Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 04.30.1974 - Declaring Election Results379 RESOLUTION DECLARING RESULT OF ELECTION STATE OF TEXAS CITY OF GEORGETOWN On this the 30th day of April, 1974, the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, convened in special session at the regular designated meeting place in the City with the following members present, to wit: JOE E. CRAWFORD MAYOR HARRY GOLD HUBERT BROCK COUNCILMEN DEE W. SCOTT J. D. WININGER W. L. WALDEN CITY SECRETARY and the following absent: William Eanes. A quorum being present and after the following resolution was read, Councilman Brock moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Councilman Wininger. The motion, carrying with it the adoption oflthis resolution, prevailed by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Gold, Brock, Scott, Wininger; NOES: None. 0 The Resoltuion is as follows: C5 WHEREAS, each and all of the members of the City Council of said City was duly V and sufficiently notified, officially and personally, in advance, of the time, place and purpose of this meeting; and WHEREAS, proper notice has been duly and timely posted as provided by law; and WHEREAS, there came on to be considered the returns of two separate but simult- aneous elections held in the City on April 30, 1974, for the purpose of submitting the follow- ing propositions to the voters of said City for their reaction thereupon: PROPOSITION NO.1 SHALL the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, be authorized to issue the bonds of said City in the amount of $250,000 maturing serially over a period of years not to exceed 30 years from their date, bearing interest at such rate or rates as shall be determined within the discretion of said City Council, for the purpose of constructing extensions and improve- ments to the City's electric light system; to be issued in accordance with and secured in the manner provided by Article 1111, et seq., V. A. T. C. S., as amended, each bond to be conditioned that,the holder thereof shall never have the right to demand payment of said obligation out of funds raised or to be raised by taxation; and secured by a lien on and pledge of the net revenues from the operation of the City's combined waterworks, sewer and electric light system? PROPOSITION NO.2 SHALL the City Counci I of the City of Georgetown, Texas, be authorized to issue, the bonds of said City in the amount of $50,000 maturing serially over a period of years not to exceed 30 years from their date, bearing interest at such rate or rates as shall be determined within the discretion of said City Council, for the purpose of constructing extensions and improve- ments to the City's water works system; to be issued in accordance with and secured in the manner provided by Article 1111, et seq., V. A. T. C. S., as amended, each bond to be conditioned that the holder thereof shall never have the right to demand payment of said obligation out of funds raised or to be raised by taxation, and secured by a lien on and pledge of the net revenues from the operation of the City's combined waterworks, sewer and electric light system? PROPOSITION NO.3 SHALL the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, be authorized to issue the bonds of said City in the amount of $400,000 maturing serially over a period of years not to exceed 30 years from their date, bearing interest at such rate or rates as shall be determined within the discretion of said City Council, for the purpose of constructing extensions and improve- ments to the City's sewer system; to be issued in accordance with and secured in the manner provided by Article 1111, et seq., V. A. T. C. S., as amended, each bond to be conditioned 3SO that the holder thereof shall never have the right to demand payment of said obligation out of funds raised or to be raised by taxation, and secured by a lien on and pledge of the net revenues from the operation of the City's combined waterworks, sewer and electric light system? PROPOSITION NO. 4 SHALL the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, be authorized to issue bonds of said City in the amount of $75,000 maturing serially over a period of years not to exceed 30 years from their date, bearing interest at such rate or rates as shall be deter- mined within the discretion of such City Council, for the purpose of constructing a public building to be used as a City warehouse, and to levy a tax sufficient to pay the interest on said bonds and create a sinking fund sufficient to redeem them at maturity? PROPOSITION NO. 5 SHALL the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, be authorized to issue bonds of said City in the amount of $100,000 maturing serially over a period of years not to exceed 30 years from their date, bearing interest at such rate or rates as shall be deter- mined within the discretion of said City Council, for the purpose of construction of a public building to be used as a Sub Fire Station, and to levy a tax sufficient to pay the interest on said bonds and create a sinking fund sufficient to redeem them at maturity? PROPOSITION NO., 6 SHALL the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, be authorized to issue bonds of said City in the amount of $150,000 maturing serially over a period of years not to exceed 30 years from their date, bearing interest at such rate or rates as shall be deter- mined within the discretion of said City Council, for the purpose of constructing street improvements (Andice Road), and to levy a tax sufficient to pay the interest on said bonds and create a sinking fund sufficient to redeem them at maturity? PROPOSITION NO.7 SHALL the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, be authorized to issue bonds of said City in the amount of $25,000 maturing serially over a period of years not to exceed 30 years from their date, bearing interest at such rate or rates as shall be determined within the discretion of said City Council, for the purpose of constructing street improvements within Urban Renewal Area), and to levy a tax sufficient to pay the interest on said bonds and create a sinking fund sufficient to redeem them at maturity? PROPOSITION NO.8 SHALL the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, be authorized to issue bonds of said City in the amount of $25,000 maturing serially over a period of years not to exceed 30 years from their date, bearing interest at such rate or rates as shall be determined within the discretion of said City Council, for the purpose of constructing extensions and improvements to the City's waterworks system (within Urban Renewal Area), and to levy a tax suffieient to pay the interest on said bonds and create a sinking fund sufficient to redeem them at maturity? PROPOSITION NO.9 SHALL the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, be authorized to issue bonds of said City in the amount of $25,000 maturing serially over a period of years not to exceed 30 years from their date, bearing interest at such rate or rates as shall be deter- mined within the discretion of said City Council, for the purpose of constructing extensions and improvements to the City's sewer system (within Urban Renewal Area), and to levy tax, sufficient to pay the interest on said bonds and create a sinking fund sufficient to redeem them at maturity? 381 WHEREAS, it appearing from the returns, duly and lawfully made, that there were cast at the election, where only the resident qualified voters who own taxable property in the City and who have duly; rendered the some for taxation voted, valid and legal votes as follows: PROPOSITION NO.1 PROPOSITION NO.2 PROPOSITION NO.3 PROPOSITION NO.4 PROPOSITION NO.5 PROPOSITION NO. 6 PROPOSITION NO.7 PROPOSITION NO.8 PROPOSITION NO, 9 AND, WHEREAS, it appearing from were cost, at the other election, wherealI FOR valid and legal votes as follows: AGAINST PROPOSITION NO.1 QM PROPOSITION NO.2 FOR PROPOSITION NO.3 285 PROPOSITION NO.4 AGAINST PROPOSITION NO.5 V PROPOSITION NO.6 FOR PROPOSITION - NO. 7 339 PROPOSITION NO.8 AGAINST PROPOSITION NO.9 FOR 280 AGAINST 294 FOR 288 AGAINST 283 FOR 291 AGAINST 285 FOR 254 AGAINST 318 FOR 284 AGAINST 291 FOR 237 AGAINST 339 FOR 245 AGAINST 330 FOR 248 AGAINST 326 FOR 251 AGAI NST 323 the returns, duly and lawfully made, that there other resident qualified voters of the City voted, FOR 22 AGAINST 29 FOR 23 AGAINST 28 FOR 25 AGAINST 27 FOR 23 AGAINST 28 FOR 26 AGAINST 25 FOR 23 AGAINST 28 FOR 23 AGAINST 28 FOR 24 • AGAIN ST-- 26 FOR 24 AGAINST 27 IT IS THEREFORE FOUND, DECLARED AND SO RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS: That a majority of the legally qualified property taxpaying voters who own taxable property in said City and who had duly rendered the same for taxation, voted Against the issuance of the bonds, as submitted in Proposition No. 1. That a majority of the resident qualified voters, being the legally qualified taxpaying voters who awn taxable property in the City and who duly rendered some for taxation and the other resident qualified voters, voted Against the issuance of the bonds, as submitted in Proposition No, 1. That a majority of the legally qualified property taxpaying voters who own taxable property in said City and who had duly rendered the same for taxation, voted For the issuance of the bonds, as submitted in Proposition No. 2. That a majority of the resident qualified voters, being the legally qualified taxpaying voters who own taxable property in the City and who duly rendered some for taxation and the other resident qualified voters, voted Against the issuance of the bonds, as submitted in Proposition No. 2. That a majority of the legally qualified property taxpaying voters who own taxable property in said City and who had duly rendered the some for taxation, voted For the issuance of the bonds, as submitted in Proposition No. 3. That aquiority of the resident qualified voters, being the legally qualified taxpaying voters who own taxable property in the City and who duly rendered some for taxation and the other resident voters, voted For the issuance of the bonds, as submitted in Proposition No. 3. That a majority of the legally qualified property taxpaying voters who own taxable property in said City and who had duly rendered the same for taxation, voted Against the issuance of the bonds, the the levying of a tax in payment thereof, as submitted in Proposition No. 4. That a majority of the resident qualified voters, being the legally qualified taxpaying voters who own taxable property in the City and who duly rendered same for taxation and the other resident qualified voters, voted Against the issuance of the bonds, and the levying of a tax in payment thereof, as submitted in Proposition No. 4. 382 That a majority of the legally qualified property taxpaying voters who own taxable property in said City and who had duly rendered the some for taxation, voted Against the issuance of the bonds, and the levying of a tax inpayment thereof, as submitted in Proposition No. 5. That a majority of the resident qualified voters, being the legally qualified tax- paying voters who own taxable property in the City and who duly rendered some for taxation and the other resident qualified voters, voted Against the issuance of the bonds, and the levying of a tax in payment thereof, as submitted in Proposition No. 5. That a majority of the legally qualified property taxpaying voters who own taxable property in said City and who had duly rendered the same for taxation, voted Against the issuance of the bonds, and the levying of a tax in payment thereof; as submitted in Proposition No. 6. That a majority of the resident qualified voters, being the legally qualified tax- paying voters who own taxable property in the City and who duly rendered some for, taxation and the other resident qualified voters, voted Against the issuance of the bonds, and the levying of a tax in payment thereof; as submitted in Proposition No. 6. That a majority of the legally qualified property taxpaying voters who own taxable property in said City and who had duly rendered the same for taxation, voted Against the issuance of the bonds, and the levying of a tax in payment thereof, as kubmi tted in Proposition No. 7. That a majority of the resident qualified voters, being the legally qualified tax- paying voters who own taxable property in the City and who duly rendered same foe taxation and the other resident qualified voters, voted Against the issuance of the bonds, and the levying of a tax in payment thereof, as submitted in Proposition No. 7: That a majority of the legally qualified property taxpaying voters who own taxable property in said City and who had duly rendered the some for taxation, voted Against the issuance 6f the bonds, and the levying of a tax in payment thereof, as submitted in Proposition No. 8, That a majority of the resident qualified voters, being the legally qualified tax- paying voters who own taxable property in the City and who duly rendered same for taxation and the other resident qualified voters, voted Against the issuance of the bonds, and the levying of a tax in payment thereof, as submitted in Proposition No. 8. That a majority of the legally qualified property taxpaying voters who own taxable property in said City and who had duly rendered the some for taxation, voted Against the issuance of the bonds, and the levying of a tax in payment thereof, as submitted in Proposition No. 9. That a majority of the resident qualified voters, being the legally qualified tax- paying voters who own taxable property in the City and who duly rendered same for taxation and the other resident qualified voters, voted Against the issuance of the bonds, and the e vying of a tax in payment thereof; as submitted in Proposition No. 9. PASSED AND APPROVED at a meeting open to the public this the 30th day of April, 1974, after public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given and posted as required by law. ATTEST: i ty Secretary Joe E. rawford, ayo