Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda CC 05.14.1996
NOTICE OF MEETING OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS TUESDAY, May 14, 1996 The City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, will meet on Tuesday, May 14, 1996, at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, located at the northeast corner of Seventh and Main Street in Georgetown, Texas. If you need accommodations for any type of disability, please advise in advance. Detailed explanatory information on the items listed below is compiled in an agenda packet which is distributed to the Mayor and each member of the Council. An agenda packet is also available at the Public Library, for the use of interested citizens. Governance Workshop - Call to order at 5:00 p.m. A Review Investment Report for the Quarter ended March 31, 1996, and discuss recommended actions/Susan Morgan B Review Draft Capital Improvements Plan C Governance discussion on desired mobile home regulations D Report on water quality testing and San Gabriel River cleanup/chip Richarte School Class E Answer questions on Consent Agenda Items listed specifically below under the Regular Session that will begin no sooner than 7.00 p.m. (for questions only, no action to be taken until Regular Session) Regular Session - to convene Executive Session Executive Session In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session that follows. E Sec.551.071 consultation with attorney F Sec.551.072 deliberation on real property G Sec.551.075 conference with employee Regular Session to begin no earlier than 7:00 p.m. H Action on Executive Session Items I Mayor, Council, City Manager, and staff comments and reports • Council Budget Retreat, May 30 and 31, and June 1 J Citizens wishing to address the Council City Council Agenda/May 14, 1996 Page 1 of 4 Pages Public Hearine K Public Hearing regarding the annexation of approximately 81.181 acres in the David Wright Survey, located between Airport Road and IH35, north of Lakeway Drive/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry Consent A enda Consent agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that council may act on with one single vote. A councilmember may pull any item from the consent agenda in order that the Council discuss and act upon it individually as part of the regular agenda. Please note that the following items may be discussed with no action taken during the Workshop at 5:00 p.m. L Consideration of approval of meeting minutes --Regular Meeting of April 9,1996/Sandra Lee M Consideration of approval of a correction to the minutes of January 23, 1996, to include the action taken on an Executive Session item/Sandra Lee N Consideration of acceptance of Investment Report for Quarter ended March 31, 1996/Micki Rundell and Susan Morgan O Consideration of approval of a resolution authorizing the City to loan an amount not to exceed $13 5, 000 to Reedholm Instruments to pay for a portion of costs to build a new facility/Susan Morgan P Consideration of approval of the 1995/1996 portion of the Annual Electric System Construction and Maintenance Contract (No. GEO-95-ED-1), between the City of Georgetown and Flowers Construction, in the amount of $50,000.00/Jim Briggs Q Consideration of approval of an annual contract with Linda Goldzimer for consulting services/Teresa Hersh and Bob Hart R Consideration of approval of the award of the annual bid for water meters to the Rohan Company in the estimated amount of $70,000.00/Terry Jones and Jim Briggs S Consideration of approval of a contract with White, Dolce & Barr for the design of the Sun City Fire Station, in an amount not to exceed $1041,831.00/Terry Jones and Bill Shanklin T Consideration of approval of Amendment No. 25 to the Agreement between the City of Georgetown and Camp, Dresser & McKee to provide easement preparation for the Pecan Branch Wastewater Interceptor Project - Phase 2 in the amount of $28,000.00/Jim Briggs U Consideration of approval of a Detailed Development Plan of City of Georgetown Block 52, Lot 5, located at 812 Church Street, and variances to the Subdivision Regulations/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry City Council Agenda/May 14, 1996 Page 2 of 4 Pages V Consideration of approval of an Access Easement, License to Encroach, and Consent for Access for the proposed Old Town Bakeray at 812 Church Street/Marianne Banks Regular Agenda Council will individually consider and possibly take action on any or all of the following items: (Council may, at any time, recess the regular session to convene in executive session at the request of the Mayor, a councilmember, or the City Manager.) W Consideration and second reading of an ordinance to rezone 2.52 acres known as Churchill Farms, Section Six, Phase One, as recorded in Cabinet M, Slides 384-385 from A, Agricultural to C-1, Local Commercial/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry X Consideration and second reading of an ordinance providing for the annexation into the City of approximately 2.821 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey, consisting of right of way and public utility easement for a portion of the proposed Northwest Boulevard between Northwood Drive and Whisper Oaks Drive/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry Y Consideration and first reading of an ordinance amending Ordinance 96-09 to replace the 80.3 acre tract with a 2.821 acre tract/Marianne Banks Z Consideration and approval of bid award to Odell Geer Construction Company, Inc. of Belton, Texas, to construct the Northwest Boulevard and Quail Valley Drive Street and Drainage Improvement Projects in the amount of $590,359.00/Jim Briggs AA Consideration of approval of a letter requesting the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to consider locating traffic signals at specified intersections in Georgetown/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry BB Consideration and first reading of an ordinance amending Exhibit 1 of the Century Plan - Development Plan for 1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46, located at 1904 Railroad Street, from Intensity Level Three to Intensity Level Five/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry CC Consideration and first reading of an ordinance to rezone the 1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46, located at 1904 Railroad Street, from RS, Residential Single Family to RM-2, Dense Multifamily/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry DD Consideration of approval to produce a Water Management/Conservation Program Media Campaign through Arrowhead Productions in the amount of $38,250.00/Jim Briggs EE Consideration and first reading of an ordinance establishing a designated hazardous materials route/Bill Shanklin FF Consideration and first reading of an ordinance establishing above -ground storage tanks/Bill Shanklin City Council Agenda/May 14, 1996 Page 3 of 4 Pages GG Consideration and first reading of an ordinance to modify Section 2.68.040 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Georgetown, Texas, relating to the appointment of members to the Georgetown Convention and Visitors Board/Hartley Sappington HH Consideration of naming the training facility on FM971 Bob Hart II Consideration of appointment of one member to the Georgetown Housing Authority BoardlLeo Wood Adjournment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING ���vDp � 0. Z. �E I , City Secretary of the City of Georgetown, Notice of Meeting was posted on the /04L day of /72 p V Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary City Council Agenda/May 14, 1996 Page 4 of 4 Pages Texas, do hereby certify that this , 1996, at '7.O=O a. m. . m Council Meeting Date: May 14, 1996 Item No. WORKSHOP ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Review Investment Report for the Quarter Ended March 31, 1996 and discuss recommended actions. ITEM SUMMARY See attached report to Council SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS none FINANCIAL IMPACT none COMMENTS none ATTACHMENTS City Investment Report for Quarter Ended March 31, 1996 Submitted By: Susan L. Morgan, Director of Finance and Administration MEMORANDUM DATE: May 6, 1996 TO: Mayor, Council Members and City Manager FROM: Susan L. Morgan, Director of Finance & Administratio SUBJECT: City Investment Report for Quarter Ended March 31, 1996 Overview The attached reports include ► Investments Outstanding as of March 31, 19963 ► Transaction Listing - Securities and Transaction Listing - Investment Pools showing investment activity during the quarter, and ► Balance Comparison by Quarter Report. Cash and Investment Balances Overall the City saw a net increase in total cash and investment balances on hand from $17,630,261 at December 31 to $18,438,858 as of March 31. The increase is a result of several factors: (1) property tax collections received in January 1996; (2) fees received from Del Webb for improvements in accordance with the development agreement; and (3) higher than average second quarter utility revenues due to the dry, cold winter. The unrealized gain on investments as of March 31 was $33,512 compared to $7,110 at December 31. It should be noted that the City's investment strategy is to invest to maturity; therefore, no gains or losses from the sale of securities will be realized except in the event of an extreme emergency. Interest Rates Market interest rates continued to decline slowly, dropping approximately 50 basis points ('/2 of 1 %) since December 31, 1995. Industry market analysts predict this trend to continue through the end of 1996. Although lower interest rates have affected the City's yield, the higher than anticipated balances available for investment will prevent any material shortfalls in budgeted interest revenues. Activity Since 12/31/95 The City shifted $5.1 million from its investment pools, Texpool and FGIC, to Treasury and Agency securities in addition to reinvesting maturing securities. This shift was the result of several factors. ► Semiannual interest payments for general obligation and revenue debt totaling $826,538 were made in February 1996. Remaining debt service funds could be invested until principal and interest payments are due in August 1996. ► City staff also firmed up construction schedules for capital projects to be completed over the next 6 - 9 months. This in turn provided us with accurate cash flow needs in order to make appropriately timed investment of funds. ► Interest rates are expected to continue to decline through the end of 1996. Staff invested available funds out over the next 6 - 15 months in order to maintain yields above what the investment pools will be able to offer. New Cash Management Program During March 1996, the City implemented a depository zero balance accounting (ZBA) process that will increase interest income on City funds by approx. $1,400 per month. Hartland Bank, the city's local depository bank, has worked closely with staff in developing this system whereby the City maintains a much smaller cash balance at the depository, earning 4.5%, and wires funds from Texpool, earning approx. 5.3%, on an as needed basis to cover checks as they clear the bank. Future Strategies The City will continue its current investment program of investing all available funds with staggered maturity dates to minimize market and interest rate risk while providing adequate liquidity. Texpool Texpool has once again been the subject of various media reports and controversy. The recent press relates to the December 1994 "run" and bail out, not to current practices. Investment Report for Quarter Ended March 31, 1996 page 2 of 3 F. VNVEST 12QTRRPT. MEM Texpool investment operations and practices were changed in January 1995 and are still being maintained. Texpool continues to maintain its AAA rating from Standard & Poor's and to comply with requirements of the Public Funds Investment Act. City staff continue to monitor state legislative hearings and actions regarding Texpool. Although the City of Georgetown did not withdraw its funds, we do not anticipate that any potential charge backs to Texpool participants who withdrew funds from Texpool in December 1994 to occur. Staff have begun evaluating alternate pools in the event that the Texas legislature should decide to discontinue Texpool sometime in the future. Recommendations Staff continues to recommend that the City diversify its use of this type of investment vehicle by utilizing at least two pools and/or money market funds. We have curtailed our use of the FGIC money market fund due to its lower rate of return and limited cash management services. In response to the Texpool controversy and these other considerations, we have been evaluating several local government investment pools and money market funds to add to the City's available options. The Texas Local Government Investment Cooperative (LOGIC) and Lone Star Investment Pool appear to provide the City with the most options, security, yield and cash management services. ► Both pools are privately run entities, but meet state law and City investment policy criteria set forth for investment of City funds. ► Both entities offer dollar for dollar net asset values, 90 day weighted average maturities and AAA ratings from at least one major rating agency. ► Both entities offer longer -term net asset value funds that the City may wish to utilize in the future to increase yield without decreasing liquidity. (Note: This type of investment is not currently allowed under our investment policy, but may be an appropriate vehicle in the future.) Investment with either entity will require City Council approval of an interlocal government investment cooperative resolution. Staff are still evaluating these two pools and anticipate bringing one or both to you for approval in the next 60 days. Compliance Statement The investment activity and strategies described in this report are in compliance with the City"s investment po i d state law. Michelle A. Rundell, Accounting Director Susan L. Morgan, Director of Finance & Administration Investment Report for Quarter Ended March 31, 1996 page 3 of 3 F: V NVES T 12Q TRRPT. MEM CITY OF GEORGETOWN INVESTMENTS OUTSTANDING AS OF MARCH 31, 1996 Purchase Coupon Purchase Investment Date Description Maturity Yield Cost Yield U. S. TREASURY SECURITIES: 03/08/94 U. S. Treasury Note 05/15/96 4.25% $ 986,094 4.93% Source: Debt Reserves 05/23/94 U. S. Treasury Note 04/30/96 5.50% 994,297 5.81% Source: Operating Funds (long-term reserves) 09/22/95 U. S. Treasury Note 10/31/96 6.88% 679,213 5.57% Source: Debt Reserves 03/21/96 U. S. Treasury Note 05/31/97 6.13% 269,466 5.63% Source: Operating Reserves 02/23/96 U. S. Treasury Bill 01/15/97 8.00% 302,513 5.04% Source: Debt Reserves U. S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY SECURITIES: 10/23/95 Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) Note 06/28/96 5.63% 999,375 5.71 % Source: Operating Reserves 11/03/95 Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Note 08/26/96 7.70% 1,016,875 5.54% Source: Operating Reserves 12/15/95 Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Note 11/25/96 8.25% 901,863 5.51% Source: Operating Reserves 12/15/95 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp (FHLMC) Note 01/17/97 7.86% 348,234 5.52% Source: Operating Reserves 12/15/95 Federal National Mortgage Assoc (FNMA) Note 01/27/97 7.68% 409,188 5.52% Source: Operating Reserves 03/19/96 Federal National Mortgage Assoc Disc (FNMA) Note 06/24/96 5.18% 295,813 5.34% Source: 95 CO Proceeds (Stormwater) 03/21/96 Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Note 07/25/96 8.00% 302,672 6.30% Source: Debt Service Funds 03/21/96 Federal National Mortgage Assoc Disc (FNMA) Note 07/30/96 5.16% 264,930 5.35% Source: Debt Service Funds 03/21/96 Federal National Mortgage Assoc Disc (FNMA) Note 07/30/96 5.16% 897,819 5.35% Source: Utility Debt Service Funds 03/21/96 Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Note 08/29/96 5.15% 747,381 5.35% Source: 95 Series TWDB Bond Proceeds 03/21/96 Federal National Mortgage Assoc Disc (FNMA) Note 09/24/96 5.14% 549,915 5.37% Source: 94 CO Proceeds 03/21/96 Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) Note 02/14/97 4.78% 997,725 5.61 % Source: Operating Reserves 03/21/96 Federal Farm Credit Discount Note (FFC) 03/17/97 5.24% 999,564 5.53% Source: Operating Reserves 03/21/96 Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) Note 06/10/97 9.20% 707,466 5.71 % Source: Operating Reserves TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES 12,670,402 10/26/95 (1) HARTLAND ESCROW CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 04/22/96 4.55% 1,053,032 FGIC 03/31/96 ° 4.99% 349,692 TEXPOOL 03/31/96 ' 5.28% 4,361,243 TOTAL INVESTMENT BALANCES (2) CITY DEPOSITORY (HARTLAND) TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENT BALANCES ' Balances and rates as of 03/31/95 18,434,368 03/31/96 4.50% 4,490 03/31/96 ",438,858 (i) Restricted investment of'95 Series Revenue Bond (TWDB) proceeds (2) Funding of outstanding checks presented for payment, interest earned netted against bank service changes Unrealized GAIN/LOSS $ 13,906 4,583 (3,769) (45) (1,890) 625 (11,875) (8,663) (2,930) (3,313) 557 (609) 372 1,260 15,707 791 (5,825) 51,532 (16,858) 33,556 $ 33,512 CITY OF GEORGETOWN QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT - MARCH 31, 1996 TRANSACTION LISTING - SECURITIES Purchase Discount / Purchase Investment Date Description Maturity Coupon Cost del_ Comments ... ... URCH.A. SES_ ;:.::.::;-;: ;.::.: ;:.;:.:.:;.;:�:: ;::.;:.::.;:::.:_:::;::.:;::.;.:.::..::::::::::.:::::::.:.:. . .:::.::.:..::..::::::.::::::. :...::.::::.....:.....::..:..:...:.:::..::.:::::.............................:::.::::.::..:.:.::::::.:::::........................................ .................................................................:::.:::::::...:::::................ ..................:..:...........:::.:..::::::::.:._::::.:............:::::.:.::._:::::::::.:.::::::._::.:.::::..:..:...:..:::.::::::..:::::::.::.::::.: ...:....... _.:::::.:.:::::...:...........................................:................. . . . 02/23/96 U. S. Treasury Bill 01/15/97 8.00% $302,513 5.04% Reinvestment of matured Source: Debt Reserves 2/21 FHLB Note 03/19/96 Federal National Mortgage Assoc Disc (FNMA) Note 06/24/96 5.18% $295,813 5.34% Maturity to coincide with project Source: 95 CO Proceeds (Stormwater) consturction 03/21/96 Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Note 07/25/96 8.00% $302,672 6.30% Maturity to coincide with August Source: Debt Service Funds P & I payment 03/21/96 Federal National Mortgage Assoc Disc (FNMA) Note 07/30/96 5.16% $264,930 5.35% Maturity to coincide with August Source: Debt Service Funds P & I payment 03/21/96 Federal National Mortgage Assoc Disc (FNMA) Note 07/30/96 5.16% $897,819 5.35% Maturity to coincide with August Source: Utility Debt Service Funds P & I payment 03/21/96 Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Note 08/29/96 5.15% $747,381 5.35% Investment of bond proceeds Source: 95 Series TWDB Bond Proceeds 03/21/96 Federal National Mortgage Assoc Disc (FNMA) Note 09/24/96 5.14% $549,915 5.37% Investment of bond proceeds Source: 94 CO Proceeds 03/21/96 Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) Note 02/14/97 4.78% $997,725 5.61% Ongoing staggered maturity Source: Operating Reserves investment strategy 03/21/96 Federal Farm Credit Discount Note (FFC) 03/17/97 5.24% $999,564 5.53% Ongoing staggered maturity Source: Operating Reserves investment strategy 03/21/96 Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) Note 06/10/97 9.20% $707,466 5.71% Ongoing staggered maturity Source: Operating Reserves investment strategy 03/21/96 U. S. Treasury Note 05/31/97 6.13% $269,466 5.63% Ongoing staggered maturity Source: Operating Reserves investment strategy �I...T.. RITIES..,:.:::::::::::.::::::..::.::...................................::.:.::::::...::..::::...............................::::.:.::::::..::...::::::............................:.:::::.::.:.:::..:::.::......................:.:.:.::::.::.:::::. 08/31/95 Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Note 02/21/96 6.91% $598,207 5.73% Proceeds reinvested Source: 94 CO Proceeds 08/31/95 Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Note 02/21/96 6.91% $296,590 5.73% Proceeds reinvested in US Source: Debt Reserves Treasury Bill 11/03/95 Federal Farm Credit (FFC) Note 01/02/96 7.21% $300,643 5.75% Proceeds reinvested Source: Operating Reserves ALL SECURITIES REDEEMED AT MATURITY, THEREFORE NO GAIN OR LOSS WAS REALIZED (Any changes In market value during the quarter are within minimun guidelines unless noted) CITY OF GEORGETOWN QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT - MARCH 31, 1996 TRANSACTION LISTING - INVESTMENT POOLS .......................... Balance lularket Value Balance Mafket V''I ........................ ............. Description 12/31/95 <12t3 %95;; 03/31/96 >03%3'I%9fi Comments Texpool $7,263,6237 26464 :. +... $4 361 243 ;::6D $OT: 4, ., „ „ - AAA Rated Pool $1 per $1 value Current value .999 $ 9 1 Per FGIC $1,339 671 339'31> $:..........:..,....:....::: 349 6 $ 92 3992 AAA Rated Pool - $1 per $1 value (Any changes in market value during quarter were within minimum guidelines unless noted) CITY OF GEORGETOWN QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT - MARCH 31, 1996 BALANCE COMPARISON BY QUARTER Balance Balance Balance INVESTMENT BALANCES BY TYPE 09/30/95 12/31/95 03/31/96 U. S. TREASURY SECURITIES $2,659,603 $2,659,603 $3,231,583 U. S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY SECURITIES $1,395,266 $4,870,975 $9,438,818 TEXPOOL $9,492,194 $7,263,623 $4,361,243 FG IC $2,310,173 $1,339,671 $349,692 HARTLAND ESCROW -CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT $2,287,291 $1,053,032 $1,053,032 HARTLAND - Local Depository $711,913 $443,356 $4,490 TOTALCASH ANDNVESTMEtI'S $18:�5644Q $17630,26 ;. $::8;43$;858: Council meeting date: 5-14-96 Item No. ODO WORKSHOP ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Report on water quality testing and San Gabriel River cleanup ITEM SUMMARY As you know, a class of students has been learning to test water and to organize volunteers for a clean-up project. The class is conducted by Lisa Garanflo (Science Teacher). The Richarteville students will provide a brief profile about the school and the project. They have also produced a video to accompany their report. ATTACHMENTS None mi Bob Hart, City Manager Council meeting May 14, 1996 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Public hearing regarding the annexation of approximately 81.181 acres in the David Wright Survey, located between Airport Road and IH35, north of Lakeway Drive. ITEM SUMMARY: This is the second of two (2) public hearings required by State law before initiation of annexation can begin. The purpose of the public hearings is to describe and receive comments on the City's plans for providing services to the annexation areas. The service plans for the areas to be annexed are attached (see Exhibit A). State law requires that the proposed service plan be explained at the public hearing. While it may be amended as a result of the public hearings, the provision of any service may not be deleted. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None FINANCIAL IMPACT: Full City services, including police and fire protection, emergency medical services, solid waste collection and disposal, maintenance of water and wastewater facilities, maintenance of road, streets and drainage, street lighting, maintenance of City park and recreation facilities must be provided to the annexed area within sixty (60) days after the effective date of the annexation. Necessary extension of capital improvements, such as water and wastewater systems, must be initiated within two years of annexation and be substantially completed within 4 1/2 years, in accordance with the adopted service plan, except when the annexed area is within the service area of another water or wastewater utility. COMMENTS: A resolution indicating intent to annex the 81.181 acres was approved by the City Council at the April 9, 1996 meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Map and service plan Submitted BY: Edward J.1 Barry, A P - Director Division o Development Services Clyde von Rosenber AICP Chief Planner, Long Range Planning r� O CITY OF GEORGETOM" 7 312 / 20 a O Ts . 70 44— •K � i MART COCK( M. al. 21 3 /631 *ILL i 136.22 AC 1 33732 AC i57M`E APPROXIMATELY 81.181 ACRES I• IN THE DA.VID WRIGHT SURVEY EXHIBIT A, Page I of 3 h I r s ti e E WITTERA A72 /-33 (102 SAC) I.OAc 79.24Ac OE"+I CHAY4A 98K/ .itT i C (20 16t _ 33 Po y� CHARLES M CARISTENSER `p »7 126 �eAc 1 v 24 37Ac EXHIBIT A, Page 2 of 3 CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS ANNEXATION SERVICE PLAN APPROXIMATELY 81.181 ACRES IN THE DAVID WRIGHT SURVEY, LOCATED BETWEEN AIRPORT ROAD AND IH35, NORTH OF LAKEWAY DRIVE Introduction This service plan has been prepared in accordance with Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 43 - Municipal Annexation. This requires that the service plan provide for the extension of full municipal services to the area to be annexed by any of the methods by which it extends services to any other area of the municipality. Police Protection Regular and routine patrolling of streets, responses to calls, and other police services will be provided upon the effective date of the annexation. Fire Protection and Code Enforcement Fire protection and prevention services are currently being provided to the area through an agreement with Williamson County. These services will continue to be provided to the area upon the effective date of the annexation. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the City Code Enforcement Officer will periodically patrol streets irk_ the area to ensure that all properties are in conformance with City Code. Solid Waste Collection Solid waste collection and disposal services will be provided upon the effective date of the annexation, in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions contained in the City Code. Water Service Water lines will be extended in accordance with City policy. The City has a Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy, which is described in this service plan. Sewer Service Wastewater lines will be extended in accordance with City policy. The City has a Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy, which is described in this service plan. Maintenance of Roads, Streets, and Drainage Roads, streets and drainage facilities dedicated to the public will be maintained according to City Code and policy upon the effective date of the annexation. Street Lightini Street lighting will be made available upon the effective date of the annexation, upon request of the property owners, in accordance with City Code and policy. Annexation Service Plan, Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, Page 3 of 3 Parks and Recreation Parks and recreation facilities dedicated to the public will be maintained according to City Code and policy upon the effective date of the annexation. Recreation services will be provided to all residents in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions, contained in the City Code. Planning and Zoning Upon the effective date of the annexation, the planning and zoning jurisdiction of the City will extend to this area. The area will be zoned A (Agricultural), unless otherwise approved through regular procedures. Inspection Services All inspection services, including building, electrical, plumbing, etc., provided by the City will be extended to the area upon the effective date of the annexation. Library Services Library services will be provided to all residents in accordance with the rates, terms, and conditions contained in the City Code upon the effective date of the annexation. Other Services Other services provided by the City, such as animal control, court, and general administration, will be made available upon the effective date of the annexation, in accordance with the City Code and policies. Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy City Ordinance Number 900404, a Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy, guides the planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of all utility system improvements, including water, wastewater and electrical service. Annexation Service Plan, Page 2 of 2 Council meeting date: 5-14-96 Item No. L AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Meeting Minutes of Regular City Council Meeting on Tuesday, April 23, 1996. ATTACHMENTS 1. Minutes of Regular City Council Meeting of Tuesday, April 23, 1996 Submitted By: Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS TUESDAY, April 23, 1996 The City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, met in Regular Session on the above date with Mayor Leo Wood presiding. Council Present: Dick Vincent George Arroyos Lee Bain Susan Hoyt Ferd Tonn Shelley Davis Doris Curl Staff Present: Bob Hart, City Manager Marianne Banks, City Attorney Sandra Lee, City Secretary Ed Barry, Dir. of Dev. Services Susan Morgan, Dir. of Finance Teresa Hersh, Dir. of Emp. & Org. Svcs. Bill Shanklin, Fire Chief Hartley Sappington, Dir. of Comm. Svcs. Randy Morrow, Dir. of Parks & Rec. Council Absent: None Hildy Kingma, Chief Planner Carla Benton, Planning Technician Kim Ashby, Customer Service Rep. Wendy Walsh, Senior Planner Charles Simon, Senior Planner Terry Jones, Purchasing Agent Dave Hall, Building Official Tom Bolt, Sr. Bldg. Inspector Governance Workshop - Called to order at 5:25 p.m. A Redesign Team Report/Bob Stevenson and Hildy Kingma Kingma and Stevenson presented an update on the goal of improving development services. B Employee Sick Leave Analysis Report/Southwestern University Intern Skye Stuart Stuart displayed to Council the comparison of the City of Georgetown Sick Leave Usage with other cities in Texas. By comparison, employees in Georgetown are not abusers of sick leave usage. C Discussion with representatives of the Historic Preservation Commission regarding downtown parking alternatives Historic Preservation Commission Chairman Bill Harris asked Council to prioritize the parking problem at their Budget Retreat and consider the options suggested by the Commission, such as creating a larger parking lot at 9th and Rock. City Council Agenda/April 23, 1996 Page 1 of 8 Pages At this point, Wood invited Marvin Waley to speak to Council about plans for the 150th Birthday Celebration. Waley asked Council to suggest names for the Committee to plan this celebration. A trip to the Fredericksburg Birthday Celebration was scheduled to leave City Hall at 9.00 a.m on May 9. D CAPCO Meeting Report/George Arroyos Arroyos shared highlights of the recent meeting. E Name the 971 Facility Hart asked Council for suggested names for the facility. Voting on the name will be scheduled for the next agenda. F Answer questions on Consent Agenda Items listed specifically below under the Regular Session that will begin no sooner than 7:00 p.m. (for questions only, no action to be taken until Regular Session) Various questions were answered. A substitute Concept Plan was distributed to Council for Item T, showing a roadway that had not been submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission. If adopted by the Council on the Consent Agenda, the revised Concept Plan would be taken back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for approval. Regular Session - Called to order at 7:03 p.m. Executive Session G Sec.551.071 consultation with attorney H Sec.551.072 deliberation on real property Sec.551.075 conference with employee Executive Session was deferred to the end of the meeting. Regular Session - Called to order at 7:03 p.m. J Action on Executive Session Items There was no action on Executive Session items at this time. K Mayor, Council, City Manager, and staff comments and reports • Reminder of Special Council Meeting on 5:15 p.m. on Tuesday, May 7, 1996, (prior to the Planning and Zoning Meeting at 6:00 p.m.) to canvass the results of the May 4, 1996 General/Special Election, swear in new councilmembers, and elect Mayor Pro Tem TML Regional Meeting in Taylor on May 16 TLI Meeting at Lake Buchanan on May 9 and 10 - Doris Curl City Council Agenda/April 23, 1996 Page 2 of 8 Pages Arroyos reminded Council that the Facilities and Services Working Group will meet on May 6 and prepare a draft for Council review. A public hearing is scheduled for May 20, and a formal acceptance is scheduled for May 28. He noted that it is very important that Councilmembers tour the City facilities, particularly the Police Station. Vincent noted that this is Volunteer Week, and reminded everyone about the Crop Walk scheduled for Saturday, April 26. Wood noted that Vincent had been elected as the new President of the GIVE Board, and also noted the Caring Place Grand Opening of the new expansion area. Hoyt thanked people for attending the Library Celebrity Day. She spoke of attending the recent Texas Leadership Institute and that there were several Georgetown people in attendance. Wood also noted that there would be a ribbon cutting ceremony on the new frontage road on Friday, May 10 at the HEB parking lot at 11:00 a.m. 0 Tourism Proclamation Wood read and presented a proclamation declaring Tourism Week, May 5 through May 11, 1996, to Convention and Visitors Bureau Board Chairman Gordon Baker. 0 Public Service Recognition Week Proclamation Wood read the proclamation and will present it to the Central Texas Chapter of the American Society of Public Administrators. L Citizens wishing to address the Council Ms. Gail Daleiden of 421 W. Ridgewood Road spoke in favor of the Rayls family being able to renovate the house at 1205 Ash Street and asked Council to reconsider the demolition order. Mr. Mark Frost of 206 Olde Oak spoke in favor of the Rayls family and asked that Rayls be allowed to continue to live at 1205 Ash Street. Mr. Paul Rayls of 1205 Ash Street told Council he still doesn't understand why the house at 1205 Ash has to be torn down. Mr. Ed Steiner of 409 W. 3rd Street told Council that he supports Mr. Rayls. He said his main purpose for speaking to the Council at the meeting tonight was regarding the Family Dollar Store. He said the manager has told him that the City is preventing him from allowing his delivery trucks to park and unload behind the store. Public Hearin-Q City Council Agenda/April 23, 1996 Page 3 of 8 Pages M Public Hearing regarding the annexation of approximately 81.181 acres in the David Wright Survey, located between Airport Road and IH35, north of Lakeway Drive/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry The Public Hearing was opened at 7:27 p.m. Barry explained the service plan and explained that this was the first of two required public hearings before the annexation ordinance would be presented to the Council for adoption. Wood recognized Mr. Marbert Moore of 3033 Airport Road, owner of the property to be annexed. Moore told Council that he was not asking to be annexed but asking "what if' he requested utility service to the area in order to develop a mobile home park. Wood asked Hart to respond. Hart stated that there were two issues involved in the annexation policy. The first is that wastewater service is generally not provided outside the City Limits. The other issue is that mobile homes are not considered to be appropriate development along an interstate highway. Curl asked and was told that this item was not posted for discussion or deliberation. Curl asked Moore if he felt that his property would be de -valued if it were annexed. Moore repeated that he had not asked to be annexed, and said if he did plan to develop the property, he would not mind being annexed. He asked Council to state whether he would be annexed if he did not develop a mobile home park. Curl stated that she wanted to make sure he understood that they were not allowed to comment. The public hearing was closed at 7:37 p.m. Consent Agenda N Consideration of approval of meeting minutes --Regular Meeting of April 9,1996/Sandra Lee O Consideration of award of semi-annual bid for poleline hardware to various bidders in the estimated amount of $78,582.37/Terry Jones and Jim Briggs P Consideration of a resolution to authorize a License to Encroach into the platted public utility easement located along Reinhardt Boulevard of Churchill Farms, Section Five, Block A. Lot 14, located at 412 Stonehedge Boulevard/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry Q Consideration of a resolution to authorize a License to Encroach into the public utility easements and drainage easements located along the rear property lines of Lots 8-13, Block M. Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Two, known as 204, 2065, 300, 302, 304, and 306 Belmont Drive/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry R Consideration of a resolution to authorize a License to Encroach into the platted public utility easement located along the west property line of Magnolia Court of Berry Creek, Section Nine, Phase II, Block A, Lot 20, located at 31007 Magnolia Court/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry City Council Agenda/April 23, 1996 Page 4 of 8 Pages S Consideration of a resolution authorizing the City Attorney to issue a quit claim deed to be filed abandoning the platted public utility easements located along the rear and south side lot lines at Parkview Estates, Block D. Lot 2, known as 102 Parque Vista Drive/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry T Consideration of a Concept Plan of a 118.951 acre tract in the John Berry Survey, to be known as Pecan Branch Subdivision, located on County Road 152 and FM971/1-111dy Kingma and Ed Barry Special Consideration regarding this item: The Council approved the Concept Plan of Pecan Branch Subdivision as submitted by the applicant and dated April 9, 1996, with the modification that the design of the development will be adjusted to accommodate the anticipated MOKAN right of way through this property such that the land on either side of MOKAN right of way can be developed independently, and such that in the event the MOKAN right of way is not required on this property, this proposed right of way could be developed in an integrated and coordinated manner with the overall development scheme of the subdivision; and conditioned on these modifications being approved by the Georgetown Planning and Zoning Commission. U Consideration of a Final Plat of a 99.096 acre tract in the R. T. Jenkins, Isaac Jones, Abner Short, W. G. Wilkinson, and George Thompson Surveys, to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Phase 2, Neighborhood Ten/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry V Consideration of a Final Plat of a Resubdivision of Logan Ranch, Section One, Lot 43, located at 221 Logan Ranch Road/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry W Consideration of a Final Plat of a 6.76 acre tract combining multiple tracts in the Cedar Oaks Subdivision, North Georgetown Addition and acreage in the Nicholas Porter survey, to be known as Foster Square, located between Spring Street, Morrow Street, Austin Avenue, North Forest Street, IH3 5, and Old Lampasas Road/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry X Consideration of a Final Plat of River Oaks IH35 Business Park, a Resubdivision of River Oaks of Georgetown Office Park, located on the East IH3 5 Frontage Road, north of SH29/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry Y Consideration of a Revised Final Plat of a 53.537 acre tract in the Daniel Monroe, Lewis M. Russell and Abner Short Surveys, being a Resubdivision of a Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhood One, Tracts H and S. and a Revision of a Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhood Eight, to be known as a Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Neighborhood Eight-A/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry Z Consideration of the development agreement concerning the platting of Foster Square (Albertson's)/Marianne Banks AA Consideration of a resolution declaring April as Fair Housing Month/Hartley Sappington City Council Agenda/April 23, 1996 Page 5 of 8 Pages Motion by Bain, second by Davis to approve the Consent Agenda in its entirety. Approved 7-0. Regular Ataenda BB Consideration of a resolution and Statewide Transportation Enhancement Program Application to Texas Department of Transportation for Hike/Bike Trails along the South San Gabriel River, with the City of Georgetown committing 20% of the cost of the program, with 80% of the cost from the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA)/Randy Morrow Morrow told Council that this application covers a "trail" from Chautauqua Park to Leander Road, where the land has already been acquired or could be acquired. Curl asked if any of the County bridges could be incorporated in this trail. Morrow said they were not at that phase yet, but the bridges would be considered. Morrow read the resolution. Motion by Bain, second by Hoyt to approve this grant application. Approved 7-0. Wood commended Morrow and staff for putting together this application on a short time frame. Arroyos also commended Morrow for attending a Hispanic Parents Meeting with him regarding their utilization of activities at the Recreation Center. CC Consideration of a Variance to the access and driveway separation standards of the Subdivision Regulations for Serenada Country Estates, Unit One, Lot 4/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry Pulled at the request of the applicant. DD Consideration of a Variance from the Subdivision Regulations for Churchill Farms, Section Five, Block A. Lot 14, located at 412 Stonehedge Boulevard/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry Kingma explained that this variance was to allow a six-foot fence, and that staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission felt this was a reasonable request. Motion by Tonn, second by Curl to approve this variance. Approved 7-0. EE Consideration of a Preliminary Plat of a 5.01 acre tract in the David Wright Survey, to be known as Hempe Estates; and Variances to the Subdivision Regulations/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry Kingma explained that the variances were approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Bain asked about the water run-off concern as expressed by an adjacent property owner. Kingma said she felt that problem had been resolved. Motion by Vincent, second by Tonn to approve the preliminary plat and variances. Approved 7-0. FF Consideration of a Preliminary Plat of a resubdivision of Crystal Knoll Terrace, Unit One, Block 11, Lot 7/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry Kingma noted that this was originally platted as a commercial lot, and there is no objection to this being resubdivided. Motion by Tonn, second by Bain to approve this Preliminary Plat. Approved 7-0. City Council Agenda/April 23, 1996 Page 6 of 8 Pages GG Consideration of the recommendation of the Council Compensation Committee regarding monthly remuneration to the Mayor and Councilmembers/Sandra Lee Curl thanked the committee, and said she personally felt that the current amount received was very generous, and she could not support the recommendation of the Committee. Arroyos also thanked the Committee and asked to clarify the remuneration policy, saying that he felt it was intended as expense reimbursement for telephone bills, wear and tear on vehicles, etc. Davis also concurred, saying that the current amount was more than enough. Vincent said he also appreciated the Committee's recommendation, but the current amount was sufficient. Bain said he felt none of the Councilmembers had sought the position to be paid. Wood asked that a letter be sent to the Committee members thanking them for their service. Motion by Curl, second by Bain to accept the report of the Council Compensation Committee, but not to accept the increase in remuneration. Approved 7-0. HH Consideration of appointments to the 150th Birthday Committee/Mayor Wood Wood asked Council to get their suggested names to Sandra Lee by the end of this week. II Consideration of appointment of one member to the Convention and Visitors Bureau Board/Mayor Wood Wood said he found out today that there would be a vacancy on the Housing Authority, and asked Hart to get a list of the available names to bring to the next Council Meeting. Davis asked if Bed and Breakfast Representatives were to be combined with Restaurant Representatives. 8:06 p.m. recessed Regular Session to convene Executive Session 9:12 p.m. resumed Regular Session J Action on Executive Session items Banks read a resolution concerning condemnation. Motion by Hoyt, second by Vincent to authorize the Mayor and staff to negotiate to acquire land for the Hike and Bike Trail. Motion by Hoyt, second by Tonn to reauthorize staff to purchase the Heritage Baptist Church site. Approved 7-0. Motion by Hoyt, second by Tonn to purchase land to reconfigure the Pepper tract and realign Shell Spur. Approved 7-0. Curl asked for input from Council regarding she and Davis backing the requests being made to Metro Mart by the neighbors in the area. Davis was asked and explained that the neighbors were asking for more concessions. Council generally agreed that everything that could be done was done, and the developer went beyond the necessary requirements. City Council Agenda/April 23, 1996 Page 7 of 8 Pages The meeting was adjourned at 9:23 p.m. Approved: Attest: Leo Wood Mayor City Council Agenda/April 23, 1996 Page 8 of 8 Pages Sandra D. Lee City Secretary Council meeting date: 5-14-96 AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET Item No. M SUBJECT Correction to the minutes of January 23, 1996, regarding action taken on an Executive Session item ITEM SUMMARY In researching the parkland purchase of 10 acres in Reata Trails, I discovered that I had failed to include in the minutes of January 23, the action taken in Open Session regarding that item. The minutes should read: 8: 22 p. m. recessed for Executive Session - 9:1 S p. m. resumed Open Session H Action on Executive Session items Motion by Vincent, second by Bain to approve the purchase of 10 acres of land in Reata Trails for parkland. Approved 7-0. ATTACHMENTS 1. Copy of page 2 of 9 from the minutes of January 23, 1996, showing at Item H that the Executive Session was postponed to the end of the Council Meeting. 2. Copy of page 6 of 9 where the action should have been placed, just prior to Item JJ. 3. Copy of proposed new pages 6, 7, 8, and 9 showing the action inserted as stated above. Sub ' ed by: Sandra _ D. Lee, City Secretary The envelopes containing the returns and tally lists of Early Voting and Precinct "A" voting on Election Day were presented to the Mayor and Council, acting as the Canvassing Authority. After a comparison of the tallies, it was officially declared that Shelley Pierre Davis defeated Luther Laubach for the District 2 Councilmember position. Lee read the ordinance. Motion by Arroyos, second by Curl to adopt the ordinance on Emergency Reading, declaring the election results official. Approved 6-0. C Swearing in of newly -elected Councilmember/Sandra Lee Shelley Pierre Davis was sworn in by Lee. D Comments by incoming Councilmember Davis thanked everyone for assisting in his election, told the Council that he looked forward to working with them, and took his position on the dias. Executive Session In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session that follows. E S ec. 5 51.071 consultation with attorney F Sec.551.072 deliberation on real property G Sec.551.074 personnel matters Regular Session H Action on Executive Session items Executive Session was postponed to the end of the Council Meeting. �---- Mayor, Council, City Manager, and staff comments and reports Hart noted to Council that the Blue Hole Project had again gained printed notoriety in a publication known as Catalyst, Volume 15, No. 10, for December, 1995--January, 1996. All of the seated Council welcomed newly -sworn Councilmember Shelley Davis. J Citizens wishing to address the Council Ed Steiner of 409 W. 3rd Street in Georgetown again requested that Chautauqua Park be renamed for Edna Powell. He spoke of two petitions that had been submitted regarding the name change. Council Meeting Minutes January 23, 1996 Page 2 of 9 Pages area. Hart explained that the provision of sewer service would allow for smaller lots to be utilized than with septic service. Motion by Tonn, second by Curl to approve the agreement. Approved 7-0. GG First Reading of an ordinance amending Ordinance 95-42/Dave Hall/Ed Barry/Marianne Banks Hall read the caption only after satisfying the requirements of the City Charter. Motion by Bain, second by Hoyt to approve this ordinance on first reading. Approved 7-0. HH First reading of an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance to include model homes and construction offices as specially permitted and restricted uses/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry The ordinance has been revised, according to von Rosenberg, to compromise between the neighborhood and the developers/builders. Hoyt thanked staff and John Gavurnik, a builder in the audience, for working together to help reach the compromise with the neighborhood. von Rosenberg read the caption only after satisfying the requirements of the City Charter. Motion by Hoyt, second by Arroyos to approve this ordinance on first reading. Approved 7-0. II First reading of an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance to revise the rules for landscaping, off-street parking and accessory uses and buildings/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry von Rosenberg explained that this amendment was the first phase of an incremental change to provide consistency between the Subdivision Regulations and the Zoning Ordinance. von Rosenberg read the caption only after satisfying the requirements of the City Charter. Motion by Bain, second by Hoyt, to approve this ordinance on first reading. Approved 7-0. �+ 8:22 p.m. recessed for Executive Session �I'-"/� Pm cZ_ JJ Consideration of a resolution to create the Airport Plan Working Grou and to direct the Working Group to proceed with the development of the Airport Functional Plan Element of the Century Plan/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry von Rosenberg explained that this Group would be formed through an agreement with the Aviation Division of the Texas Department of Transportation. von Rosenberg read the caption of the resolution. Wood recommended Albert Fittipaldi, George Taylor, Ronald Parker, Donald Cole, Randy Smedley, and at large members, Beth Jenkins, James Accuntius, Deborah Boone and Jim Spikes. Motion by Tonn, second by Hoyt to approve the resolution and the appointments. Approved 6-0. (Curl abstained.) KK Consideration of the appointment of three members to the Airport Advisory BoardlLeo Wood Wood recommended Albert Fittipaldi, Donald Cole and Randy Smedley. Motion by Vincent, second by Arroyos to approve the Mayor's recommendations. Approved 6-0. (Curl abstained) Council Meeting Minutes January 23, 1996 Page 6 of 9 Pages area. Hart explained that the provision of sewer service would allow for smaller lots to be utilized than with septic service. Motion by Tonn, second by Curl to approve the agreement. Approved 7-0. GG First Reading of an ordinance amending Ordinance 95-42/Dave Hall/Ed Barry/Marianne Banks Hall read the caption only after satisfying the requirements of the City Charter. Motion by Bain, second by Hoyt to approve this ordinance on first reading. Approved 7-0. HH First reading of an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance to include model homes and construction offices as specially permitted and restricted uses/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry The ordinance has been revised, according to von Rosenberg, to compromise between the neighborhood and the developers/builders. Hoyt thanked staff and John Gavurnik, a builder in the audience, for working together to help reach the compromise with the neighborhood. von Rosenberg read the caption only after satisfying the requirements of the City Charter. Motion by Hoyt, second by Arroyos to approve this ordinance on first reading. Approved 7-0. II First reading of an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance to revise the rules for landscaping, off-street parking and accessory uses and buildings/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry von Rosenberg explained that this amendment was the first phase of an incremental change to provide consistency between the Subdivision Regulations and the Zoning Ordinance. von Rosenberg read the caption only after satisfying the requirements of the City Charter. Motion by Bain, second by Hoyt, to approve this ordinance on first reading. Approved 7-0. 8:22 p.m. recessed for Executive Session - 9:15 p.m. resumed Open Session H Action on Executive Session items Motion by Vincent, second by Bain to approve the purchase of 10 acres of land in Reata Trails for parkland. Approved 7-0. JJ Consideration of a resolution to create the Airport Plan Working Group and to direct the Working Group to proceed with the development of the Airport Functional Plan Element of the Century Plan/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry von Rosenberg explained that this Group would be formed through an agreement with the Aviation Division of the Texas Department of Transportation. von Rosenberg read the caption of the resolution. Wood recommended Albert Fittipaldi, George Taylor, Ronald Parker, Donald Cole, Randy Smedley, and at large members, Beth Jenkins, James Accuntius, Deborah Boone and Jim Spikes. Motion by Tonn, second by Hoyt to approve the resolution and the appointments. Approved 6-0. (Curl abstained.) Council Meeting Minutes January 23, 1996 Page 6 of 9 Pages KK Consideration of the appointment of three members to the Airport Advisory Board/Leo Wood Wood recommended Albert Fittipaldi, Donald Cole and Randy Smedley. Motion by Vincent, second by Arroyos to approve the Mayor's recommendations. Approved 6-0. (Curl abstained) LL Consideration of the appointment of three members to the Board of Adjustment/Leo Wood Wood recommended Gerald Carlson, Larry Brown and Linda Vaclivik. Motion by Hoyt, second by Arroyos to approve the Mayor's recommendations. Approved 7-0. MM Consideration of the appointment of two members to the Building Standards Commission/Leo Wood Wood recommended John Gavurnik and John Offen. Motion by Arroyos, second by Curl to approve the Mayor's recommendations. Approved 7-0. NN Consideration of the appointment of four members to the Convention and Visitors Board/Leo Wood Wood recommended Gordon Baker, Pam Heller and Faye Winberg, and to hold the fourth position open until after the Council can hold a work session Motion by Arroyos, second by Bain to approve the Mayor's recommendations. Approved 7-0. 00 Consideration of the appointment of two members to the Board of Electrical Examiners/Leo Wood Wood recommended Larry Millican and Paul Griffin. Motion by Vincent, second by Davis to approve the Mayor's recommendations. Approved 7-0. PP Consideration of the appointment of three members to the Historic Preservation Commission/Leo Wood Wood recommended Bill Harris, Jan Hamman-Patterson, and Cal Wilkerson. Motion by Bain, second by Tonn to approve the Mayor's recommendations. Approved 7-0. QQ Consideration of the appointment of two members to the Hospital Authority Board/Leo Wood Wood recommended Herb Nelson and Marjorie Herbert. Motion by Curl, second by Arroyos to approve the Mayor's recommendations. Approved 7-0. RR Consideration of the appointment of two members to the Housing Authority Board/Leo Wood Wood recommended Velta Simmons and Ruby Collins. Motion by Davis, second by Arroyos to approve the Mayor's recommendations. Approved 7-0. SS Consideration of the appointment of four members to the Library Advisory Board/Leo Wood Council Meeting Minutes January 23, 1996 Page 7 of 9 Pages Wood recommended Nelda Burson, Amy Anderson, Sharon Sanders, and Sarah Riddell. Motion by Curl, second by Hoyt to approve the Mayor's recommendations. Approved 7-0. TT Consideration of the appointment of four members to the Parks and Recreation Board/Leo Wood Wood recommended Ronda Seagraves, Sarah O'Brien, Cheryl Mize, and Joan Sukup. Motion by Arroyos, second by Davis to approve the Mayor's recommendations. Approved 7-0. UU Consideration of the appointment of four members to the Planning and Zoning Commission/Leo Wood Wood recommended Cal Wilkerson, Claude Proctor, Steve Johnson, and Mike McMaster. Motion by Davis, second by Hoyt to approve the Mayor's recommendations. Approved 7-0. VV Consideration of a resolution to create the Century Plan Facilities and Services Plan Working Group and to direct the Working Group to proceed with the development of the Facilities and Services Functional Plan Element of the Century Plan/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry von Rosenberg said this Group would work with graduate students from the University of Texas to complete the Plan by May 1 in order for it to be considered in the Budget. Curl wants to ensure that someone addresses handicapped and senior citizen issues. von Rosenberg read the caption of the resolution. Wood recommended Kathryn Stallard, Leon Douglas, Cal Wilkerson, Gwen Morrison, Gordon Baker, Albert Fittipaldi, David Wolf, Rebecca Pfiester, Jim Gross, Herb Nelson, Faye Pierre, Karen Wilson, Mary Faye Sterk, David Hayes, a member of the Georgetown School Board, Eric Van Danen, Dan Bryant, Ross Duncan, Bob Brent, Steve Doering, Norm Bray, and Jim Isabell. Councilmembers Arroyos and Bain are to Co -Chair the Working Group. Motion by Curl, second by Vincent to approve the Mayor's recommendations Approved 7-0. L Consideration of approval of the purchase of property from Sierra Microwave Technology, Inc. for construction of improvements to be leased to Reedholm Instruments Company/Marianne Banks Hart asked Council for authorization for staff to purchase the property. Motion by Curl, second by Tonn to give staff the authorization. Approved 7-0. M Consideration of a community and business agreement and lease with Reedholm Instruments Company for construction and development of a manufacturing facility/Marianne Banks Motion by Curl, second by Davis to authorize staff to approve within State guidelines. Approved 7-0 Council Meeting Minutes January 23, 1996 Page 8 of 9 Pages N Consideration of the purchase of property from Sierra Microwave Technology, Inc. for construction of improvements to be leased to Advanced Cable Services, L.P./Marianne Banks Hart told Council there would be no City funds expended. Motion by Tonn, second by Vincent to approve the purchase. Approved 7-0. O Consideration of a community and business agreement and lease with Advanced Cable Services, L.P. to provide real estate improvements in the form of a building to allow Advanced Cable Service, L.P. to expand its telecommunications/CATV industry operations in the City of Georgetown/Marianne Banks Motion by Bain, second by Davis to authorize staff to approve within State guidelines. Approved 7-0. WW Final comments and evaluation of meeting process There were no final comments. Approved: Leo Wood, Mayor Council Meeting Minutes January 23, 1996 Page 9 of 9 Pages The meeting was adjourned at 9:32 p.m. Attest: Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary Council Meeting Date: May 14, 1996 Item No. __& AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Acceptance of City Investment Report for Quarter Ended March 31, 1996. ITEM SUMMARY The report presented at workshop shows (1) the investments outstanding as of 3/31/96 and their market value at that date; (2) the investment purchases and maturities for the quarter; (3) the Texpool and FGIC balances and discusses activity during the quarter; and (4) comparison of balances by quarter. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS The investment activity and strategies described in this report are in compliance with the City's Investment Policy and state law. FINANCIAL IMPACT n/a COMMENTS This report is presented to comply with quarterly reporting requirements of the Public Funds Investment Act. ATTACHMENTS Report provided with Workshop Item Sub ' ed By: Micki Rundell, Accounting Director Susan L. Morgan, Director of Finance nance and Administration Council Meeting Date: May 14 1996 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Resolution authorizing the City to loan an amount not to exceed $13 5,000 to Reedholm Instruments to pay for a portion of costs to build a new facility. ITEM SUMMARY Reedholm Instruments will receive financial assistance through the City from the Texas Capital Fund to finance a new facility. The company will also borrow approx. $300,000 from a third party with the remaining amount, not to exceed $135,000, to be borrowed from the City of Georgetown. The loan will be repaid in monthly installments over eight years at eight percent interest. The loan will be secured by an equipment lien. The attached resolution also amends the previously approved lease agreement between the City and Reedholm Instruments to include payment of this note as part of the lease terms. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS The funds for this loan will be funded from the Electric Fund's contingency reserve and is considered a specially approved investment in accordance with City Investment Policy Section 4.1.5. This clause in the investment policy was also used in 1991 to loan funds to Tessco for that project. FINANCIAL IMPACT The loan was included in the 1995/96 Annual Operating Plan. COMMENTS none ATTACHMENT Proposed Resolution Submitted By: Susan L. Morgan, Director of Finance & Administration Z Bob Hart, City Manager er RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING A LOAN TO REEDHOLM INSTRUMENTS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $135,000 AND AUTHORIZING THE LOAN AS AN INVESTMENT OF CITY FUNDS UNDER SECTION 4.1.5 OF THE CITY'S INVESTMENT POLICY. WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown has an existing agreement with Reedholm Instruments to construct and lease back a facility within Georgetown Technology Park as part of an Texas Capital Fund economic development project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has authority to loan money for economic development purposes under Section 380 of the Local Government Code and to make a specially authorized investment of city funds under its investment policy; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this resolution are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this resolution implements Economic Development Policy 1 of the Century Plan which states: "The City has a broad tax base with minimal impact from economic fluctuation through diversified growth and business opportunities to create jobs." and Finance Policy 1 of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element, which states: "The City will conduct all municipal operations in an efficient business -like manner"; and further finds that the adoption of this resolution is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan. SECTION 2. The loan to Reedholm Instruments, in an amount not to exceed $135,000 to be repaid monthly over eight year at eight percent interest, is hereby approved by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas. SECTION 3. The loan is approved as a special investment of City funds in accordance with Section 4.1.5 of the City's Investment Policy. Reedholm Instruments Loan Resolution No. Page 1 of 2 SECTION 4. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. RESOLVED this 14th day of May, 1996. ATTEST: Sandra Lee City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney Reedholm Instruments Loan Resolution No. Page 2 of 2 THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: By: LEO WOOD Mayor Council Meeting : DateMay 14 1996 Item No. Y AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Council approval of 1995/1996 portion of Annual Electric System Construction and Maintenance Contract (No. GEO-95-ED-1), between the City of Georgetown and Flowers Construction, in the amount of $50,000.00. ITEM SUMMARY: On March 28, 1995, Council approved a bid award for the above referenced Electric System contract. The contract period spanned portions of two budget years, with a portion of the funding being paid from each budget year. The amount of $200,000.00 was approved on the original bid award of $250,000.00., and was paid from 94-95 budget year funds. The remaining $50,000.00 was to be paid from 95-96 funds. Therefore, staff recommends council approval to pay the remaining funds to Flowers Flowers Constuction, in the amount of $50,000.00. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: NONE FINANCIAL IMPACT: r Funds in the amount of $50,000.00 are to be paid from Account Number 611-101-6126-00. COMMENTS ATTACHMENTS: S Y: Jim Briggs, Director Community Owned Utilities Council Meeting Date: 5-14-96 Item No. WORKSHOP ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Approve annual contract with Linda Goldzimer for consulting services ITEM SUMMARY During the preparation of the current 1995/96 Annual Operating Plan, funds were budgeted for Linda Goldzimer to provide assistance for the City for the Development Process Redesign and Organizational Systems Planning and Development. During that time, $59,000 was set aside for the comprehensive assistance in the Development Process Redesign and for Systems Planning and Development. During the course of the fiscal year, the Council used Linda Goldzimer for facilitation and development of a governance policy and an evaluation system for appointed staff for the City Council. The total cost for this service was $7,000. Because the total of these amounts exceeds $15,000, authorization is requested to utilize Linda Goldzimer for the current fiscal year in an amount not to exceed $65,000. FINANCIAL IMPACT The redesign assistance and organizational planning are included in the 1995/96 Annual Operating Plan. However, City Council consultation and the additional $8,000 was not budgeted. Staff requests that this portion ($15,000) be paid from Council Contingency. As of March 31, 1996, the available balance in the Council's contingency account is $107,500. ATTACHMENTS None Submitted by: Teresa Hersh, Director of Employee & Organizational Services D� Bob Hart, City Manager Council Meeting Date: May 14, 1996 Item No. 0;� AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Award of annual bid for water meters to the Rohan Company in the estimated amount of $70,000.00. ITEM SUMMARY Bids were received to furnish the City with 3/4 inch electronic water meters for a one year period, with an option to renew for one additional one year period. The staff recommendation is to award this bid to the only bidder, the Rohan Company of Austin. These meters are used for new installations and the replacement of old meters. Even though we had only one bidder respond, the price bid was less than last years cost. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS none FINANCIAL IMPACT (cost of item, fund and division name, budgeted amt.) Total estimated amount of this bid is $70,000.00. $100,000 was budgeted in account 660-108- 5201-00 Water Operations Maintenance for which this amount is included. COMMENTS (from City Attorney, staff, boards and commissions) none ATTACHMENTS (list individually) 1. Bid Tabulation Subrpitted By: erry Jones, Purchasing Director Jim Briggs, Director of Community Owned Utilities ITEM # K APPROX. QTY WATER METERS BID NO. 96025 DESCRIPTION 2,000 Water Meter, 3/4" PMM, Electronic, SL, with Automatic Meter Reading Capability, Precision Water Meters ONLY Per Unit Cost Trade-in of Used 3/4" meters TOTAL No Bid: Water Works Sales Bowles and Eden Rohan/Waco ROHAN/AUSTIN UNIT PRICE $35.00 $ 2.00 $70,000.00 Council Meeting Date: May 14, 1996 Item No. S AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Consider approval of a contract with White, Dolce & Barr for the design of the Sun City Fire Station in an amount not to exceed $104,831.00. ITEM SUMMARY On February 27, the Council authorized staff to negotiate a contract with the architect firm of White, Dolce & Barr for the purpose of designing the Sun City Fire Station. As a result of those negotiations staff is recommending that a contract be approved to White, Dolce & Barr for the design phase of the Sun City Fire Station. Architect/ engineering fees are usually around 10 percent of the total project cost. For this project White, Dolce & Barr's fees are approximately 7.27 percent of the estimated project cost. By comparison, the City of Austin is paying 7.45 percent for a fire station currently in the design stage. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS none FINANCIAL IMPACT (cost of item, fund and division name, budgeted amt.) Total cost for the design phase of this project is $104,831.00. Although only $80,000.00 was budgeted, the construction fund has SIP fee money available to pay the contract. A budget amendment will be proposed as part of the Mid Year Review recommendations. COMMENTS (from City Attorney, staff, boards and commissions) none ATTACHMENTS (list individually) 1. Contract Submitted By: erry Jones, Purchasing Director ill Shanklin, Director of Fire Services THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON CITY OF GEORGETOWN AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES WITH WHITE, DOLCE, & BARR ARCHITECTS This contract is entered into on this the day of 1996 by and between the CITY OF GEORGETOWN, a Texas Municipal Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"), and White, Dolce, & Barr Architects/Planners Inc., a Texas Professional Corporation, being owned by one architect who is licensed to practice architecture in the State of Texas (hereinafter referred to as "ARCHITECT"), whereby ARCHITECT agrees to perform and CITY agrees to pay for the services provided herein. 1. ARCHITECT shall perform or cause to be performed all of the structural engineering and architectural services as specified in the ARCHITECT'S proposal attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT"). The PROJECT is for the construction of the Sun City Georgetown Fire Station. The proposed time from will require the design work to be completed during . Advertising for bids will begin in September, 1996. Construction is anticipated to begin in January, 1997. 2. Description of Services The ARCHITECT's services hereunder shall include, but shall not be limited to the following: 01 The ARCHITECT understands that ARCHITECT is to work closely with the City Manager or his designee (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager") or other appropriate officials, and that ARCHITECT is to perform any and all related tasks required of ARCHITECT by the Project Manager in order to fulfill the purposes of the work to be performed. -02 The ARCHITECT shall perform or cause to be performed all of the services as set forth in Exhibit "A' and authorized by the Project Manager. .03 The work of the ARCHITECT under this contract may be authorized by the Project manager in various phases as set forth in the proposal. Optional services under the proposal must be authorized by the City Manager if the amount of the optional services is under fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00), and by the City Council if the amount of the optional services is fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00) or more. 3. Scope of Work The ARCHITECT, its associates and employees or independent contractors, or independent contractors' employees shall perform all of the work hereunder. The ARCHITECT agrees that all of its associates and employees who work on this PROJECT shall be fully qualified to undertake the same and competent to do the work described hereunder. ARCHITECT will undertake the work and complete in a timely manner. The ARCHITECT will be required to provide general construction costs estimates after a conceptual plan has been further developed. Working drawings and specifications will be included in a bid package as a final product for the PROJECT. This will be a single contract. City staff will administer the construction process. 4. Planning and Conceptual Design 01 CITY shall direct ARCHITECT to commence work on the PROJECT by sending to ARCHITECT a "letter of authorization" to begin work on the implementation of the contract. 02 Upon receipt of authorization to commence planning, ARCHITECT shall meet with CITY for the purpose of determining the nature of the PROJECT. CITY shall designate a representative to act as a contact person on behalf on the CITY. 03 ARCHITECT shall determine CITY' S needs with regard to the PROJECT including but not limited to site evaluation, needs surveys. Comparisons with other municipal projects, review of budgetary constraints and other preliminary investigations necessary for the PROJECT. .04 ARCHITECT shall prepare a conceptual design which shall include schematic layouts, surveys, sketches and exhibits demonstrating the considerations involved in the PROJECT. Additionally, ARCHITECT shall prepare a report to CITY specifying the ARCHITECT's findings and conclusions with regard to the PROJECT. ARCHITECT shall upon CITY'S request meet with the staff and City Council to make a presentation of the ARCHITECT's report. .05 ARCHITECT shall inquire in writing as to the information the ARCHITECT believes CITY may have in its possession that is necessary for ARCHITECT'S performance. CITY shall provide the information within its possession that it can make available to ARCHITECT. 2 5. Project Design Phase O1 CITY shall direct ARCHITECT to commence work on the PROJECT design by sending to ARCHITECT a "letter of authorization" to begin work on the PROJECT design pursuant to this contract. .02 Upon receipt of authorization to commence preliminary PROJECT design ARCHITECT shall meet with the CITY for the purpose of determining the extent of the PROJECT. .03 ARCHITECT shall design the PROJECT providing the initial design of the PROJECT including but not limited to the preliminary drawings and specifications. ARCHITECT shall make a cost determination with regard to the PROJECT and shall submit it to CITY. 04 Upon completion of the preparatory design of the PROJECT. ARCHITECT shall notify CITY. Upon request ARCHITECT shall meet with the CITY staff and City Council to make a presentation of his preliminary design of the PROJECT. ARCHITECT shall provide an explanation of the cost estimate. 6. Final Design Phase .01 CITY shall direct ARCHITECT to commence work on the final design of the PROJECT by sending to ARCHITECT a "letter of authorization" to begin work on the final design phase of the contract. .02 Upon receipt of authorization to proceed with final design of the PROJECT, ARCHITECT shall immediately prepare the final design including, but not limited to the bid documents, contract, drawings, and specifications. ARCHITECT shall assemble the contract documents using CITY' S pre -approved form contract for the contract between CITY and contractor. The contract documents shall include the design and specifications and other changes as required to fulfill the purpose of the PROJECT. CITY shall designate a representative to act as the contact person on behalf of CITY. .03 ARCHITECT shall provide CITY with one reproducible set of plans and specifications sufficient to be advertised for bids by CITY copies will be obtained by the City at the City's expense. Upon completion of the final design of the PROJECT with the submission of the completed plans and specifications, ARCHITECT upon request of the CITY, shall meet with the City staff and City Council to make presentation of its final design of the PROJECT. 3 .04 Upon completion of the plans and specifications of the PROJECT, CITY shall pay to ARCHITECT payment for the work completed, except that such payments may not exceed .05 Upon completion of the design of the PROJECT, CITY shall pay to ARCHITECT payment for the work completed except that such payments may not exceed 7. Assignment ARCHITECT shall not assign, sublet or transfer any rights or interests in this Contract without the written consent of the CITY. ARCHITECT will not be released or discharged from any duty or responsibility under this Contract unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment. S. Conflict of Interest ARCHITECT covenants that during the contract period neither ARCHITECT nor any of its associates or employees, will have any interest or shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which will conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the services to be performed under this contract. ARCHITECT further agrees that none of its paid personnel shall be employees of the CITY or have any contractual relationship with the CITY, except for contractors or consultants which may have other contracts with the CITY for other work. All activities, investigations, and other efforts made by ARCHITECT pursuant to this contract shall be conducted by employees, associates, or independent contractors of ARCHITECT. ARCHITECT further understands and agrees that the Charter of the City of Georgetown prohibits any officer or employee of the CITY from having any financial interest, direct or indirect, or any contract with the CITY from having any financial interest, direct or indirect, or any contract with the CITY outside of the officer or employee's employment by the CITY. Any violation of this paragraph with knowledge, expressed or implied, by ARCHITECT shall render this contract voidable by the City Manager of the City of Georgetown or the City Council. 9. Confidential Work Any reports, information, project evaluation, project designs, data, or other documentation developed by ARCHITECT hereunder give to or prepared or assembled by the ARCHITECT which the CITY desires to be kept confidential will not be made available to an individual or organization by the ARCHITECT without the prior written approval of the CITY. 4 10. Ownership of Documents CITY shall have title and ownership of all documents, publications, brochures, reports, data, plans, designs or other documentation in any form or media, produced by the ARCHITECT pursuant to this PROJECT. All such works shall be deemed works -for -hire. CITY shall have sole ownership of all copyright interest in any documents produced by ARCHITECT pursuant to the Contract, to the extent that any such documents may be copyrighted. ARCHITECT acknowledges that this is a public project, with such work product being purchased with public funds. CITY acknowledges and understands that should such documents be utilized for any project other than the one for which these design services were performed that ARCHITECT shall not be liable or responsible in any manner for the design, construction or operation of the facility constructed. CITY further agrees to assume all risk related to any reuse of the documents for any other project. CITY agrees to utilize the professional design review services of ARCHITECT on any future project utilizing these documents, where feasible. 11. Independent Contractor The parties agree that ARCHITECT shall be deemed to be an independent contractor not an agent or employee of the CITY with respect to its acts or omissions hereunder. Parties agree that the services and activities performed under this contract are not and shall not be construed as a joint venture between the parties. 12. No Oral Modification This Contract and any exhibits thereto constitute the entire contract between the CITY and ARCHITECT and supersedes all prior written or oral understandings. This contract may only be amended, supplemented, modified or canceled by a duly executed written instrument. 13. Performance This contract has been made under and shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. The parties agreed that performance and all matters related thereto shall be in Williamson County, Texas. 14. Contract Interpretation In interpreting the various provisions of this contract in a court of law, any said court having jurisdiction shall apply the laws of the State of Texas to interpret the terms and provisions herein. 5 15. Captions The captions to the various clauses of this contract are for informational purposes only and shall not alter the substance of the terms and conditions of this contract. 16. Warranty ARCHITECT warrants that ARCHITECT will exercise diligence and due care and perform in a good and workable manner in the preparation of design and drawings, the designation or selection of materials and equipment, the selection and supervision of and the performance of other services by ARCHITECT pursuant to this contract. Approval of the City should not be, constitute or be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the ARCHITECT, its employees, agents, or associates, for the exercise of skill and diligence to promote the accuracy and competency of their designs, information, plans specifications or any other document, nor shall approval be deemed to be the assumption of such responsibility by the CITY with respect to any defect or error in the documents prepare or work done by the ARCHITECT, its employees and associates. ARCHITECT warrants that the services and work provided under this Agreement, as an experienced and qualified ARCHITECT shall be of the highest standard of performance in the industry. 17. Indemnity ARCHITECT agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, causes of action, suits and liability of every kind, including all expenses of litigation, court cost, and attorney's fees, for injury to or death of any person, or for damage to any property, arising out of or in connection with the work done by ARCHITECT under this agreement. Such agreement is intended by ARCHITECT to provide protection to the CITY to the maximum extent allowed by law and for ARCHITECT to assume full responsibility for the work to be performed hereunder. 18. Insurance ARCHITECT shall procure and maintain at ARCHITECT's sole cost and expense for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by ARCHITECT, his agents, representatives, volunteers, employees or subcontractors. The ARCHITECT's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to the CITY, its officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self{-) insurance maintained by CITY, its officials, employees or volunteers, shall be considered in excess of the ARCHITECT's insurance and shall not contribute to it. Cl The ARCHITECT shall include all subcontractors as additional insured under the ARCHITECT's policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor, unless the subcontractors carry their own errors and omissions insurance and provide a certificate of insurance to the CITY documenting this coverage. All coverage for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. Certificates of Insurance and endorsements shall be furnished to the CITY and approved by the CITY before work commences. The following standard insurance policies shall be required: 1. General Liability Policy 2. Professional Liability Policy 3. Automobile Liability Policy 4. Worker's Compensation Policy The following general requirements are applicable to all policies: 1. General Liability, Automobile Liability, and Professional Liability insurance shall be written by a carrier with an A:VM or better rating in accordance with the current Best Key Rating Guide. 2. Only insurance carriers licensed and admitted to do business in the State of Texas will be accepted. 3. Deductibles shall be listed on the Certificate of Insurance and are acceptable only on a per occurrence basis for property damage only. A deductible is acceptable for Professional Liability and the deductible limits shall not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). 4. Claims Made Policies will not be accepted, except for Professional Liability Insurance. 5. The City of Georgetown, its officials, employees, and volunteers, are to be added "Additional Insured" to the General Liability and the Automobile Liability policies. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officials, employees, or volunteers insurance. 6. A Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City of Georgetown with respect to Workers' Compensation insurance must be included. 7. Each insurance policy shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except thirty (30) day's prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City of Georgetown. 8. Upon request, certified copies of all insurance policies shall be furnished to the City of Georgetown. 7 The following Commercial General Liability will be required: White, Dolce, & Barr Architects/Planners, Inc. Minimum Combined Single Limit of $1,000,000. Per occurrence for Bodily Injury and Property Damage, $2,000,000.aggregate. Jose I Guerra, Inc. Structural Engineers Minimum Combined Single Limit of $500,000. Per occurrence for Bodily Injury and Property Damage, $1,000,000. aggregate. Fleming Consulting Engineers Minimum Combined Single Limit of $500,000. Per occurrence for Bodily Injury and Property Damage, $ 1000,000. aggregate. Consort, Inc. Civil Engineers and Landscaping Design Minimum Combined Single Limit of $500,000. Per occurrence for Bodily Injury and Property Damage, $1000,000.aggregate. Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Service's Office form number CG 00 01. No coverage shall be deleted from the standard policy without notification of individual exclusions being attached for review and acceptance. The following Professional Liability will be required: White, Dolce, & Barr Architects/Planners, Inc. Minimum of $500,000. per occurrence and $1000,000.aggregate. Jose I Guerra, Inc. Structural Engineers Minimum of $500,000. per occurrence and $1,000,000.aggregate. Fleming Consulting Engineers Minimum of $500,000. per occurrence and $1,000,000.aggregate. Consort, Inc. Civil Engineers and Landscaping Design Minimum of $500,000. per occurrence and $1,000,000.aggregate. Coverage must be maintained for two (2) years after the termination of this contract. Certificates of Insurance shall be provided to the CITY on all required policies. The following Automobile Liability will be required: Minimum Combined Single Limit of $600,00 per occurrence for Bodily Injury and Property Damage. The Business Auto Policy must show Symbol 1 in the Covered Autos Portion of the liability section in Item 2 of the declarations page. The following Workers' Compenstation will be required: Employer's Liability limits of $100,000 for each accident is required. Texas Waiver of Our Right To Recover From Others Endorsements, WC 42 03 04 shall be included in this policy. Texas must appearing Item 3A of the Workers' Compensation coverage or Item 3C must contain the following: All states except those listed in Item 3A and the states of NV, ND, OH, WA, WV, WY. Certificates of Insurance shall be prepared and executed by the insurance company or its authorized agent, and shall contain provisions and warranting the following: 1. The company is licensed and admitted to do business in the State of Texas. 2. The insurances set forth by the insurance company are underwritten on forms which have been approved by the Texas State Board of Insurance. 3. Sets forth all endorsements and insurance coverage according to requirements and instructions contained herein shall specifically set forth the notice of cancellation, termination, or change in coverage provisions to the City of Georgetown Original endorsements affecting coverage required by this section shall be furnished with the certificates of insurance. 19. Termination CITY may at anytime terminate this Contract for convenience. At such time CITY notify ARCHITECT who shall cease work immediately. ARCHITECT shall be compensated for the services performed. 20. Notices Notices shall be mailed to the addresses designated herein or as may be designated writing by the parties from time to time and shall be deemed received when sent postage prepaid U.S. mail to the following addresses: 9 CITY: City Manager P.O. Box 409 Georgetown, TX 78627 ARCHITECT: White, Dolce, & Barr Architects/Planners, Inc. Attn: Alan Barr, Principal 504 Congress, Suite 200 Austin, Tx 78701 21. Waiver No waiver by either party hereto of any term or condition of this contract shall be deemed or construed to be a waiver of any other term or condition or subsequent waiver of the same term or condition. 22. Binds heirs, successors and assigns The CITY and ARCHITECT and their partners, successors, executors, administrators, are hereby bound to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 23. Attorney's Fees Should the CITY find it necessary to file suit to enforce the terms of this contract'. ARCHITECT agrees to pay CITY, upon judgement rendered against the ARCHITECT, such sums as the court may deem reasonable as attorney's fees for that action unless the Court finds against CITY in which event the CITY shall pay ARCHITECTS legal fees. 24. Severability In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this contract shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or inability to enforce shall not affect any provision thereof, and this contract shall be considered as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained in this contract. 25. Compliance ARCHITECT agrees to give all notices and comply with all laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and lawful orders of any public authority bearing on the performance of this work. 10 26. Remedies The rights and remedies of the CITY provided in this contract shall not be exclusive are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law and under this contract including the right of specific performance and offset. Payment made to ARCHITECT by the CITY shall not denote acceptance of the work. The rights and remedies of ARCHITECT provided in this contract shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights provided by law and under this contract. 27. Taxes The ARCHITECT shall not include Federal taxes or State of Texas limited sales excise and use taxes in their invoices or vouchers and statement of costs. The CITY is exempt from payment of such taxes and an exemption certification will be furnished to the ARCHITECT if requested. 28. Breach of Contract The CITY shall have the right to declare the ARCHITECT in breach of this contract for cause when the CITY determines that this contract is not being performed according to understanding of the intent and meaning of this contract. Such breach shall not in any way invalidate, abrogate or terminate the ARCHITECT'S obligations under this contract. 29. Retainage From each approved statement, the CITY shall retain until final payment, ten percent (10%) where the full contract amount is less than $400,000.00 and five percent (5%) where the full contract amount is $400,000.00 or more. The CITY may also retain from each approved statement any sums authorized under the term of this contract. Upon final completion and acceptance of the work in accordance with this contract, CITY shall pay the remainder of this contract price less any sums withheld under other of this contract less the retainage which shall be retained for a period of forty-five (45) days therefrom. If no claim, lien or affidavit is filed upon the expiration of forty-five (45) days, the retainage shall then be paid to ARCHITECT. 11 30. Signature Warranty Clause The signatories to this contract represent and warrant that they have the authority to execute this contract on behalf of the CITY and ARCHITECT respectively. SIGNED this day of CITY OF GEORGETOWN By: Leo Wood, Mayor Attest: Sandra D. Lee City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON 199 WHITE, DOLCE, & BARR ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS, INC. By: Alan Barr, Principal } CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of 1995, by Alan Barr in his capacity as Principal of White, Dolce, & Barr Architects/Planners, Inc. on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of TEXAS 12 Council Meeting Date:' May 14 1996 Item No. 7 AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Council approval of amendment No. 25 to the agreement, between the City of Georgetown and Camp, Dresser & McKee, to provide easement preparation for the Pecan Branch Wastewater Interceptor Project - Phase 2, in the amount of $28,000.00. ITEM SU MARY : One of the wastewater capital improvement projects planned for this budget year is the Pecan Branch Wastewater Interceptor - Phase 2. Before construction on this project can begin, easement acquisitions will be necessary along certain portions of the planned project route. The firm, of Camp, Dresser & McKee, has agreed to provide the services associated with easement acquisition, including surveying and field note preparation, initial route selection and review for possible conflicts in areas of archaeological or environmental significance. Therefore, staff recommends Council approval for Amendment No. 25 to the agreement with Camp, Dresser and McKee, in the amount of $28,000.00 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS• NONE FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $28,000.00 are to be paid from account number 651-101-6601-00. COMMENTS: NONE ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter and Amendment #25, from Camp, Dresser & McKee S Jim Briggs, Director Community Owned Utilities CDMCam D& Camp McKee Inc. environmental 8911 Capital of Texas Highway, Suite 4240 services Austin, Texas 78759-7267 Tel: 512 345-6651 Fax: 512 345-1483 April 22, 1996 Mr. Jim Briggs Director Community Owned Utilities City of Georgetown P.O. Box 409 Georgetown, TX 78627-0409 Re: Pecan Branch Wastewater Interceptor Phase 2 Easement Preparation Dear Mr. Briggs: Transmitted with this letter are two signed copies of Amendment No. 25 which provides for the property survey and preparation of field notes for the easements required for the construction and operation of Pecan Branch Wastewater Interceptor Phase 2. In addition to the surveying and field note preparation, the scope of work also provides for initial route selection and review of the route for conflicts with areas of archaeological or environmental significance. The archaeological and environmental work will have to be supplemented during final design, especially if SRF funding is used. The total cost associated with Amendment No. 25 is $28,000. The majority of the cost is associated with the property surveys and field note preparation. If you have any questions regarding the scope of work at cost of Amendment No. 25, please call. Sincerely, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. daict Allen D. Woelke, P.E. Principal Engineer ADW:hsp Enclosures A2428LTR.ADW AMENDMENT NO. 25 TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ENGINEER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO SELECT A ROUTE AND PREPARE EASEMENT DOCUMENTS FOR PECAN BRANCH WASTEWATER INTERCEPTOR PHASE 2 The General Services Agreement between OWNER and ENGINEER last authorized on November 26, 1991, is hereby amended as follows: The scope and cost of the anticipated services are set forth in the attached Exhibit 1. The fee for the work in Amendment No. 25 is to be paid on a lump sum basis. Your signature below will constitute your acceptance of Amendment No. 25. EXECUTED in duplicate original this day of , 1996 at Georgetown, Texas, where this contract is performable and enforceable. Approved as to form: Party of the First Part: CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS Marianne Landers Banks Leo Wood City Attorney Mayor Attest: Sandra D. Lee City Secretary Party of the Second Part: CAMP DRESSER & McKEE IN By: Allen D. Woelke, P.E. Principal Engineer STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TRAVIS This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the Z4gk day of , 192�2 by Mr. Allen D. Woelke in his capacity as Principal Engineer of Camp Dresser & McKeeInc. - Printed name: �/( D n C-0- - Hof(,�4 1q Notary Public, State of xas QQzwzjAsiQn, pp �p Expires: -r 77 —2 MONICA C. ROFFMAN Ve NQTARY PUBLIC A 1281 AMDN25 N, State of Texas �'rF At, Comm. Exp 03-17-9 EXHIBIT 1 ROUTE SELECTION AND EASEMENT DOCUMENT PREPARATION FOR PECAN BRANCH WASTEWATER INTERCEPTOR PHASE 2 SCOPE OF WORK Task 1 - Route Selection/Coordination Using exiting aerial photography and property ownership maps, decide in the field the best location for the interceptor. The decision of the best location will be made by the ENGINEER and the OWNER. Under this Task, ENGINEER shall provide support to OWNER's easement acquisition efforts. Support services shall include maps, attending public meetings and preparing correspondence needed in acquiring the easements. Task 2 - Environmental and Archaeological Assessment Following route selection, an archaeological, threatened and endangered species and wetlands assessment will be conducted to determine if there are any significant archaeological or environmental constraints that would not allow construction of the interceptor in the selected alignment. These assessments are not as thorough as required by SRF funding and additional archaeological and environmental work may be required during the design phase. If archaeological and environmental features are discovered within the selected alignment the OWNER will be consulted to determine if the alignment should be adjusted or additional archaeological and environmental work performed to further define the magnitude of the features. Task 3 - Right -of -Way Easement Preparation This task consists of preparation of the field notes for a 30-foot wide permanent and 75-foot wide temporary construction easement. This task includes the following subtasks. 1) Perform research necessary to confirm the current ownership and deed information al the selected alignment. along 2) Obtain written right -of -entry from affected owners. 3) Recover necessary property corners by surveying a control line along the selected alignment and locate the corners necessary for final easement location descriptions. 4) Field stake the selected alignment. 5) Calculate the final easement location. 6) Prepare an overall project right-of-way map. A 1281 AMD.N25 EX 1-1 7) Prepare separate written descriptions and exhibit drawings for each easement parcel. 8) Provide sufficient documentation to locate the easement in the field. A1281AMDN25 EX 1-2 CITY OF GEORGETOWN ROUTE SELECTION AND EASEMENT DOCUMENT PREPARATION FOR PECAN BRANCH WASTEWATER INTERCEPTOR PHASE 2 FEE ESTIMATE Task 1 Route Selection/Coordination Task 2 Archaeology and Endangered/Threatened Species & Wetlands Pedestrian Survey Task 3 Surveying ROW Easement Phase TOTAL $ 4,000.00 $ 4,700.00 $19,300.00 $28,000.00 A 1281 AMDN25 EX 1-3 incil meeting May 14, 1996 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET v SUBJECT: Consider approval of a Detailed Development Plan of City of Georgetown, Block 52, Lot 5, located at 812 Church Street; and variances to the Subdivision Regulations ITEM SUMMARY: The subject parcel is currently developed with one (1) single family residence. The applicant proposes to convert the first floor of the existing residence to a bakery and the second floor of the residence shows three (3) bedrooms, including one (1) which could also serve office functions. One site design issue is the creation of the two (2) parking spaces at the rear of the site. Access to these pa king spaces must be taken through the Heritage Center/City parking lot, a portion of which is owned by a third party. The City has a 50-year lease on this property for the purpose of providing public parking. The applicant is !securing a permanent parking and access easement from the property owners to the west for the length of the Cijty's lease as well as from the City across the parking area on City property and adjacent to Founder's Park. The applicant requests three (3) variances to the Subdivision Regulations. According to the parking requirements uirements listed in Table 33052 eight b t (8) parking spaces are needed to serve the proposed project. The applicant proposes three (3) parking spaces on site, including one (1) space within the shared driveway with the adjacent residence to the north and two (2) spaces at the rear of the residence, adjacent to the Heritage Center / ity parking lot. In April, staff surveyed the available number of parking spaces on 8th Street, 9th Street and the City's parking lot and concluded that between 20 and 25 spaces are unused during the standard week day working hours. A second variance is requested to Section 34020 G.2. to allow impervious cover along the north si a setback of the property due to the existing shared driveway, fence and garage between the subject lot and adjacent residence. The existing storage building located at the rear of the residence near the south property line is also proposed to be moved near the north property line and will constitute impervious cover in the north side setback. A third variance is requested to Section 37030 F. to waive i q the Type D bufferyard requirement along thie north side of the property due to the existing landscaping, shared driveway, fence and neighboring garage between the subject lot and adjacent residence. To offset the variance to the bufferyard requirements along the north property line, the applicant has agreed to install a Type D bufferyard on the south side of the property b tween the subject lot and Founder's Park, to improve the view from the park looking north. S ECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None. L IMPACT: None. qOMMENTS: At its May 14, 1996, meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to approve the Detailed Development Plan for the City of Georgetown, Block 52, Lot 5 provided the Technical Issues are a dressed prior to City Council consideration of this item and approval of the requested variances to Table 33052, t ereby allowing three (3) parking spaces to be provided on site, to Section 34020 G.2., thereby permitting i pervious cover along the north property line, and to Section 37030 F.2., thereby suspending the Type D b fferyard requirement along the north side of the property, provided a Type D bufferyard is installed along the s uth property line, after making the required findings of fact. The Technical Issues have been addressed. RECOMMENDED MOTION: If this- item is approved by the City Council, it will be consistent with the lanning and Zoning Commission's recomn1pndation, unless stated otherwise. 'TTACHMENTS: Staff Report and Detailed Development Plan. Submitt B dward J arry, AIC - Director Hildy L. gma, AICP ivision of Develop nt Services Chief Planner DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF CITY OF GEORGETOWN, BLOCK 52, LOT 5, WITH VARIANCES TO THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, LOCATED AT 812 CHURCH STREET OWNER: Mr. Horace C. Sweet, Jr. Mrs. Carolyn Sweet 812 Church Street Georgetown, Texas 78626 863-2093 AGENT: Mr..and Mrs. John Montgomery 408 Sinuso Drive Georgetown, Texas 78628 863-3560 REQUEST: Detailed Development Plan of City of Georgetown, Block 52, Lot 5, as recorded in Volume 235, Page 239 of the Official Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas; and variances to the Subdivision Regulations. FACTS: Location: Located at 812 Church Street. SEE EXHIBIT A Existing Site: Single family residence. Existing Zoning: This lot is zoned C-2A, Commercial First Height. Surrounding Uses and Zoning: North: Residence/previously Anschutz Art Studio (C-2A) South: Founder's Park (C-2A) East: Single family residence (C-2A) West: Commercial district and parking lot (C-2A & C-2B) Proposed Use: A wholesale/retail bakery is proposed for this lot. Century Plan: The Century Plan Development Plan designates this tract as Intensity Level 6. SEE EXHIBIT B The proposed commercial square footage is within the allowable limits for this Intensity Level. Detailed Development Plan - 812 Church Street May 8, 1996 DD 96-08 File:COG52.DDP Page 1 CM/WW Notification: The notification requirements have been completed. History: On July 21, 1992, the Board of Adjustment granted a variance to Section 2.0303.lb of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the construction of a garage at the rear of the lot within the zero lot line setbacks on both sides and the rear property lines. ANALYSIS: The subject parcel is currently developed with one (1) single family residence. EXHIBft§ C and D illustrate the proposed site plan and floor plans, respectively. The applicant proposes to convert the first floor of the existing residence to a wholesale / retail bakery, with both catered and walk-in baked goods and lunches available. The first floor site plan shows chairs and tables in two (2) of the rooms on the first floor, one (1) meeting area on the second floor and an outside patio area. The proposed bakery would operate Tuesday through Saturday, from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. The second floor of the existing residence shows three (3) bedrooms, including one (1) which could also serve office functions. The applicant proposes s9veral improvements to this lot, both within and surrounding the existing residence. Renovation of the existing residence would include the installation of restrooms with access and facilities on the ground floor for disabled persons; installation of a second ground floor entrance and exit with an access ramp for disabled persons; conversion of the ground floor doors and thresholds to be accessible to disabled persons; installation of a 20 minute fire door at the top of the second floor stairwell; installation of a fire sprinkler system in the stairwell and downstairs commercial areas; and, the addition of a second floor balcony and outside rear stairs to provide an outside entrance / exit to the second floor. The proposed outside improvements include: the creation of two (2) parking spaces (including one (1) space for disabled persons) at the rear of the property which would be accessed through the Heritage Center / City parking lot; replacement of the front gravel driveway with pervious pavers and improvement of the vehicle / pedestrian grade where the driveway meets the front sidewalk; installation of a five (5) foot rear sidewalk from the rear parking places to the disabled persons access ramp; repair Detailed Development Plan - 812 Church Street DD 96-08 File:COG52.DDP CM/WW May 8, 1996 Page 2 and replacement of the sidewalk to the residence as well as the sidewalk parallel to Church Street; and, the installation of an additional 250 square feet of landscaping (shrubs, ground cover and seasonal flowers) at the rear of the site. One issue of concern is the configuration of the two (2) proposed parking spaces at the rear of the site and their relation to the adjacent Heritage Center / City parking lot. As shown in Exhibit C, approximately one (1) foot of the parking space located at the far west corner of the property encroaches into the Heritage Center / City parking lot. In addition, access to these parking spaces must be taken through this parking lot, a portion of which is owned by a third party. The City has a 50-year lease on this property for the purpose of providing public parking spaces. Therefore, a permanent parking easement from the property owners to the west for the length of the City's lease and any extensions, as well as a permanent parking easement from the City across the parking area on City property and adjacent to Founder's Park must be prepared. A variance to the number of parking spaces required by the Subdivision Regulations for the proposed bakery and dwelling unit for the property owner`is discussed below. Variances: The applicant requests three (3) variances to the Subdivision Regulations. Table 33052 - Parking Requirements The applicable parking requirements for the proposed project include one (1) parking space for each 200 square feet of commercial square footage and two (2) parking spaces for each dwelling unit. The proposed bakery consists of 1,200 square feet on the first floor and three (3) bedrooms on the second floor occupy 1,074 square feet.. Thus, according to the Subdivision Regulations, eight (8) parking spaces are needed to serve the proposed project. As shown in Exhibit C, the applicant proposes three (3) parking spaces on site; one (1) space is located within the shared driveway with the adjacent residence to the north and two (2) spaces are located at the rear of the residence, adjacent to the Heritage Center / City parking lot. In mid -March, the applicant counted a total of 64 parking spaces within 200 feet of the subject lot, and identified that Detailed Development Plan - 812 Church Street DD 96-08 File:COG52.DDP CM/WW May 8, 1996 Page 3 between 21 and 32 (33 to 50 percent) of the total number of spaces were unoccupied. These parking spaces are located in the City parking lot and on -street. The lot size, existing residence and accessory structures constrain the placement of an additional five (5) parking spaces on site. The applicant has increased the number of parking spaces on site by two (2). ,The northwest corner of the site which could provide additional parking is proposed to be landscaped. Staff also surveyed the available number of parking spaces on 8th Street, 9th Street and the Heritage Center / City parking lot (within 200 feet of the subject lot) during the month of April and concludes that between 20 and 25 spaces are unused during the standard work day hours. These figures confirm the minimum numbers identified in the applicant's survey. The area surrounding downtown Georgetown is fully developed and parking is provided by public lots and along the sides of the street. While it is not likely that a large amount of new parking spaces will be created inAhe downtown area, it is expected that as Georgetown's population increases, the existing spaces will be more fully utilized. The applicant anticipates that a significant portion of the goods produced on site will be delivered and nearby residents, merchants and employees will walk, rather than drive, to the bakery. Section 34020 G.2. - Building Lines The subject lot has not been platted to apply the setback requirements of the Subdivision Regulations; therefore, the setback requirements contained in the Zoning Ordinance are used. Section 2.0403 of the Zoning Ordinance states that the required side setbacks for retail and service commercial uses is four (4) feet. No rear setback is required for properties within the C-2A zoning district that do not back up to a residential district. However, the site design standards contained in the Subdivision Regulations do apply to Detailed Development Plan applications. Section 34020 G.2. of the Subdivision Regulations prohibits impervious cover within the side setback. The applicant Detailed Development Plan - 812 Church Street DD 96-08 File:COG52.DDP CM/WW May 8, 1996 Page 4 requests a variance to this requirement on the north side of the property due to the existing shared driveway, fence and garage located within the side setback between the subject lot and adjacent residence. Applying the impervious cover requirement would remove the existing parking space accessed from Church Street as well as the two (2) additional parking spaces proposed to be located adjacent to the Heritage Center / City parking lot. The existing storage buildiV located at the rear of the residence near the south property line is also proposed to be moved near the north property line and also constitutes impervious cover. Moving the storage shed from its location near the south property line to the north property line will allow the installation of additional landscaping in the former location. In its proposed location, the storage shed would be approximately 20 feet from the southwest corner of the adjacent residence. Section 37030 F. - Bufferyard Installation The Subdivision Regulations require the placement of a Type D bufferyard along the north side of the property. The applicant is requesting a variance to the bufferyard requirements described above due to the existing.jandscaping which includes two (2) Pecan trees and ground cover, and the existing shared driveway, fence and neighboring garage between the subject lot and adjacent residence. To offset the variance to the bufferyard requirements along the north property line, one option would be to provide a Type D bufferyard on the south side of the property between the subject lot and Founder's Park. While the Subdivision Regulations only require installation of a Type A bufferyard along the south property line, the additional landscaping provided by a Type D bufferyard will improve the view from Founder's Park looking north and assist in offsetting the bufferyard requirements along the north property line. After listening to the testimony presented at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, and reading the documentation provided by the applicant and the staff's recommendation, the Commission makes the following finds of fact as required by the Subdivision Regulations: 1. The public convenience and welfare will be substantially served; and Detailed Development Plan - 812 Church Street DD 96-08 File:COG52.DDP CM/WW May 8, 1996 Page 5 2. The appropriate use of surrounding property will not be substantially or permanently impaired or diminished; and 3. The applicant has not created the hardship from which relief is sought; and 4. The variance will not confer upon the applicant a special right or privilege not commonly shared or available to the owners of similar and surrounding property; and 5. The hardship from which relief is sought is not solely of an economic nature." 6. The variance is not contrary to the public interest; and 7. Due to special conditions, the literal enforcement of the ordinance would result in an unnecessary hardship; and 8. In granting the variance the spirit of the ordinance is observed and substantial justice is done." The applicant's Documentation for Basis of Requested Variance forms are attached. Technical Issues: The Subdivision Regulations require that the following technical issues are addressed prior to Planning and Zoning Commission consideration of this application. In order to assist the applicant, however, this application has been forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to the completion of the technical issues. The Technical Issues must be addressed prior to City Council consideration of this report. 1. Prepare and record a permanent parking and access easement with the property owners to the west for the length of the City's lease and any extension. 2. Prepare and record a permanent parking and access easement with the City across the Founder's Park property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Detailed Development Plan of City of Georgetown, Block 52, Lot 5, provided the Technical Issues are addressed prior to City Council consideration of this item. Approval of the requested variances to Table 33052, thereby allowing three (3) parking spaces to be provided on site, to Section 34020 G.2. , thereby permitting impervious cover along Detailed Development Plan - 812 Church Street DD 96-08 File:COG52.DDP CM/WW May 8, 1996 Page 6 the north property line, and to Section 37030 F.2. , thereby suspending the Type D bufferyard requirement along the north side of the property, provided a Type D bufferyard is installed along the south property line, after making the required findings of fact. P&Z ACTION: Approval of the Detailed Development Plan of City of Georgetown, Block 52, Lo ,5, provided the Technical Issues are addressed prior to City Council consideration of this item. Approval of the requested variances to Table 33052, thereby allowing three (3) parking spaces to be provided on site, to Section 34020 G.2. , thereby permitting impervious cover along the north property line, and to Section 37030 F.2., thereby suspending the Type D bufferyard requirement along the north side of the property, provided a Type D bufferyard is installed along the south property line, after making the required findings of fact. Detailed Development Plan - 812 Church Street DD 96-08 File:COG52.DDP CM/WW May 8, 1996 Page 7 EXHIBIT A CITY OF GEORGETOWN, BLOCK 52, LOT 5 812 CHURCH STREET e I 7 2 6 3 5 Ip DO < .20.00' 2 3 e 6 5 7 .rp.00 8 Q 2 1 3 e N 6 5 9 ao.00' 7 n..00' ,t000'. 8 7 .ro.00 e 6 5 3 a .woo- e I 7 2 6 3 8 5 ,ro.oc a I 4O..CoN p• .ta. /. W . JQ [' c! l51 \ V rD a wOC.• Ur.CNO / ` $ awOtw:Ow ]T• _ •]• Zq• 4 To. no.0o' 8 n0.0o" I o' 7 2 6 3 5 4 o° Ito." s. oo 8 8 woo' 7— 1 a..00' 6 w.ea' 5.3 r �I g 1 2 3 4 0° CITY ao oo woa wo°' Hao.00" COURTHOUSE PUBLIC SOUARE 'g /i w oo w oo' w.00' s000' o I _ 3 4 o 8 6 5co *06 so 04go 8 .10p.• e I 2 6 3 8 5 'to O0 4 8 .to ov I •o ..C.it,r —TO. Co. � O t°N.roN 3 ..I /]]. I i n I ._It C. c. o. .to• . a]oa .. •[..art. n0.00" O 8 ,20.00' I p U 7 2 6 3 5 110.00' 4 k nO.Od 7 8 0 6 5 3, S 2 .w.00• I p • o �f0.40" O e 110.00' I 8 0 7 2 6 3 5 4 8 I 6 th STREET n C n 2 A rrl rn � J \ ` 1 7 th STREET � , I of 2 I 3 a i 1- - POST OFFICE 7 � 8 I 8 .ro oo' e .to.o I 8 7 2 1 6 3 5 4 .� os .ro.or 8 .to oo' 7 2 6 3 5 no.00' 4 .ro.00• nodo- 8 .roDo' I 8 7 2 6 3 5 .ac-oo' 4 no.00' 8 th STREET .tom' 7 I 2 I 6 3 5 4 ot .r000' .m.00 I � 9 th STREET Io Air r 1 , l �1 7 2 i 6 3 i I° 5 4 8 10 th STREET I .,o oo Ie e .to ov I a 7 2 6 3 J 4 $ no oo' EXHIBIT B DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT GIVEN A SINGLE LAND USE 1. `O TE': April 10, 1996 'Pf OJECT NAME`: City of Georgetown, Block 52, Lot 5 812 S. Church St. 2. *C IVEN' acres of Intensity Level 1 acres of Intensity Level 2 acres of Intensity Level 3 acres of Intensity Level 4 acres of Intensity Level 5 }= 0.14 acres of Intensity Level 6 0.14 TOTAL ACRES 3. A�LOWABLE DEMAND: INT NSITY WATER WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION L VEL Peak GPD Average GPD Peak Trip Ends 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 6 2,954 840 56 4. 1 OTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND: Maximum GPD Water Capacity: 2,954 Maximum GPD Wastewater Capacity: 840 Maximum Trip Ends: 56 5. ERMITTED DEVELOPMENT: (a) (b) (c) POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY MAXIMUM PER DEV LA D USES WATER WASTEWATER 'TRANSPORTATION I UNITS I REGS 1 --------_ __---------------------------------------------------------1----------------- Detached SF I --------- - I Large Lot 3 3 93 I 3 1 0 Average Lot 3 3 `-63 I 3 1 1 1 Zero Lot Line 3 3 63 I 3 1 1 1 Attached SF 5 5 52 I 5 1 2 1 Multifamily 6 5 25 I 5 1 2 1 Mobile Home 5 4 66 I 4 1 I Lodging 15 14 40 I 14 I I Institutional 8,612 9,130 66,587 I 8,612 I I Church -with day care 9,591 10,120 3,599 I 3,599 -w/o day care 15,882 16,800 77,778 I 15,882 I Medical Office 7,101 7,500 17,354 I 7,101 I General Office 8,115 9,231 21,961 I 8,115 Retail, Mixed 4,545 5,153 3,390 I 3,390 Retail, Restaurant 1,894 1,750 4,925 I 1,750 I I Retail, Store 9,089 9,545 11,662 I 9,089 I Employment Centers 8,115 9,231 12,238 I 8,115 I Warehouse 51,825 60,000 93,333 I 51,825 I 1 Mihi-Warehouse 738,500 840,000 215,3851 215,385 I 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I ------ ---- -------- I ----------------I (d) DEVELOPMENT ALLOWED/UNIT 0 housing units 1 housing units 1 housing units 5 housing units 2 housing units 4 housing units 14 rooms 8,612 square feet 3,599 square feet 15,882 square feet 7,101 square feet 8,115 square feet 3,390 square feet 1,750 square feet 9,089 square feet 8,115 square feet 51,825 square feet 215,385 square feet G) EXHIBIT C CITY OF GEORGETOWNe BLOCK 52, LOT 5 Ku'E'h e IYK{LG«, • .. • ohhso� - t , Iier'tg92 Cejer rF1 i I CIL Aown Re S1 room S Ekts��� Q rq.„U �p25 6am5e Ag B. Be.�a•d I. „e (io Lo4Li is '/ CQh� PrOPOsFit Pqf'� ' o i A.?ro�osad Y�u7Feryavd, l:�„E � FounGlers Rn rk 4 917- Ck-rck Scree+ 81t9 C6 v-cn \ c+ �� y of GFOr[�2'1owv� -+; -9-14 M5 Fooifr4 4 tArye uK�,p ,1 . , I I �t J Cra pe rtr.; C I /8 Se ack ow Boas tr[Q euxLy D. PoiI. gA 'a1;ne " _ _ _ 4' sc16a<k I ne F.� gal p p , 7e, sewn Tv¢es \\ LA)v:, C-h uw c h 9yee`f B� L iA EXHIBIT D ,u;.s W.V F S-rr.As re i o,sat�eo mess • r — � � ; ;. � � s:le4 Oh- f %S.. - PIL ❑j {C k r1 P + se.��ce \ i� ❑ f1 f �� (F n•r O `I ❑ �I ❑ F A-- Hi II �'Ms❑ �� ❑ RecePt�o„�4p>�„�q 1-1 ❑ !�❑ ;.,kle.- ;I J Sys i¢.n �y - rri PropoSeC%, F✓O n i R-11" h PcAl - Cakes, Orb TOWN BAKERY FirzsT FLooK PLAN C✓ N If--- �N ke TU rA 6AR se � I RcI�--, I � BR I C o n y /Dec k \ Bedroom Z \q \ ❑ re r� nj�Par�orlMeei;n9`: Loo) tr a., � ❑ goof — — — — _��--)—'Lill 04wtOol Iu.L } II II i Of J /' � 201r��nvTf' t��'e I. cbwr Tub I door w dos. close Q� room 31O41 Ce Beef roor-, 1 II S�:�kle. Sys�e� I i� S�a�rwetl I � _ � I � ,cIosei Close Close+ �} II I d �— I i Stovla 5e I Prof05eCl i I SEM'4 C Fl_oo R PLkN I I _ w uv� NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNI APR � 0 1996 OF A PUBLIC MEETING Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its regular p blic meeting, of the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. This meeting will be held on the 7TH day of MAY , 1996, at 6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers, 101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed:` Detailed Development Plan of City of Georgetown, Block 52, Lot 5, with variances to the Subdivision Regulations, located at 812 South Church Street. As one of the owners of adjacent property you are invited to be present at such meeting if you desire to discuss the proposed plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail. Date: 4/23/96 City of Georgetown A copy of the planning report related to this item will be available at the Division of Development Services and the Georgetown Public Library no later than the Friday prior to the meeting described above. For further information phone the Development Services Division at 930-3575. PROPERTY OW-JqER'S COMMENTS Project Name: City of Georgetown, Block 52. Lot 5 Name of Respondent: a- L-�A a. wi t Address of Respondent: Z o.7 a 5 t N • C�, < I am in favor: obj ect: If you wish to submit written comment, please respond by 5/ l /96 , it gill be provided to the Planking and Zoning Commission and City Council. Please reply to: City of Georgetown Development Services Division P. O. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78627 r, j h .- � J ` _ R v U, � � � -. fin... � V 0. v �, '.i,.v. t� \ V� < \ �... �'� L. � - \,� -t_ C�. C ��� u V ..� �_- `� L � t�J C- � — (�-- Y> � i. ��•_ 2. � � � �J-i c� KE� � �.-, y_ ` 1 1 1 •�1 i TV NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OF A PUBLIC MEETING Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its regular public meeting of the PLANNING Ai\ll ZONING COMMISSION. This meeting will be held on the 7TH day of MAY,. 199 , at 6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers, 101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed: Detailed Development Plan of City of Georgetown, Block 52, Lot 5, with variances to the Subdivision Regulations, located at 812 South Church Street. As one of the owners, of adjacent property you are invited to be present at such meeting if you de -sire to discuss the proposed plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail. Date: 4/23/96 City of Georgetown A copy of the planning report related to this item will be available at the Division of Development Services and the Georgetown Public Library no later than the Friday prior to the mceting described above. For further information phone the Development Services Division at 930-3575. a _ 3-6 9 -z- PROPERTY OWNER'S COMMENTS V Project Name: City of Ceorgetown, Block 52, Lot ri Name of Respondent: `� �L�'t'�It-� J#C Address of Respondent: I24 E • C- azz 0. x�l� I ar n In favor: I object: '--�' 6.e t If you wish to submit written comment, please respond by 5/ l /96 , it will be provided to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Please reply to: City of Georgetown Dcvclopment Services DivMon P. 0. Box 1-09 Georgetown, Texas 78627 ul /T caU J Page 1, 4/19/96, Table-33052 - Variance Request DOCUMENTATION OF BASIS FOR REQUESTED VARIANCE Date: 5107196 Applicant: Patti- Cakes, OLD TOWN BAKERY This request is for a variance from the literal enforcement of Section(s) 9 33052 of the Subdivision Regulations. Give a brief description of the variance requested: Requg# a variance to the on -site parking standard, provided staff site survey of nearby off -site public parking shows the approximate number of surplus parking spaces are identified and available You have requested a variance to the design standards of the Subdivision Regulations. In order to be able to recommend and approve such a variance, Section 60070 B. of the Regulations, requires that the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council must be able to "ensure that the variance is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship." The Commission and council are directed to meet these requirements by making specific findings of fact. In order to assist the Commission and Council in conducting their deliberations regarding your requested variance, please complete this form to document how this request will impact the issues described below. These issues relate directly to the eight (8) findings of fact that must be cited by the Commission and Council when recommending approval of any variance. You may attach an additional sheet, or submit this information in the form of a letter. 1. In what manner will the public convenience and welfare be substantially served? The public will have the availability of convenient, accessible parking on or near the site. 2. Will the appropriate use of surrounding property be substantially or permanently impaired or diminished in any manner? Provide reasons why you believe your answer to be supportable. No, the off -site spaces supplementing the on -site spaces are available within 200 feet of the site on 8th Street, 9th Street and the City parking lot 3. What are the hardships involved? How are those hardships created? How are those hardships different from those affecting the rest of the public faced with the enforcement of this same provision? note that the Commission and Council cannot approve a variance for which the hardship claimed is solely of an economic nature. The use of the site for the proposed purpose is less desirable without the proposed variance On or near the square, other businesses facing the same provision may be exempted from the on -site requirements. Away from the square, others face substantially the same dilemma (in a restricted on -site space scenario) or they are in a site planning situation where they can provide on -site parking per the Subdivision Regulations. Page 2, 4/19/96, Table 33052 - Variance Request 4. If the requested variance if approved, will it confer upon the applicant a special right or privilege not commonly shared or available to the owners of similar and surrounding property? Provide reasons why you believe your answer is supportable. No, the de facto situation in the neighborhood is that many off -site public parking spaces surrounding the proposed site are used every day by the public and surrounding property owners to satisfy their parking needs So in fact, the surrounding property owners are today enjoying on the street parking use 5. How is the public interest affected? The Public is encouraged to visit downtown Georgetown by allowing the use of public parking spaces to supplement those on -site spaces provided 6. List the special conditions that affect this property and justify the approval of the variance. Site space limitations, preservation of existing building/historical value, best utilization of site Much of the product produced on this site will be delivered off -site, thus reducing on -site parking demand Most of the downtown business will be delivered or walk-in for pick-up or on -site consumption. Proposed Saturday hours and Sunday -Monday closing will reduce impact on available off -site parking. Muchvof production work will be conducted before normal business hours u 7. How will the spirit of the ordinance be observed if this request is granted? The best utilization of on -site space and determination of off -site availability may be used as a basis to grant this variance. Current examination of surrounding parking pattern indicates an existing level of off -site parking practice exists. 8. How will substantial justice be done if this request is granted? Granting the request will increase the desirability of the site plan and contribute to the vitality of downtown Georgetown. = _ Granting the request will be consistent with current parking trends near the square . Page 1; 4/19/96, Table 43020 - Variance Request DOCUMENTATION OF BASIS FOR REQUESTED VARIANCE Date: 5107196 Applicant: Patti -Cakes, OLD TOWN BAKERY This request is for a variance from the literal enforcement of Table # 34020 of the Subdivision Regulations. Give a brief description of the variance requested: Request a variance to the four foot (4) setback required on the north side of the lot. You have requested a variance to the design standards of the Subdivision Regulations. In order to be able to recommend and approve such a variance, Section 60070 B. of the Regulations, requires that the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council must be able to "ensure that the variance is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship." The Commission and council are directed to meet these requirements by making specific findings of fact. In order to assist the Commission and Council in conducting their deliberations regarding your requested variance, please complete this form to document how this request will impact the issues described below. These issues relate directly to the eight (8) findings of fact that must be cued by the Commission and Council when recommending approval of any variance. You may attach an additional sheet, or submit this v information in the form of a letter. 1. In what manner will the public convenience and welfare be substantially served? Granting the variance will enable the proposed use of the property. 2. Will the appropriate use of surrounding property be substantially or permanently impaired or diminished in any manner? Provide reasons why you believe your answer to be supportable. No, the surrounding property will continue with its current use. The proposed shared driveway improvement enhances the proposed and adjacent site use characteristics. There will be improved access to surrounding property. 3. What are the hardships involved? How are those hardships created? How are those hardships different from those affecting the rest of the public faced with the enforcement of this same provision? note that the Commission and Council cannot approve a variance for which the hardship claimed is solely of an economic nature. The use of the site for the proposed purpose is considerably less feasible without the proposed variance. The rest of the public facing the same provision may not have an existing building with a very tight placement in a de facto shared driveway and zero to near zero lot line neighborhood Page 2, 4/19/96, Table 43020 - Variance Request 4. If the requested variance if approved, will it confer upon the applicant a special right or privilege not commonly shared or available to the owners of similar and surrounding property? Provide reasons why you believe your answer is supportable. No, Much of the surrounding property has a de facto variance of a similar nature because the older section of town was built like this and pre -dates the Subdivision Regulations. 5. How is the public interest affected?= The public interest is positively affected by preserving, improving and converting this property to a commercial enterprise 6. List the special conditions that affect this property and justify the approval of the. variance. It is the last residence on this block to be converted to commercial use and the proposed DDP preserves th e f lavor of the historic Georgetown it represents The shared driveway makes the most efficient access to the adjoining properties. 7. How will the spirit of the ordinance be observed if this request is granted? An improved site plan design and minimum additional impervious cover is achieved through the use of a shared access driveway by adjoining property owners 8. How will substantial justice be done if this request is granted? Granting the request signs scantly improves the proposed DDP. Granting the request significantly supports the conversion of this property to a contributing Georgetown (central and area -wide) commercial entity. Page 1, 4/19/96, Section 37030 - Variance Request_ DOCUMENTATION OF BASIS FOR REQUESTED VARIANCE Date: 5107196 Applicant: Patti -Cakes, OLD TOWN BAKERY This request is for a variance from the literal enforcement of Section(s) 9 37030 of the Subdivision Regulations. Give a brief description of the variance requested: Request a variance to the bufferyard requirements on the north side of the proposed site provided a Type D bufferyard is installed on the south side of the property between subject lot and Founder's Park. You have requested a variance to the design standards of the Subdivision Regulations. In order to be able to recommend and approve such a variance, Section 60070 B. of the Regulations, requires that the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council must be able to "ensure that the variance is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship." The Commission and council are directed to meet these requirements by making specific findings of fact. In order to assist the Commission and Council in conducting their deliberations regarding your requested variance, please complete this form to document how this request will impact the issues described below. These issues relate directly to the eight (8) findings of fact that must be cited by the Commission and Council when recommending approval of any variance. You may atta6h an additional sheet, or submit this information in the form of a letter. v 1. In what manner will the public convenience and welfare be substantially served? Bufferyard is provided where possible and most suitable and supports public use,of adjoining land 2. Will the appropriate use of surrounding property be substantially or permanently impaired or diminished in any manner? Provide reasons why you believe your answer to be supportable. No, the Type D bufferyard will support and enhance the Founder's Park side of the site Due to the existing shared driveway, fence and neighboring garage on the north side of the property, it would be difficult to install a bufferyard in the proposed site plan. 3. What are the hardships involved" How are those hardships created? How are those hardships different from those affecting the rest of the public faced with the enforcement of this same provision? note that the Commission and Council cannot approve a variance for which the hardship claimed is solely of an economic nature. The use of the site for the proposed purpose is considerably less desirable without the proposed variance. The rest of the public facing the same provision may not have an existing building with a very tight placement in a de facto shared driveway, fence, adjacent garage and zero to n ear zero lot lin e n eigh borh ood Page 2, 4/19/96, Section 37030 - Variance Request 4. If the requested variance if approved, will it confer upon the applicant a special right or privilege not commonly shared or available to the owners of similar and surrounding property? Provide reasons why you believe your answer is supportable. No, Much of the surrounding property has a de facto variance of a similar nature because the older section of town was built like this; and pre -dates the Subdivision Regulations. L- 5. How is the public interest affected? The public interest is positively affected by preserving, improving and converting this property to a commercial enterprise. 6. List the special conditions that affect this property and justify the approval of the variance. It is the last residence on this side of the block to be converted to commercial use and the proposed DDP preserves the flavor of the historic Georgetown it represents. The nature of the north property line with the shared driveway, fence and adjacent garage, and the proposed Type D bufferyard on the south side between the site and Founder's Park makes the most reasonable bufferyard arrangement with the adjoining properh'es. 7. How will the spirit of the ordinance be observed if this request is granted? The best use of available bufferyard design features, plus the existing shared access driveway, fence and garage between the site and the adjoining property owner is preserved and utilized, consistent with existing (local block) design characteristics. 8. How will substantial justice be done if this request is granted? Granting the request significantly improves the quality of the proposed DDP. Granting the request significantly supports the conversion of this property to a contributing Georgetown (central and area -wide) commercial entity. Granting the request improves the view to the north from Founder's Park Page 1, 4/19/96, Table 34020 - Shed Variance Request DOCUMENTATION OF BASIS FOR REQUESTED VARIANCE Date: 5/07196 Applicant: Patti -Cakes, OLD TOWN BAKERY This request is for a variance from the literal enforcement of Table 9 34020 of the Subdivision Regulations. Give a brief description of the variance requested: Blacem' ent of storage shed closer to property line than permitted under Table 34020 of the Subdivision Regulations. You have requested a variance to the design standards of the Subdivision Regulations. In order to be able to recommend and approve such a variance, Section 60070 B. of the Regulations, requires that the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council must be able to "ensure that the variance is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship." The Commission and council are directed to meet these requirements by making specific findings of fact. In order to assist the Commission and Council in conducting their deliberations regarding your requested variance, please complete this form to document how this request will impact the issues described below. These issues relate directly to the eight (8) findings of fact that must be cited by the Commission and Council when recommending approval of any variance. You may attach an additional sheet, or submit this information in the form of a letter. v 1. In what manner will the public convenience and welfare be substantially served? The storage shed placement improves site design, space utilization and provides more space for the proposed south side bufferyard and landscaping. The available property for bufferyard and landscaping will be more visually pleasing to the public and patrons of the OLD TOWN BAKERY. 2. Will the appropriate use of surrounding property be substantially or permanently impaired or diminished in any manner? Provide reasons why you believe your answer to be supportable. No. Directly north, there is a similar structure directly on the property line and a 6' fence directly behind the proposed location of the storage building. The current use of the property is office and the land directly behind the fence is driveway. The property line east of the proposed location after the 6' fence stops is shared driveway. 3. What are the hardships involved? How are those hardships created? How are those hardships different from those affecting the rest of the public faced with the enforcement of this same provision? note that the Commission and Council cannot approve a variance for which the hardship claimed is solely of an economic nature. The use and best aesthetic placement of the storage building is an important ingredient of the proposed project. It will be more difficult to operate efficiently and reduce the positive visual impact of the backyard with the storage building farther out in the middle of the back yard Page 2, 4/19/96, Table 34020 Shed Variance Request 4. If the requested variance if approved, wall it confer upon the applicant a special right or privilege not commonly shared or available to the owners of similar and surrounding property? Provide reasons why you believe your answer is supportable. No, it will not confer upon the applicant a special right not commonly shared by the owners of similar and surrounding property. There are quite a few "very old" zero lot line situations on the surrounding property. 5. How is the public interest affected? Generally, the requested placement will offer the best placement available on the small site and aid the best site design for public use 6. List the special conditions that affect this property and justify the approval of the variance. • Th is varian ce assists th is last residen tial property on th is side of th a block to con vert to a viable commercial enterprise- * This property has a very limited set of options (space, locations) for the placement of this storage building and the proposed one is by far the best overall design choice. eL- 7. How will the spirit of the ordinance be observed if thfsrequest is granted? The variance preserves the health and safety design elements and enables a solution in keeping with the surrounding property use and site designs. The placement improves the appropriate use of buffer area and landscaping while improving on placement practice previously practiced in the neighborhood 8. How will substantial justice be done if this request is granted? The best design possible is accomplished while preserving existing site resource_ s and desired operating efficiency level Page 1, 3/20/96, �:.K (LLD TOWN BAKERY Project PROPOSED INTROVEMENI'S AND REPAIRS AT 812 Church Street OLD TOWN BAKERY Project) I. Site Work A. Propose an Agreement with the City of GeorgJQvn to create two (2) parking spaces in the rear of the propem- having access from and being contiguous in design with the Heritage Center/city parking lot. One space will be 9.5' x 20.0' and one space will be Handicapped 13.0' x 20.0'. The two rear spaces will reside on both the proposed site and city property and will be constructed to the existing parking lot standard at the expense of the property owner. The additional parking spaces will be a part of the existing parking lot drainage plan. B. Propose a 5' wide rear sidewalk from the rear parking spaces to the handicapped' persons access ramp and the front parking space (approximately 65'). Construction material to be hard exposed aggregate surface on slopes and turning areas and approved pervious pavers on level walkway area. Replace front hard gravel driveway with pervious pavers and improve the vehicle/pedestrian grad(driveway cut/sidewalk slope) where the driveway crosses the front sidewalk. C. Replace/repair front building access sidewalk and public sidewalk parallel to the street D. Implement land scapinQbufferyard vegetation in rear of the site (approximately 250 s.f.) including five (5) shrubs, ground cover/bed borders and seasonal flowers. E. Site drainage will be through existing drainage pattern and drains, except for the proposed rear parking, which will drain per the existing Heritage Center parking lot drainage plan. fI. Ground Floor Renovation A. Install male and female restrooms with handicapped access and facilities. - B. Install second ground floor entrance/exit (per Building Inspection's suggestions) and handicapped person access ramp. C. Reconstruct kitchen and food preparation areas with appropriate floors, walls and ceilings to comply with commercial kitchen use codes. Install cabinetry, work areas and equipment suitable for the intended use. Cooking equipment will incIude a six burner stove with oven., a two (2) cavity convection oven and a microwave. 1. Electrical service will be replaced with 3-Phase for the convection oven (and possibly the HVAC) and a single phase for other commercial and existing electrical needs. The kitchen and under building wiring will be in conduit. 2. Building will be replumbed in copper and compliant sanitary service/fittings. Page 2; 3/20/96, i� u` �'.� �, OLD TOWN BAKERY Project D. Mixed use separation and fire code compliance is achieved by: 1. Installation of a 20 min. (one way) fire door at the top of the stairwell, and 2. Installation of hardwired smoke detectors in sleeping areas and the stairwell, and 3. Installation of a residential fire sprinkler system in the stairwell and downstairs commercial areas. 4. The addition of the second floor balcony and outside rear stairs provide an outside entrance/exit to the second floor, E. Code compliant water heater closet reconstruction and venting. F. First floor reception rooms will be renovated with ceiling and wall coverings G. Ground floor doors and thresholds will be changed to be handicapped accessible. H. Ground floor HVAC will be installed to provide a suitable environment. III. Second floor Bathrooms will be reconstructed to code. Page 3, 3/20/96, .j�.� (7 z, OLD TOWN BAKERY Project Potential Si nape Options Alternative A - Proposed rear sign. Possibly lighted on all sides until 8 or 9 PM. Rear sign located on Storage Building rear wall (see DDP). fDattL - �c7%2E1 u• OLD TOWN BAKERY Open: X:)CX?..'vI-X:JA?M Phone: }LGY-7IX7C3{ 1.0' Li Total signage - 2.5' x 8.0' x 3 (sides) =;60.0 s.f versus 75.0 s.f: sign-allowable-(17-5 x 50' Alternative B - Proposed front signs. Possibly lighted on all sides until 8 or 9 PM. Rear sign located on Storage Building rear wall (see DDP). 3.0' 2 0 OLD TOWS' BAKERY - ir Open: z:zz -vxx Phone: zzz-ziz 1.0' Total signage - 2.0' x 3.0' x 3 (sides) = 18.0 s.f versus 75.0 s.f sign allowable (1.5 x 50') Page 1, 3/20/96, _, - ., OLD TOWN BAKERY Project PROPOSED INVIPROVETMENTS AND REPAIRS AT 812 Church Street OLD TOWN BAKERY Project I. Site Work A. Propose an Agreement with the City of Georgeto:j�rn to create two (2) parking spaces in the rear of the property having access from and being contiguous in design with the Heritage Center/city parking lot. One space will be 9.5' x 20.0' and one space will be Handicapped 13.0' x 20.0' . The two rear spaces will reside on both the proposed site and city property and will be constructed to the existing parking lot standard at the expense of the property owner. The additional parking spaces will be a part of the existing parking lot drainage plan. B. Propose a 5' wide rear sidewalk from the rear parking spaces to the handicapped persons access ramp and the front parking space (approximately 65'). Construction material to be hard exposed aggregate surface on slopes and turning areas and approved pervious pavers on level walkway area. Replace front hard gravel driveway with pervious pavers and improve the vehicle/pedestrian grade (driveway cut/sidewalk slope) where the driveway crosses the front sidewalk. tl ti C. Replace/repair front building access sidewalk and public sidewalk parallel to the street. D. Implement landscaping/bufferyard vegetation in rear of the site (approximately 250 s.f.) including five (5) shrubs, ground coveribed borders and seasonal flowers. E. Site drainage will be through existing drainage pattern and drains, except for the proposed rear parking, which will drain per the existing Heritage Center parking lot drainage plan. H. Ground Floor Renovation A. Install male and female restrooms with handicapped access and facilities. B.In c Q Install second ground floor entrance/exit (per Building Inspection's suggestions) and handicapped person access ramp. C. Reconstruct kitchen and food preparation areas with appropriate floors, walls and ceilings to comply with commercial kitchen use codes. Install cabinetry, work areas and equipment suitable for the intended use. Cooking equipment will include a six burner stove with oven , a two (2) cavity convection oven and a microwave. 1. Electrical service will be replaced with 3-Phase for the convection oven (and possibly the HVAC) and a single phase for other commercial and existing electrical needs. The kitchen and under building wiring will be in conduit. 2. Building will be replumbed in copper and compliant sanitary service/fittings. Page 2, 3/20/96, i�.� �'�� s, OLD TOWN BAKERY Project D. Mixed use separation and fire code compliance is achieved by.- 1. Installation of a- 20 min. (one way) fire door at the top of the stairwell, and 2. Installation of hardwired smoke detectors in sleeping areas and the stairwell, and 3. Installation of a residential fire sprinkler system in the stairwell and downstairs commercial areas. 4. The addition of the second floor balcony and outside rear stairs provide an outside entrance/exdt to the second floor: t' E. Code compliant water heater closet reconstruction and venting. F. First floor reception rooms will be renovated with ceiling and wall coverings G. Ground floor doors and thresholds will be changed to be handicapped accessible. H. Ground floor HVAC will be installed to provide a suitable environment. III. Second floor Bathrooms will be reconstructed to code. i Page 3, 3/20/96, t�.,, OLD TOWN BAKERY Project Potential Siam_ge Options Alternative A - Proposed front and rear sign. Possibly lighted on all sides until 8 or 9 PM_ Rear sign located on Storage Building rear wall (see DDP). k: 8.0' OLD TOWN BAKERY Open: XXXAN-X'.%XPM Phone: XXX-,'OM 1 0' Total signage - 2.5' x 8.0' x 3 (sides) =`60.0 s.f versus 75.0 sT sign allowable (1.5 x 50') Alternative B - Proposed front and rear signs. Possibly lighted on all sides until 8 or 9 PM. Rear sign located on Storage Building rear wall (see DDP). 2.0' �PuEft - r�aL OLD TOWN BAKERY Open: z:zz -z:zz Phone: zzz-zzz 1.0' Total signage - 2.0' x 3.0' x 3 (sides) = 18.0 s.f versus 75.0 sT sign allowable (1.5 x 50') Council meeting date: 5-14-96 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Access Easement, License to Encroach, and Consent for Access for the proposed Old Town Bakery at 812 Church Street TEM SUMMARY This item covers three items concerning the proposed Old Town Bakery, vhich is planned to be located at 812 Church Street, immediately north of Founder's Park corner of 9th and Church). 1. The Access Easement is to grant access to 812 Church from the south, for the benefit )f the proposed Old Town Bakery. The access easement would be across the driveway which %xits Founder's Park, and so long as this area is designated for one-way traffic flow, the ;asement shall be limited to exiting traffic only from the Bakery. !. Due to the odd lot configuration of 812 Church, two of the proposed parking spaces will ;ncroach a few feet into the City's property at Founder's Park. The License to Encroach allows hese parking spaces to be constructed as proposed by the owners of the Bakery. 1. The "Consent for Access" is intended to grant to the owners of the Bakery such access ights as the City has in the leased property, where a portion of the parking lot adjacent to the Trace Heritage Center is located. The applicant has attempted to contact the owners of the iroperty, but has been unable to do so to date. This property would provide the access to ehicles entering the property, so long as the City maintains a ;lease on this property. 0 THE STATE OF TEXAS " KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON " This is a License Agreement by and between the City of Georgetown (hereinafter referred to as "LICENSOR"), and John H. Montgomery and Patricia A. Montgomery (hereinafter referred to as "LICENSEE"), owners of Lot 5, Block 52, of the Original Townsite of the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas known as 812 Church Street. LICENSOR hereby grants a license to the said LICENSEE to permit parking two vehicles on the 21-foot area located at the northwest corner of Lot 5, Block 52 of the Original Townsite of the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas, known as 812 Church Street, as shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, owned and occupied by the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas, but such improvements shall be at all times under and not in contact with any electric, water, sewer, or other utility, or equipment, or interfere in any way with such utility, improvements and other property, and subject to the following terms and conditions: Neither the granting of the license, nor any related permit, constitutes an abandonment by LICENSOR of its property, easement or easements, or any other rights in and to the above -described property. LICENSEE expressly stipulating and agreeing by LICENSEE's acceptance of this license that LICENSEE neither asserts nor claims any interest or right of any type or nature whatsoever, legal, equitable or otherwise in or to LICENSOR's property. LICENSEE hereby expressly covenants, stipulates and agrees, without limitation, to indemnify and defend the LICENSOR and hold it harmless from any and all liability, claim, cause of action, and cost, including attorneys' fees, and including any acts or omissions of the LICENSOR, its officers, agents, and employees, which may grow out of or be attributable to the granting by the LICENSOR of said license and any supplemental license which may hereafter be issued in connection herewith including any inspections which may be conducted in connection with or pursuant to said license or any supplemental license. LICENSEE, at its own expense, shall restore or cause to be restored the subject property to as good a condition as existed prior to construction of the improvements which are the subject of this License Agreement. LICENSEE shall pay all costs of relocation of any public utilities or facilities which may be incurred as a result of the proposed construction or actual construction. LICENSEE agrees to comply with all laws and ordinances in the construction and maintenance of said improvements. LICENSOR retains the right, but not the obligation, to enter upon the land to which this license applies and at LICENSEE's expense to remove any structure or Improvements or alterations thereon upon the determination by LICENSOR that such removal is necessary for exercising LICENSOR's rights or duties in regard to said easement, or for protecting persons or property, or public interest in regard to said easement. This license, until its expiration or revocation, shall run with the title to the above described real property, and the terms and conditions hereof shall be binding upon subsequent owners or holders thereof. LICENSEE shall cause any imMediate successors in interest to have factual notice of this License Agreement. This license shall expire automatically upon removal of the improvements located upon the property pursuant to this license, and shall expire as to any portion of said Improvements upon the removal, whether or not all of the proposed improvements are removed. This license Is revocable by the LICENSOR upon the occurrence of any of the following conditions or events: A. LICENSEE or its successor has failed to ,comply with the terms of the granting of the license; or B. The improvements located thereon or any portion of them interfere with the rights of the LICENSOR or the public in or to LICENSOR's property; or C. The use of the licensed area becomes necessary for a public purpose; or D. Said improvements or a portion of them constitute a danger to the public which is not remediable by maintenance or alteration of the said improvements; or E. Said improvements or a portion of them have expanded beyond the scope of the license; or F. Maintenance or alteration necessary to alleviate danger to the public has not been made within a reasonable time after the dangerous condition has arisen. This license shall be effective upon the acceptance of the terms hereof by the LICENSEE, as indicated by the signature of LICENSEE. The license shall be filed of record in the Official Records of the County Clerk of the Williamson County Courthouse. APPROVED this the day of , 1 gg6. LICENSOR: LICENSEE: CITY OF GEORGETOWN BY: MAYOR LEO WOOD JOHN H. MONTGOMERY PATRICIA A. MONTGOMERY ATTEST: SANDRA LEE, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: MARIANNE LANDERS BANKS CITY ATTORNEY STATE OF TEXAS ) CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 1996, by LEO WOOD in capacity as Mayor of the City of Georgetown, a Texas Municipal Corporation, on behalf of said municipality. _. one OlUte vT 1 t A A b STATE OF TEXAS ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 1996, by JOHN H. MONTGOMERY, a person known to me. Notary Public in and for the State ofTEXAS STATE OF TEXAS ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 1996, by PATRICIA A. MONTGOMERY, a person known to me. Notary Public in and for the State of T E X A S .r: CONSENT FOR ACCESS STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON ) CITY OF GEORGETOWN ) KNOW ALL MEN'BY THESE PRESENTS: That the CITY"OF GEORGETOWN, LESSEE of the following described real property located in the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas, ("GRANTOR")for the benefit of Lot 5, Block 52 of the Original Townsite of the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas does hereby allow ACCESS using the existing driveway improvements on and through the following described property for as long as the City of Georgetown maintains a lease and parking improvements on said property described as: 815 Main Street, part of Lot 6, Block 52 of the Original Townsite of the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas I •. as more fully described on the attached Exhibit "A", known as the "Access Area", subject to the following limitations: 1. This Consent for Parking Access shall be limited to the purposes of public crossing to access Lot 5, Block 52 of the Original Townsite of the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas ("Benefitted Property"), for the benefit of the owner of the Benefitted Property. 2. The Access Area shall be limited to the purpose of entering the parking area of the Benefitted Property by vehicular or pedestrian traffic. 3. It is expressly understood that the GRANTOR reserves the right to use this Access Area for all purposes which do not interfere with or prevent its use as expressed int his document. 4. It is further expressly understood that this Consent for Access is being granted in order to comply with the access requirements of the City of Georgetown, Texas, in effect on the date of execution. It is the intent of the GRANTOR that any future modification or relocation of the Access Area shall require the express approval of the City of Georgetown. 5. This Consent for Access is limited to the rights the GRANTOR may have to the above -described property. The GRANTOR does not, by the granting of this "Consent for Access", imply the existence of such rights under the GRANTOR's lease of the above - referenced property. 6. This Consent for Access is subject to cancellation at any time by the City if the City's rights to access the underlying property are terminated. --- EXECUTED this day of ,1996. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, GRANTOR By: Leo Wood, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: -- Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney STATE OF TEXAS ) CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON ) ' This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 1996, by LEO WOOD, MAYOR, in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Georgetown, Texas. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas ACCESS EASEMENT STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON ) CITY OF GEORGETOWN ) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, CITY OF GEORGETOWN, OWNER of the following described real property located in the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas ("GRANTOR"), for the benefit of Lot 5, Block 52 of the Original Townsite of the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas does hereby dedicate an ACCESS EASEMENT on and through the following described property: City of Georgetown, Block 52, part of Lot 8 and part of Lot 5, of the Original Townsite of the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas. as more fully described on the attached Exhibit "A" ("Property"), subject to the following limitations: I. This Access Easement shall be limited to the purposes of public crossing the Property to access Lot 5, Block 52 of the Original Townsite of the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas ("Benefitted Property"), for the benefit of the owner of the Benefitted Property. 2. The Access Easement shall be limited to the purpose of exiting the parking area of the Benefitted Property by vehicular or pedestrian traffic, along the paved portion of the Property, so long as access is designated one-way only by the City. 3. It is expressly understood that the GRANTOR reserves the right to use tfie- roperty for all purposes which do not interfere with or prevent its use as expressed in this document. 4. It is further expressly understood that this Access Easement is being granted in order to comply with the access requirements of the City of Georgetown, Texas, in effect on the date of execution. It is the intent of the GRANTOR that any future modification or relocation of the Access Easement shall require the express approval of the City of Georgetown. EXECUTED this day of ,1996. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, GRANTOR By. -- Leo Wood, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney STATE OF TEXAS ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ,the day of 1996, by LEO WOOD, MAYOR, CITY OF GEORGETOWN, individually. 1v«u y r uunc in anu for the otate or texas Council meeting May 14, 1996 Item No. &M/ AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Second Reading of an ordinance to rezone 2.52 acres, known as Churchill Farms, Section Six, Phase One, as recorded in Cabinet M, Slides 384-385 from A, Agricultural to C-1, Local Commercial ITEM SUMMARY: A Concept Plan for a 56.99 acre tract, which included this 2.52 acre parcel was approved on August 22, 1995. This plan indicated two (2) commercial lots at the southeast and southwest corners of SH29 and Georgetown Inner Loop Road and single family residences to the west, south, and east. Single family residences are presently under construction to the southeast of this parcel, across Georgetown Inner Loop. This second reading includes only the property at the southwest corner of SH29 and Georgetown Inner Loop. The plat of the subject property was recorded in April 1996. The proposed C-1 zoning district is appropriately located at the intersection of two (2) arterial streets. One (1) commercial lot is proposed in the location of the requested C-1 zoning district, which is consistent with that plan. (See Exhibit attached.) This property was annexed by the City on August 9, 1995. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None. e'. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None COMMENTS: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of a rezoning of 48.511 acres and 2.7355 acres in the William Addison Survey, as recorded in Cabinet M, Slides 384-385 and Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block N from A, Agricultural to RS, Single Family Residential and C-1, Local Commercial as depicted by Exhibit D, (in the staff report) provided the second reading of the rezoning ordinance be withheld until a Concept Plan consistent with the proposed rezoning is approved. The item was tabled at the June 27 and July 15, 1995, City Council meetings until the annexation of the property could be completed. At its August 22, 1995, meeting the City Council approved this ordinance for first reading and waived the rezoning fees. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit, Staff report and ordinance Submitted By: Edward J. a ry, AICP - Director Division f Develop= nt Services Hildy L. Kingma, AICP Chief Planner EXHIBIT A CHURCHILL FARMS 2239/095 ',\ y v �rrt�<< w STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION` 36a/29 579/4919.00 s AC. ,off OAVIO L. KELLEY \ \ tc� 1935 /627 (332.589 AC.) \ a �a+ 4P' 204.943 AC., 40.69 AC. \�\ Pol 3.70 AC. o \ yQ 1,c- �. �t t c ✓ � � \ GM .24 AC. 7 �' ✓ CITY ON�-4 tat :. �9� r \ \ L. LA.A-0-1 �- .�rf yr/ 7i1 a.r17 K. GE (15.20 AC.) 3 f t td I 3 Ac. ♦ i 2 •a• . Jo 24.00 AC. lath �� - ! 1 CITY ONLY WILLIAM PONRAROT o ty" • ..:3. It 16R 4 I t 10 1� . s ,• 0 573/469 3 AC I AC ......................................... ...'....'.. E ................:::::::.: 402 ;.:: '....... ... ..... �.:.....:.:: 2 z 1 :.........:..:::..:..::.::.:.:..:..::..::.:.:.:::.::..:.:.:.:....:..:.::.:.•• ....•.•.• D 1 pR... :.:::.."..." .;....... ss f 3 " 10 ttt \ 1 8 9 I T 2 8 _ .: 4 co L9 3 5 4 .:: REV. JOHN McCARTY`:::::::SR1NE�(E�SGE:PA./LEtTilrg5.;.::.� O BLVD 6 P �\ 7 B 6 HELENS CATHOLIC ... •��'�,\:: {7S �....A....-". . '........ I 2 3 12 ;¢J CHURCH ..:..'::.::.'.:..':.:;'.:.; .:;.:;::::.::;:.:: at : STUNEHEOGE15.60 13 31 / oI SCHNEIDER 445/532 SEC-\THFE PETROSKY �': .:':. •': ': =.:.': -: ': •:.:'. r 33 (167 AC 1256/ 55 '.; .; :; ::•:==.:::::; ::' : ': :: 1 %. (5 93 AC) (5 77 AC) SsaG 9.72 AC. a a JOddaH WAffIR tz za 2° t -ji J :_.i zs ze t7 e ,t►aa/7s2 P t3 to tt' L . o to zl 1.7a K. z If ' 7 <<• �� t1 2s NTo 11 Its GLtALD ECKLEY \•"• a .r to /z ,° c 11 a • • IT to -c ,a • !7 M �. 871 / BS .;.,.••:;:::'::.;. 1` i, y � 13 la 3 a o 3 10 a a3 J ' 11 to 12 a ly ,o D 11 t! La v a a SA BR OY 10.33 AC ': .:.;.:. :. ' = t la 17 , a L It m t 13 " to a = s 630 /2 I o- ..:::: .: ..:: I le +s a 7 1 It 1 1 la It Is z 14 a tz 16 AC. tep Zd " "' � CHURC►tlt_L FARMS DRIVE • 1� "\_.:.:_•..�.::.� ' 1 L a 1 t o 1 23 cy 1 la 1 la 13 12 ° a 7 4 ,. O�OL t it a \:•: 3 3 4 3 2 ] L I21 to o JAMES 8 TURNER \ '' \.. - a i t3 a LI a to z a Is a . 1. GERALO CKL EY ► 0 10.60AC. �" :� a y z to e It _ w to n to It 7 a 11 it 634 366 a a t' j la n a d la a>trr+�o7 17 tl 7 a l0 • ' Kl • AC- ''� Z r to G 7 I7 7 10 la a a • a s a t a6O o. ° t 19 17 } la 'a to • t 9 10 le • � ,s _ n ° '• • ly 1 7 JOE B. Mc MASTER to 11 ,, 10 1a to 10 • s 1631/934 I 1 14 ,y a It s ifa , , t 2 \o (10 16 AC) _ la t �a I _ 9.13 AC. u la 1t 12 Is12 la 17 LSO 76 c I 12 1s la • WILLIAM MORSE . 11 10 f LINOA VICE o 647 / 685 r ° • = 0 1002 AC 10 16 AG J s 1 ! a E MORY CARLSON 345/495 156 5 AC, d o+ < •e0 n Z /C� REZONING OF 48.511 ACRES AND 2.7355 ACRES IN THE WILLIAM ADDISON SURVEY, A PORTION OF THE STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION CONCEPT PLAN; AND STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION, SECTION THREE, BLOCK N, FROM A, AGRICULTURAL TO RS, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND C-1, LOCAL COMMERCIAL OR ANY MORE RESTRICTIVE CLASSIFICATION OWNER/APPLICANT: Mr. Robert Wunsch Stonehedge Partners, Inc. 30444 Berry Creek Drive Georgetown, TX 78628 512/244-9707 REQUEST: Rezoning of 48.511 acres in the William Addison Survey, as recorded in Volume 1599, Page 175 and Volume 2349, Page 88 of the Official Deed Records; and 2.7355 acres in the William Addison Survey as recorded in Volume 1599, Page 175 and further described as Tract Five in a Declaration of Restriction in Volume 2332, Page 132 rof the Official Deed Records, both being a portion�of the Stonehedge Subdivision Concept Plan; and Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block N, as recorded in Cabinet H, Slides 43-45 of the Official Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas, from A, Agricultural to RS, Single Family Residential and C-1, Local Commercial or any more restrictive classification. Location: Located on State Highway 29 East. SEE EXHIBIT A Existing Site: Vacant land. Existing Zoning: Annexation of this property is being processed at this time. An A, Agricultural zoning district will be automatically assigned upon annexation. Proposed Use: Commercial and single family residential. Surrounding Uses North: SH291 undeveloped land and single family residences and Zoning: (RS and out of City) South: Stonehedge, Section 3 (Block J, proposed RM-2 by Rezoning - Stonehedge Sub.Concept Plan and Sec. 3, Elk N May 7, 1996 RZ 95-10/File:STNHG-CC.REZ Page 1 CM:CS separate agenda item) (Blocks O and P, to be annexed) and undeveloped land (out of City) East: Indian Creek Subdivision and Dove Springs Subdivision, residential single family (out of City) and undeveloped land (soon to be annexed) West: St. Helen's Catholic Church and single family residences (out of City) Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates this location as Intensity Levels 3 and 5. SEE EXHIBIT B Notification: Notification requirements have been completed. HISTORY: The Concept Plan for Stonehedge Subdivision was reviewed and accepted by the City in May, 1984. Sections One and Two were recorded in October, 1985. Section Three was recorded in February, 1986. A Revised Concept Plan for the area under consideration in this rezoning was submitted for review in November, 1994. The a,pplicant withdrew the request prior to being considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission. v ANALYSIS: As stated above, a Concept Plan was submitted for this area in late 1994. The plan indicated single family residential in the location where the RS zoning district is requested and commercial in the location of the requested C-1 zoning district. Although it was not required, the Concept Plan indicated the proposed lot layout. The residential lots all take access from local streets that come off of Inner Loop Road, Reinhardt Boulevard and Stonehedge Boulevard. The commercial lots were proposed at the corners of Inner Loop Road and SH29. The requested zoning districts in this application are consistent with the Concept Plan that was submitted last year. This property is located generally between the existing single family residential lots of Stonehedge Subdivision, Sections One and Two and SH29. Between Sections One and Two and this subject rezoning area, however, is the lot proposed for multifamily residential use. It is also the subject of a rezoning on this agenda. As pointed out in that report, the proposed Rezoning - Stonehedge Sub.Concept Plan and Sec. 3, Blk N RZ 95-10/File:STNHG-CC.REZ CM:CS May 7, 1996 Page 2 multifamily project is adjacent to both Inner Loop Road and Reinhardt Boulevard. The intersection of Inner Loop Road and SH29 is not developed at this time. This segment of Inner Loop Road is one of the options being considered for the Mokan (SH130) route that will intersect with IH35 just north of Georgetown and return to IH35 south of Austin. SEE EXHIBIT C The Georgetown City Council recently endorsed a route about one (1) mile east of Inner Loop Road. The actual route has not been determined yet. Should this segment of Inner Loop Road not be included in the Mokan route, it will likely serve as a portion of the Georgetown Inner Loop. The Inner Loop generally surrounds the City on the west, south and southeast. This could be its most eastern segment. If this segment does eventually become the Mokan route, a larger commercially zoned area may be warranted at this location, and it may be appropriate to allow districts which permit more intense uses. However, given the City Council's endorsement of the alternate route, it is reasonable to expect that this may not be the future Mokan route. t. The proposed C-1 zoning districts are appropriately located at the intersection of two (2) arterial streets. They abut the proposed RS districts; however, the limited uses of the proposed C-1 district, the bufferyard requirement and the small area dedicated to commercial use should help lessen the effects of the commercial use on the residences. Furthermore, the Subdivision Regulations prohibit single family residences from taking access from arterial streets. The Concept Plan which was submitted for review, but subsequently withdrawn, indicates that the single family lots will front on the interior local streets with their rear yards on the arterial streets. Since this rezoning departs from the accepted Concept Plan, it is necessary that a revised Concept Plan be approved that is consistent with the proposed rezoning. Section 23060 of the Subdivision Regulations requires Concept Plans to be consistent with the zoning of the area affected. Therefore, it may be Rezoning - Stonehedge Sub.Concept Plan and Sec. 3, Elk N RZ 95-10/File:STNHG-CC.REZ CM:CS May 7, 1996 Page 3 appropriate to approve the rezoning prior to approving the revised Concept Plan. However, proceeding in this order will create a period of time that the zoning of the land will be inconsistent with the accepted Concept Plan. To avoid this, it may be prudent to withhold the second reading of the rezoning ordinance until after a Concept Plan, consistent with the proposed rezoning, has begin f1led for review and approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of a rezoning of 48.511 acres and 2.7355 acres in the William Addison Survey, and Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block N from A, Agricultural to RS, Single Family Residential and C-1, Local Commercial as depicted by Exhibit D. P & Z ACTION: At its June 6, 1995, meeting the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to approve a rezoning of 48.511 acres and 2.7355 acres in the William Addison Survey, and Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three, Block N from A, Agricultural to RS, Single Family Residential and C-1, Local Commercial as `depicted by Exhibit D, provided the second reading of the rezoning ordinance be withheld until the Concept Plan, consistent with the proposed rezoning, is approved. Rezoning - Stonehedge Sub.Concept Plan and Sec. 3, Blk N RZ 95-10/File:STNHG-CC.REZ CM:CS May 7, 1996 Page 4 EXHIBIT A CHURCHILL FARMS 2239/09S STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION— \ 364/267 579/491 DAVID L KELLEY \ \ a'` � 1935 /627 332 589 AC.) \\ a 3 ` 204.943 AC, 40 69 AC �\\ 3 70 AC ` t•tTt � eye � � � f � � OC aC ♦'r I,•t J L ll.n-0+ i 1 • PG � try: / r•a. \ 1�;. to 1 GF pRGE�Gw 4 r r e (15.20 AC.) 3 .•• J 10� 24.00 -IC 1 ,• - i 1 J t xt ..ems CITY ONLY :rn _:::_:.:.:_:_. �R 5 WILLIAM RDNHAROT %offAl �. - - y3 p .:3::..... 3 4 573/469 v o o e ' 402 AC I Ac P D .:..15 .. •' = 3 x 1 1,,. . .. 1 2 I8 8 9 24 _ co i99 „ r D 7 5 4 3 i1 5 _ REV. )OHN MCCARTY \ \: STZiNEktEUG.E:B/iRi RS.8Lv0 6 iyt \ �349/fle 6 I 697/ 110 ST. HELENS CATHOLIC 29';16.A-C:: :{ (:TS _l3AC. 4 -:_ 2 3 CHURCH o V: I ..r SANE"EDGE 1 5 60 \ = ! 31 � 11 6 AC. i 6 \. f SEOE N I C N R O S 532 SEC.\THRE P TROSKY \ `.' 3 33AG (167 AC) I 6/ 55 \ { (5 93 AC) 9172 AC. , , zt.c 1°.1..1 ,ra7CR �.: : -'� t 7 • [ Y 3 t 30 / 0 1 C SuroLY dZ�,o \`.. Zs za t7 t• P a 1••a/76Z'ase/37a t3 �t tt `, 1 r• .C. Td `':':: :.:.... t u tQ tt R A 7, • 7 • t- Zt N o T3 to Pt t1 I 1 t d Y6 to t 11 s • , 10 14 '� 7 GERALD ECKLEY \ \ :': .::.•': :'::•::.� • � 12 c• 3 0 , • -< • • �. \- a • 11 �0 1� to 6 71 / 8S '" 3 13 t• a 3 SA BRADY 10 33 AC \ '•�:::: ::: t 1• [2 m i3 It • 6 / 201 0- 1 1s ca 1 t t 3 ��: -::•:: :� • 7 ( 1t 1 1a Z I6 AC. 014 V DRIVE cHuRCnIL L FARMS 1 t• 1 23 L3 1 Id 1 14 17 1i 3 . 3 2 3 c \•\.: > �Z1 14 v JAMES 8 TURNER a _ [y m • t1 a c0 z • 13 GERALD ECKLEY 1 \ a 1t+ ° • 0 0 60 AC \ I s 3 t L, to 11 1• 1c i cr 6 3 4/ 3 66 t t t t D 1 p n • 1d .•,.-..o, 7 c 1 1 • 10 ' Z C 7 • 036 AC r 7 it 7 10 C I O I 24 AC C I T Y ONLY 1\2 10 LINDA VICE ►0 0 2 A C ,o 0 Q1 w � a 10 4 P J u n n 1 t t •6O • • 10 IT � • la 1a 1� • 1 • � 1• 'a 1i 1t 11 • •60 JOE B Mc►.•ASTER 10 - 10• 1a '01 14 17 .1t 7 1651/934 14 17 a V 7 (1016 AC) ' 11 _ n to 12 0f� t 2 913 AC 1a tt w� ti 1s 1j i3 Id i7 t bt, 17 tl /a 1a c I 11 13 14 WILLIAM MORSE " A ' t s • . 64 7 / 685 r 1016 AC 1 7 a` s E MORY CAPLSON 545/495 ,s°' 156 5 AG t t. • . % e 6 12 13 EXHIBIT B _ 7 DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT GIVEN A SINGLE LAND USE 1. 'DATE': May 3, 1995 'PROJECT NAME': Stonehedge, Section 3, Block N and remainder of original Concept Plan 2. 'GIVEN': acres of Intensity Level 1 acres of Intensity Level 2 12.86 acres of Intensity Level 3 acres of Intensity Level 4 44.14 acres of Intensity Level 5 acres of Intensity Level 6 57.00 TOTAL ACRES 3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND. - INTENSITY WATER WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION LEVEL Peak GPD Average GPD Peak Trip Ends 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 48,339 13,884 129 4 0 0 0 5 483,763 141,245 7.724 6 0 0 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND: Maximum GPO Water Capacity: 532,102 Maximum GPD Wastewater Capacity: 155,129 Maximum Trip Ends: 7,853 5' PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT: LAND USES - - -ached S-----------F ----------------------------- O�t l arge Lot Average Lot Zero Lot Line Attached SF Mgltifamily Mobile Home Lodging Institutional Church -with day care -w/o day care Medical Office General Office Retail, Mixed Retail, Restaurant Retail, Store Employment Centers Warehouse ' Mini -Warehouse ----------------------------------------------------- (a) (b) POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY MAXIMUM WATER ----- ---- ----------------- WASTEWATER TRANSPORT-ATIO -------------------------------------------- UNITS ---- - 460 537 13,110 460 533 621 8.863 533 533 621 8,863 533 819 886 7,224 819 1,008 994 3.458 994 819 804 9,271 804 2,771 2,543 5,666 2543 1,551,318 1,686.188 9.337,556 1.551,318 (c) PER DEV REGS ----------------- --- 114 414 552 828 1.650 1 (d) DEVELOPMENT ALLOWED/LNT 114 housing units 414 housing units 533 housing units 819 housing units 994 housing units 804 housing units 2,543 rooms 1,551,318 square feet 1,727,604 1,869,027 504,684 1 504,684 1 504,684 square feet 2,860,763 3.102,586 10,906,785 2,860,763 1 2.860.763 square feet 1,279,091 1,385,083 2,433,494 1,279.091 1 1,279.091 square feet 1.461,819 1,704,717 3.079.563 1,461,819 1 1,461,819 square feet 818,618 951,713 475.414 475,414 1 475,414 square feet 341,091 323,186 690,667 323,186 323,186 square feet 1,637,237 1,762,833 1.635,336 1,635.336 1,635.336 square feet 1.461.819 1,704.717 1.716,102 1,461,819 1.461,819 square feet 9.335.123 11,080,663 13,088,142 9,335,123 9.335.123 square feet 133.025,500 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 155.129.280 30,203,404 ---------------------) 30,203,404 ----------------- 30,203.404 square feet --------------------- ----------------- EXHIBIT C MOKAN (STATE HIGHWAY 130) OPTIONS i i.. �f 1p � - o v � o�ooa a;p7©©����v©mv©�a Qoo JAI • o©o �o nn pr�.s �pdO'�C� 0wa wry on m ` o:©a oa o0 WAS d oo• eO o� oO s o0 00 0o a© 00 ,• O o � 0 � _ 0 om o©eon o0 ov as p�`�aO4 4 l • ' O d , w�o o a va :iv �ri � :� ��'ssi+ off► `' n 490po 000 .© 6 o . iim o© oodo�� mi pv �ypO P� =� EXHIBIT D PR PROP. 4 Oil, IRWIN;* VIMAWF ♦♦♦♦♦�i♦♦♦O�.♦�♦ ' .. BLOCK .T - LOT I I p"Cr IL �i A 1 -4 -- DR _ww OR X + 1 1 1 1 1 LEGEND 1 1 PROP. C - 1 �, ---- PROP. R -S PROP. ZONING FOR CHURCHILL FARMS PROPERTY OWNED BY STONEHEDGE PARTNERS CITY OF GEORGETOWN MAY 0 boor, NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNE'�i OF A PUBLIC MEETING i Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its regular public meeting of the: ` [V PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION; ❑ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT This meeting will be held on the 6th-ltday of June , 1995, at 6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers, 101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed: Rezoning of Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Three Block N and 2.74 acres and 48.51 acres in the William Addison Survey from A, Agricultural to RS Residential Single Family and 2.15 and 2.26 acres in the William Addison Survey, from A =� riculturai to C-1 Local Commercial or any more restrictive classification and locally known as Churchill Fars As one of the owners of adja cent property you are invited to be present at such meeting if yowdesire to discuss the proposed plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail. Date: 5/22/95 City of Georgetown A copy of the planning report related to this item will be available at the Division of Development Services and the Georgetown Public Library no later than the Friday prior to the meeting described above. For further information prone the Development Services Division at 930-3575. PROPERTY OWNER'S COMMENTS Project Name : Stonehedcte, Sec. 3 and tract in Wm ' adVson Survey Name of Respondent: D I�lC�-ZIE C-�--� ��1 I Address of Respondent: I am in favor: I object: If you wish to submit written comment, please respond by 5/31/95, it will be provided to the Board of Adjustment or Planning and Zoning Conunission and City Council. Please reply to: City of Georgetown Development Services Division P. O. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78627 CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OF A PUBLIC MEETING (9� R 0 -W[E MAY .; 11995 Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its �gular public meeting of the: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,., ❑ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT This meeting will be held on the 6th--day of June 1995, at 6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers, 101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed: Rezoning of Stonehedqe Subdivision, Section Three, Block N and 2.74 acres and 48.51 acres in the William Addison Survey from A, Agricultural to RS, Residential Single Family and 2.15 and 2.26 acres in the William Addison Survey, from A, Agricultural to C-1 Local Commercial or any more restrictive classification and locally known as Churchill Farins. As one of the owners of adjaQent property you are invited to be present at such meeting if you,;. desire to discuss the proposed plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail. Date: 5/22/95 City of Georgetown A copy of the planning report related to this item will be available at the Division of Development Services and the Georgetown Public Library no later than the Friday prior to the meeting described above. For further information phone the Development Services Division at 930-3575. PROPERTY OWNER'S COMMENTS Project Name: Stonehedqe, Sec. 3 and tract in Wm. Addison Survey Name of Respondent: JAMM A SUZANNE HARM 410 KEENL"D DR Address of Respondent : GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 I am in fav2povided .�.�1 object: If you wish ubmit written comment, please respond by 5/31/95, it will be to the Board of Adjustment or Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Please reply to: City of Georgetown Development Services Division P. 0. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78627 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE PASSED AND ADOPTED ON THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1968, AND AMENDING PART OF THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE ORIGINAL ORDINANCE, TO CHANGE 2.52 ACRES, KNOWN AS CHURCHILL FARMS, SECTION SIX, PHASE ONE, AS RECORDED IN CABINET M, SLIDES 384-385 OF THE OFFICIAL PLAT RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM A, AGRICULTURAL TO C-19 LOCAL COMMERCIAL; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, an application has been made to the City Council for the purpose of changing the zoning district classification of the following described real property ("the property") : 2.52 ACRES KNOWN AS CHURCHILL FARMS, SECTION SIX, PHASE ONE, AS RECORDED IN CABINET M, SLIDES 384-345 OF THE OFFICIAL PLAT RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, hereinafter referred to as "the property"; WHEREAS, the City Council has submitted the proposed change in the Base Ordinance to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its consideration in a public hearing and for its recommendation or report; and WHEREAS, notice of such hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City; which stated the time and place of hearing, which time was not earlier than fifteen (15) days for the first day of such publication; and WHEREAS, written notice was given not less than fifteen (15) days before the date set for the meeting before the Planning and Zoning Commission to all the owners of the lots within two hundred feet of the property, as required by law; and WHEREAS, the applicant for such zoning change placed on the property such sign(s) as required by law for advertising the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, not less than fifteen (15) days before the date set for such hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission in a meeting held on June 6, 1995, recommended changing said zoning district classification of the above described property from the A, Agricultural district zoning classification to C-1, Local Commercial district zoning 2.52 Acres, Churchill Farms, Section Six, Phase One Rezoning Ordinance No. Page 1 of 3 classification, in accordance with Exhibit "A". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance implements the following Policies of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element: 1. Growth and Physical Development Policy 1, which states: "The City will ensure that future land use patterns provide economic, cultural, and social activities to all residents, businesses and organizations"; and 2. Growth and Physical Development Policy 2, which states: "The City's regulatory actions will efficiently and effectively implement the Policy Statements and provide the opportunity to seek change with reasonable effort and expense"; and 3. Growth and Physical Development Policy 4, which states: "The City will encourage new development and infill redevelopment in the community"; and 4. Environmental and Resource Conservation Policy 1, which states: "The City will take the steps necessary to protect the physical attributes that make Georgetown attractive"; and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan. SECTION 2. The Base Ordinance and the Zoning Map of the City, as well as the Zoning District for the Property shall be and the same is hereby changed from the A, AGRICULTURAL district to C-1, LOCAL COMMERCIAL district, in accordance with Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, is hereby adopted by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas. SECTION 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. SECTION 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. 2.52 Acres, Churchill Farms, Section Six, Phase One Rezoning Ordinance No. Page 2 of 3 SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this Ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in (10) ten days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of Georgetown. PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the 22nd day of August, 1995. PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading., n the day of , 1996. ATTEST: Sandra D. Lee City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: e Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: By: LEO WOOD Mayor Council meeting _ eft- 44�' f& Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Consideration and second reading of an ordinance providing for the annexation into the City of approximately 2.821 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey, consisting of right-of-way and public utility easement for a portion of the proposed Northwest Boulevard between Northwood Drive and Whisper Oaks Drive. ITEM SUMMARY: On January 9, 1996, the City Council passed a resolution to adopt the proposed service plans and set the public hearing dates for the annexation of approximately 80.3 acres in the Nicholas Porter and David Wright Surveys, located north of Williams Drive (RM2338) and south of Lakeway Drive. The 2.821 acres described in this ordinance, the right- of-way and public utility easement for a proposed portion of Northwest Boulevard, are within the 80.3 acre area. Two (2) public hearings were held, on February 13, 1996 and on February 27, 1996, as required by State law to describe and receive comments on the City's plans for providing services to the annexation areas. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None FINANCIAL IMPACT: The service plan, which is to be adopted as a part of the annexation ordinance, describes the City services to be provided to the areas. COMMENTS: The property owners have agreed to voluntary annexation of this property. The first reading of this ordinance was approved by the Council on March 26, 1996. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance and exhibits: Submitted By. Edward J. Ar rAICP - irector Clyde on Rosenberg, AI Division Developme t Services Chief Planner, Long Ran e Planning ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AND THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE, CONSISTING OF: APPROXIMATELY 2.821 ACRES IN THE NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, CONSISTING OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR A PORTION OF THE PROPOSED NORTHWEST BOULEVARD BETWEEN NORTHWOOD DRIVE AND WHISPER OAKS DRIVE, WHICH SAID TERRITORY LIES ADJACENT TO AND ADJOINS THE PRESENT BOUNDARY LIMIT OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS AND NOT BEING A PART OF ANY INCORPORATED AREA; PROVIDING FOR SERVICE PLANS; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, may under the Charter of said City, Section 1.06, annex areas as allowed by State law; and WHEREAS, notices of two (2) public hearings were published according to law in a newspaper having general circulation in the City of Georgetown, Texas, and in the herein described territory to be annexed not more than twenty (20) days nor less than ten (10) days prior to those hearings; and WHEREAS, two public hearings by the City of Georgetown, Texas, where all interested persons were provided with an opportunity to be heard on the proposed annexation of certain tracts of land located in. Williamson County, Texas, including the following tracts: APPROXIMATELY 80.3 ACRES IN THE NICHOLAS PORTER AND DAVID WRIGHT SURVEYS, LOCATED NORTH OF WILLIAMS DRIVE (RM2338) AND SOUTH OF LAKEWAY -DRIVE; were held, the first being or, the 13th day of February, 1996, and the second being on the 27th day of February, 1996; and WHEREAS, the right-of-way and public utility easement described in Exhibit A of this ordinance: APPROXIMATELY 2: 821 ACRES IN THE NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, were included within the approximately 80.3 acres which were the subject of the notices and public hearings for the proposed annexation; WHEREAS, at such public hearings, a proposed service plan was presented to and discussed by the Council and all interested persons; and Annexation of 2.821 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey consisting of a portion of the proposed Northwest Boulevard Ordinance No. Page 1 of 4 and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan. SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Georgetown hereby annexes: APPROXIMATELY 2.821 ACRES IN THE NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY CONSISTING OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF THE PROPOSED NORTHWEST BOULEVARD BETWEEN NORTHWOOD DRIVE AND WHISPER OAKS DRIVE as described in Exhibit A of this ordinance, which contains maps, descriptions, and the service plans for the area. SECTION 3. The property owners and qualified voters in the area to be annexed have provided the City of Georgetown with a signed request for the voluntary annexation of this area. SECTION 4. The annexation fees for voluntary annexation are hereby waived. SECTION 5. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. SECTION 6. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity�'-shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this ordinance which- can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. SECTION 7. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in (10) ten days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of Georgetown. Annexation of 2.821 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey consisting of a portion of the proposed Northwest Boulevard Ordinance No. Page 3 of 4 PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the 26th day of March, 1996. PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the 9th day of April, 1996. ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: Sandra D. Lee By: LEO WOOD City Secretary Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney Annexation of 2.821 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey consisting of a portion of the proposed Northwest Boulevard Ordinance No. Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT A, Page 1 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 Souni 31 sT TEMPLE, TEXAS 76502 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PROPOSED NORTHWEST BOULEVARD, TRACT A TEMPLE (817) 773-1447 KILLEEN (817) 526-0117 Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and. embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the east right-of-way line of Northwest Blvd., a 70 feet road as it appears upon the map of REATA EAST, a Subdivision situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 90 of the Williamson County Plat Records, said iron rod being the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block C of said REATA EAST, and being in the north line of a tract described in the deed to Irene W. Parker Trust lecorded in volume 410, page 374 of said Deed Records, and then run outh 58 degrees east along the north line of the Parker tract, for he south line of said Lot 13, REATA EAST, 20-31/100 feet to a 1/2 nch iron rod found for the northwest corner of said Brossett tract, nd then run south 32 degrees-10 minutes west alone the west line of aid Brossett tract, 56-93/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set for the ortherly and beginning corner of the right-of-way tract being .escribed. hence south 32 degrees-10 minutes west continuing along the west line f said Brossett tract, 82-68/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found or an angle point in the south line of said Brossett tract, (deed Ball is south 37 degrees-40 minutes west). Thence south 18 de rees-17 minutes east along ng the south line of said Brossett tract, 96-82/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, being in a curve to the right whose radius is 465 feet, (deed call is south 12 degrees-53 minutes east). Thence northeasterly along said curve to the right, 163-33/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0-05/100 of an acre, the long chord of said 163-33/100 feet arc is north 4 degrees-49 minutes east 162-5/10 feet. Basis of bearings is taken from the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, being the north line of said Brossett tract, as south 58 degrees east. See attached 24 inch by 36 inch Master Drawing that accompanies these field notes. r surveyed December 29, 1995 1 RO D CARROLL SURVE S OF 9 Ro ald Carroll �o' RONALD CARROLL 2025 O sua 95FN2\SURV\GEO-NW EXHIBIT A, Page 2 of 28 Page 4 of 28 ' tt I4 Qtjt,Qc U U U U U U C C C C C C t�hhoml vhhhmlm O MONO r� 0 0 0 0 0 O p M M A M �Nhv�n 4i 4i 4i W � aQian:a EXHIBIT A, Page 3 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 So= 31sr TEMPLE (817) 773-1447 TEMPLE, TExAs 76502 KILLEEN (817) 526-0117 Page 1 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PROPOSED NORTHWEST BOULEVARD, TRACT B Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Irene W. Parker Trust recorded in volume 410, page 374 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the east right-of-way line of Northwest Blvd., a 70 feet right-of-way road as it appears upon the i map of REATA EAST, a Subdivision situated n Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 90 of the Williamson County Plat Records, said iron rod being the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block C of said REATA EAST, and being in the north line said Parker Tract, and then run south 58 degrees east (basis of bearing and plat call) along the south line of said Lot 13, Block C of REATA EAST, for the north line of said Parker tract, 20-31/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of a tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of said Deed Records, and being the northeast and beginning corner of the right-of-way tract being described. Thence south 32 degrees-10 minutes west along the west line of said Brossett tract, 139-61/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in the south line of said Brossett tract, (deed call is south 37 degrees-40 minutes west). Thence south 18 degrees-17 minutes east along the Brossett tract, 147-36/100 to a 5/8 inch iron rod northwest corner of a tract described in the deed Parker, et al recorded in volume 1292, page 145 of (deed call is south 12 degrees-53 minutes east). Thence south 44 degrees-10 minutes west along the Rondald Parker tract, 92-33/100 feet to a 5/8 inch in a curve to the right whose radius is 535 feet, 46 degrees-51 minutes west). south line of said set for the to Rondald W. said Deed Records, west line of said iron rod set, being (deed call is south Thence northeasterly along said curve to the right, 377-61/100 feet to, a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the north line of said Irene Parker Trust tract, for the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, the long chord of said 377-61/100 feet arc is north 3 degrees-11 minutes east 369-82/100 feet, from said 5/8 inch iron rod set a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the southeast corner of Lot,2, Block A of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, being in the existing west right-of-way line of Northwest Blvd. bears north 58 degrees west 5-55/100 feet. '00 O00 '7 VLI xx' l�o / ..!'p.� EXHIBIT A, Page S of 28 n / , o h r o o j E 4 ° a 'F °h3 b @ a LOy 1 ,o• �� 1 �� O by t t � Q \ �C \.. \ �\ b UU b V U V C: Sys ` \ OOQO d /� fi I w l 3 { yYS c c t c ° o Q E� V 4 U U 4 u C A C C C a o a a a b a u A c�hoO V Rah Ot7O O N 4 tl tl tl tl N —NhMb 22=zZ W W W W W JzsJjj 4o.,4aCA, h 8 try / 7( 1 + / i I _ tip n r 0 �ba- 1- ♦ 1� EXHIBIT A, Page 6 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 Soon i 31 s-r TEMPLE (817)173-1447 l'u-tvLE, TE ,s 7650) KILLEEN (817) 5Z6.01 1.7 Page 1 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: RIGHT-OF-WAY OP PROPOSED NORTHWEST BOULEVARD, TRACT G Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Rondald W. Parker, et al recorded in volume. 1292, page 145 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the east right--of-way line of Northwest Blvd., a 70 feet right-of-way road as it appears upon the map of REATA EAST, a Subdivision situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 90 of the Williamson county Plat Records, said iron rod being the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block C of said REATA EAST, and being in the north line of a tract described in the deed to Irene W.'Parker Trust recorded in volume 410, page 374 of said Deed Records, then run south 58 degrees east 20-31/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of a tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of said Deed Records; and then run south 32 degrees-10 minutes west along the west line of said Br.-ossztt tract at 56-93/100 feet pass -a 5/8 inch iron rod set, in alit a distance of 139-61/1.00 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the southwest corner of said Brossett tract, ( deed call is south 37 degrees-40 minutes west); and then run south 18 degrees-17 minutesi east at 96-82/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set, and continue n all 147-36/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set for the northwest corner of said Rondald Parker tract, and being the northwest and beginning corner of the right-of-way tract being described, (deed call is south 12 degrees-53 minutes east). Thence south 1.8 degrees-1.7 minutes east along the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, at 159-23/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set, and continue in all, 262-74/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in the common line of said Brossett and Rondald parker tract, (deed call is south 15 degrees-34 minutes west). Thence south 61 degrees-24 minutes east along the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, 360-33/ 100 feet to 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in said Brossett and Rondald Parker tracts, (deed call is south 58 degrees-42 minutes east). Thence south 76 degrees--16 minutes-30 seconds east along the common line of said Brossett and Rondald Parker tracts, 98-9/10 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod sot, being in a curve to the right whose radius is 785 feet, (deed call is south 73 degree8r-32 minutes east). Thence southeasterly along said curve to the. right, 381•-95/1.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod Set in the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, and being in the west line of Lot 1, Block 5 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, an addition in the City of Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it EXHIBIT A, Page 7 of 28 Page 2 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: (continued) RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PROPOSED NORTHWEST BOULEVARD, TRACT C appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet C. Slide 180 of said Plat Records, the long chord of said 381-95/100 feet arc is south 42 degrees-10 minutes east 378-19/100. Thence south 12 degrees-17 minutes west along the west line of said Lot 1, Block 5 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, for the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, 2-13/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set for the southwest corner of said Lot 1, Block 5 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, and being in the north line of Northwest Blvd., also being an angle point in the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, (deed call is south 14 degrees-28 minutes-30 seconds west). Thence north 84 degrees-43 minutes west along the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, for the west line of NORTHWOOD OAKS Addition, 83-98/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, being in a curve to the left whose radius is 715 feet, from said 5/8 inch iron rod set, a 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, being the northwest corner of Lot 9, Block 4 of said NORTHWOOD OAKS bears north 8�4 degrees-43 minutes west 16-65/100 feet, (deed call is north 82 degrees-06 minutes west). Thence northwesterly along said curve to the left, 499-14/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set at the end of said curve to the left, and being at the beginning of a curve to the right whose radius is 535 feet, the long chord of said 499-14/100 feet arc is north 51 degrees-49 minutes west 489-06/100 feet. Thence northwesterly along said curve to the right, 511-5/10 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the west line of said Rondald Parker tract, the long chord of said 511-5/10 feet arc is north 44 degrees-25 minutes-30 seconds west 492-24/100 feet. Thence north 44 degrees-10 minutes east along the west line of said Rondald Parker tract, 92-33/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 1-50/100 acres, (deed call is north 46 degre,es-51 minutes east) . Basis of bearings is taken from the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, being the north line of said Brossett tract, as south 58 degrees east. See attached 24 inch by 36 inch Master Drawing that accompanies these field notes. Surveyed December 29, 1995 RON CARROLL Ztrd Ronald Carroll SURVEYORS CT RONALD GARROLL 0 2025 .4 9,�;o•�E�sst��{o SUFt4 95FN2\SURV\GEO-NW 2 d A$ EXHIBIT A. Page -8 of 28 tttt 31R91 tj v L lu vuuuu C C C C C o O C 0 0 O O O O O N N M M M � cl) 40 o O C o 0 zZZzz a4:4:a:C EXHIBIT A, Page 9 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 SoLrrH 31 sT TEMPLE (817) 773-1447 TEMPLE, TEXAS 76502 KILLEEN (817) 526-0117 Page 1 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PROPOSED NORTHWEST BOULEVARD, TRACT D Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the east right-of-way line of Northwest Blvd., a 70 feet road as it appears upon the map of REATA EAST, a subdivision situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F. Sliae 90 of Williamson County Plat Records, said iron rod being the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block C of said REATA EAST, and being in the north line of a tract described in the deed to Irene W. Parker Trust recorded in volume 410, page 374 of said Deed Records, then run south 58 degrees east (basis of bearings and plat call) 20-31/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of said Brossett tract, and then run south 32 degrees-10 minutes west along the west line of said Brossett tract, at 56-93/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set, and continue in all, 139-61/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in the west line of said Brossett tract, (deed call is south 37 degrees-40 minutes west); and then run south 18 degrees-17 minutes east along the southwesterly line of said Brossett tract, at 96-82/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set, at 147-36/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set for the northwest corner of a tract described in the deed to Rondald W. Parker, et al recorded in volume 1292, page 145 of said Deed Records, in all, 306-59/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in a curve to the left whose radius is 465 feet for the northwest and beginning corner of the tract being described, (deed call is south 15 degrees-34 minutes west). Thence southeasterly along said curve to the left 328-66/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set at the end of said curve to the left, and being at the beginning of a curve to the right whose radius is 785 feet, the long chord of said 328-66/100 feet arc is south 51 degrees-34 minutes east 321-87/100 feet. Thence southeasterly along said curve to the right, 215-22/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the south line of said Brossett tract, and being in the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, the long chord of said 215-22/100 feet arc is south 63 degrees-57 minutes-45 seconds east 214-55/100 feet. Thence north 76 degrees-16 minutes-30 seconds west along the south line of said Brossett tract, 98-9/10 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in the south line of said Brossett tract, and being in the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, (deed call is north 73 degrees-32 minutes west). EXHIBIT A, Page 10 of 28 Page 2 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: (continued) RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PROPOSED NORTHWEST BOULEVARD, TRACT D Thence north 61 degrees-24 minutes west along the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, 360-33/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in said Brossett and Rondald Parker tracts, (deed call is north 58 degrees-42 minutes west). Thence north 18 degrees-17 minutes west continuing along the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, 103-51/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0-20/100 of an acre, (deed call is north 15 degrees-34 minutes east). Basis of bearings is taken from the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, being the north line of said Brossett tract, as south 58 degrees east. See attached 24 inch by 36 inch Master Drawing that accompanies these field notes. Surveyed December 29, 1995 RO D CARROLL SURVEYO S OF Ronald Carroll ¢j'a RONALD CARROLL 2C25 '°• t• � '�a ,�► z CCf 95FN2\SURV\GEO-NW2 001 / ►n / EXHIBIT A, Page 11 of 28 " s ` n � G h � )) h P o O I 0 aft G � nnnn QmUp c 4 C C C C C C p e o a o e e ti n�noa, j u O�ONO v-0i < v o0000 0 N 22Z221 wwwccL JtsJjJI C0-a:4a LIM December 29, 1995 EXHIBIT A, Page 12 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 SouT i 31 ST TEMPLE (817) 773-1447 TEMPLE, TExns 76502 KILLEEN (817) 526-0117 Page 1 of 2 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 1) Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the east right-of-way line of Northwest Blvd., a 70 feet road as it appears upon the map of REATA EAST, a subdivision situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 90 of Williamson County Plat Records, said iron rod being the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block C of said REATA EAST, and being in the north line of a tract described in the deed to Irene W. Parker Trust recorded in volume 410, page 374 of said Deed Records then run south 58 degrees east (basis of bearings and plat call) along the south line of the REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, for the north line of the Irene Parker Trust tract, 20-31/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of said Brossett tract, and then run south 32 degrees-10 minutes west alone the west line of said Brossett tract, at 18-22/100 feet to a point being in a curve to the left whose radius is 455 feet for the northeast and beginning corner of the easement being described, (deed call is south 37 degrees-40 minutes west). Thence southwesterly along said curve to the left 257-85/100 feet to a point being in the south line of said Brossett tract for the north line of a tract described in the deed to Rondald W. Parker, et al recorded in volume 1292, page 145 of said Deed Records, the long chord of 257-85/100 feet arc is south 3 degrees-18 minutes west 254-41/100 feet. Thence north 18 degrees-17 minutes west along the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, at 11-91/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set for the northwest corner of said Rondald Parker tract, and continue in all, 62-45/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the beginning of a curve to the right whose radius is 465 feet, (deed call is north 15 degrees-34 minutes east). Thence northeasterly along said curve to the right, 163-33/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the west line of said Brossett tract, the long chord of said 163-33/100 feet arc is north 4 degrees-49 minutes east 162-5/10 feet. Thence north 32 degrees-10 minutes east along the west line of said Brossett tract, 38-71/100 feet to the place of beginning and t con aining 0-047/1000 of an acre. EXHIBIT A, Page 13 of 28 Page 2 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: (continued) PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 1) Basis of bearings is taken from the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, being the north line of said Brossett tract, as north 58 degrees west. See attached 24 inch by 36 inch Master Drawing that accompanies these field notes. Surveyed December 29, 1995 RON CARROLL SURVEYORS OF "aft 464 Ronald Carroll A,P�04q!.o� RONALD CARROLL 2025 t; s U R'q 95FN2\SURV\GEO-NW2 C 0 obi h o � ub 4 43 h 4� gypp- u � 4• C' �jyJOC yo., h� y aamN� lb u 4 o�oq •�SuWoE � W � W q a 9R� pp0 o EXHIBIT A, Page 14 of 28 1 h- I P :.a o- u k « C C h C a v ti a O�hN 00- 6 Y K 1 1 «CEO sr► its December 29, 1995 EXHIBIT A, Page 15 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 Soum 31 s-r TEMPLE (817) 773-1447 TEMPLE. TExws 76502 KILLEEN (817) 526-0117 Page 1 of 2 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 2) Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the east right-of-way line of Northwest Blvd., a 70 feet road as it appears upon the map of REATA EAST, a subdivision situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 90 of Williamson County Plat Records, said iron rod being the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block C of said REATA EAST, and being in the north line of a tract described in the deed to Irene W. Parker Trust recorded in volume 410, page 374 of said Deed Records, then run south 58 degrees east (basis of bearings and plat call) 20-31/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of said Brossett tract, and then run south 32 degrees-10 minutes west along the west line of said Brossett tract, at 5.6-93/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set, and continue in all, 139-61/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in the west line of said Brossett tract (deed call is south 37 degrees-40 minutes west); and then run south 18 degrees-17 minutes east along the southwesterly line of said Brossett tract, at 96-82/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set, at 147-36/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set, and continue in all, 232-23/100 feet to a point being at the beginning of a curve to the left whose radius is 455 feet for the northwest and beginning corner of the easement being described. Thence southeasterly along said curve to the left, 382-62/100 feet to a point at=;the end of said curve to the left, and being at the beginning of a curve to the right whose radius is 795 feet, the long chord of said 382-62/100 feet arc is south 47 degrees-43 minutes-30 seconds east 371-45/100 feet. Thence southeasterly along said curve to the right, 244-03/100 feet to a point in the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of a tract described in the. deed to Rondald W. Parker, et al recorded in volume 1292, page 145 of said Deed Records, the long chord of said 244-03/100 feet arc is south 63 degrees-01 minutes-20 seconds east 243-07/100 feet. Thence north 76 degrees-16 minutes-30 seconds west along the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, 27-77/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, and being in a curve to the left whose radius is 785 feet, (deed call is north 73 degrees-32 minutes west). z EXHIBIT A, Page 17 of 28 h s / 2 0 it M N �Rt�� ire 000 0 I � r I 1� 1 rN 1 � � y 1 1 fi t I 0 0• ° h $ � Iy •' ;o r E / TIP, •268�5/�� ' Z U V U V U U U U U U ««< vv4v � �hho¢> 0 0V` U d'M41(hm <O < ONO h000 `0 OOCCC O v h N N p p p p p C-. OC N �NMvn N p It p <C4 V D 0 0 0 0 0 eE' t3 4j 4j 4i 4i �i trtr JjJjj 4014aa 0 L U < c O h O EXHIBIT A, Page 18 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 Sourw 31 sr TEMPLE (817) 773-1447 TEMPLE, TEXAS 76502 KILLEEN (817) 526-0117 Page 1 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, -Texas for: PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 3) Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Rondald W. Parker, et al recorded in volume 1292, page 145 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod set in the north right-of-way line of Northwest Blvd., a 70 feet road as it appears upon the map of REATA EAST, a subdivision situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 90 of Williamson County Plat Records, for the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 5 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, an Addition in the City of Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet C, Slide 180 of said Plat Records, being an angle point in the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, -and then run north 12 degrees-17 minutes east along the._west line of said Block 5 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, for the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, 2-13/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, being in a curve to the left whose radius is 785 feet, and being the southeast and beginning corner of the easement being described, (deed call is north 14 degrees-28 minutes-30 seconds east). Thence northwesterly along said curve to the left, 381-95/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, for the south line of a tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of Deed Records, the long chord of said 381-95/100 feet arc is north 42 degrees-10 minutes west 378-19/100 feet. Thence south 76 degrees-16 minutes-30 seconds east along the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, 27-77/100 feet to a point being in a curve to the right whose radius is 795 feet, (deed call is south 73 degrees-32 minutes east). Thence southeasterly along said curve to the right, 349-14/100 feet to a point being -in the west line of said Lot 1, Block 5 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, for the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, the long chord of said 349-14/100 feet arc is south 41 degrees-38 minutes-50 seconds east 346-34/100 feet. Thence south 12 degrees-17 minutes west along the west line of said Lot 1, Block 5 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, for the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, 15-26/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0-083/1000 of an acre, (deed call is south 14 degrees-28 minutes-30 seconds west) . EXHIBIT A, Page 19 of 28 Page 2 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, -Texas for: (continued) PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 3) Basis of bearings is taken from the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, being the north line of said Brossett tract, as south 58 degrees east. See attached 24 inch by 36 inch Master Drawing that accompanies these field notes. Surveyed December 29, 1995 RON CARROLL SURVEYOR OF Ronald Carroll RONALD CARROLL 9 2025 �; O� SU10 95FN2\SURV\GEO-NW2 % / / RTw EXHIBIT A, Page 20 of 22 � f� R a EXHIBIT A, Page 21 of 28 Affirs December 29, 1995 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 SouTH 31 sT TEMPLE (817) 773-1447 TEMPLE, TExAs 76502 KILLEEN (817) 526-0117 Page 1 of 2 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 4) Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 4971 situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Rondald W. Parker, et al recorded in volume 1292, page 145 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the east line of said Parker tract, for the northwest corner of Lot 9, Block 4 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, an Addition in the City of Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet C, Slide 180 of the Williamson County Plat Records, and being in the south line of Northwest Blvd., and then run south 84 degrees-43 minutes east along the west line of said NORTHWOOD OAKS Addition, for the east line of said Parker tract, 16-65/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set for the northeast and beginning corner of the easement being described. Thence north 84 degrees-43 minutes west along the west line of said NORTHWOOD OAKS Addition, for the east line of said Parker tract, 12-6/10 feet to a point being in a curve to the left whose radius is 705 feet, (deed call is north 82 degrees-06 minutes west). Thence northwesterly along said curve to the left, 484-56/100 feet to a point at the end of said curve to the left, being at the beginning of a curve to the right whose radius is 545 feet the long chord of said 484-56/100 feet arc is north 52 degrees-07 minutes-30 seconds west 475-08/100 feet. Thence northwesterly along said curve to the right, 515-58/100 feet to a point being in the west line of said Parker tract, -he long chord of said 515-58/100 feet arc is north 44 degrees-43 minutes west 496-57/100 feet. Thence north 44 degrees-10 minutes east along the west line of said Parker tract, 11-38/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, and being in a curve to the left whose radius is 535 feet, from said 5/8 inch iron rod set, another 5/8 inch iron set for the northwest corner of said Parker tract, and being in the south line of a tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of said Deed Records bears north 44 degrees-10 minutes east 92-33/100 feet, (deed call is north 46 degrees-51 minutes east). Thence southeasterly along said curve to the left, 511-5/10 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set at the end of said curve to the left, and being at the beginning of a curve to the right whose radius is 715 feet, the long chord of said 511-5/10 feet arc is south 44 degrees-25 minutes-30 seconds east 492-24/100 feet. EXHIBIT A, Page 22 of 28 Page 2 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: (continued) PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 4) Thence southeasterly along said curve to the right, 499-14/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0-23/100 of an acre, the long chord of said 499-14/100 feet arc is south 51 degrees-49 minutes east 489-06/100 feet. Basis of bearings is taken from the south line of said REATA EAST a Subdivision situated in the City of Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F Slide 90 of said Plat Records, being the north line of said Brossett tract, as south 58 degrees east. See attached 24 inch by 36 inch Master Drawing that accompanies these field notes. Surveyed December 29, 1995 ;RZO:D CARROLL SURVEYORS ^� L 1� F Ronald Carroll A, GI RON-ALD CARROLL 2025 !: \c, SLIR'� 95FN2\SURV\GEO-NW2 0�0 O'D w a � BLVD• - OR.TT �w �a EXHIBIT A, Page 23 of 28 b 00 � w ! o ` ti I: !GG O O � tl O �hO�j 00-�0 4 X 4 M «G p tU r c O C C C o v a o c h 0 0 0 0 < o-•oN N 0 0 0 0 22ZZ w ui ki Eli �jJj aaa4 M21 EXHIBIT A, Page 24 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS IR,F45 5302 Soumi 31s-r TEMPLE (817) 773-1447 TEMPLE, TExns 76502 KILLEEN (817) 526-0117 Page 1 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 5) Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Irene W. Parker Trust recorded in volume 410, page 374 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the north line of said Parker tract, for the southwest corner of Lot 13 Block C of4REATA EAST, a Subdivision situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 90 of the Williamson County Plat Records, and being in the east line of Northwest Blvd., and then run north 58 degrees west (basis of bearings and deed call) along the south line of said REATA EAST, for the north line of said Parker tract, 64-45/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, being in a curve to the left whose radius is 535 feet. Thence southwesterly along said curve to the left, 377-61/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, being in the west line of a tract described in the deed to Rondald W. Parker, et al recorded in volume 1292, page 145 of said Deed Records, the long chord of said 377-61/100 feet arc is south 3 degrees-11 minutes west 369-82/100 feet from said 5/8 inch iron rod set, another 5/8 inch iron rod set for the northwest corner of said Rondald W. Parker tract, bears north 44 degrees-10 minutes east 92-33/100 feet. Thence south 44 degrees-10 minutes Rondald W. Parker tract, 11-38/100 the right whose radius is 545 feet, minutes west). west along the west line of said feet to a point being in a curve to (deed call is south 46 degrees-51 Thence northeasterly along said curve to the right, 391-66/100 feet to a point being in the north line of said Irene Parker tract, and being in the south line of Lot 2, Block A of said REATA EAST, the long chord of said 391-56/100 feet arc is north 2 degrees-58 minutes-30 seconds east 383-29/100 feet. Thence south 58 degrees east along the south line of said Lot 2, Block A of REATA EAST, for the north line of said Irene Parker tract, at 4-56/100 feet pass a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the southeast corner of said Lot 2, Block A of REATA EAST, and continue in all, 10-11/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0-088/1000 of an acre. EXHIBIT A, Page 25 of 28 Page 2 of 2 December 291 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: (continued) PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 5) Basis of bearings is taken from the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, being the north line of said Brossett tract, as south 58 degrees east. See attached 24 inch by 36 inch Master Drawing that accompanies these field notes. Surveyed December 29, 1995 RON D :CARROLL SURVEYORS i OF r -.�F Ronald Carroll RONA.LD CARROLL lip - 95FN2\SURV\GEO-NW2 EXHIBIT A, Page 26 of 28 y P Q O o o e�tl 2 �1`n 0 0 0 0 oc`c ` 0 l�hh0m ooQo < h000 el. 00000 O V 4) N N 4 N N A P C 0�0 nt �Nhvv� amc�o 22Z22 O HRI 444C�4 Z EXHIBIT A, Page 27 of 28 CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS ANNEXATION SERVICE PLAN APPROXIMATELY 80.3 ACRES IN THE NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, LOCATED NORTH OF WILLIAMS DRIVE (RM2338) AND SOUTH OF LAKEWAY BOULEVARD Introduction This service plan has been prepared in accordance with Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 43 - Municipal Annexation. This requires that the service plan provide for the extension of full municipal services to the area to be annexed by any of the methods by which it extends services to any other area of the municipality. Police Protection Regular and routine patrolling of streets, responses to calls, and other police services will be provided upon the effective date of the annexation. Fire Protection and Code Enforcement Fire protection and prevention services are currently being provided to the area through an agreement with Williamson County. These services will continue to be provided to the area upon the effective date of the annexation. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the City Code Enforcement Officer will periodically patrol streets in the area to ensure that all properties are in conformance with City Code. Solid Waste Collection Solid waste collection and disposal services will be provided upon the effective date of the annexation, in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions contained in the City Code. Water Service Water lines will be extended in accordance with City policy. The City has a Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy, which is described in this service plan. Sewer Service Wastewater lines will be extended in accordance with City policy. The City has a Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy, which is described in this service plan. Maintenance of Roads, Streets, and Drainaye Roads, streets and drainage facilities dedicated to the public will be maintained according to City Code and policy upon the effective date of the annexation. Street Lighting Street lighting will be made available upon the effective date of the annexation, upon request of the property owners, in accordance with City Code and policy. Annexation Service Plan, Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, Page 28 of 28 Parks and Recreation Parks and recreation facilities dedicated to the public will be maintained according to City Code and policy upon the effective date of the annexation. Recreation services will be provided to all residents in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions contained in the City Code. Planning and Zoning Upon the effective date of the annexation, the planning -and zoning jurisdiction of the City will extend to this area. The area will be zoned A (Agricultural), unless otherwise approved through regular procedures. Inspection Services All inspection services, including building, electrical, plumbing, etc., provided by the City will be extended to the area upon the effective date of the annexation. Library Services ` Library services will be provided to all residents in accordance with the rates, terms, and conditions contained in the City Code upon the effective date of the annexation. Other Services Other services provided by the City, such as animal control, court, and general administration, will be made available upon the effective date of the annexation, in accordance with the City Code and policies. Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy City Ordinance Number 900404, a Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy, guides the planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of all utility system improvements, including water, wastewater and electrical service. Annexation Service Plan, Page 2 of 2 Council meeting date: f • Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Ordinance amending Ordinance 96-09 to replace the 80.3 acre tract with a 2.821 acre tract. ITEM SUMMARY This ordinance will incorporate the annexation of a 2.821 acre tract for the right-of-way and public utility easement for a portion of the proposed extension of Northwest Blvd between Northwood Drive and Whisper Oaks Drive. This area lies adjacent to District 5 and adjoins the present boundary limit of the City. The redistricting ordinance that was recently adopted by the City Council included the entire 80.3 acre tract that was proposed to be annexed. This ordinance will amend the singlemember district plan to include only the 2.821 acre tract that is being annexed into District 5. Since this 2.821 will be street right-of-way, no additional population will now be added to District 5. The redistricting submittal to the Department of Justice is also being revised to indicate that no population is being added to District 5. This ordinance was not filed with the City Secretary seven days in advance, so it will need to be read in full at the Council Meeting. ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposed Ordinance r Submitted By: i Marianne Landers Banks, City Attorney litigate\election\red istri\040996. agd ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE 96-09, TO EXCLUDE THE 80.3 ACRE TRACT KNOWN AS HOGBERG/PARKER/SMITH TRACT AND TO INCLUDE A 2.821 ACRE TRACT TO BE INCLUDED IN DISTRICT 5; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the 80.3 acre tract known as Hogberg/Parker/Smith tract was not annexed into the City of Georgetown and should be excluded from District 5; WHEREAS, a 2.821 acre tract was annexed and will be included in District 5; WHEREAS, since the approval of the U.S. Department of Justice is required to amend the City's single member district plan, and such approval must be submitted well in advance of the City's election; WHEREAS, according to the most recent dicennial census in 1990, this recent annexation did not contain any population in 1990, such that the existing single member district boundaries must be redrawn; WHEREAS, the annexed tract is immediately adjacent to only one existing single member district boundary line; WHEREAS, the City Council hereby determines that the addition of these annexed tracts to the adjacent single member district is in the best interest of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance implements Governmental Affairs Policy 2 of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element, which states: "The City will encourage all citizens to actively participate in governmental functions", and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan. SECTION 2. The annexation of the The 80.3-acre tract identified in Ordinance 96- 0E as Hogberg/Parker/Smith tract has been reduced in scope to annex only 2.821-acre tract, as described in the document attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Ordinance No. 96-09 is amended to add only the 2.821-acre tract to District 5. SECTION 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. SECTION 4. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect Single Member District Revision 1996 amendment Ordinance No. Page 1 of 2 in (10) ten days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of Georgetown, or on the effective date of the annexation ordinance, whichever date is later. PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the 9th day of April, 1996 PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the 23rd day of April, 1996. ATTEST: Sandra D. Lee City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney Single Member District Revision 1996 amendment Ordinance No. Page 2 of 2 THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: By: LEO WOOD Mayor EXHIBIT A, Page 1 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 Souni 31 sr TEmn-E. Texws 76502 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PROPOSED NORTHWEST BOULEVARD, TRACT A TEmME (817) 773-1447 KILLEEN (817) 526-0117 Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the east right-of-way line of Northwest Blvd., a 70 feet road as it appears upon the map of REATA EAST, a Subdivision situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 90 of the Williamson County Plat Records, said iron rod being the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block C of said REATA EAST, and being in the north line of a tract described in the deed to Irene W. Parker Trust recorded in volume 410, page 374 of said Deed Records, and then run south 58 degrees east along the north line of the Parker tract, for the south line of said Lot 13, REATA EAST, 20-31/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of said Brossett tract, and then run south 32 degrees-10 minutes west alone the west line of said Brossett tract, 56-93/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set for the northerly and beginning corner of the right-of-way tract being described. Thence south 32 degrees-10 minutes west continuing along the west line of said Brossett tract, 82-68/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in the south line of said Brossett tract, (deed call is south 37 degrees-40 minutes west). Thence south 18 degrees-17 minutes east along the south line of said Brossett tract, 96-82/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, being in a curve to the right whose radius is 465 feet, (deed call is south 12 degrees-53 minutes east). Thence northeasterly along said curve to the right, 163-33/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0-05/100 of an acre, the long chord of said 163-33/100 feet arc is north 4 degrees-49 minutes east 162-5/10 feet. Basis of bearings is taken from the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, being the north line of said Brossett tract, as south 58 degrees east. See attached 24 inch by 36 inch Master Drawing that accompanies these field notes. Surveyed December 29, 1995 RON D CARROLL SURVE S OF 01 EA#';. 9' Ronald Carroll. 0" RONALD CARR(XL 2025 40 \mac, S U R 95FN2\SURV\GEO-NW a EXHIBIT A, Page 2 of 28 `` h� Z)o pVO6 0 00 art % a C,� \ k .11.0f.t•K -- � 1t � + '✓ fps E December 29, 1995 EXHIBIT A. Page 3 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 Sount 31 sr TEMME (817) 773-1447 TrmrLF- Texws 76502 KILLEEN (817) 526-01 l7 Page 1 of 2 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PROPOSED NORTHWEST BOULEVARD, TRACT B Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Irene W. Parker Trust recorded in volume 410, page 374 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the east right-of-way line of Northwest Blvd., a 70 feet right-of-way road as it appears upon the map of REATA EAST, a Subdivision situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 90 of the Williamson County Plat Records, said iron rod being the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block C of said REATA EAST, and being in the north line said Parker Tract, and then run south 58 degrees east (basis of bearing and plat call) along the south line of said Lot 13, Block C of REATA EAST, for the north line of said Parker tract, 20-31/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of a tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of said Deed Records, and being the northeast and beginning corner of the right-of-way tract being described. Thence south 32 degrees-10 minutes west along the west line of said Brossett tract, 139-61/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in the south line of said Brossett tract, (deed call is south 37 degrees-40 minutes west). Thence south 18 degrees-17 minutes east along the south line of said Brossett tract, 147-36/100 to a 5/8 inch iron rod set for the northwest corner of a tract described in the deed to Rondald W. Parker, et al recorded in volume 1292, page 145 of said Deed Records, (deed call is south 12 degrees-53 minutes east). Thence south 44 degrees-10 minutes west along the west line of said Rondald Parker tract, 92-33/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, being in a curve to the right whose radius is 535 feet, (deed call is south 4 6 • degrees-51 minutes west) . Thence northeasterly along said curve to the right, 377-61/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the north line of said Irene Parker Trust tract, for the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, the long chord of said 377-61/100 feet arc is north 3 degrees-11 minutes east 369-82/100 feet, from said 5/8 inch iron rod set a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the southeast corner of Lot.2, Block A of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, being in the existing west right-of-way line of Northwest Blvd. bears north 58 degrees west 5-55/100 feet. EXHIBIT A, Page 4 of 28 Page 2 of 2 December 291 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PROPOSED NORTHWEST BOULEVARD, TRACT B Thence south 58 degrees east along the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, for the north line of said Irene Parker Trust tract, 84-76/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0-49/100 of an acre. Basis of bearings is taken from the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, being the north line of said Brossett tract, as south 58 degrees east. See attached 24 inch by 36 inch Master Drawing that accompanies these field notes. Surveyed December 29, 1995 RON CARROLL SURVEYORS OF Ronald Carroll �P a� T :� 9 KNALD CARRCLL 9�?0 2025 SURo, 95FN2\SURV\GEO-NW EXHIBIT A, Page 5 of 28 o�� `�• Z= N CJ - Q ci t •b o 4 > t L3 u� ° C o a1J •Oy�ao� oZ � `L4 u u� a Safi$° Pao � �4�ce y 4 EXHIBIT A, Page 6 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 Sourx 31s-r TEMPLE(817) 771-1447 To -a - a- TEX43 76502 K1utEK (817) 526-01 17 Page 1 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for. RIGHT-OF-WAY OP PROPOSED NORTHWEST BOULEVARD, TRACT C Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Rondald W. Parker, et al recorded in volume 1292, page 145 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the east right-of-way line of Northwest Blvd., a 70 feet right-of-way road as it appears upon the map of REATA EAST, a Subdivision situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 90 of the Williamson County Plat Records, said iron rod being the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block C of said REATA EAST, and being in the north line of a tract described in the deed to Irene W. Parker Trust recorded in volume 410, page 374 of said Deed Records, then run south 58 degrees east 20-31/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of a tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of said Deed Records; and then run south 32 degrees-10 minutes west along the west line of said Brossett tract, at 56-93/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set, in all, a distance of 139-61/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the southwest corner of said Brossett tract, ( deed call is south 37 degrees-40 minutes west); and then run south 18 degrees--17 minutes east at 96-82/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set, and continue in all, 147--36/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set for the northwest corner of said Rondald Parker tract, and being the northwest and beginning corner of the right-of-way tract being described, (deed call is south 12 degrees-53 minutes east). Thence south 18 degrees-1.7 minutes east along the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of said Rondald Parker tract., at 159-23/100 feet. pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set, and continue in all, 262-74/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in the common line of said Brossett and Rondald Parker tract, (deed call is south 15 degrees-34 minutes west). Thence south 61 degrees-24 minutes east along the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, 360-33/100 feet to 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in said Brossett and Rondald Parker tracts, (deed call is south 58 degrees-42 minutes east). Thence south 76 degrees--16 minutes-30 seconds east along the common line of said Brossett and Rondald Parker tracts, 98-9/10 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, being in a curve to the right whose radius is 785 feet, (deed call is south 73 degrees--32 minutes east). Thence southeasterly along said curve to the right, 381--95/1.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, and being in the west line of Lot 1, Block 5 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, an addition in the City of Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it December 29, 1995 EXHIBIT A, Page 7 of 28 Page 2 of 2 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: (continued) RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PROPOSED NORTHWEST BOULEVARD, TRACT C appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet C. Slide 180 of said Plat Records, the long chord of said 381-95/100 feet arc is south 42 degrees-10 minutes east 378-19/100. Thence south 12 degrees-17 minutes west along the west line of said Lot 1, Block 5 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, for the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, 2-13/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set for the southwest corner of said Lot 1, Block 5 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, and being in the north line of Northwest Blvd., also being an angle point in the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, (deed call is south 14 degrees-28 minutes-30 seconds west). Thence north 84 degrees-43 minutes west along the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, for the west line of NORTHWOOD OAKS Addition, 83-98/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, being in a curve to the left whose radius is 715 feet, from said 5/8 inch iron rod set, a 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, being the northwest corner of Lot 9, Block 4 of said NORTHWOOD OAKS bears north 84 degrees-43 minutes west 16-65/100 feet, (deed call is north 82 degrees-06 minutes west). Thence northwesterly along said curve to the left, 499-14/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set at the end of said curve to the left, and being at the beginning of a curve to the right whose radius is 535 feet, the long chord of said 499-14/100 feet arc is north 51 degrees-49 minutes west 489-06/100 feet. Thence northwesterly along said curve to the right, 511-5/10 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the west line of said Rondald Parker tract, the long chord of said 511-5/10 feet arc is north 44 degrees-25 minutes-30 seconds west 492-24/100 feet. Thence north 44 degrees-10 minutes east along the west line of said Rondald Parker tract, 92-33/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 1-50/100 acres, (deed call is north 46 degrees-51 minutes east) . Basis of bearings is taken from the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, being the north line of said Brossett tract, as south 58 degrees east. See attached 24 inch by 36 inch Master Drawing that accompanies these field notes. Surveyed December 29, 1995 RON CARRO LL Z Ronald Carroll SURVEYORS 95FN2\SURV\GEO-NW EXHIBIT A, Page 8 of 28 0 f 2 000 Ike tl e r ra a •EiN� \ +t Ix �oy�e`uU � 1 la 2 itaa t_ o v3 a« � ti tl +�Zg• �\ i t QGU L \ 7 \ \ jl \ uee•u e �\ `•�- LL L • CC CCC - V V V p �••• O a nhheC� \ _ 10hmh° O—ONO v¢j CCC100 p ii3-1 WQWwCi t .- < zi t _ `t 14 o - •- �r , r� 4. d r . / • I d J / t YDE i N09T 'w w�� • A � Z = I . 1. IRCS December 29, 1995 EXHIBIT A, Page 9 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 Sam+ 31 sr TEmPLE (817) 773-1447 TEmPLE, TExws 76502 KILLEEN (817) 526-0117 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: Page 1 of 2 RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PROPOSED NORTHWEST BOULEVARD, TRACT D Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the east right-of-way line of Northwest Blvd., a 70 feet road as it appears upon the map of REATA EAST, a subdivision situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 90 of Williamson County Plat Records, said iron rod being the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block C of said REATA EAST, and being in the north line of a tract described in the deed to Irene W. Parker Trust recorded in volume 410, page 374 of said Deed Records, then run south 58 degrees east (basis of bearings and plat call) 20-31/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of said Brossett tract, and then run south 32 degrees-10 minutes west along the west line of said Brossett tract, at 56-93/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set, and continue in all, 139-61/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in the west line of said Brossett tract, (deed call is south 37 degrees-40 minutes west); and then run south 18 degrees-17 minutes east along the southwesterly line of said Brossett tract, at 96-82/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set, at 147-36/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set for the northwest corner of a tract described in the deed to Rondald W. Parker, et al recorded in volume 1292, page 145 of said Deed Records, in all, 306-59/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in a curve to the left whose radius is 465 feet for the northwest and beginning corner of the tract being described, (deed call is south 15'degrees-34 minutes west). Thence southeasterly along said curve to the left 328-66/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set at the end of said curve to the left, and being at the beginning of a curve to the right whose radius is 785 feet, the long chord of said 328-66/100 feet arc is south 51 degrees-34 minutes east 321-87/100 feet. Thence southeasterly along said curve to the right, 215-22/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the south line of said Brossett tract, and being in the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, the long chord of said 215-22/100 feet arc is south 63 degrees-57 minutes-45 seconds east 214-55/100 feet. Thence north 76 degrees-16 minutes-30 seconds west along the south line of said Brossett tract, 98-9/ 10 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in the south line of said Brossett tract, and being in the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, (deed call is north 73 degrees-32 minutes west). EXHIBIT A, Page 10 of 28 Page 2 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: (continued) RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PROPOSED NORTHWEST BOULEVARD, TRACT D Thence north 61 degrees-24 minutes west along the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, 360-33/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in said Brossett and Rondald Parker tracts, (deed call is north 58 degrees-42 minutes west). Thence north 18 degrees-17 minutes west continuing along the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, 103-51/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0-20/100 of an acre, (deed call is north 15 degrees-34 minutes east). Basis of bearings is taken from the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, being the north line of said Brossett tract, as south 58 degrees east. See attached 24 inch by 36 inch Master Drawing that accompanies these field notes. Surveyed December 29, 1995 RO D CARROLL SURVEYO S 'L OF �P��,o1 Ronald Carroll RONALD CARROLL 2025 \�. sup 95FN2\SURV\GEO-NW2 :;,zee yy �Q�oQ p omen �h� u 0 V V uQ4Lce S ti a Oe Vp0 000 EXHIBIT A, Page I I of 28 tl J� -� gl 1 I J 1 1 E ! , 7 / "I?1 i ^ s 1 Z e a- ou u « < aces oo�o oO1.ha oo�o t t t t <0Ci0 tt tt liR9R- v�K"C'K, e aaccc - � O O O O O C � 00000�c L �hhoml o0000 0 N G C C o 0 22Z22 ai 4i 4i,o Vi 444Ca� EXHIBIT A, Page 12 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 SouTH 31 sr TE+PU (817) 773-1447 TEmpu, TExws 76502 K&LEEN (817) 526-0117 Page 1 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 1) Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the east right-of-way line of Northwest Blvd., a 70 feet road as it appears upon the map of REATA EAST, a subdivision situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 90 of Williamson County Plat Records, said iron rod being the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block C of said REATA EAST, and being in the north line of a tract described in the deed to Irene W. Parker Trust recorded in volume 410, page 374 of said Deed Records, then run south 58 degrees east (basis of bearings and plat call) along the south line of the REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, for the north line of the Irene Parker Trust tract, 20-31/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of said Brossett tract, and then run south 32 degrees-10 minutes west alone the west line of said Brossett tract, at 18-22/100 feet to a point being in a curve to the left whose radius is 455 feet for the northeast and beginning corner of the easement being described, (deed call is south 37 degrees-40 minutes west). Thence southwesterly along said curve to the left 257-85/100 feet to a point being in the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of a tract described in the deed to Rondald W. Parker, et al recorded in volume 1292, page 145 of said Deed Records, the long chord of 257-85/100 feet arc is south 3 degrees-18 minutes west 254-41/100 feet. Thence north 18 degrees-17 minutes west along the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, at 11-91/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set for the northwest corner of said Rondald Parker tract, and continue in. all, 62-45/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the beginning of a curve to the right whose radius is 465 feet, (deed call is north 15 degrees-34 minutes east). Thence northeasterly along said curve to the right, 163-33/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the west line of said Brossett tract, the long chord of said 163-33/100 feet arc is north 4 degrees-49 minutes east 162-5/10 feet. Thence north 32 degrees-10 minutes east along the west line of said Brossett tract, 38-71/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0-047/1000 of an acre. EXHIBIT A, Page 13 of 28 Page 2 of 2 December 291 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: (continued) PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 1) Basis of bearings is taken from the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, being the north line of said Brossett tract, as north 58 degrees west. See attached 24 inch by 36 inch Master Drawing that accompanies these field notes. Surveyed December 29, 1995 RON�kq CARROLL SURVEYORS OF r7 P - 41 " "aft Ronald Carroll a1TE'��o 9 RONlALD CARROLL 2025 *; Q Off' E SU10 95FN2\SURV\GEO-NW2 Le: a C V�4 1 �< cbmq 6 �• to Eck at �q$ 20 o �c�io R a a: s 2 0V" ap0 EXHIBIT A, Page 14 of 28 I o y ' � f N a . • o QQ4 Qu V e c c e c ices � o0000 ��mnm OOlO < O C C O O rfOOO `. CCtiO N <moo z z 2 EXHIBIT A, Page 15 of 28 December 29, 1995 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 Sou-ni 31 sr TEmPu (817) 773-1447 Tcmpu. TExAs 76502 KMLEfN (817) 526-0117 Page .1 of 2 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 2) Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the east right-of-way line of Northwest Blvd., a 70 feet road as it appears upon the map of REATA EAST, a subdivision situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 90 of Williamson County Plat Records, said iron rod being the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block C of said REATA EAST, and being in the north line of a tract described in the deed to Irene W. Parker Trust recorded in volume 410, page 374 of said Deed Records, then run south 58 degrees east (basis of bearings and plat call) 20-31/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of said Brossett tract, and then run south 32 degrees-10 minutes west along the west line of said Brossett tract, at 56-93/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set, and continue in all, 139-61/100 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for an angle point in the west line of said Brossett tract, (deed call is south 37 degrees-40 minutes west); and then run south 18 degrees-17 minutes east along the southwesterly line of said Brossett tract, at 96-82/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set, at 147-36/100 feet pass a 5/8 inch iron rod set, and continue in all, 232-23/100 feet to a point being at the beginning of a curve to the left whose radius is 455 feet for the northwest and beginning corner of the easement being described. Thence southeasterly along said curve to the left, 382-62/100 feet to a point at the end of said curve to the left, and being at the beginning of a curve to the right whose radius is 795 feet, the long chord of said 382-62/100 feet arc is south 47 degrees-43 minutes-30 seconds east 371-45/100 feet. Thence southeasterly along said curve to the right, 244-03/100 feet to a point in the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of a tract described in the deed to Rondald W. Parker, et al recorded in volume 1292, page 145 of said Deed Records, the long chord of said 244-03/100 feet arc is south 63 degrees-01 minutes-20 seconds east 243-07/100 feet. Thence north 76 degrees-16 minutes-30 seconds west along the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of said Rondald-Parker tract, 27-77/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, and being in a curve to the left whose radius is 785 feet, (deed call is north 73 degrees-32 minutes west). 000 �5F EXHIBIT A, Page 17 of 28 R � t o E - f t V � J€ vie � � � •a 5 jj z e u « < C C w sve O O < p OthN, . CC�Ci <mc,c �UCaCi �uZ11bv C C g q 0 e vvvvv F o0000 � « nr)hOa OHO co 0 0 0 0 0 N o� 00000 22Z22 4i �i 4i 4i 4i jJ�JJ, 444.a4 'J, i A it December 29, 1995 EXHIBIT A, Page 18 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 Sovni 31 sT TEmpu (817) 773-1447 TrMmmE, Texas 76502 Kiu--F-EN (817) 526-0117 Page 1 of 2 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, -Texas for: PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 3) Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Rondald W. Parker, et al recorded in volume 1292, page 145 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod set in the north right-of-way line of Northwest Blvd., a 70 feet road as it appears upon the map of REATA EAST, a subdivision situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F. Slide 90 of Williamson County Plat Records, for the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 5 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, an Addition in the City of Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet C. Slide 180 of said Plat Records, being an angle point in the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, and then run north 12 degrees-17 minutes east along the west line of said Block 5 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, for the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, 2-13/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, being in a curve to the left whose radius is 785 feet, and being the southeast and beginning corner of the esement being described, (deed call is north 14 degrees-28 minutes-3-0 seconds east). Thence northwesterly along said curve to the left, 381-95/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, for the south line of a tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of Deed Records, the long chord of said 381-95/100 feet arc is north 42 degrees-10 minutes west 378-19/100 feet. Thence south 76-degrees-16 minutes-30 seconds east along the south line of said Brossett tract, for the north line of said Rondald Parker tract, 27-77/100 feet to a point being in a curve to the right whose radius is 795 feet, (deed call is south 73 degrees-32 minutes east). Thence southeasterly along said curve to the right, 349-14/100 feet to a point being in the west line of said Lot 1, Block 5 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, for the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, the long chord of said 349-14/100 feet arc is south 41 degrees-38 minutes-50 seconds east 346-34/100 feet. Thence south 12 degrees-17 minutes west along the west line of said Lot 1, Block 5 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, for the east line of said Rondald Parker tract, 15-26/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0-083/1000 of an acre, (deed call is south 14 degrees-28 minutes-30 seconds west). EXHIBIT A, Page 19 of 28 Page 2 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, -Texas for: (continued) PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 3) Basis of bearings is taken from the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, being the north line of said Brossett tract, as south 58 degrees east. See attached 24 inch by 36 inch Master Drawing that accompanies these field notes. Surveyed December 29, 1995 RON CARROLL SURVEYOR OF Ronald Carroll t RONALD CARROLL 2025 *4: 9�O •O V �,� , SUR 95FN2\SURV\GEO-NW2 EXHIBIT A, Page 20 of 28 (�Jh� r � ' r � rE Y Le}i i I � E I • IL J t �f t 1 \ t it A a1 y \ J\ - \ 1 t t I a E / / • e 6 � / .LO,,. T t4 k 1� o- V Y • O 4 L 4 L L L v u u u u o • � aacac aewS � o0000 • w e nc�hOO Oo<o < O�ONO y 0 0 0 V O C C C O o..,N N 1 11 11 do�c �i �Ncf<�n i 1 1 1 1 <1m�G1C. 22L22 �iC��U ddd�cd ti j j j , s. U a 11, IV I'm December 29, 1995 EXHIBIT A, Page 21 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 Same 31 sr TE,ru (817) 773-1447 TEmru, TEcws 76502 KILL, (817) 526-0117 Page 1 of 2 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 4) Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Rondald W. Parker, et al recorded in volume 1292, page 145 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the east line of said Parker tract, for the northwest corner of Lot 9, Block 4 of NORTHWOOD OAKS, an Addition in the City of Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet C, Slide 180 of the Williamson County Plat Records, and being in the south line of Northwest Blvd., and then run south 84 degrees-43 minutes east along the west line of said NORTHWOOD OAKS Addition, for the east line of said Parker tract, 16-65/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set for the northeast and beginning corner of the easement being described. Thence north 84 degrees-43 minutes west along the west line of said NORTHWOOD OAKS Addition, for the east line of said Parker tract, 12-6/10 feet to a point being in a curve to the left whose radius is 705 feet, (deed call is north 82-degrees-06 minutes west). Thence northwesterly along said curve to the left 484-56/100 feet to a point at the end of said curve to the left, being at the beginning of a curve to the right whose radius is 545 feet, the long chord of said 484-56/100 feet arc is north 52 degrees-07 minutes-30 seconds west 475-08/100 feet. Thence northwesterly along said curve to the right, 515-58/100 feet to a point being in the west line of said Parker tract, the long chord of said 515-58/100 _feet arc is north 44 degrees-43 minutes west 496-57/100 feet. Thence north 44 degrees-10 minutes east along the west line of said Parker tract, 11-38/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, and being in a curve to the left whose radius is 535 feet, from said 5/8 inch iron rod set, another 5/8 inch iron set for the northwest corner of said Parker tract, and being in the south line of a tract described in the deed to Frances Jean Brossett recorded in volume 1861, page 208 of said Deed Records bears north 44 degrees-10 minutes east 92-33/100 feet, (deed call is north 46 degrees-51 minutes east). Thence southeasterly along said curve to the left, 511-5/10 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set at the end of said curve to the left, and being at the beginning of a curve to the right whose radius is 715 feet, the long chord of said 511-5/10 feet arc is south 44 degrees-25 minutes-30 seconds east 492-24/100 feet. EXHIBIT A, Page 22 of 28 Page 2 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: (continued) PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 4) Thence southeasterly along said curve to the right, 499-14/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0-23/100 of an acre, the long chord of said 499-14/100 feet arc is south 51 degrees-49 minutes east 489-06/100 feet. Basis of bearings is taken from the south line of said REATA EAST, a Subdivision situated in the City of Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F. Slide 90 of said Plat Records, being the north line of said Brossett tract, as south 58 degrees east. See attached 24 inch by 36 inch Master Drawing that accompanies these field notes. Surveyed December 29, 1995 RO D CARROLL SURVEYORS R , OF Ronald Carroll AP� RON�C-ARROLL 2025 A�o S u vk 95FN2\SURV\GEO-NW2 EXHIBIT A, Page 23 of 28 J"W/// L L L u u 4 Q C . -1 o � al cCr4UO tt 4 b • • 4 L L L l L 4 4 4 4 4 Mp 0 0 0 0 0 l nnrfOO cccoc N 1 1 h izZzi aa�aa EXHIBIT A, Page 24 of 28 RONALD CARROLL SURVEYORS 5302 Same 31sT TEmpu (817) 773-1447 TEmmE. Texws 76502 Ktu-EEN (817) 526-01 l7 Page 1 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 5) Part of the NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, Abstract Number 497, situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Irene W. Parker Trust recorded in volume 410, page 374 of the Williamson County Deed Records. Commencing at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the north line of said Parker tract, for the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block C of REATA EAST, a Subdivision situated in Georgetown, in Williamson County, Texas, as it appears upon the map recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 90 of the Williamson County Plat Records, and being in the east line of Northwest Blvd., and then run north 58 degrees west (basis of bearings and deed call) along the south line of said REATA EAST, for the north line of said Parker tract, 64-45/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, being in a curve to the left whose radius is 535 feet. Thence southwesterly along said curve to the left, 377-61/100 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set, being in the west line of a tract described in the deed to Rondald W. Parker, et al recorded in volume 1292, page 145 of said Deed Records, the long chord of said 377-61/100 feet arc is south 3 degrees-11 minutes west 369-82/100 feet, from said 5/8 inch iron rod set, another 5/8 inch iron rod set for the northwest corner of said Rondald W. Parker tract, bears north 44 degrees-10 minutes east 92-33/100 feet. Thence south 44 degrees-10 minutes Rondald W. Parker tract, 11-38/100 the right whose radius is 545 feet, minutes west). west along the west line of said feet to a point being in a curve to (deed call is south 46 degrees-51 Thence northeasterly along said curve to the right, 391-66/100 feet to a point being in the north line of said Irene Parker tract, and being in the south line of Lot 2, Block A of said REATA EAST, the long chord of said 391-56/100 feet arc is north 2 degrees-58 minutes-30 seconds east 383-29/100 feet. Thence south 58 degrees east along the south line of said Lot 2, Block A of REATA EAST, for the north line of said Irene Parker tract, at 4-56/ 100 feet pass a 1/2 inch iron rod found for the southeast corner of said Lot 2, Block A of REATA EAST, and continue in all, 10-11/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0-088/1000 of an acre. EXHIBIT A, Page 25 of 28 Page 2 of 2 December 29, 1995 Field Notes for the City of Georgetown, Texas for: (continued) PROPOSED 10 FEET PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWEST BLVD. (NO. 5) Basis of bearings is taken from the south line of said REATA EAST SUBDIVISION, being the north line of said Brossett tract, as south 58 degrees east. See attached 24 inch by 36 inch Master Drawing that accompanies these field notes. Surveyed December 29, 1995 RON D CARROLL SURVEYORS OF •"4,6. Ronald Carroll °1E,��� 9 RONALD r,ARROLL 202„ � c: �O 95FN2\SURV\GEO-NW2 1 0 4 r IQSoG 1 <abva ti 4 t4 •�O�r y $ h 4 r~ 2 0 000 0 /05 P EXHIBIT A, Page 26 of 28 R z � V O 1 eQE � 2 o � uu u c< < cc�C o111.1aa ci ci < m G 0 I I I EXHIBIT A, Page 27 of 28 CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS ANNEXATION SERVICE PLAN APPROXIMATELY 80.3 ACRES IN THE NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, LOCATED NORTH OF WILLIAMS DRIVE (RM2338) AND SOUTH OF LAKEWAY BOULEVARD Introduction This service plan has been prepared in accordance with Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 43 - Municipal Annexation. This requires that the service plan provide for the extension of full municipal services to the area to be annexed by any of the methods by which it extends services to any other area of the municipality. Police Protection Regular and routine patrolling of streets, responses to calls, and other police services will be provided upon the effective date of the annexation. Fire Protection and Code Enforcement Fire protection and prevention services are currently being provided to the area through an agreement with Williamson County. These services will continue to be provided to the area upon the effective date of the annexation. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the City Code Enforcement Officer will periodically patrol streets in the area to ensure that all properties are in conformance with City Code. Solid Waste Collection Solid waste collection and disposal services will be provided upon the effective date of the annexation, in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions contained in the City Code. Water Service Water lines will be extended in accordance with City policy. The City has a Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy, which is described in this service plan. Sewer Service Wastewater lines will be extended in accordance with City policy. The City has a Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy, which is described in this service plan. Maintenance of Roads. Streets, and Drainage Roads, streets and drainage facilities dedicated to the public will be maintained according to City Code and policy upon the effective date of the annexation. Street Lighting Street lighting will be made available upon the effective date of the annexation, upon request of the property owners, in accordance with City Code and policy. Annexation Service Plan, Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, Page 28 of 28 Parks and Recreation Parks and recreation facilities dedicated to the public will be maintained according to City Code and policy upon the effective date of the annexation. Recreation services will be provided to all residents in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions contained in the City Code. Planning and Zoning Upon the effective date of the annexation, the planning and zoning jurisdiction of the City will extend to this area. The area will be zoned A (Agricultural), unless otherwise approved through regular procedures. Inspection Services All inspection services, including building, electrical, plumbing, etc., provided by the City will be extended to the area upon the effective date of the annexation. Library Services Library services will be provided to all residents in accordance with the rates, terms, and conditions contained in the City Code upon the effective date of the annexation. Other Services Other services provided by the City, such as animal control, court, and general administration, will be made available upon the effective date of the annexation, in accordance with the City Code and policies. Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy City Ordinance Number 900404, a Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy, guides the planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of all utility system improvements, including water, wastewater and electrical service. Annexation Service Plan, Page 2 of 2 Council Meeting Date: May 14, 1996 AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET Item No. Z SUBJECT: Council approval of bid award to Odell Geer Construction Co., Inc., of Belton, Texas, to construct the Northwest Blvd. and Quail Valley Drive Street and Drainage Improvement Projects, in the amount of $590,359.00. ITEM SUMMARY: Sealed bids were received and opened on Thursday, May 2, 1996 for construction of the Northwest Blvd. and quail Valley Drive Street and Drainage Improvement Projects. The engineering firm responsible to review the bids, Roming-Parker Associates, confirmed that the low bid, from Odell Geer construction Co., Inc., does conform to the engineering specifications. Therefore, staff recommends that Council award the bid for this project to Odell Geer Construction Co., Inc., in the amount of $590 f 359. 00. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: NONE FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $590,359.00 are to be paid as follows: Account Number: Account Number: Account Number: COMMENTS: NONE 110-101-6301-00 $153,125.00 110-101-6900-00 $384,740.00 110-101-6901-00 $ 52,494.00 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter and Bid tabulation from Roming-Parker Associates �%' Jim Briggs, Director Community Owned Utilities ROMWG - PARKER ASSOCIATES, L.L.P. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 3513 Southwest H.K. Dodgen Loop, Suite 103 Temple, Texas 76502 (817) 773-3731 W. l'\LAY ROMING, P.E. WM.-MACK PARKER, P.E. RICK N. KASBERG, P.E. May 7, 1996 Mr. Don M. Rundell, P.E. Manager, Systems Engineering Community Owned Utilities City of Georgetown 1101 N. College - P.O. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78627-0409 Re: City of Georgetown Northwest Boulevard/Quail Valley Drive Street and Drainage Improvements Georgetown, Texas Dear Mr. Rundell: Fax (817) 773-6667 JAMES E. LAUGHLIN, P.E. Staff Consultant Sealed Bids were received until 2:00 p.m. local time on May 2, 1996 at the office of Community Owned Utilities for the above referenced project. The Bids were opened publicly and read aloud. The tabulation of those bids are enclosed. The low, successful bidder for the project was Odell Geer Construction Company, Inc. of Belton, Texas in the amount of $590,359.00. Our opinion of probable cost for the project was $6509000.00. We have worked with Odell Geer on many similar projects. They have the equipment, personnel, management and experience to complete the Northwest Boulevard and Quail Valley Drive project successfully. We hereby recommend award of the contract to Odell Geer Construction Company, Inc. Sincerely, 0-rr-'. ma.h P� Wm. Mack Parker, P.E. WMP/tmm Enclosure 95-125-40 �4 It q TV :�,�0a �� WNW V: >OWO >v >llO��� Wt/1 ll>, >>> > ,» ttJJ, �»J NN, a�J �NaJ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>N +Ww O R � � O � � � O O� O � 00 � N V� O V= O Oi Q� 0 NA N A O� N N .:" .`�, � •'T'•� O O b b- .7� � 3' . n n n cr rA y R A A z a s s p G S 5 D• C on a 0° w" b o'^ "n w x a �' 'D ��•pp- N g `o 0 0po M.—MAN ttpi�tt tJ ttJJ W w +81 -1 N v N$ CO 00 g tAi ttA N V, N g g. q 0 0 0 ►-. V�i to l~A O A .-• r+ ►+ W N Oo O O O O O O O O O O, N O l� O N 00 Vwi 0 pNp 0 8 oQ o8 O y r y r r y m >�, r r r �,�,a>> r t m m m >�< y y r" �,�<-c-c �' (n EA w C' -c-cz �' ~1 r� �< r y -cam,-c-c r � n to > c a •" 64 4444 W N H �� t8J a o A �v O W O O~ to tJ to "• !Hp v ,�+ t/� O 4A tJ, � {{/�f O, yy�� W J H tJ O� t� �1 l/� A l� A t� QQ� N t� 69 �J to t� (y tJ W w tf, to fA �O 0A O� 6q lJ1 yq J H fA fA FA V% dA 8N pip �• b t►1 �88£58�8888888888888888��t�.,o88ot�.�888tN„G888 O O O N � ,StCA w W r+ H W H lJ1 H .- H J w ONE A N W N H CW 8 �n tHI1 r+ *110 W 6A cO7�� cAn Np� .+ 8 OOOP 8 r+ Vi tW� O tN� O �q o0oo O ppJpp AA t�ii 000� O ONO oho Q� A J V�i �O tAi, A --I N O O 6ApN oho v, NO VJi t�i� to t~I, 8 69 � ONO �w t0 �7 S pO O O gig O O p pC O pO O pv O pO O pO O pO S O pC O pC O pO O S p O pC O O O O O pO O pO O V, O pO O pO O Vp, O pO O pC O O O pO O O O Opp S pO O pO 0 pO 0 pO 0 8 p 0 pO 0 rp BID TABULATION PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG NORTHWEST BOULEVARD AND QUAIL VALLEY DRIVE MAY 2, 1996 - 2:00 P.M. CITY OF GEORGFTnWN TFYA.c Bid Data Bidd Odell Geer Const. Co., Inc. Capital Excavation Company P.O. Box 1089 P.O.Box 1301 Item Estimated Belton, Texas 76513 Austin Texas 78767 No. DescrOdon Quantify Unit Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price A-1 Preparation of Right -of -Way 16 STA $590.00 $9,280.00 $200.00 $3,200.00 A-2 Mobilization, Bonds & Insurance 10070 LS $12.000.00 $12,000.00 $23,000.00 $23,000.00 A-3 Barricades & Traffic Control 10090 LS $2,000.00 $2.000.00 $1,700.00 $1,700.00 A4 Unclassified Excavation 6,200 CY $3.25 $20,150.00 $4.40 $27,280.00 A-5 Compacted Fill (Roadway) 200 CY $3.25 5650.00 51.50 $300.00 A-6 lConercte Curb & Gutter Removal 350 LF $5.00 $1,750.00 54.00 51,400.00 A-7 lConcrete Driveway Removal 28 SY $7.00 $196.00 $20.00 $560.00 A-8 Concrete Saw Cut 50 LF $3.00 $150.00 54.00 $200.00 AA HMAC Removal (Roadway) 920 SY $1.75 $1,610.00 $2.50 $2,300.00 A-10 Concrete Encasement of Force Main "D" 56 LF $17.50 $980.00 $35.00 $1,960.00 A-11 HMAC T Patch (Roadway) "D" 20 TN $55.00 $1,100.00 $65.00 $1,300.00 A-12 HMAC T (Off -Site Drain.) 450 SY $6.00 $2,700.00 $4.25 $1,912.50 A-13 12" Crushed Limestone (Off -Site Drain.) 450 SY $9.50 $4,275.00 $15.00 $6.750.00 A-14 12" Subbase 8,600 SY $5.75 $49,450.00 $3.70 $31,820.00 A-15 6" Crushed Limestone Base 8,600 SY $3.25 $27,950.00 $1.85 $15,910.00 A-16 4" Crushed Limestone Base "D" 7,220 SY $2.25 $16,245.00 $2.00 $14,440.00 A-17 2" HMAC T Pavement 7,220 SY 54.00 $28,880.00 $3.50 $25,270.00 A-18 24" Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,100 LF 56.00 $18,600.00 56.20 $19,220.00 A-19 6" Concrete Valley Gutter 30 SY $25.00 $750.00 $40.00 $1,200.00 A-20 6" Concrete Driveway 28 SY $28.00 $794.00 $40.00 $1,120.00 A-21 20' Concrete Radius Unit 2 EA $220.00 $440.00 $400.00 $800.00 A-22 5' Curb Inlet 3 EA $1,600.00 $4,800.00 $1,800.00 $5,400.00 A-23 10' Curb Inlet 1 EA $2,450.00 $2,450.00 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 A-24 15' Curb Inlet 1 EA $3,450.00 53,450.00 $5,200.00 $5,200.00 A-25 5' x 5' !unction Box/Inld 1 EA $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 A-26 5' Diameter Manhole 4 EA $1,650.00 56,600.00 $5,000.00 $20,000.00 A-27 18" RCP Class III 40 LF $25.00 $1,000.00 $35.00 $1,400.00 A-28 24" RCP Class III 715 LF $37.00 $26,455.00 $42.00 $30,030.00 A-29 30" RCP Class III 285 LF $46.00 $13,110.00 $48.00 $13,690.00 A-30 36' RCP Class III 895 LF $58.00 $51,910.00 $65.00 $58.175.00 A-31 Concrete Collar 36" R 1 EA $150.00 $150.00 5425.00 $425.00 A-32 Stabilized Construction Entrance 500 SY $6.00 53,000.00 55.00 $2,500.00 A-33 Silt Fence 880 LF $1.50 $1,320.00 $1.10 $968.00 A-34 Rock Berm 220 LF $12.00 $2,640.00 $9.45 52,079.00 A-35 Loamin , Hydrosooding & Erosion Control 9,000 SY $0.30 $2,700.00 $0.50 54,500.00 A-36 ITrench Safety Plan 1009b LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 A-37 ITiench Safety Implementation 1,935 LF $3.00 $505.00 $2.50 $4,837.50 A-38 ITrench Safety Implementation 9,000 SF $0.35 S3,150.00 $0.40 $3,600.00 SUBTOTAL $331 .00 $342,537.00 ,rs Edward R. Coleman Const. P.O. Box 50324 Austin, Texas 78763 Unit Price Extended Price $500.00 $8,000.00 $14,500.00 $14,500.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $6.50 $40,300.00 $10.00 $2,000.00 $5.00 51,750.00 $10.00 $290.00 56.00 $300.00 $2.50 $2,300.00 $36.00 $2,016.00 $55.00 $1,100.00 $10.00 $5.10 $4,500.00 $2,295.00 $3.20 $27,520.00 $2.80 $24,080.00 $1.85 $13,357.00 $3.55 $25,631.00' $7.00 $21,700.00 $42.00 $1,260.00 $45.00 $1,260.00 $900.00 $1,800.00 $950.00 $2,850.00 $1,375.00 $1,900.00 $1,375.00 $1,900.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $3,100.00 $30.00 $12,400.00 51,200.00 $35.00 $25,025.00 $55.00 $15,675.00 $65.00 $58,175.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $4.00 $2,000.00 S1.30 51,144.00 $15.00 $3,300.00 $0.55 541950.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1.50 $2,902.50 $0.40 $3.600.00 $337.845.50 Griffin -Austin Co., Inc. P.O. Box 9 Manchaca, Texas 78652 Unit Price Extended Price $200.00 $3 200.00 $10,000.00 S 10,000.00 $2,400.00 $1,400.00 $4.00 $24,800.00 $10.00 $2,000.00 $5.00 $1,750.00 $9.00 $252.00 $2.00 $100.00 $1.00 $920.00 $25.00 $1,400.00 $50.00 $1.000.00 $9.00 $12.00 $4,050.00 $5,400.00 $6.00 $51,600.00 $4.00 $34,400.00 $3.00 $21,660.00 $3.50 $25,270.00 $6.50 $20,150.00 $50.00 $1,500.00 $45.00 $1,260.00 $700.00 $1,400.00 $2,100.00 $6,300.00 $3,400.00 53,400.00 $3,5W.00 $3,500.00 $3,000.00 $2,000.00 $3,000.00 58,000.00 $30.00 $40.00 51,200.00 $28,600.00 $54.00 $15,390.00 $72.00 $64,440.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 55.00 52,500.00 $1.20 $10.00 $1,056.00 52,200.00 $0.50 $1,000.00 54,500.00 $1,000.00 $1.00 51,935.00 $0.10 $900.00 $363,433.00 r v • °DbDT4dTTv4°FTw4,TTTTTTT00 � OWO J ,t W� O� tWw A W N � W{�,� O �NJ �D �NJ 00 J 1 �NJ � l/� �J �NJ W tJ N ttJ ►. r. ►. �. r. .— .- �. �. .. wwq�000000wq��, `b Jo J 6,-- �. p � � i M A N �-• O �O 00 v O� U A w N �- p -1 �� Of) pp ? 00 .'I'i K c��g O O\ AN N A Oi lj G 2i 70 70 70 70 0o n C� = o C). G' n S�,• Fo t n -3 Fi Y1 � � o 5 TQ Zcc rn —1 p• R° S A o y o a o a to a o a A S W ii� O ►+ S O D S r+ O O O W �' �"' �' ►+ N� �+ N O S N IJ O _ O O tJ O tJ IJ O N$ S S 88 O O yppy.. O� S S o� v�r rr�yr tnCq rr Ch Cc9 tatnr1l aaa>a MCA (A(A(A(A yc H Q% 6A H H H H H QQ H H �QHJ H HHJ ++ gyp+ ►r N N N N A Q f!9 tJ 69 H QN pp pHp ONO W J V� O O p O 8 tl/�� O O ZS O N o N 6A �n o� U to (A A 6A r.t H H w v� H w H w H 8 8 `^ 8 8 0 8 8 `S' S S S S S S S S S S 8 8 8 8 8 Cu 8 8 8 8 8 in' v "A A t UA V pO0 O b O N tp ►"' H A H W H H N H H H N H N H H W H (,A N H J H U. H H H H rr H .-. H H N H N 69 W H N H "m H H to H O _ O WA W A H N „H. O H O �. a N OQg ►+ J tptpJJ ttt1��� prpy� t�JJJ 88 ►+ t��JJ) tWtJ� t�O� cJ� i-+ lA U A U iJ O N U N A J W U N U U 00 po J .-- A pi U U �D U N U W 8g 8g _W g S 8888588$88888888$888$$88888888888888888 O O C C U U CCC O O O O U O O O O S O O U a H H {/► H 0HpN0 JJ �� pp rpp1 W pp00H H H . ^ 0 0 8 8 8 8 8 tt pNp p�(QQ pQtt pNN .64V O W O 0 8 0 8 0 S O 1t �y w cav�o q y Vf Vf Ht VQf� 6� Q� H U H .- H N H N H N H U N H W H W H W H N 44 H �-- W 00 O N N � V a q A� O J tp� O pA O pp$� O 8g O O� �.1 Oo 1p� �1 Opp 8 O� tJ 8 N 8 lh S 8 �Oa J W S OOP A H N H 00 N pJ� H Q� .4 b U H O� 00 �l to 0�8088$888888$88888$888888888888888888888 O l� O O O O 8 O O O 8 8 A O 1 O oo O 8 O O ^• O0 FF H 44 H Q O 88 O 6�f1 VAi H OWO tp� O fI► O to l~A ►r N Hp N H vWi H O H 88 4A opoOoo H Ep�OpO H p�p H cps H A O H w O H ��A9 p H J H w H w H ��qq V, opoOoo �pHpj, 1p b A �08888�88888888$S$$$8 O O O O O 8 tali 8888888��, �l A O tAJ VUi W 8 0880 OHO O O 8 8 0 88 0 � �o p a H ffQ�/f11 w O 00 NtpO� 0H8�0 1 06w09 �Qp i «� • UAA 8H8 88 8 0Hv1 808888888888888HAII88888880$$888888888888888N 44y4O,�t N8O WOa W8 �trpJ-�. iHOoA H 88O S p p H_O pO VpO1 Of8A LA HO C�O4 8OO , m O O O SpS UAHHOH O S Uw O S S S S S O S S S p O fi b O `fyp H H W N H 61 H H a A � H H �Q�pp ppp0o H (Hj Q, 4 0\ � A A A N N W w P, A OO %A J ��,r,qq •-• r�+ O �l w OtelW Q' 8 Oo O 8 U O p O j� Q_ A 189 pp�aap00 .l'N. 588888S88S8SSSSSSSS8S8 , , OwD v tt,�� Ot VWi (1�,� P W N rW.. O 00 J VI A W N N ►+ tD 00 W -4 J ,-+ O� .+ N ,-. A ,-+ w r.. N .-. ►- ►-• O �p 00 �! lI, la N :+ O """� `� ► j � � � � Ot O A Oo � v= V, d � � Q� Qt N N A O, .- �- .� x (i Ti i'i (i �i Ci C C% "�'� AnAA ����� r. 2 2 c �aa� y�3.� A �� AAA .o 0�i° 2. �ArA 'A a a s a A r a < E C17 , 3 ^+ s s O w o �• FO 5' Ez t^ �� 110.00 O NM O O O r 0,� N� A� ►+ �. W N 00 O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� 0 0 00 O S S o9 yr ^nro yrryn�rrr ^nro-c>ro�n-nro>>>>> mm w(AryyNywy ►C�G•n -ircnr(ArAA kkkkzm -cm -n-<-Cr a a H �/► H H H H H�►�` H {yy��, W QQ0 W {/1 A ,-+ W N QQ H ,O N H W J H w H H H H H HN N H H 6� H 6n H lJ, J 00A t!, H � NN pp p ��pp p p pQ pQ pQ pQ pQ p pv pCCCC pQ -{4 J W ppo- N 4Aas, 1!�'HHt/, Ok pO to pO ►- ►pp- to jNNa �- �a ppO J to w1 yq< v W H H H H IA HNH00NH �� g H H HHH OO VW (A(AHWaNH iA 00 w N J N A H toN00 WN +Co1� IA 08J88888 W Q. b. O O O Oo tr0 g 888S88 88o$4 8tkAN 8COA� BID TABULATION PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG NORTHWEST BOULEVARD AND QUAIL VALLEY DRIVE MAY 2, 1996 - 2:00 P.M. CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS (Continued) Bid Data Bidders Rent No. A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7 A-8 A-9 Description Pmparation of Right -of -Way Mobilization, Bonds & Insurance Barricades & Traffic Control Unclassified Excavation Compacted Fill (Roadway) Concrete Curb & Gutter Removal Concrete Driveway Removal Concrete Saw Cut HMAC Removal (Roadway) Estimated Quantify 16 100% 100% 6,200 200 350 28 50 920 Unit STA LS LS Cy Cy LF Sy LF Sy J.C. Evans Construction P.O. Box 9647 Austin, Texas 78766 Bay Maintenance Co., Inc. Horseshoe Bay Box 8859 Horseshoe Texas 78657 JHL Conduction P.O. Box 01 Gatesville, Texas 76528 Burris Conduction, Inc. P.O. Box 331 Georgetown, Texas 78627 Unit Price $1,415.00 $7,857.00 $550.00 S4.04 $1.62 S4.25 $15.00 $1.00 $1.00 Extended Price $22,640.00 $7,857.00 $550.00 $25,048.00 $324.00 $1,487.50 $420.00 $50.00 $920.00 Unit Price $430.00 $37,900.00 $1,000.00 $5.20 S6.17 $2.50 $10.50 $10.00 $2.15 Extended Price $6,880.00 $37,900.00 $1,000.00 $32,240.00 $1,234.00 $875.00 $294.00 $500.00 $1.978.00 Unit Price $718.75 S40,000.00 $2,500.00 S4.05 $4.00 $2.50 $5.00 $1.00 $0.75 Extended Price $11,500.00 $40,000.00 $2,500.00 $25,110.00 $800.00 $875.00 $140.00 $50.00 $690.00 Unit Price $1,000.00 $30,000.00 $7,500.00 $9.44 $15.00 $8.00 $35.00 $2.00 $1.00 Extended Price $16,000.00 $30,000.00 $7,500.00 $58,528.00 $3,000.00 $2,800.00 $980.00 $100.00 $920.00 A-10 Concrete Encasement of Force Main 56 LF $20.00 $1,120.00 $15.00 $840.00 $30.00 $1,690.00 $85.00 $4,760.00 A-11 HMAC T "D" Patch (Roadway) 20 TN $25.00 $500.00 $46.00 $920.00 $50.00 $1,000.00 $50.00 $1,000.00 A-12 HMAC T "D" (Off -Site Drain.) 450 Sy $10.00 S4,500.00 $10.30 $4,635.00 $4.35 $1,957.50 $4.00 $1,800.00 A-13 12" Crushed Limestone (Off -Site Drain.) 450 Sy $6.50 $2,925.00 $8.00 $3.600.00 $7.00 $3,150.00 $5.50 $2,475.00 A-14 12" Subbase 8,600 Sy $4.40 $37,840.00 $3.35 $28,810.00 $3.82 $32,852.00 $4.00 $34,400.00 A-15 6" Crushed Limestone Base 8,600 Sy $2.50 $21,500.00 $2.20 $18,920.00 $2.40 $20,640.00 $2.00 $17,200.00 A-16 4" Crushed Limestone Base 7,220 Sy $1.80 $12,996.00 $1.65 $11,913.00 $2.15 $15,523.00 $1.50 $10,830.00 A-17 2" HMAC T "D" Pavement 7,220 Sy $3.62 $26,136.40 $3.25 $23.465.00 $4.00 $28,880.00 $3.30 $23,826.00 A-18 24" Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,100 LF $7.48 $23,188.00 $8.40 $26,040.00 $6.50 $20,150.00 $6.50 $20,150.00 A-19 6" Concrete Valley Gutter 30 Sy $37.40 $1,122.00 $38.00 $1,140.00 $25.00 $750.00 $40.00 $1,200.00 A-20 6" Concrete Driveway 28 Sy $37.40 $1,047.20 $38.00 $1,064.00 $25.00 $700.00 $40.00 $1,120.00 A-21 20' Concrete Radius Unit 2 EA $912.10 $1,824.20 $930.00 $1,860.00 $300.00 $600.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 A-22 5' Curb Inlet 3 EA $2,600.00 $7,800.00 $3,2W.00 S9.600.00 $1,750.00 $5,250.00 $1,100.00 $3,300.00 A-23 10' Curb Inlet 1 EA $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $2,350.00 $2,350.00 S1,5W.00 $1,500.00 A 24 15' Curb Inlet 1 EA $4,100.00 S4,100.00 $4,700.00 $4,700.00 $2,650.00 $2,650.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 A-25 5' x 5' Junction Box/Inlet 1 EA S3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 A-26 5' Diameter Manhole 4 EA $3,800.00 $15,200.00 $4,900.00 $19,600.00 $1,600.00 S6,400.00 $2,000.00 $8,000.00 A-27 18" RCP Class H1 40 LF $43.00 $1,720.00 $26.00 $1,040.00 $32.00 $1,280.00 $40.00 $1,600.00 A-28 24" RCP Class III 715 LF $51.00 $36,465.00 $50.00 $35,750.00 $40.00 $28,600.00 $43.00 $30,745.00 A-29 30" RCP Class 1H 285 LF $75.00 $21,375.00 $70.00 $19,950.00 $50.00 $14,250.00 $63.00 $17,955.00 A-30 36" RCP Class IN 895 LF $93.00 $83,235.00 $80.00 $71,600.00 $61.30 $54,963.50 $114.00 $102,030.00 A-31 Concrete Collar 36" RCP 1 EA $250.00 $250.00 S600.00 $600.00 $250.00 $250.00 S400.00 $400.00 A-32 Stabilized Construction Entrance 500 Sy $2.40 $1,200.00 $4.50 $2,250.00 S3.00 $1,500.00 $5.00 S2,500.00 A-33 Silt Fence 880 LF $1.53 $1,346.40 $1.20 $1,056.00 $2.50 $2,200.00 $2.00 $1,760.00 A-34 Rock Berm 220 LF $11.00 $2,420.00 $10.00 S2 200.00 $25.00 $5,500.00 $10.00 $2,200.00 A-35 Loamin , Hydroweding & Erosion Control 9,000 Sy $0.90 $8,100.00 S0.75 S6,750.00 S2.25 $20,250.00 $0.25 $2,250.00 A-36 Trench Safety Plan 100% LS $900.00 $900.00 $850.00 $850.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $996.00 $996.00 A-37 Trench Safety Implementation 1,935 LF $1.00 $1,935.00 $1.00 S1,935.00 $2.00 $3,870.00 $5.00 S9,675.00 A-38 Trench Safety Implementation 9,000 SF S0.20 $1,800.00 $0.25 $2,250.00 $0.60 $5,400.00 $1.00 $9,000.00 SUBTOTAL $388 641.70 $393 839.00 $367 511.00 $438 000,00 BID TABULATION PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG NORTHWEST BOULEVARD AND QUAIL VALLEY DRIVE MAY 29 1996 - 2:00 P.M. CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS (Continued) Bid Data Bidders Item No. Desc ' ' n Estimated Quantity Unit J.C. Evans Construction P.O. Box 9647 Austin Texas 78766 Bay Maintenance Co., Inc. Horseshoe Bay Box 8859 Horseshoe Texas 78657 JHL Construction P.O. Box of Gatesville Texas 76528 Burris Construction, Inc. P.O. Box 331 Georgetown, Texas 78627 Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price B-1 Preparation ofRight-of-Way 11.5 STA $1,750.00 S20,125.00 $430.00 S4,945.00 S870.00 $10,005.00 $1,000.00 $11,500.00 B-2 Mobilization, Bonds & Insurance 100% LS $7,190.00 $7,190.00 $25,900.00 $25,900.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $15,255.00 $15,255.00 B-3 Barricades & Traffic Control 100% LS $550.00 $550.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 B-4 Unclassified Excavation 4,400 Cy $4.63 $20.372.00 S3.80 $16,720.00 $4.05 $17,920.00 $7.95 $34,980.00 B-5 Compacted Fill (Roadway) 1,000 Cy $2.39 $2.390.00 S3.50 $3,500.00 S4.00 $4,000.00 $15.00 $15,000.00 B-6 Compacted Fill (Drainage) 600 Cy $2.39 S1,434.00 $6.20 $3,720.00 $4.00 $2,400.00 $15.00 $9,000.00 B-7 12" Subbase 6,200 SY $4.30 $26,660.00 $3.35 $20,770.00 S3.82 $23,694.00 S4.00 $24,800.00 B-8 6" Crushed Limestone Base 6,200 SY $2.50 $15,500.00 $2.20 $13,640.00 $2.40 $14,880.00 $2.00 $12,400.00 B-9 4" Crushed Limestone Base 5,220 SY $1.90 $9,396.00 $1.65 S8,613.00 $2.15 $11,223.00 $1.50 $7,830.00 B-10 2" HMAC T "D" Pavement 5,220 SY $3.62 $18,896.40 $3.25 $16.965.00 S4.25 $22,185.00 $3.50 $18,270.00 B-11 HMAC T "D" Patch 10 TN $25.00 $250.00 $45.00 $450.00 $55.00 $550.00 $50.00 $500.00 B-12 24" Concrete Curb & Gutter 2,220 LF $7.56 $16,783.20 $8.40 $18,648.00 $6.50 $14,430.00 $6.50 $14,430.00 B-13 6" Concrete Valley Gutter 30 SY $37.40 $1,122.00 $38.00 $1,140.00 $25.00 $750.00 $40.00 $1,200.00 B-14 20' Concrete Radius Unit 2 EA $912.10 $1,824.20 $930.00 $1,860.00 $300.00 $600.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 B-15 Remove Existing Guard Rail with Posts 100 LF S6.00 $600.00 $1.70 $170.00 $3.50 $350.00 $2.00 $200.00 B-16 Furnish & Install Metal Beam Guard Rail with Posts 110 LF $18.00 $1,980.00 $18.50 $2.035.00 $17.50 $1,925.00 $25.00 $2,750.00 B-17 5' Curb Inlet 2 EA $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $3,100.00 S6,200.00 $1.750.00 $3,500.00 $750.00 $1,500.00 B-18 10' Curb Inlet 1 EA $3,9W.00 $3,900.00 $4,000.00 ss S4,000.00 $2,150.00 $2,150.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 B-19 10' Curb Inlet with Backside Opening 1 EA $3,400.00 S3,400.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,350.00 $2,350.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 B-20 8' x 8' Junction Box with Ring & Cover 2 EA $7,400.00 $14,800.00 $8,700.00 $17,400.00 $3,850.00 $7,700.00 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 B-21 5' Diameter Manhole 1 EA $2,400.00 $2,400.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 B-22 CH 11-B Headwall 60" RCP) 1 EA $6,100.00 $6,100.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $3,500.00 $3,5W.00 B-23 CH 11-B Headwall (48" RCP) 1 EA $4,900.00 S4,900.00 $4,700.00 S4,700.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 B-24 CH 11-B Headwall with BafBe Wall 48" RCP 1 EA $3,8W.00 $3,8W.00 $3,600.00 $3,600.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $2,5W.00 $2,500.00 B-25 18" RCP Class M 53 LF $43.00 $2,279.00 $50.00 $2,650.00 $32.00 $1,696.00 $25.00 $1,325.00 B-26 24" RCP Class Ul 160 LF $51.00 $8,160.00 $38.00 S6,080.00 $40.00 S6,400.00 $30.00 $4,800.00 B-27 48" RCP Class III 80 LF $78.00 $6,240.00 $88.00 $7,040.00 $94.30 $7,544.00 $80.00 $6,400.00 B-28 60" RCP Class III 490 LF S114.00 $55,860.00 S115.00 $56,350.00 $160.60 $78,694.00 $118.00 $57,820.00 B-29 Conceer Collar (24" RCP) 1 EA S200.00 $200.00 $600.00 S600.00 $250.00 $250.00 $500.00 $500.00 B-30 Stabilized Construction Entrance 5W SY $2.40 $1,200.00 $4.50 $2,250.00 $3.00 $1,500.00 $5.00 $2,500.00 B-31 Sih Fence 480 LF S3.00 S 1,440.00 $1.20 $576.00 $2.50 $1,200.00 S2.00 $960.00 B-32 Rock Berm 180 LF $11.00 $1.990.00 $10.00 $1, 900.00 $25.00 $4,500.00 $10.00 $1,800.00 B-33 Loamin , Hydroseoding & Erosion Control 9,500 SY S1.00 S8,500.00 $0.75 S6,375.00 S2.25 $19,125.00 $0.25 S2,125.00 B-34 Reconstruct Existing Sewer Manhole 1 EA $1,400.00 $1,400.00 $500.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 B-35 8" PVC SDR 35 Sanitaq Sewer Pipe 60 LF $31.00 $1,860.00 $20.00 $1,200.00 $21.00 $1,260.00 $40.00 $2,400.00 B-36 18" Steel Encasement Pipe with Two Plugs 56 LF $45.00 $2,520.00 $20.00 $1,120.00 $55.00 $3,080.00 $40.00 $2,240.00 B-37 Trench Safety Plan 100% LS $900.00 $900.00 $850.00 $850.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 B-38 Trcnch Safety Implementation 783 LF $1.00 $783.00 $1.00 $783.00 $2.50 $1,957.50 $5.00 $3,915.00 B-39 ITrench Safety Implementation 7,100 SF $0.20 $1,420.00 $0.25 $1,775.00 $0.601 $4,260.00 $1.001 $7,100.00 SUBTOTAL, $284 014.80 $280 025.00 $309 168.50 $289 000.00 TOTAL BID AMOUNT Bid A + Base Bid B * $672 656.50 *** $673,864.01) ,9676 679.50 $727 000.00 Did Bidder Acknowledge Addendum No. 1 & No. 2? Did Bidder Provide Bid Security? Total Bid Amount Error (Corrected as Shown) Extension Total Error (Corrected as Shown) Total Bid Amount Error (Corrected as Shown) »»as»>a>aa»>aaaaaa>a>aa>a»aa»»>� , , OWO J W (W� W W W yy,�� NN �NJ NN N N (� �J NN N N r �D 00 00 ,•-• r to r r A W r r N r r O � , 00 , �1 � , th �► , W N p r o-•] ..j �] ►c17 g W l�1 AOar nGa N 00 0-• lA to tit ►O o N,•-- A Yv'n0 7 � E'F��o u a tTl a ^E888 p<° <q'n a ja F. aF!p;. � R A 8 .z 0 O� b .4 O 5 5 � O r o g r�pp O WN V �Q• :o g g$ 00 J I w O �t o0 PO � O OOO W N OO o pN p * O v,r rA rA >>n�� rA (A (n (n En rA rA w rA nn n�Ey c a H y�� H VHpi Hp {�/a1 W IQ NA �p p J QQ N lQ r� Q HQ� W W N H O � Ao 00�• n {,q O N 0$8o800S88888888888800o898N,88008080888 (A O O rH.. O r A O W p O N G O O O O O O O H H tJ, W H H .•-• N H .H• W O K VHi �1 t1, H �D N H N H H 00 W H {� W r oqQ O O O O yoo W H H N r H N H H 00 N W r H N H 00 r H r H O N H H N N H H W ►- H H N J H H ,-• r O �l H W O A H H W .- H H . N H .- H H N N O H •-• N � .W O pN W H lN/� Vp, � Epp�pp VWi Op pppp� QQNN00 O 88 pp+ �ppl 88 p.ppp tpJ Op H H� OAAo, Epppp O N O 00 pN Zpo�'p- O N C JJ H -- tpNJ, H N N VpNi pW O In 8 O op0 tO� OOOS88888888888888888888888088888888888 pO pO pO pO pO 919 pO pO pO pO pO pO pO pO pO pO pO pS pO pA pA pAN p pS pO c rOn +$ fry H O �-• t �f O O r H V1 r H 8 .- �D O� tJ 00 f/f ll, A N Q Q 8 8 tJ, O G p pp 8 8 H H l/, V, O O H H OO H H H (A r--• yf H O� H W H H H r-. H 69 H Q Q 8 8 N O�� Q� '88�8b°`68888888888888�0$8$8888888888888 C C a $00 yp N C H H ,-. ► • H .- H H W r HHH 00 .••• N �D W H r H r-• H N W H H W H H H. HHHHH r N \O r N H 4A fA H H H yt A vw4A H r ►- a N V O 0po �D tp� Na �pp pVpppl J pWp pWpoo �1 prppp pppp.� 88 8g tpl, pp$� 88 $ g V, 00 W '-• �1 th 41 0p0pp�aa tI� W r . Op$p Wpp ► . -. pO000� 0�ao � pN0oo C W opHo g N N 88 8g �O tppJ �e pO tpwn pp 8 pO Ap pO pO pO pO pO pO pO pO O O p pS tp�i, 000 OpNo pO p pO pO O pO ppQ pO 0 O O 8 8 pO 818181818 OpO O a H H H H H H H :A N W W W W 00 N H w V, ,-+ H H p ppO!A H � fA O H HN H h880 l8 0 0 ppppp8pNppp8ppppp JwNwN N p0ppCpIs88 V O 0H p AhQ H H V► iA H H H H CA H rp q C 0 �+ (/f (A H W 00 N O\ H H N ►+ �l � H W H gg �O N 00 v yAy�� V1 H ,•+ ►+ �Ci� ,-•• H O W H H H W L, H H �t ►+ ipn Ep/� H H r ,-•• tJ l.1 N O\ O �l W 00 O O �n In H ,--• V1 Q� Q. H H A r O ►+ N H H r tA W W g $ W U, ip/,O O� 8 0 0 g-0 0 O 8 8 pO Cpl� 8 0 It ppO 0 0 pO 0 9 p pS 0 0 pO pO 8 8 p� pO 8 S pO pA 0 8 pO pO 8 0 pg pg 8 8 tAO-1 pO p 8 8 pN pO 0 8 pO 0 pO pO 8 8 pO O 0 0 pO O 0 0 pO 0 BID TABULATION PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG NORTHWEST BOULEVARD AND QUAIL VALLEY DRIVE MAY 2, 1996 - 2: 00 P.M. CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS (Continued) Bid Data Bidders Item No. B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-6 B-7 B-8 B-9 B-10 B-11 B-12 B-13 B-14 B-15 B-16 B-17 B-18 B-19 B-20 B-21 B-22 9723 B-24 B-25 B-26 B-27 B-28 B 29 B-30 B-31 B-32 B-33 B-34 B-35 B-36 B-37 B-38 B-39 ITrench Desc ' tion Preparation of Right -of -Way Mobilization, Bonds & Insurance Barricades & Traffic Control Unclassified Excavation Compacted Fill (Roadway) Compacted Fill (Drainage) 12" Subbase 6" Crushed Limestone Base 4" Crushed Limestone Banc 2" HMAC T "D" Pavement HMAC T "D" Patch 24" Concrete Curb & Gutter 6" Concrete Valley Gutter 20' Concrete Radius Unit Remove Existing Guard Rail with Posts Furnish & Install Metal Beam Guard Rail with Posts 5' Curb Inlet 10' Curb Inlet 10' Curb Inlet with Backside Opening 8' x 8' Junction Box with Ring & Cover 5' Diameter Manhole CH 11-B Headwall (60" RCP) CH 11-B Headwall (48" RCP) CH 11-B Headwall with Baffle Wall 48" RCP) 18" RCP Class ID 24" RCP Class lII 48" RCP Class lII " RCP Class 1H Concrcr Collar (24" RCP Stabilized Construction Entrance Silt Fence Rock Berm Loamin , Hydroseeding & Erosion Control Reconstruct Existing Sanitaty Sewer Manhole 8" PVC SDR 35 Sanitary Sewer Pipe 18" Steel Encasement Pipe with Two Plugs Trench Safety Plan Trench SafImplementation Safety lementation SUBTOTAL TOTAL DID "OUNT Maw Bid A + Base Did Estimated Quantify 11.5 1004E 1009E 49400 1,000 600 6,200 6,200 5,220 5,220 10 2,220 30 2 100 110 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 53 160 80 490 1 500 480 180 8,500 1 60 56 1009E 783 7,100 B) Unit STA LS LS CY CY CY SY SY SY SY TN LF SY EA LF LF EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA LF LF LF LF EA SY LF LF SY EA LF LF LS LF SF Chasco Contracting P.O. Box Round Rock 1057 Texas 78680 Rogers Construction P.O. Drawer Georgetown, Company 1136 Texas 78627 RAM Construction P.O. Box Tee le Texas Co. Ltd. 3595 76505 Unit Price $500.00 $20,000.00 $1,400.00 S6.35 $1.75 $1.50 $3.60 S2.00 $1.50 $3.50 $55.00 $55.00 $30.00 $600.00 $2.20 $23.00 $1,300.00 $4,000.00 $2,600.00 $6,000.00 $2,300.00 $2,200.00 $1,500.00 S 1,500.00 $32.00 S37.00 $92.00 $132.00 $400.00 $4.50 $1.50 $10.00 $0.50 $700.00 $17.00 $28.00 $750.00 1 $2.601 $0.301 Extended Price $5,750.00 $20,000.00 $1,400.00 $279940.00 $1,750.00 $900.00 $22,320.00 $12,400.00 $7,830.00 $18,270.00 $550.00 **** $122,100.00 $900.00 $1,200.00 $220.00 $2,530.00 $2,600.00 $4,000.00 $2,600.00 $12,000.00 $2,300.00 $2,200.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,696.00 $5,920.00 $7,360.00 $64,680.00 S400.00 $2,250.00 $720.00 $1, 8W.00 $4,250.00 $700.00 $1,020.00 $1,568.00 S750.00 $2,035.80 $2,130.00 $249 939.80 7 ,530.30-1 Unit Price $1,200.00 $10,000.00 $1,000.00 $7.00 $4.00 $4.00 $5.40 $3.00 $2.40 $3.90 S65.00 $6.25 S50.00 $800.00 $3.00 $20.00 $2,000.00 $2.300.00 $2,600.00 $7,000.00 $3,000.00 S4,500.00 S3,800.00 $4,000.00 $40.00 $52.00 $98.00 $159.00 $400.00 $1.50 $1.80 $15.00 $0.80 $3,000.00 $70.00 $60.00 S1,500.00 $1.00 $0.20 Extended Price $13,800.00 $10,000.00 $1,000.00 $30,800.00 $4,000.00 $2,400.00 $33,490.00 $189600.00 $12,528.00 $20,358.00 $650.00 $13,875.00 $1,500.00 $1,600.00 $300.00 $2,200.00 $4,000.00 $2,300.00 $2,600.00 $14,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,500.00 $3,800.00 $4,000.00 $2,120.00 $8,320.00 $7,840.00 S77,910.00 $400.00 $750.00 $864.00 $2,700.00 $6,800.00 $3,000.00 $4,200.00 $3,360.00 $1,500.00 $783.00 $1,420.00 $327 .00 $747,628.00 1 Unit Price $500.00 $15,000.00 $2,400.00 $7.00 Extended Price $5,750.00 S15.000.00 S2,400.00 $30,800.00 $5.00 $5,000.00 $5.00 $6.00 $3.55 $2.50 $3.70 $100.00 $7.10 $45.00 $750.00 $3.00 $30.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,500.00 $6,000.00 $2,700.00 S4,800.00 $4,500.00 S4,100.00 $46.00 S62.00 $112.00 $155.00 $500.00 $6.00 $2.00 $10.00 $2.95 $1,500.00 S20.00 $35.00 $400.001 52.00 SO.501 S3,000.00 $37,200.00 S22,010.00 $13,050.00 S19,314.00 $1,000.00 $15,762.00 $1,350.00 $1,500.00 $300.00 $3,300.00 $5,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,500.00 S12,000.00 $2,700.00 $4,800.00 $4,500.00 $4,100.00 $29438.00 $9,920.00 S8,960.00 $75,950.00 $500.00 $3,000.00 $960.00 $1, 800.00 $25,075.00 $1,500.00 $1,2W.00 $1,960.00 S400.00 $1,566.00 $3,550.00 $355115.00 $856,624.00 Did Bidder Acknowledge Addendum No. 1 & No. 2? Did Bidder Provide Bid Security? I hereby certify that this is a correct and true tabulation of all bids recei` " , rrl.'4 4-4- s- '7-'?z Wm. Mack Parker, P.E. Date Rowing -Parker Associates, L. L.P. Consulting Engineers Council meeting May 14 1996 Item No. AA AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Consideration of approval of a letter requesting the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to consider locating traffic signals at specified intersections in Georgetown. .0 ITEM SUNMARY: At a recent meeting between City staff and TxDOT staff from the Georgetown Area Office, the subject of traffic signals on the State highway system was discussed. TxDOT staff stated that if the City had any requests for the location of new traffic signals, that these should be made in writing. The locations specified in the letter were identified by the Community Owned Utilities Division and the Development Services Division. Action by TxDOT will be to complek studies on these locations in order to determine whether or not a traffic signal is justified, according to TxDOT standards. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None FINANCIAL IMPACT: Alone COMMENTS: None ATTACHMENTS: Draft letter for signature by the Mayor. Submitted Bv- Edwar J. Barry, ICP -Director Divi on of Dev opment Services Clyde von Rose e g, AICP Chief Planner, Long Range Planning ��n CITY OF FOUN,DDED IN 1848 May. 14, 1996 Bill Garbade, P.E. District Engineer, District 14 Texas Department of Transportation 7901 N. IH35 Austin, TX 78761 Dear Mr. Garbade: Re: REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL STUDIES City staff recently held a very productive coordination meeting with TxDOT staff from the Georgetown Area Office. We had an opportunity to discuss how to most effectively coordinate the road improvements that are necessary to keep up with our recent development activity. State roads are vital to Georgetown's traffic system and we appreciate the excellent job that TxDOT does in maintaining and improving them. As one result of our meeting, -,we request that your office consider locating traffic signals at the following ' intersections in Georgetown: SH29 Bus. IH35 (Austin Ave-.) RM2338 @ Inner Loop Road @ 6th Street @ River Bend Dr. @ Maple Street @ 2nd Street @ Railroad Street** @ Morrow Street* @ D.B. Wood Road @ FM971 ** Railroad Street is soon to be constructed to SH29 *the developer of the Foster's Square subdivision has offered to fund this signal We understand that intersections must meet specific criteria before a signal can be located. We appreciate your assistance and look forward to continued coordination. Please contact Clyde von Rosenberg, Chief Planner, Long Range Planning, at 930-3575 if you have any questions or need any additional information. Sincerely, Leo Wood Mayor cc: Bubba Needham, TxDOT Traffic Engineer, Austin District James Klotz, TxDOT Area Engineer, Georgetown Tim Weight, TxDOT Assistant Area Engineer, Georgetown CITY HALL • 609 MAIN STREET POST OFFICE Box 409 0 GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 7B627-0409 0 512/930-3651 0 TDD 51 2/930-3549 • FAX: 51 2/930-3659 Council meeting May 14, 1996 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Consideration and first reading of an ordinance amending Exhibit 1 of the Century Plan - Development Plan for 1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46, located at 1904 Railroad Street, from Intensity Level Three to Intensity Level Five. ITEM SUMMARY: The proposed project, utilizing tl ,s 1.94 acre tract and an adjoining 4.35 acres to the south, is a 113 unit multifamily development which will provide affordable housing for senior citizens. The 4.35 acre tract is designated as Intensity Level Five, allowing for 89 multifamily units. In order to meet the proposed 113 units utilizing both tracts, the intensity level for the 1.94 acres must be sufficient to provide 24 multifamily units. The Community -Owned Utilities Division reports that there is adequate water and wastewater capacity in the area to serve the site for the proposed number of units. The applicant has been informed of the need to construct a six (6) inch water line to serve the property and they concur with this requirement. The City is in the process of purchasing and improving Railroad Street as a major collector grade street, designated as public right-of-way. It will then provide a direct connection to Leander Road (RM2243) to the south and University Avenue (SH29) to the north, both of which are classified as major arterials. With this improvement of Railroad Street, the street system will be sufficient to serve the proposed project. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None FINANCIAL IMPACT: None COMMENTS: The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 at their meeting on May 7, 1996 to recommend approval of the Century Plan Amendment from Intensity Level Three to Intensity Level Five. ATTACHMENTS: Staff report; Ordinance Submitted Bv: Edward 1� arry, AICP irector Division of Development Services Clyde on Rosen r , AICP Chief Planner, Long Range Planning CENTURY PLAN AMENDMENT OF 1.94 ACRES IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DIVISION A, OUTLOT 46, LOCATED AT 1904 RAILROAD STREET, FROM INTENSITY LEVEL THREE TO INTENSITY LEVEL FIVE OWNERS: Mr. Hugo Marocchi ; 1904 Railroad Street Georgetown, Texas 78626 512/863-9337 AGENT: Mr. Jay Kuhne KD Housing Partners 60 Cormorant Street Newport Beach, CA 92660 714/499-6255 REQUEST: Century Plan Amendment of 1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot as recorded in Volume 231, Page 329 of the Official -Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, from Intensity Level Three to Intensity Level Five. FACTS: Location: This parcel is located at the intersection of Railroad Street and 19th Street (1904 Railroad Street) . SEE EXHIBIT A Existing Site: One (1) single family residence. Existing Zoning: The tract is currently zoned RS with a request for RM-2 zoning being processed by separate agenda item. Proposed Use: A multifamily development is proposed. Surrounding Uses and Zoning: North: Single family residences (RS) South: Undeveloped land (RP) East: Single family residences (RS) West: Carver Elementary School (RS) Century Plan Amendment - COG - Div. A, Outlot 46 PA96-02/ File: COG-A-46.CPA CM/CvR May 8, 1996 Century Plan: The Century Plan - Development Plan designates this parcel as Intensity Level Three. The applicant is requesting a Century Plan amendment to designate this parcel as Intensity Level Five. Notification: The notification requirements have been completed. ANALYSIS: The proposed project, utilizing this 1.94 acre tract and an adjoining 4.35 acres to the south, is a 113 unit multifamily development which will provide affordable housing for senior citizens. The 4.35 acre tract is designated as Intensity Level Five, allowing for 89 multifamily units. In order to meet the proposed 113 units utilizing both tracts, the intensity level for the 1.94 acres must be sufficient to provide 24 multifamily units. Water and Wastewater An Intensity Level Five designation on this parcel will provide sufficient capacity for the needed 24 multifamily units. At Intensity Level Three, which is the current designation of the 1.94 acre site, the Intensity Plan allows for a maximum of nine (9) multifamily units, with transportation as the limiting factor. SEE EXHIBIT B-1 Intensity Level Five allows for a maximum of 40 multifamily units, based on water and wastewater capacity. SEE EXHIBIT B-2 The Community -Owned Utilities Division reports that there is adequate water and wastewater capacity in the area to serve the site for the proposed number of units. The applicant has been informed of the need to construct a six (6) inch water line to serve the property and they concur with this requirement. Transportation With 40 multifamily units allowed by Intensity Level Five on this site, the maximum number of trip ends generated will be 91. Since the proposed project will utilize the demand for only 24 multifamily units on this site, the number of trip ends generated will be 55 (see "Land Use Activity to Demand Conversion Chart", Development Plan, Exhibit 3). The maximum amount of multifamily development allowed under Intensity Level Three (9 units) generates 20 trip ends, therefore, the increase from multifamily at Level Three to multifamily units at Level 5 is a Century Plan Amendment - COG - Div. A, Outlot 46 PA96-02/ File: COG-A-46.CPA CM/CvR May 8, 1996 2 275 percent increase in transportation trip ends. All Intensity Level Five land currently in the planning area has access to an existing or planned minor arterial, major arterial, or freeway. Proposed public access to -the site is from Railroad Street. While it does not fit one of those three categories of street classification, the City is in the process of purchasing and improving it as a major collector grade street, designated as public right-of-way. The improved Railroad Street will provide a direct connection to Leander Road (RM2243) to the south and University Avenue (SH29) to the north, both of which are classified as major arterials. With the improvement of Railroad Street, the street system will be sufficient to serve the proposed project. Affordable Housin;? The provision of safe and adequate housing opportunities for all household types is a Century Plan policy adopted by the Georgetown City Council. The City is currently developing an affordable housing strategy to determine how it can provide housing in a range of prices to meet the needs of all households. The proposed development will provide affordable, rental housing to senior citizens that have incomes of less than 50-60 percent of the median income of the County. The applicants are seeking federal tax credits through the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs that will require the rents to be deed restricted to ensure affordability for 30 years. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of a Century Plan Amendment of 1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46, from Intensity Level Three to Intensity Level Five, conditional upon access to the property being provided to Railroad Street, dedicated as public right-of-way and improved to City standards as a major collector grade street. P & Z ACTION: At their meeting on May 7, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to approve the Century Plan Amendment, conditional upon access being provided to Railroad Street, dedicated as public right-of-way and improved to City standards as a major collector grade street. Century Plan Amendment - COG - Div. A, Outlot 46 PA96-02/ File: COG-A-46.CPA CM/CvR May 8, 1996 EXHIBIT A CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DIVISION A, OUTLOT 46 10 .O• 18 Ih STREET �� s co ^ m gs.n*- tn 16 0 17 S 19 th STREET BID TABULATION PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG NORTHWEST BOULEVARD AND QUAIL VALLEY DRIVE MAY 2, 1996 - 2:00 P.M. CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS (Continued) Bid Data Bidders Burris Construction, P.O. Georgetown, Unit Price Inc. Box 331 Texas 78627 Extended Price Item No. A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7 A-8 A-9 A-10 A-11 A-12 A-13 A-14 A-15 A-16 A-17 A-18 A-19 A-20 A-21 A-22 A-23 A 24 A-25 A-26 A-27 A-28 A-29 A-30 A-31 A-32 A-33 A-34 A-35 A-36 A-37 A-38 jTrench Dese ' ' n Preparation of Right-of-way Mobilization, Bonds & Insurance Barricades & Traffic Control Unclassified Excavation Compacted Fill (Roadway) Concrete Curb & Gutter Removal Concrete Driveway Removal Concrete Saw Cut HMAC Removal (Roadway) Concrete Encasement of Force Main HMAC T "D" Patch (Roadway) HMAC T "D" (Off -Site Drain.) 12" Crushed Limestone (Off -Site Drain.) 12" Subbase 6" Crushed Limestone Base 4" Crushed Limestone Base 2" HMAC T "D" Pavement 24" Concrete Curb & Gutter 6" Concrete Valley Gutter 6" Concrete Drivewa 20' Concrete Radius Unit 5' Curb Inks 10' Curb Inlet 15' Curb Inlet 5' x 5' Junction Box/lnlet 5' Diameter Manhole 18" RCP Class Ill 24" RCP Class111 30" RCP Class Ul 36" RCP Class M Concrete Collar 36" RCP Stabilized Construction Entrance Silt Fence Rock Berm Loamin , Hydroweding & Erosion Control Trench Safety Plan Trench Safety Implementation Safety Implementation SUBTOTAL Estimated 16 100% 100% 6,200 200 350 28 50 920 56 20 450 450 8,600 8,600 7,220 7,220 3,100 30 28 2 3 1 1 1 4 40 715 285 895 1 500 880 220 9,000 100% 1,935 9,000 Unit STA LS LS Cy Cy LF Sy LF Sy LF TN Sy Sy Sy Sy Sy Sy LF Sy Sy EA EA EA EA EA EA LF LF LF LF EA SY LF LF Sy LS LF SF J.C. Evans P.O. Box Austin, Texas Unit Price $1,415.00 $7,857.00 $550.00 $4.04 $1.62 $4.25 $15.00 $1.00 $1.00 $20.00 $25.00 $10.00 $6.50 $4.40 $2.50 $1.80 $3.62 $7.48 $37.40 $37.40 $912.10 $2,600.00 $3,300.00 S4,100.00 S3,500.00 $3,800.00 $43.00 $51.00 $75.00 $93.00 S250.00 $2.40 $1.53 $11.00 $0.90 $900.00 $1.00 $0.20 Construction 9647 78766 Extended Price $22,640.00 $7,857.00 $550.00 $25,048.00 $324.00 $1,487.50 S420.00 $50.00 $920.00 $1,120.00 $500.00 $4,500.00 $2,925.00 $37,840.00 $21,500.00 $12,996.00 $26,136.40 $23,188.00 $1,122.00 $1,047.20 $1,824.20 $7,900.00 $3,300.00 S4,100.00 $3,500.00 $15,200.00 $1,720.00 $36,465.00 $21,375.00 $83,235.00 $250.00 S1,200.00 S 1,346.40 $2,420.00 $8,100.00 $900.00 S1,935.00 $1,800.00 $388 641.70 Bay Maintenance Horseshoe Horseshoe Unit Price $430.00 $37,900.00 $1,000.00 $5.20 S6.17 $2.50 $10.50 $10.00 $2.15 $15.00 $46.00 $10.30 $8.00 $3.35 $2.20 $1.65 $3.25 $8.40 $38.00 $38.00 $930.00 $3,200.00 $3,900.00 S4,700.00 $3,900.00 $4,900.00 $26.00 $50.00 $70.00 $90.00 $600.00 $4.50 $1.20 $10.00 $0.75 $850.00 $1.00 $0.25 1 Co., Inc. Bay Box 8859 Texas 78657 Extended Price $6,880.00 $37,900.00 $1,000.00 $32,240.00 $1,234.00 $875.00 $294.00 $500.00 $1.978.00 $840.00 $920.00 $4,635.00 $3.600.00 $28,810.00 $18,920.00 $11,913.00 $23,465.00 $26,040.00 $1,140.00 $1,064.00 $1,860.00 $9.600.00 $3,900.00 S4,700.00 $3,900.00 $19,600.00 $1,040.00 $35,750.00 $19,950.00 $71,600.00 S600.00 $2,250.00 $1,056.00 $2,200.00 $6,750.00 $850.00 $1,935.00 $2,250.00 5393 839,00 JHL Construction P.O. Gatesvi e, Unit Price $718.75 $40,000.00 $2,500.00 S4.05 $4.00 $2.50 $5.00 $1.00 S0.75 $30.00 $50.00 $4.35 $7.00 $3.82 $2.40 $2.15 $4.00 S6.50 $25.00 $25.00 $300.00 $1,750.00 $2,350.00 $2,650.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $32.00 S40.00 $50.00 $61.30 $250.00 $3.00 $2.50 $25.00 $2.25 $1,750.00 $2.00 S0.601 1 Box 01 Texas 76528 Extended Price $11,500.00 $1,000.00 $16,000.00 $40,000.00 $2,500.00 $30,000.00 $7,500.00 $30,000.00 $7,500.00 $25,110.00 $9.44 $58,528.00 $800.00 $15.00 $3,000.00 $875.00 $8.00 $2,800.00 $140.00 $50.00 $35.00 $980.00 $2.00 $100.00 $690.00 $1.00 $920.00 $1,680.00 $1,000.00 $85.00 $50.00 $4,760.00 $1,000.00 $1,957.50 $4.00 $1,800.00 $3,150.00 $32,852.00 $5.50 $4.00 $2,475.00 $34,400.00 $20,640.00 $2.00 $17,200.00 $15,523.00 $1.50 $10,830.00 $28,880.00 $3.30 $23,826.00 $20,150.00 $750.00 $6.50 $40.00 $20,150.00 $1,200.00 $700.00 $40.00 $1,120.00 $600.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $5,250.00 $2,350.00 $2,650.00 $1,600.00 $6,400.00 $1,290.00 $28,600.00 $14,250.00 $54,863.50 $250.00 $1,500.00 $2,200.00 $5,500.00 $20,250.00 $1,750.00 $3,870.00 $1,100.00 $3,300.00 S1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $1.500.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,500.00 $8,000.00 $40.00 S43.00 $63.00 $1,600.00 $30,745.00 $17,955.00 $114.00 $102,030.00 $400.00 $400.00 $5.00 $2,500.00 $2.00 $1,760.00 $10.00 $2,200.00 $0.25 $2,250.00 $996.00 $5.00 $996.00 $9,675.00 $5,400.00 5367 511.00 $1.00 1 $9,000.00 $438 000.00 11 Page 3 of 6 EXHIBIT B-1 DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT GIVEN ASINGLE LAND USE 1. 'DATE`: April 25,1996 'PROJECT NAME`: 1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46 Marocchi property 2. 'GIVEN' acres of Intensity Level 1 acres of Intensity Level 2 1.94 acres of Intensity Level 3 acres of Intensity Level 4 acres of intensity Level 5 acres of Intensity Level 6 1.94 TOTAL ACRES 3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND: INTENSITY WATER WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION LEVEL Peak GPD Average GPD Peak Trip Ends 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 7,294 2,095 19 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 4. TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND: Maximum GPD WaterCapacity: 7,294 Maximum GPD Wastewater Capacity: 2,095 Maximum Trip Ends: 19 5. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT: (a) (b) (c) (d) POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY MAXIMUM PER DEV DEVELOPMENT LAND USES WATER WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION UNITS --------------- REGS -------- ALLOWED/UNIT _-_-------- - -------------------------------------------------------------- Detached SF ---- -------------------------------- -------------------------- Large Lot 6 7 32 6 4 4 housing units Average Lot 7 8 22 7 14 '7 housing units Zero Lot Line 7 8 22 7 19 7 housing units Attached SF 11 12 18 I 11 28 11 housing units Multifamily 14 la 91 9 9 housing units Mobile Home 11 11 23 11 11 housing units Lodging 38 34 14 14 14 rooms Institutional 21,266 22,774 23,068 21,266 21,266 square feet Church -with day care 23,683 25,243 1,247 1,247 1,247 square feet -w/o day care 39,217 41,904 26,944 26,944 26,944 square feet Medical Office 17,535 18,707 6,012 6,012 6,012 square feet General Office 20,040 23,024 7,608 7,608 7,608 square feet Retail, Mixed 11,222 12,854 1,174 1,174 1,174 square feet Retail, Restaurant 4,676 4,365 1,706 1,706 1,706 square feet Retail, Store 22,444 23,809 4,040 4,040 4,040 square feet Employment Centers 20,040 23,024 4,240 4,240 4,240 square feet Warehouse 127,972 149,657 32,333 32,333 32,333 square feet Mini -Warehouse 1,823,600 ----------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2,095,200 74,615 -------------------- 74,615 ------------ ---- ------------------------------------------ 74,615 square feet EXHIB[T 8-2 DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT GIVEN A SINGLE LAND USE 1. 'DATE': April 25, 1996 'PROJECT NAME`: 1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46 Marocchi property 2. 'GIVEN' acres of Intensity Level 1 acres of Intensity Level 2 acres of Intensity Level 3 acres of Intensity Level 4 1.94 acres of Intensity Level 5 acres of Intensity Level 6 1.94 TOTAL ACRES 3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND: INTENSITY WATER WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION LEVEL Peak GPD Average GPD ----------------- Peak Trip Ends ------------------------------------ 1 0 0 2 0 0 - 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 5 21,262 6,208 6 340 0 0 0 4. TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND: Maximum GPD Water Capacity: 21,262 Maximum GPD Wastewater Capacity: 6,208 Maximum Trip Ends: 340 5. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT: (a) POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY LAND USES WATER WASTEWATER TRANSPOR- ATION I MAXIMUM UNITS PER DEV DEVELOPMENT ------------------------------------- DetachedSF I ------- I -----------------I REGS I -------------------- ALLOWED/UNIT ---------- ----------- Large Lot 18 Average Lot 21 21 25 I 567 I I 18 I I 4 I 4 housing units Zero Lot Line 21 Attached SF 25 383 I 383 I 21 I 21 I 14 I 19 I 14 housing units 19 33 Multifamily 40 35 40 312 I 33 I 28 I housing units 33 housin units 9 Mobile Home 33 Lodging 32 19 401 I 40 32 55 j 40 housing units 1 Institutional 61990 12 245 I I 102 I I I 32 housing units 102 rooms , Church 87,478 403,686 I 61,990 I I 61,990 square feet -with day care 69,034 day care 114,314 74,795 124,160 21 819 I 21,81I ( 21,819 square feet Medical cal Office 51,112 General Office 55,429 471,528 I 105,206 I 114,314 I 51,112 I I 114,314 square feet 58,413 Retail, Mixed 32,711 68,220 38,086 133,137 I 58,413 I I I 51,112 square feet 58,413 square feet Retail, Restaurant 13,630 Retail, Store 12,933 20,553 I 29,859 I 20,553 I 12,933 I I 20,553 square feet 65,423 Employment Centers 58,413 70,545 68,220 70,700 I 65,423 I I I 12,933 square feet 65,423 square feet Warehouse 373,025 Mini -Warehouse 443,429 565,833 74,191 ( I 373,025 58,413 I I I 58,413 square feet 5,315,600 -------------------------- 6,208.000 1,305,769 I 1,305,769 I I 373,025 square feet ------------------------ - - - - ----------------- ----------------- I ----------------------------------- 1,305,769 square feet --------- NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OF A PUBLIC MEETING Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its regular public meeting of the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. This meeting will be held on the 7TH day of MAY , 1996, at 6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers, 101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed: Rezoning and Century Plan Amendment for a 1.94 acre tract known as City of Georgetown, Division A, Oudot 46, from RS, Residential Single Family to RM-2, Dense Multifamily,located at 1904 Railroad Street. As one of the owners of adjacent property you are invited to be present at such meeting if you desire to discuss the proposed plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail. Date: 4/23/96 City of Georgetown A copy of the planning report related to this item will be available at the Division of Development Services and the Georgetown Public Library no later than the Friday prior to the meeting described above. For further information phone the Development Services Division at 930-3575. PROPERTY OWNER'S COMMENTS Project Name: City of Georgetown, Div. A, Block 46 Name of Respondent: Address of Respondent: I am in favor: I object: S- If you wish to submit written comment, please respond by 5/ 1 /96 , it will be provided to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Please reply to: City of Georgetown Development Services Division P. O. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78627 Ln77 f-1 NO -Man Am $ 6 lye �IJ CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OF A PUBLIC MEETING Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its regular public meeting of the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. This meeting will be held on the 7th day of May , 1996, at 6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers, 101 East 7th Street, �Q�Iorgetown, Texas to consider the proposed: Century Plan Amendment of a 1.94 acre tract known as City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46, located at 1904 Railroad Street, from Intensity Level Three to Intensity Level Five. As one of the owners of adjacent property you are invited to be present at such meeting if you desire to discuss the proposed plan. Date: 2/ 18/96 City of Georgetown A copy of the planning report related to this item el will be available at the Division of Development Services and the Georgetown Public Ivibrary no later than the Friday prior to the meeting described above. For further information phone the Development Services Division at 930-3575. -------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- PROPERTY OWNER'S COMMENTS Project Name: Century Plan Amendment of a 1.94 acre tract known as City of Georgetown, Division A. Outlot 46, located at 1904 Railroad Street, from Intensity Level Three to Intensity Level Five Name of Respondent: Address of Respondent: 3 Z, I am in favor: I object: If you wish to submit written comment, please respond by 5/l/96; it will be provided to the Planning and Zoning Commission before their meeting. Please reply to: City of Georgetown Development Services Division P. O. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78627 fE D s� ! APR 26 1-' ��� ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING EXHIBIT 1- INTENSITY MAP OF THE CENTURY PLAN - DEVELOPMENT PLAN PASSED AND ADOPTED ON THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 1990, TO CHANGE 1.94 ACRES IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DIVISION A, OUTLOT 46, LOCATED AT 1904 RAILROAD STREET, FROM INTEN LEVEL THREE TO INTENSITY LEVEL FIVE; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Charter of the City of Georgetown was amended by vote of the people in April 1986 such that comprehensive planning was established as a continuous and ongoing governmental function; and WHEREAS, the City Council did, on March 8, 1988, adopt by Ordinance Number 880097 the Georgetown Century Plan - Policy Plan as the Comprehensive Plan for the City pursuant to Section 1.08 of the City Charter; and WHEREAS, the City Council did, on March 13, 1990, adopt by Ordinance Number 900149 the Georgetown Century Plan - Development Plan as the Land Intensity, Transportation, and Utilities functional plan elements pursuant to Section 1.08 of the City Charter; and WHEREAS, the Century Plan Development Plan contains the Intensity Map designed to assign development intensities throughout the Georgetown Planning Area; and WHEREAS, an application has been made by KD Housing Partners to construct a multifamily development, necessitating changing the intensity assignment of the 1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown Division A, Outlot 46, located at 1904 Railroad Street, from Intensity Level Three to Intensity Level Five; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission did, on May 7, 1996, conduct a public hearing regarding the proposed amendment to EXHIBIT 1 of the Century Plan - Development Plan; and WHEREAS, notice of such hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, which stated the time and place of hearing which time was not earlier than fifteen (15) days for the first day of such publication; and WHEREAS, written notice was given not less than fifteen (15) days before the date set for the meeting before the Planning and Zoning Commission to all the owners of the lots within Century Plan Amendment-1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46 located at 1904 Railroad Street Ordinance No. Page 1 of 3 two hundred feet of the property, as required by law; and WHEREAS, the applicant for such Plan amendment placed on the property at the 1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown Division A, Outlot 46, located at 1904 Railroad Street, such sign(s) as required by law for advertising the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, not less than fifteen (15) days before the date set for such hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commissig a. did, on May 7, 1996, recommend that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to EXHIBIT 1 of the Century Plan - Development Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance implements the following Policies of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element: 1. Economic Development Policy 1, which states: "The City will encourage diversified growth and promote business opportunities to create jobs, broaden the tax base and minimize the impact of economic fluctuations", and 2. Growth and Physical Development Policy 1, which states: "The City will ensure that future land use patterns provide economic, cultural, and social activities to all residents, businesses and organizations;" and 3. Growth and Physical Development Policy 2, which states: "The City's regulatory actions will efficiently and effectively implement the Policy Statements and provide the opportunity to seek change with reasonable effort and expense; " as well as the following Goal of the Century Plan - Development Plan Element: 1. Policy 8, Goal A, which states: "The City will prepare and adopt a land use management program to promote orderly growth, address environmental issues, and coordinate provision of City services;" and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan. SECTION 2. EXHIBIT 1 - Intensity Map, contained within the Century Plan - Century Plan Amendment-1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46 located at 1904 Railroad Street Ordinance No. Page 2 of 3 Development Plan, is hereby amended by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, to change the Intensity Level Three designation to Intensity Level Five at the 1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown Division A, Outlot 46, located at 1904 Railroad Street, as shown on Attachment A of this Ordinance, provided that access to the property be provided to Railroad Street which shall be dedicated as public right-of-way and improved to City standards as a major collector grade street. SECTION 3. All ordinances and resolutions, o r{parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. SECTION 4. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in (10) ten days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of Georgetown. t PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the 14th day of May, 1996. PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the day of 1996. ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: Sandra D. Lee City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney Leo Wood Mayor Century Plan Amendment-1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46 located at 1904 Railroad Street Ordinance No. Page 3 of 3 C-26 IL4 WESLEYAN HOMES INC. LAG/311 7.186 ACRES EXHIM I A CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DIVISION A, OUTLOT 46 10 6 W' 18 th STREET r l"'-' � �1 Council meeting May 14, 1996 Item No. cc AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Consideration and first reading of an ordinance to rezone the 1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46, located at 1904 Railroad Street, from RS, Residential Single Family to RM-2, Dense Multifamily. ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant intends to develop .this parcel and the parcel directly to the south with a 113 unit project for rental to senior citizens. The parcel to the south, 4.35 acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, was rezoned to RM-2 in July 1994. The Century Plan - Development Plan was also amended at that time to change the Intensity designation from Level Three to Level Five. The subject property is located in an area that has potential for redevelopment and is generally surrounded by compatible land uses. The applicant has been informed of the need to construct a six (6) inch water line to serve this property and to provide driveway access to Railroad Street, which must be dedicated public right-of-way, improved to meet the standards of a major collector grade street. The City of Georgetown is in the process of acquiring right-of-way and making these improvements for Railroad Street. A detailed development plan (DDP) will also have to be submitted for review and approval. Any site - specific issues identified during review of the DDP will have to be addressed at that time. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None FINANCIAL INTPACT: None COMMENTS: The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 at their meeting on May 7, 1996 to recommend approval of the Century Plan Amendment from Intensity Level Three to Intensity Level Five. ATTACHMENTS: Staff report; Ordinance Submitted By: Edward . tarry, AICP Director Divisio4 of Develop nt Services Clyde von Rosenbei , AICP Chief Planner, Long Range Planning REZONING OF 1.94 ACRES IN THE CITY- OF GEORGETOWN, DIVISION A, OUTLOT 46, LOCATED AT 1904 RAILROAD STREET, FROM RS, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY TO RM-2, DENSE MULTIFAMILY OWNERS: Mr. Hugo Marocchi 1904 Railroad Street Georgetown, Texas 78626 512/863-9337 AGENT: Mr. Jay Kuhne KD Housing Partners 60 Cormorant Street Newport Beach, CA 92660 714/499-6255 REQUEST: Rezoning of 1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot as recorded in Volume 231, Page 329 of the Official Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, from RS, Residential Single Family to RM-2, Dense Multifamily. Existing Zoning: The tract is currently zoned RS, Residential Single Family. Proposed Use and Zoning: A multifamily development is proposed; RM-2, Dense Multifamily. HISTORY: This parcel was annexed into the City in 1964 with RS district zoning. ANALYSIS: The proposed development will provide affordable, rental housing to senior citizens who have incomes of less than 50-60 percent of the median income in the County. The applicants are seeking federal tax credits through the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs that will require the rents to be deed restricted for 30 years. Housing of this type is designed to complement other housing projects being developed under the same program for other segments of the population in Georgetown. Rezoning - COG - Div. A, Outlot 46 May 8, 1996 RZ96-02/ File: COG-A-46.REZ 1 CM/CvR The applicant intends to develop this parcel and the parcel directly to the south with a 113 unit project for rental to senior citizens. The parcel to the south, 4.35 acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, was rezoned to RM-2 in July 1994. The Century Plan - Development Plan was also amended at that time to change the Intensity designation from Level Three to Level Five. The applicant has been informed of the need to construct a six (6) inch water line to serve this property and to provide driveway access to Railroad Street, which must be dedicated public right-of-way, improved to meet the standards of a major collector grade street. The City of Georgetown is in the process of acquiring right-of-way and making these improvements for Railroad Street. A detailed development plan (DDP) will also have to be submitted for review and approval. Any site -specific issues identified during review of the DDP will have to be addressed at that time. t' Rezoning: The subject property is located in an area that has potential for redevelopment: SEE EXHIBIT A Except for the South San Gabriel Urban Renewal Addition located to the north of the subject property, all the land immediately adjacent to the north and east is in the form of unplatted tracts with scattered single family homes. Three (3) other high density residential development exist in close proximity to the subject property. The H&H Mobile Home Park is located to the south, the Stonehaven public housing development is located to the east, and Georgetown Station Apartments is located to the northeast. A rezoning and Century Plan amendment were approved in May 1995 for affordable multifamily units for families at 22nd Street and Leander Street, south of the project site. While the north half of the subject property is surrounded by the RS, Residential Single Family zoning district, the south half is adjacent to C-2A, Commercial First Height; C-2B, Commercial Second Height; and I, Industrial zoning districts. In addition to multifamily developments, the RM-2, Dense Multifamily zoning district permits other residential uses, Rezoning - COG - Div. A, Outlot 46 May 8, 1996 RZ96-02/ File: COG-A-46.REZ 2 CM/CvR lodging houses, home occupations, and intermediate child care. Given the surrounding uses and zoning districts as described above, these are all uses that would be appropriate on the subject property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the requested` rezoning of 1.94 acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46, locally known as 1904 Railroad Street, from RS, Residential Single Family to RM-2, Dense Multifamily. P & Z ACTION: At their meeting on May 7, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to approve the rezoning from RS, Residential Single Family to RM-2, Dense Multifamily. Rezoning - COG - Div. A, Outlot 46 RZ96-02/ File: COG-A-46.REZ CM/CvR May 8, 1996 EXHIBIT A CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DIVISION A, OUTLOT 46 r 10 a 5 I 6 i ao" <: d «� IS Ih STREET m _ )\v (n `9 m IS 16 17 S ).irn • -4 - P �l t a. 1 i 14 19 1h STREET = -,•kIIG�:i•}!I(AdLCKr:':'.:::•:'••••'•'•�- ' •'•' ••� R S IL3 o _ � RM-2 Nat/ 14S •W ,,Now ,. 4.350 AC. IL5 C-2B — IL4 7 .. MESLCr AN NO -ES NC G.G/311 7,186 ACRES IL3 C-2A NQN )g8ILE NO"[ PARK LURLENE HENDERSON S l l / 324 1 LZO AC w1, • 1 72 sC 1 IL3 IL3 C-2 A BURNNAU 318/s43 2 60 c; n D Z 0 m 1 m N D m 1 � 1 18 th STR ET 1 t R-M - 3 IL3 � HART 3.076 "RES '\ NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OF A PUBLIC MEETING Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its regular public meeting of the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. This meeting will be held on the 7TH day of MAY , 1996, at 6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers, 101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed: fi Rezoning and Century Plan Amendment for a 1.94 acre tract known as City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46, from RS, Residential Single Family to RM-2, Dense Multifamily, located at 1904 Railroad Street. As one of the owners of adjacent property you are invited to be present at such meeting if you desire to discuss the proposed plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail. Date: 4/23/96 City of Georgetown A copy of the planning report related to this item will be available at the Division of Development Services and the Georgetown Public Library no later than the Friday prior to the meeting described above. For further information phone the Development Services Division at 930-3575. trek PROPERTY OWNER'S COMMENTS Project Name: City of Georgetown, Div. A, Block 46 Name of Respondent: () e ay�� L,5�« -r T .S� Address of Respondent: I am in favor: Z/� I object: If you wish to submit written comment, please respond by 5/ 1 /96 , it will be provided to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Please reply to: City of Georgetown Development Services Division P. O. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78627 AID 26 iq - CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OF A PUBLIC MEETE\TG Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its regular public meeting of the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. This meeting will be held on the 7th day of May , 1996, at 6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers, 101 East 7th Street,ieorgetown, Texas to consider the proposed: Century Plan Amendment of a 1.94 acre tract known as City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46, located at 1904 Railroad Street, from Intensity Level Three to Intensity Level Five. As one of the owners of adjacent property you are invited to be present at such meeting if you desire to discuss the proposed plan. Date: 2/ 18/96 City of Georgetown A copy of the planning report related to this item will be available at the Division of Development Services and the Georgetown Publicv-,�brary no later than the Friday prior to the meeting described above. For furthor information phone the Development Services Division at 930-3575. -------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- PROPERTY OWNER'S COM 1ENTS Project Name: Century Plan Amendment of a 1.94 acre tract known as City of Georgetown, Division A. Outlot 46, located at 1904 Railroad Street, from Intensity Level Three to Intensity Level Five Name of Respondent: U� Address of Respondent. 3 I am in favor: I object: If you wish to submit written comment, please respond by 5/ 1/96; it will be provided to the Planning and Zoning Commission before their meeting. Please reply to: City of Georgetown Development Services Division P. O. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78627 C C�C90�/7 nD APR Z 6 b.- uu � ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE PASSED AND ADOPTED ON THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1968, AND AMENDING PART OF THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE ORIGINAL ORDINANCE, TO CHANGE 1.94 ACRES IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DIVISION A. OUTLOT 46, LOCATED AT 1904 RAILROAD STREET,IF AOM RS, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY TO RM-2, DENSE MULTIFAMILY; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, an application has been made to the City Council for the purpose of changing the zoning district classification of the following described real property ("the property") : 1.94 ACRES IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DIVISION A, OUTLOT 46, LOCATED AT 1904 RAILROAD STREET, hereinafter referred to as "the property"; WHEREAS, the City Council has submitted the proposed change in the Base Ordinance to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its con&.ideration in a public hearing and for its recommendation or report; and ` WHEREAS, notice of such hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City; which stated the time and place of hearing, which time was not earlier than fifteen (15) days for the first day of such publication; and WHEREAS, written notice was given not less than fifteen (15) days before the date set for the meeting before the Planning and Zoning Commission to all the owners of the lots within two hundred feet of the property, as required by law; and WHEREAS, the applicant for such zoning change placed on the property such sign(s) as required by law for advertising the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, not less than fifteen (15) days before the date set for such hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission in a meeting held on May 7, 1996, recommended changing said zoning district classification of the above described property from the RS, Residential Single Family to the RM-2, Dense Multifamily district zoning classification, in accordance with Exhibit "A". 1.94 Acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46, located at 1904 Railroad Street Rezoning Ordinance No. Page 1 of 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance implements the following Policies of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element: 1. Growth and Physical Development Policy 1, which states: "The City will ensure that future land use patterns provide economic, cultural, and social activities to all residents, businesses and organizations"; and 2. Growth and Physical Development Policy 2, which states: "The City's regulatory actions will efficiently and effectively implement the Policy Statements and provide the opportunity to seek change with reasonable effort and expense"; and 3. Growth and Physical Development Policy 4, which states: "The City will encourage new development and infill redevelopment in the community"; and 4. Environmental and Resource Conservation Policy 1, which states: "The City will take the steps necessary to protect the physical attributes that make Georgetown attractive"; and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan. SECTION 2. The Base Ordinance and the Zoning Map of the City, as well as the Zoning District for the Property shall be and the same is hereby changed from the RS, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY district to the RM-2, DENSE MULTIFAMILY district, in accordance with Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, is hereby adopted by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas. SECTION J. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. SECTION 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. 1.94 Acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46, located at 1904 Railroad Street Rezoning Ordinance No. Page 2 of 3 SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this Ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in (10) ten days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of Georgetown. PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the 14th day of May, 1996. PASSED AND APPROVED on Second ReadingF on the day of 1996. ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: Sandra D. Lee City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: el Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney By: LEO WOOD Mayor 1.94 Acres in the City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlot 46, located at 1904 Railroad Street Rezoning Ordinance No. Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DIVISION A. OUTLOT 46 10 5 I r6 a 18 th STREET r ^\ n DO o ] c0i ma � •\� >•. atT .>.n 1� N -a T _ � m 1S 16 c 17 I 19 th STREET »r L 3 ;:P;S; jiAAdFCI(r; ;: ; ;•: • R S ' a�d:�a•'s' C-2 B IL4 WESLEr.N "OWES NC 646/31l 7.166 ACRES • I;f<• AC •• l 1\ 0 \ V R M-2 IL3 1642/ls5 0.330 AC. IL5 IL3 C-2A N B N MOBILE HOME PARK LURLENE HENDERSON ill / Jz. 1 1 � z00 AC s n' stso' �.)ls 'tl IL3 I 2 BO Ac I I I D Z O m 1 m N -i m 1 m 1 L 181h STR ET 1 T+9/Hl I I i i i f RM-3 IL3 it HART IL3 3076 ACRE ° C-2A BURNHAM slais�s Council Meeting Date: May 14, 1996 AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET Item No. PD SUBJECT Council approval to produce a Water Management/Conservation Program media campaign, through Arrowhead Productions, in the amount of $38,250.00. ITEM SUMMARY: In our continuing efforts to provide utility customers with excellent customer service, an educational water management/conservation program was planned for this budget year. The program is a media campaign and is planned to be used each year, as we approach the hotter, drier months of the summer season. The program will be used to inform and educate utility customers on proper water management/conservation techniques and to assist in maintaining manageable utility bills. The firm of Arrowhead Productions specializes in such programs and has provided a proposal to produce such a program for the City of Georgetown. The program will be produced in three stages: Pre -production, in the amount of $5,550.00, Production, in the amount of $15,000.00, and Editing, Post -production, and Duplication, in the amount of $17,200.00, for a total cost of $38,250.00. The City will receive a thirty (30) minute film, for cable television, a fifteen (15) minute public outreach program and several thirty (30) second public service announcements, to be aired on major television stations, plus 100 VHS copies for distribution. The program is anticipated to be completed by mid -June. Therefore, staff recommends Council approval of the proposal from Arrowhead Productions to produce a Water Management/Conservation Program media campaign, in the amount of $38,250.00. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: NONE FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $38,250.00 are to be paid from account number 660-105-5502-00. COMMENTS: NONE S . Proposal letter from Arrowhead Productions Y; Jim Briggs, Director Mr. John Early Water and Waste water Superintendent City of Georgetown 1101 N. College Georgetown, TX 78626 Dear Mr. Early: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss your video production project and to present our qualifications. As I mentioned briefly on the phone, we have 15 years of experience producing high quality energy and water related video programs for the LCRA and have recently become available to work on outside projects such as yours. From our discussion, I have assembled a team of professionals to quickly and creatively assemble your video package. Understanding your tight deadline, the primary focus of the production team will be to create a 30 minute program that will be suitable for broadcast on the Williamson County Cablevision. Following the completion of that program we have proposed the creation of a shorter version that might be more suitable for public meeting. And finally, the creation of several public service announcements that could be aired on the cable system over the course of a year. Below is a preliminary budget estimate for the City of Georgetown Water and Waste water public outreach campaign. Please keep in mind that this has been prepared to give you a broad idea of the cost of the projects. Pre -production: Estimated cost $5, 550 During this phase of the production we meet with all people who have information to share that will be included in the video. We read and research all available materials and develop a creative blueprint for the program. We also begin to establish a filming schedule that will be implemented after client approval. Production: $ 15,500 (includes collaborative effort with channel 8) During the production phase we dispatch a film crew to shoot scenes at all appropriate locations with broadcast Betacam SP camera's. In addition we will shoot aerial footage of the Georgetown area as well as water and waste water facilities. We anticipate spending five days filming the program, which includes interviews and all supporting video. Also, during this phase we will begin to design high resolution animation and graphics that will support the program. Editing and post -production & Duplication $ 17,200 Utilizing high quality Betacam SP machines we will import all of the video footage into the Avid nonlinear editing system where we will assemble the combination of a high quality narrator with the matching visuals to create the program. In addition, music and titling graphics will be used where appropriate. At all times, the city of Georgetown will have editorial control over the program, and the Avid editing system allows for changes to be made quickly and without a significant budget impact. This estimate includes the editing and post -production of all programs...the 30-minute show for cable TV, a fifteen minute public outreach program and several 30 second PSA's. In addition, we will produce a custom video jacket for your program and a hard case for the videocassette. This proposal also includes 100 VHS copies for distribution. The total estimated cost of the project is $38,250. We appreciate the chance to work on this challenging and rewarding project for the community of Georgetown. If we answer any additional questions, please don't hesitate to call on me. Sincerely, Patrick Fries Executive producer 5Council• G 1a. meeting date: • Item No. • �+� .9 AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Approval of an ordinance establishing of a designated hazardous materials route. ITEM SUMMARY This action provides for an update of outdated flammable and hazardous materials route within the City of Georgetown. This action would limit dangerous cargo to certain specified streets. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS None. FINANCIAL IMPACT None. COMMENTS The streets selected for the transport of flammable and/or hazardous materials were chosen because of their status as major arterial roadways, and to achieve minimum exposure to the public -at -large. ATTACHMENTS Hazardous materials routes map. Submitted By: Bill Shanklin, Director of Fire Services Division Hazmatrt AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS AMENDING "SECTION 10.04.03 0 OF CHAPTER 10.04 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS GENERALLY- SPECIFICALLY (" FLAMMABLE LIQUID TRANSPORT ROUTE - PARKING RESTRICTED." REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the flammable liquid transport routes stipulated in the current code of ordinances for the City Of Georgetown are outdated; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the need for bringing the flammable liquid transport routes listing up to date in order to reflect the current needs of the City of Georgetown; and WHEREAS, the City Council is aware of the need to regulate the movement of hazardous materials within the city limits of the City of Georgetown; and WHEREAS, the City Council strives to insure the safety and well-being of the citizens of the city of Georgetown, Texas NOW THEREFORE LET IT BE ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in this preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance implements the transportation policy of the century plan element which states "The city will encourage a transportation system that provides for the safe and efficient movement of traffic, promotes the economic interest of the community, and adequately serves the personal needs of individuals"; and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is not in conflict with any other century plan policies, as required by section 2.03 of the administrative chapter of the policy plan. SECTION 2. Section 10.04.030 of the code of ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.04.030 FLAMMABLE LIQUID TRANSPORT ROUTE ---- PARKING RESTRICTED A. It is unlawful for the driver of a motor vehicle transporting flammable or combustible liquids and hazardous chemicals to travel into or through the City except in the designated areas as follows: 1. For north -south traffic: a. Interstate 35, including access roadways b. Austin Avenue (Business 35/Texas 81) c. Church Street (FM 1460) lying south of University Avenue d. College Street lying north of University Avenue 2. For east -west traffic: a. Williams Drive (RM 223 8) b. University Avenue (Texas 29) c. Airport Road d. Inner Loop Road e. Leander Road f. Sun City Boulevard g. Del Webb Boulevard B. No vehicle used for the transport of flammable or combustible liquids and hazardous chemicals shall be parked out of doors for more than one hour within the City Limits of Georgetown, Texas, except on the premises of a facility approved for storing or servicing tank vehicles. The location shall be off any street and at least 50 feet from any building and 25 feet from any property line. C. Vehicles used to transport flammable or combustible liquids and hazardous chemicals shall not be parked or garaged in any building or near any building other than those specifically approved for such use by the Fire Marshal. D. Any violations of this ordinance may be prosecuted to the fullest extent allowed by this Code and State law. LECEN� � .• • xc J 8 • 26 •' Int. Hwy State Hwy County Road -V-J35JI6 -rig, ate' t= • 70 City Limits Park or Golf Course .n r • 3a School p Cemetery Z. ZT Railroad IM MON //�S 17 • • 76 7 rp► t i i .. :: - LLB, Y _ •• ' EM rNip ® -'c- �#1�..�' �, • ' �j�E'R����w�.���•s�e cep QW sue`?� .�?a"'r �.' # � s .S�t •i'1 ,� ' §E W�11 AM Ov ce �r �c=i �� r ct�°L:�� �r• Council meeting date: SIP/44 ?16 Item No. Fe", F-1.11 AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Approval of an ordinance establishing above ground storage tanks. ITEM SUMMARY This action authorizes the city council to permit certain small tanks for flammable and/or hazardous materials storage to be placed above ground, provided certain safety criteria is met. Specifications set forth are national standards. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS Hazardous materials routes will need to be designated for the implementation of this action. FINANCIAL IMPACT None. COMMENTS The allowance for small (1,000 gal. or less) above ground storage tanks will allow some flexibility in the hazardous materials storage in Georgetown without opening the door for large bulk plants. The safety factors in this action provide for the continued safety of the general public. ATTACHMENTS None. Submitted By: Leo lin, Director of Fire Services Division Abgrndst AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, ADDING " SECTION 804.05" TO " CHAPTER 8.04 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS RELATING TO THE FIRE PREVENTION CODE - SPECIFICALLY ABOVEGROUND STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS." REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the current municipal code makes no provision for the placement of aboveground tanks for the purpose of storage of flammable liquids within the corporate limits of the City of Georgetown. Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the need for creating definitive guidelines for the construction specifications and placement of such facilities; and WI-IEREAS, the City Council of the City of Georgetown actively opposes any threat to the preservation of the safety and well-being of all citizens of the City of Georgetown; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Georgetown acknowledges the need for legislation to regulate and monitor those installations that, due to unique circumstances, require above ground storage of hazardous materials NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, THAT: SECTION 1 The facts and recitations contained in this preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance implements the environmental and Resource Conservation policy of the Century plan element which states " The City will take the steps necessary to protect the physical attributes that make Georgetown attractive; and further finds that the enactment of this ordinance is not in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan. SECTION 2. Section 804.055 of the Code of Ordinances is hereby adopted to read as follows: 804.055 ABOVE GROUND TANK STORAGE Chapter 9 of the Fire Prevention Code adopted in this chapter is amended by adding thereto section 902.1.3 as follows: Any aboveground tank for the purposes of the storage of flammable, combustible, of otherwise hazardous materials, shall be installed in accordance with the following; 1. The tank shall be a `vaulted' tank, built to testing agency specifications and approved by the authority having jurisdiction. " Minimum" standards shall include "any U.L. listed (standard 142 steel aboveground tanks for flammable and combustible liquids) steel tank, all portions of which shall be enclosed in a secondary containment and encased with six (6) inches of reenforced concrete and the complete structure shall be U.L. listed in accordance with U.L. Subject 2085, protected type. 2. All aboveground tanks shall have a spill containment area capable of holding the combined capacity of all tanks in the facility. This containment structure shall be built of a material that is impervious to the material being stored. 3. All aboveground tanks located inside the city limits of Georgetown, Texas shall be directly accessible from a major arterial roadway, as defined by section 10.04.030 of this Code " Flammable Liquid Transport Route --Parking Restricted" 4. All aboveground tanks shall have emergency vehicle access from all sides via an all-weather driving surface of not less than twenty (20) feet in width with adequate roadway turning radius , capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus, and having a minimum vertical clearance of thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches . 5. Tanks shall be limited in size to not exceed one thousand (1000) gallon capacity. 6. Aboveground tanks within the city limits shall not be used for commercial or retail purposes. 7. Aboveground tanks within the city limits of Georgetown, Texas shall not be located in areas zoned residential. 8. All aboveground tanks shall follow all guidelines set forth in National Fire Protection Association Standards 30 and 3 0A as amended. 9. No aboveground tanks shall be allowed in the fire district(s). 10. No more than two (2) tanks shall be allowed at any one site. 11. All aboveground tanks shall be protected from mechanical damage by guardrails or guard posts. 12. No materials can be dispensed by gravity feed, all materials shall be dispensed by approved pumps taking suction through the top of the container. 13. Aboveground storage tanks shall comply with all City, County, State, and Federal statutes and regulations. Council Meeting Date: 05/14/96 Item No. G� AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT First Reading of an Ordinance to modify Section 2.68.040 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Georgetown, Texas, relating to the appointment of members to the Georgetown Convention & Visitors Board. ITEM SUNEYLARY At the City Council's meeting of April 23, 1996, the Council requested the Convention & Visitors Board to review the make-up of the Board and discuss the possible addition of a representative from the bed & breakfast industry. The CVB Board met on May 8, 1996, and discussed the restaurant/motel industry position and possibly a new position for the bed & breakfast industry. In addition to appointed Board members, the meeting also consisted of representatives from the Comfort Inn, the Historic Page House Bed & Breakfast, the Claibourne House Bed & Breakfast, and the Harper-Chessher House Bed & Breakfast. The Board and guests discussed how to modify the restaurant/motel industry position and possibly add a representative from the bed & breakfast industry. After the discussion, the Board made a motion to recommend to the City Council to "Change the Restaurant/Motel Industry position and make it a representative from the Restaurant Industry only, and to add one position from the Bed & Breakfast Industry, making the Board consist of eleven members. " The recommendation passed unanimously. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS None FINANCIAL IWACT None COMMENTS None ATTACHMENTS 1. Ordinance 2. Georgetown Convention & Visitors Board By -Laws Submitted By: T- Hartley Sappington, Director of Community Services ORDINANCE No. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING SECTION 2.68.040 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, RELATING TO THE APPOINTMENT OF GEORGETOWN CONVENTION & VISITORS BOARD; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Georgetown CVB represents a broad base of interest and support from citizens, businesses, and organizations within Georgetown; and, WHEREAS,the City Council finds that broadening the representation on the Board by adding two representatives -- one who will represent major tourist attractions and one who will represent country clubs, will make the Board more effective in promoting visitors to visit the community; and, WHEREAS,the City Council finds that the appointment of City staff as ex officio members of the Board is in conflict with the governance policies adopted by Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council finds that this ordinance implements Economic Development Policy 4 of the Century Plan Policy Plan Element, which states: "The City will develop and promote the tourism industry in Georgetown"; and further finds that the adoption of this ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan. SECTION 2. Section 2.68.040 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Georgetown, Texas, is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.68.040 Appointment. A. The Board consists of ten 0*0 members recommended by the Mayor and approved by the City Council. The term of each of the members is two years. The City of Georgetown's Director of Community Services and the Convention & Visitors Bureau Director serve as ex officio members to the board. ORDINANCE No. Changes to the CVB Board Membership Page 1 of 2 SECTION 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. SECTION 4. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective immediately. PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the 14' day of May, 1996. PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the 28' day of May, 1996. ATTEST: Elizabeth Gray, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Marianne Landers Banks, City Attorney ORDINANCE No. Changes to the CVB Board Membership Page 2 of 2 THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: Leo Wood, Mayor GEORGETOWN CONVENTION & VISITORS BOARD BY-LAWS ARTICLE I Name and Purpose Section 1. The Name of this Board shall be the Georgetown Convention & Visitors Board. Section 2. The purposes of this Board are to make recommendations to the Georgetown City Council concerning allocation of financial resources available to encourage tourism in our community and to raise public visibility of local features and activities which may attract visitors to our city. At all times this Board shall act in compliance with state legislation (Section 351, Tax Code) or any subsequent legislation authorizing the collection and distribution of hotel/motel tax revenues. ARTICLE H Membership Section 1. The policy of the Board shall be approved by the Georgetown City Council. Section 2. The Board shall consist of teft " members, one each from the following community organizations and groups: GEORGETOWN CONVENTION & VISITORS BOARD BYLAWS Revised May 10, 1996 Section 3. The members shall be appointed under the following process. The following organizations shall submit two nominees for the mayor's review: Chamber of Commerce, Downtown Georgetown Association, Heritage Society and Southwestern University. The following categories will be filled by a public call for nominations by the mayor: arts community at -large, hotel/motel industry, restaurantAn te+ industry, b & r al fas ndttstry� tourist attractions, country clubs, and the business community at -large. The mayor shall then make final recommendations to City Council for approval. The public call shall be made at least six weeks prior to the beginning of the next board appointment year, and the mayor shall recommend to the City Council board members to represent these categories from nominations submitted in response to the public call. If at any time there should be no nomination for a Board vacancy from any category, the mayor shall, at his or her discretion, recommend to City Council a nominee from the appropriate organization(s) to fill the vacancy. Persons appointed to fill unexpired terms on the Board shall do so for the completion of the term of his or her predecessor. Section 4. Members shall be appointed for a term of two years. Members may serve a maximum of two consecutive terms but may be re-elected following an absence of two years. Section 5. Regular meetings of the members shall be held on days specified by the Board at its first meeting of each calendar year. Each special meeting may be called by the chairperson or by petition of Five st regular members whenever necessary. Each member shall be given three days written notice of the time and place of all meetings. Elected or appointed members who find that they are unable or unwilling to attend regularly -scheduled meetings of the Board shall inform the board secretary of this fact, and such members shall be replaced. Absence by any members from two consecutive Board meetings or three sib meetings per year shall be grounds for replacement of the member, upon a majority vote of the Board and the appointment of a new member by the City Council. Section 6. F4ve i voting members and the chairperson constitute a quorum for transaction of the business of the Board. ARTICLE III Officers of the Board Section 1. The officers of the Board shall be a Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, and Secretary. Section 2. Officers shall be elected by members of the Board at the first meeting of each calendar year and shall serve for terms of one year beginning on February 1, or until a successor shall be elected. No officer shall be GEORGETOWN CONVENTION & VISITORS BOARD BYLAWS Revised May 10, 1996 eligible for election to the same office for more than two consecutive full terms. Upon completion of the chairperson' s term, the chairperson will continue to serve on the Board in an advisory capacity for one year in the event his or her term as an active member has expired. Section 3. Any vacancy occurring in any office may be filled by the Board, with the replacement officer to complete the unexpired term. Section 4. The officers shall perform the following duties: a. The Chairperson shall conduct all business meetings. The chairperson shall act as a public spokesperson for the Board, shall have the authority to call special meetings of the Board, and shall interpret decisions to the media and to the City Council. The chairperson shall vote only in cases of tie votes among other members. b. The Vice Chairperson shall assume the duties of the chairperson in his or her absence, or on occasions when the chairperson is unable to serve due to illness or other extenuating circumstances. C. The Secretary shall assume the duty of chairperson in the event neither the chairperson nor the vice chairperson is able to serve; shall record all of the official actions of the Board in the form of minutes which shall be kept for each Board meeting; shall inform other members in writing of specially -called meetings; and shall prepare, on consultation with the chairperson, an agenda for each meeting. Section 5. There shall be an executive committee composed of the officers and chairpersons of the board committees. The executive committee will administer the business of the Board between meetings of the Board of Directors. ARTICLE IV Committees Section 1. The Board shall have the power to establish committees which may work on ongoing and special projects of the promotion of tourism. Committee members need not be members of the Board of Directors; however, chairpersons of the committees shall be members of the Board. Section 2. The chairpersons of committees shall be appointed by the chairperson of the Board, subject to the approval of other members of the Board. Section 3. Standing committees report to and are responsible to the chairperson and the Board. GEORGETOWN CONVENTION & VISITORS BOARD BYLAWS Revised May 10, 1996 ARTICLE V Amendments The Board shall propose for approval by City Council amendments to the bylaws as may be required from time to time. ARTICLE VI Budget Section 1. The Board shall present a proposed budget for its annual operations to the Georgetown City Council each year. The Board shall comply with City deadlines for the preparation and presentation of its proposed budget, and the Board's fiscal year shall correspond to the City's fiscal year. Section 2. The Board shall have authority, subject to approval by City Council, to expend revenues generated by hotel/motel occupancy taxes which are designated by the City of Georgetown to be used for the promotion of tourism. Funds raised through grants or other means may also be utilized by the Board to promote tourism. Section 3. The Board shall not create debt or engage in deficit spending. Adopted by the Georgetown City Council and the Georgetown Convention & Visitors Board. Leo Wood, Mayor City of Georgetown, Texas Gordon Baker, Chairperson Georgetown Convention & Visitors Board Date Date GEORGETOWN CONVENTION & VISITORS BOARD BYLAWS Revised May 10, 1996 Council meeting date: S14-9 Item No. HI AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Consideration of naming the training facility on FM971 ITEM SUMMARY I have received the preferences for the naming of the house. These are provided in descending order. Katy Lake Conference and Training Center 2. (tie) Camp GT 2.(tie) Winfred Bonner Conference and Training Center 2.(tie) Georgetown Training Center 2.(tie) Pecan Branch Professional Development Center 6.(t1e) Rap Shack 6. (tie) Camp Georgetown 6. (tie) Berry Creek Retreat ATTACHMENTS None miffed b : /'-� 6� ,P� Bob Hart, City Manager J l Council Meeting Date: 05/14/96 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET Appoint one member to Georgetown Housing Authority Board. ITEM SUMMARY Due to the resignation of a current board member of the Georgetown Housing Authority Board, a new member needs to be appointed to complete the resigned person's term, which will expire in January, 1997. �� 11 11 \ • - Submitted By: Lv_ 27--, Leo Wood, Mayor .. CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP May 14, 1996 Manufactured Housing Developments: Policy Discussibn I. General Issues ➢ Definition • Manufactured Home • Mobile Home • Modular Home • Travel Trailer/RV ➢ Location Standards for Appropriate areas in the Community ➢ Appropriate Zoning Classification ➢ Purpose • Regular vs. Infd' l Housing • Permanent vs. Temporary Housing • "Granny" Flats ➢ Type • Individual Lot vs. Community • Park vs. Subdivision ➢ Affordability ➢ Inspection After Delivery (Transportation) H. Park/Community Issues ➢ Minimum Area (Acreage) ➢ Density/Lot Size ➢ Lot Shape/Orientation ➢ Streets • Design Standards • Public vs. Private • Construction Specifications • Street vs. Driveway ➢ Parking • Design Standards • Location ➢ V Utility Improvements • Design/Construction Standards • Public vs. Private ➢ Utility Connections • Master vs. Individual Meters ➢ Sidewalks ➢ Parkland • Public vs. Private ➢ Landscaping and Signage ➢ Storm Shelter City Council Workshop May 14, 1996 Page 2 III. Home Site Issues ➢ Foundation • Required? • Type: Slab, Pier, Etc. ➢ Size • Single vs. Double/Triple ➢ Aesthetics • Facade Materials • Orientation • Roof Design • Wheel Removal/Skirting • Add-ons/Out-buildings t IV. Other Issues Construction Standards City Council Workshop May 14, 1996 Page 3 1 I 11 1 0 RICHARTE LEARNING CENTER ' : n Allmtative )f aY to a High School Education " RICHARTE HIGH SCHOOL ADULT ABE / GED / ESL FAMILY LITERACY / ESL 2201 Old Airport Road Georgetown, 7cxas 78626 (512)819-0385 Office (512) 819-0386 Fax Jennifer Read, Director Dr. Jim G111111, Superintendent Sipriana "Chip" Richarte The Chip Richarte Learning Center is named in honor of Sipriana "Chip" Richarte. Chip was a registered nurse for Georgetown Independent School District fi-oni August 25, 1980 until her death on February 19, 1991. MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the staff at Chip Richarte High School is to provide students an opportunity to achieve their academic potential and prepare them for post- secondary life. Our goal is to mobilize the "Whole Village" to accept, include, and validate the limitations and potential of human systems. Our vision is that these measures, enacted in an atmosphere of acceptance and integrity, will produce confident life- long learners and productive citizens. RICHARTE, A SCHOOL OF CHOICE Society needs graduates who can function at high levels of verbal and math literacy and who have the foundation on which to build more sophisticated skills. In today's world it is not possible to cut short one's education and still become a productive citizen. The structure of traditional school does not meet the needs of all students. The small informal nature of Richarte makes it a more comfortable educational environment. Individualized curriculum and advanced technology make it possible for learning, rather than the clock or the calendar, to determine each student's progress toward graduation. Teachers at Richarte are first-rate professionals N-N-ho also serve as guides, coaches, facilitators and mentors. Their goal is to create an atmosphere of excellence in which students can succeed and develop into lifelong learners. i WHOLE VILLAGE RIIS acknowledges the powerful truth of the old proverb, "It Takes the Whole Village to Raise a Child," and has worked in collaboration with various local agencies and concerned citizens to provide excellent support services for all students. Literacy Council for Williamson County provides evening classes for ABE/GED & ESL. Williamson County Council on Alcohol and Drug Abuse has been funded for a grant which provides group and/or individual programs for all students and instructs pecr mcdiation. Williamson County health Dept. sends personnel to Rieharte weekly to conduct wellness and benefits screening. Student interns for Southwestern University help Richarte students by acting as liaison/advocate between them and the community. GIVE has sent mentors and proctors from the Georgeto%Nin area to tutor students in academic areas and guide them in a career planning program. First Presbyterian Church and First United Methodist Church keep our student food bank, supply shelf and clothes closet well stocked. ELIGIBIUTY AND ENROLLMENT Students are accepted on a self -referral basis only. Teen parents of any age may apply; all others must be at least 16 years old by the first day of school. The first step in the enrollment process is picking up an application which must be returned with a transcript. Following an entrance test, applicants will be contacted for follow-up interviews and additional paperwork. EVENING SCHOOL Evening School for students who wish to remain enrolled at their home campus and earn transfer credits is offered. Monday 4-8 Tuesdav 4-8 $125 for each 1/2 credit Applications must be accompanied by a transcript and permission from a guidance counselor at students home campus. RICHARTE HIGH SCHOOL Competency based diploma classes are from 8- noon or noon-4, Monday -Friday. These classes are English 1, 11, Ill, IV, World Literature, Creative Writing, Research/ Technical Writing, Practical/Business Writing; Physical Science, Biology, Health, Anatomy and Physiology, Environmental Science; World History, World Geography, American History, Government, Economics, Sociology and Psychology; Algebra 1, Algebra 11, Algebra 1.4, Informal Geometry, Geometry, Math of Money; Life Skills, Study Skills and Community Problem Solving Skills. IN -SCHOOL GED Classes are offered to students 17-21 years of age on Monday and Wednesday, 4-8. RICHARTE HIGH SCHOOL STAFF Steve Anderson, Social Studies Judy Bledsoe, Multi Disciplines Mary Ann Cabrera, Tech./Inst. R.C. Fry, Mentor , Lisa Garanflo, Scien1ce Jackie Gunn, English a Linda Hanner, School Nurse Jack Jenkins, Mentor Sarah Miranda, Human Resources Debbie Segler, M.O.C.T./Parenting It. B. Smith, Mentor Pete Weyrauch, Math Mary Whiteside, Secretary EAGLE WINGS CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM This program enables school -age parents to stay in school by offering quality care for their children. The Eagle Wings philosophy is to provide infants and toddlers a program in which they can grow to their fullest potential. This program is thriving under the direction of Kathy Keller. 91,95 RICHARTEVILLE • Richarteville is an interdisciplinary class at RHS. It is a class for anyone who likes to do hands on activities. Our project for this year was testing the water quality in the San Gabriel Rivers. We wanted to look at effects of runoff from neighborhoods along the rivers. Our class is trying to find out what exactly is in the water and where the pollution is coming from. We chose our location by figuring out what areas are used mainly for recreational purposes. With this in mind we decided to test at the Blue Hole, the San Gabriel Park low water crossing, and the San Gabriel Park foot bridge.. We tested the water for pH levels, hardness, E.coli, phosphate levels, and nitrate levels. Everything came normal except the E.coli bacteria. E.coli is standard indicator bacterium that is used to indicate fecal contamination of the water sources. The quality of the water is so poor that we would not recommend swimming in the Blue Hole where the E.coli is the highest. Our original hypothesis was that somehow, the effluent from the wastewater treatment plant was affecting the water quality. We toured and talked to people at the plant and discovered they have very high standards and have to report their test results to the city and state. Our group determined this was not where the bacterial pollution could be coming from. The class then hypothesized that the high E. coli levels were coming from rainfall runoff from the neighborhoods along the San Gabriel Rivers. We started i our study at the end of October and since that time we have less than 2 inches of rainfall so we ruled out that hypothesis. Our final hypothesis is that the bacteria is coming from old, faulty, defective sewer pipes in the Blue Hole area possibly along Scenic Drive. We searched this area and found several suspicious sites including one large pipe with raw sewage in the drainage ditch below it. We reported this to the city and they are investigating it. This class has been exciting and we have all learned a lot. We utilized math in our testing, discussed the governmental impact of water and even used English skill in order write our presentation. We hope to make a positive difference in our community. Richarteville is one way to do this. CHARLES KACZMAREK, Chris Bryce and tT� test water at the San Gabriel River low water crossing. lUcharte students test environmenw,.waters By cxwmxn nemms Aided by a state grant, eight Richarte High School students are making weekly trips the San Gabriel River to test the waters. After. gauging the river's water quality for their environmental sci- ence class, the students will try to determine pollution sources in the river and document their findings. "We test -three spots on the -San Gabriel and Blue Hole is the worst we've found," said senior Chris Bryce,16. "If people knew what was in there, they wnuldn't dive in." To assist the student effort, the Texas General Land Office recently awarded the class a $712 environ- mental challenge grant for testing supplies. The class will spend every week taking samples for project, which the students hope will continue af- ter they leave the school - Lisa Garanflo, yvho teaches the class, said the class also -will moni- tor the waters quality, take pic- tures of the items floating in the water and keep records of the water's pH and bacteria levels. Many students learned through EDUCATION SPOTLIGHT testing the river that their swim - wing spots were not as clean as they thought "I wouldn't swim in it, drink it or fish in it," said senior Hillary Fuller,: 17, .referring to the San Gabriel rivers. The class also plans to ask the City of Georgetown to put up signs to warn swimmers on days when the bacteria count is high, said senior Tracy Reid,18. _ "It'll be so they know when they probably shouldn't skim, like when E coli levels are high," Reid said. ' - Garanflo said the school plans to apply for more grants to buy chemi- cals and software for record -keep: ing. Future classes also will compare tap -water and river water tests to see how much cleaner drinking water is after treatment, Bryce said. The class also wants to test school water fountains • for water - quality, he said. . Bryce said there are many cul- prits in the trail of pollution. "People think it's the water treat- ment centers that -cause the pollu- tion, but it's the pesticides that farmers use," Bryce said. "We want to find out what's in the water, not blame anyone for it -."I remember when I first.moved here in 1984 the water was almost blue. Now it's black," Bryce- said. LF "I used to fish there but now there are little fish." • Junior Leticia Carrizales,17, col- lected a test tube full of water from the river at Blue Hole Park on Thursday. She and six other classmates then used chemicals to determine the pH of the water and the levels of E coli bacteria in the water. "Everybody in -general pollutes," Carrizales said. "People throw stuff in the river, there are the animals, and then there are the neighbor- hoods with all that - fertilizer and pesticides. Most folks don't realize they're all contributing, -. -and they're drinking it" GETTING TO KNOW E. COLI Water can become contaminated in many ways. In fact, there is always a certain level of bacteria in all water sources. E. coli is the standard indicator bacterium that is used to indicate fecal contamination of water. Human intestinal bacteria fall into the general group of bacteria known as coliforms. Coliform bacteria are found in human's (and most warm-blooded animals) lower Intestine and play an important role in digestion. If the bacteria is swallowed it can cause mild to severe diarrhea or even hemolytic uremic syndrome in children which can lead to kidney failure, brain damage, strokes, and seizures. Due to these health concerns, the Texas Department of Health set these standards: for primary contact waters (swimming) an average of no more than 200 fecal coliforms per 100 ml.; for noncontact waters (boating) an average of no more than 2000 colonies per 100 ml. In testing the three sites along the San Gabriel river, the highest awoant of E. coli was found in the Blue Hole, a favorite swimming spot for children and teens. We believe this fecal contamination could be leaking into the Blue Hole area from faulty sewage lines. Until the source is identified, citizens should be made aware of this dangerous pollutant. RICHARTE HIGH SCHOOL SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT - 1995-1996 rooa %W1. 6000. f= E. COLI BACTERIA TEST RESULTS FOR BLUE HOLE TESTING SITE et .. f,. . 5740 , .Fjh '-9 :: 5000 1 .,l :; r k } "I. . I..1,;: i �'+ tit=.- - 4Q00 1.r °' P F k .. ;.; 3 . . .. ;. .. .; M�+r :'a i. y µ1. 2000 r . 16fi0 1200 1280: f1. <, loon 1040 �1rJ rx. 94 : 3 a } ,' E�..: d; � ; f� O .. -.- '' ... ..: .. :' :.: Oct 31 Nov. 6 Nov. 15 Nov. 21 ` Dec. 5 Dec 18 Mar 271. Apr 4 Apr. 17 Page 1 RICHARTE HIGH SCHOOL SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT-1996-1996 Page 2 E. COLI BACTERIA TEST RESULTS FOR SAN GABRIEL PARK FOOTBRIDGE TESTING SITE RICHARTE HIGH SCHOOL SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT-1996-1996 SAN GABRIEL PARK - LOW WATER CROSSING Page 3 E. COLI BACTERIA TEST RESULTS FOR SAN GABRIEL PARK LOW WATER CROSSING TESTING ............... .... .. . SITE W�1 fAf/IrG THIS SECTION OF THE SAN GABRIEL RIVER MAY BE HA ZA RDO US FOR SWIMMING. RECENT WA TER TESTS Of THE SAN GABRIEL RIVER HAVE INVICA TEV HIGH LEVELS OF EwCOLI 8AC7ERlAo ic. Student Comments about Richarteville I've really got to say that Richarteville is one of my most favorite classes. I really enjoyed going to Austin and talking to T.A.A.E with my classmates ,and working with my favorite teacher Mrs.Garanflo. Sarah Ortiz Richarteville is a great class due to the fact that we get to go outdoors instead of being all crammed up inside the building all of the time. It is also a good learning experience knowing the difference of the water qualities in our Georgetown areas. Beck-e Miller I enjoy being a part of Richarteville. We do alot of exciting trips, and testing water samples from three diffrent areas. We all work together as a family. Jessica Gonzalez X ichsrteville has been a really good and experimental class for me. I've learned alot of things that I didn't know about our water. -We work together as a team. We also go out alot and get water samples to test fpr E-coli. Sandra Castillo Richarteville has been a very real experience. During the class I experienced the importance of awareness. I hope our awareness has made you aware, aware enough to help save our community's nature beauties. Lindsey Ball Richarteville has been a very good and experiential. class. The most exciting thing is the outdoor team work, that we all enjoy. A very important thing that I have learned is that we can really make a dilfernce. Christy Snider RichartMlle has beer a fu», leaming, mb worthwhile class. RichartMlle consists of clot of outhoor teamwork that l reall4 enjoy. Our water testing experiments will "lake a biffererce it the com"iunitrt. Amy 4 Rerbon X icharteville has been a great learning experience. I was able to learn alot about the water quality of the San Cabrie1,. ever. I enjoyed working with all the other students. It was a lot of fun trying to make our environment a better place. Amanda Paschall Richarteville has been an exciting class and I have thoroughly enjoyed it. Danielle Lester 111KE RICHARTEVIUX BECAUSE IT MADE ME AWARE OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND RAYS TO IMPROVE IT. MEI.ISSA WI3It']'FIIT 1 believe fhaf Richarfeville is fhe most valuable class fhaf I have Taken of Phis school. Tracy Swearingen (ZiC4-I(A2.rEVUE 6 (ALL (A5OU7` HAKiNG (A DIFF2.ENCE. > JOr ONLY iN 7-4AE LiV'E5 OF 74-IE 57-UDENr5 5Ur AL50 r4-IE VEOPLE OF 7- -AE COMMUNirY. 1 FEEL 74-(A7- Wir4a r4 l E 4AA2.D EFFO2.7-5 F2.OM (ZiC4-(A2.rEOLLE WE CAN HAKE OU2. ENOZONMENr (A 567TE2. ?LACE? (A ?LACE W E(Z.E 7446ZE (NZE NOr (ANY WO2.2.i E5, LIKE " 15 ri�6 WAZ-E2. 5AFE?", (AND "15 OU12 02ONE DEQLCM67" c(Z.i5rY t02.t3E5 Richarteville is a class that you can participate in to help make our community a better and cleaner place to live for ourselves and our children to come. Sylvia Espinoza Richarteville is a good learning experience for anybody. It teaches you how to test water for different chemicals so you can moniter the environment around you. This allows you to watch for hazourdous changes in your environment. If these changes occur you can take the necessary steps to fix or prevent these changes from damaging your environment. All this is due to Richarteville. It is just a great program that I think every school should have a program like this one. Wesley Schmidt Richarteville has been a wonderful learning experience for me this year. I really enjoyed going out into the community and testing the ecoli levels in the public water sources such as the San Gabriel River. I learned how to test water and not only did I learn science but I learned some computer skills and also speaking skills for an audience. Chris Truitt COMMUNITY OWNED UTILITIES DIVISION CIP SUMM4RY1997 - 2001 MAY1996 ELECTRIC SYSTF-MAVROiTF�NTS 1997 rJrn QT7A n fe n v ELECTRIC CIP PROJECTS 1997 LUTHER DRIVE AND ROCKMOOR DRIVE Install one capacitor bank on Chief Brady Braker-40 for power factor correction. Install a 3-200 kvar, 7,200 Volt, switched capacitor bank near the intersection of Luther Drive and Rockmoor Drive. This capacitor bank will help correct the load growth demand to a power factor to above 95%. The current sensing switch will turn the bank off during light load periods to help reduce line losses. This project is estimated to cost $7,000. GARRIEL SUBSTATION: TO LAIEWAY DRIVE AND LONESOME TRAIL Reinsulate approximately 2.4 miles of three-phase, 7,200/12,500 Volt line to 14,400/24,900 Volt capacity from Gabriel Substation to near the intersection of Lakeway Drive and Lonesome Trail. If served at 14,400/24,900 primary voltage, this feeder would then be able to serve as a back up feed to Sun City. This and all main feeder lines North of Lakeway Drive are planned for conversion to this higher voltage. The estimated cost of project to be $24,000. COUNTY ROAD 151 Tie Gabriel Braker-20 to Gabriel Braker-90 near County Road 151. Gabriel Braker-20 to utilize the existing Gabriel Braker-90,14,400 Volt substation bay. This switch is needed so that feeder Gabriel Braker-20 can serve as a backup supply to Sun City. Cost included in the Lakeway and Lonesome Trail costs. LAKEWAY DR. AND LONESOME TRAH., TO END OF THREE PHASE LINE Reinsulate approximately 4.1 miles of three-phase, 7,200/125500 Volt line to 14,400/24,900 Volt capacity from near the intersection of Lakeway Drive and Lonesome Trail to the end of the three-phase line. This reinsulation is part of the voltage conversion process to allow all lines north of Lakeway Drive to utilize 14,400/24,900 primary voltage and will help maintain higher voltage levels with reduced line losses in the residential areas north of Lakeway Drive. Estimated cost for project is $41,000. ELECTRIC CIP —PAGE I ELECTRIC SYSTFMPWR0 MWENTS 1997 SEWSO DRIVE CIP .W IAAA fA P V Reinsulate approximately 0.3 miles of 3-phase, 7,200/12,500 kV line to 141,400/24,900 Volt capacity from Serenada Drive to near Granada Drive along Sinuso Drive. This project will allow the existing conductor to carry twice as much load without the need to upgrade the larger conductor. The estimated cost for project is $2,580. NORTH OF LAMWAY DRIVE Reinsulate approximately 12.0 miles of single-phase, 7,200 Volt line to 14,400 Volt capacity on all Gabriel Braker-30 single-phase lines north of Lakeway Drive. This project is a part of the upgrade to the area north of Lakeway Drive. Project cost estimated at $75,600. TRANSFORMER REPLACEMENT Replace approximately two hundred forty-two (242) 7,200 Volt distribution secondary transformers with 14,400 Volt distribution transformers. The replacement of these transformers is necessary due to the primary voltage conversion of all lines north of Lakeway Drive. Estimated cost for this project is $200,860. SERENADA DRIVE AND SEQUOIA TRAH, EAST Replace a 3-200 kvar, 7,200 Volt, fixed capacitor bank near the intersection of Serenada Drive and Sequoia Trail East with a 3-200 kvar, 14,400 Volt, switched capacitor bank. Project's estimated cost is $7,150.. The retired capacitor bank will be returned to the City's stock. The capacitor bank can be used anywhere on the City's remaining 7,200/12,500 volt distribution system. Retire a 3-328 amp, 7,200 Volt, voltage regulator bank from near the intersection of Serenada Drive and Sequoia Trail East. The voltage conversion of feeder Gabriel Braker-30 to 14,400/245900 volts improves the voltage drop on this line to the point where voltage regulation is no longer required beyond the Substation. Estimated cost of project is $1,500. The retired voltage regulators will be returned to the City's stock. Retired voltage regulators can be utilized as needed elsewhere on the City's remaining 7,200/12,500 volt distribution system. ELECTRIC CIP - PAGE 2 ' ELECTRIC SYSTWWROVF MUS 1997 CIP SU AMY rip GRANADA DRIVE AND BELLO CIRCLE Replace a 3-200 kvar, 7,200 Volt, fixed capacitor bank between Granada Drive and Bello Circle with a 3-200 kvar, 14,400 Volt, fixed capacitor bank. Due to the conversion of feeder Gabriel Braker-30 to 14,400/24,900 capacity, it is necessary to replace this 7,200 volt capacitor bank with a capacitor bank rated for operation at the higher voltage level. Estimated cost of project is $3,300. FT SERF NADA DRIVE AND SINUSO DRIVE 0 Replace a 3-200 kvar, 7,200 Volt, fixed capacitor bank near the intersection of Serenada Drive and Sinuso Drive with a 3-200 kvar, 14,400 Volt, fixed capacitor bank. Project necessary to install capacitor bank rated for higher voltage operation. Project's estimated cost is $3,300. HIGHWAY 81 AND F.M. 2606 (9 Install one (1) capacitor bank on Gabriel Braker-90 for power factor correction. Install a 3-200 kvar, 7,200 Volt, switched capacitor bank northwest of the intersection of US Highway 81 and F.M. 2606. Due to load growth long F.M. 971, this feeder is expected to exhibit a power factor less than 95%. This switched capacitor bank will correct the power factor on this feeder to above 95%, and the current sensing switch will turn the bank off and on as needed, helping to minimize line losses. Estimated cost is $7,000. Install one (1) sectionalizing air -break switch to enable load transfers between Georgetown Braker-10 and Gabriel Braker-90 east of the intersection of Highway 81 and F.M. 2606. Will allow for efficient and safe transfer of load between these feeders during outage or other emergency conditions. Estimated cost is $3,150. 7TH STREET Install one (1) sectionalizing air -break switch to enable load transfers between Georgetown Braker-10 and Gabriel Braker-90 along the M.K.T. Railroad north of the cemetery on 7th Street. Will allow the City Electric to quickly and safely transfer load between these feeders during outage or other emergency conditions. Estimated cost is $3,150. ELECTRIC CIP - PAGE 3 n ELECTRIC SYYTEMAIPROVEWNTS 1997 HART STREET TRANSFORMERS CM .W MAfe D v Replace approximately eight (8) 2,400 Volt, pad -mounted distribution transformers with 7,200 Volt, pad -mounted distribution transformers along Hart Street between 17th and 18th Streets. These antiquated, high loss transformers are proposed to be replaced with more efficient 7,200 volt pad mounted transformers. This will eliminate the only 2,400 volt transformers remaining on the City's distribution system. Project cost estimated at $12,000. Retire one (1) step-down transformer bank near the intersection of Hart and 17th Street. The replacement of the transformers on Hart Street negates the need for this step transformer. Estimated cost for this project is $1,300. CUSTOMER CONTROLLED LOAD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPGRADE This project is for necessary new services and maintenance required on the new CCLM System implemented in 1996. Estimated annual cost is $10,000. ELECTRIC C.I.P. PROJECTS These projects are to construct new services into new subdivisions and new commercial and residential services needed throughout the system. Projected cost for 1996-1997 is $350,000. ELECTRIC CIP - PAGE 4 ELECTRIC SYSTEMAVROVEMENTS 1997 ELECTRIC SUN CITY UP PROJECTS 1997 SUN CITY LIFT STATION C1P .CT TAAAAd R v Construct approximately 0.75 mile of three-phase, #500 MCM Cu, 14,400/24,900 Volt underground distribution feeder line from the #336 AAC, three-phase, overhead line at the Sun City Lift Station, northwest along Trail of the River to Sun City Boulevard. The purpose of this project is to loop Sun City Electric System to provide backup feeds. Estimated cost of this project is $157,500. ANDICE ROAD Install two (2) capacitor banks consisting of six (6) 200 kvar, 14,400 Volt capacitors each on F.M. 2338 near the Sun City Development. This project is designed to prevent severe voltage drop at Sun City before completion of Glasscock Substation. Approximate cost is $841000. SUN CITY SECTIONALIZING EQUIPMENT ADDITIONS 11 The purpose of this project is to allow sectioning off certain electric lines for repairs or maintenance in the future without having whole streets without power. Approximate cost is $10,000. SUN CITY UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION LINES Construct underground distribution facilities to serve approximately 425 residences. This underground will include Neighborhoods 6, 7, 8 and 12. Cost of this project would be approximately $340,000. SUN CITY MAIN UNDERGROUND FEEDER LINE Construct approximately 0.4 miles of three-phase, #500 MCM Cu, 14,400/24,900 Volt underground distribution main feeder line to serve Phase I of the Sun City Development. This is completion of the backup service tie to Sun City Boulevard from Trail of the River. Construction will be along Sun City Boulevard; yet to be constructed. Approximate cost of project is $84,000. ELECTRIC UP - PAGE 5 11 °rt 14E LEC ' 17ELEC •`t , ^�' 4,'llK..7,,,!!7•{ ilj�,^'7'r~�'Y 'VS"� ;: }y., �,.4ul ir .401 S , I SIK SA ELECTRIC C.I.P. 96/97 M"` 1 ELEC-LUTHER DR. AND ROCKMOOR;i',' `y DR. (CAPACITOR BANK) 2ELECGABRIEL SUBSTATION TO ,f�. S ikx �-' LAKEWAY DR. AND LONESOME TRAIL (REINSULATE) �"q'`"'d� 4; 3ELEC-COUNTY RD. 151 (CIRCUIT SWITCH CONNECTION) 4ELEC-LAKEWAY DR. AND LONESOME TRAIL TO END OF THREE-PHASE LINE (REINSULATE) 5ELEC-SINUSO DR. (REINSULATE) 65 Ell ..F .:--'NOPTA€ OF !_ KF`,jA`: DR.. : RDN�#_;[_ATE) E_LE - !'Rr.N`_>I !'Iw,ME-i-' : E' P LA%1`jEME"'N N'C. I D L N I S j 6EL'-i . ..ABOVE) 8ELEC- SERENADA DR. AND' SEQUOIA TRAIL EAST (CAPACITOR BANK) 9ELEC-GRANADA DR. AND BELLO CIRCLE (CAPACITOR BANK) 10ELEC-SERENADA DR. AND SINUSO DR. (CAPACITOR BANK) 1 1 ELEC-HIGHWAY 81 AND F.M. 971 (CAPACITOR BANK) 12EL�C-7TH STREET (AIR SWITCH CONNECTION) 13ELEC-HART STREET TRANSFORMERS REPLACEMENT 2 c I Ors" ;•o.:n ,' nd�.......... ..' / Y ,2�Lr/1, ys:r�tia: 4t ` S ^.it,�•„Vlaa`,�ri'�.P'"rJ//y� /' rSyr•'_., �y N,. i S, • �. a`.'.t._�:t+`r"�,"'�'•t,�. t " .,.cY:....wmNK�ir,,,l• v5#• <„'`"' L rJrr•la.'�, wz _•,•) 5 jyylMyry i.�••`/'"yk.' l� ��4����ylY�,,t% r(`'ir�.yq��n,•.,✓". '�.iY.....m�•",.. S 9$ S �i, antis' \po? j 14ELEC-SUN CITY LIFT STATION (DISTRIBUTION FEEDER) 15ELEC-ANDICE ROAD (CAPACITOR BANK) l .!:lt(-���l`�L?�'.►� t %I/`i 1 PIBU S IC iN LINES / !IDiSTREBUTION I`}-iCI;_..l IE'.:, vv X.- : 17ELEC-SUNCITY MAIN UNDERGROUND FEEDER LINE (SERVING PHASE 1) •`4 Prepared by: Community Owned Utilities L ELECTRIC SYSTE t1PROYF1vfF.N7S 1997 CIP SU' RUARY 0 CONSTRUCTION OF GLASSCOCK SUBSTATION The City of Georgetown has identified a new substation, George W. Glasscock, as a future system addition by December 1997. The proposed substation will be served by a new transmission line linking the Gabriel and Andice substations. Initially, it will feed the Sun City development load at the George W. Glasscock substation radially from the Gabriel 138 kV substation. Loop service will be provided by upgrading the 69 kV line from Leander to Andice to 138 kV service, then constructing a new 138 kV line from Andice to George W. Glasscock. Eventually the 69 kV line from Andice to Burnet will also have to be converted to 138 kV operation. The City of Georgetown FY 1997 funding requirement for this project is estimated at $238661,000. This project will provide the capacity necessary to serve new load additions in the Sun City development, and will also support pport new City of Georgetown and Pedernales Electric Cooperative ancillary growth in the area which is beginning to occur as a result of this new development. ELECTRIC CIP - PAGE 6 Al vw- ELECTRIC C.I.P. 96/97 W� ELEc18-CUN3TRUCOON OF »^ v'- QLASSCOCK SUBSTATION (INCREASE ELECTRICAL ' CAPACITY FOR SUN CITY AND OTHER FUTURE AREA GROWTH) Prepared by: Community Owned Utilities WATER SYSTT.MIMPROVF.M NYS 1997 WATER CIP PROJECTS 1997 TURTLE BEND 20" WATER LINE CIP SUAIMARY The Turtle Bend water line is the northern portion of the West Loop Water Line Project. The project is designed to tie the north and south pressure planes together. This project will be important to defer more costly system improvements associated with Sun City. Estimated cost is $155,000. AUSTIN AVENUE LINE FROM 12TH TO 17TH This project is to replace the existing water line. The existing line is old and in constant need of repair. Fire flows will be improved by 35% as a result of this construction. Cost for this project is estimated at $ 12500. WEST LOOP/D.B. WOOD RO /2338 - REGIONAL WATER Designed to connect the 12" water line on D.B. Wood Road to Oakcrest H in order to loop the entire water system. This will enable the City to feed water in any direction of our water system. This project will also allow use of more elevated storage on Rabbit Hill and to extend future construction of new storage. This project is estimated to cost $584,000. WATER CAPITAL PROJECTS Capital projects that may arise during the 1997 budget year due to development and growth. These projects will address new subdivisions and growth that cannot be quantified but that we know will develop prior to October 1997. Estimated cost of these projects is $50,000. CUSTOMER CONTROLLED LOAD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Required for new services and maintenance on the CCLM System implemented in 1996. Estimated cost of service and maintenance is $132,000. WATER CIP -PAGE 1 0 WATER SYSTFMIMPROVEA4WTS 1997 LAKE WATER PLANT IMPROVEMENTS - RE -RATING UP SUMMARY This project will enable the City to meet the future projected water capacity needs by re -rating the Lake Water Treatment Plant for a 1.5 MGD expansion at $.50 per gallon of water. New plant construction costs are estimated at $1.00 per gallon of water. The re -rating project will defer debt financing for a new water treatment plant for at least 2, and possibly 3 years. The approximate cost for this project is $1,100,000. FOURTH PUMP A SEQUOIA SPUR TANK Adding the fourth pump at Sequoia Spur will enable the City to meet the state requirements for minimum storage capacity for the predicted growth as defined by TNRCC. Cost of this project is estimated to be $161 NO. WATER CY -PAGE 2 1 1�(1141 61'"ffy, .......... ... ..... .. ........ % ... ... . ... kQ 4W♦ I W . .......... . . I W t .... ..... . ...... . ......... . .......... ............. . S 4 1�. N-Y V 0_0 3W- P, _�welk . . ......... WATER C.I.P. 96/97 1W—TURTLE BEND 20* 'WATER LINE J . . ......................... 2W—AUSTIN AVENUE LINE FROM 12TH TO 17TH /v , ". 3W—WEST LOOP/D.B. WOOD RD./2338— - REGIONAL WATER V 4W—LAKE WATER PLANT IMPROVEMENTS —RE —RATING f j 5W—FOURTH PUMP @ SEQUOIA SPUR RANK ...... ....... ......... .... Prepared by: Community Owned Utilities WASTEWATER SYSTF.MIAPROYENMTS 1997 CIP S UARK, 4 R Y WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS 1997 EDWARDS AQUIFER I & I This study is required by the Texas Water Commission. The wastewater line will be monitored and studied to determine how much extraneous moisture, including rainfall, is going into the sewer system and being processed. The study will help determine how to correct the problem and alleviate unnecessary moisture from being processed at the Dove Springs Wastewater Treatment Plant. Reports and construction will be done by both in house staff and outside consultants. Estimated cost of this project is $50,000. NORTH 81 SEWER: NEW SERVICE The north 81 sewer line will provide city sewer to the industrial businesses on the west side of Business 81 and provide capacity for further industrial growth in this area. The proposed portion of the sewer line will be linked to the already existing portion on the east side of Business 81 The estimated cost for this project is $160,000. SMITH BRANCH PHASE H The Smith Branch wastewater line will be redone to correct the I & I problem stated in the above Edwards Aquifer I & I project that affects the Dove Springs Wastewater Treatment Plant. Cost of this project is estimated at $482,098. SMITH BRANCH FEEDER The purpose of the Smith Branch Feeder line is to divert wastewater from 15th Street south to the Smith Branch Interceptor in order to lessen the capacity load on the San Gabriel Wastewater Treatment Plant and divert the wastewater to the Dove Springs Wastewater Treatment Plant. Estimated cost of this project is $40,588. CAPITAL PROJECTS FOR SEWER: NEW CONSTRUCTION j As situations arise due to development and growth during the Fiscal Year of 1997, budgeting will allow additional construction projects necessary for the sewer system. These projects will address new subdivisions and growth that cannot be quantified but that we know will develop prior to October 1997. Estimated budget amount allotted for this is $100,000. WASTEWATER CIP -PAGE I 1 WASTEWATER SYSTEMB PROVEMENTS 1997 CIP SU,?►1t MY CUSTOMER CONTROLLED LOAD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPGRADE This project is for necessary new services and installation of additional connection points required on the new CCLM System implemented in 1996. Estimated annual cost is $10,000. SEQUOIA TRAIL WEST SEWER LINE - PHASE I This project is designed to extend wastewater lines to Sequoia Trail West at Serenada Drive and then south along Serenada Drive to Williams Drive to accomodate the future commercial development occurring on Williams Drive and provide full City services to areas that could potentially be annexed by the City. The estimated cost of this project is $4005000. WASTEWATER CY - PAGE 2 QMO 7 5RAN Cry Md"ZT-1 Z'WA'14 . ......... If N,_ ,I S"I W- � P .......... d. ..... ........ . .. ....... .... ... ...... f#'r'44 '; 59'r'..�''r''''"h" •'Yr'". .N'N'do 0-4 �: . . ........ A .. . . ............... . I........ . A ? e tt 4 4 i;3i ...... ... ....... ...... . g, co . . ... ON' 1'� %e"k e �Z, \".'A" - , 7 %\ �j Y .. ... ......... 0 7 Wd V ....... . ... ........... . Ax iA . .............. _"l ��T ;4 . . ... ... =,�. --- I "A A, twe 001? WASTEWATER C.I.P. 96/97 1WW—EDWARDS AQUIFER 1&1 1 ...... . ... 2WW—NORTH 81 SEWER: NEW SERVICE ......... 3WW—SMITH BRANCH PHASE 11 (CORRECT IM) 4WW—SEQUOIA TRAIL WEST SEWER LINE —PHASE 1 5WW—SMITH BRANCH FEEDER (DIVERT WW) I- 0 Prepared by: Community Owned Utilities io- STREET SYS7F.MIMPROVEMEIM 1997 STREET CH' PROJECTS 1997 16TH STREET (MAPLE TO OLIVE): MAINTENANCE C'IP STIMUAPY This project is designed to relieve traffic congestion on Olive and 15th. The upgrading of 16th Street will allow traffic to go to and from Annie Purl Elementary school by way of Maple. The project is estimated to cost $35,000. ROCKMOOR TO IH35; TRAFFIC MOVEMENT IMPROVEMENT This extension, in combination with the State moving it's IR35 entrance ramp south of the Rockmoor intersection, will allow traffic access to the interstate without entering Leander Road and therefore relieve the traffic on Leander Road. Right -of -Way will be required. Estimated cost will be $1105,000. NORTHWEST BLVD. TO SERENADA DRIVE - NORTHWEST QUADRANT As part of the Northwest Quadrant & Roadway Study, construction of Northwest Blvd. will give Serenada traffic an alternate route to IH35 as well as relieve the heavy traffic on Williams Drive (2338). This project's estimated cost is $750,000. LAKEWAY DRIVE (2338) TO LONESOME TRAIL Lakeway Drive will be widened to from 2338 to Lonesome Trail. Estimated cost of project to be $103,000. SEAL COAT Annual maintenance of City streets on an as needed basis. The focus of the 1997 Budget will be maintenance and repair in old town. Cost for maintenance is estimated at $50,000. REHABILITATE DOWNTOWN STREETS Main Street from 6th Street to 9th Street is to be repaired. The cost of this project is estimated at $110,000. STREET CIP - PAGE I 4 STREET SYS7EMWR0VFIVENTS 1997 CIP SUA,IMARY OVERLAY Overlay is the annual maintenance of streets on an as needed basis and is estimated to cost $150,000. AIRPORT ROAD (LAKEWAY TO CAM - NORTHWEST QUADRANT Airport Road from Lakeway to Cavu will be reconstructed and rehabilitated. Cost for this project is estimated at $724,500. 15TH STREET PROJECT Due to information provided during Engineering of this project in the 1995-1996 Budget, this street will be reconsidered for construction in the 1996-1997 Budget. The construction includes the area from Hutto Road to San Jose Street on 15th Street. Estimated cost of this project is $500,000. STREET UP - PAGE 2 5A4N 0"*TY . .... ... . ..... /7"t A,1 v k ............ .......... . . ........ . ......... Ok I . .. .......... 11 st .............. ... . . ........ .......... , :-7 . ... ..... ....... ... .......... A $SfR ♦ t'3STR tTR ...... -" R f _q� A . ........ 0. L STREET C.I.P. 96/9 i ;.p 1STR-16TH STREET MAPLE TO OLIVE . ............ . ' s' (MAINTENANCE) 2STR-ROCKMOOR TO IH35 (TRAFFIC MOVEMENT IMPROVEMENT) 3STR--NORTHWEST BLVD. TO SERENADA DR. . ......... NORTHWEST QUADRANT 4STR-LAKEWAY DR.(2338) TO LONESOME TRAIL 5STR-REHABILITATE DOWNTOWN STREETS .... ........ (MAIN T. FROM 6TH TO 9TH) . . .......... 6STR-AIRPORT ROAD (LAKEWAY TO CAVU) NORTHWEST QUADRANT (RECONSTRUCT & REHABILITATE) .. 2% 7STR=-15TH STREET PROJECT (RECONSTRUCT) ............ . ..... ....... Prepared by: Community Owned Utilities rA DRAINAGE SYSTEM APR 0VF.MF.NTS 1997 STORMWATER DRAINAGE CIP PROJECTS 1997 18TH AND PINE CIP SUAIVARY This project will be done by contract services. The intersection of 18th and Pine is to be redesigned and reconstructed. At present this intersection has no drainage and is an extreme traffic hazard. Estimated cost of this project is $140,000. CURB AND GUTTER Annual maintenance and curb placement where necessary. The locations for curb and gutter are as follows: 13th Street from College to Ash, 14th Street from College to Elm, College Street to widen at 12th Street intersection from 12th to 13th, 4th Street from Rock to Business 81, College Street and 19 1/2Street, and Walnut north of Highway 29. Cost of this maintenance and placement is estimated at $25,000. W. 22ND STORMWATER TRUNK LINE EXTENSION AT HOSPITAL This project is a result of an easement acquisition coordination with Georgetown Hospital and is an extension of the W. 22nd Street Drainage Project constructed in 1996. Estimated cost is $100,000 and will be done in conjuction with the expansion of the Georgetown Hospital. DRAINAGE CY -PAGE 1 -/ STORMWATER DRAINAGE C.I.P. 96/97 1STM-'18TH AND PINE (STREET INTERSECTION REDESIGN) 2STN-VV22ND 8T0RMV&«JER TRUNK LINE EXTENTl0N AT HOSPITAL / IF It Prepared by: Community Owned Utilities FUTURE CIP SYSTEM IMPROYEMF.NTS 1997 - 2001 FUTURE ELECTRIC PROJECTS 1997 - 1998 Capacitor Additions System Improvements Electric Capacity Project: New Service Line Protection/load Distribution Breaker Additions 1999-2000 System Improvements GIS/Database Project Electric Capacity Project FUTURE SUN CITY ELECTRIC PROJECTS 1997-1998 Underground Construction Sectionalizing Equipment 1999-2000 Underground Construction io FUTURE WATER PROJECTS 1997-1998 Water Capital Projects - Square District Sun City - Construct Pump Station Sun City - Construct Elevated Storage West Loop water line to Sequoia tank - Regional Water Customer Controlled Load Management - System Upgrade 1998-1999 Lakeway Drive 12" water line from Airport Road to FM 2338 FUTURE CIP -- PAGE I CIP SUMMARY Electric Capacity Project Protective Devices Capacitor Additions Sectionalizing Equipment GIS/Database Project System Improvements 2000-2001 Protective Devices Capacitor Additions Electric Capacity Project 1998-1999 Underground Construction 2000-2001 Underground Construction FUTURE CIP SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 1997 - 2001 West Loop water line from Thousand Oaks to US 81 Water Capital Projects - System Isolation College at Pine - Maintenance Upgrade Sequoia Spur Ground Tank - Repaint tank Leander Elevated Tank - Repaint tank Southwest Loop - County Road 116 Customer Controlled Load Management - System Upgrade 1999-2000 IH 35 Crossing - Regional Water Customer Controlled Load Management - System Upgrade 2000-2001 Customer Controlled Load Management - System Upgrade West Loop - Enlarge Main Size - Regional Water Railroad Crossing - Maintenance Upgrade Plant Modifications - SDWA 1995 Amendments Bore 81 Crossing - Maintenance Upgrade San Gabriel Intake - Increase Available Capacity Customer Controlled Load Management - System Upgrade - Sun City - New Ground Storage/feeder FUTURE WASTEWATER PROJECTS 1997-1998 Utility Trench Repairs Wastewater CIP 97/98 Crystal Knoll Lift Station - Replace Pumps & Motors Oakcrest Replacement - Phase 3 Smith Branch - Phase 3 South Fork - Phase 1 Customer Controlled Load Management - System Upgrade 1998-1999 Utility Trench Repairs River Study - Phase 2 - 1995 TNRCC Mandate Utility Capacity Projects - Sewer 98/99 - New Construction - Pecan Branch - Phase 2 FUTURE CIP - PAGE 2 CIP ATAIVARY FUTURE CIP SYSTEMWROYEMENTS 1997 - 2001 Pecan Branch Wastewater Treatment Plant Smith Branch - Phase 4 West Street Collector - Phase 1 Customer Controlled Load Management - System Upgrade 1999-2000 Utility Trench Repairs Golden Oaks Lift Station Relief System Evaluation Smith Branch - Phase 5 South Industrial Customer Controlled Load Management - System Upgrade 2000-2001 Utility Trench Repairs Utility Capital Projects - Wastewater System Evaluation Edwards Aquifer I & I - TNRCC Required Pecan Branch - Phase 3 Smith Branch - Phase 6 Williams Drive Lift Relief Customer Controlled Load Management - System Upgrade FUTURE STREET PROJECTS 1997-1998 C[P .1?T Xf",4 RV io Street Rehabilitation Program - Maintenance Power Road (2338 to Gabriel View) - Improvement of Traffic Movement Hutto Road (Highway 29 to 18th) - Improvement of Traffic Movement DB Wood/Oakcrest Tie - Northwest Quadrant Improvements Lakeway Drive (Lonesome Trail to Northwest Boulevard) - Northwest Quadrant Improvements Street Replacement - Maintenance Sequoia Spur (2338 to Sequoia Trail West) - Northwest Quadrant Improvements Rehabilitate Downtown Streets - Blocks around the Square Seal Coat - Maintenance Overlay - Maintenance FUMRE CIP -- PAGE 3 FUTURE CIP SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 1997 - 2001 1998-1999 CIP SUMMARY Inner Loop to Churchill - Improvement of Traffic Movement Airport Road (Cavu to Sanaloma) - Northwest Quadrant Improvements Street Rehabilitation Program - Maintenance Seal Coat - Maintenance Rehabilitate Downtown Streets - Blocks around the Square County Road 116 (Westinghouse to IH 35) - Stormwater Utility Lakeway Drive (Northwest Boulevard to Airport) - Improvement of Traffic Movement Overlay - Maintenance 1999-2000 Rehabilitate Downtown Streets - Blocks around the Square Street Replacement - Improvement of Traffic Movement Seal Coat - Maintenance Overlay - Maintenance Booty's Crossing to Dam - Northwest Quadrant Improvements Southwestern Boulevard to Inner Loop - Improvement of Traffic Movement 2000-2001 Vortac (Pilot to Airport) - Northwest Quadrant Improvements Shell Spur - Northwest Quadrant Improvements Street Rehabilitation Program - Major Arterials f Sequoia Trail East (Granada to Serenada) - Improvement of Traffic Movement Northwest (IH 35 to US 81) - Northwest Quadrant Improvements D.B. Wood (Hwy 29 to FM 2243) - Northwest Quadrant Improvements Shell Road (FM 2338 to Shell Ranch) - Northwest Quadrant Improvements FUTURE STORMWATER DRAINAGE PROJECTS 1997-1998 Curb & Gutter 1999-2000 Curb & Gutter FUTURE CIP - PAGE 4 1998-1999 Curb & Gutter 2000-2001 Curb & Gutter