HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda CC 06.27.1995NOTICE OF MEETING OF THE GOVERNING BODY
OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS
TUESDAY, June 27, 1995
The City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, will meet on Tuesday, June 27, 1995, at 5:30 p.m. in
the City Council Chambers, located at the northeast corner of Seventh and Main Street in Georgetown,
Texas. If you need accommodations for any type of disability, please advise in advance.
Detailed explanatory information on the items listed below is compiled in an agenda packet which is
distributed to the Mayor and each member of the Council. An agenda packet is also available at the Public
Library, for the use of interested citizens.
Workshop --Call to order 5:30 p.m. at the Council Chambers
A HOME Housing Program Tour: 1303 Hart Street and 2108/2204 San Jose Street
Regular Session - Will begin no earlier than 7:00 p.m.
Public Hearing
B Annexation of: approximately 1,241 acres generally bordering the Stonehedge (also known as
Churchill Farms) Subdivision to the west, south and east/Ed Barry and Clyde von Rosenberg
C ADA Self -Evaluation Transition Plan/Elizabeth Gray
Consent Agenda
nda
Consent agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that council may act on with one single vote.
A councilmember may pull any item from the consent agenda in order that the Council discuss and act upon
it individually as part of the regular agenda.
D Approval of meeting minutes --Regular Meeting of June 13, 1995/Sandra Lee
E Approval of a short form final plat of Pepper Subdivision, a Resubdivision of Logan Ranch, Section
1, Lot 29, located at Logan Ranch and Shell Spur Road/Ed Barry and Hildy Kingma
F Approval of a request for a one (1) year extension of final plat approval for the Final Plat of
Georgetown Church of Christ Subdivision/Ed Barry and Hildy Kingma
G Approval of a short form final plat of Good Luck Subdivision, a 2.0 acre tract in the Clement
Stubblefield Survey/Ed Barry and Hildy Kingma
H Approval of a contract for 1994-1995 Sun City Underground Electric Materials Bid/Jim Briggs
City Council Agenda/June 27, 1995
Page 1 of 4 Pages
Approval of a contract for the 1994-95 labor, materials, tools, and equipment for the force main
sewer and irrigation transmission line to the Sun City -Georgetown Project/Jim Briggs
Approval of Amendment 419 of the contract with Camp, Dresser, McKee related to professional
services associated with permitting and site selection for the proposed wastewater treatment plant
in the amount of $42,250.00/Jim Biggs
Regular Agenda
Council will individually consider and possibly take action on any or all of the following items: (Council
may, at any time, recess the regular session to convene in executive session at the request of the Mayor, a
councilmember, or the City Manager.)
K Citizens wishing to address the Council
L Mayor, Council, City Manager, and staff comments and reports
• Bond Rating Presentation Material/Susan Morgan
M Second reading of an ordinance amending "Section 10.16.070" of the Code of Ordinances of the
City relating to fire zones/Bill Shanklin
N Second reading of an ordinance amending the 1994/95 Annual Operating Plan Element (budget) by
$1,734,200 for the purchase and operating cost of the Berry Creek Water and Wastewater
System/Susan Morgan
O Second reading of an ordinance amending the 1994/95 Annual Operating Plan Element (budget)
for various mid year adjustments as outlined at the May 23, 1995 Mid Year Review Report to
Council/Susan Morgan
P Second reading of an ordinance amending the 1994/95 Annual Operating Plan Element (budget) by
$80,799 for the addition of building inspection staff as outlined at the May 23, 1995 Mid Year
Review Report to Council/Susan Morgan
Q Second reading of an ordinance providing for the annexation into the City of: (1) the Stonehedge
subdivision, Sections One, Two and Three (also known as Churchill Farms); (2) a 48.51 acre tract
in the William Addison Survey owned by Stonehedge Partners; and (3) a 2.735 acre tract in the
William Addison Survey described as "Tract Five" in a Declaration of Restriction in Volume 2332,
Page 132 of the Williamson County land records/Ed Barry and Clyde von Rosenberg
R First reading of an ordinance to rezone Stonehedge Subdivision, Sections One and Two from A,
Agricultural to RS, Residential Single Family/Ed Barry and Hildy Kingma
S First reading of an ordinance to rezone 48.511 acres and 2.73 5 acres in the William Addison Survey,
and Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block N, from A, Agricultural to RS, Single Family
Residential and C-1, Local Commercial or any more restrictive classification; and a request to waive
rezoning fees/Ed Barry and Hildy Kingma
City Council Agenda/June 27, 1995
Page 2 of 4 Pages
T First reading of an ordinance to rezone Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block J, Lot 31
from A. Agricultural to RM-2, Dense Multifamily or any more restrictive classification; and a
request to waive rezoning fees/Ed Barry and Hildy Kingma
U Detailed development plan of 1.279 acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, currently known as
Murray's Texaco., and variances to the Subdivision Regulations/Ed Barry and Hildy Kingma
V First reading of an ordinanc to ezone 1.279 acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey from RS,
Residential Sinle Familyto-G�, Commercial First Height or an more restrictive classification-
9
g Y
and a request to waive rezoning fees/Ed Barry and Hildy Kingma
W Final plats of the planned unit development of Sun City Georgetown Subdivision, Phase 1,
Neighborhoods One, Two, and Three; and consider approval of a variance to the Subdivision
Regulations/Ed Barry and Hildy Kingma
X First reading of an ordinance to Rezone a 983.539 acre tract in the W. Roberts, M. Lewis, L.
Russell, A. Short, G. Thompson, W. Wilkerson and D. Monroe Surveys to be known as Sun City
Georgetown, Phase I, from A, Agricultural to RP, Residential Planned, C-1, Local Commercial and
C-2B, Commercial First Height/Ed Barry and Hildy Kingma
Y First reading of an ordinance to rezone a 4.747 acre tract in the Nicholas Porter Survey, to be known
as Park Meadow West, a part of Lot 4, from A, Agricultural to C-2A, Commercial Height, or any
more restrictive district, located on Dawn Drive/Ed Barry and Hildy Kingma
Z First reading of an ordinance to rezone a 2.0 acre tract in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, to be
known as Good Luck Subdivision from RS, Residential Single Family to C-1, Local Commercial
or any more restrictive classification; and a request to waive rezoning fees/Ed Barry and Hildy
Kingma
AA Governance discussion regarding the designation of no parking and one-way traffic at Blue Hole
Park/Randy Morrow, Larry Hesser and David Morgan
Executive Session
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes,
Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular
session that follows.
BB Sec.551.071 consultation with attorney
CC Sec.551.072 deliberation on real property
DD Sec.551.075 conference with employee
City Council Agenda/June 27, 1995
Page 3 of 4 Pages
ReOular Session
EE Action on Executive Session items
FF Final comments and evaluation of meeting process
Adjournment
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, , City Secretary of the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice
of Meeting was posted on the day of , 1995, at a.m./p.m.
City Council Agenda/June 27, 1995
Page 4 of 4 Pages
Council meeting June 27, 1995 Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT: Public hearing regarding the annexation of approximately 1,241 acres generally
bordering the Stonehedge (also known as Churchill Farms) subdivision to the west, south and
east.
ITEMS Y: This is the second of two (2) public hearings required by State law before
initiation of annexation can begin. The purpose of the public hearings is to describe and receive
comments on the City`s plans for providing services to the annexation areas. The service plans
for the areas to be annexed are attached (see Exhibit A). State law requires that the proposed
service plan be explained at the public hearing. While it may be amended as a result of the
public hearings, the provision of any service may not be deleted.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Full City services, including police and fire protection, emergency
medical services, solid waste collection and disposal, maintenance of water and wastewater
facilities, maintenance of road, streets and drainage, street lighting, maintenance of City park and
recreation facilities must be provided to the annexed area within sixty (60) days after the effective
date of the annexation. Necessary extension of capital improvements, such as water and
wastewater systems, must be initiated within two years of annexation and be substantially
completed within 4 1/2 years, in accordance with the adopted service plan, except when the
annexed area is within the service area of another water or wastewater utility.
COMMENTS: None
ATTACHMENTS: Map and service plan
u
Edwar J Barry, AIC - Director Clyde von Rosen rg, AICP
Divisi n of Developm nt Services Chief Planner, Long Range Planning
r-
EXHIBIT A, Page 2 of 3
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS
ANNEXATION SERVICE PLAN
APPROXIMATELY 1,241 ACRES GENERALLY BORDERING
THE STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION (ALSO KNOWN AS CHURCHILL FARMS)
TO THE WEST, SOUTH AND EAST
Introduction
This service plan has been prepared in accordance with Texas Local Government Code,
Chapter 43 - Municipal Annexation. This requires that the service plan provide for the extension
of full municipal services to the area to be annexed by any of the methods by which it extends
services to any other area of the municipality.
Police Protection
Regular and routine patrolling of streets, responses to calls, and other police services will be
provided upon the effective date of the annexation.
Fire Protection and Code Enforcement
Fire protection and prevention services are currently being provided to the area through an
agreement with Williamson County. These services will continue to be provided to the area upon
the effective date of the annexation. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the City Code
Enforcement Officer will periodically patrol streets in the area to ensure that all properties are
in conformance with City Code.
Solid Waste Collection
Solid waste collection and disposal services will be provided upon the effective date of the
annexation, in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions contained in the City Code.
Water Service
Water lines will be extended in accordance with City policy. The City has a Utility Expansion
and Improvement Policy, which is described in this service plan.
Sewer Service
Wastewater lines will be extended in accordance with City policy. The City has a Utility
Expansion and Improvement Policy, which is described in this service plan.
Maintenance of Roads Streets and Draina e
Roads, streets and drainage facilities dedicated to the public will be maintained according to City
Code and policy upon the effective date of the annexation.
Street Lighting
Street lighting will be made available upon the effective date of the annexation, upon request of
the property owners, in accordance with City Code and policy.
Annexation Service Plan, Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT A, Page 3 of 3
Parks and Recreation
Parks and recreation facilities dedicated to the public will be maintained according to City Code
and policy upon the effective date of the annexation. Recreation services will be provided to all
residents in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions contained in the City Code.
Planning and Zoning
Upon the effective date of the annexation, the planning and zoning jurisdiction of the City will
extend to this area. The area will be zoned A (Agricultural), unless otherwise approved through
regular procedures.
Inspection Services
All inspection services, including building, electrical, plumbing, etc., provided by the City will
be extended to the area upon the effective date of the annexation.
Library Services
Library services will be provided to all residents in accordance with the rates, terms, and
conditions contained in the City Code upon the effective date of the annexation.
Other Services
Other services provided by the City, such as animal control, court, and general administration,
will be made available upon the effective date of the annexation, in accordance with the City
Code and policies.
Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy
City Ordinance Number 900404, a Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy, guides the
planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of all utility system improvements,
including water, wastewater and electrical service.
Annexation Service Plan, Page 2 of 2
Council meeting date: 6-27-95
Item No. 1)
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT Meeting Minutes of Regular City Council Meeting on Tuesday, June 13, 1995.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Minutes of Regular City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 13, 1995
Sub
d By:
Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE GOVERNING BODY
OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS
TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1995
The City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, met in Regular Session on the above date with
Mayor Leo Wood presiding.
Council Members
Present:
Ferd Tonn
George Arroyos
Doris Curl
Jane Voltz
Winfred Bonner
Susan Hoyt
Lee Bain
Staff Present:
Bob Hart, City Manager
Sheree Rabe, Asst. City Attorney
Sandra Lee, City Secretary
Ed Barry, Dir. of Development Services
Hartley Sappington, Dir. of Community Svcs.
Susan Morgan, Dir. of Finance & Admin.
Jim Briggs, Dir. of Community Owned Utilities
Bill Shanklin, Dir. of Fire Services
Council Members
Absent:
Dick Vincent
Hildy Kingma, Chief Planner
Clyde von Rosenberg, Chief Planner
Terry Jones, Purchasing Agent
Travis McLain, Airport Manager
Workshop --Called to order at 6:00 p.m.
A Review of ends and priority issues for 1995-96 Budget direction
Hart explained to Council that he had included in the packet for this item a draft of the issues that
he felt were important to Council at the Retreat and asked them for their input. Tonn asked Hart
to add upgrading Old Airport Road. Curl asked about emphasis on a Council arts commission;
protection of the river banks, as well as the river water quality; and a mandatory training program
for members of advisory boards. Arroyos also asked for adequate training of advisory
boardmembers and asked for Council support of the Habitat for Humanity Program.
Regular Session to call Executive Session to order - 6:48 p.m.
Executive Session
B Sec.551.071 consultation with attorney
City Council Minutes
June 13, 1995
Page 1 of 8 Pages
C Sec.551.072 deliberation on real property
D Sec.551.074 staff report
Regular Session - Called to order at 7:12 p.m.
E Action on Executive Session items, including any formal resolutions authorizing litigation as
needed.
No action was taken on Executive Session items.
Public Hearing
F Annexation of: approximately 354 acres located south of Westinghouse Road (CR111) and east
of the existing .City limit boundary and the Pottery and More property/Ed Barry and Clyde von
Rosenberg
von Rosenberg explained the services that would be provided upon annexation. Wood asked
Council for comments. Bonner asked if there were any areas within the City Limits or the
extraterritorial jurisdiction that have not been annexed. Hart explained that there are some "donut
holes" and some development on the fringe of the City Limits that is not within the City.
Vera Anderson and Charles Johnson, residents on Westinghouse Road, spoke against annexation,
and Johnson asked about the timeframe for fire protection to his residence.
von Rosenberg replied that State law requires that the fire protection be provided within 4 1/2
years.
Wood announced that Hart was intending to tell the attorney for the previous speakers that there
is another option that needs to be discussed. The first reading of this ordinance will be July 11,
leaving 30 days to come to a reasonable resolution of differences.
Norma Steele of 750 County Road 111 asked about the street service addressed in the annexation
service plan. She pointed out that there is only one public road --Westinghouse Road --so she
didn't feel that the service plan in that area would be an advantage to her.
The Public Hearing closed at 7:33 p.m.
G Annexation of: approximately 1,241 acres generally bordering the Stonehedge (also known as
Churchill Farms) Subdivision to the west, south and east/Ed Barry and Clyde von Rosenberg
von Rosenberg stated that the service plan was the same as for the previous area.
Calvin Walker of 2601 Hutto Road questioned the boundary lines and spoke against the
annexation. Wood noted that staff would work on a meeting with the property owners.
City Council Minutes
June 13, 1995
Page 2 of 8 Pages
Wesley Poarch stated that he could see no benefit in being annexed and asked that the lines be
adjusted to exclude his property.
Wood replied that annexation would protect the citizens from construction that might lower the
value of their property.
Gerry Anderson spoke representing the Schneider Farm, distributing to Council copies of a letter
to Hart explaining that because the property he represents is agricultural the owner does not wish
to be annexed.
Fred Churchill of Texas Parks and Wildlife spoke representing some of the property owners who
do not wish to be annexed because their property is used for hunting and is depended on for
income.
Pam Carlson, representing three properties, south of Stonehedge (Churchill Farms), asked that
those properties be exempted because they are an active family farm; none of the three properties
is now for sale or intended to be sold in the future, being dedicated to the heirs of the family. The
assessment of city taxes would be a burden on the income of the owners who supplement their
social security income with the sale of cattle raised on the farm.
Keith Morrow, President of Churchill Farms Homeowners Association, explained that their
request to be annexed did not intend to cause harm to the surrounding properties, but was done
to protect their property values from future objectionable development.
Wood asked for any other comments, explaining that the City would try to do everything it could
to please everyone concerned.
Morrow asked why the property directly north of Highway 29 was not included in the annexation
plan. Hart said that a 500-foot deep strip of the land immediately north is already within the City
Limits and would be covered by zoning regulations.
Gerry Anderson said he also was concerned about the property north of Highway 29. He
understands that the owner bought the land for speculation and that there are approximately 90
acres of land in that parcel. Wood replied that staff would look into that situation.
Anderson asked why the Williamson County vehicle maintenance facility was not included in the
annexation. Hart explained that it was because the development had already taken place.
Anderson said he felt some of that land is still intended to be used as a juvenile detention center
according to the County Century Plan.
Wood asked Bain and Curl to meet with the County and obtain a copy of the Century Plan and
the intent of the County for the use of that property.
Morrow also addressed Council concerning the item regarding the first reading of the annexation
City Council Minutes
June 13 , 1995
Page 3 of 8 Pages
ordinance, asking for clarification as to which properties were in fact being annexed. Wood
directed von Rosenberg to show him the annexation map. Morrow also asked about the
apartments that were to be constructed. He asked why the property was being proposed to be
rezoned for multi -family since the owner, David Starr, had already obtained the right to build
apartments there because of being "grandfathered. " Barry explained that the rezoning would
protect the zoning designation in the future in case of a catastrophy so that the apartments could
be rebuilt. Morrow asked if the public would be allowed to be heard before the rezoning would
become final. Barry advised him that he could come before Council to speak when that item is
brought to them in two weeks.
An unidentified person in the audience asked if Starr sold the property to someone else whether
the zoning would go with the property. Barry and Asst. City Attorney Sheree Rabe concurred that
the zoning designation would remain with the property.
The Public Hearing closed at 8:08 p.m.
Consent Agenda
H Approval of meeting minutes --Regular Meeting of May 23, 1995/Sandra Lee
Award of annual bid for the landscape maintenance of City owned facilities and the downtown
square to Bill's Greenhill Service Company in the amount of $35,040.00/Susan Morgan and Terry
Jones
Award of annual bid for water and wastewater pipe and fittings to various bidders in the estimated
amount of $58,920.00/Jim Briggs and Terry Jones
K Approval of a request for extension of approval of an administrative modification to the site plan
for Southwestern University/Ed Barry and Hildy Kingma
L Approval of a contract between the City of Georgetown and the Brazos River Authority, to
conduct the San Gabriel Nutrient Study Segment 1248 in an amount not to exceed $70,000/Jim
Briggs
M Approval of a resolution to adopt a -Water Conservation and Drought Contingency Plan/Jim Briggs
N Adopt an amendment to the City of Georgetown Policy on claims against the City/Bob Hart
O Adopt an executive limitation relative to compensation of City employees/Bob Hart
P Engage APR consultants to design and construct LPG/LNG distribution system to serve Sun City
and other areas with Georgetown/Bob Hart
Q Authorize City Manager to negotiate with potential suppliers to serve Sun City and other areas
within Georgetown/Bob Hart
City Council Minutes
June 13, 1995
Page 4 of 8 Pages
R Authorize City Manager to establish schedule and notices relative to financing the LPG/LNG
distribution system to Sun City and other areas within Georgetown/Bob Hart
S Authorize the City Manager to work out terms of an agreement with the purchaser of a 52-acre
tract subject to the I-35 frontage road assessment/Bob Hart
T Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Secretary to attest to on behalf of the City of
Georgetown a Contract with Dorcon, Inc., for an Airport T-Hanger construction project/Hartley
Sappington and Travis McClain
U Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Secretary to attest to on behalf of the City of
Georgetown a Contract with Austin Engineering Co., Inc., for an Airport construction
project/Hartley Sappington and Travis McClain
Bain asked for the name of the current contractor on Item I. Purchasing Agent Terry Jones replied that
Pride Landscaping out of Hutto is the current contractor, and that the City had opted not to extend their
contract.
Bain asked why the resolution in Itenr M was being brought to Council at this time. Hart advised that
the resolution is required by the Texas Water Development Board in order to sell bonds.
Motion by Tonn, second by Bonner to approve the Consent Agenda. Approved 6-0. (Vincent absent.)
(Curl abstained from Items T and U due to conflict of interest)
Regular Agenda
V Citizens wishing to address the Council
Ed Steiner of 409 W. 3rd Street spoke to Council about Blue Hole, saying that the parking on
MLK is a result of lawyers and jurors parking there instead of at the Courthouse parking lots, not
from people using Blue Hole. He also said there is no excessive noise from Blue Hole and the
traffic is not a problem. He added that he wants the "slave" graveyard to be cleaned and mowed,
and wants Chitauqua Park re -named for Edna Powell. Also doesn't think the soldiers from Ft.
Hood are the cause of the problems at Blue Hole.
W Mayor, Council, City Manager, and staff comments and reports
Tonn asked for a report on 1405 E. 14th Street. , Hart said he has asked Code Enforcement to
overlook the normal procedure on properties whose owners don't respond to certified mailings and
begin taking action by posting a notice on the property so that the property can be cleaned up
legally.
Arroyos thanked Wood and Curl for attending the unveiling of the Neighborhood Watch sign in
his district and commended the people of his neighborhood for making this program work.
City Council Minutes
June 13, 1995
Page 5 of 8 Pages
• Focus Group Session on Subdivision Regulations Process with Linda Goldzimmer, June
201 5:30 p.m., Recreation Center
Hart pointed out that the time and place for this session is 7:00 p.m. at the Library.
8:28 p.m. recess - resumed at 8:34 p.m.
X Second reading of an ordinance to rezone the Village of River Bend, an 8.13 acre Planned Unit
Development in River Bend, Unit V, located on Booty's Crossing Road, from A, Agricultural to
RP, Residential Planned/Ed Barry and Hildy Kingma
Kingma said the first reading was done last year, the second reading was held up until the plat was
filed. The plat was filed last month. Kingma read the caption.
Motion by Tonn, second by Curl to approve Ordinance No.95-24 on second reading. Approved
6-0.
Y Approval of a final plat of Park Meadow West, an 11.182 acre tract in the Nicholas Porter
Survey, located on Williams Drive and Dawn Drive/Ed Barry and Hildy Kingma
Kingma said this final plat was being brought in advance of the preliminary plat and before the
zoning is approved. The annexation becomes effective tomorrow. Because a piece of the property
is already zoned C2B, the more intense zoning controls. The applicant has requested the
remaining piece be zoned the same.
Motion by Tonn, second by Bonner to approve the rezoning. Approved 6-0.
Z Approval of a resolution adopting revisions to the City of Georgetown Mission Statement/Bob
Hart
Hart read the resolution. Motion by Bain, second by Curl to approve this resolution. Approved
6-0.
AA Adopt amendment to the City of Georgetown Policy on professional services/Bob Hart
Hart read the resolution. Motion by Tonn, second by Bain to approve the resolution.
Approved 6-0.
BB Adopt an amendment to the City of Georgetown Policy on Advisory Board Appointments/Bob
Hart
Hart read the resoltuion. Motion by Curl, second by Tonn to approve this resolution.
Approved 6-0.
City Council Minutes
June 13, 1995
Page 6 of 8 Pages
CC First reading of an ordinance providing for the annexation into the City of: (1) the Stonehedge
subdivision, Sections One, Two and Three (also known as Churchill Farms); (2) a 48.51 acre tract
in the William Addison Survey owned by Stonehedge Partners; and (3) a 2.735 acre tract in the
William Addison Survey described as "Tract Five" in a Declaration of Restriction in Volume
2332, Page 132 of the Williamson County land records/Ed Barry and Clyde von Rosenberg
von Rosenberg noted that this is considered to be a voluntary annexation. von Rosenberg read the
caption of the ordinance. Motion by Tonn, second by Bain to approve the ordinance on first
reading. Approved 6-0.
DD First reading of an ordinance amending "Section 10.16.070" of the Code of Ordinances of the
City relating to fire zones/Bill Shanklin
Shanklin noted -that it expands the designation of fire zone and allows the enforcement of those
zones. Shanklin, Hart, Leggitt and Rabe took turns reading the six -page ordinance on first
reading. Motion by Tonn, second by Bain. Approved 6-0.
EE Approval of a resolution revising the current City of Georgetown Budget and Financial Policies
regarding encumbrances/Susan Morgan
Morgan explained that this resolution and the following ordinance were a result of the mid -year
financial review. Motion by Hoyt, second by Tonn to approve this resolution. Approved 6-0.
FF First reading of an ordinance amending the 1994/95 Annual Operating Plan Element (budget) by
$1,734,200 for the purchase and operating cost of the Berry Creek Water and Wastewater
System/Susan Morgan
Morgan read the caption. Motion by Curl, second by Arroyos to approve this ordinance on first
reading. Approved 6-0.
GG First reading of an ordinance amending the 1994/95 Annual Operating Plan Element (budget) for
various mid -year adjustments as outlined at the May 23, 1995 Mid -Year Review Report to
Council/Susan Morgan
Morgan explained that this ordinance is for "housekeeping" purposes and read the caption.
Motion by Hoyt, second by Bonner to approve this ordinance on first reading. Approved 6-0.
HH First reading of an ordinance amending the 1994/95 Annual Operating Plan Element (budget) by
$80,799 for the addition of building inspection staff as outlined at the May 23, 1995 Mid Year
Review Report to Council/Susan Morgan
Morgan read the caption. Motion by Tonn, second by Arroyos to approve this ordinance on first
reading. Approved 6-0.
City Council Minutes
June 13, 1995
Page 7 of 8 Pages
II Approval of a resolution requesting the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to relocate
the entrance ramp to IH35 south from the southbound frontage road between Lakeway Drive and
Williams Drive (RM2338) in Georgetown in order to allow traffic traveling south on the frontage
road from Northwest Boulevard to enter IH35 without first passing through the frontage road's
intersection with Williams Drive (RM2338)/Ed Barry and Clyde von Rosenberg
von Rosenberg explained the purpose of the resolution. Wood asked if TXDOT had been
informed about this action. von Rosenberg said he has mentioned it to Bill Glenn, but no formal
notification has been given. von Rosenberg read the resolution. Motion by Bain, second by Tonn
to approve the resolution. Approved 6-0.
JJ Appoint one member to the Convention & Visitors Bureau and one member to the Board of
Adjustment/Mayor Leo Wood
Wood recommended the suggested applicants be approved. Motion by Tonn, second by Curl to
approve the two appointments. Approved 6-0.
KK Appoint three members to the Georgetown Industrial Development Cooperation/Mayor Leo Wood
Wood asked Hart to give Council some background on this action. Hart explained that this board
has existed for several years. The purpose of the board is to authorize industrial revenue bonds.
In the past, bonds have not been a good financing vehicle for investment for financing.
Therefore, the board was inactive. Triple S Plastics would like to have the financing of industrial
revenue bonds in order to expand their business and bring it to Georgetown. The attorney for
Triple S already has located buyers in Michigan for the bonds.
Wood recommended that Tim Harris, Judi Shanklin, and Mark Dixon be appointed to the Board
of Directors of the Industrial Development Cooperation. These people are all members of the
Georgetown Industrial Foundation. Motion by Tonn, second by Bonner to approve the
recommendations. Approved 6-0.
9:22 p.m. recess for Executive Session - resumed Open Session at 9:40 p.m.
LL Final comments and evaluation of meeting process
There were no final comments.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
Leo Wood, Mayor
City Council Minutes
June 13, 1995
Page 8 of 8 Pages
Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary
Council meeting June 27, 1995 Item No. 46
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT: Consider approval of a Short Form Final Plat of Pepper Subdivision, a
Resubdivision of Logan Ranch, Section 1, Lot 29, Located at Logan Road and Shell Spur Road
ITEM SUMMARY: This plat conforms to the information requirements and design standards
of the Subdivision Regulations. This property is impacted by the construction of the City, s
wastewater force main and effluent return line that service the Sun City Georgetown project.
The City requires an easement through this property to accommodate those public improvements.
Working with the property owner the City has initiated this request in order to create the
necessary easements by converting the existing 50 foot wide ingress/egress easement (Shell Spur
Road) to a 60 foot wide public utility and road right-of-way easement. The plat also creates an
additional two (2) lots from the existing lot.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
COMMENTS: At their regular meeting of June 6, 1995, the Planning and Zoning Commission
voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the Short Form Final Plat of the Pepper Subdivision,
provided the Technical Issues is addressed prior to City Council consideration.
The remaining technical issue has been addressed.
ATTACHMENTS: Staff report and plat.
Submitted By:
�dzl�r�
Edward arry, AIC - Director
Division of Development Services
L-
*Hi -r -
yL. 'ngma, AIC
Chief Planner
SHORT FORM FINAL PLAT OF PEPPER SUBDIVISION,
A RESUBDIVISION OF LOGAN RANCH, SECTION I, LOT 299
LOCATED AT LOGAN ROAD AND SHELL SPUR ROAD
OWNER: Mr. Stephen Pepper
Ms. Mary J. Pepper
361 Logan Ranch Road
Georgetown, TX 78628
512/863-0379
APPLICANT:
City -initiated request
REQUEST: Short Form Final Plat of Pepper Subdivision, a resubdivision
of Logan Ranch, Section 1, Lot 29, a 5.04 acre tract in the
William Roberts Survey as recorded in Cabinet E, Slides 7-12 of
the Official Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas.
FACTS:
Location: Located at Logan Road and Shell Spur Road. SEE EXHIBIT A
Existing Site: A single family residence is located on this tract.
Existing Zoning: This tract is located out of the City so zoning does not apply.
Proposed Use: Three (3) single family residential lots are proposed.
Surrounding Uses North: Unplatted land (out of City)
and Zoning: South: Logan Ranch Subdivision (out of City)
East: Logan Ranch Subdivision (out of City)
West: Logan Ranch Subdivision (out of City)
Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates this location as
Intensity Level 2. The proposed development can be
accommodated within the intensity allocated. SEE EXHIBIT B
Notification: The notification process has been completed as required.
HISTORY: This property is impacted by the construction of the City's
wastewater force main and effluent return line that service the
Sun City Georgetown project. The City requires an easement
Final Plat - Pepper Subdivision June 18, 1995
FP 95-10/File: PEPPER.FP Page 1
CM:HK
through this property to accommodate those public
improvements. Working with the property owners, the City is
proposing to plat this property to provide a 60 foot wide public
utility and road right-of-way easement along the west property
boundary of the subject tract. In the process of creating these
easements, the property owner requested that two (2) additional
lots be created from their original 5.04 acre tract.
ANALYSIS: This property is being platted in accordance with the rural
subdivision design standards contained in Section 36000 of the
ordinance. It conforms to the information requirements and
design standards of the Subdivision Regulations. SEE EXHIBIT
C Shell Spur Road has been in a 50 foot wide ingress/egress
easement granted by the property owners. This plat widens the
easement to 60 feet and converts it to a public utility and road
right-of-way easement. It is not proposed to be dedicated as
right-of-way in order to maintain the minimum one (1) acre lot
size on Lots 29-B and 29-C. Lot 29-A has a lien on it which
precludes making it any smaller than what is proposed.
No variances are requested for this subdivision. The only
remaining technical issue to be addressed prior to City Council
consideration is the submittal of certification from all applicable
taxing authorities that all taxes due have been paid.
STAFF RECOMMIENDATION:
Approval of the Short Form Final Plat of the Pepper
Subdivision, provided the Technical Issue is addressed prior to
City Council consideration.
P & Z ACTION: At their regular meeting of June 6, 1995, the Planning and
Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the
Short Form Final Plat of the Pepper Subdivision, provided the
Technical Issues is addressed prior to City Council
consideration.
Final Plat - Pepper Subdivision
FP 95-10/File: PEPPERTP
CM:HK
June 18, 1995
Page 2
EXHIBIT B
DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT
GIVEN A SINGLE LAND USE
1. 'DATE': May 3, 1995
'PROJECT NAME': Pepper Subdivision
2. 'GIVEN': acres of Intensity Level 1
5.04 acres of Intensity Level 2
acres of Intensity Level 3
acres of Intensity Level 4
acres of Intensity Level 5
acres of Intensity Level 6
5.04 TOTAL ACRES
3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND:
INTENSITY WATER
LEVEL Peak GPD
1
0
2
12,096
3
0
4
0
5
0
6
-----------------------------------------
0
- -
4. TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND
WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION
Average GPO Peak Trip Ends
----------------------------------------------
0 0
3,276 20
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
----------------------------------------------
Maximum GPD Water Capacity:
12,096
Maximum GPD Wastewater Capacity:
3,276
Maximum Trip Ends:
20
5. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT-
(a)
LAND USES
POTENTIAL
WATER
UNITS BY UTILITY
WASTEWATERTRANSPORTATIOI
(b)
MAXIMUM
(c)
PER DEV
(d)
DEVELOPMENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------
---------Detached
UNITS J
REGS I
ALLOWED/UNIT
SF
-----------------------------------
------------- ---------------------
i
-----------------
Large Lot
Average Lot
10
12
11
I 34
10 I
I
10 I
10 housing units
Zero Lot Line
12
13
13
23 I
12 J
37 I
12 housing units
Attached SF
1 9
19
23 I
12 J
49 J
12 housing units
Multifamily
2
21
19 I
9 I
19 I
9
73 J
19 housing units
Mobile Home
1 9
17
24 I
J
17
142 J
9 housing units
Lodging
Institutional
6
54
I
I
J
17 housing units
Church
35,265
35,609
23,971 I
23,971
i
J
I
15 rooms
23,971 square feet
-with day care
-w/o day care
39,273
65,032
,470
39,470
39
65,520
I
1.296
1,296 I
I
1,296 square feet
Medical Office
General
29,077
29.250
28,000
6,247
28,000
6,247
8,000 square feet
Office
Retail, Mixed
33,231
36,000
120J
1,20
I
6,247 square feet
7,906 square feet
Retail, Restaurant
18609
7754
20098
6825
,22
2
1,220 square feet
Retail, Store
Employment Centers
37218
37227
1,7
4198
1,
4,198
1,773 square feet
4,198 square feet
Warehouse
Mini
33,231
212,211
36,000
234.000
4,406
4,40
4,406 square feet
-Warehouse
------------------
3,024,000
3,276,000
,0
77,538
,0
77,538
3,600 square feet
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -
---------- --- I - --------------------
77,538 square feet
EXHIBIT C
( N W5 00- E 356.W )'.
m N 6 8'00' 46' E 356.25'
lz
00. 296.25------_--
.00
4 I
Nam` Iql>;
In *ILL
I I •�. I 1
........... I --- ---- --- ---
29 Ili
aAY * B L
N , G,
�J ,�. a Q I N
J S� .,
----'--------- I v*
ANCI.
Op
SFCSOT---- - - `•�--- ,c ----
np I ,
CID
• � u �j- �.I: I I I m
\\ co
u
I tA ,
I I I I
for I I Ed
a� or ..............
1 I t 1 I
i 1 Ott II
1 i � ICI
I I I L -ys°' aj- I
,1
S 75 *4.0' 19 * W ROAD
LSt8.32" w _3�1 s - ---
IIEPIPER u a- -D=- 1�111
A'RESU-B"DMSHON OF
- L OT 299
(3"`AN.R"(CH
In
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNE
OF A PUBLIC MEETING
Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its
regular public meeting of the:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ❑ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
This meeting will be held on the 6th day of June , 1995, at
6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers,
101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed:
Short From Final Plat of Pepper Subdivision, a Resubdivision of
Logan Ranch, Section One Lot 29, located on Logan Road and
Shell Spur Road.
As one of the owners of adjacent property you are invited to be
present at such meeting if you desire to discuss the proposed
plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail.
Date: 5/22/95 City of Georgetown
A copy of the planning report related to this item will be
available at the Division of Development Services and the
Georgetown Public Library no later than the Friday prior to the
meeting described above. For further information phone the
Development Services Division at 930-3575.
PROPERTY OWNER ' S COMMENTS
Project Name: Pepper Subd.
Name of Respondent:
Address of Respondent: 3 f GO 3 S/, C//
I am in favor: Imo- I object:
If you wish to submit written comment, please respond by 5/31/95,
it will be provided to the Board of Adjustment or Planning and
Zoning Commission and City Council.
Please reply to: City of Georgetown
Development Services Division
P. O. Box 409
Georgetown, Texas 78627
Council meeting _June 27, 1995
Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT: Consideration and possible approval of a request for a one (1) year extension of final
plat approval for the Final Plat of Georgetown Church of Christ Subdivision
ITEMS Y: Section 26060 of the Subdivision Regulations requires that a final plat be
recorded in the County Clerk's office within 12 months of Planning and Zoning Commission
approval or the approval of the final plat is void. It also, however, allows the City Council to
grant an extension to the final plat not to exceed one (1) year if the subdivider shows just cause
for such extension.
This plat was -approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on June 7, 1994, and
by the City Council on June 28, 1994. The detailed development plan was approved at the same
time. The construction plans for the required water line along SH29 have been submitted for City
review and were approved in February 1994. The water line has largely been completed, but
cannot be finalized until the segment of water line to the east is completed. In addition, the
church construction is under way. This extension will allow the church to continue work on the
construction of their facility without recording the final plat.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: The Community Owned Utilities Division has commented that
the water line required for the Church of Christ should be completed within a few weeks.
Therefore, it does not seem appropriate to grant the full one (1) year extension for this final plat.
An extension of three (3) months would be sufficient time to complete the water line and get the
plat recorded. Approving a more limited extension will help to prevent the situation where the
church facility is completed before the plat is recorded.
FINANCIAL IlVIPACT: None.
COMMENTS: None.
ATTACHMENTS: None.
Submitted By:
EdwardC . Barry, AICP - irectoi
Division of Developmenf Services
Hildy L. gma, AICP
Chief Planner
Council meeting June 27, 1995
Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUB.TECT: Consideration of a Short Form Final Plat of Good Luck Subdivision, a 2.0 acre tract in the
Clement Stubblefield Survey.
ITEM SUMMARY: This subdivision is being processed as a Short Form Final Plat although there are
required public improvements. The public improvement required is a water line to serve the site. The
construction plans for the water line have been reviewed and approved.
The proposed one (1) lot subdivision is approximately one-fourth (1/4) mile west of the
IH35/SH29 interchange. The front portion of the lot is in the City Limits and about the rear one-third
of it is outside of the City. As required by the Subdivision Regulations, the applicant proposes to extend
water service to the lot. There is an existing ten (10) foot utility easement along the front lot line which
is to be used for a water line to serve the Karr property located about 400 feet to the west. The applicants
have provided, at the request of the Community Owned Utilities Division, a fifteen (15) foot public utility
easement (PUE) at the front of the lot, beyond the existing ten (10) foot easement. This is necessary to
accommodate any utilities that may need to be extended beyond this lot and not only those that serve this
lot. Also, ten (10) foot PUEs shall be provided along the rear and both side lot lines to provide for the
extension of the water line to the western boundary.
The nearest existing water line is along County Road 265, which is parallel to SH29 and about
500 feet north of it. In order to provide the required service to the site, either 1,400 feet of water main
must be extended from the intersection of IH35 and SH29 or about 500 feet from CR265, through the rear
of the property. Either route may require the securing of off -site easements by the applicant to locate the
water line. The applicant indicates that there are easements which are on adjacent properties that touch
this lot near the rear lot line, in which the water line may be placed. If any additional easements are
necessary, the applicant shall obtain them.
It is not necessary to extend wastewater service to the site. The nearest wastewater line is farther
than one-half (1/2) mile. The Subdivision Regulations require the extension of wastewater service when
facilities are within one-half (1/2) mile.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
COMMENTS: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning Commission vote 5-0 to
recommend approval of a Short Form Final Plat of Good Luck Subdivision, provided the Technical Issues
are addressed prior to City Council consideration.
Revised plats addressing the Technical Issues have been submitted.
ATTACHMENTS: Staff report
Submitted By:
- - Z--'7
Edward ry, D' e
AICP - ctor
Division Development ervices
Hildy L. K%gma, AICP
Chief Planner
R
SHORT FORM FINAL PLAT OF GOOD LUCK SUBDIVISION, A 2.0 ACRE TRACT
IN THE CLEMENT STUBBLEFIELD SURVEY, LOCATED ON
STATE HIGHWAY 29 WEST
OWNER/APPLICANT:
Ben and Alicia Johnson
2890 Cedar Hollow Road
Georgetown, Texas 78628
512/869-2890
AGENT: Don Bizzell, P.E.
Steger and Bizzell Engineering, Inc.
1978 South Austin Avenue
Georgetown, Texas 78626
512/863-4521
REQUEST: Short Form Final Plat of Good Luck Subdivision, a 2.0 acre
tract in the Clement Stubblefield Survey as recorded in Volume
1526, Page 300 of the Official Deed Records of Williamson
County, Texas.
FACTS:
Location: Located on State Highway 29 West. SEE EXHIBIT A
Existing Site: Undeveloped land.
Existing Zoning: The rezoning of this tract from RS, Residential Single Family to
C-1, Local Commercial is being processed by separate agenda
item.
Proposed Use: A convenience store is proposed.
Surrounding Uses North: Citizens Memorial Garden Cemetery (out of City)
and Zoning: South: Undeveloped agricultural land (RS)
East: Vacant office building (RS)
West: San Gabriel Storage (RS)
Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates this location as
Intensity Level 4. SEE EXHIBIT B
Final Plat - Good Luck Subdivision June 17, 1995
FP 95-08/File: GOODLUCK.FP Page 1
CM:CS
Notification: The notification process has been completed.
HISTORY: This tract was annexed into the City on November 18, 1986.
ANALYSIS: The proposed subdivision meets the design standards and
information requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. SEE
EXHIBIT C It does not, however, meet the criteria to be
considered as a Short Form Final Plat due to the fact that off -site
public improvements are required. However, staff is able to
process this one (1) lot plat as such with the exception of
forwarding the request to the City Council immediately after
Commission consideration. The applicant has been advised that
the plat may be considered by the Commission and the staff will
withhold forwarding the plat to the City Council until the
construction plans for the public improvements are reviewed and
approved. Since there is a time limit in which the Council has
to act on a request before it is automatically approved, the staff
requested and received the applicant's concurrence with
withholding City Council consideration temporarily. Otherwise,
the request would have to be sent to the City Council with a
recommendation of denial if the construction plans were not
received.
Final Plat - Good Luck Subdivision
FP 95-08/File: GOODLUCK.FP
CM:CS
The proposed one (1) lot subdivision is approximately one-fourth
(1/4) mile west of the IH35/SH29 interchange. The front
portion of the lot is in the City Limits and about the rear one-
third of it is outside of the City. As required by the Subdivision
Regulations, the applicant proposes to extend water service to
the lot. There is an existing ten (10) foot utility easement along
the front lot line which is to be used for a water line to serve the
Karr property located about 400 feet to the west. The applicants
have provided, at the request of the Community Owned Utilities
Division, a fifteen (15) foot public utility easement (PUE) at the
front of the lot, beyond the existing ten (10) foot easement. This
is necessary to accommodate any utilities that may need to be
extended beyond this lot and not only those that serve this lot.
Also, ten (10) foot PUEs shall be provided along the rear and
both side lot lines to provide for the extension of the water line
June 17, 1995
Page 2
to the western boundary.
The nearest existing water line is along County Road 265, which
is parallel to SH29 and about 500 feet north of it. SEE
EXHIBIT D In order to provide the required service to the site,
either 1,400 feet of water main must be extended from the
intersection of IH35 and SH29 or about 500 feet from CR265,
through the rear of the property. Either route may require the
securing of off -site easements by the applicant to locate the
water line. The applicant indicates that there are easements
which are on adjacent properties that touch this lot near the rear
lot line, in which the water line may be placed. If any
additional easements are necessary, the applicant shall obtain
them.
It is not necessary to extend wastewater service to the site. The
nearest wastewater line is farther than one-half (1 /2) mile. The
Subdivision Regulations require the extension of wastewater
service when facilities are within one-half (1/2) mile.
TECHNICAL ISSUES: The following Technical Issues must be addressed prior to City
Council consideration.
PRIOR TO RECORDING:
Final Plat - Good Luck Subdivision
FP 95-08/File: GOODLUCK.FP
CM:CS
1. Ten (10) foot PUEs are required along the rear and both side
lot lines.
2. Construction plans for the proposed water line shall be
submitted for review and approval.
The following items must be provided prior to recording the
approved Final Plat.
1. The required eight (8) inch water line shall be constructed or
financial security shall be provided to guarantee construction of
said water line.
2. A letter requesting annexation of the portion of the property
that is not in the City must be submitted.
3. Certification from all taxing authorities that all taxes due on
the property have been paid must be provided.
June 17, 1995
Page 3
STAFF RECOnE14ENDATION:
Approval of a Short Form Final Plat of Good Luck Subdivision,
provided the Technical Issues are addressed prior to City
Council consideration.
P & Z ACTION: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning
Commission vote 5-0 to approve a Short Form Final Plat of
Good Luck Subdivision, provided the Technical Issues are
addressed prior to City Council consideration.
Final Plat - Good Luck Subdivision
FP 95-08/File: GOODLUCK.FP
CM:CS
June 17, 1995
Page 4
EXHIBIT A
ti
O
O
o.
EXHIBIT B
DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT
GIVEN A SINGLE LAND USE
1. 'DATE': May 3, 1995
'PROJECT NAME': Good Luck Subdivision
2. 'GIVEN': acres of Intensity Level 1
acres of Intensity Level 2
acres of Intensity Level 3
2.00 acres of Intensity Level 4
acres of Intensity Level 5
acres of Intensity Level 6
2.00 TOTAL ACRES
3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND. -
INTENSITY WATER
WASTEWATER
TRANSPORTATION
LEVEL Peak GPD
------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Average GPD
Peak Trip Ends
1 0
0
--------
0
2 0
0
0
3 0
0
0
4 13,440
3,840
160
5 0
0
0
6 0
------------------------------ --------------------- -------------------------------------------------
0
0
4- TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND:
Maximum GPD Water Capacity:
13.440
Maximum GPD Wastewater
Capacity
3,840
Maximum Trip Ends:
160
5. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
LAND USES
POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY
MAXIMUM
PER DEV
DEVELOPMENT
- --------------------------------------------------------------
WATER
--------------------------
WASTEWATERTRANSPORTATIOI
UNITS (
REGS I
ALLOWED/UNIT
Detached SF
--------------------------------------
---------------------
------
Large Averageot
g Lot
12
13
13
267
12 I
4 I
housing units
Zero Lot Line
13
15
15
181 I
13 I
15 I
13 housing units
Attached SF
21
22
181 I
13 I
19
13 housing units
Multifamily
25
25
147 I
21 I
29 I
21 housing units
Mobile Home
21
20
70
189 I
25 I
20 I
53 I
25 housinunits
Lodging
70
63
115 I
63 I
I
20 housing units
g
63
Institutional
Church
39,184
41, 739
190,250 I
39,184 I
I
I
rooms
39184 square feet
,
-with day care
-w/o day care
43,636
46,265
I
10.283 I
I
10.283 I
I
10,283
10,283 square feet
Medical Office
72,258
32,308
76,800
34,286
222.222 I
49.582 I
72,258 I
32.308 I
I
square feet
32,308
General Office
Retail, Mixed
36,923
42,198
62.745 I
36,923 I
I
I
square feet
36,923 square feet
Retail, Restaurant
20.677
8.615
23.558
8,000
9,686 I
9,686 I
I
9,686 square feet
Retail, Store
41,354
43,636
14,072 I
33,319 I
8,000 I
33,319 I
I
8,000 square feet
38.000
Employment Centers
Warehouse
36,923
42,198
34,965 I
34.965 I
I
I
square feet
33,319 square feet
Mini -Warehouse
235,789
3,360.000
274,286
3.840,000
266,667 I
615,385 I
235, 789 I
615,385 I
I
235, 789 square feet
615.385
------ -----------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
I
square feet
EXHIBIT C
CITIZENS
MEMORIAL GARDEN
( 1906 )
020' 63
. 2 • A5� � •1
x�El
2�� 3
---Ls 110 31. 50^ E ,
15.27'
1.414 AC.
GEORGETOWN TITLE
1789/428
w
N
cr
P
A \g
1-
•
F�
NO. 29
EXHIBIT D
i
1 i
j
„ 1
G
j
1 t
O .
3
Council Meeting Date: June 27, 1995 Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT:
Council approval of a contract for 1994-1995 Sun City
Underground Electric Materials bid.
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown will receive bids, on Wednesday, June
21, 1995, for the Electric System Underground Materials for the Sun
City Project. Due to the complexity of the bid items, we will not
have had time to fully evaluate and itemize the bids for inclusion
in the Council packets prior to the June 27th meeting. This being
the last meeting of June, it is imperative that we proceed with the
award of the contract during this Council meeting to keep the time
line of the project on schedule. A copy of the bid tabulation will
be completed and available on the Council dais at the June 27th
Council meeting.
P
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
NONE
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
COMMENTS:
NONE
ATTACHMENTS:
NONE
S
Jim Briggs, Director
Community Owned Utilities
PUBLIC UTILITIES 930 3509 P.06
06/27/95 TUE 16:55 F-kX 409 764 9644 )icCORD ENG, IN0 IM 002
• .... .�.ff +V_'. Lire. __ ,
June 27, 1995
i
Honorable Mayor & City Council
City g of Georgetown
i
►. G. Box 409
Georgetown, 'texas 78627-0409
1
i
WC Materials Bid N'o. V950022,44
nd Materials Sun CityeDr ego
j
Gentlemen: a
On June 11, 1995, sealed bids for two (2) separate groups of Eleotric System materials
were opened and publioly read under Bid No. 95024 (Specifications for Electric System
Materials for City of Georgetown, Texas fot Sun City Georgetown). Included in this bid
solicitation wero the electric materials as specified by your City for Phase I of the Sun City
i Developmetit.
Attached hereto as Rdijbit "A" for your review and consideration are tabulations of the
ten (10) bids submitted for this project. We have reviewed and evaluated each of the bids !
received, and checked all unit extensions and totals for each of the bid submittals.
k i
On the basis of review and evaluation of each of the bid proposals received for this
l ro ect, we recommend the City of Georgetown award the materials z°equiremen# fore above
st ate reject to the f0ftwing low Bidders who Submitted satisfactory and conforming group
,
bids:
` 7EA-55
Division Material Description Recommended Bid Award Bid Award Amount 4 � l
a A-3 Underground 25 kV priester-M01 & Nicholson
19,655.00
Cable
i4 Cable Termi.natofs
KES Electridd Distribution 1,312.80
152,214.00
u A-18 Underground 25 kV Warren Electric I
Accessories
■ R wc 158,908.00 i
} Group � Pad- Mounted Switagear Warren Electri
Totsl Recommended Bid Award 732,QS9'80
i
t i
PUBLIC UTILITIES 930 3509
06/27/95 TUE 16:55 FAX 409 764 9644 ScCORD ENG,INC
City of Georgetown
June 27, 1995
P.05
4 003
Page 2
We would like to call attention, for the City Council's benefit, that the total low bid
price recommended for this project does not represent a total new expenditure on the part of
your City. The bid includes a sizable amount of materials for which the Developer is responsi-
ble. Listed below is a tabulation of the CIP funding to be required for commitment by your
City toward the completion of Phasa Orie of the Sun City Georgetown Development,
Total 131d Proposal .............. . . . . . . . . . . . , $732,089, 80
Tess Developer Expenditure . . . ..... ... ... . .. 4419.655.
5.
ToMl.Amount of CIP Funds to be Required for the Project ....... $312,434.80
Please do not hesitate to let us ,mow if any questions arise in reference to this bid
Solicitation and our recommendations made hereifl. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to
assist your City on this project, and are most thankful for the good assistance and cooperation
extended us by your fine City Administration and Staff_
Yours very truly,
McCGRD ENGINEERING, INC.
Timmy 1). McCord, P.R.
;. President
JDM/mw
Enclosures
co: Mr. Jinn Briggs (w/encl,)
Mr. John Thomas (w/encl.)
XrY OF GEORGETOWN
BID EVALUATION
BM NO. 9SO24
3yskm Undergmuld Materials Bid
IU A-3 - UNDERGROUND 25 kV CABLE
SouGmay Eiec� WRY Semice, kv--
WarrenEkv-'Ulc Telcom Lm"
Power Supply., kw- (E�
3d Unit
Exisffifed
Evalumded
UAR Extended
Evaluated
Nice
Eked
Price (s) i Price CS)
Evabiated
Prkm
Price {s)
Price
PYIDS 1(s) Prise (4)
343.101-00
6.150 341,325,00
"'3-44MQD
1,001 5.198
343X9.00
543,989.OD
6.182
343,1101-00
LM 1.445
47,%5.00
47,6eSM
1.457
4%081.0G 48,MI.00
i-45c
47,E50.00
47,850.DD -
LDG 1997
59,910DO
59M0L130
63,3DO-DO
6:3.3MOD
2.110
63,300.00
6:3,3MDO
451,584.00
4514
�oj :!10
4! �54,, 4"R 21 - 0 0
. . . . . .
4$Z.475=
Lk
Temple, Inc.
Aed Unit I Extended EvaJuMed
($) price (S) Price ($) 1 Price W,
VDD
6.692
371.405M
371,406,00
40.00
1.922-
60,126.00
50,126.00
D0.00
2.024
60,720.00
60.720.00
2.r.00
492,25ZDO
4RZ2S2.00
7
fed
0.00
81.00
ctm
&LOG
Power Supply, Inc. (A)
ikin empded
Evaluated
Price (3) price M
price (S)
—1
5X20 378'5T0'00
378,S-1QM
I.M
61,0M00
61 �0.OD
2.055
61,950.00
61,950.00
.501.smw
Westinghouse Electric SuPP1Y CAWrfflPmW
Unit
I
Exbmded
Evaluated
Price M
mm (s)
Pfroe ($)
382,&M.00
'n4431,9@095
1.31 e
43,494-"00
045,568.70
se " 3 -0 D
I
MY OF GORGETOWN
BiD EVALUkTION
BID NO. 9so24
Eleark System U]adergmmd Materials Bid
r � A_t rr mu &_i _ rr V.RGR0ITKD 25 kV CABLE
Ptie-14Aell do NlEcfiotson B 31
()
-1�[eil i� �llcfiafsaa
Pflester (A)
Smi y EWchFIC U�iftf Service, Inc.
Warren, E�lc Tal<com. LX"
- -Power Supply,. Inc (0) 1
Clem
Oty.
Ua[t
price {�
Extended
Price to
Evaluated
Price {�
Unit
Price (#�
Extended
Prk* ($a
Evaluated
Prlae 10
Usfd
Pcks (P
EewAed Evahaded
Price {$) Prim M
343,989.00 343,989-00
47,68a.00 47,685.1;1D
gait Extended Evaluated
Pfte �j Price {fj Price M
Uodt Famed
Price (s) PrtcB (�)
£-�hiated
Price {�}
6.182
1.457
343,110 I DD
4$.O$1.(!il
343.101.00
48�46140
6.150
1_4rii1
341,325r.04
47,$50.00
c�F��m
47,8b0.1
41
-2
56,500
33,000
S-50
t23
305250=
417,SgD.tiO
"1317,460-W
46,6�Ir.S10
5.79
7.2'i
321,345.00
41,9y0.04
321,345.00 5.198
41tQ END 1.445
53,910.00
59,9:0.D0 2.110 63,300-M 63, 0 2.110 63,300.00 63,300:OD
U.
::•. 45 4�.QD
454,482. Q0 _�i ::" --.Y✓•'r":t:x r.- .-c-
F�3
30,00PD
ZS4
56,�,00
55,2M.00
1.88
5b,400.DD
56j,101100 1-997
Total Bid
<":i•:.::_�..s:.a...
+1,
y:�� _
n
-
........-_._--,%:-j=x:t:- ;"<-•fi'-
Hem aty.
Pei 55,5D0
!42 33=
A-3 34�QQ0
Q_
Total BW =: =
.n
KSS Eiectrkmi Dlslributoes
Unit Extended Evakwted
Price M Prue ($) 1 Ptioe, J$)
6.34
1.492
351 RO.00
49236.00
"'364.453.50
"151.897.80
Z.:}6
6 tA0.00
w64,890.00
462,906.04
4.86,051.30
Cummins LWIty Sup¢Y
.Unit
Exftnded
Evaluated
Unit
Price ($)
Price ($)
Price M
Pace M
6.634
379,287.00
373,287.00
6.6w
1.38
45,540.00
45,W.OD
1A2
Z22
66,600.00
6&,600.00
2.024
-_ - --
491
491,427.00
-ti
Techilne, Inc.
Paldlne $ectrk: Supw4f
Unit
Ended
Evaluated
Unit
Extended
Evaluafted
Stem
•
Price
Proe ($)
Price { j
Nice
Price (S)
Prise (s)
A i
55,50Q
723
404,040.00
404,040.W
0.00 D.04
0.00
2
33, =
1.3E5
4.5,045,00
45,045.CO
1.457 48,081.00
4a081.00
A3
30,000
2.1.5
64,650.00
64,6M00
0.00 am
owe
TotBed7
5,73S.U8
5t3,T40
:r-1.-
4B,Z�
fiO4% in-uaase for capper cable.
4S% In:reame for exception taken to iiquidatsd damages for Isse delivery.
12'i3id not arr-epted due iv esca Lion of mtal prices.
"41rcompletr. Bid.
Temple, iric.
Nmer Supply, Inc. (A)
Extended Evaius"
Price ($) 1 Price W,
Ertemded Evaluated
Prime Ptic+e (S) Prtcae (S)
371,40.5M
M,406.00
6.6Z0 TM'Sf0.00 378,51Q Oa
6D,126.00
50,126.00
1.850 61,050-00 61,050.00
60,7210-00
617.7 .fl0
2.Q&5
51,�50.00
61,950.00
492,26ZOD
4g2,2�a2.00
= _ `' x^=r: s _= =
V&stinghouse Electric S.appLy CAMVP W
Untt
Ezbmted
Evaluated
Prk>e
Price (S)
Prue (S)
89$
382,B34.00
�4LI1 �B�dg5
1.31E
43,494_00
045,668.70
2
-5z580.04
12IM709.00
-
�
1
J�
LL
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
BID EVALUkTION
Blip NO. 9SO24
Electrk Sysh m Underground Materials Bid
rMUS A-1 THRU A-3 - LUNWERC ROUND 25 k— CABLE
P7 -biefl & Wlcholsan (g}�"
P�iestrr-f�[e� i� Nichalsaa (A)
Sir Electric Ufty Service, Inc.
Warren Electric Tercom. !pity
Poorer Supply" � (9)
[tact
extended
Evaluated
Unit
Extee�ded
Evaluated
UAft
Ectsndt�d
Evaluated
i�abt
Extended
Evaluated
�r+rlae f�I
Uadt
P[lrea {S}
F
Pr1ce 4�
Price {
fiern C".
Prue {
Price {$
Pride {�i
Price �3�
Pfte M
Price M
Prig M
Price (}
Prim �$j
Pike 4?
Prloe (�
A-1 55,500
343,989.D0
343y989.0D
6.182
3�43,U1.00
343,101.00
fi.t50
341,325.04
cv��
5M
305.25D=
...317,46a-M
5179
321,345.00
321,345.il4 5.198
A,-2 3,3,000
%M
40,:390 DO
40,590M
127
41,910.00
41 OtCM
1.445
47,685.00
4705.D0
1.457
48XI.DD
48,081.00
t_4�
4f,�.00
47,8Z
3 30,Q44
tZ4
56swo.00
55,2DD.00
1.88
56,400.00
5�4MDO
1.967
59,91Q.00
59,910.D0
LJV
2t10
- _- - Jj�i
-: S-
63,3Q�D0
63,30D.fl0
��. pprry�
7
2.110
..__�t:!• � iC',i_'w%j
63,300.00
63,30
466,12
_ r;JC i
_:'fir:-;.:<.:
r
z
r�
W
a
r) J
W Ll
H
J
H
I �
Li
H t�
J �
Total
c�
Z
w
r'
W
H
a
KeS Electrical Disiritwtors
Cummins LMtty Suppilry
Temple, Inc.
Unit
ExteniSed
Ev+akwted
Unit
Extended
Evaluated
emit
Extended
Evalure"
hem
atg.
L Price
Prioe (S)
Price
Price )
Price {;)
Price
Price (S)
Price ()
Price
Arl
55,50r`I
6,34
351.$3'O.M
`ac369.453.50
6.934
378,287.00
3T8,287DD 'I
6.6M
371,40&W
37`1,40 ,W
42�
1.492
4S,23 .00
M51�T.80
45,5.40.00
45,54D.40
1'
0
150,1T26.�0y0�!
► -3
r33Aw
J�,Vliu
C..aJI!
6 AO.DO
" 64.0.90=0
r1.�39
LGG
66,WV.�
,S4U.00
.0L4
�6(0�,1215.�U•
W,7G1J Jf..ri,
UQrf tJ.l ihJ
Hid
46 .00
051
A M
441 42T.QQ
_EToa-
492 252a0l
2 a2
Kam
MY-
Techllne, Inc.
Palallne Ekctrla Suppwq
[Unit
Price ($)
Exwnded
Pr Pce (S)
Evaluated
Price (S)
Unit
Price ($)
Extended
Price (#)
Eval t ed
Price (p
A-1
55-900
TM
404,040.00
404,04000
0.00
0.00
0.00
Ar2
33, =
1.395
45,045.00
45,045.00
1.457
48,081.00
48,081.00
A3
30,000
PASS
64,M.00i
64,6 00
0.00 1 0M
0M
To gCd{;;�
Rli
35--_max-
�23 7 .00
513 T3�.40
=' `' � _r . " ,fft�i
#S �}U
484S2fi0tn]
0i
4� imisase for capper cable.
4215% In wease for exception taken to liquidated damages for isle delivery.
QHd new R=C:epted due io es a2slion of rr=tal prices.
`'`Incomplete Bid.
Power Supply, Inr- (A)
may 1 a,.= a I Evaluated
Price Price ($) Price (S)
6.620 378, 510.00 378,51 Q 04
1. 61,090.d4 fit MODD
2JQ65 51,9'50.04 {71,950.OQ
591,510.0D 1 5+D1.S10A0
Westinghouse Electric S+uWY C V*
Untt
I
Exbwided
Eralue
Price (*
M" (s)
Wee
-6.88$
382,s39.OD
144I10
1.316
43,494.fl0
1�145,6f
2-086
-52,580.06
1 ewn
=::=fie ::^•.`=�_ :j,:-;
• _ x• YxK._.-. _..a .v
4$8
M
G
m
LD
to
0
to
m
CITY € F GEORGETO N
BID EVALILTAIION
$11D NO. 95024
Electric System Underground Materials Bid
Bidden
�df ),rice
ed Price {$}
valuated Price
6 �� . �
3��.�
390.00
War= E1 e�e� Telcorn- UtidityO
KBS El ecbri cal Distributors
6 218.80
173 l2. 80
L,3 l2- n
Priester-)A& Nicholson
6
.55
1,563.30
1,563.30
{ Power Supply, Inc.
6
274.00
1,644.00
19644.003
Crn�ins U �iLi t 1 `�
u PP y
6
288.68
1,'732. 09
1,'732.08
297.00
3'7?. �
648.88
1 ,7���
2,�62.00
3,893.'28
0. �}0
��,3'�� .1 �
3,83.28
0.00
.�
so'�1f�1� �2et1'XC Utlll� Service
Fc�lc-[tee Eletitric. supply
6
6
'I'iiae, Inc.
6
4
Tle, Inc.
6
0.00
6
0.
0.00
o
(i)Unable too make the October 1, 1995 delivery deadline.
�}Not la spw.fica ons.
�1}5 % increases for exception taken to Iigcidated damages fw late delivery.
CITY OF GEORGETOW
BID EVALUATION
BID NO. 95024
Electric System Underground Materials Bid
ITEMS A-S THEW A•IS - UNDERGROUND 25 kV ACCESSORIES
Curnmi`ns Utility Sapple' 'warren ElecWc Telcam. Utility
Unit Extended Ewaivated Unit Extended Evaicated
Q Prioa ? Prue ($) Pace (S} Price (S} Price 'j Price��}
324 97.5r 26,35&-20 28.366.2D 113.00 36,812.00 36.61Z100
Power Supply, ins
unit Extended Evaluated
Prioe (S) Price (S) Prue {�
1!34.DD 33,696.00 33,696.00
KBS Electrical Distributors
Unit Extended Evaluated
Price (S) Price Price (Sj
Southway 13ectric WRY She
Unit ratended E-Yaluated
Mae M Price Price
item
1811%
584935.60
58,335.60
195.00
63.00,00
M130.04
A-5
A-6
as-7
57 177.19 10,099.83
168 236.29 39,696.72
10,OW.83 234-4o
39496.72 249.00 1
13„338.00
41,832.00
13,338.00
41,83ZW
174.U0
254kD
9,918-01D
4ZSn.00
9XB.00
42,672XO
252.90
291.62
14.415.30
49,025.76
14,415.30
49,025.76
273.00
315.t}t7
15.661.00
W.,920.00
15,561.04
52l20.iXi
A-8
336
43.20 14515.220
14,515.2Q 46.00
15,456-M
15,•456.00
45.00
15,120.00
15,120-00
43.65
14,6M40
14,665.40
46A0
15,456.00
15,455-OG
j l4-9
so
22SAI 2O,3z2.80
20=90 203.00
18,270.00
18,270.00
314,0Q
28,280.00
28,260.DQ
2 57M
24,T 15.50
24,115.50
294.OQ
26,1 DO.00
26,10CLOO
A-1 U
178
27.81 4,950.18
4,95D.18 30.00
5,340.D0
5,340M
41 X
7,299M
7,298.OD
31.70
5,,642.60
5,.642.50
34=
6,D52.00
i
6,Ua'ZOCf
A-1 1
J�-12
81
253
41.23 3,33 �63
11.88 3,4D5.64
3,33.4m 31-00
3,005.64 8.00
2,5 t t"
2,1}24.DD
2,511.00
2,024.00
41.00
8.50
3,321.00
2,154.50
3,321.00!
2,150M
1 31.70
14.55
2,567,70
3,681.15
2,567.70
3,681.1.5
34A0
15.75
Z754M
3,964.75
2,754L0.t
3�FA75
-13
324
14.81 4;79&44
4,798.44 12.ce
3,888.D0
3,88&C t3
11.00
3,%4M
3,554.0D
14.55
4,71420
4,714 20
18,25
5,913A0
5- M 3.00
�4-14
67
110.68 7,415.56
7,415.56 t63.D0
1GX1.00
10,M100
166.00
11,122 DO
1 t,`r.22.00
111.50
7.470.50
7,470.5Q
119.00
7,g7'3.DD
Ton.00
S
5
83.16 498.95
498.96 115.00
6WOO
690.00
60.00
360.00
5+63.70
563.70
110.00
F#1.DD
660M
-t6
A-17
6
2
124.14 744.194
146.88 293.76
7'44_M 1224D
243.76 161.00
732Co
322.40
732M
.3?2.00
125DO
161.00
750.D0
32200
75D.U0
322.00
140.DO
840.00
844.DD
141.0D
E46.00
846AD
168.40
331M
3W.,DD
161.,50
323.00
323M
-19
2
125.74 253.4E
2s3 4fi 139M
278.00
278A0
139.00
2J9.00
278.00
145-00
290M
M.00
IMM
258.DO
258ADD
y,�d ��r��j
Totad }
.... i::c..-;_ti-.._ .�:+
_ _ :_;_�c•= • ._. 138 D1.34
-'~ •v• _�_
;.;{; y:.'v .t•`+�`•`f,�s,..;
138,301.34_ >=
}`:!'-Pf �.-1�.�.�'.'.•i'..•_---•�ia._.`
152 t4.fl�
15 t4,00
-- --:=.vt?•-)._•`•=•: _=_
- : �_ .;:'._,�.
-_ _x:_= :=� -
"' _ _• .=; =-
',.- -• _ __
158,831.50
$
t5�, 3t.
:••'•�`�z...'.: •t.•� '. fir
=-�.� __�r-,:_,:>�-
_ •;. ., :
__._��
�-- .,. ^�•, :�_^'.-�'?"{2f_
1 H7 4.41
187 2i.�'I
r
_W. _-_•.[._t.y:.
;:;==.� 1.�::,
_
_
r:"•A'=`� : - :�Y �;"
201 981t.75
241 ltQ.7v
OIL", nNe to make th9 OdDbef, 1995 delivery deadline.
n
CrrY OF GEORGETOWN
BID EVALUATION
BID NO. 95024
Eaectfic Sys Underground Materials Bid
r'X'E A,-5 }THRU A 18 - UNDERGROUND 25 kV ACCESSORIES (Continued)
Paleline Elect is Supply
Prkm ter -hell & Nrctplson
Techline, Inc.
Tempi, Inc. WESCO
item
OW-
Una
PriCe
Extended
Price ]
Evaluated
Delve 0)
Unit
Price
Extended
Prloe
Evaluated
Price {��
Unit
Price { }
Extended
Price
Evaluated
Price (s)
Unit
Price ($)
Extended
PFICe
E-Muated
Price (#j
Unit
Price {)
Extended Evaiuurbed
Price ( Prke
A6
2.2+4
't76 60
57,2B3.20
1 14T.35
D-OD
D.130
am
118.55
3E,41 a 20
(1'403 r 1
0.00
0,D0
OW
10.730
0.00
QW
A
57
t] DD
>Q.00
4AD
D.00
D.0D
D,m
Sam
5�1.6.21
"45<,897.022
0�0
0.00
�O.LIf?
0.00
0J00
A7
168
455AQ
75,600.00
1D8%43& 0
0.0D
0.00
0.00
381.41
64,C76.88
"$7,280.72
0.(}0
Q.00
(.00
IDDD
D.Oq 0.00
A-,8
3w
49m
16.4-64.00
"637,287-20
0.00
D.00
0.D0
46.28
15,550.08
►,F16,327.58
0.00
C1.D0
am
D.00 OW
Ls>0.
90
32' 21
2}b`28.909031.11C35
0.04
{1.0q
0.00
310.0E
2B,715.44
1 "30,151.17
203ZI
18 315-90
Ee 19,231,70
207.00
18,630,W
19,561.50
A-10
A-11
178 I 46.11
at � 46.11
8,202.58
3,734.91
c�$617M
013 21jw
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
D.OD
0.00
30-95
31.61
I 5,509.10
2.54.41
5,W9.10
f °2.£88,43
31.02
2,512-62
11)2,63&25
31.33
2,537.73
'*2,564.152
,412
253
10.21
21.582.13
142,712-29
0.00
0.0c
0-W
13.04
3,299,12
3, 299. %2
0.00
io.D0
0-00
G.D0
0.00
0.0c
}4-13
324
15.21
4,928.04
'15,174�44 ]F
4.00
am
10D
1513
4,f42.12
4,902-12
0
0.00
0.00
ODU
0.00
A 14
67
�
.24.61
15.048.67
c'� 15,8D1J31
In-43 +
8, m9.81
8,269r81
112.90
71�&t.30
7,W.3+0
0.U0
0.60
4.fl(3
0.00
4.DD
O.RC
A15
A16
Ail
6
6
2
a.O4
0.00
0;{)0
0.00
0.00
0.00 t
DAD
0.00
0.00
W€ 75
121100
0.00
520.50
7MOO
0.00
520.50
726M
0A0
0.L50
12S.DD
D.00
a.00
726.00
0.00
0.00
726"
D.00
72.00
143A0
i43.35
432-00
858.00
287-1U
111453.80
� ;940.90
`�341 E
0.00
D.40
O.0D
0.00
0.00
:0.00
0.0C
0-a
0.
2
Ctoo
0-D0 h 010D
0100
0.00 f O.Ud
0.001
fl..00
0.00
123.91
247-w-
tth .21
�
r ow
CKK
iotal i35
3
l•:•v�vr -__2
- - -
1 663 22 2 7
5
-':
--
��ti -
-
� 1
516- 3
- -
' iY •%: is � ':-:_:{;�
17 6
$7fr.�t
a4i 2?
1[-""
ji^-tip:_-._
axL3
I�,�
1 VDE--�j
580.7
{ increase 1W exception taken to Dquidat d damages for late de5vary.
CITY OF GFORGETOWN
BID EVALrtJATION
BID NO. 95024
IIekric Sim Undwground serials Bid
GROTJ "B"
PAD -MOUNTED SWT1'CHGEAR
KOS Electrical Distributors
Ter h[Irre, Irtc-
Southway 8ectric MV Service ywarr= FJectric - Attecna* Bid
eower Supply, Inc. (G-M)
hem
Qty�-
Unit
{ Prica (S)
Extended
Price
Evaluated
Frfcs M
X)ntt
Ptir1Ce ($)
Extended
Price ($)
Evaluated
Price (j
Unit Extended
Price Price (
Evaluated Unit
Price ($)I Prlrre is)
Extearled
Prim (S)
Evaluated
Pdm ($)
U.ait
Price (S)
Extended Evalm",
Price price (S)
B 1
8
2,502_DC3
2016A0
ca20,618.64
w5i12.1 Q
20,01 6.50
20.01.80
2,002A9 22,41£ 72
{?.; 31339 2,576.00
20,$UB.00
20.608.0CI
2,7&S�Of!
22,12D.00 22112fri
B2
7
°�,765-%
6 355.00
�1,089.20
1B11d,729.SD
75,106.50
75,306.50
r'ta, �'415-57 7z9D9.69
""7'5,826.08 s"12,8MOU
B9,b0Q.IIi!
89,f�.00
13.E3S.00
96,845.00 9E 9W-I
B3
3
°�9r7fi�a04
29,?45.00
r"3D,46680
i�'iD,72�k.S0
32,1t38.54
32, 188.50
°u113,415.57 31,247.45
'32y496.8,4 12,8i14.00
38.�04.00
38,400.04
13,835.00
41,505.00 41,506_I
B4 t r�1a„ 2'[5.00 10,215.0 "�' 10,62 .fi0 ''5'11,2D5.25
Total Bid �' �Y. _ t27 681.00 132 ' _ - _13R,51{m
,:• � ,99�24 .;�:�_ r--�:: <,�•:17'AS
} -
•,',•jiG!`;:.. •?.� z, - •:::+cv_
__ is 'l_v'v'r'.•.r_:'f.Jt
41.205.25
1 I ,2A5.25
'�' 13,Z31 S6 13,231.86
m13,761.13 1C11300.00
14,311i}.DD
10,300.04
11,101100
11,1 DD.00
7.�5
1
�
f � _
-:'�" --i
- : � 7
-:::�.<t=:>: 139805.28
rd' 1 49 0&0b 158 908.�q�0 -
4$qq�I.
J'-�
L� C.
171 0.00 #7-1,57
f i`
Power! Supply, Inc. (S&C)'r'
Priesier-hell & Nicholsonrp
Curnmirm Mity SupplVa
WESCO''s
Templex Inc.
�r�
QtY•
Unit
Price ($)
Extended
Price AM
Evaluated
ftoe SS}IL
Urdt
Price IS)
Extended
Pelce (S)
Evaluated
Price (5)
UnEt
Prioe
Extended
Price °j
End
PriDo ($}
Unit
Price
Extended
Price
Evaluated
Pdoe {;j
fjntt
lPrIce
Extended
Price
Ewa1t�
Price {:
E--1
8
3,125.00
2500M.00
a25,450.O0
31147.16
25,177.23
4+)25,E44.28
3,273w
26,184.D0
0'26,634.W
0.00
0,001
'30.D0
Q.D0
O.D4
�C
9-2
7
T 1,ifl0�IJD
BUDD.00
11�8Q. .00
11.560,63
80,9,7 +1
"'81,W1.41
84,182-00
0164.jM00
11,225.OU
78,5M.00
m8#,71 8.00
i 1,2n.flf1
78,953.e0
M82:11 ^
B-3
3
1?,i5J�n0
51,45D.eb
r�51F9ti0.0�0
a7,2 i
51,733.68
"''52~2Uf�.63
17.938.00
53,914.OD
,26�4.OQ
21,2.6&00
m sD44.00
�68,356..16
lUDD
t1.00
I2I
l
E-4
1
17,74ZL-DD
17,740M
r"1H,190.00
17,83524
17,835.24
**18=2.24
18,653.D0
18.553.
!D=. 1011
23,.95D.00
23,950=
m24,90&OD
0.00
DIM—]
0�
FT;_
o ta i p{�
... _ _ _
--
�-:�.���V
- - -
_
90 {r6
3�, 4 9Q OQ
_ -
.7-vi
:��
-
7 O.fil
i77' B,.i6t
-_ -
vrjry'�:'•
1
-
- 16�E 3.39A0
1 .16
- -
- - - - -
7 8 �
82 1
-
r"Warren 8eCWiC has a base bid orr arts item. The unit price for tips r'tem was $11,693.CG and the ic,-3 price vas $81451.,M
1214% increas_- fit exception taken to provision -�or shipping f.o.b, destinaiiort_
pi$450.;C1 !muse for
'41$457o.%0C1 inomease far
15'Un;ah'* to rrrake the October, 1995 delivery deadline.
'D1h[C lip s�ica lonr,
Council Meeting Date: June 27, 1995
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
Item No. Mr
SUBJECT •
Council approval of a contract for the 1994-1995 Labor,
Materials, Tools and Equipment for the Force Main, Sewer and
Irrigation Transmission Line to the Sun City Georgetown Project.
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown will receive bids, on Monday, June 26,
1995, for Labor, Materials, Tools and Equipment for the Force Main,
Sewer and Irrigation Transmission Line to the Sun City - Georgetown
Project. Due to the timing, regarding Council agenda items, we
will not have had time to review and itemize the bids for their
inclusion in the June 27th Council packets. Because of strict time
schedules related to this project, it is imperative that we proceed
with the award of the contract during the June 27th Council meeting
to keep the project on schedule. A copy of the bid tabulation will
be completed and available on the Council dais at the June 27th
Council meeting.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
NONE
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
COMMENTS:
NONE
ATTACHMENTS:
NONE
E
Y:
Jim Briggs, Director
Community Owned Utilities
fra
ZfEm I
June 27, 1995
Mr. Jim Briggs
Director, Community Owned Utilities
City of Georgetown
1101 N. College Street
Georgetown, TX 78627
Dear Mr. Briggs:
Yesterday, June 26, 1995, bids received from eight contractors were opened at 3:00 p.m.
The bids were for construction of the advertised project, "Force Main, Sewer, and Irrigation
Transmission Line to serve Sun City -Georgetown". Our construction cost estimate for the
project was $2,509,600. Bids ranged from a high amount of $2,627,356 to a low bid of
$1,955,835 by J.C.Evans Construction Co., Inc.; Austin, Texas. The bid tabulation is
enclosed.
I recommend that the City of Georgetown award its contract for the construction of the
previously mentioned project to the low bidder, J.C. Evans Construction Co., Inc.
Sincerely,
HDR Engineering, Inc.
.. ► -,yam. `� `JP•80
00^
5 YA�
�� s+R�•aMseiw-..oc�.on.s.o.+•as...•o�
G. . Kre mar, Jr., P.E.
Project Manager
�k^fo`-,•,jk`�
� 9s
HDR Engineering, Inc. 2211 South lH 35
Suite 300
Austin, Texas
78741
Telephone
512 912-5100
Fax
512 442-5069
Force Main, Sewer and Irrigation Transmission Line
To Serve Sun City - Georgetown
BID TAB
City of Georgetown, Texas r, "
June 26,1995
Bid
Item Description
Quan' /Unit
J.C. Evans
Gamey Co., Inc.
BRH - Garver, Inc.
Keystone Construction, Inc
Unit Price
Total
Unit Price
Total
Unit Price
Total
Unit Price
Total
1. Mobilization
1 LS
N/A
$97,500.00
N/A
$100,000.00
N/A
$100,000.00
WA
$100,000.00
2. Pipe -Force Main
2a. 16" Ductile 250 psi
8,800 LF
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
2b. 16" PVC DR25
8,800 LF
$31.00
$272,800.00
$33.15
$291,720.00
$43.00
$378,400.00
$36.80
$323,840.00
3. Pipe - Sanitary Sewer
3a. 18" PVC
11,000 LF
$35.00
$385,000.00
$34.00
$374,000.00
$34.00
$374,000.00
$40.00
$440,000.00
3b. 6" PVC Double Service
300 LF
$28.00
$8,400.00
$20.00
$6,000.00
$50.00
$15,000.00
$43.20
$12,960.00
3c. 4" PVC Single Service
400 LF
$26.00
$10,400.00
$18.00
$7.200.00
$45.00
$18.000.00
$33.00
$13,200.00
4. Pipe - Irrigation Transmission
4a. 18" Ductile Iron 250 psi
17,200 LF
$41.00
$705,200.00
$42.50
$731,000.00
$46.00
$791,200.00
$48.60
$835,920.00
4b. 18" PVC DR18
17,200 LF
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
5. Manholes
33 EA
$2,200.00
$72,600.00
$3,700.00
$122,100.00
$4,200.00
$138,600.00
$1,500.00
$49,500.00
6. Trench Safety
37,000 LF
$1.00
$37,000.00
$0.50
$18,500.00
$0.50
$18,500.00
$1.10
$40,700.00
7. Fire Hydrant
1 EA
$1,800.00
$1.800.00
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
$2,200.00
$2,200.00
8. 2" Irr Line Comb Air/Vac
4 EA
$2,000.00
$8,000.00
$3,500.00
$14,000.00
$2,500.00
$10,000.00
$2,200.00
$8,800.00
Valve and Structure
9. 2" Sewage Line Comb Air/Vac
3 EA
$2,000.00
$6,000.00
$3,200.00
$9,600.00
$2,600.00
$7,800.00
$2,200.00
$6,600.00
Valve and Structure
10. 10" Pressure Substaining
1 EA
$7,500.00
$7,500.00
$12,000.00
$12,000.00
$9,500.00
$9,500.00
$7,500.00
$7,500.00
Valve/Structure
11. Silt Fence
4,500 LF
$1.85
$8,325.00
$1.50
$6,750.00
$3.00
$13,500.00
$4.00
$18,000.00
12. Rock Berm
400 LF
$16.00
$6,400.00
$11.00
$4,400.00
$10.00
$4,000.00
$30.00
$12,000.00
13: Road Surface Restroation
13a. Compacte Flexible Base
5,000 Ton
$6.50
$32,500.00
$6.25
$31,250.00
$0.10
$500.00
$11.00
$55,000.00
13b. Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete
9,000 SY
$3.80
$34,200.00
$8.00
$72,000.00
$0.10
$900.00
$5.50
$49,500.00
14. Booster Pump Station
Structure, Equipment, Electrical
Complete
1 LS
N/A
$195,000.00
N/A
$200,000.00
N/A
$175,000.00
N/A
$190,000.00
15. - Water Main - Relocate as Necessary
15a. 6" Class 150 PVC
400 LF
$40.00
$16,000.00
$18.00
$7,200.00
$30.00
$12,000.00
$32.00
$12,800.00
15b. 6" Ductile Iron
1,000 LB
$1.25
$1,250.00
$2.00
$2,000.00
$1.50
$1,500.00
$2.20
$2,200.00
16. Allowance for Radio Receiver
1 LS
N/A
$20,000.00
N/A
$20,000.00
N/A
$20,000.00
N/A
$20,000.00
17. Add On Alternate - Additional
Cost for HDR Engineering to be
Indemnified and Insured by Contractor
1 LS
N/A
$0.00
N/A
$500.00
N/A
$100.00
N/A
$1,000.00
18. Concrete Encasement of 18"
Pipeline
1,300 LF
$20.00
$26,000.00
$27.00
$35,100.00
$30.00
$39,000.00
$11.00
$14,300.00
19. Waterline Crossings
9 EA
$440.00
$3,960.00
$2,500.00
$22,500.00
$600.00
$5,400.00
$1,100.00
$9,900.00
$1,955,835.00
$2,089,320.00
$2,135,400.00
$2,225.920.00
TOTAL BID
Force Main, Sewer and Irrigation Transmission Lin
To Serve Sun City - Georgetown
Bid '
Item Description Quanil
1.
Mobilization
2. Pipe -Force Main
2a.
16" Ductile 250 psi
8.8
2b.
16" PVC DR25
8,8
3. Pipe - Sanitary Sewer
3a.
18" PVC
11,
3b.
6" PVC Double Service
3c.
4" PVC Single Service
4
4. Pipe - Irrigation Transmission
4a.
18" Ductile Iron 250 psi
17,2
4b.
18" PVC DR18
17,2
5.
Manholes
6.
Trench Safety
37,
7.
Fire Hydrant
8.
2" Irr Line Comb Air/Vac
Valve and Structure
9.
2" Sewage Line Comb Air/Vac
Valve and Structure
10.
10" Pressure Substaining
Valve/Structure
11.
Silt Fence
4,
12.
Rock Berm
4
Reddico Construction Rogers Construction Co. Cash Construction Co.
'rice Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total
N/A $110,000.00 WA $75,000.00 N/A $101.00
00
13: Road Surface Restroation
13a. Compacte Flexible Base 5,
13b. Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete 9,
14. Booster Pump Station
Structure, Equipment, Electrical
Complete
15. - Water Main - Relocate as Necessary
15a. 6" Class 150 PVC 4
00
15b. 6" Ductile Iron 1,
16. Allowance for Radio Receiver
17. Add On Alternate - Additional
Cost for HDR Engineering to be
Indemnified and Insured by Contractor
18. Concrete Encasement of 18"
Pipeline 1,
19. Waterline Crossings
TOTAL BID
Reddico Construction Rogers Construction Co. Cash Construction Co.
'rice Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total
N/A $110,000.00 WA $75,000.00 N/A $101.00
00 LF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
00 LF $42.00 $369,600.00 $46.00 $404,800.00 $39.86 $350,768.00 $51.90 $456,720.00
000 LF $41.00 $451,000.00 $52.60 $578,600.00 $51.40 $565,400.00 $49.90 $548,900.00
300 LF $23.00 $6,900.00 $30.00 $9,000.00 $39.76 $11,928.00 $51.20 $15,360.00
00 LF $20.00 $8,000.00 $30.00 $12,000.00 $32.40 $12,960.00 $51.20 $20,480.00
00 LF $0.00 $49.50 $851,400.00 $53.22 $915,384.00 $51.90 $892,680.00
00 LF $53.00 $911,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
33 EA $2,600.00 $85,800.00 $2,000.00 $66,000.00 $2,640.00 $87,120.00 $2,770.00 $91,410.00
000 LF $1.00 $37,000.00 $1.00 $37,000.00 $1.00 $37,000.00 $1.00 $37,000.0000
1 EA $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $3,778.75 $3,778.75 $1,900.00 $1,9.00
4 EA $2,700.00 $10,800.00 $2,500.00 $10,000.00 $3,000.00 $12,000.00 $3,070.00 $12,280.00
3 EA $3,000.00 $9,000.00 $2,500.00 $7,500.00 $2,834.00 $8,502.00 $2,950.00 $8,850.00
1 EA $8,400.00 $8,400.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,251.00 $12,251.00 $12,300.00 $12,300.00
500 LF $1.50 $6,750.00 $2.00 $9,000.00 $1.75 $7,875.00 $1.60 $7,200.00
LF $15.00 $6,000.00 $15.00 $6,000.00 $15.00 $6,000.00 $15.00 $6,000.00
000 Ton $25.50 $127,500.00 $12.00 $60,000.00 $15.00 $75,000.00 $10.80 $54,000.00
000 SY $5.60 $50,400.00 $4.60 $41,400.00 $6.00 $54,000.00 $5.40 $48,600.00
1 LS N/A $181,000.00 N/A $195,000.00 N/A $204.000.00 N/A $200,900.00
LF $28.00 $11,200.00 $40.00 $16,000.00 $40.00 $16,000.00 $28.50 $11,400.00
000 LB $1.70 $1,700.00 $3.00 $3,000.00 $2.00 $2,000.00 $3.40 $3,400.00
1 LS N/A $20,000.00 N/A $20,000.00 N/A $20,000.00 N/A $20,000.00
1 LS N/A $5,000.00
300 LF $24.00 $31,200.00
9 EA $900.00 $8,100.00
N/A $500.00
$30.00 $39,000.00
1.000.00 $9.000.00
N/A $1,000.00
$30.00 $39,000.00
$1.700.00 $15.300.00
N/A $500.00
$24.80 $32,240.00
!,800.00 $25,200.00
0
,4
1 LS N/A $5,000.00
300 LF $24.00 $31,200.00
9 EA $900.00 $8,100.00
N/A $500.00
$30.00 $39,000.00
1.000.00 $9.000.00
N/A $1,000.00
$30.00 $39,000.00
$1.700.00 $15.300.00
N/A $500.00
$24.80 $32,240.00
!,800.00 $25,200.00
0
,4
N/A $1,000.00
$30.00 $39,000.00
$1.700.00 $15.300.00
N/A $500.00
$24.80 $32,240.00
!,800.00 $25,200.00
0
,4
N/A $500.00
$24.80 $32,240.00
!,800.00 $25,200.00
0
,4
0
,4
Council Meeting Date: June 27, 1995
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
Item No.
SUBJECT:
Council approval of Amendment No. 19, of the contract between
the City of Georgetown and Camp, Dresser & McKee, related to the
professional services associated with permitting and site selection
for the proposed wastewater treatment plant near the confluence of
Pecan Branch and the San Gabriel River, in the amount of
$42,250.00.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Because of the Sun City development, it has been determined
that a new wastewater treatment plant will be necessary to
effectively maintain our current level of service and remain in
line with our long-term expansion plan for wastewater services
related to this development.
Camp, Dresser & McKee has been asked to provide preliminary
services such as, preparation of the permit forms to be provided to
the TNRCC and EPA NPDES, site selection, obtaining stream cross
sections, etc.
Staff requests approval of Amendment No. 19 to the contract between
the City of Georgetown and Camp, Dresser & McKee, in the amount of
$42,250.00, to begin the process for completing this project.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
NONE
FINANCIAL IMPACT•
Funds in the amount of $42,250.00 to be paid from Account
Number 651-101-6365-00.
COMMENTS:
NONE
ATTACHMENTS
1. Proposal letter from Camp, Dresser & McKee
2. Amendment No. 19 from Camp, Dresser & McKee
Submitted B
riggs, Director
kiity Owned Utilities
CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc.
environmental
services
Westech 360
8911 Capital of Texas Highway, Suite 4240
Austin, Texas 78759-7267
Tel: 512 345-6651 Fax: 512 345-1483
June 6, 1995
Mr. Jim Briggs
Director
Community Owned Utilities
City of Georgetown
1101 N. College
Georgetown, TX 78626
Dear Mr. Briggs
Transmitted with this letter are two originals of Amendment No.19 to our
professional services agreement. Amendment No. 19 is for providing professional
services related to the permitting and site selection for the proposed wastewater
treatment plant near the confluence of Pecan Branch and the San Gabriel River. The
scope of work described in the Amendment includes preparation of the TNRCC
wastewater permit application forms including preparation of maps and completion
of the forms and preparation of the EPA NPDES permit application forms. The scope
of work also includes obtaining stream cross sections above, at and below the
proposed outfall into the San Gabriel River. We have already contacted the TNRCC
about a potential wastewater treatment plant discharging up to 4.5 MGD into the San
Gabriel River at the proposed site and have been told that a wastewater discharge at
this site would be acceptable unless the river study underway by the City as a
condition of its existing wastewater discharge permits produced data to the contrary.
Therefore, we have not included stream modelling as part of our scope of work.
Because this is a permit for a new facility, the City will not need to obtain wastewater
and sludge biologic and analytical data, including biomonitoring tests, and pollutant
analysis of the effluent.
The site selection portion of the project consists of an analysis of the proposed site for
the following criteria:
• floodplain and floodway determination
• site access
• buffer zone requirements
• utility availability including telephone, electric and water service
• geologic assessment consistent with the TNRCC Edwards Aquifer
Rules for the treatment plant site and the outfall line
• preliminary archeological assessment for the treatment plant site and
the outfall line (this does not include detailed archeological
investigations if culturally significant sites are discovered)
A2059LTR.AW
CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc.
Mr. Jim Briggs
June 6, 1995
Page 2
• preliminary endangered species and wetlands assessment to determine
if the treatment plant site or the outfall line is a habitat to an
endangered species or is in a wetland
• environmental assessment of the site to determine if there are any
environmental hazards on the site that would become the City's if the
site is purchased
• preliminary layout of the ultimate treatment plant site based upon a
capacity of 3.0 MGD
We propose to complete the services described above for a lump sum fee of
$45,250.00. The fee for these services is itemized on the attached page. We will have
the application for the TNRCC and EPA permits ready for your review within 45
days of approval of the amendment. The site assessment report will be complete
within 90 days of access to the proposed site.
If you have any questions regarding this letter or Amendment No. 19 please call.
Sincerely,
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.
A, r
Allen D. Woelke, P.E.
Principal Engineer
AW:ta
ATTACHMENTS
A2059LTR.AW
CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc.
TNRCC Permit Application Preparation
Stream Survey
Map Preparation
Data Acquisition
Form Preparation
Coordination with TNRCC Staff
Application Filing Fee
SUBTOTAL
EPA NPDES Permit Application Preparation
Map Preparation
Data Acquisition
Form Preparation
Coordination with EPA Staff
Application Filing Fee
SUBTOTAL
Site Assessment
Floodplain and Floodway Determination
Site Access
Buffer Zone Determination
Utility Availability Assessment
Geologic Assessment
Archeological Assessment
Endangered Species / Wetlands Assessment
Environmental Assessment
Plant Layout / Process Assessment
Report Preparation
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
$ 1,200
2,000
3,000
2,500
1,500
9 _n.5n
$ 12,250
$ 2,000
3,000
2,500
1,500
0
$ 9,000
$ 500
500
1,000
500
2,000
1,500
2,500
5,000
6,000
4_.,;nn
$ 24,000
$ 45,250
A2059LTR.AW
AMENDMENT NO. 19
TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ENGINEER
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TO PREPARE A TNRCC AND NPDES WASTEWATER PERMIT APPLICATION
The General Services Agreement between OWNER and ENGINEER last authorized on November 26,
1991, is hereby amended as follows:
The scope and cost of the anticipated services are set forth in the attached Exhibit 1. The fee for the work
in Amendment No. 19 is to be paid on a lump sum basis.
Your signature below will constitute your acceptance of Amendment No. 19.
EXECUTED in duplicate original this day of , 1995 at Georgetown, Texas, where this
contract is performable and enforceable.
Approved as to form: Party of the First Part:
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS
Marianne Landers Banks Leo Wood
City Attorney Mayor
Attest:
Sandra D. Lee
City Secretary
Party of the Second Part:
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.
By: Allen D. Woelke
Principal Engineer
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TRAVIS
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the day of 19j!�'
by Mr. Allen D. Woelke in his capacity as Principal Engineer of Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
Printed name: J'
otary b i , State o Texas Commission Expires: -2F
r
ULIA FINNEY
t.* NOTARY PUBLIC
�. State of Texas
A1281AMD.N19 OF
Comm. Exp. 02-03-97
Exhibit 1
Amendment No. 19
TNRCC WASTEWATER PERMIT AND EPA NPDES PERMIT
APPLICATION PREPARATION AND SITE ASSESSMENT
SCOPE OF WORK
Permit Application
The ENGINEER shall. prepare wastewater discharge permit applications using the latest
TNRCC and EPA forms for the proposed wastewater treatment plant near the confluence
of Pecan Branch and the San Gabriel River. The ENGINEER shall develop and gather
the data necessary for submission of the permit applications and organize it into the
forms as required by the regulatory authority. The ENGINEER shall develop the
treatment plant process diagrams and calculations, sludge treatment process diagrams
and calculations, sludge disposal technique description, and wastewater flow projections.
The ENGINEER shall gather names and addresses of property owners adjacent to the
plant site and downstream of the discharge site, and stream cross -sections upstream, at,
and downstream of the proposed outfall. According to the regulatory agencies, there will
not need to be wastewater and sludge analytical and biological data submitted with a
new wastewater discharge permit application.
The ENGINEER shall complete the permit application documents as required by the
regulatory authority, including the preparation of original maps and drawings. The draft
permit application shall be submitted to the OWNER for their review and review by their
legal staff if so desired. The ENGINEER shall submit the permit application on the
behalf of the OWNER and pay any necessary filing fee for the TNRCC permit
application.
The ENGINEER shall review the draft permits and provide comments to the OWNER.
The ENGINEER shall coordinate between the regulatory authorities and the OWNER as
required. The ENGINEER shall attend the TNRCC meeting when the permit is
considered, if so requested by the OWNER.
The scope of work does not include the development of stream biological surveys,
preparation of stream analysis using computer models to predict the dissolved oxygen
in the stream, nor preparation and testimony as an expert witness at a contested permit
hearing.
The ENGINEER shall submit the permit applications to the TNRCC and EPA within 45
days of the notice to proceed. This assumes a one week review period by the OWNER.
Site Assessment
The ENGINEER shall prepare a site assessment report that evaluates the proposed
treatment plant site's suitability for development. The site assessment will evaluate the
site for the following conditions:
A2059LTR.ATT
1. Floodplain and floodway determination to evaluate the portion of the site that can
be developed without special permits from FEMA.
2. Site access evaluation to determine access to the site and permits necessary from
TxDOT and Georgetown Railroad to develop the site.
3. Buffer zone determination to evaluate the impact that the TNRCC regulatory
buffer zone for wastewater treatment plants will have on the amount of land
required to construct a new wastewater treatment plant.
4. Utility availability assessment to evaluate the availability of water, electric and
telephone utilities available to the site in the quantity required. This assessment
will concentrate on backup power for the treatment plant and fire protection
capability at the site.
5. Geologic assessment as required by the water pollution abatement plan (WPAP)
for the TNRCC. Although the wastewater discharge is off of the regulated
Edwards Aquifer, the plant will be constructed on the regulated Edwards Aquifer
and will require a WPAP prior to construction.
6. Archeological assessment to determine if there are any culturally significant
artifacts or sites on the proposed treatment plant site that would interfere with
construction of a new treatment plant. This assessment is a pedestrian survey
only, and additional studies may be required if an EID for SRF funding is
required.
7. Endangered species and wetlands evaluation consisting of a pedestrian survey to
determine if there are endangered species habitats or significant wetlands on the
site that would require special permits from USF&W or the COE. Completion of
the permit applications would be done in the design phase of the treatment plant
project.
S. Environmental assessment to determine if there are, or have been activities on the
site that would result in hazardous wastes being on the site.
9. Plant layout on the proposed site to determine if the size of the site is sufficient
to accommodate the new plant and the required floodways, buffer zones and any
sites that as a result of the evaluations cannot be disturbed by construction
activities. The ENGINEER will coordinate with the OWNER to prepare a plant
process, both liquid and solid treatment, that is acceptable to the OWNER during
this task. The ENGINEER will prepare a summary of processes available for the
OWNER's consideration for biological wastewater treatment, disinfection, and
sludge treatment.
10. Prepare a report summarizing the results of the assessments and evaluations and
recommending whether the site is acceptable and itemizing the various permits
and approvals necessary for site development.
A2059LTR.ATT
TNRCC Permit Application Preparation
Stream Survey
$ 1,200
Map Preparation
2,000
Data Acquisition
3,000
Form Preparation
2,500
Coordination with TNRCC Staff
1,500
Application Filing Fee
2,050
SUBTOTAL
$ 12,250
EPA NPDES Permit Application Preparation
Map Preparation
$ 2,000
Data Acquisition
3,000
Form Preparation
2,500
Coordination with EPA Staff
1,500
Application Filing Fee
0
SUBTOTAL
$ 9,000
Site Assessment
Floodplain and Floodway Determination
$ 500
Site Access
500
Buffer Zone Determination
1,000
Utility Availability Assessment
500
Geologic Assessment
2,000
Archeological Assessment
1,500
Endangered Species / Wetlands Assessment
2,500
Environmental Assessment
5,000
Plant Layout / Process Assessment
6,000
Report Preparation
4,500
SUBTOTAL
$ 24,000
TOTAL
$ 45,250
A2059LTR.AW
ITEM SUMMARY
This provision for establishing fire lanes in the City was requested by the City Council, and
provides for the access by emergency vehicles to heavily trafficked and populated areas. This
process adds an element of safety to the citizens of Georgetown by heightening visibility in
heavily populated areas, and providing a smoother traffic flow in heavily trafficked shopping
p g y
centers, hospitals, and schools.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
None
ORDINANCE No.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN,
TEXAS, AMENDING "SECTION 10.16.070 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, RELATING TO FIRE ZONES"; REPEALING
CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the current parking code for the City of Georgetown establishes and
maintains fire lanes only in those areas specifically listed in the city code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there exist many more areas in the City of
Georgetown which require fire lane designation other than those listed in the city code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to ensure access for emergency
vehicles for the safety and protection of the citizens and property of the City of Georgetown;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that access for emergency vehicles would be more
easily and more effectively ensured and maintained if fire lanes were established as needed by
the Fire Marshal, rather than limited to those listed in the city code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the fire lane requirements and specifications
contained herein are proper and necessary for the safety and protection of the citizens and
property of the City of Georgetown; and
WHEREAS, the fire lane requirements and specifications contained herein are found
to be in accordance with National Fire Protection Association;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS THAT:
SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are
hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein
and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that
this ordinance implements the Economic Development Policy of the Century Plan - Policy
Plan Element, which states: "The City will encourage diversified growth and promote
business opportunities to create jobs, broaden the tax base and minimize the impact of
economic fluctuations," as well as End C of the Facilitates and Services Policy - Policy Plan
Element which states, "The City should ensure that all sectors of the City are served 'by an
adequate level of fire protection..., " and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is
not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section
2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan.
Section 2. Section 10.16.070 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Georgetown,
Texas hereby amended to areas as follows:
Section 10.16.070 Fire Lanes
A. When required
1. No building of any type construction for occupancy shall be constructed in such
a manner that any part of the structure is more than one hundred fifty feet
(150') from a public street or highway; provided, however, that such structure
may be erected at a greater distance if the owner designates, constructs, and
maintains a fire lane having a minimum unobstructed width of twenty feet (20')
and a minimum height clearance of fourteen feet (14') terminating within one
hundred fifty feet (150') of the futherest set point of such structure; providing
further, however, that no fire lane shall be required for any single family or
duplex dwelling.
2. The Fire Marshal, Fire Chief, Incident Commander, or other authorized
representative is hereby authorized to establish fire lanes during any fire, and
to exclude all persons other than those authorized to assist in extinguishing the
fire from within such lanes.
3. The Fire Marshal or authorized representative is authorized to establish such
other fire lanes as deemed necessary for the safe and adequate movement of
fire trucks and apparatus.
B. Specifications
1. Any fire lane more than one hundred feet (100') in length shall either connect
at each end to a dedicated street or be provided with a turnaround having a
minimum radius of eighty feet (80') when measured from curb to curb. All
fire lanes must be maintained and kept in a state of good repair at all times by
the owner, manager, or person in charge of the premises and the City of
Georgetown bears no responsibility for the maintenance thereof.
2. All fire lanes shall have at least a twenty-five foot (25') inside turning radius
and at least a fifty foot (50') outside turning radius.
3. Fire lanes shall be maintained free of all obstruction at all times.
4. The Fire Marshal, or his authorized representative, is authorized to designate
adequate fire lanes and/or turnarounds to any building when deemed necessary
for fire department access.
The Fire Marshal, or his authorized representative, is authorized to require an
increase in the minimum access widths where they are inadequate for fire or
rescue operations.
The Fire Marshal, or his representative, may take into consideration the use
and occupancy of the property in marking fire lane and/or turnaround lane
designation. Buildings specifically included in this particular category include,
but are not limited to: schools, churches, hospitals, nursing homes, shopping
centers, and places of assembly.
5. Fire lanes shall be established to prohibit parking within twenty feet (20') of
the driveway entrance to any fire station and on the side of the street opposite
of the entrance to any fire station within seventy-five feet (75') of said
entrance.
C. Fire Lane Markings
1. The owner, manager, or person in charge of any building or property to which
fire lanes have been approved or required by the Fire Marshal, or his
authorized representative, shall mark and maintain said fire lanes in the
following manner:
All curbs and curb ends shall be painted red with four inch (4") white lettering
stating "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE. " Wording may
not be spaced more than fifteen feet (15') apart.
In areas where fire lanes are required but no continuous curb is available, one
of the following methods shall be used, in conjunction with the curb markings,
to indicate that the fire lane is continuous:
Option #1: A sign twelve inches (12") wide and eighteen inches (18") in
height shall be mounted in a conspicuous location at each entrance to the
property.
Option #2: From the point the fire lane begins to the point the fire lane ends,
including behind all parking spaces which adjoin a fire lane, shall be marked
with one continuous eight inch (8:) red stripe painted on the drive surface
behind the parking spaces. All curbing adjoining a fire lane must be painted
red.
Red stripes and curbs will contain the wording "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE
- TOW AWAY ZONE," painted in four inch (4") white letters.
2.- Signs may be required in lieu of curb markings when necessary at the
discretion of the Fire Marshal or authorized representative.
D. Fire Lane Signs: Tow -Away Zone Signs
Appropriate signs shall be posted and maintained in conspicuous places along such fire
lanes stating "No Parking - Fire Lane" by the owner or person in charge of any
building once the fire lanes have been approved by the Fire Marshal or authorized
representative. Such signs shall be twelve inches (12") wide eighteen inches (18")
high.
Any "No Parking - Fire Lane" sign shall be painted on a white background with
symbols, letters and border in red. Drawings and samples of such signs may be
obtained from Fire Services of the City of Georgetown. Standards for mounting,
including but not limited to, the height above the grade at which such signs are to be
mounted, shall be as adopted by the Fire Marshal of Georgetown or authorized
representative.
E. Destruction of Fire Lane or Tow -Away Signs
It is hereby unlawful for any person, without lawful authority to attempt or in fact
alter, destroy, deface, injure, knock down, or remove any sign designating a fire lane
or tow -away zone erected under the terms of this code, or to deface a curb marking in
any way.
F. Abandonment or Closing
No owner, manager, or person in charge of any premises served by a required fire
lane shall abandon or close such fire lane without written permission of the Fire
Marshal of the City of Georgetown.
G. Parking in Fire Lanes Prohibited
No person shall park, place, allow, permit or cause to be parked, placed, or remain
unattended, any motor vehicle, trailer, boat, or similar obstruction within or upon an
area designated as fire lane and marked by an appropriate sign or curb marking.
Any motor vehicle, trailer, boat or similar obstruction found parked or unoccupied
within an are designated as fire lane as required by this section is hereby declared a
nuisance per se and may be towed without notice. Any such motor vehicle, trailer,
boat, or similar obstruction parked or unoccupied in such a manner as to obstruct in
whole or in part any such fire lane shall be prima facie evidence that the registered
owner unlawfully parked, place, or permitted to be parked or placed such obstruction
within a fire lane.
The records of the. State Highway Department or the County Highway License
Department showing the name of the person to whom the highway license or boat or
trailer license is issued shall constitute prima facie evidence of ownership by the
named persons.
H. Modifications
The Fire Marshal of the Fire Division, or authorized representative, shall have power
to modify any of the provisions of the code, hereby adopted upon application in writing
by the owner of the property, or his duly authorized agent, when there are practical
difficulties in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the code; provided that the
spirit of the code shall be observed, public safety secured, and substantial justice done.
The particulars of such modifications when granted or allowed and the decision of the
Fire Marshal of the Fire Division, or authorizer) representative, thereon shall be
entered upon the records of the division and a signed copy shall be furnished to the
applicant.
I. Enforcement; Issuance of Citations; Impoundment of Obstructions
The Fire Marshal, or any member of the Fire Division designated by the Fire
Marshal, the Police Chief, or any member of the Police Division designated by the
Police Chief are hereby authorized to issue parking citations for any motor vehicle,
trailer, boat, or similar obstruction or by having said vehicle removed by towing it
away without further notice. Such vehicle or obstruction may be redeemed by
payment of the towage and storage charges at the owner's expense.
No parking citations shall be voided nor shall the violator be relieved of any penalty
assessed by a judge of the Municipal Court for any violation of this provision by the
redemption of the obstruction from the storage facility.
J. Submission of Plot Plans; Duties of Contractors
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, two (2) plot plans with designated fire lanes
shall be submitted to the Building Inspection Department for review by the Fire
Marshal, or authorized representative. The Fire Marshal, or authorized
representative, will approve or disapprove the designated fire lanes and indicate the
needed signs and pavement markings. One (1) of these plans shall be retained by the
City of Georgetown and the other returned to the owner for his use.
The contractor or person in charge of any construction site for commercial, industrial,
mercantile, education, instructional, assembly, hotel, motel, multifamily dwelling, or
mobile home park occupancies or for any other development for which the Fire
Marshal, or authorized representative, deems appropriate shall provide and maintain
during construction an approved all-weather fire lane, not less than twenty feet (20') in
width, as shown on approved plot plans. Final paving of such fire lane shall be
completed prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy.
K. Penalties
Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of this Code hereby adopted or fail
to comply herewith, or shall violate or fail to comply with any order made thereunder,
or who shall build in violation of any detailed statement of specifications or plans
submitted and approved thereunder, or any certificate or permit issued thereunder, and
from which not appeal has been taken, or who shall fail to comply with such an order
as affirmed or modified by the City of Georgetown, shall severally for each every
violation and noncompliance respectively, be guilty of a misdemeanor. A violation of
this ordinance is punishable by a fine not to exceed the maximum fine allowed by law
as provided for by Article 4.14 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, as
amended. The imposition of one (1) penalty for any violation shall not excuse the
violation or permit it to correct or remedy such violations or defects within a
reasonable time; and when not otherwise specified, each ten (10) days that prohibited
conditions are maintained shall constitute a separate offense. The application of the
above penalty shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited
conditions.
SECTION 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions,
in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
SECTION 4. -If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person
or circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or
application thereof, of this ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision
or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be
severable.
SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City
Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in
(10) ten days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the
City of Georgetown.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the day of , 1995.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the day of 1995.
ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN
Sandra Lee By: LEO WOOD
City S ecretary Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Marianne Landers Banks
City Attorney
Council Meeting Date: June 27, 1995
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT
Item No. /)/
An Ordinance amending the 1994/95 Annual Operating Plan Element (budget) by $1,734,200 for the
purchase and operating cost of the Berry Creek Water and Wastewater System. Second Reading.
ITEM SUMMARY
Council approved the purchase of the Berry Creek water and wastewater system for $1,700,000 at
its March 28, 1995 meeting. Operations of the system were transferred to the City on April 10, 1995.
The purchase was not anticipated at the time the 1994/95 Annual Operating Plan was adopted.
Therefore a budget amendment for the purchase cost and additional operating expenses is required.
The purchase price will be funded from the revenue bonds issued in May 1995 (wastewater portion)
and August 1995 (water portion). Operating costs of $34,200 will be offset by revenues received
from water and wastewater services.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
The City Charter requires that a majority plus one must approve an amendment to the approved
budget.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The budget amendment will be incorporated with the previously approved budget.
COMMENTS
none
ATTACHMENTS
Proposed Ordinance
Submitted By:
ra� C'�' Susan L. Morgan, Director of Finance and Administration
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN
AMENDING THE 1994/95 ANNUAL OPERATING PLAN ELEMENT
(BUDGET) BY $1,734,200 FOR THE PURCHASE AND OPERATING COST OF
THE BERRY CREEK WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEM;
APPROPRIATING THE VARIOUS AMOUNTS THEREOF; AND REPEALING
ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT
THEREWITH.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the purchase of the Berry Creek Water and
Wastewater System at its March 28, 1995 regular meeting; and
WHEREAS, the purchase cost will be funded through revenue bond proceeds and the
operating costs will be funded from water and wastewater service revenues; and
WHEREAS, the purchase of the Berry Creek System was not known at the time the fiscal
year 1994/95 budget was approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Charter allows for changes in the Annual Operating Plan'by a Council
of a majority plus one in emergency situations;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1.
The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and
declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part
hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance implements Finance
Policy 1 of the Century Plan- Policy Plan Element, which states "The City will conduct all municipal
operations in an efficient business -like manner" and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance
is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of
the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan.
SECTION 2.
The amendment to the 1994/95 Annual Operating Plan Element (Budget) of the revenues of
the City of Georgetown and expenses of conducting the affairs thereof, is in all things adopted and
approved as an addition to the previously approved budget of the current revenues and expenses as
well as fixed charges against said City for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1994, and ending
September 30, 1995. A copy of the amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by
reference herein.
SECTION 3.
The total of $1,734,200 is hereby appropriated for payments of expenditures and payments
of the funds and included in the Exhibit "A'.
SECTION 4
All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this
Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
SECTION 5.
If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall
be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this
ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the
provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
SECTION 6.
The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This
ordinance shall become effective upon adoption of its second and final reading by the City Council
of the City of Georgetown, Texas.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the 13th day of June, 1995.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the 27th day of June, 1995.
ATTEST:
Sandra D. Lee
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Marianne Landers Banks
City Attorney
Budget Amendment No.
Page 2 of 3
THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
By: Leo Wood
Mayor
EXHIBIT A
Annual Operating Plan Element (Budget) Amendment
Purchase of Berry Creek:
Wastewater Capita! Improvement Proiects Fund
Revenues:
Bond Proceeds
Expenditures:
Berry Creek Wastewater System
Excess revenue over expenditures
Water Coital Improvement Projects Fund
Revenues:
Bond Proceeds
Expenditures:
Berry Creek Wastewater System
Excess revenue over expenditures
Berry Creek Operations:
Wastewater Fund
Revenues:
Sewer Sales
Expenditures:
Wastewater Contracts
Excess revenue over expenditures
Water Fund
Revenues:
Water Sales
Expenditures:
Water Contracts
Excess revenue over expenditures
Budget Amendment No.
Page 3 of 3
$ (1,106,486)
1,106,486
$ 0
$ (593,514)
593,514
$ 0
$ 16,416
(16,416)
$ 0
$ 17,784
(17,784)
$ 0
Council Meeting Date: June 27, 1995 Item No, 0
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT
An Ordinance amending the 1994/95 Annual Operating Plan Element (budget) for various mid year adjustments as outlined
at the May 23, 1995 Mid Year Review Report to Council. Second Reading.
ITEM SUMMARY
During the May 23, 1995 Mid Year Review Report from staff, various proposed amendments to the 1994/95 Annual Operating
Plan Element were proposed. Several of those amendments involved minor:clean-up" adjustments for grants, timing
differences, etc. A summary of the proposed changes is as follows:
Encumbrances - A budget amendment is needed for encumbrances that were outstanding at fiscal year end 1993/94. These
encumbrances were for capital and supply items ordered in 1993/94, but not received until 1994/95 due to delays in delivery.
The current year budgeted fund balance assumed that these expenditures would be made in the previous year, but due to
timing, these expenditures occurred in the current fiscal year. Therefore, the net effect on the ending budgeted fund balances
is zero. The total rollover of encumbrances needed in the various department is $52,430.
Fire Suppression - Council approved the usage of $7,000 from Contingency to schedule volunteer firefighters to work regular
shifts in the Fire Department. This budget amendment will move the funds from the Wastewater Fund Council Contingency
account to the Fire Suppression Department, where the volunteer firefighters are budgeted. This has no net effect on budget.
General Capital Projects Fund - The General Capital Projects - Streets Fund will need an additional transfer from the General
Fund of $7,235 to cover costs associated with the Sun City traffic impact analysis project. The additional transfer out will be
covered in the General Fund by the increase in budget revenues for Del Webb planning fees.
Sierra Microwave Grant - The Sierra Microwave grant was closed out during this fiscal year. A budget amendment of $28,000
is needed for unanticipated close-out costs. These costs were reimbursed in full by the State and there is no financial effect
on the City.
Reedholm Grant - A grant in the amount of $439,050 was awarded to the City in December, 1994, for the construction of a
facility for Reedholm Industries. All the expected costs will be covered by the grant, so there is no financial effect on the City.
A budget amendment is needed to expend funds in relation to this grant.
The net increase in total budgeted expenditures for 1994/95 for the City of Georgetown is $526,715. The increase is funded
fro prior year fund balances, increased fee revenues, and grant proceeds.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
The City Charter requires that a majority plus one must approve an amendment to the approved budget.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The budget amendment will be incorporated with the previously approved budget. Minimum working capital/fund balance
requirements for the City are not affected by this amendment.
COMMENTS
None
ATTACHMENTS
Proposed Ordinance
5uornitted By:
Susan L. Morgan, Director of Finance and Administration
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN
AMENDING THE 1994/95 ANNUAL OPERATING PLAN ELEMENT
(BUDGET) FOR VARIOUS MID YEAR ADJUSTMENTS AS OUTLINED AT
THE MAY 23, 1995 MID YEAR REVIEW REPORT TO COUNCIL;
APPROPRIATING THE VARIOUS AMOUNTS THEREOF; AND REPEALING
ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT
I11:1:87WAIV/(I :
WHEREAS, budgeted funds from 1993/94 need to be carried forward to the current year due
to delays in delivery dates; and
WHEREAS, Fire Services and General Capital Projects budgets require adjustment to meet
current year project demands; and
WHEREAS, grant awards and close out proceeds have been received for disbursement, and;
WHEREAS, the need for these adjustments were unknown at the time the fiscal year 1994/95
budget was approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Charter allows for changes in the Annual Operating Plan by a Council
of a majority plus one in emergency situations;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1.
The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and
declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part
hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance implements Finance
Policy 1 of the Century Plan- Policy Plan Element, which states "The City will conduct all municipal
operations in an efficient business -like manner" and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance
is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of
the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan.
SECTION 2.
The amendment to the 1994/95 Annual Operating Plan Element (Budget) of the revenues of
the City of Georgetown and expenses of conducting the affairs thereof, is in all things adopted and
approved as an addition to the previously approved budget of the current revenues and expenses as
well as fixed charges against said City for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1994, and ending
September 30, 1995. A copy of the amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by
SECTION 3.
The total of $526,715 is hereby appropriated for payments of expenditures and payments of
the funds and included in the Exhibit
SECTION 4
All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this
Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
SECTION 5.
If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall
be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this
ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the
provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
SECTION 6,
The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This
ordinance shall become effective upon adoption. of its second and final reading by the City Council
of the City of Georgetown, Texas.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the 13th day of June, 1995.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the 27th day of June, 1995.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
Sandra D. Lee By: Leo Wood
City Secretary Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Marianne Landers Banks
City Attorney
Budget Amendment No.
Page 2 of 4
EXHIBIT A
Annual Operating Plan Element (Budget) Amendment
Encumbrances:
General Fund
Expenditures:
Fire Suppression
Municipal Court
Fund balance prior year
Excess revenue over expenditures
Electric Fund
Expenditures:
Electric Service Operations
Electric Contracts
Fund balance prior year
Excess revenue over expenditures
Wastewater Fund
Expenditures:
Wastewater Collections
Fund balance prior year
Excess revenue over expenditures
Facilities Maintenance Fund
Expenditures:
Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Fund balance prior year
Excess revenue over expenditures
Joint Services Fund
Expenditures:
Risk Management
Utility Office
Fund balance prior year
Excess revenue over expenditures
Budget Amendment No.
Page 3 of 4
$ 9,358
1,400
(10,758)
$ 0
$
7,000
5,000
(12,000)
$
0
$
3,894
(3,894)
$
0
$
3,350
(3,350)
$
0
$ 2,780
12,375
(15,155)
$ 0
EXHIBIT A
Annual Operating Plan Element (Budget)
Amendment
Continued
Management Information Services Fund
Expenditures:
MIS Capital Replacement
$
7,273
Fund balance prior year
(7,273)
Excess revenue over expenditures
$
0
Fire Suppression:
General Fund
Expenditures:
Volunteer Firefighters
$
7,000
Wastewater Fund
Expenditures:
Council Contingency
(7,000)
Excess revenue over expenditures
$
0
General Capital Projects Fund:
General Fund
Revenues:
Planning fees
$
7,235
General Capital Projects Fund - Streets
Expenditures:
Sun City Traffic Impact Study
(7,235)
Excess revenue over expenditures
$
0
Sierra Microwave Grant Special Revenue Fund:
Revenue:
State grant reimbursement
$ 28,000
Expenditures:
Operations
(28,000)
Excess revenue over expenditures
$ 0
Reedholm Grant Special Revenue Fund:
Revenue:
State grant reimbursement
$ 439,050
Expenditures:
Operations
(439,050)
Excess revenue over expenditures
$ 0
Budget Amendment No.
Page 4 of 4
Council Meeting Date: June 27, 1995 Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT
An Ordinance amending the 1994/95 Annual Operating Plan Element (budget) by $80,799 for the addition of
building inspection staff as outlined at the May 23, 1995 Mid Year Review Report to Council. Second Reading.
ITEM SUMMARY
The May 23, 1995 Mid Year Review Report from staff included a recommendation to hire additional building
inspection staff to accommodate the rapid growth including the Sun City Georgetown project. At the time the
1994195 Annual Operating Plan Element was prepared, actual staffing and cost requirements were not yet
known. Four additional inspectors and one assistant at a current year cost of $80,799 are needed to handle the
additional workload.
The commercial construction and model homes for the Sun City project will be starting in July, 1995 with
production housing to begin in late August or early September.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
The City Charter requires that a majority plus one must approve an amendment to the approved budget.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The budget amendment will be incorporated with the previously approved budget. Building permit fee revenue
is projected to exceed the budget by $95,000 and will cover the additional expense. Permit fees from the Sun
City development in 1995/96 and beyond will cover the on -going expenses of these positions.
COMMENTS
ATTACHMENTS
Proposed Ordinance
Submitted By:
Susan L. Morgan, Director of Finance and Administration
/1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN
AMENDING THE 1994/95 ANNUAL OPERATING PLAN ELEMENT
(BUDGET) BY $80,799 FOR THE ADDITION OF BUILDING INSPECTION
STAFF AS OUTLINED AT THE MAY 23, 1995 MID YEAR REVIEW REPORT
TO COUNCIL; APPROPRIATING THE VARIOUS AMOUNTS THEREOF; AND
REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT
THEREWITH.
WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown will need additional building inspection staff to serve
Sun City Georgetown and other developments; and
WHEREAS, the costs of additional staff are offset by the increase in permit fee revenue; and
WHEREAS, the staff and operating cost needs were unknown at the time the fiscal year
1994/95 budget was approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Charter allows for changes in the Annual Operating Plan by a Council
of a majority plus one in emergency situations;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1.
The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and
declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part
hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance implements Finance
Policy 1 of the Century Plan- Policy Plan Element, which states "The City will conduct all municipal
operations in an efficient business -like manner" and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance
is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of
the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan.
SECTION 2.
The amendment to the 1994/95 Annual Operating Plan Element (Budget) of the revenues of
the City of Georgetown and expenses of conducting the affairs thereof, is in all things adopted and
approved as an addition to the previously approved budget of the current revenues and expenses as
well as fixed charges against said City for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1994, and ending
September 30, 1995. A copy of the amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by
reference herein.
SECTION 3.
The total of $80,799 is hereby appropriated for payments of expenditures and payments of
the funds and included in the Exhibit "A".
SECTION 4
All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this
Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
SECTION 5.
If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall
be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this
ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the
provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
SECTION 6.
The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This
ordinance shall become effective upon adoption of its second and final reading by the City Council
of the City of Georgetown, Texas.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the 13th day of June, 1995.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the 27th day of June, 1995.
ATTEST:
Sandra D. Lee
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Marianne Landers Banks
City Attorney
Budget Amendment No.
Page 2 of 3
THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
By: Leo Wood
Mayor
EXHIBIT A
Annual Operating Plan Element (Budget) Amendment
GENERAL FUND
Revenues:
Permit Fees (80,799)
Expenditures:
Building Inspection
Personnel 543,569
Operations 4,430
Capital 21,800
Excess of Revenue
Over Expenditures 0
Budget Amendment No.
Page 3 of 3
Council meeting June 27, 1995 Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT: Consideration and second reading of an ordinance providing for the annexation into
the City of: (1) the Stonehedge subdivision, Sections One, Two and Three (also known as
Churchill Farms); (2) a 48.51 acre tract in the William Addison Survey owned by Stonehedge
Partners; and (3) a 2.735 acre tract in the William Addison Survey described as "Tract Five"
in a Declaration of Restriction in Volume 2332, Page 132 of the Williamson County land
records.
ITEM SUMMARY: On March 28, 1995, the City Council passed a resolution to adopt the
proposed service plans and set the public hearing dates for the annexation of these properties.
Two (2) public hearings were held, on April 25, 1995 and on May 9, 1995, as required by State
law, to describe and receive comments on the City's plans for providing service to the annexation
areas.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Representatives of the Churchill Farms neighborhood and the
Stonehedge Partners have stated their willingness to volunteer annexation of these properties and
City staff has been in contact with them to arrange for the completion of their requests.
Section 3 of the ordinance states that owners have provided the requests for voluntary annexation.
If the requests are not received, this section could be deleted before the second ordinance reading
and the property can be annexed without the request of the property owners.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The service plan, which is to be adopted as a part of the annexation
ordinance, describes the City services to be provided to the areas.
COMMENTS: This ordinance was passed on first reading by the City Council on June 13, 1995.
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance and exhibits.
M
a� ",
ward J. ry, AICP - Director Clyde von Rosenber CP
Division o Developme t Services Chief Planner, Long ange Planning
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXTENSION OF
CERTAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN,
TEXAS, AND THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE, CONSISTING OF:
THE STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION SECTIONS ONE, TWO AND THREE
(ALSO KNOWN AS CHURCHILL FARMS), A 48.51 ACRE TRACT IN
THE WILLIAM ADDISON SURVEY OWNED BY STONEHEDGE
PARTNERS AND A 2.735 ACRE TRACT IN THE WILLIAM ADDISON
SURVEY DESCRIBED AS "TRACT FIVE" IN A DECLARATION OF
RESTRICTION IN VOLUME 2332, PAGE 132 OF THE WILLIAMSON
COUNTY LAND RECORDS, WHICH SAID TERRITORY LIES
ADJACENT TO AND ADJOINS THE PRESENT BOUNDARY LIMIT OF
THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS AND NOT BEING A PART OF
ANY INCORPORATED AREA; PROVIDING FOR SERVICE PLANS;
REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS;
INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, may under the Charter
of said City, Section 1.06, annex areas as allowed by State law; and
WHEREAS, notices of two (2) public hearings were published according to law in a
newspaper having general circulation in the City of Georgetown, Texas, and in the herein
described territory to be annexed not more than twenty (20) days nor less than ten (10) days prior
to those hearings; and
WHEREAS, two public hearings by the City of Georgetown, Texas, where all interested
persons were provided with an opportunity to be heard on the proposed annexation of certain
tracts of land located in Williamson County, Texas, including the following tracts described in
Exhibit A of this ordinance: THE STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION SECTIONS ONE, TWO
AND THREE (ALSO KNOWN AS CHURCHILL FARMS), A 48.51 ACRE TRACT IN THE
WILLIAM ADDISON SURVEY OWNED BY STONEHEDGE PARTNERS AND A 2.735
ACRE TRACT IN THE WILLIAM ADDISON SURVEY DESCRIBED AS "TRACT FIVE"
IN A DECLARATION OF RESTRICTION IN VOLUME 2332, PAGE 132 OF THE
WILLIAMSON COUNTY LAND RECORDS; were held, the first being on the 25th day of
April, 1995, and the second being on the 9th day of May, 1995; and
Annexation of Stonehedge Sections One, Two and Three (Churchill Farms)
and two adjoining tracts in the William Addison Survey
Ordinance No.
Page 1 of 4
WHEREAS, at such public hearings, a proposed service plan was presented to and
discussed by the Council and all interested persons; and
WHEREAS, such public hearings were held not more than forty (40) nor fewer than
twenty (20) days prior to the institution of these proceedings; and
WHEREAS, the total corporate area of the City of Georgetown, Texas, on the 1st day
of January, 1995, was 9,577 acres; and
WHEREAS, the population of the City of Georgetown, Texas includes approximately
18,800 inhabitants; and
WHEREAS, all of the herein -described property lies within the extraterritorial jurisdiction
of the City of Georgetown, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the herein -described property lies adjacent and contiguous to the City of
Georgetown, Texas; and
WHEREAS, all notices and other prerequisites of state law and the City Charter have
been complied with;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are
hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and
expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this
ordinance implements the following policies of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element:
1. Environmental and Resource Conservation Policy 1, which states: "The Physical
attributes that make Georgetown attractive are protected" ; and
2. Growth and Physical Development Policy 1, which states: "Land use patterns within
the City provide economic, cultural, and social activities to all residents, businesses and
organizations"; and
3. Growth and Physical Development Policy 2, which states: "The City's regulations
implement the policy statements and provide the opportunity to seek change with
reasonable effort and expense"; and
Annexation of Stonehedge Sections One, Two and Three (Churchill Farms)
and two adjoining tracts in the William Addison Survey
Ordinance No.
Page 2 of 4
4. Growth and Physical Development Policy 3, which states: "Annexations procedures
and standards benefit the community";
and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any
other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the
Policy Plan.
SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Georgetown hereby annexes: THE
STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION SECTIONS ONE, TWO AND THREE (ALSO KNOWN AS
CHURCHILL FARMS), A 48.51 ACRE TRACT IN THE WILLIAM ADDISON SURVEY
OWNED BY STONEHEDGE PARTNERS AND A 2.735 ACRE TRACT IN THE WILLIAM
ADDISON SURVEY DESCRIBED AS "TRACT FIVE" IN A DECLARATION OF
RESTRICTION IN VOLUME 2332, PAGE 132 OF THE WILLIAMSON COUNTY LAND
RECORDS, as described in Exhibit A of this ordinance, which contains maps, descriptions, and
the service plans for the tracts.
SECTION 3. Requests for voluntary annexation have been received from the majority
of qualified voters and property owners in the areas being annexed.
SECTION 4. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in
conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
SECTION 5. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or
circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or
application thereof, of this ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
SECTION 6. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City
Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in (10)
ten days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of
Georgetown.
Annexation of Stonehedge Sections One, Two and Three (Churchill Farms)
and two adjoining tracts in the William Addison Survey
Ordinance No.
Page 3 of 4
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the 13th day of June, 1995.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the 27th day of June, 1995.
ATTEST:
Sandra D. Lee
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Marianne Landers Banks
City Attorney
THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
By: LEO WOOD
Mayor
Annexation of Stonehedge Sections One, Two and Three (Churchill Farms)
and two adjoining tracts in the William Addison Survey
Ordinance No.
Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT A, Page I of 8
ANNEXATION AREA FOR
STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION (SECTIONS I, II, III),
A 48.51 ACRE TRACT, AND A 2.735 ACRE TRACT IN
' THE WILLIAM ADDISION SURVEY
amµ i (JJ2.J69 At.l
21 S S 9 AC., 40 69 AC
moo•
3 70 AC
a►"1.tt _
iL
t•t 7• � > r
•'� �a�� IM�t
GEAR (I5.ZO AC.)
.1• io l •' ''� 24.00 1C. �t� .•
.i CITY ONLY \�
Wit- LIAv RE IN r1LR0T •,vh \ ="�
• _ ��;\.
J4O2 AC I AG
�• "\\ ,:;;icy -
,.• __ ,��\-tom ,�:`:�:.�,�-_`:*.<-.� ,;�>��
i a
Rome
�:.
4 E V. JOH H A. C CAA T Y � \ � �\j�;``. ��'� 'a• � ��`Y\. \ .
697/110
$7. r+E L E N S CAT HOL K \ �� \ x ��� =v "�� -• \ - \
CHURCH
O C,J_ •T G1 O E C7C1 E Y
BRADY IO.SSAG
�i
*• \ "fir° :;E�.' `.y:i x..
CI
•EH WAtINTIR( •.
a7S/926
29.367 A.C_)
"AC I AC
a �
% �
a
►O
T O
N
24 AC.
1 z 4
CI TT OILY �G 2 3
I �l
\'
5
5
4 3 4
L
4 5
I
8
4 7
3
3
9 !O
8 7
9
12
x")
4 , , 1n 10 (6� 1
—3 I I
z
3
S
(
s
"
2 7 3 4
E 2 7
13 10
\
2 v
1 I IS a
12 S
�
3
1
►6 w
10 2 18 9
6
I1
8
9
4
10 7
S 4
8
S
- � 1t+olan
9
4 11 .P Ig
22
23
��-
12 C xH`
>� ••
17
i3 IS 16
7r
_ �4
4 S / 332
ti\
(167 ♦Q
'a93AC)
.or.....rt •
^
AMALT 3O+nE10Ei
IISr- \
445/532
(to-7 AC )
.JA#4E3 9 Tuw
aER
\ a \ 1!! Y \ \\ e T
ALOECKLE` I0
60AC
384
k _
31 / 9 + I s?r�. `�` 13
21
o l •O I G >L I Y� i YG. f�`7z i
w ILLIAy wCf+SE - . .:, .. .- =.f13 a=gin-.
2110
LINOA YKE . 64 � / BeS :a.� La� '` i O 06 AC-
0 IO 02 AC .O 16 aC :::v:; 'L:'::ni,< E �ORr CA 7t 50►I /
u I 56.5 AC
v t�Y
N
0 i =
0
_>s
•L
Not To Scale
i AL/IRL n SJV�NGS \
\ Prepared by Development Services - March 21, 1995
.0) Basemap Source: Williamson County Appraisal District maps
EXHIBIT A, Page 2 of 8
ANNEXATION TRACT
STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION (SECTIONS I, II, AND III),
A 48.51 ACRE TRACT, AND A 2.735 ACRE TRACT IN
THE WILLIAM ADDISION SURVEY
Being all of that certain 162.457 acre tract, more or less, situated in the William Addison
Survey, Abstract No. 21 in the Williamson County, Texas land records, and including the
following subdivisions, tracts, or parcels:
1. All of Stonehedge, Section 1 subdivision (also known as Churchill Farms), Cabinet G, Slides
280-282; being a portion of that deed recorded in Volume 1599, Page 175 of the Williamson
County land records;
2. All of Stonehedge, Section 2 subdivision (also known as Churchill Farms), Cabinet G, Slides
283-285; being a portion of that deed recorded in Volume 1599, Page 175 of the Williamson
County land records;
3. All of Stonehedge, Section 3 subdivision, Cabinet H, Slides 43-45; being a portion of that
deed recorded in Volume 1004, Page 524 of the Williamson County land records, and including
Block J, Lot 31; Block N, Lot 1; Block O, Lot 1; and Block P, Lot 1;
4. A 48.5111 acre tract, being a portion of those deeds recorded in Volume 1599, Page 175, and
Volume 2349, Page 88 of the Williamson County land records;
5. A 2.7355 acre tract, being a portion of that deed recorded in Volume 1599, Page 175, and
further described as TRACT FIVE in a Declaration of Restriction in Volume 2332, Page 132
of the Williamson County land records.
The tract to be annexed is described in more detail below.
BEGINNING, for a POINT OF BEGINNING hereof, at the northwest terminus point of the
northern line of the herein described annexation tract, this corner being in common with the
northeast corner of a 15.6 acre tract conveyed to Rev. John McCarty for St. Helens Catholic
Church in Volume 697, Page 110 of the Williamson County land records, said corner also lying
in the southern margin of State Highway 29 and lying on the south line of the existing
Georgetown City Limits (as described in City of Georgetown Ordinance No. 86-59 as annexation
Tract 6), said corner also being the northwest interior corner of a 28.16 acre portion of a parcel
which is part of the annexation tract and which was conveyed to Stonehedge Partners in Volume
2349, Page 88 of the Williamson County land records; and proceeding as follows:
1. THENCE continuing in a northeasterly direction along the northern line of said
Stonehedge Partners parcel, said line also being in common with the south margin of State
Highway 29 and the south margin of the existing Georgetown City Limits; to the
Page 1 of 5
EXHIBIT A, Page 3 of 8
northeast interior corner of said Stonehedge Partners, this corner lying in the western
margin of the proposed Georgetown Inner Loop Road, said Inner Loop Road right-of-way
being a 7.8 acre portion, more or less, of the parcel which is part of the annexation tract
and which was conveyed to Stonehedge Partners in Volume 2349, Page 88 of the
Williamson County land records;
2. THENCE crossing said Inner Loop Road and proceeding along the northern margin of
the 7.8 acre Stonehedge Partners parcel in a northeasterly direction, said northern margin
also being in common with the south margin of State Highway 29 and the south margin
of the existing Georgetown City Limits; to the eastern margin of the proposed
Georgetown Inner Loop Road, said eastern margin also lying at or near the northwestern
interior corner of a 12.55 acre portion of the said Stonehedge Partners (2349/88) parcel;
3. THENCE proceeding in a northeasterly direction along the northern line of said 12.55
acre Stonehedge Partners parcel, said line also being in common with the south margin
of State Highway 29 and the south margin of the existing Georgetown City Limits; to the
western margin of Reinhardt Blvd., which lies in common with the northeastern interior
corner of said 12.55 acre Stonehedge Partners parcel;
4. THENCE crossing said Reinhardt Blvd. in a northeasterly direction along the south
margin of State Highway 29 and the south margin of the existing City Limits; to the
eastern margin of Reinhardt Blvd., which lies in common with the northwestern interior
corner of a 2.735 acre parcel, more or less, that is part of the herein described annexation
tract, said parcel being a portion of that deed recorded in Volume 1599, Page 175, and
further described as "TRACT FIVE" in a Declaration of Restriction in Volume 2332,
Page 132 of the Williamson County land records;
5. THENCE leaving Reinhardt Blvd. and continuing in a northeasterly direction along the
northern line of said 2.735 acre parcel, said line lying in common with the southern
margin of State Highway 29; to the northeastern interior corner of said parcel, which lies
in common with the northwestern corner of a tract conveyed to Schneider in Volume 445,
Page 532 of the Williamson County land records, and said interior corner also being the
northeastern terminus point of the northern line of the herein described annexation tract;
THENCE leaving the terminus point of the northern line of the said annexation tract and
continuing along its eastern line; and proceeding as follows:
1. THENCE leaving the southern margin of State Highway 29 and proceeding in a southerly
direction along the eastern line of said 2.735 acre parcel and the western line of said
Schneider tract; to the southwestern corner of Schneider, this corner also being a
northwestern corner of Indian Creek Subdivision (Cabinet E, Slide 379 in the Williamson
County land records);
2. THENCE leaving Schneider and continuing in a southerly direction along the eastern line
Page 2 of 5
EXHIBIT A, Page 4 of 8
of said 2.735 acre parcel and the western line of said Indian Creek; to the southeastern
interior corner of said 2.735 acre parcel, said corner lying in common with the
northeastern corner of Stonehedge Subdivision, Section III (Cabinet H, Slide 43-45), and
said corner being the northeastern interior corner of a 1.99 acre parcel in Stonehedge,
Section III, Block P, Lot 1 conveyed to James C. Wukasch in Volume 2518, Page 577;
3. THENCE leaving said 2.735 acre parcel and continuing in a southerly direction along the
eastern line of said 1.99 acre Wukasch parcel and the western line of said Indian Creek;
to the southeastern interior corner of said Wukasch parcel, this corner lying in the
northern margin of Paleface Drive;
4. THENCE crossing Paleface Drive in a southerly direction along the eastern line of said
Stonehedge Section III and the western line of said Indian Creek; to the southern margin
of Paleface Drive, which lies in common with the northeastern interior corner of a 3.33
acre parcel in Stonehedge Section III, Block O, Lot 1 conveyed to James C. Wukasch in
Volume 2518, Page 577;
5. THENCE leaving Paleface Drive and proceeding in a southerly direction along the eastern
line of said 3.33 acre Wukasch parcel and the eastern line of said Stonehedge Section III,
said line being in common with the western line of said Indian Creek; to a southern
corner of Indian Creek, said corner being in common with the northwestern corner of a
parcel conveyed to F.D.I.C. in Volume 1998, Page 762;
6. THENCE leaving Indian Creek and continuing in a southerly direction along the eastern
line of said 3.33 acre Wukasch parcel and the eastern line of said Stonehedge Section III,
said line being in common with the western line of the F.D.I.C. tract; to the southeast
interior corner of said Wukasch parcel, this corner being in common with southeastern
corner of Stonehedge Section III, and in common with the northernmost northeastern
corner of Stonehedge Section I (also known as Churchill Farms), Cabinet G, Slides 280-
282, and being a portion of that deed recorded in Volume 1599, Page 175 of the
Williamson County land records;
7. THENCE leaving Stonehedge Section III and said Wukasch parcel and continuing in a
southerly direction along the eastern line of said Stonehedge Section I and the western line
of said F.D.I.C. tract; to a southern corner of Stonehedge Section I, this corner being at
or near an eastern interior corner of said Section I, Block E, Lot 8, and being at or near
a northwestern interior corner of said Stonehedge, Block E, Lot 16, and said corner being
in common with the southwestern corner of said F.D.I.C. tract;
8. THENCE proceeding in an easterly direction along the southernmost northern line of said
Section I, said line being in common with a northern line of said Section I Block E, and
said line being in common with the southern line of said F.D.I.C. tract; to the
southeastern corner of said F.D.I.C., this corner being in common with the southwestern
corner of a portion of a tract conveyed to Schneider in Volume 445, Page 532 of the
Page 3 of 5
EXHIBIT A. Page 5 of 8
Williamson County land records, and said corner being at or near the northeastern interior
corner of said Stonehedge Block E, Lot 18, and at or near the northwestern interior
corner of said Block E, Lot 19;
9. THENCE leaving said F. D.I.C. and proceeding in an easterly direction along the
southernmost northern line of said Section I, said line being in common with a northern
line of said Section I Block E, and said line being in common with the southern line of
said portion of the Schneider tract; to the easternmost northeast corner of Section I, said
corner being at or near the northeastern interior corner of said Section I Block E, Lot 24,
and said corner being in common with an interior corner of said Schneider tract, and
being an eastern corner of the herein described annexation tract;
10. THENCE proceeding in a southeasterly direction along the easternmost line of Section
I and the western line of a 52.90 acre portion, more or less, of the Schneider tract; to the
southeasternmost corner of said Section I, this corner being at or near a southwestern
corner of said Schneider tract, and also at or near with the northwestern corner of Dove
Springs subdivision (Cabinet H, Slide 28 in the Williamson County land records), and
said corner being at or near the northeastern corner of a tract conveyed to Emory Carlson
in Volume 345, Page 495 of the Williamson County land records, and said corner being
the southern terminus point of the eastern line of the herein described annexation tract;
THENCE leaving the terminus point of the eastern line of the said annexation tract and
continuing along its southern line; and proceeding as follows:
1. THENCE leaving Schneider and the eastern line of said Section I and proceeding in a
southwesterly direction along the southern line of Section I and the northern line of said
Carlson; to the southernmost southwest corner of said Section I, said corner being in
common with the southeastern corner of Stonehedge Section II (also known as Churchill
Farms), Cabinet G, Slides 283-285, and being a portion of that deed recorded in Volume
1599, Page 175 of the Williamson County land records;
2. THENCE leaving said Section I and continuing in a southwesterly direction along the
southern line of said Stonehedge Section II and the northern line of said Carlson tract; to
a northwestern corner of Carlson, this corner being in common with a northeastern corner
of a tract conveyed to Franklin Savings in Volume 1599, Page 170 of the Williamson
County land records;
3. THENCE leaving said Carlson and continuing in a southwesterly direction along the
southern line of said Section II and the northern line of said Franklin Savings tract; to the
southwesternmost corner of said Section II, this corner lying at or near the eastern margin
of the proposed Georgetown Inner Loop Road, and said corner being at or near a
southern corner of a tract conveyed to Joe B. McMaster in Volume 1831, Page 934 of
the Williamson County land records, and said corner also being the southwestern terminus
point of the southern line of the herein described annexation tract;
Page 4 of 5
EXHIBIT A, Page 6 of 8
THENCE leaving the terminus point to the southern line of the said annexation tract and
continuing along its western line; and proceeding as follows:
1. THENCE leaving said Franklin Savings and proceeding in a northerly direction along the
western line of said Section II, this line lying in the eastern margin of said Inner Loop
Road, and being in common with an eastern margin of said McMaster tract; to the
southernmost corner of said Stonehedge Partners 28.16 acre portion of the parcel
conveyed in 2349/88, this corner being in common with an eastern interior corner of said
McMaster;
2. THENCE leaving said Stonehedge Section II and crossing said Inner Loop Road in a
northwesterly direction along the western line of said 28.16 acre Stonehedge Partners and
the eastern line of said McMaster tract; to the western margin of said Inner Loop;
3. THENCE leaving said Inner Loop and proceeding in a northwesterly direction along the
western line of said Stonehedge Partners and the eastern line of said McMaster; to the
northeast corner of McMaster, this corner being at or near the southeastern corner of a
10.60 acre tract conveyed to James B. Turner of the Williamson County land records;
4. THENCE leaving said McMaster and continuing in a northwesterly direction along the
western line of said Stonehedge Partners and the eastern line of said Turner tract; to the
northeast corner of Turner, this corner being at or near the southeastern corner of a 10.33
acre tract conveyed to Gerald Eckley in Volume 871, Page 85 of the Williamson County
land records;
5. THENCE leaving said Turner tract and proceeding in a northwesterly direction along the
western line of said Stonehedge Partners and the eastern line of said Eckley tract; to the
northeast corner of Eckley, this corner being at or near the southeastern corner of said
15.60 acre St. Helens Catholic Church tract;
6. THENCE leaving said Eckley and proceeding in a northwesterly direction along the
western line of said Stonehedge Partners and the eastern line of said St. Helens Catholic
Church; back to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Note: This description was compiled from the Williamson County Appraisal District tax parcel
maps in March 1995.
Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT A, Page 7 of 8
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS
ANNEXATION SERVICE PLAN
STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION, SECTIONS ONE, TWO AND THREE (ALSO KNOWN
AS CHURCHILL FARMS), A 48.51 ACRE TRACT IN THE WILLIAM ADDISON
SURVEY OWNED BY STONEHEDGE PARTNERS, AND A 2.735 ACRE TRACT IN
THE WILLIAM ADDISON SURVEY DESCRIBED AS "TRACT FIVE" IN A
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTION IN VOLUME 2332, PAGE 132 OF THE
WILLIAMSON COUNTY LAND RECORDS
Introduction
This service plan has been prepared in accordance with Texas Local Government Code,
Chapter 43 - Municipal Annexation. This requires that the service plan provide for the extension
of full municipal services to the area to be annexed by any of the methods by which it extends
services to any other area of the municipality.
Police Protection
Regular and routine patrolling of streets, responses to calls, and other police services will be
provided upon the effective date of the annexation.
Fire Protection and Code Enforcement
Fire protection and prevention services are currently being provided to the area through an
agreement with Williamson County. These services will continue to be provided to the area upon
the effective date of the annexation. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the City Code
Enforcement Officer will periodically patrol streets in the area to ensure that all properties are
in conformance with City Code.
Solid Waste Collection
Solid waste collection and disposal services will be provided upon the effective date of the
annexation, in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions contained in the City Code.
Water Service
Water lines will be extended in accordance with City policy. The City has a Utility Expansion
and Improvement Policy, which is described in this service plan.
Sewer Service
Wastewater lines will be extended in accordance with City policy. The City has a Utility
Expansion and Improvement Policy, which is described in this service plan.
Maintenance of Roads, Streets, and Drainage
Roads, streets and drainage facilities dedicated to the public will be maintained according to City
Code and policy upon the effective date of the annexation.
Annexation Service Plan, Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT A, Page 8 of 8
Street Lighting
Street lighting will be made available upon the effective date of the annexation, upon request of
the property owners, in accordance with City Code and policy.
Parks and Recreation
Parks and recreation facilities dedicated to the public will be maintained according to City Code
and policy upon the effective date of the annexation. Recreation services will be provided to all
residents in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions contained in the City Code.
Planning and Zoning
Upon the effective date of the annexation, the planning and zoning jurisdiction of the City will
extend to this area. The area will be zoned A (Agricultural), unless otherwise approved through
regular procedures.
Inspection Services
All inspection services, including building, electrical, plumbing, etc., provided by the City will
be extended to the area upon the effective date of the annexation.
Library Services
Library services will be provided to all residents in accordance with the rates, terms, and
conditions contained in the City Code upon the effective date of the annexation.
Other Services
Other services provided by the City, such as animal control, court, and, general administration,
will be made available upon the effective date of the annexation, in accordance with the City
Code and policies.
Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy
City Ordinance Number 900404, a Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy, guides the
planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of all utility system improvements,
including water, wastewater and .electrical service.
Annexation Service Plan, Page 2 of 2
Council meeting June 27, 1995
Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT: First Reading of an ordinance to rezone Stonehedge Subdivision, Sections One and
Two from A, Agricultural to RS, Residential Single Family.
ITEMS Y: This is a portion of the Churchill Farms currently under consideration for
annexation by the City Council. The area comprises 302 single family residential lots.
Approximately one-half (1/2) of these lots are built upon, and if the current rate of new home
construction in the subdivision continues, it should be built out very soon.
Section 1.205 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that all property annexed into the City
of Georgetown be assigned the A, Agricultural zoning district unless otherwise requested and
approved by the City. As described above, this property is platted for single family residential
use and is nearly one-half built out for that purpose. It does not seem reasonable, therefore, to
annex this property into a non -conforming status. Further, there are a large number of different
property owners in the area, which would likely result in a piecemeal rezoning of the area, if it
occurred at all. For those reasons, on May 9, 1995, the City Council recommended that this
rezoning be initiated in accordance with Section 14.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
COMMENTS: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0
to recommend approval of a rezoning of Stonehedge Subdivision, Sections One and Two from
A, Agricultural to RS, Residential Single Family.
ATTACHMENTS: Staff report and ordinance
Submitted Bv:
Edward J. Bar y, AICP - Dir or Hildy L. ngma, AI P
Division of evelopment Se ces Chief Planner
REZONING OF STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION, SECTIONS ONE AND TWO FROM
A, AGRICULTURAL TO RS, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY
APPLICANT: City -initiated application
REQUEST: Rezoning of Stonehedge Subdivision, Sections One and Two
from A, Agricultural to RS, Residential Single Family, as
recorded in Cabinet G, Slides 280-285 of the Official Plat
Records of Williamson County, Texas.
Location: Located south of State Highway 29 and east of Inner Loop
Road. SEE EXHIBIT A
Existing Site: Single family residential.
Existing Zoning: Annexation of this property is being processed at this time. An
A, Agricultural zoning district will be automatically assigned
upon annexation.
Proposed Use: Single family residential.
Surrounding Uses North: Stonehedge, Section 3 (Block J, proposed RM-2 by
separate agenda item) ( Blocks O and P, to be annexed)
and undeveloped land (out of City)
and Zoning: South: Agricultural land and County Central Maintenance
Facility (out of City)
East: Indian Creek Subdivision and Dove Springs Subdivision,
residential single family (out of City) and undeveloped
land (soon to be annexed)
West: Churchill Farms, Concept Plan and undeveloped land
(out of City)(soon to be annexed)
Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates this location as
Intensity Level 3. SEE EXHIBIT B
Notification: Notification requirements have been completed.
Rezoning - Stonehedge Sub., See. 1 and 2
June 17, 1995
RZ 95-11/Fi1e:STNHGI&2.REZ Page 1
HISTORY: The Concept Plan for Stonehedge Subdivision was reviewed and
accepted by the City in May, 1984. At that time, Concept Plans
were considered accepted rather than approved. Sections One
and Two were recorded in October, 1985. Section Three was
recorded in February, 1986.
ANALYSIS: This is a portion of the Churchill Farms currently under
consideration for annexation by the City Council. The area
comprises 302 single family residential lots. Approximately one-
half (1/2) of these lots are built upon, and if the current rate of
new home construction in the subdivision continues, it should be
built out very soon.
Section 1.205 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that all property
annexed into the City of Georgetown be assigned the A,
Agricultural zoning district unless otherwise requested and
approved by the City. As described above, this property is
platted for single family residential use and is nearly one-half
built out for that purpose. It does not seem reasonable,
therefore, to annex this property into a non -conforming status.
Further, there are a large number of different property owners in
the area, which would likely result in a piecemeal rezoning of
the area, if it occurred at all. For those reasons, the City
initiated this rezoning in accordance with Section 14.1 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of a rezoning of Stonehedge Subdivision, Sections One
and Two from A, Agricultural to RS, Residential Single Family.
P & Z ACTION: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning
Commission voted 5-0 to approve a rezoning of Stonehedge
Subdivision, Sections One and Two from A, Agricultural to RS,
Residential Single Family.
Rezoning - Stonehedge Sub., Sec. 1 and 2
RZ 95-11/Fi1e:STNHGI&2.REZ
June 17, 1995
Page 2
II EXHIBIT A
STONEHEDGE, SECTIONS ONE AND TWO
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
OF A PUBLIC MEETING
Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its
gular public meeting of the:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ❑ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
This meeting will be held on the 6th day of June , 1995, at
6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers,
101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed:
Rezoning of Stonehedcre Subdivision, Sections One and Two, from
A, AGricultural to RS, Residential Single Family, or any more
_restrictive classification, located on Reinhardt Egulevard and
Georgetown Inner Loop Road and locally known as Churchill Farms
As one of the owners of adjacent property you are i-lvited to be
present at such meeting if you desire to discuss the proposed
plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail.
Date: 5/22/95 City of C�eo-^getown
A copy of the planning report related to this item .gill be
available at the Division of Development Services and the
Georgetown Public Library no later than the Friday prior to the
meeting described above. For further information phone the
Development Services Division at 930-3575.
-------------
PROPERTY OWNER'S COMMENTS
Project Name: Stonehedge Subd, Sec One and Two
Name of Respondent:
Address of Respondent: C }�C&,l A-&,'
I am in favor: �< I object:
If you wish to submit written comment, please respond by 5/31/95,
it will be provided to the Board of Adjustment or planning and
Zoning Commission and City Council.
Please reply to: City of Georgetown
Development Services Division
P. 0. Box 409
Georgetown, Texas 78627
-- 19 -- DW
uu !AY� 1
�iv
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
OF A PUBLIC MEETING
Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its
gular public meeting of the:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ❑ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
This meeting will be held on the 6th day of June , 1995, at
6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers,
101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed:
Rezoning of Stonehedae Subdivision, Sections One and Two, from
A, AGricultural to RS Residential Single Family, or any more
restrictive classification located on Reinhardt Boulevard and
Georgetown Inner Loom Road and locally known as Churchill Farms
As one of the owners of adjacent property you are invited to be
present at such meeting if you desire to discuss the proposed
plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail.
Date: 5/22/95
City of Georgetown
A copy of the planning report related to this item will be
available at the Division of Development Services and the
Georgetown Public Library no later than the Friday prior to the
meeting described above. For further information phone the
Development Services Division at 930-3575.
PROPERTY OWNER'S COMMENTS
Project Name: Stonehedae Subd Sec One and Two
Name of Respondent:
410 KEENLAND DR
Address of Respo dent: GEORGETOWN,TX 78626
I am in
I f you
it will
Zoning
favo2suhmli
I object:
wish t written comment, please
be provided to the Board of Adjustment
Commission and City Council.
respond by 5/31/95,
or Planning and
Please reply to: City of Georgetown
Development Services Division
P. O. Box 409
Georgetown, Texas 78627
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1968, AND
AMENDING PART OF THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE
ORIGINAL ORDINANCE, TO CHANGE STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION,
SECTIONS ONE AND TWO, AS RECORDED IN CABINET G, SLIDES
280-285 OF THE OFFICIAL DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON
COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM A, AGRICULTURAL TO RS, RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY OR ANY MORE RESTRICTIVE CLASSIFICATION;
REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS;
INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, an application has been made to the City Council for the purpose of
changing the zoning district classification of the following described real property ("the
property") :
STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION, SECTIONS ONE AND TWO, AS RECORDED IN
CABINET G, SLIDES 280-285 OF THE OFFICIAL DEED RECORDS OF
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, hereinafter referred to as "the property";
WHEREAS, the City Council has submitted the proposed change in the Base Ordinance
to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its consideration in a public hearing and for its
recommendation or report; and
WHEREAS, notice of such hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation
in the City; which stated the time and place of hearing, which time was not earlier than fifteen
(15) days for the first day of such publication; and
WHEREAS, written notice was given not less than fifteen (15) days before the date set
for the meeting before the Planning and Zoning Commission to all the owners of the lots within
two hundred feet of the property, as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the applicant for such zoning change placed on the property such sign(s) as
required by law for advertising the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, not less than
fifteen (15) days before the date set for such hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission in a meeting held on June 6,
1995, recommended changing said zoning district classification of the above described property
from the A, Agricultural district zoning classification to RS, Residential Single Family, in
accordance with Exhibit "A".
Stonehedge, Sections One and Two Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 1 of 3
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are
hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and
expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this
ordinance implements the following Policies of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element:
1. Growth and Physical Development Policy 1, which states: "The City will ensure that
future land use patterns provide economic, cultural, and social activities to all residents,
businesses and organizations"; and
2. Growth and Physical Development Policy 2, which states: "The City's regulatory
actions will efficiently and effectively implement the Policy Statements and provide the
opportunity to seek change with reasonable effort and expense"; and
3. Growth and Physical Development Policy 4, which states: "The City will encourage
new development and infill redevelopment in the community"; and
4. Environmental and Resource Conservation Policy 1, which states: "The City will take
the steps necessary to protect the physical attributes that make Georgetown attractive";
and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any
other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the
Policy Plan.
SECTION 2. The Base Ordinance and the Zoning Map of the City, as well as the Zoning
District for the Property shall be and the same is hereby changed from the A, AGRICULTURAL
district to RS, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY district, in accordance with Exhibit "A",
which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, is hereby adopted by the City
Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas.
SECTION 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in
conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
SECTION 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or
circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or
application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
Stonehedge, Sections One and Two Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this Ordinance and the City
Secretary to attest. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in (10)
ten days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of
Georgetown.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the day of , 1995.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the day of , 1995.
ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
Sandra D. Lee
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Marianne Landers Banks
City Attorney
Stonehedge, Sections One and Two Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 3 of 3
By: LEO WOOD
Mayor
EXHIBIT A
STONEHEDGE, SECTIONS ONE AND TWO
O�rw
Tlwf
o�) (2%167-c
9900 •C •76+9 aC IBC
o�
'o
�e9 .0 1
ID fig
co
sscx
7
Council meeting June 27, 1995
Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
s
SUBJECT: First Reading of an ordinance to rezone 48.511 acres and 2.7355 acres in the William
Addison Survey, and Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block N, from A, Agricultural to RS,
Single Family Residential and C-1, Local Commercial or any more restrictive classification; and a
request to waive rezoning fees.
ITEM SUMMARY: A Concept Plan was submitted for this area in late 1994 and later withdrawn.
The plan indicated single family residential lots in the location where the RS zoning district is requested
and commercial lots in the location of the requested C-1 zoning district. The requested zoning districts
in this application are consistent with that plan. SEE EXHIBIT D
This property is located generally between the existing single family residential lots of Stonehedge
Subdivision, Sections One and Two, and SH29. Between Sections One and Two and this subject
rezoning area, however, is the lot proposed for multifamily residential use. It is also the subject of a
rezoning on this agenda.
The proposed C-1 zoning districts are appropriately located at the intersection of two (2) arterial
streets. The Concept Plan which was submitted for review, but subsequently withdrawn, indicates that
the single family lots will front on the interior local streets with their rear yards on the arterial streets.
Since this rezoning departs from the accepted Concept Plan, it is necessary that a revised Concept
Plan be approved that is consistent with the proposed rezoning. Section 23060 of the Subdivision
Regulations requires Concept Plans to be consistent with the zoning of the area affected. Therefore, it
may be appropriate to approve the rezoning prior to approving the revised Concept Plan. However,
proceeding in this order will create a period of time that the zoning of the land will be inconsistent with
the accepted Concept Plan. To avoid this, it may be prudent to withhold the second reading of the
rezoning ordinance until after a Concept Plan, consistent with the proposed rezoning, has been filed for
review and approval.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Consistent with City policy, a request to waive the $250 rezoning fee is being
processed with this application. This is the first rezoning request following annexation.
CONEWENTS: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to
recommend approval of a rezoning of 48.511 acres and 2.7355 acres in the William Addison Survey,
and Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block N from A, Agricultural to RS, Single Family
Residential and C-1, Local Commercial as depicted by Exhibit D, provided the second reading of the
rezoning ordinance be withheld until a Concept Plan consistent with the proposed rezoning is approved.
ATTACHMENTS: Staff report and ordinance
Submitted By:
Edward J. B y, AICP - Di for
Division of evelopment S ices
4--u' - -r . .
Hildy L.QKingma, AICP
Chief Planner
6
REZONING OF 48.511 ACRES AND 2.7355 ACRES IN THE WILLIAM ADDISON
SURVEY, A PORTION OF THE STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION CONCEPT PLAN;
AND STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION, SECTION THREE, BLOCK N, FROM A,
AGRICULTURAL TO RS, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND C-1, LOCAL
COMMERCIAL OR ANY MORE RESTRICTIVE CLASSIFICATION
OWNER/APPLICANT: Mr. Robert Wunsch
Stonehedge Partners, Inc.
30444 Berry Creek Drive
Georgetown, TX 78628
512/244-9707
REQUEST: Rezoning of 48.511 acres in the William Addison Survey, as
recorded in Volume 1599, Page 175 and Volume 2349, Page 88
of the Official Deed Records; and 2.7355 acres in the William
Addison Survey as recorded in Volume 1599, Page 175 and
further described as Tract Five in a Declaration of Restriction in
Volume 2332, Page 132 of the Official Deed Records, both
being a portion of the Stonehedge Subdivision Concept Plan; and
Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block N, as recorded in
Cabinet H, Slides 43-45 of the Official Plat Records of
Williamson County, Texas, from A, Agricultural to RS, Single
Family Residential and C-1, Local Commercial or any more
restrictive classification.
Location: Located on State Highway 29 East. SEE EXHIBIT A
Existing Site: Vacant land.
Existing Zoning: Annexation of this property is being processed at this time. An
A, Agricultural zoning district will be automatically assigned
upon annexation.
Proposed Use: Commercial and single family residential.
Surrounding Uses North: SH29, undeveloped land and single family residences
and Zoning: (RS and out of City)
South: Stonehedge, Section 3 (Block J, proposed RM-2 by
Rezoning - Stonehedge Sub.Concept Plan and Sec. 3, Blk N June 17, 1995
RZ 95-10/File:STNHG-CC.REZ Page 1
CM:CS
separate agenda item)(Blocks O and P, to be annexed)
and undeveloped land (out of City)
East: Indian Creek Subdivision and Dove Springs Subdivision,
residential single family (out of City) and undeveloped
land (soon to be annexed)
West: St. Helen's Catholic Church and single family residences
(out of City)
Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates this location as
Intensity Levels 3 and 5. SEE EXHIBIT B
Notification: Notification requirements have been completed.
HISTORY: The Concept Plan for Stonehedge Subdivision was reviewed and
accepted by the City in May, 1984. Sections One and Two were
recorded in October, 1985. Section Three was recorded in
February, 1986. A Revised Concept Plan for the area under
consideration in this rezoning was submitted for review in
November, 1994. The applicant withdrew the request prior to
being considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
ANALYSIS: As stated above, a Concept Plan was submitted for this area in
late 1994. The plan indicated single family residential in the
location where the RS zoning district is requested and
commercial in the location of the requested C-1 zoning district.
Although it was not required, the Concept Plan indicated the
proposed lot layout. The residential lots all take access from
local streets that come off of Inner Loop Road, Reinhardt
Boulevard and Stonehedge Boulevard. The commercial lots
were proposed at the corners of Inner Loop Road and SH29.
The requested zoning districts in this application are consistent
with the Concept Plan that was submitted last year.
This property is located generally between the existing single
family residential lots of Stonehedge Subdivision, Sections One
and Two and SH29. Between Sections One and Two and this
subject rezoning area, however, is the lot proposed for
multifamily residential use. It is also the subject of a rezoning
on this agenda. As pointed out in that report, the proposed
Rezoning - Stonehedge Sub.Concept Plan and Sec. 3, Blk N
RZ 95-10/File:STNHG-CC.REZ
CM:CS
June 17, 1995
Page 2
multifamily project is adjacent to both Inner Loop Road and
Reinhardt Boulevard.
The intersection of Inner Loop Road and SH29 is not developed
at this time. This segment of Inner Loop Road is one of the
options being considered for the Mokan (SH130) route that will
intersect with IH35 just north of Georgetown and return to IH35
south of Austin. SEE EXHIBIT C The Georgetown City
Council recently endorsed a route about one (1) mile east of
Inner Loop Road. The actual route has not been determined yet.
Should this segment of Inner Loop Road not be included in the
Mokan route, it will likely serve as a portion of the Georgetown
Inner Loop. The Inner Loop generally surrounds the City on the
west, south and southeast. This could be its most eastern
segment. If this segment does eventually become the Mokan
route, a larger commercially zoned area may be warranted at
this location, and it may be appropriate to allow districts which
permit more intense uses. However, given the City Council's
endorsement of the alternate route, it is reasonable to expect that
this may not be the future Mokan route.
The proposed C-1 zoning districts are appropriately located at
the intersection of two (2) arterial streets. They abut the
proposed RS districts; however, the limited uses of the proposed
C-1 district, the bufferyard requirement and the small area
dedicated to commercial use should help lessen the effects of the
commercial use on the residences. Furthermore, the Subdivision
Regulations prohibit single family residences from taking access
from arterial streets. The Concept Plan which was submitted for
review, but subsequently withdrawn, indicates that the single
family lots will front on the interior local streets with their rear
yards on the arterial streets.
Since this rezoning departs from the accepted Concept Plan, it is
necessary that a revised Concept Plan be approved that is
consistent with the proposed rezoning. Section 23060 of the
Subdivision Regulations requires Concept Plans to be consistent
with the zoning of the area affected. Therefore, it may be
appropriate to approve the rezoning prior to approving the
Rezoning - Stonehedge Sub.Concept Plan and Sec. 3, Blk N
RZ 95-10/File:STNHG-CC.REZ
CM:CS
June 17, 1995
Page 3
revised Concept Plan. However, proceeding in this order will
create a period of time that the zoning of the land will be
inconsistent with the accepted Concept Plan. To avoid this, it
may be prudent to withhold the second reading of the rezoning
ordinance until after a Concept Plan, consistent with the
proposed rezoning, has been filed for review and approval.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of a rezoning of 48.511 acres and 2.7355 acres in the
William Addison Survey, and Stonehedge Subdivision, Section
Three, Block N from A, Agricultural to RS, Single Family
Residential and C-1, Local Commercial as depicted by
Exhibit D.
P & Z ACTION: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning
Commission voted 5-0 to approve a rezoning of 48.511 acres
and 2.7355 acres in the William Addison Survey, and
Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block N from A,
Agricultural to RS, Single Family Residential and C-1, Local
Commercial as depicted by Exhibit D, provided the second
reading of the rezoning ordinance be withheld until the Concept
Plan, consistent with the proposed rezoning, is approved.
Rezoning - Stonehedge Sub.Concept Plan and Sec. 3, Elk N
RZ 95-10/File:STNHG-CC.REZ
CM:CS
June 17, 1995
Page 4
EXHIBIT A
CHURCHILL FARMS
2239/095
"
�p` STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION—
,\ 36a/29 579/491
�.
J e o I' .t. � .—
z
� 9 9 00 AC
�•�
oI� DAVID L. KELLEY
\
1935/627
\
—• t� ��. (332 569 AC)
\\
204 943 AC , 40 69 AC
\
`►fir;'` 3 70 AC
�'
•
T, .° ;
\
24 AC
to, ;
CITY ONLY
r
O\�
O[ r( •S� gut
t � `t
• ��
L 11 --O•
. [ 17 .0
T
:, '• 4
01
G� (15.20 AC)
3
J
2 3
for 24.00 aC e
I
�;,, o CI T Y ONLY
WILLIAM RONHAROT �
4
to
0 573/469
0
�. (6 06 A c�
.
402 AC I AG 7 8 Ac
�•' to j �
p. 2 v I
1
I
Is 1
3 10
1
2 18
e 9
.�• °° \
4
coL99
4
3
REV JOHN MCCARTY \ \: STQNEI/EUGE PAPTII�RS 8Lv0
697 / 11 O 2 3:4y113H
r 6
7
ST HELENS CATHOLIC \: 2e r6 R.0 F {75: AC. I
4 5
CHURCH V
I 2
12
;6 1560 \� STONEHEDGE 31
13
/
11 66 ACSCHNEIDER
4 a 5/ S32
PE7RQSKYSEC.NT
\ ` 1
•
3 3J nG _ (167 AC)
IZ56/ 55
\` � (577AG)
-
� (593AC)
972AC.
\
, ILK
_ JOM dr+ rA f (1t
s
C ; , •
• tt is
La
25
26 r7
w
to t
rl
oc .6s en
a IH e/reS
A
fS
to
6 0 to z1 A
I
\
Ir
a
7 e L[
7 i
.t1
°
zz
_
o 3 11 ro
\ \j
IF
t
1I
s
e
e • to
l0 IL
ie
to
'
g GLAALD ECKLEY Iz 10
.
6
6 6
IT
3 le
!
a
)
10
11 •
D I I
> s IL 1r
6 17
SA
13RADY 10 33 AC \ :• L
�. :.�.�
m t1 14 M` a
i .� .... 14 17
,
.
f
11
��t
630 / 201 0 1 Is 1e
e
7
1
f
I la 11 17
le
..
16 AC 16914 \ \ CHURCrt1LL
FAR
NS
z
DRIVE
e c3
1 1
r6
1
La
It
3
I
le 1 . 13 12
7 S
e
t t S
1
t
'�
a
S
\
JAME9 8 TURNER a > a t3
a
t1
a to
I
a 13 s
GERALD ECKLEY 1
0 10 60 AC \ \ s s
L
to
e
•
w ro
n 16 It II 7 •
634 / 3 e6 0 \` ite
��-.,
_
'
j
S
1 0 n
d
e
le
�
1 7 6 ➢ 1
• t 10 I I
J 1336 AC L
7
r
Ie I7
7 10
s
60 e 6
0
19
17 ) e 16
,� 16 e •
t
0
a v its,s
le •
'e, •>> JOE 8 MCMA$TER ,0 i0 1e W p, 14
10 9
It „ •
17 r
6
.6V
le51/934 ,a P
1) •
(10 16 AC) u - t112 16 I '
BE�J 2 ,
1!
/ 913 AC
I II
1
la IT
I S 13 14
O I 1) la
'L
WILLIAM MORSE O 11
LINDA VICE o 6.;7 / 885
•
on 0 1002 AC 1016 AC 1 4` s
E MORY CA?LSON
O o' on
v
}45/495
1565AG
4 O
rn ► < .eo
u O t•
2
u
0 Sa
EXHIBIT B
DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT
GIVEN A SINGLE LAND USE
1. 'DATE': May 3, 1995
'PROJECT NAME': Stonehedge, Section 3, Block N
and remainder of original Concept
Plan
2. 'GIVEN': acres of Intensity Level 1
acres of Intensity Level 2
12.86 acres of Intensity Level 3
acres of Intensity Level 4
44.14 acres of Intensity Level 5
acres of Intensity Level 6
57.00 TOTAL ACRES
3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND:
INTENSITY WATER WASTEWATER
TRANSPORTATION
LEVEL Peak GPD Average GPO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Trip Ends
1 0 0
0
2 0 0
0
3 48,339 13,884
129
4 0 0
0
5 483,763 141,245
7,724
6 0 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
----------------
4. TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND. -
Maximum GPD Water Capacity:
532,102
Maximum GPD Wastewater Capacity:
155,129
Maximum Trip Ends:
7.853
5. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY
LAND USES
MAXIMUM
PER DEV
DEVELOPMENT
WATER
- ------- ------ ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------
WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATIOI
UNITS I
REGS I
ALLOWED/UNIT
Detached SF
------------------------------------------
Large Lot 460
Average Lot 533
537
I
13.110 I
I
460 I
I
114 I
114 housing units
Zero Lot Line 533
621
621
8,863 I
8,863 I
533 I
533 I
414 I
552 I
414 housing units
533 housing units
Attached SF 819
Multifamily
886
7,224 I
819 I
828 I
819 housing units
1.008
Mobile Home 819
994
804
3.458 I
994 I
1,650 I
994 housing units
Lodging 2.771
2,543
9.271 I
5.666 I
804 I
2543 I
I
I
804 housing units
2,543 rooms
Institutional 1.551,318
Church
1,686,188
9.337,556 I
1,551,318 I
I
1,551.318 square feet
-with day care 1,727,604
-w/o day care
1,869,027
I
504,684 I
I
504,684 I
I
I
504,684 square feet
2,860,763
Medical Office
3,102,586
10.906.785 I
2,860,763 I
I
2,860,763 square feet
1,279,091
General Office 1.461,819
1,385.083
1,704,717
2,433,494 I
3,079.563 I
1,279,091 I
1,461,819 I
I
I
1,279,091 square feet
1,461,819 square feet
Retail, Mixed 818,618
Retail, Restaurant
951,713
475,414
475,414 I
475.414 square feet
341,091
Retail, Store 1,637,237
323.186
1.762,833
690.667 I
1.635,336 I
323,186 I
1,635,336 I
I
(
323.186 square feet
1.635,336 square feet
Employment Centers 1,461,819
Warehouse
1,704,717
1,716,102 I
1,461,819 I
I
1,461,819 square feet
9,335,123
Mini -Warehouse 133,025.500
-----------------------------------------
11,080,663
155,129.280
13,088.142 I
30.203,404 I
9,335.123 I
30,203,404 I
I
I
9.335,123 square feet
30.203,404 square feet
EXHIBIT C
MOKAN (STATE HIGHWAY 130) OPTIONS
n••..s i.r,...cl .o .•.c 1 I�1 \ , � .F•�
atl5 A I
x ••+.o•a. na �� .u.
.•l i N r
1 a �. •T:
•1
R
I
1
� t•
7
t r
1 1
A 1
1 � it • .•a i
1 � II � w •c
T • D •
1
Is a Ir t7
_ 1 Y
l
I
• 4
..,.. •o--.•..
r �
q •<
A. .,!•n � 1
•O100•L
A
EXHIBIT D
4VA
;---,
-
------.--_
.LOCK -rp,
LQT I
BLOCK 'O' ---` ---1
LOT I
PLACE
1
1-
lJ
j ! 1
7.
ci
'-- J
t_ - 1 - ri Df3- Wit DR ---
- � �Jhr�D �_ � _
-1 --t -- _ CT.[�
1 gE1.L OR l I 1 I
1 1 I LEGEND
! � H
+ PROP. C - 1
PROP. R-S i
PROP. ZONING FOR CHURCHILL FARMS
PROPERTY OWNED BY STONEHEDGE PARTNERS
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNE
OF A PUBLIC MEETING
MAY n nor,
Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its
regular public meeting of the:
(� PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ❑ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
This meeting will be held on the 6th day of June , 1995, at
6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers,
101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed:
Rezoning of Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three Block N and
2.74 acres and 48.51 acres in the William Addison Survey from
A, Agricultural to RS, Residential Single Family and 2.15 and
2.26 acres in the Uv'iiliam Addison Survey,from A ti riculturai
to C-1 Local Commercial or any more restrictive classification
and locally known as Churchill Farms
As one of the owners of adjacent property you are '-nvited to be
present. at such meeting if you desire to discuss the proposed
plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail.
Date: 5/22/95
City of Georgetown
A copy of the planning report related to this item will be
available at the Division of Development Services and the
Georgetown Public Library no later than the Friday prior to the
meeting described above. For further information phone the
Development Services Division at 930-3575.
PROPERTY OWNER'S COMMENTS
Project Name: Stonehedge, Sec 3 and tract in Wm ',-dAson Survey
Name of Respondent: D m * c�--,� 1�
a
Address of Respondent: e6J j)
I am in favor: I object:
If you wish to submit written comment, please respond by 5/31/95,
it will be provided to the Board of Adjustment or Planning and
Zoning Commission and City Council.
Please reply to: City of Georgetown
Development Services Division
P. O. Box 409
Georgetown, Texas 78627
H@Hack
CITY OF GEORGETOWN MAY %3 1 1995
NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
OF A PUBLIC MEETING
Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its
regular public meeting of the:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ❑ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
This meeting will be held on the 6th day of June , 1995, at
6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers,
101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed:
Rezoning of Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block N and
2.74 acres and 48.51 acres in the William Addison Survey from
Al Agricultural to RS, Residential Single Family and 2.15 and
2.26 acres in the William Addison Survey, from A Agricultural
to C-1, Local Coirunercial or any more restrictive r-lassification
and locally known as Churchill Farms.
As one of the owners of adjacent property you are invited to be
present at such meeting if you desire to discuss the proposed
plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail.
Date: 5/22/95
City of Georgetown
A copy of the planning report related to this item will be
available at the Division of Development Services and the
Georgetown Public Library no later than the Friday prior to the
meeting described above. For further information phone the
Development Services Division at 930-3575.
PROPERTY OWNER'S COMMENTS
Pro3ect Name: Stonehedge, Sec. 3 and tract in Wm addison Survey
Name of Respondent: .te11 ES & StneNNE HARVEY
410 KEENLAND DR
Address of Respondent: GEORGETOWN, TX T8626
I am in favor:
object:
If you wisho ubmit written comment, please respond by 5/31/95,
it will be p^ vided to the Board of Adjustment or Manning and
Zoning Commission and City Council.
Please reply to: City of Georgetown
Development Services Division
P. O. Box 409
Georgetown, Texas 78627
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1968, AND
AMENDING PART OF THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE
ORIGINAL ORDINANCE, TO CHANGE 48.511 ACRES AND 2.7355
ACRES IN THE WILLIAM ADDISON SURVEY, A PORTION OF THE
STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION CONCEPT PLAN; AND STONEHEDGE
SUBDIVISION, SECTION THREE, BLOCK N, AS RECORDED IN
VOLUME 1599, PAGE 175, VOLUME 2349, PAGE 88, VOLUME 2332
PAGE 132 OF THE OFFICIAL DEED RECORDS AND CABINET H,
SLIDES 43-45 OF THE OFFICIAL PLAT RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON
COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM A, AGRICULTURAL TO RS, RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY AND C-1, LOCAL COMMERCIAL OR ANY MORE
RESTRICTIVE CLASSIFICATION; REPEALING CONFLICTING
ORDINANCES A - ND RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, an application has been made to the City Council for the purpose of
changing the zoning district classification of the following described real property ("the
property"):
48.511 ACRES AND 2.7355 ACRES IN THE WILLIAM ADDISON SURVEY, A
PORTION OF THE STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION CONCEPT PLAN; AND
STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION, SECTION THREE, BLOCK N, AS RECORDED IN
VOLUME 1599, PAGE 175, VOLUME 2349, PAGE 88, VOLUME 2332 PAGE 132
OF THE OFFICIAL DEED RECORDS AND CABINET H, SLIDES 43-45 OF THE
OFFICIAL PLAT RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, hereinafter
referred to as "the property";
WHEREAS, the City Council has submitted the proposed change in the Base Ordinance
to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its consideration in a public hearing and for its
recommendation or report; and
WHEREAS, notice of such hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation
in the City; which stated the time and place of hearing, which time was not earlier than fifteen
(15) days for the first day of such publication; and
WHEREAS, written notice was given not less than fifteen (15) days before the date set
for the meeting before the Planning and Zoning Commission to all the owners of the lots within
two hundred feet of the property, as required by law; and
48.511 Acres and 2.7355 Acres in the William Addison Survey
and Stonhedge Subdivision, Block N Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 1 of 3
WHEREAS, the applicant for such zoning change placed on the property such sign(s) as
required by law for advertising the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, not less than
fifteen (15) days before the date set for such hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission in a meeting held on June 6,
1995, recommended changing said zoning district classification of the above described property
from the A, Agricultural district zoning classification to RS, Residential Single Family and C-1,
Local Commercial district zoning classification, in accordance with Exhibit "A".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are
hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and
expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this
ordinance implements the following Policies of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element:
1. Growth and Physical Development Policy 1, which states: "The City will ensure that
future land use patterns provide economic, cultural, and social activities to all residents,
businesses and organizations"; and
2. Growth and Physical Development Policy 2, which states: "The City's regulatory
actions will efficiently and effectively implement the Policy Statements and provide the
opportunity to seek change with reasonable effort and expense"; and
3. Growth and Physical Development Policy 4, which states: "The City will encourage
new development and infill redevelopment in the community"; and
4. Environmental and Resource Conservation Policy 1, which states: "The City will take
the steps necessary to protect the physical attributes that make Georgetown attractive";
and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any
other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the
Policy Plan.
SECTION 2. The Base Ordinance and the Zoning Map of the City, as well as the Zoning
District for the Property shall be and the same is hereby changed from the A, AGRICULTURAL
district to RS, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY and C-1, LOCAL COMMERCIAL district,
in accordance with Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein,
is hereby adopted by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas.
SECTION 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in
48.511 Acres and 2.7355 Acres in the William Addison Survey
and Stonhedge Subdivision, Block N Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 2 of 3
conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
SECTION 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or
circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or
application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this Ordinance and the City
Secretary to attest. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in (10)
ten days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of
Georgetown.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the day of , 1995.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the day of . 1995.
ATTEST:
Sandra D. Lee
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Marianne Landers Banks
City Attorney
48.511 Acres and 2.7355 Acres in the William Addison Survey
and Stonhedge Subdivision, Block N Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 3 of 3
THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
By: LEO WOOD
Mayor
EXHIBIT A
SH 29
LEGEND
PROP. C- 1
PROP. R-S
ING FOR CHURCHILL FARMS
BY STONEHEDGE PARTNERS
Council meeting June 27, 1995
Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUB.TECT: First Reading of an ordinance to rezone Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block J, Lot 31
from Al Agricultural to RM-2, Dense Multifamily or any more restrictive classification; and a request to waive
rezoning fees.
ITEM SUMMARY: The proposed rezoning area is also the area proposed for a 112 unit apartment complex.
Recently, a detailed development plan was approved for the complex. Since the DDP conforms to all applicable
regulations, it was reviewed and approved administratively. The applicant has submitted building plans which
are currently being reviewed by the Building Inspections staff.
In the Concept Plan for this area accepted in 1984, and the Final Plat approved in 1985, this area is
designated as multifamily residential. The remaining areas are indicated as single family residential and
commercial. Most of the single family residential area has been developed to date, and the commercial has not.
The commercial uses are adjacent to SH29, the residential uses are in the rear of the subdivision and the
multifamily uses are placed between them, so as to buffer the single family residences from the commercial uses.
The plats approved subsequent to then are based on that design. A new Concept Plan that was presented last year,
but withdrawn, proposes to depart from that design. Assigning an RM-2 zoning classification to the subject area
is consistent with the currently approved plans and plats.
The City has determined that, since the submittal of the first application for the construction of the
apartments has occurred, it is permitted to continue as approved regardless of the zoning district assignment. The
Texas Government Code, Section 481.183, requires the City to do so. If this requested rezoning to RM-2 is not
approved the apartments can still be constructed, but will be subject to the non -conforming provisions of the
regulations. It is to the applicant's benefit to rezone for at least two (2) reasons. If the complex were destroyed
it could not be rebuilt unless it conformed to the current zoning, and typically, financial institutions will not lend
funds to projects that are not consistent with applicable zoning.
The site has direct access to a collector street (Reinhardt Boulevard) and is adjacent to a major arterial
street (Inner Loop Road). Although the lot is 11.66 acres total, only 6.49 acres are developable due to a large
detention pond on the southern half of the lot. This pond is serving the entire subdivision with the exception of
the commercial uses proposed to front on SH29, which will provide on -site detention.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Consistent with City policy, a request to waive the $250 rezoning fee is being processed
with this application. This is the first rezoning request following annexation.
COMMENTS: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend
approval of a rezoning of Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block J. Lot 31 from A, Agricultural to RM-2,
Dense Multifamily.
ATTACHMENTS: Staff report and ordinance
Submitted By:
Edward J. ariy,,_AICP - Dir ctoi
Division Development S ices
Hildy L. K gma, AICP
Chief Planner
REZONING OF STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION, SECTION THREE, BLOCK J, LOT
31 FROM A, AGRICULTURAL TO RM-2, DENSE MULTIFAMILY OR ANY MORE
RESTRICTIVE CLASSIFICATION
OWNERS/APPLICANT:
Dr. David Starr
3200 Indian Mound Road
Georgetown, Texas 78628
512/863-6466
REQUEST: Rezoning of Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block J,
Lot 31 from A, Agricultural to RM-2, Dense Multifamily or any
more restrictive classification as recorded in Cabinet H, Slides
43-45 of the Official Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas.
Location: Located on Stonehedge Boulevard and Reinhardt Boulevard. SEE
EXHIBIT A
Existing Site: Undeveloped land.
Existing Zoning: Annexation of this property is being considered by the City
Council, therefore there is no zoning on the property at this
time. However, pursuant to Section 1.205 of the Zoning
Ordinance this property will be assigned an A, Agricultural
zoning classification unless otherwise requested by the property
owner.
Proposed Use: Multifamily development.
Surrounding Uses North: Vacant land (to be annexed)
and Zoning: South: Stonehedge, Section One, Single family residences (to be
annexed)
East: Indian Creek Subdivision, single family residences (out
of City)
West: Stonehedge, Concept Plan approved (to be annexed)
Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates this location as
Intensity Levels 3 and 5. SEE EXHIBIT B
Notification: Notification requirements have been completed.
Rezoning - Stonehedge Sub., Sec. 3, Blk J, Lot 31 June 17, 1995
Project # RZ 95-09/Fi1e:STNHDG3.REZ Page 1
HISTORY: The Concept Plan for Stonehedge Subdivision was reviewed and
accepted by the City in May, 1984. At that time, Concept Plans
were considered accepted rather than approved. Sections One
and Two were recorded in October, 1985. Section Three was
recorded in February, 1986.
The City Council initiated an annexation of Stonehedge Sections
One, Two and Three, and an area which was submitted for
approval as a Concept Plan of Churchill Farms on March 28,
1995. The two (2) public hearings have already occurred and
the first and second readings of the ordinance to annex the area
will occur on June 13, 1995, and June 27, 1995, respectively.
The ordinance shall become effective on July 12, 1995. Upon
annexation, the area is automatically assigned an A, agricultural
zoning district classification. The rezoning ordinance will take
effect July 26, 1995.
ANALYSIS: The proposed rezoning area is also the area proposed for a 112
unit apartment complex. Recently, a detailed development plan
was approved for the complex. Since the DDP conforms to all
applicable regulations, it was reviewed and approved
administratively. The applicant has submitted building plans
which are currently being reviewed by the Building Inspections
staff.
In the Concept Plan accepted in 1984, and the Final Plat
approved in 1985, this area is designated as multifamily
residential. The remaining areas are indicated as single family
residential and commercial. Most of the single family residential
area has been developed to date, and the commercial has not. In
the Concept Plan accepted in 1984, the desired stepping -down of
uses was proposed. SEE EXHIBIT C The commercial uses are
adjacent to SH29, the residential uses are in the rear of the
subdivision and the multifamily uses are placed between them,
so as to buffer the single family residences from the commercial
uses. The plats approved subsequent to then are based on that
design. The new Concept Plan that was presented last year, but
withdrawn, proposes to depart from that design. Assigning an
RM-2 zoning classification to the subject area is consistent with
the currently approved plans and plats.
Rezoning - Stonehedge Sub., Sec. 3, Blk J, Lot 31
Project # RZ 95-09/File:STNHDG3.REZ
June 17, 1995
Page 2
Until about three (3) years ago the subdivision remained vacant.
In the short time since then many residences have been built in
Sections One and Two. There was substantial opposition to the
apartments from the residents of those sections. It is perhaps
this opposition that led to the request for annexation. The City
has determined that, since the submittal of the first application
for the construction of the apartments has occurred, it is
permitted to continue as approved regardless of the zoning
district assignment. The Texas Government Code, Section
481.183, requires the City to do so. If this requested rezoning
to RM-2 is not approved the apartments can still be constructed,
but will be subject to the non -conforming provisions of the
regulations. It is to the applicant's benefit to rezone for at least
two (2) reasons. If the complex were destroyed it could not be
rebuilt unless it conformed to the current zoning, and typically,
financial institutions will not lend funds to projects that are not
consistent with applicable zoning.
The site has direct access to a collector street (Reinhardt
Boulevard) and is adjacent to a major arterial street (Inner Loop
Road). It is probable that there will be some single family
residences between this site and SH29 to the north based on the
revised Concept Plan that was submitted for staff reviews but
has not been forwarded to the Commission or City Council.
Although the lot is 11.66 acres total, only 6.49 acres are
developable due to a large detention pond on the southern half of
the lot. This pond is serving the entire subdivision with the
exception of the future commercial uses fronting on SH29,
which will provide on -site detention. As demonstrated in the
DDP filed for the apartment complex, the applicant proposes to
construct nearly all of the units allowed by the Century Plan,
112 out of an allowed 120. Should the lot be resubdivided for
single family residential usage instead, the most units possible
are 47 when applying the minimum lot size requirement. The
Century Plan allows up to 65 single family detached residential
units for this lot. Therefore, the use of this lot for multifamily
residential is the most efficient use of the densities allowed by
the Century Plan, which was based on the Concept Plan.
Rezoning - Stonehedge Sub., Sec. 3, Blk J, Lot 31
June 17, 1995
Project # RZ 95-09/File:STNHDG3.REZ Page 3
Fee Waiver: The applicant requests a waiver of the $250 application fee since
this is the first rezoning request subsequent to the initial zoning
assignment upon annexation. The City Council will consider this
waiver request.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval a rezoning of Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three,
Block J, Lot 31 from A, Agricultural to RM-2, Dense
Multifamily.
P & Z ACTION: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning
Commission voted 5-0 to approve a rezoning of Stonehedge
Subdivision, Section Three, Block J, Lot 31 from A,
June 17, 1995
Page 4
EXHIBIT A
8TONEHEOGE,SECTION THREE, BLOCK J,LOT31
EXHIBIT B
DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT
GIVEN A SINGLE LAND USE
1. 'DATE': May 3, 1995
'PROJECT NAME': Stonehedge Section 3, Block J. Lot 31
2. 'GIVEN': acres of Intensity Level 1
acres of Intensity Level 2
8.74 acres of Intensity Level 3
acres of Intensity Level 4
2.92 acres of Intensity Level 5
acres of Intensity Level 6
11.66 TOTAL ACRES
3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND:
INTENSITY WATER WASTEWATER
TRANSPORTATION
LEVEL Peak GPD Average GPD
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Trip Ends
1 0 0
0
2 0 0
0
3 32,862 9,439
87
4 0 0
0
5 32,003 9,344
511
6 0 0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
4. TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND:
Maximum GPD Water Capacity
64.866
Maximum GPD Wastewater Capacity:
18.783
Maximum Trip Ends
598
5. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY
MAXIMUM
PER DEV
DEVELOPMENT
LAND USES WATER
------------------------------------------------
WASTEWATER TRANS PORTAT10
UNITS
REGS I
ALLOWED/UNIT
------------------------------------------------
Detached SF
Large Lot 56
65
999 I
56 I
23
23 housing units
Average Lot 65
75
675 I
65 I
85
65 housing units
Zero Lot Line 65
75
675 I
65 I
113 I
65 housing units
Attached SF 100
107
551
100 I
169 I
100 housing units
Multifamily 123
Mobile Home 100
120
263 I
120 I
334
120 housing units
Lodging 338
97
308
706
432 I
97 I
308 I
I
97 housing units
308 rooms
Institutional 189,113
Church
204,165
711,534 I
189,113
189.113 square feet
-with day care 210,603
226,304
38,458 I
38,458
I
38,458 square feet
-w/o day care 348,740
375.664
831,111
348,740
I
348,740 square feet
Medical Office 155,927
General Office
167,707
185,435
155,927
155,927 square feet
178.202
Retail, Mixed
206.409
234.667
178,202
I
178,202 square feet
99,793
Retail, Restaurant 41,581
115,234
39,132
36,227 I
52,630 I
36,227
39,132 I
I
I
36,227 square feet
39.132 square feet
Retail, Store 199,586
Employment Centers 178,202
213,445
206.409
124,615 I
130,769
124,615 I
124,615 square feet
Warehouse 1,137.993
1,341,657
I
997.333 I
130,769 I
997.333
130,769 square feet
997,333 square feet
Mini -Warehouse 16.216,400
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
18,783.200
2,301,538 I
2,301.538 I
2,301,538 square feet
EXHIBIT C
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
OF A PUBLIC MEETING
Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its
regular public meeting of the:
B' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ❑ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
This meeting will be held on the 6th day of June , 1995, at
6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers,
101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed:
Rezoning of Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block J,
Lot 31, from A, Agricultural to RM-2 Dense Multifamily or any
more restrictive classification located on Stonehedge Boulevard
and locally known as Churchill Farms
As one of the owners of adjacent property you are invited to be
present at such meeting if you desire to discuss tie proposed
plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail.
Date: 5/22%95
City of Georgetown
A copy of the planning report related to this item will be
available at the Division of Development Services and the
Georgetown Public Library no later than the Friday prior to the
meeting described above. For further information phone the
Development Services Division at 930-3575.
PROPERTY OWNER'S COMMENTS
Project Name: Stonehedge Sub. Sec 3, Blk J, Lot 31 Rezoning
Name of Respondent : � /l1` i C 1{ �.-�' �' AtJ�
Address of Respondent: G�i CA LZ-Fft
z4AA5
I am in favor:
I object:
f /
If you wish to submit written commlease respond b /31/95,
1t will be provided to the Board of Adjustmen nning and
Zoning Commission and City Council.
Please reply to: City of Georgetown
Development Services Division
P. O. Box 409
Georgetown, Texas 78627
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
OF A PUBLIC MEETING
H (K� E ow M
MAY 3 11995
uu �
Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its
regular public meeting of the:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ❑ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
This meeting will be held on the 6th day of June 1995, at
6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers,
1014 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed:
Rezoning of Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block J,
Lot 31 from A Agricultural to RM-2, Dense Multifamily or any
more restrictive classification located on Stonehed e Boulevard
and locally known as Churchill Farms
As one of the owners of adjacent property you are invited to be
present at such meeting if you desire to discuss the proposed
plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail.
Date: 5/22/95
City of Georgetown
A copy of the planning report related to this item will be
available at the Division of Development Services and the
Georgetown Public Library no later than the Friday prior to the
meeting described above. For further information phone the
Development Services Division at 930-3575.
PROPERTY OWNER'S COMMENTS
Project Name: Stonehedge Sub. Sec 3, Blk J, Lot 31 Rezoning
Name of Respondent: JAMES & SUZANNE HARM
Address of Respondent: GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 /
I object
If you wish to submit written comment, pi Ua respond by 5/31/95,
it will be provided to the Board of Adjustment or Manning and
Zoning Commission and City Council.
Please reply to: City of Georgetown
Development Services Division
P. O. Box 409
Georgetown, Texas 78627
V fto ( Z� L-�Qj
Y e'er
µin o" n,A-s 0---
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1968, AND
AMENDING PART OF THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE
ORIGINAL ORDINANCE, TO CHANGE STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION,
SECTION THREE, BLOCK J, LOT 31, AS RECORDED IN CABINET H,
SLIDES 43-45 OF THE OFFICIAL PLAT RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON
COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM A, AGRICULTURAL TO RM-2, DENSE
MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OR ANY MORE RESTRICTIVE
CLASSIFICATION; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, an application has been made to the City Council for the purpose of
changing the zoning district classification of the following described real property ("the
property") :
STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION, SECTION THREE, BLOCK J, LOT 31, AS
RECORDED IN CABINET H, SLIDES 43-45 OF THE OFFICIAL PLAT RECORDS
OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, hereinafter referred to as "the property";
WHEREAS, the City Council has submitted the proposed change in the Base Ordinance
to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its consideration in a public hearing and for its
recommendation or report; and
WHEREAS, notice of such hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation
in the City; which stated the time and place of hearing, which time was not earlier than fifteen
(15) days for the first day of such publication; and
WHEREAS, written notice was given not less than fifteen (15) days before the date set
for the meeting before the Planning and Zoning Commission to all the owners of the lots within
two hundred feet of the property, as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the applicant for such zoning change placed on the property such sign(s) as
required by law for advertising the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, not less than
fifteen (15) days before the date set for such hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission in a meeting held on June 6,
1995, recommended changing said zoning district classification of the above described property
from the A, Agricultural district zoning classification to RM-2, Dense Multifamily Residential
district zoning classification, in accordance with Exhibit "A".
Stonehedge, Section Three, Block J, Lot 31
Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 1 of 3
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are
hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and
expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this
ordinance implements the following Policies of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element:
1. Growth and Physical Development Policy 1, which states: "The City will ensure that
future land use patterns provide economic, cultural, and social activities to all residents,
businesses and organizations"; and
2. Growth and Physical Development Policy 2, which states: "The City's regulatory
actions will efficiently and effectively implement the Policy Statements and provide the
opportunity to seek change with reasonable effort and expense"; and
3. Growth and Physical Development Policy 4, which states: "The City will encourage
new development and infill redevelopment in the community"; and
4. Environmental and Resource Conservation Policy 1, which states: "The City will take
the steps necessary to protect the physical attributes that make Georgetown attractive";
and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any
other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the
Policy Plan.
SECTION 2. The Base Ordinance and the Zoning Map of the City, as well as the Zoning
District for the Property shall be and the same is hereby changed from the A, AGRICULTURAL
district to RM-2, DENSE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL district, in accordance with Exhibit
"A", which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, is hereby adopted by the
City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas.
SECTION 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in
conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
SECTION 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or
circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or
application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
Stonehedge, Section Three, Block J, Lot 31
Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this Ordinance and the City
Secretary to attest. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in (10)
ten days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of
Georgetown.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the day of , 1995.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the day of . 1995.
ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
Sandra D. Lee
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Marianne Landers Banks
City Attorney
Stonehedge, Section Three, Block J, Lot 31
Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 3 of 3
By: LEO WOOD
Mayor
EXHIBIT A
8TC>NEHEOGE,8ECT|C/N THREE, BLOCK J, LOT31
,
99
~." ^ ^^^,
1IR
G I-
Council meeting June 27, 1995 Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Detailed Development Plan of 1.279 acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, currently
known as Murray's Texaco, and variances to the Subdivision Regulations.
ITEM SUMMARY: The proposal is to raze the existing service station building and construct a more modern facility
eliminating the service bays and front pump islands. The new design will accommodate more vehicles at once. The
proposed 2,680 square foot building is nearly entirely dedicated for use as a convenience store. Whereas the convenience
area in the existing building is approximately 600 square feet.
The proposed site retains the two (2) existing 45 foot wide undivided driveways that are spaced about 65 feet
apart. The Subdivision Regulations requires 450 feet between driveways on undivided major arterial streets such as SH29.
The applicant states that the two (2) driveways are necessary to accommodate the volume of traffic that will be generated
by the site and will provide for smooth traffic flow entering and exiting the site. The existing driveways are located
between the exit ramp from the northbound lane of IH35 and Riveroaks Drive. This area has been identified as dangerous
and congested. Clearly, the improvement to the subject site will generate even more traffic in the area.
The width of undivided driveways is limited to 30 feet by the Subdivision Regulations. The design standards allow
for 45 foot wide driveways only in the case where the driveway is divided and there are two (2) lanes of twenty (20) feet
width each. The reason for limiting the width of driveways is to prevent excessive openings on thoroughfares and provide
for managed flow of traffic. This is especially important at a busy location such as this.
Table 34020 permits side and rear setbacks to be reduced by 50 percent where they are adjacent to land that is
either zoned, used or platted for commercial or industrial purposes. Inasmuch as the property to the east and southeast
is in commercial use, the required setback from this property is ten (10) feet. The property west and southwest of the
site has no established use. Therefore, it is subject to the standard requirement of twenty (20) feet. It is reasonable to
expect that the property will be used commercially.
The maneuvering lane at the front of the site exceeds the required 24 foot width by one (1) foot. The maneuvering
lane for the rearparking spaces is too narrow, however. Twenty-two (22) feet is required. The plan proposes 21 feet.
,
A type E bufferyard is required along all but the front lot lines. The landscaping proposed on the plan does
not conform to the requirements for a type "E" bufferyard, including a fence. If the adjacent properties were zoned C-2A
or C-1, a lesser bufferyard would be required. The plan proposes landscaping in excess of what would be required in
„
that situation. Along the front lot line, a type D bufferyard with a fence is required. The plantings proposed in the
DDP are in excess of what is required for the type "D" bufferyard, but no fence is proposed.
If the site were developed consistent with the reviewed DDP, then variances to the identified landscaping
requirements may be appropriate to achieve the overall intent and purpose of the landscape regulations as if the adjacent
land is zoned either C-1 or C-2A.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
COMMENTS: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning Commission vote 5-0 to recommend approval of
a Detailed Development Plan for 1.279 acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, provided the Technical Issues are
addressed prior to City Council consideration and recommend approval of the requested variances to Table 34020 to allow
a ten (10) foot setback on the south and west lot lines; to Section 37000 to allow the landscaping as proposed in the
submitted DDP; and Sections 33042 and 33043 thereby allowing the existing two (2) 45 foot wide driveways to remain,
after making the required findings of fact. The Commission recommended denial of the requested variance to Section
33057, thereby requiring a 22 foot wide maneuvering lane within the parking area behind the building. The approval of
this DDP requires final approval by TNRCC.
A revised Detailed Development Plan addressing the Technical Issues has been submitted.
ATTACHMENTS: Staff report
Submitted Bv:
Edward J. B r , AICP - Di ector Hildy L. Kingma, AICP
Division of evelopment rvices Chief Planner
DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF 1.279 ACRES IN THE CLEMENT
STUBBLEFIELD SURVEY, KNOWN AS MURRAYIS TEXACO,
LOCATED AT IH35 AND STATE HIGHWAY 29; AND VARIANCES TO THE
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
OWNER/APPLICANT: Mr. R.O. Schneider
Star Enterprises
110 Cypress Station Drive #255
Houston, Texas 77090
713/586-3616 FAX 713/586-3666
AGENT: Mr. Edward E. Carroll
Carroll Consultants
2000 S . Dairy Ashford
Houston, Texas 77077
713/531-6709 FAX 713/531-0893
REQUEST: Detailed Development Plan of 1.279 acres in the Clement
Stubblefield Survey as recorded in Volume 2059, Page 672 of
the Official Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas; and
variances to the Subdivision Regulations.
FACTS:
Location: Located at IH35 and State Highway 29. SEE EXHIBIT A
Existing Site: Murray's Texaco Station and Car Wash.
Existing Zoning: RS, Residential Single Family. A rezoning request to C-2A,
Commercial First Height is being processed by separate agenda
item.
Proposed Use: A Texaco fuel station, convenience store and car wash.
Surrounding Uses North: Riveroaks Shopping Center (HEB, Wal-Mart, etc.) (C-1)
and Zoning: South: Undeveloped land and West University Professional
Center (RS)
East: West University Professional Center (RS)
West: Undeveloped land and IH35 (RS)
Detailed Development Plan - Star Enterprises
D 95-03/File: STBFD-SE.DDP
CM:CS
June 17, 1995
Page 1
Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates this location as
Intensity Level 6. The proposal is within the limits allowed by
the Century Plan. SEE EXHIBIT B
Notification: The notification requirements have been completed.
HISTORY: A Final Plat for this lot was presented to Planning and Zoning
Commission on April 7, 1991, but did not proceed to City
Council due to the applicant's withdrawal of the request. During
the platting process Star Enterprise and the City of Georgetown
were working on a Development Agreement which was not
finalized. That agreement was to have included road widening,
utility easements, redesign of the access driveways upon exterior
changes to the current facility, and relocation of existing
improvements. Subsequently, deed records have been submitted
to validate the "grandfathered" legal lot status of this tract.
Therefore, a plat for this lot is not required to be reviewed at
this time.
ANALYSIS: The proposal is to raze the existing service station building (SEE
EXHIBIT C) and construct a more modern facility by the
corporation's standards (SEE EXHIBIT D). The new design
eliminates the service bays and front pump islands. In the new
design, the pumps are located on the sides of the new building
and are designed to accommodate more vehicles at once. The
number of actual pumps is not increased, but the new pumps
appear to be the type that the motorist is able to choose from all
fuels available. The existing pumps are dedicated to providing
only one (1) fuel type. This, coupled with more maneuvering
space surrounding the pumps, will allow a vehicle at each side
of each pump, a total of twelve (12) vehicles. The existing
layout accommodates eight (8) vehicles at the most. However,
given the limited maneuverability between pump islands, it is
unlikely that eight (8) vehicles can be present concurrently. The
proposed 2,680 square foot building is nearly entirely dedicated
for use as a convenience store. Whereas the convenience area in
the existing building is approximately 600 square feet. The
existing car wash will be demolished and the new one placed
farther back on the lot.
Detailed Development Plan - Star Enterprises June 17, 1995
D 95-03/File: STBFD-SE.DDP Page 2
CM:CS
The applicant has provided staff with information indicating that
this lot, in the current configuration, was deed divided in 1966
and subsequently sold several times in the same configuration.
Because of this, the lot is recognized as legal and is not subject
to the requirement for platting at this time. This is a substantial
exemption for the applicant since platting would also require the
extension of wastewater service to the site from the HEB site
across SH29.
As in the existing site, the proposed improvements are located
on the western two-thirds (2/3) of the lot. The applicant states
that this is done to avoid the septic field, currently located on the
eastern one-third (1/3). Also, this field serves as the filtration
from the runoff of the area of impervious coverage.
Alternatively, the applicant would be required to provide a
sedimentation and filtration basin to filter the runoff. The
applicant states that he has already contacted the Texas Natural
Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) and it has
determined that the proposal is sufficient to handle the runoff.
The staff has not yet received notification of approval from the
TNRCC.
The existing signs are to remain. They do not conform to the
requirements of the Sign Ordinance, however they are permitted
to remain as non -conforming signs until they are removed. Any
new sign erected after that is subject to the current regulations in
the Sign Ordinance.
Variances: Section 33043 Spacing Between Driveways
The proposed site, like the existing site, includes two (2)
driveways that are spaced about 65 feet apart. The Subdivision
Regulations requires 450 feet between driveways on undivided
major arterial streets such as SH29. Although even one (1)
driveway on this site will not be separated by at least 450 feet
from driveways on adjacent properties, each commercial lot is
permitted to have one (1) driveway regardless of the separation
requirement. The applicant states that the two (2) driveways are
necessary to accommodate the volume of traffic that will be
generated by the site and will provide for smooth traffic flow
Detailed Development Plan - Star Enterprises June 17, 1995
D 95-03/File: STBFD-SE.DDP
CM:CS Page 3
entering and exiting the site. Each driveway will have both
entrance and exit lanes. A single, thirty (30) foot wide driveway
typically accommodates one (1) entrance lane and two (2) exit
lanes.
The existing driveways are located between the exit ramp from
the northbound lane of IH35 and Riveroaks Drive, which is the
street into the HEB/Wal-Mart sites. The frontage road,
currently under construction, will intersect with SH29 just west
of the driveways. Already, this area has been identified as
dangerous and congested. The City is taking steps to control
access to Riveroaks Drive to help alleviate some of the conflict
between turning vehicles. Clearly, by adding more convenience
store space and more available gas pumps, the improvement to
the subject site will generate even more traffic compounding the
problem further. In addition to the existing problem and the
increased traffic created by the subject site's rebuilding, is the
probability of another driveway between the site and the IH35
exit ramp. A tract of approximately 17.2 acres southwest of the
subject site meets the requirements for being recognized as a
subdivision and exempt from current platting requirements. Its
only access to a public street is through a flag lot configuration
with the mast portion fronting on SH29 just west of the subject
site. SEE EXHIBIT E Given the current alignment of the IH35
exit ramp, this is the only possible location for a driveway onto
that lot. There is an existing driveway on the lot that is only
serving a temporary construction site facility being used in
conjunction with the frontage road construction. This temporary
use generates a very small amount of traffic. Obviously, any
other commercial use will add a substantial amount of trips to
the already congested area.
There are similar uses in the City that utilize only one (1)
driveway onto a major arterial street. All Diamond Shamrock
locations are designed as such. The Diamond Shamrock sites do
differ from the subject site, however, since they are all located
on corner lots. There are driveways to the other streets at all
three (3) locations. The Leander Road location utilizes a shared
driveway with the lot next to it that is currently vacant.
Detailed Development Plan - Star Enterprises
D 95-03/File: STBFD-SE.DDP
CM:CS
June 17, 1995
Page 4
Section 33042 Driveway Width
Both driveways proposed in the DDP are wider than the 30 foot
limit. They are approximately 45 feet wide. These are the
existing driveways which the applicant wishes to maintain.
Currently, they are not subject to the width limit in the
Subdivision Regulations. However, as pointed out previously,
the proposed improvements to the site make it subject to the
current regulations.
The Subdivision Regulations do allow for 45 foot wide
driveways only in the case when the driveway is divided and
there are two (2) lanes of twenty (20) feet width each. The
driveways proposed in this DDP do not meet the criteria for
divided driveways.
The reason for limiting the width of driveways is to prevent
excessive openings on thoroughfares and provide for managed
flow of traffic with well defined entrances and exits. This is
especially important at a busy location such as this, where traffic
control has been identified as a priority.
Table 34020 Design Standards for Lots
Like the subject property, the surrounding properties are all
zoned RS. Table 34020 permits side and rear setbacks to be
reduced by 50 percent where they are adjacent to land that is
either zoned, used or platted for commercial or industrial
purposes. Inasmuch as the property to the east and southeast is
in commercial use, the required setback from this property is ten
(10) feet. The property west and southwest of the site has no
established use, although it is currently being used temporarily
as a construction office for the frontage road project. Therefore,
it is subject to the standard requirement of twenty (20) feet. SEE
EXHIBIT F It is reasonable to expect that the property will not
be developed for residential use and will be used commercially.
With this in mind, it may be appropriate to consider granting a
variance to this requirement and still achieve the desired result.
The DDP proposes a portion of the maneuvering lane around the
pump islands and the car wash building encroaching into the
Detailed Development Plan - Star Enterprises
D 95-03/File: STBFD-SE.DDP
CM:CS
June 17, 1995
Page 5
building setback adjacent to the west and south lot lines. If the
setback is reduced to ten (10) feet in these locations, the
encroachment will no longer exist.
Table 33057 Parking Facilities Design
The plan proposes two groups of parking spaces. There are four
(4) spaces in the front of the building and ten (10) spaces behind
the building, near the car wash. The parking spaces in the front
are 90 degrees and the rear spaces are approximately 60
degrees. All spaces are designed to the correct width and
length requirements for their applicable category. The front
maneuvering lane width exceeds the required 24 feet by one (1)
foot. The maneuvering lane for the rear parking spaces is too
narrow, however. For spaces which are 54 - 74 degrees, a lane
width of 22 feet is required. The plan proposes 21 feet. SEE
EXHIBIT F Since there is one (1) foot excess on the front of
the building, it is possible to move the building forward and
provide the required width for both maneuvering lanes. This is
based solely on the information provided in the plan, and if there
is some other reason why the building cannot be moved, it is not
evident in the plan.
Section 37000 Landscaping and Buffering
The applicant does not indicate from which requirements a
variance is requested. Staff reviewed the DDP with the
assumption that the requested rezoning to C-2A is approved and
analyzed all possible variances. SEE EXHIBIT F
As mentioned earlier, the subject site and all of the surrounding
property are zoned RS. Bufferyard requirements are based on
zoning districts. In this case, a type "E" bufferyard is required
along all but the front lot lines.
most densely planted bufferyard
all available options.
Except for type "F", this is the
type. It also requires a fence in
The landscaping proposed on the plan does not include all the
materials required for the type "E" bufferyard, including the
fence. There is an existing fence on the south and west adjacent
properties that the plan indicates will remain. The Commission
Detailed Development Plan - Star Enterprises
D 95-03/File: STBFD-SE.DDP
CM:CS
June 17, 1995
Page 6
has considered allowing similar fences to be credited toward the
bufferyard requirement when there is some guarantee from the
fence owner that it will be maintained and remain for the
duration of the business. The staff has not received any such
guarantee. If the adjacent properties were zoned C-2A or C-1, a
type "A" bufferyard would be required instead of a type "E" .
The plan proposes materials in excess of what is required for a
type "A" bufferyard. A fence is not required in any of the type
"A" bufferyard options. As mentioned previously, it is
reasonable to expect these adjacent properties to develop
commercially once a rezoning for them is approved.
Additionally, the most narrow type "E" bufferyard allowed is
fifteen (15) feet. Only a ten (10) foot width is provided. The
type "A" bufferyard allows for ten (10) foot widths.
Along the front lot line, a type "D" bufferyard is required since
there is parking area between the street and the building. The
plan provides only a ten (10) foot width for planting in this
location. The ten (10) foot option for type "D" requires a fence.
Normally, a 25 foot bufferyard is provided in this area so the
fence would not be required. A fence may not be appropriate at
this location, since it is the front of a retail establishment. The
intent is to buffer the effects of the parking area from the
roadway. The plantings proposed in the DDP are in excess of
what is required for the type "D" bufferyard.
If the site were developed consistent with the reviewed DDP,
then variances to the identified requirements may be appropriate
to achieve the overall intent and purpose of the landscape
regulations as if the adjacent land is zoned either C-1 or C-2A.
After listening to the testimony presented at the Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting, and reading the documentation
provided by the applicant and the staff's recommendation, the
Commission makes the following findings of fact as required by
Section 60070 B. of the Subdivision Regulations:
Detailed Development Plan - Star Enterprises
D 95-03/File: STBFD-SE.DDP
CM:CS
June 17, 1995
Page 7
1. The public convenience and welfare will be substantially
served; and
2. The appropriate use of surrounding property will not be
substantially or permanently impaired or diminished; and
3. The applicant has not created the hardship from which
relief is sought; and
4. The variance will not confer upon the applicant a special
right or privilege not commonly shared or available to the
owners of similar and surrounding property; and
5. The hardship from which relief is sought is not solely of
an economic nature; and
6. The variance is not contrary to the public interest; and
7. Due to special conditions, the literal enforcement of the
ordinance would result in an unnecessary hardship; and
8. In granting the variance the spirit of the ordinance is
observed and substantial justice is done."
The applicant has completed two (2) Documentation of
Requested Variance forms and they are attached.
TECHNICAL ISSUES: The following Technical Issues must be addressed prior to City
Council consideration.
1. The applicant shall submit engineered construction plans
showing detailed on -site stormwater drainage and detention plans
with calculations for this development in compliance with
Sections 32000-32999 of the Subdivision Regulations.
2. All existing and proposed utilities shall be shown including
sizes, services, and meter locations.
3. The proposed electric service connection, transformer
location, and required load data shall be indicated.
PRIOR TO APPROVAL: 1. A copy of the approved Water Pollution Abatement Plan, or
certification that such is not required, shall be provided prior to
approval of the DDP.
Detailed Development Plan - Star Enterprises
D 95-03/File: STBFD-SE.DDP
CM:CS
June 17, 1995
Page 8
STAFF RECOMIMENDATION:
Approval of a Detailed Development Plan for 1.279 acres in the
Clement Stubblefield Survey, provided the Technical Issues are
addressed prior to City Council consideration. Approval of the
requested variances to Table 34020 to allow a ten (10) foot
setback on the south and west lot lines, to Section 37000 to
allow the landscaping as proposed in the submitted DDP, after
making the required findings of fact. Denial of the requested
variances to Section 33043 thereby permitting only one (1)
driveway on the site; to Section 33042 thereby limiting the width
of an undivided driveway to 30 feet or a divided driveway to 45
feet, and to Section 33057 thereby requiring a 22 foot wide
maneuvering lane within the parking area behind the building.
P & Z ACTION: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning
Commission vote 5-0 to approve a Detailed Development Plan
for 1.279 acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, provided the
Technical Issues are addressed prior to City Council
consideration and recommend approval of the requested
variances to Table 34020 to allow a ten (10) foot setback on the
south and west lot lines; to Section 37000 to allow the
landscaping as proposed in the submitted DDP; and Sections
33042 and 33043 thereby allowing the existing two (2) 45 foot
wide driveways to remain, after making the required findings of
fact and recommend denial of the requested variance to Section
33057 thereby requiring a 22 foot wide maneuvering lane within
the parking area behind the building. The approval of this DDP
requires final approval by TNRCC.
Detailed Development Plan - Star Enterprises
D 95-03/File: STBFD-SE.DDP
CM:CS
June 17, 1995
Page 9
EXHIBIT A
>
! I �/ t=I �l/-A
0
r\
L/ I
-T
BIOCK t LOT t
0797 ♦c
STATE HIGHWAY
. . ............. ............
g::::::'::::::-:-:•:•:-:-:-:-:•::•:...
g I
C�
rzz5 � �)
2 is °c
J
f
I1
i
I
I
I !I
REFER TO 3 I lil7
i
I I
JL7 L WOLF
G go/ .375
(24 00 AC.)
zO a Ac
it r GA+rar- [
la2/ate
'700 •CR,-s
29 (UNIVERSfTY AVENUE)
�P
�? � e5 suE A�Ce,v B+qK• v+[STC •Kf
' F j ss0 s)z
c zsz ,<
i
a72/Ba
9 nC 1
.4 90 °C
- r � Of GCO4G( TOvn
\ )� /.9J
2 tl5� cC
EXHIBIT B
DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT
GIVEN A SINGLE LAND USE
1. 'DATE': May 3, 1995
'PROJECT NAME': 1.279 acres in Clement Stubblefield Survey
Murray's Texaco
2. 'GIVEN': acres of Intensity Level 1
acres of Intensity Level 2
acres of Intensity Level 3
acres of Intensity Level 4
acres of Intensity Level 5
1.28 acres of Intensity Level 6
1.28 TOTAL ACRES
3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND:
INTENSITY WATER
LEVEL Peak GPO
----------------------------------------------------
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 26,987
----------------------------------------------
WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION
Average GPD Peak Trip Ends
-------------------------------------------------
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
7,674 512
-------------------------------------------------
4. TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND:
Maximum GPO Water Capacity:
26,987
Maximum GPO Wastewater Capacity:
7,674
Maximum Trip Ends:
512
5. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY
MAXIMUM
PER DEV
DEVELOPMENT
LAND USES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WATER
WASTEWATERTRANSPORTATIOj
UNITS J
REGS J
ALLOWED/UNIT
Detached SF
------- j ---
-----------------;
-----------------) --------------------
--------------------------
Large Lot
23
27
854 J
23 j
3 J
3 housing units
Average Lot
27
31
577 j
27 j
9 J
9 housing units
Zero Lot Line
27
31
577 J
27 J
12 j
12 housing units
Attached SF
42
44
471 J
42 j
19 J
42 housing units
Multifamily
51
49
225 j
49 J
32 J
32 housing units
Mobile Home
42
40
604 J
40
j
40 housing units
Lodging
141
126
369 J
126 j
126' rooms
Institutional
78,679
83,413
608,323 j
78,679 J
J
78,679 square feet
Church
J
j
-with day care
87.620
92,458
32,879
32,879 J
32.879 square feet
-w/o day care
145.091
153,480
710.556
145,091 J
145,091 square feet
Medical Office
64,872
68,518
158,537
64,872
64,872 square feet
General Office
74.140
84,330
200,627
74,140 J
74,140 square feet
Retail, Mixed
41,518
47,080
30,972
30,972 J
30.972 square feet
Retail, Restaurant
17,299
15,988
44,996 J
15,988 j
J
15,988 square feet
Retail, Store
Employment Centers
83,037
74,140
87,205
84,330
106,539 J
83,037 J
J
83.037 square feet
Warehouse
473,454
548,143
111,801 J
852.667 J
74,140 J
473.454 J
J
J
74.140 square feet
473.454 square feet
Mini -Warehouse
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6,746,725
7,674.000
1,967,692 J
1.967.692 j
1,967,692 square feet
------------------------
LAHIL311 U
xco
Pt ANT qrWM1I1r
I
KEY I BOTANICAL NAME OOM!!ON NAME I SIZE
CALIPER
OUAN TI rY
REMARKS
LANDSCAM IMPROVEMENIS E20A)
20 TREES
51 SMRUHS
I F 3 CRAP F 3 CRAP I
WCS I LIN, vT w,! I I-Pof L -NA, EN 'EP '0L 490 Pr• ,v. *r()Q
rl I SL ()Cr A R(MAINE)EP ill 2- -. .,.Pl II -A
Af,41N[1 11 9 140111E n I'lux '�"(l
J LOAA
5 PAIN
-'9'38-/28'
----------------- ---
c
CAR :AS
362
2 LOAK
5 PAMP
A
7 348 ACRES; f
I ii 58.739 S F I
9 60 3 5,
Yi S,' Ex,SrING SLPrl(, SrSTIM
(UNDERGROUND)
•
it
T
C STOR
3 LARL
kel
+4
3 LARL
41
L
LAK— N
0. Cl cc rpic
N 873808 E 99,87' - - - - - - -
6 SAGE --7
8 MONA PINE J 7 S ACE
5 MONA 5 MONA
0 MONA
'L'.PUk'AJV I
'OP Of NAIL it IN
STATE HIGHWAY 29
EXHIBIT E
"= ~°~ " t�WE~ff, ~E.°.
Enterprises
..........
..........
............ ..... . .. ....... .
.... ..... ....
.. ....... .........
... ..........
... ........
...
--,' ,
.� ......... `,^
/
`.. ..........
.............
.............
...........
~^...........
-
,
�
\/ !
. .
� .
�
Fq.
PLANT SCHEDULE
KVY I BOTANICAL NAME i COUMON NAME SIZE CAUP(Y OUAN n T'y REMARKS LANDSCAPM IMPROAMFhTs PROXWEM
20 MCES
CRAP 3 CRAP
f—,A—, Ao�f
1� A;n()L
toA
5 P QUIP
(D Ty Po E Buffer ark
O (D
(D 5 6 1 29 36' �89 9
CAR
WA20' SH
3,5-
r I Fe
v CO 0
r r
2
3
0
1<
• :r
cc
3
CD CD
CD CD q .1 ' %
c:
CD I 19 7 )"3ACRES 5 9 S F CD
♦-7 9 60 35 'cD
< Ii
7—
CL a):
- - �
ORE ��
0 57
iv"i
1(7..,,I1 I H : �
- It,
A trV /4-, . . . .. r 1„i /, - •. ��,
7 '7 '7
6 SAGE
SACI
6 HONA % 5 L)—
Type D Bufferyard
STATE HIGHWAY 29
)I- NAIL 5C 1 11
:1! .,Alto, , 777?1
DOCUIVILNTATION OF BASIS FOR REQUESTED VARIANCE
i)1te L4-28-qApplicant: _aP2is -- --
This request is for a variance from the literal enl'orc:e.rnent of Scction(s)
of the Subdivision Regulations.
Give a brief description (it' the vari:lncr regt1zstGd: -Tn UTt l_rze hv-1ut=w�`�5
You have to the deli,- n -Jandards of the In order
to ha able to re;cor,lrr efid and approve sucli a variance, Sectior, 6,0070 B. of the Regulatiowe,
requires ihsrt the Pl.-inninO Arid Zoning (:omnik; ion and City Council 111USt be able to "c'nsure that
the variance is not conmiry to the. public 111tcrest and, dui tc:► conditions, a literal
enforcement of the; o,-dirltlrlce would result in unriece.ssary hilydshlp." The Commission and
Council are directed tc► rr-1�ct these' regLlirerllznts by n;aking spt:c:�ific findings of fact. In e�rd��r
to assist the Cormms.ion ;,n;l Council in their delihemions reParding your re'ttUC-Stc'.d
�-ariance', (.least' r.crlTtjllett' ti115 fo►-m to docurnertt how,, this rei{uz',t •% ill impact the P�sues c1r'scribcd
below. These issues relate directly to the CiYht (8) ftn,dm--,s of fact that must be cited by the
Commissionaril Council whenrrcornrllertdirtg appiovat ot� ,my variance'. YOU n�;3y attach �1r1
addltlonal sheet, ear Subn-,It this ji-dormation M thtl form of a )kttc:.
1. In what, ;?iami r will the public <1:1d IeVelf;ire he :LIbSt,11-ltiidly served?
�NaresS a-, d e5res5 wL ll tx -Fact 11 +0, f3`C t vLu c, �¢ ►�Ec�u�Y A
Pr-t rm c r- I l es S e r v e s E AG � Y1 c e p. = rJ C o m i "�) -� rA q -(, c w i t l n G 4 U So n N -I b t FA r- 1 1v-�
EXI �tn,� Vet-„Cl e- s -Et,�, Arm USI N� +�,c SAolc cArlvewAY .
2. Will the ;rpp.c�r�riat: u`e u1, surrcle_rriclrr'I 11ro pe!-ty he st6stjim,dily perrnancrltly Impaired or
(1irllinishe.d in an.y rrlarrrlf r ' Providl✓ rr<,sons %�,-hy you be ieVe yl)ur ar►vxQr to he supportable'.
►J a. -C h e R p p o-a c, c h e 5 cl ► e r--- l Y Q c c e s S +c q 1 -)1- i e.) A.1t- 2 ej -, cl el o
(� o -l- e ry c r- o ra ,t-\ c N A IJ� A e e .`T P ro ff r -kr .
3. What are.. the lr<lyd ships involved`? I-fow lucre those hardshilr; crelt-ltcd7 How are those
Hardships different front :hosc affecting the-. rest of the public faced 1with the enforcement of this
sarlle provision? Mote that the C'ommismor, and Council c,inno! -'fr rove a variance for which the
hardship chained Is sole-ij, of :{n economic nature. - ke Groper 1 raw 2n JoYs +wo Rpf>rOAG
Tv 2erv,avt E:14-1.cr o�•,�! r'epr�,cc e..s ��� one Appzoack Wou W R S rt,c � Ec>�Q o F
=ngresS /dress. Sq�'c;� Ljo,ld due 4, veh,c.leS f4(,^--) ecc.L, 6-IV
IJ.J(1t-- eN--tr,•-`-, C, r 4� GA- . 1. 1 \/ I ^1 I v .,r . . r I_ . . . - 1 _1 1- - n -" ---Slv,,ti I " I
4. If the requested variance will it CU(lft[ III)( the' i-alit :1 srecial right or
privilege not commonly shared or available to the owners of �imilar and property.
Provide reasons why you believe your an. «wer to be supportable. �j (,
Se,rrvlce S�-A-�t 5 Gur-rr.f� (� �J�Y -bluV r-
,�2o�c;LS
5. How is the public interest affected?
+�\e Publ,c Us("� 4k-e 4c, U y eAjuUlP, �e o r �ti;-Vr;:ti c,. ci ey"
NJ SA he'cl aN
��c 'D2tvt=V,,aY_
I_.ist the special conditions that affect this properly Arid justify the ap, of the varirin;c.
t ��r rt
ole��ttI�,��cSS�nnia�.aec�
UN1v-1peo,ed +rAr�,c Ury �o Fatnc1 0 �� 5, rrA�r C.1,, �r��tr FAG, i,� ( 1�, �hC _f�,Tw`e a,
l� Duel r-i6L,j, F'vt, +Lo,,r Vei.,,cL VS nj EX,ST +►.4 a44er v-�PProAct-, \,4 SA-4C v►►Anne� BT 2Pci4kt
Fc,c, I,-V6 one C1CL-"cwn� wu.,1d eleec-e,sx t � s Cu A1zor) er 5er rice CC_P -,L-.), iL qnc( C4lJe C, Cer4,,
1�f1�cn,n�- OT ��P2n�1N`� �ur Veh.LIeS �L+ E"+rr, �p_- -fin jke J5fe,Scr5 4ncJl ��er Fx,f
7. How will the spirit of the ordWancc be, observed if this reL;uest is gmnled?
erev here--4 1"ec,�v,,,*j heh-.cC
�nd w�� a���nqe -1�_ t.�1j C1�
lC, t -,,,
�►.� iCr �, �.r� d e x, k I ..r a r- a pe , 4► e. S S o, JP c�� 1 S rr1 Q� n, i� �� c
►DPP ro Qc� e5 -�� re Mc� rJ � � i I u�.,, ,.,..� a'�t
+�. Qolol,� t l r.�ppr* c►s s n ,
ue s T how eu,r
UT, L t z e 4--LQ ekLS -�,PPC_C3A-Che, .
$. How will substantial. justice br done if this request is grar,ttd?
+cu C,, 4% ue lS Si., j -} t e A�ppr�.�-�e lr�
a t Q 46c-rn
Council meeting June 27, 1995
Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT: First Reading of an ordinance to rezone 1.279 acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey
from RS, Residential Single Family to C-1, Local Commercial; and a request to waive rezoning fees.
ITEM SUIELMARY: The existing service station use was operating at the time of annexation and is
considered legal, non -conforming. Also on this agenda is the consideration of a Detailed Development
Plan for this site. The provisions of non -conforming status do not permit the site to be reconstructed
to the degree that is proposed at this time if the RS zoning remains. Therefore, this rezoning is
requested.
The site is located at the intersection of IH35 and SH29, one of the busiest intersections in the
City. Furthermore, IH35 has the highest volume of traffic of all roadways in the City. Given the high
traffic volume in the area and the proximity to IH35, the land is not suited for residential use. Being
in a similar situation to this lot, the surrounding property does not seem to be suitable for residential use
either. The nearest residential uses are southeast of the site and across the South San Gabriel River.
The distance and the river should act as a buffer from anything occurring on this site. Any zoning
districts applied to the adjacent property should be of an equivalent or less intense classification in order
to provide the desirable stepping -down in intensity.
The SH29/IH35 interchange serves as a major entryway into the City of Georgetown. Any use
located in this area will have a dominant effect on the perception and appearance of Georgetown. The
C-2A district permits several high intensity, quasi -industrial uses such as bottling and warehousing.
Therefore, it may be appropriate to consider rezoning this property to the C-1, Local Commercial zoning
district rather than the C-2A district requested. The C-1 zoning district will permit the proposed use,
(a convenience store with fuel pumps and a car wash) but will prevent any of the more intensive uses.
Further, establishing the C-1 zoning district in this location is consistent with the C-1 zoning located on
the north side of SH29. This may help to establish a precedent that C-1 zoning is most appropriate
along this portion of SH29 when the undeveloped land in this area begins to develop.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Consistent with City policy, a request to waive the $250 rezoning fee is being
processed with this application. This is the first rezoning request following annexation.
CONEWENTS: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to
recommend denial of the requested rezoning from RS, Residential Single Family to C-2A, Commercial
First Height for 1.279 acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey currently known as Murray's Texaco,
and to recommend approval of a rezoning from RS, Residential Single Family to C-1, Local
Commercial.
ATTACHMENTS: Staff report and ordinance
Submitted By:
Edward J. y, AICP - D- ector
Division of Development S 'ices
Hildy L. Kingma, AICP
Chief Planner
V
REZONING OF 1.279 ACRES IN THE CLEMENT STUBBLEFIELD SURVEY,
CURRENTLY KNOWN AS MURRAY'S TEXACO, LOCATED AT IH35 AND STATE
HIGHWAY 29 FROM RS, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY TO C-2A,
COMMERCIAL FIRST HEIGHT OR ANY MORE RESTRICTIVE CLASSIFICATION
OWNER/APPLICANT: Mr. R.O. Schneider
Star Enterprises
110 Cypress Station Drive #255
Houston, Texas 77090
713/586-3616 FAX 713/586-3666
AGENT: Mr. Edward E. Carroll
Carroll Consultants
2000 S. Dairy Ashford
Houston, Texas 77077
713/531-6709 FAX 713/531-0893
REQUEST: Rezoning of 1.279 acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey as
recorded in Volume 2059, Page 672 of the Official Deed
Records of Williamson County, Texas, from RS, Residential
Single Family to C-2A, Commercial First Height or any more
restrictive classification.
FACTS:
Location: Located at IH35 and State Highway 29. SEE EXHIBIT A
Existing Site: Murray's Texaco Station and Car Wash.
Existing Zoning: RS, Residential Single Family.
Proposed Use: A Texaco fuel station, convenience store and car wash.
Surrounding Uses North: Riveroaks Shopping Center (HEB, Wal-Mart, etc.) (C-1)
and Zoning: South: Undeveloped land and West University Professional
Center (RS)
East: West University Professional Center (RS)
West: Undeveloped land and IH35 (RS)
Rezoning - Star Enterprises
RZ 95-13/File: STBFD-SE.REZ
CM:CS
June 17, 1995
Page 1
Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates this location as
Intensity Level 6. SEE EXHIBIT B
Notification: The notification requirements have been completed.
HISTORY: A rezoning from RS to C-2A was requested for this property in
1991. The request was withdrawn by the applicant prior to
being presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission. That
rezoning request was in conjunction with the platting of the lot.
At that time it was determined, based on the applicant's input,
that the site did not have legal lot status and was therefore
required to plat. The applicant withdrew both the platting and
rezoning request due to the magnitude of the requirements for
approval. At this time the applicant has provided staff with
information indicating that the existing lot has legal lot status.
Therefore, the lot is not required to be platted at this time.
A lot can have legal lot status if it was either platted or deed
divided and recorded prior to May 10, 1977.
ANALYSIS: Given the fact that the previous rezoning request was withdrawn,
this is being handled as the first requested rezoning since the
land was annexed. According to standard procedure at the time
of annexation, the land was automatically assigned an RS zoning
district classification. The existing service station use was
operating at the time of annexation and is considered legal, non-
conforming. Also on this agenda is the consideration of a
Detailed Development Plan for this site. The provisions of non-
conforming status do not permit the site to be reconstructed to
the degree that is proposed at this time if the RS zoning remains.
Therefore, this rezoning is requested.
Rezoning - Star Enterprises
RZ 95-13/File: STBFD-SE.REZ
CM:CS
The proposed use is for a convenience store with fuel pumps and
a car wash. All of these uses are permitted in the C-1 district as
well as the C-2A and lower districts. Not only will the C-2A
district permit these uses, but it will also permit such uses as
auto repair, retail auto sales, bottling, jewelry manufacture,
drive-in theaters, newspaper publishing, transmitters, and other
uses. The lot conforms to the design standards for commercial
June 17, 1995
Page 2
lots in the Subdivision Regulations.
The site is located at the intersection of IH35 and SH29, one of
the busiest intersections in the City. Furthermore, IH35 has the
highest volume of traffic of all roadways in the City. Given the
high traffic volume in the area and the proximity to IH35, the
land is not suited for residential use. Being in a similar situation
to this lot, the surrounding property does not seem to be suitable
for residential use either. The nearest residential uses are
southeast of the site and across the South San Gabriel River.
The distance and the river should act as a buffer from anything
occurring on this site. Any zoning districts applied to the
adjacent property should be of an equivalent or less intense
classification in order to provide the desirable stepping -down in
intensity.
The SH29/IH35 interchange serves as a major entryway into the
City of Georgetown. Any use located in this area will have a
dominant effect on the perception and appearance of
Georgetown. The C-2A district permits several high intensity,
quasi -industrial uses such as bottling and warehousing.
Therefore, it may be appropriate to consider rezoning this
property to the C-1, Local Commercial zoning district rather
than the C-2A requested. The C-1 zoning district will permit the
proposed use, but will prevent any of the more intense uses.
Further, establishing the C-1 zoning district in this location is
consistent with the C-1 zoning located on the north side of
SH29. This may help to establish a precedent that C-1 zoning is
most appropriate along this portion of SH29 when the
undeveloped land in this area begins to develop. So the more
intensive, quasi -industrial uses allowed in the less restrictive
districts will not be established at this major entryway.
Fee Waiver: The applicant requests a waiver of the $250 application fee since
this is the first rezoning request subsequent to the initial zoning
assignment upon annexation. The City Council will consider this
waiver request.
Rezoning - Star Enterprises June 17, 1995
RZ 95-13/File: STBFD-SE.REZ Page 3
CM:CS
STAFF RECOMIIAENDATION:
Denial of the requested rezoning from RS, Residential Single
Family to C-2A, Commercial First Height for 1.279 acres in the
Clement Stubblefield Survey currently known as Murray's
Texaco. Approval of a rezoning from RS, Residential Single
Family to C-1, Local Commercial.
P & Z ACTION: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning
Commission voted 5-0 to deny the requested rezoning from RS,
Residential Single Family to C-2A, Commercial First Height for
1.279 acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey currently known
as Murray's Texaco, and to approve a rezoning from RS,
Residential Single Family- to C-1, Local Commercial.
June 17, 1995
Page 4
EXHIBIT B
DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT
GIVEN A SINGLE LAND USE
1. 'DATE': May 3, 1995
'PROJECT NAME': 1.279 acres in Clement Stubblefield
Survey
Murray's Texaco
2. 'GIVEN': acres of Intensity Level 1
acres of Intensity Level 2
acres of Intensity Level 3
acres of Intensity Level 4
acres of Intensity Level 5
1.28 acres of Intensity Level 6
1.28 TOTAL ACRES
3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND
INTENSITY WATER WASTEWATER
TRANSPORTATION
LEVEL Peak GPD Average GPD
Peak Trip Ends
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0
0
0
2 0
0
0
3 0
0
0
4 0
0
0
5 0
0
0
6 26.987
---------------------------------------------------------------------
7.674
----------
512
-- -----------
4. TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND
Maximum GPD Water Capacity:
26.987
Maximum GPD Wastewater Capacity
7.674
Maximum Tnp Ends
512
5 PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT
(a)
POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY
LAND USES WATER
WASTEWATER TRANSPORTArlO;
---- -------------------
Detached SF
--- --.
Large Lot
23
27
854
Average Lot
27
31
577 j
Zero Lot Line
27
31
577
Attached SF
42
44
471
Multifamily
51
49
225
Mobile Home
42
40
604
Lodging
141
126
369
Institutional
78.679
83.413
608.323
Church
-with day care
87.620
92,458
32.879
-w/o day care
145,091
153,480
710,556
Medical Office
64,872
68,518
158,537
General Office
74,140
84,330
200.627
Retail, Mixed
41.518
47.080
30,972
Retail, Restaurant
17.299
15.988
44,996 I
Retail, Store
83.037
87.205
106,539 I
Employment Centers
74,140
84.330
1 1 1.801
Warehouse 473.454
548,143
852,667
Mini -Warehouse 6.746,725
-------------------------------------------------------
7.674.000
1.967.692
-
MAxIt,11-IM P 1=
UNITS R S
23
27
27
42
49
40
126
78 679
32.879
145,091
64,872
74.140
30.972
15.988
83,037
74.140
473.454
1.96 7.692
3�
9j
12 I
19
32 I
(i1)
DEVELOPMENT
ALLOWED/UNIT
3 housing units
9 housing units
12 housing units
42 housing units
32 housing units
40 housing units
126 rooms
78.679 square feet
32.879 square feet
145,091 square feet
64.872 square feet
74.140 square feet
30,972 square feet
15,988 square feet
83.037 square feet
74.140 square feet
473.454 square feet
1,967.692 square feet
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1968, AND
AMENDING PART OF THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE
ORIGINAL ORDINANCE, TO CHANGE A 1.279 ACRE TRACT IN THE
CLEMENT STUBBLEFIELD SURVEY, CURRENTLY KNOWN AS
MURRAY'S TEXACO, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 2059, PAGE 672 OF
THE OFFICIAL DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS,
FROM RS, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY TO C-1, LOCAL
COMMERCIAL; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, an application has been made to the City Council for the purpose of
changing the zoning district classification of the following described real property ("the
property") :
A 1.279 ACRE TRACT IN THE CLEMENT STUBBLEFIELD SURVEY,
CURRENTLY KNOWN AS MURRAY'S TEXACO, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME
2059, PAGE 672 OF THE OFFICIAL DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY,
TEXAS, hereinafter referred to as "the property";
WHEREAS, the City Council has submitted the proposed change in the Base Ordinance
to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its consideration in a public hearing and for its
recommendation or report; and
WHEREAS, notice of such hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation
in the City; which stated the time and place of hearing, which time was not earlier than fifteen
(15) days for the first day of such publication; and
WHEREAS, written notice was given not less than fifteen (15) days before the date set
for the meeting before the Planning and Zoning Commission to all the owners of the lots within
two hundred feet of the property, as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the applicant for such zoning change placed on the property such sign(s) as
required by law for advertising the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, not less than
fifteen (15) days before the date set for such hearing; and
1.279 Acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey
Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 1 of 3
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission in a meeting held on June 6,
1995, recommended changing said zoning district classification of the above described property
from the RS, Residential Single Family district zoning classification to C-1, Local Commercial,
in accordance with Exhibit "A".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are
hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and
expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this
ordinance implements the following Policies of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element:
1. Growth and Physical Development Policy 1, which states: "The City will ensure that
future land use patterns provide economic, cultural, and social activities to all residents,
businesses and organizations"; and
2. Growth and Physical Development Policy 2, which states: "The City's regulatory
actions will efficiently and effectively implement the Policy Statements and provide the
opportunity to seek change with reasonable effort and expense"; and
3. Growth and Physical Development Policy 4, which states: "The City will encourage
new development and infill redevelopment in the community"; and
4. Environmental and Resource Conservation Policy 1, which states: "The City will take
the steps necessary to protect the physical attributes that make Georgetown attractive";
and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any
other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the
Policy Plan.
SECTION 2. The Base Ordinance and the Zoning Map of the City, as well as the Zoning
District for the Property shall be and the same is hereby changed from the RS, RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY district to C-1, LOCAL COMMERCIAL district, in accordance with Exhibit
"A", which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, is hereby adopted by the
City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas.
SECTION 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in
conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
SECTION 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or
circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or
application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
1.279 Acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey
Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this Ordinance and the City
Secretary to attest. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in (10)
ten days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of
Georgetown.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the day of 1995.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the - day of 1995.
ATTEST:
Sandra D. Lee
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Marianne Landers Banks
City Attorney
1.279 Acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey
Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 3 of 3
THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
By: LEO WOOD
Mayor
S
EXHIBIT A
I i..
L.
0
I r) r
I
.7Lv
y
BLOCK 1 LOT 1
�-�
6.0797 Ac c
°EPEP TC 3 i Ili 7 =/
I
RS
<90/57S
7.
1 r, GA-ft_E
Kzi.ze
" 00 ACRE S
RS
29 (UNIVERSfTY AVENIf)
00 AC1 —
j zo a AL
0
Bcnt.
251 <<
/
7: ; <C 1
;: v0 AC j I
/ ' 1
1
i
AC
Council meeting June 27, 1995 Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT: Consider approval of the Final Plats of the Planned Unit Development of Sun City
Georgetown Subdivision, Phase 1, Neighborhoods One, Two, and Three; and consider approval of a
variance to the Subdivision Regulations
ITEMS Y: The subject Final Plats represent the first three (3) phases of development within
the approved Preliminary Plat, and they are substantially consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat.
The differences include the creation of a new commercial lot along RM2338, and the identification of
a site for a fire station. The Fire Services Division has requested some modification to Tract X,
created for the fire station, in order to better accommodate the preliminary site design. Construction
plans are currently being reviewed for each of these neighborhoods. The Development Agreement
allows construction of the non-residential projects and the model homes to begin prior the completion
of the public improvements and recordation of the final plats. The COU Division will ensure that this
construction occurs in a manner that does not interfere with the installation of public improvements in
order to prevent any possible damage to the utilities within the street rights -of -way. No permits will
be issued for the single family homes until the public improvements are completed and the final plats
are recorded.
A variance has been requester) to allow several lots within Neighborhoods Two and Three to
take access to Whispering Wind, which is a collector road and therefore the higher classification street
where the subject corner lots are located. Section 34020 F.3. requires corner lots to access only the
lower classification street. With regard to the subject lots, this standard conflicts with a provision in
the Development Agreement which allows back-to-back corner lots to be designed with 15 foot
secondary front yards as long as the access from those lots is from the frontage with a 20 foot front
yard. In the case of the subject lots, this means that the access would have to come from Whispering
Wind, the higher classification street. Staff has recommended that the requirement to take access from
the local street is of more significance because of the safety factor involved. Therefore, on the subject
lots, both front yard setbacks should be 20 feet, and the access should be from the local street.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None.
FINANCIAL EMPACT: None.
COMMENTS: - At a special P&Z meeting held on June 21, 1995, the Planning and Zoning
Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the Final Plats of the Planned Unit Development of
Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhoods One, Two, and Three, provided all Technical Issues
are addressed prior to City Council consideration. They also recommended approval of the requested
variance to Section 34020 F.3. , thereby allowing access to Whispering Wind from the corner lots in
Neighborhoods Two and Three, after making the required findings of fact. The Commission's
recommendation is contingent upon the City and Del Webb coming to an agreement on the size and
configuration of the fire station tract such that Del Webb will provide additional land for that tract in
Neighborhood Seven only if the City determines it is necessary to accommodate the fire station.
The attached plat addresses the Technical Issues as required by the Commission's
recommendation.
ATTACHMENTS: Staff report and plats
Submitted By
t
Edward Y arry, AIC - Director Hildy L. ngma, AICP
Divisio of Develop ent Services Chief Planner
FINAL PLATS OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SUN CITY
GEORGETOWN SUBDIVISION, PHASE 1, NEIGHBORHOODS ONE, TWO AND
THREE; AND VARIANCES TO THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
OWNER/APPLICANT: Mr. Robert L. Eck
Del Webb Development Company
203 IH35, Suite 100
Georgetown, Texas 78628
512/930-5424 FAX 930-6770
Mr. Theron S. Bradford, Trustee
P.O. Box 200339
Austin, TX 78720
AGENT: Mr. Scott A. Smiley, P.E.
Turner, Collie & Braden, Inc.
5000 Plaza On The Lake, Suite 150
Austin, Texas 78746
512/329-5002 FAX 512/329-0802
REQUEST: Final Plats of the Planned Unit Development of Sun City
Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhood One, a 511.334 acre tract;
Neighborhood Two, a 103.246 acre tract; and Neighborhood
Three, a 74.803 acre tract, as recorded in Volume 2679, Page
744, Volume 2687, Page 945, Volume 2712, Page 103, and
Volume 1898, Page 597 of the Official Deed Records of
Williamson County, Texas; and variances to the Subdivision
Regulations.
Location: Located on F.M.2338. SEE EXHIBIT A
Existing Site: Undeveloped land.
Existing Zoning: RP, Residential Planned Development, C-1, Local Commercial,
C-2B, Commercial Second Height, and A, Agricultural.
Proposed Use: Neighborhood One contains 23 tracts for commercial, park,
village center, entry feature, golf course, preserve, utilities,
open space, fire station, and drainage easement use, and 26
residential lots. The residential lots in this neighborhood will
Final Plat - Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhoods 1,2 &3 June 21, 1995
FP 95-07/File:SCP1N123.FP Page 1
CM:HK
initially be used for the model homes. SEE EXHIBIT B
Neighborhood Two contains five (5) tracts for golf course,
drainage easement, and open space use, and 157 residential lots.
SEE EXHIBIT C
Neighborhood Three contains seven (7) tracts for drainage
easement and open space use, and 247 residential lots. SEE
EXHIBIT D
Note that the non-residential parcels are referred to as "tracts"
and assigned alphabetical labels ("Tract A"), while the
residential parcels are referred to as "lots" and assigned
numerical labels ("Lot 1 ").
Surrounding Uses North: Lakewoods Estates, future Sun City (out of City)
and Zoning: South: Undeveloped land, future Sun City and Chapparo
Subdivision (out of City)
East: Future Sun City (RP)
West: Casa Loma Subdivision (out of City)
Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates this location to
be Intensity Level 2 by a Plan Amendment approved by City
Council on February 14, 1995. The subject plats are consistent
with the overall development approved as part of that
amendment.
Notification: The notification requirements have been completed as required.
HISTORY: A Revised Concept Plan was approved by the City Council on
October 25, 1994. A Preliminary Plat which includes this tract
was approved by City Council on February 28, 1995. A
Development Agreement was approved by the City Council on
February 14, 1995. The Development Agreement addressed
issues such as the commitment of utility capacity, the required
public improvements, compliance with the City's development
regulations, and the fees to be paid by the Del Webb
Corporation. The Agreement makes specific modifications to
the design standards in the Subdivision Regulations which apply
to this development. These modified design standards include
such elements as street design, sidewalk location, setbacks, lot
Final Plat - Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhoods 1,2 &3 June 21, 1995
FP 95-07/File:SCP1N123.FP
CM:HK
Page 2
layout, and impervious cover. It was determined to be appropriate to
make these modifications specifically for the Sun City Georgetown
development because of its size and the fact that it is being developed
and built by one developer. These facts ensure a greater level of
control and consistency throughout the life of the project than would be
possible for the same number of dwelling units built by numerous
developers. The Sun City Georgetown Planned Unit Development
Standards were provided to the Commission earlier. Given these
modifications to the design standards, all Sun City plats will be
approved as planned unit developments (PUDs).
ANALYSIS: The subject Final Plats represent the first three (3) phases of
development within the approved Preliminary Plat, and they are
substantially consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat. The most
significant differences between the Preliminary Plat and any of these
Final Plats are found in Neighborhood One. On that plat, Tract D,
which is one of the lots zoned agricultural to preserve open space at the
entrance to the development, has been subdivided further to create an
additional commercial lot (Tract U). This lot is considered for rezoning
to C-1, Local Commercial, by a separate agenda item. As noted in that
report, the utility demands estimated for this project as part of the
Development Agreement did not include this additional commercial lot.
Therefore, it is possible that sufficient utility capacities have not been
built into the overall development to accommodate the demands that it
may create.
The final plat for Neighborhood One also identifies a site for a fire
station. Tract X is located at the corner of Texas Drive and Sun City
Boulevard and is approximately 1.4 acres in size. The Fire Services
Division has reviewed the proposed site and indicates that it will not
meet their needs based on a preliminary fire station site design planned
to accommodate a crew of four (4) fire fighters and two (2) EMS
personnel. The Fire Services Division originally indicated the need for
a site of 1.3 acres with dimensions of 220 feet in width by 260 feet in
depth. Tract X is actually larger in total acreage than requested, but
because of its irregular design is 240 feet in width by 230 feet in depth.
The lot is further constrained because it is a corner lot and therefore has
two (2) 25 foot front yard setbacks. The City's goal when developing
public projects is always to design a site that meets or exceeds the
design standards established by the Subdivision Regulations. More
important, however, is to design a site for a fire station that is safe.
Final Plat - Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhoods 1,2 &3
FP 95-07/File:SCP1N123.FP
CM:HK
June 21, 1995
Page 3
For these reasons the site should be designed to take access to Texas
Drive. This is consistent with the requirement for corner lots to take
access to the lower classification street, but it also provides the safest
means of access. Sun City Boulevard will be designed as a minor
arterial and will likely have a median that would interfere with
emergency access to that street. Therefore, it is recommended that the
irregular design of the rear lot line be modified to provide the necessary
260 feet depth to better accommodate the preliminary fire station
design. Another concern on this site is that a water quality pond will be
located on Tract O to serve the Village Center, which will be located on
Tract J. This pond encroaches about 300 square feet into Tract X, the
fire station site, further reducing its developable area. The water
quality pond should be moved about 30 feet to the south to eliminate
this encroachment.
Construction plans are currently being reviewed for each of these
neighborhoods. The Development Agreement allows construction of the
non-residential projects and the model homes to begin prior to the
completion of the public improvements and recordation of the final
plats. The Community Owned Utilities Division will ensure that this
construction occurs in a manner that does not interfere with the
installation of public improvements in order to prevent any possible
damage to the utilities within the street rights -of -way. No permits will
be issued for the single family homes until the public improvements are
completed or financially secured and the final plats are recorded.
VARIANCE: Section 34020 F.3. Access to Street of Unequal Classification
This variance request involves two design standards, one in the
Subdivision Regulations and one in the Development Agreement, that
conflict. Section 34020 F.3. states "corner lots adjacent to streets of
unequal classification shall access the lower classification street only and
only one (1) drive approach shall be allowed, except as otherwise
approved by the Commission." The PUD standards in the Development
Agreement allow residential back-to-back corner lots to provide a 15
foot front yard setback on the secondary front yard, provided the
driveway access is from the front yard with the 20 foot setback. This
ensures that the driveway on the private property is sufficient to
accommodate a vehicle without encroaching into the public right-of-
way.
There are several situations in Neighborhoods Two and Three where
Final Plat - Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhoods 1,2 &3 June 21, 1995
FP 95-07/File:SCP1N123.FP Page 4
CM:HK
one of the lots in a back-to-back corner lot situation fronts on
Whispering Wind. (SEE EXHIBITS C and D) In these cases, the lots
have been designed to use the PUD standards allowing for the 15 foot
secondary front yard setback. In doing so, however, the 20 foot front
yard ends up along Whispering Wind, thereby requiring the access to be
from that street if only the Development Agreement is considered.
Whispering Wind was identified on the approved Preliminary Plat as a
residential collector, making it the higher classification street for these
corner lots. According to Section 34020 F.3., the access should not be
allowed from Whispering Wind. Although the Development Agreement
modifies some of the design standards for Sun City, those standards not
specifically described in the Agreement remain in effect for the project.
Section 34020 F.3. was not modified by the Agreement.
In evaluating the impacts of these two standards, it was determined that
the requirement to take access from the local street is of more
significance because of the safety factor involved. Whispering Wind
already has residential driveways accessing it. In fact, the PUD
standards established in the Development Agreement allow for no
driveway separation requirements on collector streets in Sun City, while
Table 33030-A requires 125 foot driveway separation for residential
uses fronting on collector streets. Given the design of most of the lots
along Whispering Wind, this means that there will already be more
driveways along it than would typically be allowed along a collector
street. Therefore, in order to provide some relief to this situation, the
staff recommendation is to require that when a back-to-back corner lot
has frontage on two streets of unequal classification, and allowing the
15 foot setback would require access to be taken from the higher
classification street, the 15 foot setback cannot be used. Further, a
notation should be added to each of the impacted lots indicating that
there is a note referring to this lot (such as "see Note XX"). Then Note
XX should be provided to state that the driveway to these lots must
come from the local street, not from Whispering Wind. Including both
the lot with frontage on Whispering Wind and the adjacent back-to-back
corner lot, this situation impacts a total of 18 lots: Neighborhood Two,
Block 1, Lots 84 and 103; Block 3, Lots 85, 949 95, and 102; and
Block 28, Lot 124; Neighborhood Three, Block 25, Lot 183 (and its
adjacent lot outside this plat); Block 26, Lots 196 and 222; Block 27,
Lots 197 and 221; Block 28, Lots 32, 39 and 40; and Block 38, Lots
171 and 172.
Final Plat - Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhoods 1,2 &3 June 21, 1995
FP 95-07/File:SCP1N123.FP
CM:HK Page 5
The applicant has provided a letter to the Commission in which he
provides documentation for this variance (attached). Some of the issues
raised in this letter have been addressed by this report. In addition, it
should be noted that the subdivision construction plans for
Neighborhoods Two and Three indicate that Whispering Wind will be
built to the maximum standards required for collector streets in the
Subdivision Regulations (Table 33030-A). These standards are
substantially different from those required for local streets. Therefore,
while the term "residential collector" may have been created for Sun
City, this street is being designed and will function consistent with all
collector streets in the whole Georgetown community.
Section 60070.B of the Subdivision Regulations states:
"In granting approval of a request for variance the Commission shall
make findings that:
1. The public convenience and welfare will be substantially served;
and
2. The appropriate use of surrounding property will not be
substantially or permanently impaired or diminished; and
3. The applicant has not created the hardship from which relief is
sought; and
4. The variance will not confer upon the applicant a special right or
privilege not commonly shared or available to the owners of
similar and surrounding property; and
5. The hardship from which relief is sought is not solely of an
economic nature; and
6. The variance is not contrary to the public interest; and
7. Due to special conditions, the literal enforcement of the
ordinance would result in an unnecessary hardship; and
8. In granting the variance the spirit of the ordinance is observed
and substantial justice is done."
Technical Issues: The following Technical Issues must be addressed prior to consideration
of these plats by the City Council. If they are not addressed within a
time frame that will enable the City Council to consider the plats within
30 days after Commission approval, and if the applicant does not concur
with a delay of their consideration to allow the Technical Issues to be
addressed, the plats will be automatically approved. Therefore, if they
are not addressed, the plats will be forwarded to the Council with a
Final Plat - Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhoods 1,2 &3 June 21, 1995
FP 95-07/File:SCP1N123.FP Page 6
CM:HK
recommendation for denial.
Comments related to Neighborhood One
1. The secondary front yard setback on Lot 129, Block 5, is labeled as
five (5) feet. It scales to approximately 20 feet, and it should be a
minimum of 15 feet.
2. Be sure it is appropriate to include Tracts U and X in the owner's
certification that states the parcels are "reserved for the private use and
convenience of Del Webb and the owner thereof shall be responsible for
maintenance of such areas. "
3. Remove the five (5) foot building line label on the common property
line of Tracts H and I (Sheet 9).
4. Redesign Tract X to provide a minimum depth of 260 feet.
Comments related to Neighborhood Two
1. The side setback on Tract C, adjacent to Lot 44, should be 20 feet
(Sheet 4).
2. If the requested variance is denied, revise the front yard setbacks on
the following lots to provide two (2) front yards: Block 1, Lots 84 and
103; Block 3, Lots 85, 94, 95, and 102; and Block 28, Lot 124 (and its
adjacent lot outside this plat). Remove the notation referring to Note
19. Add a notation to only the lots with frontage on Whispering Wind
indicating that there is a note referring to this lot (such as "see Note
XX") . Then Note XX should be provided to state that the driveway to
these lots must come from the local street, not from Whispering Wind.
Comments related to Neighborhood Three
1. The owner's certification lists the future disposition of each of the
non-residential tracts. Tract G is shown on the plat, but is not included
in this certification.
2. The following street name inconsistency shall be corrected: High
Country/County Drive (Sheets 4 and 5).
3. Add drainage easements to the following locations (these are general
locations, provide the easement as necessary to accommodate the
swale): Block 34, along the rear lot lines of Lots 80 and 81; Block 35,
along the side lot lines of Lots 103, 104, 125, and 126; Block 35, along
the rear lot lines of Lots 112-116; Block 36, along the side lot line
between Lots 147 and 148. Provide an easement wide enough to
accommodate the improved channel, plus one (1) foot on either side of
the top of the bank, with a minimum width of 15 feet. Review the
subdivision construction plans to ensure that this list includes all the
Final Plat - Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhoods 1,2 &3
FP 95-07/File:SCP1N123.FP
CM:HK
June 21, 1995
Page 7
locations where drainage easements are not already provided.
4. If the requested variance is denied, make the revisions described in
Technical Issue #2, Neighborhood Two, to the following lots: Block
25, Lot 183 (and its adjacent lot outside this plat); Block 26, Lots 196
and 222; Block 27, Lots 197 and 221; Block 28, Lots 39 and 40; and
Block 38, Lots 171 and 172.
Before Filing Plat: The following items must be addressed before the plats will be
recorded:
1. A revised set of deed restrictions should be submitted with the
indication that they are consistent with the Development Agreement.
2. The public improvements must be completed or financially secured.
3. Provide a metes and bounds description of the right-of-way
dedication along RM2338 so a separate dedication instrument can be
recorded to satisfy the Texas Department of Transportation's
requirements.
4. Ensure that the easement for the wastewater interceptor is in the
proper location, and add any required public utility easements to the
developable tracts, such as the Village Center and Sales Center.
5. Staff will review the location of the water quality pond on Tract O
as shown on the revised DDP for the Village Center to ensure it has
been moved to eliminate any encroachment into Tract X.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of the Final Plats of the Planned Unit Development of Sun
City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhoods One, Two, and Three,
provided all Technical Issues are addressed prior to City Council
consideration. Denial of the requested variance to Section 34020 F. 3. ,
thereby requiring provision of Technical Issue #2, Neighborhood Two,
and Technical Issue #4, Neighborhood Three.
P & Z ACTION: At a special P&Z meeting held on June 21, 1995, the Planning and
Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the Final Plats
of the Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1,
Neighborhoods One, Two, and Three, provided all Technical Issues are
addressed prior to City Council consideration. They also recommended
approval of the requested variance to Section 34020 F.3., thereby
allowing access to Whispering Wind from the corner lots in
Neighborhoods Two and Three, after making the required findings of
fact. The Commission's recommendation is contingent upon the City
and Del Webb coming to an agreement on the size and configuration of
Final Plat - Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhoods 1,2 &3 June 21, 1995
FP 95-07/File:SCP1N123.FP Page 8
CM:HK
the fire station tract such that Del Webb will provide additional land for
that tract in Neighborhood Seven only if the City determines it is
necessary to accommodate the fire station.
Final Plat - Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhoods 1,2 &3
FP 95-07/File:SCP1N123_FP
CM:HK
June 21, 1995
Page 9
EXHIBIT A
--- \ - - -
2 1
Nelghborhood\l
4
CIO
Ad
•
V'Q
rr",l
I hborhood 1
(9hborhood 2
001
04
tq`orhood 1
EXHIBIT B
li
(bO
SCALE: 1'=400'
cl) rRAL r c,
COEM SPACL
AND 0 L
1014C 0 AI
Twrcr
WT. SPACI
Al
TRACT 'Er
TRACT 'A'
GOLF COURSE ANO C) I
OPEN SPACE AND D L 1 03
(ZONED A)) (ZONED Rp)
7 it sppp
co
it
'o
litACI 'Er
GOLF COURSE AND D E
(ZONED RP)
$-
TRACI 'A'
OPEN SPACE AND DE
(IONED Al)
SUN CITY GEORGETOWN
NEIGHBORHOOD TWO
SCALE: 1' a400'
oQ
mC-;
°
(D
'0
7o
Y/. 57
n
� �
C
a
.+ 3
Q
^^<11
W
^
7r/
MO
10
VV
CD
X a
A
m D�
N O
a
0
�wCt Sp'C,C
Op N �U UU��
ltUNt
0
n 11
Y� 11 L
S O
y »
,1 ,r 7• L 77 ,r
le
O D `•� UC
u000Y TRAIL ) t�CC 1
PP C
N 0 U
OpC 110 � � U
19 14 W ,• 3Y „ lC �U�
11 c� 1 O r . OpCN JUNCO
s g l
T
U ; �7)a / r
tr 2 i0 YUCCA COvt
1, 71 a • „ m r e � � � , O 2.
0 7
0
b 7i • 1r r 11 A ,r 37
1�J u
to 4
n 7• • • u se e 1 t Je (UNC S"R DRlvf
1 it )e 11 J ,e
• 7. rryyyy�. 1, n
pp • a le 1 1' > t1 )) W� • h
� n Cc],— 7• f, � • 3r �?
HONEYSUCKLE 1 .T R ; 7 r ) • P p C
COvE ,o STREEI
,. a to ),•.. i ), n hEEff _ Fi7.C�C �iU
17
7 `V
TRACT 1' C i, 1' . r r r VE-N it~t•U
OP(N SPACE AND D( i 11 7•
(ZONED AI) 12 y
2 s >
fa Wlllc�P(RING WINO • � � ra
U
lr M U
.a a .f7 �p •�. ,r
I f7I•C�
SP A
P(N C
1t ' d •° ' r (�1
SUN CITY GEORGETOWN
NEIGHBORHOOD THREE
m
_W
v
Del Webb's
kolle�Sun City Georgetown
May 30, 1995
Mr. Paul T. Weyrauch, Chairman
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Georgetown
113 East 8th Street
P.O. Box 409
Georgetown, Texas 78627-0409
Attention: Ms. Hildy Kingma
Re: Request for Approval of Driveway Locations in Sun City Georgetown,
Phase 1 - Neighborhoods Two and Three
Dear Mr. Weyrauch:
On behalf of Del E. Webb Development Co., L.P. ("Del Webb"), this letter
requests the City's approval of Del Webb's proposed location of driveways on certain back-to-
back corner lots that front on a residential collector and are adjacent to local streets. It appears
that this situation arises for four lots in Neighborhood Two and for nine lots in Neighborhood
Three of Sun City Georgetown Phase 1. Del Webb has requested driveway access to the
residential collector from certain corner lots fronting on the residential collector. In response, the
City has referred to the Subdivision Regulations Section 34020 F.3., which states as follows:
Corner lots adjacent to streets of unequal classification shall access the
lower classification street only and only one (1) drive approach shall be allowed,
except as otherwise approved by the Commission.
Del Webb has proposed, for certain back-to-back corner lots along a residential
collector, that driveway access be taken from the residential collector (instead of the adjacent
local street). We believe that this proposal is reasonable and approvable for several reasons, as
discussed below.
First, the "residential collector" type of street was a term created specifically for
use within the Sun City Georgetown community. It meets the design criteria of a "local" street,
except that the right-of-way and pavement are wider. Both local streets and collectors are
considered "minor streets" under the City's Subdivision Regulations. Therefore, it is not clear
20:3 S. Ili 35 - Suite 100
Geer-etown. Texas 78628
Mr. Paul T. Weyrauch, Chairman -2- May 30, 1995
that the "residential collector" and "local street" are of such unequal classification that Section
34020 F.3. would necessarily apply to this unique situation.
Second, the safety considerations that may form the basis of the general guidance
in Section 34020 F.3. have been addressed in this specific situation. The residential collector will
have driveways along it for many other lots, and the driveway separation distances established
by the City for intersection setbacks will be satisfied. The wider pavement of the residential
collector also provides additional room for vehicles to steer around residents who are entering or
exiting their driveways along this street.
Third, from an aesthetic perspective, these back-to-back corner lots appear to front
on the residential collector, and driveway access from the front of the lot is preferred to driveway
access from another side of the lot. According to lot shape and lot orientation provisions
included in Section 34020, it appears reasonable to consider the front of the lots as facing the
residential collector.
Fourth, the Development Agreement between the City and Del Webb dated
February 14, 1995 addresses this situation. In Paragraph 6g of the Development Agreement, the
City approved the Sun City Georgetown Planned Unit Development Standards that appear as
Exhibit G to the Agreement. These standards in Exhibit G are the standards applicable to all
applications for developing the property, and are deemed to be included within the development
regulations for the project.
Exhibit G-1 of the Development Agreement includes specific standards that have
been approved by the City for setbacks on the residential lots. For standard lots, a 20' front
setback is established, and 20' is the approved distance for corner side setbacks. However, "(o)n
back-to-back corner lots only, 15 ' setback is allowed on secondary front setbacks. Driveways
on back-to-back corner lots must take access from the 20' front yard." Del Webb interprets this
provision to authorize driveways that take access from the front of the lot, which, in this case,
would be access to the residential collector. If the City disallows driveway access to residential
collectors for back-to-back corner lots, the purpose of this negotiated standard would be defeated.
Further, a City requirement to take access from the corner side of these back-to-back corner lots
creates a significant hardship for Del Webb with respect to the size and orientation of a home and
a driveway on such lots.
We appreciate your consideration of this request to approve the driveway access
on to Whispering Wind (the residential collector) as shown in the final plats for Sun City
Georgetown Phase 1, Neighborhoods Two and Three for Lot 103, Block 1; Lots 95 and 102,
Mr. Paul T. Weyrauch, Chairman -3- May 30, 1995
Block 3; Lot 124, Block 28 (in Neighborhood Two) and Lot 183, Block 25; Lot 196, Block 26;
Lot 197, Block 27; Lot 39, Block 28; Lots 112 and 116, Block 35; Lots 143 and 146, Block 36;
and Lot 1725 Block 38 (in Neighborhood Three). We would further appreciate your clarification
of the City's expectations on this situation in future plats, so that we can proceed in accordance
with the applicable requirements.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please let us know.
Sincerely,
T /
Robert L. Eck II, P.E.
Director, Land Development
Council meeting June 27, 1995 Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT: First Reading of an ordinance to Rezone a 983.539 acre tract in the W. Roberts,
M. Lewis, L. Russell, A. Short, G. Thompson. W. Wilkinson and D. Monroe Surveys, to be
known as Sun City Georgetown, Phase I, from A, Agricultural to RP, Residential Planned, C-1,
Local Commercial and C-2B, Commercial First Height
ITEM SUMMARY: This request has two components to it. The first component will change
the tract designations given to the lots already rezoned by action approved by the City Council
on April 11, 1995. The final plat for Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhood One,
(separate agenda item) indicates different tract designations than those given to the non-residential
tracts in the initial rezoning of this property. Therefore, in order to ensure that the rezoning
ordinance carries the same designations as the legal descriptions given to the tracts by this plat,
this action is necessary. The approved zoning districts enable the property to be developed
consistent with the approved Concept Plan, Preliminary Plat, and Development Agreement.
The second reason for this rezoning request is to consider the rezoning of a new tract
from A, Agricultural to C-1, Local Commercial. Tract U, Block 44, was not shown on either
the Revised Concept Plan or the Preliminary Plat. This tract is takei3 out of Tract D, Block 44,
one of the agricultural tracts. The proposed use of this tract is for office space. While this use
seems appropriate for the location, the applicant should be aware that the utility demands
estimated as part of the Development Agreement did not include provisions for this additional
commercial development. Therefore, as Sun City develops it is possible that the utility demands
created by any commercial development on this property will take capacity programmed for other
parts of the development.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
COMMENTS: At a special P&Z meeting held on June 21, 1995, the Commission voted 5-0
to recommend approval of the requested rezoning of a 983.539 acre tract, to be known as Phase
I of Sun City Georgetown, from A, Agricultural to C-1, Local Commercial (Block 43, Tract A,
Block 44, Tract U, and Block 46, Tract C - this lot restricted to the entry feature described in
the Development Agreement), C-2B, Commercial Second Height (Block 11, Tract J), and RP,
Residential Planned (all other lots). Block 43, Tract B and Block 44, Tract D will remain A,
Agricultural.
ATTACHMENTS: Staff report and Ordinance
Submitted By.
::fz -
Edward J. ry, AICP 'Services
Division f Developme- Services
Hildy L. ingma, AICP
Chief Planner
REZONING OF A 983.539 ACRE TRACT IN THE W. ROBERTS, M. LEWIS, L.
RUSSELL, A. SHORT, G. THOMPSON, W. WILKINSON AND D. MONROE
SURVEYS TO BE KNOWN AS SUN CITY GEORGETOWN, PHASE 1, FROM A,
AGRICULTURAL TO RP, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED, C-1, LOCAL COMMERCIAL
AND C-2B, COMMERCIAL SECOND HEIGHT
OWNERS: Del Webb Corporation
Mr. Theron E. Bradford
APPLICANT: Mr. Robert L. Eck
Del Webb Corporation
203 South IH-35, Suite 100
Georgetown, Texas 78628
930-5424 FAX 930-6770
AGENT: Mr. Scott Smiley, P.E.
Turner, Collie & Braden, Inc.
5000 Plaza On The Lake, Suite 150
Austin, Texas 78746
512/329-0802
REQUEST: Rezoning of a 983.539 acre tract in the W. Roberts, M. Lewis,
L. Russell, A. Short, G. Thompson, W. Wilkinson, D. Monroe
Surveys, to be known as Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, as
recorded in Volume 1898, Page 597, Volume 2679, Page 744,
Volume 2687, Page 945, and Volume 2712, Page 103 of the
Official Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas from A,
Agricultural to RP, Residential Planned, C-1, Local Commercial
and C-2B, Commercial Second Height.
Location: Located northeast of F.M. 2338. SEE EXHIBIT A
Existing Site: Undeveloped land. A filed plat for the Wilding Subdivision,
which was included in this tract, was vacated by City Council on
May 23, 1995.
Existing Zoning: Annexation of this property was effective on May 13, 1995. The
first rezoning of this property was approved by City Council on
April 11, 1995. A second request is being processed due to the
change in the legal description of the tracts.
Rezoning - Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1 June 21, 1995
RZ 95-14/Fi1e:SUNCTYIA.REZ Page 1
CM:HK
Proposed Use: 1,375 lots, including 1,331 single family residential lots, with
the remaining lots used as commercial, recreational, open space,
park land, habitat preserve and golf course.
Surrounding Uses North: Undeveloped land (out of City)
and Zoning: South: Undeveloped land and Chaparro Estates Subdivision,
single family residential (A and out of City)
East: Undeveloped land, (out of City)
West: Undeveloped land and Lakewood Estates Subdivision,
single family residential (A and out of City)
Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates this location as
Intensity Level 2 by a Plan Amendment approved by City
Council on February 14, 1995. The subject development is
consistent with the overall development approved as part of that
development.
Notification: The notification requirements have been completed.
HISTORY: A Revised Concept Plan was approved by the City Council on
October 25, 1994. The City Council approved a Preliminary
Plat of Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1 on February 28, 1995.
ANALYSIS: This request has two components to it. The first component will
change the tract designations given to the lots already rezoned in
the action considered by the Commission in March. In order to
ensure that the rezoning ordinance carries the same lot
designations as the legal descriptions given to the lots by the
plat, this action is necessary. The second component rezones a
new lot created by the Neighborhood One Final Plat (and
considered by a separate agenda item) .
Following are the rezoning districts that are created by the
change in the lot designations and a brief description of the
intended use of each of the zoning districts. SEE EXHIBIT B
The former designations are shown in parentheses.
Block 43, Tract A (Lot 1): C-1, Local Commercial
Block 46, Tract C (Lot 1): C-1, Local Commercial
Block 11, Tract J (Lot 1): C-2B, Commercial Second Height
Block 43, Tract B (Lot 2): A, Agricultural
Rezoning - Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1
RZ 95-14/Fi1e:SUNCTYIA.REZ
CM:HK
June 21, 1995
Page 2
Block 44, Tract D (Lot 1): A, Agricultural
All remaining lots: RP, Residential Planned
C-1, Local Commercial
Block 43, Tract A is currently being used as the Temporary Sales and
Construction Administration office. This use is expected to be in place
for approximately two (2) to three (3) years. The City is currently
reviewing a detailed development plan for Block 46, Tract C, for an
entry house. This will be a small building with an information center.
C-2B, Commercial Second Height
Block 11, Tract J is a 26.2124 acre lot shown on the Preliminary Plat to
be used for the central recreation center, which will include a social
hall, swimming area, crafts and other buildings.
A, Agricultural
These lots (Block 43, Tract B and Block 44, Tract D) are proposed to
remain undeveloped in order to create a large open space at the main
entrance of the development. The applicant also proposes to graze a
longhorn on the lots, so has requested the A, Agricultural zoning
designation.
RP, Residential Planned
The remainder of the property included within Phase I of Sun City
Georgetown is zoned RP, Residential Planned district. This district is
consistent with the approval of the preliminary plat as a planned unit
development (PUD) under the Subdivision Regulations. The uses that
will be developed in this district include the single family residential
lots, golf courses, golf club house, park pavilion, and golf maintenance
facility.
The second reason for this rezoning request is to consider the rezoning
of a new tract from A, Agricultural to C-1, Local Commercial. Tract
U, Block 44, was not shown on either the Revised Concept Plan or the
Preliminary Plat. This tract is taken out of Tract D, Block 44, one of
the tracts zoned A, Agricultural as described above. The tract is
approximately 0.50 acres in size and is located at the south edge of the
property along RM2338. SEE EXHIBIT B The proposed use is for
office space. The C-1 zoning district allows all residential uses, as well
as general retail, service shops, and indoor recreation uses.
Commercial uses are appropriate along FM2338, a major arterial, as
Rezoning - Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1
RZ 95-14/File:SUNCTYIA.REZ
CM:HK
June 21, 1995
Page 3
long as they conform to the design standards contained in the
Subdivision Regulations. While the location seems appropriate for a C-
1 zoning classification, the applicant should be aware that the utility
demands estimated as part of the Development Agreement did not
include provisions for this additional commercial development.
Therefore, as Sun City develops it is possible that the utility demands
created by any commercial development on this property will take
capacity actually programmed for other parts of the overall Sun City
development.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of the requested rezoning of a 983.539 acre tract, to be
known as Phase 1 of Sun City Georgetown, from A, Agricultural to C-
1, Local Commercial (Block 43, Tract A, Block 44, Tract U and Block
46, Tract C - this lot restricted to the entry feature described in the
Development Agreement), C-2B, Commercial Second Height (Block 11,
Tract J), and RP, Residential Planned (all remaining lots). Block 43,
Tract B and Block 44, Tract D will remain A, Agricultural.
P & Z ACTION: At a special P&Z meeting held on June 21, 1995, the Commission
voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the requested rezoning of a
983.539 acre tract, to be known as Phase I of Sun City Georgetown,
from A, Agricultural to C-1, Local Commercial (Block 43, Tract A,
Block 44, Tract U, and Block 46, Tract C - this lot restricted to the
entry feature described in the Development Agreement), C-2B,
Commercial Second Height (Block 11, Tract J), and RP, Residential
Planned (all other lots). Block 43, Tract B and Block 44, Tract D will
remain A, Agricultural.
June 21, 1995
Page 4
EXHIBIT A
N
FM 977
i
--SH 291
EXHIBIT B
SUN CITY GEORGETOWN PHASE I
♦ %
%
%
%
%
%
;1000,
C)
e0oo,
-*..t jr�
/0001,
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1968, AND
AMENDING PART OF THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE
ORIGINAL ORDINANCE, TO CHANGE A 983.539 ACRE TRACT IN THE
W. ROBERTS, M. LEWIS, L. RUSSELL, A. SHORT, G. THOMPSON, W.
WILKINSON AND D. MONROE SURVEYS TO BE KNOWN AS SUN
CITY GEORGETOWN PHASE I, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 1898,
PAGE 597, VOLUME 1270, PAGE 305, VOLUME 2679, PAGE 744 OF THE
OFFICIAL DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS,
FROM THE A, AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT TO THE RP,
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED, C-1, LOCAL COMMERCIAL, AND C-211,
COMMERCIAL SECOND HEIGHT ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATIONS; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, an application has been made to the City Council for the purpose of
changing the zoning district classification of the following described real property ("the
Property") :
983.539 ACRES IN THE W. ROBERTS, M. LEWIS, L. RUSSELL, A.
SHORT, G. THOMPSON, W. WILKINSON AND D. MONROE SURVEYS AS
RECORDED IN VOLUME 1898, PAGE 597, VOLUME 2679, PAGE 744,
VOLUME 2687, PAGE 945, VOLUME 2712, PAGE 103 OF THE OFFICIAL
DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, hereinafter referred
to as "the property";
WHEREAS, the City Council has submitted the proposed change in the Base Ordinance
to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its consideration in a public hearing and for its
recommendation or report; and
WHEREAS, notice of such hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation
in the City; which stated the time and place of hearing, which time was not earlier than fifteen
(15) days for the first day of such publication; and
WHEREAS, written notice was given not less than fifteen (15) days before the date set
for the meeting before the Planning and Zoning Commission to all the owners of the lots within
two hundred feet of the property, as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the applicant for such zoning change placed on the property such sign(s) as
required by law for advertising the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, not less than
Sun City Phase I Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 1 of 3
fifteen (15) days before the date set for such hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission in a meeting held on June 19,
1995, recommended changing said zoning district classification of the above described property
from the A, Agricultural district zoning classification to the RP, Residential Planned, C-1, Local
Commercial, and C-2B, Commercial Second Height district zoning classifications.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are
hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and
expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this
ordinance implements the following Policies of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element:
1. Growth and Physical Development Policy 1, which states: "The City will ensure that
future land use patterns provide economic, cultural, and social activities to all residents,
businesses and organizations"; and
2. Growth and Physical Development Policy 2, which states: "The City's regulatory
actions will efficiently and effectively implement the Policy Statements and provide the
opportunity to seek change with reasonable effort and expense"; and
3. Growth and Physical Development Policy 4, which states: "The City will encourage
new development and infill redevelopment in the community"; and
4. Environmental and Resource Conservation Policy 1, which states: "The City will take
the steps necessary to protect the physical attributes that make Georgetown attractive";
and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any
other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the
Policy. Plan.
SECTION 2. The Base Ordinance and the Zoning Map of the City, as well as the Zoning
District for the property shall be and the same is hereby changed from the A, AGRICULTURAL
district, to the C-1, LOCAL COMMERCIAL district on Block 43, Tract A, Block 44, Tract U,
and Block 46, Tract C (this lot restricted to the entry feature described in the Development
Agreement between the City of Georgetown and the Del E. Webb Development Company); to
the C-2B, COMMERCIAL SECOND HEIGHT district on Block 11, Tract J; and to the RP,
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED district on all other lots on the property, in accordance with Exhibit
"A", which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, and is hereby adopted by
the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas. Block 43, Tract B and Block 44, Tract D
shall remain in the A, AGRICULTURAL district.
Sun City Phase I Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in
conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
SECTION 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or
circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or
application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this Ordinance and the City
Secretary to attest. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in (10)
ten days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of
Georgetown.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the day of , 1995.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the day of ,1995.
ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
Sandra D. Lee
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Marianne Landers Banks
City Attorney
Sun City Phase I Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 3 of 3
By: LEO WOOD
Mayor
EXHIBIT A
SUN CITY GEORGETOWN PHASE I
BlOck 11 Tr
A
'41
e0oll
i r �� .
:,
... ........
___`
Council meeting June 27, 1995
Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT: First reading of an ordinance to rezone a 4.747 acre tract in the Nicholas Porter
Survey, to be known as Park Meadow West, a part of Lot 4, from A, Agricultural to C-2A,
Commercial First Height, or any more restrictive district, located on Dawn Drive
ITEM SUNVEWARY: The property that is the subject of this rezoning request was annexed by
the City of Georgetown effective June 14, 1995. Section 1.205 of the Zoning Ordinance
provides that all property newly annexed into -the City will be assigned the A, Agricultural zoning
district unless otherwise requested by the property owner. The property owner has requested this
rezoning. The remainder of this lot, and the remainder of the Park Meadow West subdivision
has been within the City limits since 1974, and was zoned C-2B, Commercial Second Height at
that time. The only distinction between the C-2A and C-2B zoning districts is the fact that in C-
2B there is no limit on the height of structures and there is no requirement for off-street parking.
The Final Plat of Park Meadow West was approved by the City Council on June 13,
1995. That plat designated this property for commercial use. City staff is currently reviewing
a detailed. development plan (DDP) for Lot 4 for the construction of a mini -storage facility.
Given that a portion of Lot 4 is already zoned C-2B, this use can be built on this lot by right.
Section 12.104 of the Zoning Ordinance allows the least restrictive zoning district to control the
land use of a lot when that lot is split by zoning districts. The recommendation to make this
rezoning exempt from that provision means that height and off-street parking requirements would
apply to that portion of Lot 4 that is the subject of this rezoning request, and which will be zoned
C-2A if this request is approved.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Consistent with past practice, the second reading of this
rezoning ordinance should be held until the Park Meadow West plat is recorded so that the
property being ,rezoned will have legal lot status.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
COMMENTS: At their regular meeting of June 6, 1995, the Planning and Zoning Commission
voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the requested rezoning of a 4.747 acre portion of the
proposed Lot 4, Park Meadow West, from A, Agricultural to C-2A, Commercial First Height.
This rezoning action shall be exempt from Section 12.104 of the Georgetown Zoning Ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS: Staff report and Ordinance.
Submitted Bv:
Edward J. BArty, AICP - Di
Division of evelopment Sei
Hildy L. kingma, AI
Chief Planner
REZONING OF A 4.747 ACRE TRACT IN THE NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, TO
BE KNOWN AS PARK MEADOW WEST, A PART OF LOT 49
FROM A. AGRICULTURAL TO C-2A, COMMERCIAL FIRST HEIGHT,OR ANY
MORE RESTRICTIVE DISTRICT, LOCATED ON DAWN DRIVE
OWNER/APPLICANT: Georgetown A-1 Best Storage
Mr. Roane Puett
1702 Misty Wood
Austin, Texas 78746
512/328-1498 FAX 329-9840
REQUEST: Rezoning of a 4.747 acre tract in the Nicholas Porter Survey, to
be known as Park Meadow West, a part of Lot 4, as recorded in
Volume 2660, Page 361 of the Official Deed Records of
Williamson County, Texas, from A, Agricultural to C-2A,
Commercial First Height, or any more restrictive district.
FACTS:
Location: Located on Dawn Drive. SEE EXHIBIT A
Existing Site: Undeveloped land.
Existing Zoning: This tract was purchased as an addition to Park Meadow West,
and is being annexed into the City as A, Agricultural.
Proposed Use: This tract is a portion of Lot 4 which is to be developed as a
mini -storage facility.
Surrounding Uses North: Reata Trails, single family residences (RS)
and Zoning: South: Unplatted land (out of City) and Park Meadow II ,
commercial lots (C-2B)
East: Unplatted land (out of City)
West: Reata Trails, single family residences (RS) and Park
Meadow West
Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates Lot 4 as
Intensity Levels 3 and 4. EXHIBIT B illustrates the potential
development that would be permitted on this lot.
Notification: The notification requirements have been completed.
Rezoning - Park Meadow West, pt Lot 4 June 18, 1995
RZ95-15/File: PKMEDOWT.REZ Page 1
CM: HK
HISTORY: On September 3, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved
a Short Form Final Plat of Park Meadow West, which constituted only
that portion of the subject property that was originally inside the City
limits. The Planning and Zoning Commission was unable to meet the
majority plus one vote for numerous variances. The request was
forwarded to the City Council for direction. On September 22, 1992,
the City Council recommended it return to the Planning and Zoning
Commission for consideration without the requested variance not to
build Dawn Drive, however the applicant requested this item be pulled.
No further action was taken. A Preliminary Plat for the subject
development was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on
March 7, 1995, and by City Council on March 28, 1995, with a
variance to allow a 50 foot right-of-way for Dawn Drive.
The annexation of this tract was approved on second reading of the
ordinance by City Council on May 23, 1995. The effective date for
annexation of this property is Wednesday June 7, 1995.
ANALYSIS: Section 1.205 of the Zoning Ordinance provides that all property newly
annexed into the City of Georgetown will be assigned the A,
Agricultural zoning district unless otherwise requested by the property
owner. A detailed development plan is currently being reviewed for
Lot 4 for the construction of a mini -storage facility. The least
restrictive zoning district in which such a use can be located by right is
the C-2A, Commercial First Height district. That portion of Lot 4 that
has been within the Georgetown City limits since 1974 is zoned C-2B,
Commercial Second Height. The City's records indicate that this
zoning district was assigned at the time the property was annexed.
The only distinction between the C-2A and C-2B zoning districts is the
fact that in C-2B there is no limit on the height of structures (Section
2.0601) and there is no requirement for off-street parking (Section
7.201). The property to the northwest of this tract is developed as
single family residential (Beata Trails, Unit One) and zoned RS,
Residential Single Family. The property to the northeast is undeveloped
and outside the City limits. SEE EXHIBIT A Although the C-2B
zoning district was assigned to the balance of the Park Meadow West
property when it was annexed, it does not appear to be appropriate to
continue this district on the subject tract given the adjacent residential
development. However, because an application for a DDP for a mini -
storage facility has already been received by the City, it would not be
Rezoning - Park Meadow West, pt Lot 4
RZ95-15/File: PKMEDOWT.REZ
CM:HK
June 18, 1995
Page 2
appropriate for the City to recommend a zoning district that cannot
accommodate the mini -storage facility. Therefore, the most restrictive
district that can be recommended and still allow the proposed use is the
C-2A district. The applicant has agreed that this district is appropriate
for the subject property.
Section 12.104 of the Zoning Ordinance states: "In case of a district
boundary line dividing a property into two parts, the district boundary
line shall be construed to be the property line nearest the less restricted
district." This clause is interpreted such that the more intensive, or
higher classification, district controls the zoning. When the Park
Meadow West plat is recorded, Lot 4 will be one (1) lot, with no legal
lot division at the location where it is split by the two (2) zoning
districts. If Section 12.104 were to apply to this rezoning, all the
property would be C-2B, with no restrictions. In order to ensure that
the portion of Lot 4 that is adjacent to single family residential
development is controlled by the C-2A district regulations, it is
necessary to exclude the rezoning of this portion of Lot 4 from this
provision of the Zoning Ordinance. The Staff Recommendation reflects
this exclusion.
STAFF RECOM.WENDATION:
Approval of the requested rezoning to C-2A, Commercial First Height,
for a 4.747 acre portion of the proposed Lot 4, Park Meadow West.
This rezoning action shall be exempt from Section 12.104 of the
Georgetown Zoning Ordinance.
P & Z ACTION: At their regular meeting of June 6, 1995, the Planning and Zoning
Commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the requested
rezoning of a 4.747 acre portion of the proposed Lot 4, Park Meadow
West, from A, Agricultural to C-2A, Commercial First Height. This
rezoning action shall be exempt from Section 12.104 of the Georgetown
Zoning Ordinance.
Rezoning - Park Meadow West, pt Lot 4
RZ95-15/File: PKMEDOWT.REZ
CM:HK
June 18, 1995
Page 3
EXHIBIT A
ZZ
,I
22
a
�I
RS
1 8
RP
A
i3 \UJ part annex d
\� proposed z ning C-2A
OVTS
IDE
CITY
G26 3G i�\
>GS3
� G1 1g-14
03
C2B 1 974
-0 3 . G S
i
G8.
LAKE.AIRE
SH0PPt.N.f--
CENTER i
i
i
i
i
EXHIBIT
DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT
GIVEN A SINGLE LAND USE
1. `DATE': April 16, 1995
'PROJECT NAME': Park Meadow West - Lot 4
Rezoning
2. 'GIVEN': acres of Intensity Level 1
acres of Intensity Level 2
4.52 acres of Intensity Level 3
1.93 acres of Intensity Level 4
acres of intensity Level 5
acres of Intensity Level 6
6.45 TOTAL ACRES
3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND:
INTENSITY WATER WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION
LEVEL Peak GPD Average GPD Peak Trip Ends
-----------------------------------------------------
2 0
2
0
0
0
3
0
0
17,003
4
4,884
45
12.936
5
3,696
154
0
0
0
0
-----------------------------------------------------
0
0
4. TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND:
Maximum GPD Water Capacity:
Maximum GPD Wastewater Capacity:
29,939
Maximum Trip Ends:
8,580
199
5. PERMITTED DEVFLOPMENT
LANE) USES
Detached SF
Large Lot
Average Lot
Zero Lot Line
Attached SF
Multifamily
Mobile Home
Lodging
Institutional
Church
-with clay care
-w/o day care
Medical Office
General Office
Retail, Mixed
Retail, Restaurant
Retail, :Store
Employment Centers
_ (a)
POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY
(b)
(c)
(d)
WATER
WASTEWATERTRANSPORTATIOI
MAXIMUM
UNITS
PER DEV
DEVELOPMENT
----------------------------
----------------------------------------
--------- --- ---- I --------------------
I
REGS I
----------------- I ----------------------------------------------
ALLOWED/UNIT
26
30
30
34
225 I
30 I
I
43 (
13 housing units
30
46
34
49
225 I
30 I
I
62 I
30 housing units
30 housing units
57
57
55
183 I
I
46 I
55 I
94 I
183
46 housingunits
44
288
35 I
44 I
I
55 housing units
156
87,285
141
93,258
144
236,885 I
141
87,285
I
I
44 housing units
141 rooms
I
87,285 square feet
97,204
160,961
103,371
171.595
12,803 I
276,694I
12,803 I
16,
I
12.803 square feet
71,968
76,605
61,735I
61,735
I
160,961 square feet
82249
94283
78125
78,125
61,735 square feet
46,060
52,637
12,061
12,61
78,125 square feet
19,191
92,119
17,875
97497
17522
1,52
I
12,061 square feet
17,522 square feet
82.249
94,283
41,487I
43,536
41,487
41,487 square feet
525,241
612840
332,033
,536
43,536 square feet
,
------ - -- - 7,484680
8,579,760
766,231
332,033
766,231
332,033 square feet
-- -
-
--------------------
IIII
766,231 square feet
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1968, AND
AMENDING PART OF THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE
ORIGINAL ORDINANCE, TO CHANGE A 4.747 ACRE PORTION OF
LOT 4 OF THE PARK MEADOW WEST SUBDIVISION FROM THE A,
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO THE C-2A, COMMERCIAL FIRST
HEIGHT, DISTRICT ZONING CLASSIFICATION; REPEALING
CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, an application has been made to the City Council for the purpose of
changing the zoning district classification of the following described real property ("the
property") :
A 4.747 ACRE PORTION OF LOT 4 OF THE PARK MEADOW WEST
SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 2660, PAGE 361 OF THE OFFICIAL
DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, hereinafter referred to as
"the property";
WHEREAS, the City Council has submitted the proposed change in the Base Ordinance
to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its consideration in a public hearing and for its
recommendation or report; and
WHEREAS, notice of such hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation
in the City; which stated the time and place of hearing, which time was not earlier than fifteen
(15) days for the first day of such publication; and
WHEREAS, written notice was given not less than fifteen (15) days before the date set
for the meeting before the Planning and Zoning Commission to all the owners of the lots within
two hundred feet of the property, as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the applicant for such zoning change placed on the property such sign(s) as
required by law for advertising the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, not less than
fifteen (15) days before the date set for such hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission in a meeting held on June 6,
1995, recommended changing said zoning district classification of the above described property
from the A, Agricultural district to C-2A, Commercial First Height, district zoning classification;
Part Lot 4, Park Meadow West Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 1 of 3
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission further recommended that said
rezoning be exempt from Section 12.104 of the Georgetown Zoning Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are
hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and
expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this
ordinance implements the following Policies of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element:
1. Growth and Physical Development Policy 1, which states: "The City will ensure that
future land use patterns provide economic, cultural, and social activities to all residents,
businesses and organizations"; and
2. Growth and Physical Development Policy 2, which states: "The City's regulatory
actions will efficiently and effectively implement the Policy Statements and provide the
opportunity to seek change with reasonable effort and expense"; and
3. Growth and Physical Development Policy 4, which states: "The City will encourage
new development and infill redevelopment in the community"; and
4. Environmental and Resource Conservation Policy-1, which states: "The City will take
the steps necessary to protect the physical attributes that make Georgetown attractive";
and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any
other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the
Policy Plan.
SECTION 2. The Base Ordinance and the Zoning Map of the City, as well as the Zoning
District for the property shall be and the same is hereby changed from the A, AGRICULTURAL
district to C-2A, COMMERCIAL FIRST HEIGHT district, and is hereby adopted by the City
Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas. Said C-2A zoning district shall be defined in
accordance with Exhibit "A" attached, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference
herein. Said C-2A zoning district shall be exempt from Section 12.104 of the Georgetown
Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in
conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
SECTION 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or
circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or
application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or
Part Lot 4, Park Meadow West Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 2 of 3
application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this Ordinance and the City
Secretary to attest. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in (10)
ten days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of
Georgetown.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the day of . 1995.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the day of 1995.
ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
Sandra D. Lee
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Marianne Landers Banks
City Attorney
Part Lot 4, Park Meadow West Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 3 of 3
By: LEO WOOD
Mayor
EXHIBIT A
LEGEND
DRG
---,Q'OD Cr,,�.
OF
'1, WATSON SURVEYING
+- 9501 CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY.
JASUITE 303 AUSTIN, TX 78759
I 346-8566 FAX 346-856
1946
FIELD NOTES FOR 4.747 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NUMBER 497, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING PART OF A 45.25
ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO IRENE W. PARKER BY DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 410,
PAGE 383, AND PART OF A 371.96 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO IRENE W. PARKER
BY DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 410, PAGE 374, WILLIAMSON COUNTY DEED RE-
CORDS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING at a 3/4-inch steel pin found at a cedar fence corner post in
the southeast line of Lot 4, Reate Trails Unit One, a subdivision re-
corded in Cabinet C, Slide 368, Williamson County Plat Records, said
pin being the most northern corner of a 7.065 acre tract as recorded in
Volume 1852, Page 316, Williamson County Deed Records;
THENCE N52005'30"E 321.38 feet with said southeast line of Reata Trails
Unit One to a steel pin set in the southeast line of Lot 8, for the
most northern corner hereof;
THENCE crossing said 45.25 acre Parker tract the following 3 courses:
1) S37°54'30"E 92.47 feet to steel pin set, 2) S52°18'16"E 248.01
feet to steel pin set, 3) S37°26'32"E 236.73 feet to a steel pin
found for the most eastern corner hereof;
THENCE S52033'28"W 390.38 feet to a steel pin set in the northeast line
of Park Meadow Section Two, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet F, Slide
387, Williamson County Plat Records, for the southern corner hereof;
THENCE N36054'30"W 89.81 feet to a steel pin found at the north corner
of said Park Meadow Section Two, for an angle point hereof;
THENCE N36059'W 476.58 feet with the northeast line of said 7.065 acre
tract, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 4.747 acres of land.
Surveyed December 28, 1994 by:
St art W. Watson �I;J
RPLS #4550 -S
STUART W. W!'*,." (JN
9 9 4550
y�kF"*g4** �-�
$ U -4
Council meeting June 27, 1995
Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT: First Reading of an ordinance to rezone a 2.0 acre tract in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, to be
known as Good Luck Subdivision from RS, Residential Single Family to C-1, Local Commercial or any more
restrictive classification; and a request to waive rezoning fees.
ITEM SUMMARY: The two (2) acre area proposed for rezoning is currently vacant, but it is proceeding through
platting to establish it as a legal lot. The applicant's proposed use at this time is for a convenience store. The
requested C-1 zoning district permits such a use.
The subject rezoning area fronts on SH29 about one-fourth (1/4) mile west of IH35. The entire area west
of IH35 is mostly vacant. There is some scattered development such as the First Baptist Church, the future
Church of Christ, a service station, and a barbecue stand. The reason for the lack of development of the area
despite its proximity to the IH35/SH29 intersection can likely be attributed to the absence of wastewater service
to the area. Currently, businesses and residences must provide their own on -site treatment. Although water
service is not available at the subject site, there are facilities in the vicinity that will be extended as a condition
of the platting of this lot. If City wastewater service is extended to the area, it is reasonable to expect the quick
development of the area. It is most likely that the demand will be for commercial uses. Also, given the
proximity to the IH35 interchange, the area does not appear to be suitable for residential use.
In order to evaluate this request comprehensively, all uses permitted in the C-1 zoning district
classification must be reviewed. Some other uses permitted in the C-1 district are sale of retail products, bicycle
repair shops, tailors, bank, commercial parking lots, hotels, theaters, and any use permitted in all "R" zoning
districts. The most intense of these uses appear to be suitable for the location and will not be detrimental to the
surrounding properties.
Also on this agenda is the consideration of a Short Form Final Plat for these two (2) acres. It indicates
that the proposed lot meets the design standards for commercial lots in the Subdivision Regulations. Prior to
development of the site, a Detailed Development Plan must be submitted for review and approval to demonstrate
compliance with site design standards such as landscaping, stormwater detention, parking, and access.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Consistent with City policy, a request to waive the $250 rezoning fee is being processed
with this application. This is the first rezoning request following annexation.
COMMENTS: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend
approval of a rezoning from RS, Residential Single Family to C-1, Local Commercial for a 2.0 acre tract in the
Clement Stubblefield Survey, to be known as Good Luck Subdivision.
ATTACHMENTS: Staff report and ordinance
:Submitted BY:
.Edwar . B rry, AICP - Dir for
:Division of evelopment S ices
Hildy L. ngma, 4A�I C�
Chief Planner
REZONING OF A 2.0 ACRE TRACT IN THE CLEMENT STUBBLEFIELD
SURVEY, TO BE KNOWN AS GOOD LUCK SUBDIVISION, FROM
RS, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY TO C-1, LOCAL COMMERCIAL OR ANY
MORE RESTRICTIVE CLASSIFICATION,
LOCATED ON STATE HIGHWAY 29 WEST
O WNER/APPLICANT:
Ben and Alicia Johnson
2890 Cedar Hollow Road
Georgetown, Texas 78628
512/869-2890
AGENT: Mr. Don Bizzell, P.E.
Steger and Bizzell Engineering, Inc.
1978 South Austin Avenue
Georgetown, Texas 78626
512/863-4521
REQUEST: Rezoning of a 2.0 acre tract in the Clement Stubblefield Survey,
to be known as Good Luck Subdivision, as recorded in Volume
1526, Page 300 of the Official Deed Records of Williamson
County, Texas; from RS, Residential Single Family to C-1,
Local Commercial or any more restrictive classification.
FACTS:
Location: Located on State Highway 29 West. SEE EXHIBIT A
Existing Site: Undeveloped land.
Existing Zoning: RS, Residential Single Family
Proposed Use: Convenience Store
Surrounding Uses North: Citizens Memorial Garden Cemetery (out of City)
and Zoning: South: Unplatted agricultural land (RS)
East: Vacant office building (RS)
West: San Gabriel Storage (RS)
Rezoning - Good Luck Subdivision June 17, 1995
RZ 95-12/File: GOODLUCK.REZ Page 1
CM: CS
Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates this location as
Intensity Level 4. SEE EXHIBIT B
Notification: The notification process has been completed.
HISTORY: This tract was annexed into the City on November 18, 1986.
This is the first request for rezoning since the annexation. At
that time the RS, Residential Single Family zoning classification
was assigned to the property upon annexation.
ANALYSIS: The two (2) acre area proposed for rezoning is currently vacant,
but it is proceeding through platting to establish it as a legal lot.
The applicant's proposed use at this time is for a convenience
store. The requested C-1 zoning district permits such a use.
Rezoning - Good Luck Subdivision
RZ 95-12/File: GOODLUCK.REZ
CM: CS
The subject rezoning area fronts on SH29 about one-fourth (1/4)
mile west of IH35. The entire area west of IH35 is mostly
vacant. There is some scattered development such as the First
Baptist Church, the future Church of Christ, a service station,
and a barbecue stand. The reason for the lack of development
of the area despite its proximity to the IH35/SH29 intersection
can be attributed to the absence of wastewater service to the
area. Currently, businesses and residences must provide their
own on -site treatment. Although water service is not available at
the subject site, there are facilities in the vicinity that will be
extended as a condition of the platting of this lot. If City
wastewater service is extended to the area, it is reasonable to
expect the quick development of the area. It is most likely that
the demand will be for commercial uses. Also, given the
proximity to the .IH35 interchange, the area does not appear to
be suitable for residential use. However, the subject rezoning
area is not located very near the interchange, where a higher
intensity zoning district classification may be warranted, such as
C-2A. Nor is it close enough to D. B. Wood Road to the west.
Those intersections may be reserved for a higher intensity
classification.
Immediately behind the rezoning area is the Citizens Memorial
Cemetery. It is likely that this use will remain for a long time.
June 17, 1995
Page 2
In the event that the north side of County Road 265 develops
residentially, the cemetery will provide an ideal buffer between
the business on the subject lot and the residences.
In order to evaluate this request comprehensively, all uses
permitted in the C-1 zoning district classification must be
reviewed. Some other uses permitted in the C-1 district are sale
of retail products, bicycle repair shops, tailors, bank,
commercial parking lots, hotels, theaters, and any use permitted
in all "R" zoning districts. The most intense of these uses
appear to be suitable for the location and will not be detrimental
to the surrounding properties.
Also on this agenda is the consideration of a Short Form Final
Plat for these two (2) acres. It indicates that the proposed lot
meets the design standards for commercial lots in the
Subdivision Regulations. Prior to development of the site, a
Detailed Development Plan must be submitted for review and
approval to demonstrate compliance with site design regulations
of landscaping, stormwater detention, parking, access, etc.
Fee Waiver: The applicant requests a waiver of the $250 application fee since
this is the first rezoning request subsequent to the initial zoning
assignment upon annexation. The City Council will consider this
waiver request.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of a rezoning from RS, Residential Single Family to
C-1, Local Commercial for 2.0 acre tract in the Clement
Stubblefield Survey, to be known as Good Luck Subdivision.
P & Z ACTION: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning
Commission voted 5-0 to approve a rezoning from RS,
Residential Single Family to C-1, Local Commercial for a 2.0
acre tract in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, to be known as
Good Luck Subdivision.
Rezoning - Good Luck Subdivision June 17, 1995
RZ 95-12/File: GOODLUCK.REZ Page 3
CM: CS
G`
er•.
RS
,. s•o„c: tit, S_ ,�o.'. AS nee •r.e pG4
=.:. C-
AS
C�f14m. Mini-W—afeltouse ::.,. Offices Res. Vacant
m
x
Co
I C-2A BBQ Service Stat n --i
RS D
00 .
EXHIBIT B
DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT
GIVEN A SINGLE LAND USE
1. "DATE': May 3, 1995
'PROJECT NAME': Good Luck Subdivision
2. 'GIVEN' acres of Intensity Level 1
acres of Intensity Level 2
acres of Intensity Level 3
2.00 acres of Intensity Level 4
acres of Intensity Level 5
acres of Intensity Level 6
2.00 TOTAL ACRES
3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND:
INTENSITY WATER WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION
LEVEL Peak GPO Average GPD Peak Trip Ends
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
3 0 0 0
4 13.440 3.840 160
5 0 0 0
6 0 0 0
4. TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND.
Maximum GPO Water Capacity 13.440
Maximum GPD Wastewater Capacity: 3.840
Maximum Trip Ends 160
5. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY
MAXIMUM
PER DEV
DEVELOPMENT
LAND USES
----------------------------------
WATER
WASTEWATERTRANSPORTATIOI
UNITS I
REGS j
ALLOWED/UNIT
---------------
Detached SF
----------------------
----------- ---- ------
------------ ------
---------- '
- -- -------------------------------------
Large Lot
12
13
267
12 j
4 j
4 housing units
Average Lot
13
15
181
13
15
13 housing units
Zero Lot Line
13
15
181
13
19 j
13 housing units
Attached SF
21
22
147
21 j
29 j
21 housing units
Multifamily
25
25
70
25
53
25 housing units
Mobile Home
21
20
189
20 j
j
20 housing units
Lodging
70
63
115
63 j
j
63 rooms
Institutional
39.184
41.739
190.250
39.184
j
39,184 square feet
Church
I
I
-with day care
43.636
46.265
10,283
10.283 j
j
10,283 square feet
-w/o day care
72,258
76.800
222.222 j
72,258
72,258 square feet
Medical Office
32,308
34,286
49,582 j
32,308 j
j
32,308 square feet
General Office
36,923
42.198
62,745
36.923 j
36,923 square feet
Retail. Mixed
20,677
23.558
9,686 j
9.686 j
j
9,686 square feet
Retail. Restaurant
8,615
8.000
14.072
8,000 j
j
8.000 square feet
Retail. Store
41.354
43.636
33,319 j
33.319 j
j
33,319 square feet
Employment Centers
36,923
42,198
34.965 ;
34.965
j
34,965 square feet
Warehouse
235,789
274.286
266,667
235,789
j
235,789 square feet
Mini -Warehouse
------------------------------------------------------
3,360,000
--------------------------------------
3,840,000
615.385 j
615.385 j
j
615,385 square feet
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1968, AND
AMENDING PART OF THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE
ORIGINAL ORDINANCE, TO CHANGE A 2.0 ACRE TRACT IN THE
CLEMENT STUBBLEFIELD SURVEY, TO BE KNOWN AS GOOD LUCK
SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 526, PAGE 300 OF THE
OFFICIAL DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS,
FROM RS, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY TO C-1 LOCAL
COMMERCIAL OR ANY MORE RESTRICTIVE CLASSIFICATION;
REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS;
INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, an application has been made to the City Council for the purpose of
changing the zoning district classification of the following described real property ("the
property"):
A 2.0 ACRE TRACT IN THE CLEMENT STUBBLEFIELD SURVEY, TO BE
KNOWN AS GOOD LUCK SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 526, PAGE
300 OF THE OFFICIAL DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS,
hereinafter referred to as "the property";
WHEREAS, the City Council has submitted the proposed change in the Base Ordinance
to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its consideration in a public hearing and for its
recommendation or report; and
WHEREAS, notice of such hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation
in the City; which stated the time and place of hearing, which time was not earlier than fifteen
(15) days for the first day of such publication; and
WHEREAS, written notice was given not less than fifteen (15) days before the date set
for the meeting before the Planning and Zoning Commission to all the owners of the lots within
two hundred feet of the property, as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the applicant for such zoning change placed on the property such sign(s) as
required by law for advertising the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, not less than
fifteen (15) days before the date set for such hearing; and
2.0 Acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey
Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 1 of 3
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission in a meeting held on June 6,
1995, recommended changing said zoning district classification of the above described property
from the RS, Residential Single Family district zoning classification to C-1, Local Commercial,
in accordance with Exhibit "A".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are
hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and
expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this
ordinance implements the following Policies of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element:
1. Growth and Physical Development Policy 1, which states: "The City will ensure that
future land use patterns provide economic, cultural, and social activities to all residents,
businesses and organizations"; and
2. Growth and Physical Development Policy 2, which states: "The City's regulatory
actions will efficiently and effectively implement the Policy Statements and provide the
opportunity to seek change with reasonable effort and expense"; and
3. Growth and Physical Development Policy 4, which states: "The City will encourage
new development and infill redevelopment in the community"; and
4. Environmental and Resource Conservation Policy 1, which states: "The City will take
the steps necessary to protect the physical attributes that make Georgetown attractive";
and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any
other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the
Policy Plan.
SECTION 2. The Base Ordinance and the Zoning Map of the City, as well as the Zoning
District for the Property shall be and the same is hereby changed from the RS, RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY district to C-1, LOCAL COMMERCIAL district, in accordance with Exhibit
"A", which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, is hereby adopted by the
City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas.
SECTION 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in
conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
2.0 Acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey
Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or
circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or
application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this Ordinance and the City
Secretary to attest. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in (10)
ten days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of
Georgetown.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the day of , 1995.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the day of . 1995.
ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
Sandra D. Lee
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Marianne Landers Banks
City Attorney
2.0 Acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey
Rezoning Ordinance No.
Page 3 of 3
By: LEO WOOD
Mayor
Cemetery \1'�
63
Co
�S o
R.S.o'. `sae,•°;a C-2A 4
•vt.s .. ,,,t.'. a
Cjrtm. Myn'i-4af°efibuse .. Offices Res. Vacant
X
I C-2A BBQ Service Stat(b.n
RS .J,,.. \D
C
Council meeting date: June 27, 1995 Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT
Governance discussion relating to parking zones in and around Blue Hole Park and the
roadway in Blue Hole Park being designated as one-way.
ITEM SUMMARY
Blue Hole Park has a one lane roadway running through it from the end of Rock Street
to Scenic Drive. The Police Services Division desires two ordinances, one that would
officially establish no parking areas in and around Blue Hole Park and another that would
establish the roadway in Blue Hole Park one-way, east to west, from Rock Street to
Scenic Drive.
Vehicular traffic in and out of Blue Hole Park on the weekends is estimated at about 500
cars from Friday evening to Sunday evening. At the same time there is considerable foot
traffic along the roadway to the waters edge. The pedestrian traffic includes many small
children. Cars park all along the waters edge along the roadway and many small children
walk in and out of cars to the roadway. The high volume of vehicular and pedestrian
traffic in such a small area along with the alcohol consumption in the park creates a
substantial hazard to the pedestrian traffic.
The parking along the waters edge contaminates the water by fluids leaking from vehicles.
The vehicles also destroy the vegetation along the river bank.
From April 1990 through June 1995, the Police Services Division has responded to 358
calls for service in Blue Hole Park. The Emergency Medical Services has responded to
17 calls for service during the same time period. The Fire Services Division, during the
last two years, has responded to all EMS calls. The public safety. responses to Blue Hole
Park have ranged from disorderly conduct to drownings to murder -suicides.
The Police Services Division is currently unable to enforce the no parking and the one-
way traffic flow restrictions because there is no ordinance giving us the authority.
With the ordinances being requested, the Police would have the authority to enforce the
traffic restrictions in Blue Hole Park which would allow for the safe and efficient flow
of vehicular and pedestrian traffic in the park. Additionally, we could assure that
emergency response vehicles could have easy access to emergencies occurring at Blue
Hole Park.
The Citizens Advisory Committee to the Police Services Division and the Parks and
Recreation Board support this initiative.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The financial impact is minimal and can be absorbed within the present budget. The use
of existing signs and the purchase of a few additional signs would be needed.
CITY ATTORNEY
ATTACHMENTS
List of calls for service for Police and EMS, Water Fatality Detail List from Texas Parks
and Wildlife Department and a number of local newspaper articles relating to Blue Hole
Park.
C� 1_ __ «_ -1 Tl _
Newell, Patro
8N
]UOSOJX] 1.N]3]ONI
91O006
` '- 80�3
9T/�O/C6
8N
13V1.1103 8J
966
'OT�3
9T/�O/C6
S]8
8Or,VN 0s;-0i:
881:00S!C6
Ty
rO/�0/C6
'Jl
736IJ ]l3I11]A
68T002;C6
' TV
T0/9O/C6
S]8
7lV3 ]O3S]8
367
30/�0/C6
U
O]SV]3]O/140138]J 804IS13I14
T60tr00C6
- 31:t�3
6
H
'M NOF,'LNOON/IMO
0/C6
8
AN8
C�T�00C6
- 0T�3
CO/�O/C6
of
N]ZIll: lI3 lSISSV
9O1: ty00C6
- C3)l[`
C0/�0/C6
UN
lIAI3 '33NV8811113I0
888C0006
- 3Tty3
93/t'O/C6
8N
N8]3NO3 ]8V�l]M
0�CC0006
- OT��
UN
0436)V 8]HlO lSISSV
03630OC6
' O3�3
0C/C0/C6
8N
95-01
39;070006
IO/30/C6
l�S
3GI� wMONxwO
/13100S36
CV
CO/Tz/36
8N
�3N]8V �lI3 81/1lO SSV
I6I0TO36
- 37�3
�q
]lllV3 ]SOOl
6
r:",0/OT/36
]l3IH�A O:3 1130l
O3/60/3�
]l3IH]A 0]X30l
9800TO36
~�0�l
6T/60/36
of
3l3IH]A O]X3Ol
6
z!0/60/36
'GN
NO138]6 ' JSOS
80O36
0T/80/36
-V
lS38UV 1.NV88VM
O3980036
-3Tt'3
6O/8O/36
~UN
-OT
81:980036
'31:t�3
60/8O/36
—8N
30O
�O�80036
-�7�3
80/80/36
--�N
N[`IlVlOIA ]3NVNIO8O klI3
980;80036
1:Tt"3
8O/8O/36
N
'lOIA 'O8O "UI3
3
61:/4!O/36
3
'lOIA 'O8O �lI3
00 6
3
8T/�O/36
—8N
NOI1V-10I1) O8O "klI3
71")0
3I is
1:1:/1O/36
-8N
113I8OlO44 lSISSV
9T11 Z00TV6
O3t"3
TT/at0/36
-V
3 OINOlNV'S]8Ol�/I6
7T��0036
�0,3
I�/�O/��
-804
OWIT) lNO/H3A 0]N30l
900; 10036
-OT
TT0/36
8
l]llVM/lof]Hl
83690036
IT
I3/90/36
-G
ANOD
133690036
-O3t�3
e!3/90/36
-3
NVHSNIllOJ/'J'I'N
879�0036
—C3>|r'
13/t'O/36
-8N
11I3 'JSOS
9T9t"O036
-C3�F
�0/36
of
]8I1644V3/OJ lSISSV
10036
03t'3
0;3/t'O/36
8
N/8 lO�J']SO8/llOVSSV
�3O�O036
C3��
TT/�O/36
- of
'3'H 14]37lI)l 14O8hl NVO8l
��6C0036
-T3ll
OT/�O/36
—N
JO M011
C0T6
�OT3
33/�0YT6
-V
Is
r3/1O/T6
-8
JO M011Oaj
t' I 19OOT6
-0T
C3/90/T6
^-N
H3A OOl
90OT
Tt"3
�T/9O/T6
—8
304INM080
900T6
—Z:0t�3
Z0/9O/T6
-rl
1�]H1
�7�C00T6
'3
1:C/1;0/1:6
N
N]ZIlI3 JSISSV
T31; 54001:6
to3S3
93/S;O/T6
'N
006
-67t'3
503/8O/O�
-8
t"3C3
Z7/9O/06
-V
QQ0
J.,
N
86Z 1,
T�3
93/q0/06
N
0�11;tF0006
6O03
31:/5;0/Od,
N
6O MO7lOJ
�T9CO006
-CTC3
C0/06
— 8
66�C00O6
~IOto3
33/00/06
lNO] S]8AON
011V3
to T8
]lVO
T
]SVJ
1:
1-.;6/91:/9C |
* "
°
V
�JIlN]OI Ol lIV.j
00890006
T TC6
UN
]3N1---)88Ol13IO ]SION
86Z90006
T0/C6
8N
8ONIN 1
90006
-C&Ur
OT1716
3
NOIlVlOIA 'OHO AlI3
Z e:9O0C6
T3ll
0T/Z.O/C6
8
111]14SS118V11
9990006
—80I3
8N
]l3IH]A SOOI3IJSOS
9So990006
8N
S]3NVlSNO3UI3 'JSOS
9O006
0/Z.0/C6
8N
llOVSSV
T1299O006
-3TV3
9C6
V
]3N]lOIA 1IV..: 1
�l�9OOC6
- �0NO
30/�0/C6
8
Al8]6O8J ONOOA
8839O006
-80V3
83/9CS/ C6
V
IlN]OI Ol lIVU
C6390006
- 73ll
83/90/C6
V
NOISS]SSOJ NI 8ONIN
36390006
- T3ll
83/9O/C6
8N
H]A O]VIOl
06390006
31: 13
83/90/C6
-11S
lsISSV lV3Io3w
or10OOtoC6
- rV
z!3/p0/Ca
llS
lSISSV -I II-) IO]N
T1:C001;C6
- 7V
83/90/C6
U
l]llVM/lad]HL
390006
1;3>1 f"
/3/9O/C6
8
]S8OJ/l�]Hl
6�39O006
�C��[`
�3/90/C6
V
IJ
�V390OC6
-1:T�3
/3/90/C6
V
30O
111W390006
8N
SN3 lSISSV
1: V39O006
-TT�3
�3/9O/C6
8N
30O
0I390006
1:�3
�3/90/C6
8N
]l3IH]A OOl
it. C390006
- Tltr3
/3/9O/C6
8N
lHOIJ
SAC390OC6
- C3>1 F,
/3/9O/C6
8N
N]ZIlI3 1SISSV
TC390006
- C3>1 f"
/3/9O/Cid,
UN
]l3IH]A 1(171>130l
C9790006
- 0TV3
5n3/90/C6
8
> 10O8> i33H3 /Al83JO8J ONOOA
to el
- TT13
C7/9O/C6
8N
O8VZVH 3I1121118l
C6
313
73/90/C6
8
AM
886S;0006
~OTV3
6T/9O/C6
GN
1]l7VM-1�]Hl
9to 12 4:0006
V
3T# 300
0006
-3T
CT/90/C6
8
Al8]JOUJ ONOOJ
731l
T/90/C6
814
13l3I1113A 0]X30l
3TV3
Z1:/90/C6
8N
llOVSSV
97
31:V3
37/9O/C6
8N
lV38H1 3I1.13I8088]l
S995;0006
-C3>1 f"
11:/9O/126
llS
lSISSV lV3IO]N
1:9300QSC6
-TV
�0/9O/C6
8N
�3N]SV 8]111O lSISTV
3w; V SoO0C6
8O113
90/9O/C6
of
SNIMN]F, NNV 1l3V11403 68
6105;0006
-60*3
ty0/90/C6
8N
]l3IH]A O]A3Ol
Z.3ty to00C6
- C3)ir
!�;0/9O/C6
8N
13V1.1403 86
93��0006
- C3if F,
toO/9O/C6
8N
lIAI3'133144)88OlSIO
8tyC110OC6
- 9OT3
C0/90/C6
8
�NI OO8/M llOVSSV/llOVSSV
TCC6
- O7�3
30/9O/C6
V
lS]8UV lNVdi, Ill VM
8itSIT C;0006
- 3TV3
T0/9O/C6
V
IJ/]3NVIII UOlSIO
9in3S;0OC6
- 0T�3
TO,'9O/C6
�
AN8
TC3toO0C6
- �0t,3
TC/S0/C6
8N
]8OS0JX] 114]3]O14I
TT0C6
- 03V3
0C/toO/1`2J.-
Al N
lSISSV 11310:1I3
06TSo00C6
- IT: 3>1 F,
0C/is0/C6
NI
N]ZIlill: 3 lSISSV
0CT0;000176
- ATS8
63/to0/C6
8N
AVMwNO8
9600;O006
8THM
0/C6
3
NOI11)lOIA ]3NVNIO80
{T0�0006
- 07�3
93/Q!O/C6
8N
]l3IH]A 03A]13l
1; 4:8V0006
3/�O/C6
8N
NOIlVlOIA ]3NVNIO8O A1I3
W rn8V00C
0V3
33/410/C6
13IOl3
i0403 U]8NON
08to3 llV3
118J AO
]lVO
m ,
p iv
if
lO8lV6 lOOof
is at to to00ty6
81:HM
8N
8ONIA'lN]OI33V
8ef S; SO00tv6
8THM
83/530/`�
8N
NOIlVlOIA 113NV14I0180
8N
NOIlVlOIA 13314V14IO813 klI3
t, S0Ot,6
�0/r=
N
ONIAIHO SS]
0Cto00tr6
C3Ar
113A;O/��
GN
NOIlVlOIA ]3NVNIO8O 1,I3
0ec35;00t,
OJJ
07/!�;0/��
8N
NOIlVlOIA ]3N1)NIO80 itlI3
& si 00»6
8rHM
3T/��/��
UN
3O3338 8]lVM/3NO3 �l]M
q68
8
9T7 z
of
]8OS]8 8]lVM
68C00�W6
3V
8
NOIlN]l]O 3NIOVA]
C0CC00t�6
03N8
AN
71l3IH11A O7
�T3T00It, 6
87HM
8N
N3ZI1I3 1SISSV/llOVSSV
086000t�6
90J8
61;/1:0/,�
V
NOIlN]l]O 8NIOVA]
908O00�6
O0�3
H
Al8]6O8J ONOOA
t,3O60006
60�3
8N
lIAI3'33NV88OlSI01,
t,3
Tr'6)/��
V
1.S]8810 lNV88VM
880006
C3>1r
t.0/6')/F�
V
lO ON/M 004IAI80
Z91:8O006
3Tty3
W (�/al D/:.-
V
NVNVlV N]8O8'Z]AV1-13/�!�-0T
99A80006
3Tt?3
W'6DIE�
V
18OA'NOlSNI88VJ/IJ
z! §j &8O006
so3ty3
00/60.�`
8N
NOIlVlOIA ]3NVNI08O
Tto Z80OC6
TT1I.3
t{/6'�/��
V
]lIN]AMVNO8
80981")0
3t,3
r[
8N
S33NVlSNO38I3 13O0I3IJSOS
TZ 1;80006
8N
]l3IH]A O]if3Ol
07T8001136
V
N]HJ3lS'OI38/'I'J
CT080006
0T��
8N
'lOIA 133NVNIO8O 1.I3
0006
8N
NOIlVlOIA ]3NVNI08O
1:39J00176
TT�3
TL
V
VIl]OV'8]88]11 VMVNOH
09Z0006
03ti3
1:[/1)/1 -
�
N'�2IP10]S/l13]88V 1NV88VM
939Z001v6
V�3�3
of
0]>130lNO/]l3I14]A O
T
TC'��'.'��
llS
lSISSV lV3IO3A
en6C0003C6
TV
8T/E�
S]oil
]O3S]8 8]lVM
86CO0Q;C6
TV
87'1)/��
llS
llS
lSISSV O]N
ONIN8FIE! O]ZI8OHlOVNO
an0t"O051C6
C3t"005;C6
TV
t,3'�}/��
8N
�3N]8V �lI3 lSISSw
Ct, 11 Z0006
80t73
6Z/11}1�
V
OlIH3 V OL F,NI/AJ—llSSV
80S3
62''��.'��
V
NJM 0]lI8IHO86 9NIA88V3
f 0006
C3>1r
82'2�'��
V
NOIlV3IXOlNI 3Il8O6
38W 40006
C3UF,
8J'��,'��
8N
]3NVNI08O A.1I3
�
JIN
t,CC�00C6
V
NIN 3lV NUO�/ONIl]O 1NO3
CCCAOOC6
1:311
V
XOlNI 3I78O6
0CCOOC
t�/��/��
V
NOIlV]IXOlNI 3Il8O6
8�C�0006
8
�l8]6O8J ONOO�i
6CC1:0006
C3>1r
W 1'Z:�'.'��
UN
N3ZIlI3 1SIS13V
99Tat00C6
tot! A f"
O71T�
8N
]l3IH]A O]>1 30l
86Ov!0006
8OT3
` 8
SOO/SN3 lSISSV
60006
80T3
if
SN] lSISS
0OC6
37f/-3
V
0lIH3/M '3]0NI/11M]l '8OJ
800anO0C
0ty3
8N
03S]8808J NI 11-18I_1
8T690006
8N
l3OONO3 Al8]O8OSIO
1v3890006
3T
T�
V
NOIlV3IXOlNI 3Il8O6
1:08900C
3t,3
T�'�)/�,
SIOl3
0033
80864ON O8V3 ll4j3
118A AO
30 - CC-
TO'��'97
^
�� '�-'`
'
° � °
14
,
O6/16/95 16.45.01
PAGE 4
DATE
0F17R1
CALL CARD NUMBER
COMT
CLOI
5/28
J023
94O05583
ASSIST.CITIZEN
NR
6/04
FP07
9*005918
DIST. CIVIL
N
4
FP07
94005921
ASSIST CITIZEN
A
6/O7
2412
94O06044
LOCKED VEHICLE
NR
6/10
10420
94006172
ABANDONED VEHICLE
NR
6/12
TT21
94006250
CITY ORDINANCE VIOLATION
Cl
6/11
JK23
94006217
DISORDERLY CONDUCT
NR
6/11
JK23
940O6219
CITY ORDINANCE VIOLATlON
NR
6/18
RP06
94006464
WARR ARR/OKUNIEWICZ.DARQ[
A
6/18
CL09
94006465
PI/8ROWN.O/SARRIA.J/CRANE
A
6/20
2412
94006564
VEHICLE IN RIVER
NR
6/25
241O
94006780
LOCKED VEHICLE
NR
6/26
RN2O
94006812
CRIMINAL MISCHIEF
R
6/27
2411
94006842
SUSP CIRCUMSTANCES
NR
7/03
142
94500612
ASSIST.CITIZEN
STL
7/O3
TT21
94007117
LOCKED VEHICLE
NR
7/04
TT21
94O07164
WARRANT SERVICE
NR
7/04
TT21
94OU7166
CITY ORDINANCE VIOLATION
NR
7/03
JK23
94007128
CITY ORDINANCE VIOLATION
NR
7/05
TT21
94007208
FOUND PROPERTY
R
7/10
2408
940O7434
D.O.C.
NR
7/15
FPO7
94007657
FOUND PROPERTY
R
7/19
RG17
94007831
ROBBERY
UN
7/23
JK23
94007986
ASSAULT/ROBBERY
R
7/24
JK23
940O8024
INJURIED P[RSON
NR
7/27
JK23
940O8135
RECOVEREO STOLEN VEHICLE
U
7/30
JK23
9400O264
IF, OMEST DIST/FIDHT
NR
7/30
WH18
940O8271
ASSAULT
NR
�/04
JK23
94008484
FOUND PROPERTY
R
]/O8
2108
94008689
ASSAULT hi/INJURY
R
3/08
JK23
94008690
ASSAULT W/INJURY
R
]/08
JK23
940O8691
CRIMINAL MISCHIEF
R
:3/08
JK23
74008695
CRIMINAL MISCHIEF
R
]/08
JK23
94O08692
CRIMINAL MISCHIEF
R
3/24
2313
94009309
SEXUAL ASSUALT
R
y/O4
RN2O
94009822
ORDINANCE VIOLATION
NR
�/O5
RP06
94009873
TRAFFIC
NR
Oo
nN20
940m988p
ORDzNANCE VIOLAITON
NR
05
RN20
94009891
FOOT PATROL
NR
MT05
94010183
TRAFFIC STOP
NR
25
Lill 18
94011312
ORDINANCE VIOLATION
N
27
2412
94011481
RECKLESS DRIVING
NR
>/03
2314
94011918
TRAFFIC
NR
)/O9
MT05
94O12248
TRAFFIC
NR
)/09
WH18
94012267
TRAFFIC STOP
VW
)/08
11T05
94012183
SUSPICIOUS VEHICLE
NR
)/O8
MTO5
94012182
SUSPICIOUS VEHICLE
NR
)/15
JK23
94012638
TRAFFIC STOP
WW
)/22
RN20
94013092
TRAFFIC STOP
C
/14
RN20
9500O873
PR CONTACT
/19
RP06
95001219
SUSPICIOUS VEHICLE
NR
3
H]A JSOS/6OlS 3Ial AVUl
OT9�O0�6
�3�3
0C/�0/�6
MA
NOIlVlOIA 233NV14I080
981; 100S;6
V3t,3
0C/VO/SO6
3
3
'J'I'N
C8��00�6
to3ty3
8N
JOlS 3IJ alV8l
385; &00to6
S;3V3
0C/V0/No6
8N
lO8lV6 lVI336S
T81; evOO1;6
3Ot,3
0C/t,O/So6
MA
JOlS 3IJ�V8l
084; &001;6
so3ty3
0Cto
8N
NOIlVlOIA 33NVNI080 AlI3
66V 40O16
Q;3V3
66
3
l3OONO3 �1U3O8OSI10
�
3IJ.TV8l
6ty 1OO1;6
S;3V3
63/t,0/�6
3
6OlS 3IJ J.
IV. �00�6
!,;"31.7,3
63/�0/�6
8N
JOlS 3I��V8l
68��00�6
�3�3
63/V0/�6
3
l3OONO3 �l8]O8OSIO
88t, K00So6
03�3
�
JOlS 3Ial.:PV8l
�8��OO�6
O3�3
63/�0/S6
3
JOlS 3IJAV81
051
�0/�6
�
JOlS 3I��V8l
�8�00�6
3
6OlS 3IJ AVU1
C8W 400to
3V3
63/V0/to6
3
60l13 3I8l
38�0t�6
03V3
63/t,0/S;6
3
NOIlVlOIA ]3NVNIO8O
78V 4!00to6
03V3
63/ty0/to6
3
NOIlVlOIA ]3NVNIO8O
08��00�6
�3�3
63/�0/�6
3
JO1S 3I��V8l
it W 1100to6
03�3
3
6OlS 3IOWV8l
1: V ZOO1;6
O3ty3
63/trO/So6
of IN
]l3IH]A 3OOI3IJSOS
CV 4!00to6
03V3
83/V0/So6
3
JOl$3Ial JV8l
C9C�00S6
O17 t,3
it3/tyO/So6
V
L�38O8']]l/lS]aUV 1.14V8UyM
69O00;6
03V3
T3/t"O/Go6
8N
]l3I14]A SOOI3I613OS
89OOIs6
T3/tyO/!�6
MA
JO1S 3IJ, 8l
T3/V0/0;6
8N
NOS83J SOOI3I6SOS
A3J90O1;6
TCV3
6T/VO/116
8N
NOIlVlOIA 133NVNIO80 AlI3
�';900!-o6
03V3
91:/VO/So6
V
3'8]lWTI 8V3/AVMVNO8 SSOJ
351 to9005;6
3Ot,3
9T/VO/to6
V
'1 ]NVHS']]U8OO/IMO
�el, �90O6
�o3�/-
1:/�0/�6
8N
N0IlVNI8O 8OJ-300/813J SOS
36ty90OS;6
to3V3
CT/tyO/to6
3
131-1111403 )ll8]O8OSIO
�900!2,6
3C�3
t, T/t;l0/�6
3
H]A 8]6O/3lV SNIuOSNO3
CCty900G;6
3CV3
VT/VO/to6
3
NOISS]SSO6 NI 8OIN! IN
q6
3Ct,3
8N
]l3IH]A SOOI3IJSOS
T909O0to6
TCt,3
60/V0/S;6
MA
JOlS 3IJ JV81
��9�
83V3
30/V0/Go6
O
6OLS 3Iof JV8l
981:5;00G;6
O3V3
P3/C0/So6
VOS
N]ZI1I3 lSISSV
3V3to00to6
03Q3
S?3/CO/216
N
A3N]3V 8]11l0 1SISSV
&I8T5100to6
03V3
t,3/C0/S;6
3
6OlS 3IJl
�60�00�6
to3V3
33/C0/A;6
MA
6OlS 3IJ JV8l/H]A JSOS
8V6V00S;6
30�3
03/C0/S6
8104
NOS8]J SOOI3IJSOS
C06ty00S;6
83Iv3
67/C0/�6
8N
]l3I14]A 13OOI3IJ13O13
in08V00E;6
83t,3
8T/CO/S;6
of
]l3IH]A JSOS
83w! ty00Go6
03V3
91:/C0/to6
hi
S33NVlSNO38I3 SO0I3IJ13OS
t,T9V005;6
TCV3
S;T/C0/5;6
MA
JOlS 3IJ AV81
79toC00516
�3
93/3O/�o6
8N
]SION ]3NV88OlSIO
C63C001;6
V0C3
T3/3O/!�6
MA
S33NVlSNO38I3 1;COI3IJSOS
C7C00�6
03
61:/30/So6
8N
NOIlJO8lS8O 14V0)0V08
898300A6
1:Tt,3
SoT/30/So6
M
3IJ]V81
93300
8THM
6
SIOl3
114O3
823814ON O8V3 llV3
1:8
`
:"HilVO `
S] ]OVJ 70'��'9T �6/9T/90
/5.
MA
NOIlVlOIA ]3NVNIcl80 )lI3
366O0to6
3V3
3
NOI1VlOIA ]3NVNI08O
36600116
O3ty3
8N
]l3IH]A O]U3Ol
CC8600�6
3
MA
NOIlVlOIA
06
TCt,3
V
3I11]0]J'S0I8—'I'a/OIA O8O
6S 00�
03t,3
8N
NOS8]6 13OOI3IJ13OS
C6O0116
OCV3
UN
N]ZIlI3 lSISSV
909600S;6
31:t-3
8N
]l3IH]A SO0I3IJSO13
302;60O1!6
3CO3
8
L]l701 / k18]JO8J ONDOJ
C6C600S,
V3
8N
3
3l3IH]A SOOI3IJSOS
'3'O'O
CtyC6001;6
3017ty3
�
JOlS 3I��V8l
�00600�6
7006O0�6
�3�3
03V3
3
6OlS 3IJV81
86
51313
3
1OlS
63600
3V3
3
NOIlwlOIA 1111410NI0UO �lI3
��76O0�6
0��3
p!A
6OlS 3I
9Z.6800S6
T3V3
AlN
NOCEO! ]J SOOI3IJSOS
6V680O516
37��
NOIlVlOIA ]3110)11I0H0 klI3
0O68OO1;6
00�3
3
6OlS 3I�.JV8l
T6800�6
�3�3
UN
JO—M011OJ
516
V3V3
8N
SNOS8]6 SOOI3IJS['IS
�6
3CV3
MA
A.
CS; 0096
5;3ty3
MA
JOlS 3IJ.JVUl
3t,3
3
NOIlVlOIA 13NVNIO8O W.I3
009
3V3
MA
JOlS 3I.:." JV8l
O
5;303
3
JOlS 3I
00!�6
Z Q3
MA
JOlS 3IJJV81
6
3tv3
MA
S; tr 800516
3ty3
M
�ty
41��3
MA
JOlS 3I��V8l
0898O05;6
to3V3
H
]�I8 / lHl
980
ty303
MA
601.13 3wj81
0C98002;
3V3
M�
JOlS 3J8
98
3V3
MA
JOlS 3J8l
9398001;6
113V3
8N
140138]d 0;O0I3IJSO
C0P3
MA
JOlS 3IJ alV8l
3V3
MA
NOIlVlOIA ]3NVNIO8O
S6
�3�3
3
NOI1�lOIA ]3NVNIO8O
��C800�6
�3�3
3
NOIlVlOIA ]3NVNIO8O
��C8O0�6
�3V3
3
NOIlVlOIA ]3NVNIO8O �lI3
61;38O0!16
03ty3
80;T800Sl6
3Cty3
V
l8]8O8'8]IZV888V 118VM
Z !IT800S6
3Ctr3
MA
NOIlYlOIA ]3NVNIO8O
S6
36V3
UN
]l3IH]A JSOS
8001;6
3CI3
MA
JOlS 3ITIV8l
800So
3V3
3
JOlS 3IalV8l
0608001;6
03V3
UN
lO8lVJ 100J
80800Q;6
03V3
8N
JOLS 3I��V8l
6�O8O0�6
�3�3
3
NVHlVN'NOSMVl3 / JI�
C�0800�6
3C�3
V
S33NVlSNO38I3 13O0I3IJ13OS
3�0800
3Ct?3
3
NOISS]SSOJ NI UONIN
300800Sl6
�CV3
���0�
9 ]8VJ
1NO3 G]8NON O8V3 llV) T8nj JO ]lVO
llS
lSISSV 7V3IO]A
V8800Go so6
1:11
V7/90/�
3
]l3IH]A SO3I3I03OS
40CC1:10So6
7/9O/�
UN
H]A JSOS / JOlS 3IA�V81.
T7CTT0T'Al
T/90/no
MA
NOIlVlOIA ]3NVNIO8O �lI3
ty V3TT01;6
V3V3
C1/90/is
8N
N]ZIlI3 lSISCV
C33TT0�6
9CV3
31:/9OPS;
MA
NOIlVlOIA ]3NVNI08O lklI3
Z.6TTTWo6
TIt,3
CT/9O/s
MA
JOlS 3IJAV8l
3T/9O/Is
UN
]l3IH0) O]A30l
11:1:01;6
SoCI3
TT/90/Gs
M
JOlS 3IV8l
C37"IF 1:
�3�3
Tr/9O/S
MM
JOlS 3I1LAV8l
33TTT0to
TT/9O/�
l081.toJ 10O.1
6T7110A
is
11:1.:/90.
8N
NOIl3O8lSOO OVO8
C80TTOto6
3CV3
1:T/9O/S;.
8N
OS3M /"UN]O, 83HlO 1SISSV
0no07705;6
�3
01:/90/�'
V
NNV VSIl'OZNOlV
1:0to6
30C3
60/90/�.
8N
]l3IH]A SOOI3IJSOS
h880T0n]6
07Ct,3
60/90/So.
8N
SN]'lSIS
0 T 0
O3V3
8O/9O/S;.
V�
N8V7VA
��8O0�
T8
80/9O/so.
llS
lSISSIO]N
so8O00; S,6
T]
EN to
M�
NOILVlOI� ]3NVNIOUO
77
3W3
Z!OAN/ 1;.
M
00T0S6
3".-3
0/90/i�'
8N
NOS836 SDOI3IJSO
T6
C0ly3
90/�'
ONOOaj
8690TOto6
IsCV3
90/90/1;/
8N
]l3IH]A SOOI3IJSOS
7990T0�6
CTV3
90/9O/s/
MA
NOIlVlOIA 33NVNI0O80 AlI3
C3S0T0S6
9Ct,3
VO/9O/s�
8N
N]ZI1I3'lSISEW
I T no0T0�6
T713
10/90/A�
V
]1414VM 0IAV0'83llIN—'I'J
at ty 1;0T0to6
V3t,3
V0/90/13/
3
NOIlVlOIA ]314yNI080 141.I3
0CT0!-."6
t,3V3
VO/90/��
8N
l3OONO3 Al8]O8OSIO
V0T0So6
3
6OlS 3IAIV81
no313
C0/90/S!/
MA
6OlS 3Il
TV VOT0to6
3t"3
C0/90/1;�
8N
8ONI�' LN]OI33V/U]3NO3 7]p!
81;�-00T0�
1: V3
30/90/Go�
V
H/8 1331438Vl3'Sll7l'...M—'3'O'0
3Z120T00;6
03
30/90/9�
V
NOSVr'NOSNHOF,-88V UVM/JIN
7AC01:0Go
0/9O/Go/
llS
14OI1.V8I113]ANI
S!T8OO5; S;6
7]
30/90/9�
UN
]l3I14]1% SOOI3IJSOS
C000T0�
0/90/Go�
8N
lSI8OlOA lSISSV
V8T0T096
3T
TC/qO/S�
of
>10011)l3]H3/ Al8]6OU6 ONOOJ
6900T0no6
TCV3
OC/S;0/51�
3
JOlS 3IA AV8l
4!0O0TOG;6
03V3
63/to0/S; to-
MA
JOlS 3IJ�VU1
866600�6
�3�3
63/�0/��
V
8'Z]DSI8008 130I8/IJ
IS Z6O0so6
03V3
93/toO/GA 16
llS
l2;I2;3id 7V3IO]N
006
11:]
83/�0/��
llS
lSISSV lV3IO]A
ED Z Z00S; 116
T]
83/SoO/So�
3
NOIlVlOIA ]3NVNIO8O A1I3
1!C6600Q?6
!-o
83/�0/��
UN
SA] lSISSV
VC660O5;6
30
sO/n�<
3
NOIlVlOIA ]3NVNIO8O �1I3
CC6600�6
�3V3
83/�0/��
UN
13143 lSISSV
3C6600to6
1;3t,3
83/SO/S;�
3
NOI1VlOIA ]3NVNIO8O AlI3
7C6606
0313
83/s0/S:c
?
NOIlVlOIA 3314V14I08O Al]3
0
513ty3
817/1;O/S� K
3
NOISS]SSOJ NI 8ONIN
63660O�60/�`"
3
NOI1VlOIA ]314V11I080
an366OO516
to3V3
8S0/S;/
8N
lO81VJ l1
936600�6
SIOl3
lAO3 G]8NON
08V3 ll13
l8A AO
]lVO
�
]SVJ
70'�'9�
C6/9�/7''
DATE
06u791
062991
072192
050193
050293
050293
060493
062793
062893
071893
072093
041694
0724 94
052895
052895
052895
052895
060895
SUMMARY OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL
CALLS FOR SERVICE FOR
BLUE HOLE PARK
JUNE 91-JuivE 95
SERVICE NUMBER
91006004
91006973
92uu7869
93004059
93004091
93500192
93500311
93300310
93500311
93007095
93500407
94500389
94008024
95009932
95500775
95009934
95500776
95500854
NATURE OF CALL
NEAR DROWNING
SUICIDE
ASSIST EMS
MAJOR ACCIDENT
MISSING PERSON
RESCUE ALARM
MEDICAL ASSIST
MEDICAL ASSIST
MEDICAL ASSIST
ASSIST EMS/DOS
MEDICAL ASSIST
WATER RESCUE
INJURED PERSON
ASSIST EMS
MEDICAL ASSIST
ASSIST EMS
MEDICAL ASSIST
MEDICAL ASSIST
061495 95500884 MEDICAL ASSIST
DISPOSITION
2 DOS
SUBJ FELL FROM
CLIFFS
1 VEH ROLLOVER
1 DOS/DROWNING
STABBING
3 PATIENTS/HEAD
INJURIES
FOOT LACERATION
DROWNING
POSS DROWNING
SUBJ FELL FROM
CLIFFS
SUBJ FELL FROM
CLIFFS/BROKEN
ANKLE
LACERATION/CHILD
ff i,
LACERATION/CHILD
it it
SUBJ FELL FROM
CLIFFS/BROKEN LEG
SUB,; FELL FROM
CLIFFS/DISLOCATED
SHOULDER
Jr. _-7. = -—
n jFA— — z LLB".
REPOP— r VIC'Ile NAME
89080355 WASHINGTON, CHRISTOPHER LOYD
L RI 246 RIVERS 2 00
93030067 RAMIREZ. ALFREDO
L RI 246 RIVERS 2
93050086 RAMIREZ. MOCADA ALFREDO
L RI 246 RIVERS 2
93070203 LAFUSE. JASON
L RI 246 RIVERS 2
h=E EvE-7 •
COUr:T % hoc 7E; 604 -
CODE TYPE INVL BAP Jr
5G4" TY
l0A Sunaay ,-.j .. ,
BLUE HOLE WOES
City must take action to expel ruffians
A precious asset in this town has gone abutted
and neglected, allowed to become a haven for
drunks, miscreants and outside riffraff.
An undesirable element has established a strong-
hold on Blue Hole Park, where the incidents of
theft, burglary, drunkeness and deviant behavior
are numerous. And the city's efforts to control the
near -anarchic activity are minimal.
Anyone who questions this should spend a week-
end afternoon watching the hoodlum circus in the
park, where two people died last year. Yes, sonic
families still feel safe spending a day there, but they
are outnumbered by the beer -guzzling ruffians who
have little respect for the beauty that the area be-
holds. Most of the park -goers are outsiders, many
of them from Fort Hood.
A group of city representatives and Bluc Hole
area residents is trying to come up with suggestions
on what should be done about the park. Under a city
park plan, the road through Blue Hole would be
closed, with the only access to the area being a
hike -and -bike trail.
However, this would further restrict access to the
area and is not a proper solution. What the city must
do is reclaim its aesthetic jewel by fixing up the
place and running out the unsavory hooligans.
Improving the road, building rest rooms, con-
structing a parking area and stepping up police
protection would be moves in the right direction.
Georgetown should embrace resources instead
of letting them go to waste. As the town experi-
ences tremendous growth, it's the only way to
preserve an image that has been years in the mak-
ing.
t:i97, MCI
:13y UI
A"1251
"year-ol
Rourid
was -flounM dea'dIiXt'6'r'!,
IL19-It9le §6nda' ni
Alftej 0 --R
IIe2,y een sWImmngro
*s.T f
aft
sho url e
e
S4
ra )�s.�C n ..Ru
V-1
ammer
AOT
sprfq■&*�A JL%,Felj A L"& i-, �v
. . . . . . . . . . . .
died,after. lea ing-of a.-cliff,acBlu6,
as eclare'&&i'd`�
M
e S,,
Hole Park on Jul 11 had p rid
.9
Incu wo' e.peiic,
POPP e be wa � C-,,
d drowned.' Two dif Fth"
an cardio
S on er PAutopsy-, in
ed
fib
Pulmonary rescucitutiow
un tim au
-Jason Lafuse of IndianajumpqI
c6uh IMM-c-Al.
0 ty_ xam
n VI
off 'th' cliffs on
e the riverbank oppo-nl-
otti�i nthbitifig.: factor
re fighteik'and emergency lisW'in L'Ithe%io6rr-b6 *beside
site of the park. He reportedly began When
JIL,
F 4 A
try
Zol
A, Fort Hood soldiSr,
14. i from.-Indiana.,was atte
RAIP.iq&
died S unday- ifter"a lc@p from a cliff "Police
4W. 10,14
at Blue Hole .'Paik,'.-G'
,k gorgetown-To-"'-�,' 6
rived. at :d
lice said..
CPRqlE
unj
icesper
.,Witnesses'::'tpol'd"Poli'c#"e..-ithat'Jasoncli,:,.,..�*,-
soru
l
Lafuse Y21 standingNionv, ate A .
friend they� f
U W
e,,, 0 t) Zil 2,14 r .jumped.", off..- th c sl�-aroun Oth
Vrabouv geto�vn.Hpl
"e,
popular�- , 'swimming.t16W',�i
-'at,8-45-'
.6:45'` official ' "' W - i -I", - - �PPRM
PP s: said.,., Th' i-'Ik� d.�i
se�hitrui_ '11W ell!
)rated.w ays
the.-air,34nd.-
C
LIP
water.wi is ches4. police said:krW`
1.0fripe for., z
Police reports said h'e;s
struggled in � ".,Jhe. call
I ,A
other "i m'.'
se of
the,-, d_
n .1� , w m e s
out T of , thi
. � �
stolplped'bi
Cardiopulmon*:';�,:
use was;
x."-
V
0�, % !
2. ,
ICA J on
x
rip
'by i- a: UeorgertoNn ,di eaufflu,. eHolePark
this s
"' year.
mlArefighe.4aI"firstman,a 25;yeii-0 dRoundF-
ued residentdrownedon
z3He
�
e n gy, �q., Sefv-. also.beenfdrinking y
:according,
Ao
rivedw M-.4fiinuta
1011
4,44, porw_aqJGeor
kanj�'J&lix6 , &dead,-
U
0, eace;
Medical xaminers
tOPs,yAq,,,'detennine
h'
1c,
ohol.qp
FIR
second
to L
� L
"ItAdt"
A medical look at Blue Hole
Regarding upcoming decisions concerning, inlprmr
rncnts at Blue Hole: I am aware that This is ;► conlplc.\
issue which will have a lasting inlpac;t on (he 1()cal
ncighhorhood residcn(s and Georgetown as a whole. AS
a father with two kids that swine al 131uc I lolc rciQularly,
I agree that improvements are 1()Ilg mcrduc. 13111 as ;In
Emergency Room physician at (jcor,,n) II I lw pi(al, I
would like to express my concerns about 131uc. Holc front
a medical perspective.
Strictly front an EMS and Fincrgcncy I)char(nlcnl
standpoint, Blue Hole is a nightmare. Not only, is 131uc
Hole (hc site ol'rnorc than SO percent of (hc c im% nint_1,, in
Georgetown, but more than 100 pallcnts ;I \ c;u with
lacerations, scir.ures, scab wounds, ovcrdosc•s. sprains
and brulSCs end up ;It the (;corgclo%\ n I Iospil;11 l :mcr
gcncy Department. Many (4 these paticn(s arc tr;lns-
portcd by Williamson County LMS.
Most ol' these injuries and drownings are alcohol -
related. Both drownings in 1993 were alcohol -related.
Most lacerations are the result of the area being littered
with broken glass beer bottles. Most lights, stabbings,
and shootings in the area are drug- and alcohol -related. I
I'cel that prohibiting alcohol at Bluc Ilolc along with
other improvements is essential (o make Blue I lolc ,;Il'c.
What makes Blue F-lolc clifTcrenl than other parks in
the Georgetown area'.' First, 131uc Ilole is prilnariIN' a
swimming hole, unlike any o(hcr park in Gcorgct m,l),
Because ol' the cliffs and steep hlll`IdCS surrounding the
area, Blue Hole will always he prinlarily a swilnrlllrlg
area. PICtUrc the Williams 1XIN-c city pool crowdcd with
300 swirnrncrs. First, eliminate the Iifcp.,rcls, ;Ind stir -
Letters to
the Editor
round (he Fool with 30400t-high diving boards. Then
allow swirnntcrs to drink alcohol, smash beer bottles,
`wlin and dive at randorll.
Second, Blue Hole is isolated. Because of the cliffs,
ccrllcicry and Ilrnllcd access, Blue Hole will always be
isolated no nl;lttcr how much the area is improved or pa-
lrollccl.
'I'llild. Blue Ilolc has hcen a favorite swimming and
watering hole for For( If()()(] soldiers for at least the last
20 years. Rcgardlcss ol' where these visitors have to park,
if* they can sit on the clifl:s with an ice chest of beer, this
will always he a problem.
Finally, intoxicated drivers leaving Blue Hole are
routed through a busy residential area.
Plcase address this issue hef'orc more people are need-
lessly ch-owncd, killed or injured. Blue Hole is a beautiful
natural resource. Let's make it as safe as we can.
Mark Shepherd, M.D.,
('hicl' ol' Staff at Georgetown Hospital
1 12 Northcross
Gcorgclown
F(h1w 's 11ol ': Thls leller was also signed by Pat
Trrrr►c'►" R.N., LR n►crsc, Chetyl A. Harrison, LVN, ER
r►►r►s , (III(/ ,S'tcphe►► Behold, M.U., Medical Director,
IVillrc►msoi► C(mlih r A4S.