Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_P&Z_05.20.2025Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission City of Georgetown., Texas Tuesday,, May 201 2025 The Georgetown Planning and Zoning Commission rnet on Tuesday, May 20, 2025 at 6:00 PM at Council and Court Building, 61011. 9th Street. The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (AbA). if you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary's Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 808 Martin Luther King, Jr Street for additional inforrnation,TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. The following Members were in attendance: Present were: Travis Perthuis, Scott A Allen, Rueben Leslie L Rodriguez, Pierce P Macguire, Michael D Charles, Lance A Morgan, Shelley G G Roclocker, David "Alan" McDonald, Joseph D. Digiacomo Public Wishing to Address an Advisory Board QD-2---5u--bLe-c-t-that -i-s-P-0-s-t-e-d--O-n-this --a-&en-da.* Please fill out a speaker registry on form which can be found on the table at the entrance to the thee ng room. Clearly print your name and the le er of the item on which you wish to speak and present it to the Board Liaison prior to the start of the mee ng. You will be called forward to speak when the Board considers that item. Only persons who have delivered the speaker form prior to the mee ng being called to order may speak. Speakers will be allowed up to three minutes to speak. If you wish to speak for six minutes, it is permissible to use another requestor's granted me to speak. No more than six minutes for a speaker may be granted. The requestor gran ng me to another speaker must also submit a form and be present at the meeting. Loin a d2bject_nqt pq�-Ied n --944:, A request must be received bV the Advi5ory Board or Commission Liaison prior to the day the agenda for this mee ng is posted. Each speaker will be given three minute$ to address the Board or Commission members. No action can be taken at this meeting. Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Comments from the Chair Announcements 1. Statutory Consent Agenda The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that may be acted upon Frith one single vote. An itern may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Session. 1.A Meeting Minutes Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the May 6, 2025, regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission -- Erica Dunlop, Planning Specialist Moved by Scott A Allen, seconded by Pierce P Macguire to Approve the minutes from the May 6, 2025, regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Motion Approved- 7- 0 Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Scott A Alen, Rueben Leslie L Rodriguez, Pierce P Macguire, Michael D Charles, Lance A Morgan, Shelley G G Rodocker Voting Against: None 2. Regular Session 2.A 2022-6-PUD live haven Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone 8.705 acres in the Orville Perry Survey, Abstract 10, from the Residential Single -Family (RS) zoning district to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district with base zoning districts of Low -Density Multi -Family (MF-1) and Local Commercial (C-1), for the property generally located at 903 Riverhaven Drive (2022-6-PUD) -- Ryan Clark, AICP, Senior Planner Ryan Clark presented the staff reporL Chair Perthuis inquired about the history of reserving right-of-way, ROW, and then requiring the city to purchase it later. Clark explained that it has been done and further provided that when someone develops in the subdivision planning process and has a Future Mobility Plan, FMP, roadway adjacent to the site or running through it, then Chapter 12 of the Unified Development Code, UDC, requires dedication of the ROW th area but still maintain ownership, so the city will ne to purchase it later. Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director — Current Planning, approached the podium to address the commission and noted that the only reservations of ROW he was aware of was within a Development Agreement, DA, not within a Planned Unit Development, PU Chair Perthuis asked if it was possible not to dedicate or reserve the ROW and build on Baird explained that it would be under consideration under the PUD but noted that transportation improvements were needed in the area as well as for the proposed development as it would create traffic and demand. I Lua Saluone, Transportation Planning Manager, approached the podium to address the commission and explained that the city was in the process of purchasing the ROW on FM 971 from the property owner of this proposed site. Saluone commented that the road going through the property will need to be constructed with the development. Saluone mentioned that typically reservations aren't made through PUDs. Commissioner Allen asked if the proposed number of minimum parking requirements and the UDC standards were equitable. Clark shared that it was dependent on the use and added that it was difficult to determine the equity. Rachel Lowder, One World Development, approached the podium to address the commission and explained that the rezone request was from the Residential Single - Family, RS, zoning district to the Low -Density Multi -Family, MF-1, and Local Commercial, C1, zoning district. Lowder shared that the intent for the rezone request was to better align the area's goals for the future land use and comprehensive plan. Lowder explained that the project began in September 2021 and continued with the timeline of the application process. Lowder shared that the property was considered a legal lot status and added that a legal lot was not required to go through the platting process, so dedication was not required. Lowder shared that they will reserve the ROW so that the city can purchase the property. Lowder shared that, according to realtor.com, there were over 2,400 large single-family homes for sale in Georgetown and only 112 under 1,400 square feet. Lowder explained that due to the data provided, there was a priority for smaller and more affordable residences. Lowder shared that they met with the Parkview HOA to cooperate with the neighbors. Lowder explained that there will be an additional public amenity in the commercial space. Lowder spoke about the acreage loss due to reserving the ROW for the city's future purchase. Lowder highlighted that their portion of property was 4% of the 124 acres in the community center node. Lowder explained that their plan was to include 50% residential and 50% non-residential use on the property with the size of home as 1,350 square feet or less. Lowder highlighted that they will include public parking along East Morrow Street to enhance the park and will not allow parking from FM 971. Chair Perthuis opened the public hearing. Jeff Doering, 100 Parque Court, approached the podium to address the commission and shared that he was a member of the Parkview Estates HOA. Doering believed that the proposed development did not align with the intent of the community center designation. Doering highlighted that there was a significant increase in multi -family units. Doering highlighted that the property is adjacent to the San Gabriel Park and river and believed that it presented an opportunity to develop a space that compliments the park. Doering shared that feedback from nearby neighborhoods highlighted support that the best use of the property would be a development that enhances and integrates the park. Doering highlighted that the developers plan to develop within the vicinity of the Guadalupe Cemetery and believed that the anticipated noise and traffic would disturb the site. Doering highlighted that the burial ground was intended for Georgetown residents of the Hispanic descent and explained that other cemeteries do not have significant development around it. Doering requested that the commission maintain the current zoning for the property. Doering believed that the current zoning district was appropriate until a development proposal is submitted to benefit the area and preserve the area of the character of Georgetown and its values. Tad Browning, 101 Benchmark Street, approached the podium to address the commission and explained that he was going to speak on safety but voiced that he depended on the commission's decision to make sure the neighborhood is safe for pedestrians. Ki Browning, 101 Benchmark Street, approached the podium to address the commission and believed that the San Gabriel park was the cherished jewel in the heart of Georgetown for families and friends. Browning highlighted that the park provided an idyllic setting for sports and picnics for families and that the trails provide exercise and reflection time. Browning highlighted that the open spaces within the park provide gatherings that foster connection and that it offered sanctuary for nature and the community. Browning believed that the proposed development risk disruption to the environment and believed that a thoughtful approach should enhance rather than distract from the park's atmosphere. Browning thanked the commission for their consideration and commitment to making decisions that support the vision of Georgetown residents. Mary Calixtro, 908 East 22nd Street, approached the podium to address the commission and shared concern with regard to the Guadalupe Cemetery. Calixtro believed that the areas around the cemetery should not be disturbed and believed that the development would bring traffic and noise. Calixtro explained that those buried there and their visiting family members were due the reverence and highlighted that the community should be sensitive to the cemetery. Calixtro shared that her family members were buried at the cemetery and urged the commissioners to consider the impact that the development would bring. Brad McGrew, 204 Gann Street, approached the podium to address the commission and shared that he relied on the surrounding residential zoning districts when he purchased his home. Tony Prete, Civil Engineer for 903 Riverhaven, approached the podium to address the commission and shared that the owners have strived to work with the neighborhood association and the transportation department for the vision of the project. Prete shared his support for the project. Larry Magehee, 903 Riverhaven, approached the podium to address the commission and identified that they have been working with city staff, the HOA, and the transportation department. Magehee highlighted that the property owner has been compliant with working through issues. Magehee shared that he was familiar with the San Gabriel Park and would not want to distract or take away any part from the park. Magehee explained that there will be a strong buffer zone from the cemetery and identified a couple of cemeteries in the area that do not include a buffer zone. Magehee explained that the developers will do the most to respect and protect what the families have endured and handled. Magehee thanked the staff for their time. Larry Parker, 14170 FM 2964, approached the podium to address the commission and shared that at the time of purchase, the property was a nursing home that was in the process of closing. Parker provided background on the application process, noting that at least 10 different uses were not accepted. Parker encouraged the commission to use their own judgement on whether the criteria presented have not been met. Parker believed that the request did comply with the criteria that were presented. Parker understood that vacant property and unobstructed view of the park would lead to a desire for undeveloped land. Parker requested that the commission approve the proposal. Chair Perthuis closed the public hearing and opened the floor to a motion. Moved by Travis Perthuis; seconded by Lance A Morgan to Approve the proposal. Chair Perthuis explained that the current zoning district was not economically viable to build single family homes as it will have density. Chair Perthuis believed that there should be more protection outlined in the PUD for the cemetery. Chair Perthuis explained that he was generally in support of the request. Chair Perthuis highlighted that the road construction and traffic was the concern during a past P&Z meeting held for the item and noted that the build out of the road and connectivity appear to be a solution to the concern. Commissioner Morgan shared that he leaned toward approval and mentioned that he was not sure what would fit on the property and be better for the community. Commissioner Morgan believed that the applicants tried their best to adjust to the city's requirements. Commissioner Arlen acknowledged staff's evaluation of the rezoning criteria regarding the promotion of health safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and healthful development of the City and questioned if the ROW was the largest concern. Clark acknowledged that there is a legal lot letter for the property but explained that it would not be applicable if the property were subdivided or required to extend public improvements which would require a replat. Commissioner Allen referred to the separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and inquired about what it would take to move the evaluation to compliant. Clark explained that a firmer commitment to protection of heritage trees and maintaining the UDC requirements for transportation would improve evaluation of the criteria. Commissioner Allen shared that he leaned towards approval but was still concerned that there are gaps that would need to be filled. Commissioner Charles expressed concerns about traffic and the potential impact on the park. Clark noted that the considerations have been laid out in the city's FMP. Motion Approved: 4- 3 Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Rueben Leslie L Rodriguez, Pierce P Macguire, Lance A Morgan Voting Against: Scott A Allen, Michael D Charles, Shelley G G Rodocker 2.13 Discussion Items Updates, Commissioner questions, and announcements -- Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director — Current Planning There were no discussion items, Adjournment These minutes were approved at the meeting of Chair IAttest