HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_P&Z_08.19.2025Minutes of the
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Georgetown,, Texas
Tuesday, August 19, 2025
The Georgetown Planning and Zoning Commission met on Tuesday, August 19, 2025 at 6*00 PM at
Council and Court Building, 510 W. 9th Street.
If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the
ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please
contact the City Secretary's Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at
(512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 808 Martin Luther King, Jr Street for additional information; TTY users
route through Relay Texas at 711.
The following Members were in attendance*
Present were: Scott A Allen, Travis Perthuis, David "Alan" McDonald, Pierce P Macguire,
Michael D Charles, Lance A Morgan, Jeri Bradac, Michael L Price, Joseph D. DiGiacom*
Public Wishing to Address an Advisory Board
On a subiect that is posted on this aRenda: Please fill out a speaker registra on form which can be found on
the table at the entrance to the mee ng room. ClearIV print Your name and the le er of the item on which Vou
wish to speak and present it to the Board Liaison prior to the start of the mee ng. You will be called forward
wn- delivered the syeaker form %rior to the
mee ng being called to order maV speak. Speakers will be allowed up to three minutes to speak. If Vou wish
to speak for six minutes, it is permissible to use another requestor's granted me to speak. No more than six
ii-iduntow-for,rc syeaker ma,,YA be gra-ritett-The-j-P P gpestoor gwo-oy m -tni
and be present at the meeting.
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Comments from the chair
Announcements
1. Statutory Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that may be acted upon
acted upon individually as part of the Regular Session.
1.A Mooting Minutes
Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the July 15, 2025,
regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission -- Erica Dunlop, Planning
•*
Moved by Scott A Allen-, seconded by Pierce P Macguire to Approve the minutes frorm.
the July 15, 2025, regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Motion Approved: 7- 0
Voting For: Scott A Allen, Travis Perthuis, David "Alan" McDonald, Pierce P Macguirli
Michael D Charles, Lance A Morgan, Michael L Price
Voting Against: None
2. Regular Session
2.A 2025-4-REZ 609 S. Church St.
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone
.16 Acres out of Lot 7, Block 11, Glasscock Addition, from the Residential Single Family
zoning district to the Mixed Use Downtown zoning district, for the property generally
located at 609 S Church Street 2025-4-REZ -- Olivia Beams, Historic and Downtown
MEMO=
,ommissioner ; ien inquire ne concern o
Commission, HARC, member that voted against the request. Beams believed that the
concern was related to the allowed uses within the Mixed -Use Downtown, MUDT, zoning
district in comparison to what would be allowed in the Residential Single Family zoning
district.
• asked for clarification • the finding for the rezoning criteria that referred to suitability
for uses permitted by the zoning district. Beams shared that the criteria was not compliant
because the site did not have enough parking to serve the proposed zoning district and
the structure would not meet the setback requirements. Beams explained that because the
property would be brought into area two, the request would meet the parking, 0-foot
setback, and buffering requirements.
Harley Coons, owner, approached the podium to address the commission and noted that
there was no desire to allow a band, live music, bar, or anything to that nature. Coons
explained that the difference between the Richards tract and this site was that golden
rule was across the street which causes some noise concerns. Coons shared that there
was no desire to add square footage or changes to the exterior of the home and would
like the • to utilize the space as an • space.
MV lTffT,# -1
:, =d?* Wis oxenTo an jrlTffT"#; !I Chair Perthuis opened the •• ',• a motion. Wi
Moved by Michael L Price-, seconded by Lance A Morgan to Approve the request.
Motion Approved: 7- 0
Voting For: Scott A Allen, Travis Perthuls, David "Alan" McDonald, Pierce P Macguire,
Michael D Charles, Lance A Morgan, Michael L Price
Voting Against: None
23 2025-1-SUP ADU - Country Club
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP) for the
specific use of an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in the Residential Single -Family (RS)
zoning district on the property located at 910 Country Club Road, Georgetown, TX
78628, bearing the legal description of Lot 9, Block E of the Country Club Acres
Subdivision (2025-1 -SUP) -- Haley Webre, Planner
Annemarie Diaz, applicant, approached the podium to address the commission and
noted that the request would be downstream from the street front. Diaz highlighted tha
her neighbor to the east signed a letter of support for the request. Diaz noted that they
would not go beyond the original encroachment. Diaz shared that the original
homeowners of 1977 provided a letter from the neighbor who supported the
encroachment, so Diaz took the same approach and obtained a letter from the neighbi
s openea an e u i1c nearing,"Ifn no speax—efs cominTj
Chair Perthuis opened the floor to a motion.
Moved by Pierce P Maguire; seconded by Scott A Allen to Approve the request.
Motion Approved: 7- 0
Voting For: Scoff A Allen, Travis Perthuis, David "Alan" McDonald, Pierce P Maguire,
Michael D Charles, Lance A Morgan, Michael L Price
Voting Against: None
2.0 2025-4-ANX Shell Spur Tract PUD and Ahnexation
Public Hearing and possible action on a `♦ for a Zoning Map Amendment to zone,
upon annexation, approximately 43.13 acres in the Williams Roberts Survey, Abstract
524, as the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district, with portions of Right -Of -
Way for Shell Road and Shell Spur, for the property generally located at 2200 Shell
Road, Georgetown, Texas (2025-4-ANX) -- Ryan Clark, AICP, Senior Planner
Chair Perthuis inquired about the number of times a property may be disannexed and
annexed back into the ETJ. Clark shared that there were no limitations to the process,
Commissioner Allen asked for more information regarding the feedback from the city
council about complying with the Transportation Impact Fee, TIF, policy versus the
request from the applicant in removing the Traffic Impact Analysis, TIA. Clark explained
that the applicant would pay for the TIF which was a flat fee applied to all development.
Clark explained that the developer was typically responsible for traffic improvements in an
area.
Lua Saluone, Transportation Planning Manager, approached the podium to address the
commission and noted that a development would be required to complete a TIA if it
generated over 5,000 trips. Saluone explained that the full policy would be to have the
development pay their TIF and conduct a TIA to note other impacts that it may cause with
the number of trips generated.
Commissioner Allen inquired about the lack of extensions of roads, no public street
network, and no inter -parcel connectivity throughout the development. Clark
acknowledged that the request did not include proposals for public streets within the
site or connections between parcels, which leaves uncertainty around internal
circulation and may limit efforts to mitigate traffic on Shell Road and Shell Spur.
Commissioner Charles expressed concern regarding the request to waive the TIA
despite anticipated traffic within the neighborhood.
Alternate Commissioner McDonald asked if the unimproved road on the site had
adequate distance between proposed entrances to the neighborhood. Saluone explained
that the unimproved road was intended to be an emergency access and commented that
it did not meet the standards for a right -in -and -right -out. Saluone explained that the
unimproved road would need to be gated and locked for fire access only.
Amanda Brown, applicant, approached the podium to address the commission and
provided a presentation.
Chair Perthuis inquired about the request to omit the TIA. Brown explained that the
reason for the provisions with the TIA was because the applicant had a strong desire to
annex into the city limits with a vision of the traffic improvements they would like to make.
Per Brown, as a compromise, the best way to mitigate added traffic would be to include
right deceleration lanes into the site from Shell Road and Shell Spur. Chair Perthuis
asked if there was flexibility with the request to omit the TIA. Brown explained that there
was no flexibility.
Commissioner Price asked if there was flexibility with regard to the trees on site. Brown
acknowledged that they would be able to remove the request for 50% reduction in the
cost of mitigation. Commissioner Price shared his concern with the removal of heritage
trees and the omission of the TIA.
Commissioner Allen referred to the two right -in lanes and inquired about left turns. Brown
acknowledged that there were no modifications for left turns and noted that the
preference would be a signal light at Shell Road and Shell Spur. Brown indicated that the
intersection does not currently warrant a signal light. Commissioner Allen asked if the
applicant would have concerns with the possibility to table the request so that they could
work and refine it. Brown shared that the preference would be to move forward.
Chair Perthuis opened the public hearing.
Kirsten Lawley, 1603 Shinnecock Hills Drive, approached the podium to address the
commission and shared that it was difficult to leave her driveway due to the traffic that
cuts through Shinnecock Hills Drive to get to the Serenada neighborhood. Lawley
believed that the TIA needed to be a part of the process and added that sidewalks were
needed on Shell Spur. Lawley highlighted that there was uncertainty of timing to add a
traffic light with new development occurring around the area.
Heath Culp, 383 Logan Ranch Road, approached the podium to address the commission
and shared that the option of building a wastewater plant may not be suitable for wells in
the area. Culp explained that the neighborhood committee's focus was to mitigate impact
to surrounding neighborhoods. Culp explained that they were unsuccessful with their
goals due to the gas station and commercial uses request. Culp highlighted that the C3
zoning district typically allows for larger uses and asked that the commission consider the
potential uses. Culp acknowledged that the request did not appear to adhere to mitigation
standards. Culp asked the commission to consider that the request exceeded the
requirement for Edwards Aquifer Recharge zone. Culp believed that the TIA omission
may delay traffic improvements for the area and highlighted that the two return lanes
offered in the request would not benefit consumers or residents that need to leave the
property. Culp highlighted that the backyards of the request could be fenced to the
property line and noted that masonry walls were not allowed. Culp shared that the public
agenda did not mention construction staging and asked for clarification on that. Culp
believed that the PUD request was used to avoid the standard UDC zoning requirements
rather than improve and increase on the development in ways that could be beneficial.
Chair Perthuis closed the public hearing and opened the floor to a motion.
Moved by Michael L Price; seconded by Scott A Allen to Deny the request.
Commissioner Price noted that there were many concerns which included trees,
recreation, and TIA. Commissioner Allen explained that he was inclined to deny the
request based on feedback from applicant about postponement. Alternate Commissioner
McDonald expressed that the thought of a development coming in with no recourse or city
control was concerning and added that the development needed additional time to work
out some of the concerns mentioned in the meeting. Commissioner Charles and
Commissioner Morgan agreed with the previous sentiment.
With no further discussion, the commission proceeded to vote on the motion.
Motion Approved: 7- 0
Voting For: Scott A Allen, Travis Perthuis, David "Alan" McDonald, Pierce P Macguire,
Michael D Charles, Lance A Morgan, Michael L Price
Voting Against: None
2. D UDC Text Amendment 6C" UDC Chapters 8, 11, 12, 16
Public Hearing and possible action on a proposed Unified Development Code Text
Amendment to amend Section 8.01 General, Section 8.02 Tree Preservation, Section
8.05 Review and Approval Process, Section 11.02.010 Impervious Cover Limitation, Sec.
12.02.020 Developer Responsibilities, Section 12.03.030 Local and Neighborhood
Streets, Section 12.05.020 Streets and Blocks, Section 12.05.030 Inter -Parcel
Connectivity, Section 12.06 Design and Technical Standards, and Section 16.02
Definitions -- Zane Brown, Development Support Manager
ninissiTner lien Intsilea a.71=117TRIe z orell an*
drip line. Brown explained that the terms are similar, but the CRZ is a circular region,
based on the diameter of the tree, whereas the drip line may vary depending on the tree
and the way it is oriented.
Commissioner Allen referred to 12.05.03O.B and asked if there would be standards or
criteria to evaluate the request.
Lua Saluone, Transportation Planning Manager, approached the podium to address the
commission and explained that this standard stems from multi -family being next to
commercial or residential that would require a connection into the residential
development. Saluone explained that this would provide the director with discretion on thl
use type and connectivity.
Moved by Michael L Price, seconded by Lance A Morgan to Approve item 2.D as
presented including the minor correction on slide 19.
Motion Approved- 7- 0
Voting For: Scoff A Allen, Travis Perthuis, David "Alan" McDonald, Pierce P Macguire,
Michael D Charles, Lance A Morgan, Michael L Price
Voting Against: None
2,E Discussion Items
Updates, Commissioner questions, and announcements -- Travis Baird, Assistant
Planning Director — Current Planning
There were no discussion items.
Adjournment
These minutes were approved at the meeting of
Chair Xttest