Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda CC 11.28.2017
Notice of M eeting of the Governing B ody of the City of Georgetown, Texas November 28 , 20 17 The Ge orgetown City Council will meet on No vember 28, 2017 at 6:00 PM at Co uncil Chambers - 101 East 7th Street The City o f Georgetown is committed to co mpliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you re quire assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or ac c ommo datio ns will be provided upo n request. P lease contact the City Se c retary's Office, at least three (3 ) days prio r to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930- 3652 o r City Hall at 113 East 8th Street fo r additional information; TTY use rs ro ute through Relay Texas at 7 11. Re gular Se ssion (This Regular Sessio n may, at any time, be re cessed to convene an Executive Se ssio n for any purpose authorize d by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Go vernment Code 551.) A Cal l to Order Invocati o n P l e dg e of Al l egi ance Co mments from the Mayor Ci ty Co unci l Regi onal Board Re po rts Announcements - City Bo ards & Commissions Ac c e pting Applications Ac ti on fro m Executi ve Sessi on Statutory Conse nt Age nda The Statuto ry Co nsent Agenda includes no n-c ontroversial and routine items that may be acted upon with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda. B Consideration and possible action to appro ve the mi nutes of the Wo rksho p and Regular Meeting held on Tuesday, November 14, 20 17 -- Shelley Nowling, City Secre tary C Consideration and possible action to vacate and abandon two ten fo ot publ i c uti l i ty ease ments, to taling 0.1657 acres (7 ,21 7 square feet) along the shared pro perty l i ne of Lots 41 and 42 , Block D, of the Final Plat o f the P reserve P hase II, as depic ted in that certain plat reco rded in Document No. 200907 76 78 of the Official Public Rec ords of Williamson County, Texas and to authori ze the Mayor to e xecute a qui tcl ai m deed --Travis Baird, Real Estate Page 1 of 454 Se rvices Coo rdinator D Consideration and possible action to vacate and abandon two 0.34 ac re tracts of land, total i ng 0 .68 acres, o ut of the Antonio Flores Survey, Abstract 235, l ocate d at the so uth east corner of No r th East Inner Loop and Nor th Austi n Ave. and being a remainde r of that 2.004 acres deeded to the City o f Georgetown in Docume nt 2 00 20 96046 of the Official P ublic Records of Williamso n County, Texas and to authori ze the Mayor to execute a deed w i thout w arranty -- Travis Baird, Real Estate Services Co ordinator E Fo rwarded fro m the Parks and Recreatio n Adviso ry Bo ard: Consideration and possible action to grant an electrical easement and approval of a utility agreement for electrical service at Garey Park in the amount of $52,819.96 to Pedernales Electric Co o perative -- Kimberly Garrett, P arks and Recreation Director and Travis Baird, Real Estate Services Coordinator F F orw arded by the Parks and Re c r e ati on Advi sory Board: Consideration and possible action to appro ve a B uyBoard cooperati ve purchase contract for poo l fi l ters and i nstal l ati on at Wi l l i ams Dri ve P ool with P rogressi ve Co mmerci al Aquati cs o f Manor, TX in the amount of $57 ,87 1.3 0 -- Kimberly Garrett, Park and Recreation Director G F orw arded from the G eorgetow n Economi c Devel opment Cor po r ati on (G EDCO): Consideration and possible action to appro ve an agreement between Atmos Energy and the Geo rgeto wn Economic Developme nt Corpo ration (G EDCO) for natur al gas i nfrastructure i mpr ovement i n dow ntown -- Michaela Dollar, Economic Developme nt Director H F orw arded from the G eorgetow n Vi l l ag e Publ i c Improvement Di stri ct (G VP ID): Consideration and possible action to appro ve Task Order KPA-18-0 05 to Kasberg, P atri ck, and Associ ates, LP of Georgetown, TX in the amo unt of $59,490.00 fo r a l andscape, ameni ty, and w ayfi ndi ng si gnage masterpl an fo r the G eo rgetown Vi l l age P ubl i c Improvement Di stri ct - - Eric Nuner, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director I F orw arded from the G eorgetow n Transpo rtati on Advi sory Board (G TAB ): Consideration and possible action to award a contract to Pati n Co nstr ucti o n, LLC of Taylor, Texas fo r the constructi on of the 20 17 CDB G Sceni c Dri ve Si dew al k project in the amount o f $1 40 ,90 2.00 -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director/Michael Hallmark, CIP Manager J F orw arded from the G eorgetow n Transpo rtati on Advi sory Board (G TAB ): Consideration and possible action to appro ve a change order to MA Smi th Contracti ng Co mpany, Inc. in the amount of $11 8,8 05 .00 for Ci tyw i de Si dew al k Impro vements -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director Le gislative Re gular Age nda K P ubl i c Heari ng and Fi rst Readi ng of an Ordinance rezoni ng appro xi matel y 4.40 acres in the Fish Survey lo cated at 4819 Wi l l i ams Dri ve from the Nei ghborho od Commerci al (CN) Di str i ct, to Local Commerci al (C-1 ) Di stri ct -- Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Dire c to r (acti on requi red) L P ubl i c Heari ng and Fi rst Readi ng of an Ordinance granting a Speci al Use Permi t for an event fac i l i ty in the Mi xed-Use Dow ntow n zo ni ng di stri ct for 0.33 acres out of the City of Geo rgeto wn Subdivision, Block 26 , Lots 5 -6 located at 511 S. Mai n St. -- Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director (acti on requi r e d) M P ubl i c Heari ng and Fi rst Readi ng of an Ordinance granti ng a Spe c i al Use P ermi t (SUP) for mul ti -fami l y, attached dw el l i ng uni ts in the G eneral Commerci al (C-3 ) Zoni ng Di stri ct on the property located at 1515 and 1 53 1 Ri very Bl vd -- Sofia Nelso n, CNU-A, P lanning Director (acti o n requi red) N Consideration and possible action to appro ve a Resolution granti ng an excepti on to the use restr i cti ons included in the special warranty deed dated December 17 , 20 13 , conveyi ng the pr operty l ocated at 610 North Austi n Avenue , Georgetown, Texas -- Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director O Consideration and possible action to authori ze appl i cati on for a G LO Communi ty Page 2 of 454 Devel o pment Non-Housi ng B l o c k G rant for $850,000.00 to pr ovi de hazard mi ti gati on acti o ns to the CDBG i denti fi ed ar e as fro m the General Land Office -- John Sullivan, Fire Chief P F orw arded from the Housi ng Advi sory Bo ard: Consideration and possible action to appro ve a Resol uti on of no objecti o n, allowing P edcor Inve stments to apply for Housi ng Tax Credi ts to the State for the co nstructi o n of 192 units to be kno wn as the Resi dences at Sti l l w ater, located at approximate ly the 15 00 bl ock of NE Inner Loo p -- Susan Watkins, AICP, Housing Coordinator and Sofia Ne lson, CNU-A, Planning Dire c to r Q F orw arded from the Housi ng Advi sory Bo ard: Consideration and possible action to appro ve a Resolution acknow l e dg i ng that Georgetown has mo r e than tw o ti mes the averag e per capi ta amount of Housi ng Tax Credi t uni ts, allowing P e dco r Investments to apply for Ho usi ng Tax Credi ts to the State for the constructi on of 1 92 units to be known as the Resi denc es at Sti l l water, located at appro ximately the 1500 bl ock o f NE Inner Loop -- Susan Watkins, AICP, Ho using Coordinator and Sofia Nelso n, CNU-A, Planning Director R F i r st Readi ng of an Ordinance establ i shi ng the cl assi fi cati ons and number o f posi ti ons (Str e ng th o f F orce) for all the City of Geo rgetown F i re Fi ghters and Po l i ce Offi cers pursuant to Chapter 14 3 of the Texas Local Go vernment Code pertaining to Civil Service -- Tadd Phillips, Human Reso urces Director (acti o n requi red) S Se c ond Readi ng of an Ordinance to rezo ne approximately 3.235 acres in the P orter Survey located at 2 80 5 Mesqui te Lane fro m the Lo cal Commerci al (C-1) Di stri ct to the Mul ti - fami l y 1 (MF -1) Di stri ct -- Sofia Nelso n, CNU-A, P lanning Director (acti o n requi red) T Se c ond Readi ng of an Ordinance fo r the Vol untary Annexati on o f 24 4.8 6 acres in the Fredrick Foy Survey located approximately between the intersections of Ro nal d Reagan B oul evard at Co unty Road 245 and Ronal d Re agan B oul evard at Sun Ci ty B o ul evard to be known as Somerset Hi l l s-1 and for the Vol untary Annexati on of the adjacent ri ght-of-w ay known as Ronald Reagan Boulevard and County Ro ad 2 45 -- Chris Yanez, CNU-A, Assistant Planning Dire c to r (acti on requi red) U Se c ond Readi ng of an Ordinance fo r the Vol untary Annexati on o f 13 3.1 acres in the Fredrick Foy Survey located approximately alo ng and between the intersections of Ro nal d Reagan B o ul evard at County Road 245 and Ronal d Reagan Boul evard and Sun Ci ty B oul evard to be kno wn as Somerset Hi l l s-2 and fo r the Vol untary Annexati on of the adjacent ri ght-of-way kno wn as Ronald Reagan Boulevard -- Chris Yanez, CNU-A, Assistant Planning Director (acti on requi red) V Se c ond Readi ng of an Ordinance fo r the Vol untary Annexati on o f 12 0.5 3 acres in the Lewis P. Dyches Survey located approximately w est of the i ntersecti on of Ro nal d Reagan B oul evard and Co unty Road 245 to be known as Hi g hl and Vi l l age and for the Vo l untary Annexati on of the adjacent ri ght-of-w ay known as Ronald Reagan Boulevard and County Ro ad 245 -- Chris Yanez, CNU-A, Assistant Planning Dire cto r (acti on requi red) W Se c ond Readi ng of an Ordinance amendi ng the 2017 Annual Budget for year-end obligations that were no t known at the time the budget was adopted, appropriating various amounts thereof, and repealing all ordinances or parts o f ordinances in conflict therewith -- P aul Diaz, Budget Manager (acti on requi red) X Se c ond Readi ng of an Ordinance o f the City of Georgetown amendi ng the Code of Ordinances by adding Chapter 10.10 enti tl ed “Thru Truck Traffi c” and directing the Traffic Engineer to erect appro priate signs; repealing c onflicting o rdinances and Resolutio ns; pro viding a severability clause; providing for a penalty as state d in Section 1.08.010 of the Co de of Ordinances; providing fo r publicatio n and setting an effective date -- Octavio Garza, Public Works Director (acti on requi red) Proje ct Update s Y Pro ject updates and status reports re garding current and future transpo rtation and traffic project; street, sidewalk, and other infrastructure projects; police, fire and other public safety projects; eco nomic developme nt projects; city facility projects; and do wntown pro jects including parking Page 3 of 454 enhancements, city lease agreements, sanitatio n services, and possible direction to c ity staff -- David Mo rgan, City Manager Public Wishing to Addre ss Council On a subje c t that is posted on this agenda: Ple ase fill out a speaker registratio n form which can be found on the table at the entrance to the Council Chamber. Clearly print your name and the letter of the item on whic h you wish to speak and present it to the City Secretary on the dais, preferably prior to the start of the me e ting. You will be called forward to speak when the Council conside rs that item. On a subje c t no t po sted on the agenda: P e rso ns may add an item to a future City Co uncil agenda by contac ting the City Secretary no later than noo n on the Wednesday prior to the Tuesday meeting, with the subje c t matter o f the topic they would like to address and their name. The City Secretary can be reache d at 51 2/93 0-3651. Z - At the time of posting, no persons had signed up to address the City Council Exe cutive Se ssion In compliance with the Open Meetings Ac t, Chapter 551, Government Co de , Verno n's Texas Codes, Annotate d, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular se ssio n. AA Se c . 55 1.0 71 : Consul tati on wi th Atto rney Advic e from attorney about pending o r contemplated litigation and othe r matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Co uncil, including agenda items Se c . 55 1.0 72 : Del i berati ons about Real Pro perty Parc e l 5 , Airport Road -- Travis Baird Se c . 55 1:0 74 : Personnel Matte r s City Manager, City Attorney, City Se c retary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the appointment, employment, evaluatio n, reassignment, duties, discipline, o r dismissal Se c . 55 1:0 87 :Del i berati on Regardi ng Eco nomi c Devel opment Ne go ti ati ons - TLCC Update Adjournme nt Ce rtificate of Posting I, Shelley No wling, City S ecretary for the C ity of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , do hereby c ertify that this Notic e o f Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a p lac e read ily acc es s ib le to the general pub lic at all times , o n the _____ day of _________________, 2017, at __________, and remained so p o s ted for at leas t 72 c o ntinuo us ho urs p receding the s cheduled time of s aid meeting. __________________________________ Shelley No wling, City S ecretary Page 4 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Cal l to Order Invocati on Pl edge of Al l e gi ance Comments fro m the Mayo r Ci ty Counci l Re gi o nal Bo ard Reports Announcements - City Boards & Commissio ns Accepting Applicatio ns Acti on from Executi ve Sessi on ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Shelley Nowling, City Secretary Page 5 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to approve the mi nutes o f the Workshop and Re gular Meeting held on Tuesday, November 14, 20 17 -- Shelley Nowling, City Sec re tary ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: ATTACHMENT S: Description Regular Meeting Minutes 11.14.2017 Works hop Meeting Minutes 11.14.2017 Page 6 of 454 Minutes of Meeting of the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown, Texas Tuesday, November 14, 2017 The Georgetown City Council will meet on Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 6:00 PM at the Council Chambers at 101 E. 7th St., Georgetown, Texas The city of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary’s Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Mayor Ross called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. All Councilmembers were in attendance, with the exception of Ty Gipson, Councilmember District 5. Mayor Dale Ross, Anna Eby, District 1, Valerie Nicholson, District 2, John Hesser, District 3, Steve Fought, District 4, Rachael Jonrowe, District 6, and Tommy Gonzalez, District 7 were in attendance. Regular Session (This Regular session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.) A. Call to Order Invocation Pledge of Allegiance Comments from the Mayor Mayor Ross announced a meeting that he and Nicholson attended today. - Judge Bill Gravell Proclamation - National Hospice and Palliative Care Month - National Alzheimer’s Month Proclamation - Shop Small Saturday Proclamation City Council Regional Board Reports Mayor Ross said that he had attended the recent CAMPO meeting but did not have anything significant to report. Announcements - City Boards and Commissions Accepting Applications Action from Executive Session No motions were made out of Executive Session. Mayor Ross announced that Item M and Item N had been pulled from the agenda. Motion by Eby, second by Nicholson, to move Item I from the Consent Agenda to the Legislative Regular Agenda for discussion. Approved: 6-0 (Gipson absent) Page 7 of 454 Statutory Consent Agenda The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine that may be acted upon with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda. B. Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the Workshop and Regular Meeting held on Tuesday, October 24, 2017 and the Special Meetings held November 1, 2017 and November 2, 2017 -- Shelley Nowling, City Secretary C. Consideration and possible action to formally cancel the City Council meeting that would fall on the fourth Tuesday of December, cancelling the City Council meeting that would have fallen on December 26, 2017 – Shelley Nowling, City Secretary D. Consideration and possible action to enter into a Public Right of Way Maintenance and License Agreement with Woodhull Ventures 2015, L.P., to allow the installation and maintenance of stamped asphalt in the right- of-way known as Saddlecreek Avenue -- Travis Baird, Real Estate Services Coordinator E. Consideration and possible action to vacate and abandon a 0.013 acre Water and Wastewater Easement of variable width out the Woodruff Stubblefield Survey, Abstract 556, being that same easement granted by Paula and Monty Thomas to the City of Georgetown in Document No. 2011037148 of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas and to authorize the Mayor to execute a quitclaim deed -- Travis Baird, Real Estate Services Coordinator F. Forwarded from the General Government and Finance Advisory Board (GGAF): Consideration and possible action to approve the annual contract for facility access control and security technician to be provided by Convergint Technologies of Austin, TX who is the City’s current security, video surveillance, and access control provider in the amount of $83,000.00 -- Eric Nuner, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director G. Forwarded from the General Government and Finance Advisory Board (GGAF): Consideration and possible action to approve a consulting agreement with Plante Moran, PLLC for consulting services for a citywide risk assessment -- Elaine Wilson, Controller H. Forwarded from the General Government and Finance Advisory Board (GGAF): Consideration and possible action for the approval to purchase vehicles and equipment in the amount of $1,600,188.00 -- Stan Hohman, Fleet Services Manager I. Consideration and possible action authorizing the Mayor to execute a Right of Entry Agreement with Williamson County for due diligence analysis related to the Berry Creek Wastewater Interceptor -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director Item I was moved to the Legislative Regular agenda for discussion. Motion by Fought, second by Nicholson, to approve the Statutory Consent Agenda in its entirety, with the exception of Item I, which was moved to the Legislative Regular Agenda for discussion Approved: 6-0 (Gipson absent) Legislative Regular Agenda I. Consideration and possible action authorizing the Mayor to execute a Right of Entry Agreement with Williamson County for due diligence analysis related to the Berry Creek Wastewater Interceptor -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director Item I was moved from the Consent agenda to the Legislative agenda for discussion. Jim Briggs, General Manager of Utilities, explained changes in the agreement that had occurred at the County Commissioner’s Court that day. He explained that a right of entry agreement was requested from Williamson County for the Berry Creek Interceptor. Staff discussed this with the County and the County Commissioners unanimously approved the agreement with some non-substantive changes. Briggs spoke on the changes. Page 8 of 454 • City shall provide a weekly testing schedule to the County’s Parks Director prior to testing being performed each week within the County’s Berry Springs Park and Preserve, as well as provide a status update on all prior testing and any issues or damages resulting from such testing • At the City’s expense, Dr. Kemble White, PhD, PG of Cambrian Environmental shall oversee all subsurface testing and provide all testing protocol oversight to provide adequate protection of the County’s springs and other natural resources within the County’s Berry Springs Park and Preserve. To the extent that Dr. W hite deems his presence is necessary onsite during any testing, the City shall provide compensation for his onsite services Motion by Eby, second by Hesser, to approve Item I. Approved: 6-0 (Gipson J. Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance to Rezone approximately 3.235 acres in the Porter Survey located at 2805 Mesquite Lane from the Local Commercial (C-1) District to the Multi-family 1 (MF-1) District -- Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director (action required) Assistant Planning Director, Chris Yanez, spoke on a rezoning request for a property located at 2805 Mesquite Lane. He provided a location map, zoning map, future land use map, and an aerial view of the property. Yanez spoke on suburban mixed-use and medium density mixed housing for the project. Yanez provided the zoning description for Low-Density Multi-Family (MF-1) Page 9 of 454 Yanez listed the criteria for the zoning changes and said that staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission had found the request to be consistent in all areas and recommended approval. Yanez showed the Public Notifications map and said that staff had received just 1 letter of objection and 1 phone call of concern. Yanez read the caption Mayor Ross opened the Public Hearing at 6.30 PM. No persons had signed up to speak. Mayor Ross closed the Public Hearing at 6.30 PM. Motion by Jonrowe, second by Nicholson, to approve Item J. Approved: 6-0 (Gipson absent) K. Consideration and possible action to approve submission of a grant application for the Bloomberg Philanthropies 2017 Mayor Challenge -- Jack Daly, Assistant to the City Manager, and Chris Foster, Manager of Resource Planning & Integration Jack Daly, Assistant to the City Manager, spoke on a grant application to the Bloomberg Philanthropies 2017 Mayor’s Challenge. He explained that Georgetown had been invited to participate and winners are based on the impact of a great idea. Daly said the City would like to submit a project called Virtual Power Plant, devised by Chris Foster, the City’s Manager of Resource Management & Integration. Daly said the project would include a network of solar panels and reduce the need for purchased power. He explained that this is a good way to test the idea, with no impact to the City. Daly explained that this item was asking the Council for their approval for submission of the idea only. Motion by Fought, second by Jonrowe, to approve Item K. Approved: 6-0 (Gipson absent) Page 10 of 454 L. Consideration and possible action to approve and ratify the Construction Manager at Risk Agreement with Balfour Beatty executed on January 27, 2017 for the Downtown West Civic Center Project and approve Amendment No. 1 to the same Agreement establishing a guaranteed maximum price of $10,831,365.00 -- Eric Johnson, CIP Manager CIP Manager, Eric Johnson, spoke on a Construction Manager and Risk Agreement with Balfour Beatty. Mayor Ross announced that the Council had discussed this at length and in detail at their workshop meeting earlier in the day. Johnson said that the City Council had provided feedback at their August 23, 2016 meeting to proceed with a renovation plan that is worthy of our City and exemplifies our Values, with a budget of $13,000,000.00. He provided renderings of the New City Hall and Council Chambers and provided a video of the virtual Court Room. Johnson next described the campus and landscaping of the site and its features. He showed images of the signage on the buildings and images of the entry doors. Johnson provided descriptions and images of the floor plans. Johnson spoke on the Downtown West Project Budget, Contracted Services and Professional Services. Page 11 of 454 Page 12 of 454 Johnson explained that, in addition to design modifications, possible alternate funding sources are being evaluated to supplement the sale of the Downtown buildings at $6,249.000.00 and he provided funding options and a funding summary. Page 13 of 454 Johnson spoke on bridging the funding by aligning sources and revenues with the construction budget. • Interest Earnings on bonds and Albertsons • Assumptions on the sale of buildings • Continue to look for savings through construction Johnson provided the Next Steps of the project. Page 14 of 454 Johnson read the caption. Motion by Jonrowe, second by Gonzalez, to approve Item L. Approved: 6-0 (Gipson absent) M. Consideration and possible action to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with The Lawrence Group of Austin, Inc. executed on June 9th, 2015 for the Downtown West Civic Center Project, establishing a fixed fee for premium services and removing Historic Light and Waterworks Building Concept and Festival Space Concept, for a new total estimated design fee of $1,404,419.00, including Programming, Basic Services, Premium Basic Services and Sign Master Plan -- Eric Johnson, CIP Manager and Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager Mayor Ross announced at the beginning of the meeting, that Item M had been pulled from the agenda. N. Consideration and possible action to authorize the Environmental Services staff to apply for a Capital Area Council of Governments (CAPCOG) FY 2017/18 Regional Solid Waste Management Grant program, in the amount of $8,110.00 -- Jordan Fengel, Environmental Service Programs Coordinator and Octavio Garza, Director of Public Works Mayor Ross announced at the beginning of the meeting, that Item N had been pulled from the agenda. O. First Reading of an Ordinance amending the 2017 Annual Budget for year-end obligations that were not known at the time the budget was adopted, appropriating various amounts thereof, and repealing all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict therewith -- Leigh Wallace, Finance Director (action required) Finance Director, Leigh Wallace, spoke on amendments to the 2017 Annual Budget. She explained that this had been presented to the City Council, in detail, earlier that day in the City Council Workshop meeting. Wallace listed the funds for consideration. • General Fund • EMS Fund • Council Discretionary Fund • Airport Fund • Transportation Fund • Electric Fund • Water Fund Wallace acknowledged that Councilmember Gonzalez had asked about the water fund balance in the earlier meeting and Wallace had said she would have the exact figures for him at this evening’s meeting. Wallace said the water fund balance and figures can be found in the agenda packet on page 222, where there is a summary of the water fund and how it would change with this amendment. She noted that $8.9 million dollars was the ending balance. She explained that a $5 million dollar contingency is required in the fund and the amendment represents $1.5 million dollars. Wallace said that, when the year is closed, the operational savings will be realized. She explained that after the needed reserves, there is cash available even after this amendment. Wallace read the caption. Motion by Jonrowe, second by Hesser, to approve Item O. Approved: 6-0 (Gipson absent) P. First Reading of an Ordinance of the City of Georgetown amending the Code of Ordinances by adding Chapter 10.10 entitled “Thru Truck Traffic” and directing the Traffic Engineer to erect appropriate signs; repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; providing a severability clause; providing for a penalty as stated in Section 1.08.010 of the Code of Ordinances; providing for publication and setting an effective date – Octavio Garza, Public Works Director (action required) Public Works Director, Octavio Garza, spoke on the signage for the Thru Truck Traffic proposed for Apache Mountain Blvd. He spoke on residential and commercial traffic and the need for the signage. Page 15 of 454 Garza read the caption. Motion by Nicholson, second by Hesser, to approve Item P. Councilmember Jonrowe asked about the map and if the construction companies will be required to send the new regulations to their employees. She asked if other cities are grappling with these issues. Garza said he is not aware of any. City Manager, David Morgan, said he will look into this and report back. Councilmember Nicholson asked about the penalty and enforcement of violations. Garza said the penalty is a fine up to $500.00 and enforcement would be handled by the City of Georgetown Police Department, but only in the city limits. He explained that the County would need to place the signage for Majestic Oak and that they would not be helping with enforcement. Approved: 6-0 (Gipson absent) Q. Second Reading of an Ordinance Renaming the 800 Block through 1500 Block of FM 1460 to Old 1460 Trail -- Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Planning Coordinator (action required) Ed Polasek, Transportation Planning Coordinator, spoke on the renaming of FM 1460 to Old FM 1460 Trail. He explained that this is the portion of FM 1460 abandoned by the state and passed to the City. Polasek read the caption. Motion by Jonrowe, second by Eby, to approve Item Q. Approved: 6-0 (Gipson absent) Project Updates R. Project updates and status reports regarding current and future transportation and traffic project; street, sidewalk, and other infrastructure projects; police, fire and other public safety projects; economic development projects; city facility projects; and downtown projects including parking enhancements, city lease agreements, sanitation services, and possible direction to city staff -- David Morgan, City Manager Mayor Ross asked City Manager, David Morgan, if he had any project updates to report. Morgan said that he did not have anything to report at the time, but would be happy to answer any questions. Public Wishing to Address Council On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found on the table at the entrance to the Council Chamber. Clearly print your name and the letter of the item on which you wish to speak and present it to the City Secretary on the dais, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Council considers that item. On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future City Council agenda by contacting the City Secretary no later than noon on the Wednesday prior to the Tuesday meeting, with the subject matter of the topic they would like to address and their name. The City Secretary can be reached at 512/930-3651. S. Alex Curry would like to address the Council regarding the impact of growth in the area. Cynthia Curry would like to address the Council on the same subject and has given her speaking time to Alex Curry. Cynthia Curry did not want to donate her 3 minutes. Alex Curry spoke to the Council regarding his concerns with growth and development in the area. Executive Session In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon’s Texas Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session. T. Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney Page 16 of 454 Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items - Hoskins Brown Update Sec. 551.072 Deliberations about Real Property - Downtown Real Estate Sale Sec. 551:074: Personnel Matters City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal Sec. 551.087: Deliberations Regarding Economic Development Negotiations - Project Legacy Adjournment Motion by Fought, second by Hesser, to adjourn the meeting. Mayor Ross adjourned the meeting at 6.53 PM. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Approved by the Georgetown City Council on _____________________________ Date _____________________________ _____________________________ Dale Ross, Mayor Attest: City Secretary Page 17 of 454 Minutes of Meeting of the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown, Texas Tuesday, November 14, 2017 The Georgetown City Council will meet on Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 3:00 PM at the Council Chambers, at 101 E. 7th St., Georgetown, Texas The city of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary’s Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Mayor Ross called the meeting to order at 3:00 PM. All Councilmembers were in attendance, with the exception of Councilmember Nicholson, District 2 and Councilmember Gipson, District 5. Mayor Dale Ross, Anna Eby, District 1, John Hesser, District 3, Steve Fought, District 4, Rachael Jonrowe, District 6, and Tommy Gonzalez, District 7 were in attendance. Councilmember Nicholson joined the meeting at 3:05 PM. Policy Development/Review Workshop – Call to order at 3:00 PM A. Presentation and discussion on the feasibility of a joint aquatic facility between the City of Georgetown and the Georgetown Independent School District -- Kimberly Garrett, Parks & Recreation Director Parks & Recreation Director, Kimberly Garrett, spoke on the feasibility of a joint aquatic facility between the City and the Georgetown Independent School District (GISD). She explained that a study was conducted with an intent to look at future needs, and if the facility made sense, to determine a place and location for such a facility. Garrett introduced Keith Hayes, CFO and Principal of Barker, Rinker and Seacat Architecture, who provided the presentation. Hayes recognized the team that had worked on the study and the presentation and described the Vision Statement for the project. Page 18 of 454 Hayes spoke next on the Core Values of the Feasibility Study Hayes described the Project Goals. 1. Reflect the public wants and needs of the City and GISD a. Reflect the culture and character of Georgetown 2. Define the Aquatic Center program 3. Define the Aquatic Center budget 4. Define the Aquatic Center schedule for funding & construction 5. Assist in setting up a framework for the COG and GISD partnership 6. Present the findings and recommendations for the City Council and GISD Board to make a decision on the project future including a potential partnership 7. Explore other partnership entities that could add value to the Georgetown Aquatic Center Hayes said that the presentation would include the Program, the Schedule and the Budget and spoke on the question of how one would benefit from this process. He then provided a slide showing the proposed schedule. Page 19 of 454 Hayes spoke on the Steering Committee’s Wish List pertaining to space and characteristics. Hayes described the difference in water temperature needs and water depth needs. • 78-82 Degrees for Competition Swimming, Training and Water Polo • 82-87 Degrees for Diving • 86-95 Degrees for Instruction, Recreation, Wellness and Therapy • 100-104 Degrees for Whirlpools and Spas Page 20 of 454 Hayes provided images of various pool types and sizes, as well as images of various areas included in a pool facility, such as spectator seating, scoring space, wet classrooms and locker rooms. He described the flexibility of the wet classroom, which can also be used for a party room, providing a good revenue opportunity. He provided images of lap swimming pools with play structures, lazy rivers and beach like entries. He explained that the beach like entry is good for therapy in a recovery process and important to the quality of life for elder citizens. Hayes spoke on the Market & Operations Analysis and explained the necessity to determine the market to be served and understand other providers in the area, whether public, private or non-profit. Hayes provided a slide depicting 2010 demographics for population, households, families, average household size, ethnicity, median age and median income. He said it would be impossible to service all, but many actually could be serviced. Page 21 of 454 Hayes spoke next on the Operations Analysis and provides graphs of a similar project. Hayes described two Options for comparison and contrast. Page 22 of 454 Option A – Renovate existing indoor 25yd body of water into leisure water and expand or construct a new 25m x 25yd competition pool, as presented. Option B – Renovate existing indoor 25yd body of water into leisure water and construct a new 50m x 25yd outdoor competition pool, assuming that the pool will be attached to the center, be operated year round, and the water heated. Hayes spoke on the Assumptions of the Aquatic Center Operations Analysis • The first year of operation will be 2020 or later. This budget represents the second full-year of operation • The presence of other providers in the market will remain the same. • Access to the new competitive pool will be through the existing main entry to the recreation center. The only direct access to the new pool area will be for swim meets. • Operation of the center is shown by the City of Georgetown with all costs and revenues included. This is based on City staff guarding the pool during all hours of use. • The operations estimate is based on the program for the facility as developed by Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture • Full time staff rates are based on existing staff rates for the same basic positions inflated to 2020. Part time rates are based on a minimum wage projection of $9 hour by 2020. • Custodial services are shown as being provided by in-house staff (full time and part time) but could possibly be a contracted service • The admission fees for the center are the same as the existing recreation center. Rates are for the entire center, not just aquatics • A reasonably aggressive approach to estimating use and revenues from pass sales and programs taking place at the center has been used for this pro-forma. The center will need to draw well from the Secondary Service Area on a consistent basis. Page 23 of 454 Hayes provided Conceptual Plan Diagrams for Option A and Option B and described the floor plans of each. Page 24 of 454 Page 25 of 454 Hayes provided Site Discussion and several images of proposals for the Site at San Gabriel Park. He spoke on proposed parking and parking plans. Hayes went on to speak on the budget of the project and provided comparison and contrast options. He spoke on future considerations. Page 26 of 454 Hayes completed the presentation and asked the Council for their feedback. City Manager, David Morgan, said the study is an exploration process. He noted that even though this is a high level of detailed information, there is actually a lot of flexibility. He said this study was to explore initial possibilities. Morgan said the exploration was conducted in order to get Council reaction and if there is potential to move forward with this type of project. Councilmember Fought said he appreciates the study, but would like to continue to explore. He said that is not enough information to say yes or no at this point. Fought said he would like to see examples of the outside events that would come in to judge and needs to see the funding between the City and the School District. He noted that this would be specific information of who pays what. Fought said he does like the idea of working together on such a project. Councilmember Jonrowe thanked the presenter for his presentation. She asked how much the project would cost if the school district built it on their own. Hayes said the dollars would be the same as presented. City Manager, Morgan, said there would be a possibility that the costs would be lower, but the maintenance fees would be higher for them without the competitive water factor. He noted that it makes sense to combine the waters. Councilmember Jonrowe asked Garrett if the aquatics program is currently at capacity at the Rec Center. Garrett said yes - at all of the pique times and said these plans would expand the offerings. Jonrowe asked if the expansion would double. Garrett said there would be a need for additional personnel and other expenses, but she did not have exact figures at this time. Jonrowe asked about minimizing disruption at the current facility during any construction of a new facility. Garrett said that would certainly be the intent, but it is not yet known. Hayes explained the difference if a facility was combined with an existing structure or built separately. He spoke on costs that the City would contribute to the school facility Jonrowe said it is all interesting but the cost is very high. She noted that this is assuming that a bond package would pass. She said she would support exploring this project further, but only if it does not cost money. Mayor Ross asked if there would be additional cost if the project was explored further. Councilmember Gonzalez said he agrees with Jonrowe that there cannot be further cost to the exploration of the project. He noted that the Parks and Recreation Departments is already doing a lot with very large projects in the works and this would be too much of an addition to what is already being done He suggested re-exploring the project in 10 years. Gonzalez added that $330,000.00 of maintenance cost per year does not seem like a wise return on investment at this time. Councilmember Nicholson thanked Hayes for the presentation. She said she works with school districts and agrees with Councilmember Jonrowe. She asked if the capital expense would be provided by the district and the maintenance taken care of by the City. City Manager, Morgan, said a school bond would be issued from the district and they would need city support for increases. He explained that it has not yet been decided who would pay for what. Morgan said the numbers could change accordingly and there are no operating agreements yet. He said a starting point would be a school bond, with the City taking care of operational expenses, because the City is experienced in the operational factor. Councilmember Nicholson said the proposed site makes sense and she does not see a need to look at other sites. She said there are currently a lot of Parks and Rec projects. She noted that the community offers a lot of support for youth and youth programs currently. She said, if there is no additional cost, she would support proceeding, but there is a lot more to discuss regarding responsibilities. Councilmember Eby said this is at a conceptual stage and she is not opposed to further exploration. She asked for the next step and more information. David Morgan said this could be a future project with a growing city and growing school district. He said staff would look for ways to make sure City costs are reduced and the scope of the project is scaled back. He said they would look more at the revenue assumptions. He reminded Council that this would not come to fruition until at least 2020, and fee changes would be likely by then, with additional changes, as well. He said staff needed to know if Council wants to continue pursuing such a project. Mayor Ross said he wants more information if it does not cost anything. He noted staff time being used by the current large park projects. Page 27 of 454 Councilmember Hesser said he likes the location and working with the school district, but this would be a big load on staff at this time. He said the $365,000.00 per year in costs should be better explained and understood. Hesser said, if this is going forward, the numbers would need to make sense. Mayor Ross said this is the conceptual phase and said he has heard from Council that they would not want to explore the project further if that would cost money. He asked Garrett if it would cost to go further and also asked her for an estimation of staff time. Garrett said additional research would cost extra in consultant time. Morgan said the school district needs to see the presentation also and the City needs their feedback on costs and responsibilities. He noted that if it does not make sense at that point, staff would not bring it back to Council. If it does make sense, it would be brought back. Leigh Wallace, Finance Director, asked if she could present Item C, prior to Item B, as it would flow better. Mayor Ross said that would be fine. Wallace spoke on Item C and then spoke on Item B. B. Presentation and discussion regarding the proposed FY2017 budget amendment for the Annual Budget for year- end obligations that were not known at the time the budget was adopted -- Leigh Wallace, Finance Director Finance Director, Leigh Wallace, spoke on amendments to the FY 2017 budget and explained the purpose. • The City Charter allows for budget amendments when circumstances were unforeseen at the time the original budget was adopted • Expenditure overages at the fund or division level must be addressed before closing the fiscal year Wallace said that the Council Discretionary fund had shown an available balance of $298,000.00. She noted Council direction to spend $10,000.00 on the Hospice Study and $5,000.00 for airport fuel for the Harvey storm relief efforts, leaving a new available balance of $283,000.00. Wallace spoke on the Airport fund and said the $5,000.00 from the Council Discretionary fund had been recognized. Wallace provided slides and descriptions of the General fund, the EMS Fund, the Transportation Fund, the Electric Fund and the Water Fund Page 28 of 454 Page 29 of 454 Wallace said that Fire Chief, John Sullivan would be bringing the EMS Services Update presentation to the Council at the next workshop. She said the County Funds shown in the Transportation Fund will be used for their portion of the Southwest Bypass project. Wallace said she anticipates bringing the CIP Roll Forward program and changes to the Electric Fund to the Council on December 12th. Councilmember Gonzalez asked where the water fund was at. Wallace said she does not have exact figures with her at this time but will be able to provide them at the regular city council meeting that evening. City Manager, David Morgan, said it is a healthy fund. Gonzalez said he wants to make sure the City does not rob Peter to pay Paul. Page 30 of 454 Wallace said the action items would be on the night meeting’s agenda as the first reading and the second reading would be on November 28th and at that point staff would be able to close fiscal year 2017. C. Presentation of the City’s Quarterly Financial Report, which includes the Investment Reports for the City of Georgetown, Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC), and the Georgetown Economic Development Corporation (GEDCO) for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 -- Leigh Wallace, Finance Director Finance Director, Leigh Wallace, provided a presentation on the City’s Quarterly Financial Report. She began the presentation with an explanation of the Preliminary Year-End. • Bring information to Council sooner • Overall, a solid picture, but subject to change • FY2017 will close in late November • One month of sales tax still to receive • Unaudited numbers Wallace said staff had received the sales tax collection information that day and it was up 7% compared to the same period last year. She noted that property tax collections were at 100% for the year. Wallace said the Utility ROI was up 3% compared to the same period last year. She said development fees were ahead earlier in the year, but finished at about the same as 2016. Wallace noted that expenditures were on track for the year and the overall fund was under budget by 3%. She explained that there were overages in Fire and Environmental Services. Wallace spoke on Major Enterprise • Electric o Revenue up 2% compared to last year o Purchase Power expenditures exceeded budget and projections – discussed in amendment workshop • Water o Revenue up 26% year over year, mostly due to development impact fees o Operations expenses under budget; CIP expenses under budget and will roll forward due to project timing and capacity • Hotel Occupancy Tax revenue up 24% year over year • Airport Revenue up 14% year over year Wallace provided a list of CIP Highlights • Sidewalk improvements completed downtown, along Williams Drive and I35 • Garey Park and San Gabriel Park improvements continue • Completion of Grace Church rehab • Substantial progress on Southwest Bypass • New residential development continues in Electric • Design phases complete for major water projects, construction to begin in 2018 Investment Highlights were shown next. Page 31 of 454 Wallace spoke on changes in interest rates and said the City has been able to take advantage of good money market rates. She ended the preliminary year end presentation and said she was not expecting any major changes. D. Update to City Council on Downtown West Civic Center Project -- Eric Johnson, CIP Manager and Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager Eric Johnson, CIP Manager, provided an update on the Downtown West Civic Center Project. Johnson recognized the design team, the signage masterplan team, and the executive finishes team for the project. Johnson spoke on the background of the project. Page 32 of 454 Johnson said that the City Council had provided feedback at their August 23, 2016 meeting to proceed with a renovation plan that is worthy of our City and exemplifies our Values, with a budget of $13,000,000.00. He provided renderings of the New City Hall and Council Chambers and provided a virtual video of the Court Room. Johnson next described the campus and landscaping of the site and its features. He showed images of the signage on the buildings and images of the entry doors. Johnson provided descriptions and images of the floor plans. Johnson spoke on the Downtown West Project Budget, Contracted Services and Professional Services. Page 33 of 454 Page 34 of 454 Mayor Ross asked if this is guaranteed pricing and if the total could increase over time. City Manager, David Morgan, said the guaranteed maximum price on the night’s agenda is the final cost, as long as the project stays within scope. Morgan said there are contingencies for both the contractor and the City that are loaded in the agreement. Johnson explained that, in addition to design modifications, possible alternate funding sources are being evaluated to supplement the sale of the Downtown buildings at $6,249.000.00 and provided funding options and a funding summary. Page 35 of 454 Johnson spoke on bridging the funding by aligning sources and revenues with the construction budget. • Interest Earnings on bonds and Albertsons • Assumptions on the sale of buildings • Continue to look for savings through construction Johnson provided the Next Steps of the project. Page 36 of 454 Mayor Ross asked to see the image of City Hall again and asked about the possibility of branding by having the City of Georgetown Logo on city buildings. Morgan said renovations are being looked at and staff will look into unifying the Georgetown brand on City buildings. He said the Police Chief and Fire Chief are already looking into putting the logo on the Public Safety Facility buildings, as well. Councilmember Jonrowe asked how many kids recognize the brand since kids don’t use cursive anymore. Gonzalez said they would still recognize the symbol. Morgan said he wants to add the City logo to all of the buildings. E. Presentation on annexation requirements and discussion on establishing an annexation strategy -- Sofia Nelson, Planning Director Planning Director, Sofia Nelson, spoke on annexation requirements, recent changes to annexation regulations and the establishment of an annexation strategy. She began the presentation with a recognition of the Presentation Team and an Overview of the Presentation. Presentation Overview • Purpose of the Presentation and Feedback Requested • Value in Annexation • Georgetown Annexation History • Overview of 2017 SB 6 – Update to Annexation Law • Annexation Options and Tools to Study • Areas for Consideration • Request Feedback from the City Council Nelson spoke on the purpose of the presentation Page 37 of 454 She explained the Value in Annexation. • Manage Growth • Ability to Implement the Comprehensive Plan • Development and Land Use Standards • Balance the Tax Base Page 38 of 454 Part 2 of Nelson’s presentation was an overview of 2017 SB 6 and an update to the annexation law. She described the new requirements and what they mean to Georgetown both today and in the future. She noted that Georgetown is on the brink of becoming a Tier 2 community with the rapid growth it is experiencing and it is wise to look at this so as not to lose opportunities. She said, when classified as a Tier 2 Community, there will be a more restrictive annexation processes. She noted that currently Williamson County is a Tier 1 Community, based off of the 2010 Census, but this will change with the 2020 Census. Page 39 of 454 Councilmember Jonrowe asked how “area” is determined or defined. City attorney, Charlie McNabb clarified the information. McNabb said there are some restrictions on the size of an area that a city can annex. He said the area must be contiguous and wider than 1000 feet. He said, other than this, area is just the “area” defined to come into the city limits. Nelson spoke on what this means to Georgetown today. She explained that, on December 1, 2017, municipal annexation, as it has existed for over a century, will be over. The new bill requires landowner or voter approval of Page 40 of 454 annexation in the state’s largest counties (those with 500,000 population or more) and in counties that opt-in to the bill through a petition and election process. Nelson spoke next on what the new law means to Georgetown’s future Nelson said that, following the 2020 Census, Williamson County will become a Tier 2 County and involuntary annexation will not be permitted in Williamson County. Page 41 of 454 Part 3 of Nelson presentation spoke on Involuntary Annexation Requirements. • Continuation of Land Use: prevents a city from prohibiting a person from continuing to use land in the manner in which it was being used prior to annexation • Width Requirements: area must generally be at least 1,000 feet wide unless the boundaries of the city are contiguous to the area on at least two sides, with certain exceptions. • Maximum Amount per Year: limiting the maximum amount of annexation each year to ten percent of the incorporated area of the municipality with certain exceptions. Nelson described the Annexation Plan Process and explained that any area with 100 dwelling units must be listed. Nelson explained that a city may not annex an area that is appraised for ad valorem tax purposes such as agricultural, wildlife management or timber management unless the city offers a development agreement to the landowner that would guarantee the continuation of the extraterritorial status of the area and authorize the enforcement of all regulations and planning authority of the city that do not interfere with the use of the area for agriculture, wildlife or timber. Nelson summarized: • Following the 2020 Census, Williamson County will become a Tier 2 County and involuntary annexation without consent will not be permitted in the county. • Now is the time to act on an annexation plan if Council desires to explore areas that require a plan. Part 4 of Nelson’s presentation spoke on areas for consideration. She said there are 14 areas for consideration and these include corridors and donut holes. She noted that the areas she would be speaking on are noted with a green or yellow star. She explained that those areas with green stars would not require an annexation plan and those noted with a yellow star would require an annexation plan. Page 42 of 454 Page 43 of 454 Page 44 of 454 Page 45 of 454 Page 46 of 454 Mayor Ross asked about requiring a development agreement and what this would look like. Nelson said the development agreement would be a requirement for a period up to 45 years, allowing the property owner to continue the use of that property. Nelson said a development’s subdivision platting would trigger a voluntary request for annexation. Councilmember Fought asked about areas with houses and how it works with fire flow, sewer and other infrastructure. Nelson said if the area is still in the ETJ, it would not necessarily require provisions for utilities and would be handled on a case by case basis. Fought asked about a septic area and if there would be a requirement to connect to the sewer. City Attorney, Charlie McNabb, said it is possible that an on-site sanitation system would be grand- fathered in. Fought wanted to know if it would be expensive to provide services in these areas. McNabb said if the landowner wanted services, the City would need to provide them. Fought spoke on the Shady Oaks and Woodland Park developments and asked how this would involve city services. City Manager, David Morgan, said Council will be asked about specific areas they would like to examine and some of the areas are expensive to bring on board. Mayor Ross said staff will need to give pros and cons for each area considered and provide cost considerations for each. Councilmember Gonzalez asked about the 10 year R.O.I. on these projects. Fought said the Council will need more information in order to make valid decisions. City Manager, Morgan, said staff wanted Council to be informed. Morgan said he has understood Council direction to mean they would like staff to examine the areas for consideration and if something makes sense to bring it back to the Council. Ross asked about the Old Oak Subdivision. Morgan there will be a three year annexation plan, if Council wants to proceed. Ross asked how the 14 areas listed were chosen. Morgan said these are the top 14 areas, but more need to be looked at. Nelson said staff had looked at corridors and donut holes for tonight’s purpose. Councilmember Jonrowe said the City will need to spend, but will need a threshold for breaking even. Ross asked when staff would need an answer from Council on what to go forward with. Morgan said the City would need to take action by the end of the year and staff will bring this back at the next workshop meeting. Councilmember Gonzalez suggested identifying all areas on the required list and then not proceeding with annexation for those areas that are later found not to be feasible. City Attorney, McNabb, said they just need to be on the list. Morgan said anyone put on an annexation plan list must be notified. He said it would not make sense to notify people who will never be annexed. Ross directed staff to make this thoughtful and reasonable. Page 47 of 454 Councilmember Nicholson said there are only 5 of the yellow areas and asked about the urgency of the green areas. Nelson said there is no urgency until the 2020 census. Nicholson suggested looking at these. Gonzalez said staff needs to also examine some of those areas not yet listed today. Morgan said staff will provide Council with a financial analysis of the areas in question and asked Council to identify other areas they might want staff to look at. Morgan said Council will receive updates on November 28th and December 12th. Councilmember Hesser suggested recruiting students to help with the ROI analysis. He asked how this affects zoning. Nelson said anything annexed is zoned as agriculture and then is changed later. City Manager, Morgan, noted that this greatly impacts the decision making regarding MUDs. Mayor Ross recessed the meeting to Executive Session under Sec. 551.071, Sec. 551.072, Sec. 551.074 and Sec. 551.087 at 5.02 PM. Executive Session In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon’s Texas Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session. F. Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items - Hoskins Brown Update Sec. 551.072: Deliberations about Real Property - Downtown Real Estate Sale Sec. 551:074: Personnel Matters City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal Sec. 551.087: Deliberations Regarding Economic Development Negotiations - Project Legacy Adjournment Mayor Ross adjourned the meeting to begin the Regular City Council meeting at 6:00 PM. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Approved by the Georgetown City Council on _____________________________ Date _____________________________ _____________________________ Dale Ross, Mayor Attest: City Secretary Page 48 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Consideration and po ssible action to vacate and abando n tw o ten fo ot publ i c uti l i ty easements, totaling 0.1657 ac r e s (7,217 square feet) along the shared property l i ne o f Lots 4 1 and 42 , Block D, o f the Final Plat of the Preserve Phase II, as depicted in that certain plat recorded in Document No. 200 90 77 67 8 of the Official Public Records o f Williamson County, Texas and to authori ze the Mayor to exe c ute a qui tcl ai m deed --Travis Baird, Real Estate Services Coordinator ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant is seeking to combine Lots 4 1 & 42 o f the Preserve Phase II. Currently, there is a 1 0' public utility easement along e ach side o f the common lot line, which will bisect the newly c re ated lot at the end of the re -plat process. This will complicate development of the site. Abando nment of these two easements will not ne gatively impac t utility service to either lo t o r the wider area as the new lot will have sufficient easement space fo r any new utilitie s. There are no utilitie s currently operating within the easements to be abandoned. Staff recommends appro val o f this item. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Travis Baird-Real Estate Services Coordinator ATTACHMENT S: Description Res o lutio n P c kg Eas ements to b e aband o ned Page 49 of 454 Resolution No. _____________________________ Description: Vacation and abandonment of two 10’ PUEs Lots 41 & 42, Final Plat of the Preserve Phase II Date Approved:____________________________ Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. ____________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN VACATING AND ABANDONING TWO 10-FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS OUT OF LOTS 41 & 42, BLOCK D, OF THE FINAL PLAT OF THE PRESERVE PHASE II, A SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN DOCUMENT 2009077678 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS (THE “PUES”), AND BEING LOCATED ON CHADWICK DRIVE IN GEORGETOWN, TEXAS. WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown has received a request for the vacation and abandonment of the above described PUEs, as Lots 41 and 42 will be combined and the future lot will be bisected by these easements; and WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown (“City”) has received a request from Ronald D. Evans, the current owner of property encumbered by the above described easements. The bisection of the newly created lot by these easements will prevent development of the lot. The easements requested to be abandoned and vacated are described by the metes and bounds with sketch on Exhibit “A” attached hereto (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, upon considering the request for vacation and abandonment of the subject PUEs and additional information pertaining to the request, the City Council finds that a public need for the areas sought to be vacated and abandoned no longer exists and that said PUEs may be vacated and abandoned pursuant to City Ordinance No. 2009-47 relating to disposition of City property; and WHEREAS, nothing herein shall operate to vacate or abandon any other PUE or easement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this resolution are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that the adoption of this resolution is not inconsistent or in conflict with any of the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan policies. SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a Quitclaim Deed in substantially the same form attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and any other conveyance document(s) necessary to complete the vacation and abandonment of the PUEs described herein and the City Secretary is authorized to attest thereto on behalf of the City of Georgetown. Page 50 of 454 Resolution No. _____________________________ Description: Vacation and abandonment of two 10’ PUEs Lots 41 & 42, Final Plat of the Preserve Phase II Date Approved:____________________________ Page 2 of 2 SECTION 3. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. RESOLVED this ______ day of ___________, 2017. CITY OF GEORGETOWN ATTEST: BY: Dale Ross, Mayor Shelley Nowling, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: _______________________ Charlie McNabb, City Attorney STATE OF TEXAS ) ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON ) BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this date personally Dale Ross, Mayor of the City of Georgetown, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, as the act and deed of said municipality, and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this day of , 2017. ________________________________________ Notary Public, State of Texas AFTER RECORDING, RETURN TO: City of Georgetown ATTN: Real Estate Services Coordinator 300-1 Industrial Ave. Georgetown, Texas 78626 Page 51 of 454 Page 52 of 454 Page 53 of 454 Page 54 of 454 Page 55 of 454 Exhibit: “B” Quitclaim Deed abandoning two 10’ PUEs Lots 41 & 42, Final Plat of the Preserve Phase II Page 1 of 2 QUITCLAIM DEED NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE A NATURAL PERSON, YOU MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FROM THIS INSTRUMENT BEFORE IT IS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER’S LICENSE NUMBER. DATE: __________________________, 2017 GRANTOR: City of Georgetown, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation GRANTOR'S Mailing Address (including County): P.O. Box 409, Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas 78627 GRANTEE: Ronald D. Evans GRANTEE'S Mailing Address (including County): 12508 Belcara Place, Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas, 78732 CONSIDERATION: Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged. PROPERTY: BEING portions of two 10’ Public Utility Easements (PUEs) out of Lots 41 and 42, Block D, Final Plat of the Preserve Phase II, a subdivision in Williamson County, Texas, as recorded in Document 2009077678, Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas, said PUEs being depicted by the sketch on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. For the consideration, GRANTOR quitclaims to GRANTEE all of GRANTOR'S right, title, and interest in and to the above described property, to have and to hold it to GRANTEE, GRANTEE'S successors and assigns, forever. Neither GRANTOR, nor GRANTOR'S successors and assigns, shall have, claim or demand any right or title to the property or any part of it. Page 56 of 454 Exhibit: “B” Quitclaim Deed abandoning two 10’ PUEs Lots 41 & 42, Final Plat of the Preserve Phase II Page 2 of 2 EXECUTED this the _____ day of _________________, 2017. GRANTOR ATTEST: CITY OF GEORGETOWN BY:__________________________ ___________________________________ Dale Ross, Mayor Shelley Nowling, City Secretary STATE OF TEXAS ) ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON ) BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this date personally Dale Ross, Mayor of the City of Georgetown, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, as the act and deed of said municipality, and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this day of , 2017. ______________________________ Notary Public, State of Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ Charlie McNabb, City Attorney Page 57 of 454 [Exhibit “A” to Quitclaim Deed] Exhibit “A” to the Quitclaim Deed is heretofore attached as Exhibit “A” to the foregoing Resolution and will be attached accordingly to the original Quitclaim Deed prior to execution and recording. Page 58 of 454 Page 59 of 454 Page 60 of 454 Page 61 of 454 Page 62 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to vacate and abandon two 0.3 4 acre tracts of land, to tal i ng 0.6 8 acres, out of the Antonio Flores Survey, Abstract 235, l ocated at the south east corner of North East Inner Loop and North Austi n Ave. and being a remainder of that 2.004 acres deeded to the City of Georgetown in Do cument 2 00 2096046 of the Official P ublic Records of Williamson County, Texas and to authori ze the Mayor to e xecute a deed w i thout w arranty - - Travis Baird, Real Estate Services Coordinator ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant has requested abandonment of the property owned by the City located at NE Inner Loo p and Austin Ave. This property was a po rtion of a larger tract purchased in 2002 fo r the extensio n of NE Inner Loo p. The applicant owns the property adjoining to the so utheast and is in the process of purchasing the property adjoining the subject to the southwest. The City no longer has any use fo r this property. The applicant has provided an appraisal generated by Lone Star Appraisals and Realty, Inc. Abandonment o f this property to the applicant will allo w development of the site as part of their larger property. Staff recommends appro val o f this item. FINANCIAL IMPACT: $148,500 will be paid to the City. SUBMITTED BY: Travis Baird-Real Estate Services Coordinator ATTACHMENT S: Description Res o lutio n P ac kage Aerial Exhibit Tract 1 Tract 2 Page 63 of 454 Resolution No. _____________________________ Description: Corner ROW, NE Inner Loop and Austin Ave Date Approved:____________________________ Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. ____________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN AUTHORIZING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF TWO 0.34- ACRES TRACTS OF LAND, COMPRISING A 0.68-ACRE PROPERTY, MORE OR LESS, OUT OF THE ANTONIO FLORES SURVEY, AS DESCRIBED IN THE METES AND BOUNDS WITH SKETCH ON EXHIBITS “A” & “B” ATTACHED HERETO, AND BEING LOCATED AT THE SOUTH-EAST CORNER OF NORTH EAST INNNER LOOP AND AUSTIN AVENUE. WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown has received a request to abandon two 0.34-acre tracts of land, totaling 0.64 acres, and being a remainder of that 2.004 acre tract conveyed to the City in Document No. 2002096046. Said tracts being described on Exhibits “A” & “B” attached hereto (collectively, the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property was acquired in 2002 as part of the North East Inner Loop Extension; and WHEREAS, the North East Extension has been completed and the property is now vacant and not necessary for the operation and maintenance of the roadway; and WHEREAS, the applicant owns the 28.27 acre tract adjoining the Property to the southwest; and, WHEREAS, the applicant has received the consent of the owner of that certain 0.5-acre tract adjoining the Property to the Southwest; and, WHEREAS, in return for the abandonment of the property and conveyance by Deed without Warranty, the applicant has agreed to pay the City $148,500, that amount being the appraised value of the Property as of September 6, 2017. WHEREAS, upon considering the request for vacation and abandonment of the Property and additional information pertaining to the request, the City Council finds that a public need for the Property no longer exists, and that such Property may then be vacated and abandoned; and WHEREAS, the General Manager of Utilities, or his designee, has reviewed this request and has no objection to the vacation and abandonment of the Property, subject to the conditions described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: Page 64 of 454 Resolution No. _____________________________ Description: Corner ROW, NE Inner Loop and Austin Ave Date Approved:____________________________ Page 2 of 2 SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this resolution are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that the adoption of this resolution is not inconsistent or in conflict with any of the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan policies. SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a Deed Without Warranty in substantially the same form attached hereto as Exhibit “C”, and any other conveyance document(s) necessary to complete the vacation and abandonment of the Property described herein, and the City Secretary is authorized to attest thereto on behalf of the City of Georgetown, subject to receipt of payment. SECTION 3. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. RESOLVED this ______ day of ___________, 2017. CITY OF GEORGETOWN ATTEST: By: Dale Ross, Mayor Shelley Nowling, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: _______________________ Charlie McNabb, City Attorney Page 65 of 454 Exhibit "A" Page 66 of 454 Page 67 of 454 Page 68 of 454 Exhibit "B" Page 69 of 454 Page 70 of 454 Page 71 of 454 Special Warranty Deed City of Georgetown to Pence Investments & Joseph Hoover/CTX Page 1 of 2 DEED WITHOUT WARRANTY NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or strike any of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in the public records: Your social security number or your driver’s license number. DATE: ___________________, 2017 GRANTOR: City of Georgetown, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation GRANTOR'S MAILING ADDRESS (including County): P.O. Box 409, Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas 78627 GRANTEE: Pence Investments, Ltd. (as to an undivided 80% interest); and Joseph Hoover/CTX, LLC. (as to an undivided 20% interest) GRANTEE'S MAILING ADDRESS (including County): Pence Investments, Ltd., 708 Rio Grande, Austin, Travis County, Texas 78701 Joseph Hoover/CTX, LLC, 4203 North Hills Drive, Travis County, Texas 78731 CONSIDERATION: One Hundred Forty-eight Thousand Five Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($148,500.00) and other good and valuable consideration. PROPERTY (including any improvements): Tract 1 Being a 0.34-acre tract of land, said tract being more fully described by metes and bounds with sketch in the attached Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof; Tract 2 Being a 0.34-acre tract of land, said tract being more fully described by metes and bounds with sketch in the attached Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part hereof; Both Tracts together equaling approximately 0.68 acres of land (the “Property). Exhibit "C" Page 72 of 454 Special Warranty Deed City of Georgetown to Pence Investments & Joseph Hoover/CTX Page 2 of 2 RESERVATIONS FROM AND EXCEPTIONS TO CONVEYANCE: This conveyance is made, delivered and accepted subject to any and all easements, covenants, leases, rights-of-way, conditions, restrictions, outstanding mineral interests and royalty interests, if any, relating to the Property, to the extent, and only to the extent, that the same may still be in force and effect, and either shown of record in the office of the County Clerk of Williamson County, Texas, or apparent on the Property. Grantor, for the consideration and subject to the Reservations From and Exceptions to Conveyance, GRANTS, SELLS, and CONVEYS to Grantee the Property, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in any way belonging, to have and hold it to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever, without express or implied warranty. All warranties that might arise by common law as well as the warranties in section 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are excluded. GRANTOR: CITY OF GEORGETOWN, A TEXAS HOME-RULE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Dale Ross, Mayor STATE OF TEXAS ) )ACKNOWLEDGEMENT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____ day of __________________, 2017, by Dale Ross, as Mayor of the City of Georgetown, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, on behalf of said City. ________________________________ Notary Public, State of Texas Page 73 of 454 [Exhibits “A” & “B” to Quitclaim Deed] Exhibit “A” & “B” to the Quitclaim Deed is heretofore attached as Exhibit “A” & “B” to the foregoing Resolution and will be attached accordingly to the original Quitclaim Deed prior to execution and recording. Page 74 of 454 Hoover Abandonment Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/AirbusDS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Parcels November 20, 2017 City of Georgetown | TX Orthoimagery Program, DigitalGlobe, Microsoft, CNES/Airbus DS | Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS 0 0.035 0.070.0175 mi 0 0.04 0.080.02 km 1:2,257 NE I n n e r L o o p N. A u s t i n A v e . North Page 75 of 454 Page 76 of 454 Page 77 of 454 Page 78 of 454 Page 79 of 454 Page 80 of 454 Page 81 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Fo rwarded fro m the Parks and Recreatio n Adviso ry Bo ard: Consideration and possible action to grant an electrical easement and approval of a utility agreement for electrical service at Garey Park in the amount of $52,819.96 t o Pedernales Electric Co o perative -- Kimberly Garrett, P arks and Recreation Director and Travis Baird, Real Estate Services Coordinator ITEM SUMMARY: Garey Park is in Pedernales Electric Cooperative 's (PEC) service area. In order for P EC to provide the underground electrical service in the park, a utility easeme nt must be granted. Halff Associate s prepared a me e ts and bo unds survey designating a te n foo t easement for the service. Trenching, co nduit, and other accessorie s were included in the Garey park construction co ntract and have been installed as re quired. The agreement is required for PEC to install the underground cable for the ele c tric al service in the park in the amo unt o f $5 2,819.96. The underground agre e ment and utility easement have been comple ted and reviewed by the City’s Real Estate Service Coordinator and Legal Department. Staff recommends appro val o f this agreement and utility easement with Pedernales Electric Coo perative. Inc. This item was unanimo usly approved November 9 , 20 17 by the Parks and Recreatio n Adviso ry Board. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds for this pro ject are budgeted in the Garey P ark CIP fund acct # 120-9-0280-90 -04 6 and have been included the overall budget o f the park. SUBMITTED BY: Kimberly Garrett, Parks and Recreation Director ATTACHMENT S: Description P EC Agreement Garey Park Eas ement Quo te fo r ins tallation Eas ement Alignment Page 82 of 454 UNDERGROUND AGREEMENT PEDERNALES ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF Williamson WHEREAS, City Of Georgetown § § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: (hereinafter called Developer) is desirous that electric service to Garey Park & Recreation 6450 FM 2243 be served by an underground electrical distribution system as shown on Exhibit A. WHEREAS, Pedernales Electric Cooperative, Inc. (hereinafter called PEC) will install a portion of said underground electric distribution system and Developer will install a portion of said system; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, Developer and PEC hereby agree as follows: I. Developer will provide the trench, purchase and install the conduits, concrete transformer pads, above ground sectionalizing enclosures, sectionalizing enclosure pads, secondary enclosures or pads, ground rods, ground rod clamps, cap ends of all conduits, install approved pulling cord in conduits, and electric caution tape in accordance with plans and specifications. 2. PEC will invoice the Developer for the installed cost of primary and secondary URD cable in accordance with plans and specifications, including primary termination equipment. PEC shall provide, at its discretion, either transformer termination cabinets or transformers at each transformer pad as cable is installed. 3. If agreement and payment are not returned within ninety (90) days, a new cost estimate will be generated to reflect current material costs. 4. PEC, through its inspections, will ascertain that the plans and specifications are complied with during all phases of construction. In the event PEC finds any part of said system that has not been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications, PEC shall notify Developer of any such deficiencies. Notification shall be given three (3) days prior to commencement of initial trenching. 5. Developer will correct any and all deficiencies within ninety (90) days of notification from PEC. 6. Developer will show proof that the labor and materials installed have been paid in full and that all liens against said labor and materials are released. 7. Developer will furnish PEC easement rights as required for the purpose of operation and maintenance of said underground electrical system. Developer will ensure that all conduits, pads, etc. are installed within said easement and, thereby, assumes responsibility for the placement of all pads. 8. Developer hereby agrees to save and hold PEC harmless from any and all claims, judgments, causes of action, or any other type damages which may arise or result, either directly or indirectly, from any of the actions connected with the installation of said electrical distribution system. 9. Developer shall instruct all lot owners in the sections covered by this agreement who will be served by the underground system that they shall install a 3" conduit, in accordance with PEC PECENGF004 Ver. 1/2015 Page 83 of 454 specifications, from a stub or pad, installed by the utility contractor, to a meter socket located on the residence, or meter pedestal, and that PEC shall be notified before installation begins. 10. PEC agrees that it will complete the system as an underground electrical distribution system in segments as required to furnish electrical service to qualified applicants in said sections provided Developer has completed its part of said system in accordance with this agreement. 11. All applications for service will be subject to the policies established by PEC which are in effect at the time the applications for electric service are made. 12. After Developer and the individuals applying for electric service have completed their portions of the underground electric installation in accordance with all PEC requirements, PEC will complete said portion of the electric underground facility by installing, when appropriate, transformers, terminations, and cable. 13. Any changes to the electrical system required because of re-subdivision by present or future owner shall be at the sole expense of the party desirous of the re-subdivision. 14. Upon completion and inspection of the underground electric facility, Developer agrees, in accordance with PEC's Tariff, that PEC shall at all times have complete ownership and control of the entire electric underground distribution system without any obligation to refund any part of the contribution made by the Developer and that the underground electric system shall be and become the property of Pedemales Electric Cooperative, Inc., upon the completion of the terms outlined above. Further, Developer hereby grants, gives and transfers the conduit and related electrical equipment to PEC free from any lien, security interest or other encumbrance. 15. This Agreement shall be governed by, construed, and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, exclusive of conflicts of law provisions. Executed in duplicate originals this __ day of ________ , __ _ PECENGF004 Ver. 1/2015 [NAME OF DEVELOPER] BY : ----------------------~ Name: Dale Ross Title: Mayor Pedemales Electric Cooperative, Inc. BY: ------------------~ Name: Ed Kepner Title: Line Inspector City of Georgetown, Texas, a Texas home-rule municipality Page 84 of 454 Exhibit A DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION OF FACILITIES City of Georgetown, Garey Park & Recreation, 6450 FM 2243, Georgetown, Texas Williamson County PECENGF004 Ver. 1/2015 Page 85 of 454 UTILITY EASEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF ____________ § That ____________________________________________________________________________By (Company Name) and through ________________________ in the capacity of _____________________________ and not (Printed Name) (Title) individually, hereinafter referred to as “Grantor” (whether one or more), for and in consideration of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) in hand paid by PEDERNALES ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. of Johnson City, Texas, have granted, sold, and conveyed and by these presents do grant, sell, and convey unto Pedernales Electric Cooperative, Inc. an easement and right-of-way as hereinafter described for the purpose of an underground electric distribution system consisting of a variable number of underground cables and all necessary or desirable appurtenances (including, without limitation, conduits, primary cables, secondary conductors, enclosures, concrete pads, ground rods, ground clamps, transformers, cable terminators, cable riser shields, cutouts, and lightning arrestors overground) over, across and upon the following described lands located in Williamson County, Texas, to-wit: Being ________ acres of land, more or less, out of the __________________ Survey, Abstract No.__________, in Williamson County, Texas, as described on instrument (Deed) recorded in Volume/Document No ________________, in the Official Property Records of Williamson County, Texas. Location of right-of-way and easement herby conveyed shall be limited to a strip of land ten (10) feet in width, being five (5) feet on easch side of the centerline of the facilities as built, or as indicated on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein for all pertinent purposes. Together with the right of ingress and egress over Grantor’s adjacent lands to or from said right-of-way for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, patrolling, hanging new wire on, maintaining and removing said lines or cable and appurtenances; the right to place new or additional cable or cables in said system and to change the sizes thereof; the right to relocate within the limits of said right-of-way or system; the right to remove from said lands all trees and parts thereof, or other obstructions which endanger or may interfere with the efficiency of said lines or system or their appurtenances; the right to place temporary structures for use in constructing or repairing said system; Grantor warrants that Grantor is the owner of said property and has the right to execute this easement. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described easement and rights unto Pedernales Electric Cooperative, Inc. and their successors and assigns, until said line shall be abandoned. Grantor, Grantor’s heirs and legal representatives bind themselves to warrant and forever defend all and singular the above described easement and rights unto Pedernales Electric Cooperative, Inc. their successors and assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof. WITNESS my hand this ________ day of _____________________, 20_____. ______________________________________ (Printed Name of Corporation or Business Name) BY____________________________________ (Printed Name and Title) _______________________________________ (Signature) (NOTARIZE ON BACK) Vi r t u a l G r i d / F a c e t N o . : Wo r k O r d e r N o . : 1 0 8 3 1 5 Pr o p e r t y O w n e r N a m e : G a r e y Pa r k , T h e C i t y o f G e o r g e t o w n . Williamson the City of Georgetown, Texas, a Texas home-rul municipality Dale Ross Mayor City of Georgetown, Texas, a Texas home-rule municipality Dale Ross, Mayor 17 Page 86 of 454 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF ______________ BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared ______________________________, acting on behalf of _______________________________ (Printed Name) (Printed Corporate or Business Name) and known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same on behalf of said Business or Corporation for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this _____ day of ____________________, 20_____. ______________________________ Notary Public in and for The State of Texas 17 Page 87 of 454 Account: Description: Expire Date: Terms: Order Date: QUOTE:205241 05/22/2017 08/22/2017 Due Upon Receipt 905009 WO108315 URD GAREY PARK 6450 FM 2243 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF GEORGETOWN C/O ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PO BOX 409 GEORGETOWN TX 78627-0409 Instructions:We look forward to installing underground facilities for your project. Please sign the URD Agreement and returned with your payment. Once payment and documents are received, the construction will be scheduled. If you have any questions, please contact Brian Slaton (512)525-4120 or Stacy Warren (877)372-0391, option 8, between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. CATALOG ITEM AMOUNTUOMDESCRIPTIONQUANTITYUNIT PRICE TAX CIAC-LINE EXTEN Total Construction-Line Extensions 1.000 EA 54,119.9600 54,119.96 PEC CONTRIBUTI PEC Contribution -1.000 EA 2,400.0000 -2,400.00 3001166654 Application Fees_Garey House 1.000 EA 275.0000 275.00 3001166660 Application Fees_Maintenance 1.000 EA 275.0000 275.00 3001166662 Application Fees_Arena 1.000 EA 275.0000 275.00 3001166664 Application Fees_Gatehouse 1.000 EA 275.0000 275.00 TOTAL ORDER AMOUNT:$ 52,819.96MESSAGES Direct Inquiries to: Liberty Hill Planning Department 1-877-372-0391, option 8 Fax: 512-778-6754 PECLibertyHillPlanning@peci.com Page 88 of 454 Page 89 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Forwarded by the Parks and Recreati on Advi sory B o ard: Consideration and po ssible actio n to approve a B uyB oard cooperati ve purchase contract for pool fi l ter s and i nstal l ati on at Wi l l i ams Dri ve Pool with P r og r essi ve Comme r ci al Aquati cs of Manor, TX in the amo unt of $57,871.30 -- Kimberly Garrett, Park and Recreation Directo r ITEM SUMMARY: The existing Williams Drive poo l filte rs were purchased in 2003 and the typical lifespan of these filte r is 1 0-1 2 years. These filte rs have been maintaine d and repaired ove r their lifespan but have deteriorated to a point where replacement is required. The dete rio ratio n is causing debris to pass directly through the filters which must be removed fro m the poo l. This creates longer maintenance cycles than is typical for pool maintenance. Additionally, the replacement is required to ensure proper sanitation o f the pool is maintained. The poo l filters are budgete d for replacement in the parks c apital repair and replac e ment schedule. P rogressive Co mme rcial Aquatics has successfully co mpleted many pool projects fo r the City including the Williams Drive Pool renovatio ns, River Ridge Pool renovatio ns, and the San Jose Splash Pad. Staff re commends the approval of this co operative BuyBoard contract fo r the filter replacement at Williams Drive P oo l in the amount o f $5 7,8 71 .30 to P rogressive Comme rc ial Aquatics. This item was unanimo usly approved November 9 , 20 17 by the Parks and Recreatio n Adviso ry Board. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds are budge ted in 22 8-5 -0211-51-550 for parks e quipment repair and replaceme nt. SUBMITTED BY: Kimberly Garrett, Parks and Recreation Director ATTACHMENT S: Description Quo te Page 90 of 454 Project Name: Williams Drive Filters Attn: Robert Gaylor Date: 11/9/17 Buyboard# 533-17 Quote: • (2) 93” with the same square footage needs you currently have vertical WATERCO filter. We will have this custom made with flanges in exact same spots to save on labor so that we can drop it in place and bolt it to existing manifold and not have to replumb anything. 15 Year Warranty on the tank non-prorated. To include the sand and gravel needed for both filters and stainless connection hardware. (List price for filters are $27,500/each) Total: $40,817.97 • Labor to remove old filter sand and gravel and then crane them out and install new filters in place. Check all internals and confirm seals. Bolt flanges together with NEW stainless steel hardware and gaskets. Add sand and gravel needed to each filter. Total: $9,053.33 • Equipment rentals/fuel/Dumpster and dump fees. Total: $4,500 Total: $54,371.30 Freight: $3,500 Grand Total: $57,871.30 ***This filter has a 15 year NON PRORATED WARRANTY which means if it springs any leaks waterco will fix it for free. If it is not able to be patched, waterco will replace the filter free of charge excluding labor and freight. **Allow for 5-7 days for work to be performed. Thank you, Myles Phelps Progressive Commercial Aquatics, Inc. 15616 Schmidt Loop Manor, Texas 78653 (512) 278-0801 Fax (512) 350-2154 Website www.proaquatic.com E-MailTPHELPS4@austin.rr.com Page 91 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Forwarded fro m the G eo rgetown Economi c Devel o pment Corporati on (GEDCO): Consideration and possible action to approve an agreement between Atmos Ener gy and the Georgetown Economic Development Co rporation (G EDCO) for natural g as i nfrastructure i mprovement i n dow ntow n -- Michaela Dollar, Economic Deve lo pment Director ITEM SUMMARY: Downtown Georgetown makes the city unique and appealing to businesses of all industries and is, therefo re , an impo rtant economic deve lo pment recruitment tool. Re c e nt retail studies have sho wn the largest categories for retail leakage in the city are restaurants, espec ially in downtown. That and the fac t that two out of every three dollars spe nt in downtown is on food and drinks e mphasizes the importance o f recruiting a variety of quality re staurants. Unfo rtunately, the natural gas infrastructure in do wntown is maxed-out and will be unable to serve additional restaurants. At GEDCO's re que st, staff consulted with Atmo s Energy to determine the scope of upgrades needed to accommodate planned and future gro wth along with the costs for the se upgrades. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Up to $300,000 out of GEDCO funds SUBMITTED BY: Michaela Dollar, Directo r of Economic Developme nt ATTACHMENT S: Description Main Extensio n Gas Agreement Page 92 of 454 {00009545 / v2 / CMCNABB / ECODEVO / 00014 / 9/13/2017} 1 GAS MAIN EXTENSION AGREEMENT Atmos Energy Corporation, (“Company”) and City of Georgetown, Texas (“Applicant”), whose address is 113 East 8th Street, Georgetown, TX 78626, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, agree as follows: 1. Company will extend gas service as identified in “Exhibit A,” attached and made a part hereof (the “Project”). 2. Upon execution of this Agreement, Applicant will deposit with Company up to $300,000, Exhibit “B” which is equal to the preliminary Ballpark Estimate for the Project. Within 90 days after the completion of the Project, Company will forward a statement to Applicant setting forth the total of the actual costs incurred by Company for the Project. If said actual costs are in excess of said Ballpark Estimate, then Applicant will, within 15 days after receipt of such statement, reimburse Company for all such additional costs. If the statement establishes that the actual costs for the Project were less than the Ballpark Estimate, then Company will, together with the statement, refund to Applicant the difference between the actual costs for the Project and the Ballpark Estimate. 3. If easements are required, Applicant will provide Company two executed and notarized originals of the easement. Applicant will provide Easement exhibits in the form of a certified (Texas Registered Professional Land Surveyor) plat and metes/bounds description of the new easement. In addition, Applicant agrees to provide Company necessary temporary working easement and access to easement in order to design & construct Project. 4. Company’s obligation to undertake the Project is subject to applicable laws, rules, and regulations of governmental authorities and to any delay occasioned by force majeure or events or conditions of whatever nature, which are reasonably beyond Company’s control. Applicant understands that Company will not be obligated or required to undertake the Project prior to the construction of projects covered by contracts and authorizations that were entered into by Company prior to the date of execution of this Agreement by Company (the “Effective Date”), the construction of projects required to be constructed by the provisions of Company’s franchise, or construction or repair required to maintain existing service. 5. Applicant will be responsible for any landscape restoration work required after Company has completed the Project, unless specifically stated in the project scope. To the extent allowed by Texas Law, Applicant agrees to hold Company harmless from any and all claims, demands, or judgments by other parties as a result of such restoration. 6. Title to the Project, including appurtenances, connections thereto, and extensions thereof, and including the right to use, operate, and maintain the same, will forever be and remain exclusively and unconditionally vested in Company, its successors and assigns. 7. Applicant will be responsible for any additional costs incurred by Company because of Applicant’s failure to perform any of the obligations required of Applicant under this Agreement. Page 93 of 454 {00009545 / v2 / CMCNABB / ECODEVO / 00014 / 9/13/2017} 2 8. THIS AGREEMENT WILL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY CONFLICT OF LAWS PROVISIONS. 9. In no event will any Party be liable to any other Party or any third party for any incidental, special, indirect, consequential, punitive, or exemplary damages that might occur as a result of, relating to, or arising out of the Party’s obligations under this Letter Agreement. 10. This Agreement constitutes the final expression of agreement between the parties and parol or extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to explain, vary, or contradict the express terms of this Agreement. If the foregoing terms are acceptable to Applicant, please indicate by signing two (2) copies of this Relocation Agreement in the spaces provided below and return both to this office for execution by Atmos Energy. It is understood and agreed that this Relocation Agreement is conditioned on the approval of Atmos Energy’s management as evidenced by Atmos Energy’s execution in the space provided below. Following Atmos Energy’s execution, one (1) fully executed original of this Letter Agreement will be returned for your file. City of Georgetown, Texas Atmos Energy Corporation By: David Morgan By: ___ Printed Name: ____________ Printed Name:________________________ Title: City Manager Title: _______________________________ Date: ______________________________ Date: _______________________________ Page 94 of 454 {00009545 / v2 / CMCNABB / ECODEVO / 00014 / 9/13/2017} 1 Exhibit “A” Project Description Proposed gas main extension along W 7th Street, to the west of Austin Avenue Page 95 of 454 Proposed gas main extension at 9th Street and Main Street Page 96 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Forwarded fro m the G eo rgetown Vi l l age P ubl i c Improvement Di stri ct (GVP ID): Consideration and possible action to approve Task Or der KPA-18-005 to Kasber g, P atri ck, and Associ ates, LP o f Georgetown, TX in the amount of $59,490.00 for a l andscape, ameni ty, and w ayfi ndi ng si g nage masterpl an for the G eorgetow n Vi l l age P ubl i c Improvement Di stri ct -- Eric Nuner, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director ITEM SUMMARY: Funding fo r a maste r plan for public impro vements within the Georgetown Village P ublic Improvement District (GVP ID) is included in the FY1 8 budget. This project will involve preparing a master plan and operational and maintenance co sts for proposed and e xisting park facility improvements within the GVPID. This pro ject will also include wayfinding signage design and implementation. By evaluating the existing conditions, existing surve y and working close ly with the Board and City Staff, the deliverable will include re nde red graphics for proposed de sign improvements and locatio ns, opinion of pro bable co sts for improve ments, a 5-year phasing plan and o pinion of probable operational and mainte nance costs. Input and information gathered fro m the neighborhood survey co mpleted in 2016, previo us GVP ID board meetings, and future board meetings will be utilized to develop this plan. Additionally, KPA in coordination with Co vey Landsc ape Architects will lead discussion items during future board meetings to refine the plan. This plan will provide a framework for the GVPID adviso ry board to prioritize funding for future improvements within the district. A final master plan is scheduled to be presente d to the board in April fo r approval. This will allow any priorities to be included in the FY1 9 budget process. Staff re c ommends executing Task Order KPA-1 8-005 fo r professional services relate d to the GVPID master plan with Kasberg, Patric k, and Asso ciates, LP of Georgeto wn, TX, in the amount of $59,490 . This item was unanimo usly approved at the Ge orgetown Village Public Impro vement District Advisory Board meeting on November 13, 20 17 . FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds are available in GVPID FY18 budget fund 23 4-5 -02 11-5 1-315 in the amount o f $7 0,0 00 . SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost for Eric Nuner, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director ATTACHMENT S: Description KPA Task Ord er Page 97 of 454 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 1 of 4 Task Order In accordance with paragraph 1.01 of the Master Services Agreement between Owner and Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP (“Engineer”) for Professional Services – Task Order Edition, dated March 23, 2016 ("Agreement"), Owner and Engineer agree as follows: 1. Specific Project Data A. Title: _Georgetown Village PID Master Plan__________________________ B. Description: This project will involve preparing a master plan and operational and maintenance costs for proposed and existing park facility improvements within the Georgetown Village Public Improvement District (GVPID). This project will also include wayfinding signage design and implementation. By evaluating the existing conditions, existing survey and working closely with the Board and City Staff, the deliverable will include rendered graphics for proposed design improvements and locations, opinion of probable costs for improvements, a 5-year phasing plan and opinion of probable operational and maintenance costs. C. City of Georgetown Project Number: NA D. City of Georgetown General Ledger Account No.: 234-5-0211-51-315 E. City of Georgetown Purchase Order No. 3800964 F. Master Services Agreement, Contract Number: 2016-730-MSA 2. Services of Engineer See Exhibit A, Scope of Services, attached 3. Owner's Responsibilities Owner shall have those responsibilities set forth in the Agreement subject to the following The City of Georgetown will provide asbuilt records and data of the existing utilities within the project area. 4. Times for Rendering Services Phase Completion Date Master Plan 60% February 1, 2018 Master Plan 75% March 15, 2018 Master Plan 100% May 1, 2018 Task Order No. KPA-18-005-TO, consisting of 16 pages Page 98 of 454 Page 99 of 454 Page 100 of 454 Page 101 of 454 EXHIBIT A – DETAILED PROJECT SCOPE SERVICES PROVIDED BY KPA ENGINEERS, LP GEORGETOWN, TEXAS Project Description: This project will involve preparing a master plan and operational and maintenance costs for proposed and existing park facility improvements within the Georgetown Village Public Improvement District (GVPID). This project will also include wayfinding signage design and implementation. By evaluating the existing conditions, existing survey and working closely with the Board and City Staff, the deliverable will include rendered graphics for proposed design improvements and locations, opinion of probable costs for improvements, a 5-year phasing plan and opinion of probable operational and maintenance costs. This scope includes proposed professional services to be provided by Covey Landscape Architects for this project. Scope of Services: The scope of services associated with creating a Masterplan for the Georgetown Village Public Improvement District (GVPID) includes: I. Project Management/Coordination: a. Meeting #1 November Meeting and project kick-off. i. The ENGINEER will attend the November board meeting for introduction. ii. The ENGINEER will assist the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT in preparation for the meetings and provide support documentation. b. Meeting #2 December Meeting i. The ENGINEER will attend the December Board Meeting. ii. The ENGINEER will assist the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT in preparation for the meetings and provide support documentation. c. Meeting #3 January Meeting i. The ENGINEER will attend the December Board Meeting. ii. The ENGINEER will assist the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT in preparation for the meetings and provide support documentation. d. Meeting #4 February Meeting i. The ENGINEER will attend the December Board Meeting. ii. The ENGINEER will assist the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT in preparation for the meetings and provide support documentation. Page 102 of 454 e. Meeting #5 March Meeting i. The ENGINEER will attend the December Board Meeting. ii. The ENGINEER will assist the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT in preparation for the meetings and provide support documentation. f. Meeting #6 April Meeting i. The ENGINEER will attend the December Board Meeting. ii. The ENGINEER will assist the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT in preparation for the meetings and provide support documentation. g. Staff Meetings i. The ENGINEER will attend up to six (6) Staff Meetings with the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. II. Site Analysis and Evaluation a. Meet with City staff to develop initial strategies i. The ENGINEER will meet with City staff to acquire existing maps, easements and utilities for working base maps for the Georgetown Village. b. Review all survey and public input information collected i. The ENGINEER will provide support to the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT in review and evaluation of the survey findings. c. Organize existing electronic files and bases i. The ENGINEER will assist the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT with organizing the existing base files and GIS data. d. Conduct existing site inventory and conditions of streetscapes and signage. i. The ENGINEER will assist the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT with an on- site site inventory of Georgetown Village for all signage elements and street trees. III. .Development of Overall Landscape and Amenity Masterplan a. Organize site analysis, site inventory and all evaluation information. i. The ENGINEER will assist the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT updating the existing base file to include information from the site survey and to evaluate the proposed improvement quantities and locations. b. Develop rehabilitation and propose new concepts. i. The ENGINEER will develop a proposed layout for a new round-a-bout and prepare an overall rendering and cost estimate to include in the Master Plan. c. Prepare cost estimates for all projects. Page 103 of 454 i. The ENGINEER will assist the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT in preparing line items descriptions and opinions of probable costs for all proposed improvements. d. Make design revisions based on feedback i. The ENGINEER will assist the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT in providing revisions to the proposed master plan based off feedback from City Staff and Board. e. Provide maintenance costs of all proposed and renovated items i. The ENGINEER will assist the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT in providing O & M Costs. f. Prepare overall landscape masterplan / budget for final presentation to the Board i. The ENGINEER will assist the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT in preparing the final master plan and opc’s for the project. IV. Wayfinding Signage Masterplan Layout a. The ENGINEER will assist the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT in updating the base file to determine locations for wayfinding signage. b. The ENGINEER will assist the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT in preparing Wayfinding Signage Plans/Schematics and Proposed OPC's for the Project . Page 104 of 454 EXHIBIT A – DETAILED PROJECT SCOPE SERVICES PROVIDED BY COVEY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS GEORGETOWN, TEXAS Scope of Services: The scope of services associated with creating a Masterplan for the Georgetown Village Public Improvement District (GVPID) includes: I. Project Management/Coordination: a. Meeting #1 November Meeting and project kick-off. i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will attend the November board meeting for introduction. ii. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will gather input from the Board for the overall Masterplan and define Masterplan services. iii. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will address wayfinding and signage as the first priority. b. Meeting #2 December Meeting i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will present wayfinding / signage locations and design concepts of for feedback from the Board. ii. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will address the overall existing survey and site analysis findings with the Board. c. Meeting #3 January Meeting i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will present wayfinding / signage final concepts and locations. ii. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will address and prioritize design improvements to be implemented into the overall Masterplan. d. Meeting #4 February Meeting i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will present the prioritized design improvements and locations with associated costs integrated into a 5 year plan. e. Meeting #3 March Meeting i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will present an overall preliminary design graphic integrating the final wayfinding / signage for feedback from the Board. f. Meeting #3 April Meeting Page 105 of 454 i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will present an overall final rendered Masterplan reflecting proposed design improvements and locations, estimate of cost, 5-year plan and estimate of maintenance costs to the Board. II. Site Analysis and Evaluation a. Meet with City staff to develop initial strategies i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will meet with City staff to acquire existing maps, easements and utilities for working base maps for the Georgetown Village. b. Review all survey and public input information collected i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will collect and import all files in order to utilize the most up to date base information. c. Provide graphic showing survey findings i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will use base map information collected in order to show existing and proposed features graphically. d. Organize existing electronic files and bases i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will compile all information collected into electronic files. e. Conduct existing site inventory and conditions of streetscapes and signage. i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will conduct an on-site site inventory of Georgetown Village for all signage elements and street trees. f. Evaluate existing inventory data from different areas within Georgetown Village i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will conduct an on-site site inventory of Georgetown Village for all park areas and amenities. g. Provide existing conditions and inventory report and overall graphic plan i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will utilize base maps and all collected site analysis information into one electronic file base map. III. .Development of Overall Landscape and Amenity Masterplan a. Organize site analysis, site inventory and all evaluation information. i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will utilize the collected existing base information to evaluate the proposed improvement quantities and locations. b. Develop rehabilitation and propose new concepts. Page 106 of 454 i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will utilize the collected existing base information to evaluate the proposed improvement designs and will be interpreted through graphic renderings. c. Develop technical specifications and recommendations for proposed items. i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will provide technical specifications for detailed descriptions of proposed or specific improvements not conveyed graphically. d. Graphically organize existing renovation items with proposed new items. i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will distinguish existing inventory from proposed improvements through graphic plans and perspectives. e. Prepare cost estimates for all projects. i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will prepare line items descriptions and estimate of probable cost for all proposed improvements. f. Prepare overall design development and schematic design graphic concepts i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will utilize the collected existing base information work through concept design to final design. g. Make design revisions based on feedback i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will present each phase of the design progression graphically at the monthly meetings and the will request feedback from the Board to revise. ii. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will make (1) revision per feedback from each monthly meeting. The revision based on feedback will be presented at the following monthly meeting. h. Provide maintenance costs of all proposed and renovated items i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will prepare line items descriptions and estimate of probable cost for all proposed maintenance items. i. Prepare overall landscape masterplan / budget for final presentation to the Board i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will present a final plan graphic, associated graphic perspective views. ii. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will present a final estimate of probable costs for improvements. iii. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will present a final estimate of probable cost for maintenance IV. Wayfinding Signage Masterplan Layout a. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will identify locations for Wayfinding Signage. Page 107 of 454 i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will utilize the collected existing base information to evaluate the proposed improvement quantities and locations. b. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will develop Wayfinding Signage Concepts. i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will present up to three (3) concept designs at the December meeting based on input for signage improvements at the November meeting. c. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT review Wayfinding Signage Concepts with City Staff and Board. i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will present wayfinding / signage concepts and request feedback from the Board. ii. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will make (1) revision per feedback from each monthly meeting. The revision based on feedback will be presented at the following monthly meeting. d. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT prepare Wayfinding Signage Plans/Schematics and Proposed OPC's for the Project. i. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will present a final plan graphic, associated graphic perspective views. ii. The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT will present a final estimate of probable costs for improvements. Page 108 of 454 EXHIBIT B: FEE SCHEDULE KPA CLA TOTAL 1. Project Management & Coordination 4,360.00$ 7,300.00$ 11,660.00$ 2. Site Analysis and Evaluation 1,350.00$ 10,650.00$ 12,000.00$ 3. Development of Overall Landscape & Amenity Masterplan 2,900.00$ 22,600.00$ 25,500.00$ 4. Wayfinding Signage Master Layout 1,230.00$ 9,100.00$ 10,330.00$ TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOTAL 9,840.00$ 49,650.00$ 59,490.00$ Subconsultants: Covey Landscape Architects Georgetown Village Public Improvements District Master Plan Summary of Professional Services Fee November 7, 2017 COST SUMMARY Summary of Hours SUMMARY Page 1 of 5 Page 109 of 454 EXHIBIT B: FEE SCHEDULE Principal Project Manager Project Engineer Graduate Engineer (EIT) Senior Eng Tech (CAD) Eng Tech (CAD)Clerical Fee Schedule 200.00$ 160.00$ 135.00$ 105.00$ 85.00$ 75.00$ 55.00$ 1. Project Management & Coordination a.Board Meetings - Six (6) Board Meetings 2,180.00$ 4 6 4 14 b.Staff Meetings - Six (6) Staff Meetings 2,180.00$ 4 6 4 14 Project Management & Coordination 4,360.00$ 8 12 0 8 0 0 0 28 2. Site Analysis and Evaluation a.Develop initial strategies 360.00$ 1 1 2 b.Review all survey and public input information collected 160.00$ 1 1 c.Provide graphic showing survey findings -$ 0 d.Organize existing electronic files and bases 415.00$ 1 1 2 4 e.Conduct existing site inventory and conditions of streetscapes, signage and parks 415.00$ 1 1 2 4 f.Evaluate existing inventory data from different areas within Georgetown Village -$ 0 g.Provide existing conditions and inventory report and overall graphic plan -$ 0 Site Analysis and Evaluation 1,350.00$ 1 4 0 2 0 4 0 11 3. Development of Overall Landscape & Amenity Masterplan a.Organize site analysis, site inventory and all evaluation information 415.00$ 1 1 2 4 b.Develop rehabilitation and propose new concepts 615.00$ 1 1 1 2 5 c.Develop technical specifications and recommendations for proposed items -$ 0 d.Graphically organize existing renovation items with proposed new items -$ 0 e.Prepare cost estimates for all projects 570.00$ 1 1 2 4 f.Prepare overall design development and schematic design graphic concepts -$ 0 g.Make design revisions based on feedback 465.00$ 1 1 1 3 h.Provide maintenance costs of all proposed and renovated items 370.00$ 1 2 3 i.Prepare overall landscape masterplan / budget for final presentation to the Board 465.00$ 1 1 1 3 Development of Overall Landscape & Amenity Masterplan 2,900.00$ 4 6 0 8 0 4 0 22 Georgetown Village Public Improvements District Master Plan Summary of Professional Services Fee Estimate by Employee/Position Category November 7, 2017 Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP (KPA) Total Fee Summary of Hours TOTAL Scope Items KPA Page 2 of 5 Page 110 of 454 EXHIBIT B: FEE SCHEDULE Principal Project Manager Project Engineer Graduate Engineer (EIT) Senior Eng Tech (CAD) Eng Tech (CAD)Clerical Fee Schedule 200.00$ 160.00$ 135.00$ 105.00$ 85.00$ 75.00$ 55.00$ Georgetown Village Public Improvements District Master Plan Summary of Professional Services Fee Estimate by Employee/Position Category November 7, 2017 Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP (KPA) Total Fee Summary of Hours TOTAL Scope Items 4. Wayfinding Signage Master Layout a.Identify locations for Wayfinding Signage 615.00$ 1 1 1 2 5 b.Develop Wayfinding Signage Concepts -$ 0 c.Review Wayfinding Signage Concepts with City Staff and Board -$ 0 d.Prepare Wayfinding Signage Plans/Schematics and Proposed OPC's for the Project 615.00$ 1 1 1 2 5 Wayfinding Signage Master Layout 1,230.00$ 2 2 0 2 0 4 0 10 Total Fee Principal Senior Engineer Project Engineer Graduate Engineer (EIT) Senior Eng Tech (CAD) Eng Tech (CAD)Clerical TOTAL 1. Project Management & Coordination 4,360.00$ 8 12 0 8 0 0 0 28 2. Site Analysis and Evaluation 1,350.00$ 1 4 0 2 0 4 0 11 3. Development of Overall Landscape & Amenity Masterplan 2,900.00$ 4 6 0 8 0 4 0 22 4. Wayfinding Signage Master Layout 1,230.00$ 2 2 0 2 0 4 0 10 9,840.00$ 15 24 0 20 0 12 0 71 Summary of Labor & Associated Cost TOTAL KPA Page 3 of 5 Page 111 of 454 EXHIBIT B: FEE SCHEDULE Principal Project Manager Landscape Architect (LA) Landscape Designer Clerical Fee Schedule 200.00$ 175.00$ 150.00$ 125.00$ 70.00$ 1. Project Management & Coordination a.Board Meetings - Six (6) Board Meetings including Project Kickoff, Progress Meetings, Final Presentation 3,650.00$ 6 6 6 4 22 b.Staff Meetings - Six (6) Staff Meetings including Project Kickoff, Progress Meetings, Final Presentation 3,650.00$ 6 6 6 4 22 Project Management & Coordination 7,300.00$ 12 12 12 8 0 44 2. Site Analysis and Evaluation a.Develop initial strategies 1,050.00$ 2 2 2 6 b.Review all survey and public input information collected 1,100.00$ 1 2 2 2 7 c.Provide graphic showing survey findings 2,550.00$ 1 4 6 6 17 d.Organize existing electronic files and bases 650.00$ 1 1 1 1 4 e.Conduct existing site inventory and conditions of streetscapes, signage and parks 2,000.00$ 1 4 4 4 13 f.Evaluate existing inventory data from different areas within Georgetown Village 1,650.00$ 1 2 4 4 11 g.Provide existing conditions and inventory report and overall graphic plan 1,650.00$ 1 2 4 4 11 Site Analysis and Evaluation 10,650.00$ 8 17 23 21 0 69 3. Development of Overall Landscape & Amenity Masterplan a.Organize site analysis, site inventory and all evaluation information 1,650.00$ 1 2 4 4 11 b.Develop rehabilitation and propose new concepts 4,400.00$ 1 8 12 8 29 c.Develop technical specifications and recommendations for proposed items 2,950.00$ 1 6 8 4 19 d.Graphically organize existing renovation items with proposed new items 2,450.00$ 2 4 4 6 16 e.Prepare cost estimates for all projects 2,000.00$ 1 4 4 4 13 f.Prepare overall design development and schematic design graphic concepts 3,900.00$ 2 4 12 8 26 g.Make design revisions based on feedback 1,100.00$ 1 2 2 2 7 h.Provide maintenance costs of all proposed and renovated items 1,150.00$ 1 2 4 7 i.Prepare overall landscape masterplan / budget for final presentation to the Board 3,000.00$ 2 4 6 8 20 Development of Overall Landscape & Amenity Masterplan 22,600.00$ 12 36 56 44 0 148 Georgetown Village Public Improvements District Master Plan Summary of Professional Services Fee Estimate by Employee/Position Category November 7, 2017 Covey Landscape Architects (CLA) Total Fee Summary of Hours TOTAL Scope Items CLA Page 4 of 5 Page 112 of 454 EXHIBIT B: FEE SCHEDULE Principal Project Manager Landscape Architect (LA) Landscape Designer Clerical Fee Schedule 200.00$ 175.00$ 150.00$ 125.00$ 70.00$ Georgetown Village Public Improvements District Master Plan Summary of Professional Services Fee Estimate by Employee/Position Category November 7, 2017 Covey Landscape Architects (CLA) Total Fee Summary of Hours TOTAL Scope Items 4. Wayfinding Signage Master Layout a.Identify locations for Wayfinding Signage 2,150.00$ 1 2 4 8 15 b.Develop Wayfinding Signage Concepts 2,550.00$ 1 4 6 6 17 c.Review Wayfinding Signage Concepts with City Staff and Board 1,100.00$ 1 2 2 2 7 d.Prepare Wayfinding Signage Plans/Schematics and Proposed OPC's for the Project 3,300.00$ 2 4 8 8 22 Wayfinding Signage Master Layout 9,100.00$ 5 12 20 24 0 61 Total Fee Principal Senior Engineer Project Engineer Graduate Engineer (EIT) Senior Eng Tech (CAD) TOTAL 1. Project Management & Coordination 7,300.00$ 12 12 12 8 0 44 2. Site Analysis and Evaluation 10,650.00$ 8 17 23 21 0 69 3. Development of Overall Landscape & Amenity Masterplan 22,600.00$ 12 36 56 44 0 148 3. Development of Overall Landscape & Amenity Masterplan 9,100.00$ 5 12 20 24 0 61 49,650.00$ 37 77 111 97 0 322 Summary of Labor & Associated Cost TOTAL CLA Page 5 of 5 Page 113 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Forwarded fro m the G eo rgetown Transportati on Advi sory Board (G TAB): Consideration and possible action to award a contr ac t to Pati n Constructi on, LLC o f Taylor, Texas for the constructi on o f the 2 01 7 CDBG Sceni c Dri ve Si de w al k project in the amount of $14 0,9 02 .00 -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director/Michael Hallmark, CIP Manager ITEM SUMMARY: This pro posed project is to provide ADA/TDLR Compliant sidewalks and inc rease mo bility along Scenic Dr. and 6 th St. The project co nsists of construc ting approximately 925 square yards of sidewalk and 1 3 curb ramps along Scenic Drive from 10th St. to the existing mix trail near the 700 blo ck of Scenic Drive. This pro ject also inc ludes constructing the sidewalk on 6th street from Martin Luther King Dr. to Scenic Drive. This project was publicly advertise d on Septe mber 17, 20 17 and September 24 , 2017. Twelve (1 2) firms o btained plans. From these plan ho lders on October 1 7, 2 01 7 we receive d nine (9) competitive bids. The low bidder fo r the pro ject was Jaimes Concre te o f Hutto, Texas with a total bid of $13 7.0 92 .90. However, Jaimes Co ncrete withdrew their bid. The next lo w qualified bidde r for the pro ject was Patin Construction, LLC with a total bid o f $140,90 2.0 0. Kasberg, P atrick & Associates, LP have reviewed the current workload, references and c onstruction history of Patin Construc tion. As a results o f the findings Kasbe rg, Patrick & Associates recommend the co ntract be awarded to Patin Construc tion, LLC. STAF F RECOMMENDATION: Kasberg, Patrick & Associate s, LP and staff reco mmend awarding the contract to Patin Constructio n, LLC of Taylo r, Texas for the co nstruction o f the 2017 CDBG Scenic Drive Sidewalk project in the amo unt o f $140,902.00 FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the current year capital impro vement budget. This project is funded almost entirely via a CDBG grant received last year. SUBMITTED BY: Chris Pousson ATTACHMENT S: Description Bid Tabulatio n Letter of Rec ommend ation P atin Co nstruc tio n, LLC Bid Respons e Page 114 of 454 Page 115 of 454 Page 116 of 454 Page 117 of 454 Page 118 of 454 Page 119 of 454 Page 120 of 454 Page 121 of 454 Page 122 of 454 Page 123 of 454 Page 124 of 454 Page 125 of 454 Page 126 of 454 Page 127 of 454 Page 128 of 454 Page 129 of 454 Page 130 of 454 Page 131 of 454 Page 132 of 454 Page 133 of 454 Page 134 of 454 Page 135 of 454 Page 136 of 454 Page 137 of 454 Page 138 of 454 Page 139 of 454 Page 140 of 454 Page 141 of 454 Page 142 of 454 Page 143 of 454 Page 144 of 454 Page 145 of 454 Page 146 of 454 Page 147 of 454 Page 148 of 454 Page 149 of 454 Page 150 of 454 Page 151 of 454 Page 152 of 454 Page 153 of 454 Page 154 of 454 Page 155 of 454 Page 156 of 454 Page 157 of 454 Page 158 of 454 Page 159 of 454 Page 160 of 454 Page 161 of 454 Page 162 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Forwarded fro m the G eo rgetown Transportati on Advi sory Board (G TAB): Consideration and possible action to approve a c hange order to MA Smi th Contracti ng Company, Inc. in the amo unt of $118,805.00 for Ci tyw i de Si dew al k Improve me nts -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Syste ms Engineering Director ITEM SUMMARY: With the recent renovatio n of the Grace Heritage Church and the elimination of the bus stop adjacent to the church, eight (8) parking spac e s can be added and sidewalk connectivity can be improved in the immediate area. The area adjacent to Grac e Heritage Church, kno wn as Fo unders Park was included in the o riginal scope o f the Citywide Sidewalk Improvement. The existing contractor has pro vided pricing for consideration as an addition to the ir existing contract. MA Smith Contracting has done exc e lle nt work to date o n the ove rall project and they have provided competitive pric ing for the work. Staff and the de sign engineer recommend award of this change o rder in order to expedite the improvements. It is important to no te that no work will occur in this area during the holiday season. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds are available in vario us budget centers (Public Works Sidewalk Repair and Mainte nance, General Repair & Maintenance, and Public Facilities) to cover the co sts o f these improvements. SUBMITTED BY: Wesley Wright ATTACHMENT S: Description Layout - Propos ed Imp ro vements Quo te - Propos ed Imp ro vements Page 163 of 454 TR SO 21 FH SCV SCV LP LP LP PP PP WM WV WM WM WV 753 754 754 75 3 FURNISH AND INSTALL ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN FURNISH AND INSTALL 24 LF 4" WHITE PARKING STRIPE (TYPICAL THIS BAY) 8~ 45° PARKING SPACES 45 ° ' 8' 9' 9' FURNISH AND INSTALL 16 LF 4" WHITE PARKING STRIPE (TYPICAL THIS BAY) FURNISH AND INSTALL 96 LF OF 4" WHITE STIPE FOR ADA ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE FURNISH AND INSTALL ADA PARKING SYMBOL 0 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 5 10 N O R T H Plot Date: 9/18/2017 3:44:32 PM Plotted By: SILIFF STRIPING PLAN FI L E : P: \ G e o r g e t o w n \ 2 0 1 7 \ 2 0 1 7 - 1 3 9 G R A C E H E R I T A G E P L A Z A \ C A D \ B a s e \ 1 7 - 1 3 9 - P B S . d w g L A S T S A V E D : 9/ 1 8 / 2 0 1 7 3 : 4 3 : 2 6 P M LA Y O U T : P- 0 2 S T R I P I N G P L A N SHEET NO. P-02 OF 03 SHEETSAPPROVED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NO. DATE ALVIN R. SUTTON III, P.E. 2016-134 Sean Iliff GEORGETOWN, TEXAS GRACE HERITAGE PLAZA SIDEWALK AND PARKING IMPROVEMENTSKASBERG, PATRICK & ASSOCIATES, LP CONSULTING ENGINEERS GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78626© 2017 Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP KPA Firm Registration Number F-510 BYREVISIONDATENO.DESIGN SET Page 164 of 454 UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE FOR GRACE HERITAGE CENTER PARKING AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PART A: 9TH STREET PARKING IMPROVEMENTS A‐1 100% LS $ 5,000.00 5,000.00 FIVE THOUSAND Dollars and ZERO Cents per Lump Sum. A‐2 100% LS $ 500.00 500.00 FIVE HUNDRED Dollars and ZERO Cents per Lump Sum. A‐3 100% LS $ 1,500.00 1,500.00 ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDR Dollars and ZERO Cents per Lump Sum A‐4 100% LS $ 2,500.00 2,500.00 TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDR Dollars and ZERO Cents per Lump Sum. Provide a Video DVD of the Project Area Prior to and After Construction for All Parts, Complete For Insurance, Bonds and Mobilization, not to exceed 5% of Total Bid (All Parts), Complete For For Preparing, Implementing, and Maintiaing a Pedestrian Control Plan for All Parts, Complete for ITEM NO.ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION & UNIT PRICE IN WORDS TOTAL EXTENDED PRICE UNIT PRICE IN FIGURES Implement and Administer Barricade, Signing and Traffic Safety Plan (Vehicular) for All Parts, Complete For Page 1 of 12 Bid FormPage 165 of 454 UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE FOR GRACE HERITAGE CENTER PARKING AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PART A: 9TH STREET PARKING IMPROVEMENTS ITEM NO.ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION & UNIT PRICE IN WORDS TOTAL EXTENDED PRICE UNIT PRICE IN FIGURES A‐5 100% LS $ 2,400.00 2,400.00 TWO THOUSAND FOUR HUND Dollars and ZERO Cents per Lump Sum. A‐6 100% LS $ 15,000.00 15,000.00 FIFTEEN THOUSAND Dollars and ZERO Cents per Lump Sum. A‐730CY $ 50.00 1,500.00 FIFTY Dollars and ZERO Cents per Cubic Yards. A‐8 230 SY $ 5.00 1,150.00 FIVE Dollars and ZERO Cents per Square Yard. Prepare Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, including submission to and receiving permits from Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) for All Parts, Complete For Provide Labor, Equipment, Tools and Supervision to Complete Preparation of Right‐of‐way for All Parts, Complete For Remove Existing Asphalt Pavement, Complete For For Unclassified Excavation, complete in place for Page 2 of 12 Bid FormPage 166 of 454 UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE FOR GRACE HERITAGE CENTER PARKING AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PART A: 9TH STREET PARKING IMPROVEMENTS ITEM NO.ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION & UNIT PRICE IN WORDS TOTAL EXTENDED PRICE UNIT PRICE IN FIGURES A‐9 195 LF $ 8.00 1,560.00 EIGHT Dollars and ZERO Cents per Linear Foot A‐10 8 EA $ 125.00 1,000.00 ONE HUNDRED TWENTY FIV Dollars and ZERO Cents per Each. A‐11 6 LF $ 2,000.00 12,000.00 TWO THOUSAND Dollars and ZERO Cents per Linear Foot. A‐12 200 SY $ 10.00 2,000.00 TEN Dollars and ZERO Cents per Square Yard. Concrete Flume and Cover as detailed in the Plans, Complete For Remove Exisitng Concrete Curb, Complete For Furnish and Install Wheel Stops, Complete For For Hydromulching Disturbed Areas, Including Watering, Fertilizing, and Mowing to Establish Growth, Complete For Page 3 of 12 Bid FormPage 167 of 454 UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE FOR GRACE HERITAGE CENTER PARKING AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PART A: 9TH STREET PARKING IMPROVEMENTS ITEM NO.ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION & UNIT PRICE IN WORDS TOTAL EXTENDED PRICE UNIT PRICE IN FIGURES A‐13 41 SY $ 100.00 4,100.00 ONE HUNDRED Dollars and ZERO Cents per Square Yard. A‐14 2 EA $ 2,000.00 4,000.00 TWO THOUSAND Dollars and ZERO Cents per Each. A‐15 85 SY $ 50.00 4,250.00 FIFTY Dollars and ZERO Cents per Square Yard. A‐16 10 SY $ 100.00 1,000.00 ONE HUNDRED Dollars and ZERO Cents per Square Yard. A‐17 10 SY $ 100.00 1,000.00 Furnish & Install Concrete Brick Paver Base, Complete For Furnish and Install Brick Pavers, Complete For Furnish & Install ADA Compliant Sidewalk per Detail and Plan Sheets, Including Reinforcement and Bedding, Complete For Remove and Reset Existing Brick Pavers for ADA Compliance, Complete For Furnish & Install TxDOT Type 7 Ramp, Complete For Page 4 of 12 Bid FormPage 168 of 454 UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE FOR GRACE HERITAGE CENTER PARKING AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PART A: 9TH STREET PARKING IMPROVEMENTS ITEM NO.ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION & UNIT PRICE IN WORDS TOTAL EXTENDED PRICE UNIT PRICE IN FIGURES ONE HUNDRED Dollars and ZERO Cents per Square Yard. A‐18 90 LF $ 40.00 3,600.00 FOURTY Dollars and ZERO Cents per Linear Foot. Furnish and Install Standard Curb and Gutter, Including Transition Area Complete For Page 5 of 12 Bid FormPage 169 of 454 UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE FOR GRACE HERITAGE CENTER PARKING AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PART A: 9TH STREET PARKING IMPROVEMENTS ITEM NO.ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION & UNIT PRICE IN WORDS TOTAL EXTENDED PRICE UNIT PRICE IN FIGURES A‐19 100 LF $ 20.00 2,000.00 TWENTY Dollars and ZERO Cents per Linear Foot. A‐20 190 LF $ 13.00 2,470.00 THIRTEEN Dollars and ZERO Cents per A‐21 230 SY $ 50.00 11,500.00 FIFTY Dollars and ZERO Cents per Square Yard. A‐22 15 TN $ 315.00 4,725.00 THREE HUNDRED FIFTEEN Dollars and ZERO Cents per Ton. PART A TOTAL $ (in figures) SEVENTY NINE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS (in written words) 84,755.00 Furnish and Install 4ʺSolid White Thermo Plastic Striping, Complete For Furnish & Install Type ʺDʺHMAC, Complete For Furnish and Install Concrete Ribbon Curb per Detail in the Plans, Complete For Furnish & Install Type ʺDʺHMAC for Level Up, Complete For Page 6 of 12 Bid FormPage 170 of 454 UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE FOR GRACE HERITAGE CENTER PARKING AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PART B ‐ SIDEWALK & RESTROOM PARKING AREA B‐150CY $ 50.00 2,500.00 FIFTY Dollars and ZERO Cents per Cubic Yard. B‐2 120 SY $ 5.00 600.00 FIVE Dollars and ZERO Cents per Square Yard. Remove Existing Asphalt Pavement, Complete For For Unclassified Excavation, complete in place for ITEM NO. ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION & UNIT PRICE IN WORDS UNIT PRICE IN FIGURES TOTAL EXTENDED PRICE Page 7 of 12 Bid FormPage 171 of 454 UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE FOR GRACE HERITAGE CENTER PARKING AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PART B ‐ SIDEWALK & RESTROOM PARKING AREA ITEM NO. ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION & UNIT PRICE IN WORDS UNIT PRICE IN FIGURES TOTAL EXTENDED PRICE B‐31EA $ 800.00 800.00 EIGHT HUNDRED Dollars and ZERO Cents per Each. B‐4 110 SY $ 30.00 3,300.00 THIRTY Dollars and ZERO Cents per Square Yard. B‐5 230 LF $ 10.00 2,300.00 TEN Dollars and ZERO Cents per Linear Foot. B‐638LF $ 160.00 6,080.00 ONE HUNDRED SIXTY Dollars and ZERO Cents per Linear Foot. Remove Existing Non‐Compliant Ramp, Complete For Remove Existing Non‐Compliant Sidewalk, Complete For Remove Existing Brick Pavers and Deliver intact to City, Complete For Furnish & Install TxDOT Handrail, Type B, Complete for Page 8 of 12 Bid FormPage 172 of 454 UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE FOR GRACE HERITAGE CENTER PARKING AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PART B ‐ SIDEWALK & RESTROOM PARKING AREA ITEM NO. ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION & UNIT PRICE IN WORDS UNIT PRICE IN FIGURES TOTAL EXTENDED PRICE B‐735SY $ 60.00 2,100.00 SIXTY Dollars and ZERO Cents per Square Yard. B‐81EA $ 340.00 340.00 THREE HUNDRED FORTY Dollars and ZERO Cents per Each. B‐91EA $ 400.00 400.00 FOUR HUNDRED Dollars and ZERO Cents per Each. B‐10 115 LF $ 12.00 1,380.00 TWELVE Dollars and ZERO Cents per Linear Foot. Furnish & Install ADA Accessible Parking Symbols, Complete For Furnish & Install ADA Accessible Parking Signs, Complete For Furnish and Install 4ʺSolid White Thermo Plastic Striping, Complete For Furnish & Install ADA Compliant Sidewalk per Detail and Plan Sheets, Including Reinforcement and Bedding, Complete For Page 9 of 12 Bid FormPage 173 of 454 UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE FOR GRACE HERITAGE CENTER PARKING AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PART B ‐ SIDEWALK & RESTROOM PARKING AREA ITEM NO. ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION & UNIT PRICE IN WORDS UNIT PRICE IN FIGURES TOTAL EXTENDED PRICE B‐11 90 LF $ 40.00 3,600.00 FORTY Dollars and ZERO Cents per Linear Foot. B‐12 120 SY $ 50.00 6,000.00 FIFTY Dollars and ZERO Cents per Square Yard. B‐13 10 TN $ 315.00 3,150.00 THREE HUNDRED FIFTEEN Dollars and ZERO Cents per Ton. B‐14 50 SY $ 30.00 1,500.00 THIRTY Dollars and ZERO Cents per Square Yard. PART B TOTAL $ (in figures) THIRTY FOUR THOUSAND FIFTY DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS. 34,050.00 Furnish & Install Type ʺDʺHMAC, Complete For For Hydromulching, Including Watering, Fertilizing, and Mowing to Establish Growth, Complete For Furnish and Install Standard Curb and Gutter, Complete For Furnish & Install Type ʺDʺHMAC for Level Up, Complete For Page 10 of 12 Bid FormPage 174 of 454 UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE FOR GRACE HERITAGE CENTER PARKING AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PART B ‐ SIDEWALK & RESTROOM PARKING AREA ITEM NO. ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION & UNIT PRICE IN WORDS UNIT PRICE IN FIGURES TOTAL EXTENDED PRICE (in written words) Page 11 of 12 Bid FormPage 175 of 454 PROJECT SUMMARY BASE BID: PART A $ BASE BID: PART B $ TOTAL BID $ 84,755.00 34,050.00 118,805.00 Page 12 of 12 Bid FormPage 176 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Publ i c Heari ng and Fi rst Readi ng of an Ordinanc e rezoni ng approxi matel y 4.4 0 acres in the Fish Survey locate d at 4819 Wi l l i ams Dr i ve from the Nei ghborhood Commerci al (CN) Di stri ct, to Lo c al Commerci al (C-1) Di stri c t -- Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, P lanning Director (acti on requi red) ITEM SUMMARY: B ackground: The applicant is re questing to rezone the 4.40-acre property, located at 48 19 Williams Drive, from the Neighborho od Commercial (CN) zoning district to the Lo c al Commercial (C-1) zo ning district. The property is currently the site of Georgetown Mortgage (o n the east portion) and the remaining portion of the property is undeveloped. Staff's Anal ysi s: The pro posed request meets the approval criteria of the Unified Development Co de for a zoning map amendme nt (rezoning). Pl anni ng and Zoni ng Commi ssi on Recommendati o n: At its No vember 7, 2017 regular scheduled meeting, the P lanning and Zoning Commission reco mmended appro val (7 -0) of the rezoning re quest. Publ i c Comments: A total o f 1 3 notices we re mailed to the property owners located within 200 feet of the subject pro perty within the city limits, posted on the Williamson County Sun o n October 22 , 2017, and posted on site. As part of the first rezo ning request (REZ-2017-0 22 ), public comments were submitted via email and accounted for 20.6% of the prote st are a. The same public comments were included as part of this request (Attachment 5). FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The applic ant has paid all application fees. SUBMITTED BY: Andreina Dávila-Quintero , Current P lanning Manager ATTACHMENT S: Description REZ-2017-022 - Staff Rep o rt Attachment 1 - Lo catio n Map Attachment 2 - F uture Land Us e Map Attachment 3 - Zo ning Map Attachment 4 - C -1 d is tric t Develo p ment Standards and Permitted Land Us es Attachment 5 - P ublic Co mments REZ-2017-022 Ordinanc e w/ exhib its Page 177 of 454 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report REZ-2017-033 - 4819 Williams Drive CN to C-1 Page 1 of 4 Report Date: November 3, 2017 File No: REZ-2017-022 Project Planner: Chelsea Irby Item Details Project Name: 4819 Williams Drive Project Address: 4819 Williams Drive Total Acreage: 4.40 acres Legal Description: S10307 - CHAPRIEL PLACE, Lot 1-C, ACRES 4.4 Existing Zoning: Neighborhood Commercial (CN) Proposed Zoning: Local Commercial (C-1) Applicant: Compostela, c/o Scott Stribling Property Owner: Penny Lane Partners LTD, c/o Roy Jones Case History: This is the second request to rezone the subject property to Local Commercial (C- 1). The first application was submitted on July 12, 2017. However, this request was later withdrawn on September 5, 2017, per the applicant’s request. Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant is requesting to rezone the 4.40-acre property, located at 4819 Williams Drive, from the Neighborhood Commercial (CN) zoning district to the Local Commercial (C-1) zoning district. The property is currently the site of Georgetown Mortgage (on the east portion) and the remaining portion of the property is undeveloped. Page 178 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report REZ-2017-022 - 4819 Williams Drive CN to C-1 Page 2 of 4 Site Information Location: The property is located at the northeast corner of Williams Drive and Penny Lane, just adjacent to the Olde Oak subdivision. Physical Characteristics: The property has a building (Georgetown Mortage) on the southeast corner. The remaining portion of the property is undeveloped, flat, and has little tree cover. The property is not located within the floodplain. Surrounding Properties: Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use North AG Low Density Residential Residential South CN/C-1 Low Density Residential Undeveloped East AG Low Density Residential CrossFit 365 gym West OF Low Density Residential Undeveloped Property History The property was annexed into the City in 1995 (Ordinance 95-12) and zoned Agricultural (AG). In 2003, the property was rezoned from Agricultural (AG) to Office and Service Use (RM-3) by Ordinance 2003-22, which was later converted to the Office (OF) zoning district with the adoption of the Unified Development Code (UDC) in 2003. In 2007, it was rezoned from Office (OF) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) by Ordinance 2007-97. The property is located in the Gateway Overlay District, more specifically the Scenic/Natural Gateway overlay district. 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use: The property is designated as Low Density Residential on the Future Land Use Map. • This category includes the city’s predominantly single-family neighborhoods that can be accommodated at a density between 1.1 and 3 dwelling units per gross acre. Conservation subdivisions are also encouraged in this land use district. Modifications to development standards applicable to this category could address minimum open space requirements, public facility impacts, and greater roadway connectivity. • This category may also support complementary non-residential uses along arterial roadways such as neighborhood-serving retail, office, institutional, and civic uses, although such uses may not be depicted on the Future Land Use Map. Standards should be established to maximize compatibility of these uses with adjacent land uses, minimize traffic congestion and overloading of public infrastructure, and also ensure a high standard of site, landscape, and architectural design. Page 179 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report REZ-2017-022 - 4819 Williams Drive CN to C-1 Page 3 of 4 Growth Tier: The property is in Growth Tier 1A (Short Term Growth Area – 10 Years) on the Growth Tier Map. • Tier 1A is that portion of the city where infrastructure systems are in place, or can be economically provided and where the bulk of the city’s growth should be guided over the near term. Within Tier 1A, the city is called on to conduct assessments of public facility conditions and capacities (Policy 2B.1) and to prioritize short and long term capital investments so as to ensure that infrastructure capacity is sufficient to serve development intensities as indicated on the Future Land Use Map and in the zoning districts. Transportation The property currently has access from Williams Drive and has the potential for access from Penny Lane. There are no new roadways planned through the subject property. Utilities The property is near existing water and wastewater mains. The existing water main runs down Williams Drive and the wastewater main is located on the opposite side of Williams Drive from the southeast corner of the property. Proposed Zoning District The Local Commercial (C-1) zoning district is intended to provide areas for commercial and retail activities that primarily serve residential uses. Uses should have pedestrian access to adjacent and nearby residential areas, but are not appropriate along residential streets or residential collectors. The C-1 district is more appropriate along major and minor thoroughfares and corridors. Staff Analysis Comply Do Not Comply Approval Criteria for Rezoning X The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review and final action. Yes. X The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The Low Density Residential category allows for non-residential uses along arterial roadways. X The zoning change promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and healthful development of the City The subject property is located at the intersection of a major arterial and local street. The Comprehensive Plan supports non-residential uses in this area to serve neighborhoods within the vicinity. Therefore, the proposed zoning Page 180 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report REZ-2017-022 - 4819 Williams Drive CN to C-1 Page 4 of 4 district promotes the safe, orderly, and healthful development of the City. X The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood The current zoning on the property is Neighborhood Commercial (CN) and the properties across Williams Drive are zoned Neighborhood Commercial (CN) and Local Commercial (C-1). X The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the District that would be applied by the proposed amendment. The property has an existing commercial/office use. General Findings Based on all the information presented above, staff has made the following findings: 1. The properties across Williams Drive is already zoned for commercial uses (CN and C-1). 2. The property is already being utilized as a form of commercial. 3. The Local Commercial (C-1) district is compatible with near residential areas. Public Comments A total of 13 notices we mailed to the property owners located within 200 feet of the subject property within the city limits, posted on the Williamson County Sun on October 22, 2017, and posted on site. As part of the first rezoning request (REZ-2017-022), public comments were submitted via email and accounted for 20.6% of the protest area. The same public comments has been included as part of this request (Attachment 5). Attachments Attachment 1 – Location Map Attachment 2 – Future Land Use Map Attachment 3 – Zoning Map Attachment 4 – C-1 District Development Standards and Permitted Land Uses Attachment 5 – Public Comments Page 181 of 454 ")2338 D el W e b b B l v d D elWebbBlvd WilliamsDr WilliamsDr W illia ms Dr Lake w ay Dr Lakeway D r DB W o o d R d B ooty'sCrossingRd Shell Rd ShellRd S h ell R d ")3405 ¬«195 Sun City B lv d ")262 Jim H o g g Rd S eren a da D r N orth w estBlvd Lake w ay Dr N L a k e w o od s D r ")262 S e d r o T rl ")2338 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ Location MapREZ-2017-022Exhibit #1 LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 0 0.5 1Mi Page 182 of 454 WIL L I A M S D R PENNY LN SEDRO TR L BIG BEND T R L LIMESTO N E L AKEDR C A P R O C K CAN Y O N T R L WOO D L A K E D R LA K E S I D E R A N C H R D A C K E R R D F O R T D A V I S S T VERDE VISTA OLDE O A K D R L A K E S P R I N G C I R LAKERIMCIR O L I V E C R E E K DR HAYS H I L L D R B I G S P R I N G S T L O S T M A P L E S TR L M O RELAND DR FLATCREEKCT T E R I C T LAKE CAVERN C T D R I F T W O O D H I L L S WAY WOOD S T OC K D R GATL I N C R E E K D R OLIV E C R E E K D R M O R E L A N D D R Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ Future Land Use / Overall Transportation PlanREZ-2017-022 Exhibit #2 Legend Thoroughfare Future Land Use Institutional Regional Commercial Community Commercial Employment Center Low Density Residential Mining Mixed Use Community Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Moderate Density Residential Open Space Specialty Mixed Use Area Ag / Rural Residential Existing Collector Existing Freeway Existing Major Arterial Existing Minor Arterial Existing Ramp Proposed Collector Proposed Freeway Propsed Frontage Road Proposed Major Arterial Proposed Minor Arterial Proposed Railroad High Density Residential Legend SiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 0 500 1,000Feet Page 183 of 454 WIL L I A M S D R PENNY LN SEDRO TR L BIG BEND T R L LIMESTO N E L AKEDR C A P R O C K CAN Y O N T R L WOO D L A K E D R LA K E S I D E R A N C H R D A C K E R R D F O R T D A V I S S T VERDE VISTA OLDE O A K D R L A K E S P R I N G C I R LAKERIMCIR O L I V E C R E E K DR HAYS H I L L D R B I G S P R I N G S T L O S T M A P L E S TR L M O RELAND DR FLATCREEKCT T E R I C T LAKE CAVERN C T D R I F T W O O D H I L L S WAY WOOD S T OC K D R GATL I N C R E E K D R OLIV E C R E E K D R M O R E L A N D D R Zoning InformationREZ-2017-022Exhibit #3 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ ¯ 0 500 1,000Feet Page 184 of 454 Minimum Lot Width = 50 feet Front Setback = 25 feet Bufferyard = 15 feet with plantings Maximum Building Height = 35 feet (0 feet for build‐to option) adjacent to AG, RE, RL, RS, TF, MH, Maximum Building Size = .5 FAR Side Setback = 10 feet MF‐1, or MF‐2 districts (only applies to those uses Side Setback to Residential = 15 feet marked with * below) Rear Setback = 0 feet Rear Setback to Residential = 25 feet Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required Agricultural Sales* Activity Center (youth/senior) Event Facility Artisan Studio/Gallery* Bar/Tavern/Pub Meat Market Assisted Living Bed and Breakfast (with events) Multifamily Attached Automotive Parts Sales (indoor)* Business/Trade School Personal Services Restricted Banking/Financial Services* Car Wash Private Transport Dispatch Facility Blood/Plasma Center* Church (with columbarium) Student Housing Consumer Repair* College/University Dry Cleaning Service* Commercial Recreation Emergency Services Station Community Center Farmer's Market* Dance Hall/Night Club Fitness Center* Day Care (group/commercial) Food Catering Services* Fuel Sales Funeral Home* Live Music/Entertainment General Retail* Micro Brewery/Winery General Office* Neighborhood Amenity Center Government/Postal Office Park (neighborhood/regional) Group Home (7+ residents) Pest Control/Janitorial Services * Home Health Care Services* Self‐Storage (indoor only) Hospital School (Elementary, Middle, High) Hotel/Inn (excluding extended stay) Theater (movie/live) Integrated Office Center* Upper‐story Residential Landscape/Garden Sales* Wireless Transmission Facility (<41') Laundromat* Library/Museum Medical Diagnostic Center* Medical Office/Clinic/Complex* Membership Club/Lodge* Nature Preserve/Community Garden Nursing/Convalescent/Hospice Parking Lot (commercial/park‐n‐ride) Personal Services* Printing/Mailing/Copying Services* Restaurant (general/drive‐through)* Rooming/Boarding House Social Service Facility Surgery/Post Surgery Recovery* Urgent Care Facility* Utilities (Minor/Intermediate/Major) Veterinary Clinic (indoor only)* Local Commercial (C‐1) District District Development Standards Specific Uses Allowed within the District Page 185 of 454 From:Karen Miller To:Chelsea Irby Subject:REZ-2017-022 - 4819 Williams Dr Date:Monday, October 23, 2017 11:41:17 AM Chelsea, It looks like this is the same filing that was brought up in REZ-2017-013. Are there any changes? Has the individual filing the request changed? Also, the neighbors submitted a number of comments to the last filing. Will those be included, or should we re-send them? Please feel free to give me a call if that would be easier. Thanks, Karen Miller 910-915-5261 ATTACHMENT 5 - Public Comments Page 186 of 454 ATTACHMENT 5 - Public Comments Page 187 of 454 1 Chelsea Irby From:Sofia Nelson Sent:Wednesday, August 30, 2017 9:48 AM To:Chelsea Irby Cc:Andreina Davila; Chris Yanez Subject:FW: Neighbor feedback regarding RAZ-2017-013 - 4819 Williams Dr Attachments:Objection to zoning change 29Aug2017.pdf Chelsea and Andreina, Please below and attached. I have shared the email with the applicant. Can you guys have GIS run a 20% protest calculation on this as soon as possible? From: Karen Miller [mailto:miller.karen.joy@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 9:24 AM To: Sofia Nelson <Sofia.Nelson@georgetown.org> Subject: Neighbor feedback regarding RAZ‐2017‐013 ‐ 4819 Williams Dr Sofia, I've attached a letter we, the neighborhood immediately behind the property in question, submit for the zoning office, zoning commission, and city councils consideration. We object to changing the zoning of 4819 Williams Dr from CN to C-1. Rezoning must be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The existing zoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan, as well as the Williams Drive study. In the plans posted online, the area is slated to remain low density residential. Zoning should remain the same to make the property consistent with the comprehensive plan. Furthermore, per the 2030 Comprehensive Plan “C-1… is not meant to be located along residential streets or collectors.” (pg 3.14) A large portion of this property borders Penny Ln, which is a collector. The neighborhood has concerns that Penny Lane is already becoming too busy due to neighboring construction. Please restrict any commercial development on 4819 Williams Dr from utilizing Penny Ln. The zoning change must promote health, safety, or general welfare of the city and the safe orderly, and healthful development of the city. The existing development on 4819 Williams Dr has proven to flood the neighboring properties, which still rely on shallow septic systems. Regardless of the safeguards put in place, denser development will result in greater difficulty managing run-off. The existing zoning aligns with the environmental constraints of the area. Rezoning creates a greater risk of over-developing the property and worsening the environmental risks associated with flooding septic systems. The zoning change must be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood. The properties surrounding this property are all zoned agricultural or are vacant. This property immediately borders low density residential housing - housing situated on 1 to 2.5 acres. The current zoning, neighborhood commercial, is compatible with its neighbors, provided a natural wooded buffer is restored on the property in order to restore privacy and protection from Williams Drive to the neighborhood. Rezoning the property to C-1 would permit a variety of high traffic, loud, 24/7 uses, especially gas stations, that are unacceptable to a quiet, agriculturally zoned neighborhood. I'm happy to discuss further if needed. Thanks, Karen Miller 100 Teri Ct 910-915-5261 ATTACHMENT 5 - Public Comments Page 188 of 454 1 Chelsea Irby From:Sofia Nelson Sent:Sunday, August 20, 2017 1:46 PM To:Chelsea Irby Subject:FW: zoning change notice Please add this to the zoning file and add to the PZ and CC novus item when you are creating agenda material. Thank you From: Fred Wagner [mailto:fred_wagner@suddenlink.net] Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 8:32 PM To: Sofia Nelson <Sofia.Nelson@georgetown.org> Subject: zoning change notice Hello Sofia, I received the notice of the public hearing on a request to rezone some land in our neighborhood. (REZ-2017-013 - 4819 Williams Drive) Wasn't this already discussed and acted on in 2006/2007, or is this a different parcel adjacent to the one I'm thinking of? Regardless, the neighborhood wasn't supportive of a zoning change back then and probably will not be this time either. The concern most of us had at that time was the differences between the current CN and C-1 and the potential disruption of the quality of the neighborhood if the limits of the C-1 zoning were to be actualized. The CN zoning was felt to be much more sympathetic to the concerns of the neighborhood and would not severely limit the development possibilities for that property. The owners, at that time, had presented the neighborhood with their plan which included architectural renderings of the elevations especially in the rear that helped ease the concerns of those neighbors who would border on that property. There was no discussion of changing the zoning by the property owners at that time. The first we heard of it was when we got the notification from your office and that didn't sit well with the neighborhood. None of us are opposed to development of the property but we were united in our opposition to changing the zoning. As things turned out, we were not all able to attend the second hearing of the City Council on 12-11-06 and the rest is history. Some of the other issues brought up were mostly due to the traffic problems. Since that time Williams Dr. has been improved but the increase in development of Sun City and numerous areas farther out have increased traffic to a significant extent once again making it difficult to make a left turn out of any of the side streets unloading onto Williams Dr. in the vicinity of the property being discussed. Another business with access to Williams Dr. will not improve the situation. I'm not sure if there are plans on changing any of that to improve the safety of Williams Dr. or not, but this is a very real concern not just for our neighborhood but those folks on Olde Oaks and Sedro Tr. as well. One of the members of the Council commented at that time that the Williams Dr. situation wasn't as choked as SH29/University Ave, but the speed limit wasn't 60 mph in town either. Since the improvements to Williams Dr. the speed limit is now 50 but it's still significantly more than in town and a bit riskier to try making left turns. I have no idea of what kind of business is planned for the property and am happy to see something that fits within the CN zoning limits but I would be opposed to a zoning change that would change to C-1 and have more potential to disrupt the neighborhood. Best regards, Fred Wagner 120 Penny Ln. ATTACHMENT 5 - Public Comments Page 189 of 454 ATTACHMENT 5 - Public Comments Page 190 of 454 ATTACHMENT 5 - Public Comments Page 191 of 454 From:Sofia Nelson To:Andreina Davila; Chelsea Irby Subject:FW: RAZ-2017-013; 4819 Williams Drive Date:Wednesday, September 27, 2017 11:00:45 AM Even though we have closed the case please add it the case folder. From: Randy Hartford [hartfordemail@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 10:35 AM To: Sofia Nelson Cc: hartfordemail@yahoo.com Subject: RAZ-2017-013; 4819 Williams Drive Hi Sofia, Thank you for taking time to visit with me this morning regarding this rezoning request. My wife and I respectfully express our opposition to this zoning change request. We share many of the same concerns as those in the Teri Court & Penny Lane area. Additional traffic, light and noise from C1 development will adversely effect the quality of life for the residents living on residential only streets, on extending both directions off of Williams Drive. The change from AG to CN was an acceptable compromise at that time and adequately supports the business needs in that area. The HEB area development provides for many of the needs allowed with C1 zoning and is less than a mile away. In addition Gatlin Creek is only a few hundred feet away and includes C1 zoning and further along Williams Drive will be the Randall's Grocery development. There are already many empty commercial properties along Williams Drive. Sincerely, Randy and Melanie Hartford 103 Olde Oak Dr. Georgetown, TX 78633 ATTACHMENT 5 - Public Comments Page 192 of 454 Ordinance Number: Page 1 of 4 Description: 4819 Williams Dr CN to C-1 Case File Number: REZ-2017-022 Date Approved: ORDINANCE NO. _____________________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING PART OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 4.40 ACRES CONSISTING OF LOT 1-C OF THE CHAPRIEL PLACE SUBDIVISION FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE LOCAL COMMERCIAL (C-1) ZONING DISTRICT; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, an application has been made to the City for the purpose of amending the Official Zoning Map, adopted on the 12th day of June, 2012, for the specific Zoning District classification of the following described real property ("The Property"): Lot 1-C of the Chapriel Place Subdivision, as recorded in Document Number 2012087226 of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "The Property"; and WHEREAS, public notice of such hearing was accomplished in accordance with State Law and the City’s Unified Development Code through newspaper publication, signs posted on the Property, and mailed notice to nearby property owners; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a meeting on November 7, 2017, held the required public hearing and submitted a recommendation of approval to the City Council for the requested rezoning of the Property; and WHEREAS, the City Council, at a meeting on November 28, 2017, held an additional public hearing prior to taking action on the requested rezoning of the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this Ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance implements the vision, goals, and policies of the Georgetown 2030 Comprehensive Plan and further finds that the enactment of this Ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other policies or provisions of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the City’s Unified Development Code. Section 2. The Official Zoning Map, as well as the Zoning District classification(s) for the Property is hereby amended from the Neighborhood Commercial (CN) zoning district to the Page 193 of 454 Ordinance Number: Page 2 of 4 Description: 4819 Williams Dr CN to C-1 Case File Number: REZ-2017-022 Date Approved: Local Commercial (C-1) zoning district, in accordance with the attached Exhibit A (Location Map) and Exhibit B (Legal Description) and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. Section 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective in accordance with the provisions of state law and the City Charter of the City of Georgetown. APPROVED on First Reading on the 28 day of November, 2017. APPROVED AND ADOPTED on Second Reading on the 12 day of December, 2017. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: ATTEST: ______________________ _________________________ Dale Ross Shelley Nowling Mayor City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________ Charlie McNabb City Attorney Page 194 of 454 Ordinance Number: Page 3 of 4 Description: 4819 Williams Dr CN to C-1 Case File Number: REZ-2017-022 Date Approved: Exhibit A Location Map Page 195 of 454 Ordinance Number: Page 4 of 4 Description: 4819 Williams Dr CN to C-1 Case File Number: REZ-2017-022 Date Approved: Exhibit B Legal Description Lot 1-C of the Chapriel Place Subdivision, as recorded in Document Number 2012087226 of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas. Page 196 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Publ i c Heari ng and Fi rst Readi ng of an Ordinance granting a Speci al Use P ermi t fo r an event faci l i ty in the Mi xe d- Use Downtow n zoni ng di stri ct for 0.33 acres out of the City of Ge orgetown Subdivision, Block 26, Lots 5-6 lo c ate d at 511 S. Mai n St. -- So fia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Directo r (acti on requi red) ITEM SUMMARY: B ackground: The applicant has requested consideration of a Special Use P ermit (SUP) that would allow an Event Facility to be located in the Mixed Use Downtown (MU-DT) district. The applicant propo ses to pro vide approximately 6,600 square feet of indoor space and 3,000 square feet o f outdoo r space to be used for events such as wedding ceremonies and receptio ns, rehearsal dinne rs, co rporate functions, birthday partie s, and reunions. Pl anni ng and Zoni ng Commi ssi on: The P lanning and Zoning Commission appro ved the request, without conditions, with a 6-1 vote at their Nove mber 7, 2017 meeting. Public Co mments: A total o f 2 3 notices we re se nt out to the owners of property within 2 00 feet o f the subject pro pe rty. Public notice was posted in the Sun ne wspaper on October 22, 2017 . As of the date of this report, the City received one (1) written comment in favor with reservations and one (1) in oppo sition o f the request, as well as o ne (1) general inquiry. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The applic ant has paid all application fees. SUBMITTED BY: Nathaniel Waggoner, AICP, P MP, Long Range Planning Manager ATTACHMENT S: Description S UP-2017-008 S taff Report Exhib it 1 - Loc ation Map Exhib it 2 - Future Land Use Map Exhib it 3 – Zoning Map Exhib it 4 – Aerial Map Exhib it 5 – MU DT Dis trict Development Stand ard s and P ermitted Land Us e Exhib it 6 – Ap p lic ant’s Letter o f Intent Exhib it 7 – Conc eptual Site P lan Exhib it 8 – Pub lic Comment Rec eived Exhib it 9 - Survey S UP-2017-008 Ordinanc e Exhib it A Co nc ep tual S ite Plan Page 197 of 454 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 1 of 13 Report Date: November 3, 2017 File No.: SUP-2017-008 Project Planner: Nat Waggoner, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager Item Details Project Name: Wish Well Project Address: 511 S. Main St. Location: Northeast Corner of Main Streets and 6th and Total Acreage: 0.33 acres Legal Description: Glasscock Addition, Block 26, Lots 5-6 Applicant: Compostella Development Property Owner: William Bryce Contact: Scott Stribling Existing Use: Office (Commercial) Existing Zoning: MU-DT, Mixed Use Downtown / Downtown Overlay District Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant has requested consideration of a Special Use Permit (SUP) that would allow an Event Facility to be locate in the Mixed Use Downtown (MU-DT) district. The Event Facility land use category was initially defined via the “Director’s Determination of an Unlisted Use” process and adopted in the Unified Development Code (UDC) in 2015 by Ordinance 2015-049 (see Previous Event Facility Special Use Permit section for more information). Proposed Use Details: The applicant proposes to provide approximately 6,600 square feet of indoor space and 3,000 square feet of outdoor space to be used for events such as wedding ceremonies and receptions, rehearsal dinners, corporate functions, birthday parties, and reunions. Please refer to Exhibit 6, applicant’s Letter of Intent, and Exhibit 7, Conceptual Site Plan, for more information. Proposed Site Design: As shown on their Conceptual Site Plan, the applicant proposes to utilize the existing 4,100 square foot building and proposes the following modifications to the site, (1) a 3,056 sq. ft. outdoor seating area and (2) a 2,600 sq. ft. addition to the east side of the existing building. Page 198 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 2 of 13 (1) The new 3,056 square foot courtyard area will be constructed adjacent to the north wall of the building and abut Main Street. A standard 6 foot high masonry perimeter wall will be installed around the new courtyard area. A metal entry gate will be installed on the Main Street side of the perimeter wall for emergency and ADA purposes. One large tree (size unknown at the time of report), one of three on the site, will be preserved in the courtyard area. (2) The proposed 2,600 square foot addition is composed of the following: a. 285 sq. ft. storage area b. 324 sq. ft. warming kitchen c. 164 sq. ft. stair d. 252 sq. ft. hallway e. 244 sq. ft. sanitary facilities f. 1,374 sq. ft. cocktail area The applicant is also proposing to construct thirteen (13) new on-street parking spaces; four (4) located within the Main Street right-of-way and nine (9) located within the 6th Street right-of-way. Background Property History: According to the City’s 2016 Historic Resources Survey, this property was constructed in 1922. Historic Surveys completed in 1984, 2007 and 2016 rated the resources as a high priority. Structures identifed as High Prioriy Contribute significantly to local history/broader historical patterns, are good examples of architecture, engineering, or crafted design and retain a high degree of integrity. This property is am excellent example of a Center Passage plan house with a sufficient degree of integrity. Zoning History: The site was originally assigned a C2-A (commercial) zoning designation. With the adoption of the UDC in 2003, any C2-A districts in the Downtown Overlay were converted to C-2, Downtown Commercial zoning. The name of the C-2 district was later changed to MU-DT, Mixed Use Downtown along with use standards and land uses. Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC) Review: The applicant intends to submit the proposed alterations and additions for HARC Page 199 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 3 of 13 consideration following Special Use Permit approval. Site Information Location: The site is located at the northeast corner of South Main Street and 6th Street. The property falls just within the eastern edge of the Downtown Overlay District and is one block north of the courthouse square. Physical Characteristics: The lot measures approximately 120-feet by 80-feet and is approximately one third of an acre. The existing building sits approximately six (6) feet from the south property line and 17 feet from the west property line. Approximately one third of the property appears to be covered by the primary building. The property also includes two small outbuildings in the northeast corner of the property (dimensions were not available at the time of this report). The property is flat with three (3) trees located on the southwest and northern portions of the site. The northern portion of the property is generally undeveloped. Existing Conditions: The property is currently serving as a professional office (non-residential use). According to records from Williamson County Appraisal District the property appears to be in the original configuration however a carport and open porch have been added to the original structure. Surrounding Properties: See Exhibit 3 – Current Zoning Map and Exhibit 4 - Future Land Use Designation. North: The property directly adjacent and to the north to the site is zoned Office (OF) and the use is professional office. The Future Land Use Map designation is Specialty Mixed-Use. South: The properties directly across 6th Street and to the south of the subject property are currently zoned Mixed-Use-Downtown (MU-DT) and the use is surface parking that serves the adjacent Municipal Court and City Council Chambers. The Future Land Use Map designation is Specialty Mixed-Use. East: The property directly adjacent and to the east of the subject project is zoned Residential Single-Family (RS) and the use is residential. The other properties along Church are Page 200 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 4 of 13 also zoned RS and identified as Moderate Density Residential in the Future Land Use Map. West: The property directly across Main Street and to the west of the subject property is zoned Mixed-Use-Downtown (MU-DT) and the use is professional office, retail and restaurant. The Future Land Use Map designation is Specialty Mixed-Use. Utilities: Water, wastewater, and electric are currently served by the City of Georgetown. Additional utility capacities will be evaluated during Site Plan review process. Transportation: The property is served by one (1) unimproved driveway, approxiamtely 10 ft. wide by 40 ft. long, which provides an informal area for one (1) on-site parking space. According to the City’s adopted thoroughfare plan, Main Street is classified as a Collector roadway with a speed limit of 30 mph. 6th Street is classified as Local Street with a speed limit of 30 mph. The property is served with sidewalks along both Main and 6th Streets. In the Downtown Master Plan, Main Street is identified as a priority corridor for both bikes and pedestrians, however the roadway is not striped nor signed for bike use. Adjacent to the property, parking is permitted along the eastern side of Main Street and the western side of the roadway includes eight (8) head in spaces. 6th Street also permits parallel parking along the curb. The property is within 500 ft. of fixed route bus service. 2030 Plan Future Land Use Plan: This property is designated as a Specialty Mixed-Use Area on the Future Land Use Map, due to its location within the Downtown Overlay District. This category also applies to downtown Georgetown, reflecting its role as a regional desitination for services, cultural, and civic function. This emphasizes the urban character and the mix and intensity of uses uniquely suited to this center of activity. The designation is intended to permit a true mix of uses, with unique development standards tailored to the character of the area, such as the downtown area. As promoted by the Downtown Master Plan, the intent is to move the downtown area towards becoming a center of activity not only in the day, but also at night and on weekends, by promoting a mix of commercial, entertainment, residential, and civic uses. Vision Statements: The 2030 Plan Vision Statements identify what the community wants to be 20 years in the future. The Plan indicates in downtown Georgetown and older neighborhoods, home- Page 201 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 5 of 13 grown businesses should be supported and a mix of businesses, services, retail and entertainment uses suited to the scale and historic charm of downtown should be planned for. Additionally, the Plan indicates the City should attract or create “an array of civic, arts and other cultural activities and events to expand the level of downtown activity”. Goals, Policies, and Actions: Goal 2 Promote sound investment in Georgetown’s older developed areas, including downtown, aging commercial and industrial areas, in-town neighborhoods, and other areas expected to experience land use change or obsolescence. 2.A. Remove present inadvertent impediments to infill and re-investment in older, developed areas. 2.C. Identify potential opportunities and selectively target, plan, and promote development/re-use initiatives. 2.D. Continue to promote diversification and strengthening of downtown Georgetown and its in-town historic neighborhoods. These policies situate the City in a more proactive stance to promote its vision of downtown – one in which new development and re-investment are actively pursued to strenghten and diversify the land use and activity mix of downtown. The City will continue to be supportive of, and responsive to private initiatives through incentives, public parking, and capital improvements. In addition, these policies call for the City to develop its own “action agenda” for downtown, including the identification of redevelopment areas and plans for area-wide improvments to streets, parking, and urban design amenities. Growth Tier Map: The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map identifies the downtown area designation as Tier 1A, which is the portion of the City where infrastructure systems are in place, or can be economically provided, and where the bulk of the City’s growth should be guided over the near term. Downtown Master Plan The Downtown Master Plan encourages the “intensive use of land and structures … along with public parking and pedestrian-friendly design, to provide an active live/work environment”. The Plan suggests the intensity of uses outside the square, in outlying areas, should be built up. Based on the community’s need for space for performance art and conferences, the Plan sees opportunity for cultural uses, including additional arts spaces and meeting facilities. Page 202 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 6 of 13 The Plan directs the City to “frame the pedestrian-oriented core with four anchors of activity that will attract pedestrian circulation beyond the traditional retail center. Along the eastern edge, a collection of churches serves as an informal anchor; to the west, government facilities, the south, retail/convienent commercial, office and banking amd to the north restaurants and recreation. Development downtown should be organized around a series of “activity centers” - including outlying blocks around the courthouse – and providing community focal points or “mini-destinations” such as the Tamiro Plaza across the street and the Monument Café one block west. Opportunities exist for “redevelopment designed to strenghthen the downtown area … accomplished by increasing the level of commercial activities, creating a stronger sense of excitement and ambience and identity within the downtown, providing new land uses downtown. Each activity center should include uses that will attract people to downtown and encourage pedestrian activity.” The property is located within the Downtown Core Character Area, and as defined by the Downtown Master Plan, this area retains the best definition of a retail-oriented street edge surrounding the Town Square Historic District. It has a collection of historic buildings that provide interest and is served by on-street parking, for the most part. The existing streetscape amenities consist of brick pavers, benches, decorative lights and period street signs. Development recommendations included in the Master Plan for this area include specialty shopping and dining destination for the county. According to the Plan, the area should be entertaining and highlight the unique qualities of a downtown shopping experience. It should include shops, restaurants and specialty stores. Office space and apartments on upper floors should be promoted that will help energize this area and support the street level businesses. Existing historic assets should be preserved whenever feasible, and be adapted to a new use. A key recommendation of the development plan for the Dowtown Core Character Area, as noted in the Master Plan, includes the promotion of more cultural facilities and entertainment venues. Mixed Use Downtown (MU-DT) Zoning District Purpose Statement: The Mixed Use Downtown District (MU-DT) is intended to provide a location for a mix of land uses including general commercial and retail activities, and office, as well as single-family and multifamily in the downtown area. Developments in the MU-DT district are typically smaller in size and scope, although there may be occasionally heavy traffic. The MU-DT district is only appropriate in the traditional downtown area of Georgetown. Properties in MU-DT shall meet the design requirements of the Downtown Overlay District and Downtown Design Guidelines. Permitted Land Uses: See Exhibit 5 – MU DT District Development Standards and Permitted Land Use Page 203 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 7 of 13 The MU-DT district permits a range of land uses by right including single-family residences, governmental offices, libraries, museums, inns, restaurants, caterers, artisan’s studios and galleries, and a wide range of personal services. Some uses are permitted by right within the district subject to certain listed limitations, including churches, bed and breakfasts, bed and breakfasts with events, micro breweries, wineries, live music or entertainment, general office, and general retail. Other uses may be allowed through approval of a Special Use Permit by City Council including ground floor residential, hotels, drive through restaurants, membership clubs, night clubs. A full list of uses allowed by right, limited or those that require approval by City Council are included in Exhibit 5 MU DT District Development Standards and Permitted Land Use. Table 5.04.010 Commercial Uses Specific Use AG RE RS RL TF TH MF MH CN C1 C3 OF BP IN PF MU D T MU No t e s Entertainment and Recreation Event Facility S -- -- -- -- -- -- -- S S L -- -- -- L S * W *See Section 4.11 5.04.010 Commercial Use Limitations W. Event Facility An event facility is permitted in accordance with the Use Table in 5.04.010 and subject to the following standards and limitations: 1. A Special Use Permit is required in the C-3 and PF Districts for Event Facilities designed to host events with more than 300 attendees. A Special Use Permit is required in the AG, CN, C-1 and MUDT Districts for all Event Facilities. 2. Any outdoor live music or entertainment area shall be shown on a Site Plan and shall be set back a minimum of 50 feet from the property line of residentially zoned property. 3. Any live music or entertainment in association with an event is subject to the provisions of Chapter 8.16 “Noise” of the Georgetown Municipal Code. Section 9.02.030. A Use Category Specific Use General Requirement Commercial Uses Food and Beverage Establishments All Restaurants/Bar/Brewery/ Winery 1 per 100 sq ft of designated seating area/ entertainment area + 4 additional spaces Food Catering Services 1 per 400 sq ft GFA Entertainment and Recreation Theaters and Stadiums 1 per 250 sq ft GFA + 1 additional per 500 sq ft GFA up to 50,000 sq ft GFA All other Entertainment and Recreation 1 per 400 sq ft GFA + 1 additional per 4 capacity seating Page 204 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 8 of 13 Use Category Specific Use General Requirement Major Utilities 1 per 500 sq ft GFA - minimum of 2 Downtown Overlay District Downtown Overlay District Retail buildings greater than 20,000 square feet in Area 1 1 per 1,500 sq ft GFA All other uses in Area 1 No off-street parking requirement Residential Uses in Area 2 See the Household Living parking requirements of this table Non-Residential Uses in Area 2† 1 per 500 sq ft GFA Section 16.02 Definitions Event Facility. A building, structure, or site available for rental by the public for the primary intended purpose of hosting parties, wedding receptions, banquets, corporate meetings or similar group events. Event Facility does not include an event room available for rental in a structure housing another primary use where the event room rental is an accessory use to the primary use (i.e., General Restaurant) or a Community Center as it is defined in this Code. Downtown Overlay District Purpose Statement: The Downtown Overlay District (D) is intended to protect the aesthetic and visual character of the Town Square and downtown Georgetown through the establishment of two distinct zones, designated as Area 1 and Area 2. All development within the Downtown Overlay District, except ordinary maintenance and repair, shall be reviewed in accordance with the adopted Design Guidelines by the Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC), which shall review the location, character, and appearance of proposed development, renovation, or redevelopment activity. Adopted in 2001, The Downtown Overlay District defines an area in which design guidelines apply for many types of improvements. In terms of permitted land uses, the boundary is the same as that of what has been designated as the Downtown Pedestrian Mixed Use zone in the Future Land Use Plan of the city’s Century Plan. This boundary is used for the Downtown Master Plan because it includes all of the properties that have the potential to redevelop with a mix of uses, including a variety of commercial uses, as well as residential. The planning area is framed by established neighborhoods, which the comprehensive plan envisions remaining stable residential places. Special Use Permits Applicability: Special Use Permits allow for City Council approval of uses with unique or widely varying operating characteristics or unusual site development features, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the UDC. Special Use Permits may be issued only for uses that are generally compatible with other uses permitted in a zoning district, but that require individual review of their location, Page 205 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 9 of 13 design, intensity, etc. These uses may be located in districts as indicated with conditions described in the Special Use Permit recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and approved by the City Council. Approval Criteria: When considering a request for a Special Use Permit, Commission and City Council tasked with “reasonably determining that there will be no significant negative impact upon residents of surrounding property or upon the general public”. The following criteria shall be considered: 1. The proposed use is not detrimental to the health, welfare, and safety of the surrounding neighborhood or its occupants. 2. The proposed conceptual site layout, circulation plan, and design are harmonious with the character of the surrounding area. 3. The proposed use does not negatively impact existing uses in the area and in the City through impacts on public infrastructure such as roads, parking facilities and water and sewer systems, and on public services such as police and fire protection and solid waste collection, and the ability of existing infrastructure and services to adequately provide services. 4. The proposed use does not negatively impact existing uses in the area and in the City through the creation of noise, glare, fumes, dust, smoke, vibration, fire hazard, or other injurious or noxious impact. Special Use Permits convey with the property, and not the property owner, renter, or lessee. City Council may impose any additional conditions or limitations deemed appropriate for the requested use. Code of Ordinances – Noise Control Chapter 8.16 of the City of Georgetown Code of Ordinances restricts noise generated on commercial properties to a maximum of 70 decibels during the daytime (between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m.) and 63 decibels during the nighttime (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.). Measurements of noise emanating from private property shall be taken from a point beyond the real property line of the property from which the noise is being generated. Previous Event Facility Special Use Permits in the MUDT: In February 2013, an application was submitted to the City for the consideration of a Special Use Permit (SUP) that would allow an Event Facility to locate in the Mixed Use Downtown (MU-DT) district at 224 E. 8th Street. The application required the Page 206 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 10 of 13 acknowledgement and definition as a Land Use category via a “Director’s Determination of an Unlisted Use” process. The Director determined the “event space” use did not fit within any of the existing uses listed in Chapter 5 – Zoning Use Regulations and therefore required the new use category of “Event Facility” be established. Specifically, the Director determined an Event Facility in the MU-DT district required approval of an SUP. Additionally, limitations were included, applicable to all Event Facilities across all zoning districts. The Zoning Board of Adjustment upheld the Director’s determination through the consideration of an appeal on January 23, 2013. Through the development review and approval process, City staff supported and Council approved the requested SUP for an Event Facility with the following conditions: 1. Events to be limited to a maximum of 225 guests; 2. Events to start no earlier than 9:00 a.m., and shall end by 10:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and by 11:00 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays; 3. Music and entertainment to discontinue by 9:45 p.m. Sunday through Thursdays and by 10:45 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays; 4. Alcoholic beverages not be served after 9:30 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 10:30 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays; 5. Any amplification, speaker or music source required to be located entirely within the building; 6. A facility representative was required to be present on-site during all events; 7. A minimum of one security officer required at any event exceeding 50 guests, with two required at events exceeding 100 guests; 8. Events serving alcohol required a state-licensed and certified bartender; 9. No direct retail sales of alcohol to the general public was permitted; 10. Primary entry to the building was directed to be on the north side of the property for guests, vendors, and office usage; 11. Parking related to the event or office usage was prohibited on Myrtle Street and the adjacent residential area; 12. The applicant was required to acquire a shared parking agreement, as outlined in the UDC, to address the parking demands of larger events prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Page 207 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 11 of 13 Inter Departmental, Governmental and Agency Comments None. Staff Analysis Staff has reviewed this application with regard to the 2030 Plan, the Downtown Master Plan, and the provisions of the UDC and finds the following: The 2030 Plan emphasizes the desire for the downtown area to be a destination and activity area not only during the day, but at night and on the weekends as well. To accomplish this, the Plan directs the City to support a mix of services, retail, entertainment venues suited to the scale and charm of downtown and to promote re-use and re-investment in older developed areas to strengthen and diversify both downtown and the historic neighborhoods. • Staff finds that the proposed plan meets the desire of the 2030 Plan as it proposes re- use of an existing commercial site in the downtown area, helps to diversify the types of uses available downtown, and will be a destination providing activity in the evenings and on weekends too. The Downtown Master Plan encourages activity centers and indicates the intensity of uses in outlying areas outside the square should be built up to attract pedestrian circulation beyond the traditional retail center. The Plan supports activities that will attract people to downtown and help to create a stronger sense of excitement, ambience, and identity. As part of the Downtown Core Character Area, the Master Plan suggests that the City should promote development of more cultural facilities and entertainment venues. • The proposed project is supported by the Downtown Master Plan’s goal of attracting people downtown, beyond the square, and providing office space as well as an additional cultural facility. The MU-DT district is designed to provide a mix of uses, including those uses that operate later hours, can generate vehicular traffic and provide amplified sound associated with live music. Some of these uses include restaurants, places of worship (churches), bed and breakfast (B&B), microbreweries, wineries and event facilities. • Each of these uses are generally subject to limitations or restrictions that are intended to mitigate negative impacts. However, when considering a request for a Special Use Permit, Commission and City Council may consider previous conditions placed upon similar Event Facilities to ensure “that there will be no significant negative impact upon residents of surrounding property or upon the general public”. Page 208 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 12 of 13 UDC Approval Criteria Review 1. The criteria state the proposed use cannot be detrimental to the health, welfare, and safety of the surrounding neighborhood or its occupants. • The proposed Event Facility will operate similarly to events that are permitted at a B&B without any additional public review. The Commission and Council should consider all aspects of operation for the proposed use when deciding on the request, including the maximum guest count of 350 people. 2. The criteria also state the proposed conceptual site layout, circulation plan, and design are harmonious with the character of the surrounding area. • The applicant has taken the surrounding residents into consideration with the design of the site. An existing historic building that has been in place since 1922 will remain and be re-used. The outdoor courtyard area has been located furthest away from the residential areas to the western most portion of the property. The applicant is proposing a wall that could be designed to be pedestrian friendly and provide screening and noise control. 3. The criteria require that the use not negatively impact public infrastructure, or public services. • The Commission and Council should consider the Event Facility’s ability to meet the noise ordinance outside of the UDC’s required screening for aesthetics and privacy. The applicant has not proposed any additional plan for the accommodation of guest parking outside of the thirteen (13) new parking spaces within the right-of-way. The Commission and Council should consider the overall impact that up to 350 guest will cause to vehicular circulation and parking within public right of way, including nearby City parking lots. While there is ample public parking available in the area, the Commission and Council may consider measures to ensure the parking demands of larger events can be met while ensuring that access and parking for other uses and the general public are protected. 4. Finally, the criteria require that the proposed use not negatively impact existing uses in the area and in the City through the creation of noise, glare, fumes, dust, smoke, vibration, fire hazard, or other injurious or noxious impact. • The applicant has proposed a location and approximate dimensions of a screening wall and landscaping above what is required and that is designed to mitigate impacts associated with the proposed use. Staff finds that the proposed project supports the Downtown Master Plan’s goal of attracting people downtown, beyond the square, and providing office space as well as an additional cultural facility. Staff finds that the UDC approval critera, 1, 2 and 4 have Page 209 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 13 of 13 generally been met and recommends that the Commission and Council consider additional measures to ensure that the use does not negatively impact public infrastructure, or public services (Criteria #3), specifically parking, hours of operation and noise control. Commission and Council Options: 1. Approve 2. Approve with Conditions 3. Deny Public Comments A total of 23 notices were sent out to the owners of property within 200 feet of the subject property. Public notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on October 22, 2017. As of the date of this report, the City received one (1) written comment in favor with reservations and one (1) in opposition of the request, as well as one (1) general inquiry. Meetings Schedule November 7, 2017 – Planning and Zoning Commission November 28, 2017 – City Council 1st Reading (pending) December 12, 2017 – City Council 2nd Reading (pending) Attachments Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Future Land Use Map Exhibit 3 – Zoning Map Exhibit 4 – Aerial Map Exhibit 5 – MU DT District Development Standards and Permitted Land Use Exhibit 6 – Applicant’s Letter of Intent Exhibit 7 – Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit 8 – Public Comment Received Page 210 of 454 EL M ST E 7 TH ST R O C K S T A SH ST S M A I N S T SCENIC DR E 5 TH ST E 8 T H S T E 4 TH ST E 2 N D S T WE S T S T E 6 TH ST S A U S TI N AV E PIN E ST W 8 T H S T S M Y R T L E S T W 1 0 T H S T S C HURCH S T S C O L L E G E S T M A P L E S T H O LLY ST E 3 R D S T W 6T H S T W 4T H S T W 11 T H S T E U N I V ERS I T Y AV E W U N IV E R SI TY AV E WA L N U T S T FO R E S T S T W 7T H S T W 3RD S T E 1 0T H S T E 1 1 T H S T MA R T I N L U TH E R KI N G JR S T S IH 35 NB W 5 T H S T B R I D GE S T N C OL LE G E S T W 9T H S T S IH 35 FWY NB W ESLEY A N D R RAILROAD AVE BLUE HOLE PARK RD W 2 N D S T N A U S T I N AV E E 9 T H S T R U C K E R S T O L I V E S T S OUL E D R WAT E R S E D GE C I R E 9 TH 1 /2 S T M C K E N Z IE DR T I N B A R N A LY SANGABRIELVI L L A G E B L V D MONT GOMERY ST WA L N U T S T E 9 TH ST PIN E ST E 3 R D S T W 9 T H S T E 1 0T H S T H O L L Y S T W 2N D S T E 9 T H S T SUP-2017-008Exhibit #1 Coordi nate System : Texas State Plane/Centr al Zone/N AD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For G eneral Plann ing Pu rpo ses Only ¯ Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 0 500 1,000Feet Page 211 of 454 EL M ST R O C K S T S M A IN S T E 4 TH ST E 5 TH ST E 6 TH ST E 7 TH ST E 8 TH ST A SH ST S M Y R T L E S T W 8T H S T W 7T H S T W 6 T H S T S C H U R C H ST W 4T H S T S A U S T I N AV E W 3R D ST FOR E S T S T E 3 R D S T W 5 T H S T MA R T I N L U T H E R K I N G J R S T Coord inate System: Texas Sta te Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Plan ning Pu rposes Only ¯ Future Land Use / Over all Transportation Plan Exhibit #2 SUP -201 7-008 Leg en d Thoroughfare Future Land Use Institutional Regional Com mercial Com munity Commercial Emp loym ent Center Low Density Residential Min ing Mixed Use Comm unity Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Mode rate Density Residential Op en Space Specialty Mixed Use Area Ag / Rural Residential Existing Collector Existing F reeway Existing Major Arterial Existing Minor Arterial Existing Ramp Pro p osed Collector Pro p osed Freeway Pro p sed Frontage Road Pro p osed M ajor Arterial Pro p osed M inor Arterial Pro p osed Railroad Hig h Density Residential Legend Sit eParce lsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 0 250 500Ft Page 212 of 454 ELM ST R O C K S T S M A I N S T E 4 TH ST E 5 TH ST E 6 TH ST E 7 TH ST E 8 TH ST A SH ST S M Y R T L E S T W 8T H S T W 6 T H S T W 7T H S T S C H U R C H ST W 4 T H S T S A U S T I N AV E W 3RD S T FOR E S T S T E 3 R D S T W 5 T H S T MA R T I N L U T H E R K I N G J R S T Zoning InformationSUP-2017-008Exhibit #3 Co o rdi nate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zo ne/N A D 83/US FeetCartographic D ata For Gener al Plann ing Pu rposes Only LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ ¯ 0 250 500FtPage 213 of 454 ELM ST R O C K S T S M A I N S T E 4 T H S T E 5 T H S T E 6 T H S T E 7 T H S T S M Y R T L E S T S CHURCH ST W 7 T H S T S A U STIN AVE W 6 T H S T W 4 T H S T W 5 T H S T Coordi nate System : Texas State Plane/Centr al Zone/N AD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For G eneral Plann ing Pu rpo ses Only ¯ Aeria l SUP-2017-008 LegendSiteCity Limits 0 250 500Feet Page 214 of 454 Maximum Density = NA Front Setback = 0 feet Bufferyard = 10 feet with plantings Maximum Building Height = 40 feet Side Setback = 0 feet adjacent to AG, RE, RL, RS,TF, or MH Maximum Units per Building = NA Side Setback to Residential = 0 feet districts Rear Setback = 0 feet adjacent to residences in AG Rear Setback to Residential = 0 feet Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required Inn Bed and Breakfast Hotel (boutique) Restaurant, General Bed and Breakfast (with events)Hotel (Full service) Food Catering Services Microbrewery or Microwinery Restaurant (drive thru) Home Health Care Services Live Music or Entertainment Bar, Tavern or Pub Medical or Dental Office General Office Theater (Movie or live) Farmers Market Integrated Office Center Mebership (Club or Lodge) Arisan Studio/Gallery General Retail Event Facility Personal Services Upper story residential Commercial Recreation Dry Cleaning Service (drop off only)Home based business Blld or Plasma Center Laundromat Daycare (family home)Diagnostic Center Printing, Mailing, Reproduction Services Daycare (goup)Medical or Dental Clinic Banking and Financial Services Religious assembly facilities Medical Complex Consumer Repair Religious assembly facilities (with columbaria)Post Surgical Recovery Center Vet Clinic (Indoor pens only)Public Park (neighborhood)Surgey Center Single Family Detached Heliport Urgent Care Facility Group Home (6 residents or less)Utility Services Intermediate Personal Services (restricted) Emergency Services Station Wireless Transmission Facility (40 ft or less)Fitness Center Government or Postal Office Townhouse Library or Museum Multi-family attached dwelling units Neature Preserve or Community Garden Accessory dwelling unit Parking Lot (offsite)Group Home (7-15 residents) Parking Lot (commercial)Assisted Living Park and Ride Facility Hospice Transit Passenger Terminal Rooming or Boarding House Utillity Services (Minor)School, College or University School, Business or Trade Activity Center (Youth or Senior) Community Center Correctional Facility Social Service Facility Transient Service Facility Hospital Hospital, Psychiatric Private Transport Service Dispatch Facility Mixed Use Downtown (MU-DT) District District Development Standards Specific Uses Allowed within the District Page 215 of 454 September 14, 2017 City of Georgetown Planning Department 406 West 8th Street Georgetown, Texas 78626 Please accept this letter of intent to obtain a Special Use Permit for Event Center for 511 S Main Street, in Georgetown, TX. It is currently zoned MUDT and as such, requires a special use permit for the site. The intended business operation will be an event center with hours of operation of daily from 7:00am until 12:00pm. The subject property is listed as area 2 in the MUDT category and will comply with all parking requirements for MUDT Area 2. Additionally, the design will be subject to HARC review. The intent is not to change the front facade at all. There will be an addition to the rear of the structure which will be shorter in height than the historic structure, so as to not take away from the historic structure. Building dimensions are detailed on the attached Conceptual Site Plan. Estimated number of staff would be up to 3 at a time. The max occupancy will be 350 guests per event. The subject property is listed as MUDT in the Future Land Use, and currently borders commercial lots on 3 sides and 1 residential lot to the rear. Roads and utilities are located either on site or on the perimeter, not needing any special attention or approval out of the ordinary site plan process. Thank you for your consideration and time. Sincerely, Scott Stribling Compostela Development 511 S. Main St. Georgetown, Texas 78626 LETTER OF INTENT TO OBTAIN SPECIAL USE PERMIT Page 216 of 454 Page 217 of 454 Exhibit 8 – Public Comment Received Page 218 of 454 Exhibit 8 – Public Comment Received Page 219 of 454 Page 220 of 454 Ordinance Number: ___________________ Page 1 of 2 Description: Wish Well Event Center, 511 S Main St Case File Number: SUP-2017-008 Date Approved: __________________ Exhibit A attached ORDINANCE NO. _____________________ An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, granting a Special Use Permit for an event facility in the Mixed-Use Downtown zoning district for 0.33 acres out of the City of Georgetown Subdivision, Block 26, Lots 5-6 located at 511 S. Main St.; repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; including a severability clause; and establishing an effective date. Whereas, an application has been made to the City for the purpose of allowing a special use of the following described real property ("The Property"): 0.33 acres of the City of Georgetown Subdivision, Block 26, Lots 5-6, as recorded in Document Number 185401168DR, Volume 5, page 211 of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "The Property"; and Whereas, public notice of such hearing was accomplished in accordance with State Law and the City’s Unified Development Code through newspaper publication, signs posted on the Property, and mailed notice to nearby property owners; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a meeting on November 7, 2017, held the required public hearing and submitted a recommendation of approval to the City Council for the requested special use of the Property; and Whereas, the City Council, at a meeting on November 28, 2017, held an additional public hearing prior to taking action on the requested special use of the Property. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, that: Section 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this Ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance implements the vision, goals, and policies of the Georgetown 2030 Comprehensive Plan and further finds that the enactment of this Ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other policies or provisions of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the City’s Unified Development Code. Section 2. The Zoning District for the Property shall Mixed-Use Downtown zoning district and the Ordinance allowing for the special use of an event facility on the property is hereby adopted, in accordance with the attached Exhibit A (Conceptual Site Plan). Section 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. Page 221 of 454 Ordinance Number: ___________________ Page 2 of 2 Description: Wish Well Event Center, 511 S Main St Case File Number: SUP-2017-008 Date Approved: __________________ Exhibit A attached Section 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective in accordance with the provisions of state law and the City Charter of the City of Georgetown. APPROVED on First Reading on the 28th day of November, 2017. APPROVED AND ADOPTED on Second Reading on the 12th day of December, 2017. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: ATTEST: ______________________ _________________________ Dale Ross Shelley Nowling Mayor City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________ Charlie McNabb City Attorney Page 222 of 454 Page 223 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Publ i c Heari ng and Fi rst Readi ng of an Ordinanc e granti ng a Speci al Use Per mi t (SUP) fo r mul ti -fami l y, attac hed dw el l i ng uni ts in the G eneral Commerci al (C-3 ) Zoni ng Di stri ct on the property lo cated at 1515 and 1531 Ri very B l vd -- Sofia Ne lson, CNU-A, Planning Director (ac ti on requi red) ITEM SUMMARY: B ackground: The applic ant has requested consideration of a Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow multi-family units in the General Commercial (C-3) zo ning district. The proposed project will bring more owner-o c cupied condominiums to the Rivery area, similar to the e xisting bro wnsto nes just to the east o f Rivery Blvd. The condo s will provide mo re customers for the many retail, service, and entertainment o ptions that are available in walking and biking distance. The applicant proposes a maximum of 89 dwe lling units (8.39 dwelling units/acre). Publ i c Comment: To date, no written public co mments have been received. Pl anni ng and Zoni ng Commi ssi on Recommendati o n: At their November 7, 2017 meeting, the P lanning and Zoning Commissio n rec ommended to the City Council appro val (7-0 ) of the SUP request. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The applic ant has paid all application fees. SUBMITTED BY: Andreina Dávila-Quintero , Current P lanning Manager ATTACHMENT S: Description S UP-2017-007 S taff Report Attachment 1 - Lo catio n Map Attachment 2 - F uture Land Us e Map Attachment 3 - Zo ning Map Attachment 4 - Letter of Intent Attachment 5 - C o nc ep tual P lan Ordinanc e Ordinanc e Exhibit A - Conceptual Plan Page 224 of 454 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report Summit West | SUP-2017-007 Special Use Permit Page 1 of 6 Report Date: November 3, 2017 File No: SUP-2017-007 Project Planner: Chelsea Irby, Planner Item Details Project Name: Summit West Project Address: 1515 and 1531 Rivery Blvd Total Acreage: 10.6 acres Legal Description: S9005 - RIVERY PARK 2 (BLK B AMD), BLOCK B, Lot 4, ACRES 6.266 S9005 - RIVERY PARK 2 (BLK B AMD), BLOCK B, Lot 3, ACRES 4.354 Existing Zoning: General Commercial (C-3) Applicant: RP Georgetown Development Co LLC, c/o Mark Allen Representative: Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC, c/o Terrence L. Irion Property Owner: RP Georgetown Development Co LLC, c/o Mark Allen Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant has requested consideration of a Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow multi- family units in the General Commercial (C-3) zoning district. The proposed project will bring more owner-occupied condominiums to the Rivery area, similar to the existing brownstones just to the east of Rivery Blvd. The condos are planned as two-story units to better fit with the neighborhood and surrounding uses. These units will also provide more customers for the many retail, service, and entertainment options that are available in walking and biking distance. The applicant proposes a maximum of 89 dwelling units (8.39 dwelling units/acre). Location Map Page 225 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Summit West | SUP-2017-007 Special Use Permit Page 2 of 6 Site Information Location: The subject site is located along Rivery Blvd, just north of the intersection with Wolf Ranch Parkway. Physical Characteristics: The subject site has approximately 600 feet of frontage along Rivery Blvd and shares a property line with the City Light Theatre and the Baylor, Scott, & White Clinic. It is also located south of the north for of the San Gabriel River. Surrounding Properties: Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use North General Commercial (C-3) Open Space Open Space/Parkland South General Commercial (C-3) Regional Commercial Medical facility/Movie theater East Planned Unit Development (PUD) with General Commercial (C-3) Regional Commercial Parking lot for the Summit at Rivery/Brownstones West General Commercial (C-3) Regional Commercial Vacant Aerial Image Page 226 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Summit West | SUP-2017-007 Special Use Permit Page 3 of 6 Draft Concept Plan Property History The subject site was annexed into the City in 1986 (Ord. 86-51) as part of a larger tract. The property was re-zoned from Residential Single-Family (RS) to its current zoning designation, General Commercial (C-3), in 1996 (Ord. 96-45). The property is part of the Rivery Park 2 (BLK B AMD) subdivision. If approved, the proposed project would require the following applications: Amending Plat to be approved by the P&Z commission (FP-2017-061) Site Development Plan to be processed administratively Building Permits for construction 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use: The 2030 Future Land Use category for the subject site is Regional Commercial. The Regional Commercial category applies to large concentrations of commercial uses that serve or draw a regional market, such as major shopping centers, stand-alone big-box retail, tourist attractions and supporting accommodations, and automobile-oriented commercial uses that rely on convenient access from major transportation routes and highway interchanges. Such properties are often configured in a manner or located in areas that may not be suitable for the introduction of mixed-uses. Page 227 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Summit West | SUP-2017-007 Special Use Permit Page 4 of 6 Transportation The subject site’s inbound and outbound access is on Rivery Blvd. Rivery Blvd also provides direct access to Williams Drive and the IH-35 Southbound Frontage Road. Rivery Blvd is identified as an existing minor arterial road; which is a roadway designed to connect lower funcation classifications and major arterials and tend to be shorter in distance. Utilities The subject site is located within the City of Georgetown’s service area for water, wastewater and electric. It is anticipated that there is adequate capacity to serve this property either by existing capacity or developer participation in upgrades to infrastructure. Zoning District The General Commercial (C-3) zoning district is intended to provide a location for general commercial and retail activities that serve the entire community and its visitors. Uses may be large in scale and generate substantial traffic, making the C -3 district only appropriate along freeways and major arterials. The C-3 district offers the most options of permitted land uses and is the most intense land use apart from the Industrial (IN) district. Typical uses in this district include general retail, hotels, restaurants, and general office. Certain land uses require a Special Use Permit (SUP). The purpose for requiring an SUP is to allow for City Council to review the location, design, and intensity of certain land uses on an individual basis to determine if the specific use is appropriate at the proposed location. Additionally, it provides the City Council the option to establish conditions for the use within the zoning district to help mitigate and reduce the impact that the use may have on the adjacent properties and vicinity. Staff Analysis Staff has reviewed the applicant’s request to establish multi-family residential units located at 1515 and 1531 Rivery Blvd at a density of 8.39 units per acre. The UDC, in Section 3.07.030.C, states that the City Council may approve an application for an SUP where it reasonably determines that there will be no significant negative impact upon residents of surrounding property or upon the general public. The City Council shall consider the following criteria in its review: 1. The proposed special use is not detrimental to the health, welfare, and safety of the surrounding neighborhood or its occupants. The proposed special use does not pose any threat to the health, welfare, and safety of the surrounding neighborhoods or its occupants. The proposed multi-family use is compatible with the surrounding existing and proposed uses that include multi-family, general retail, personal services and entertainment. Furthermore, it will bring additional density to the area to further Page 228 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Summit West | SUP-2017-007 Special Use Permit Page 5 of 6 support the non-residential uses of the Summit at Rivery development and other nearby non- residential uses. 2. The proposed conceptual site layout, circulation plan, and design are harmonious with the character of the surrounding area. The proposed conceptual site layout, circulation, and design are harmonious with the character of the surrounding area. According to the applicant, the Rivery development was planned as a walkable and bike oriented [mixed-use] development. Across Rivery Blvd there are existing three-story brownstone condos with trail access to the Rivery Park. The proposed condos would only be two-story. Additionally, the conceptual site layout is sensitive to the nearby San Gabriel River by providing ample open space and tree preservation to adjoin with the existing open space near the river. 3. The proposed use does not negatively impact existing uses in the area and in the City through impacts on public infrastructure such as roads, parking facilities, and water and sewer systems and on public services such as police and fire protection and solid waste collection and the ability of existing infrastructure and services to adequately provide services. The subject site includes an access easement along the southern property line to provide cross- access to adjacent lots and provide additional access to Wolf Ranch Pkwy (and thus access to SH 29/University), Rivery Blvd (and thus access to Williams Dr and IH-35). As part of the approval process, the applicant is required to submit a Utility Evaluation for the proposed development. Any public improvements that may be required to provide the necessary water and wastewater utilities for the site will be the responsibility of the developer. 4. The proposed use does not negatively impact existing uses in the area and in the City through the creation of noise, glare, fumes, dust, smoke, vibration, fire hazard or other injurious or noxious impact. The proposed multi-family development (to be known as Summit West) would not have any negative impact on existing uses in the area. There would not be added noise, glare, smells, or other injurious or noxious impacts. The proposed condos would be owner-occupied, which would have a lower turnover rate (compared to renter-occupied units). Owner-occupied units typically attract long-term residents who are invested in their neighborhood. The condos would be developed near existing condos and would provide an increased customer base for the existing non-residential uses. General Findings Based on all the information presented, staff has found that the requested SUP promotes the Page 229 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report Summit West | SUP-2017-007 Special Use Permit Page 6 of 6 following goals established in the Comprehensive Plan: 1.B – Promote more compact, higher density development (e.g., traditional neighborhoods, Transit-Oriented Development, mixed-use, and walkable neighborhoods) within appropriate infill locations. 1.E.3 – Promote mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly land use patterns, including community activity centers, neighborhood activity centers, conservation subdivisions, and walkable neighborhoods. The Summit at Rivery Park is located across Rivery Blvd and provides many multi-family residential options and retail providers. The development of Summit West would increase housing choices, as well as create more walkable and bikeable opportunities for residents consistent with the original intent of the Rivery development. In addition to the Summit at Rivery Park - the City Lights Theatre, Sheraton Hotel, Rivery Park, and multiple restaurants and offices uses are within walking and biking distance. 2C – Identify potential opportunities and selectively target, plan, and promote development/reuse initiatives. The development of Summit West enhances the existing development of the Rivery area. This area has a large amount of private investment that has greatly benefit the City. It is important to develop the remaining tracts in this area in a manner consistent with the existing development type. Public Comments As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 200-foot radius of the subject property that are located within City limits were notified of the SUP application (15 notices mailed), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper (October 22, 2017) and signs were posted on-site. To date, staff has received no written comments. Attachments Attachment 1 – Location Map Attachment 2 – Future Land Use Map Attachment 3 – Zoning Map Attachment 4 – Letter of Intent Attachment 5 – Conceptual Plan Page 230 of 454 N IH 35 R I V E RY BL V D N AUSTIN AVE S IH 35 S M A I N S T §¨¦35 W IL LIA M S D R SUP-2017-007Exhibit #1 Coordi nate System : Texas State Plane/Centr al Zone/N AD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For G eneral Plann ing Pu rpo ses Only ¯ Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 0 0.25 0.5Mi Page 231 of 454 P A R K L N S IH 35 SB S IH 35 NB RIVERY BLVD R A N C H R D W IL LIA M S D R P A R K W A Y S T W O L F R D COUN T R Y C L U B R D S IH 35 FW Y SB S IH 35 FW Y NB P O W E R R D WOLF RANCH PKWY ENTR 261 NB O A K L N EXIT 261 S B N IH 35 SB DUN M A N D R JUDY D R A L L Y S H A N NONLN CLAY ST HINTZ RD M E S Q UIT E L N A D A MS ST RIVERY DRIVEWAY RIDG E C R E S T R D G A B R I E L V I E W D R W I L L O W L N W MORROW S T A S H W OODLN N IH 35 FWY SB S P R I N G VALLEY RD PARK E R C I R WJANISDR C E D A R D R W CENTR AL D R C O T T O N W O O D D R E JANIS DR RIV E R SID E D R N AUSTIN AVE ENTR 262 NB HARMON Y L N WO O D L A WNAVE M O R RIS D R WILLIAMS D RTNNB WSPRI N G S T HIGHK N O LL L N P O W E R C I R HERSHEY AVE HAGEN CT G A B R IE L VIE W D R Coor dinate System: Texas State Plane/Ce ntral Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic D ata For Gen eral Planni ng Purposes O nly ¯ Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan Exhibit #2 SUP-2017 -007 Leg en d Thoroughfare Future Land Use In stitutional Re g ional Commercial Co m munity Comm ercial Employment Center Lo w Density Residential Mining Mixe d Use Com munity Mixe d Use Neighborhood Center Mo derate Density Residential Open Space Spe cialty M ixed Use Area Ag / Rural Residential Existing Collector Existing Freeway Existing Major Arterial Existing Minor Arterial Existing Ramp Pro p osed Collector Pro p osed Freeway Pro p sed Frontage Road Pro p osed M ajor Arterial Pro p osed M inor Arterial Pro p osed Railroad Hi gh Density Residential Legend Sit eParcelsCity L im itsGeorgetown ET J 0 500 1,000Fee t Page 232 of 454 P A R K L N S IH 35 SB S IH 35 NB RIVERY BLVD R A N C H R D W IL LIA M S D R P A R K W A Y S T W O L F R D COUN T R Y C L U B R D S IH 35 FW Y SB S IH 35 FW Y NB P O W E R R D WOLF RANCH PKWY ENTR 261 NB O A K L N EXIT 261 S B N IH 35 SB DUN M A N D R JUDY D R A L L Y S H A N NONLN CLAY ST HINTZ RD M E S Q UIT E L N A D A MS ST RIVERY DRIVEWAY RIDG E C R E S T R D G A B R I E L V I E W D R W I L L O W L N W MORROW S T A S H W OODLN N IH 35 FWY SB S P R I N G VALLEY RD PARK E R C I R WJANISDR C E D A R D R W CENTR AL D R C O T T O N W O O D D R E JANIS DR RIV E R SID E D R N AUSTIN AVE ENTR 262 NB HARMON Y L N WO O D L A WNAVE M O R RIS D R WILLIAMS D RTNNB WSPRI N G S T HIGHK N O LL L N P O W E R C I R HERSHEY AVE HAGEN CT G A B R IE L VIE W D R Zoning InformationSUP-2017-007Exhibit #3 Co o rdi nate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zo ne/N A D 83/US FeetCartographic D ata For Gener al Plann ing Pu rposes Only LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ ¯ 0 500 1,000Fee t Page 233 of 454 Letter of Intent Summit West SUP C-3 Zoning 1515 & 1531 Rivery Blvd Intro The RP Georgetown group and Novak Brothers have combined to bring another outstanding project to the Rivery development. These groups are responsible for some of Georgetown’s most outstanding commercial and residential projects such as the Sheridan hotel and Conference Center, several hundred thousand square feet of commercial retail and service space, the award winning Brownstone residential development, and the initial bringing of the Rivery project together. Adding another outstanding owner occupied condominium project to the Rivery provides even more customers for the many retail, service and entertainment options available in walking and biking distance. These condos are planned as two story to fit better with the surrounding neighborhood and final design will come later. Summit West extends the already successful and outstanding Brownstone project just to the east of Rivery Blvd. From its very beginning, the Rivery was planned as a walkable and bike oriented development surrounded on two sides by the city’s exceptional hike and bike trail. The RP Georgetown group has supported the trail system from its very beginning by donating 60 plus acres so the City of Georgetown could use it as match to start the trials back in the 1990’s. Their shared vision is has expanded to today’s very special system across our community. This special project will not interfere with the traffic around the movie theater, Scott and White Clinic or the Independent Bank. On the contrary, the project will add needed customers who can easily walk to use the services offered. Summit West is not a heavy utility user and those services are planned for the area and already extended to the site. Additionally with the spring setback in place, a project of this type provides the ability to use a now difficult site in a way to support the other more intense uses developed in the surrounding area. Overall Summit West will be an exceptional addition to an already vibrant mixed use development. Page 234 of 454 Page 235 of 454 Ordinance Number: ___________________ Page 1 of 2 Description: Summit West SUP for Multi-Family, Attached Case File Number: SUP-2017-007 Date Approved: __________________ ORDINANCE NO. _____________________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR MULTI-FAMILY, ATTACHED DWELLING UNITS IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-3) ZONING DISTRICT FOR LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK B, RIVERY PARK 2 (BLOCK B AMENDMENT) SUBDIVISION, LOCATED AT 1515 AND 1531 RIVERY BOULEVARD; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, an application has been made to the City for the purpose of allowing a special use of the following described real property ("the Property"): Lots 3 and 4, Block B, of the Rivery Park 2 (Block B Amendment) Subdivision, as recorded in Document Number 2005098021 of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "The Property"; and WHEREAS, public notice of such hearing was accomplished in accordance with State Law and the City’s Unified Development Code through newspaper publication, signs posted on the Property, and mailed notice to nearby property owners; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a meeting on November 7, 2017, held the required public hearing and submitted a recommendation of approval to the City Council for the requested special use of the Property; and WHEREAS, the City Council, at a meeting on November 28, 2017, held an additional public hearing prior to taking action on the requested special use of the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this Ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance implements the vision, goals, and policies of the Georgetown 2030 Comprehensive Plan and further finds that the enactment of this Ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other policies or provisions of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the City’s Unified Development Code. Section 2. The Zoning District for the Property shall remain General Commercial (C-3) and the Ordinance allowing for the special use of a multi-family, attached dwelling units on the Property is hereby adopted, in accordance with the attached Exhibit A (Conceptual Site Plan). Section 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. Page 236 of 454 Ordinance Number: ___________________ Page 2 of 2 Description: Summit West SUP for Multi-Family, Attached Case File Number: SUP-2017-007 Date Approved: __________________ Section 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective in accordance with the provisions of state law and the City Charter of the City of Georgetown. APPROVED on First Reading on the 28 day of November, 2017. APPROVED AND ADOPTED on Second Reading on the 12 day of December, 2017. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: ATTEST: ______________________ _________________________ Dale Ross Shelley Nowling Mayor City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________ Charlie McNabb City Attorney Page 237 of 454 Exhibit A Conceptual Plan Page 238 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to approve a Resolution g ranti ng an excepti on to the use restri cti ons included in the special warranty deed dated December 17, 2013, co nveyi ng the property l ocated at 61 0 No rth Austi n Avenue , Georgetown, Texas -- Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director ITEM SUMMARY: B ackground/Hi story The City purchased the pro perty at 6 10 North Austin Avenue in 20 08 for the purpose of a public safe ty fac ility. The City subsequently reevaluate d the location fo r the public safety facility and the property was sold in 2013, with the following use restrictions inc luded in the deed : 1. No tax e xe mpt or no n-profit persons or entitie s shall o wn or occupy the building 2. Use of pro pe rty is limited to entities providing retail sales and/or commercial services. 3. Retai l sal e s must generate at least $150 o f sales per square foot of retail floo r area and are restricted to: a. General retail b. Agriculture sales c. Landscape supply sales/garden cente r d. Farme r ’s market; or e. Artisan studio or gallery Unless an exceptio n to this requirement is approve d by the City Council 1. Comme r c i al servi ce uses must be appro ved by the City Council and are limited to: a. Personal services b. Dry cleaning drop off c. Printing/mailing/repro services d. Fitne ss center e. Banking/financial services; or f. Consumer repair In August of 2015, City Council appro ved a resolution granting an e xception to the use restric tions to allow restaurant and office tenants. In February of 2016, City Council approved a request to permit a fitne ss center in the building. Current Request The pro pe rty owner has received a re quest from a prospect wishing to open a cigar and wine lounge at 61 0 N Austin Ave (remaining vacant suite). Staff Anal ysi s The proposed use is co nsistent with the zo ning of the property and does not appear to be co ntrary to the uses within the building suites. As a cigar lo unge the suite and building will be subject to all applicable building code require ments for indoor use of the cigars. FINANCIAL IMPACT: n/a SUBMITTED BY: Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, P lanning Director ATTACHMENT S: Description spec ial warranty deed Res o lutio n Page 239 of 454 Page 240 of 454 Page 241 of 454 Page 242 of 454 Page 243 of 454 Page 244 of 454 Page 245 of 454 Page 246 of 454 Page 247 of 454 Page 248 of 454 Resolution No. _____________________ Page 1 of 2 Date Approved: November 28, 2017 RESOLUTION NO. ____________________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS GRANTING AN EXCEPTION TO THE RESTRICTIONS AGAINST USE IN THE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED DATED DECEMBER 17, 2013 CONVEYING THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 610 NORTH AUSTIN AVENUE, GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS 78626 WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown conveyed Property identified as Lot 1, Block B, Foster Square, located at 610 North Austin Avenue, Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas 78626 (the “Property”) to Anderson Mill Acquisitions, LLC, by Special Warranty Deed dated December 17, 2013, and recorded at 2013116447, Official Records, Williamson County, Texas. WHEREAS, the Deed conveyed the Property to Anderson Mill Acquisitions, LLC, subject to certain covenants and restrictions (“Restrictions”) that limited the uses allowed on the Property, as more fully described in the Deed; WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown has received a request from Anderson Mill Acquisitions, LLC, to grant exceptions to the Restrictions in conjunction with the proposed redevelopment of the Property (the “Project”) as shown in Exhibit A; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this resolution are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. SECTION 2. The City of Georgetown hereby grants exceptions to the Restrictions contained in the Deed to allow a cigar and wine lounge on the Property. SECTION 3. This resolution shall become effective from and after its passage. RESOLVED on this 28th day of November, 2017. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: ATTEST: ___________________________ ___________________________ Dale Ross Shelley Nowling Mayor City Secretary Page 249 of 454 Resolution No. _____________________ Page 2 of 2 Date Approved: November 28, 2017 Page 250 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to authori ze appl i cati o n for a G LO Communi ty Devel opment Non-Housi ng B l ock G rant fo r $8 50 ,00 0.00 to provi de hazard mi ti gati on acti ons to the CDB G i denti fi ed areas from the General Land Office -- John Sullivan, Fire Chief ITEM SUMMARY: The City o f Georgetown Offic e o f Emergency Management & Homeland Security has been in co ordination with the Georgetown Ho using Department and Geo rgeto wn Utility Systems to ensure that we were able to select the projects that best served the areas of focus by the CDBG in the City o f Geo rge to wn. The CDBG focus for the City of George to wn in this specific grant is Hazard Mitigation for the areas of lower inco me within o ur c ity. The Mitigatio n proje c ts that have been selected support reducing three of the main hazards that were identified in the 2014 Hazard Mitigation Ac tion Plan that was adopte d by the City of Georgetown. The first hazard to be addressed is flo oding. The City o f Georgetown developed mitigation actions that ensure our city maintains the standards that are set within the National Flood Insurance Program. The actions that the City of Georgetown is requesting assistance with thro ugh this grant includes Fire Rescue Equipment. The equipment that is be ing requested at this time includes two Swift Water Re scue Boats and the necessary flash floo d rescue gear. Wildfire is another hazard that the City of Georgetown faces. Therefore it is vital to take aggressive hazard mitigation actions to reduce the fuel load and to develop a citywide Firewise P rogram, educating and empowering citizens to assist in wildfire mitigation action. In addition to the Firewise program it is vital to add two additional Brush Trucks to the fro nt line apparatus. Tornadoes are among the most vio lent sto rms on the planet. We currently have a few ways to notify the public in the city of Georgetown. With this grant we sho uld add Outdo or Warning Sirens to the low income areas that provide verbal warning and instruc tions to the public in English and Spanish. The Hazard Mitigation P lan for the City of Ge orgetown is due to be revised and submitted to the state and federal government. In addition to this the changes and ne w programs must be imple mented within the City o f George to wn. Therefore for the City o f Geo rgetown to have an effe c tive Hazard Mitigation P rogram it is necessary to add a Hazard Mitigation Offic e r for a minimum of 24 months to ensure the completion of the c urre nt pro gram changes. The deadline fo r this grant application has been exte nded to Friday, November 30, 20 17 . FINANCIAL IMPACT: The CDBG grant is a 10 0% funded grant, the refore there is a $0.00 financial burden to the City of Georgetown if we receive this grant. The financial be ne fit on the other hand would be $1,026,748 .14 . This amount is higher than originally estimated due to last-minute changes in the project. SUBMITTED BY: John Sullivan, Fire Chief ATTACHMENT S: Description Draft Propos al F irewise Too lkit F irewise Principles Hazard Mitigation P lanner for the City of Georgetown Hazard Mitigation P lanner INMAR Quo te City of Georgetown, Tx Modulator CDBG Projec t To tal City of Georgetown, TX UV Controller Es timate Jo e Go d d ard Enterp ris es Page 251 of 454 Page 252 of 454 Proposal 302806.2 1/2 10-09-2017 3500 Shelby Lane Denton, Texas 76207 GDN P115891 TXDOT MVD No. A115890 EIN 27-4333590 October 9, 2017 Clay Shell, Asst. Chief Georgetown Fire Department P.O. Box 409 GEORGETOWN TX 78627 Proposal for 2018 Skeeter Brush Truck Siddons-Martin Emergency Group, LLC is pleased to provide the following proposal to Georgetown Fire Department. Unit will comply with all specifications attached and made a part of this proposal. Total price includes delivery FOB Georgetown Fire Department and training on operation and use of the apparatus. Description Amount Price guaranteed for days. Delivery within months of order date.Vehicle Price $ 0.00 SUB TOTAL $ 0.00 EP804488, No. 2854, 2018 Skeeter Brush Truck Skeeter, Dodge, 4 Door, Skeeter, Rescue-Side, ISC 300, 400 gal, CET PFP-21H- -DSL-MR Price guaranteed for 30 days. Delivery within 11-12 months of order date. A warranty term of 12 months is included.Vehicle Price $ 201,850.00 Equipment $ 18,540.00 SUB TOTAL $ 220,390.00 H-GAC FS12-15 Skeeter $ 1,000.00 TOTAL $ 221,390.00 Taxes. Tax is not included in this proposal. In the event that the purchasing organization is not exempt from sales tax or any other applicable taxes and/or the proposed apparatus does not qualify for exempt status, it is the duty of the purchasing organization to pay any and all taxes due. Balance of sale price is due upon acceptance of the apparatus at the factory. Late Fee. A late fee of .033% of the sale price will be charged per day for overdue payments beginning ten (10) days after the payment is due for the first 30 days. The late fee increases to .044% per day until the payment is received. In the event a prepayment is received after the due date, the discount will be reduced by the same percentages above increasing the cost of the apparatus. Cancellation. In the event this proposal is accepted and a purchase order is issued then cancelled or terminated by Customer before completion, Siddons-Martin Emergency Group may charge a cancellation fee. The following charge schedule based on costs incurred may be applied: (A) 10% of the Purchase Price after order is accepted and entered by Manufacturer; (B) 20% of the Purchase Price after completion of the approval drawings; (C) 30% of the Purchase Price upon any material requisition. The cancellation fee will increase accordingly as costs are incurred as the order progresses through engineering and into manufacturing. Siddons-Martin Emergency Group endeavors to mitigate any such costs through the sale of such product to another purchaser; however, the customer shall remain liable for the difference between the purchase price and, if applicable, the sale price obtained by Siddons-Martin Emergency Group upon sale of the product to another purchaser, plus any costs incurred by Siddons-Martin to conduct such sale. Acceptance. In an effort to ensure the above stated terms and conditions are understood and adhered to, Siddons-Martin Emergency Group, LLC requires an authorized individual from the purchasing organization sign and date this proposal and include it with any purchase order. Upon signing of this proposal, the terms and conditions stated herein will be considered binding and accepted by the Customer. The terms and acceptance of this proposal will be governed by the laws of the state of TX. No additional terms or conditions will be binding upon Siddons-Martin Emergency Group, LLC unless agreed to in writing and signed by a duly authorized officer of Siddons-Martin Emergency Group, LLC. Page 253 of 454 Proposal 302806.2 2/2 10-09-2017 Sincerely, Travis Walden Siddons-Martin Emergency Group, LLC I, ________________________________________, the authorized representative of Georgetown Fire Department, agree to purchase the proposed and agree to the terms of this proposal and the specifications attached hereto. __________________________________________ Signature & Date Page 254 of 454 F I R E WISE T O O LKIT A GUIDE TO FIREWISEPRINCIPLES During a wildfire, firefighting resources are limited and firefighters must often make quick decisions on which homes they can work on defending. Implementing Firewise actions at your home will increase the chances that firefighters will be able to try and protect your property. Page 255 of 454 F I R E WISE T O O LKIT A GUIDE TO FIREWISEPRINCIPLES Homeowners can and must take primary responsi- bility for wildfire safety actions around the home. According to fire science research, individual efforts do make a difference even in the face of a wildfire. The Firewise Communities Program provides homeowners with simple and easy steps to help reduce a home’s wildfire risk by preparing ahead of a wildfire. These steps are rooted in prin- ciples based on solid fire science research into how homes ignite. The research comes from the world’s leading fire experts and research organizations whose experiments, models, and data collection are based on some of the country’s worst wildland fire disasters. The following are Firewise principles and tips that serve as a guide for residents: When it comes to wildfire risk, it is not a geographical location, but a set of conditions that determine the home’s ignition potential in any community. Wildfire behavior is influenced by three main fac- tors: topography (lie of the land), weather (wind speed, relative humidity and ambient temperature) and fuel (vegetation and man-made structures). In the event of extreme wildfire behavior, extreme weather conditions are normally present, like ex- tended drought, high winds, low humidity and high temperatures, coupled with excess fuel build up in- cluding the accumulation of live and dead vegeta- tion material. Additionally, the area’s topography influences the fire’s intensity and rate of spread. OF THESE THREE FACTORS, FUEL IS THE ONLY ONE WE CAN INFLUENCE. Debris like dead leaves and pine needles left on decks, in gutters and strewn across lawns can ignite from embers. Fire moving along the ground’s surface can “ladder” into shrubs and low hanging tree limbs to create longer flames and more heat. If your home has flammable features or vulnerable openings, it can also serve as fuel for the fire, and become part of a disastrous chain of ignitions to other surrounding homes and structures. 2 Page 256 of 454 F I R E WISE T O O LKIT A GUIDE TO FIREWISEPRINCIPLES A home’s ignition risk is determined by its immediate surroundings or its “home ignition zone” and the home’s construction materials. According to fire science research and case stud- ies, it’s not where a home is located that necessarily determines ignition risk, but the landscape around it, often referred to as the “home ignition zone.” The home ignition zone is defined as the home and its immediate surroundings up to 100 feet (30 m). The Firewise Communities Program provides tips for reducing wildfire risk based on the home ignition zone concept: Home Zone – the home itself and within 5 feet of the foundation: Harden your home against wildfire. This includes fences, decks, porches and other attachments. From a fire behavior point of view, if it’s attached to the house it is a part of the house. Non-flammable or low flammability construction materials — especially for roofs, siding and windows — are recommended for new homes or retrofits. Keep any flammables, including plantings, debris and mulch, out of the area within 5 feet of your home’s foundation as well as off your roof, eave lines, gutters and deck or porch surfaces. Ensure vents and other openings are screened or otherwise protected from ember penetration during a wildfire. 5 – 30 feet: This well-irrigated area around the home includes decks and fences, and provides space for fire suppression equipment in the event of an emer- gency. Lawns should be well maintained and mowed. Plantings should be limited to carefully-spaced low flammability species, and consider hardscaping using rocks, gravel or stone instead of mulch. Keep any large fuel packages, such as firewood piles, out of this area. 30 – 100 feet: Low flammability plant materials should be used here. Plants should be low-growing and the irrigation system should extend into this section. Create separation between grasses, shrubs and trees to avoid a “fuel ladder” effect where fire can climb into taller vegetation. Trees should be spaced to prevent crowns from touching. 100+ feet: Place low-growing plants and well- spaced trees in this area, remembering to keep the volume of vegetation (fuel) low. 3 Page 257 of 454 F I R E WISE T O O LKIT A GUIDE TO FIREWISEPRINCIPLES Residents play a major role in protecting their lives and property. Your home ignition zone extends up to 100 feet – and it’s quite common to have neighbors whose home ignition zone overlaps yours. Once a structure is engulfed in flames, it could ignite other struc- tures located less than 100 feet away. In addition, many communities have commonly owned property, including natural or wooded areas that can pose fire risks to all. This means that to be most effective, neighbors need to work together and with their local fire service to achieve greater wildfire safety. Together, community residents can work with agencies and elected officials to accomplish the following: » Ensure that homes and neighborhoods have legible/clearly marked street names and numbers » Know “two ways out” of the neighborhood for safe evacuation during a wildfire » Create phone and text trees to alert residents about local fires » Sign up for emergency notifications » Talk to your Homeowner Association (HOA) to make sure you are in compliance with existing community rules or regulations on vegetation management and construction materials and if they are “Firewise-friendly” » Engage with your local fire department on how they can work with you and your neigh- bors, and participate in the “Ready, Set, Go!” program » Participation in the Firewise Communities/USA Recognition Program provides the community with a risk assessment and action plan that will help residents work together annually to make where they live a safer place Learn more about how to keep families safe and reduce homeowners’ risk for wild- fire damage at firewise.org. Free printed and audiovisual materials can be found on the Firewise website and ordered online through the Firewise catalog. 4 Page 258 of 454 Hazard Mitigation Planner for the City of Georgetown This position coordinates updates of the City of Georgetown’s natural hazards mitigation plan. This plan is required to be updated in a five-year cycle. This position ensures the state plan retains FEMA-approved status by meeting all FEMA planning requirements, in order to maintain eligibility for FEMA mitigation, public assistance, and fire management assistance grant programs. This position serves as project manager for all aspects of the mitigation planning process and works closely with partners and stakeholders as necessary. This position coordinates with other planners to promote consistency between risk assessments and reduce duplication of effort between program areas. This position provides guidance and determines processes for mitigation programs and provides direction on day to day operations within the mitigation section. This position obtains strategic goals and objectives from the Emergency Management Coordinator in order to maximize mitigation efforts. This position manages collective mitigation efforts to ensure appropriate program goals and objectives are achieved. This position develops program guidance documents specific to Georgetown. Specific program areas within this section include local natural hazards mitigation planning, natural hazards risk reduction, mitigation technical assistance, and grant program administration (the FEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program, the FEMA Flood Mitigation Assistance Program). This position serves as the Hazard Mitigation Planner and as the This position trains and works with communities and others to ensure correct interpretation and implementation of the federal and state rules and regulations associated with hazard mitigation for the City of Georgetown. Page 259 of 454 Budget Request Information Notes Requestor Name: Chad Berg, EMC Budget Request Title: Hazard Mitigation Planner Departmental Priority Rank Council Focus Area Respond to Issues of Growth and Mitigation Needs Implementation Date 2018 FULL TIME Personnel Information Requesting New Full Time Staff? Yes Job Title of Requested Position(s) Emergency Management Planner How Many New FT Employees? 1 HR Preliminary Approved Pay Range 26 100-5-0402-50-100 SALARIES 61,610 100-5-0402-50-105 PART TIME SALARIES - 100-5-0402-50-110 OVERTIME 100-5-0402-50-200 TAXES, SOCIAL SECURITY 4,713 100-5-0402-50-201 WORKER'S COMP 277 100-5-0402-50-300 GROUP INSURANCE 10,800 100-5-0402-50-301 RETIREMENT 7,701 Requesting New Part Time? No Vehicle Information Notes Does this Request have a Fleet Impact? No 100-5-0402-51-730 UNIFORMS 1,500 100-5-0402-51-710 SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 135 OEM is a new division within the FD. This position is needed to ensure all emergency operation plans are maintained and updated as required by the State. Mitigation would be the primary function of this position and mitigation is an emergency management function that can potentially save millions of dollars in disaster prevention and risk reduction. Hazard Mitigation Officer - Grant Request 86,736 Page 260 of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age 261 of 454 Estimate # Q14495 Date: 11/20/2017 Expires 12/20/2017 Sales Rep: TC Ryan TC@rescuegear.com Bill to:Ship To: Fire Department Chief Carl Boatright 3500 DB Wood Georgetown TX 78628 Fire Department Chief Carl Boatright 3500 DB Wood Georgetown TX 78628 Contact: Chief Clay Shell Phone:Email: clay.shell@georgetown.org Memo: Boats Page# 1 Item Item Description Vendor QTY Orig $Disc %Price Ext P$ INMAR CUSTOM BOAT PACKAGE, FREIGHT INCLUDED INMAR 3 $18,515.90 6.03%$17,399.00 $52,197.00 Subtotal:$52,197.00 Tax:$0.00 Freight:$0.00 Quote Total:$52,197.00 Page 262 of 454 Modulator® Electronic Siren Series https://www.fedsig.com/product/modulator®-ii-electronic-siren-series 11/21/17, 2=50 PM Page 1 of 6 Page 263 of 454 FEATURES Federal Signal’s Modulator High Powered Speaker Array offers the same proven technology as the original Modulator with the exception of a smaller compact chassis. Modulator provides a flat frequency response up to 2000Hz producing intense warning signals and digital voice messaging over a large area. The Modulator design enables the siren to produce a high sound level and intelligible voice communications. The innovative omni-directional electronic Modulator speaker array consists of modules that utilize four 100 watt drivers. It also provides clear voice communication and offers warning signals which are produced by Federal Signal’s UltraVoice™ electronic controller and amplifier system. Custom tones and professionally recorded voice messages for the UltraVoice controller are available and can be purchased upon request. The Modulator High Powered Speaker Array combined with the UltraVoice controller is ideal for community/municipal, industrial and military applications where immediate instruction is necessary. The MOD6032 and MOD6048 have been replaced by the MOD8032B, which is shorter, lighter and more compact. The Modulator and UltraVoice controller can be networked via radio, IP, landline, cellular and/or satellite communications. Powering is available in AC, DC, or solar. The system typically operates from batteries which are charged from either AC or Solar. Federal Signal can also provide customized solutions to fit your special applications. Light-weight, compact design Utilizes Federal Signal Ultravoice™ for control and amplification Excellent frequency response for clear voice reproduction 360º coverage without sound variation in horizontal planes Easy servicing through convenient access panels Anechoic chamber-certified Shown with optional QuadraFlare lights https://www.fedsig.com/product/modulator®-ii-electronic-siren-series 11/21/17, 2=50 PM Page 2 of 6 Page 264 of 454 SPECIFICATIONS *The bottom module contains no active devices and is simply used as a reflective surface. **Based on far field measurements ***Coverage based on 10 dB(C) distance doubled loss factor Frequency Response 200-2000Hz ± 1dB Color Off-white Paint Type TGIC-polyester powder coat Modulator Horn Type Hyperbolic flare Modulator Horn Type 200-2000Hz1,200 ft Horizontal Coverage 360º +/- 1 dB(C)28.000 in Diameter 35"/88.9cm264 lb RESOURCES PRODUCT LITERATURE Modulator Product Sheet https://www.fedsig.com/product/modulator®-ii-electronic-siren-series 11/21/17, 2=50 PM Page 3 of 6 Page 265 of 454 ORDERING INFORMATION Model Types MODEL DESCRIPTION UPC MOD1004B Electronic Speaker Array, One Module 782979701309 MOD2008B Electronic Speaker Array, Two Modules 782979701316 MOD3012B Electronic Speaker Array, Three Modules 782979701323 MOD4016B Electronic Speaker Array, Four Modules 782979701330 MOD5020B Electronic Speaker Array, Five Modules 782979701347 MOD6024B Electronic Speaker Array, Six Modules 782979701354 MOD8032B Electronic Speaker Arry, Eight Modules 782979701378 Battery Information.pdf Model PVS240W-24 and PVS240W-48 Solar Power Option for Outdoor Sirens Data Sheet ANS326-Cell_Sat_Comm-812PRESS_(2).pdf PRODUCT MANUALS Mod_2_Manual.pdf Solar Power Systems PVS220W-24 PVS220W-48 PVC240W-24 PVS240W-48 | 255379 E3 0917.pdf AGENCY CERTIFICATES UL and cUL Certificate - Modulator® II https://www.fedsig.com/product/modulator®-ii-electronic-siren-series 11/21/17, 2=50 PM Page 4 of 6 Page 266 of 454 Replacement Parts DESCRIPTION PART NUMBER UPC Driver, 100 watt K8570063A YOU MIGHT ALSO BE INTERESTED IN... https://www.fedsig.com/product/modulator®-ii-electronic-siren-series 11/21/17, 2=50 PM Page 5 of 6 Page 267 of 454 Commander® On-Premises Siren Control and Messaging System QuadraFlare® ©2017 Federal Signal https://www.fedsig.com/product/modulator®-ii-electronic-siren-series 11/21/17, 2=50 PM Page 6 of 6 Page 268 of 454 #Description Unit 2 Equipped Swift Water Rescue Boats 70,612.95$ 2 Wildfire Brush Trucks 221,390.00$ 1 Firewise Wildfire Mitigation Program 140,000.00$ 4 Voice Inteligible Sirens 32,317.56$ 2 year Hazard Mitigation Planner 86,736.00$ Grand Total: CDBG Non-Housing 2018 Emergency Hazards Projects Page 269 of 454 Total 141,225.90$ 442,780.00$ 140,000.00$ 129,270.24$ 173,472.00$ 1,026,748.14$ CDBG Non-Housing 2018 Emergency Hazards Projects Page 270 of 454 UV UltraVoice® Electronic Siren Controller https://www.fedsig.com/product/uv-siren-controller 11/21/17, 3=02 PM Page 1 of 9 Page 271 of 454 FEATURES The Federal Signal UltraVoice® controller combines micro-processor based system control with highly efficient amplifiers to deliver optimized tones and voice capability for electronic sirens. The UltraVoice controller can generate and amplify single or dual frequency warning tones and comes with seven pre-set warning signals. In addition, the controller has been designed specifically to reproduce high quality live or pre-recorded-voice capability. The controller includes a NEMA 4X cabinet housing the control module, up to eight 400 watt amplifiers, and a NEMA 3R battery cabinet. The unit may be equipped with a plug-in programmable receiver module, utilizing DTMF or two- tone sequential activation protocols. A digital voice option can be added by plugging in a single mini SD card which can store up to 250 messages. Two-way Status System The UltraVoice Controller can also be a two-way communication system. A transceiver allows the unit to report status back to a central control point utilizing DTMF or the Commander Software System protocol. Two transceiver ports are available for radio repeating or when using multiple frequencies. The two-way option provides information on the following conditions: AC power Battery voltage Charger operation 7 built-in warning signals (click here for tones) Up to 250 stored message, 17 hours of available audio Decodes single-tone, two-tone, DTMF and AFSK digital Quiet test standard Up to 8 controller zones Stackable siren functions Distinct dual tone capacity Highly efficient pulse width modulated amplifiers Windows®-based programming software (optional) https://www.fedsig.com/product/uv-siren-controller 11/21/17, 3=02 PM Page 2 of 9 Page 272 of 454 Activation current Amplifier voltage and current Quiet test (Speakers & Amps) Signal A Signal B Mode of operation Intrusion Local activation SD card status SPECIFICATIONS Operating Temperature**-22°F to 149°F (-30°C to 65°C) Input Voltage 120 or 240VAC +/- 10%, 50/60 Hz Single-phase Battery Input Voltage 24 Volts (nom.) Operating Voltage 24VDC Standby Time Greater than 7 days Control Module Signal duration (auto reset)3 minute standard Microphone Input Impedance 10K Ohms Audio Distortion 1% THD max, Maximum Load 600 Ohms Microphone Input 10k Ohms https://www.fedsig.com/product/uv-siren-controller 11/21/17, 3=02 PM Page 3 of 9 Page 273 of 454 Impedance Audio Distortion 1% THD max. Contact Closure (min) 500ms < 2k Ohms Amplifier Module Frequency Response: (300 to 3kHz) ±3dB (ref. 1kHz) Output Voltage (Tone and PA): (to speaker drivers) 70 Vrms (nom.) Input Impedance: (per amplifier)100Ohms Enclosures Conteol Cabinet Type 4 or 4X Battery Cabinet Type 4 (vented) ** The siren can operate throughout this temperature range provided the battery temperature is maintained at 0°F/-18°C or higher. RESOURCES PRODUCT LITERATURE UV |ANS316 0817 Battery Information.pdf Model PVS240W-24 and PVS240W-48 Solar Power Option for Outdoor Sirens Data Sheet https://www.fedsig.com/product/uv-siren-controller 11/21/17, 3=02 PM Page 4 of 9 Page 274 of 454 ORDERING INFORMATION Model Types MODEL DESCRIPTION UPC UV Controller, one-way 782979213246 UVH Siren control, one-way, VHF high band 782979702764 UVU Siren control, one-way, UHF band 782979702993 UVTD Controller, two-way digital with radio control options 782979702924 UVTDH Siren control, two-way digital, VHF (136-174)782979702948 UVTDU Siren control, two-way digital, UHF (403-470)782979702979 UVTD-IP Controller, IP enabled 782979702955 ANS326-Cell_Sat_Comm-812PRESS_(2).pdf PRODUCT MANUALS UV Charger Retrofit Kit | 25500365A0 UV_Manual_255354Q.pdf SE2000 User Guide 255373A.pdf Solar Power Systems PVS220W-24 PVS220W-48 PVC240W-24 PVS240W-48 | 255379 E3 0917.pdf AGENCY CERTIFICATES UL and cUL Certificate of Compliance - UV https://www.fedsig.com/product/uv-siren-controller 11/21/17, 3=02 PM Page 5 of 9 Page 275 of 454 UVTD-LL Controller, landline 782979702962 Accessories PRODUCT #DESCRIPTION UPC DVSD Digital voice mini SD card, 250 messages, 17 hours 782979700814 FSPWARE Windows® programming software (Two-tone & DTMF) 78297970500 FS-PL1 Tone coded and digital coded squelch decoder 78297970499 UV400 Amplifier, 400 watt 782979702733 TB-LL Telco base, landline 782979702672 ES-PROG-DTMF Two-way DTMF programming 78297970498 UVTR 210-264 VAC Transformer/Rectifier Replacement Parts DESCRIPTION PART NUMBER UPC DC-to-DC Converter PCB Q2005173E UV+ Controller PCB Q2005698C 200A Fuse Q148A147A 24VDC Charger 120816C-KIT YOU MIGHT ALSO BE INTERESTED IN... https://www.fedsig.com/product/uv-siren-controller 11/21/17, 3=02 PM Page 6 of 9 Page 276 of 454 Commander® On-Premises Siren Control and Messaging System https://www.fedsig.com/product/uv-siren-controller 11/21/17, 3=02 PM Page 7 of 9 Page 277 of 454 Modulator® Electronic Siren Series https://www.fedsig.com/product/uv-siren-controller 11/21/17, 3=02 PM Page 8 of 9 Page 278 of 454 DSA High-Powered Directional Speaker ©2017 Federal Signal https://www.fedsig.com/product/uv-siren-controller 11/21/17, 3=02 PM Page 9 of 9 Page 279 of 454 PROPOSAL Date 11/21/2017 Proposal# 1382 Name / Address City of Georgetown, TX JOE GODDARD ENTERPRISES LLC 11950 THOUSAND OAKS DRIVE EDMOND, OK 73034 Project Thank you for your business.Total Description Qty Rate Total This Quote is for (4) Refurbished Federal Signal MOD6032 Omni-directional Electronic Siren, 3200 Watt. Installed on a Class II 50' Galvanized Steel Pole (to include standard batteries) Installation of (4) Refurbished Federal Signal MOD6032 Omni-directional Electronic Siren, 3200 Watt. Installed on a Class II 50' Galvanized Steel Poles (to include 4 standard Batteries) 4 6,500.00 26,000.00 (4) Galvanized Steel Poles 4 4,600.00 18,400.00 (4) Refurbished MOD6032 Siren Head 3200 Watt Omni-directional Electronic Siren 4 9,000.00 36,000.00 (4) UVTDH DIGITAL, 2-WAY, Hi-BND, 120V 4 5,419.09 21,676.36 (32) UV400 AMPLIFIER-400W 32 579.53 18,544.96 (4) Antenna Kit 4 395.00 1,580.00 (4) AMB-P Pole Mount Antenna Bracket 4 114.38 457.52 (1) DVR Digital Voice Recording Session 1 593.08 593.08 (4) DVSD Digital Voice Mini SD Card 4 276.21 1,104.84 (4) Solar Panel Kits 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 Shipping Fees 1 2,413.48 2,413.48 $129,270.24 Page 280 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Forwarded fro m the Housi ng Advi sory B oard: Consideration and possible action to approve a Re so l uti o n of no objecti on, allo wing Pedcor Investments to apply for Housi ng Tax Cr e di ts to the State for the co nstr ucti o n o f 19 2 units to be known as the Resi dences at Sti l l w ater, located at approximately the 1500 bl ock of NE Inner Loo p -- Susan Watkins, AICP, Housing Coordinator and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, P lanning Director ITEM SUMMARY: In 2016, City Council adopted a Low Inco me Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) review process for resolution requests which includes two application type s for the 4% and 9% HTC pro grams. The Te xas Department of Housing and Community Affairs allocates housing tax credits under a 4% and 9 % program, each with diffe re nt funding so urc e s and application requirements. The 4 % HTC is a non-co mpetitive program that uses tax-exempt bo nds as a component o f proje c t financing. The 9% HTC application cycle is an annual co mpetitive proc e ss. Rules for the 9% HTC program are outlined in the Qualified Application P lan (QAP ). The state appro ves the QAP e ach fall and awards are generally allocated the following July. 9% HTC program A resolution stating the City’s position of either “support or no objection” must be o btained from the city and/or co unty where the project is lo c ate d and submitted with the 9% HTC application by March 1 st of the program year. The City of Georgetown Request for Re so lutio n application has dates that must be updated each year in response to the State ’s timeline for the c ompetitive 9% HTC application c yc le. 4% HTC program Applications for 4 % HTCs require a “Resolution of No Objection” from the city and/or co unty where the project is located. Applications for the 4% HTC program can be submitted to TDHCA throughout the year. As part o f the 2016 Wo rk P lan, the Housing Advisory Bo ard updated the City of Georgetown Housing Tax Credit (HTC) resolution review process. On Se ptember 27 , 20 16 , City Council approved a HTC review process that requires applic ants requesting a resolution to conduct public o utreach to the surro unding neighbo rhoo ds, undergo zoning review, me e t specific deadlines and pro vide data regarding the current tax credit inventory. P lanning staff has revie wed the original process adopted in 2016 and has updated process timelines for the new cale ndar year. In support of the direction Council issued whe n reviewing applicatio ns for the 2016 cycle, staff has added an explicit date for a workshop with Council fo r a concurrent review of all applications. The general reso lution request submittal and review process includes: December 1, 2 01 7 Rezo ning Application Due (if necessary) January 2, 2018 HTC Resolution Applications Due January 22, 2018 Housing Advisory Board Me e ting January 23, 2018 Hold P ublic Meetings January 23, 2018 Co uncil Workshop February 13, 201 8 City Council Meeting March 1, 2018 TDHCA Application Due Twice the State Average Per Capita To submit an applic atio n for Ho using Tax Credits, the develo per must obtain a Reso lution from George to wn acknowledging that the c ity has more than two times the state average per capita amount of Housing Tax Credit units. In Texas, there is an average of 0.0 09 tax credit units fo r each person. In Georgetown, we have 0.02 units per perso n, which means we have 2 .96 times the average amount o f statewide units of tax credit. The tables below compares the surrounding counties and cities. Page 281 of 454 P l ace Name P l ace po pul ati on Al l P l ace Uni ts Al l Uni t P er Cap P l Pl ace > 2x P er Capi ta Cedar Park 60,841 86 8 0.01 43 No Hutto 20,052 50 0.00 25 No Jarrell 927 -0.00 00 No Leander 32,051 37 0 0.0 115 No Round Rock 1 09 ,69 0 73 6 0.00 67 No Austin 8 87 ,06 1 1 6,5 00 0.01 86 Yes Taylor 16,276 30 5 0.01 87 Yes P flugerville 53,847 1,022 0.01 90 Yes Georgetown 56,102 1,539 0.02 74 Yes Salado 1,6 42 50 0.03 05 Yes San Marcos 54,712 1,791 0.03 27 Yes Liberty Hill 1,2 42 211 0.16 99 Yes County name County popul ati o n Al l Co unty Uni ts Al l Uni ts P er Capi ta Cnty Cnty > 2x P er Capi ta Bell 32 6,0 41 1,786 0.0 05 5 No Milam 24,344 18 0 0.0 07 4 No Williamson 47 3,5 92 4,449 0.0 09 4 No Burnet 44,144 48 8 0.0 111 No Travis 1,121,645 1 7,1 92 0.0 15 3 No 4% LIHTC Resolution Request Jean Latsha, a project coordinato r with PedCor, a Multi-family (MF) deve lo pe r, is seeking 4 % HTCs for a portion of the Stillwater development located at Inner Lo op and FM 97 1. The property is zoned MF-2. The developer submitted an application requesting a Reso lutio n of “No Objection” and also a reso lutio n ackno wledging Georgetown has twice the state per capita number of tax credit units to the Housing Co ordinator on Septembe r 11 , 2 01 7. The developer prese nted her project at the October 1 6, 2017 Housing Advisory Board meeting. Commission Recommendation The developer presented her project at the October 16 , 2 01 7 Housing Adviso ry Board me e ting. The Housing Advisory Board recommended granting the request for both resolutions. Staff Findings Staff finds the applic atio n to have met the process approved in 2016 by City Council. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time . SUBMITTED BY: Susan Watkins, AICP ATTACHMENT S: Description Attachment 1 - R es o lutio n o f No Objec tion Page 282 of 454 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. __________ A Resolution of the City Council of Georgetown, Texas, regarding an application for 2018 Housing Tax Credits by Pedcor Investments-2017-CLXVII, L.P., for the development named Residences at Stillwater, to the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs to d evelop affordable rental housing and declaring and effective date. WHEREAS, Pedcor Investments-2017-CLXVII, L.P., has proposed a development for affordab le rental housing of 192 rental units at the 1500 block of NE Inner Loop named Residences at Stillwater in the city of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas; and WHEREAS, Pedcor Investments-2017-CLXVII, L.P., has advised that it intends to submit an application to the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA) for 2018 Housing Tax Credits for Residences at Stillwater ; It is hereby RESOLVED, that in accordance with the requirements of Texas Government Code §2306.67071 and Texas Administrative Code §10.204(4), it is hereby found that: 1. Notice has been provided to the Governing Body in accordance with Texas Government Code §2306.67071(a); and 2. The Governing Body has had sufficient opportunity to obtain a response from the Applicant regarding any questions or concerns about the proposed Development; and 3. The Governing Body has held a hearing at which public comment may be made on the proposed Development in accordance with Texas Government Code, §2306.67071(b); and 4. After due consideration of the information provided by the Applicant and public comment, the City of Georgetown does not object to the proposed Application; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that for and on behalf of the Governing Body, Dale Ross, Mayor is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to certify these resolutions to the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs on the 28th day of November 2017. ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: Shelley Nowling Dale Ross City Secretary Mayor Page 283 of 454 Page 2 of 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Charlie McNabb City Attorney Page 284 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Forwarded fro m the Housi ng Advi sory B oard: Consideration and po ssible action to approve a Re so lutio n acknow l edgi ng that Geo rgetown has more than tw o ti me s the aver age per capi ta amount of Housi ng Tax Credi t uni ts, allowing Pedcor Investments to apply for Housi ng Tax Credi ts to the State for the constructi on o f 192 units to be kno wn as the Resi dences at Sti l l water, located at approximate ly the 1 50 0 bl ock of NE Inner Loo p -- Susan Watkins, AICP, Housing Coo rdinato r and So fia Ne lson, CNU-A, Planning Director ITEM SUMMARY: In 2016, City Council adopted a Low Inco me Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) review process for resolution requests which includes two application type s for the 4% and 9% HTC pro grams. The Te xas Department of Housing and Community Affairs allocates housing tax credits under a 4% and 9 % program, each with diffe re nt funding so urc e s and application requirements. The 4 % HTC is a non-co mpetitive program that uses tax-exempt bo nds as a component o f proje c t financing. The 9% HTC application cycle is an annual co mpetitive proc e ss. Rules for the 9% HTC program are outlined in the Qualified Application P lan (QAP ). The state appro ves the QAP e ach fall and awards are generally allocated the following July. 9% HTC program A resolution stating the City’s position of either “support or no objection” must be o btained from the city and/or co unty where the project is lo c ate d and submitted with the 9% HTC application by March 1 st of the program year. The City of Georgetown Request for Re so lutio n application has dates that must be updated each year in response to the State ’s timeline for the c ompetitive 9% HTC application c yc le. 4% HTC program Applications for 4 % HTCs require a “Resolution of No Objection” from the city and/or co unty where the project is located. Applications for the 4% HTC program can be submitted to TDHCA throughout the year. As part o f the 2016 Wo rk P lan, the Housing Advisory Bo ard updated the City of Georgetown Housing Tax Credit (HTC) resolution review process. On Se ptember 27 , 20 16 , City Council approved a HTC review process that requires applic ants requesting a resolution to conduct public o utreach to the surro unding neighbo rhoo ds, undergo zoning review, me e t specific deadlines and pro vide data regarding the current tax credit inventory. P lanning staff has revie wed the original process adopted in 2016 and has updated process timelines for the new cale ndar year. In support of the direction Council issued whe n reviewing applicatio ns for the 2016 cycle, staff has added an explicit date for a workshop with Council fo r a concurrent review of all applications. The general reso lution request submittal and review process includes: December 1, 2 01 7 Rezo ning Application Due (if necessary) January 2, 2018 HTC Resolution Applications Due January 22, 2018 Housing Advisory Board Me e ting January 23, 2018 Hold P ublic Meetings January 23, 2018 Co uncil Workshop February 13, 201 8 City Council Meeting March 1, 2018 TDHCA Application Due Twice the State Average Per Capita To submit an applic atio n for Ho using Tax Credits, the develo per must obtain a Reso lution from George to wn acknowledging that the c ity has more than two times the state average per capita amount of Housing Tax Credit units. In Texas, there is an average of 0.0 09 tax credit units fo r each person. In Georgetown, we have 0.02 units per perso n, which means we have 2 .96 times the average amount o f statewide units of tax credit. The tables below compares the surrounding counties and cities. Page 285 of 454 P l ace Name P l ace po pul ati on Al l P l ace Uni ts Al l Uni t P er Cap P l Pl ace > 2x P er Capi ta Cedar Park 60,841 86 8 0.01 43 No Hutto 20,052 50 0.00 25 No Jarrell 927 -0.00 00 No Leander 32,051 37 0 0.0 115 No Round Rock 1 09 ,69 0 73 6 0.00 67 No Austin 8 87 ,06 1 1 6,5 00 0.01 86 Yes Taylor 16,276 30 5 0.01 87 Yes P flugerville 53,847 1,022 0.01 90 Yes Georgetown 56,102 1,539 0.02 74 Yes Salado 1,6 42 50 0.03 05 Yes San Marcos 54,712 1,791 0.03 27 Yes Liberty Hill 1,2 42 211 0.16 99 Yes County name County popul ati o n Al l Co unty Uni ts Al l Uni ts P er Capi ta Cnty Cnty > 2x P er Capi ta Bell 32 6,0 41 1,786 0.0 05 5 No Milam 24,344 18 0 0.0 07 4 No Williamson 47 3,5 92 4,449 0.0 09 4 No Burnet 44,144 48 8 0.0 111 No Travis 1,121,645 1 7,1 92 0.0 15 3 No 4% LIHTC Resolution Request Jean Latsha, a project coordinato r with PedCor, a Multi-family (MF) deve lo pe r, is seeking 4 % HTCs for a portion of the Stillwater development located at Inner Lo op and FM 97 1. The property is zoned MF-2. The developer submitted an application requesting a Reso lutio n of “No Objection” and also a reso lutio n ackno wledging Georgetown has twice the state per capita number of tax credit units to the Housing Co ordinator on Septembe r 11 , 2 01 7. The developer prese nted her project at the October 1 6, 2017 Housing Advisory Board meeting. Commission Recommendation The developer presented her project at the October 16 , 2 01 7 Housing Adviso ry Board me e ting. The Housing Advisory Board recommended granting the request for both resolutions. Staff Findings Staff finds the applic atio n to have met the process approved in 2016 by City Council. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time . SUBMITTED BY: Susan Watkins, AICP, Ho using Coordinator ATTACHMENT S: Description Page 286 of 454 Attachment 1 - R es o lutio n Acknowled ging Two Times Per Capita Page 287 of 454 Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. __________ A Resolution of the City Council of Georgetown, Texas, acknowledging that Georgetown has more than 2 times the state average per capita Housing Tax Credit units for 2018 Housing Tax Credits by Pedcor Investments-2017-CLXVII, L.P. for the development named Residences at Stillwater , to the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs to develop affordable rental housing and declaring and effective date W HEREAS, Pedcor Investments-2017-CLXVII, L.P. has proposed a development for affordable rental housing of 192 rental units at the 1500 block of NE Inner Loop named Residences at Stillwater in the city of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas; and WHEREAS, P edcor Investments-2017-CLXVII, L.P. has advised that it intends to submit an application to the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA) for 2018 Housing Tax Credits for Residences at Stillwater ; It is hereby RESOLVED, that as provided for in §11.3(c ) of the Qualified Allocation Plan, it is expressly acknowledged and confirmed that the city of Georgetown in Williamson County has more than twice the state average of units per capita supported by Housing Tax Credits or Private Activity Bonds and FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city of Georgetown in Williamson County hereby supports the proposed Residences at Stillwater and confirms that its governing body has voted specifically to approve the Development and to authorize an allocation of Housing Tax Credits for the Development pursuant to Texas Government Code §2306.6703(a)(4), and FURTHER RESOLVED that for and on behalf of the Governing Body, Dale Ross, Mayor is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to certify these resolutions to the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, on the 28th day of November, 2017. ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: Shelley Nowling Dale Ross City Secretary Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Charlie McNabb City Attorney Page 288 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Fi rst Readi ng o f an Ordinance establ i shi ng the c l assi fi cati ons and number of posi ti ons (Strength of Force) for all the City of Ge orgetown Fi re F i ghters and Pol i ce Offi cers pursuant to Chapte r 14 3 o f the Texas Local Governme nt Code pertaining to Civil Service -- Tadd Phillips, Human Resources Director (acti on r e qui red) ITEM SUMMARY: Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government Code, Section 143.021, requires that the governing body of a municipality shall establish classifications and numbers of positions by ordinance. This ordinance supplements the Ordinance that adopts the Annual Operating Budget Plan as the ordinance that establishes the classifications and numbers of positions. T his “Strength of Force” Ordinance separates and details the specific classifications and numbers of Civil Service positions. T he changes reflected on this Strength of Force are as follows: Fire - 4 additional Firefighter Positions. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for new positions accounted for in 17/18 budget amendment coming before C ouncil on December 12th. SUBMITTED BY: Elliott Harper ATTACHMENT S: Description S trength o f Forc e Ordinanc e Page 289 of 454 Ordinance Number: Page 1 of 2 Description: Strength of Force Ordinance Date Approved: ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS RELATING TO THE CLASSIFICATIONS AND NUMBER OF POSITIONS FOR ALL CITY OF GEORGETOWN FIRE FIGHTERS AND POLICE OFFICERS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 143 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE PERTAINING TO CIVIL SERVICE; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETINGS AT WHICH THE ORDINANCE IS PASSED ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the citizens of the City of Georgetown, Texas have adopted the civil service system for its fire and police departments; and WHEREAS, civil service is governed under Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, Local Government Code, Section 143.021, requires that the governing body of a municipality shall establish classifications and numbers of positions by ordinance. WHEREAS, the caption of this ordinance was printed in the Williamson County Sun in compliance with the City Charter of the City of Georgetown. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The classification plans for classified positions in the Fire and Police Departments shall be as follows: PART ONE – FIRE DEPARTMENT The following classifications of firefighters in the Fire Department shall exist effective on and after the dates set forth herein under the provisions of Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government Code. These classifications and no others shall exist effective on and after the dates set forth herein with the number shown indicating the number of positions in each classification. Number in Classification Classification Assistant Chief 2 Fire Battalion Chief 5 Fire Captain 9 Fire Lieutenant 18 Fire Driver 21 Firefighter 64 Total 119 The one (1) Assistant Fire Chief is appointed by the head of the department, and serves at the pleasure of the Department Head, in accordance with Local Government Code, Section 143.014. Page 290 of 454 Ordinance Number: Page 2 of 2 Description: Strength of Force Ordinance Date Approved: PART TWO – POLICE DEPARTMENT The following classifications of officers in the Police Department shall exist effective on and after the dates set forth herein under the provisions of Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government Code. These classifications and no others shall exist effective on and after the dates set forth herein with the number shown indicating the number of positions in each classification. Number in Classification Classification Assistant Chief of Police 1 Police Captain 2 Police Lieutenant 9 Police Sergeant 14 Police Officer / Detective 57 Total 83 The one (1) Assistant Police Chief is appointed by the head of the department, and serves at the pleasure of the Department Head, in accordance with Local Government Code, Section 143.014. SECTION 2. All positions, other than the position immediately below the Department Head, shall be filled pursuant to the provisions of Local Government Code, Chapter 143, and eligibility lists applicable to the position. SECTION 3. That it is hereby found and determined that the meetings at which this ordinance was passed were open to the public, as required by Section 551, Texas Government Code, and that advance public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meetings was given. SECTION 4. Should any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any purpose by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected thereby and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately after its second and final reading. PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the ____ day of __________, 2017 at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas. PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the ____ day of __________, 2017 at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas. ATTEST: CITY OF GEORGETOWN By: Shelley Nowling, City Secretary Dale Ross, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Charlie McNabb City Attorney Page 291 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Second Readi ng of an Ordinance to rezone approximately 3.2 35 acres in the Porte r Survey lo cated at 2805 Mesqui te Lane from the Lo c al Commerci al (C-1) Di stri c t to the Mul ti -fami l y 1 (MF-1) Di stri ct -- Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, P lanning Director (acti o n requi red) ITEM SUMMARY: B ackground: The applicant has reque ste d to rezone the 3.23 5 acre tract from C-1 District, to MF-1 District. The property is located southwest of Williams Drive near the intersection o f Mesquite Lane and River Bend Drive. Publ i c Comment: To date, one pho ne c all was been received and one resident came to the planning department co ncerning this case. Pl anni ng and Zoni ng Commi ssi on Recommendati o n: At their October 17th, 20 17 meeting, the Planning and Zo ning Commission unanimously recommended to the City Council appro val (7-0 ) to rezone the 3.235 acres to the MF-1 district. Ci ty Counci l Ac ti on: At their November 14th, 2 017 me e ting the Council unanimo usly vo ted approval (7-0) to rezone the 3 .23 5 acres to the MF-1 district. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None studied at this time. SUBMITTED BY: Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, P lanning Director ATTACHMENT S: Description S taff Report Exhib it 1 - Loc ation Map Exhib it 2 - Future Land Use Map Exhib it 3 - Zoning Map Exhib it 4 - Aerial Map Exhib it 5 - MF-1 Land Uses Exhib it 6 - Pub lic Comments Ordinanc e and Exhibits Page 292 of 454 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report REZ-2017-019 | Mesquite Lane | C-1 to MF-1 Page 1 of 5 Report Date: October 13, 2017 File No: REZ-2017-019 Project Planner: Chelsea Irby Item Details Project Name: Mesquite Lane Project Address: 2805 Mesquite Lane Owner: B3 Texas Ventures, Inc. Applicant: Clark & Fuller, PLLC Total Acreage: 3.235 acres Legal Description: WALDEN ADDITION, ACRES 3.235 Existing Zoning: C-1 (Local Commercial) Proposed Zoning: MF-1 (Low-Density Multi-Family) Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant is requesting to rezone the subject property from C-1 (Local Commercial) to MF-1 (Low-Density Multi-Family) to construct a detached multi-family condo regime project. The proposed project name is Mesquite Lane Condominiums. Site Information Location: The property is located southwest of Williams Drive near the intersection of Mesquite Lane and River Bend Drive. Physical Characteristics: The property is generally flat with approximatley 12 trees scattered throughout the property. Surrounding Properties: Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use North C-3 Moderate Density Residential and Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Warehousing/open storage South C-1 Moderate Density Residential and Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Office East C-1 Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Funeral home West RS and TF Moderate Density Residential Church and duplexes Page 293 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report REZ-2017-019 | Mesquite Lane | C-1 to MF-1 Page 2 of 5 Property History The property was annexed in 1974 via Ordinance No. 74-08 and has not been rezoned since its current C-1 zoning designation. Additionally, the subject property falls within the Scenic Natural Gateway Overlay district. The property was platted in the Walden Addition in 1998. In July 2017, the subject property was included in the Williams Drive Study, specifically within the Centers Area boundary. The purpose of this Study was to develop a plan of action that incorporates safety, efficient transportation operations, safe accommodations of all modes, and integration of smart transportation and land use, community needs and the future economic growth of Williams Dr. The focus of the Centers Area included developing a plan for a vibrant mixed-use center and gateway along Williams Drive, and included land use recommendations to meet this goal. The Study recommends Medium Density Mixed Housing (small lot single-family, cottage courts, townhouses, multiplexes, etc.) and Suburban Mixed Use (i.e. townhouse, apartment, assisted living, office, etc.) uses for the subject property. 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use: The property has Moderate Density Residential and Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Future Land Use designations. Moderate Density Residential: This land use category comprises single family neighborhoods that can be accommodated at a density ranging between 3.1 and 6 dwelling units per gross acre, with housing types including small-lot detached and attached single-family dwellings (such as townhomes). Mixed Use Neighborhood Center: This designation applies to smaller areas of mixed commercial use within existing and new neighborhoods. These areas are primarily proposed adjacent to, or as part of, larger residential neighborhoods. Neighborhood-serving mixed-use areas abut roadway corridors or are located at key intersections. They often function as gateways into the neighborhoods they serve. Growth Tier: The property is located in growth Tier 1A (high priority). This growth tier is intended for short- term growth. Tier 1A is that portion of the city where infrastructure systems are in place, or can be economically provided and where the bulk of the city’s growth should be guided over the near term. Within Tier 1A, the city is called on to conduct assessments of public facility conditions and capacities and to prioritize short and long term capital investments so as to ensure that infrastructure capacity is sufficient to serve development intensities as indicated on the Future Land Use Map and in the zoning districts. Page 294 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report REZ-2017-019 | Mesquite Lane | C-1 to MF-1 Page 3 of 5 Transportation The property fronts Mesquite Lane and this is the only access. From Mesquite Lane, River Bend Drive provides access to Williams Drive. Utilities The subject property is located within the City’s service are for water, wastewater and electric. There are existing water and wastewater mains along Mesquite Lane. Proposed Zoning District Low-Density Multi-Family (MF-1): The Low Density Multi-family District (MF-1) is intended for attached and detached multi-family residential development, such as apartments, condominiums, triplexes, and fourplexes, at a density not to exceed 14 dwelling units per acre. The MF-1 District is appropriate in areas designated on the Future Land Use Plan as High Density Residential or one of the Mixed-Use categories, and may be appropriate in the Moderate Density Residential area based on location, surrounding uses, and infrastructure impacts. Properties zoned MF-1 should have convenient access to major thoroughfares and arterial streets and should not route traffic through lower density residential areas. The MF-1 District is appropriate adjacent to both residential and non-residential districts and may serve as a transition between single-family districts and more intense multi-family or commercial districts. Staff Analysis Comply Do Not Comply Approval Criteria for Rezoning X The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review and final action The application was deemed complete and allowed for adequate review. X The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan states that MF-1 can be appropriate in areas shown as Moderate Density Residential on the Future Land Use Map. X The zoning change promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and healthful development of the City This zoning change would not affect the health, safety, or welfare of residents. Additionally, it promotes the safe orderly and healthful development of the City by serving as a transition zone from the more intense commercial uses along Williams Drive and the less intense single and two-family residential uses west of Mesquite Lane. Page 295 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report REZ-2017-019 | Mesquite Lane | C-1 to MF-1 Page 4 of 5 Comply Do Not Comply Approval Criteria for Rezoning X The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood This is a less intensive use then the current C-1 zoning and low density multi-family would be compatible adjacent to the surrounding duplexes, church, and businesses. X The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the District that would be applied by the proposed amendment. The property is currently vacant and flat. It is also near existing water and wastewater mains. The land is ready for development. General Findings Based on all the information presented, staff has made the following findings: 1.The MF-1 (Low Density Residential) is recommended in Medium Density Residential areas of the Future Land Use Map where it is appropriate. This zoning district is appropriate because of its proximity to Williams Drive and the existing single and two-family residential west of Mesquite Lane. 2.Roadway, water, and wastewater infrastructure is already in place, which aligns with goals of growth Tier 1A. 3.The development of a project in the MF-1 district would not circulate traffic through the nearby neighborhoods. The traffic would occur on Mesquite Lane and River Bend Drive, as access points to Williams Drive. 4.The MF-1 district is a less intense use then the current C-1 zoning district, thus providing a transition zone between the more intense uses along Williams Drive and the less intense residential uses west of Mesquite Lane. Additionally, traditional high-density apartments are not allowed in this district. 5.The development of this property is in alignment with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and helps to achieve the 10 year growth goals from the Plan. 6.The requested zoning district is consistent with the recommendations of the 2017 Williams Drive Study for this area. Public Comments To date, one phone call has been received at the planning department. The caller was concerned with the development of an apartment complex. The caller also expressed desire to see the buffering on the sides and rear of the lots. The caller was not upset with the development, but desires input in the process. Additionally, the Planning Department received one written comment in opposition of the request (Attachment 6). Page 296 of 454 Planning Department Staff Report REZ-2017-019 | Mesquite Lane | C-1 to MF-1 Page 5 of 5 Attachments Attachment 1 – Location Map Attachment 2 – Future Land Use Map Attachment 3 – Zoning Map Attachment 4 – Aerial Map Attachment 5 – MF-1 District Development Standards and Permitted Land Uses Attachment 6 – Public Notice Responses Page 297 of 454 B O O T Y S C R O S S I N G RD N IH 35 LAKEWAYDR W IL LIA M S D R N AUSTIN AVE §¨¦35 BOOTYS CROSSING RD W IL LIA M S D R REZ-2017-019Exhibit #1 Coordi nate System : Texas State Plane/Centr al Zone/N AD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For G eneral Plann ing Pu rpo ses Only ¯ Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 0 0.25 0.5Mi Page 298 of 454 W IL LIA M S D R DA W N DR PARKER DR P A R K L N R I V E R B E N D D R N O R T H W E STBLVD PO W ER RD R A N C H R D G A B R I E L V I E W D R P A R K W A Y S T MES Q UITE LN L A K E W A Y D R WESTW OOD LN SPRING VALLEYRD BOOTYSCROSSINGRD E JANIS DR ADDIELN E CENTRAL DR KATHILN R IV E R R D D U N M A N D R C O U N T R Y C L U B R D SOUTHCR O S S R D BRANDYL N O A K L N RIDGECRESTRD TERRYLNW O O DLANDRD W E S T E R N T R L P ATTI D R JUDY D R P RI M R O S E T R L B R O K E N S P O K E T R L S H A D Y H O L L O W D R THOR N T ONLN S H A N NONLN W HISPEROAKSLN HIGHVIE W R D O A K CRE S T L N R A N D O L P H R D R O C K Y H O L L O W T R L S P R I N G W O O D LN T I F F A N Y L N RIVERY BLVD J O H N THO M A S D R CROS S L ANDDR NORTHWOOD D R W I L L O W L N G O LDENO A K S R D OAK RIDGE CIR C OTTO N W O O D D R PARKE R C I R WJANISDR W C E NTR AL D R KIM BERLYST MELISSA CT VILL A G E D R P A R K M E A D O W B L V DSTACEY LN P O W E R C I R HAGEN CT C O U N T R Y CLU B R D O A K LN C O T T O N W O O D D RCoordinate System: Texas State Plane/Ce ntral Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic D ata For Gen eral Planni ng Purposes O nly ¯ Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan Exhibit #2 REZ-2017-019 Leg en d Thoroughfare Future Land Use In stitutional Re g ional Commercial Co m munity Comm ercial Employment Center Lo w Density Residential Mining Mixe d Use Com munity Mixe d Use Neighborhood Center Mo derate Density Residential Open Space Spe cialty M ixed Use Area Ag / Rural Residential Existing Collector Existing Freeway Existing Major Arterial Existing Minor Arterial Existing Ramp Pro p osed Collector Pro p osed Freeway Pro p sed Frontage Road Pro p osed M ajor Arterial Pro p osed M inor Arterial Pro p osed Railroad Hi gh Density Residential Legend Sit eParcelsCity L im itsGeorgetown ET J 0 ¼½Mi Page 299 of 454 W IL LIA M S D R DA W N DR PARKER DR P A R K L N R I V E R B E N D D R N O R T H W E STBLVD PO W ER RD R A N C H R D G A B R I E L V I E W D R P A R K W A Y S T MES Q UITE LN L A K E W A Y D R WESTW OOD LN SPRING VALLEYRD BOOTYSCROSSINGRD E JANIS DR ADDIELN E CENTRAL DR KATHILN R IV E R R D D U N M A N D R C O U N T R Y C L U B R D SOUTHCR O S S R D BRANDYL N O A K L N RIDGECRESTRD TERRYLNW O O DLANDRD W E S T E R N T R L P ATTI D R JUDY D R P RI M R O S E T R L B R O K E N S P O K E T R L S H A D Y H O L L O W D R THOR N T ONLN S H A N NONLN W HISPEROAKSLN HIGHVIE W R D O A K CRE S T L N R A N D O L P H R D R O C K Y H O L L O W T R L S P R I N G W O O D LN T I F F A N Y L N RIVERY BLVD J O H N THO M A S D R CROS S L ANDDR NORTHWOOD D R W I L L O W L N G O LDENO A K S R D OAK RIDGE CIR C OTTO N W O O D D R PARKE R C I R WJANISDR W C E NTR AL D R KIM BERLYST MELISSA CT VILL A G E D R P A R K M E A D O W B L V DSTACEY LN P O W E R C I R HAGEN CT C O U N T R Y CLU B R D O A K LN C O T T O N W O O D D R Zoning InformationREZ-2017-019Exhibit #3 Co o rdi nate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zo ne/N A D 83/US FeetCartographic D ata For Gener al Plann ing Pu rposes Only LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ ¯ 0 ¼½Mi Page 300 of 454 W IL LIA M S D R R I V E R B E N D D R P A R K E R D R M ES Q UITE LN O AK LN D A W N D R P A T TI D R TI F F A N Y L N PO W ER RD KIMBERLY ST B R A N D Y L N MELISSA CT VILLAGE DR C OTTO N W O O D DR P A R K M E A D O W B L V D DUN M A N D R TIFFA N Y CIR Coordi nate System : Texas State Plane/Centr al Zone/N AD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For G eneral Plann ing Pu rpo ses Only ¯ Aeria l REZ-2017-019 LegendSiteCity Limits 0 250 500Feet Page 301 of 454 Maximum Density = 14 units/acre Front Setback = 20 feet Bufferyard = 15 feet with plantings Maximum Building Height = 35 feet Side Setback = 10 feet adjacent to RE, RL, RS,TF, or MH Maximum Units per Building = 12 Side Setback to Residential = 20 feet districts; 10 feet with plantings Rear Setback = 10 feet adjacent to residences in AG Rear Setback to Residential = 20 feet Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required Group Home (7‐15 residents) Church (with columbarium) Activity Center (youth/senior) Multifamily Attached Day Care (family/group/commercial) Assisted Living Multifamily Detached Golf Course Bed and Breakfast (with events) Rooming/Boarding House Nature Preserve/Community Garden Emergency Services Station Utilities (Minor) Neighborhood Amenity Center Group Home (16+ residents) Park (Neighborhood) Halfway House School (Elementary) Nursing/Convalescent Home Utilities (Intermediate) Orphanage Wireless Transmission Facility (<41') School (Middle) Student Housing Specific Uses Allowed within the District Low Density Multifamily (MF‐1) District District Development Standards Page 302 of 454 1 Chelsea Irby From:Sofia Nelson Sent:Wednesday, October 04, 2017 1:19 PM To:Andreina Davila; Chelsea Irby Subject:Mesquite Lane Rezoning Received a phone call at 10/4/17 at 1:05pm indicating the following: ‐ The caller was concerned about development of an apartment complex ‐ The caller explained a desire to have a solid masonry fence on the perimeter and wooden privacy lots in the rear of the lot ‐ The caller explained he is not opposed to single family lot and block lots with the development of homes that are masonry in finish ‐ The caller had a concern about minimum setbacks between two lots ( 5 foot setbacks between building) ‐ The caller is not upset with the development but he does want some input into the process. Sofia Nelson, CNU-A Planning Director City of Georgetown (512)931.7611 Page 303 of 454 Page 304 of 454 On 10.25.17 a resident came in to the planning office to inquire about the Mesquite Lane rezoning (REZ- 2017-019). He did not have concerns, but just had questions about what was allowed in the MF-1 district. He also wanted to know why he wasn’t notified and I informed him that he was outside of the required notification zone. He also mentioned that one notification sign was on the ground and the other had the white paper torn off. I provided him with a zoning map and a list of allowed used in MF-1. Chelsea Irby 10.25.17 Page 305 of 454 Ordinance Number: ___________________ Page 1 of 2 Description: Mesquite Lane Rezoning Case File Number: REZ-2017-019 Date Approved: __________________ Exhibits A and B Attached ORDINANCE NO. _____________________ An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, amending part of the Official Zoning Map to rezone 3.235 acres out of the Porter Survey in the Walden Addition, as recorded in Cabinet Q Slide 137, from the Local Commercial District to the Low-Density Multi-Family District also known as 2805 Mesquite Lane; repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; including a severability clause; and establishing an effective date. Whereas, an application has been made to the City for the purpose of amending the Official Zoning Map, adopted on the 12th day of June, 2012, for the specific Zoning District classification of the following described real property ("The Property"): 3.235 acres of the Porter Survey in the Walden Addition of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "The Property"; and Whereas, public notice of such hearing was accomplished in accordance with State Law and the City’s Unified Development Code through newspaper publication, signs posted on the Property, and mailed notice to nearby property owners; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a meeting on October 17, 2017, held the required public hearing and submitted a recommendation of 7-0 approval to the City Council for the requested rezoning of the Property; and Whereas, the City Council, at a meeting on November 14, 2017, held an additional public hearing prior to taking action on the requested rezoning of the Property. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, that: Section 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this Ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance implements the vision, goals, and policies of the Georgetown 2030 Comprehensive Plan and further finds that the enactment of this Ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other policies or provisions of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the City’s Unified Development Code. Section 2. The Official Zoning Map, as well as the Zoning District classification(s) for the Property is hereby amended from the Local Commercial District (C-1) to the Low-Density Multi-Family District (MF-1), in accordance with the attached Exhibit A (Location Map) and Exhibit B (Legal Description) and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in Page 306 of 454 Ordinance Number: ___________________ Page 2 of 2 Description: Mesquite Lane Rezoning Case File Number: REZ-2017-019 Date Approved: __________________ Exhibits A and B Attached conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. Section 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective in accordance with the provisions of state law and the City Charter of the City of Georgetown. APPROVED on First Reading on the 11th day of November, 2017. APPROVED AND ADOPTED on Second Reading on the 28th day of November, 2017. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: ATTEST: ______________________ _________________________ Dale Ross Shelley Nowling Mayor City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________ Charlie McNabb City Attorney Page 307 of 454 1 ME S Q U I T E L A N E CO N D O M I N I U M S W I L L I A M S D R . RIVER B E N D D R . M E S Q U I T E L N . MF-1 Page 308 of 454 Page 309 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Second Readi ng of an Ordinance for the Vol untary Annexati on of 244.86 acres in the Fredrick Foy Survey located approximately be twe en the intersections of Ronal d Reag an Boul evard at County Road 24 5 and Ronal d Reagan B oul evard at Sun Ci ty Bo ul evard to be known as Somerset Hi l l s-1 and for the Vol untary Annexati on of the adjacent ri ght-of-way known as Ro nald Reagan Boulevard and Co unty Road 245 -- Chris Yane z, CNU-A, Assistant Planning Director (acti on r e qui red) ITEM SUMMARY: The action required o f Co uncil is to approve the se c ond reading of the ordinance fo r vo luntary annexation. In order to comple te the annexation, the following pro cess will be followed: Annexation Cycle : August 8, 2017: Resolution accepting petition (Co mpleted) August 8, 2017: 1st Public Hearing held at City Co unc il Meeting (Completed) August 22, 2017 : 2 nd P ublic Hearing held at City Council Meeting (Completed) September 12, 20 17 : 1 st Reading of Ordinance at City Co uncil Meeting (Completed) November 28, 20 17 : 2 nd Reading of Ordinance On the Future Land Use P lan, this area is designate d as Open Space, Community Commercial, Mixed Use Community, Mixed Use Neighbo rhoo d Center and Moderate De nsity Residential, Agricultural Rural Residential. A P lanned Unit Deve lo pment zoning request is be ing pro cessed concurrently with the annexation request and propose s a General Commercial (C-3 ), Low Density Multifamily (MF-1), Residential Single-Family (RS) base zoning district. P ublic Comment: To date, no written public comments have been received. Staff Recomme ndatio n: Approval of the second re ading of the ordinance for voluntary annexation and service plan for the Somerset Hills-1 tract including annexation of the adjacent right-of-way known as Ronald Reagan Boulevard and County Road 245. FINANCIAL IMPACT: City services, including po lice and fire protectio n, e mergency medical services, so lid waste collection and disposal are immediately subje c t to the property. Extension of capital improvements such as wate r and wastewater systems will be subject to the City’s utility extension and improve ment policy or the terms of any po tential agreement with the prope rty owner. The property is c urre ntly undeveloped. SUBMITTED BY: Chris Yanez, CNU-A, Assistant Planning Director ATTACHMENT S: Description Attachment 1 - Ordinanc e Exhib it A - Letter o f Intent Page 310 of 454 Exhib it B - Lo c atio n Map Exhib it C - Property Survey No tes Exhib it D - ROW Survey No tes Exhib it E - Servic e Plan Page 311 of 454 Ordinance No. _____________________ Page 1 of 2 Somerset Hills-1 Tract ANX-201X-004 Date Approved: 11.28.2017 Exhibit A,B,C,D,E attached Ordinance No. __________________ An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, providing for the extension of certain boundary limits of the City of Georgetown, Texas, and the annexation of certain territory consisting of 244.5 acres, more or less, in the Fredrick Foy Survey Abstract Number 229 and adjacent of rights-of-way known as Ronald Reagan Boulevard and County Road 245, as described herein; providing for service plans; repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; including a severability clause; and establishing an effective date. Whereas, the owners of the area proposed for annexation submitted a petition in writing requesting annexation of the area, pursuant to Local Government Code Section 43.028; and Whereas, the Section 4.03.010 of the Unified Development Code creates procedures for initial zoning of newly annexed territory; and Whereas, the Georgetown City Council approved a petition for voluntary annexation on August 8, 2017; and August 22, 2017; and Whereas, all of the herein-described property lies within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Georgetown, Texas; and Whereas, the herein-described property lies adjacent and contiguous to the City of Georgetown, Texas; and Whereas, all prerequisites of state law and the City Charter have been complied with; Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas that: Section 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance implements and is not inconsistent or in conflict with any 2030 Comprehensive Plan Vision Statements, Goals and Policies. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Georgetown (the Council) hereby annexes into the city limits 244.5 acres in the Fredrick Foy Survey Abstract Number 229, as shown in “Exhibit A” and Exhibit “B” of this ordinance, and as described in “Exhibit C” of this ordinance. Additionally, the Council hereby annexes those public rights-of-way adjacent to the above described 244.5 acres, known as Ronald Reagan Boulevard and County Road 245, being portions of those rights-of-way described in “Exhibit D”. “Exhibit E” contains the service plan. Page 312 of 454 Ordinance No. _____________________ Page 2 of 2 Somerset Hills-1 Tract ANX-201X-004 Date Approved: 11.28.2017 Exhibit A,B,C,D,E attached Section 3. The 244.5 acres, as described in “Exhibit C” of this ordinance, is included in City Council District 3, as it is adjacent to Council District 3 and no other City Council Districts. Section 4. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in accordance with the City Charter. Passed and Approved on Second Reading on the 28th day of November, 2017. Attest: The City of Georgetown: _________________________________ _________________________________ Shelley Nowling Dale Ross City Secretary Mayor Approved as to form: _________________________________ Charlie McNabb City Attorney Page 313 of 454 Page 314 of 454 Page 315 of 454 Page 316 of 454 ")2338 R o n a ld W R e a g a n B lv d D e l WebbBlvd Ronald W R e a g a n Blv d ")3405 ")245 Sun City B l v d ¬«195 ")2338 N L a k e w o o d s D r ")2338 ANX-2017-004Exhibit B Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 0 0.5 1Mi Page 317 of 454 Page 318 of 454 Page 319 of 454 Page 320 of 454 Page 321 of 454 Page 322 of 454 Page 323 of 454 Page 324 of 454 Page 325 of 454 Page 326 of 454 Page 327 of 454 Page 328 of 454 Page 329 of 454 Page 330 of 454 Page 331 of 454 Page 332 of 454 Page 333 of 454 Page 334 of 454 Page 335 of 454 Page 336 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 1 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-1 Exhibit E CITY OF GEORGETOWN ANNEXATION SERVICE PLAN AREA: SOMERSET HILLS-1 COUNCIL DISTRICT NO.: 3 DATE: NOVEMBER 28, 2017 I. INTRODUCTION This Service Plan (the “Plan”) is made by the City of Georgetown, Texas (“City”) pursuant to Sections 43.056(b)-(o); 43.062, and 43.052(h)(1) of the Texas Local Government Code (“LGC”). This Plan relates to the annexation into the City of the land shown on Exhibit “B” to this Service Plan, which is referred to as “Somerset Hills-1”. The provisions of this Plan were made available for public inspection and explained to the public at the two public hearings held by the City on August 8, 2017 and August 22, 2017 in accordance with Section 43.056(j) of the LGC. II. TERM OF SERVICE PLAN Pursuant to Section 43.056(l) of the LGC, this Plan shall be in effect for a ten-year period commencing on the effective date of the ordinance approving the annexation. Renewal of the Plan shall be at the discretion of the City Council and must be accomplished by Ordinance. III. INTENT It is the intent of the City that municipal services under this Plan shall provide municipal services in accordance with the timetables required by the LGC. The City reserves the rights guaranteed to it by the LGC to amend this Plan if the City Council determines that changed conditions, subsequent occurrences, or any other legally sufficient circumstances exist under the LGC or other Texas laws that make this Plan unworkable, obsolete, or unlawful. IV. CATEGORIZATION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES The municipal services described herein are categorized by those services which are (1) available to the annexed area immediately upon annexation; (2) those services which will be available to the annexed area within 2½ years from the effective date of the annexation; and (3) those services for which capital improvements are needed and which will be available within 4½ years from the effective date of the annexation based upon a schedule for construction of such improvements as set forth herein. For the purposes of this Plan, “provision of services” includes having services provided by any method or means by which the City provides municipal services to any other areas of the City, Page 337 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 2 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-1 and may include causing or allowing private utilities, governmental entities and other public service organizations to provide such services by contract, in whole or in part, and may include duties on the part of a private landowner with regard to such services. In addition, in accordance with Section 43.056(g) of the LGC, if before annexation the annexed area had a lower level of services, infrastructure, and infrastructure maintenance than the same being provided by the City to other areas within the City limits, this Plan shall be construed to allow for the provision to the annexed area of a level of services, infrastructure, and infrastructure maintenance that is comparable to the level of services, infrastructure, and infrastructure maintenance in other parts of the City with topography, land use, and population density similar to those reasonably contemplated or projected in the annexed area. V. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED UPON ANNEXATION 1. Police Protection –Upon annexation, the Georgetown Police Department will extend regular and routine patrols to the area. 2. Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services– Upon annexation, in the areas where the City has jurisdiction over fire protection and emergency medical services or a contract under which the City provides such services, the City of Georgetown Fire Department will provide response services in the annexed area consisting of: fire suppression and rescue; emergency response to 9-1-1 calls; fire prevention education efforts, and other duties and services provided by the Georgetown Fire Department to areas within the City limits. 3. Solid Waste Collection – Upon annexation, for occupied structures, the City will provide solid waste collection services to the annexed area in accordance with City ordinances and policies in effect on the date of the annexation. However, per the terms of Sections 43.056(n) and (o) of the LGC, if a property owner chooses to continue to use the services of a privately owned solid waste management provider, the City is prevented from providing solid waste services for 2 years. 4. Operation and Maintenance of Water and Wastewater Facilities in the Annexed Area that Are Not Within the Area of Another Water or Wastewater Utility – City- owned water and wastewater facilities that exist in the annexed area will be maintained upon annexation and such maintenance shall be governed by the City’s ordinances, standards, policies and procedures. Per the provisions of Section 13.01. 020 of the Unified Development Code (“UDC”), for unplatted tracts in the annexed area, the City shall not repair, maintain, install or provide any public utilities or services in any subdivision for which a Final Plat has not been approved and filed for record, nor in which the standards contained in the UDC or referred to therein have not been complied with in full. Page 338 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 3 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-1 5. Operation and Maintenance of Streets, Roads, and Street Lighting – The City will provide preventative maintenance of the existing public streets and roads in the annexed area over which it has jurisdiction through maintenance and preventative maintenance services such as emergency pavement repair; ice and snow monitoring; crack seal, sealcoat, slurry seal, and PM overlay; and other routine repair. The City shall not maintain private roads in the annexed area. Preventative maintenance projects are prioritized on a City-wide basis and scheduled based on a variety of factors, including surface condition, rideability, age, traffic volume, functional classification, and available funding. As new streets are dedicated and accepted for maintenance they will be included in the City’s preventative maintenance program. Per the provisions of Section 13.01.020 of the UDC, for unplatted tracts in the annexed area, the City shall not repair, maintain, install or provide any streets or street lighting to any subdivision for which a Final Plat has not been approved and filed for record, nor in which the standards contained in the UDC or referred to therein have not been complied with in full. With regard to street lighting, it is the policy of the City of Georgetown that adequate street lighting for the protection of the public and property be installed in all new subdivisions. Installation procedures and acceptable standards for street lights shall be governed by the utility standards of the City in effect at the time of subdivision construction or addition thereto. 6. Operation and Maintenance of Public Parks, Playgrounds, and Swimming Pools - Upon annexation, publicly owned parks, playgrounds, and swimming pools in the annexed area (if any) will be operated and maintained by the City in accordance with the Section 12.20 of the City Code of Ordinances, and other applicable ordinances, policies, and procedures in effect at the time of annexation for other areas in the City limits. Privately owned parks, playgrounds, and pools will be unaffected by the annexation and shall not be maintained by the City. 7. Operation and Maintenance of Publicly Owned Buildings, Facilities, and Services – Should the City acquire any buildings, facilities or services necessary for municipal services in the annexed area, an appropriate City department will operate and maintain them. 8. Library – Upon annexation, library privileges will be available to anyone residing in the annexed area. 9. Planning and Development, Building Permits, and Inspections Services; - Upon annexation, the City’s Unified Development Code and Title 15 of the City Code of Ordinances will apply in the area. These services include: site plan review, zoning approvals, Building Code and other standard Code inspection services and City Code enforcement; sign regulations and permits; and Stormwater Permit services. For a full description of these services, see the City’s Unified Development Code and Title 15 of the City Code of Ordinances. Page 339 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 4 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-1 10. Animal Control Services – The provisions of Chapter 7 of the City Code of Ordinances relating to animal control services shall apply in the annexed area. 11. Business Licenses and Regulations – The provisions of Chapter 6 of the City Code of Ordinances relating to business licenses and regulations (Carnivals Circuses and Other Exhibitions; Electrician’s Licenses; Gross Receipts Charge or Street Rental; Peddlers and Solicitors; Taxicabs, Buses and Other Vehicles for Hire; Horse Drawn Carriages and other Non-Motorized Vehicles for Hire; Sexually Oriented Businesses; and Alcoholic Beverages) shall apply in the annexed area. 12. Health and Safety Regulations – The provisions of Chapter 8 of the City Code of Ordinance relating to health and safety regulations (Fire Prevention Code; Fireworks; Food Sanitation; Noise Control; Nuisances; Junked Motor Vehicles; and Smoking in Public Places) shall apply in the annexed area. 13. Regulations Pertaining to Peace, Morals and Welfare -- The provisions of Chapter 9 of the City Code of Ordinance relating to peace, morals and welfare (Housing Discrimination; Weapons; and Enforcement of Other Miscellaneous Violations) shall apply in the annexed area. VI. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED WITHIN 4½ YEARS OF ANNEXATION; CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 1. In General – The City will initiate the construction of capital improvements necessary for providing municipal services for the annexation area as necessary for services that are provided directly by the City. 2. Water and Wastewater Services– Water and wastewater services are only provided to occupied lots that have been legally subdivided and platted or are otherwise a legal lot, and that are located within the boundaries of the City’s authorized service areas. Further, existing residences in the annexed area that were served by a functioning onsite sewer system (septic system) shall continue to use such private system for wastewater services in conformance with the provisions of Section 13.20 of the City Code of Ordinances. Existing non-residential establishments in the annexed area may continue to use an onsite sewer system (septic system) for sewage disposal in conformance with the provisions of Section 13.20 of the City Code of Ordinances. Upon the Development of any property in the annexed area, the provisions of Chapter 13 of the UDC shall apply. The City shall have no obligation to extend water or wastewater service to any part of the annexed area that is within the service area of another water or wastewater utility. For annexed areas located within the City’s authorized service areas, the City shall, subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan, extend water and wastewater service in accordance with the service extension ordinances, policies, and standards that are summarized in Section X of this Plan, which may require that the property owner or developer of a newly developed tract install water and wastewater lines. The extension Page 340 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 5 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-1 of water and wastewater services will be provided in accordance with the policies summarized in Section X of this Plan and with any applicable construction and design standards manuals adopted by the City. 3. Water and Wastewater Capital Improvements Schedule – Because of the time required to design and construct the necessary water and wastewater facilities to serve the annexed area, certain services cannot be reasonably provided within 2½ years of the effective date of annexation. Therefore, in accordance with Sections 43.065(b) and (e) of the LGC, the City shall implement a program, which will be initiated after the effective date of the annexation and include the acquisition or construction of capital improvements necessary for providing water and wastewater services to the area. The following schedule for improvements is proposed: construction will commence within 2 ½ years from the effective date of annexation and will be substantially complete within 4 ½ years from the effective date of annexation. However, the provisions of Section VII of this Plan shall apply to the schedule for completion of all capital improvements. In addition, the acquisition or construction of the improvements shall be accomplished by purchase, lease, or other contract or by the City succeeding to the powers, duties, assets, and obligations of a conservation and reclamation district as authorized or required by law. 4. Roads and Streets – No road or street related capital improvements are necessary at this time. Future extension of roads or streets and installation of traffic control devices will be governed by the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the City’s Overall Transportation Plan, the City’s Capital Improvements Plan; the City’s regular or non-impact fee Capital Improvements Program, and any applicable City ordinances, policies, and procedures, which may require that the property owner or developer install roads and streets at the property owner’s or developer’s expense. It is anticipated that the developer of new subdivisions in the area will install street lighting in accordance with the City’s standard policies and procedures. Provision of street lighting will be in accordance with the City’s street lighting policies. 5. Capital Improvements for Other Municipal Services – No capital improvements are necessary at this time to provide municipal Police; Fire Protection; Emergency Medical Services; Solid Waste Collection; Public Parks, Playgrounds, or Swimming Pools; Public Buildings or Facilities; or Library Services. The annexed area will be included in the City’s future planning for new or expanded capital improvements and evaluated on the same basis and in accordance with the same standards as similarly situated areas of the City. VII. FORCE MAJEURE AND SCHEDULE EXTENSIONS 1. Certain events, described as Force Majeure Events in this Plan, are those over which the City has no control. Force Majeure Events shall include, but not be limited to, acts of God; terrorism or acts of a public enemy; war; blockages; riots; strikes; epidemics; forces Page 341 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 6 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-1 of nature including landslides, lightening, earthquakes, fires, storms, floods, washouts, droughts, tornadoes, hurricanes; arrest and restraint of government; explosions; collisions, and all other inabilities of the City, whether similar to those enumerated or otherwise, which are not within the control of the City. Any deadlines or other provisions of this Plan that are affected by a Force Majeure Event shall be automatically extended to account for delays caused by such Force Majeure Event. 2. In accordance with Section 43.056(e) of the LGC, this Plan and the schedules for capital improvements necessary to provide full municipal services to the annexed area may be amended by the City to extend the period for construction if the construction is proceeding with all deliberate speed. The construction of the improvements shall be accomplished in a continuous process and shall be completed as soon as reasonably possible, consistent with generally accepted local engineering and architectural standards and practices. However, the City does not violate this Plan if the construction process is interrupted for any reason by circumstances beyond the direct control of the City. VIII. AMENDMENTS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 43.056(k) of the LGC, on approval by the City Council, the Plan is a contractual obligation that is not subject to amendment or repeal except as provided by state law. Section 43.056(k) of the LGC provides that if the City Council determines, after public hearings, that changed conditions or subsequent occurrences make the Plan unworkable or obsolete, the City Council may amend the Plan to conform to the changed conditions or subsequent occurrences. An amended Plan must provide for services that are comparable to or better than those established in the Plan before amendment. Before any Plan amendments are adopted, the City Council must provide an opportunity for interested persons to be heard at public hearings called and held in the manner provided by Section 43.0561 of the LGC. IX. FEES The City may impose a fee for any municipal service in the area annexed if the same type of fee is imposed within the corporate boundaries of the City. All City fees are subject to revision from time to time by the City in its sole discretion. X. SUMMARY OF CURRENT WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE EXTENSION POLICIES Per the requirements of Section 43.056(e) of the LGC, the following summary is provided regarding the City’s current service extension policies for water and wastewater service. However, this is a summary of the current policies, and the policies and regulations related to water and wastewater utility extensions that are included in the City Code of Ordinances, the Unified Development Code, the City’s Construction and Specifications Manual; Drainage Page 342 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 7 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-1 Manual, and other published policies and technical manuals, as the same may be amended from time to time, shall control the extension of water and wastewater services to the annexed area. In addition, these policies and ordinances are set by City Council and can be amended in the future: 1. In General -- The provisions of Chapter 13 of the City’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) shall apply in the annexed area and Chapter 13 of the City Code of Ordinances. Portions of the current Chapter 13 of the UDC and the current Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances are summarized below. Note that these provisions are established by ordinance of the City Council and are subject to change from time to time. A. The City shall not repair, maintain, install or provide any water services, wastewater service, gas, electricity or any other public utilities or services to any property that has not been legally subdivided or is a non-legal lot. B. For property that is required by the City’s UDC or other City regulations to construct water or wastewater facilities, funding and construction of those facilities are the responsibility of the property owner or developer (the “subdivider”). C. Subdividers shall be responsible for providing an approved public water supply system for fire protection and domestic/ commercial/ industrial usage consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Where an approved public water supply or distribution main is within reasonable distance of the subdivision, but in no case less than one-quarter mile away, and connection to the system is both possible and permissible (including adequate system capacity), the subdivider shall be required to bear the cost of connecting the subdivision to such existing water supply. The subdivider shall, consistent with all existing ordinances, make a pro- rata contribution to funding of needed storage facilities, treatment facilities, and specific distribution lines as determined necessary by the City. D. Subdividers shall be responsible for providing an approved public sanitary sewer system, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, throughout the entire subdivision such that all lots, parcels, or tracts of land will be capable of connecting to the sanitary sewer system except as otherwise provided herein. Where an approved public sanitary sewer collection main or outfall line is in no case less than one-half mile away, and connection to the system is both possible and permissible (including adequate system capacity), the subdivider shall be required to bear the cost of connecting the subdivision to such existing sanitary sewer system. Where an approved public wastewater collection main or outfall line is more than one-half mile away from the property boundary, and where extension of a sanitary sewer collection main or outfall line is scheduled in the City’s Capital Improvements Plan to be completed to a point within one-half mile of the property boundary within five (5) years from the date of the Preliminary Plat approval, the subdivider shall be required to install a public Page 343 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 8 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-1 wastewater collection system. The design and construction of a public sanitary sewer system shall comply with regulations covering extension of public sanitary sewer systems adopted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. E. All infrastructure and public improvements must be designed and installed in accordance with all of the elements of the Comprehensive Plan and shall meet the minimum requirements established by the UDC, the City's Construction Standards and Specifications for Roads, Streets, Structures and Utilities, and any other adopted City design or technical criteria. No main water line extension shall be less than eight inches. All new public sanitary sewer systems shall be designed and constructed to conform with the City’s Construction Standards and Specifications and to operate on a gravity flow basis by taking advantage of natural topographic conditions and thereby reducing the need for lift stations and force mains. 2. If the specific undeveloped property does not have City water or wastewater facilities and capacity fronting the property – the owner may make an application for an extension of service to the property. If the Assistant City Manager for Utilities determines in writing that adequate water or wastewater capacity is available, or will be available, and if the project does not include City cost participation or reimbursement, if the proposed facilities are depicted on the City’s Water and Wastewater Master Plans, and the requested service otherwise meets the City’s requirements, the extension size, capacity, and routing may be approved by the Assistant City Manager for Utilities for construction by the developer at the developer’s cost and expense. 3. If the specific undeveloped property does have adequate City water or wastewater facilities and capacity fronting the property – the owner may receive water or wastewater service from the City by applying for a tap permit and paying the required fees. 4. If any property in the annexed area is using a septic system – the property owner remains responsible for the operation and maintenance of the septic system. If the property is in a Rural Residential Subdivision as defined in Chapter 13 of the UDC, or is a legal lot greater than one acre in size and used for single family residential purposes, the property shall continue the use of a septic system after annexation until such time that the use of the property changes, the property is further subdivided or developed, or a public sanitary sewer line has been extended to within 200 feet of the property boundary and the property owner has received notification from the City of the City’s desire for the property to be connected to the public sanitary sewer line. If the septic system fails before the City’s centralized wastewater service is extended to within 200 feet of the property and the City determines that the provision of centralized wastewater service is not feasible or practical at that time, then the property owner must either repair or replace the septic system in accordance with the provisions of Section 13.20 of the City Code of Ordinances. Properties using a septic system that are not in a Rural Residential Subdivision , or are not legal lots greater than one acre in size and used for Page 344 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 9 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-1 single family residential purposes at the time of annexation, but that are designated as either residential, open space or agricultural on the City’s Future Land Use Plan shall continue the use of a septic system until such time that the use of the property changes, the property is further subdivided or developed, or a public sanitary sewer line has been extended to within 200 feet of the property boundary and the property owner has received notification from the City of the City’s desire for the property to be connected to the public sanitary sewer line. 5. Reimbursement and cost participation by the City – Pursuant to Section 13.09.030 of the UDC, the City, in its sole discretion and with City Council approval, may participate with a property owner or developer in the cost of oversized facilities or line extensions. The actual calculation of the cost participation and reimbursement amounts, including limits and schedules for the payments, are set forth in the UDC. 6. City Code of Ordinances: (The following provisions are set by the City Council and can be amended in the future by ordinance.) Chapter 13.10 of the City Code of Ordinances currently provides as follows: Section 13.10.010 Policy established. This policy shall apply to improvements to the City's utility systems, including system upgrades, system expansion, and plant capacity additions. In this Section, the term “utility system” shall mean the City’s water system, wastewater system, reuse irrigation system, and stormwater drainage system. Section 13.10.020 System Planning. The City shall maintain and periodically update system plans for each utility so that system improvements are implemented to maintain adequate capacity for growth while maintaining proper service levels to existing customers. Section 13.10.030 Project Timing. A. Projects designed to expand or upgrade a utility system must be completed and ready for operations such that capacity requirements by state regulatory agencies and City system plans are met. B. When possible, the City should coordinate the construction of system improvements in a particular location with the expansion or maintenance of other utility infrastructure to minimize the future impact on each utility. C. Projects should begin the design phase when existing demand at a specific location exceeds 75% of current capacity and future demand is expected to exceed the current total capacity. Page 345 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 10 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-1 D. Projects should begin the construction phase when existing demand at a specific location exceeds 90% of current capacity and future demand is expected to exceed the current total capacity. E. Projects required to facilitate the development of a specific tract shall be done in accordance with the Unified Development Code. F. Projects required as a result of an annexation service plan shall be provided as stated in the approved Service Plan for such annexed tracts. Section 13.10.040 Project Financing. A. Projects required to facilitate the subdivision of a specific tract shall be paid by the subdivider in accordance with the Unified Development Code, unless otherwise authorized in writing and approved by the City Council in accordance with the terms of Section 13.09 of the Unified Development Code or other applicable law. B. When utility expansion is requested within a portion of the City’s utility service area, but the City is not otherwise required to provide service or planning to provide service as reflected in the City’s Capital Improvements Plan, the City may nonetheless, at the City’s sole option, facilitate the design and construction of the required utility extensions or upgrades by managing the project with the cost of such extensions to be shared and fully paid by the requesting landowners or subdividers prior to commencement of the project. C. When utility expansion is requested within a portion of the City’s utility service area, the City shall evaluate degree to which the project 1) facilitates contiguous growth, 2) maximizes the provision of service to the service area, 3) enhances economic development, 4) improves system operations, 5) contributes to conservation or other environmental concern, and 6) facilitates the completion of the utility master plan. D. At the City’s sole option, the City may also facilitate the installation of utility expansion requests through 1) financial cost contribution, 2) financing of the improvement using individual contracts between the City and each landowner for a proportionate share of the project cost to be paid out over a specified period of time at a specified rate of interest, 3) Impact Fee or connection fee reduction or waiver. Chapter 13.20 of the City Code of Ordinances currently provides as follows: Sec. 13.20.010. General. A. It is unlawful for any owner or lessee, tenant or other person in possession of any premises where any person lives or works, or occupies the same, to establish, maintain or use any water closet, bathtub, lavatory or sink except by one of the following means and consistent with the other terms, conditions and requirements of this Chapter and with the City’s Unified Development Code: Page 346 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 11 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-1 1. connection to an approved Onsite Sewage Facility that is constructed and maintained in accordance with the rules and regulations of all appropriate state and local agencies having jurisdiction over such facilities; or 2. connection to a public centralized wastewater collection main with all wastewater discharged to a centralized public wastewater collection system. B. Upon the “Development” of property, the provisions of Chapter 13 of the Unified Development Code (pertaining to Infrastructure and Public Improvements) shall govern the provision of wastewater service to the property. For the purposes of this section, the term “Development” shall have the same meaning as in Section 16.05 of the City’s Unified Development Code. C. It is the duty of each such person referenced in subsection (A), above, to connect such fixtures to an approved wastewater system, and to maintain the same. Sec. 13.20.020. On Site Sewage Facilities. A. General. All On Site Sewage Facilities must be constructed and maintained in accordance with the rules and regulations of the appropriate state and local agencies having jurisdiction over such facilities. B. Availability of a Public Centralized Wastewater Collection Main. If a public centralized wastewater collection main is located within 200 feet of a property line, and the wastewater collection main has adequate capacity to receive and transport the wastewater flow produced by the property, then property owner shall connect that property to said utility line at the earliest to occur of either of the following events: failure of the On Site Sewage Facility servicing the property, or the date that is five (5) years after receipt of notice of the availability of a wastewater collection main within 200-feet of the property line. C. Failure of On Site Sewage Facility. When an Onsite Sewage Facility fails, the following provisions shall apply: a. If a public centralized wastewater collection main is located within 200 feet of the property boundary, and the wastewater collection main has adequate capacity to receive and transport the wastewater flow produced by the property, then the property must be connected to said utility line by the property owner; b. If no public centralized wastewater collection main is located within 200 feet of the property boundary, the City shall evaluate the feasibility of providing centralized wastewater collection services to the property via a gravity or low pressure system. Where the provision of gravity sewer service or low pressure system is technically feasible, utility system improvements may be made in accordance with Chapters 13.10; c. If the City determines that the provision of wastewater service via a centralized wastewater collection main is not necessary due to existing or future land use, then the On Site Sewage Facility may be repaired or replaced. (Prior code § 12-101) Page 347 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 12 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-1 Sec. 13.20.030. Privies prohibited. It is unlawful for any owner or lessee, tenant or other person in possession of any premises in the City to establish or maintain any privy or dry closet. Sec.13.20.040 Low Pressure Sewer Systems A. A “Low Pressure Sewer System” is an individual lift station located at each utility customer or property owner location having a private force main connecting to a public force main or gravity main located in a public utility easement or public right-of-way. B. Each property owner and utility customer shall be responsible for the cost of installation and maintenance of the individual lift station and private force main. Section 13.20.050. Prohibited Discharges into Sewer System No person shall discharge, cause to be discharged, or permit to be discharged, either directly or indirectly into the public sewer system, waste or wastewater from any of the following sources unless allowed by the City Manager, or his/her designee: A. Any wastes or wastewater that does not meet the limitations imposed by Section 13.24 of the Code of Ordinances. B. Any stormwater, groundwater, rainwater, street drainage, subsurface drainage, or yard drainage; C. Any unpolluted water, including , but not limited to, cooling water, process water or blow-down water from cooling towers or evaporative coolers; D. Any wastes or wastewater, or any object, material, or other substance directly into a manhole or other opening into the sewer facilities other than wastes or wastewater through an approved service connection. E. Any holding tank waste, provided, that such waste may be placed into facilities designed to receive such wastes and approved by the City Manager, or his/her designee. Section 13.20.060 Sewer System Maintenance A. For properties with gravity wastewater service, the property owner and utility customer shall be responsible for the proper operation, maintenance, and repairs of the sewer system in the building and the service lateral between the building and the point of connection into the public sewer main. B. For properties with low pressure service, the property owner and utility customer shall be responsible for the proper operation, maintenance, and repairs of the Page 348 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 13 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-1 sewer system in the building and the service lateral, lift station (grinder pump) and force main between the building and the point of connection into the public sewer main. C. When, as a part of sewer system testing, the City identifies a flaw in a private service lateral or force main where a repair is necessary to prevent infiltration or inflow, the property owner and utility customer shall be responsible to cause the repairs to be made within one (1) year of the date of notification by the City. D. If repairs are not complete within one year of notification by the City, City may engage the services of a contractor to make the necessary repairs with the costs for such repairs to be paid by the City and subsequently charged to property owner and utility customer. Page 349 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Second Readi ng of an Ordinance for the Vol untary Annexati on of 133.1 acres in the Fredrick Foy Survey located approximately along and between the intersections o f Ronal d Reagan Boul evard at Co unty Road 245 and Ronal d Reagan B oul evard and Sun Ci ty Boul evard to be kno wn as Somerset Hi l l s-2 and fo r the Vol untary Annexati on o f the adjacent ri g ht-o f-w ay known as Ronald Reagan Bo ulevard -- Chris Yanez, CNU-A, Assistant P lanning Director (acti on r e qui red) ITEM SUMMARY: The action required o f Co uncil is to approve the first reading of the ordinance for voluntary annexation. In order to comple te the annexation, the following pro cess will be followed: Annexation Cycle : August 8, 2017: Resolution accepting petition (Co mpleted) August 8, 2017: 1st Public Hearing held at City Co unc il Meeting (Completed) August 22, 2017 : 2 nd P ublic Hearing held at City Council Meeting (Completed) September 12, 20 17 : 1 st Reading of Ordinance at City Co uncil Meeting (Completed) November 28, 20 17 : 2 nd Reading of Ordinance On the Future Land Use P lan, this area is designate d as Open Space, Community Commercial, Mixed Use Neighborhoo d Center and Mo de rate Density Residential. A P lanned Unit Deve lo pment zoning request is be ing pro cessed concurrently with the annexation request and propose s a Residential Single-Family (RS) base zoning distric t. Publ i c Comment: To date, no written public comme nts have been received. Staff Recommendati o n: Approval of the second re ading of the ordinance for voluntary annexation and service plan for the Somerset Hills-2 tract including annexation of the adjacent right-of-way known as Ro nald Reagan Boulevard and County Road 2 45 . FINANCIAL IMPACT: City services, including po lice and fire protectio n, e mergency medical services, so lid waste collection and disposal are immediately subje c t to the property. Extension of capital improvements such as wate r and wastewater systems will be subject to the City’s utility extension and improve ment policy or the terms of any po tential agreement with the prope rty owner. The property is c urre ntly undeveloped. SUBMITTED BY: Chris Yanez, CNU-A, Assistant Planning Director ATTACHMENT S: Description Attachment 1 - Ordinanc e Exhib it A - Letter o f Intent Exhib it B - Lo c atio n Map Exhib it C - Property Survey No tes Page 350 of 454 Exhib it D - ROW Survey No tes Exhib it E - Servic e Plan Page 351 of 454 Ordinance No. _____________________ Page 1 of 2 Somerset Hills-2 ANX-2017-005 Date Approved: 11.28.2017 Exhibit A,B,C,D,E attached Ordinance No. __________________ An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, providing for the extension of certain boundary limits of the City of Georgetown, Texas, and the annexation of certain territory consisting of 133.10 acres, more or less, in the Fredrick Foy Survey Abstract Number 229 and adjacent of rights-of-way known as Ronald Reagan Boulevard, as described herein; providing for service plans; repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; including a severability clause; and establishing an effective date. Whereas, the owners of the area proposed for annexation submitted a petition in writing requesting annexation of the area; and Whereas, the Section 4.03.010 of the Unified Development Code creates procedures for initial zoning of newly annexed territory; and Whereas, the Georgetown City Council approved a resolution granting the petition on August 8, 2017; and Whereas, the Georgetown City Council conducted public hearings on the proposed annexation on August 8, 2017, and August 22, 2017; and Whereas, all of the herein-described property lies within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Georgetown, Texas; and Whereas, the herein-described property lies adjacent and contiguous to the City of Georgetown, Texas; and Whereas, all prerequisites of state law and the City Charter have been complied with; Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas that: Section 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance implements and is not inconsistent or in conflict with any 2030 Comprehensive Plan Vision Statements, Goals and Policies. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Georgetown hereby annexes into the city limits 133.10 acres in the Fredrick Foy Survey Abstract Number 229, as shown in “Exhibit A” and “Exhibit B” of this ordinance, and as described in “Exhibit C” of this ordinance. Additionally, the Council hereby annexes those public rights-of-way adjacent to the above described 133.10 acres, Page 352 of 454 Ordinance No. _____________________ Page 2 of 2 Somerset Hills-2 ANX-2017-005 Date Approved: 11.28.2017 Exhibit A,B,C,D,E attached known as Ronald Reagan Boulevard, being portions of those rights-of-way described in “Exhibit D”. “Exhibit E” contains the service plan. Section 3. The 133.10 acres, as described in “Exhibit C” of this ordinance, is included in City Council District 3 and 4, as it is adjacent to Council District 3 and 4 and no other City Council Districts. Section 4. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in accordance with the City Charter. Passed and Approved on First Reading on the 28th day of November, 2017. Attest: The City of Georgetown: _________________________________ _________________________________ Shelley Nowling Dale Ross City Secretary Mayor Approved as to form: _________________________________ Charlie McNabb City Attorney Page 353 of 454 Page 354 of 454 Page 355 of 454 ")2338 R o n a l d W R e a g a n B lv d")245 Sun City B l v d ¬«195 ANX-2017-005Exhibit B Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 0 0.5 1Mi Page 356 of 454 Page 357 of 454 Page 358 of 454 Page 359 of 454 Page 360 of 454 Page 361 of 454 Page 362 of 454 Page 363 of 454 Page 364 of 454 Page 365 of 454 Page 366 of 454 Page 367 of 454 Page 368 of 454 Page 369 of 454 Page 370 of 454 Page 371 of 454 Page 372 of 454 Page 373 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 1 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-2 Exhibit E CITY OF GEORGETOWN ANNEXATION SERVICE PLAN AREA: SOMERSET HILLS-2 COUNCIL DISTRICT NO.: 3 & 4 DATE: NOVEMBER 28, 2017 I. INTRODUCTION This Service Plan (the “Plan”) is made by the City of Georgetown, Texas (“City”) pursuant to Sections 43.056(b)-(o); 43.062, and 43.052(h)(1) of the Texas Local Government Code (“LGC”). This Plan relates to the annexation into the City of the land shown on Exhibit “B” to this Service Plan, which is referred to as “Somerset Hills-2”. The provisions of this Plan were made available for public inspection and explained to the public at the two public hearings held by the City on August 8, 2017 and August 22, 2017 in accordance with Section 43.056(j) of the LGC. II. TERM OF SERVICE PLAN Pursuant to Section 43.056(l) of the LGC, this Plan shall be in effect for a ten-year period commencing on the effective date of the ordinance approving the annexation. Renewal of the Plan shall be at the discretion of the City Council and must be accomplished by Ordinance. III. INTENT It is the intent of the City that municipal services under this Plan shall provide municipal services in accordance with the timetables required by the LGC. The City reserves the rights guaranteed to it by the LGC to amend this Plan if the City Council determines that changed conditions, subsequent occurrences, or any other legally sufficient circumstances exist under the LGC or other Texas laws that make this Plan unworkable, obsolete, or unlawful. IV. CATEGORIZATION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES The municipal services described herein are categorized by those services which are (1) available to the annexed area immediately upon annexation; (2) those services which will be available to the annexed area within 2½ years from the effective date of the annexation; and (3) those services for which capital improvements are needed and which will be available within 4½ years from the effective date of the annexation based upon a schedule for construction of such improvements as set forth herein. For the purposes of this Plan, “provision of services” includes having services provided by any method or means by which the City provides municipal services to any other areas of the City, Page 374 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 2 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-2 and may include causing or allowing private utilities, governmental entities and other public service organizations to provide such services by contract, in whole or in part, and may include duties on the part of a private landowner with regard to such services. In addition, in accordance with Section 43.056(g) of the LGC, if before annexation the annexed area had a lower level of services, infrastructure, and infrastructure maintenance than the same being provided by the City to other areas within the City limits, this Plan shall be construed to allow for the provision to the annexed area of a level of services, infrastructure, and infrastructure maintenance that is comparable to the level of services, infrastructure, and infrastructure maintenance in other parts of the City with topography, land use, and population density similar to those reasonably contemplated or projected in the annexed area. V. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED UPON ANNEXATION 1. Police Protection –Upon annexation, the Georgetown Police Department will extend regular and routine patrols to the area. 2. Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services– Upon annexation, in the areas where the City has jurisdiction over fire protection and emergency medical services or a contract under which the City provides such services, the City of Georgetown Fire Department will provide response services in the annexed area consisting of: fire suppression and rescue; emergency response to 9-1-1 calls; fire prevention education efforts, and other duties and services provided by the Georgetown Fire Department to areas within the City limits. 3. Solid Waste Collection – Upon annexation, for occupied structures, the City will provide solid waste collection services to the annexed area in accordance with City ordinances and policies in effect on the date of the annexation. However, per the terms of Sections 43.056(n) and (o) of the LGC, if a property owner chooses to continue to use the services of a privately owned solid waste management provider, the City is prevented from providing solid waste services for 2 years. 4. Operation and Maintenance of Water and Wastewater Facilities in the Annexed Area that Are Not Within the Area of Another Water or Wastewater Utility – City- owned water and wastewater facilities that exist in the annexed area will be maintained upon annexation and such maintenance shall be governed by the City’s ordinances, standards, policies and procedures. Per the provisions of Section 13.01. 020 of the Unified Development Code (“UDC”), for unplatted tracts in the annexed area, the City shall not repair, maintain, install or provide any public utilities or services in any subdivision for which a Final Plat has not been approved and filed for record, nor in which the standards contained in the UDC or referred to therein have not been complied with in full. Page 375 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 3 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-2 5. Operation and Maintenance of Streets, Roads, and Street Lighting – The City will provide preventative maintenance of the existing public streets and roads in the annexed area over which it has jurisdiction through maintenance and preventative maintenance services such as emergency pavement repair; ice and snow monitoring; crack seal, sealcoat, slurry seal, and PM overlay; and other routine repair. The City shall not maintain private roads in the annexed area. Preventative maintenance projects are prioritized on a City-wide basis and scheduled based on a variety of factors, including surface condition, rideability, age, traffic volume, functional classification, and available funding. As new streets are dedicated and accepted for maintenance they will be included in the City’s preventative maintenance program. Per the provisions of Section 13.01.020 of the UDC, for unplatted tracts in the annexed area, the City shall not repair, maintain, install or provide any streets or street lighting to any subdivision for which a Final Plat has not been approved and filed for record, nor in which the standards contained in the UDC or referred to therein have not been complied with in full. With regard to street lighting, it is the policy of the City of Georgetown that adequate street lighting for the protection of the public and property be installed in all new subdivisions. Installation procedures and acceptable standards for street lights shall be governed by the utility standards of the City in effect at the time of subdivision construction or addition thereto. 6. Operation and Maintenance of Public Parks, Playgrounds, and Swimming Pools - Upon annexation, publicly owned parks, playgrounds, and swimming pools in the annexed area (if any) will be operated and maintained by the City in accordance with the Section 12.20 of the City Code of Ordinances, and other applicable ordinances, policies, and procedures in effect at the time of annexation for other areas in the City limits. Privately owned parks, playgrounds, and pools will be unaffected by the annexation and shall not be maintained by the City. 7. Operation and Maintenance of Publicly Owned Buildings, Facilities, and Services – Should the City acquire any buildings, facilities or services necessary for municipal services in the annexed area, an appropriate City department will operate and maintain them. 8. Library – Upon annexation, library privileges will be available to anyone residing in the annexed area. 9. Planning and Development, Building Permits, and Inspections Services; - Upon annexation, the City’s Unified Development Code and Title 15 of the City Code of Ordinances will apply in the area. These services include: site plan review, zoning approvals, Building Code and other standard Code inspection services and City Code enforcement; sign regulations and permits; and Stormwater Permit services. For a full description of these services, see the City’s Unified Development Code and Title 15 of the City Code of Ordinances. Page 376 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 4 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-2 10. Animal Control Services – The provisions of Chapter 7 of the City Code of Ordinances relating to animal control services shall apply in the annexed area. 11. Business Licenses and Regulations – The provisions of Chapter 6 of the City Code of Ordinances relating to business licenses and regulations (Carnivals Circuses and Other Exhibitions; Electrician’s Licenses; Gross Receipts Charge or Street Rental; Peddlers and Solicitors; Taxicabs, Buses and Other Vehicles for Hire; Horse Drawn Carriages and other Non-Motorized Vehicles for Hire; Sexually Oriented Businesses; and Alcoholic Beverages) shall apply in the annexed area. 12. Health and Safety Regulations – The provisions of Chapter 8 of the City Code of Ordinance relating to health and safety regulations (Fire Prevention Code; Fireworks; Food Sanitation; Noise Control; Nuisances; Junked Motor Vehicles; and Smoking in Public Places) shall apply in the annexed area. 13. Regulations Pertaining to Peace, Morals and Welfare -- The provisions of Chapter 9 of the City Code of Ordinance relating to peace, morals and welfare (Housing Discrimination; Weapons; and Enforcement of Other Miscellaneous Violations) shall apply in the annexed area. VI. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED WITHIN 4½ YEARS OF ANNEXATION; CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 1. In General – The City will initiate the construction of capital improvements necessary for providing municipal services for the annexation area as necessary for services that are provided directly by the City. 2. Water and Wastewater Services– Water and wastewater services are only provided to occupied lots that have been legally subdivided and platted or are otherwise a legal lot, and that are located within the boundaries of the City’s authorized service areas. Further, existing residences in the annexed area that were served by a functioning onsite sewer system (septic system) shall continue to use such private system for wastewater services in conformance with the provisions of Section 13.20 of the City Code of Ordinances. Existing non-residential establishments in the annexed area may continue to use an onsite sewer system (septic system) for sewage disposal in conformance with the provisions of Section 13.20 of the City Code of Ordinances. Upon the Development of any property in the annexed area, the provisions of Chapter 13 of the UDC shall apply. The City shall have no obligation to extend water or wastewater service to any part of the annexed area that is within the service area of another water or wastewater utility. For annexed areas located within the City’s authorized service areas, the City shall, subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan, extend water and wastewater service in accordance with the service extension ordinances, policies, and standards that are summarized in Section X of this Plan, which may require that the property owner or developer of a newly developed tract install water and wastewater lines. The extension Page 377 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 5 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-2 of water and wastewater services will be provided in accordance with the policies summarized in Section X of this Plan and with any applicable construction and design standards manuals adopted by the City. 3. Water and Wastewater Capital Improvements Schedule – Because of the time required to design and construct the necessary water and wastewater facilities to serve the annexed area, certain services cannot be reasonably provided within 2½ years of the effective date of annexation. Therefore, in accordance with Sections 43.065(b) and (e) of the LGC, the City shall implement a program, which will be initiated after the effective date of the annexation and include the acquisition or construction of capital improvements necessary for providing water and wastewater services to the area. The following schedule for improvements is proposed: construction will commence within 2 ½ years from the effective date of annexation and will be substantially complete within 4 ½ years from the effective date of annexation. However, the provisions of Section VII of this Plan shall apply to the schedule for completion of all capital improvements. In addition, the acquisition or construction of the improvements shall be accomplished by purchase, lease, or other contract or by the City succeeding to the powers, duties, assets, and obligations of a conservation and reclamation district as authorized or required by law. 4. Roads and Streets – No road or street related capital improvements are necessary at this time. Future extension of roads or streets and installation of traffic control devices will be governed by the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the City’s Overall Transportation Plan, the City’s Capital Improvements Plan; the City’s regular or non-impact fee Capital Improvements Program, and any applicable City ordinances, policies, and procedures, which may require that the property owner or developer install roads and streets at the property owner’s or developer’s expense. It is anticipated that the developer of new subdivisions in the area will install street lighting in accordance with the City’s standard policies and procedures. Provision of street lighting will be in accordance with the City’s street lighting policies. 5. Capital Improvements for Other Municipal Services – No capital improvements are necessary at this time to provide municipal Police; Fire Protection; Emergency Medical Services; Solid Waste Collection; Public Parks, Playgrounds, or Swimming Pools; Public Buildings or Facilities; or Library Services. The annexed area will be included in the City’s future planning for new or expanded capital improvements and evaluated on the same basis and in accordance with the same standards as similarly situated areas of the City. VII. FORCE MAJEURE AND SCHEDULE EXTENSIONS 1. Certain events, described as Force Majeure Events in this Plan, are those over which the City has no control. Force Majeure Events shall include, but not be limited to, acts of God; terrorism or acts of a public enemy; war; blockages; riots; strikes; epidemics; forces Page 378 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 6 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-2 of nature including landslides, lightening, earthquakes, fires, storms, floods, washouts, droughts, tornadoes, hurricanes; arrest and restraint of government; explosions; collisions, and all other inabilities of the City, whether similar to those enumerated or otherwise, which are not within the control of the City. Any deadlines or other provisions of this Plan that are affected by a Force Majeure Event shall be automatically extended to account for delays caused by such Force Majeure Event. 2. In accordance with Section 43.056(e) of the LGC, this Plan and the schedules for capital improvements necessary to provide full municipal services to the annexed area may be amended by the City to extend the period for construction if the construction is proceeding with all deliberate speed. The construction of the improvements shall be accomplished in a continuous process and shall be completed as soon as reasonably possible, consistent with generally accepted local engineering and architectural standards and practices. However, the City does not violate this Plan if the construction process is interrupted for any reason by circumstances beyond the direct control of the City. VIII. AMENDMENTS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 43.056(k) of the LGC, on approval by the City Council, the Plan is a contractual obligation that is not subject to amendment or repeal except as provided by state law. Section 43.056(k) of the LGC provides that if the City Council determines, after public hearings, that changed conditions or subsequent occurrences make the Plan unworkable or obsolete, the City Council may amend the Plan to conform to the changed conditions or subsequent occurrences. An amended Plan must provide for services that are comparable to or better than those established in the Plan before amendment. Before any Plan amendments are adopted, the City Council must provide an opportunity for interested persons to be heard at public hearings called and held in the manner provided by Section 43.0561 of the LGC. IX. FEES The City may impose a fee for any municipal service in the area annexed if the same type of fee is imposed within the corporate boundaries of the City. All City fees are subject to revision from time to time by the City in its sole discretion. X. SUMMARY OF CURRENT WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE EXTENSION POLICIES Per the requirements of Section 43.056(e) of the LGC, the following summary is provided regarding the City’s current service extension policies for water and wastewater service. However, this is a summary of the current policies, and the policies and regulations related to water and wastewater utility extensions that are included in the City Code of Ordinances, the Unified Development Code, the City’s Construction and Specifications Manual; Drainage Page 379 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 7 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-2 Manual, and other published policies and technical manuals, as the same may be amended from time to time, shall control the extension of water and wastewater services to the annexed area. In addition, these policies and ordinances are set by City Council and can be amended in the future: 1. In General -- The provisions of Chapter 13 of the City’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) shall apply in the annexed area and Chapter 13 of the City Code of Ordinances. Portions of the current Chapter 13 of the UDC and the current Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances are summarized below. Note that these provisions are established by ordinance of the City Council and are subject to change from time to time. A. The City shall not repair, maintain, install or provide any water services, wastewater service, gas, electricity or any other public utilities or services to any property that has not been legally subdivided or is a non-legal lot. B. For property that is required by the City’s UDC or other City regulations to construct water or wastewater facilities, funding and construction of those facilities are the responsibility of the property owner or developer (the “subdivider”). C. Subdividers shall be responsible for providing an approved public water supply system for fire protection and domestic/ commercial/ industrial usage consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Where an approved public water supply or distribution main is within reasonable distance of the subdivision, but in no case less than one-quarter mile away, and connection to the system is both possible and permissible (including adequate system capacity), the subdivider shall be required to bear the cost of connecting the subdivision to such existing water supply. The subdivider shall, consistent with all existing ordinances, make a pro- rata contribution to funding of needed storage facilities, treatment facilities, and specific distribution lines as determined necessary by the City. D. Subdividers shall be responsible for providing an approved public sanitary sewer system, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, throughout the entire subdivision such that all lots, parcels, or tracts of land will be capable of connecting to the sanitary sewer system except as otherwise provided herein. Where an approved public sanitary sewer collection main or outfall line is in no case less than one-half mile away, and connection to the system is both possible and permissible (including adequate system capacity), the subdivider shall be required to bear the cost of connecting the subdivision to such existing sanitary sewer system. Where an approved public wastewater collection main or outfall line is more than one-half mile away from the property boundary, and where extension of a sanitary sewer collection main or outfall line is scheduled in the City’s Capital Improvements Plan to be completed to a point within one-half mile of the property boundary within five (5) years from the date of the Preliminary Plat approval, the subdivider shall be required to install a public Page 380 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 8 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-2 wastewater collection system. The design and construction of a public sanitary sewer system shall comply with regulations covering extension of public sanitary sewer systems adopted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. E. All infrastructure and public improvements must be designed and installed in accordance with all of the elements of the Comprehensive Plan and shall meet the minimum requirements established by the UDC, the City's Construction Standards and Specifications for Roads, Streets, Structures and Utilities, and any other adopted City design or technical criteria. No main water line extension shall be less than eight inches. All new public sanitary sewer systems shall be designed and constructed to conform with the City’s Construction Standards and Specifications and to operate on a gravity flow basis by taking advantage of natural topographic conditions and thereby reducing the need for lift stations and force mains. 2. If the specific undeveloped property does not have City water or wastewater facilities and capacity fronting the property – the owner may make an application for an extension of service to the property. If the Assistant City Manager for Utilities determines in writing that adequate water or wastewater capacity is available, or will be available, and if the project does not include City cost participation or reimbursement, if the proposed facilities are depicted on the City’s Water and Wastewater Master Plans, and the requested service otherwise meets the City’s requirements, the extension size, capacity, and routing may be approved by the Assistant City Manager for Utilities for construction by the developer at the developer’s cost and expense. 3. If the specific undeveloped property does have adequate City water or wastewater facilities and capacity fronting the property – the owner may receive water or wastewater service from the City by applying for a tap permit and paying the required fees. 4. If any property in the annexed area is using a septic system – the property owner remains responsible for the operation and maintenance of the septic system. If the property is in a Rural Residential Subdivision as defined in Chapter 13 of the UDC, or is a legal lot greater than one acre in size and used for single family residential purposes, the property shall continue the use of a septic system after annexation until such time that the use of the property changes, the property is further subdivided or developed, or a public sanitary sewer line has been extended to within 200 feet of the property boundary and the property owner has received notification from the City of the City’s desire for the property to be connected to the public sanitary sewer line. If the septic system fails before the City’s centralized wastewater service is extended to within 200 feet of the property and the City determines that the provision of centralized wastewater service is not feasible or practical at that time, then the property owner must either repair or replace the septic system in accordance with the provisions of Section 13.20 of the City Code of Ordinances. Properties using a septic system that are not in a Rural Residential Subdivision , or are not legal lots greater than one acre in size and used for Page 381 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 9 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-2 single family residential purposes at the time of annexation, but that are designated as either residential, open space or agricultural on the City’s Future Land Use Plan shall continue the use of a septic system until such time that the use of the property changes, the property is further subdivided or developed, or a public sanitary sewer line has been extended to within 200 feet of the property boundary and the property owner has received notification from the City of the City’s desire for the property to be connected to the public sanitary sewer line. 5. Reimbursement and cost participation by the City – Pursuant to Section 13.09.030 of the UDC, the City, in its sole discretion and with City Council approval, may participate with a property owner or developer in the cost of oversized facilities or line extensions. The actual calculation of the cost participation and reimbursement amounts, including limits and schedules for the payments, are set forth in the UDC. 6. City Code of Ordinances: (The following provisions are set by the City Council and can be amended in the future by ordinance.) Chapter 13.10 of the City Code of Ordinances currently provides as follows: Section 13.10.010 Policy established. This policy shall apply to improvements to the City's utility systems, including system upgrades, system expansion, and plant capacity additions. In this Section, the term “utility system” shall mean the City’s water system, wastewater system, reuse irrigation system, and stormwater drainage system. Section 13.10.020 System Planning. The City shall maintain and periodically update system plans for each utility so that system improvements are implemented to maintain adequate capacity for growth while maintaining proper service levels to existing customers. Section 13.10.030 Project Timing. A. Projects designed to expand or upgrade a utility system must be completed and ready for operations such that capacity requirements by state regulatory agencies and City system plans are met. B. When possible, the City should coordinate the construction of system improvements in a particular location with the expansion or maintenance of other utility infrastructure to minimize the future impact on each utility. C. Projects should begin the design phase when existing demand at a specific location exceeds 75% of current capacity and future demand is expected to exceed the current total capacity. Page 382 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 10 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-2 D. Projects should begin the construction phase when existing demand at a specific location exceeds 90% of current capacity and future demand is expected to exceed the current total capacity. E. Projects required to facilitate the development of a specific tract shall be done in accordance with the Unified Development Code. F. Projects required as a result of an annexation service plan shall be provided as stated in the approved Service Plan for such annexed tracts. Section 13.10.040 Project Financing. A. Projects required to facilitate the subdivision of a specific tract shall be paid by the subdivider in accordance with the Unified Development Code, unless otherwise authorized in writing and approved by the City Council in accordance with the terms of Section 13.09 of the Unified Development Code or other applicable law. B. When utility expansion is requested within a portion of the City’s utility service area, but the City is not otherwise required to provide service or planning to provide service as reflected in the City’s Capital Improvements Plan, the City may nonetheless, at the City’s sole option, facilitate the design and construction of the required utility extensions or upgrades by managing the project with the cost of such extensions to be shared and fully paid by the requesting landowners or subdividers prior to commencement of the project. C. When utility expansion is requested within a portion of the City’s utility service area, the City shall evaluate degree to which the project 1) facilitates contiguous growth, 2) maximizes the provision of service to the service area, 3) enhances economic development, 4) improves system operations, 5) contributes to conservation or other environmental concern, and 6) facilitates the completion of the utility master plan. D. At the City’s sole option, the City may also facilitate the installation of utility expansion requests through 1) financial cost contribution, 2) financing of the improvement using individual contracts between the City and each landowner for a proportionate share of the project cost to be paid out over a specified period of time at a specified rate of interest, 3) Impact Fee or connection fee reduction or waiver. Chapter 13.20 of the City Code of Ordinances currently provides as follows: Sec. 13.20.010. General. A. It is unlawful for any owner or lessee, tenant or other person in possession of any premises where any person lives or works, or occupies the same, to establish, maintain or use any water closet, bathtub, lavatory or sink except by one of the following means and consistent with the other terms, conditions and requirements of this Chapter and with the City’s Unified Development Code: Page 383 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 11 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-2 1. connection to an approved Onsite Sewage Facility that is constructed and maintained in accordance with the rules and regulations of all appropriate state and local agencies having jurisdiction over such facilities; or 2. connection to a public centralized wastewater collection main with all wastewater discharged to a centralized public wastewater collection system. B. Upon the “Development” of property, the provisions of Chapter 13 of the Unified Development Code (pertaining to Infrastructure and Public Improvements) shall govern the provision of wastewater service to the property. For the purposes of this section, the term “Development” shall have the same meaning as in Section 16.05 of the City’s Unified Development Code. C. It is the duty of each such person referenced in subsection (A), above, to connect such fixtures to an approved wastewater system, and to maintain the same. Sec. 13.20.020. On Site Sewage Facilities. A. General. All On Site Sewage Facilities must be constructed and maintained in accordance with the rules and regulations of the appropriate state and local agencies having jurisdiction over such facilities. B. Availability of a Public Centralized Wastewater Collection Main. If a public centralized wastewater collection main is located within 200 feet of a property line, and the wastewater collection main has adequate capacity to receive and transport the wastewater flow produced by the property, then property owner shall connect that property to said utility line at the earliest to occur of either of the following events: failure of the On Site Sewage Facility servicing the property, or the date that is five (5) years after receipt of notice of the availability of a wastewater collection main within 200-feet of the property line. C. Failure of On Site Sewage Facility. When an Onsite Sewage Facility fails, the following provisions shall apply: a. If a public centralized wastewater collection main is located within 200 feet of the property boundary, and the wastewater collection main has adequate capacity to receive and transport the wastewater flow produced by the property, then the property must be connected to said utility line by the property owner; b. If no public centralized wastewater collection main is located within 200 feet of the property boundary, the City shall evaluate the feasibility of providing centralized wastewater collection services to the property via a gravity or low pressure system. Where the provision of gravity sewer service or low pressure system is technically feasible, utility system improvements may be made in accordance with Chapters 13.10; c. If the City determines that the provision of wastewater service via a centralized wastewater collection main is not necessary due to existing or future land use, then the On Site Sewage Facility may be repaired or replaced. (Prior code § 12-101) Page 384 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 12 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-2 Sec. 13.20.030. Privies prohibited. It is unlawful for any owner or lessee, tenant or other person in possession of any premises in the City to establish or maintain any privy or dry closet. Sec.13.20.040 Low Pressure Sewer Systems A. A “Low Pressure Sewer System” is an individual lift station located at each utility customer or property owner location having a private force main connecting to a public force main or gravity main located in a public utility easement or public right-of-way. B. Each property owner and utility customer shall be responsible for the cost of installation and maintenance of the individual lift station and private force main. Section 13.20.050. Prohibited Discharges into Sewer System No person shall discharge, cause to be discharged, or permit to be discharged, either directly or indirectly into the public sewer system, waste or wastewater from any of the following sources unless allowed by the City Manager, or his/her designee: A. Any wastes or wastewater that does not meet the limitations imposed by Section 13.24 of the Code of Ordinances. B. Any stormwater, groundwater, rainwater, street drainage, subsurface drainage, or yard drainage; C. Any unpolluted water, including , but not limited to, cooling water, process water or blow-down water from cooling towers or evaporative coolers; D. Any wastes or wastewater, or any object, material, or other substance directly into a manhole or other opening into the sewer facilities other than wastes or wastewater through an approved service connection. E. Any holding tank waste, provided, that such waste may be placed into facilities designed to receive such wastes and approved by the City Manager, or his/her designee. Section 13.20.060 Sewer System Maintenance A. For properties with gravity wastewater service, the property owner and utility customer shall be responsible for the proper operation, maintenance, and repairs of the sewer system in the building and the service lateral between the building and the point of connection into the public sewer main. B. For properties with low pressure service, the property owner and utility customer shall be responsible for the proper operation, maintenance, and repairs of the Page 385 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 13 of 13 Area: Somerset Hills-2 sewer system in the building and the service lateral, lift station (grinder pump) and force main between the building and the point of connection into the public sewer main. C. When, as a part of sewer system testing, the City identifies a flaw in a private service lateral or force main where a repair is necessary to prevent infiltration or inflow, the property owner and utility customer shall be responsible to cause the repairs to be made within one (1) year of the date of notification by the City. D. If repairs are not complete within one year of notification by the City, City may engage the services of a contractor to make the necessary repairs with the costs for such repairs to be paid by the City and subsequently charged to property owner and utility customer. Page 386 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Second Readi ng of an Ordinance for the Vol untary Annexati on of 120.53 acres in the Lewis P. Dyches Survey located approximately w est of the i ntersecti on of Ronal d Reagan B oul evard and County Ro ad 2 45 to be known as Hi ghl and Vi l l age and for the Vol untary Annexati on of the adjacent ri ght-of-way known as Ro nald Reagan Boulevard and Co unty Road 245 -- Chris Yanez, CNU-A, Assistant Planning Directo r (acti on requi red) ITEM SUMMARY: The action required o f Co uncil is to approve the first reading of the ordinance for voluntary annexation. In order to comple te the annexation, the following pro cess will be followed: Annexation Cycle : August 8, 2017: Resolution accepting petition (Co mpleted) August 8, 2017: 1st Public Hearing held at City Co unc il Meeting (Completed) August 22, 2017 : 2 nd P ublic Hearing held at City Council Meeting (Completed) September 12, 20 17 : 1 st Reading of Ordinance at City Co uncil Meeting (Completed) November 28, 20 17 : 2 nd Reading of Ordinance at City Co uncil Meeting On the Future Land Use P lan, this area is designate d as Open Space, Community Commercial and Mixed Use Community. A P lanned Unit Deve lo pment (P UD) zoning reque st is being processed concurrently with the annexation request and proposes a Gene ral Co mmercial (C-3), High Density Multifamily (MF-2), Low De nsity Multifamily (MF-1), Townho use Residential (TH), Two Family Residential (TF) and Re sidential Single-Family (RS) base zoning districts. Publ i c Comment: To date, no written public comme nts have been received. Staff Recommendati o n: Approval of the first reading o f the o rdinance for voluntary annexatio n and service plan for the Highland Village trac t including annexation of the adjacent right-of-way known as Ro nald Reagan Boulevard and County Road 245. FINANCIAL IMPACT: City services, including po lice and fire protectio n, e mergency medical services, so lid waste collection and disposal are immediately subje c t to the property. Extension of capital improvements such as wate r and wastewater systems will be subject to the City’s utility extension and improve ment policy or the terms of any po tential agreement with the prope rty owner. The property is c urre ntly undeveloped. SUBMITTED BY: Chris Yanez, CNU-A, Assistant Planning Director ATTACHMENT S: Description Attachment 1 - Ordinanc e Exhib it A - Letter o f Intent Exhib it B - Lo c atio n Map Exhib it C - Property Survey No tes Exhib it D - ROW Survey No tes Page 387 of 454 Exhib it E - Servic e Plan Page 388 of 454 Ordinance No. _____________________ Page 1 of 2 Highland Village ANX-2017-006 Date Approved: 11.28.2017 Exhibit A,B,C,D,E attached Ordinance No. __________________ An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, providing for the extension of certain boundary limits of the City of Georgetown, Texas, and the annexation of certain territory consisting of 120.53 acres, more or less, in the Lewis P. Dyches Survey Abstract Number 171 and adjacent of rights-of-way known as Ronald Reagan Boulevard and County Road 245, as described herein; providing for service plans; repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; including a severability clause; and establishing an effective date. Whereas, the owners of the area proposed for annexation submitted a petition in writing requesting annexation of the area; and Whereas, the Section 4.03.010 of the Unified Development Code creates procedures for initial zoning of newly annexed territory; and Whereas, the Georgetown City Council approved a resolution granting the petition on August 8, 2017; and Whereas, the Georgetown City Council conducted public hearings on the proposed annexation on August 8, 2017, and August 22, 2017; and Whereas, all of the herein-described property lies within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Georgetown, Texas; and Whereas, the herein-described property lies adjacent and contiguous to the City of Georgetown, Texas; and Whereas, all prerequisites of state law and the City Charter have been complied with; Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas that: Section 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance implements and is not inconsistent or in conflict with any 2030 Comprehensive Plan Vision Statements, Goals and Policies. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Georgetown hereby annexes into the city limits 120.53 acres in the Lewis P. Dyches Survey Abstract Number 171, as shown in “Exhibit A” and “Exhibit B” of this ordinance, and as described in “Exhibit C” of this ordinance. Additionally, the Council hereby annexes those public rights-of-way adjacent to the above described 120.53 acres, Page 389 of 454 Ordinance No. _____________________ Page 2 of 2 Highland Village ANX-2017-006 Date Approved: 11.28.2017 Exhibit A,B,C,D,E attached known as Ronald Reagan Boulevard and County Road 245, being portions of those rights-of-way described in “Exhibit D”. “Exhibit E” contains the service plan. Section 3. The 120.53 acres, as described in “Exhibit C” of this ordinance, is included in City Council District 3, as it is adjacent to Council District 3 and no other City Council Districts. Section 4. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in accordance with the City Charter. Passed and Approved on Second Reading on the 28th day of November, 2017. Attest: The City of Georgetown: _________________________________ _________________________________ Shelley Nowling Dale Ross City Secretary Mayor Approved as to form: _________________________________ Charlie McNabb City Attorney Page 390 of 454 Page 391 of 454 ")2338 R o n ald W R e a g a n B lv d D el W e b b B l v d D elWebbBlvd R o n ald W R e a g a n Blvd ")3405 ")3405 ")245 Sun City B lv d Jim H o g g Rd ¬«195 ")2338 N L a k e w o o d s D r ")2338 ANX-2017-006Exhibit B Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 0 0.5 1Mi Page 392 of 454 Page 393 of 454 Page 394 of 454 Page 395 of 454 Page 396 of 454 Page 397 of 454 Page 398 of 454 Page 399 of 454 Page 400 of 454 Page 401 of 454 Page 402 of 454 Page 403 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 1 of 13 Area: Highland Village Exhibit E CITY OF GEORGETOWN ANNEXATION SERVICE PLAN AREA: HIGHLAND VILLAGE COUNCIL DISTRICT NO.: 3 DATE: NOVEMBER 28, 2017 I. INTRODUCTION This Service Plan (the “Plan”) is made by the City of Georgetown, Texas (“City”) pursuant to Sections 43.056(b)-(o); 43.062, and 43.052(h)(1) of the Texas Local Government Code (“LGC”). This Plan relates to the annexation into the City of the land shown on Exhibit “B” to this Service Plan, which is referred to as “Highland Village”. The provisions of this Plan were made available for public inspection and explained to the public at the two public hearings held by the City on August 8, 2017 and August 22, 2017 in accordance with Section 43.056(j) of the LGC. II. TERM OF SERVICE PLAN Pursuant to Section 43.056(l) of the LGC, this Plan shall be in effect for a ten-year period commencing on the effective date of the ordinance approving the annexation. Renewal of the Plan shall be at the discretion of the City Council and must be accomplished by Ordinance. III. INTENT It is the intent of the City that municipal services under this Plan shall provide municipal services in accordance with the timetables required by the LGC. The City reserves the rights guaranteed to it by the LGC to amend this Plan if the City Council determines that changed conditions, subsequent occurrences, or any other legally sufficient circumstances exist under the LGC or other Texas laws that make this Plan unworkable, obsolete, or unlawful. IV. CATEGORIZATION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES The municipal services described herein are categorized by those services which are (1) available to the annexed area immediately upon annexation; (2) those services which will be available to the annexed area within 2½ years from the effective date of the annexation; and (3) those services for which capital improvements are needed and which will be available within 4½ years from the effective date of the annexation based upon a schedule for construction of such improvements as set forth herein. For the purposes of this Plan, “provision of services” includes having services provided by any method or means by which the City provides municipal services to any other areas of the City, Page 404 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 2 of 13 Area: Highland Village and may include causing or allowing private utilities, governmental entities and other public service organizations to provide such services by contract, in whole or in part, and may include duties on the part of a private landowner with regard to such services. In addition, in accordance with Section 43.056(g) of the LGC, if before annexation the annexed area had a lower level of services, infrastructure, and infrastructure maintenance than the same being provided by the City to other areas within the City limits, this Plan shall be construed to allow for the provision to the annexed area of a level of services, infrastructure, and infrastructure maintenance that is comparable to the level of services, infrastructure, and infrastructure maintenance in other parts of the City with topography, land use, and population density similar to those reasonably contemplated or projected in the annexed area. V. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED UPON ANNEXATION 1. Police Protection –Upon annexation, the Georgetown Police Department will extend regular and routine patrols to the area. 2. Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services– Upon annexation, in the areas where the City has jurisdiction over fire protection and emergency medical services or a contract under which the City provides such services, the City of Georgetown Fire Department will provide response services in the annexed area consisting of: fire suppression and rescue; emergency response to 9-1-1 calls; fire prevention education efforts, and other duties and services provided by the Georgetown Fire Department to areas within the City limits. 3. Solid Waste Collection – Upon annexation, for occupied structures, the City will provide solid waste collection services to the annexed area in accordance with City ordinances and policies in effect on the date of the annexation. However, per the terms of Sections 43.056(n) and (o) of the LGC, if a property owner chooses to continue to use the services of a privately owned solid waste management provider, the City is prevented from providing solid waste services for 2 years. 4. Operation and Maintenance of Water and Wastewater Facilities in the Annexed Area that Are Not Within the Area of Another Water or Wastewater Utility – City- owned water and wastewater facilities that exist in the annexed area will be maintained upon annexation and such maintenance shall be governed by the City’s ordinances, standards, policies and procedures. Per the provisions of Section 13.01. 020 of the Unified Development Code (“UDC”), for unplatted tracts in the annexed area, the City shall not repair, maintain, install or provide any public utilities or services in any subdivision for which a Final Plat has not been approved and filed for record, nor in which the standards contained in the UDC or referred to therein have not been complied with in full. Page 405 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 3 of 13 Area: Highland Village 5. Operation and Maintenance of Streets, Roads, and Street Lighting – The City will provide preventative maintenance of the existing public streets and roads in the annexed area over which it has jurisdiction through maintenance and preventative maintenance services such as emergency pavement repair; ice and snow monitoring; crack seal, sealcoat, slurry seal, and PM overlay; and other routine repair. The City shall not maintain private roads in the annexed area. Preventative maintenance projects are prioritized on a City-wide basis and scheduled based on a variety of factors, including surface condition, rideability, age, traffic volume, functional classification, and available funding. As new streets are dedicated and accepted for maintenance they will be included in the City’s preventative maintenance program. Per the provisions of Section 13.01.020 of the UDC, for unplatted tracts in the annexed area, the City shall not repair, maintain, install or provide any streets or street lighting to any subdivision for which a Final Plat has not been approved and filed for record, nor in which the standards contained in the UDC or referred to therein have not been complied with in full. With regard to street lighting, it is the policy of the City of Georgetown that adequate street lighting for the protection of the public and property be installed in all new subdivisions. Installation procedures and acceptable standards for street lights shall be governed by the utility standards of the City in effect at the time of subdivision construction or addition thereto. 6. Operation and Maintenance of Public Parks, Playgrounds, and Swimming Pools - Upon annexation, publicly owned parks, playgrounds, and swimming pools in the annexed area (if any) will be operated and maintained by the City in accordance with the Section 12.20 of the City Code of Ordinances, and other applicable ordinances, policies, and procedures in effect at the time of annexation for other areas in the City limits. Privately owned parks, playgrounds, and pools will be unaffected by the annexation and shall not be maintained by the City. 7. Operation and Maintenance of Publicly Owned Buildings, Facilities, and Services – Should the City acquire any buildings, facilities or services necessary for municipal services in the annexed area, an appropriate City department will operate and maintain them. 8. Library – Upon annexation, library privileges will be available to anyone residing in the annexed area. 9. Planning and Development, Building Permits, and Inspections Services; - Upon annexation, the City’s Unified Development Code and Title 15 of the City Code of Ordinances will apply in the area. These services include: site plan review, zoning approvals, Building Code and other standard Code inspection services and City Code enforcement; sign regulations and permits; and Stormwater Permit services. For a full description of these services, see the City’s Unified Development Code and Title 15 of the City Code of Ordinances. Page 406 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 4 of 13 Area: Highland Village 10. Animal Control Services – The provisions of Chapter 7 of the City Code of Ordinances relating to animal control services shall apply in the annexed area. 11. Business Licenses and Regulations – The provisions of Chapter 6 of the City Code of Ordinances relating to business licenses and regulations (Carnivals Circuses and Other Exhibitions; Electrician’s Licenses; Gross Receipts Charge or Street Rental; Peddlers and Solicitors; Taxicabs, Buses and Other Vehicles for Hire; Horse Drawn Carriages and other Non-Motorized Vehicles for Hire; Sexually Oriented Businesses; and Alcoholic Beverages) shall apply in the annexed area. 12. Health and Safety Regulations – The provisions of Chapter 8 of the City Code of Ordinance relating to health and safety regulations (Fire Prevention Code; Fireworks; Food Sanitation; Noise Control; Nuisances; Junked Motor Vehicles; and Smoking in Public Places) shall apply in the annexed area. 13. Regulations Pertaining to Peace, Morals and Welfare -- The provisions of Chapter 9 of the City Code of Ordinance relating to peace, morals and welfare (Housing Discrimination; Weapons; and Enforcement of Other Miscellaneous Violations) shall apply in the annexed area. VI. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED WITHIN 4½ YEARS OF ANNEXATION; CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 1. In General – The City will initiate the construction of capital improvements necessary for providing municipal services for the annexation area as necessary for services that are provided directly by the City. 2. Water and Wastewater Services– Water and wastewater services are only provided to occupied lots that have been legally subdivided and platted or are otherwise a legal lot, and that are located within the boundaries of the City’s authorized service areas. Further, existing residences in the annexed area that were served by a functioning onsite sewer system (septic system) shall continue to use such private system for wastewater services in conformance with the provisions of Section 13.20 of the City Code of Ordinances. Existing non-residential establishments in the annexed area may continue to use an onsite sewer system (septic system) for sewage disposal in conformance with the provisions of Section 13.20 of the City Code of Ordinances. Upon the Development of any property in the annexed area, the provisions of Chapter 13 of the UDC shall apply. The City shall have no obligation to extend water or wastewater service to any part of the annexed area that is within the service area of another water or wastewater utility. For annexed areas located within the City’s authorized service areas, the City shall, subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan, extend water and wastewater service in accordance with the service extension ordinances, policies, and standards that are summarized in Section X of this Plan, which may require that the property owner or developer of a newly developed tract install water and wastewater lines. The extension Page 407 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 5 of 13 Area: Highland Village of water and wastewater services will be provided in accordance with the policies summarized in Section X of this Plan and with any applicable construction and design standards manuals adopted by the City. 3. Water and Wastewater Capital Improvements Schedule – Because of the time required to design and construct the necessary water and wastewater facilities to serve the annexed area, certain services cannot be reasonably provided within 2½ years of the effective date of annexation. Therefore, in accordance with Sections 43.065(b) and (e) of the LGC, the City shall implement a program, which will be initiated after the effective date of the annexation and include the acquisition or construction of capital improvements necessary for providing water and wastewater services to the area. The following schedule for improvements is proposed: construction will commence within 2 ½ years from the effective date of annexation and will be substantially complete within 4 ½ years from the effective date of annexation. However, the provisions of Section VII of this Plan shall apply to the schedule for completion of all capital improvements. In addition, the acquisition or construction of the improvements shall be accomplished by purchase, lease, or other contract or by the City succeeding to the powers, duties, assets, and obligations of a conservation and reclamation district as authorized or required by law. 4. Roads and Streets – No road or street related capital improvements are necessary at this time. Future extension of roads or streets and installation of traffic control devices will be governed by the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the City’s Overall Transportation Plan, the City’s Capital Improvements Plan; the City’s regular or non-impact fee Capital Improvements Program, and any applicable City ordinances, policies, and procedures, which may require that the property owner or developer install roads and streets at the property owner’s or developer’s expense. It is anticipated that the developer of new subdivisions in the area will install street lighting in accordance with the City’s standard policies and procedures. Provision of street lighting will be in accordance with the City’s street lighting policies. 5. Capital Improvements for Other Municipal Services – No capital improvements are necessary at this time to provide municipal Police; Fire Protection; Emergency Medical Services; Solid Waste Collection; Public Parks, Playgrounds, or Swimming Pools; Public Buildings or Facilities; or Library Services. The annexed area will be included in the City’s future planning for new or expanded capital improvements and evaluated on the same basis and in accordance with the same standards as similarly situated areas of the City. VII. FORCE MAJEURE AND SCHEDULE EXTENSIONS 1. Certain events, described as Force Majeure Events in this Plan, are those over which the City has no control. Force Majeure Events shall include, but not be limited to, acts of God; terrorism or acts of a public enemy; war; blockages; riots; strikes; epidemics; forces Page 408 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 6 of 13 Area: Highland Village of nature including landslides, lightening, earthquakes, fires, storms, floods, washouts, droughts, tornadoes, hurricanes; arrest and restraint of government; explosions; collisions, and all other inabilities of the City, whether similar to those enumerated or otherwise, which are not within the control of the City. Any deadlines or other provisions of this Plan that are affected by a Force Majeure Event shall be automatically extended to account for delays caused by such Force Majeure Event. 2. In accordance with Section 43.056(e) of the LGC, this Plan and the schedules for capital improvements necessary to provide full municipal services to the annexed area may be amended by the City to extend the period for construction if the construction is proceeding with all deliberate speed. The construction of the improvements shall be accomplished in a continuous process and shall be completed as soon as reasonably possible, consistent with generally accepted local engineering and architectural standards and practices. However, the City does not violate this Plan if the construction process is interrupted for any reason by circumstances beyond the direct control of the City. VIII. AMENDMENTS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 43.056(k) of the LGC, on approval by the City Council, the Plan is a contractual obligation that is not subject to amendment or repeal except as provided by state law. Section 43.056(k) of the LGC provides that if the City Council determines, after public hearings, that changed conditions or subsequent occurrences make the Plan unworkable or obsolete, the City Council may amend the Plan to conform to the changed conditions or subsequent occurrences. An amended Plan must provide for services that are comparable to or better than those established in the Plan before amendment. Before any Plan amendments are adopted, the City Council must provide an opportunity for interested persons to be heard at public hearings called and held in the manner provided by Section 43.0561 of the LGC. IX. FEES The City may impose a fee for any municipal service in the area annexed if the same type of fee is imposed within the corporate boundaries of the City. All City fees are subject to revision from time to time by the City in its sole discretion. X. SUMMARY OF CURRENT WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE EXTENSION POLICIES Per the requirements of Section 43.056(e) of the LGC, the following summary is provided regarding the City’s current service extension policies for water and wastewater service. However, this is a summary of the current policies, and the policies and regulations related to water and wastewater utility extensions that are included in the City Code of Ordinances, the Unified Development Code, the City’s Construction and Specifications Manual; Drainage Page 409 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 7 of 13 Area: Highland Village Manual, and other published policies and technical manuals, as the same may be amended from time to time, shall control the extension of water and wastewater services to the annexed area. In addition, these policies and ordinances are set by City Council and can be amended in the future: 1. In General -- The provisions of Chapter 13 of the City’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) shall apply in the annexed area and Chapter 13 of the City Code of Ordinances. Portions of the current Chapter 13 of the UDC and the current Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances are summarized below. Note that these provisions are established by ordinance of the City Council and are subject to change from time to time. A. The City shall not repair, maintain, install or provide any water services, wastewater service, gas, electricity or any other public utilities or services to any property that has not been legally subdivided or is a non-legal lot. B. For property that is required by the City’s UDC or other City regulations to construct water or wastewater facilities, funding and construction of those facilities are the responsibility of the property owner or developer (the “subdivider”). C. Subdividers shall be responsible for providing an approved public water supply system for fire protection and domestic/ commercial/ industrial usage consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Where an approved public water supply or distribution main is within reasonable distance of the subdivision, but in no case less than one-quarter mile away, and connection to the system is both possible and permissible (including adequate system capacity), the subdivider shall be required to bear the cost of connecting the subdivision to such existing water supply. The subdivider shall, consistent with all existing ordinances, make a pro- rata contribution to funding of needed storage facilities, treatment facilities, and specific distribution lines as determined necessary by the City. D. Subdividers shall be responsible for providing an approved public sanitary sewer system, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, throughout the entire subdivision such that all lots, parcels, or tracts of land will be capable of connecting to the sanitary sewer system except as otherwise provided herein. Where an approved public sanitary sewer collection main or outfall line is in no case less than one-half mile away, and connection to the system is both possible and permissible (including adequate system capacity), the subdivider shall be required to bear the cost of connecting the subdivision to such existing sanitary sewer system. Where an approved public wastewater collection main or outfall line is more than one-half mile away from the property boundary, and where extension of a sanitary sewer collection main or outfall line is scheduled in the City’s Capital Improvements Plan to be completed to a point within one-half mile of the property boundary within five (5) years from the date of the Preliminary Plat approval, the subdivider shall be required to install a public Page 410 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 8 of 13 Area: Highland Village wastewater collection system. The design and construction of a public sanitary sewer system shall comply with regulations covering extension of public sanitary sewer systems adopted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. E. All infrastructure and public improvements must be designed and installed in accordance with all of the elements of the Comprehensive Plan and shall meet the minimum requirements established by the UDC, the City's Construction Standards and Specifications for Roads, Streets, Structures and Utilities, and any other adopted City design or technical criteria. No main water line extension shall be less than eight inches. All new public sanitary sewer systems shall be designed and constructed to conform with the City’s Construction Standards and Specifications and to operate on a gravity flow basis by taking advantage of natural topographic conditions and thereby reducing the need for lift stations and force mains. 2. If the specific undeveloped property does not have City water or wastewater facilities and capacity fronting the property – the owner may make an application for an extension of service to the property. If the Assistant City Manager for Utilities determines in writing that adequate water or wastewater capacity is available, or will be available, and if the project does not include City cost participation or reimbursement, if the proposed facilities are depicted on the City’s Water and Wastewater Master Plans, and the requested service otherwise meets the City’s requirements, the extension size, capacity, and routing may be approved by the Assistant City Manager for Utilities for construction by the developer at the developer’s cost and expense. 3. If the specific undeveloped property does have adequate City water or wastewater facilities and capacity fronting the property – the owner may receive water or wastewater service from the City by applying for a tap permit and paying the required fees. 4. If any property in the annexed area is using a septic system – the property owner remains responsible for the operation and maintenance of the septic system. If the property is in a Rural Residential Subdivision as defined in Chapter 13 of the UDC, or is a legal lot greater than one acre in size and used for single family residential purposes, the property shall continue the use of a septic system after annexation until such time that the use of the property changes, the property is further subdivided or developed, or a public sanitary sewer line has been extended to within 200 feet of the property boundary and the property owner has received notification from the City of the City’s desire for the property to be connected to the public sanitary sewer line. If the septic system fails before the City’s centralized wastewater service is extended to within 200 feet of the property and the City determines that the provision of centralized wastewater service is not feasible or practical at that time, then the property owner must either repair or replace the septic system in accordance with the provisions of Section 13.20 of the City Code of Ordinances. Properties using a septic system that are not in a Rural Residential Subdivision , or are not legal lots greater than one acre in size and used for Page 411 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 9 of 13 Area: Highland Village single family residential purposes at the time of annexation, but that are designated as either residential, open space or agricultural on the City’s Future Land Use Plan shall continue the use of a septic system until such time that the use of the property changes, the property is further subdivided or developed, or a public sanitary sewer line has been extended to within 200 feet of the property boundary and the property owner has received notification from the City of the City’s desire for the property to be connected to the public sanitary sewer line. 5. Reimbursement and cost participation by the City – Pursuant to Section 13.09.030 of the UDC, the City, in its sole discretion and with City Council approval, may participate with a property owner or developer in the cost of oversized facilities or line extensions. The actual calculation of the cost participation and reimbursement amounts, including limits and schedules for the payments, are set forth in the UDC. 6. City Code of Ordinances: (The following provisions are set by the City Council and can be amended in the future by ordinance.) Chapter 13.10 of the City Code of Ordinances currently provides as follows: Section 13.10.010 Policy established. This policy shall apply to improvements to the City's utility systems, including system upgrades, system expansion, and plant capacity additions. In this Section, the term “utility system” shall mean the City’s water system, wastewater system, reuse irrigation system, and stormwater drainage system. Section 13.10.020 System Planning. The City shall maintain and periodically update system plans for each utility so that system improvements are implemented to maintain adequate capacity for growth while maintaining proper service levels to existing customers. Section 13.10.030 Project Timing. A. Projects designed to expand or upgrade a utility system must be completed and ready for operations such that capacity requirements by state regulatory agencies and City system plans are met. B. When possible, the City should coordinate the construction of system improvements in a particular location with the expansion or maintenance of other utility infrastructure to minimize the future impact on each utility. C. Projects should begin the design phase when existing demand at a specific location exceeds 75% of current capacity and future demand is expected to exceed the current total capacity. Page 412 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 10 of 13 Area: Highland Village D. Projects should begin the construction phase when existing demand at a specific location exceeds 90% of current capacity and future demand is expected to exceed the current total capacity. E. Projects required to facilitate the development of a specific tract shall be done in accordance with the Unified Development Code. F. Projects required as a result of an annexation service plan shall be provided as stated in the approved Service Plan for such annexed tracts. Section 13.10.040 Project Financing. A. Projects required to facilitate the subdivision of a specific tract shall be paid by the subdivider in accordance with the Unified Development Code, unless otherwise authorized in writing and approved by the City Council in accordance with the terms of Section 13.09 of the Unified Development Code or other applicable law. B. When utility expansion is requested within a portion of the City’s utility service area, but the City is not otherwise required to provide service or planning to provide service as reflected in the City’s Capital Improvements Plan, the City may nonetheless, at the City’s sole option, facilitate the design and construction of the required utility extensions or upgrades by managing the project with the cost of such extensions to be shared and fully paid by the requesting landowners or subdividers prior to commencement of the project. C. When utility expansion is requested within a portion of the City’s utility service area, the City shall evaluate degree to which the project 1) facilitates contiguous growth, 2) maximizes the provision of service to the service area, 3) enhances economic development, 4) improves system operations, 5) contributes to conservation or other environmental concern, and 6) facilitates the completion of the utility master plan. D. At the City’s sole option, the City may also facilitate the installation of utility expansion requests through 1) financial cost contribution, 2) financing of the improvement using individual contracts between the City and each landowner for a proportionate share of the project cost to be paid out over a specified period of time at a specified rate of interest, 3) Impact Fee or connection fee reduction or waiver. Chapter 13.20 of the City Code of Ordinances currently provides as follows: Sec. 13.20.010. General. A. It is unlawful for any owner or lessee, tenant or other person in possession of any premises where any person lives or works, or occupies the same, to establish, maintain or use any water closet, bathtub, lavatory or sink except by one of the following means and consistent with the other terms, conditions and requirements of this Chapter and with the City’s Unified Development Code: Page 413 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 11 of 13 Area: Highland Village 1. connection to an approved Onsite Sewage Facility that is constructed and maintained in accordance with the rules and regulations of all appropriate state and local agencies having jurisdiction over such facilities; or 2. connection to a public centralized wastewater collection main with all wastewater discharged to a centralized public wastewater collection system. B. Upon the “Development” of property, the provisions of Chapter 13 of the Unified Development Code (pertaining to Infrastructure and Public Improvements) shall govern the provision of wastewater service to the property. For the purposes of this section, the term “Development” shall have the same meaning as in Section 16.05 of the City’s Unified Development Code. C. It is the duty of each such person referenced in subsection (A), above, to connect such fixtures to an approved wastewater system, and to maintain the same. Sec. 13.20.020. On Site Sewage Facilities. A. General. All On Site Sewage Facilities must be constructed and maintained in accordance with the rules and regulations of the appropriate state and local agencies having jurisdiction over such facilities. B. Availability of a Public Centralized Wastewater Collection Main. If a public centralized wastewater collection main is located within 200 feet of a property line, and the wastewater collection main has adequate capacity to receive and transport the wastewater flow produced by the property, then property owner shall connect that property to said utility line at the earliest to occur of either of the following events: failure of the On Site Sewage Facility servicing the property, or the date that is five (5) years after receipt of notice of the availability of a wastewater collection main within 200-feet of the property line. C. Failure of On Site Sewage Facility. When an Onsite Sewage Facility fails, the following provisions shall apply: a. If a public centralized wastewater collection main is located within 200 feet of the property boundary, and the wastewater collection main has adequate capacity to receive and transport the wastewater flow produced by the property, then the property must be connected to said utility line by the property owner; b. If no public centralized wastewater collection main is located within 200 feet of the property boundary, the City shall evaluate the feasibility of providing centralized wastewater collection services to the property via a gravity or low pressure system. Where the provision of gravity sewer service or low pressure system is technically feasible, utility system improvements may be made in accordance with Chapters 13.10; c. If the City determines that the provision of wastewater service via a centralized wastewater collection main is not necessary due to existing or future land use, then the On Site Sewage Facility may be repaired or replaced. (Prior code § 12-101) Page 414 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 12 of 13 Area: Highland Village Sec. 13.20.030. Privies prohibited. It is unlawful for any owner or lessee, tenant or other person in possession of any premises in the City to establish or maintain any privy or dry closet. Sec.13.20.040 Low Pressure Sewer Systems A. A “Low Pressure Sewer System” is an individual lift station located at each utility customer or property owner location having a private force main connecting to a public force main or gravity main located in a public utility easement or public right-of-way. B. Each property owner and utility customer shall be responsible for the cost of installation and maintenance of the individual lift station and private force main. Section 13.20.050. Prohibited Discharges into Sewer System No person shall discharge, cause to be discharged, or permit to be discharged, either directly or indirectly into the public sewer system, waste or wastewater from any of the following sources unless allowed by the City Manager, or his/her designee: A. Any wastes or wastewater that does not meet the limitations imposed by Section 13.24 of the Code of Ordinances. B. Any stormwater, groundwater, rainwater, street drainage, subsurface drainage, or yard drainage; C. Any unpolluted water, including , but not limited to, cooling water, process water or blow-down water from cooling towers or evaporative coolers; D. Any wastes or wastewater, or any object, material, or other substance directly into a manhole or other opening into the sewer facilities other than wastes or wastewater through an approved service connection. E. Any holding tank waste, provided, that such waste may be placed into facilities designed to receive such wastes and approved by the City Manager, or his/her designee. Section 13.20.060 Sewer System Maintenance A. For properties with gravity wastewater service, the property owner and utility customer shall be responsible for the proper operation, maintenance, and repairs of the sewer system in the building and the service lateral between the building and the point of connection into the public sewer main. B. For properties with low pressure service, the property owner and utility customer shall be responsible for the proper operation, maintenance, and repairs of the Page 415 of 454 Annexation Service Plan Page 13 of 13 Area: Highland Village sewer system in the building and the service lateral, lift station (grinder pump) and force main between the building and the point of connection into the public sewer main. C. When, as a part of sewer system testing, the City identifies a flaw in a private service lateral or force main where a repair is necessary to prevent infiltration or inflow, the property owner and utility customer shall be responsible to cause the repairs to be made within one (1) year of the date of notification by the City. D. If repairs are not complete within one year of notification by the City, City may engage the services of a contractor to make the necessary repairs with the costs for such repairs to be paid by the City and subsequently charged to property owner and utility customer. Page 416 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Second Readi ng of an Ordinance amendi ng the 20 17 Annual Budget for year-end obligations that were not known at the time the budge t was ado pted, appropriating vario us amo unts thereof, and repealing all ordinances or parts of ordinances in c onflict therewith -- P aul Diaz, Budget Manager (acti on requi red) ITEM SUMMARY: Each year staff estimate year-end projections co mpared to the annual budget. During the summer review of FY 2017, and planning sessions fo r FY 20 18 , several issues were identified. Examples inc lude Fire Overtime, Electric Purchased P ower, as well as the appropriation of the Council’s Special Reve nue Fund. The fo llowing summarizes the budget change s by fund and department required to co mply with the City Charter. Detaile d info rmation is included in the attached Exhibit A. General Fund Fire Department – increase expenditure authority fo r personnel by $20,000 due to overtime from vacant positio ns Police De partment – decrease expenditure authority fo r fuel by $20,000 to c ove r costs in Fire Department Environmental Services – increase expenditure autho rity for so lid waste contrac t overage of $32 4,0 00 due to customer gro wth; offset by corresponding c ontract revenue City Council Departme nt – receive a transfer in from the Council Discretionary Fund and increase expenditure authorizatio n by $1 0,0 00 for a study evaluating the viability of a hospice fac ility EMS Fund Recognize $10 0,0 00 of additional revenue from transport services Authorize $1 00 ,00 0 o f expenditures over budget due to personnel overtime e xpe nses from vacant positions Council Discretio nary Fund Transfer o ut $10 ,00 0 to the General Fund for the Hospice Study Transfer o ut $5,0 00 to the Airport Fund for fuel costs for Harvey relief efforts Airport Fund Receive transfer in of $5,000 from Council Discretio nary Fund for Harvey re lie f Transportation Fund Increase expenditure authority for the County’s portio n of the Southwest Bypass project by $60 9,0 00 in FY2 01 7 due to timing o f starting the project; corresponding adjustments will be made to reduce the project in FY2018 Recognize a revenue accrual from the County fo r its po rtion of the Southwe st Bypass project Electric Fund Increase expenditure authority for Purchased P ower by $9.6 million due to a seco nd year of sales in a depressed energy market Increase allo c atio n of meter related servic e s revenue from Water Fund of $1 .5 million Recognize decrease in Rate Stabilization Re serve of $4,500,000 Water Fund Increase allo c atio n of meter related servic e s expenses from Water Fund of $1.5 millio n Page 417 of 454 Self-Insurance Fund Increase medical claim expenditure for claims incurred but not received. T his expense is offset by contribution revenue. SP ECIAL CONSIDERATIONS The City Charter requires that a majority plus one must approve an amendment to the approved budget. The City charter allows fo r budget amendments in e mergency situations and when the issues and ne e ds were unknown at the time the budget was adopte d. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The increase in total budgeted new appropriation expenditures fo r FY 20 17 is $12 ,41 7,0 54. Changes in re venue, expenditures and fund balances are noted in the attached Exhibit A. SUBMITTED BY: P aul Diaz, Budget Manager - SP ATTACHMENT S: Description F und Schedules 2017 Year End BA Ord inance Page 418 of 454 2017 Approved Impact of This Action 2017 Amended Budget Beginning Fund Balance 10,893,558$ 10,893,558$ Revenues Transfer In, Council Discretionary 1,177,000 10,000 1,187,000 Solid Waste Revenue 5,750,000 323,084 6,073,084 All Other Revenue 50,554,453 50,554,453 Total Revenues 57,481,453 333,084 57,814,537 Expenses Fire 12,465,079 19,919 12,484,998 Police 20,079,658 (19,919) 20,059,739 City Council 127,644 10,000 137,644 Environmental Services - Solid Waste 5,879,717 323,084 6,202,801 All Other Expenses 20,442,618 20,442,618 Total Expenses 58,994,716 333,084 59,327,800 Contingency Reserve 7,925,000 7,925,000 Benefit Payout Reserve 222,000 222,000 Economic Stability Reserve 1,150,000 1,150,000 Ending Fund Balance 83,295$ -$ 83,295$ 2017 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2017 Amended Budget Beginning Fund Balance (853,003)$ (853,003)$ Revenues EMS Revenue 2,205,096 100,000 2,305,096 Total Revenues 2,205,096 100,000 2,305,096 Expenses Personnel 1,585,854 100,000 1,685,854 Operations 492,579 - 492,579 Total Expenses 2,078,433 100,000 2,178,433 Ending Fund Balance (726,340)$ -$ (726,340)$ General Fund EXHIBIT A 2017 Budget Amendment - Year End Proposed budget amendments include recognizing $323,084 of additional revenue from the solid waste services contract, which offsets the corresponding increase in expenditures due to customer growth. The amendment also proposes receiving a $10,000 transfer in from the Council Discretionary Fund to cover costs in the City Council cost center of sponsoring a hospice feasibility study. Finally, the amendment proposes recognizing fuel savings of $19,919 in the Police Division to offset over budget personnel expenditures in the Fire Division due to overtime covering vacant positions. EMS FUND Proposed budget amendment includes recognizing $100,000 in additional revenue from transport services and $100,000 in additional expense from personnel overtime. Page 419 of 454 Council Discretionary Fund 2017 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2017 Amended Budget Beginning Fund Balance 185,045$ -$ 185,045$ Revenues Transfer In, General Fund 1,734,779 1,734,779 Total Revenues 1,734,779 - 1,734,779 Expenditures Transfer Out, General Capital Proj.270,000 270,000 Transfer Out, ISF 80,000 80,000 Transfer Out, General Fund 1,177,000 10,000 1,187,000 Transfer Out, Joint Services 95,000 95,000 Transfer Out, Airport - 5,249 5,249 Total Expenditures 1,622,000 15,249 1,637,249 Ending Fund Balance 297,824$ (15,249)$ 282,575$ 2017 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2017 Amended Budget Beginning Fund Balance 43,849$ 43,849$ Revenues Transfer in from Council Disc - 5,249 5,249 All Other Revenue 3,589,993 3,589,993 Total Revenues 3,589,993 5,249 3,595,242 Expenses Total Expenses 3,511,563 3,511,563 Ending Fund Balance 122,279$ 5,249$ 127,528$ 2017 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2017 Amended Budget Beginning Fund Balance -$ -$ Revenues All Other Revenue - 505,180 505,180 Total Revenues - 505,180 505,180 Expenses Southwest Bypass (Wilco)- 609,194 609,194 Total Expenses - 609,194 609,194 Ending Fund Balance -$ (104,013)$ (104,013)$ Proposed budget amendments include increasing Transfers Out to the General Fund by $10,000 to pay for the City's portion of the hospice study. The budget amendment also includes a $5,249 transfer out to the Airport Fund to cover the fuel costs for volunteers who flew for hurricane relief efforts. Transportation Fund Proposed budget amendments include increasing revenue $505,180 and expense for $609,194 due to timing of the county segment of the Southwest Bypass (Leander to IH35) beginning sooner than planned. Airport Fund Proposed budget amendments include recognizing a $5,249 transfer in from the Council Discretionary Fund to cover the fuel costs of hurricane relief efforts. Page 420 of 454 Electric Fund 2017 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2017 Amended Budget Beginning Fund Balance 6,436,145$ 6,436,145$ Revenues 76,761,316 1,541,190 78,302,506 Total Revenues 76,761,316 1,541,190 78,302,506 Expenses Operating Expenses 63,547,080 9,618,337 75,340,417 All Other Expenses 5,654,271 - 3,479,271 Total Expenses 69,201,351 9,618,337 78,819,688 Rate Stabilization Reserve 4,500,000 (4,500,000) - Contingency Reserve 5,000,000 - 5,000,000 Available Ending Fund Balance 4,496,110$ (8,077,147)$ 918,963$ Water Fund 2017 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2017 Amended Budget Beginning Fund Balance 54,428,336$ 54,428,336$ Revenues All Revenue 66,872,177 66,872,177 Total Revenues 66,872,177 - 66,872,177 Expenditures Capital Improvement Projects 73,799,005 73,799,005 All Other Expenditures 38,581,475 1,541,190 40,122,665 Total Expenditures 112,380,480 1,541,190 113,921,670 Contingency Reserve 5,000,000 - 5,000,000 Available Ending Fund Balance 3,920,033$ 1,541,190$ 2,378,843$ 2017 Approved Budget Impact of This Action 2017 Amended Budget Beginning Fund Balance 2,205,987$ 2,205,987$ Revenues Contributions 6,349,287 200,000 6,549,287 All Other Revenue 1,635,881 1,635,881 Total Revenues 7,985,168 200,000 8,185,168 Expenses Medical Claims 4,981,400 200,000 5,181,400 All Other Expnses 1,695,000 1,695,000 Total Expenses 6,676,400 200,000 6,876,400 Ending Fund Balance 3,514,755$ -$ 3,514,755$ Total New Appropriations All Funds 12,417,054 Self Insurance Fund Proposed budget amendment include recognizing $200,000 of contribution revenue to offset $200,000 of incurred but not received medical claims expenditures. Proposed amendments include recognizing $1,541,190 in transfers in from the water fund, which is an allocation adjustment to fund it's share of automated meter reading program expenses. The proposed amendment also includes authorizing an additional $14,606,424 in Purchased Power expense which was offset by an additional $4,988,087 in congestion revenue rights credits. Proposed amendments include authorizing $1,541,190 in transfers out expense to the Electric Fund, which is an allocation adjustment for the Water Fund's share of the automated meter reading program expenses. Page 421 of 454 Ordinance Number:____________ Page 1 of 2 Description: Year End Budget Amendment Date Approved: November 14, 2017 ORDINANCE NO. __________________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING THE 2017 ANNUAL BUDGET FOR YEAR-END OBLIGATIONS THAT WERE NOT KNOWN AT THE TIME THE BUDGET WAS ADOPTED, APPROPRIATING THE VARIOUS AMOUNTS THEREOF, AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH. WHEREAS, the City had greater than anticipated costs in Fiscal Year 2017 in the Fire Department, Environmental Services Department, and Council Department in the General Fund; and in the EMS, Electric, Airport and Transportation Funds; and WHEREAS, the resources to cover these costs is available in the General Fund, EMS Fund, Council Discretionary Fund, Water Fund and Transportation Fund; and WHEREAS, the changes were unknown and unforeseeable at the time the fiscal year 2017 budget was approved; and WHEREAS, the City Charter allows for changes in the Annual Operating Plan by a Council majority plus one in emergency situations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. SECTION 2. The amendment to the 2017 Annual Budget of the revenues of the City of Georgetown and expenses of conducting the affairs thereof, is in all things adopted and approved as an addition to the previously approved budget of the current revenues and expenses as well as fixed charges against said City for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2016, and ending September 30, 2017. A copy of the amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” incorporated by reference herein. SECTION 3. The total of $12,417,054 is hereby appropriated for payments of expenditures and payments of the funds and included in the Exhibit “A”. SECTION 4 Page 422 of 454 Ordinance Number:____________ Page 2 of 2 Description: Year End Budget Amendment Date Approved: November 14, 2017 All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. This ordinance complies with the vision statement of the Georgetown 2030 Plan. SECTION 5. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. SECTION 6. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective upon adoption of its second and final reading by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas. PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the 14th day of November, 2017. PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the 28th day of November, 2017. ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: ______________________ ______________________ Shelley Nowling By: Dale Ross City Secretary Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________ Charlie McNabb City Attorney Page 423 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Second Readi ng of an Ordinance o f the City of Georgetown amendi ng the Co de o f Ordinances by adding Chapter 10.10 enti tl ed “Thr u Truck Traffi c” and directing the Traffic Engineer to erect appropriate signs; repealing conflicting ordinances and Resolutions; pro viding a severability clause; providing for a penalty as stated in Sectio n 1.0 8.010 of the Code of Ordinances; providing for publication and setting an effective date -- Octavio Garza, Public Works Director (acti on requi red) ITEM SUMMARY: With growth in our co mmunity, trucks, constructio n e quipment, and vehicles with traile rs use residential roads as a destination sho rt cut. Many times as directed by internet mapping systems. This is pre sently o ccurring in Sun City alo ng Apache Mountain Lane. Passing of this ordinance will allow the traffic engineer to e re c t signage that prohibits thru truck traffic in order to improve public safety. Staff rec ommends passing of this ordinanc e prohibiting thru truck traffic as directed by the traffic engineer. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Existing resources will be used to identify affected ro utes. SUBMITTED BY: Octavio Garza, PE, Public Works Director ATTACHMENT S: Description Ordinanc e - Thru Truck Traffic Page 424 of 454 {00009559 / v5 / / TRANS / 111 / 10/02/2017} Ordinance Number: ________________________ Page 1 of 4 Description: Thru Truck Traffic Date Approved: ____________________, 2017 ORDINANCE NO. _______________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN BY ADDING CHAPTER 10.10 ENTITLED “THRU TRUCK TRAFFIC;” AND DIRECTING THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER TO ERECT APPROPRIATE SIGNS; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY AS STATED IN SECTION 1.08.010 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has identified certain streets and roadways within the City limits on which commercial truck and construction traffic present safety concerns to pedestrians and local residents; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that restricting commercial truck and construction traffic on certain streets will improve traffic flow and is in the best interest of public safety. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. The meeting at which this ordinance was approved was in all things conducted in compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. Section 2. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. Section 3. Chapter 10.10 entitled “Thru Truck Traffic” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Georgetown, Texas is hereby added and shall provide as shown in EXHIBIT A. Section 4. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. Section 5. That all ordinances that are in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed and all other ordinances of the City not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Page 425 of 454 {00009559 / v5 / / TRANS / 111 / 10/02/2017} Ordinance Number: ________________________ Page 2 of 4 Description: Thru Truck Traffic Date Approved: ____________________, 2017 Section 6. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect ten (10) days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of Georgetown. PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the _______ day of November, 2017. PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the _____ day of __________, 2017. ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN ______________________________ By: _____________________________ Shelley Nowling, City Secretary Dale Ross, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________________ Charlie McNabb, City Attorney Page 426 of 454 {00009559 / v5 / / TRANS / 111 / 10/02/2017} Ordinance Number: ________________________ Page 3 of 4 Description: Thru Truck Traffic Date Approved: ____________________, 2017 EXHIBIT A CHAPTER 10.10 THROUGH TRUCK TRAFFIC Sec. 10.10.010 Definitions (a) For the purpose of this chapter, truck means a motor vehicle designed, used, or maintained primarily to transport property that has dual or tandem rear axles. (b) For the purpose of this chapter, construction vehicle means licensed or non- licensed vehicles or machinery used for the purposes of road, utility or home / recreational construction, including but not limited to trucks with a classification greater than “one ton”, loaders, skid steers, excavators, cranes, fork lifts, drilling equipment, dump and flatbed trucks, rollers, and earth moving equipment. (c) For the purpose of this chapter, commercial motor vehicle means a motor vehicle or combination of motor vehicles used to transport passengers or property that: 1) has a gross combination weight or a gross combination weight rating of 26,001 or more pounds, including a towed unit with a gross vehicle weight or a gross vehicle weight rating of more than 10,000 pounds; 2) has a gross vehicle weight or a gross vehicle weight rating of 26,001 or more pounds; 3) is designed to transport 16 or more passengers, including the driver; or 4) is transporting hazardous materials and is required to be placarded under 49 C.F.R. Part 172, Subpart F. (d) For purpose of this chapter, a trailer means a vehicle that is designed or used to carry a load wholly on its own structure is drawn or designed to be drawn by a motor vehicle. (e) For the purpose of this chapter, types of vehicles not otherwise defined above shall have the meanings ascribed to them in Texas Transportation Code, Secs. 502.001 and 622.014, as it may be amended. Sec. 10.10.020 Through truck traffic (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to drive or operate any truck, construction vehicle, commercial motor vehicle or trailer on any street, roadway, highway or segments of such street, roadway, or highway within the city Page 427 of 454 {00009559 / v5 / / TRANS / 111 / 10/02/2017} Ordinance Number: ________________________ Page 4 of 4 Description: Thru Truck Traffic Date Approved: ____________________, 2017 limits when such street is marked with a sign prohibiting truck, construction vehicle, commercial motor vehicle or trailer traffic (b) The Traffic Engineer, designated pursuant to Chapter 10.04, is authorized to designate streets or parts of streets on which the operation of trucks, construction vehicles or commercial motor vehicles is prohibited by erecting appropriate traffic control signs giving notice thereof. (c) Exceptions. The provisions of this section shall not apply to vehicles that are: (1) Owned, leased, used or in service to the city, the county, the state or the United States; (2) School buses and public buses; (3) Emergency vehicles en route to and returning from an emergency, including any wrecker or tow trucks; (4) Making home deliveries or pickups of goods or services to a residence located on said street; (5) Mobile homes which are being installed or removed from within the boundaries of the city; (6) Travel trailers, boats and recreational vehicles; (7) Owned or used in the service of public utilities when in the performance of their duties; or (8) Making business deliveries to or pickups from a business or construction site located on said street. (d) If the point of origin or destination (for commercial purposes only) for any such truck shall be off such street, roadway or highway and the only route to such location is by using such street, then such truck may proceed by the most direct route to and from the nearest street, roadway or highway not so marked. A bill of lading, routing sheet or other such documentation portraying the specific address from which the merchandise, goods or services are to be picked up to the address to which the delivery is to be made is prima facie proof of legitimacy. Sec. 10.10.030 Offense A violation of this article constitutes a misdemeanor as provided in Chapter 1.08 the City of Georgetown Code of Ordinances. Page 428 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: P roject updates and status reports regarding current and future transportation and traffic project; street, sidewalk, and other infrastructure pro jects; police, fire and other public safety pro jects; econo mic development projects; city facility projects; and downtown pro jects inc luding parking enhancements, city lease agreements, sanitation services, and possible direction to city staff -- David Morgan, City Manager ITEM SUMMARY: The City Council has requested regular updates regarding the status of projects, as well as the ability to discuss the se projects as a collective. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This is a Council Update Item. SUBMITTED BY: Shirley J. Rinn o n be half of David Morgan, City Manager ATTACHMENT S: Description GEDCO Projec t Update GTAB Co vers heet GTAB Pro jec t Updates GTEC Covers heet GTEC Projec t Up d ate Page 429 of 454 Name Description Start Date (Council Approved)End Date $ Encumbered $ Expended Citigroup Grant for wastewater infrastructure for construction of datacenter. 12/12/2006 12/31/2018 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 DisperSol Grant for job creation related to expansion of manufacturing facilities.10/16/2014 2/15/2019 250,000$ $ 80,000 Grape Creek Grant for reimbursement of Qualified Expenditures for the lease/purchase and future site improvements at 101 E. 7th Street and 614 Main Street for the operation of a winery on the Downtown Square. 8/23/2011 3/1/2018 280,000$ 280,000$ Grape Creek GEDCO purchase of building. GCV currently under lease/purchase agreement with right to exercise purchase at end of PA for $447K.8/23/2011 3/1/2018 447,000$ 447,000$ Lone Star Circle of Care Grant for Qualified Expenditures for future site improvements at 205 East University Avenue, Georgetown, Texas. Loan Agreement and Promissory Note have been executed. 6/28/2011 11/30/2017 387,000$ $ 387,000 Radiation Detection Corporation Grant for Qualified Expenditures and job creation related to the relocation of the corporate offices to Georgetown. 7/23/2013 12/31/2021 320,000$ 320,000$ Radix BioSolutions, Ltd. Provided grant to assist with the work and future plans of Radix BioSolutions at the TLCC. Radix paid back $47K on 3/15/15. Radix paid back $50K 3/10/16. Radix paid back $50K on 3/10/2017 .3/9/2010 3/31/2018 250,000$ $ 103,000 GEDCO - ACTIVE PERFORMANCE AGREEMENTS STATUS REPORT October 16, 2017 Over Page 430 of 454 November 2017 Cover Sheet Austin Avenue Bridges Project - N & S San Gabriel Rivers: 3rd Public Meeting held 5/11, 4-7pm at the GTAC . Under TxDOT environmental review. Flood Study: Study ongoing. Preliminary flood study results are complete. Mitigation efforts are current summer 2017. Final report due end of 2017. FM 971 - Realignment at Austin Avenue: Engineer’s plans submitted to City for the 60% design, received the fully executed AFA 10-20-17 plans will now be submitted to TxDOT for review. Scheduled engineering completion early 2018. FM 1460: Construction is on-going; administered by TxDOT. Utility relocation complete. I 35 SB FR Sidewalk Improvements Project (University Ave to Leander Rd): Construction complete only final revegetation outstanding. Installation of railing complete. Ribbon cutting to be scheduled for November. (Southwest Bypass (RM 2243 to IH 35) Phase 1 – WPAP for phase 1 approved. On site tasks: Phase 1 Clearing complete, Pilot bores complete for bridge columns, fill started between the frontage road and the Rail, also West of RR. Southwest Bypass (RM 2243 to IH 35) Phase 2 – County let preliminary construction project for phase 2 which includes the construction of ramps into and out of the Quarry, completion scheduled for July. Surveying and staking of phase 2 ongoing. Southwest Bypass (Leander Rd. to Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension) SWBP Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension (SW Bypass to DB Wood Rd.) Construction is approximately 85% complete project wide. South San Gabriel bridge is 95% complete with the rail pour complete this week. Second bridge south of the Gabriel, beam set complete. Base course installed along with first course Asphalt on the entire project excluding the area between the bridges. Transit Service (Fixed Route Bus): Stops and Routes updated and presented to Council 2/14/17. ADA Plan meeting with CMTA 2/28. CMTA will provide eligibility screening. Council adopted service plan 4/25/17. Grand Opening scheduled for 8/21 at 1pm. 2015 Road Bond Program, Citywide Sidewalk Improvements Project Construction started May 1, 2017. All work along Williams drive is complete, with revegetation underway. 8th and Rock work waiting on grates to be complete. Crews have moved to Founders Park the final area for this project. Williams Drive Study: Concept Plan Final report expected 3/1/17. Council to consider acceptance of Plan 7/11, adopt 4 year implementation plan. Transportation Services Operations CIP Maintenance Page 431 of 454 KPA working on Curb and gutter design, Cutler, limited in-house chip seals and point repairs. Currently working with Steger and Bizzell on task order for drainage study at 18th and Hutto, construction administration for 20th and Hogg, and design for 2nd and Rock Street detention pond upgrade. 50% desing complete for Serenada drainage. 2017 CDBG Scenic Drive Sidewalk 100% Complete. Bids have been obtained. KPA is reviewing bids received. Sidewalk Easements are secure. Power Pole has been relocated. Fire hydrant to be relocated as construction begins. On GTAB Agenda for 10/10/2017 Old Town “Northeast” Sidewalk Task Order approved 7-25-17. Surveying is in progress. Page 432 of 454 Page 433 of 454 Page 434 of 454 Page 435 of 454 Page 436 of 454 Page 437 of 454 Page 438 of 454 Page 439 of 454 Page 440 of 454 Page 441 of 454 Page 442 of 454 Page 443 of 454 November 2017 Cover Sheet Airport Road: Engineering design 100% +: addressing storm water/water quality, performing environmental investigations for clearances. Row docs ready. WPAP submitted to TCEQ first of May. FM 1460 ROW & Utility Relocations: All water/wastewater utility relocates have been completed and are in service Three Utility companies have submitted invoices for reimbursement – Atmos Energy, ONCOR and Seminole Pipeline Mays St Extension: Council – August 9th; NTP – October 10, 2016 Council – August 9th; NTP – October 10, 2016 Open to full traffic & partial Retainage Release submitted with only minor PunchList Items remain Northwest Boulevard: Engineering underway: 60% plans submitted for review, received the fully executed AFA 10-20-17 plans will now be submitted to TxDOT for review. Engineering completion scheduled 12-17, Environmental Clearance 2-18/ NEPA Clearance 3-18 Ready to Let 3-18. Rabbit Hill Road Improvements: Task Order awarded by Council August 9, 2016. CP&Y surveying and identifying utility conflicts along route with Final Design Plans for review early fall of 2017. ROW to be procured late 2017 early 2018 Rivery Boulevard - TIA Improvements: Engineering 95% complete. Slight modification is being made to length of added lane to fit with existing features. Modifications are also being made to Williams dr turn lane to eliminate the need for ROW at this location. TCEQ written WPAP approval is complete for Hintz, Williams and Wolf Ranch Pkwy turn lanes. Rivery Boulevard Extension: Plans at 100%. WPAP approved. Demolition contract for structures in the ROW to be bid December. Offers have been made on 21 parcels. Closed on 16 parcels; 4 pending contract execution or final closing preparation. Environmental assessment complete on 9 parcels. Condemnation proceedings have been requested on 1 parcel. Aggressive efforts continue to close all outstanding parcels in FY 2017. Page 444 of 454 Page 445 of 454 Page 446 of 454 Page 447 of 454 Page 448 of 454 Page 449 of 454 Page 450 of 454 Page 451 of 454 Page 452 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: - At the time of po sting, no persons had signed up to address the City Council ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Page 453 of 454 City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Regula r Meeting November 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Sec. 551.071: Consul tati on w i th Attorney Advice from attorney abo ut pending or co ntemplated litigation and o ther matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items Sec. 551.072: De l i berati o ns about Real P roperty P arcel 5, Airpo rt Road -- Travis Baird Sec. 551:074: Personnel Matters City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the appointment, employme nt, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal Sec. 551:087:De l i berati o n Regardi ng Economi c Devel opment Negoti ati ons - TLCC Update ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Shelley Nowling, City Secretary Page 454 of 454