
(3,167,316)
12,140,685
29
14 82039
407,830
(3,106,633)
12,201,602
30
14, 82 :396
341,088
(3,017,853)
12,143,631
31
2,891,174
61,007
(576,355)
2,375,925
32
2,797,703
(535,724)
2,261,979
33
161 846
(303,669)
1,313,179
34
1 5 3:411
(M,003)
1,275,412
35
5034, 5
1,503,5
(282,481)
1,280,934
38
3 , 484
1,394,484
(247,127)
1,147,357
37
1,394,484.
3 4,484
(242,388)
1,152,096
36
1,394,484
(237,911)
1,156,572
39
199:4 4
(33,395)
166,029
PTD
3,63'4A"
3,A?4�003
W23-0--rROM
6-00) W, -430,61k
�1� Ww:m� Apo`dioss - �,S Se,tlen 1
2 W-I.Appnd!--peg® 4
(3) Ugbl. WsWnlirl labi furded plqoda as , pw,ml e told pnrr1pd times nflghrd -d debt -., mdddirg P.id-To-D.l. (FTD) -1s
(4) Wmlm,l, Appendices - page 9
2025 Wastewater Impact Fee Study
City of Georgetown, Texas Page 5 of 9 Wastewater Appendices
City of Georgetown - 2025 Wastewater Impact Fee Study
Capital Improvement Plan for Impact Fees
Revenue Test
Wastewater Service Area
Impact
Net
Estimated
Impact Service Fee
Annual
Accumulated
Fund
Year
Fee�
Swb-Tmmal!
Interest
Balance
Initial
$ -`
1
$ 13.577 3.000 $ 40.731.269
$ (67.793.495)
$108.524.754
$ 1.627.871
110.152.025
2
18.577 3.080 40.731.259
73.423.784
(32.692.525)
2.814.191
80'274.291
3
13.577 3.000 40'731.259
65,406.298
(25.735.040)
2.022.203
56.501.455
4
13\577 3.000 40731,258
79,880,441
(38.149.182)
1.109,600
18,521,879
5
13,577 3.000 40.731,259
18,789,848
21,941,411
884,778
41.348.087
6
13,577 3,000 40731,258
16\712,855
24,018,404
1,600.710
00,907108
T
13'577 3.000 40.731.259
11.978.105
28.755.154
2,440.813
90.100.656
8
13,577 3,000 40,731259
11,285,203
29,440,050
3,380.511
130.093,222
9
13.577 5.000 40.731.259
3.167.655
37.503.604
4,493.251
173.050.077
10
13,577 3.000 40,731,259
15,211.147
25,520.112
5'574,304
204144,494
11
^ - -
18.082,671
(18,062,671)
5,858,395
191,935,218
12
^ - -'
18.383,604
(10.593,604)
5482.152
179,023706
13
^ ,~ _
12,603,497
(12,603,497)
5,181,661
171,601,929
14
. -- ,r
11.700,447
(11.700,447)
4,972,551
184,874,034
15
- �� �`
11.997.791
(11,997J91)
4.786,254
157,642,497
16
~
12,276J44
(12.276'744)
4.545.124
149.810.877
17
- ~ -
12,543,312
(12,543,312)
4,309.177
141,676J41
18
-
12.773,372
(12.773'372)
4.058.702
132.962.071
19
~ ~ =
12.993,441
(12,993,441)
3,793,901
123J82.590
20
-
12,847.105
(12,847.105)
3,520.171
114,435.056
21
-
12.525,365
(12.525'305)
3.245.189
105.155,480
22
~ ~ ~
11.715,979
n1.715,979
2.878,925
90,418,426
23
~ ~` -
11J32,020
(11.792'030)
2.715.072
87.342.079
24
- ,^ -
11,800710
(11,886710)
2,442,262
77,917,651
25
- _ __
11.938,408
<11.938.488
2.158,452
88.137.594
26
-
12,009552
(12.009'552)
1.868.985
57'892.027
27
= ~ -
12.070.090
(12.870.890)
1,558'580
47,471.917
28
~ -" -
12.140,685
(12.140,685)
1,242,047
30'573.278
29
- - -
12.201,802
(12'201'602)
914'174
25,285.852
ow
- -c �
12.143,631
(12.143.631)
576,421
13718,642
31
- - -
2,375,825
(2'375.825)
375'922
11.718.740
32
- ^ w
2,261,978
(2,201.979)
817,633
9774.894
33
1.313.179
(1.313.179)
273.534
8'734.748
34
- ~" -
1,275,412
(1,275,412)
242,911
7702,248
35
- - _
1.280.934
(1.280.934)
211.853
0.633.107
36
1.147,357
(1,147,357)
181.785
5,667594
37
1.152,096
(1,152,096)
152.746
4'088.245
38
, - - -
1.150,572
(1,156,572)
122,699
3,634.371
39
° p- °
160,029
(108,029)
106,541
3.574.888
PTD
- ~
3
(3.574.883)
(0)
2O2SWastewater Impact Fee Study ^
City ufGeorgetown, Texas Page GcfA Wastewater Appendices
City of Georgetown - 2025 Wastewater Impact Fee Study
Capital Improvement Plan for Impact Fees
Impact Fee Calculation
Wastewater Service Area
Future Value Escalation
Number of Interest Recovery
Years to Rate Fee Annual Service Units Net Annual Expense
Year End of Period Factor Factor Actual Escalated Actual Escalated
1
39
3.1209
1.0000
3,000
9,363 $
(67,793,495)
$ (211,577,073)
2
38
3.0300
1.0000
3,000
9,090
73,423,784
222,474,438
3
37
2.9418
1.0000
3,000
8,825
66,466,298
195,527,400
4
36
2.8561
1.0000
3,000
8,568
79,880,441
228,144,162
5
35
2.7729
1.0000
3,000
8,319
18,789,848
52,102,068
6
34
2.6921
1.0000
3,000
8,076
16,712,855
44,993,016
7
33
2.6137
1.0000
3,000
7,841
11,978,105
31,307,281
8
32
2.5376
1.0000
3,000
7,613
11,285,203
28,637,123
9
31
2.4637
1.0000
3,000
7,391
3,167,655
7,804,061
10
30
2.3919
1.0000
3,000
7,176
15,211,147
36,383,754
11
29
2.3222
110000
-
18,062,671
41,945,976
12
28
2.2546
1a0000
-
18,393,604
41,470,373
13
27
2.1889
1.0000
12,603,497
27,588,301
14
26
2.1252
1.0000
_
11,700,447
24,865,609
15
25
2.0633
1.0000
11,997,791
24,754,874
16
24
2.0032
1.0000
12,276,744
24,592,655
17
23
1.9448
1=0000
12,543,312
24,394,797
18
22
1.8882
10000
-
12,773,372
24,118,668
19
21
1.8332
1..0000
12,993,441
23,819,614
20
20
1.7798
10000
12,847,105
22,865,388
21
19
17280
10000
_
-
12,525,365
21,643,450
22
18
1.6776
1.0000
11,715, 979
19.655,199
23
17
1,6288
1.0000
-
11,792,020
19,206,572
24
16
1.5813
1.0000
-
_
11,866,710
18,765,266
25
15
15353
1.0000
11,938,488
18,328,905
26
14
1.4906
1.0000
12,009,552
17,900,979"
27
13
1.4471
1.0000
-
-
12,078,690
17,479,643
28
12
1.4050
1.0000
-
12,140,685
17,057,631
29
11
1.3641
1.0000
12,201,602
16,643,901
30
10
1.3243
1.0000
12,143,631
16,082, 354
31
9
1.2858
1.0000
-
2,375,825
3,054,768
32
8
1.2483
1.0000
2,261,979
2,823,678
33
7
1.2120
1.0000
1,313,179
1,591,525
34
6
1.1767
1.0000
-
1,275,412
1,500,730
35
5
1.1424
1.0000
1,280,934
1,463,329
36
4
1.1091
1.0000
1,147,357
1,272, 554
37
3
1.0768
1.0000
1,152,096
1,240,592
38
2
1.0455
1.0000
1,156,572
1,209,139
39
1
1.0150
1.0000
166,029
168,520
PTD
1.0000
1.0000
ra
_
3,574,883
- „- 3,574,883
82,262
$ 1,116,876,101
Annual Interest Rate:
Total Escalated Expense for Entire Period
3.00%
$ 1,116,876,101
Total Escalated Service Units 82,262
Maximum Assessable Impact Fee for Wastewater Service Area $ 13,577
2025 Wastewater Impact Fee Study
City of Georgetown, Texas Page 7 of 9 Wastewater Appendices
C) m V I,- r.- M q CD U) 0 "qq(OOOOOON
I;r (0 m I- m 0 0 a 0 co
oci rl�, C� ll� Cli Vi Iq rl.� V(q "'L aO! ul v! q
� M N M 0 W M N LO M N M 0 'T r- r- M 0 1'- Co M
0 CD rl- I' OD r- a) N0) LO 1�- N Cl) LO 0 m w Ir N w m N
C
cn r- o LO 0 (o (D co (D OD r- CO m 0 LO �t m 0
0 = C6 cl� -7 C15 1-: CI_: (d
z LLI N (D C14
(A
0 LO U) 0 co co OD m Q0 M 00 q, 0 0 0
00 M 0) Cl) Cl) CO 0) 00 r• r fl- LO CN - 0 0 C)
cl! R (3) R cl -I a� cy! -I C',! (q v! LQ C',! CC� IQ ul oc�
C) co C.0 Cl) Cl) LO N co C) C14 C) I- I-- C*4 00 (3) 00 U) N Cl) Lr)
0) Cl) 0) co C14 7 co (0 0 CY) N 00 m d rl- CO m N
O Lq "t Oct M C� C'� cl! — w N — m 00 n 0) 0) 0 00
0 CN r 04 CN 00 -7 cli (d lq7 L6 1. r-:
— U) 04 N
CN
GF> W
LL
w C) 0 (D
CD 0 0 000
fV
(R 't C� C� CL C�
M (0 a 0 00 LO
I,- C) LO Lo LO 0
N
P. 00 CN N 0) m
IL 04 co m M rl: Cl) r,17
fig ff8
C) CO It N N NT N r M M 0 M (D - CD 0 C> �r It C) C C, 0 'T
CD w IT m 0 w m 0 w 0 P- 0 0) C) It It CD It C) C) 0 C) LO
cl� LQ C,! a! cl! Lrk -L CZ --I Iq cq ""I cl! 't CN Liz cq. Cl C� q cl C�
U) C) M LO N LD - W M 1- M M I-- --t M r- CD (D W 0 CD Q (n N
LL LL CC) 00 C) ;: y N 00 0) M U) (D �t N (0 1- N Cl) C) CY) LO 0 Izr N co
CA - CF! V: r-C\� r! M M CD r- 0) LO - 0) r- Lr) M 'It 0
M 04 1*Mr 00 r
CT C6 Ld 6 V-7 Cq V-: 6 6 Cq
m 0 CN - a) C) a)
co CL N cn
CL E
E U—
ca
C
(DQ m
E
'.Q, �.o e e 0'. g o 0 0 e
CN "t CO cl) LO 0 "4' 10 m 0 0 1- N CN CC) LO C-4 0 0 Cl) 0
(D 4-- U- u m
Q r- co N m N CN r-- m CZJ - m F 0 to
C4
U) CL
CD
N
a) (D a C) M Il- r 0 M M T CO M M M M a 0 M LO 00 a 0 0 to
a LO CO I-- a m m r- r- C) m Lo 0 0 0 N m LO 0 0 C)
LO E -M C) cq (R R (q (R Ci r-� V: (R LQ C";t t C� (R 'It q CL Cz CCD
� F,
C\l 3: r Ld - r- N rMMvM
w - r.- N N 0 N M W M 0 C) CD LO cq
C:) > t co m 0) N m o It M 0) OD �T N CN r- W LO C) CD No
U) LO co r-; COCD -t N- - M a) COLO NLO w co M r-0 0 -,t
C,q m
0 M N r-: 0� C6 L6 r-: Mcli r-: (6 C6 -�i L6 M r_: r-MCO-
M C) N r- - CO
M co
E E
L C,
ca ea
0
0 > O o o o OOO o o o o o o o
(D IM 0) 0) 0) cn
0 a) a) (D 0 4) (D a) a) 0) 0 Q) a) a) 0) -E- -S -S . S . E E E >.
R 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 cL a cL cL cL cL 15 75
0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 . . . E E E E E E . . .
4-
0 c c c c c c c c c -E -E c c 0- = a. m m = m = m m m:, - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Al
:t::!
C)
2
CL
:3 0
.2 o cD o2m U-
a0
t5 a)
w )
-
a) co C-n c U CL
co U)
2
2
-j
m
C
w a) w
CN Z! E
m
m
A?
"0
a) a)
a) 0 7: 0 2 'n
-0 '0
U.
C: m o 2` w
10
15 r c
2 2 r- o li 0 rz o
2
c c
m cU M M Co CO -V
m m m
:E :E
L) 0 c
c c 3: 3: 2� 2�
E m m 0 0 m
0 co U) 0 () 0 0 2
c c t: V-
= m o o
U) z z
- c
(-D.g m w a m o m
m co 0 o (A 2 z U) z 3:
a.''
City of Georgetown - 2025 Wastewater Impact Fee Study
Capital Improvement Plan for Impact Fees
Credit Determination
Wastewater Service Area
Eligible Debt Annual Growth in Credit for Annual
Eligible Revenue
Annual Service
Service per
Service Units
utility
��
m
Units (3)
Service Unit
1
$ 13,422.845
47.125 $
284.83
3.000
$ 854,505
e
14.722.077
50.125
233J1
6,000
1.762'244
o
15,93e.520
53.125
300.02
9,000
2.700.173
4
18,029,918
56,125
285.61
12,000
3,427,332
o
10.060.045
59.125
271.64
15.000
4.074033
m
16,313,348
62,125
282z9
18,000
4726,604
7
15.997.024
65.125
245o4
21,000
5.158,349
m
18,086.875
68.125
23614
24,000
5.667,303
o
17.377.779
71.125
244.33
27.000
8.590.837
m
17.642.835
74.125
238.01
30.000
7.140.439
11
17.711.782
78,202
220.48
30,000
8.794.835
12
17,675157
82,503
214.24
30,000
6,427.097
13
17.672.866
07.041
203.0*
30,000
6.0e1.250
14
17.377.723
91.828
189.24
30,000
5.077.276
vm
17.378.698
96.878
17040
30,000
5.381.907
16
17.377,402
102.207
10.02
30.000
5.100.658
17
17,378,323
107,828
18117
30,000
4,835,011
vu
17,378.077
113,219
153.49
30.000
4.604.705
19
17,37e136
11e,881
146.1e
30,000
4'385695
mo
17,011,624
122,547
138.82
30,000
4,164,519
21
10,473,249
125,180
131.60
30,000
3.947.884
22
15,307,252
127,870
118J1
30,000
3,591,273
oa
15,307,888
130.618
117.20
30,000
3.515.868
24
15,308,823
133,425
114.74
30,000
3,442113
um
15,308.008
136,282
112.32
30.000
3.369.521
ma
15,308,236
139,221
109a6
30,000
3,298,683
27
15,307,908
142,213
107.64
30,000
" 3,228,218
28
15,308,004
144,993
105.50
30,000
3,107,318^
29
15,308,234
147.82e
103o5
30,000
3.106,633
mu
15.101.484
150.718
100.60
30.000
3.017.053
m
2.852.181
153.084
19.21
30,000
576.356
32
2.7e7.703
156.668
17.86
30,000
535.724
oo
1'016.040
159.731
1012
30,000
303.069
nw
-1,563,415
162.854
9.60
30,000
288,003
uo
1.5e8.415
106.038
8.42
30,000
282,4e1
on
1.394.484
108.204
8.24
30.000
247.127
ur
1.394.484
172.e93
8.08
30.000
242.388
zu
1.394.484
175.841
7.93
30.000
237.e11
39
, 179.150
1.11
30.808
33,395
2025Service Units p 44,125
Ten Year Growth mService Units p m\mm �
10 years
Annual Growth in Service Units 3.000
Credit Amount $ 132,004,590
(1)Wastewater Appendices page 5Section n
(2)Per CDM Smith
<mPer noM Smith Master Plan and State Water Plan Projections
2025 Wastewater Impact Fee Study
City ofGeorgetown, Texas Page 0cfQ Wastewater Appendices