Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda CC 08.11.2020
Notice of Meeting of the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown, Texas Tuesday, July 28, 2020 The Georgetown City Council will meet on Tuesday, July 28, 2020 at 2:30 PM at the Council Chambers, at 510 West 9 th Street, Georgetown, TX 78626. The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary’s Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 808 Martin Luther King Jr. Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Mayor Ross called the meeting to order at 2:14 p.m. The following Council Members were in attendance: Mayor Dale Ross; Mary Calixtro, Council Member District 1; Mike Triggs, Council Member District 3; Steve Fought, Council Member District 4; Kevin Pitts, Council Member District 5; and Rachael Jonrowe, Council Member District 6; and Tommy Gonzalez, Council Member District. Council District 2 is vacant. All Council Members present via videoconferencing and a roll call was performed. Fought joined during Item A. Policy Development/Review Workshop – Call to order at 2:30 PM A. Presentation and discussion regarding Transportation Services Platforms -- Ray Miller, Director of Public Works Miller presented the item and reviewed the goals of the Transit Development Plan. He then noted the key questions from the City Council Workshop June 9, 2020 which are: Should Georgetown continue to provide transit services?; Are the goals of the Transit Development Plan still true?; What should be the scope of our transit system?; Serve current fixed route population area?; Serve more limited population, such as paratransit?; Should the City evaluate an alternate transit service?; and Should the City consider Dynamic Rideshare/Micro Transit? Miller stated that Council gave Staff direction to look into different transportation platforms such as Dynamic Ride share or Micro transit; pursue an RFI/RFP for ride share/micro-transit; and Council also wanted to maintain transportation services for the citizens that are currently using the transit system. He then provided a Ride Share/Micro Transit Update and noted that staff has developed a draft RFI (Request for Information) and the RFI will allow the City of Georgetown to gain information on the companies that have interest in providing transportation services to the City. Miller continued that the RFI will also allow the City to see what other transportation platforms might be available and will help define a scope of work for a request for proposals after learning more about the capabilities and services available for ride share/micro transit. He reviewed how the City could maintain current services and based on the current contract the City could execute another yearly contract with Capital Metro for continuation of current services. Miller stated that the current agreement with Capital Metro Expires on September 30, 2020 and the agreement has only been approved on a yearly basis not multiple years. He noted that the proposed FY 2020 Budget Amount is $865,566 with FTA funding of $322,301, local match funding of $392,590, and Georgetown Health Foundation (GHF) funding of $150,000 with the GHF agreeing to participate for 3 years. Miller then reviewed the timeline for RFI/RFP and noted the RFI structure which will include company history, experience, content, innovation, performance and data; and insurance and fare structure. He then reviewed the process to change services and noted the need to amend the Transit Development Plan to add Ride Share/Micro Transit per the Service expansion policy approved by CAMPO and Capital Metro Board an addendum must be completed prior to a transition in service. Miller stated that if the City contracts with a private company, then the City will have to become the Direct Recipient of the Federal Transit Funds (FTA 5307) and follow all FTA reporting and other requirements and Capital Metro currently accepts the Federal Funds on our behalf and follows all FTA reporting and other requirements. He noted a possible timeline to process to the change if the City contracts with a private company noting that the City will: receive Section 5307 funds directly from the FTA and becoming a Direct Recipient could take up to 9 months through FTA; be responsible for management of funds, compliance, DBE goals, certifications, FTA coordination and local match; be subject to a Triennial Review at the request of the FTA to ensure compliance with all FTA Direct Recipient requirements; as a Direct Recipient COG would have to place the service in the CAMPO TIP (3-6 month process) and also enter into an MOU with CAMPO to go over planning services (2-4 month process); if the City contracts with a public provider (Capital Metro) then the City would not have to become the Direct Recipient and the administrator of the FTA Funds; and a new Interlocal Agreement would need to be executed with Cap Metro which would take 3-4 months. Miller explained that the City of Manor Cap Metro Pickup Service operates Monday-Friday 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. and citizens can use a smart phone or a call center to book a trip, with a single ride costing $1.25. He then noted the following draft time line: Miller note the next steps which are based on Council’s direction issue the RFI: review responses; provide results to City Council; issue an RFP; provide results to City Council and select a provider including possible interviews of providers, and once under contract, develop a transition plan. He then reviewed the Council direction he was seeking, which to answer if Council wants to proceed with a competitive process for a rideshare/micro transit program. Calixtro asked if the City would be under another year contract. Miller responded yes for GoGeo and paratransit services. Calixtro stated she supports staff moving forward. Triggs stated he supported staff moving forward. Fought stated that he is anxious about continuing for another year and he would like to get the City out from underneath GoGeo earlier. He added that if a transition is need that’s okay but would prefer a faster timeline. Pitts asked if it was possible to have a shorter contract with CapMetro than one year. Miller responded that he can ask. Pitts asked if the proposed timeline will be 12 months. Miller responded yes. Pitts asked if a shorter-term contract was possible, could the RFP be shortened and condensed. Miller responded that the unknown is dependent upon if Council selects a public or provide provider for services. Pitts asked about funding for the different options. Miller responded that it depends on if the City becomes a direct recipient or not for federal funding. He added that the FTA process would have to start as soon as the RFPs are received. Pitts asked if the FTA funds were not received by the City, would the cost of the program then be placed upon the City. Miller responded that is correct. Pitts asked if it was possible for the City to not be approved to be an FTA provider. Miller stated that the didn’t see any issues with the City being approved. Pitts stated that he would also like to see the City move off of GoGeo sooner, but he doesn’t want to strand the existing riders. Miller stated that the current contract does include an exit clause. Pitts stated that he would like to see the timeline sped up if at all possible. Jonrowe stated that she is fine with the staff presentation. Gonzalez stated that GoGeo was supposed to be a test and it didn’t work out how it was expected. He added that he would like to move off of system as soon as possible. Mayor Ross stated that it sounds like council is mixed on their feedback. David Morgan, City Manager, stated that staff can move forward as quickly as possible with RFI and RFP, and noted that some things out of the City’s control. Mayor Ross suggested a transition sooner rather than later and asked when staff would update Council. Morgan stated that the next thing will be to extend the CapMetro contract. Mayor Ross asked for a timeline. Miller responded that the contract is under legal review and he should be able to return mid- September. B. Presentation, update, and discussion regarding the existing Distributed Renewable Electric Generation Program -- Daniel Bethapudi, General Manager of the Electric Utility and Leticia Zavala, Customer Care Director Zavala introduced the item and provided the background of the program noting that the City retained NewGen Strategies and Solutions, LLC to provide guidance on 2 specific rates, to develop an EV Charger Rate Program and review the current Net Metering Program. She noted that the EV Charger Rate Program was adopted at second reading on May 26,2020 and provides for EV charging infrastructure within the City’s electric territory. Zavala stated that the Net Metering Program was reviewed with Council on May 12, 2020 and the overview of the plan includes: rate impact analysis and identification of cross-subsidies; eliminates the ability for energy credit to exceed the utility bill charges; and adjust the energy credit provided to customers. She noted that the Council direction received at the meeting on May 12, 2020 was to have proposed changes to Net Energy Metering Program including changing the ordinance language in order to make it easier to understand. Zavala stated that staff is currently working with NewGen Strategies to simplify the ordinance language and is reviewing the Distributive Generation (DG) agreement and related questions and customer feedback. She reviewed the first principal questions of: Did the DG Agreement signed by residential net metering customers preclude changes to the rate? Did the contract specify a rate? Zavala stated that the response is that staff worked with outside legal and rate consultants, the City Attorney’s office, Customer Care and finance to review the current net metering agreements and billing practice; and based on the review, the interconnection agreements signed by residential net metered customers are subject to any changes adopted by City Council on City’s policies, rates, and any other conditions placed by ordinances and the existing contract language aligns with the proposed changes of renewable energy credit based on avoided costs. She reviewed the second principal questions that were: Is the City’s current NEM billing methodology in alignment with industry practices? Is the City’s current NEM billing methodology in compliance with the current DG agreement? Grant Rabon with NewGen Strategies began presenting and started by explaining metering configuration using the following graphic: Rabon explained the typical residential load profile as follows: Rabon provided a comparison of residential load with generation of a 10KW system: Rabon explained measuring volumetric and received energy at regular intervals: Calixtro asked if at any point there is a way to know what the PV energy consumed is and if that information can be sent to the customer. Rabon responded stated that the bill will provide the needed information for the calculation. Rabon then provided a summary and noted that every NEM customer has two meters: a “REC” meter for informational purposes only; and a “bi-directional” meter that registers at each interval. He noted that: customers have volumetric energy and received energy; values/measurements are registered by the bi-directional meter are used to bill the customer; the Utility’s NEM billing methodology is reasonable, appropriate and is consistent with common industry practices; the DG Agreement accurately describes the NEM billing method of summing a customer’s net consumed energy (Volumetric) and energy sent back to the City (Received) over the course of a bill cycle; the City has been billing NEM customers using the NEM billing method as described in the DG Agreement for the last 10 years; and the proposed update to the NEM rate does not change the mechanics of how NEM customers are billed, it merely changes the amount that Received energy is credited to better reflect “the City’s estimated avoided fuel costs” as stated in the DG Agreement and establishes a minimum bill policy. Calixtro asked about the effort to clarify confusing language for customers. Rabon responded that he is working with City staff to clarify the language. Triggs stated that he has had customers come to him and explain their bill and how they are being shorter. He stated that he can’t understand why customers feel that they are being shorted. Triggs stated that it appears the customers are not paying fixed and then asked why they would feel they are being shorted. Rabon responded that the customers desire a different billing structure where they would receive all of their energy generation at the residential energy rate. He added that his is not sure why they are unhappy with the current process. Morgan responded noting that some customers are concerned with the billing methodology with the assumption that the City is taking the energy generated by solar panel and netting it at the end of the month instead of 15 minute intervals. He added that the proposed practice will allow the City to come up with the correct rate. Triggs stated that he understands why the City is making changes, he is just curious about the disconnect for customers. Fought stated that the has been through this in excruciating detail by reading the contracts. He noted the huge disconnect that needs to be fixed and that the 2012 contract was a bad contract. Fought stated the confusing language in the contract about consumption versus generation. He noted the need for clearer language going forward for customers. Fought stated that those already in the system need to be grandfathered in somehow and thanked staff and the consultant for their work to clear the issue up. Pitts asked if the proposed change to the policy/Ordinance would still provide an incentive for citizens to put solar panels on their homes. Rabon responded yes and noted that the cost of panels has dropped significantly making it more affordable to invest. He added that the suggestion should not significantly alter someone’s decision to invest in solar panels. Jonrowe asked about the ability to grandfather in existing customers and what the best structure would be. Rabon responded that the consultant recommendations is to allow for a six month transition period. Jonrowe noted that six months seems rather short and asked if there was a different way. Morgan responded that there are two things at play. He added that it is one thing to change the rate which has flexibility. Morgan noted that the City’s current agreement needs clarification but does meet all legal aspects. Jonrowe stated that she does support a longer transition period for the existing customers. Gonzalez state that he supports allowing existing users to step into the new program over the course of six month to a year, but he does not want non-solar customers to be burdened with unnecessary costs. Mayor Ross stated that the Council does support the idea of allowing existing customers a transition period for coming onto the new program. He then asked what Bethapudi needed to proceed forward. Bethapudi responded that staff’s recommendation is to initiate the consultant’s proposed changes to new customers straight away. He added that staff needs Council direction on how long to allow existing customers to transition into the new program. Morgan stated that staff would like to simplify the ordinance; adopt the consultant recommendations on NEM Program; eliminate the ability for <$0 energy bill; and adjust the received Energy Credit. He added that staff had initially proposed a six-month transition for existing customers but can do longer. Fought asked for financial estimates for customers to stay on the existing plan. Morgan responded that currently it is $117,000 per year, but if moved to the new structure it would cost $47,000 per year. Pitts asked if the non-solar customers bear those costs. Morgan responded yes, that’s correct. Pitts asked for clarification on the Ordinance and it’s meaning. He asked if the City is trying to get more customers to use solar panels. Bethapudi responded that residential solar has been increasing over the last few years and it is recommended to have policies that allow for residents to have solar installation. He added that the City is agnostic towards adoption or not adoption. Bethapudi stated that the program should be designed in a way that it does not negatively affect the non- solar customers and that is what staff is trying to achieve. Pitts noted that the proposed change is must less overall in costs, but still puts some burden on non-solar customers. Bethapudi responded that is correct. Pitts stated that if this policy is successful it has the potential to have an exponential impact to non-solar customers. He added that he is fine grandfathering in existing customers, but he doesn’t feel the City should be paying for any excess energy. Mayor Ross noted that when these policies were initially developed the intent was to make sure there was always plenty of electricity for Georgetown, but clearly things have changed. He then noted the comments about inequity and noted the various different rates that the City provides to different types of customers. Mayor Ross suggested that staff move forward with allowing for a one-year time frame for existing solar customers to be grandfathered into the new system. Pitts stated that he disagrees and that a homeowner’s personal choice should not negatively impact other citizens. He did note the need to grandfather existing customers. Mayor Ross stated this item is before Council now because the market has changed. General discussion about how the program would effect new and existing customers. Morgan stated that staff has not done a full rate review, but that one will be happening in the next year. He added that this will lead to evaluation of all rate structures. Bethapudi noted that in FY2021 there will be a full and comprehensive rate study. He added that new customers will get $0.049 rate while grandfathered customers will the get the existing, full retail rate for a time period determined by Council. Morgan stated that Council will review the rate study and can then make additional changes to program if they choose. Mayor Ross asked that Morgan recap the feedback provided by Council. Morgan stated Council is overall comfortable moving forward with staff and consultant recommendations and that existing customers should be grandfathered in for twelve months. He added that Council will review the rate study in FY2021 and can made additional changes then. Bethapudi stated that staff will bring their recommendations forward within the next few Council meetings. The following comments were made during the meeting using the Zoom client: Mark Arico yielded his time to Darrell Buck Darrell Buck did a presentation that covered the meaning of net metering per the agreement; showed the billing formulas per the agreement; noted significant savings for GUS with customers that produce more than they use; and that other customers receive less credit than entitled. He stated that the City is not using the Net Metering formulas specified by the Agreement. Mr. Buck’s time expired before his finished his presentation. Robert Sobotik stated that he is not sure how much the agreement can be changed because it must be a mutual agreement among all parties. He noted the need to pay out participants. Sobotik stated that the existing program was put in under a federal grant program to encourage solar panels. He noted claims made by previous City employees. C. Presentation, update, and discussion regarding the CommUNITY Initiative -- Wayne Nero, Police Chief and David Morgan City Manager Nero presented the item and reviewed the stakeholder groups that include micro communities, youth, businesses, seniors, media, faith based, and social services. He reviewed the engagement strategy as it relates to relationships, problem solving, and meaningful dialogue. Nero provided examples that include working with Citizen Police Academy, community awareness training, Law Enforcement Field Day, Chase the Chief 5K, GISD SRO Program, Blue Santa, Silver Shields, Drug Take Back Box, BSA Flag Box (Lobby), Field of Honor, PTO Program VA Certified, National Night Out, Coffee with the Chief, Shattered Dreams, PSOTC public tours, Women in Law Enforcement Night, Explorer Program, Safe Trade Location, Junior Police Academy, and CRASE Training. He then explained the CommUNITY Advisory Task Force which was newly formed in July 2020 and consist of 25+ members who have longstanding working relationships with a diverse group of community leaders, and is an advisory group to the Office of the Chief regarding the CommUNITY Initiative and provided a series of Stakeholder Summits. Nero stated that the Stakeholder Summits are an opportunity to listen and learn with the summit pillars of building trust and legitimacy; policy and oversight; technology and strategic communications; community engagement and crime reduction; training and education; and officer wellness and safety. He noted the Stakeholder Summit working framework consisting of: identifying a desired end state of each pillar through collaboration; identifying the stakeholders involved; get “outward” regarding those stakeholders; and brainstorming and identifying actionable ideas that work towards the desired end state from the perspective of the various stakeholders. Nero stated that the next steps are to: complete remaining 5 pillars with the Advisory Task Force; develop Leadership Task Force for each of the specific 7 stakeholder groups; develop and host Listen and Learn Summits within each of the 7 stakeholder groups; develop a summary report containing recommendations resulting from each summit; work with staff to develop action items from community recommendations; and dedicate staff and resources towards working on action items. He ended with the following quote, “Let’s build bridges, not walls,” Martin Luther King, Jr. Mayor Ross noted that this has been a work in progress for several years and not a reaction to recent events. Nero responded that is fair. He added that the PD has been working in this framework for a while and now is a good time to take the next steps. Jonrowe thanked Nero for the presentation and stated that she looks forward to the reports that come out of the stakeholder work. She asked if the citizen group who is tasked with reviewing training and education will review the current training requirements and practices. Nero responded absolutely. Jonrowe asked who will help facilitate those conversations to provide a professional framework for analyzing the data. Nero responded that the advisory groups can speak to that. Jonrowe asked if there was a budget for this process. Nero responded yes and no. He added that things that are action item oriented may be brought forward on a future agenda for approval. Jonrowe asked specifically about the Summits. Nero responded not at this time, but staff is working through that. Jonrowe stated that having third parties participate may help lead to building trust and legitimacy. She then asked if the firing range be built after input is received. Nero responded that those are two separate issues. He added that the firing range will lead to the City becoming a contract training provider and there is already a group that reviews that made up of community members. Jonrowe confirmed that community members are on the board. Nero responded yes, as it allows the City to train other entities for State credit. Jonrowe asked how suggestions made by the citizen committees related to training would be handled. Nero responded that staff will review all recommendations and accommodate as many as possible. Jonrowe asked which pillar would address mental health. Nero responded training and education. Jonrowe asked for clarification on turning the department “outward” to the stakeholders. Nero responded that it is based on discussions that have taken place with the advisory task force and he would be happy to share that information. Jonrowe asked if the Summits would be recorded. Nero responded that they can be. Jonrowe ask that it be considered. Gonzalez thanked Chief for the presentation and noted that people from outside the community may not be the best idea as the City is attempting to build trust and legitimacy from within. He added that the more training the better especially when dealing with the citizens. Calixtro stated that she no questions at this time and has expressed her personal concerns to the Chief. She added that she looks forward to the progression of the program. Triggs stated that the pillars are important, and he has nothing to add or remove. He thanked Nero for his work. Fought stated that he has nothing to add and will watch the program carefully. He added that the key seems to be working with youth, and the PD does that well. Fought thanked Nero. Pitts stated that he is supportive and has no real feedback on presentation. He added that he did a ride along and saw job in person and encourages other council members to do a ride along when times are safer post COVID-19. Pitts continued that it is easy to watch TV, but not the same as seeing things in person and it made him appreciate PD even more. Mayor Ross noted the City’s Texas Police Chiefs Accreditation and thanked Nero for his efforts. Robyn Densmore, City Secretary read public comments that were submitted via email in the following order (comments appear exactly as submitted): Joe Reedholm Did not find anything in the Adobe document specifically addressing the now world-wide to defund the police. As Chief Nero knows, there has been push back against militarization of the police since Daryl Gates formed the first SWAT teams in LA during the 1960's. Furthermore, the push back did not start with liberals, but with libertarians concerned with abuse of constitutional rights. Radley Balko of the Cato Institute is particularly eloquent as he traces the loss of community policing in his 2014 book, "Rise of the Warrior Cop--the Militarization of America's Police Forces". There are too many issues to cover here, but I would like to hear Chief Nero's take on why the Georgetown PD is as militarized as it is, and what he plans to do about it. Densmore stated that she has forwarded Mr. Reedholm’s comment to the Chief so that he can reach and make contact with him. D. Presentation and discussion regarding FY21 Budget Development -- Tadd Phillips, Human Resources Director and David Morgan, City Manager Morgan presented the item noted that the purpose is to address follow-up items from the budget workshop on July 21, 2020. He stated that he will review the July 21 recommendations, provide an employee compensation approach overview for public safety employee market and step compensation and non-public safety market and merit compensation, provide a revenue update, review recommended compensation and other budgetary adjustments aligned with Council feedback, and the opportunity for additional feedback prior to August 11, 2020 City Manager’s Proposed Budget. Morgan reviewed the financial circumstances for the FY2021 Budget and the lower revenue for FY2021 based on flat sales tax, lower development, court and recreation revenue, and a property tax within 3.5% cap. He noted the increased costs pressures of Fire Stations 6 and 7, and the SAFER Grant reduction 75% to 35% funding. Morgan noted staff’s strategy for a flat expenditure plan, reduced compensation plan, and base budget cuts. He explained the targeted base budget cuts of $726,000 in the General Fund and $220,000 in Joint Services with the cuts including frozen positions with 6 in the General Fund, travel/training, equipment/supplies, and maintenance items. Morgan provided a reminder from July 21, 2020 related to continued market and step pay adjustments with market adjustments implemented for police and fire sworn, along with step increases. He noted that Police market totals $99,000 consisting of 88 employees with 60% implementation and a 0.3% to 1.5% average increase; Fire market totals $264,000 consisting of 138 employees with 60% implementation and a 1.7% to 2.5% average increase; Police steps totaling $118,000 consisting of 88 employees with 2-4% average annual step; Fire steps totaling $176,000 consisting of 138 employees with 2-4% average annual step; and Non-Public Safety totaling $246,000 across all funds consisting of 44% of employees, 30% of job titles, and an average of 2% increase. Morgan provided Council compensation examples based on the July 21st input: Employee Count Market Step/Merit Total Firefighter* 138 @60%=2.5% 2-4% 4.5-6.5% Police Officer* 88 @60%=1.5% 2-4% 3.5-5.5% Non-Public Safety 265 Yes = 2% 0% 2% Non-Public Safety 280 No = 0% 0% 0% Total Cost: $903,000 *not all public safety ranks have same market or step as FF & PO, these are illustrative examples Phillips presented and reviewed the Fiscal and Budgetary Policy noting that City Council and Management recognize the importance of attracting, hiring, developing, and retaining the best people, and compensating them for the value they create. He continued that the City has outstanding and innovative City employees who work diligently to bring the Vision of Council to life and deliver exceptional services to our customers while exemplifying our Core Values. Phillips stated that the following programs are subject to available funding in the annual operating budget, starting with competitive compensation, in order to maintain a competitive pay scale, the City has implemented a Competitive Employee Compensation Maintenance Program to address competitive market factors and other issues impacting compensation and the program consists of: Annual Pay Plan Review (Market) – To ensure the City’s pay system is accurate and competitive within the market, the City will review its pay plans annually for any potential market adjustments necessary to maintain the City’s competitive pay plans; Pay for Performance (Merit) – Each year the City will fund performance based pay adjustments for regular non-public safety personnel. This merit-based program aids in retaining quality employees by rewarding their performance. Pay for Performance adjustments are based on the employee’s most recently completed performance evaluation; and Public Safety Steps (Steps)– Each year the City will fund anniversary step increases for public safety sworn personnel consistent with public safety pay scale design. He noted that competitive compensation is a core to the Human Resources Mission and Goals and market reviews focus on Strategic goal 3: retain City Employees by rewarding high performance, and assuring pay is market competitive. Phillips then reviewed the following visual that represents total rewards to an organization: Phillips then explained employee turnover with the following graphs: Phillips then reviewed the current Police and Fire pay scales as shown: Phillips explained the current Police and Fire market data that is analyzed by the City: Phillips explained the Police Officerincrease history and market impactnoting that all market increases for Police and Fire from FY2016 through FY2020 were recommended and funded at 100%: Phillips explained the Fire Fighter increase history and market impact noting that all market increases for Police and Fire from FY2016 through FY2020 were recommended and funded at 100%: Phillips provided the non-public safety merit history as follows: Phillips explained the non-public safety market history noting that 40% of the 280 non-public safety job titles are benchmarked annually against comparator organizations previously approved by Council: Phillips then reviewed the side by side history and projection for all employees while noting: firefighter includes paramedic credential pay; projections based on historical market Rating Feb-16 Feb-17 Jan-18 Jan-19 Jan-20 Below Expectations 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Meets Expectations 1% 1%2% 2% 2% Exceed Expectations 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% Excellent 3% 3%4% 4% 4% increases; and non-civil supervisor with one prior market adjustment, one in future, and exceeds expectations merit increases for all years: Morgan resumed the presentation and explained the revised FY2021 Budget plan that will include two police officer patrol positions, increase compensation for Fire and Police civil service and non-civil service positions, with a funding strategy based on: an improved Tax Roll with $374,000 in additional revenue; use of the Economic Stability Reserve/Council Contingency for one-time uses; and finding additional cuts. He noted that staff’s recommended budgetary adjustments consisting of: use of One-Time Funding via available balances with $1,759,446 coming form the Economic Stability Reserve (ESR) and $110,983 coming from the Council Special Revenue Fund (CSRF) for a total of $1,870,429; less One Time Uses totaling $458,400 made up of new police staff equipment costing $192,000 and small neighborhood plans costing $100,000; previously funded in the General Fund in the July 21, 2020 version totaling $166,400 and consisting of Fire Station equipment costing $78,400, redistricting costing $50,000, and Mobility Bond costing $38,000; leading to an ending balance in ESR/CSRF $1,400,000; other General Fund adjustments including an increase in Property Tax revenue of $374,000, addingback $166,400for projects previously funded in General fund move to Council SRF/ESR (Equipment, Redistricting, Mobility Bond), freeze vacant library position $75,000 and increasing costs of Police market at 80% totaling $33,000, Fire market at 80% totaling $88,000, two police officers and on-going costs totaling $162,000, 2% merit increase for non-civil service totaling $199,000; and a remaining balance of $273,910. Morgan provided a compensation update as follows: Morgan provided the Police Officer increase history and market impact noting that all market increases for Police & Fire from FY2016 through FY2020 were recommended and funded at 100%: Morgan reviewed the Fire Fighter increase history and market impact: Morgan then reviewed the FY2021 proposed Budget Calendar as follows: August 11 th the City Manager’s proposed budget, set max tax rate, and set dates for Public Hearings; September 9th Regular Meeting hold public hearings, First Reading of the budget, First Reading of the tax rate; and September 22 nd Regular Meeting hold the 2nd reading of the budget and 2nd reading of the tax rate. Mayor Ross asked for clarification on the final numbers of the proposed implementation. Morgan responded that the proposed version of the budget will allow for a cushion of about $273,000. Fought stated that staff did a good job. He added that he would like to see 100% for civil service but need to consider whole picture. Fought stated that 80% is good compromise and noted the cost of health care and its success. Pitts stated good job incorporating feedback from the last meeting. He added that 80% is a good compromise. Pitts stated that people have lost jobs and some that have kept jobs will not likely see pay raises and he supports the plan. Jonrowe stated that staff walked a fine line and she likes the proposal. She added that she would like to see a rate increase for all employees year over year. Gonzalez commended Morgan and staff and noted that public safety and general staff deserve increases. He asked what the difference is between funding at 100% and 80%. Morgan responded that the total cost is $121,000 for 100%. Gonzalez stated that doesn’t want the City to fall far behind and asked that compensation get shored up as soon as possible. Calixtro thanked Morgan and staff for working the numbers. She noted that everyone is working and putting their lives at risk deserves to be compensated and she supports the plan. Triggs stated that he wanted Morgan to find more money, and he found what he could. He then thanked Morgan for his efforts. Mayor Ross stated that Council supports the plan as presented with the possibility to reevaluate compensation as the economy allows. Morgan thanked Council and stated his appreciation for all City staff. The following comments were made during the meeting using the Zoom client: Cody Stout, President of the Georgetown Association of Firefighters stated that the Association would like to see 100% but understands budgetary constraints and he appreciates the thought that Council put into this. Mayor Ross recessed into Executive Session at 4:58 to start at 5:10 p.m. Executive Session In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon’s Texas Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session. (45 Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items - Litigation Update - PEC Franchise Sec. 551.072: Deliberations about Real Property - Sale of Property – CTSUD building Sec. 551.087: Deliberation Regarding Economic Development Negotiations - Project Zeus Adjournment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approved by the Georgetown City Council on _______________________________________________ Date _____________________________ _____________________________ Dale Ross, Mayor Attest: City Secretary Notice of a Meeting of the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown, Texas Tuesday, July 28, 2020 The Georgetown City Council will meet on Tuesday, July 28, 2020 at 6:00 PM at the Council Chambers at 510 West 9th St., Georgetown, Texas 78626. The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary’s Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 808 Martin Luther King, Jr Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Mayor Ross called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The following Council Members were in attendance: Mayor Dale Ross; Mary Calixtro, Council Member District 1; Mike Triggs, Council Member District 3; Steve Fought, Council Member District 4; Kevin Pitts, Council Member District 5; and Rachael Jonrowe, Council Member District 6; and Tommy Gonzalez, Council Member District. Council District 2 is vacant. All Council Members present via videoconferencing and a roll call was performed. Regular Session (This Regular session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.) A.Call to Order Invocation Charlie Turner with River Rock Bible Church Pledge of Allegiance Pitts led both. Comments from the Mayor None. City Council Regional Board Reports None. Announcements None. Action from Executive Session Motion by Pitts to authorize the City Manager to negotiate the sale of City property located 851 FM 970, Florence, Texas 76527 to the City of Florence, Texas, on the terms discussed in executive session; and, to authorize the Mayor to execute the necessary documents to complete the sale, second by Triggs. Calixtro – Yes Triggs – Yes Fought – Not on call. Pitts – Yes Jonrowe – Yes Gonzalez – Yes Approved 5-0 (District 2 vacant). Statutory Consent Agenda The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that may be acted upon with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda. B. Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the Workshop and Regular Meetings held on July 14, 2020 -- Robyn Densmore, City Secretary C. Consideration and possible action to appoint Debra Meyer to fill a vacancy on the Zoning Board of Adjustment -- Mayor Dale Ross D. Consideration and possible action to appoint Melissa Sheldon to fill a vacancy on the Animal Shelter Advisory Board -- Mayor Dale Ross E.Forwarded from Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC): Consideration and possible action to approve an economic development agreement with Titan NorthPark35 -- Michaela Dollar, Economic Development Director F. Consideration and possible action to approve a contract with ImageTrend, Inc for an Electronic Health Record (EHR) and Records Management System (RMS) in the amount not to exceed $61,477.00 for Year One setup and service fees -- John Sullivan, Fire Chief Mayor Ross recessed the meeting from 6:10 – 6:15 p.m. to allow Council Member Fought to join the meeting and work through technical issues. Motion by Pitts to approve the Consent Agenda as presented, second by Triggs. Calixtro – Yes Triggs – Yes Fought – Yes Pitts – Yes Jonrowe – Yes Gonzalez – Yes Approved 6-0 (District 2 vacant). Legislative Regular Agenda G.Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance for the voluntary annexation of an approximately 0.763-acre tract of land out of the William Roberts Survey, Abstract 524, and a 0.109 acre tract of land, being over and across a portion of Shell Road, a right-of-way of varying width described to Williamson County, Texas, for the property generally located at 3700 Shell Road -- Nat Waggoner, PMP, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager Waggoner presented the item and reviewed Location Map, Aerial Map, Property Map, Annexation Process, and the Tentative Schedule of: July 14th Municipal Services Agreement; July 28th Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance held at City Council Meeting; and August 11th Second Reading of Ordinance at City Council Meeting. Mayor Ross opened and closed the Public Hearing at 6:18 p.m. as there were no speakers. Motion by Pitts, second by Triggs. Council had no questions or comments. Calixtro – Yes Triggs – Yes Fought – Yes Pitts – Yes Jonrowe – Yes Gonzalez – Yes Approved 6-0 (District 2 vacant). H.Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to amend the Seven Strand Planned Unit Development (PUD) Development Plan consisting of Lots 5-7, Village Gate at Sun City Final Plat, generally located at 60 Del Webb Blvd -- Andreina Davila- Quintero, AICP, Current Planning Manager Davila-Quintero presented the item and reviewed the Location Map, Aerial Map, Future Land Use/Overall Transportation Plan Map, Zoning Map, PUD Explanation, and the approved 2019-75-SDP. She then explained the deviations from the existing PUD noting that the current PUD where all accessory uses are permitted by residents only and parking at the independent living retirement center use shall be one space per dwelling unit + 1 space per each 15 dwelling units or fraction thereof for visitor and employee parking. Davila-Quintero stated that the proposed amended PUD will have barber/beauty shop and restaurant/kitchens open to the general public and the independent living use shall be one space per dwelling unit; the assisted living shall be one space per two beds; and the memory care use shall be one space per 3.5 beds. She stated that based on the approval criteria the request complies in all areas of UDC Section 3.06.030 and at their July 7, 2020 meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of the request (7-0). Davila-Quintero read the caption. Mayor Ross opened the Public Hearing at 6:30 p.m. Densmore read public comments that were submitted via email in the following order (comments appear exactly as submitted): Cheri Alderman Dear Councilmen and Mayor: I support your decision on denying low income housing coming into Georgetown. I agree with you that we have enough low income housing in our City. Thank you for keeping the vision for Georgetown. Cheri Alderman Realtor J Paul Aubin Compass William Streeter Dear Council Members My wife and I strongly support the current council vote. Georgetown has more than its fair share of low income housing. On a regional basis the facts speak for themselves. Let the surrounding communities step up and increase their share. Kind regards, The Streeter’s Pitts asked for clarification on change and if the only real change being sought out was for the beauty salon and restaurant to be open to members of the public instead of just residents. Davila-Quintero yes and to allow for alternative parking for the senior living facility. Motion by Fought, second by Gonzalez. Council had no addition comments or questions. Calixtro – Yes Triggs – Yes Fought – Yes Pitts – Yes Jonrowe – Yes Gonzalez – Yes Approved 6-0 (District 2 vacant). I.Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinanceon for a request for a the voluntary annexation of an approximate 2.213-acre tract of land, out of the W. Roberts Survey No. 4, Abstract 524, and a 0.939 acre tract of land, out of the W. Roberts Survey No. 4, Abstract 524, being over and across a portion of Shell Road, a right-of-way of varying width described to Williamson County, Texas, with the initial zoning designation of General Commercial (C- 3) upon annexation, for the property generally located southwest of the intersection of Shell Road and State Highway 195 -- Nat Waggoner, PMP, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager Waggoner presented the item including the Location Map, Aerial Map, Future Land Use/Overall Transportation Plan, Zoning Map, Community Center explanation, and the General Commercial explanation including what is permitted by right, permitted with limitations, and permitted with a SUP. He noted that the application meets the approval criteria and complies in all areas regarding UDC Section 3.06.030. Waggoner stated that at their June 2, 2020 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously (7-0) in favor of zoning the property General Commercial (C-3) upon annexation. He then reviewed the annexation process Waggoner read the caption. Mayor Ross opened and closed the Public Hearing at 6:38 p.m. as there were no speakers. Motion by Pitts, second by Triggs. Council had no comments or questions. Calixtro – Yes Triggs – Yes Fought – Yes Pitts – Yes Jonrowe – Yes Gonzalez – Yes Approved 6-0 (District 2 vacant). J.Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone Lots 1 & 2, Saavedra Subdivision (0.459 acres), from the Residential Single-Family (RS) zoning district to the Townhouse (TH) zoning district, for the property generally located at 1604 Forest Street -- Andreina Davila- Quintero, AICP, Current Planning Manager Davila-Quintero presented the item and reviewed the Location Map, Aerial Map, photos of two existing homes; photos of surrounding homes, Future Land Use/Overall Transportation Plan Map, Mixed-Density explanation, Zoning Map, Townhouse explanation, aerial map of lot, and permitted uses in Townhouse zoning. She stated that the application met the approval criteria and complied in all areas regarding UDC Section 3.06.030. Davila-Quintero explained that public notifications were sent to 39 property owners within the 300 foot buffer area and a notice was placed in Sun Newspaper on May 31, 2020, as well as signs posted on the property, and to date, staff has received 5 letters in favor and 13 letters opposed. She added that in the 200-foot State Mandated Notice Area 20% of land area requires a super majority vote of Council for approval and at time of posting the opposition was 20.28% but is currently 13.95%. Davila-Quintero stated that at their June 16, 2020 meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended disapproval of the request (5-1) based on UDC Sec 3.06.020.F.2 – “…the amendment may not become effective except by a three-fourths vote of all members of the City Council.” Davila-Quintero read the caption. Mayor Ross opened the Public Hearing at 6:52 p.m. Landon Smith, applicant for the project stated prior to the P&Z meeting there were several letters of objection noting parking, drainage, and some note wanting townhomes. He stated that he sent out a letter about the project and received some responses that anything would be better than the current structure. Smith explained the attributes of the project and how the townhomes would not negatively impact property values. He noted the need for attainable housing in Georgetown and how few townhomes there are in Georgetown. Smith stated that the project falls in line with the City’s housing plan and noted that the current structures are low priority structures that are uninhabitable. He stated that sales price per square foot has increase 78% from 2008-2015. Smith stated that if the item is not approved, could Council please provide a reason to allow him to adjust his plan. The following comments were made during the meeting using the Zoom client: Alton Glenn Trubee stated that he was opposed to project as there are no townhomes nearby. He noted the lack of support from neighbors. Jenel Looney stated that she is opposed to the project and deciding between what is there and townhomes is a false choice as current homes will be demolished. She also noted the need for a super majority vote by Council. Mayor Ross closed the Public Hearing at 7:00 p.m. Calixtro noted the possible increased in traffic. She added that even though the drainage was improved, more needs to happen. Triggs had no questions. Fought noted the staff’s analysis as being consistent with Council’s wishes and he cannot find a reason to vote against. He added that providing an explanation is appropriate. Pitts asked what the expected price point is for the units. Smith responded below $350,000. Pitts asked what the square footage would be. Smith responded from 1300 to 1500 per unit. Jonrowe asked what for the reason for the P&Z vote. Davila-Quintero responded that is was based on concerns about character of neighborhood, the location of property, the desire to be closer to transition zone, and the location being more in middle of block than on the edge. Jonrowe noted that the structures on the property are from 1900 and 1940 and then asked if they were on the City’s historic survey. Davila-Quintero responded that they are on survey, but not considered to be contributing structures. Jonrowe asked if the structures were located in the correct area would they be going to staff for consideration. Davila-Quintero responded that she would check. Jonrowe asked if the current structures can be demolished with just building inspector approval. Davila-Quintero responded yes. Jonrowe stated that she has a hard time with demolition of existing structures and noted the HARC process if the structures were in the overlay. Davila-Quintero responded that only one structure has something to document it as historic. Jonrowe noted the scrutiny that the project could possibly receive in a different area and she doesn’t like the demolition of historic structures without review. She added that if it was infill development, she would approve due to the need for more affordable types of housing in the downtown area. Gonzalez stated that he finds it interesting that the project meets the 2030 Plan, but because of neighborhood it isn’t being supported. He added that he’s not sure how he fills about the project. Mayor Ross asked if the price point would $350,000 or less per unit. Smith responded yes, between $300,000 to $350,000. Mayor Ross asked if that equals affordable housing. Smith responded that it would be “attainable” housing and added that the cost of land is skyrocketing. He noted that construction costs are increasing, and it is hard to build single family home for under $500,000. Mayor Ross stated that the project has indicated to be affordable, not attainable. Smith responded that it is both. Mayor Ross asked if Smith understood the definition of affordable housing and what a household would need to make. Gary Wang, with the applicant team, stated that the applicant is set to look at workforce housing which is distinct from affordable housing. He added that the project meets workforce based on City definition. Wang stated that the project would be more attainable for more participants of the workforce. Mayor Ross asked for the income levels that qualify as being able to afford workforce housing. Wang responded that there are strong definitions set out by the City. Mayor Ross stated that he finds it hard to believe that $350,000 is affordable housing. He then asked for the comments received about the project. Davila-Quintero responded that P&Z voted 5-1 for disapproval and staff received 5 letters in favor and 13 against. Ross stated that he drives this area and asked how tall the units will be. Wang responded two story. Ross asked if the units would be over 35 feet tall. Wang responded no they are low scale two story buildings. Ross stated that the project doesn’t seem like a good fit. Pitts stated that for a $350,000 home the minimum income level to qualify for loan, would be $85,714 gross income with 20% down. Motion by Fought, second by Triggs. Pitts responded that he will support the motion. He added that affordable housing doesn’t have to be a tax credit deal and these projects will be below the value of a majority of homes in the area. Pitts stated that this will make the area more affordable and the project complies with City policies. Jonrowe called point of order and asked that Pitts speak to the issue at hand. Pitts responded noted and stated that the current homes are falling down and the project complies. Calixtro – No Triggs – Yes Fought – Yes Pitts – Yes Jonrowe – No Gonzalez – Yes Fails due to lack of super majority with 4-2 vote in favor (Triggs, Fought, Pitts, and Gonzalez for; Calixtro and Jonrowe against; and District 2 vacant). K. Consideration and possible action to approve a Municipal Services Agreement with Highland Village Georgetown GP, LLC for the provision of municipal services to an approximately 0.526 acre tract of land out of the L.P Dyches Survey, Abstract No. 171 generally located at 8300 RM 2338 -- Nat Waggoner, PMP, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager Waggoner presented the item and reviewed the Location Map, Future Land Use/Overall Transportation Plan, Zoning Map, Land Use Summary Aerial Map, Annexation Process, and Tentative Schedule of: July 28, 2020 Council Considers Municipal Services Agreement; August 18, 2020 P&Z Public Hearing & Recommendation on Initial Zoning; September 8, 2020 City Council Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance; and September 22, 2020 City Council Second Reading of Ordinance. Council had no comments or questions. Motion by Fought, second by Triggs. Calixtro – Yes Triggs – Yes Fought – Yes Pitts – Yes Jonrowe – Yes Gonzalez – Yes Approved 6-0 (District 2 vacant). L.Second Reading of an Ordinance amending Section 12.20.050 of the Code of Ordinances entitled “Prohibited Practices” relating to the prohibition of consumption of alcoholic beverages in certain City Parks -- Kimberly Garrett, Parks and Recreation Direction Garrett presented the item and provided a brief overview of the proposed Ordinance. She noted the proposed effective date of August 12th and that no changes had been made since the first reading. Garrett read the caption. Motion by Pitts, second by Triggs. Council had no comments or questions. Calixtro – Yes Triggs – Yes Fought – Yes Pitts – Yes Jonrowe – Yes Gonzalez – Yes Approved 6-0 (District 2 vacant). M. Discussion and possible action on a potential City Council Governance Policy violation by Council Member Rachael Jonrowe at the City Council meeting on July 14, 2020 -- Mike Triggs, Council Member District 3 and Kevin Pitts, Council Member District 5 Ross introduced item and explained that Triggs and Pitts would have the ability to present the item and then Jonrowe would be allowed to respond. He added that they the remaining members of Council will be able to speak on the item and then Council will hear the public comments. Jonrowe asked for a clarification and if there would be a motion first. Mayor Ross responded no, because there may or may not be a motion. Jonrowe stated that she had a question on the legality of the way the item is presented. Mayor Ross asked that City Attorney, Skye Masson, answer Jonrowe’s question. Jonrowe asked the possibility to strike the words “and public action” on the item as the Governance Policy only allows for discussion and she did not believe that action could be taken. Masson responded that the Governance Policy is silent about what happens after a discussion, and Council can take action as they see fit. Triggs stated that redlining is basically an infraction against underserved areas that made lenders responsible for serving underserved areas. He added that this has nothing to do with redlining, even in a modern-day context. Triggs stated that the decision was a business decision to deny the tax credit project and he doesn’t understand how changing the definition of redlining, would have this action falls under it. He stated that mortgage lenders that were charged with redlining were later charged with predatory lending and that there is a fine line between redlining and predatory lending. Triggs stated that he would have hoped that the appropriate people would know what Council was looking for and what the applicant should do. He stated that he would like to see this taken care of and Council go back to work to find good projects for affordable housing. Pitts asked that video be played. The video showed Item P from the July 14, 2020 Council meeting. The video was the vote on the item and then at after vote Jonrowe is heard saying, “This is modern redlining.” Pitts then went through a presentation that started with explanation of the The Fair Housing Act, which is title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended (42 USC 3601 et seq.), makes it unlawful for any lender to discriminate in its housing-related lending activities against any person because of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, handicap, or familial status. He added that anyone who is in the business of providing housing-related loans is subject to the FHAct. Pitts stated that redlining is the practice of denying a creditworthy applicant a loan for housing in a certain neighborhood even though the applicant may otherwise be eligible for the loan. He added that the term refers to the presumed practice of mortgage lenders of drawing red lines around portions of a map to indicate areas or neighborhoods in which they do not want to make loans. Pitts continued that redlining on a racial basis has been held by the courts to be an illegal practice. He stated that therefore, the Fair Housing Act establishes that Redlining is wrong and illegal. Pitts then reviewed the City of Georgetown City Council Governance Policy where he perceived there was a violation of the Governance Guidelines referring to the following section: The City Council will govern the City in a manner associated with a commitment to the preservation of the values and integrity of representative local government and democracy, and a dedication to the promotion of efficient and effective governing. The following statements will serve as a guide and acknowledge the commitment being made in this service to the community. The City Council shall: communicate and serve with respect, dignity and courtesy in relations with Staff, all Councilmembers, members of the boards, commissions, committees, and the public; be dedicated to the faithful stewardship of the public trust and seek to improve the quality and image of public service. Pitts noted that claiming that members of Council committed an illegal act does not respect or dignity. He added that the claim also disrupts public trust. Pitts then reviewed the Guidance Principles: The office of elected official is one of trust and service to the citizens of Georgetown. This position creates a special responsibility for the Georgetown City Councilmember, and the following principles shall govern the conduct of each Councilmember. A Councilmember shall: be dedicated to the highest ideals of honor and integrity in all public and personal relationships and conduct themselves, both inside and outside the City's service, so as to give no occasion for the distrust of their integrity, impartiality or of their devotion to the best interests of the City and the public trust, to merit the respect and confidence of the citizens of Georgetown; Pitts stated that stating members of Council are doing illegals violates this section as well. Pitts then reviewed that at Council meetings each Councilmember shall: be familiar with and follow parliamentary rules applicable to the Council process and procedure; Pitts stated that Jonrowe is very familiar with parliamentary procedure and that all discussion about an item should have taken place during the item and not via an outburst after a vote has been made. Jonrowe began her presentation that she titled, “Redlining from the past to the present” and provided definitions noting that: in the United States, redlining is the systematic denial of various services by federal government agencies, and local governments, as well as the private sector, either directly or through the selective raising of prices; historically, redlining originated from the practice of loan corporations using color coding to determine which areas were eligible for loans; red areas were deemed the least worthy, and corresponded with predominately minority and poor neighborhoods; and more recently, the definition of “redlining” or “modern-day redlining” has been broadened to include practices which are less overt, but just as discriminatory such as certain real estate practices, predatory lending or “reverse redlining,” exclusionary zoning, less investment in infrastructure, credit score algorithms, gentrification, the clustering of subsidized housing in particular geographic regions, and more. She then played a video from youtube.com called, “Relined, a legacy of housing discrimination.” Jonrowe then reviewed modern-day redlining examples: not only is it easy to find examples of the term “modern day redlining” in current vernacular, it is easy to find examples of the effects of historic redlining, and ways in which these discriminatory practices have taken on new forms, with some businesses and institutions are rising to the challenges of equity and justice. She continued that Zillow has taken a strong position, recognizing the inequities in real estate; Zillow believes that all Americans deserve to find a home free from discrimination; one way Zillow uphold this value is by shining light on inequities through our economic research; Zillow’s intention is to help customers, partners and policymakers make informed decisions on fair housing guidelines and regulations; since 2015, Zillow has published a growing body of research addressing disparities; the work demonstrates that housing inequities persist nationwide; and this work has informed media stories, advocacy groups, and policymakers to drive the public conversation around the troubling history of blatant racism in real estate, and its lasting effects. Jonrowe discussed intent versus impact and that intent is about “what I meant” and impact is about “what I did.” She continued that she mentions this because it is vital, when deciding upon policies and their implementation, to consider both, but also to give appropriate weight to the possibility of disparate impact; and disparate impact refers to practices in employment, housing, and other areas that adversely affect one group of people of a protected characteristic more than another, even though rules applied are formally neutral. Jonrowe then reviewed the Texas v. Inclusive Communities Project and noted that in 2009, the Inclusive Communities Project sued the State of Texas, alleging that the citing of most Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties was in predominately poor and minority neighborhoods; on June 25, 2015, the Supreme Court upheld the disparate impact standard for housing discrimination; they ruled that the 1968 Fair Housing Standards act applies to BOTH intentional discrimination AND those that have the effect of discrimination, even if unintended; and Justice Kennedy wrote, “…antidiscrimination laws must be construed to encompass disparate impact claims when their text refers to the consequences of actions and not just to the mindset of actors. Pitts called for point of order, noting that the item at hand is about a policy violation and not about discrimination and race. Jonrowe responded that she is almost done with her presentation and that here are multiple ways to explain redlining. Mayor Ross allowed Jonrowe to continue, but did not the validity of Pitt’s comments. Jonrowe then noted that Texas responded and according to NextCity.org, this court case had the effect of “…notable improvements in Texas since ICP first brought its original suit. The state agency revised its process for allocating housing tax credits, now offering greater rewards to developers seeking to build in higher-income areas…in Dallas, a housing committee on the city council has been working on a plan to expand affordable housing units throughout the city…The Dallas Morning News editorial board recently praised these efforts to create more mixed-income neighborhoods, saying this carries ‘the potential to make Dallas a more equitable city for all of its residents.’” She continued that in other words, the State of Texas has been encouraging LIHTC development alongside single-family residential developments, and mixed-use development, the same as is called for in the Housing Element of our 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Jonrowe stated that after George Floyd, many difficult conversations are happening, across the country, not just about our vision for policing in our communities, but about the myriad ways in which the legacies of slavery, the unfulfilled promise of Reconstruction, black codes, Jim Crow, racial terror by lynching, segregation, and state-sanctioned discrimination influence policies and outcomes, even today. Pitt called point of order, again stating that the current content of Jonrowe’s presentation did not apply to the item at hand. Mayor Ross asked Jonrowe what her current slide had to do with the item at hand. Jonrowe responded that she may have a difference in opinion on what redlining mean. She also added that she was not told what the possible policy violations were, so she wanted to show that she was speaking truth. Mayor Ross stated that he didn’t understand what the current slide had to do with the issue at hand. Jonrowe stated that she did. She stated that you can find numerous examples of investments being made in community conversations about these topics; Round Rock is discussing the creation of an Equity Task Force; and 6 days ago, Eanes ISD hired an Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Consultant. Jonrowe provided her final thoughts as follows: in the decades since the Civil Rights act, we’ve made the vocabulary of racism and white supremacy so taboo, that some people react more strongly to the use of these words, than they do to possible impacts to minority and underprivileged populations; as elected officials, she would argue that we have a moral obligation to recognize modern forms of discrimination, and support plans to eliminate such discrimination, as best we can, wherever and whenever we can; refusing to do engage in good-faith efforts to do so is disrespectful of the people and communities being impacted, and an abdication of our duties as elected representatives; she has made a pledge to myself and my constituents to work on recognizing discrimination stemming from systemic racism and supporting policies that take measurable steps towards remedying inequities and injustice; and that she does not intend to stop. Jonrowe then asked that Council have a moment of reflection and consider the following words from Congressman John Lewis, “When you see something that is not right, not just, not fair, you have a moral obligation to say something. To do something. Our children and their children will ask us, ‘What did you do? What did you say?’…We have a mission and a mandate to be on the right side of history. Get in good trouble, necessary trouble, and redeem the soul of America.” She then provided her sources for her presentation. Calixtro stated that she feels similar to Jonrowe. She added that the City had 2030 Plan, recognizing a need for affordable housing and then Council chose not to approve the Housing Tax Credit item. Calixtro stated that she has received comments from citizens, so she knew what to expect and she had to bite her tongue. She continued that she understands there will be disagreement and understands Jonrowe’s passion, but she finds it hard in this day and age to look at this governance policy where it was violated. Calixtro stated that she feels at times Pitts has also violated policy, for example by asking Lou Snead to resign and actions of the Housing Authority Board. Gonzalez called for point of order to stay on topic with the item. Ross asked that Council stay focused on the topic, and that Council will not rehash past agenda items. Calixtro stated that there were things that happened where both sides have violated the Governance Policy in comments and perception. She stated that Council needs to get to a better place, possibly in face to face discussions. Fought stated that Council may be at a point where then rather than talking to each other, Council talks through the Chair, to respect Robert’s Rules of Order. He added that Council could possibly dial back. Fought focused on Jonrowe’s comments and that he understands her feelings on this are intense and over the line. He stated that he wished that when addressed at the meeting Jonrowe would have noted it then. Fought stated that he believes in the system and has voted for affordable housing for it in the past but didn’t like the proposed project. He added that Council needs to be careful in how they address each other and address each other respect and respect each other’s views. Fought stated that Council needs to get on with the people’s business and he wishes this didn’t have to be dealt with. He stated that everyone needs a step back. Gonzalez stated that there have been many votes that are taken where he may be on losing side and he is just as passionate, but he doesn’t lash out. He added that he doesn’t appreciate being called racist based on the vote. Gonzalez stated that Jonrowe had doubled down with her presentation. He asked if Jonrowe can be in his shoes as someone who did not receive white privilege. Gonzalez stated that the project had many flaws and he has approved other projects like this in the past. He continued that using the term redlining is equivalent to calling all the members of the community who spoke against the project racist as well. Mayor Ross asked that Gonzalez direct his comments to him, instead of other members of Council. Gonzalez stated that his comments were in general and not directed at any one person. Gonzalez stated that not liking the outcome of the votes doesn’t equal racism and there is a system in place to vote on those projects. He added that he felt Jonrowe doubled down on referring to her colleagues as racists. Gonzalez stated that he is offended by the comment that was made. Mayor Ross noted that because there are 20+ speakers each speaker will be allowed 2 minutes. Densmore read public comments that were submitted via email in the following order (comments appear exactly as submitted): Brian Combs Dear members of the city council and Mr. Ross, I sat in a previous City council meeting to request that the KCG development on Bell Gin and Sam Houston be denied. After this vote to deny it was completed, Mrs Jonrowe blurted out in a disrespectful manner that this was, and I quote “Modern Day Redlining”. This is disrespectful at any time, it is especially in today’s America of racial unrest. I emailed her twice to ask for an apology and only received a reply after I had correspondence with the Mayor. However no apology was given, instead she said her comment was towards Council members Pitts, Gonzalez, and Fought because she said they always vote against affirmative action items. So instead of an apology, she tries to explain it away and throw others under the bus. Maybe her role as a councilwomen has ran its course. Thank you for your time John R. Marler In stating that the City Council's vote on July 14th on the issue of low income housing, Council member Jonrowe was disingenuous is stating that the vote was, in her words, "Modern day Red-Lining!" This was done after the vote was 4-2 to disallow the request! Ms. Jonrowe disregards the Governance and Council Protocols often when she hands out her personal business/affiliation cards to attendees, taking the opportunity to have an audience due solely to her presence on the Council. I am strongly for the motion by Council members Trigg and Pitts. Decorum and civility should be the cause of the Council at all times. Sincerely, John R. Marler Robert J. Whittaker Jr In my opinion" modern day redlining" language used by Rachael Jonrowe in response to the council's vote not to approve two more low-income apartments for the City of Georgetown is highly inappropriate, divisive, political and she should be censured for having said it. Having viewed the data presented at the vote it is apparent to me that the data clearly showed there is no need for two additional low-income housing apartments in Georgetown. It appears to me that Georgetown has far to many of these low-income apartments already as there isn't a large enough job market here to justify them. The only justification that seems apparent to me is that bringing in low-income apartments is using taxpayers money to deliberately change the voting demographics of Georgetown. It is commonly known that through studies done elsewhere like St. Louis, Chicago, and Detroit, that such housing attracts people who usually vote Democrat and who are dependent upon the welfare system for assistance. Linda Austin Rachael Jonrowe is my Council person but she has not represented me in a long while. Her comments after the vote at the July 14 meeting about “modern redlining” are tantamount to calling the members who voted differently from her, racists. Her comments were uncalled for and reflect poorly in her, Old Town, and our whole town. Public discourse has gotten so uncivil that we can’t watch national or state coverage of it. Now, it seems, she has brought the same kind of baseless, name calling and divisive tantrums to our city council meetings that have corrupted the proceedings elsewhere. I hope it doesn’t spread! Lalena Parkhurst I’m disappointed to see that Council Members Mike Triggs and Kevin Pitts seek to reprimand Rachael Jonrowe for a potental City Council Governance Policy violation. Ms. Jonrowe’s comment of “this is modern redlining” was a valid critique of the decision made by the majority of City Council Members on items P & Q regarding an affordable housing development. I can’t find anything in the Governance Policy saying that Council Members can’t offer a minority critique after the vote. If anyone violated the City Council Governance Policy during the July 14th regular meeting, it was Kevin Pitts who called for Lou Sneed’s removal from the Housing Advisory Board because he dared enter comments in support of the affordable housing development. Mr. Pitts’ vitriolic attack on Mr. Sneed violates the guideline calling City Council Members to “communicate and serve with respect, dignity and courtesy in relations with Staff, all Councilmembers, members of the boards, commissions, committees, and the public;” If Rachael Jonrowe is to be reprimanded for her comments, then to avoid hypocrisy, Council also needs to reprimand Kevin Pitts reprimanded for his comments. Ray Conlan Council Member Jonrowe's "redlining" comments were flagrantly racist, offensive, and inflammatory. No one has a right to make such derogatory and an utterly FALSE accusation. Her comments should not be overlooked and her racist rhetoric is an ugly view into her underlying hate-filled persona. I recommend that City Council take extreme measures and reprimand her to the fullest extent for violating City Council's Governance Policy. Katy Bohls Members of Council, I am writing to address Ms. Jonrowe’s accusation of her fellow City Council members of “redlining”. I have been fortunate enough to call Georgetown my home for over 25 years. After college, my husband and I moved back to Georgetown to put down roots, start businesses, grow our family and contribute to the community. Over the past eight years we have opened, or are in the process of opening, four businesses in Georgetown. We are proud of our city and want to see it thrive. We live in District 6 and Ms. Jonrowe is our representative. As her constituent and a voter, I am disappointed by her comment and its implication. I expect my representative to be a champion of the district and our city. I expect her to conduct herself in a professional manner while working with council, staff and the citizens to ensure Georgetown’s long term success. What I don’t expect from my council person: Unjustly accusing fellow council members of illegal acts, juvenile outbursts when things don’t go her way, and displaying a general inability to tolerate any view or opinion that doesn’t fit her own. This pattern of behavior is not only unacceptable, it has proven Mrs. Jonrow’s ineffectiveness as our representative. We deserve better. Sincerely, Katy Bohls Karen S. Darby To Mayor Ross and City Council: I write to oppose any act of censure directed at Councilor Rachael Jonrowe, apparently for her daring to say the quiet part out loud. She analogized the impact of the negative vote on the proposal for affordable workforce and senior housing to “modern redlining.” It did seem as if some residents were reacting not on the basis of facts, but on the basis of unjustified fear about the “others” who might move into those properties. Add residents’ reactions to the adamant opposition to multi-family housing expressed by Mr. Pitts and Mr. Gonzalez, and Ms. Jonrowe can be forgiven for suspecting that some of their objections were driven by discriminatory animus. The positions of Mr. Pitts and Mr. Gonzalez in opposition to multi-family affordable housing also run counter to the policy goal set forth in Georgetown's 2030 plan, to wit: "Increase rental choices for workforce households through support of LIHTC development and providing incentives in development regulations, agreements and negotiated standards." If our honorable Councilors are concerned with promoting effective governance in Georgetown, then they should perhaps stay attuned to the stated goals and policies that the community and the Council have jointly agreed upon. They should also refrain from calling out a fellow councilor for drawing attention to the disparate, negative impact resulting from their decisions. Please vote against any act of censure against Ms. Jonrowe. Thank you. LaVonne Lynette Frazier I vehemently disagree with ANY narrative of redlining as ridiculously claimed against the Georgetown City Council's legal ruling against supporting additional, disproportionate (per population) low income housing. Carolyn Burson Dunk Dear Council Members, As a nearly lifelong resident of Georgetown (about 50 of my 64 years), I am ashamed, embarrassed, and angry over what I heard at your last meeting in regards to the proposed affordable housing development (Espero Landing and Asperanza Heights). If you, as representatives of the people of Georgetown, are bound to address the established 2030 comprehensive plan, which identifies affordable housing as the number one priority, I do not think you are following an ethical path (with the exceptions of Ms. Jonrowe and Ms. Calixtro). During your discussion I heard many statements that would not lead me to believe that that is your intention. When a council member states he will “never” approve this type of affordable housing project and others state it is time for someone else to “step up” and “Georgetown has done enough”, I am appalled! Some seem to forget that the presence of multi-family housing is not the same as affordable multi-family housing. The supposed “roadblocks” to approval such as traffic, lack of public transportation, no tax benefits, and location, appear to be thinly veiled attempts to use the age old reason of “it’s good somewhere else, but not in my neighborhood.” It is this kind of thinking that has put our country in the state that it is in today. It is our responsibility to address the inequities all around us and affordable housing has already been identified as a major issue. All of my grandparents lived and worked in Georgetown, my parents were born and raised here. My mother worked for GISD for 23 years and was active in in many community organizations. My Dad held multiple terms as a Councilman, like yourselves. And I believe each of them would disagree with your decision to not approve this housing project. I urge you to reconsider. Although you must be fiscally responsible your higher calling is to be morally and ethically responsible. And to try to censure a fellow council member for a comment that was an accurate depiction of the comments and actions taken during the last meeting is beyond offensive. The truth may be uncomfortable or inconvenient but it is still the truth. Thank you for your time, Carolyn Burson Dunk Steven Taylor Mr. Mayor, members of council: On the issue of affordable housing, and in reference to Ms. Janrowe's comments after the vote on July 14, it's obvious that a great majority residents of District 7 were opposed to the affordable housing project. That should spur council to find a solution that is more agreeable to residents. Discussion and debates among council and residents have always been civil, even when viewpoints were diametrically opposed. Open debate is essential. However I do understand the issue with some people over Ms. Jonrowe's comment after the vote was taken on the affordable housing project. My only concern is that this will be taken too far. Sure, I believe she spoke out of turn. Her comment about "modern redlining" could be taken as inappropriate or offensive. One could even say she alluded to the members of the council who voted to disapprove as racists or at least discriminatory, but I'm not going try to guess her motivation. While this is a social issue, it is also an economic issue, that requires debate and careful planning, but if we devolve into name calling, shame on all of us. But let's not take this too far. Ms.Jonrowe spoke out of turn. A lesson for all. Let it go at that. She is a valuable member of council who sometimes asks the hard questions, as you all do. Ms.Jonrowe, as some other council members noted, was correct on one point. There should have been more data on this issue. But let's not let emotions override correct analysis. And the will of the people should always be the decisive influence, even if we're wrong at times. Thank you. P.S. As Dan Crenshaw, Congressional Representative from Houston, famously put it: Try hard not to offend, but try even harder not to be offended. Christopher Joyce Ms. Jonrowe spoke inappropriately by likening the opposition to a proposed housing project as "modern redlining". Georgetown is a wonderfully inclusive and diverse community. She mischaracterized this city for all the world to hear and see. Her comment conflates the voting against the proposal by her fellow city council members with some sort of systemic racism. She inferred racism where no racism exists. It is insulting and potentially damaging to the reputation of Georgetown and she should be censured. Linda Buck Mr. Mayor and Councilmen, I am writing in regards to the inappropriate comment Councilwoman Jonrowe made at the last meeting. It was disappointing to see a leader of the community behave so poorly because she was not getting the outcome she wanted. As if her interjection was not rude enough the comment was far worse. Can she explain how not wanting another low income community is the same as "modern day redlining"? Is she saying that low income people are all minorities? As minorities ourselves, my husband and I found that very offensive. In all of the letters submitted not once did anyone make it about race. As a leader and representative for this community she should have behaved better and truly owes the community and the councilmen committee an apology at the very least. Colleen Sigley I am alarmed that Mr. Triggs and Mr. Pitts want to use the important time of the city council meeting to call out Ms. Rachael Jonrowe for a comment she made on July 14 after a vote was taken regarding two low income housing units proposed for Georgetown. I am assuming that the governance policy in question is a fairly recent one that states, "avoid publicly stating an opinion on an item to be considered by the Council in situations where the Council is serving as an appellate body". If I understand the policy correctly, I see no infraction with Ms. Jonrowe’s comment as it was made after the votes were taken. If there was indeed an infraction to this governance policy it was from the councilman who stated in discussion before the vote that he would never approve any low income housing proposal brought before the council. Regarding this governance policy on opinions, it is a very difficult one to understand or interpret and I would question its purpose. One could look at it as a means of entrapping or silencing council members. With that in mind, there should be no tolerance for council members to use this governance policy to punish, suppress, intimidate or harass other city council members. Why is this item even on the agenda? We need our city council members to get to work on the matters that affect the future of our city, not waste council meeting time airing grievances and bickering. Keri Smith The City Council governance guidelines state that the council should have a "dedication to the promotion of efficient and effective governing" and that the City Council shall "be responsive to the needs of the citizens and the Georgetown Community." It further states that Councilmembers shall "communicate and serve with respect, dignity and courtesy in relations with Staff, all Councilmembers, members of the boards, commissions, committees, and the public" and "be committed to improve the quality of life for the individual and the community." I would like to voice my disappointment with Coucilmember Rachael Jonrowe's divisive, incendiary and uncharitable remarks following the vote on Items P&Q in the City Council meeting on July 14th. Council Members are sworn to represent the interests and needs of the citizens of Georgetown. Ms. Jonrowe's unbridled hostility towards residents and fellow Councilmembers who do not share her policy positions does not serve the interests or the needs of those she was elected to represent. Her ad hominem attacks on the character and motivations of those who do not share her policy positions undermine the spirit of cooperation necessary to reach compromise and unity in the best interests of the community. To impugn the motivations and character of those on the council and in the community who do not share one's opinions is not the way to communicate with respect, dignity or courtesy, and it's in violation of the City Council Governing Principles. I want a City Council that works for me and for the interests and needs of the community, even when votes do not go the way that I or others want them to. I want a Council that engages in good faith, rather than in bad faith, and that recognizes that we need opposing views in order to sharpen our own and to arrive at the best possible compromises and decisions. I would like to see Ms. Jonrowe censured for her conduct, as a matter of principle and in the interest of de-incentivizing such divisive and bad spirited communication going forward. Thank you for your time. Billye Adams My question is related to the proposed censure of my District 6 Council Member Rachael Jonrowe after the 5 to 2 vote to not approve a multi-family housing project at Saddle Creek. Does that vote by the City Council mean that no further workforce, senior or low-income housing projects will be approved going forward? Having listened to the Council discussion that preceded the vote, the primary reasons mentioned for rejecting that project were 1. no property tax is collected from this type housing so it is not financially viable for the city due to the cost of city services and 2. Georgetown has more housing credits than neighboring towns. If these are indeed the primary reasons, then would City Council please, formally state for the record that 1. they have decided that no further low-income housing will be approved until specific financial criteria are met, 2. what these exact financial criteria are, and 3. when they will again be willing to consider using housing credits? After the rejection of the multi-family housing project at Saddle Creek, which appears to negate goals of the 2030 Housing Plan, clearly communicating the current situation to the public will prevent developers and builders from wasting time and energy. I am proud that Council Member Jonrowe speaks for all of her constituents, not just the well- established residents in our District. I give her my full support. Respectfully, Billye Adams Early Johnson Mayor, Council, City Staff: So a couple of bankers are angry at a comment about modern red-lining? The ladies doth protest too much, methinks. The hit dogs holler. So y’all got offended at a sideways comment? So what? Now you pull out some dusty old Governance Policy to do some finger-waving?? “Good work, fellers! Nice job! Let’s whip out the Governance Policy boys and get her!! Ew-weee!!! We’re really gonna give her what-fer!!!” What statesmen you both are! How strong and powerful you must have felt while fumbling for a policy to hide behind and defend your ruffled honor. Why don’t you instead detail all the work you have done to combat red-lining rather than hiding behind a pseudo-righteous procedural fight. Y’all are weak and hiding, and it’s pathetic. Here’s a great idea: Withdraw this ridiculous item and go home for the night. Motion to adjourn! I know you’ll get second on that. Oooh, Wait, one more thing before you make that motion… Council member Jonrowe, please grow a spine, and when you call someone out, do it to their face, so your supporters can get behind something real. I want to support you. You're almost there. Johnny Watford I want to say thank you to Council Members Triggs and Pitts for coming to the defense of the bankers of this nation. Finally someone has the courage to defend bankers from ever having to think about not only the racist history of red-lining in America but also the current biases in lending practices that still favor white folks over minorities. Personally, I thought we didn’t do enough for bankers by bailing out their entire industry back in 2008. Kudos to the two of you, brave, brave men –heroes, really -- for taking the time to step up and speak out against a generally accurate, yet vaguely insulting comment that you sort of heard. If people call you petty for this, shame on them, I say! If people say, “You two fools don’t get it!” you just tell them, “Bankers are people, too,” even if they don’t extend loans to minorities or folks with ethnic surnames. I am sure everyone listening to you this evening will understand completely. Kimberly Denning This council claims to be a governing body that honors the past while innovating for the future. Meanwhile, our city branding claims diversity and inclusivity. But Rachael Jonrowe and Mary Calixtro are the only members of the council who seem to live up to these values and you are now attempting to silence one of those important voices. Our councilmen seem to have forgotten that Georgetown historically has been home to a working-class that brings diversity and life to this city. The people of Georgetown paid for the consulting and data on which the affordable housing plans were based, but the current council is suddenly ready to exclude moderate to low income taxpayers from living there. For example, you claimed to support our school district but don’t seem to care that the teachers and staff members who work in our schools are the people with income levels who would most benefit from rent-controlled housing. Your actions state that property tax dollars are more important than their livelihoods. If you truly cared about attracting talent to our city’s schools, then you would support projects such as this one. Also, in the July 14 meeting, no one other than our Councilwomen attempted to refute the inaccurate and biased claims made by citizens who have been misinformed about the purpose of these housing plans. Instead, you all allowed stereotypes to persist, and this does not align with the values of inclusivity and diversity that this city claims to uphold. Finally, the attempt to silence the voice of your fellow councilwoman through “possible” and vague action underscores your unwillingness to hear the concerns of all citizens of this city. It highlights a lack of understanding regarding the policies and practices that bifurcate communities by class and contribute to de facto divisions regarding race and ethnicity. Concerns about taxes, commercial development, banking interests, all of these things have historically been used as reasons for exclusivity and discrimination in public policy. That is not opinion, it is historical fact. It is not acceptable that many workers are excluded from living in our community as neighbors and friends while contributing to our economy at the same time. That is not what makes a community, and she was not wrong when she referred to it as modern-day redlining. If this truth is so difficult to hear that you must waste council time on agenda item M in your attempt to silence your colleague, then I suggest that the City of Georgetown invest in equity and cultural proficiency training. Until then, please be truthful about this city’s biases and remove the claims about diversity and inclusivity from all city council branding. I end by reminding you all that by asking the hard questions and standing up for Georgetown's working class and people of color, Rachael Jonrowe was the only council member who truly attempted to make good on the investment time and money that the City of Georgetown spent on consultant fees and research for affordability in housing. Brian K Ortego Good Evening Mayor and Councilmembers: I was dismayed to see that an Agenda Item for an alleged City Council Governance Policy violation being brought by two Councilmembers against another Councilmember did not list the specific section and line of the City Council Governance Policy being alleged that Councilmember Jonrowe potentially violated by her alleged comment after the vote. It's reasonable that everyone knows today that even if a formal accusation or charge is found to be without merit or dropped, the public knowledge can be very defamatory and damaging to a persons professional reputation and/or career. This is why such an allegation must contain the background information to allow a fair perception by the public before the accused has a chance to rebut the charge being made. How can this alleged derogatory comment by Councilmember Jonrowe rise to the level of a violation of the policy and Councilmember Pitts statements made at the same time during the consideration and deliberation of Item. P & Q at the same July 14th City Council meeting regarding Housing Advisory Board Chairman Lou Snead's submitted comments not also be discussed as a potential violation of the City Council Governance Policy? Is there a provision in the City Council Governance Policy that allows a member of City Council to publicly admonish and/or ask for the resignation in public session of a Chairman or Member of a City Council Board or Commission for a comment or statement made to City Council or based on a procedure or action taken by the Advisory Board or Commission? I think that we all expect civility and decorum in the public process and that evidence and opinion expressed during deliberations by Councilmembers be honest and not targeted towards the body or an individual, but the current policy as written can easily create an atmosphere of bullying and oppression against a member, which is what I believe we are seeing here. I watch City Council and if this item is the standard, we could easily see a like agenda item at every meeting. There's no need to go below the line. The following comments were made in person via the City Hall viewing room: Lawrence Ramero stated that the discussion at the July 14, 2020 was good and on both sides. He added that Jonrowe’s comments were not needed. Ramero stated that he agrees with Calixtro regarding the need for affordable housing and in 2015 or 2016 he sat through meetings where several apartment complexes were allowed in the City that would provide affordable housing. He stated that the use of the term redlining in a flippant was is offensive. The following comments were made during the meeting using the Zoom client: Ann Seaman stated that she would not address redlining. She stated that she agrees with Fought and that the Council needs to move on. Seaman stated that she has been to many meetings and workshops and when Jonrowe wants to question the process, she sometimes needs resistance. She stated that she has seen Jonrowe attacked many times by the men on the Council. Seaman stated that there should be no action against Jonrowe. Pam Mitchell stated that she is a resident of District 6 and that there have been several descriptions of redlining. She noted that the term now relates to systematic denial of services and Jonrowe’s comment was not directed at anyone. Mitchell stated that she is a little shocked about the reaction and the view of the comment being a personal attack. She stated that it is not an affront to not support something that someone sees as racist. Mitchell thanked Mayor for facilitating the discussion. She stated that this item should be withdrawn and she can thing of other scenarios where other Council members have been more out of line than Jonrowe. Ross Hunter stated that then notice provided didn’t show what section of Code that Jonrowe had violated. He stated that redlining is a systemic issue and Jonrowe’s comment is worthy of a response. Hunter stated that there is nothing that states that the actions were not modern redlining. He stated that racism is not necessarily the issue, but systematic issues. Triggs stated that just because the 2030 Plan says something and just because we need this housing doesn’t mean that Council has to approve a high-risk project. He continued that he was offended by Jonrowe’s comments and the film she presented is something everyone has seen and agrees with. Triggs stated that he doesn’t see how that fits in on discussion of a proposal and he is disappointed that Jonrowe says that she’s not going to change. He added that it is hard to change when Council can’t be congenial, and he wants to get back to work. Pitts stated that the facts are still the same and redlining is still illegal. He added that he will stick with definition that federal reserve bank put out, and the claim was that Council took an illegal action. Pitts stated that the video reiterated Jonrowe’s position and there is more to the comment now. He added that he didn’t think that the proposed project has anything to do with race and Jonrowe made an inappropriate comment. Pitt stated that the policy is written loosely, and this has not been done before, but making a claim that colleagues are breaking the law is wrong. Jonrowe stated that she acknowledges speaking out of turn and if point of order had been raised it would have been appropriate. She continued that speaking out of turn has been done by others and addressing each other in a formal fashion isn’t always done. Jonrowe noted that there are different definitions of redlining and the historic version is what Pitts is using. She continued that she was not thinking of those terms, but instead of those used in media. Jonrowe stated that she was speaking to the potential effect of the Council decision, not to specific members of Council. She stated that there should have been more dialogue on affordable housing, and she wants the public to review when governance policy was discussed. Jonrowe said that on January 22, 2109 Pitts was concerned about having punishments for this policy, and she asked for the then attorney to weigh in on legalities being discussed. She continued that Council finally voted on policy on August 13, 2019 she predicted that the broadness of policy could have a chilling effect on Council dialogue if misused. Jonrowe stated that she doesn’t think this sets good precedent and apologized for speaking out of turn. She stated that there are systemic issues to be addressed and it is not okay when members use the policy to humiliate or intimidate her. Calixtro stated that there is an underlying current here and maybe this type of discussion should be held when Council can be in front of each other. She continued that it is embarrassing to be yelling at each other and she would like the conversation to continue to clear the way. Calixtro noted a possible Executive Session discussion. Fought stated that she appreciated Jonrowe’s tone and supports what she said. He continued that she is speaking with her heart and using her head, and things got away from her in the moment which happens to everyone. Fought asked that Council move on and that the mood has been set right. He stated that he respects Council members stating their feelings and sometimes you have to work things through in public, it’s part of the role. Gonzalez stated that everyone makes mistakes, and no one is perfect. He stated that he can accept an apology and wished it had been done a week ago. Gonzalez noted the mounting rhetoric and that if something is said and you know the intent is different, you should state it sooner. He stated that as a banker redlining is very specific. Gonzalez said that he was offended, but he can accept an apology. He stated that he doesn’t like being accused of an illegal act. Motion by Pitts for Council to reaffirm the Governance Policy and their commitment to follow it, second by Fought. Calixtro and Triggs had no additional comments. Pitts stated that he wants to move forward, and Council has to work together. He continued that building relationships and effective communication are the most important parts of the job and those two things would solve most problems. Jonrowe had no additional comments. Gonzalez stated that compromise and hearing are important, and Council must build positive relationships. He added that without that it is hard to move on. Mayor Ross provided the following final comments: in an environment with extreme partisanship and volatile political climate, Council Members always put citizen first and Council will move on from this and have better relationships. Calixtro – Yes Triggs – Yes Fought – Yes Pitts – Yes Jonrowe – Yes Gonzalez – Yes Approved 6-0 (District 2 vacant). Public Wishing to Address Council On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found on the table at the entrance to the Council Chamber. Clearly print your name and the letter of the item on which you wish to speak and present it to the City Secretary on the dais, prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Council considers that item. Only persons who have delivered the speaker form prior to the meeting being called to order may speak. Speakers will be allowed up to three minutes to speak. On a subject not posted on the agenda: An individual may address the Council at a regular City Council meeting by contacting the City Secretary no later than noon on the Wednesday prior to the Tuesday meeting, with the individual’s name and a brief description of the subject to be addressed. Only those persons who have submitted a timely request will be allowed to speak. The City Secretary can be reached at (512) 931-7715 or cs@georgetown.org. Speakers will be allowed up to three minutes to speak. N. At the time of posting no one had signed up to speak. Executive Session In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon’s Texas Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session. O.Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items - Litigation Update - PEC Franchise Sec. 551.072: Deliberations about Real Property - Sale of Property – CTSUD building Sec. 551.087: Deliberation Regarding Economic Development Negotiations - Project Zeus Adjournment Motion by Fought, second by Calixtro. Calixtro – Yes Triggs – Yes Fought – Yes Pitts – Yes Jonrowe – Yes Gonzalez – Yes Approved 6-0 (District 2 absent). Meeting adjourned at 9:02 p.m. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approved by the Georgetown City Council on _______________________________________________ Date _____________________________ _____________________________ Dale Ross, Mayor Attest: City Secretary Resolution No.: Ordering a General Election on November 3, 2020 for Mayor, Council Members Districts 2 and 6 Date Adopted: August 11, 2020 Page 1 of 7 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 021120-C AND ORDERING A GENERAL ELECTION FOR THE ELECTION OF MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR COUNCIL DISTRICTS 2 AND 6 TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2020, ORDERING A RUN-OFF ELECTION, IF NECESSARY, AND ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR SAID ELECTIONS. WHEREAS, the City Council is composed of a Mayor and seven Council Members per Article II of the City Charter; and WHEREAS, the Mayor is elected at large, and the Council members are elected from single- member districts; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council members serve three-year terms; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council members are composed of the following individuals with terms as delineated as follows: OFFICE DATE THAT TERM EXPIRES MAYOR DALE ROSS MAY 2020 DISTRICT 1 COUNCIL MEMBER CALIXTRO MAY 2021 DISTRICT 2 VACANT MAY 2020 DISTRICT 3 COUNCIL MEMBER TRIGGS MAY 2022 DISTRICT 4 COUNCIL MEMBER FOUGHT MAY 2022 DISTRICT 5 COUNCIL MEMBER PITTS MAY 2021 DISTRICT 6 COUNCIL MEMBER JONROWE MAY 2020 DISTRICT 7 COUNCIL MEMBER GONZALEZ MAY 2022; and Resolution No.: Ordering a General Election on November 3, 2020 for Mayor, Council Members Districts 2 and 6 Date Adopted: August 11, 2020 Page 2 of 7 WHEREAS, in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the Charter of the City of Georgetown, Texas, on February 11, 2020, the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, approved Resolution No. 21120-C, which ordered a General Election to be held on Saturday, May 2, 2020, to elect the following officials for this City: Two (2) Members of the Georgetown City Council and the Mayor: Councilmembers from each of Districts 2, and 6, and the Mayor; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 2020, the Governor of the State of Texas declared a state of disaster for all counties related to the imminent threat of disaster posed by COVID-19; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 418.016 of the Texas Government Code, on March 18, 2020, the Governor issued a proclamation suspending certain provisions of the Texas Election Code and the Texas Water Code to allow all local political subdivisions that are utilizing the May 2, 2020 uniform election date to postpone their elections to the November 3, 2020 uniform election date; and WHEREAS, on March 24, 2020, the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, approved Resolution No. 032420-M, postponing the May 2, 2020, General Election to November 3, 2020, pursuant to the authority granted by Texas Election Code Section 41.0052, as modified by the Governor’s proclamation; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 032420-M, consistent with the guidance of Texas Secretary of State Election Advisory 2020-12, declared that all candidate filings for the May 2, 2020 election remained valid for the election to be held on November 3 and the filing period was not to be re-opened for the November election date; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 17, Article XVI, of the Texas Constitution and Texas Election Code Section 41.0052(d), the Mayor and Councilmembers for Districts 2 and 6 were obligated to holdover beyond the expiration date of their terms, unless otherwise required by other law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 418.016 of the Texas Government Code, on July 27, 2020, the Governor issued a proclamation suspending Texas Election Code Section 85.001(a) to the extent necessary to require that, for any election ordered to occur on November 3, 2020, early voting by personal appearance shall begin on Tuesday, October 13, 2020; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 21120-C, ordering a General Election for May 2, 2020, must be amended to change the date of the election ordered and other provisions; and WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Texas and the Charter of the City of Georgetown, Resolution No.: Ordering a General Election on November 3, 2020 for Mayor, Council Members Districts 2 and 6 Date Adopted: August 11, 2020 Page 3 of 7 Texas further provide that the Election Code of the State of Texas is applicable to said election, and in order to comply with said Code, a Resolution should be passed establishing the procedure to be followed in said election and designating the voting places for said election. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1. VERIFICATION OF FACTS The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this resolution are hereby found and declared to be true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. SECTION 2. CANDIDATES This general election shall be held to elect the Mayor and Council Members for City of Georgetown Single-Member Districts 2 and 6. The boundaries for Single-Member Districts 2 and 6, and the city limits have been updated to include newly annexed lands. Maps showing the updated boundaries are attached hereto as Exhibits “A,” “B,” and “C”. These maps are hereby adopted as the Official Council District Maps and shall determine the qualification of the candidates to serve and shall govern the qualification of the voters to vote in said election. SECTION 3. CANDIDATE APPLICATION DEADLINE AND ORDER OF NAMES ON BALLOT All candidate filings for the May 2, 2020 election will remain valid for the election to be held November 3, 2020 and the filing period will not be re-opened for the November election date. The order in which the names of the candidates are to be printed on the ballot was determined by a drawing held by the City Secretary on Thursday, February 20, 2020, at 4:00 p.m. in the Foyer at City Hall, 808 Martin Luther King Jr. Street, Georgetown, Texas. SECTION 4. POSSIBLE RUN-OFF ELECTION As provided in the City Charter, in the event that no candidate can be declared the winner in any or all of the individual races to be conducted in the General Election, a runoff election shall be held not earlier than 20 days nor later than 45 days after the date of the Final Canvass of the November 3, 2020 Election. If necessary, the period for the Run-Off Election would be scheduled between November 26, 2020 through Friday, January 1, 2021. Resolution No.: Ordering a General Election on November 3, 2020 for Mayor, Council Members Districts 2 and 6 Date Adopted: August 11, 2020 Page 4 of 7 In such a Runoff Election, the candidates who received, in the preceding election, the highest number of votes for each office to which no one was elected, shall be voted on again, and the candidate who receives the majority of the votes cast for each such office in the Runoff Election shall be elected to such office. SECTION 5. OPTICAL SCAN BALLOTS Voting shall be conducted with optical scan ballots prepared in conformity with the Texas Election Code, and there shall be at least one disabled-access voting device, such as a Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) machine at each polling place. SECTION 6. CONDUCT OF ELECTION Pursuant to Subchapter D of Chapter 31 of the Texas Election Code, the City Council is further ordering that this General Election and possible Runoff Election be conducted under the terms and conditions of a Joint Election Agreement and Contract for Election Services (“Joint Election Agreement”) between the City of Georgetown and Williamson County. Chapter 31, Subchapter D of the Texas Election Code provides that a city may contract with the County Elections Officer for election services if the city is located in whole or in part in the county. In addition, this will be a joint election conducted with other entities that will also hold an election on November 3, 2020 pursuant to the Joint Election Agreement. As authorized by Chapter 31, Subchapter D of the Texas Election Code, the Georgetown City Council hereby appoints the Williamson County Elections Administrator, Christopher J. Davis, 301 Inner Loop, Suite 104, Georgetown, Texas 78626, as the election officer for the purpose of conducting the November 3, 2020 General Election. This appointment includes services as Early Voting Clerk for the Election, Counting Station Manager, Presiding Judge of the Central Counting Station, Alternate Judge and Tabulation Supervisor. In addition and in accordance with Chapter 66 and Chapter 31 of the Texas Election Code, the City Council hereby appoints Williamson County Elections Administrator, Christopher J. Davis, as agent for the Custodian of Records (“Agent”) for the November 3, 2020 General Election for the purpose of preserving voted ballots and other election records as required by the Texas Election Code. SECTION 7. EARLY VOTING Early Voting by Personal Appearance shall take place at the locations and times delineated Resolution No.: Ordering a General Election on November 3, 2020 for Mayor, Council Members Districts 2 and 6 Date Adopted: August 11, 2020 Page 5 of 7 by the Williamson County Election Administrator per the Joint Election Agreement beginning Tuesday, October 13, 2020, and ending on the fourth day before Election Day, which is Friday, October 30, 2020. In the event of a Runoff Election, Early Voting by Personal Appearance shall take place at the locations and times delineated by the Williamson County Elections Administrator per the Joint Election Agreement. If the Elections Administrator plans to change any of the polling locations or the dates and times, he shall timely notify the City of Georgetown so that the appropriate Justice Department Submission can be made by the City Attorney and the City Council can be made aware thereof and be given the opportunity to comment thereon. SECTION 8. ELECTION DAY VOTING Election Day Voting shall take place from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the locations delineated by the Williamson County Election Administrator per the Joint Election Agreement. If the Elections Administrator plans to change any of the polling locations or the times, he/she shall timely notify the City of Georgetown so that the appropriate Justice Department Submission can be made by the City Attorney and the City Council can be made aware thereof and be given the opportunity to comment thereon. In the event of a Runoff Election, the Georgetown Election Day voting locations will be as delineated by the Williamson County Elections Administrator per the Joint Election Agreement. If the Elections Administrator plans to change any of the polling locations or times, he/she shall timely notify the City of Georgetown so that the appropriate Justice Department Submission can be made by the City Attorney and the City Council can be made aware thereof and be given the opportunity to comment thereon. SECTION 9. ELECTION INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED IN SPANISH The Mayor and all other election officers appointed by the City Council as being responsible for the preparation of notices, instructions, orders, ballots, and other written material pertaining to the General Election shall cause each such document to be translated into and furnished to voters in both the English language and the Spanish language in order to aid and assist voters speaking Spanish as a primary or an alternative language to properly participate in the election process. In addition, the Mayor and other responsible election officers are hereby authorized and directed to make available to the voters having the need of an individual capable of acting as a translator and speaking both English and Spanish languages who will assist Spanish speaking voters in understanding and participating in the election process. Resolution No.: Ordering a General Election on November 3, 2020 for Mayor, Council Members Districts 2 and 6 Date Adopted: August 11, 2020 Page 6 of 7 SECTION 10. CANVASSING OF RETURNS; DECLARING RESULTS The Williamson County Elections Administrator, as Georgetown’s designated election officer, shall provide the written return of the Election results to the City of Georgetown in accordance with the Texas Election Code. The City Council shall canvass the returns on a date and time set by the Mayor between the dates of November 6, 2020 and November 17, 2020 and declare the results of the General Election in accordance with Texas Election Code Section 67.003(b) and (c), which provides that for elections held on the uniform election date in November, the following provisions apply: For an election held on the uniform election date in November, the local canvass must occur not later than the 13th day after the date of the election and not earlier than: (1) the third day after election day; (2) the date on which the early voting ballot board has verified and counted all provisional ballots, if a provisional ballot has been cast in the election; or (3) the date on which all timely received ballots cast from addresses outside of the United States are counted, if a ballot to be voted by mail in the election was provided to a person outside of the United States. SECTION 11. NOTICE OF ELECTION Notice of the General Election shall be published at least one time in the English and Spanish languages, in a newspaper published within Georgetown’s territory at least 10 days and no more than 30 days before the General Election and as otherwise may be required by the Texas Election Code. Notice of the General Election shall also be posted on the bulletin board used by the City Council to post notices of its City Council meetings no later than the 21st day before the General Election. SECTION 12. AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE The Mayor of the City of Georgetown is authorized to execute and the City Secretary is authorized to attest to the Order on behalf of the City Council; and the Mayor is further authorized to do all other things legal and necessary in connection with the holding and consummation of the General Election which includes the giving of and the publication of the Notice of Election to be in a form as to be approved by the City Attorney. SECTION 13. PREAMBLE TRUE AND CORRECT Resolution No.: Ordering a General Election on November 3, 2020 for Mayor, Council Members Districts 2 and 6 Date Adopted: August 11, 2020 Page 7 of 7 The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this resolution are hereby found to be true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein and made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. SECTION 14. EFFECTIVE DATE This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this 11 day of August, 2020 by the City Council of the City of Georgetown. ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: Robyn Densmore, City Secretary By: Dale Ross, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Skye Masson, City Attorney Resolution No.: Ordering a General Election on November 3, 2020 for Mayor, Council Members Districts 2 and 6 Date Adopted: August 11, 2020 Page 8 of 7 Exhibit List: Exhibit A Boundaries of all Council Districts and City Limits Exhibit B Boundaries of Council District 2 Exhibit C Boundaries of Council District 6 !( !( !( ") £¤ ") ") ") ") !( !( ") ") §¨¦ ") !( §¨¦ §¨¦ ") ") ") §¨¦ ") ") ") ") ") ") !( !(") !( Council District 2 City of Georgetown n N Chandler Branch Lake Georgetown 22 77 66 11 33 55 E 15TH ST W 17TH ST N D G DR L E 11TH ST NE V S O 15 O I R I E A ST T W 24TH ST SIER D O LOWE E R R A E 16TH ST ST E 9TH ST W 18TH ST 18 ST D !!I This map is a representation of the information currently held by the City of Georgetown Utility Systems. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the product, G.U.S. makes no warranties regarding the veracity or precision of the information depicted or the data from which it was produced and assumes no liability for damages due to errors or omissions. This map is not suitable for survey purposes. January 2020 0 10.5 Miles Map maintained by: City of Georgetown, Texas Technical Services 300 Industrial Avenue Georgetown, Texas 78626 maps@georgetown.org Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/Feet Legend Parcels City Limits River/Stream Water Body District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 District 7 Council District 6 City of Georgetown b 77 66 22 11 55 33 W 17TH ST U T LEGACY XING E 11TH ST ST U E B C LN D H ST S PR K E L P C D ST O EADO C NZIE DR G BLU K W 18TH ST E 9TH ST CHURCHILL FAR H ST E 17TH ST E 16TH ST 18TH !!I This map is a representation of the information currently held by the City of Georgetown Utility Systems. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the product, G.U.S. makes no warranties regarding the veracity or precision of the information depicted or the data from which it was produced and assumes no liability for damages due to errors or omissions. This map is not suitable for survey purposes. January 2020 0 10.5 Miles Map maintained by: City of Georgetown, Texas Technical Services 300 Industrial Avenue Georgetown, Texas 78626 maps@georgetown.org Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/Feet Legend Parcels City Limits River/Stream Water Body District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 District 7 1 Agreement Between The Georgetown Independent School District And The City of Georgetown, Texas For The School Resource Program THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this ___ day of _________, 2020, by and between THE GEORGETOWN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, (hereinafter referred to as the sets forth the specific terms and conditions by which the School Resource Officer Program ) will be administered for the 22002200--22002211 school year. SERVICE Pursuant to Chapter 791, Texas Government Code, the Texas Interlocal Cooperation Act performance of governmental functions, including police protection, and as permitted in 37.081 of the Texas Education Code. ASSUMPTIONS A. The School and the City share a mutual goal of ensuring a learning environment in Georgetown that is free from the fear of crime, violence and victimization by providing law enforcement and related services to the public schools of Georgetown, Texas; and B. The School and the City recognize the potential outstanding public safety benefits that both the School Resource Officer program will provide to the students, teachers, and staff of the public school system and all the citizens of Georgetown Texas; and C. The School and the City desire to build and maintain a positive relationship between Police Officers and the youth of our community; and D. The best interests of the School, the City, and the entire community will be served by establishing these programs, 2 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the School and the City hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE I The School Resource Officer Program is hereby established in the public school system of Georgetown, Texas for the 2020-2021 school year beginning August 20, 2020 and ending May 28, 2021. ARTICLE II The Police Department shall provide the following, which are deemed necessary to the success of the Program and the performance to the duties of the officer: A. Number and Assignment of Officers 1. The Police Department shall assign one (1) regularly employed SRO to the Georgetown High School campus. 2. The Police Department shall assign one (1) regularly employed SRO to the East View High School campus. 3. The Police Department shall assign one (1) regularly employed SRO to the Tippit Middle School campus. 4. The Police Department shall assign one (1) regularly employed SRO to the Forbes Middle School campus. 5. The Police Department shall assign one (1) regularly employed SRO to the Benold Middle School campus. 6. The Police Department shall assign one (1) regularly employed SRO to the Wagner Middle School. 7. The Police Department shall assign one (1) regularly employed SRO who will serve as the Sergeant over the SRO Unit. 8. The SROs will be stationed at their respective campuses, however, will serve as needed in other areas and/or other campuses as mutually agreed upon between the Chief of Police and the Superintendent of Schools. 9. All SROs shall be full time Georgetown Police Department employees that are certified Peace Officers for the State of Texas and meet all requirements as set forth by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officers Standards and Education, the City of Georgetown, and the Georgetown Police Department. 3 B. Supervision 1. The day to day operation and administrative control of the officer will be the responsibility of the Georgetown Police Department. Responsibility with the Georgetown Police Department. The Georgetown Police Department shall provide supervisory personnel to oversee the SRO program. The Police Department shall assign a SRO Sergeant as the supervisor to oversee the officers listed above. The Sergeant may be stationed at any campus mutually agreed upon by the Chief of Police and the Superintendent of Schools. C. Equipment 1. Georgetown Police Department uniforms. 2. Standard duty gear. 3. 800 MHz radio. 4. Vehicle and all cost associated with the operation and maintenance of the vehicle. 5. All City software applications. D. Training 1. All training required by TCLEOSE for officers of the State of Texas. 2. The City shall be responsible for funding all training, and all cost related to said training, in areas deemed necessary by the City. ARTICLE III The School shall provide the following, which are deemed necessary to the success of the Program and the performance to the duties of the officer: A. Facilities & Equipment 1. Access to an air-conditioned and properly lighted private office that shall contain a telephone that may be used for general business purposes. 2. A desk with drawers, a chair, worktable, filing cabinet, and office supplies. 4 3. A computer with a minimum of 900 MHz Processor capable of accessing the City network. 4. A location for files and records which can be properly locked and secured. 5. Secretarial assistance on an as needed basis. 6. Office supplies. B. Training 1. The School shall be responsible for funding all costs for the attendance to the National School Resource Officers Training Conference. 2. The School shall be responsible for funding all training, and all cost related to said training, in areas deemed necessary by the School. C. Personnel 1. School personnel that witness a criminal act or matter requiring attention or action by the SRO shall serve as a witness to said act. Witnessing includes, but is not limited to, a verbal account of actions involved, preparing a signed written report detailing all the circumstances of the act, and testifying in any court in which a criminal complaint has been filed in prosecution of said act. 2. Opportunity for the officer to address teachers and school administrators regarding criminal justice or safety matters relating to students, teachers, or staff during in-service workdays. 3. Provide and Encourage classroom participation by the officer. 4. Communicate to the Program Supervisor any expectations or requested changes to the Program in future years. ARTICLE IV The following shall establish regular duty hours, compensation for overtime, reassignments, and leave time for the SRO. A. Duty Hours of School Resource Officers 1. The SRO shall be assigned to the High School/Middle School on a full time basis. The workweek of the SRO shall consist of no more than 40 5 hours in accordance with Section 142.0015 of the Texas Local Government Code. 2. The campus Principal and the SRO Supervisor shall agree upon the Assigned SROs must agree to hours in excess of 40 during a calendar week. Work in excess of 40 hours in a calendar week shall be compensated in accordance with Article IV, Section B. During their daily tour of duty, the SRO may be off campus to perform tasks as required by their assignment. Any time the SRO will be off campus, the SRO will 3. Time spent by the SRO attending mandatory training or court arising out of their employment as a Police Officer shall be considered as hours worked under this agreement. 4. The regular workday hours of the SRO may be adjusted by the School on a temporary basis for specific situations. These adjustments will require 5. The City may temporarily reassign the SRO for situations deemed to be a Public Safety emergency. 6. Leave time should routinely be taken at times when the school is not in s they are assigned must approve all requests for leave time during the B. Overtime Hours for School Resource Officer 1. If the School requests the officer to work in excess of 40 hours within a work week, the School will reimburse the City for the additional hours at the officer s overtime rate as billed by the City. 2. If the City requests the officer to work in excess of 40 hours within a work week, the City will be responsible for paying for the additional hours in accordance with established overtime procedures. 3. Officers who enter into a contractual agreement with the School for School related duties such as coaching duties, intramural after school programs or teaching shall be paid by the School in accordance with the accordance with Police Department policy. 6 4. SROs shall have first priority to work overtime hours authorized by school administration, at their respective campus, for security, sporting events and other special programs or projects. All overtime worked shall be in accordance with departmental policy. C. Overtime for Backfill Coverage 1. During SRO absences such as mandatory training, authorized vacation, or short term illness the affected campus will be without an SRO. Options for coverage under these circumstances will include, but are not limited to the following: a. b. assign remaining SROs to share time across campuses; or c. officer to be paid by GISD. 2. During SRO absences not identified in Article IV. C. 1., the Chief of Police and the Superintendent of Schools or designee, will collaborate to reach a mutually beneficial decision to ensure adequate campus coverage based upon the anticipated duration of the SRO absence. Options for coverage under these circumstances will include, but are not limited to the following: a. p for the affected campus; b. assign remaining SROs to share time across campuses; c. officer to be paid by GISD; d. backfill vacancy via internal assignment of an officer to be paid by the City; or e. reassignment of a new SRO to the position. ARTICLE V Duties of the officers and Supervisor involved in the program shall include, but not be limited to, the following: A. Duties of Officers Assigned to the School The following shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, and will in no way relieve the City of its obligation to provide, routine patrol services on the same basis as are provided to other School campuses or other properties within the City. 1. Duties and responsibilities of the SRO: a. Protection of the lives and property of the students, teachers, staff members and visitors of the GISD school campuses as directed. 7 b. Enforcement of Federal, State and Local criminal laws and ordinances. c. Investigations of criminal activity and accidents occurring at assigned campuses. d. Provide traffic control during the arrival and departure of students on an as needed basis, based upon a law enforcement determination of need. e. Provide assistance to other law enforcement officers with outside investigations concerning GISD students or in matters regarding their school assignment. f. The SRO shall not act as a school disciplinarian. However, if the principal believes an incident is a violation of the law, the principal may contact the SRO and the SRO shall then determine whether law enforcement action is appropriate. g. Make the principal of the school aware of any law enforcement action taken, as soon as practicable. h. ake appropriate law enforcement action against intruders and unwanted guests who may appear at the school and related school functions, to the extent that the SRO may do so under the authority of law. i. Advise the principal before requesting additional police assistance on campus, when practicable. j. Coordinate their activities with the principal and staff members concerned. k. Seek permission, advice, and guidance prior to enacting any program within the school. l. Encourage individual and small group discussions with students, to further establish rapport with the students. m. Make themselves available for conference with students, parents and faculty members in order to assist them with problems of law enforcement or crime prevention nature. n. Become familiar with all community agencies offering assistance to youths and their families, such as mental health clinics, drug 8 treatment centers, etc. The SRO shall make referrals to such agencies when necessary thereby acting as a resource person to the students, faculty, and staff of the school. o. Coordinate all security efforts at their assigned campuses including the coordination of a safety audit of the campus and develop a long-range plan for campus safety. The plan will incorporate input from school staff, students and parents. p. Assist the principal in identifying situations or school protocol, on campus or during school sponsored events, which have a potential for becoming dangerous situations and develop action plans, through long term problem solving, in an attempt to prevent or minimize their impact. q. Maintain detailed and accurate records of the operation of the School Resource Officer Program. r. School Resource Officers are not to be used for routine administrative duties such as lunchroom duty, hall monitor, bus duty, or other monitoring duties. If there is a problem in one of these areas, the SRO may assist the school until the problem is solved. 2. Instructional responsibility of the SRO at the secondary schools: f. All instruction by the SRO shall be as a guest speaker. The principal or a member of the faculty may request the SRO to provide instruction. The SRO shall not be asked to teach on a full-time basis. g. Make a variety of specialized, short-term law related presentations available to the high school faculty and students. h. Develop an expertise in various subjects that can be presented to the students. Such subjects should include a basic understanding of the laws, the role of the police officer and the police mission, and other topics that relate to student or school safety. 3. Duties and Responsibilities of Supervisor a. Program development and administration. b. Approving reports, overseeing problem solving efforts, providing leadership, training, direction, evaluations, 9 c. Establishing rapport with the school Principals and GISD staff. d. Performing scheduled and non-scheduled visits to the school campuses. e. Liaison with School Principals. ARTICLE VI Financing of the SRO Program The School and the City each agree to pay 50% of the total annual cost associated with the SRO program, which will include salary, benefits, and all other related cost not specifically addressed elsewhere in this agreement. The City will prepare an itemized summary of the total program cost for the school year immediately approaching and submit it to the School each year prior to the passage of the The City will prepare and submit an invoice to the School, payable to the City, during the term of the school year. ARTICLE VII Dismissal of S.R.O; Replacement A. In the event the Principal of the school to which either officer is assigned feels that the Officer is not effectively performing their duties, the Principal shall situation. B. If the working relationship between the Principal and the officer does not improve, mediation between the two parties may be held to attempt to resolve any problems that still exist. C. If within a reasonable amount of time after such mediation the problems cannot be resolved, the Principal may recommend to the Supervisor that the officer be removed from the program at his/her school and shall state the reasons therefore in writing. D. The Chief of Police and the Superintendent of Schools shall jointly determine the status of the Officer and a replacement shall be made if the Officer is removed from the school. 10 E. The Chief of Police may dismiss or reassign an Officer based upon Department Rules, Regulations and/or General Orders or when it is in the best interest of the School or the City. F. In the event of the resignation, termination, dismissal or reassignment of an Officer, the City shall provide a replacement for the Officer within thirty (30) school days of receiving notice of such. G. In the event of a long-term absence by an Officer, the City shall provide a temporary replacement for the Officer within thirty (30) school days of receiving notice of such until such time as the Officer may reassume their duties. H. Transfers will not be permitted during the school year, except under special circumstances such as vacancies or promotions or when it is deemed in the best interest of the program and subject to the joint approval of the Chief of Police and the Superintendent of the Schools should submit a request in writing prior to the beginning of the school year. ARTICLE VIII Termination of Agreement This agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice that either party has failed to substantially perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and an attempt to mediate the issue has proven unsuccessful. Either party, upon ninety (90) days written notice, may terminate this Agreement without cause. Termination of this Agreement may only be accomplished as provided herein. In the event this Agreement is terminated, compensation will be made to the City for all services performed to the date of termination. ARTICLE IX Notices Any and all notices or any other communication herein required or permitted shall be in writing, and may be effected by personal delivery, or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, at the address of the respective parties indicated below: Superintendent Fred Brent, Ed.D. Georgetown Independent School District 507 E. University Ave. Georgetown, TX 78626 11 Chief Wayne Nero Georgetown Police Department 3500 D B Wood Rd. Georgetown, Texas 78628 ARTICLE XI Good Faith The School, the City, their agents and employees agree to cooperate in good faith in fulfilling the terms of this Agreement. Unforeseen difficulties or questions will be resolved by negotiation. Each party hereto acknowledges and represents that their respective governing body has duly authorized this Agreement. ARTICLE XII Entire Agreement This document constitutes the full understanding of the parties, and supersedes all prior understandings and agreements between the parties. No terms, conditions, understandings or agreement purporting to modify or vary the terms of this document shall be binding unless hereafter made in writing and signed by the parties to be charged. ARTICLE XIII Non-Assignment This Agreement, and each and every covenant herein, shall not be capable of assignment, unless the express written consent of the School and the City is obtained. ARTICLE XIV Invalid Provisions Any clause, sentence, paragraph or article of this Agreement which is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect shall not be deemed to impair, invalidate, or nullify the remainder of this Agreement. ARTICLE XV Applicable Laws This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws and constitutions of the United States and the State of Texas. All obligations hereunder are performable in 12 Williamson County, Texas, and venue for any action arising hereunder shall be in Williamson County, Texas. ARTICLE XVI Renewal of Agreement party before the date of termination, this Agreement will automatically be renewed for an additional one (1) year term beginning on August 1 and terminating on May 31 of the ensuing year. ARTICLE XIV Merger This Agreement constitutes a final written expression of all the terms of this Agreement and is a complete and exclusive statement of those terms. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be signed by their duly authorized officers. Signed, this the ____day of ____________, 2020, for the 2020-2021 school year. THE GEORGETOWN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent School Board President THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN Chief of Police Mayor 13 ATTACHMENT - A The following is a breakdown of the actual annual cost, per officer, related to funding the program for the 2020-2021 school year. ACTUAL GISD 50% Personnel Salary/Benefits/Insurance - SRO SGT $120,852.82 $ 60,426.41 Personnel Salary/Benefits/Insurance - SRO 2 $ 96,510.43 $ 48,255.22 Personnel Salary/Benefits/Insurance - SRO 3 $ 96,689.50 $ 48,344.75 Personnel Salary/Benefits/Insurance - SRO 4 $ 101,902.24 $ 50,951.12 Personnel Salary/Benefits/Insurance - SRO 5 $ 86,625.45 $ 43,312.73 Personnel Salary/Benefits/Insurance - SRO 6 $ 85,398.01 $ 42,699.01 Personnel Salary/Benefits/Insurance - SRO 7 $ 101,951.98 $ 50,975.99 Total actual annual cost for 6 officers and 1 Sgt: $689,930.43 $344,965.22 * This one-time cost is for the initial 2020-2021 school year only. WCCHD Mosquito Control ILA Page 1 of 5 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR MOSQUITO CONTROL SERVICES THE STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § This INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FORMOSQUITO CONTROL SERVICES (this “Agreement”) is entered into by and between the CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, a home rule municipality located in Williamson County, Texas (the “City”), and WILLIAMSON COUNTY AND CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT (“WCCHD”), in order to set forth the terms and conditions under which the WCCHD will provide mosquito control services within the City. RECITALS: WHEREAS, on July 3, 2020, the WCCHD has entered into a Contract for Mosquito Adulticide Application Services (the “Contract”) with Vector Disease Control International, LLC (“VDCI”) to provide for the application of mosquito control insecticides, and a copy of the Contract is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”; and WHEREAS, the City and the WCCHD are empowered, pursuant to Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code (the “Interlocal Cooperation Act”), to contract with each other for the performance of governmental functions, including the purchase services, and desire to enter into this Agreement to set forth the terms and conditions on which the WCCHD will provide mosquito control services within the City; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, as well as other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the WCCHD and the City agree as follows: Section 1. Application of Mosquito Control Insecticide Services. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the WCCHD will provide the following services (“Services”): a) Maintain the terms of the Contract with VDCI; and b) Coordinate with City staff to provide resources, technical support and information to determine the need for mosquito adulticide applications services in Georgetown; and c) Coordinate the services of VDCI for application of mosquito control insecticides in the City based on map locations provided by the City; and d) Ensure VDCI is reimbursed for services performed in the City from the City’s payments; and e) Provide the City of Georgetown with all records needed for documentation of the services WCCHD Mosquito Control ILA Page 2 of 5 Section 2. In order to facilitate the provision of the Services, the City will: a) Determine and authorize the need for mosquito adulticide application services. b) Provide the exact map location fo the application services to be given to VDCI. c) Set up a purchase order prior to services being requested. d) Compensate WCCHD for the Services as provided in Section 3. Section 3. Compensation. The City agree to pay the WCCHD a service fee for the Services in accordance with the Pricing and Payment Schedule in the Contract (the “Service Fee”) in a total amount not to exceed $15,000 for all Services. The City, in paying for the Services, will make such payments out of current revenues available, as required by the Interlocal Cooperation Act. The WCCHD will invoice the City for all Services performed under the Agreement on a monthly basis, within 30 days after the end of each calendar month, and the City will cause payment to be remitted within 30 days of receipt of invoice. Section 4. Performance of Services. All Services provided to the City under this Agreement will be provided by employees employed by the WCCHD or employees of VDCI, who will remain under the control and supervision of their respective employers at all times. Section 5. Liability. All individuals providing Services under this Agreement will be acting in the course and scope of their employment by their respective employer at all times while providing the Services contemplated under this Agreement. Section 6. Notice. Any notice given hereunder will be in writing, and may be effected by personal delivery, or by certified mail, return receipt requested, at the address of the respective parties indicated below: WCCHD: Williamson County and Cities Health District Attn: Justine L. Price 355 Texas Avenue Round Rock, Texas 78664 City: City of Georgetown Attn: City Manager P.O. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78627 With a copy to: City of Georgetown City Attorney P.O. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78627 Each party’s address for notice may be changed by such party by delivering written notice of the change, in accordance with the requirements of this Section, to the other party. WCCHD Mosquito Control ILA Page 3 of 5 Section 7. Term. Any party may terminate this Agreement with 30 days’ notice to the other parties. Section 8. General Provisions. (a) Interlocal Cooperation. The WCCHD and the City agree to cooperate with each other, in good faith, at all times during the term of this Agreement to effectuate the purposes and intent of this Agreement. Each party acknowledges and represents that this Agreement has been duly authorized by its respective governing body. (b) Entire Agreement; Amendments; Conflict with Consent Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties respecting the subject matter and supersedes all prior understandings and agreements between the parties regarding such matters. This Agreement may not be modified or amended except by written agreement, duly executed by the parties. (c) Interpretation. The parties acknowledge and confirm that this Agreement has been entered pursuant to the authority granted by the Interlocal Cooperation Act. All terms and provisions hereof are to be construed and interpreted consistently with such Act. (d) Invalid Provisions. Any clause, sentence, paragraph, or article of this Agreement which is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect will not be deemed to impair, invalidate, or nullify the remainder of this Agreement. (e) Applicable Laws. This Agreement will be construed in accordance with the laws and constitution of the State of Texas. All obligations hereunder are performable in Williamson County, Texas, and venue for any action arising hereunder will be in Williamson County, Texas. (f) Counterparts. To facilitate execution, (i) this Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts; (ii) the signature pages taken from separate individually executed counterparts of this instrument may be combined to form multiple fully executed counterparts; and (iii) a signature delivered by facsimile or in another electronic format (e.g., .PDF via email) will be deemed to be an original signature for all purposes. All executed counterparts of this instrument will be deemed to be originals, and all such counterparts, when taken together, will constitute one and the same agreement. (g) Exhibits. The following exhibits are attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein by reference: Exhibit “A”Contract for Mosquito Adulticide Application Services Executed on the date or dates indicated below, to be effective on the date of final signature. WCCHD Mosquito Control ILA Page 4 of 5 _________________________________ Dale Ross, Mayor Date:_____________________________ ATTEST: _________________________________ Robyn Densmore, City Secretary Approved as to Form: _________________________________ Skye Masson, City Attorney WCCHD Mosquito Control ILA Page 5 of 5 WILLIAMSON COUNTY AND CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT Printed Name: Title: Date: ATTEST: Printed Name: Title: Page 1 of 9 CONTRACT FOR MOSQUITO ADULTICIDE APPLICATION SERVICES This agreement, dated July 3, 2020 to provide aerial and ground-based application services is entered into between Vector Disease Control International, LLC (VDCI) with offices at 1320 Brookwood Dr., Ste. H, Little Rock, AR 72202 and Williamson County and Cities Health District (WCCHD), Texas (Customer). Scope of Services: Ultra-Low Volume (ULV) Truck Application(s) VDCI hereby agrees to provide Ground Application Services for the application of mosquito control insecticides. VDCI shall provide all labor, equipment, supplies, insurance and any other requirements to complete the terms, conditions and specifications herein. VDCI shall furnish Vehicles equipped for ultra-low volume (ULV) dispersal of insecticides used for the control of adult mosquitoes. Minimum Specifications: A. General Contract Scope: VDCI shall furnish Trucks and equipment to be used for ULV application of insecticides to control adult mosquitoes within the geographical confines to be determined by Customer. VDCI will provide all equipment, personnel (including driver), equipment, fuel, oil, maintenance, licenses and all other items required to successfully complete the application(s). VDCI will respond within 48 hours or less. B. Adulticide Specifications: Product for adulticide use is to be determined by VDCI with approval from the Customer. VDCI will apply the insecticide at a rate which is dependant on the product to be used. No applications will be at rates above and/or below those specified on the label. C. Equipment: VDCI shall make available as many trucks as necessary to complete the mission as directed by the customer. VDCI is capable of spraying up to 200 miles per night with a minimum of 20 miles per Ground ULV Treatment. Trucks and equipment used within the contract shall: 1. Be equipped with GPS tracking units capable of delineating the spray routes of each vehicle. Page 2 of 9 2. Have GPS information available that records the date, time, latitude, longitude, roads sprayed, chemical flow rate and sprayer status (on or off) for each vehicle. 3. Produce maps, graphically illustrating the application data as well as chemical used, linear miles of the application and acres sprayed. D. Application: The Customer will supply VDCI with the geographical areas to be sprayed, date, time, alternate time, and the estimated number of miles to be treated. A representative to be named by the Customer will be available to coordinate the spray mission to ensure procedures are followed that will result in a successful best effort mission. Some of the items to be dealt with may include: 1. Public notification 2. Pre and post Landing Rate Counts (LRC) 3. Pre and post surveillance traps 4. Meteorological conditions (favorable or unfavorable) 5. Application protocols such as no spray zones etc. authority to approve, delay or terminate the spray mission(s). Scope of Services: Aerial Application(s) VDCI hereby agrees to provide Aerial Application Services for the application of mosquito control insecticides. VDCI shall provide all labor, equipment, supplies, insurance and any other requirements to complete the terms, conditions and specifications herein, including the NPDES permit pertaining to Mosquito Control. VDCI shall furnish aircraft equipped for ultra-low volume (ULV) dispersal of insecticides used for the control of adult mosquitoes. Minimum Specifications: 1.1 General Contract Scope: VDCI shall furnish multi-engine fixed wing aircraft to be used for ULV application of insecticides to control adult mosquitoes within the geographical confines to be determined by Customer. VDCI will provide all aircraft, personnel (including pilots), equipment, fuel, oil, maintenance, landing and tie down fees and all other items required to successfully complete the application(s). VDCI will respond within 72 hours or less. Page 3 of 9 1.2 Adulticide Specifications: Product for adulticide use is to be determined by Customer. VDCI will apply the insecticide at a rate which is dependent on the product to be used (e.g. 0.50-0.75 fluid ounce per acre for Dibrom and mid label rate for a Permethrin based insecticide). No applications will be at rates above and/or below those specified on the label. 1.3 : VDCI agrees to deliver the pesticide and provide sufficient personnel with the capabilities which meet or exceed safety requirements for transferring product(s) to the aircraft in compliance with Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), State and local agencies as well as the ability to proactively contain any challenges associated with product spills. craft shall be calibrated to deliver the correct amount of insecticide and droplet size must comply with the insecticide label based on the operation parameters (i.e. swath width, airspeed, etc.). VDCI shall provide a copy of each aerial spray mission report, showing spray altitude, release height wind speed, release height temperature, aircraft speed (ground speed), date and time of application, amount of insecticide applied, all be submitted within forty-eight (48) hours after each application. 1.4 Aircraft: VDCI shall make available multi-engine fixed wing aircraft each capable of treating a minimum of thirty thousand (30,000 to 40,000) acres in one evening. Aircraft used within the contract shall: A. Be certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and comply with all requirements of FAR Part 137, Agricultural Operation. An approved FAA congested area plan is required prior to commencement of operations by VDCI. B. manufactured by ADAPC meteorology accurate within less than one (1) knot; a two (2) degree vector and less than one (1) degree in temperature to be used for optimization in real- time and detection of a temperature inversion. Page 4 of 9 C. Be equipped with a ULV rotary atomizer spray system with nozzles that have been certified by a Malvern Laser Wind-Tunnel analysis or industry approved on impengers. D. Be capable of applying approved larvicides and adulticides within label rates, at various operating protocols (i.e. swath width, ground wind speeds, etc.). E. Be capable of GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) guidance with gridline capabilities. The system must have an accuracy of zero (0) to fifty (50) feet and be used on all aerial spray missions. 1.5 Application: The Customer will supply VDCI with the geographical areas to be sprayed, date, time, alternate time, and the number of acres to be treated via the GIS software supplied by VDCI. During the mission VDCI will have the ability to perform the following: 1. Receive in real-time via an AIMMS-20 weather monitoring system, meteorological conditions at release height into the aircraft, specifically: a. Temperature b. Wind speed c. Wind direction d. Humidity 2. Based upon the cumulative effect of many variables such as droplet spectra, aircraft vortices, meteorology from multiple altitudes, evaporation, nozzle location, aircraft characteristics, product characteristics, source geometry (aircraft speed, release height) and application rates, VDCI will have onboard the aircraft the equipment necessary to optimize the application strategies, which result in increased droplet densities, product volume and most efficient droplet sizes into the intended treatment area, while minimizing off-target drift. In addition, the onboard GPS system will be capable of alerting the pilots of real-time meteorological changes and temperature inversions. 3. Through the use of software, VDCI will have the ability to produce a digital GIS map capable graphically display the flight path, spray switch status, air speed, date, time, positional GPS coordinates, meteorological variables and spray cloud drift prediction data for each application. Page 5 of 9 1.6 Pilot Qualifications: Pilots shall have the following qualifications: 1. Minimum of fifteen hundred (1500) logged and verifiable flight hours. 2. Minimum of five hundred (500) logged and verifiable hours in aerial application of insecticide to control mosquitoes. 3. Possess and maintain current certification in public health and aerial categories of pest control. 4. In addition to the with multi-engine rating, first or second class medical certificate, FCC required by the FAA, State and local agencies. 2.0 Standard Conditions of Agreement VDCI shall procure and maintain insurance in amounts acceptable to WCCHD, for bodily injury including personal injury, sickness or disease or death of any and all employees or of any person other than such employees from claims or damages because of injury to or destruction of property including loss of use resulting therefrom, and from damages or claims as a result of acts or errors or omissions VDCI made during the performance of this contract. All liability insurance required under this paragraph, shall include WCCHD, agents and employees as additional named insured and be with a company or companies satisfactory to WCCHD. A coverage shall include in its provisions a waiver of any rights of subrogation against the WCCHD. 2.1 Insurance Requirements: VDCI shall procure and maintain, at its own expense, for the duration of the contract, insurance against claims for injuries to person or damages to property which may arise from, or in connection with, the performance of the work hereunder by VDCI, his agents, representatives, or employees. A. Minimum Limits of Insurance 1. Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 2. as per Texas statutory requirements. 3. Commercial General Liability: $5,000,000 each occurrence, $5,000,000 general aggregate 4. or bodily injury or disease. 5. Aviation Liability Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence. Any Page 6 of 9 Chemical Coverage sub-limits shall be at least $300,000/$300,000/$300,000 for bodily injury per person, bodily injury per accident & property damage. B. Before commencement of any work, the Contractor shall submit written evidence that he and all his subcontractors (if the Contractor employs subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement) have obtained the minimum insurance required by this Agreement. Such written evidence shall be in the form of a Certificate of Insurance executed by the Con force for the specified period or by furnishing a copy of the actual policy or policies. Each policy or certificate will bear and endorsement or statement waiving the right of cancellation or reduction in coverage without thirty (30) days notice in writing to be delivered by registered mail to the Owner. C. The Contractor shall not commence work under this Agreement until he has obtained at his expense all insurance required under this section and such insurance has been approved by the Owner, nor shall the Contractor allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until all similar insurance required of the subcontractor has been so obtained and approved. Such insurance shall remain in full force and effect on all phases of the work, whether or not the work is occupied or utilized by the Owner, until all work under the Agreement is completed and has been accepted by the Owner. D. Nothing contained in the insurance requirements shall be construed as limiting the his operations. 2.2 Controlling Law a. This Agreement is to be governed by the law of the State of Texas. Venue shall lie exclusively in Williamson County, Texas for all state actions and in the Austin Division of the Western District of Texas for all federal actions. 2.3 Successors and Assigns a. Owner and Contractor each is hereby bound and the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives of Owner and Contractor are hereby bound to the other party to this Agreement and to the Partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives (and said assigns) of such other party, in respect of all covenants, agreements and obligations of this Agreement. 2.4 Neither Owner nor Contractor shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under or interest in (including due or moneys that are due) this Agreement without written consent Page 7 of 9 of the other, except to the extent that any assignment, subletting or transfer is mandated by law or the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent Contractor from employing such independent professional associates and consultants as Contractor may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder, provided such independent associates or consultants are approved in writing in advance by Owner and are paid by Contractor. 2.5 Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in the Agreement to anyone other than Owner and Contractor, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to the Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of Owner and Contractor and not for the benefit of any other party. 2.6 As to the contractual relationship between Contractor and Owner, Contractor is and shall be considered in all things an independent contractor. 2.7 This contract shall not be subject to binding arbitration. 2.8 solidate any and all phases of performance set out in the standard form contractual documents. The consolidation of said services shall not in any way affect the Contracto to perform the services set out therein. 2.9 This Agreement may be terminated by the Owner hereto, with or without cause, upon ten (10) days written notice thereof. If this Agreement is terminated by the Owner without cause, the Contractor shall be paid for services performed to termination date, including all reimbursable expenses then incurred. 2.10 Entire Agreement. a. This Agreement, together with the exhibits and schedules identified above, constitute the entire Agreement between Owner and Contractor and supersede all prior or oral understandings. This Agreement and said exhibits and schedules may only be amended, supplemented, modified or canceled by a duly executed written instrument. 2.11 Severability. a. The invalidity of any provision of the Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of the Agreement. 2.12 Waiver. a. The waiver of any breach of a term or condition of this Agreement does not waive any other breach of that term or condition or any breach of any other term or condition of this Agreement. Page 8 of 9 Primary Contact: Name: Malcom Williams, Aerial Division Manager Office Phone: (800) 413-4445 Mobile Phone: (318) 372-4073 E-mail: mwilliams@VDCI.net or Name: Jason Williams, Regional Director Office Phone: (800) 413-4445 Cell Phone: (757) 449-0123 E-mail: jwilliams@vdci.net Alternate Contact: Name: Mobile Phone: E-mail: Pricing and Payment: Description of Service Price Per Mile Ground ULV Truck Applications $45.00 Description of Service Price Per Acre Aerial Application using Dibrom at 0.50 ounces per acre $1.79 Aerial Application using Dibrom at 0.66 ounces per acre $2.10 Aerial Application using Dibrom at 0.75 ounces per acre $2.28 Aerial Application using Permethrin base at mid label rate $1.90 After each application, VDCI shall submit to Customer an invoice for all services provided. All amounts shall be due upon receipt. Invoices shall be payable to the following address: Vector Disease Control International, LLC 1320 Brookwood Dr., Ste. H Little Rock, AR 72202 Contract Term: Page 9 of 9 This agreement will remain in full force and effect until December 31, 2020 (the Termination Dates, if a letter of termination is not sent to VDCI the this contract will be automatically renewed for a one year period. This contract may be renewed for a period of four (4) one (1) year renewals, subject to mutual agreement by both parties to any changes in the pricing and terms of this agreement. AGREED AND ACCEPTED: Vector Disease Control International Williamson County and Cities Health District, Texas____ (Customer) ________________________________ ___________________________________ By: _____________________________ By: Justine L. Price Title: ___________________________ Title: Deputy Director, Williamson County and Cities Health District Location 2020-3-PUD Exhibit #1 Location 2020-3-PUD Exhibit #1 FM 1 4 6 0 ROSSINGR ILIAMSDR N AW G SAM VE HA D LIMMER LOOP WAY UNIVERSITY AVE R 7 5 NE P EL SO U THW S E RN B LV D §¨¦35 §¨¦35 2020-3-PUD Exhibit #3 Zoning Georgetown, Texas ZONES WESTINGHOUSE THE SUMMIT AT EXHIBIT C DEVELOPMENT 9500 AMBERGLEN BLVD.BLDG F, SUITE 125AUSTIN, TEXAS 78729 TEL (512)777-4600 FAX (512) 252-8141 300'150'0'NORTH TH/2 ZONE E (MF-2)ZONE F (C-3) ZONE C (C-3) ZONE B (C-3) ZONE A (TH) ZONE D (C-3) ZONE A (TH/MF-2) 11 Summit at Westinghouse City Council August 11, 2020 22 33 44 55 Future Land Use 66 Surrounding Zoning Part of the PUD proposed for change Part of the PUD NOT proposed for change 77 Proposed Changes Zone A Current PUD Proposed PUD amendment Zoning Standard MF-1 TH/MF-2 Maximum Acreage 24 24/ 7.50 Maximum Units 250 250/188 Approximate Density 10.42 10.42/ 25.07 88 Proposed Changes Zone B Current PUD Proposed PUD amendment Zoning Standard C-3 w/ use restrictions C-3 w/ use restrictions Min. Acreage 4 2 Min. Building SF 16,000 sf. 8,000 sf 99 Proposed Changes Zone C Current PUD Proposed PUD amendment Zoning Standard C-3 w/ use restrictions C-3 w/ use restrictions Min. Acreage 15 17 Min. Building SF 150,000 sf 158,000 1010 Zone Use(s) Max. Approx. Acres Max. Res. Units Approx. Density Max. # LUEs A Townhouse District (TH) 24.00 250 10.42 250.00 High-Density Multifamily (MF-2) Family 7.50 188 25.07 131.60 C & D Upper Story Residential Built above C- 3 122* 722 185.40 E High-Density Multifamily (MF-2) 15.00 350 23.33 245.00 DevelopmentDensity 1111 Development Density Zone Use(s) Min. Approx. Acres Min. Buildin g SF Approx. FAR Approx. # LUEs B General Commercial (C-3) 2.00 8,000 0.92 40.00 C General Commercial (C-3) 17.00 158,000 0.21 214.29 D General Commercial (C-3) 6.00 50,000 0.19 16.67 1212 Development Density Zone Use(s) Max. Approx. Acres Max. Buildin g SF Approx. FAR Max. # LUEs F General Commercial (C-3) 6.00 180,000 0.69 52.94 Note: An increase in maximum residential units within each zone is allowed up to 20%. In no case shall the total residential unit number exceed 860. *Maximum residential units can be increased to the difference between the maximum total residential units (860) and the sum of the total actual units in ZoneAand Zone E. 1313 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.06.030 Criteria for Rezoning Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review and final action; X The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan;X The zoning change promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and healthful development of the City; X 1414 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.06.030 Criteria for Rezoning Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood; and X The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the district that would be applied by the proposed amendment. X 1515 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.06.040 Criteria for PUDs Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply A variety of housing types, employment opportunities, or commercial services to achieve a balanced community. X An orderly and creative arrangement of all land uses with respect to each other and to the entire community. X A planned and integrated comprehensive transportation system providing for a separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic, to include facilities such as roadways, bicycle ways, and pedestrian walkways. X 1616 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.06.040 Criteria for PUDs Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply The provisions of cultural or recreational facilities for all segments of the community.X The location of general building envelopes to take maximum advantage of the natural and manmade environment. X The staging of development in a manner which can be accommodated by the timely provision of public utilities, facilities, and services. X Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Department Staff Report 2020-7-ANX 980 Patriot Way & 4270 University Page 1 of 5 Report Date: July 24, 2020 Case No: 2020-7-ANX Project Planner: Nat Waggoner, PMP, AICP Item Details Project Name: 980 Patriot Way Project Location: 980 Patriot Way & 4270 University Road, within City Council district No. 7 Total Acreage: 20.67 acres Legal Description: 20.67 acres out of the Woodruff Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 556 Applicant: Don Pool Property Owner: Wayne Gattis; Samuel Gattis Request: Voluntary disanenxation Case History: This is the first public hearing of this request. Planning Department Staff Report 2020-7-ANX 980 Patriot Way & 4270 University Page 2 of 5 Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant is seeking to remove approximately 20.67 acres from the corporate limits of the City. According to the applicant’s letter of intent, the property owners intend to maintain both tracts as homesteads and use the land for cattle grazing. The property located at 980 Patriot Way (the “southern tract”) is approximately 9.10 acres and is used as a homestead. The property at 4270 University (the “northern tract”) consists of approximately 11.57 acres and is also intended to be used as private residence. According to the applicant, the owner of the northern tract intends to place a manufactured home on the property and the current zoning district (Agriculture) prohibits the use. Removing the property from the corporate limits and the restrictions of zoning will allow the applicant to place the residential structure on the property. Site Information Location: The subject properties are accessed from Patriot Way, approximately 1 mile north and east of SH-130 and 1 mile south of University. Physical and Natural Features: The northern tract is undeveloped with little change in elevation across the property with a portion of the tract within FEMA Flood Zone A. The southern tract is developed with residential structures, includes slight elevation changes with southern and western portions of the tract within FEMA Flood Zone A. Future Land Use and Zoning Designations: Both properties have a future land use designation of Neighborhood (NH) and Open Space (OS). Both properties are zoned Agriculture (AG). Surrounding Properties: The areas surrounding the subject properties to the west and south are zoned Agriculture. Properties to the east are outside of the city limits and are therefore not zoned. The current zoning, Future Land Use designation, and existing uses of the adjacent properties to the north, south, east and west are outlined in the table below: Planning Department Staff Report 2020-7-ANX 980 Patriot Way & 4270 University Page 3 of 5 Northern tract (4270 University) DIRECTION ZONING DISTRICT FUTURE LAND USE EXISTING USE North Agriculture (AG)Institutional (I)Residential/AG East Agriculture (AG) Rural Residential (RR) Residential/AG South Agriculture (AG) Open Space and Mixed Density Neighborhood (MXDN) Residential/AG West Agriculture (AG)Open Space (OS) and (OS)Neighborhood (NH)Residential/AG Southern tract (980 Patriot Way) DIRECTION ZONING DISTRICT FUTURE LAND USE EXISTING USE North Agriculture (AG) Neighborhood (N) Residential/AG East ETJ Rural Residential (RR) Residential/AG South Agriculture (AG) Open Space (OS) and Mixed Density Neighborhood (MXDN) Residential/AG West Agriculture (AG)Open Space (OS) and Neighborhood (NH)Residential/AG Tract Property History: 1969 Southern tract granted by deed to Glenda Kay Raum Gattis 2005 City Council passed Res No. 071205- "Policy to Guide the Planning and Procedures for the Annexation of Territory into the City Limits of Georgetown, Texas” City Council on August 8, 2006, by Resolution No. 082206-S, adopted a revised priority annexation area map, including the area that is the subject of this request. 2006 Annexed by Ordinance 2006-138 Neitherpropertieshave any resources listed on the 2016 City of Georgetown Historic Resources Survey. Comprehensive Plan Guidance Future Land Use: The neighborhood future land use supports a suburban atmosphere with less than 5 dwelling units/acre; encouraging the preservation of open space and environmentally sensitive areas. Where appropriate along major thoroughfare bordering neighborhoods or on collector roads leading into neighborhoods, secondary uses include neighborhood- serving retail, office, institutional, and civic uses. Supporting nonresidential uses are Planning Department Staff Report 2020-7-ANX 980 Patriot Way & 4270 University Page 4 of 5 similar in scale to the residential properties, include appropriate landscaping and buffering standards. Nonresidential uses should be limited to less than 10% of the subject area. Utilities Both properties are located outside of the City of Georgetown water and electric service areas. According to the application, both properties are on private water wells. Transportation Both properties are accessed from Patriot Way, currently constructed as a two-lane undivided road identified by the Overall Transportation Plan as a future major arterial road. There are no sidewalks nor formal bike lanes along Patriot Way. Neither property is served by the City’s Fixed Route Transit System, GoGeo. The 2009 Parks Trails Master Plan (the “Plan”) does identify Patriot Way (CR104 in the Plan) as a “Potential Developer Trail Opportunity”. Intergovernmental and Interdepartmental Review The proposed request was reviewed by all applicable City Departments to primarily determine UDC approval criteria B (below). The granting of the request does not have a direct and immediate impact on the provision of Emergency Services (Police/Fire), Public Works (transportation) nor Systems Engineering (Utilities). Collectively City Departments recognize the need to maintain land use controls for long range utility and transportation planning for this area based on the priorities established by the City in 2005. UDC Approval Criteria 3.025.030 Approval Criteria Finding Comment A. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review and final action. Complies B. The annexation promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, and healthful development of the City. Does Not Comply Removing these parcels of land from the corporate limits of the City will limit the City’s land use controls and will have an impact on the City’s master planning efforts including the Utility Master Plan, Trails Master Plan and Overall Transportation Plan. Concurrent with this request, the City is evaluating multiple development applications Planning Department Staff Report 2020-7-ANX 980 Patriot Way & 4270 University Page 5 of 5 for properties contiguous to both the northern and southern subject properties. C. Consistency with the City's adopted long range plans and annexation policies. Does Not Comply This request is counter to City Council Resolution No. 071205- "Policy to Guide the Planning and Procedures for the Annexation of Territory into the City Limits of Georgetown, Texas”. On August 8, 2006, City Council by Resolution No. 082206-S, adopted a revised priority annexation area map, including the area that is the subject of this request. Meetings Schedule August 11, 2020– City Council First Reading of the Ordinance August 25, 2020 – City Council Second Reading of the Ordinance Public Notification As required by the Unified Development Code a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper (July 26, 2020), letters were mailed to service providers and a notification was placed on the City’s website. To date, staff has received no written comments in favor or in opposition to the request. Attachments Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Future Land Use Map Exhibit 3 – Zoning Map Exhibit 4 – Letter of Intent Public Hearing and 1st Ordinance Reading August 11, 2020 2020-7-ANX An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, providing for the disannexation of certain territory consisting of 20.67 acres, situated in the Woodruff Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 556, Williamson County, Texas, as described herein; repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; and establishing an effective date. Criteria for Rezoning Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review and final action; X The annexation promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, and healthful development of the City.X Consistency with the City's adopted long-range plans and annexation policies.X 7 Service providers notified Notice in Sun News on July 26, 2020 Signs posted on the property Notice published on City website 8 Public Hearing and 1st Reading of an Ordinance Public Hearing and 2nd Reading of an Ordinance Public Hearing and First Ordinance Reading: August 11, 2020(today) Public Hearing and Second Ordinance Reading: August 25, 2020 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, providing for the disannexation of certain territory consisting of 20.67 acres, situated in the Woodruff Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 556, Williamson County, Texas, as described herein; repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; and establishing an effective date. Location 2020-7-ANX Exhibit #1 Location 2020-7-ANX Exhibit #1 BO ROS GR W L M D N SAM VE HAND LIMMER LOOP WAY UNIVERSITY AVE 1 7 5 INNER LOOP C R 11 0 EL D B WO OD R D R OCK RIDE LN B E LL GIN R D SO U THW E T N B LV D §¨¦35 §¨¦35 2020-7-ANX Exhibit #3 Zoning Ordinance No. _____________________ Page 1 of 2 Project Name: 980 Patriot Way Disannexation (20.67 acres) 2020-7-ANX Date Approved: August 25, 2020 Exhibit A-B attached Ordinance No. __________________ An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, providing for the disannexation of certain territory consisting of 20.67 acres, situated in the Woodruff Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 556, Williamson County, Texas, as described herein; repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; and establishing an effective date. Whereas, the owners of the areas proposed for disannexation requested disannexation of the area , pursuant to Local Government Code Section 43.142, Unified Development Code Section 3.25, and City Charter Section 1.06; and Whereas, all of the herein-described properties lie within the municipal boundaries of the City of Georgetown, Texas; and Whereas, all prerequisites of state law and the City Charter have been complied with; Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas that: Section 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Georgetown hereby disannexes certain territories consisting of 9.10 acres, situated in the Woodruff Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 556, Williamson County, Texas, and being a portion of a called 9.46 acre tract described in a Deed to Wayne M. Gattis and wife, Glenda R. Gattis, as recorded in Volume 514, Page 251 of the Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas and an approximately 11.57 acre tract of land, situated in the Woodruff Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 556 in Williamson County, Texas, and being a portion of a called 93.060 acres as described in a Warranty Deed for Life Estate to Glenda K. Raum Gattis from Gary D. Raum, et al., as recorded in Doc. 2012021515., as shown in Exhibit A and as described in Exhibit B of this ordinance . City Council Districts map shall be amended accordingly. Section 3. The Propert zoning classification of Agriculture (AG) will no longer be in effect. accordingly. Section 4. Upon disannexation of the Properties, the City shall have no obligation to provide services to the Properties outside of any existing Development Agreements. Section 5. In accordance with Section 43.148 of the Texas Local Government Code, no refund is owed because the taxes and fees collected by the City were less what the City spent in Ordinance No. _____________________ Page 2 of 2 Project Name: 980 Patriot Way Disannexation (20.67 acres) 2020-7-ANX Date Approved: August 25, 2020 Exhibit A-B attached services to the area. Section 6. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. Section 7. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in accordance with the City Charter. Passed and Approved on First Reading on the 11th day of August 2020. Passed and Approved on Second Reading on the 25th day of August 2020. The City of Georgetown: Attest: _________________________________ _________________________________ Dale Ross Robyn Densmore, TRMC Mayor City Secretary Approved as to form: _________________________________ Skye Masson City Attorney © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. This presentation, including all supporting materials, is proprietary to Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and is for the sole internal use of the intended recipients. Because this presentation may contain information that is confidential, proprietary or otherwise legally protected, it may not be further copied, distributed or publicly displayed without the express written permission of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 CIS Assessment & AMI-MDM Analysis Proposal 7 July 2020 Engagement: 330063873 Version 4 1 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Cover Letter Dear Mr. Bryce: Gartner, Inc. (Gartner) is pleased to present the City of Georgetown (City) with this proposal to conduct an assessment and analysis of your Customer Information System (CIS), and Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) and Meter Data Management (MDM) systems. The key objectives of the engagement: Evaluate the City’s CIS business processes against the current CIS system, identify gaps or areas for opportunities, and explore alternative options to improve the City’s CIS operations and supporting technologies Evaluate the business value provided by the AMI and MDM systems to enable the City to meet its smart meter information needs Gartner Consulting understands the strategic importance of this initiative and will work with you to improve the City’s CIS operations and assess your AMI and MDM. Our proven methodology combined with our seasoned practitioners allow us to execute with speed and confidence Our perspective on the future direction of CIS, Advanced Metering Infrastructure, Meter Data Management and IoT engenders the development of an industry leading strategy Our advice is independent and objective, so we focus on your immediate strategic needs with no downstream interests We possess unparalleled knowledge of the vendor and solution marketplace to enable smart technology decisions We will collaborate with you to deliver a City-specific actionable set of recommendations Our offer is valid through 15 August 2020. If this proposal represents your requirements, please sign the Authorization Page and return the entire proposal to William Wong at william.wong@gartner.com. Please let us know if you have any questions. We thank you for this opportunity and look forward to the possibility of partnering with the City on this important strategic initiative. Sincerely, William Wong Managing Partner, Gartner Consulting Cc: Allix Jackson, Account Executive 2 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Contents Section 1: Gartner Overview Section 2: Executive Summary Section 3: Scope of Work Section 4:Project Management Section 5: Appendix Scope Approach Detail Deliverables Detail Our Understanding and Gartner Response Proposal Approach Overview Project Team Biographies Timeline Project Team Overview Project Management and Control Assumptions Investment Summary Changes to Scope Validity Period and Further Assurances Authorization 3 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Section 1: Gartner Overview 4 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Gartner is the world leader in research and advisory services About Gartner Founded in 1979 15,000+ associates in 100+ offices around the world 32 consecutive quarters of double-digit growth Member of the S&P 500 Deep global insight into every major business function Clients we serve Customer Svc. & Support Finance Human Resources Information Technology Legal Marketing & Communications Sales & Service Supply Chain 300,000+ professionals across all business functions 12,000+ distinct organizations in more than 100 countries C-suite members from small companies to global, multinational enterprises 74% of the Global 500 rely on Gartner for insight and advice 74% of the Global 500 About Gartner 5 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Research Industry’s largest database 135,793 documents across 1,372 technology and business topics Advisory Services Unique client perspective 2,000+ analysts conduct 380,000+ one-to-one client interactions annually Consulting Results on initiatives 2,000 custom engagements a year fueled by 14,000 peer benchmarks Events Networking with peers 55,000 professionals a year attend 75+ worldwide events About Gartner All Gartner services are grounded in our world-class Research insights 6 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Gartner Consulting capabilities are fueled by Research but contextualized to City of Georgetown’s specific business objectives Application Transformation Benchmark Analytics Data & Market Analytics Digital Business & Technology Infrastructure & Platforms • Application Strategy • Architecture and Integration • Development and Support (Agile/DevOps) • IT Spend and Cost Benchmarks • Price Benchmarks • Industry-Specialized Benchmarks • Data Management and Governance • Data Analytics and Insights • Market Opportunity Assessments • Digital and IT Strategy • Disruptive Technologies Strategies • Organization and Governance • I&O Strategy • Data Center Modernization • IT Service Management • Platform Strategy Contract Optimization Project & Portfolio Management Security & Risk Management Sourcing & Vendor Ecosystems • Optimize costs and reduce the risks of high-value, long- term, IT contracts • Project and Program Oversight • Project and Program Risk Assessments • Security Maturity and Capability Assessments • Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery • Threat and Resiliency Management • Adaptive Sourcing Strategy • Vendor Selection and Negotiations • Vendor Management Consulting Solution Areas About Gartner Consulting 7 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Utility clients rely on Gartner insights to support their mission-critical priorities 8 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Section 2: Executive Summary Our Understanding and Gartner Response Gartner’s Proposed Approach to Conducting the CIS Assessment and the AMI-MDM Analysis 9 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Key Objectives Objective 1 Evaluate the City’s CIS business processes against the current CIS system, identify gaps or areas for opportunities, and explore alternative options to improve the City’s CIS operations and supporting technologies Objective 2 Evaluate the business value provided by the AMI and MDM systems to enable the City to meet its smart meter information needs Workstream 1: CIS Assessment Workstream 2: AMI-MDM Analysis 10 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Executive Summary – Workstream 1 (CIS Assessment) Our Understanding and Background Gartner’s Proposed Response City of Georgetown (the City) has invited Gartner to submit a proposal to conduct an assessment of their new CIS (Itineris), which they implemented in 2018. The CIS implementation was a migration from a legacy system that involved a significant level of complexity/customization with the Itineris implementation The new CIS has experienced several issues, leading to: – severe challenges in Billing operations –a large volume of CIS-related tickets City of Georgetown seeks an independent assessment of their CIS implementation in order to facilitate: – remediation of outstanding billing issues – reduction in operational challenges – improved business outcomes Gartner proposes to conduct an assessment and analysis of City of Georgetown’s CIS implementation and develop an approach for resolving the current challenges with the implementation. Gartner will partner with City of Georgetown for the following: –Conduct a review of the City’s CIS business processes, business capabilities, and business needs –Complete an assessment of the functional capabilities of the Itineris CIS –Conduct a gap analysis between the City’s business needs and the CIS’ functional capabilities –Conduct a high-level analysis of open CIS-related tickets, including categories, distribution, trends and ticket management processes –Develop a set of recommendations and a prioritized high- level roadmap for a going-forward strategy (including alternative options) to mitigate outstanding billing issues and closing gaps between current CIS capabilities and the City’s business needs –Recommend metrics for measuring CIS value –Provide insights into CIS best practices among peer utilities 11 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Executive Summary – Workstream 2 (AMI-MDM Analysis) Our Understanding and Background Gartner’s Proposed Response City of Georgetown (the City) has invited Gartner to submit a proposal to conduct an analysis of their Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) and their Meter Data Management (MDM) systems. The City seeks an independent assessment of how they utilize the capabilities of their AMI and MDM systems The City would like a recommendation on whether their smart- meter data acquisition and processing business needs are being met using the AMI and MDM systems Gartner proposes to conduct a high-level assessment of the business value provided by the City of Georgetown’s AMI and MDM systems. Gartner will partner with City of Georgetown for the following: –Conduct an assessment of the City’s AMI and MDM system functionality –Conduct an analysis of the City’s business needs that are currently being met using the AMI and MDM platforms –Develop recommendations to best serve the smart meter information needs of the business –Recommend metrics for measuring AMI-MDM value, and provide comparable benchmark data –Provide insights into AMI-MDM utilization best practices among peer utilities 12 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Section 3: Scope of Work Scope Approach Detail Deliverables Detail 13 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Workstream 1: CIS Assessment 14 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Utility CIS Functionality Account Management Product / Service Management Order Processing Rate Design Billing Bill Presentment Payment Processing Accounts Receivable Collections Gartner Magic Quadrant for Utilities Customer Information Systems (ID: G00336433) Customer Interaction Channels Digital Interaction Channels Customer Self- Service ChannelsCRM MDM Financial Information Outage Management Work & Asset Management Payment Gateway Content Management Reporting & Analytics Data Warehouse Bolt-ons / Integrations 15 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Sample CIS Business Capability Model Order Processing Service Order Completion Field/ Service Order Management Collections Collections Management Special Collection Program Support Delinquency & Bankruptcy Management Deposit Management Write Offs Account Adjustment Management Rate Design Rate & Rate Plan Management Account Management Customer Account Management Service Point Management Product/Rate Association Self Service Support Customer Service Script Support Special Program Management Account Search Fraud Management Customer Contact Management Accounts Receivable Payment Plan Management Financial System Integration Accounts Receivable Management Product/Service Management Service Activation/ Deactivation Work & Asset Management Integration Emergency Call Management In CIS Scope Integration Payment Processing Third-party Payment Processing In-house Payment Processing Payment Reversals Payment Reconciliation Customer Payment Management Statement Preparation Internal Bill Messages Statement Presentment Statement Printing External Bill Messages Billing Special Program/ Service Billing Service Rating & Billing Fee Calculation Budget Billing Bill Estimation Usage Data Management Cancel/Rebill Processing Tax Calculation Retail Choice Management 16 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Sample CIS Business Capability Model Assessment Artifact Order Processing Service Order Completion Field/ Service Order Management Collections Collections Management Special Collection Program Support Delinquency & Bankruptcy Management Deposit Management Write Offs Account Adjustment Management Rate Design Rate & Rate Plan Management Account Management Customer Account Management Service Point Management Product/Rate Association Self Service Support Customer Service Script Support Special Program Management Account Search Fraud Management Customer Contact Management Accounts Receivable Payment Plan Management Financial System Integration Accounts Receivable Management Product/Service Management Service Activation/ Deactivation Work & Asset Management Integration Emergency Call Management Major gaps exist Integration Payment Processing Third-party Payment Processing In-house Payment Processing Payment Reversals Payment Reconciliation Customer Payment Management Statement Preparation Internal Bill Messages Statement Presentment Statement Printing External Bill Messages Billing Special Program/ Service Billing Service Rating & Billing Fee Calculation Budget Billing Bill Estimation Usage Data Management Cancel/Rebill Processing Tax Calculation Retail Choice Management Minor gaps exist Minimal/no gaps exist 17 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Gartner will conduct an assessment and analysis of the City’s CIS functionality and processes in order to develop recommendations to enhance the services and value it provides to the organization. This will include: Data collection and CIS current state assessment including: A high-level assessment of key business processes such as Rating, Billing, and customer record management, and key best practice recommendations utilized among peer Utilities An assessment of met and unmet CIS operational requirements Analysis of the Itineris CIS’ functional capabilities, including a high level assessment of interfaces A high-level assessment of key CIS issues and the support process for billing issues An analysis of gaps between business needs and CIS capabilities Definition of metrics for measuring value derived from the CIS Recommendations, including: Initiatives to enhance the City’s CIS implementation (including alternative options) Key CIS utilization best practices Project Scope The scope of this project includes: People (Organization) Process and Technology Location (Geography) City of Georgetown’s core CIS team Key CIS process owners and functional users Other key IT stakeholders CIS business process CIS configured functionality (Itineris) Discovery interviews and workshops will be conducted remotely via teleconference bridge 18 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Perform Current State Business Capability & Needs Assessment Approach Overview Conduct Project Kickoff 1 Perform Current State CIS Capability & Support Assessment Conduct Alternatives Analysis 3 Define Improvement Actions & Roadmap 4 Gartner Activities Set up project management activities for the engagement and conduct kick-off Establish the list of participants for the ‘discovery’ process and the overall workshop schedule Review City submitted current state documentation Conduct up to 2 interviews with key IT and business resources Deliverables Kick-off materials Duration Week 1 Kickoff Gartner Activities Review the implemented CIS functionality (including high- level interface assessment) Review key CIS billing issues, trends and support process Conduct up to 6 interviews/discovery sessions with key IT resources Develop high-level 10-year Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for existing CIS application for Executive Report Deliverables Current State CIS Capability and Support Findings Duration Weeks 3 - 5 Gartner Activities Conduct analysis to determine gaps between business needs and CIS functional capabilities Recommend metrics to measure CIS business value Collate CIS utilization best practices amongst peers Identify candidate CIS implementation and support improvement initiatives and alternatives Conduct workshops to confirm current state and analysis results Deliverables Gap Analysis Assessment Report (including current state, support recommendations and CIS best practices) CIS Value Metrics Duration Weeks 5 - 7 Gartner Activities Conduct a workshop to review and prioritize identified initiatives Develop CIS implementation improvement roadmap Prepare and present executive report Deliverables Roadmap & Improvement Initiatives Executive Report Duration Weeks 7 - 8 INITIATION AND BASELINE RECOMMENDATIONS & ROADMAPANALYSIS Gartner Activities Conduct high-level assessment of CIS business processes Assess CIS business capabilities using the Gartner Business Capability Model Review current CIS-related business needs Conduct up to 6 interviews/discovery sessions with key IT and business resources Deliverables Current State Business Capability & Needs Findings Duration Weeks 1 - 3 2 5 19 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Gartner anticipates completion of this CIS Assessment engagement over an 8 week timeframe* *This schedule is dependent on the assumptions included in this proposal. Actual dates will be based on agreed start date. Timeline will also shift based on the required review/approval periods of submitted deliverables that have a direct impact to subsequent steps of this engagement. Weekly status call Step 2 – Business Capability & Needs Assessment Step 3 – CIS Capability & Support Assessment Step 4 – Alternatives Analysis Step 5 – Roadmap & Final Report Key Deliverables Kick-off meeting Project plan Gap analysis CIS value metrics CIS best practices Recommend- ations Roadmap Summary Executive report Current state Business findings Step 1 – Project Kickoff Workshop Executive summary Current state Technology findings Workshop 20 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Objective Initiate the project by setting the foundation for a successful engagement that is delivered on time and within budget, and achieves business objectives Activities Performed by Gartner Hold kickoff meeting with core leadership team Assess CIS business capabilities using the Gartner Business Capability Model Understand CIS-related business processes Review current CIS-related business needs / documentation Conduct up to 2 interviews/discovery sessions with key IT and business leadership City Responsibilities Ensure attendance at kickoff meeting by Project Sponsor, Project Manager, and other key stakeholders as determined prior to kickoff Identify key stakeholders for interviews and workshops, schedule interviews and workshops, participate as required Provide documentation as requested Deliverable(s) Kickoff Materials Project Plan Status report template Time Frame Week 1 Assumptions Gartner will conduct up to two (2) interviews with key stakeholders (1 to 3 participants each) Step 1: Project Kick-Off Setting the foundation for successful engagement Step 5 21 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Objective Gain an understanding of current CIS-related business capabilities and needs Activities Performed by Gartner Analyze the City’s CIS-related business capabilities using the Gartner Business Capability Model Conduct high-level assessment of current CIS-related business processes Assess met and unmet CIS-related business needs Conduct up to 6 interviews/discovery sessions with key representatives from the business and IT City Responsibilities Ensure attendance at meetings by Project Sponsor, Project Manager, and other key stakeholders as determined prior to kickoff Schedule interviews and workshops, and participate as required Provide documentation as requested Deliverable(s) Current State Business Capability & Needs Findings Time Frame Weeks 1-3 Assumptions Gartner will conduct up to six (6) interviews with key stakeholders (1 to 3 participants each) Gartner may require additional follow-up meetings to conduct further due diligence and clarifications where appropriate Detailed business process analysis is not in scope Step 2: Perform Current State Business Capability & Needs Assessment Establish a common understanding of the current state Step 5 22 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Step 3: Perform Current State CIS Capability & Support Assessment Establish a common understanding of the current state Objective Gain understanding of the configured/implemented functional capabilities of the current CIS implementation (Itineris) Activities Performed by Gartner Conduct up to 6 interviews/discovery sessions with key IT resources to: –Assess CIS functionality as currently implemented at the City –Conduct high-level assessment of CIS interfaces –Conduct high-level assessment of billing issues and trends Develop high-level 10-year Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for existing CIS application for the Executive Report based on information provided by the City regarding existing investments and ongoing support/maintenance (including City staff costs) City Responsibilities Ensure attendance at and participation in workshop meetings by Project Sponsor, Project Manager and other key stakeholders, as determined prior to meeting Provide documentation as requested Review, and provide timely and substantive feedback on working documents and interim deliverables Review, and approve deliverables, as necessary Deliverable(s) Current State CIS Capability and Support Findings Time Frame Weeks 3-5 Assumptions Gartner will conduct up to six (6) interviews with key stakeholders (1 to 3 participants each) Information to support the current state CIS Capability and Support assessment will be obtained through interviews and documentation. Direct access to the CIS application and review of application configuration / code is out of scope. Evaluation of utility rates is not in scope. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 23 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Step 4: Conduct Alternatives Analysis Develop analysis of CIS implementation, support gaps and alternative options Objective Identify gaps between the current CIS implementation and support in comparison to business needs Activities Performed by Gartner Conduct analysis to determine gaps between business needs and CIS functional capabilities Conduct high-level assessment of CIS support process Identify trends in Billing tickets Recommend metrics to measure CIS value Collate CIS utilization best practices Identify initiatives: –Candidates for improvement of the CIS as currently implemented –Alternatives to the current CIS implementation –CIS support process improvement (high level) Conduct workshop to confirm current state and analysis results City Responsibilities Ensure attendance at and participation in workshop meetings by Project Sponsor, Project Manager and other key stakeholders, as determined prior to meeting Provide documentation as requested Review, and provide timely and substantive inputs and feedback on working documents and interim deliverables Review, and approve deliverables, as necessary Deliverable(s) CIS Assessment Report (including current state, support process improvement recommendations and CIS best practices) Gap Analysis Recommended metrics for measuring CIS value Time Frame Weeks 5-7 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 24 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Step 5: Define Improvement Actions & Roadmap Develop comprehensive recommendations and roadmap Objective Develop a list of actions that can be taken and a high-level roadmap for making improvements to the City’s CIS implementation Activities Performed by Gartner Lead workshop to review and prioritize CIS improvement initiatives Develop roadmap for CIS implementation improvement Develop and present executive report with City Management and City Council (two separate presentations) via MS Teams Assumptions Scope does not include development of duration, cost or resource estimates for improvement roadmap Scope does not include fit analysis, implementation duration, cost or resource estimates for alternative solutions The CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis Executive Reports will be presented as a single presentation. City Responsibilities Review, and provide timely and substantive feedback on working documents and interim deliverables Review and approve final deliverables Deliverable(s) Roadmap and Improvement Initiatives Executive Report Time Frame Weeks 7-8 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 25 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Approach Detail Summary of Deliverables Step Deliverables Step 1: Conduct Project Kick-Off Kickoff Materials Project plan Weekly status report template Step 2: Perform Current State Business Capability Assessment Current State Assessment of Business Capabilities and Needs Step 3: Perform Current State CIS Capability Assessment CIS Issue Assessment and Billing Support Assessment Current State Assessment of CIS Functional Capabilities and Support Step 4: Conduct Alternatives Analysis Gap Analysis (between capabilities and business needs) Assessment Report (including current state, support process improvement recommendations and CIS best practices) CIS Value Metrics Step 5: Define Improvement Actions & Roadmap Roadmap and Improvement Initiatives Executive Report 26 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Workstream 2: AMI – MDM Analysis 27 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 AMI and MDM Platform (illustrative) Service Consumption Points Smart Meters Wide Area Communication Network AMI Head End System MDM System Downstream Systems (CIS, OMS, WMS, GIS, Data Warehouse, BI platform etc.) Raw Interval Usage Data Collated Usage Data Operations-ready Usage Data Service Provisioning Commands Service Provisioning Instructions Service Provisioning Requests Meter Status Data Meter Status Data Operations-ready Meter Status Data 28 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Project Scope People (Organization) Process and Technology Location (Geography) City of Georgetown’s core AMI and MDM team Key AMI and MDM process owners and functional users Other key IT stakeholders AMI and MDM functionality AMI and MDM supporting processes Discovery interviews and workshops will be conducted via teleconference bridge Gartner will conduct an assessment of the City of Georgetown’s AMI and MDM systems in order to determine the business value delivered to the City by these systems. This will include: AMI and MDM system current state functionality review AMI and MDM system business needs assessment Metrics recommendation for measuring AMI-MDM value Reporting on AMI-MDM utilization best practices among peer utilities Final assessment and recommendation development The scope of this project will include: 29 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Workstream 2 (AMI-MDM Analysis) Approach Overview Perform MDM Business Needs Assessment 2 Gartner Activities Conduct a high level analysis of the business needs that are supported by and desired from the AMI and MDM system Conduct interviews/ discovery sessions with select IT and business resources Deliverables AMI and MDM Business Needs Findings Duration Weeks 2 - 3 Conduct Business Value Analysis 3 Gartner Activities Conduct analysis to determine the value provided to the City by the AMI and MDM systems Develop recommendations to best serve the smart meter information needs of the business Develop recommendation for metrics to measure AMI-MDM business value Collate industry best practice insights for AMI-MDM utilization Deliverables Business Value Analysis (including AMI-MDM value metrics) AMI-MDM Best Practices Duration Week 3 INITIATION AND BASELINE ANALYSIS & RECOMMENDATIONS Perform AMI and MDM Current State Assessment Gartner Activities Gain a high level understanding of the functionality provided by the City’s AMI and MDM systems Conduct interviews/ discovery sessions with select IT and business leadership Develop high-level 10-year Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for existing AMI and MDM systems for Executive Report Deliverables Current State AMI and MDM functionality Findings Duration Weeks 1 - 2 1 Develop Final Report 4 Gartner Activities Prepare final assessment report Conduct a workshop to review and validate assessment results, including current state findings, business needs findings, business value analysis and final recommendation Prepare and present executive report Deliverables Assessment Report Executive Summary Duration Week 4 30 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Gartner anticipates completion of this AMI-MDM Analysis engagement over a 4 week timeframe* *This schedule is dependent on the assumptions included in this proposal. Weekly status call Step 1 – AMI & MDM Current State Assessment Step 2 – AMI & MDM Business Needs Assessment Step 4 – Final Report Workshop Executive summary Step 3 – Business Value Analysis Key Deliverables Kick-off meeting Project plan Assessment Report Executive Summary report Current state findings AMI and MDM Business Needs Business Value Analysis AMI-MDM value metrics recommendation AMI-MDM Utilization best practices 31 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Objective Gain an understanding of the functionality provided by the City’s AMI and MDM systems Activities Performed by Gartner Review existing City of Georgetown AMI and MDM-related documentation Continue interviews with key stakeholders to assess the functionality provided by the City’s AMI and MDM systems, including integration with downstream systems and known issues (if any) Interview participants are anticipated to include representatives of the business as well as IT and OT as applicable Develop high-level 10-year Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for existing AMI and MDM systems for the Executive Report based on information provided by the City regarding existing investments and ongoing support/maintenance (including City staff costs) City of Georgetown Responsibilities Ensure attendance in interview meetings by Project Manager and other key stakeholders as determined prior to kickoff Schedule interviews and workshops, participate as required Provide documentation as requested Deliverable(s) Current State AMI and MDM Functionality Findings Time Frame Weeks 1-2 Assumptions Gartner will conduct up to four (4) interviews with key stakeholders Gartner analysis will be based on AMI and MDM functional capabilities gathered from interviews of City resources Gartner will not have direct access to any City applications or databases Gartner may require additional follow-up meetings to conduct further due diligence and clarifications where appropriate Evaluation of utility rates is not in scope. Step 1: Perform AMI and MDM Current State Assessment Establish a common understanding of the current state 32 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Step 2: Perform AMI and MDM Business Needs Assessment Establish a common understanding of business needs Objective Gain a high-level understanding of the City’s business needs met by/expected from the AMI and MDM systems Activities Performed by Gartner Conduct interviews with key stakeholders to assess the needs of the business that are met/not met through use of the AMI and MDM systems City of Georgetown Responsibilities Ensure attendance at and participation in workshop meetings by Project Manager and key stakeholders, as determined prior to meeting Provide documentation as requested Provide MDM needs data to Gartner as requested Review, and provide timely and substantive feedback on working documents and interim deliverables Deliverable(s) Current State Business Needs Findings Time Frame Weeks 2-3 Assumptions Gartner will conduct up to two (2) interviews with key stakeholders Gartner analysis will be based on MDM functionality requirements gathered from interviews of City resources. Gartner will not have direct access to any City applications or databases Gartner may require additional follow-up meetings to conduct further due diligence and clarifications where appropriate Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 33 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Step 3: Conduct Business Value Analysis Develop analysis of business value provided by the AMI and MDM systems Objective Determine the value the business is currently receiving from the City’s AMI and MDM platform Activities Performed by Gartner Perform analysis to determine whether or not AMI and MDM systems are providing value to City’s customers from a functionality perspective Determine if all the capabilities of MDM are being utilized by the City and whether current billing practices require an MDM Develop recommendations to best serve the smart meter information needs of the business Recommend metrics to measure AMI-MDM value Collate AMI-MDM utilization best practices among peer utilities City of Georgetown Responsibilities Ensure attendance at and participation in workshop meetings by Project Sponsor, Project Manager and other key stakeholders, as determined prior to meeting Provide documentation as requested Review, and provide timely and substantive inputs and feedback on working documents and interim deliverables Review and approve final deliverables Deliverable(s) Business Value Analysis Recommended metrics for measuring AMI-MDM value Utility industry AMI-MDM utilization best practices Time Frame Week 3 Assumptions Development of the business value analysis will be dependent on the outcomes of the AMI and MDM functionality analysis and business needs analysis Information regarding the City’s Customer’s expected business values and functionality perspectives will be provided through interviews with the City or existing documentation. Focus groups, direct interaction with City customers are not in scope. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 34 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Step 4: Develop Assessment Report and Recommendation Objective Develop and present assessment findings and a final recommendation Activities Performed by Gartner Develop a Final Assessment Report Conduct workshop to: –Confirm analysis results –Review recommendations Prepare and present executive summary with City Management and City Council (two separate presentations) via MS Teams City of Georgetown Responsibilities Ensure attendance at and participation in workshop meetings by Project Sponsor, Project Manager and other key stakeholders, as determined prior to meeting Review, and provide timely and substantive feedback on working documents and interim deliverables Review and approve final deliverables Deliverable(s) Assessment Report Executive Summary Report Time Frame Week 4 Assumptions Gartner will conduct one (1) workshop with key stakeholders The final recommendation for business value provided by the AMI and MDM systems will be developed based on the understanding of the functional capabilities and business needs of the City’s AMI and MDM systems acquired through the previous steps. Other considerations (technical, licensing, financial, resource impacts etc.) are outside the scope of this engagement The CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis Executive Reports will be presented as a single presentation. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 35 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Approach Detail Summary of Deliverables Step Deliverables Step 1: Perform AMI and MDM Current State Assessment Current State Assessment Report Step 2: Perform AMI and MDM Business Needs Assessment AMI and MDM Business Needs Report Step 3: Conduct Business Value Analysis Business Value Analysis Report AMI-MDM Value Metrics Report AMI-MDM Utilization Best Practices Step 4: Develop and present Final Report Assessment Report Executive Summary Report 36 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Section 4: Project Management Timeline Project Management and Control Project Team Overview Assumptions Investment Summary Changes to Scope Validity Period and Further Assurances Authorization 37 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Gartner proposes delivering the two workstreams in parallel over an 8 week timeframe* *This schedule is dependent on the assumptions included in this proposal. Actual dates will be based on agreed start date. Timeline will also shift based on the required review/approval periods of submitted deliverables that have a direct impact to subsequent steps of this engagement. Weekly status call Step 2 – Business Capability & Needs Assessment Step 3 – CIS Capability & Support Assessment Step 4 – Alternatives Analysis Step 5 – Roadmap & Final Report Step 1 – Project Kickoff Workshop Executive summaryWorkshop Step 1 –Current State Assessment Step 2 –Business Needs Assessment Step 4 – Final Report Executive summaryStep 3 – Business Value Analysis 38 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 A number of crucial activities are accomplished via Gartner’s project management process, namely: Our project management process guides reporting, risk mitigation and project control throughout and includes: –Weekly written status report including project progress, key activities executed/planned and risks/issues –Gartner will be in constant communication with stakeholders to ensure full awareness of activities, the associated timeline and actions required to ensure efficient control of project change –Specifying project stakeholder interaction Project Management and Control Progress Reporting Risk Management Performance Metrics Quality Deliverables Budget Management Schedule Management Client Communication 39 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Project Team Overview Organization Chart Gartner has created an organization structure for this project that ensures high-level sponsorship and quality assurance, strong day-to-day project management, a focused team of project consultants, and deep subject matter expertise. Proposed team members are shown below. Gartner will be able to confirm resources upon execution of this SOW. City Sponsor Chris Bryce City Project Manager TBD Gartner Engagement Manager Sudeep Kappadan Gartner Utility Consultant TBD Gartner Research Analyst Ethan Cohen Gartner Managing Partner Will Wong Gartner Account Partner Allix Jackson Gartner SME & Quality Assurance Alfredo Villalobos Gartner Research Analyst Zarko Sumic 40 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Gartner Associate Functional Role Responsibilities William Wong Engagement Sponsor Ensure that Gartner activities support City goals Build and maintain a long-standing relationship with City Provide high-level oversight to the project and become more heavily involved should any issue resolution be necessary Sudeep Kappadan Engagement/Project Manager Be responsible for the day-to-day management of project initiatives Ensure that project deliverables are completed on time and meet the Gartner quality standards Act as the primary point of contact for the Gartner team Work closely with City to ensure that Gartner is meeting its needs Alfredo Villalobos Quality Assurance Specialist Provide day-to-day consulting support for project steps Provide subject matter expertise as needed throughout the project Participate in deliverable creation, deliverable review and client presentations as needed Provide quality assurance review of Gartner project plan and Gartner deliverables throughout the project Ensure value through use of the Gartner Project Management Life Cycle detailed in this document TBD Project Consultant Provide day-to-day consulting support for project steps Be supported by additional project consultants as needed Ethan Cohen Zarco Sumic Research Analyst Support the Gartner project team by providing a context-sensitive perspective to issues specific to City based on Gartner industry-leading research Participate in analysis and comparisons, and review deliverables as needed Project Team Overview Gartner Roles and Responsibilities 41 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Project Team Overview City Roles and Responsibilities Role Estimated Time Responsibilities City Project Manager 20-25% of time throughout the engagement for: weekly status calls, scheduling and logistics, workshops, validation sessions Attend weekly status meetings Provide supporting documentation Identify participants for interviews and workshops Logistics for interviews, workshops, and other on-site activities Gartner Point-of-Contact (POC) City Subject Matter Experts 15-20% of time for the duration of the engagement for weekly status calls, workshops and draft deliverable validation sessions Provide supporting documentation Participate with interviews and/or workshops Participate with review and validation of deliverables Participate with workshops throughout engagement Provide input and feedback of draft deliverables to finalize City Key Stakeholders 10-15% of time during on-site interviews (1 to 1.5 hours per interview) and workshops Participate with interviews and follow up, as needed Participate with workshops throughout engagement 42 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Assumptions Page 1 of 2 The deliverables, schedule, and pricing in this document are based on the scope, approach, and the following assumptions. City Participation City will designate a project lead to act as the primary point of contact for this engagement. The project lead will be expected to work closely with the Gartner employees as needed and will: (a) approve project priorities, detailed task plans and schedules; (b) facilitate the scheduling of Gartner interviews with appropriate client personnel; (c) notify Gartner in writing of any project or performance issues; and (d) assist in resolving project issues that may arise The work effort described in this proposal assumes that City personnel are available to assist in the project as defined in this Proposal, per the project schedule and to participate in discovery, clarification, and validation interviews/discussions/work sessions in a timely manner and on an ad hoc basis as needed. If City personnel are not available, a change of scope may be necessary City will schedule the resources for project interviews, discussions, and work sessions and provide meeting facilities as necessary City will make resources available for interviews and workshops to be defined in the project plan outlined in Step 1 of this proposal City will review and approve the all submitted final deliverables within seven (7) calendar days and the Final Executive Reports within twenty- one (21) calendar days for the Executive Reports. If no formal approval or rejection is received within that time, the deliverable is considered to be accepted by City 43 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Assumptions Page 2 of 2 Data Collection Existing documentation will be made available to the Gartner team as needed per the workstream detailed project plans Project pricing is based on the assumption that Gartner will conduct up to sixteen (16) interviews (14 for CIS Assessment and 6 for AMI- MDM Analysis) of City staff members (in group or individual settings) and that the City will arrange all sessions with City personnel. Additionally, Gartner is prepared to conduct up to three (3) validation workshops (2 for CIS Assessment and 1 for AMI-MDM Analysis) Existing application functionality and business needs inventory exists with information that has been validated within the City All interviews, discussions, work sessions will take place via telephone as described in this proposal and/or as agreed to at project kickoff Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) will be calculated based on readily available information provided by the City Place of Performance Due to the COVID-19 situation, all project work will be conducted remotely through online meetings and collaboration tools General Assumptions Availability of key personnel as outlined in the project biographies section of the Appendix are available at an mutually agreed to start date. As the actual project start date is finalized, proposed individuals may not be available. In this event, we will work with the City to identify alternative personnel with appropriate skills and background All deliverables will be developed using Microsoft products (for example, Project, Excel, Word and PowerPoint) Detailed/in-depth review of business processes, product capabilities, system architecture and infrastructure, and support processes are excluded from the scope of this project Any requests for additional information (beyond the details described in the tasks above) that are made by the City will be considered a change in scope for this engagement and will be handled accordingly (see Changes to Scope section of this proposal) 44 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Investment Summary Gartner will conduct the Consulting steps outlined in this Proposal for a firm-fixed price of USD $210,000. Gartner will submit invoices as outlined in the schedule below: Workstream Step Deliverable(s) Total Step 1.1: Project Kickoff Project Kick-off Materials, Project Plan $14,500 Step 1.2: Data Collection & Current State Review Current State Business Capability Assessment $45,000 Step 1.3: Assessment & Analysis Strategies Current State CIS Capability Assessment $45,000 Step 1.4: Recommendations & Roadmap Analysis and Assessment $40,000 Step 1.5: Final Roadmap Final Report and Roadmap $25,000 Both workstreams and their respective steps are bundled into the fixed fee price of $210,000. Any changes to workstreams and/or reduction to steps will not necessarily result in a direct reduction in pricing assigned to each step as the step pricing is intended for payment milestone invoicing purposes only. Travel and expenses are included in the fees above. All invoices are payable net thirty (30) days from date of invoice. While we do not itemize billing for professional services, we agree and will comply with any reasonable requests for records substantiating our invoices. If City requires a purchase order (PO) number, please specify the PO number in the Authorization section and forward a copy of the PO, with this agreement, to William Wong, william.wong@gartner.com. Ensure that the PO includes all labor and travel expenses quoted in this Proposal. Any pre-printed terms on the PO that are in addition to or in contradiction of the terms of this agreement shall be inapplicable Workstream Step Deliverable(s) Total Step 2.1: Perform AMI and MDM Current State Assessment Current State Report $7,500 Step 2.2: Perform Business Needs Assessment Business Needs Report $12,000 Step 2.3: Conduct AMI-only Fit Analysis Fit Analysis Report $12,000 Step 2.4: Develop and present Final Report Final Assessment Report & Executive Summary $9,000 Total Fixed Fee: $210,000 45 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Changes to Scope The scope of this project is defined by this Proposal/Statement of Work. All City requests for changes to the SOW must be in writing and must set forth with specificity the requested changes. As soon as practicable, Gartner shall advise City of the cost and schedule implications of the requested changes and any other necessary details to allow both parties to make an informed decision as to whether they will proceed with the requested changes. The parties shall agree in writing upon any requested changes prior to Gartner commencing work As used herein, “changes” are defined as work activities or work products not originally planned for or specifically defined by this SOW. By way of example and not limitation, changes may include the following: –Any activities not specifically set forth in this SOW –Providing or developing any deliverables not specifically set forth in this SOW –Any change in the respective responsibilities of Gartner and City, including any reallocation or any changes in engagement or project manager staffing –Any rework of completed activities or accepted deliverables –Any investigative work to determine the cost or other impact of changes requested by City –Any additional work caused by a change in the assumptions set forth in this SOW –Any delays in deliverable caused by modification of acceptance criteria in this SOW –Any changes requiring changes to research analyst time or resources 46 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Validity Period and Further Assurances The Proposal, including the Statement of Work, is valid through 15 August 2020 Gartner Research and Consulting recommendations are produced independently by the Company’s analysts and consultants, respectively, without the influence, review or approval of outside investors, shareholders or directors. For further information on the independence and integrity of Gartner Research, see “Guiding Principles on Independence and Objectivity” on our website, gartner.com or contact the Office of the Ombudsman at ombudsman@gartner.com or +1 203 316 3334 47 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 This Proposal/Statement of Work is submitted under the terms and conditions of the Texas Department of Information Services (DIR) Deliverables-Based IT Services (DBITS) contract with an effective date of November 10, 2017 with the State of Texas. When signed by Gartner, Inc. and City of Georgetown, this Proposal/Statement of Work is an attachment to and governed by the Contract Number DIR-TSO-4030 between the parties. These two documents will set forth the relationship between the parties for this engagement. This Statement of Work may be modified at any time provided such changes (i) are agreed by the parties in writing and (ii) where applicable, are in accordance with the Change Order provision. Authorization DATE PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE SUBMITTED ON BEHALF OF GARTNER, INC. DATE PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE AGREED ON BEHALF OF CITY OF GEORGETOWN PO NUMBER (If applicable) 48 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Section 5: Appendix Project Team Biographies 49 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Sudeep Kappadan is a Director with Gartner Consulting and has over 20 years of experience in IT strategy definition, program management, project management and solution delivery. He has deep experience in the Utilities industry, which he combines with his program management and program delivery skills to drive client success. Mr. Kappadan has led technology strategy development, program management and project management efforts for business transformation, business- technology alignment and project turnarounds. Mr. Kappadan’s recent project experience includes: For a Utility — The client wanted to modernize their aging and brittle technology stack. Mr. Kappadan and his team helped the client in performing a current-state assessment, identifying gaps and developing a multiyear roadmap for replacing their work management, asset management, work scheduling, and time-keeping platforms as part of an overall IT strategy. For a Utility — Led multivendor teams that planned and delivered portions of the work management, asset management and time-keeping platform modernization roadmap he had helped define for the client. Program scope included solution selection, budget planning, risk evaluation and complex integrations with multiple legacy systems. For a Utility — The client wanted to transform their model for engaging with new and existing utility customers. Mr. Kappadan helped define a technology solution roadmap to enhance customer engagement through mobile-enabled customer-facing and internal portals integrated with Work and Asset Management, Supply Chain, Inventory, Geographic Information System (GIS), Scheduling, Financial Information Management (FIM), Customer Information System (CIS) and Enterprise Content Management (ECM) platforms. The roadmap was coordinated with Organizational Change Management (OCM) processes on the business side. For a Utility — Led an effort to analyze process and system gaps, and to subsequently select and implement a Wholesale Power Demand Forecasting, Scheduling and Settlement system for the client. He also advised the client in the definition and implementation of IT governance, Project Management Office (PMO), project prioritization, resource allocation and stakeholder reporting processes. For a Utility — This client was focused on innovation and geographic footprint expansion. To enable this, Mr. Kappadan helped them adopt Agile methodologies in both IT and their business. He also delivered an innovative technology solution for a pre-paid power product along with repeatable solutions and processes to support rapid expansions into new Retail markets. For a Telecom Service Provider — Led a multivendor team that delivered a complex ordering and service provisioning system as part of a marquee fiber-based broadband rollout for a Fortune 50 client. For a Telecom Solution Provider — Led gap analysis, system conversion and integration efforts for Customer Care and Billing (CC&B) systems for several U.S.- based and international wireless and fixed line clients. Mr. Kappadan has an M.B.A. from the University of Texas, Dallas, and is a PMI-certified Project Management Professional (PMP). Project Team Biographies Sudeep Kappadan, Director, Gartner Consulting 50 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Alfredo Villalobos is an Expert Partner with Gartner Consulting with broad experience in strategic positioning of technology, operations and technology leadership. Mr. Villalobos has functioned as the Chief Technology Officer of a large healthcare system and as an advisor to the Chief Technology Office of a Texas state agency. His experience also includes developing IT Strategies, Enterprise Architectures and optimizing IT operations for healthcare, educational, governmental and commercial enterprises in the United States and Latin America. Over the past 25 years, Mr. Villalobos has served in leadership roles in the Network Services practice of IBM Global Services, in the Business Process Management and Network Solutions practice of Accenture (previously Andersen Consulting), the telecommunications area of SHL Systemhouse (which became part of MCI), and at Unisys Corporation. Mr. Villalobos has a degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Kansas and is fluent in both English and Spanish. Representative IT Leadership, Governance and Strategy Experience: For the United States Air Force — Participated with a “think tank” group of the Air Force to determine how ‘Smart Bases’ and the Internet of Things could be harnessed to improve the life of an Airman, enhance the experience of visitors, and improve the security posture of the base. The effort included a week long Design Thinking sprint that brought together the experience and knowledge of Air Force personnel and IT industry experts. The outputs of the Design Thinking sprint provided the Air Force with a series of prioritized initiatives to further design, solution and implement in a pilot environment. Gartner developed an architecture framework and a roadmap for implementation of the initiatives and transitioned the effort to an organization within the Air Force who would then review and revise internal policies, develop final detailed designs and lead the procurement efforts and deployment. For the Texas Department of Information Resources - Functioned as the Program Director for a Statewide Security Program working in conjunction with the State CISO. Mr. Villalobos’ role included developing and overseeing the governance model for the program, interfacing directly with all Texas agencies executive leadership, coordinating all activities and execution of initiatives surrounding the security program, and coordination of Gartner and State resources to perform the training and ongoing activities committed through the Program. Also established the governance and charter for the State Information Security Advisory Committee (SISAC) that was created to provide security advisory counsel to the state’s leadership. For the Texas Department of Insurance – Led the development of a governance model to help prioritize, oversee and manage risks of IT Projects. Worked directly with the Executive Directors of the agency and gained participation from key agency executives for implementation. For a leading Healthcare System — Functioned as the Chief Technology Officer for its centralized IT organization. Under the responsibilities of the CTO were the System’s IT Operations group and the Strategic Implementation teams (PMO). As part of the role, Mr. Villalobos also provided guidance to the Enterprise Architecture group and worked closely with the Business Analysis and Planning group. The overall Healthcare System included a Health Plan business unit, a Home Health business unit, a Medical Center, a Preferred Physicians business unit, a centralized services business unit and a Foundation unit. For an Institution of Higher Education — Led an IT assessment and IT strategic plan of their Information Technology organization focusing on its alignment with the business imperatives and key initiatives, its governance models, its organization structure and its infrastructure technology Project Team Biographies Alfredo Villalobos, Expert Partner, Gartner Consulting 51 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 William Wong is a Managing Partner with Gartner Consulting — based out of the Gartner offices in Austin, Texas — and a Subject Matter Expert within the State and Local Government industry group focused on serving Texas government clients. Mr. Wong has over 20 years of experience in managing and delivering on key IT initiatives including Sourcing (including RFP/SOW Development), Project Oversight/Quality Assurance, Enterprise Application Modernization, IT Strategy and Application Assessments. For a large State transportation agency — Mr. Wong provided subject matter expertise and advisory services for the Director of Applications. The role included providing strategic guidance in software development life cycle/application development, conducting project health checks, and providing project oversight for key initiatives. For a large Texas city client – Mr. Wong led a job architecture and compensation study to help the IT organization move from a project-based to product-based delivery model and recalibrate their compensation ranges to improve talent acquisition. For a large water utility client – Mr. Wong was engaged in a modernization effort to migrate to an enterprise asset management platform and implement a new permitting solution. For a large Texas county client — Mr. Wong was responsible for multiple initiatives including a data center migration strategy, procurement support for a large initiative, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) initiative, and a multiple year project oversight for an enterprise implementation. For a large City client— Mr. Wong led the City’s procurement efforts to replace their existing Permitting and Licensing system. Scope of work included business case development, identifying future state business use cases, technology architecture, RFP development, vendor evaluation and selection, program oversight and Independent Verification and Validation (V&V.) For a Texas city client — Mr. Wong was engaged to assist the City with their IT modernization efforts associated with their permitting and licensing initiative. Scope of work included use case development, sourcing strategy, solution architecture definition, technical requirements, Request for Proposal development, program oversight, and IV&V. For large Texas community college client — Mr. Wong was responsible for working with the client’s leadership team to manage and oversee the procurement efforts of their ERP (Human Capital Management and Financials) solution, from business case development through vendor evaluation/selection. For city client — Mr. Wong was engaged to manage with the sourcing of an ERP Human Capital Management solution. This work included business case development, strategy definition, use case development, proposal development, and assisting the City with the procurement process. Mr. Wong earned his Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees from Carnegie Mellon University and has received two U.S. patents for his technology-based process improvement architectures. He also has a Six Sigma green belt. . Project Team Biographies Will Wong, Managing Partner, Gartner Consulting 52 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Suggested Gartner Research ID G00411186 Market Guide for Utility Customer Information Systems , Zarko Sumic, 4 November 2019 ID G00368583 Strategic Roadmap for Utility Customer Information Systems , Zarko Sumic, 15 November 2018 ID G00389059 Market Guide for Advanced Distribution Management Systems, Zarko Sumic, 19 June 2019 ID G00450510 Market Guide for Meter Data Management, Zarko Sumic, 23 December 2019 ID G00389114 Hype Cycle for Digital Grid Transformation Technologies, 2019, Zarko Sumic, 30 July 2019 ID G00355733 10 Critical Actions Water Utility CIOs Should Take to Move Digital Initiatives Forward, Nicole Foust and Ethan Cohen, 5 November 2019 53 © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. RESTRICTED | July 2020 | CIS Assessment and AMI-MDM Analysis 330063873 Version 4 Gartner Contacts Allix Jackson Account Executive Gartner Research Phone: 512 948 0531 allix.jackson@gartner.com William Wong Managing Partner Public Sector Gartner Consulting Phone: 512 589 9886 william.wong@gartner.com Department of Information Resources Department of Information Resources Department of Information Resources Department of Information Resources Department of Information Resources Department of Information Resources Department of Information Resources Department of Information Resources Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 i Table of Contents 1. No Quantity Guarantees:........................................................................................................ 1 2. Definitions.............................................................................................................................. 1 3. General Provisions................................................................................................................. 2 Entire Agreement.......................................................................................................... 2 Modification of Contract Terms and/or Amendments.................................................. 2 Invalid Term or Condition............................................................................................ 3 Assignment ................................................................................................................... 3 Survival......................................................................................................................... 3 Choice of Law............................................................................................................... 3 Limitation of Authority................................................................................................. 4 Proof of Financial Stability........................................................................................... 4 4. Intellectual Property Matters.................................................................................................. 4 Definitions..................................................................................................................... 4 Ownership..................................................................................................................... 5 Further Actions............................................................................................................. 6 Waiver of Moral Rights................................................................................................ 6 Confidentiality.............................................................................................................. 6 Injunctive Relief............................................................................................................ 7 Return of Materials Pertaining to Work Product .......................................................... 7 Vendor License to Use.................................................................................................. 7 Third-Party Underlying and Derivative Works. ........................................................... 7 Agreement with Subcontracts....................................................................................... 8 License to Customer. .................................................................................................... 8 Vendor Development Rights......................................................................................... 8 5. Terms and Conditions Applicable to State Agency Purchases Only:.................................... 8 Electronic and Information Resources Accessibility Standards, As Required by 1 TAC Chapters 206 and 213 (Applicable to State Agency and Institution of Higher Education Purchases Only)......................................................... 8 B. Purchase of Commodity Items (Applicable to State Agency Purchases Only) ................ 9 6. Contract Fulfillment and Promotion...................................................................................... 9 Service, Sales and Support of the Contract................................................................... 9 Internet Access to Contract........................................................................................... 9 1) Vendor Webpage .................................................................................................... 9 2) Accurate and Timely Contract Information.......................................................... 10 3) Webpage Compliance Checks .............................................................................. 10 4) Webpage Changes................................................................................................. 10 5) Use of Access Data Prohibited ............................................................................. 10 Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 ii 6) Responsibility for Content.................................................................................... 10 Services Warranty and Return Policies....................................................................... 11 DIR Logo.................................................................................................................... 11 Vendor Logo............................................................................................................... 11 Trade Show Participation............................................................................................ 11 Orientation Meeting.................................................................................................... 11 Performance Review Meetings................................................................................... 11 DIR Cost Avoidance................................................................................................... 12 7. Pricing, Purchase Orders, Invoices, and Payments.............................................................. 12 Tax Exempt................................................................................................................. 12 Travel Expense Reimbursement................................................................................. 12 C. Purchase Orders.......................................................................................................... 12 D. Invoices....................................................................................................................... 13 E. Payments..................................................................................................................... 13 8. Contract Administration....................................................................................................... 13 Contract Managers...................................................................................................... 13 1) State Contract Manager......................................................................................... 13 2) Vendor Contract Manager..................................................................................... 14 Reporting and Administrative Fees ............................................................................ 14 1) Reporting Responsibility ...................................................................................... 14 2) Detailed Monthly Report ...................................................................................... 14 3) Historically Underutilized Businesses Subcontract Reports................................. 14 4) DIR Administrative Fee........................................................................................ 15 5) Accurate and Timely Submission of Reports ....................................................... 15 Records and Audit....................................................................................................... 15 Contract Administration Notification......................................................................... 17 9. Vendor Responsibilities....................................................................................................... 17 Indemnification........................................................................................................... 17 1) INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR....................................................................... 17 2) Acts or Omissions................................................................................................. 17 3) Infringements........................................................................................................ 17 4) PROPERTY DAMAGE........................................................................................ 18 ........................ 18 Vendor Certifications.................................................................................................. 19 Ability to Conduct Business in Texas......................................................................... 21 Equal Opportunity Compliance .................................................................................. 21 Use of Subcontractors................................................................................................. 22 Responsibility for Actions .......................................................................................... 22 Confidentiality............................................................................................................ 22 Security of Premises, Equipment, Data and Personnel............................................... 22 Background and/or Criminal History Investigation.................................................... 23 Limitation of Liability................................................................................................. 23 Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 iii Overcharges ................................................................................................................ 23 Prohibited Conduct..................................................................................................... 23 Required Insurance Coverage..................................................................................... 23 Use of State Property.................................................................................................. 24 Immigration................................................................................................................. 25 Public Disclosure........................................................................................................ 25 Product and/or Services Substitutions ........................................................................ 25 Secure Erasure of Hard Disk Managed Services Products and/or Services ............... 25 Deceptive Trade Practices; Unfair Business Practices ............................................... 26 U. Drug Free Workplace Policy ...................................................................................... 26 Accessibility of Public Information............................................................................ 26 Vendor Reporting Responsibilities............................................................................. 26 10. Contract Enforcement.......................................................................................................... 27 Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution...................................................... 27 Termination................................................................................................................. 27 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation..................................................................... 27 a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer.......................................... 27 b) Termination for Non-Appropriation by DIR .................................................. 27 2) Absolute Right...................................................................................................... 28 3) Termination for Convenience............................................................................... 28 4) Termination for Cause .......................................................................................... 28 a) Contract........................................................................................................... 28 b) Purchase Order................................................................................................ 28 5) Immediate Termination or Suspension................................................................. 29 6) Customer Rights Under Termination.................................................................... 29 7) Vendor or Order Fulfiller Rights Under Termination........................................... 29 Force Majeure............................................................................................................. 29 11. Notification.......................................................................................................................... 30 Notices ........................................................................................................................ 30 Handling of Written Complaints................................................................................. 30 12. Captions............................................................................................................................... 30 Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 1 of 30 1. No Quantity Guarantees: Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED The Contract is not exclusive to the Vendor. Customers may obtain services from other sources during the term of the Contract. DIR makes no express or implied warranties whatsoever that any particular quantity or dollar amount of services will be procured through the Contract. 2. Definitions A. Customer any Texas state agency, unit of local government, institution of higher education as defined in Section 2054.003, Texas Government Code, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, the Lower Colorado River Authority, a private school, as defined by Section 5.001, Education Code, a private or independent institution of higher education, as defined by Section 61.003, Education Code, a volunteer fire department, as defined by Section 152.001, Tax Code and those state agencies purchasing from a DIR contract through an Interagency Agreement, as authorized by Chapter 771, Texas Government Code, any local government as authorized through the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791, Texas Government Code, the state agencies and political subdivisions of other states as authorized by Section 2054.0565, Texas Government Code, and, except for telecommunications services under Chapter 2170, Texas Government Code, assistance organizations as defined in Section 2175.001, Texas Government Code to mean: 1) A non-profit organization that provides educational, health or human services or assistance to homeless individuals; 2) A nonprofit food bank that solicits, warehouses, and redistributes edible but unmarketable food to an agency that feeds needy families and individuals; 3) Texas Partners of the Americas, a registered agency with the Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid, with the approval of the Partners of the Alliance Office of the Agency for International Development; 4) A group, including a faith-based group, that enters into a financial or non- financial agreement with a health or human services agency to provide services t 5) A local workforce development board created under Section 2308.253; 6) A nonprofit organization approved by the Supreme Court of Texas that provides free legal services for low-income households in civil matters; 7) The Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc., or an entity successor entity under Section 74.1011, Texas Agriculture Code; 8) A nonprofit computer bank that solicits, stores, refurbishes and redistributes used computer equipment to public school students and their families; and 9) A nonprofit organization that provides affordable housing. B. Compliance Check performed by, but not limited to, a third party auditor, DIR Internal Audit department, or DIR contract management staff or their designees. Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 2 of 30 C. Contract the document executed between DIR and Vendor into which this Appendix A is incorporated. D. CPA refers to the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. E. Day shall mean business days, Monday through Friday, except for State and Federal holidays, unless otherwise specified as calendar days. If the Contract calls for performance on a day that is not a business day, then performance is intended to occur on the next business day. F. Purchase Order a purchase (e.g., formal written Purchase Order, Procurement Card, Electronic Purchase Order, or other authorized instrument). G. State refers to the State of Texas. H. Statement of Work Solicitation (SOW) A document, hereinafter referred to as a performed for a specified DIR Customer. SOW Solicitations may include: background, description of deliverables, acceptance criteria for deliverables, service levels for deliverables, duration of engagement with the DIR Customer, additional Customer terms and conditions and other relevant information J. Technology Category A DBITS service grouping for which Vendors may be awarded a Contract. 3. General Provisions Entire Agreement The Contract, Appendices, and Exhibits constitute the entire agreement between DIR and the Vendor. No statement, promise, condition, understanding, inducement or representation, oral or written, expressed or implied, which is not contained in the Contract, Appendices, or its Exhibits shall be binding or valid. Modification of Contract Terms and/or Amendments 1)The terms and conditions of the Contract shall govern all transactions by Customers under the Contract. The Contract may only be modified or amended upon mutual written agreement of DIR and Vendor. 2)Customers shall not have the authority to modify the terms of the Contract; however, additional Customer terms and conditions that do not conflict with the Contract and are acceptable to Vendor may be added in a Purchase Order and given effect. No additional term or condition added in a Purchase Order issued by a Customer can conflict with or diminish a term or condition of the Contract. Pre-printed terms and conditions on any Purchase Order issued by Customer hereunder will have no force and effect. the Contract, the Contract term shall control. 3)Customers and Vendor will negotiate and enter into written agreements regarding statements of work, service level agreements, remedies, acceptance criteria, information confidentiality and security requirements, and other terms specific to their Purchase Orders under the Contract with Vendor. Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 3 of 30 Invalid Term or Condition 1)To the extent any term or condition in the Contract conflicts with the applicable Texas and/or United States law or regulation, such Contract term or condition is void and unenforceable. By executing a contract which contains the conflicting term or condition, DIR makes no representations or warranties regarding the enforceability of such term or condition and DIR does not waive the applicable State and/or United States law or regulation which conflicts with the Contract term or condition. 2)If one or more term or condition in the Contract, or the application of any term or condition to any party or circumstance, is held invalid, unenforceable, or illegal in any respect by a final judgment or order of the State Office of Administrative Hearings or a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Contract and the application of the term or condition to other parties or circumstances shall remain valid and in full force and effect. Assignment DIR or Vendor may assign the Contract without prior written approval to: i) a successor in interest (for DIR, another state agency as designated by the Texas Legislature), or ii) a subsidiary, parent company or affiliate, or iii) as necessary to satisfy a regulatory requirement imposed upon a party by a governing body with the appropriate authority. Assignment of the Contract under the above terms shall require written notification by the assigning party and, for Vendor, a mutually agreed written Contract amendment. Any other assignment by a party shall require the written consent of the other party and a mutually agreed written Contract amendment. Survival All applicable Statements of Work that were entered into between Vendor and a Customer under the terms and conditions of the Contract shall survive the expiration or termination of the Contract. All Purchase Orders issued and accepted by Vendor shall survive expiration or termination of the Contract for the term of the Purchase Order, unless the Customer terminates the Purchase Order sooner. However, regardless of the term of the Purchase Order, no Purchase Order shall survive the expiration or termination of the Contract for more than five years, unless Customer makes an express finding and justification for the longer term. The finding and justification must either be included in the Purchase Order, or referenced in it and Rights and obligations under this Contract which by their nature should survive, including, but not limited to the DIR Administrative Fee; and any and all payment obligations invoiced prior to the termination or expiration hereof, obligations of confidentiality; and indemnification will remain in effect after termination or expiration hereof. Choice of Law The laws of the State shall govern the construction and interpretation of the Contract. Exclusive venue for all actions will be in state court, Travis County, Texas. Nothing immunity. Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 4 of 30 Limitation of Authority Vendor shall have no authority to act for or on behalf of the Texas Department of Information Resources or the State except as expressly provided for in this Contract; no other authority, power or use is granted or implied. Vendor may not incur any debts, obligations, expenses, or liabilities of any kind on behalf of the State or DIR. Proof of Financial Stability Either DIR or Customer may require Vendor to provide proof of financial stability prior to or at any time during the contract term. 4. Intellectual Property Matters Definitions 1) under a Statement of Work issued pursuant to this Contract, including any and all tangible or intangible items or things that have been or will be prepared, created, developed, invented or conceived at any time following the effective date of the Contract, including but not limited to any (i) works of authorship (such as manuals, instructions, printed material, graphics, artwork, images, illustrations, photographs, computer programs, computer software, scripts, object code, source code or other programming code, HTML code, flow charts, notes, outlines, lists, compilations, manuscripts, writings, pictorial materials, schematics, formulae, processes, algorithms, data, information, multimedia files, text web pages or web sites, other written or machine readable expression of such works fixed in any tangible media, and all other copyrightable works), (ii) trademarks, service marks, trade dress, trade names, logos, or other indicia of source or origin, (iii) ideas, designs, concepts, personality rights, methods, processes, techniques, apparatuses, inventions, formulas, discoveries, or improvements, including any patents, trade secrets and know-how, (iv) domain names, (v) any copies, and similar or derivative works to any of the foregoing, (vi) all documentation and materials related to any of the foregoing, (vii) all other goods, services or deliverables to be provided to Customer under the Contract or a Statement of Work, and (viii) all Intellectual Property Rights in any of the foregoing, and which are or were created, prepared, developed, invented or conceived for the use or benefit of Customer in connection with this Contract or a Statement of Work, or with funds appropriated by or for by any Vendor personnel or Customer personnel, or (b) any Customer personnel who then became personnel to Vendor or any of its affiliates or subcontractors, where, although creation or reduction-to-practice is completed while the person is affiliated with Vendor or its personnel, any portion of same was created, invented or conceived by such person while affiliated with Customer. 2)means the worldwide legal rights or interests evidenced by or embodied in: (i) any idea, design, concept, personality right, method, process, technique, apparatus, invention, discovery, or improvement, including any patents, trade secrets, and know-how; (ii) any work of authorship, including any copyrights, moral rights or neighboring rights; (iii) any trademark, service mark, trade Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 5 of 30 dress, trade name, or other indicia of source or origin; (iv) domain name registrations; and (v) any other proprietary or similar rights. The Intellectual Property Rights of a party include all worldwide legal rights or interests that the party may have acquired by assignment or license with the right to grant sublicenses. 3) describing a specific set of activities and/or deliverables, which may include Work Product and Intellectual Property Rights, that Vendor is to provide Customer, issued pursuant to the Contract. 4) not a party to this Contract, and that is not directly or indirectly providing any goods or services to Customer under this Contract. 5) Intellectual Property Rights therein, created or developed by Vendor (a) prior to providing any Services or Work Product to Customer and prior to receiving any documents, materials, information or funding from or on behalf of Customer relating to the Services or Work Product, or (b) after the Effective Date of the Contract if such tangible or intangible items or things were independently developed by Vendor were not created, prepared, developed, invented or conceived by any Customer personnel who then became personnel to Vendor or any of its affiliates or subcontractors, where, although creation or reduction-to-practice is completed while the person is affiliated with Vendor or its personnel, any portion of same was created, invented or conceived by such person while affiliated with Customer. Ownership. As between Vendor and Customer, the Work Product and Intellectual Property Rights therein are and shall be owned exclusively by Customer, and not Vendor. Vendor specifically and that the Work Product shall, upon creation, be owned exclusively by Customer. To the extent that the Work Product, under applicable law, may not be considered works made for hire, Vendor hereby agrees that the Contract effectively transfers, grants, conveys, assigns, and relinquishes exclusively to Customer all right, title and interest in and to all ownership rights in the Work Product, and all Intellectual Property Rights in the Work Product, without the necessity of any further consideration, and Customer shall be entitled to obtain and hold in its own name all Intellectual Property Rights in and to the Work Product. Vendor acknowledges that Vendor and Customer do not intend Vendor to be a joint author of the Work Product within the meaning of the Copyright Act of 1976. Customer shall have access, during normal business hours (Monday through Friday, 8AM to 5PM) and upon reasonable prior notice to Vendor, to all Vendor materials, premises and computer files containing the Work Product. Vendor and Customer, as appropriate, will cooperate with one another and execute such other documents as may be reasonably appropriate to achieve the objectives Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 6 of 30 herein. No license or other right is granted hereunder to any Third Party IP, except as may be incorporated in the Work Product by Vendor. Further Actions. Vendor, upon request and without further consideration, shall perform any acts that may be deemed reasonably necessary or desirable by Customer to evidence more fully the transfer of ownership and/or registration of all Intellectual Property Rights in all Work Product to Customer to the fullest extent possible, including but not limited to the execution, acknowledgement and delivery of such further documents in a form ny document reasonably necessary for any purpose set forth in the foregoing sentence, Vendor hereby irrevocably designates and appoints Customer and its duly authorized officers and -in-fact to act for and in V behalf and stead to execute and file any such document and to do all other lawfully permitted acts to further any such purpose with the same force and effect as if executed and delivered by Vendor, provided however that no such grant of right to Customer is applicable if Vendor fails to execute any document due to a good faith dispute by Vendor with respect to such document. It is understood that such power is coupled with an interest and is therefore irrevocable. Customer shall have the full and sole power to prosecute such applications and to take all other action concerning the Work and prosecution of all such applications and in any legal actions and proceedings concerning the Work Product. Waiver of Moral Rights. Vendor hereby irrevocably and forever waives, and agrees never to assert, any Moral Rights in or to the Work Product which Vendor may now have or which may accrue reign copyright or other laws and any and all other residual rights and benefits which arise under any other applicable law now in force or hereafter enacted. Vendor acknowledges the receipt of equitable compensation for its assignment and waiver of such any and all rights of paternity or integrity of the Work Product and the right to object to any modification, translation or use of the Work Product, and any similar rights existing under the judicial or statutory law of any country in the world or under any treaty, regardless of whether or not such right is denominated or referred to as a moral right. Confidentiality. All documents, information and materials forwarded to Vendor by Customer for use in and preparation of the Work Product shall be deemed the confidential information of Customer, and subject to the license granted by Customer to Vendor under sub- paragraph H. hereunder. Vendor shall not use, disclose, or permit any person to use or obtain the Work Product, or any portion thereof, in any manner without the prior written approval of Customer. Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 7 of 30 Injunctive Relief. Work Product, and the Intellectual Property Rights therein, and any misuse of such Therefore, Vendor acknowledges and stipulates that a court of competent jurisdiction may immediately enjoin any material breach of the intellectual property, use, and confidentiality provisions of this Contract, upon a request by Customer, without requiring proof of irreparable injury as same should be presumed. Return of Materials Pertaining to Work Product. Upon the request of Customer, but in any event upon termination or expiration of this Contract or a Statement of Work, Vendor shall surrender to Customer all documents and things pertaining to the Work Product, including but not limited to drafts, memoranda, notes, records, drawings, manuals, computer software, reports, data, and all other documents or materials (and copies of same) generated or developed by Vendor or furnished by Customer to Vendor, including all materials embodying the Work Product, any Customer confidential information, or Intellectual Property Rights in such Work Product, regardless of whether complete or incomplete. This section is intended to apply to all Work Product as well as to all documents and things furnished to Vendor by Customer or by anyone else that pertain to the Work Product. Vendor License to Use. Customer hereby grants to Vendor a non-transferable, non-exclusive, royalty-free, fully paid-up license to use any Work Product solely as necessary to provide the Services to Customer. Except as provided in this Section, neither Vendor nor any Subcontractor shall have the right to use the Work Product in connection with the provision of services to its other customers without the prior written consent of discretion. Third-Party Underlying and Derivative Works. To the extent that any Vendor IP or Third Party IP are embodied or reflected in the Work Product, or are necessary to provide the Services, Vendor hereby grants to the Customer, or shall irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free right and license, for perform, distribute copies of, and prepare derivative works based upon such Vendor IP or Third Party IP and any derivative works thereof embodied in or delivered to Customer in conjunction with the Work Product, and (ii) authorize others to do any or all of the foregoing. Vendor agrees to notify Customer on delivery of the Work Product or Services if such materials include any Third Party IP. On request, Vendor for Vendor to use any Third Party IP that may be embodied or reflected in the Work Product. Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 8 of 30 Agreement with Subcontracts. Vendor agrees that it shall have written agreement(s) that are consistent with the provisions hereof related to Work Product and Intellectual Property Rights with any employees, agents, consultants, contractors or subcontractors providing Services or Work Product pursuant to the Contract, prior to their providing such Services or Work Product, and that it shall maintain such written agreements at all times during performance of this Contract, which are sufficient to support all performance and grants of rights by Vendor. Copies of such agreements shall be provided to the Customer promptly upon request. License to Customer. Vendor grants to Customer, a perpetual, irrevocable, royalty free license, solely for any means), transmit and prepare derivative works of any Vendor IP embodied in or delivered to Customer in conjunction with the Work Product. The foregoing license includes the right to sublicense third parties, solely for the purpose of engaging such Product. Except for the preceding license, all rights in Vendor IP remain in Vendor. Vendor Development Rights. forth herein, nothing in this Contract shall preclude Vendor from developing for itself, or for others, materials which are competitive with those produced as a result of the Services provided hereunder, provided that no Work Product is utilized, and no Intellectual Property Rights of Customer therein are infringed by such competitive materials. To the extent that Vendor wishes to use the Work Product, or acquire licensed rights in certain Intellectual Property Rights of Customer therein in order to offer competitive goods or services to third parties, Vendor and Customer agree to negotiate in good faith regarding an appropriate license and royalty agreement to allow for such. 5. Terms and Conditions Applicable to State Agency Purchases Only: Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED Electronic and Information Resources Accessibility Standards, As Required by 1 TAC Chapters 206 and 213 (Applicable to State Agency and Institution of Higher Education Purchases Only) 1)Effective September 1, 2006 state agencies and institutions of higher education shall procure products which comply with the State Accessibility requirements for Electronic and Information Resources specified in 1 TAC Chapters 206 and 213 when such products are available in the commercial marketplace or when such products are developed in response to a procurement solicitation. Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 9 of 30 B. Purchase of Commodity Items (Applicable to State Agency Purchases Only) 1)Texas Government Code, §2157.068 requires State agencies to buy commodity items, as defined in 5.B.2, below, in accordance with contracts developed by DIR, unless the agency obtains an exemption from DIR or a written certification that a commodity is not on DIR contract (for the limited purpose of purchasing from a local government purchasing cooperative). 2) Commodity items are commercially available software, hardware and technology services that are generally available to businesses or the public and for which DIR determines that a reasonable demand exists in two or more state agencies. Hardware is the physical technology used to process, manage, store, transmit, receive or deliver information. Software is the commercially available programs that operate hardware and includes all supporting documentation, media on which the software may be contained or stored, related materials, modifications, versions, upgrades, enhancements, updates or replacements. Technology services are the services, functions and activities that facilitate the design, implementation, creation, or use of software or hardware. Technology services include seat management, staffing augmentation, training, maintenance and subscription services. Technology services do not include telecommunications services. Seat management is services through which a state agency transfers its responsibilities to a vendor to manage its personal computing needs, including all necessary hardware, software and technology services. 3) Vendor agrees to coordinate all State agency commodity item sales through existing DIR contracts. Institutions of higher education are exempt from this Subsection 5.B. 6. Contract Fulfillment and Promotion Service, Sales and Support of the Contract Vendor shall provide service, sales and support resources to serve all Customers throughout the State. It is the responsibility of the Vendor to sell, market, and promote services available under the Contract. Vendor shall use its best efforts to ensure that potential Customers are made aware of the existence of the Contract. All sales to Customers for services available under the Contract shall be processed through the Contract. Internet Access to Contract 1) Vendor Webpage Within thirty (30) calendar days of the effective date of the Contract, Vendor will establish and maintain a webpage specific to the services awarded under the Contract that are clearly distinguishable from other, non-DIR website. The webpage must include: a) the services awarded and services description; b) contact information (name, telephone number and email address) for Vendor; Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 10 of 30 c) instructions for obtaining quotes and placing Purchase Orders; d) e) f) the DIR logo in accordance with the requirements of this Section. If Vendor does not meet the webpage requirements listed above, DIR may cancel the contract without penalty. 2) Accurate and Timely Contract Information Vendor warrants and represents that the website information specified in the above paragraph will be accurately and completely posted, maintained and displayed in an objective and timely manner. Vendor, at its own expense, shall correct any non- business days after written notification by DIR. 3) Webpage Compliance Checks webpage will be conducted by DIR. Upon request by DIR, Vendor shall provide verifiable documentation that pricing listed upon this webpage is compliant with the pricing as stated in the Contract. 4) Webpage Changes to facilitate access to Contract information. The establishment of the link is provided solely for convenience in carrying out the business operations of the State. DIR reserves the right to suspend, terminate or remove a link at any time, in its sole discretion, without advance notice, or to deny a future request for a link. DIR will provide Vendor with subsequent notice of link suspension, termination or removal. Vendor shall provide DIR with timely written notice of any change in URL or other information needed to access the site and/or maintain the link. 5) Use of Access Data Prohibited If Vendor stores, collects or maintains data electronically as a condition of accessing Contract information, such data shall only be used internally by Vendor for the purpose of implementing or marketing the Contract, and shall not be disseminated to third parties or used for other marketing purposes. The Contract constitutes a public document under the laws of the State and Vendor shall not restrict access to Contract terms and conditions including pricing, i.e., through use of restrictive technology or passwords. 6) Responsibility for Content Vendor is solely responsible for administration, content, intellectual property rights, listed content if, in the opinion of DIR, it does not adequately represent the Contract. Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 11 of 30 Services Warranty and Return Policies -currently published policies concerning services warranties and returns. Such policies for Customers will not be more restrictive or more costly than warranty and return policies for other similarly situated Customers for like services. DIR Logo Vendor may use the DIR logo in the promotion of the Contract to Customers with the following stipulations: (i) the logo may not be modified in any way, (ii) when displayed, the size of the DIR logo must be equal to or smaller than the Vendor logo, (iii) the DIR logo is only used to communicate the availability of services under the Contract to Customers, and (iv) any other use of the DIR logo requires prior written permission from DIR. Vendor Logo logo in the promotion of the Contract to communicate the availability of services under the Contract to Customers. Use of the logos may be on the DIR website or on printed to the purposes of the Contract and any usage guidelines communicated to DIR from time to time. Nothing contained in the Contract will give DIR any right, title, or interest limited usage rights expressly provided by Vendor. Trade Show Participation sponsored trade shows each calendar year. Vendor understands and agrees that similar presence. DIR will provide four months advance notice of any required participation. Vendor must display the DIR logo at all trade shows that potential Customers will attend. DIR reserves the right to approve or disapprove of the location Orientation Meeting Within thirty (30) calendar days from execution of the Contract, Vendor will be required to attend an orientation meeting to discuss the content and procedures of the Contract to include reporting requirements. DIR, at its discretion, may waive the orientation requirement for Vendors who have previously held DIR contracts. The meeting will be held in the Austin, Texas area at a date and time mutually acceptable cost for the time and travel of the Vendor for attendance at the meeting. Performance Review Meetings the Austin, Texas area at a date and time mutually acceptable to DIR and the Vendor Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 12 of 30 or by teleconference. DIR shall bear no cost for the time and travel of the Vendor for attendance at the meeting. DIR Cost Avoidance As part of the performance measures reported to state leadership, DIR must provide the cost avoidance the State has achieved through the Contract. Upon request by DIR, Vendor shall provide DIR with a detailed report of a representative sample of service sold under the Contract. The report shall contain: service description, list price, price to Customer under the Contract. 7. Pricing, Purchase Orders, Invoices, and Payments Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR A-E Tax Exempt Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED As per Section 151.309, Texas Tax Code, Customers under this Contract are exempt from the assessment of State sales, use and excise taxes. Further, Customers under this Contract are exempt from Federal Excise Taxes, 26 United States Code Sections 4253(i) and (j). Customers shall provide evidence of tax-exempt status to Vendor upon request. Travel Expense Reimbursement Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED Pricing for services provided under this Contract are exclusive of any travel expenses that may be incurred in the performance of those services. Travel expense reimbursement may include personal vehicle mileage or commercial coach transportation, hotel accommodations, parking and meals; provided, however, the amount of reimbursement by Customers shall not exceed the amounts authorized for state employees as adopted by each Customer; and provided, further, that all reimbursement rates shall not exceed the maximum rates established for state employees under the current State Travel Management Program (http://www.window.state.tx.us/procurement/prog/stmp/). Travel time may not be included as part of the amounts payable by Customer for any services rendered under this Contract. The DIR administrative fee specified in the contract is not applicable to travel expense reimbursement. Anticipated travel expenses must be pre-approved in writing by Customer. Customer reserves the right not to pay travel expenses which are not pre-approved in writing by the Customer. C. Purchase Orders Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED All Customer Purchase Orders will be placed directly with the Vendor. Accurate Purchase Orders shall be effective and binding upon Vendor when accepted by Vendor. Customer and Vendor may work together to include specific requirements as to what constitutes a valid Purchase Order. Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 13 of 30 Vendors will be required to comply with the disclosure requirements of Section 2252.908, Texas Government Code, as enacted by House Bill 1295, 84 th Regular Session, when execution of a contract requires an action or vote by the governing body of a governmental entity before the contract may be signed. D. Invoices Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1)Invoices shall be submitted by the Vendor directly to the Customer and shall be issued in compliance with Chapter 2251, Texas Government Code. All payments for services purchased under the Contract and any provision of acceptance of such services shall be made by the Customer to the Vendor. For Customers that are not subject to Chapter 2251, Texas Government Code, Customer and Vendor will agree to acceptable terms. 2)Invoices must be timely and accurate. Each Purchase Order and include any written changes that may apply, as it relates to Purchase Order number or other pertinent information for verification of receipt of the services by the Customer. 3)The administrative fee specified in the contract shall not be broken out as a separate line item when pricing or invoice is provided to Customer. E. Payments Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED Customers shall comply with Chapter 2251, Texas Government Code, in making payments to Vendor. The statute states that payments for goods and services are due thirty (30) calendar days after the goods are provided, the services completed, or a correct invoice is received, whichever is later. Payment under the Contract shall not foreclose the right to recover wrongful payments. For Customers that are not subject to Chapter 2251, Texas Government Code, Customer and Vendor will agree to acceptable terms. 8. Contract Administration Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR A, C1, D Contract Managers Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED DIR and the Vendor will each provide a Contract Manager to support the Contract. Information regarding the Contract Managers will be posted on the Internet website designated for the Contract. 1) State Contract Manager DIR shall provide a Contract Manager whose duties shall include but not be limited to: i) advising DIR and Vendor of Vend of the Contract, and ii) periodic verification of pricing and, iii) verification of monthly Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 14 of 30 reports submitted by Vendor. 2) Vendor Contract Manager Vendor shall identify a specific Contract Manager whose duties shall include but not be limited to: i) supporting the marketing and management of the Contract, ii) facilitating dispute resolution between Vendor and a Customer, and iii) advising DIR . DIR reserves -current Contract Manager if the assigned Contract Manager is not, in the reasonable opinion of DIR, adequately serving the needs of the State. Reporting and Administrative Fees 1) Reporting Responsibility a)Vendor shall be responsible for reporting all services purchased under the Contract. Vendor shall file the monthly reports, subcontract reports, and pay the administrative fees in accordance with the due dates specified in this section. b)DIR shall have the right to verify required reports and to take any actions necessary to enforce its rights under this section, including but not limited to required documentation at no cost. 2) Detailed Monthly Report Vendor shall electronically provide DIR with a detailed monthly report in the format required by DIR showing the dollar volume of any and all sales under the Contract for the previous calendar month period. Reports are due on the fifteenth (15th) calendar day of the month following the month of the sale. If the 15 th calendar day falls on a weekend or state or federal holiday, the report shall be due on the next business day. The monthly report shall include, per transaction: the detailed sales for the period, Customer name, invoice date, invoice number, description, quantity, MSRP or List Price or Fixed Price, unit price, extended price, Customer Purchase Order estimated administrative fee for the reporting period, subcontractor name, EPEAT designation (if applicable), configuration (if applicable), contract discount percentage, actual discount percentage, negotiated contract price (if fixed price is offered instead of discount off of MSRP), and other information as required by DIR. Each report must contain all information listed above per transaction or the report will be rejected and returned to the Vendor for correction in accordance with this section. Vendor shall report in a manner required by DIR which is subject to contract termination. 3) Historically Underutilized Businesses Subcontract Reports a)Vendor shall electronically provide each Cus Historically Underutilized Business Subcontracting Report, pursuant to the Contract, as required by Chapter 2161, Texas Government Code. Reports shall also be submitted to DIR. Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 15 of 30 b)Reports shall be due in accordance with the CPA rules. 4) DIR Administrative Fee a)The Vendor shall pay an administrative fee to DIR to defray the DIR costs of negotiating, executing, and administering the Contract. The maximum administrative fee is set by the Texas Legislature in the biennial General Appropriations Act. DIR will review Vendor monthly sales reports, close the sales period, and notify the Vendor of the administrative fee no later than the fourteenth (14th) day of the second month following the date of the reported sale. Vendor shall pay the administrative fee by the twenty-fifth (25th) calendar day of the second month following the date of the reported sale. For example, Vendor reports January sales by February 15th; DIR closes January sales and notifies Vendor of administrative fee by March 14th; Vendor submits administrative fee for January sales by March 25th. b)DIR may change the amount of the administrative fee upon thirty (30) calendar days written notice to Vendor without the need for a formal contract amendment. c)Vendor shall reference the DIR Contract number, reporting period, and administrative fee amount on any remittance instruments. 5) Accurate and Timely Submission of Reports a)The reports and administrative fees shall be accurate and timely and submitted in accordance with the due dates specified in this section. Vendor shall correct any inaccurate reports or administrative fee payments within three (3) business days upon written notification by DIR. Vendor shall deliver any late reports or late administrative fee payments within three (3) business days upon written notification by DIR. If Vendor is unable to correct inaccurate reports or administrative fee payments or deliver late reports and fee payments within three (3) business days, Vendor must contact DIR and provide a corrective plan of action, including the timeline for completion of correction. The corrective plan of action shall be subject to DIR approval. b)Should Vendor fail to correct inaccurate reports or cure the delay in timely delivery of reports and payments within the corrective plan of action timeline, DIR (and all payments to auditor will require DIR approval). c)Failure to timely submit three (3) reports or administrative fee payments within of late fees of $100/day for each day the report or payment is due (up to Records and Audit Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED IN SUBPARAGRAPH 1. 1)Acceptance of funds under the Contract by Vendor acts as acceptance of the authority of the Sta Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 16 of 30 an audit or investigation in connection with those funds. Vendor further agrees to conduct of the audit or investigation, including providing all records requested. Vendor will ensure that this clause concerning the authority to audit funds received indirectly by subcontractors through Vendor and the requirement to cooperate is included in any subcontract it awards pertaining to the Contract. Under the direction of the Legislative Audit Committee, a Vendor that is the subject of an audit or investigation by the State information the 2) Vendor shall maintain adequate records to establish compliance with the Contract until the later of a period of seven (7) years after termination of the Contract or until full, final and unappealable resolution of all Compliance Check or litigation issues that arise under the Contract. Such records shall include per transaction: Customer name, invoice date, invoice number, description, quantity, MSRP or List Price, unit price, extended price, Customer Purchase Order billing address, the calculations supporting each administrative fee owed DIR under the Contract, Historically Underutilized Businesses Subcontracting reports, and such other documentation as DIR may request. 3) Vendor and/or Order Fulfillers shall grant access to all paper and electronic records, books, documents, accounting procedures, practices, customer records including but not limited to contracts, agreements, purchase orders and statements of work, and any other items relevant to the performance of the Contract to the DIR Internal Audit department or DIR Contract Management staff, including the compliance checks designated by the DIR Internal Audit department, DIR Contract Management staff, the designated by DIR for the purposes of inspecting, Compliance Checking and/or copying such books and records. Vendor and/or Order Fulfillers shall provide copies and printouts requested by DIR without charge. DIR shall provide Vendor and/or Order Fulfillers records, whether paper or electronic, shall be made available during regular office hours. Vendor and/or Order Fulfiller personnel familiar with the Internal Audit department, or DIR Contract Management staff and designees as needed. Vendor and/or Order Fulfiller shall provide adequate office space to DIR staff during the performance of Compliance Check. If Vendor is found to be responsible for inaccurate reports, DIR may invoice for the reasonable costs of the audit, which Vendor must pay within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt. 4) For procuring State Agencies whose payments are processed by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, the volume of payments made to Vendor through the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts and the administrative fee based thereon shall Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 17 of 30 Contract Administration Notification Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1)Prior to execution of the Contract, Vendor shall provide DIR with written notification of the following: i) Vendor Contract Administrator name and contact information, ii) Vendor sales representative name and contact information, and iii) name and contact information of Vendor personnel responsible for submitting reports and payment of administrative fees. 2)Upon execution of the Contract, DIR shall provide Vendor with written notification of the following: i) DIR Contract Administrator name and contact information, and ii) DIR Cooperative Contracts E-Mail Box information. 9. Vendor Responsibilities Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED IN C-H, L-M, O-S, V-W. Indemnification 1) INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR VENDOR AGREES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT DURING THE EXISTENCE OF THIS CONTRACT, IT IS FURNISHING SERVICES IN THE CAPACITY OF AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AND THAT VENDOR IS NOT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE CUSTOMER OR THE STATE OF TEXAS. 2) Acts or Omissions Vendor shall indemnify and hold harmless the State of Texas and Customers, AND/OR THEIR OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS, ASSIGNEES, AND/OR DESIGNEES FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, ACTIONS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, OR SUITS, AND ALL RELATED COSTS, ATTORNEY FEES, AND EXPENSES arising out of, or resulting from any acts or omissions of the Vendor or its agents, employees, subcontractors, Order Fulfillers, or suppliers of subcontractors in the execution or performance of the Contract and any Purchase Orders issued under the Contract. THE DEFENSE SHALL BE COORDINATED BY VENDOR WITH THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHEN TEXAS STATE AGENCIES ARE NAMED DEFENDANTS IN ANY LAWSUIT AND VENDOR MAY NOT AGREE TO ANY SETTLEMENT WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE CONCURRENCE FROM THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. VENDOR AND THE CUSTOMER AGREE TO FURNISH TIMELY WRITTEN NOTICE TO EACH OTHER OF ANY SUCH CLAIM. 3) Infringements a)Vendor shall indemnify and hold harmless the State of Texas and Customers, AND/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS, ASSIGNEES, AND/OR DESIGNEES from any and all third party claims involving infringement of United States patents, copyrights, trade and service marks, and any other intellectual or intangible property rights in connection Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 18 of 30 with the PERFORMANCES OR ACTIONS OF VENDOR PURSUANT TO THIS CONTRACT. VENDOR AND THE CUSTOMER AGREE TO FURNISH TIMELY WRITTEN NOTICE TO EACH OTHER OF ANY SUCH CLAIM. VENDOR SHALL BE LIABLE TO PAY ALL COSTS OF DEFENSE INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES. THE DEFENSE SHALL BE COORDINATED BY VENDOR WITH THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHEN TEXAS STATE AGENCIES ARE NAMED DEFENDANTS IN ANY LAWSUIT AND VENDOR MAY NOT AGREE TO ANY SETTLEMENT WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE CONCURRENCE FROM THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. b)Vendor shall have no liability under this section if the alleged infringement is caused in whole or in part by: (i) use of the product or service for a purpose or in a manner for which the product or service was not designed, (ii) any modification tions, (iv) any intellectual property right owned by or licensed to Customer, or (v) any use of the product or service by Customer that is not in conformity with the terms of any applicable license agreement. c)If Vendor becomes aware of an actual or potential claim, or Customer provides Vendor with notice of an actual or potential claim, Vendor may (or in the case of procure for the Customer the right to continue to use the affected portion of the product or service, or (ii) modify or replace the affected portion of the product or service with functionally equivalent or superior product or service so that -infringing. 4) PROPERTY DAMAGE IN THE EVENT OF LOSS, DAMAGE, OR DESTRUCTION OF ANY PROPERTY OF CUSTOMER OR THE STATE DUE TO THE NEGLIGENCE, MISCONDUCT, WRONGFUL ACT OR OMISSION ON THE PART OF THE VENDOR, ITS EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, OR SUBCONTRACTORS, THE VENDOR SHALL PAY THE FULL COST OF EITHER REPAIR, RECONSTRUCTION, OR REPLACEMENT OF THE PROPERTY, AT THE SUCH COST SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CUSTOMER AND SHALL BE DUE AND PAYABLE BY THE VENDOR NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE VENDORS RECEIPT FROM THE CUSTOMER OF A WRITTEN NOTICE OF THE AMOUNT DUE. 1)VENDOR AGREES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT DURING THE EXISTENCE OF THIS CONTRACT, VENDOR SHALL BE ENTIRELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LIABILITY AND PAY TAXES OF WHATEVER KIND, ARISING OUT OF THE PERFORMANCES IN THIS CONTRACT. VENDOR AGREES TO COMPLY Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 19 of 30 WITH ALL STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS APPLICABLE TO ANY SUCH PERSONS, INCLUDING LAWS REGARDING WAGES, TAXES, INSURANCE, AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION. THE CUSTOMER AND/OR THE STATE SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO THE VENDOR, ITS EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, OR OTHERS FOR THE PAYMENT OF TAXES OR THE PROVISION OF UNEMPLOYMENT INSURAN OMPENSATION OR ANY BENEFIT AVAILABLE TO A STATE EMPLOYEE OR EMPLOYEE OF ANOTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY CUSTOMER. 2)VENDOR AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS CUSTOMERS, THE STATE OF TEXAS AND/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS, AND/OR ASSIGNEES FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, ACTIONS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, OR SUITS, AND ALL RELATED COSTS, ATTOR NSES, RELATING TO TAX LIABILITY, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AND/OR COMPENSATION IN ITS PERFORMANCE UNDER THIS CONTRACT. VENDOR SHALL BE LIABLE TO PAY ALL COSTS OF DEFENSE INCLUDING E DEFENSE SHALL BE COORDINATED BY VENDOR WITH THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHEN TEXAS STATE AGENCIES ARE NAMED DEFENDANTS IN ANY LAWSUIT AND VENDOR MAY NOT AGREE TO ANY SETTLEMENT WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE CONCURRENCE FROM THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. VENDOR AND THE CUSTOMER AGREE TO FURNISH TIMELY WRITTEN NOTICE TO EACH OTHER OF ANY SUCH CLAIM. Vendor Certifications Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED Vendor certifies on behalf of Vendor and its designated Subcontractors that they: (i) have not given, offered to give, and do not intend to give at any time hereafter any economic opportunity, future employment, gift, loan, gratuity, special discount, trip, favor, or service to a public servant in connection with the Contract; (ii) are not currently delinquent in the payment of any franchise tax owed the State and are not ineligible to receive payment under §231.006 of the Texas Family Code and acknowledge the Contract may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate; (iii) neither they, nor anyone acting for them, have violated the antitrust laws of the United States or the State, nor communicated directly or indirectly to any competitor or any other person engaged in such line of business for the purpose of obtaining an unfair price advantage; (iv) have not received payment from DIR or any of its employees for participating in the preparation of the Contract; (v) under Section 2155.004, Texas Government Code, the vendor certifies that Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 20 of 30 the individual or business entity named in this bid or contract is not ineligible to receive the specified contract and acknowledges that this contract may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate; (vi) to the best of their knowledge and belief, there are no suits or proceedings pending or threatened against or affecting them, which if determined adversely to them will have a material adverse effect on the ability to fulfill their obligations under the Contract; (vii) Vendor and its principals are not suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government as listed in the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration; (viii) as of the effective date of the Contract, are not listed in the prohibited vendors list authorized by Executive Order #13224, "Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or published by the United States Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control; (ix) Vendor represents and warrants that, for its performance of this contract, it shall purchase products and materials produced in the State of Texas when available at the price and time comparable to products and materials produced outside the state, to the extent that such is required under Texas Government Code, Section 2155.4441; (x) agrees that all equipment and materials used in fulfilling the requirements of this contract are of high-quality and consistent with or better than applicable industry standards, if any. All Works and Services performed pursuant to this Contract shall be of high professional quality and workmanship and according consistent with or better than applicable industry standards, if any; (xi) agree that any payments due under this contract will be applied towards any debt, including but not limited to delinquent taxes and child support that is owed to the State of Texas; (xii) are in compliance Section 669.003, Texas Government Code, relating to contracting with executive head of a state agency; (xiii) represent and warrant that the provision of goods and services or other performance under the Contract will not constitute an actual or potential conflict of interest and certify that they will not reasonably create the appearance of impropriety, and, if these facts change during the course of the Contract, certify they shall disclose the actual or potential conflict of interest and any circumstances that create the appearance of impropriety; (xiv) under Section 2155.006 and Section 2261.053, Texas Government Code, are not ineligible to receive the specified contract and acknowledges that this contract may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate; (xv) have complied with the Section 556.0055, Texas Government Code, Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 21 of 30 restriction on lobbying expenditures. In addition, Vendor acknowledges the applicability of §2155.444 and §2155.4441, Texas Government Code, in fulfilling the terms of the Contract; and (xvi) appropriated or other funds under this Agreement are not prohibited by Sections 556.005 or Section 556.008, Texas Government Code. (xvii) represent and warrant that in accordance with Section 2270.002 of the Texas Government Code, by signature hereon, Vendor does not boycott Israel and will not boycott Israel during the term of this Contract. During the term of the Contract, Vendor shall, for itself and on behalf of its Subcontractors, promptly disclose to DIR all changes that occur to the foregoing certifications, representations and warranties. Vendor covenants to fully cooperate in the development and execution of resulting documentation necessary to maintain an accurate record of the certifications, representations and warranties. In addition, Vendor understands and agrees that if Vendor responds to certain Customer pricing requests or Statements of Work, then, in order to contract with the Customer, Vendor may be required to comply with additional terms and conditions or certifications that an individual customer may require due to state and federal law (e.g., privacy and security requirements). Ability to Conduct Business in Texas Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED Vendor and its Subcontractors shall be authorized and validly existing under the laws of its state of organization, and shall be authorized to do business in the State of Texas in accordance with Texas Business Organizations Code, Title 1, Chapter 9. Equal Opportunity Compliance Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED Vendor agrees to abide by all applicable laws, regulations, and executive orders pertaining to equal employment opportunity, including federal laws and the laws of the State in which its primary place of business is located. In accordance with such laws, regulations, and executive orders, the Vendor agrees that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, veteran status or handicap, be excluded from employment with or participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity performed by Vendor under the Contract. If Vendor is found to be not in compliance with these requirements during the term of the Contract, Vendor agrees to take appropriate steps to correct these deficiencies. Upon request, Vendor will furnish information regarding its nondiscriminatory hiring and promotion policies, as well as specific information on the composition of its principals and staff, including the identification of minorities and women in management or other positions with discretionary or decision-making authority. Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 22 of 30 Use of Subcontractors Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED If Vendor uses any subcontractors in the performance of this Contract, Vendor must make a good faith effort in the submission of its Subcontracting Plan in accordance A Vendor can engage additional subcontractors in the performance of this Contract. A Vendor can remove subcontractors currently engaged in the performance of this Contract. Vendor shall remain solely responsible for the performance of its obligations under the Contract. Responsibility for Actions Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1)Vendor is solely responsible for its actions and those of its agents, employees, or subcontractors, and agrees that neither Vendor nor any of the foregoing has any authority to act or speak on behalf of DIR or the State. 2) Vendor, for itself and on behalf of its subcontractors, shall report to DIR promptly when the disclosures under the Certification Statement of Exhibit A to the RFO and/or Section 9.C. (x), Vendor Certifications of this Appendix A to the Contract change. Vendor covenants to fully cooperate with DIR to update and amend the Contract to accurately disclose the status of conflicts of interest. Confidentiality Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1)Vendor acknowledges that DIR and Customers that are governmental bodies as defined by Texas Government Code, Section 552.003 are subject to the Texas Public Information Act. Vendor also acknowledges that DIR and Customers that are state agencies will comply with the Public Information Act, and with all opinions of the Texas 2)Under the terms of the Contract, DIR may provide Vendor with information related to Customers. Vendor shall not re-sell or otherwise distribute or release Customer information to any party in any manner. Security of Premises, Equipment, Data and Personnel Vendor and/or Subcontractor may, from time to time during the performance of the Contract, have access to the personnel, premises, equipment, and other property, including data, files and /or materials (coll the Customer. Vendor shall use their best efforts to preserve the safety, security, and the integrity of the personnel, premises, equipment, Data and other property of the Customer, in accordance with the instruction of the Customer. Vendor shall be responsible for damage to Customer's equipment, workplace, and its contents when such damage is caused by its employees or subcontractors. If a Vendor fails to comply er may immediately terminate its Purchase Order and related Statement of Work. Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 23 of 30 Background and/or Criminal History Investigation Prior to commencement of any services, background and/or criminal history services to the Customer under the Contract may be performed by the Customer. Should any employee or subcontractor of the Vendor who will be providing services to the Customer under the Contract not be acceptable to the Customer as a result of the background and/or criminal history check, then Customer may immediately terminate its Purchase Order and related Statement of Work or request replacement of the employee or subcontractor in question. Limitation of Liability For any claim or cause of action arising under or related to the Contract: i) to the extent permitted by the Constitution and the laws of the State, none of the parties shall be liable to the other for punitive, special, or consequential damages, even if it is advised to the Customer shall be limited to the total amount paid to Vendor under the Contract during the twelve months immediately preceding the accrual of the claim or cause of action. bodily injury; violation of intellectual property rights including but not limited to patent, trademark, or copyright infringement; indemnification requirements under this Contract; and violation of State or Federal law including but not limited to disclosures of confidential information and any penalty of any kind lawfully assessed as a result of such violation. Overcharges Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED Vendor hereby assigns to DIR any and all of its claims for overcharges associated with this contract which arise under the antitrust laws of the United States, 15 U.S.C.A. Section 1, et seq., and which arise under the antitrust laws of the State of Texas, Tex. Bus. and Comm. Code Section 15.01, et seq. Prohibited Conduct Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED Vendor represents and warrants that, to the best of its knowledge as of the date of this certification, neither Vendor nor any subcontractor, firm, corporation, partnership, or institution represented by Vendor, nor anyone acting for such, subcontractor, firm, corporation or institution has: (1) violated the antitrust laws of the State of Texas under Texas Business & Commerce Code, Chapter 15, or the federal antitrust laws; or (2) communicated its response to the Request for Offer directly or indirectly to any competitor or any other person engaged in such line of business during the procurement for the Contract. Required Insurance Coverage As a condition of this Contract with DIR, Vendor shall provide the listed insurance coverage within 5 business days of execution of the Contract if the Vendor is awarded any Customer Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 24 of 30 premises and/or use employer vehicles to conduct work on behalf of Customers. In addition, when engaged by a Customer to provide services on Customer premises, the Vendor shall, at its own expense, secure and maintain the insurance coverage specified herein, and shall provide proof of such insurance coverage to the related Customer within five (5) business days following the execution of the Purchase Order. Vendor may not begin performance under the Contract and/or a Purchase Order until such proof of insurance coverage is provided to, and approved by, DIR and the Customer. All required insurance must be issued by companies that have an A rating and a Financial Size Category Class of VII from A.M. Best, and are licensed in the State of Texas and authorized to provide the corresponding coverage. The Customer and DIR will be named as Additional Insureds on all required coverage. Required coverage must remain in effect through the term of the Contract and each Purchase Order issued to Vendor there under. The minimum acceptable insurance provisions are as follows: 1) Commercial General Liability Commercial General Liability must include $1,000,000 per occurrence for Bodily Injury and Property Damage with a separate aggregate limit of $2,000,000; Medical Expense per person of $5,000; Personal Injury and Advertising Liability of $1,000,000; Products/Completed Operations Aggregate Limit of $2,000,000; and Damage to Premises Rented: $50,000. Agencies may require additional Umbrella/Excess Liability insurance. The policy shall contain the following provisions: a) Blanket contractual liability coverage for liability assumed under the Contract; b) Independent Contractor coverage; c) State of Texas, DIR and Customer listed as an additional insured; and d) Waiver of Subrogation. 2) N INSURANCE AND EMPL LIABILITY COVERAGE MUST INCLUDE LIMITS CONSISTENT WITH STATUTORY BENEFITS OUTLINED IN THE TEXAS COMPENSATION ACT (ART. 8308-1.01 ET SEQ.TEX. REV. CIV. STAT) AND MINIMUM POLICY LIMIT IABILITY OF $1,000,000 PER ACCIDENT, $1,000,000 DISEASE PER EMPLOYEE AND $1,000,000 PER DISEASE POLICY LIMIT. 3) Business Automobile Liability Insurance Business Automobile Liability Insurance must cover all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles with a minimum combined single limit of $500,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. The policy shall contain the following endorsements in favor of DIR and/or Customer: a) Waiver of Subrogation; and b) Additional Insured. Use of State Property Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 25 of 30 any other resources of the Customer or the State for any purpose other than performing services under this Agreement. For this purpose, equipment includes, but is not limited to, copy machines, computers and telephones using State long distance services. Any performing services under this Agreement must be fully reimbursed by Vendor to the Customer immediately upon demand by the Customer. Such use shall constitute breach of contract and may result in termination of the contract and other remedies available to DIR and Customer under the contract and applicable law. Immigration Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED The Vendor shall comply with all requirements related to federal immigration laws and regulations, to include but not be limited to, the Immigration and Reform Act of 1986, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 ("IIRIRA") and the Immigration Act of 1990 (8 U.S.C.1101, et seq.) regarding employment verification and retention of verification forms for any individual(s) who will perform any labor or services under this Contract. Pursuant to Executive Order No. RP-80, issued by the Governor of Texas on December 3, 2014, and as subsequently clarified, the Vendor shall, as a condition of this Contract, also comply with the United States Department of Homeland Security¹s E-Verify system to determine the eligibility of: all persons 1) to whom the E-Verify system applies, and 2) who are hired by the Vendor during the term of this Contract to perform duties within Texas; and all subcontr -Verify system applies, and 2) who are hired by the subcontractor during the term of this Contract and assigned by the subcontractor to perform work pursuant to this Contract. The Vendor shall require its subcontractors to comply with the requirements of this Section and the Vendor is responsible for the compliance of its subcontractors. Nothing herein is intended to exclude compliance by Vendor and its subcontractors with all other relevant federal immigration statutes and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto. Public Disclosure Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED No public disclosures or news releases pertaining to this contract shall be made by Vendor without prior written approval of DIR. Product and/or Services Substitutions Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED Substitutions are not permitted without the written permission of DIR or Customer. Secure Erasure of Hard Disk Managed Services Products and/or Services Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 26 of 30 Vendor agrees that all managed service products and/or services equipped with hard disk drives (e.g., computers, telephones, printers, fax machines, scanners, multifunction devices) shall have the capability to securely erase data written to the hard drive prior to final disposition of such managed service products and/or services, of the related Customer Managed Services Agreement for such products and/or services, in accordance with 1 TAC 202. Deceptive Trade Practices; Unfair Business Practices 1)Vendor represents and warrants that neither Vendor nor any of its Subcontractors has been (i) found liable in any administrative hearing, litigation or other proceeding of Deceptive Trade Practices violations as defined under Chapter 17, Texas Business & Commerce Code, or (ii) has outstanding allegations of any Deceptive Trade Practice pending in any administrative hearing, litigation or other proceeding. 2)Vendor certifies that it has no officers who have served as officers of other entities who (i) have been found liable in any administrative hearing, litigation or other proceeding of Deceptive Trade Practices violations or (ii) have outstanding allegations of any Deceptive Trade Practice pending in any administrative hearing, litigation or other proceeding. U. Drug Free Workplace Policy Vendor shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Drug-Free Work Place Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. §§8101-8106) and maintain a drug-free work environment; and the final rule, government-wide requirements for drug-free work place (Financial Assistance), issued by the Office of Management and Budget (2 C.F.R. Part 182) to implement the provisions of the Drug-Free Work Place Act of 1988 is incorporated by reference and the contractor shall comply with the relevant provisions thereof, including any amendments to the final rule that may hereafter be issued. Accessibility of Public Information Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1)Pursuant to S.B. 1368 of the 83rd Texas Legislature, Regular Session, Vendor is required to make any information created or exchanged with the State pursuant to this Contract, and not otherwise excepted from disclosure under the Texas Public Information Act, available in a format that is accessible by the public at no additional charge to the State. 2)Each State government entity should supplement the provision set forth in Subsection 1, above, with the additional terms agreed upon by the parties regarding the specific format by which the Vendor is required to make the information accessible by the public. Vendor Reporting Responsibilities Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 27 of 30 Vendor shall comply with Subtitle C, Title 5, Business & Commerce Code, Chapter 109 as added by HB 2539 of the 83 rd Texas Legislature, Regular Session, requiring computer technicians to report images of child pornography. 10. Contract Enforcement Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B1-2, 5-7. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1)Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in Travis County, Texas. 2)Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, Customer, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. Termination Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer Customer may terminate Purchase Orders if funds sufficient to pay its obligations under the Contract are not appropriated: i) by the governing body on behalf of local governments; ii) by the Texas legislature on behalf of state agencies; or iii) by budget execution authority provisioned to the Governor or the Legislative Budget Board as provided in Chapter 317, Texas Government Code. In the event of non- appropriation, Vendor will be provided ten (10) calendar days written notice of intent to terminate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Customer issues a Purchase Order and has accepted delivery of the services, they are obligated to pay for the services or they may discontinue using services under any return provisions that Vendor offers. In the event of such termination, the Customer will not be considered to be in default or breach under this Contract, nor shall it be liable for any further payments ordinarily due under this Contract, nor shall it be liable for any damages or any other amounts which are caused by or associated with such termination. b) Termination for Non-Appropriation by DIR Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 28 of 30 DIR may terminate Contract if funds sufficient to pay its obligations under the Contract are not appropriated: by the i) Texas legislature or ii) by budget execution authority provisioned to the Governor or the Legislative Budget Board as provided in Chapter 317, Texas Government Code. In the event of non-appropriation, Vendor will be provided thirty (30) calendar days written notice of intent to terminate. In the event of such termination, DIR will not be considered to be in default or breach under this Contract, nor shall it be liable for any further payments ordinarily due under this Contract, nor shall it be liable for any damages or any other amounts which are caused by or associated with such termination. 2) Absolute Right Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED DIR shall have the absolute right to terminate the Contract without recourse in the event that: i) Vendor becomes listed on the prohibited vendors list authorized by Executive Order #13224, "Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons Who C published by the United States Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control; ii) Vendor becomes suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government as listed in the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration; or (iii) Vendor is found by DIR to be ineligible to hold this Contract under Subsection (b) of Section 2155.006, Texas Government Code. Vendor shall be provided written notice in accordance with Section 11.A, Notices, of intent to terminate. 3) Termination for Convenience DIR may terminate the Contract, in whole or in part, by giving the other party thirty or other contractual document or relationship by giving the other party thirty (30) calendar 4) Termination for Cause a) Contract Either DIR or Vendor may issue a written notice of default to the other upon the occurrence of a material breach of any covenant, warranty or provision of the Contract, upon the following preconditions: first, the parties must comply with the requirements of Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code in an attempt to resolve a dispute; second, after complying with Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, and the dispute remains unresolved, then the non-defaulting party shall give the defaulting party thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of notice to cure said default. If the defaulting party fails to cure said default within the timeframe allowed, the non-defaulting party may, at its option and in addition to any other remedies it may have available, cancel and terminate the Contract. Customers purchasing services under the Contract have no power to terminate the Contract for default. b) Purchase Order Customer or Vendor may terminate a Purchase Order or other contractual document or relationship upon the occurrence of a material breach of any term or condition: Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 29 of 30 (i) of the Contract, or (ii) included in the Purchase Order or other contractual document or relationship in accordance with Section 3.B.2 above, upon the following preconditions: first, the parties must comply with the requirements of Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, in an attempt to resolve a dispute; second, after complying with Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, and the dispute remains unresolved, then the non-defaulting party shall give the defaulting party thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of notice to cure said default. If the defaulting party fails to cure said default within the timeframe allowed, the non-defaulting party may, at its option and in addition to any other remedies it may have available, cancel and terminate the Purchase Order. Customer may immediately suspend or terminate a Purchase Order without advance notice in the event Vendor fails to comply with confidentiality, privacy, security requirements, environmental or safety laws or regulations, if such non-compliance relates or may relate to vendor provision of goods or services to the Customer. 5) Immediate Termination or Suspension Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED DIR may immediately suspend or terminate this Contract without advance notice if DIR receives notice or knowledge of potentially criminal violations by Vendor (whether or not such potential violations directly impact the provision of goods or services under this Contract). In such case, the Vendor may be held ineligible to receive further business or payment but may be responsible for winding down or transition expenses incurred by Customer. DIR or Customer will use reasonable efforts to provide notice (to the extent allowed by law) to vendor within five (5) business days after imposing the suspension or termination. Vendor may provide a response and request an opportunity to present its position. DIR or Customer will review vendor presentation, but is under no obligation to provide formal response. 6) Customer Rights Under Termination Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED In the event the Contract expires or is terminated for any reason, a Customer shall retain its rights under the Contract and the Purchase Order issued prior to the termination or expiration of the Contract. The Purchase Order survives the expiration or termination of the Contract for its then effective term. 7) Vendor or Order Fulfiller Rights Under Termination Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED In the event a Purchase Order expires or is terminated, a Customer shall pay: 1) all amounts due for products or services ordered prior to the effective termination date and ultimately accepted, and 2) any applicable early termination fees agreed to in such Purchase Order. Force Majeure DIR, Customer, or Vendor may be excused from performance under the Contract for any period when performance is prevented as the result of an act of God, strike, war, civil disturbance, epidemic, or court order, provided that the party experiencing the Appendix A: Standard Terms and Conditions for DELIVERABLES-BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (DBITS) 01/08/2018 Page 30 of 30 event of Force Majeure has prudently and promptly acted to take any and all steps that event of Force Majeure. The party suffering an event of Force Majeure shall provide notice of the event to the other parties when commercially reasonable. Subject to this provision, such non-performance shall not be deemed a default or a ground for termination. However, a Customer may terminate a Purchase Order if it is determined by the Customer that Vendor will not be able to deliver services in a timely manner to meet the business needs of the Customer. 11. Notification Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED Notices All notices, demands, designations, certificates, requests, offers, consents, approvals and other instruments given pursuant to the Contract shall be in writing and shall be validly given on: (i) the date of delivery if delivered by email, facsimile transmission, mailed by registered or certified mail, or hand delivered, or (ii) three business days after being mailed via United States Postal Service. All notices under the Contract shall be sent to a party at the respective address indicated in Section 6 of the Contract or to such other address as such party shall have notified the other party in writing. Handling of Written Complaints In addition to other remedies contained in the Contract, a person contracting with DIR may direct their written complaints to the following office: Public Information Office Department of Information Resources Attn: Public Information Officer 300 W. 15th Street, Suite 1300 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 475-4759, facsimile 12. Captions Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED The captions contained in the Contract, Appendices, and its Exhibits are intended for convenience and reference purposes only and shall in no way be deemed to define or limit any provision thereof. Project Name Technology Category DIR Customer Name DATE specify day specify day o o o o o o Project Name Technology Category DIR Customer Name DATE specify day specify day o o o o o o Amendment 1 Contract DIR-TSO-4030 rev. 10/2017 Page 1 Amendment Number 1 to Contract Number DIR-TSO-4030 between State of Texas, acting by and through the Department of Information Resources and Gartner, Inc. This Amendment Number 1 to Contract Number DIR-TSO-4030 Contract is between the Vendor Vendor agree to modify the terms and conditions of the Contract as follows: 1. Contract, Section 3, Service Offerings, is hereby amended as follows: Services available under this Contract are limited to the Deliverables-Based Information Technology Services Technology Categories as specified below. Vendor may incorporate changes to their services offering; however, any changes must be within the scope of the RFO and services awarded based on the posting described in Section 1.B above. Vendor described in Section 1.B above. No hardware or software products and related services may be sold through this contract. Any products needed to deliver final services must be procured through another contract vehicle. Examples of these products include: Software as a Service (SaaS), subscriptions, annual license maintenance and support, and web hosting. Business Intelligence (BI) and Data Warehouse 1) Definition: BI enables an organization to perform in-depth analysis and includes, where required, data mining of detailed business data providing real and significant information to business users. BI may include an integrated group of operational and decision support applications and databases. BI makes use of tools designed to easily access data warehouse data. A data warehouse collects, organizes and makes data available for the purpose of analysis and gives organizations the ability to access and analyze information about its business. The function of the data warehouse is to consolidate and reconcile information from across disparate business units and IT systems and provide a context for reporting and analysis. 2) Examples of included services: architectural design, extraction, transformation and loading of data sources; planning, assessment, product installation and tuning; prototype development, deployment, data cleansing, data mart development and support; data migration, integration with data mining; integration with business intelligence tools and/or systems; data scrubbing; data transformation; training and knowledge transfer. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) 1) Definition: Amendment 1 Contract DIR-TSO-4030 rev. 10/2017 Page 2 are modularized and generally highly configurable. 2) Examples of included services: planning and assessment; requirements development; business process reengineering (BPR); implementation and conversion services; application programming and support services; database administration, system software administration and support; functional support; and training support. Information Technology Project Management 1) Definition: Project Management service providers may perform any or all of the project management processes identified by the Project Management Institute as published in the PMBOK® Guide, Fifth Edition or most recent. 2) - the-esses to manage a project and using the Texas Project Delivery Framework. Information about the framework tool can be found at the following url: http://www.dir.texas.gov/management/projectdelivery/projectframework/pages/fra mework.aspx Technology Upgrade/Migration and Transformation 1) Definition: Technology Upgrade/Migration may be required to increase business functionality, reengineer a business function, keep current with vendor upgrades or when upgrading existing technology. Technology Transformation may be accomplished by converting/migrating legacy applications to new technology either with or without new business functionality or it may include introducing new technology into the enterprise. Technology Upgrade/Migration may also include providing website content accessibility compliance. 2) Examples of included services: assessments of the current application portfolio, evaluation of the technology assets before beginning technology transformation and Business Case development for justification of an initiative. Also included are: technology transformations, which may include, appropriate Return on Investment (ROI), benchmarks and milestones. The following activities may also be included: planning, analysis, requirements development, proof of concept, deployment, implementation, integration, remediation, data migration, documentation, application programming and support services; and training support. Information Technology Assessments and Planning 1) Definition: IT Assessments and Planning may include IT effectiveness, maturity, governance, project management and architecture. Strategic planning activities may include mission statement development, visioning and goals, objectives, and strategy development. Tactical planning may require that actionable plans and roadmaps be provided. Amendment 1 Contract DIR-TSO-4030 rev. 10/2017 Page 3 2) Examples of included services: IT assessments, including enterprise architecture and cloud assessments; staff knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) assessments; bandwidth assessments, network performance and strategic and tactical planning. Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) 1) Definition: Verification and Validation are independent procedures that are used together for in-depth analysis by checking that a product, service, or system meets requirements, independent oversight of SDLC processes and specifications and that it fulfills its intended purpose. 2) Examples of included services: Validation of software design to meet system needs/requirements; traceability of safety critical requirements; design analysis of selected critical algorithms; and code analysis of mission-critical software components and the independent oversight and assessment of systems development life cycle (SDLC) processes (such as issue and risk management, requirements analysis, testing, data conversion etc.) Information Technology Procurement Assistance 1) Definition: Information Technology Procurement Assistance services may include assistance in IT Statement of Work (SOW) and/or Request for Offer (RFO) development. Procurement assistance activities may include requirements gathering, scoring criteria development, and evaluation criteria development. 2) Examples of included services: specification development, Statement of Work (SOW) development, and RFO development for IT products and services. Note: Under Texas Government Code, § 2155.004, a state agency may not accept a bid or award a contract that includes proposed financial participation by a person who received compensation from the agency to participate in preparing the specifications or request for proposals on which the bid or contract is based. The selected Vendor and the employees of that Vendor who perform IT Procurement Assistance Services will be ineligible to respond to any resulting solicitation(s). 2. Appendix A, Standard Terms and Conditions for DBITS Services Contracts, is hereby restated in its entirety and replaced with the attached Appendix A. Standard Terms and Conditions for DBITS Services Contracts dated 01/08/2018, except where previous authorized exceptions to Appendix A were allowed and documented as part of the Contract. In such cases, the previously authorized exceptions shall be applied to the portions of the new Appendix A which are comparable to those in the earlier Appendix A for which they were written, and this without regard for the numbering or lettering associated with any of the documents. Applied in such manner, the exceptions shall remain in full force and effect until such time the contract expires or is terminated. 3. Previously Authorized Exceptions to Contract and any Appendices. A. Appendix A, Section 4. Intellectual Property Matters, B. Ownership is hereby replaced as follows: Amendment 1 Contract DIR-TSO-4030 rev. 10/2017 Page 4 As between Vendor and Customer, the Work Product and Intellectual Property Rights therein are and shall be owned exclusively by Customer, and not Vendor. Vendor and that the Work Product shall, upon creation, be owned exclusively by Customer. To the extent that the Work Product, under applicable law, may not be considered works made for hire, Vendor hereby agrees that the Contract effectively transfers, grants, conveys, assigns, and relinquishes exclusively to Customer all right, title and interest in and to all ownership rights in the Work Product, and all Intellectual Property Rights in the Work Product, without the necessity of any further consideration, and Customer shall be entitled to obtain and hold in its own name all Intellectual Property Rights in and to the Work Product. Vendor acknowledges that Vendor and Customer do not intend Vendor to be a joint author of the Work Product within the meaning of the Copyright Act of 1976. Customer shall have access, during normal business hours (Monday thru Friday, (8AM to 5PM) and upon reasonable prior notice to Vendor, to all Vendor materials, premises and computer files containing the Work Product. Vendor and Customer, as appropriate, will cooperate with one another and execute such other documents as may be reasonably appropriate to achieve the objectives herein. No license or other right is granted hereunder to any Third Party IP, except as may be incorporated in the Work Product by Vendor. Ownership of Prior Rights by Customer All tangible and intangible property including the Intellectual Property Rights therein, which are owned by Customer prior to the execution of any Statement of Work (e.g., copyrights, trademarks, etc.) shall to be exclusively owned by the Customer and Vendor shall have no ownership thereof and no rights thereto other than the limited, non-exclusive right to use such property for purposes set forth in a Statement of Work and only for the duration of such Statement of Work which is hereby granted to Vendor by Customer. Ownership of Prior Rights by Vendor All tangible and intangible property including the Intellectual Property Rights therein, which is owned by Vendor prior to the execution of any Statement of Work (e.g., pre-existing tools, processes, methodologies, -existing Vendor ownership thereof and no rights thereto other than the limited, non-exclusive right to use such Pre-existing Vendor IP for internal business use, solely for purposes set forth in a Statement of Work. Ownership of Pre-Existing Rights Embodied in Deliverables To the extent any pre- existing rights or property of either party are embodied or contained in the Works or a Deliverable, each party retains ownership of its pre-existing rights and property (e.g., Customer ownership of the Works that include Pre-existing Vendor IP shall extend only to the additional work product or deliverables that do not comprise such Pre-Existing Vendor IP). Each party hereby grants to the other an irrevocable, perpetual, non- exclusive, worldwide, royalty free right and license to use, execute, reproduce and display, perform and distribute copies of the Works as necessary for their business purposes or to enjoy the benefits of the services to be provided under a Statement of Amendment 1 Contract DIR-TSO-4030 rev. 10/2017 Page 5 Work (and provided further that Vendor does not identify Customer by name or otherwise use any of Customers confidential or proprietary information). B. Appendix A, Section 4. Intellectual Property Matters, G. Return of Materials Pertaining to Work Product is hereby replaced as follows: Upon the request of Customer, but in any event upon termination or expiration of this Contract or a Statement of Work, Vendor shall surrender to Customer all documents and things pertaining to the Work Product, including but not limited to drafts, memoranda, notes, records, drawings, manuals, computer software, reports, data, and all other documents or materials (and copies of same) generated or developed by Vendor or furnished by Customer to Vendor, including all materials embodying the Work Product, any Customer confidential information, or Intellectual Property Rights in such Work Product, regardless of whether complete or incomplete that Customer has paid for. This section is intended to apply to all Work Product as well as to all documents and things furnished to Vendor by Customer or by anyone else that pertain to the Work Product. C. Appendix A, Section 9. Vendor Responsibilities; A. Indemnification, 2) Acts or Omissions, is hereby replaced as follows: Vendor shall indemnify and hold harmless the State of Texas and Customers, AND/OR THEIR OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS, ASSIGNEES, AND/OR DESIGNEES FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, ACTIONS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, OR SUITS, AND ALL RELATED COSTS, ATTORNEY FEES, AND EXPENSES arising out of, or resulting from any intentional, willful, negligent, or otherwise wrongful acts or omissions of the Vendor or its agents, employees, subcontractors, Order Fulfillers, or suppliers of subcontractors in the execution or performance of the Contract and any Purchase Orders issued under the Contract. THE DEFENSE SHALL BE COORDINATED BY VENDOR WITH THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHEN TEXAS STATE AGENCIES ARE NAMED DEFENDANTS IN ANY LAWSUIT AND VENDOR MAY NOT AGREE TO ANY SETTLEMENT WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE CONCURRENCE FROM THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. VENDOR AND THE CUSTOMER AGREE TO FURNISH TIMELY WRITTEN NOTICE TO EACH OTHER OF ANY SUCH CLAIM. D. Appendix A, Section 9. Vendor Responsibilities; K. Limitation of Liability, is hereby replaced as follows: For any claim or cause of action arising under or related to the Contract: i) to the extent permitted by the Constitution and the laws of the State, none of the parties shall be liable to the other for punitive, special, or consequential damages, even if it is advised of the possibility of such damages; and ii)Vendors Liability for damages of any kind to the Customer shall be limited to the greater of one and one half (1.5) times the total amount of fees paid to Vendor under the Task Order or Statement of Work that gave not apply to claims of bodily injury; violation of intellectual property rights including but not limited to patent, trademark, or copyright infringement; indemnification Amendment 1 Contract DIR-TSO-4030 rev. 10/2017 Page 6 requirements under this Contract; and violation of State or Federal law including but not limited to disclosures of confidential information and any penalty of any kind lawfully assessed as a result of such violation. All other terms and conditions of the Contract not specifically modified herein, shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of conflict among the provisions, the order of precedence shall be Amendment Number 1 and then the Contract. (Remainder of page intentionally left blank) Amendment 1 Contract DIR-TSO-4030 rev. 10/2017 Page 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this amendment to be effective as of the date of the last signature. Gartner, Inc. Authorized By: Signature on File Name: Phillip A. Cummings Title: Contracts Counsel Date: 5/23/2018 The State of Texas, acting by and through the Department of Information Resources Authorized By: Signature on File Name: Hershel Becker Title: Chief Procurement Officer Date: 5/30/2018 Office of General Counsel: 5/30/2018 Utility Technology Review Gartner Study OVERVIEW •History •Project and Changes •Costs/Investments •Challenges •Then Vs. Now •Proposal •Recommendation •The City was implementing many technological changes in 2009: •Citywide software (IT) Master Plan •Replacing an end-of-life utility automated meter reading (AMR) system •Evaluating customer information system (CIS) capabilities for post AMR implementation •A Utility Office review was completed as a result of a reorganization. Pivotal function areas were identified that could provide issue resolution in one place. •“meter to cash” billing services for all utilities (electric, water, sewer, drainage, & garbage) •The department was tasked to serve the utilities in a larger capacity •This more visible role was the catalyst for the evolution of the department into a Customer Care environment HISTORY PROJECTS AND CHANGES 2009–2013 Automated Meter Reading (AMR) Replacement Project 2009 Financial Information & Customer Information System Replacement -Not Completed 2009–2014 Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Software 2014–2019 Acquisition/Merger of Chisolm Trail Special Utility District (CTSUD) 2015–2018 Customer Information System (CIS) Replacement Project COST Project Cost AMR Replacement Project $10,000,000 CIS/Financial Upgrade Project $500,000 *Not Completed Meter Data Management (MDM) $300,000 Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Software $1,400,000 Customer Information System (CIS) Replacement Project $4,072,737 ITINERIS/UMAX CHALLENGES –2015 to Now •Data Migration of Legacy system not included in the initial pricing •Staff changes impacted project as decisions previously made during project scoping had to be modified later in the project •Organizational philosophies required UMAX to be adapted to current processes. The business was unable to adapt processes to the new system capabilities •Complex system, lack of internal technical knowledge, & difficulty in scaling staff resources to support a system with a high level of support demand lead to errors after software fixes and updates affecting billing and seamless continuity •Reporting on system data is difficult at best and requires specialized skill sets to create reports, impacting operational and strategic business review •The Itineris UMAX customer information system has so far shown that it requires a level of support much higher than forecasted by the preliminary studies conducted by the vendor and selection consultants. •Business and technology leaders in the City agree that the ongoing systems will require long-term growth in staffing, consulting, and technology resources to derive value from the system. This will add further overhead costs to the utility. SUPPORT Evaluation Criteria Cayenta Itineris Baseline Point Total 84.4369221 84.59137587 Functional Fit Percentage 84% 85% Core Hardware & SoftWare Costs 0.00 1.26 0.00 8.31 Services and Expenses Costs 5.00 4.21 33.00 27.79 0.00 2.00 0.00 13.23 Core Hardware & SoftWare Costs $452,600 $392,800 (Cost sheet Sections 1 - 5)0.00 1.26 Services and Expenses Costs $1,354,067 $1,493,600 (Cost sheet Sections 6 - 8)5.00 4.21 On-Going Support/Maintenance Costs $625,225 $521,357 (Cost sheet Columns H, I, J, K & L)0.00 2.00 5 Year Total Cost 2,431,892 2,407,757 On-Going Support/Maintenance Costs SUPPORT (cont.) Lack of system knowledge has impacted the complex network of system integrations intended to fully automate all processes and standardize service offerings causing system failures. These failures affect several integrated systems driving even larger support requirements and have potential to create system- wide failures. The complexity and intricacies of the UMAX system make it prone to failure. Numerous system failures have occurred. These are typically due to system updates & patches that unexpectedly impact intricate pieces of the system that support staff are either unaware of, or unable to check on a routine basis. CURRENT SUPPORT •IT- personnel- 6 •Systems Analysts (2) •Architect (1) •Managers (2) •GIS integrations (1) •Customer Care (3) •Business Analyst (1) •Reporting, testing, business process review/development •Operational Managers – PT (2) •Analytical management of operational processes ANTICIPATED FUTURE SUPPORT •IT- personnel – 9 •Add Integration Architect (1) •Add Lead System Analyst (1) •Add Cloud Architect (if UMAX 365) •Customer Care (4) •Business Analyst (1) •Reporting, testing, business process review/development •System Analyst (1) •System configurations •Operational Managers – PT (2) •Analytical management of operational processes STAFFING THEN VS. NOW LARGE UTILITY Then •The Customer Care department would offer utility billing services to other jurisdictions on a contract basis, thus increasing their customer base and generating additional revenue. Now •Current resources do not allow the City to offer these services, and after the acquisition of the Chisolm Trail Utility District cities like Round Rock, Leander, and Liberty Hill have expressed interest in taking over customers and water lines within their region, effectively transferring those customers to them and reducing the number of Georgetown customers. IN-HOUSE ELECTRIC MARKET Then •The Electric utility would build a full-fledged, in- house energy marketing function with a large technology ecosystem around that function as well. It would be similar to ecosystems leveraged by much larger utility providers. That new technology ecosystem would be driven by data provided by a large CIS-MDM-AMI meter-to-cash ecosystem. Now •The City has since determined there is much more value in outsourcing its energy market business to large scale providers that have significantly more resources to engage with the market. The organization has yet to be able to financially support the implementation of a data analytics function to transform the data generated meter-to- cash technologies into useful information. SYSTEM INTEGRATION Then • Substantial, highly complex integrations with other technology systems would be implemented to create a level of automation that would allow the technology systems to scale rapidly with the utility. Now • Lack of knowledge leads to integrations having minimal value, are costly to support, and their complexity often results in system outages or errors in processes. RATES Then •City of Georgetown rates were competitive with other retailers and municipal utilities Now •Georgetown electric rates are some of the highest in the State of Texas. Largely due to overhead costs. RATE STRUCTURES & CONSERVATION Then: • The utility would invest significantly in the creation of unique and expansive conservation programs, including non- standard rate structures, to define itself as a unique and innovative business. Now: • Complex rate structures add complexity to the CIS system that may not be supportable or sustainable under current financial conditions. Unique conservation programs would require additional investment in technology. NOW •The City has done good work in moving operations and customer programs into the new millennium. •Since 2010, “Customer Operations” has evolved into a larger role within each utility, acting as point of contact for all customer interactions instead of only a billing point of contact. When these technology and operational projects were begun in 2009, a different philosophy and direction was being prescribed and followed. While fully supportive of changes in vision and strategic goals, it is important to step back and understand the framework that was in play during the time the original decisions were made to gain clarity and understanding. FUTURE •CIS and MDM system that can easily be supported and is in scope with the utility system we have •Create a system that adds value to our customers •Reduction in risk within the CIS and MDM systems •Staff with the needed business system and data skillsets to support the system •Understanding the 10-year cost of ownership to ensure we have adequate personnel and financial support PROPOSAL-GARTNER STUDY •Evaluate current MDM and CIS system to determine: •Cost of ownership (staffing and financial) •Risk levels •Expectations for the system •Operating models of Customer Care and IT •System’s functional scope •Determine whether these systems are still appropriate and utilizing the analysis to drive future strategic decisions around the meter-to-cash technology ecosystem RECOMMENDATIONS •Have Gartner conduct a utility technology review to analyze the systems in place •Cost - $200,000 •Funding Sources – Shared between Water, Electric and Information Technology Funds •Utilize the study for future strategic decisions regarding the MDM and CIS systems QUESTIONS? STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § OPERATING AGREEMENT THIS OPERATING AGREEMENT is made the day of __________________, _______, by and between the CITY OF GEORGETOWN, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation GEORGETOWN Art Works, a non-profit corporation Operator For and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, it is mutually agreed as follows: 1. Space Provided. City hereby agrees to provide space to Operator in the old Fire Station #1 at 816 S. Main Street, Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas as shown in Exhibit A (the Space Provided ), attached to this Agreement and incorporated by reference. 2. Operating Term. The Term of this Operating Agreement shall be for three years, beginning on September 1, 2020 and ending on August 31, 2023 . 3. Use of Property. The Operator will utilize the Space Provided to operate an art center and to provide studio space to local artists which the City Council hereby finds is a public benefit to the citizens of the City of Georgetown as fostering a vibrant arts scene encouraging local economic development according to the , attached to this Agreement and incorporated by reference. No other use of the Space Provided shall be permitted by the Operator without expressed written permission by the City. The City shall maintain approval over the use of the Space Provided at all times. Operator Space Provided is nonexclusive, and the City reserves the right to reduce the Space Provided on the second floor with thirty days notice. 4. Prohibited Use. Operator may not use or permit any part of the Space Provided to be used for: (a) any activity that is a nuisance or is offensive to a person of ordinary sensibilities, or that threatens public health and safety; (b) any commercial use; or (c) any activity that violates any applicable law, regulation, ordinance, governmental order, or this Operating Agreement. 5. Revenue. All revenue from the operation of the gift shop in the Art Center,art classes offered by the Operator, and rental of studio space, and further described in Exhibit B, shall be retained by the Operator and shall be used only to pay for the operating costs and expenses of the Art Center. 6. Non-Discrimination. Operator will operate the art center without discriminating against any person or class of persons and will seek participation by all interested members of the public. 7. Oversight. The Georgetown Arts and Culture Board shall provide oversight to the art center. Each month Operator will provide a report that includes door count, name of exhibit, number of classes and class attendance, number of volunteer hours, monthly revenue, and attendance of artist reception. 8. Utilities. Operator shall be liable to pay the electric and water costs for the property located at 816 S. Main Street during the Term of this Agreement; provided however, that the City shall pay a pro-rata portion of the utilities based upon the City s usage of second floor of the Property. 9. Taxes. Operator shall pay all taxes or special assessments, if any, assessed against or levied upon the Space Provided, the property located at 816 S. Main Street or upon the Operator. The Operator understands that should any portion of under any Texas Tax Code provisions to be taxable, that Operator will incur all liability and responsibility for the prompt payment of any taxes levied by taxing entities except that Operator may contest as provided by the Texas Tax Code any assessed valuation. 10. Meeting Space. City shall provide meeting space for scheduled public meetings of Operator at no cost. 11. Improvements. If Operator desires to make any improvements to the Space Provided, Operator written approval prior to construction or implementation of any proposed improvements. Operator shall be liable to pay all costs of any improvement and agrees not to in any way attempt to use City property as collateral in any financing agreement.. The City assumes no financial responsibility or obligation for payment of the cost of any improvements. Any improvements to the Space Provided made by Operator shall remain and become property of the City at the end of an Operating Term. 12. Insurance. Operator will provide insurance written by companies licensed to conduct business in the State of Texas. Operator shall keep in full force and effect during a Operating Term of this Operating Agreement insurance in the amounts and types and incorporated by reference. The insurance policies will name the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers as additional insureds. All insurance policies shall be subject to the examination and approval of City for sufficiency as to form, content, form of protection, coverage and insurance company. Operator shall furnish a Certificate of Insurance to City as well as a copy of the applicable insurance policy issued to Operator evidencing compliance with the required insurance requirements at the time Operator delivers the executed Operating Agreement to City. Operator agrees to provide a copy of any insurance policy on All insurance policies shall provide that the insurance coverage shall not be canceled or materially changed without a minimum of thirty advance notice in writing to the City. Operator failure to timely comply with the insurance requirements shall be cause for termination of the Operating Agreement. 13. Indemnity. City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers, shall not be liable to Operator, its directors, officers, officials, employees, members, customers, volunteers, agents or representatives, for any damage caused by negligence of Operator, its directors, officers, officials, employees, members, customers, volunteers, agents or representatives. Operator assumes all liability and responsibility for loss, damages, claims, injuries, lawsuits, judgments or causes of action of any type. Operator releases, fully indemnifies, holds harmless and agrees to defend City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers, from any and all liability, loss damages, claims, injuries, lawsuits, judgments or causes of action of any type. 14. Default. Operator violation of any provision of this Operating Agreement shall constitute a default. Operator shall have thirty (30) days from the receipt of a notice of default to cure the default. If the Operator fails to cure the default the City may immediately terminate this Operating Agreement. 15. Notices. Notices or other correspondence concerning this Operating Agreement shall be in writing and are effective when mailed, hand-delivered, or transmitted by facsimile or electronic transmission as follows: To City: To Operator: City Manager ______________________________ 113 E. 8th Street ______________________________ Georgetown, Texas 78626 ______________________________ T: 512.930.3723 T: ____________________________ F: 512.930.3622 F: ____________________________ Email: david. morgan@georgetown.org E-mail: ________________________ 16. Access by City. City may enter the Space Provided at any time for any purpose. 17. Condition of Property. Operator has inspected the Space Provided and accepts the Space Provided in its present condition unless expressly provided otherwise in this Operating Agreement. City has made no express or implied warranties as to the condition or permitted use of the Space Provided. At the time this Operating Agreement ends, Operator will surrender the Space Provided in the same condition as when received, normal wear and tear excepted. Operator will not cause damage to the Space Provided and will not cause or allow hazardous materials or environmental contaminants on the Space Provided. If Operator leaves any personal property in the Space Provided after expiration of an Operating Term, City may, at its sole option: (1) require Operator, at Operator's expense, to remove the personal property within ten (10) after written notice to Operator; or (2) retain such personal property as forfeited property. 18. Repair and Maintenance. City assumes responsibility for the continued exterior and interior maintenance of the Space Provided, including painting, structural repairs, HVAC repairs, maintenance of the grounds, plumbing and electric repairs. 19. Records. Operator shall provide a complete copy of its Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and/or other governing documents with the executed Operating Agreement. Operator shall provide an annual report as required by Exhibit B to this agreement. In addition, City shall be entitled to inspect and copy Operator or related to the art center upon request with reasonable notice. Operator shall file their annual IRS Form 990 by May 15 of each year. 20. Entire Agreement. This Operating Agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement of the parties, and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreements between the Parties, concerning the subject matter of this Operating Agreement. There are no verbal or written representations, understandings, stipulations, agreements or promises pertaining to this Operating Agreement that are not incorporated in this Operating Agreement. If a provision of this Operating Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision of this Operating Agreement and this Operating Agreement shall be construed and interpreted as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provisions had not been included. All exhibits referenced in this Operating Agreement are attached and incorporated by reference for all purposes. 21. Applicable Law. This Operating Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with Texas law. The parties agree that this Operating Agreement is performable in Williamson County, Texas. 22. Amendment. This Operating Agreement may not be modified or amended except in writing signed by the City and Operator. 23. Non-Assignment. Operator shall not assign or transfer any right or interest in the Operating Agreement, in whole or in part, without prior written approval of the City. Operator shall not sublease or rent out any part of the premises without prior written consent of the City. This Operating Agreement shall bind the parties, and their respective legal representative, successors, and permitted assigns. 24. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Operating Agreement shall not be construed as affording any rights or benefits to anyone other than City and Operator. EXECUTED this day of _______________, 2020. _______________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Name: ________________________________ Title: __________________________________ STATE OF TEXAS § § ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the _____ day of __________, 2020, by _____________________________, a person known to me in his capacity as _______________________________________ of the _________________________________________. _______________________________________ Notary Public State of Texas City of Georgetown, Texas By: _____________________________ Dale Ross, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Robyn Densmore, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ Skye Masson, City Attorney STATE OF TEXAS § ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the _____ day of __________, 2020, by Dale Ross, a person known to me in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Georgetown, Texas. _______________________________________ Notary Public State of Texas E First Floor Space Provided consists of the entire First Floor. Plan provided courtesy Gary Wang/Wang Architects Second Floor Space Provided consists of the individual office space shown below as available and not otherwise in use by the City. OPERATING REQUIREMENTS During the Operating Term of the Operating Agreement, Operator shall be responsible for: A. Providing space for an exhibition gallery, instructional space, meeting facilities, artist studio space, and a gift shop. Secondary functions may include but are not limited to: oversight of outdoor sculpture installations, art installations in a pocket park, instructional programs for pre-schoolers, summer camps and after school art programs; coordination of advertising space for the local arts community such as local galleries, the Palace Theatre, the Georgetown Symphony Society, Southwestern University, and the Georgetown ISD; and other arts and culture related activities such as small musical performances, when space is available. The Operator shall be allowed to rent the Space Provided or a portion thereof as studio space and for meetings or other events consistent with the uses outlined above to third parties. Such rentals shall be subject to all applicable Operating Requirements contained in the Agreement and specifically this Exhibit. B. Hours of operation shall be Tuesday through Saturday, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Sunday 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. (44 hours per week). The art center shall be open an additional two evenings per month for a minimum of 2 hours per for a total of 180 hours per month. C. The gallery of the art center shall have between six and ten major shows per year. A reception for the featured artist(s) shall be held with each exhibit. D. Operator shall have a gift shop in the art center and revenue from the shop shall be used to pay operating costs of the art center. E. Operator shall provide art classes for children and adults. Revenue from class registrations shall be used to pay operating costs of the art center. F. Operator shall provide all equipment to operate an art center, which may include: a. Cash register b. Moveable walls for art display c. Flat screen television d. DVD player e. Desktop photocopier f. Stereo g. Coffee pot h. Folding chairs and tables i. Information board j. Office supplies k. Art supplies l. Easels m. Safe n. Storage cabinet o. Office furniture p. Gift shop display cases q. Postage r. People counter for main entrance s. Public address system G. Operator will provide all regular housekeeping of the premises, including restrooms, gift shop, instructional space, and gallery space. H. Operator shall include a member from the Arts and Culture Board or the library administration as a non-voting attendee at all meetings of the Operating Board. I. Alcohol Policy. If the Operator sells alcohol, or leases the premises to a sublessee who will serve alcohol, the Operator shall receive prior written approval by the City. Whenever alcohol is served on the premises, the Operator and its lessee are subject to all state and federal laws and regulations, including the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code. J. Annual Visitor Survey: the Operator shall conduct an annual visitor survey of visitors to the Arts Center. K. Quarterly Reports. The Operator shall provide the City with quarterly on March 1, June 1, September 1, and December 1 written reports with information that includes: door count, zipcode information for visitors, name of exhibit, number of classes and class attendance, number of volunteer hours, monthly revenue and expenses, and attendance of artist receptions and other special events. L. Annual Report. The annual report shall be provided by February 1 of each year and shall include totals for the information compiled in monthly reports and the results of the annual visitor survey and shall present a strategic plan to the City of Georgetown Arts and Culture Board by the end of the first year of the term of this Agreement. The Georgetown Arts and Culture Board and the Executive Director of Georgetown Arts Works will hold an annual meeting at the April board meeting to discuss the annual report. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Minimum insurance limits for Operator to provide throughout the operating term of this Operating A Minimum liability for damage claims through public use or arising out of accidents or injuries occurring in or around the described premises, - $100,000.00 per person each occurrence, - $300,000.00 accident each occurrence, - $100,000.00 property damage each occurrence. The Operator also shall obta equipment located in the Space Provided. Resolution No. Description: GVPID Filing of Assessment Roll and setting Public Hearing date Date Approved: August 11, 2020 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #1; AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR THE ASSESSMENT FOR AUGUST 25, 2020. WHEREAS, the City is required by State Law to file the proposed assessment roll for the Georgetown Village Public Improvement District #1 (“District”) with the City Secretary’s Office for public inspection; and WHEREAS, the City will provide notice of the assessment levy to the residents within the District and hold a public hearing on August 25, 2020, to provide a reasonable opportunity for any property owner located within the District to speak for or against the assessment against real property and real property improvements exclusive of right-of-way, to continue funding for the District for the purpose of providing supplemental services and improvements; and WHEREAS, the Council will subsequently adopt the 2021 Service Plan, including the Assessment Plan, and the levy the assessment on August 25, 2020, following the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: USECTION 1U. Pursuant to the requirements by State Law, the Council, after reviewing the proposed Service Plan for the Georgetown Village Public Improvement District #1 attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, will consider approval of the final Service Plan for 2021 subject to the public hearing on August 25, 2020. USECTION 2U. That a public hearing shall be held at 6:00 p.m. on August 25, 2020, in the City Council Chambers, 510 W 9th St., Georgetown, Texas, at which time any interested person may appear and speak for or against the setting of an assessment against real property and real property improvements, exclusive of rights-of-way, to continue funding for the District for the purpose of providing supplemental services and improvements. USECTION 3U. That notice of such public hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City of Georgetown and mailed to the property owners in the District before the 10P th P day before the public hearing. USECTION 4U. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute, and the City Secretary to attest this Resolution. Resolution No. Description: GVPID Filing of Assessment Roll and setting Public Hearing date Date Approved: August 11, 2020 Page 2 of 2 USECTION 5U. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. RESOLVED this 11P th P day of August, 2020. ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: ______________________________ _______________________________ Robyn Densmore Dale Ross City Secretary Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ Skye Masson City Attorney Draft GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2021 SERVICE PLAN, ASSESSMENT PLAN AND 2020 ASSESSMENT ROLL Chapter 372 of the Local Government Code of the State of Texas, known as the “Public Improvement Assessment Act” (the “Act”), authorizes and defines the formation of a Public Improvement District within the State of Texas. By action taken by their City Council, the City of Georgetown (the “City”) passed Resolution No. 990223-N, which authorized the creation of the Georgetown Village Public Improvement District No. 1, and which has been amended to include additional acreage via Resolution Numbers 050801-AA-1, 032602-R, 040803-V-2, 011309-JJ, 062612-M, and 072214-R (the “District”). In compliance with the requirements outlined in various sections of the Act, the Five- Year Service Plan and Assessment Plan for the District is defined herein. USection 1.U UImprovements and Services to be provided for the District After analyzing the improvements authorized by the Act, the City determined that the services and improvements described herein should be provided within the District and will be of special benefit to the District. The purpose of the District is to supplement and enhance services within the District, but not to replace or supplant existing City services provided within the District. The general nature of the proposed services and improvements to be performed by the District are described below and more defined in Attachment I attached hereto and incorporated herein: Pocket parks, landscape areas, trees, sidewalks, trails, alleyways, distinctive lighting and signage, recreational facilities, water quality facilities, and other related improvements. The services to be provided by the District (the “Services”) shall consist of those necessary for the administration and operation of the District, including those of the City and the annual collection of assessments. USection 2.U UFive-Year Service Plan The total estimated cost of services and improvements to be provided for the District for the next five (5) years is approximately $U1,651,237 U(Attachment II). The estimated average annual cost is approximately $U330,247U, not including interest. The District shall incur no bonded indebtedness. USection 3.U UMethod of Assessment The proposed method of assessment, which specifies included or excluded classes of assessable property, is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements Draft as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. USection 4.U UAssessment Roll The District is described as being those properties described in Attachment III, attached hereto and incorporated herein. USection 5.U UAssessment Plan After analyzing the assessment methods allowed under the Act, the City has determined to allocate costs based upon appraised value; that the assessments are based on the benefits of the Improvements; that the assessments are fair and equitable; and the appraised value method is the most reasonable means of allocating the costs of the services to be provided. USection 6.U ULevy of Assessments There is to be levied by the City an assessment of $U0.14U per $100 valuation (“Assessment”) to pay the annual costs of the Improvements. Each annual Assessment, together with interest in the unpaid amount of each Assessment, shall be due and payable on or before January 31 of each year, with the first annual assessment occurring January 1 of the first year after the assessed lot is part of a final, recorded subdivision plat. Each subsequent annual Assessment shall be delinquent if not paid prior to January 31 of the subsequent year such annual Assessment is due. As authorized by Section 372.003(14) of the Act, there shall be levied each year an Assessment to pay the annual costs of the administration and operation of the District. This levy shall remain in effect from year to year until the City adjusts the levy after a hearing and a determination of benefits in any year pursuant to Section 372.015(d) of the Act. USection 7.U UInterest of Delinquent Annual Assessments A delinquent Assessment will accrue interest at the rate of one percent (1%) for each month or portion of a month the Assessment remains unpaid after it becomes delinquent. USection 8.U UPenalties A delinquent Assessment incurs a penalty of six percent (6%) of the annual Assessment for each calendar month or fraction thereof it is delinquent plus one percent (1%) from each additional month or fraction thereof the Assessment remains unpaid prior to January 31 of the year in which it becomes delinquent; however, an Assessment delinquent on July 1 of the year Draft in which the Assessment is due incurs a total penalty of twelve percent (12%) of the amount of the delinquent Assessment without regard to the number of months the Assessment has been delinquent. Penalties shall not exceed the amount permitted by the Act or any other applicable law. USection 9U. UAdditional Penalties If an Assessment remains delinquent on July 15 in the year in which the Assessment became delinquent, there shall be imposed an additional penalty to defray costs of collection if it necessary for the City to contract with an attorney for the purposes of representing the City in the collection of the delinquent Assessment. The additional penalty shall be fifteen percent (15%) of the annual Assessment and the penalties and interest on the annual Assessment. Penalties shall not exceed the amount permitted by the Act or any other applicable law. USection 10.U ULien for Collection of Assessments Assessments together with interest, penalties and expense of collection and reasonable attorney fees, as permitted by the Act, shall be a first and prior lien against the property assessed, superior to all other liens and claims, except liens or claims for state, county, school district or municipal ad valorem taxes, and shall be a liability of and a charge against the owner of the property regardless of whether the owners are named. The lien for Assessments and the penalties and interest is effective from the date of the Ordinance levying the Assessments until the Assessment is paid, and shall be enforced by the City in the same manner provided by the Texas Tax Code for collecting ad valorem taxes on real property. USection 11.U UApplicability of Tax Code To the extent not inconsistent with the Ordinance levying Assessments, and not inconsistent with the Act or the other laws governing public improvement districts, the provisions of the Texas Tax Code shall be applicable to the imposition and collection of Assessments by the City. Draft Attachment I Georgetown Village Public Improvement District (GVPID) Assessed Public Improvements GVPID Assessed Public Improvements (Includes all parks less than 1 acre, landscape easement lots, greenbelts, medians, roundabouts, and other landscape areas within the rights-of-way) General Grounds Maintenance Tree trimming/pruning Plant and tree removal and replacement Landscaping Irrigation (maintenance, repair and replacement) Utilities (Includes maintenance, removal and preparation for new tree) Tree trimming/pruning Removal and preparation for new appropriate tree (Includes walkways around perimeter, trails in park and landscape easement lots, pedestrian alleyways, and sidewalks affected by the street trees) Maintenance, repair and replacement (Excludes stormwater drainage improvements; inlets, catch basins and buried pipe) Maintenance, repair and replacement of pavement (GVPID parks, gazebo and street antique street lights) Maintenance (paint and coating) (Includes special brown street signs, trail signs and markers, park name signs, and subdivision entry and directional signs) Maintenance, repair and replacement (Includes gazebo, playscape shade structures, mutt mitt dispenser, park benches, tables, trash receptacles, and Shell Rd fence) Maintenance and repair (Includes Water Quality ponds) Pond rehabilitation Ongoing maintenance Draft GVPID Assessed Public Improvements (Services needed for the administration and operation of the District) City cost to administer annual fee assessment and collection (Accountant and Controller) Administrative Personnel Legal Office Supplies Plans and Communication/Notices Insurance Draft Attachment II Georgetown Village PID Five-Year Service Plan FY 2021 – 2025 Georgetown Village Public Improvement District DRAFT Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Beginning Fund Balance 394,229 406,056 418,238 430,785 443,708 Revenue: Ad Valorem Taxes 455,000 468,650 482,710 497,191 512,107 Allocated Interest 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Property Taxes - Penalties and Interest 100 100 100 100 100 Total Revenue 456,100 469,750 483,810 498,291 513,207 Expense: Adminstrative (Joint Services) Allocation 4,485 4,620 4,758 4,901 5,048 General Fund Allocation 23,933 24,651 25,391 26,152 26,937 Printing (Previously Brochures) 2,100 2,163 2,228 2,295 2,364 Appraisal Contracts 3,000 3,090 3,183 3,278 3,377 Consulting - Management 20,000 20,600 21,218 21,855 22,510 Mowing Contracts 115,000 118,450 122,004 125,664 129,434 Utilities 56,000 57,680 59,410 61,193 63,028 Office Supplies, General 300 309 318 328 338 Maintenance - Street Asphaltic 12,000 12,360 12,731 13,113 13,506 Maintenance - Sidewalk 23,200 23,896 24,613 25,351 26,112 Tree and Shrub Removal Services 20,000 20,600 21,218 21,855 22,510 Maintenance - Ponds and Irrigation Systems 30,000 30,900 31,827 32,782 33,765 Property and Casualty Insurance 1,000 1,030 1,061 1,093 1,126 Park Improvements (Pavilion, Gazebo, Ball Fences) - - - - - Expense Subtotal 311,018 320,349 329,959 339,858 350,053 Projects: Rowan Park Improvements Parklets Shell Landscape Madrone Park Improvement Projects Subtotal - - - - - Total Expense 311,018 320,349 329,959 339,858 350,053 Contingency Reserve 113,750 117,163 120,677 124,298 128,027 CAFR (Auditor's) Adjustment Ending Fund Balance 425,561 438,295 451,411 464,920 478,835 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) R545928 R-20-4695-0909-D078 972 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 78 $333,015.00 $466.22 R545927 R-20-4695-0909-D077 968 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 77 $305,211.00 $427.30 R545926 R-20-4695-0909-D076 964 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 76 $300,158.00 $420.22 R545925 R-20-4695-0909-D075 960 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 75 $302,513.00 $423.52 R545924 R-20-4695-0909-D074 956 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 74 $367,598.00 $514.64 R496803 R-20-4695-090M-0014 955 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK M, Lot 14 $300,080.00 $420.11 R496813 R-20-4695-090N-0010 954 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 10 $370,747.00 $519.05 R545923 R-20-4695-0909-D073 952 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 73 $394,903.00 $552.86 R496802 R-20-4695-090M-0013 951 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK M, Lot 13 $312,177.00 $437.05 R496812 R-20-4695-090N-0009 950 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 9 $320,898.00 $449.26 R545922 R-20-4695-0909-D072 948 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 72 $332,241.00 $465.14 R496801 R-20-4695-090M-0012 947 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK M, Lot 12 $310,696.00 $434.97 R496811 R-20-4695-090N-0008 946 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 8 $295,390.00 $413.55 R545921 R-20-4695-0909-D071 944 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 71 $398,960.00 $558.54 R496800 R-20-4695-090M-0011 943 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK M, Lot 11 $319,215.00 $446.90 R496810 R-20-4695-090N-0007 942 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 7 $294,565.00 $412.39 R545929 R-20-4695-0909-Q001 941 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK Q, Lot 1 $354,564.00 $496.39 R545920 R-20-4695-0909-D070 940 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 70 $345,266.00 $483.37 R496799 R-20-4695-090M-0010 939 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK M, Lot 10 $302,165.00 $423.03 R496809 R-20-4695-090N-0006 938 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 6 $339,044.00 $474.66 R545930 R-20-4695-0909-Q002 937 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK Q, Lot 2 $408,894.00 $572.45 R545919 R-20-4695-0909-D069 936 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 69 $301,173.00 $421.64 R496798 R-20-4695-090M-0009 935 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK M, Lot 9 $367,819.00 $514.95 R545931 R-20-4695-0909-Q003 933 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK Q, Lot 3 $352,731.00 $493.82 R545918 R-20-4695-0909-D068 932 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 68 $342,076.00 $478.91 R548286 R-20-3152-030J-0013 932 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK J, Lot 13 $302,448.00 $423.43 R496797 R-20-4695-090M-0008 931 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK M, Lot 8 $305,833.00 $428.17 R496808 R-20-4695-090N-0005 930 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 5 $301,375.00 $421.93 R545932 R-20-4695-0909-Q004 929 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK Q, Lot 4 $309,311.00 $433.04 R545917 R-20-4695-0909-D067 928 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 67 $340,928.00 $477.30 R548285 R-20-3152-030J-0012 928 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK J, Lot 12 $242,866.00 $340.01 R496796 R-20-4695-090M-0007 927 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK M, Lot 7 $355,250.00 $497.35 R545933 R-20-4695-0909-Q005 925 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK Q, Lot 5 $294,451.00 $412.23 R545916 R-20-4695-0909-D066 924 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 66 $356,338.00 $498.87 R548284 R-20-3152-030J-0011 924 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK J, Lot 11 $239,061.00 $334.69 R496807 R-20-4695-090N-0004 922 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 4 $317,186.00 $444.06 R545934 R-20-4695-0909-Q006 921 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK Q, Lot 6 $356,338.00 $498.87 R545915 R-20-4695-0909-D065 920 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 65 $382,782.00 $535.89 R548283 R-20-3152-030J-0010 920 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK J, Lot 10 $302,700.00 $423.78 R496794 R-20-4695-090M-0005 919 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK M, Lot 5 $342,626.00 $479.68 R545935 R-20-4695-0909-Q007 917 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK Q, Lot 7 $342,693.00 $479.77 R545914 R-20-4695-0909-D064 916 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 64 $397,505.00 $556.51 R548282 R-20-3152-030J-0009 916 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK J, Lot 9 $297,210.00 $416.09 R496793 R-20-4695-090M-0004 915 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK M, Lot 4 $340,047.00 $476.07 R496806 R-20-4695-090N-0003 914 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 3 $319,991.00 $447.99 R545936 R-20-4695-0909-Q008 913 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK Q, Lot 8 $364,028.00 $509.64 R545913 R-20-4695-0909-D063 912 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 63 $397,484.00 $556.48 R548281 R-20-3152-030J-0008 912 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK J, Lot 8 $302,448.00 $423.43 R496792 R-20-4695-090M-0003 911 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK M, Lot 3 $324,098.00 $453.74 *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll Page 1 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R441392 R-20-4695-070E-0043 911 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 43, ACRES 0.2188 $253,553.00 $354.97 R530808 R-20-3151-020B-0032 909 SLIP DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 32 $304,842.00 $426.78 R545937 R-20-4695-0909-Q009 909 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK Q, Lot 9 $290,718.00 $407.01 R441391 R-20-4695-070E-0042 909 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 42, ACRES 0.1432 $239,068.00 $334.70 R441401 R-20-4695-070E-0052 909 ELMWOOD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 52, ACRES 0.2558 $239,186.00 $334.86 R545912 R-20-4695-0909-D062 908 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 62 $347,333.00 $486.27 R441393 R-20-4695-070E-0044 908 ELMWOOD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 44, ACRES 0.2136 $252,817.00 $353.94 R548280 R-20-3152-030J-0007 908 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK J, Lot 7 $317,903.00 $445.06 R496791 R-20-4695-090M-0002 907 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK M, Lot 2 $251,603.00 $352.24 R441390 R-20-4695-070E-0041 907 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 41, ACRES 0.1468 $247,635.00 $346.69 R441400 R-20-4695-070E-0051 907 ELMWOOD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 51, ACRES 0.1542 $250,910.00 $351.27 R441359 R-20-4695-070E-0010 906 POPLAR DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 10, ACRES 0.2104 $239,869.00 $335.82 R496805 R-20-4695-090N-0002 906 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 2 $349,420.00 $489.19 R441394 R-20-4695-070E-0045 906 ELMWOOD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 45, ACRES 0.1518 $242,869.00 $340.02 R530807 R-20-3151-020B-0031 905 SLIP DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 31 $342,709.00 $479.79 R545938 R-20-4695-0909-Q010 905 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK Q, Lot 10 $330,020.00 $462.03 R441389 R-20-4695-070E-0040 905 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 40, ACRES 0.1501 $248,270.00 $347.58 R441399 R-20-4695-070E-0050 905 ELMWOOD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 50, ACRES 0.2501 $260,977.00 $365.37 R441360 R-20-4695-070E-0011 904 POPLAR DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 11, ACRES 0.1704 $274,152.00 $383.81 R545911 R-20-4695-0909-D061 904 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 61 $347,790.00 $486.91 R441395 R-20-4695-070E-0046 904 ELMWOOD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 46, ACRES 0.1603 $265,876.00 $372.23 R548279 R-20-3152-030J-0006 904 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK J, Lot 6 $301,216.00 $421.70 R496790 R-20-4695-090M-0001 903 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK M, Lot 1 $315,059.00 $441.08 R441388 R-20-4695-070E-0039 903 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 39, ACRES 0.1322 $241,175.00 $337.65 R441398 R-20-4695-070E-0049 903 ELMWOOD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 49, ACRES 0.2948 $266,643.00 $373.30 R441361 R-20-4695-070E-0012 902 POPLAR DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 12, ACRES 0.1678 $262,010.00 $366.81 R496804 R-20-4695-090N-0001 902 MADRONE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 1 $300,962.00 $421.35 R441396 R-20-4695-070E-0047 902 ELMWOOD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 47, ACRES 0.3924 $257,006.00 $359.81 R530806 R-20-3151-020B-0030 901 SLIP DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 30 $285,041.00 $399.06 R545939 R-20-4695-0909-Q011 901 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK Q, Lot 11 $379,517.00 $531.32 R441387 R-20-4695-070E-0038 901 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 38, ACRES 0.2734 $272,605.00 $381.65 R441397 R-20-4695-070E-0048 901 ELMWOOD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 48, ACRES 0.3521 $280,078.00 $392.11 R545910 R-20-4695-0909-D060 900 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 60 $392,898.00 $550.06 R548278 R-20-3152-030J-0005 900 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK J, Lot 5 $241,687.00 $338.36 R475547 R-20-4695-060C-0028 835 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 28, ACRES 0.1854 $333,433.00 $466.81 R475546 R-20-4695-060C-0027 831 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 27, ACRES 0.1578 $282,585.00 $395.62 R475545 R-20-4695-060C-0026 827 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 26, ACRES 0.1898 $293,443.00 $410.82 R475544 R-20-4695-060C-0025 823 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 25, ACRES 0.1924 $318,018.00 $445.23 R475543 R-20-4695-060C-0024 817 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 24, ACRES 0.1924 $308,329.00 $431.66 R475542 R-20-4695-060C-0023 813 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 23, ACRES 0.1633 $266,046.00 $372.46 R441376 R-20-4695-070E-0027 811 BEDFORD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 27, ACRES 0.2742 $254,666.00 $356.53 R441377 R-20-4695-070E-0028 810 BEDFORD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 28, ACRES 0.3801 $272,530.00 $381.54 R475541 R-20-4695-060C-0022 809 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 22, ACRES 0.1608 $289,448.00 $405.23 R530805 R-20-3151-020B-0029 809 SLIP DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 29 $293,893.00 $411.45 R441386 R-20-4695-070E-0037 809 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 37, ACRES 0.1875 $258,317.00 $361.64 R441374 R-20-4695-070E-0025 809 BEDFORD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 25, ACRES 0.3399 $272,530.00 $381.54 R548277 R-20-3152-030J-0004 808 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK J, Lot 4 $237,839.00 $332.97 R441378 R-20-4695-070E-0029 808 BEDFORD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 29, ACRES 0.1708 $248,064.00 $347.29 R441385 R-20-4695-070E-0036 807 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 36, ACRES 0.1885 $267,900.00 $375.06 R441373 R-20-4695-070E-0024 807 BEDFORD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 24, ACRES 0.216 $239,869.00 $335.82 R441379 R-20-4695-070E-0030 806 BEDFORD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 30, ACRES 0.1677 $236,351.00 $330.89 Page 2 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R475540 R-20-4695-060C-0021 805 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 21, ACRES 0.1607 $339,704.00 $475.59 R530804 R-20-3151-020B-0028 805 SLIP DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 28 $298,188.00 $417.46 R441384 R-20-4695-070E-0035 805 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 35, ACRES 0.2195 $239,068.00 $334.70 R441372 R-20-4695-070E-0023 805 BEDFORD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 23, ACRES 0.1712 $267,156.00 $374.02 R441403 R-20-4695-070F-0001 804 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK F, Lot 1, ACRES 0.2366 $267,581.00 $374.61 R548276 R-20-3152-030J-0003 804 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK J, Lot 3 $300,634.00 $420.89 R441380 R-20-4695-070E-0031 804 BEDFORD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 31, ACRES 0.1974 $272,605.00 $381.65 R441383 R-20-4695-070E-0034 803 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 34, ACRES 0.3011 $249,087.00 $348.72 R441371 R-20-4695-070E-0022 803 BEDFORD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 22, ACRES 0.1721 $248,064.00 $347.29 R441404 R-20-4695-070F-0002 802 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK F, Lot 2, ACRES 0.1636 $265,255.00 $371.36 R441381 R-20-4695-070E-0032 802 BEDFORD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 32, ACRES 0.2466 $254,509.00 $356.31 R475539 R-20-4695-060C-0020 801 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 20, ACRES 0.1607 $278,832.00 $390.36 R530803 R-20-3151-020B-0027 801 SLIP DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 27 $242,797.00 $339.92 R441382 R-20-4695-070E-0033 801 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 33, ACRES 0.3142 $272,605.00 $381.65 R441370 R-20-4695-070E-0021 801 BEDFORD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 21, ACRES 0.1784 $262,010.00 $366.81 R441405 R-20-4695-070F-0003 800 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK F, Lot 3, ACRES 0.178 $240,802.00 $337.12 R548275 R-20-3152-030J-0002 800 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK J, Lot 2 $283,293.00 $396.61 R475538 R-20-4695-060C-0019 755 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 19, ACRES 0.1607 $319,585.00 $447.42 R475537 R-20-4695-060C-0018 751 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 18, ACRES 0.1607 $277,004.00 $387.81 R475536 R-20-4695-060C-0017 747 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 17, ACRES 0.1607 $264,465.00 $370.25 R475535 R-20-4695-060C-0016 743 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 16, ACRES 0.1607 $317,599.00 $444.64 R475610 R-20-4695-060I-0014 742 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 14, ACRES 0.1784 $330,403.00 $462.56 R475534 R-20-4695-060C-0015 739 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 15, ACRES 0.1607 $271,722.00 $380.41 R475611 R-20-4695-060I-0015 738 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 15, ACRES 0.1578 $278,943.00 $390.52 R475533 R-20-4695-060C-0014 735 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 14, ACRES 0.1607 $291,588.00 $408.22 R475612 R-20-4695-060I-0016 734 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 16, ACRES 0.1578 $332,736.00 $465.83 R475532 R-20-4695-060C-0013 731 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 13, ACRES 0.169 $357,091.00 $499.93 R475613 R-20-4695-060I-0017 730 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 17, ACRES 0.1578 $348,153.00 $487.41 R475531 R-20-4695-060C-0012 727 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 12, ACRES 0.1873 $305,036.00 $427.05 R475614 R-20-4695-060I-0018 726 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 18, ACRES 0.1677 $280,646.00 $392.90 R475530 R-20-4695-060C-0011 723 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 11, ACRES 0.1873 $332,844.00 $465.98 R475615 R-20-4695-060I-0019 722 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 19, ACRES 0.2017 $322,794.00 $451.91 R548259 R-20-3152-030E-0020 720 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 20 $244,542.00 $342.36 R475529 R-20-4695-060C-0010 719 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 10, ACRES 0.1873 $314,561.00 $440.39 R475616 R-20-4695-060I-0020 718 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 20, ACRES 0.1844 $260,625.00 $364.88 R548258 R-20-3152-030E-0019 716 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 19 $290,000.00 $406.00 R475528 R-20-4695-060C-0009 715 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 9, ACRES 0.2972 $321,174.00 $449.64 R519730 R-20-4695-0904-K015 714 NAMBOCA WAY, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 15 $367,344.00 $514.28 R548257 R-20-3152-030E-0018 712 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 18 $284,689.00 $398.56 R475527 R-20-4695-060C-0008 711 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 8, ACRES 0.1616 $283,825.00 $397.36 R475599 R-20-4695-060I-0003 710 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 3, ACRES 0.1436 $318,017.00 $445.22 R519729 R-20-4695-0904-K014 710 NAMBOCA WAY, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 14 $321,177.00 $449.65 R548261 R-20-3152-030F-0001 709 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK F, Lot 1 $314,108.00 $439.75 R548256 R-20-3152-030E-0017 708 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 17 $291,680.00 $408.35 R475526 R-20-4695-060C-0007 707 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 7, ACRES 0.1616 $287,224.00 $402.11 R475598 R-20-4695-060I-0002 706 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 2, ACRES 0.1436 $272,209.00 $381.09 R519693 R-20-4695-0904-D021 706 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK D, Lot 21 $310,004.00 $434.01 R519728 R-20-4695-0904-K013 706 NAMBOCA WAY, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 13 $261,583.00 $366.22 R548262 R-20-3152-030F-0002 705 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK F, Lot 2 $301,002.00 $421.40 R519692 R-20-4695-0904-D020 704 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK D, Lot 20 $299,460.00 $419.24 R441406 R-20-4695-070F-0004 704 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK F, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1707 $272,336.00 $381.27 Page 3 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R548255 R-20-3152-030E-0016 704 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 16 $284,164.00 $397.83 R475525 R-20-4695-060C-0006 703 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 6, ACRES 0.1603 $282,601.00 $395.64 R475597 R-20-4695-060I-0001 702 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 1, ACRES 0.1685 $379,324.00 $531.05 R519691 R-20-4695-0904-D019 702 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK D, Lot 19 $298,373.00 $417.72 R441407 R-20-4695-070F-0005 702 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK F, Lot 5, ACRES 0.1698 $247,336.00 $346.27 R519690 R-20-4695-0904-D018 700 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK D, Lot 18 $350,506.00 $490.71 R519727 R-20-4695-0904-K012 700 NAMBOCA WAY, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 12 $382,026.00 $534.84 R441408 R-20-4695-070F-0006 700 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK F, Lot 6, ACRES 0.251 $278,124.00 $389.37 R548254 R-20-3152-030E-0015 700 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 15 $288,199.00 $403.48 R548253 R-20-3152-030E-0014 620 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 14 $297,973.00 $417.16 R475524 R-20-4695-060C-0005 619 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 5, ACRES 0.1581 $352,872.00 $494.02 R545940 R-20-4695-0909-Q012 617 BELLAIRE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK Q, Lot 12 $329,701.00 $461.58 R548252 R-20-3152-030E-0013 616 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 13 $241,935.00 $338.71 R545908 R-20-4695-0909-D058 616 BELLAIRE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 58 $118,578.00 $166.01 R475523 R-20-4695-060C-0004 615 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1578 $318,677.00 $446.15 R545941 R-20-4695-0909-Q013 613 BELLAIRE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK Q, Lot 13 $325,765.00 $456.07 R548251 R-20-3152-030E-0012 612 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 12 $272,148.00 $381.01 R545907 R-20-4695-0909-D057 612 BELLAIRE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 57 $406,922.00 $569.69 R475522 R-20-4695-060C-0003 611 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 3, ACRES 0.1578 $283,113.00 $396.36 R545942 R-20-4695-0909-Q014 609 BELLAIRE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK Q, Lot 14 $332,241.00 $465.14 R519689 R-20-4695-0904-D017 608 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK D, Lot 17 $305,533.00 $427.75 R548250 R-20-3152-030E-0011 608 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 11 $327,018.00 $457.83 R545906 R-20-4695-0909-D056 608 BELLAIRE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 56 $65,500.00 $91.70 R475521 R-20-4695-060C-0002 607 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 2, ACRES 0.1578 $318,150.00 $445.41 R441369 R-20-4695-070E-0020 607 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 20, ACRES 0.1733 $267,156.00 $374.02 R519688 R-20-4695-0904-D016 606 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK D, Lot 16 $364,321.00 $510.05 R441362 R-20-4695-070E-0013 606 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 13, ACRES 0.1994 $244,000.00 $341.60 R441368 R-20-4695-070E-0019 605 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 19, ACRES 0.1386 $249,530.00 $349.34 R545943 R-20-4695-0909-Q015 605 BELLAIRE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK Q, Lot 15 $387,372.00 $542.32 R519687 R-20-4695-0904-D015 604 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK D, Lot 15 $322,901.00 $452.06 R441363 R-20-4695-070E-0014 604 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 14, ACRES 0.1803 $248,064.00 $347.29 R548249 R-20-3152-030E-0010 604 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 10 $356,316.00 $498.84 R545905 R-20-4695-0909-D055 604 BELLAIRE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK D, Lot 55 $65,500.00 $91.70 R475520 R-20-4695-060C-0001 603 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 1, ACRES 0.1854 $282,276.00 $395.19 R441367 R-20-4695-070E-E018 603 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9161 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 7 PUD (BLK E LT 1 & 18 AMD), BLOCK E, Lot 18, ACRES 0.19 $262,010.00 $366.81 R519686 R-20-4695-0904-D014 602 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK D, Lot 14 $259,994.00 $363.99 R441364 R-20-4695-070E-0015 602 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 15, ACRES 0.2144 $282,780.00 $395.89 R441366 R-20-4695-070E-0017 601 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 17, ACRES 0.2202 $249,066.00 $348.69 R519685 R-20-4695-0904-D013 600 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK D, Lot 13 $298,499.00 $417.90 R441365 R-20-4695-070E-0016 600 FAIRMONT DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 16, ACRES 0.2129 $240,802.00 $337.12 R548248 R-20-3152-030E-0009 600 CROWN ANCHOR BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 9 $245,441.00 $343.62 R426249 R-20-4695-050C-0001 563 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 1 $270,087.00 $378.12 R426250 R-20-4695-050C-0002 559 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 2 $258,079.00 $361.31 R426273 R-20-4695-050D-0013 558 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 13 $274,454.00 $384.24 R426251 R-20-4695-050C-0003 555 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 3 $257,836.00 $360.97 R426272 R-20-4695-050D-0012 554 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 12 $242,197.00 $339.08 R426252 R-20-4695-050C-0004 551 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 4 $238,900.00 $334.46 R426271 R-20-4695-050D-0011 550 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 11 $254,059.00 $355.68 R496731 R-20-4695-090A-0039 549 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 39 $270,192.00 $378.27 R426253 R-20-4695-050C-0005 547 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 5 $260,371.00 $364.52 R426270 R-20-4695-050D-0010 546 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 10 $288,834.00 $404.37 Page 4 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R496730 R-20-4695-090A-0038 545 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 38 $237,587.00 $332.62 R426254 R-20-4695-050C-0006 543 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 6 $249,840.00 $349.78 R426269 R-20-4695-050D-0009 542 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 9 $264,661.00 $370.53 R496729 R-20-4695-090A-0037 541 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 37 $270,478.00 $378.67 R426255 R-20-4695-050C-0007 539 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 7 $281,007.00 $393.41 R426268 R-20-4695-050D-0008 538 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 8 $228,996.00 $320.59 R496728 R-20-4695-090A-0036 537 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 36 $243,801.00 $341.32 R426256 R-20-4695-050C-0008 535 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 8 $238,900.00 $334.46 R426267 R-20-4695-050D-0007 534 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 7 $254,059.00 $355.68 R496727 R-20-4695-090A-0035 533 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 35 $280,168.00 $392.24 R426257 R-20-4695-050C-0009 531 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 9 $269,868.00 $377.82 R426266 R-20-4695-050D-0006 530 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 6 $288,834.00 $404.37 R496726 R-20-4695-090A-0034 529 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 34 $315,577.00 $441.81 R426258 R-20-4695-050C-0010 527 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 10 $268,823.00 $376.35 R426265 R-20-4695-050D-0005 526 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 5 $265,512.00 $371.72 R496725 R-20-4695-090A-0033 525 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 33 $271,324.00 $379.85 R426259 R-20-4695-050C-0011 523 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 11 $257,579.00 $360.61 R426264 R-20-4695-050D-0004 522 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 4 $242,197.00 $339.08 R496724 R-20-4695-090A-0032 521 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 32 $258,629.00 $362.08 R426260 R-20-4695-050C-0012 519 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 12 $238,900.00 $334.46 R426263 R-20-4695-050D-0003 518 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 3 $254,059.00 $355.68 R519684 R-20-4695-0904-D012 518 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK D, Lot 12 $340,997.00 $477.40 R496745 R-20-4695-090H-0011 518 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 11 $321,301.00 $449.82 R496723 R-20-4695-090A-0031 517 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 31 $240,778.00 $337.09 R519683 R-20-4695-0904-D011 516 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK D, Lot 11 $291,919.00 $408.69 R526957 R-20-3151-010A-0001 515 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 1 $342,159.00 $479.02 R531085 R-20-4695-0907-A012 515 CONCORD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK A, Lot 12 $319,689.00 $447.56 R426262 R-20-4695-050D-0002 514 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 2 $288,834.00 $404.37 R519682 R-20-4695-0904-D010 514 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK D, Lot 10 $291,229.00 $407.72 R496744 R-20-4695-090H-0010 514 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 10 $272,037.00 $380.85 R548263 R-20-3152-030F-0003 513 SHEEP SHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK F, Lot 3 $325,689.00 $455.96 R519674 R-20-4695-0904-C008 513 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK C, Lot 8 $421,209.00 $589.69 R496722 R-20-4695-090A-0030 513 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 30 $248,387.00 $347.74 R548236 R-20-3152-030D-0005 512 SHEEP SHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK D, Lot 5 $334,264.00 $467.97 R441340 R-20-4695-070C-0007 511 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 7, ACRES 0.1732 $247,762.00 $346.87 R531084 R-20-4695-0907-A011 511 CONCORD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK A, Lot 11 $263,509.00 $368.91 R426261 R-20-4695-050D-0001 510 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 1 $274,454.00 $384.24 R531097 R-20-4695-0907-B022 510 CONCORD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK B, Lot 22 $294,327.00 $412.06 R496743 R-20-4695-090H-0009 510 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 9 $280,858.00 $393.20 R548264 R-20-3152-030F-0004 509 SHEEP SHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK F, Lot 4 $288,761.00 $404.27 R441339 R-20-4695-070C-0006 509 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 6, ACRES 0.1732 $243,152.00 $340.41 R531093 R-20-4695-0907-A020 509 PINON CV, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK A, Lot 20 $294,067.00 $411.69 R496721 R-20-4695-090A-0029 509 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 29 $243,801.00 $341.32 R441344 R-20-4695-070D-0004 508 SHERWOOD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 4, ACRES 0.3957 $270,293.00 $378.41 R548235 R-20-3152-030D-0004 508 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK D, Lot 4 $268,626.00 $376.08 R531088 R-20-4695-0907-A015 508 PINON CV, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK A, Lot 15 $300,424.00 $420.59 R441345 R-20-4695-070D-0005 507 SHERWOOD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 5, ACRES 0.3643 $253,043.00 $354.26 R441338 R-20-4695-070C-0005 507 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 5, ACRES 0.1733 $245,818.00 $344.15 R531083 R-20-4695-0907-A010 507 CONCORD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK A, Lot 10 $316,714.00 $443.40 R441343 R-20-4695-070D-0003 506 SHERWOOD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 3, ACRES 0.2916 $237,208.00 $332.09 R531098 R-20-4695-0907-B023 506 CONCORD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK B, Lot 23 $258,102.00 $361.34 Page 5 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R496742 R-20-4695-090H-0008 506 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 8 $281,303.00 $393.82 R441346 R-20-4695-070D-0006 505 SHERWOOD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 6, ACRES 0.1434 $248,561.00 $347.99 R548265 R-20-3152-030F-0005 505 SHEEP SHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK F, Lot 5 $266,536.00 $373.15 R441337 R-20-4695-070C-0004 505 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1739 $256,629.00 $359.28 R531092 R-20-4695-0907-A019 505 PINON CV, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK A, Lot 19 $244,606.00 $342.45 R496720 R-20-4695-090A-0028 505 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 28 $258,825.00 $362.36 R496746 R-20-4695-090I-0001 504 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 1 $273,945.00 $383.52 R441342 R-20-4695-070D-0002 504 SHERWOOD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 2, ACRES 0.2778 $246,127.00 $344.58 R548234 R-20-3152-030D-0003 504 SHEEP SHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK D, Lot 3 $349,547.00 $489.37 R531089 R-20-4695-0907-A016 504 PINON CV, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK A, Lot 16 $349,550.00 $489.37 R441347 R-20-4695-070D-0007 503 SHERWOOD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 7, ACRES 0.2108 $271,044.00 $379.46 R441336 R-20-4695-070C-0003 503 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK C, Lot 3, ACRES 0.1923 $241,022.00 $337.43 R426247 R-20-4695-050B-0008 502 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK B, Lot 8 $302,312.00 $423.24 R441341 R-20-4695-070D-0001 502 SHERWOOD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 1, ACRES 0.3895 $270,293.00 $378.41 R496741 R-20-4695-090H-0007 502 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 7 $246,178.00 $344.65 R441348 R-20-4695-070D-0008 501 SHERWOOD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK D, Lot 8, ACRES 0.2761 $252,785.00 $353.90 R548266 R-20-3152-030F-0006 501 SHEEP SHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK F, Lot 6 $274,290.00 $384.01 R531091 R-20-4695-0907-A018 501 PINON CV, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK A, Lot 18 $262,761.00 $367.87 R496719 R-20-4695-090A-0027 501 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 27 $248,008.00 $347.21 R496747 R-20-4695-090I-0002 500 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 2 $250,736.00 $351.03 R548233 R-20-3152-030D-0002 500 SHEEP SHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK D, Lot 2 $268,809.00 $376.33 R531090 R-20-4695-0907-A017 500 PINON CV, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK A, Lot 17 $325,558.00 $455.78 R476575 R-20-4695-080A-0001 4910 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 1, ACRES 0.1722 $282,076.00 $394.91 R476576 R-20-4695-080A-0002 4906 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 2, ACRES 0.1377 $247,219.00 $346.11 R476577 R-20-4695-080A-0003 4902 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 3, ACRES 0.1377 $277,991.00 $389.19 R476578 R-20-4695-080A-0004 4822 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1377 $267,728.00 $374.82 R476579 R-20-4695-080A-0005 4818 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 5, ACRES 0.1377 $273,217.00 $382.50 R476580 R-20-4695-080A-0006 4814 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 6, ACRES 0.1377 $257,652.00 $360.71 R476581 R-20-4695-080A-0007 4810 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 7, ACRES 0.1378 $269,899.00 $377.86 R476640 R-20-4695-080H-0019 4809 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 19, ACRES 0.1612 $326,199.00 $456.68 R476582 R-20-4695-080A-0008 4806 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 8, ACRES 0.1378 $268,675.00 $376.15 R476639 R-20-4695-080H-0018 4805 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 18, ACRES 0.1564 $242,786.00 $339.90 R476583 R-20-4695-080A-0009 4802 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 9, ACRES 0.1642 $270,749.00 $379.05 R476638 R-20-4695-080H-0017 4801 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 17, ACRES 0.1564 $238,641.00 $334.10 R530827 R-20-3151-020C-0043 480 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 43 $302,532.00 $423.54 R530826 R-20-3151-020C-0042 476 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 42 $298,020.00 $417.23 R530851 R-20-3151-020G-0026 473 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 26 $277,890.00 $389.05 R530825 R-20-3151-020C-0041 472 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 41 $346,055.00 $484.48 R476637 R-20-4695-080H-0016 4719 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 16, ACRES 0.1564 $286,125.00 $400.58 R476584 R-20-4695-080B-0001 4718 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 1, ACRES 0.1642 $255,168.00 $357.24 R476636 R-20-4695-080H-0015 4715 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 15, ACRES 0.156 $267,933.00 $375.11 R476585 R-20-4695-080B-0002 4714 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 2, ACRES 0.1377 $277,742.00 $388.84 R476635 R-20-4695-080H-0014 4711 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 14, ACRES 0.1614 $292,599.00 $409.64 R476586 R-20-4695-080B-0003 4710 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 3, ACRES 0.1377 $280,432.00 $392.60 R476587 R-20-4695-080B-0004 4706 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1378 $258,315.00 $361.64 R476588 R-20-4695-080B-0005 4702 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 5, ACRES 0.1377 $252,584.00 $353.62 R530852 R-20-3151-020G-0027 469 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 27 $242,866.00 $340.01 R530824 R-20-3151-020C-0040 468 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 40 $239,814.00 $335.74 R530853 R-20-3151-020G-0028 465 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 28 $268,362.00 $375.71 R530823 R-20-3151-020C-0039 464 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 39 $267,304.00 $374.23 R476589 R-20-4695-080B-0006 4622 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 6, ACRES 0.1377 $286,758.00 $401.46 Page 6 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R476590 R-20-4695-080B-0007 4618 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 7, ACRES 0.1518 $270,043.00 $378.06 R476591 R-20-4695-080B-0008 4614 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 8, ACRES 0.1487 $261,135.00 $365.59 R476617 R-20-4695-080G-0045 4613 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 45, ACRES 0.1695 $270,043.00 $378.06 R476592 R-20-4695-080B-0009 4610 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 9, ACRES 0.1488 $250,228.00 $350.32 R530854 R-20-3151-020G-0029 461 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 29 $300,166.00 $420.23 R476618 R-20-4695-080G-0046 4609 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 46, ACRES 0.142 $252,220.00 $353.11 R476593 R-20-4695-080B-0010 4606 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 10, ACRES 0.1487 $242,209.00 $339.09 R476619 R-20-4695-080G-0047 4605 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 47, ACRES 0.142 $270,741.00 $379.04 R476594 R-20-4695-080B-0011 4602 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 11, ACRES 0.1998 $253,952.00 $355.53 R476620 R-20-4695-080G-0048 4601 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 48, ACRES 0.142 $269,411.00 $377.18 R530822 R-20-3151-020C-0038 460 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 38 $342,343.00 $479.28 R530855 R-20-3151-020G-0030 457 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 30 $291,782.00 $408.49 R530821 R-20-3151-020C-0037 456 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 37 $243,181.00 $340.45 R530856 R-20-3151-020G-0031 453 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 31 $283,920.00 $397.49 R530820 R-20-3151-020C-0036 452 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 36 $239,086.00 $334.72 R476595 R-20-4695-080C-0001 4510 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 1, ACRES 0.1811 $253,766.00 $355.27 R476621 R-20-4695-080G-0049 4507 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 49, ACRES 0.1628 $241,831.00 $338.56 R476596 R-20-4695-080C-0002 4506 MADRID DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK C, Lot 2, ACRES 0.1563 $249,838.00 $349.77 R475549 R-20-4695-060D-0001 450 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 1, ACRES 0.1872 $284,223.00 $397.91 R530857 R-20-3151-020G-0032 449 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 32 $236,835.00 $331.57 R530819 R-20-3151-020C-0035 448 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 35 $308,921.00 $432.49 R475550 R-20-4695-060D-0002 446 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 2, ACRES 0.1578 $313,503.00 $438.90 R530858 R-20-3151-020G-0033 445 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 33 $279,351.00 $391.09 R530818 R-20-3151-020C-0034 444 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 34 $302,448.00 $423.43 R475551 R-20-4695-060D-0003 442 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 3, ACRES 0.1578 $265,166.00 $371.23 R530859 R-20-3151-020G-0034 441 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 34 $285,069.00 $399.10 R530817 R-20-3151-020C-0033 440 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 33 $298,548.00 $417.97 R475552 R-20-4695-060D-0004 438 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1578 $320,742.00 $449.04 R530860 R-20-3151-020G-0035 437 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 35 $237,392.00 $332.35 R530816 R-20-3151-020C-0032 436 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 32 $333,938.00 $467.51 R475553 R-20-4695-060D-0005 434 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 5, ACRES 0.1578 $253,370.00 $354.72 R530861 R-20-3151-020G-0036 433 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 36 $326,314.00 $456.84 R530815 R-20-3151-020C-0031 432 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 31 $239,261.00 $334.97 R405621 R-20-4695-03BC-0027 432 HANOVER CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 27 $230,916.00 $323.28 R475554 R-20-4695-060D-0006 430 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 6, ACRES 0.1578 $258,682.00 $362.15 R530862 R-20-3151-020G-0037 429 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 37 $278,445.00 $389.82 R530814 R-20-3151-020C-0030 428 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 30 $280,051.00 $392.07 R405620 R-20-4695-03BC-0026 428 HANOVER CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 26 $242,331.00 $339.26 R475555 R-20-4695-060D-0007 426 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 7, ACRES 0.1578 $273,897.00 $383.46 R530863 R-20-3151-020G-0038 425 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 38 $296,034.00 $414.45 R496748 R-20-4695-090I-0003 424 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 3 $252,385.00 $353.34 R530813 R-20-3151-020C-0029 424 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 29 $267,289.00 $374.20 R405619 R-20-4695-03BC-0025 424 HANOVER CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 25 $241,653.00 $338.31 R496735 R-20-4695-090H-0001 423 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 1 $301,076.00 $421.51 R441413 R-20-4695-070G-0001 423 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 1, ACRES 0.19 $270,293.00 $378.41 R475556 R-20-4695-060D-0008 422 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 8, ACRES 0.1578 $292,462.00 $409.45 R530864 R-20-3151-020G-0039 421 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 39 $299,366.00 $419.11 R441414 R-20-4695-070G-0002 421 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 2, ACRES 0.14 $251,875.00 $352.63 R496718 R-20-4695-090A-0026 421 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 26 $308,137.00 $431.39 R496749 R-20-4695-090I-0004 420 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 4 $302,368.00 $423.32 R530812 R-20-3151-020C-0028 420 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 28 $294,318.00 $412.05 Page 7 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R405618 R-20-4695-03BC-0024 420 HANOVER CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 24 $259,837.00 $363.77 R496736 R-20-4695-090H-0002 419 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 2 $267,640.00 $374.70 R441415 R-20-4695-070G-0003 419 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 3, ACRES 0.1428 $246,127.00 $344.58 R426246 R-20-4695-050B-0007 418 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK B, Lot 7 $346,107.00 $484.55 R475557 R-20-4695-060D-0009 418 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 9, ACRES 0.1578 $263,388.00 $368.74 R441351 R-20-4695-070E-0002 418 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 2, ACRES 0.1985 $241,914.00 $338.68 R530865 R-20-3151-020G-0040 417 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 40 $266,143.00 $372.60 R441416 R-20-4695-070G-0004 417 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1477 $237,208.00 $332.09 R496717 R-20-4695-090A-0025 417 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 25 $308,702.00 $432.18 R496750 R-20-4695-090I-0005 416 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 5 $272,339.00 $381.27 R530811 R-20-3151-020C-0027 416 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 27 $299,833.00 $419.77 R441352 R-20-4695-070E-0003 416 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 3, ACRES 0.1472 $239,869.00 $335.82 R405617 R-20-4695-03BC-0023 416 HANOVER CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 23 $249,499.00 $349.30 R496737 R-20-4695-090H-0003 415 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 3 $253,285.00 $354.60 R441417 R-20-4695-070G-0005 415 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 5, ACRES 0.1477 $270,293.00 $378.41 R426245 R-20-4695-050B-0006 414 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK B, Lot 6 $312,500.00 $437.50 R475558 R-20-4695-060D-0010 414 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 10, ACRES 0.1578 $263,126.00 $368.38 R441353 R-20-4695-070E-0004 414 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1489 $272,530.00 $381.54 R530866 R-20-3151-020G-0041 413 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 41 $296,867.00 $415.61 R441418 R-20-4695-070G-0006 413 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 6, ACRES 0.1393 $246,218.00 $344.71 R496716 R-20-4695-090A-0024 413 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 24 $301,435.00 $422.01 R496751 R-20-4695-090I-0006 412 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 6 $306,430.00 $429.00 R530810 R-20-3151-020C-0026 412 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 26 $245,793.00 $344.11 R441354 R-20-4695-070E-0005 412 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 5, ACRES 0.1521 $261,585.00 $366.22 R405616 R-20-4695-03BC-0022 412 HANOVER CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 22 $232,722.00 $325.81 R496733 R-20-4695-090G-0010 412 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 10 $278,753.00 $390.25 R496738 R-20-4695-090H-0004 411 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 4 $249,801.00 $349.72 R441419 R-20-4695-070G-0007 411 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 7, ACRES 0.1384 $252,735.00 $353.83 R426244 R-20-4695-050B-0005 410 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK B, Lot 5 $332,070.00 $464.90 R475559 R-20-4695-060D-0011 410 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 11, ACRES 0.1578 $311,081.00 $435.51 R441355 R-20-4695-070E-0006 410 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 6, ACRES 0.1495 $273,201.00 $382.48 R530867 R-20-3151-020G-0042 409 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 42 $238,247.00 $333.55 R441420 R-20-4695-070G-0008 409 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 8, ACRES 0.1937 $268,801.00 $376.32 R531096 R-20-4695-0907-A023 409 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK A, Lot 23 $272,217.00 $381.10 R496752 R-20-4695-090I-0007 408 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 7 $283,866.00 $397.41 R530809 R-20-3151-020C-0025 408 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK C, Lot 25 $281,638.00 $394.29 R441356 R-20-4695-070E-0007 408 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 7, ACRES 0.1471 $239,869.00 $335.82 R405615 R-20-4695-03BC-0021 408 HANOVER CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 21 $241,653.00 $338.31 R531107 R-20-4695-0907-G009 408 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 9 $355,003.00 $497.00 R496739 R-20-4695-090H-0005 407 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 5 $302,580.00 $423.61 R441421 R-20-4695-070G-0009 407 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 9, ACRES 0.1384 $243,991.00 $341.59 R426243 R-20-4695-050B-0004 406 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK B, Lot 4 $313,794.00 $439.31 R475560 R-20-4695-060D-0012 406 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 12, ACRES 0.1578 $320,750.00 $449.05 R441357 R-20-4695-070E-0008 406 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 8, ACRES 0.1471 $267,156.00 $374.02 R426212 R-20-4695-050A-0001 405 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 1 $407,985.00 $571.18 R530868 R-20-3151-020G-0043 405 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 43 $260,809.00 $365.13 R441422 R-20-4695-070G-0010 405 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 10, ACRES 0.1384 $242,115.00 $338.96 R531095 R-20-4695-0907-A022 405 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK A, Lot 22 $291,496.00 $408.09 R527014 R-20-3151-010C-0024 404 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 24 $295,474.00 $413.66 R441358 R-20-4695-070E-0009 404 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK E, Lot 9, ACRES 0.2028 $261,585.00 $366.22 R405614 R-20-4695-03BC-0020 404 HANOVER CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 20 $249,247.00 $348.95 Page 8 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R531106 R-20-4695-0907-G008 404 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 8 $300,719.00 $421.01 R496740 R-20-4695-090H-0006 403 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 6 $252,090.00 $352.93 R441423 R-20-4695-070G-0011 403 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 11, ACRES 0.1436 $237,115.00 $331.96 R426242 R-20-4695-050B-0003 402 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK B, Lot 3 $303,472.00 $424.86 R475561 R-20-4695-060D-0013 402 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 13, ACRES 0.1853 $280,625.00 $392.88 R531094 R-20-4695-0907-A021 401 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK A, Lot 21 $357,555.00 $500.58 R527013 R-20-3151-010C-0023 400 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 23 $265,730.00 $372.02 R405613 R-20-4695-03BC-0019 400 HANOVER CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 19 $250,499.00 $350.70 R531105 R-20-4695-0907-G007 400 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 7 $286,984.00 $401.78 R426241 R-20-4695-050B-0002 398 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK B, Lot 2 $315,109.00 $441.15 R426240 R-20-4695-050B-0001 394 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK B, Lot 1 $344,719.00 $482.61 R380365 R-20-9916-02AC-0034 387 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 34 $331,870.00 $464.62 R380364 R-20-9916-02AC-0033 383 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 33 $410,786.00 $575.10 R380363 R-20-9916-02AC-0032 379 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 32 $390,670.00 $546.94 R380362 R-20-9916-02AC-0031 375 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 31 $348,744.00 $488.24 R380361 R-20-9916-02AC-0030 371 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 30 $315,302.00 $441.42 R391696 R-20-4695-040A-0001 370 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7221 - Georgetown Village Sec 4 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 1, ACRES 4.9848 $240,718.00 $337.01 R380360 R-20-9916-02AC-0029 367 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 29 $393,102.00 $550.34 R380359 R-20-9916-02AC-0028 363 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 28 $316,135.00 $442.59 R389244 R-20-9916-02BD-0014 360 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 14 $423,876.00 $593.43 R380358 R-20-9916-02AC-0027 359 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 27 $318,197.00 $445.48 R389243 R-20-9916-02BD-0013 356 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 13 $390,697.00 $546.98 R380357 R-20-9916-02AC-0026 355 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 26 $337,943.00 $473.12 R380356 R-20-9916-02AC-0025 351 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 25 $263,272.00 $368.58 R389242 R-20-9916-02BD-0012 350 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 12 $412,772.00 $577.88 R380355 R-20-9916-02AC-0024 347 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 24 $331,946.00 $464.72 R389241 R-20-9916-02BD-0011 344 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 11 $340,097.00 $476.14 R545944 R-20-4695-0910-O014 344 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK O, Lot 14 $304,399.00 $426.16 R380354 R-20-9916-02AC-0023 343 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 23 $421,846.00 $590.58 R475497 R-20-4695-060A-0001 343 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 1, ACRES 0.185 $251,047.00 $351.47 R389240 R-20-9916-02BD-0010 340 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 10 $312,912.00 $438.08 R545945 R-20-4695-0910-O015 340 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK O, Lot 15 $293,051.00 $410.27 R380353 R-20-9916-02AC-0022 339 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 22 $351,563.00 $492.19 R475498 R-20-4695-060A-0002 339 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 2, ACRES 0.1578 $258,507.00 $361.91 R545946 R-20-4695-0910-O016 336 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK O, Lot 16 $368,549.00 $515.97 R380352 R-20-9916-02AC-0021 335 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 21 $304,358.00 $426.10 R496734 R-20-4695-090G-0011 335 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 11 $258,487.00 $361.88 R475499 R-20-4695-060A-0003 335 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 3, ACRES 0.1578 $323,266.00 $452.57 R545947 R-20-4695-0910-O017 332 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK O, Lot 17 $304,115.00 $425.76 R380351 R-20-9916-02AC-0020 331 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 20 $329,176.00 $460.85 R531108 R-20-4695-0907-G012 331 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 12 $262,062.00 $366.89 R475500 R-20-4695-060A-0004 331 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1578 $265,033.00 $371.05 R389239 R-20-9916-02BD-0009 330 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 9 $349,588.00 $489.42 R475562 R-20-4695-060E-0001 330 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK E, Lot 1, ACRES 0.1907 $300,310.00 $420.43 R545948 R-20-4695-0910-O018 328 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK O, Lot 18 $286,321.00 $400.85 R531109 R-20-4695-0907-G013 327 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 13 $353,371.00 $494.72 R475501 R-20-4695-060A-0005 327 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 5, ACRES 0.2116 $249,977.00 $349.97 R475563 R-20-4695-060E-0002 326 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK E, Lot 2, ACRES 0.2189 $318,016.00 $445.22 R545949 R-20-4695-0910-O019 324 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK O, Lot 19 $301,486.00 $422.08 R531110 R-20-4695-0907-G014 323 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 14 $249,001.00 $348.60 R475502 R-20-4695-060A-0006 323 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 6, ACRES 0.153 $263,126.00 $368.38 Page 9 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R475564 R-20-4695-060E-0003 322 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK E, Lot 3, ACRES 0.1464 $308,579.00 $432.01 R545950 R-20-4695-0910-O020 320 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK O, Lot 20 $286,123.00 $400.57 R531111 R-20-4695-0907-G015 319 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 15 $255,382.00 $357.53 R475503 R-20-4695-060A-0007 319 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 7, ACRES 0.1575 $321,237.00 $449.73 R380323 R-20-9916-02AA-0013 319 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK A, Lot 13 $360,732.00 $505.02 R475565 R-20-4695-060E-0004 318 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK E, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1555 $271,126.00 $379.58 R545951 R-20-4695-0910-O021 316 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK O, Lot 21 $338,243.00 $473.54 R531112 R-20-4695-0907-G016 315 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 16 $259,362.00 $363.11 R475504 R-20-4695-060A-0008 315 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 8, ACRES 0.1578 $257,893.00 $361.05 R475566 R-20-4695-060E-0005 314 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK E, Lot 5, ACRES 0.1616 $316,732.00 $443.42 R530794 R-20-3151-020B-0018 313 SQUARE BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 18 $292,481.00 $409.47 R380324 R-20-9916-02AA-0014 313 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK A, Lot 14 $280,669.00 $392.94 R531104 R-20-4695-0907-G006 312 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 6 $302,243.00 $423.14 R545952 R-20-4695-0910-O022 312 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK O, Lot 22 $373,580.00 $523.01 R531113 R-20-4695-0907-G017 311 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 17 $330,132.00 $462.18 R475505 R-20-4695-060A-0009 311 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 9, ACRES 0.1578 $310,162.00 $434.23 R476605 R-20-4695-080G-0033 311 PLUM CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 33, ACRES 0.2417 $274,920.00 $384.89 R475567 R-20-4695-060E-0006 310 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK E, Lot 6, ACRES 0.1584 $251,047.00 $351.47 R476610 R-20-4695-080G-0038 310 PLUM CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 38, ACRES 0.2336 $257,787.00 $360.90 R530793 R-20-3151-020B-0017 309 SQUARE BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 17 $264,115.00 $369.76 R441424 R-20-4695-070G-0012 309 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 12, ACRES 0.1467 $246,218.00 $344.71 R380380 R-20-9916-030A-0015 309 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 15 $339,661.00 $475.53 R531087 R-20-4695-0907-A014 309 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK A, Lot 14 $250,119.00 $350.17 R441409 R-20-4695-070F-0007 308 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK F, Lot 7, ACRES 0.2787 $267,097.00 $373.94 R531103 R-20-4695-0907-G005 308 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 5 $291,919.00 $408.69 R545953 R-20-4695-0910-O023 308 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK O, Lot 23 $392,483.00 $549.48 R531114 R-20-4695-0907-G018 307 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 18 $355,797.00 $498.12 R475506 R-20-4695-060A-0010 307 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 10, ACRES 0.1578 $304,629.00 $426.48 R441425 R-20-4695-070G-0013 307 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 13, ACRES 0.2115 $252,047.00 $352.87 R476606 R-20-4695-080G-0034 307 PLUM CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 34, ACRES 0.2458 $269,411.00 $377.18 R475568 R-20-4695-060E-0007 306 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK E, Lot 7, ACRES 0.1578 $265,096.00 $371.13 R441410 R-20-4695-070F-0008 306 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK F, Lot 8, ACRES 0.1969 $248,337.00 $347.67 R476609 R-20-4695-080G-0037 306 PLUM CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 37, ACRES 0.2849 $284,200.00 $397.88 R530792 R-20-3151-020B-0016 305 SQUARE BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 16 $243,561.00 $340.99 R441426 R-20-4695-070G-0014 305 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 14, ACRES 0.1536 $271,203.00 $379.68 R380390 R-20-9916-030A-0016 305 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 16 $280,622.00 $392.87 R531086 R-20-4695-0907-A013 305 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK A, Lot 13 $255,639.00 $357.89 R527018 R-20-3151-010G-0002 304 SQUARE BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK G, Lot 2 $251,220.00 $351.71 R441411 R-20-4695-070F-0009 304 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK F, Lot 9, ACRES 0.1977 $240,802.00 $337.12 R531102 R-20-4695-0907-G004 304 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 4 $348,974.00 $488.56 R545954 R-20-4695-0910-O024 304 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK O, Lot 24 $455,816.00 $638.14 R519715 R-20-4695-0904-G019 303 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK G, Lot 19 $270,214.00 $378.30 R475507 R-20-4695-060A-0011 303 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK A, Lot 11, ACRES 0.1578 $258,327.00 $361.66 R441427 R-20-4695-070G-0015 303 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 15, ACRES 0.1502 $240,493.00 $336.69 R476607 R-20-4695-080G-0035 303 PLUM CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 35, ACRES 0.2474 $250,228.00 $350.32 R475569 R-20-4695-060E-0008 302 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK E, Lot 8, ACRES 0.1853 $304,806.00 $426.73 R441412 R-20-4695-070F-0010 302 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK F, Lot 10, ACRES 0.2458 $277,857.00 $389.00 R476608 R-20-4695-080G-0036 302 PLUM CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 36, ACRES 0.1967 $241,831.00 $338.56 R526990 R-20-3151-010B-0015 301 SQUARE BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK B, Lot 15 $272,656.00 $381.72 R526989 R-20-3151-010B-0014 301 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK B, Lot 14 $315,859.00 $442.20 R441428 R-20-4695-070G-0016 301 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 16, ACRES 0.1472 $246,984.00 $345.78 Page 10 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R380391 R-20-9916-030A-0017 301 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 17 $311,970.00 $436.76 R389238 R-20-9916-02BD-0008 300 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 8 $370,103.00 $518.14 R527017 R-20-3151-010G-0001 300 SQUARE BND, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK G, Lot 1 $275,523.00 $385.73 R527012 R-20-3151-010C-0022 300 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 22 $317,046.00 $443.86 R531101 R-20-4695-0907-G003 300 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 3 $289,854.00 $405.80 R545955 R-20-4695-0910-O025 300 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK O, Lot 25 $301,173.00 $421.64 R389237 R-20-9916-02BD-0007 290 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 7 $340,552.00 $476.77 R389236 R-20-9916-02BD-0006 280 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 6 $308,749.00 $432.25 R389235 R-20-9916-02BD-0005 276 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 5 $332,367.00 $465.31 R380431 R-20-9916-030H-0006 276 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK H, Lot 6 $283,426.00 $396.80 R380432 R-20-9916-030H-0007 272 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK H, Lot 7 $301,903.00 $422.66 R380433 R-20-9916-030H-0008 268 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK H, Lot 8 $278,803.00 $390.32 R380434 R-20-9916-030H-0009 264 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK H, Lot 9 $259,528.00 $363.34 R389234 R-20-9916-02BD-0004 260 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 4 $383,543.00 $536.96 R380435 R-20-9916-030H-0010 260 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK H, Lot 10 $310,159.00 $434.22 R380436 R-20-9916-030H-0011 256 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK H, Lot 11 $283,436.00 $396.81 R389233 R-20-9916-02BD-0003 250 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 3 $337,981.00 $473.17 R389232 R-20-9916-02BD-0002 244 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 2 $322,633.00 $451.69 R545959 R-20-4695-0910-R001 244 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 1 $388,504.00 $543.91 R388471 R-20-9916-02BD-0001 240 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 1 $370,000.00 $518.00 R545960 R-20-4695-0910-R002 240 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 2 $359,943.00 $503.92 R380337 R-20-9916-02AC-0006 238 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 6 $281,351.00 $393.89 R389231 R-20-9916-02BB-0008 236 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK B, Lot 8 $357,500.00 $500.50 R545961 R-20-4695-0910-R003 236 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 3 $351,440.00 $492.02 R380332 R-20-9916-02AB-0009 235 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK B, Lot 9 $356,636.00 $499.29 R418231 R-20-4695-04BA-0033 235 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 33, ACRES 0.191 $278,996.00 $390.59 R519714 R-20-4695-0904-F013 235 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK F, Lot 13 $335,029.00 $469.04 R418230 R-20-4695-04BA-0032 233 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 32, ACRES 0.132 $259,926.00 $363.90 R389230 R-20-9916-02BB-0007 232 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK B, Lot 7 $317,952.00 $445.13 R380336 R-20-9916-02AC-0005 232 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 5 $312,183.00 $437.06 R545962 R-20-4695-0910-R004 232 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 4 $342,600.00 $479.64 R380331 R-20-9916-02AB-0008 231 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK B, Lot 8 $304,042.00 $425.66 R418229 R-20-4695-04BA-0031 231 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 31, ACRES 0.132 $322,867.00 $452.01 R519713 R-20-4695-0904-F012 231 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK F, Lot 12 $259,240.00 $362.94 R418228 R-20-4695-04BA-0030 229 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 30, ACRES 0.132 $296,022.00 $414.43 R475508 R-20-4695-060B-0001 229 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 1, ACRES 0.1854 $253,596.00 $355.03 R389229 R-20-9916-02BB-0006 228 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK B, Lot 6 $343,811.00 $481.34 R380335 R-20-9916-02AC-0004 228 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 4 $328,040.00 $459.26 R545963 R-20-4695-0910-R005 228 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 5 $290,961.00 $407.35 R380330 R-20-9916-02AB-0007 227 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK B, Lot 7 $349,014.00 $488.62 R418227 R-20-4695-04BA-0029 227 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 29, ACRES 0.132 $263,353.00 $368.69 R519712 R-20-4695-0904-F011 227 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK F, Lot 11 $241,288.00 $337.80 R475570 R-20-4695-060F-0001 226 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK F, Lot 1, ACRES 0.1853 $290,330.00 $406.46 R418226 R-20-4695-04BA-0028 225 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 28, ACRES 0.132 $316,755.00 $443.46 R475509 R-20-4695-060B-0002 225 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 2, ACRES 0.1578 $259,902.00 $363.86 R526988 R-20-3151-010B-0013 225 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK B, Lot 13 $337,686.00 $472.76 R380334 R-20-9916-02AC-0003 224 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 3 $264,222.00 $369.91 R519726 R-20-4695-0904-K011 224 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 11 $335,968.00 $470.36 R545964 R-20-4695-0910-R006 224 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 6 $306,541.00 $429.16 R380329 R-20-9916-02AB-0006 223 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK B, Lot 6 $343,675.00 $481.15 R418225 R-20-4695-04BA-0027 223 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 27, ACRES 0.1535 $293,703.00 $411.18 Page 11 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R519711 R-20-4695-0904-F010 223 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK F, Lot 10 $276,416.00 $386.98 R389228 R-20-9916-02BB-0005 222 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK B, Lot 5 $396,766.00 $555.47 R475571 R-20-4695-060F-0002 222 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK F, Lot 2, ACRES 0.1594 $314,308.00 $440.03 R418224 R-20-4695-04BA-0026 221 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 26, ACRES 0.1535 $331,115.00 $463.56 R475510 R-20-4695-060B-0003 221 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 3, ACRES 0.1578 $260,981.00 $365.37 R526987 R-20-3151-010B-0012 221 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK B, Lot 12 $326,475.00 $457.07 R380333 R-20-9916-02AC-0002 220 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 2 $305,485.00 $427.68 R519725 R-20-4695-0904-K010 220 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 10 $366,274.00 $512.78 R545965 R-20-4695-0910-R007 220 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 7 $291,974.00 $408.76 R418223 R-20-4695-04BA-0025 219 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 25, ACRES 0.132 $260,537.00 $364.75 R519710 R-20-4695-0904-F009 219 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK F, Lot 9 $246,636.00 $345.29 R475572 R-20-4695-060F-0003 218 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK F, Lot 3, ACRES 0.1594 $232,789.00 $325.90 R418222 R-20-4695-04BA-0024 217 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 24, ACRES 0.1318 $331,951.00 $464.73 R475511 R-20-4695-060B-0004 217 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1578 $270,113.00 $378.16 R526986 R-20-3151-010B-0011 217 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK B, Lot 11 $236,772.00 $331.48 R380310 R-20-9916-02AC-0001 216 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 1 $310,243.00 $434.34 R519724 R-20-4695-0904-K009 216 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 9 $347,100.00 $485.94 R545966 R-20-4695-0910-R008 216 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 8 $305,916.00 $428.28 R418221 R-20-4695-04BA-0023 215 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 23, ACRES 0.1551 $309,921.00 $433.89 R519709 R-20-4695-0904-F008 215 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK F, Lot 8 $240,556.00 $336.78 R496756 R-20-4695-090I-0011 215 MORAL PASS, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 11 $291,736.00 $408.43 R475573 R-20-4695-060F-0004 214 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK F, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1594 $255,198.00 $357.28 R380327 R-20-9916-02AB-0004 213 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK B, Lot 4 $408,444.00 $571.82 R418220 R-20-4695-04BA-0022 213 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 22, ACRES 0.1547 $280,739.00 $393.03 R475512 R-20-4695-060B-0005 213 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 5, ACRES 0.1578 $286,816.00 $401.54 R526985 R-20-3151-010B-0010 213 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK B, Lot 10 $234,499.00 $328.30 R519723 R-20-4695-0904-K008 212 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 8 $353,587.00 $495.02 R545967 R-20-4695-0910-R009 212 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 9 $292,534.00 $409.55 R418219 R-20-4695-04BA-0021 211 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 21, ACRES 0.1476 $288,769.00 $404.28 R519708 R-20-4695-0904-F007 211 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK F, Lot 7 $254,078.00 $355.71 R496755 R-20-4695-090I-0010 211 MORAL PASS, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 10 $288,523.00 $403.93 R389226 R-20-9916-02BB-0003 210 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK B, Lot 3 $305,152.00 $427.21 R475574 R-20-4695-060F-0005 210 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK F, Lot 5, ACRES 0.1638 $304,806.00 $426.73 R380326 R-20-9916-02AB-0003 209 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK B, Lot 3 $345,632.00 $483.88 R418218 R-20-4695-04BA-0020 209 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 20, ACRES 0.1469 $293,429.00 $410.80 R475513 R-20-4695-060B-0006 209 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 6, ACRES 0.1578 $258,444.00 $361.82 R526984 R-20-3151-010B-0009 209 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK B, Lot 9 $293,295.00 $410.61 R545957 R-20-4695-0910-P002 209 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK P, Lot 2 $332,861.00 $466.01 R519722 R-20-4695-0904-K007 208 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 7 $380,797.00 $533.12 R545968 R-20-4695-0910-R010 208 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 10 $333,102.00 $466.34 R418217 R-20-4695-04BA-0019 207 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 19, ACRES 0.1477 $278,958.00 $390.54 R519707 R-20-4695-0904-F006 207 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK F, Lot 6 $289,583.00 $405.42 R441429 R-20-4695-070G-0017 207 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 17, ACRES 0.1498 $287,007.00 $401.81 R496754 R-20-4695-090I-0009 207 MORAL PASS, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 9 $355,266.00 $497.37 R389225 R-20-9916-02BB-0002 206 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK B, Lot 2 $384,000.00 $537.60 R475575 R-20-4695-060F-0006 206 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK F, Lot 6, ACRES 0.1806 $332,880.00 $466.03 R531100 R-20-4695-0907-G002 206 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 2 $360,149.00 $504.21 R380325 R-20-9916-02AB-0002 205 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK B, Lot 2 $381,566.00 $534.19 R418216 R-20-4695-04BA-0018 205 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 18, ACRES 0.1908 $289,123.00 $404.77 R475514 R-20-4695-060B-0007 205 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 7, ACRES 0.1578 $310,683.00 $434.96 R526983 R-20-3151-010B-0008 205 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK B, Lot 8 $315,859.00 $442.20 Page 12 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R441430 R-20-4695-070G-0018 205 ROSEDALE BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 18, ACRES 0.145 $236,522.00 $331.13 R545958 R-20-4695-0910-P003 205 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK P, Lot 3 $329,378.00 $461.13 R519721 R-20-4695-0904-K006 204 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 6 $258,521.00 $361.93 R545969 R-20-4695-0910-R011 204 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 11 $303,462.00 $424.85 R418215 R-20-4695-04BA-0017 203 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 17, ACRES 0.1841 $268,973.00 $376.56 R496753 R-20-4695-090I-0008 203 MORAL PASS, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 8 $298,569.00 $418.00 R388470 R-20-9916-02BB-0001 202 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK B, Lot 1 $385,089.00 $539.12 R475576 R-20-4695-060F-0007 202 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK F, Lot 7, ACRES 0.2435 $262,923.00 $368.09 R531099 R-20-4695-0907-G001 202 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10680 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 7, BLOCK G, Lot 1 $322,977.00 $452.17 R380309 R-20-9916-02AB-0001 201 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK B, Lot 1 $305,930.00 $428.30 R475515 R-20-4695-060B-0008 201 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 8, ACRES 0.1578 $300,955.00 $421.34 R526982 R-20-3151-010B-0007 201 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK B, Lot 7 $242,866.00 $340.01 R525207 R-20-4695-0905-B021 201 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10528 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 5, BLOCK B, Lot 21, ACRES 0.1575 $274,218.00 $383.91 R545978 R-20-4695-0910-P004 201 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK P, Lot 4 $407,075.00 $569.91 R519720 R-20-4695-0904-K005 200 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 5 $357,166.00 $500.03 R545970 R-20-4695-0910-R012 200 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 12 $294,914.00 $412.88 R405657 R-20-4695-03BG-0040 185 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 40 $263,213.00 $368.50 R405656 R-20-4695-03BG-0039 181 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 39 $228,748.00 $320.25 R405623 R-20-4695-03BG-0005 181 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 5 $238,838.00 $334.37 R405655 R-20-4695-03BG-0038 177 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 38 $238,391.00 $333.75 R405624 R-20-4695-03BG-0006 177 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 6 $228,748.00 $320.25 R405654 R-20-4695-03BG-0037 173 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 37 $241,958.00 $338.74 R405625 R-20-4695-03BG-0007 173 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 7 $238,838.00 $334.37 R405666 R-20-4695-03BH-0021 172 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK H, Lot 21 $250,004.00 $350.01 R405653 R-20-4695-03BG-0036 169 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 36 $238,391.00 $333.75 R405626 R-20-4695-03BG-0008 169 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 8 $229,203.00 $320.88 R405665 R-20-4695-03BH-0020 168 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK H, Lot 20 $241,918.00 $338.69 R405612 R-20-4695-03BC-0018 166 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 18 $259,657.00 $363.52 R405652 R-20-4695-03BG-0035 165 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 35 $228,748.00 $320.25 R405627 R-20-4695-03BG-0009 165 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 9 $242,331.00 $339.26 R405664 R-20-4695-03BH-0019 164 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK H, Lot 19 $248,658.00 $348.12 R405611 R-20-4695-03BC-0017 162 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 17 $248,910.00 $348.47 R405651 R-20-4695-03BG-0034 161 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 34 $238,838.00 $334.37 R405628 R-20-4695-03BG-0010 161 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 10 $229,196.00 $320.87 R496788 R-20-4695-090L-0039 1605 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 39 $320,014.00 $448.02 R496787 R-20-4695-090L-0038 1601 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 38 $352,385.00 $493.34 R405663 R-20-4695-03BH-0018 160 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK H, Lot 18 $234,306.00 $328.03 R405610 R-20-4695-03BC-0016 158 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 16 $242,412.00 $339.38 R405629 R-20-4695-03BG-0011 157 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 11 $242,331.00 $339.26 R405662 R-20-4695-03BH-0017 156 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK H, Lot 17 $245,488.00 $343.68 R405650 R-20-4695-03BG-0033 155 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 33 $229,203.00 $320.88 R416858 R-20-9916-02CA-0010 154 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7677 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-c, BLOCK A, Lot 10, ACRES 0.2283 $391,507.00 $548.11 R405609 R-20-4695-03BC-0015 154 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 15 $232,722.00 $325.81 R405630 R-20-4695-03BG-0012 153 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 12 $228,748.00 $320.25 R496786 R-20-4695-090L-0037 1521 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 37 $273,885.00 $383.44 R405661 R-20-4695-03BH-0016 152 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK H, Lot 16 $252,257.00 $353.16 R496785 R-20-4695-090L-0036 1517 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 36 $337,340.00 $472.28 R496784 R-20-4695-090L-0035 1513 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 35 $284,865.00 $398.81 R405649 R-20-4695-03BG-0032 151 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 32 $242,634.00 $339.69 R380411 R-20-9916-030A-0037 151 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 37 $246,631.00 $345.28 R496783 R-20-4695-090L-0034 1509 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 34 $319,789.00 $447.70 Page 13 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R496782 R-20-4695-090L-0033 1505 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 33 $272,831.00 $381.96 R496781 R-20-4695-090L-0032 1501 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 32 $297,105.00 $415.95 R405608 R-20-4695-03BC-0014 150 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 14 $244,781.00 $342.69 R380426 R-20-9916-030G-0016 150 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK G, Lot 16 $283,253.00 $396.55 R405631 R-20-4695-03BG-0013 149 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 13 $232,722.00 $325.81 R416857 R-20-9916-02CA-0009 148 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7677 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-c, BLOCK A, Lot 9, ACRES 0.2009 $394,153.00 $551.81 R405660 R-20-4695-03BH-0015 148 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK H, Lot 15 $248,658.00 $348.12 R380349 R-20-9916-02AC-0018 147 GREEN GROVE, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 18 $332,306.00 $465.23 R405607 R-20-4695-03BC-0013 146 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 13 $248,910.00 $348.47 R426228 R-20-4695-050A-0008 146 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 8 $430,529.00 $602.74 R405648 R-20-4695-03BG-0031 145 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 31 $228,748.00 $320.25 R405632 R-20-4695-03BG-0014 145 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 14 $244,144.00 $341.80 R405659 R-20-4695-03BH-0014 144 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK H, Lot 14 $244,061.00 $341.69 R380348 R-20-9916-02AC-0017 143 GREEN GROVE, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 17 $333,274.00 $466.58 R426227 R-20-4695-050A-0007 143 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 7 $333,682.00 $467.15 R496764 R-20-4695-090L-0001 1428 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 1 $321,806.00 $450.53 R496762 R-20-4695-090I-0017 1427 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 17 $349,121.00 $488.77 R496780 R-20-4695-090L-0031 1425 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 31 $357,264.00 $500.17 R496765 R-20-4695-090L-0002 1424 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 2 $279,461.00 $391.25 R496761 R-20-4695-090I-0016 1423 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 16 $281,012.00 $393.42 R496779 R-20-4695-090L-0030 1421 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 30 $313,512.00 $438.92 R496766 R-20-4695-090L-0003 1420 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 3 $290,899.00 $407.26 R496815 R-20-4695-090N-0012 1420 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 12 $311,327.00 $435.86 R416856 R-20-9916-02CA-0008 142 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7677 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-c, BLOCK A, Lot 8, ACRES 0.2009 $405,572.00 $567.80 R405606 R-20-4695-03BC-0012 142 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 12 $246,757.00 $345.46 R426229 R-20-4695-050A-0009 142 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 9 $273,290.00 $382.61 R496760 R-20-4695-090I-0015 1419 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 15 $278,838.00 $390.37 R496778 R-20-4695-090L-0029 1417 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 29 $341,673.00 $478.34 R496767 R-20-4695-090L-0004 1416 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 4 $267,550.00 $374.57 R496759 R-20-4695-090I-0014 1415 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 14 $298,569.00 $418.00 R496814 R-20-4695-090N-0011 1414 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 11 $316,119.00 $442.57 R496777 R-20-4695-090L-0028 1413 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 28 $252,880.00 $354.03 R496768 R-20-4695-090L-0005 1412 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 5 $347,851.00 $486.99 R496758 R-20-4695-090I-0013 1411 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 13 $272,037.00 $380.85 R405633 R-20-4695-03BG-0015 141 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 15 $249,757.00 $349.66 R405585 R-20-4695-03BB-0038 141 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK B, Lot 38 $241,653.00 $338.31 R496776 R-20-4695-090L-0027 1409 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 27 $316,193.00 $442.67 R519706 R-20-4695-0904-F005 1409 BIRCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK F, Lot 5 $333,055.00 $466.28 R496769 R-20-4695-090L-0006 1408 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 6 $249,759.00 $349.66 R496757 R-20-4695-090I-0012 1407 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 12 $336,197.00 $470.68 R496775 R-20-4695-090L-0026 1405 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 26 $303,552.00 $424.97 R519705 R-20-4695-0904-F004 1405 BIRCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK F, Lot 4 $267,910.00 $375.07 R496770 R-20-4695-090L-0007 1404 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 7 $318,637.00 $446.09 R496774 R-20-4695-090L-0025 1401 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 25 $310,247.00 $434.35 R519704 R-20-4695-0904-F003 1401 BIRCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK F, Lot 3 $289,392.00 $405.15 R496771 R-20-4695-090L-0008 1400 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 8 $347,514.00 $486.52 R380381 R-20-9916-030B-0010 140 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK B, Lot 10 $262,525.00 $367.54 R405658 R-20-4695-03BH-0013 140 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK H, Lot 13 $233,806.00 $327.33 R405634 R-20-4695-03BG-0017 140 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 17 $248,490.00 $347.89 R380382 R-20-9916-030G-0001 139 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK G, Lot 1 $263,651.00 $369.11 R380347 R-20-9916-02AC-0016 139 GREEN GROVE, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 16 $339,017.00 $474.62 Page 14 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R405605 R-20-4695-03BC-0011 138 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 11 $232,722.00 $325.81 R380437 R-20-9916-030H-0012 138 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK H, Lot 12 $281,948.00 $394.73 R426230 R-20-4695-050A-0010 138 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 10 $285,123.00 $399.17 R380374 R-20-9916-02AC-0043 137 VILLAGE GLEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 43 $359,251.00 $502.95 R405647 R-20-4695-03BG-0030 137 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 30 $245,375.00 $343.53 R380321 R-20-9916-02AA-0011 137 FAIRFIELD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK A, Lot 11 $332,013.00 $464.82 R426226 R-20-4695-050A-0006 137 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 6 $280,676.00 $392.95 R416855 R-20-9916-02CA-0007 136 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7677 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-c, BLOCK A, Lot 7, ACRES 0.2009 $277,948.00 $389.13 R380413 R-20-9916-030B-0011 136 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK B, Lot 11 $255,938.00 $358.31 R380423 R-20-9916-030G-0002 135 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK G, Lot 2 $274,195.00 $383.87 R380346 R-20-9916-02AC-0015 135 GREEN GROVE, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 15 $310,504.00 $434.71 R525206 R-20-4695-0905-B020 135 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10528 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 5, BLOCK B, Lot 20, ACRES 0.1513 $321,377.00 $449.93 R405604 R-20-4695-03BC-0010 134 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 10 $244,781.00 $342.69 R380445 R-20-9916-030J-0008 134 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK J, Lot 8 $246,717.00 $345.40 R426231 R-20-4695-050A-0011 134 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 11 $313,284.00 $438.60 R475590 R-20-4695-060H-0009 134 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 9, ACRES 0.3401 $251,682.00 $352.35 R418214 R-20-4695-04BA-0016 133 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 16, ACRES 0.1484 $276,589.00 $387.22 R380373 R-20-9916-02AC-0042 133 VILLAGE GLEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 42 $347,393.00 $486.35 R405646 R-20-4695-03BG-0029 133 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 29 $248,490.00 $347.89 R380320 R-20-9916-02AA-0010 133 FAIRFIELD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK A, Lot 10 $311,455.00 $436.04 R380400 R-20-9916-030A-0026 132 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 26 $310,278.00 $434.39 R380378 R-20-9916-02AD-0023 132 SPRING CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK D, Lot 23 $376,270.00 $526.78 R380414 R-20-9916-030B-0012 132 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK B, Lot 12 $230,134.00 $322.19 R496773 R-20-4695-090L-0024 1311 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 24 $326,487.00 $457.08 R418213 R-20-4695-04BA-0015 131 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 15, ACRES 0.1479 $295,917.00 $414.28 R380401 R-20-9916-030A-0027 131 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 27 $288,986.00 $404.58 R380424 R-20-9916-030G-0003 131 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK G, Lot 3 $294,974.00 $412.96 R405586 R-20-4695-03BB-0039 131 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK B, Lot 39 $249,247.00 $348.95 R380345 R-20-9916-02AC-0014 131 GREEN GROVE, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 14 $408,623.00 $572.07 R525205 R-20-4695-0905-B019 131 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10528 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 5, BLOCK B, Lot 19, ACRES 0.1474 $338,919.00 $474.49 R496772 R-20-4695-090L-0009 1308 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 9 $342,007.00 $478.81 R506821 R-20-4695-0902-L001 1307 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10024 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 2 PUD, BLOCK L, Lot 1, ACRES 0.1835 $317,936.00 $445.11 R519703 R-20-4695-0904-F002 1307 BIRCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK F, Lot 2 $258,152.00 $361.41 R519732 R-20-4695-0904-L010 1304 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK L, Lot 10 $267,981.00 $375.17 R519735 R-20-4695-0904-L022 1303 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK L, Lot 22 $336,114.00 $470.56 R519702 R-20-4695-0904-F001 1303 BIRCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK F, Lot 1 $262,524.00 $367.53 R519733 R-20-4695-0904-L011 1300 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK L, Lot 11 $349,655.00 $489.52 R416854 R-20-9916-02CA-0006 130 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7677 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-c, BLOCK A, Lot 6, ACRES 0.2009 $351,173.00 $491.64 R405603 R-20-4695-03BC-0009 130 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 9 $264,506.00 $370.31 R380399 R-20-9916-030A-0025 130 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 25 $331,758.00 $464.46 R380444 R-20-9916-030J-0007 130 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK J, Lot 7 $289,460.00 $405.24 R405635 R-20-4695-03BG-0018 130 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 18 $244,061.00 $341.69 R426232 R-20-4695-050A-0012 130 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 12 $354,995.00 $496.99 R475589 R-20-4695-060H-0008 130 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 8, ACRES 0.203 $314,336.00 $440.07 R525208 R-20-4695-0905-F014 130 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10528 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 5, BLOCK F, Lot 14, ACRES 0.2288 $320,639.00 $448.89 R418212 R-20-4695-04BA-0014 129 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 14, ACRES 0.1488 $286,565.00 $401.19 R380372 R-20-9916-02AC-0041 129 VILLAGE GLEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 41 $399,651.00 $559.51 R405645 R-20-4695-03BG-0028 129 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 28 $241,653.00 $338.31 R380402 R-20-9916-030A-0028 129 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 28 $259,842.00 $363.78 R380319 R-20-9916-02AA-0009 129 FAIRFIELD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK A, Lot 9 $376,521.00 $527.13 R380377 R-20-9916-02AD-0022 128 SPRING CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK D, Lot 22 $306,908.00 $429.67 Page 15 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R380415 R-20-9916-030B-0013 128 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK B, Lot 13 $269,787.00 $377.70 R418211 R-20-4695-04BA-0013 127 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 13, ACRES 0.1343 $284,274.00 $397.98 R380410 R-20-9916-030A-0036 127 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 36 $270,416.00 $378.58 R380344 R-20-9916-02AC-0013 127 GREEN GROVE, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 13 $346,693.00 $485.37 R525204 R-20-4695-0905-B018 127 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10528 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 5, BLOCK B, Lot 18, ACRES 0.144 $318,570.00 $446.00 R532409 R-20-4695-0908-D024 1261 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 24 $361,848.00 $506.59 R405602 R-20-4695-03BC-0008 126 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 8 $232,722.00 $325.81 R380398 R-20-9916-030A-0024 126 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 24 $276,691.00 $387.37 R380443 R-20-9916-030J-0006 126 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK J, Lot 6 $285,578.00 $399.81 R426233 R-20-4695-050A-0013 126 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 13 $329,804.00 $461.73 R475588 R-20-4695-060H-0007 126 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 7, ACRES 0.1601 $264,520.00 $370.33 R525209 R-20-4695-0905-F015 126 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10528 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 5, BLOCK F, Lot 15, ACRES 0.2091 $379,117.00 $530.76 R532410 R-20-4695-0908-D025 1257 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 25 $308,861.00 $432.41 R532411 R-20-4695-0908-D026 1253 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 26 $359,251.00 $502.95 R418210 R-20-4695-04BA-0012 125 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 12, ACRES 0.1279 $330,845.00 $463.18 R380371 R-20-9916-02AC-0040 125 VILLAGE GLEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 40 $400,336.00 $560.47 R405644 R-20-4695-03BG-0027 125 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 27 $247,621.00 $346.67 R380403 R-20-9916-030A-0029 125 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 29 $285,402.00 $399.56 R380425 R-20-9916-030G-0004 125 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK G, Lot 4 $310,195.00 $434.27 R380318 R-20-9916-02AA-0008 125 FAIRFIELD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK A, Lot 8 $301,931.00 $422.70 R475604 R-20-4695-060I-0008 125 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 8, ACRES 0.176 $341,902.00 $478.66 R532412 R-20-4695-0908-D027 1249 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 27 $351,890.00 $492.65 R532439 R-20-4695-0908-O001 1248 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK O, Lot 1 $317,170.00 $444.04 R532413 R-20-4695-0908-D028 1245 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 28 $360,000.00 $504.00 R532440 R-20-4695-0908-O002 1244 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK O, Lot 2 $359,675.00 $503.55 R532414 R-20-4695-0908-D029 1241 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 29 $368,602.00 $516.04 R532441 R-20-4695-0908-O003 1240 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK O, Lot 3 $403,000.00 $564.20 R416853 R-20-9916-02CA-0005 124 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7677 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-c, BLOCK A, Lot 5, ACRES 0.2009 $309,315.00 $433.04 R380376 R-20-9916-02AD-0021 124 SPRING CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK D, Lot 21 $304,173.00 $425.84 R380416 R-20-9916-030B-0014 124 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK B, Lot 14 $343,037.00 $480.25 R525150 R-20-4695-0906-L012 1238 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK L, Lot 12, ACRES 0.1796 $353,930.00 $495.50 R532415 R-20-4695-0908-D030 1237 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 30 $357,170.00 $500.04 R532442 R-20-4695-0908-O004 1236 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK O, Lot 4 $299,490.00 $419.29 R525142 R-20-4695-0906-K016 1235 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK K, Lot 16, ACRES 0.3162 $383,798.00 $537.32 R525151 R-20-4695-0906-L013 1234 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK L, Lot 13, ACRES 0.1789 $313,665.00 $439.13 R532416 R-20-4695-0908-D031 1233 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 31 $365,079.00 $511.11 R532443 R-20-4695-0908-O005 1232 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK O, Lot 5 $345,224.00 $483.31 R525143 R-20-4695-0906-K017 1231 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK K, Lot 17, ACRES 0.2243 $330,138.00 $462.19 R525152 R-20-4695-0906-L014 1230 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK L, Lot 14, ACRES 0.1785 $282,794.00 $395.91 R418209 R-20-4695-04BA-0011 123 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 11, ACRES 0.1316 $338,361.00 $473.71 R380409 R-20-9916-030A-0035 123 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 35 $285,379.00 $399.53 R380343 R-20-9916-02AC-0012 123 GREEN GROVE, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 12 $333,175.00 $466.45 R525203 R-20-4695-0905-B017 123 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10528 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 5, BLOCK B, Lot 17, ACRES 0.1575 $259,028.00 $362.64 R532417 R-20-4695-0908-D032 1229 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 32 $370,488.00 $518.68 R532444 R-20-4695-0908-O006 1228 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK O, Lot 6 $402,463.00 $563.45 R548269 R-20-3152-030H-0008 1228 HALF HITCH TRL, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK H, Lot 8 $308,316.00 $431.64 R525144 R-20-4695-0906-K018 1227 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK K, Lot 18, ACRES 0.217 $373,014.00 $522.22 R525153 R-20-4695-0906-L015 1226 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK L, Lot 15, ACRES 0.177 $324,224.00 $453.91 R532418 R-20-4695-0908-D033 1225 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 33 $351,890.00 $492.65 R548272 R-20-3152-030I-0007 1225 HALF HITCH TRL, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK I, Lot 7 $282,165.00 $395.03 R532445 R-20-4695-0908-O007 1224 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK O, Lot 7 $338,087.00 $473.32 Page 16 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R548268 R-20-3152-030H-0007 1224 HALF HITCH TRL, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK H, Lot 7 $281,652.00 $394.31 R525145 R-20-4695-0906-K019 1223 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK K, Lot 19, ACRES 0.2005 $325,135.00 $455.19 R525154 R-20-4695-0906-L016 1222 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK L, Lot 16, ACRES 0.174 $382,003.00 $534.80 R532419 R-20-4695-0908-D034 1221 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 34 $346,715.00 $485.40 R548271 R-20-3152-030I-0006 1221 HALF HITCH TRL, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK I, Lot 6 $288,956.00 $404.54 R532446 R-20-4695-0908-O008 1220 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK O, Lot 8 $329,642.00 $461.50 R548267 R-20-3152-030H-0006 1220 HALF HITCH TRL, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK H, Lot 6 $281,652.00 $394.31 R405601 R-20-4695-03BC-0007 122 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 7 $244,061.00 $341.69 R380397 R-20-9916-030A-0023 122 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 23 $293,688.00 $411.16 R380442 R-20-9916-030J-0005 122 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK J, Lot 5 $270,877.00 $379.23 R426234 R-20-4695-050A-0014 122 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 14 $333,685.00 $467.16 R475587 R-20-4695-060H-0006 122 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 6, ACRES 0.1578 $304,806.00 $426.73 R525210 R-20-4695-0905-F016 122 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10528 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 5, BLOCK F, Lot 16, ACRES 0.2098 $322,622.00 $451.67 R525146 R-20-4695-0906-K020 1219 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK K, Lot 20, ACRES 0.1851 $294,028.00 $411.64 R525155 R-20-4695-0906-L017 1218 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK L, Lot 17, ACRES 0.1674 $359,466.00 $503.25 R532420 R-20-4695-0908-D035 1217 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 35 $331,292.00 $463.81 R530879 R-20-3151-020I-0005 1217 HALF HITCH TRL, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK I, Lot 5 $282,105.00 $394.95 R532447 R-20-4695-0908-O009 1216 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK O, Lot 9 $359,674.00 $503.54 R530873 R-20-3151-020H-0005 1216 HALF HITCH TRL, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK H, Lot 5 $256,054.00 $358.48 R525147 R-20-4695-0906-K021 1215 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK K, Lot 21, ACRES 0.1915 $322,859.00 $452.00 R525156 R-20-4695-0906-L018 1214 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK L, Lot 18, ACRES 0.172 $305,298.00 $427.42 R519679 R-20-4695-0904-C013 1214 BIRCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK C, Lot 13 $324,675.00 $454.55 R532421 R-20-4695-0908-D036 1213 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 36 $325,815.00 $456.14 R530878 R-20-3151-020I-0004 1213 HALF HITCH TRL, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK I, Lot 4 $270,372.00 $378.52 R532448 R-20-4695-0908-O010 1212 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK O, Lot 10 $376,494.00 $527.09 R530872 R-20-3151-020H-0004 1212 HALF HITCH TRL, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK H, Lot 4 $291,082.00 $407.51 R525148 R-20-4695-0906-K022 1211 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK K, Lot 22, ACRES 0.1979 $302,322.00 $423.25 R525157 R-20-4695-0906-L019 1210 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK L, Lot 19, ACRES 0.178 $349,013.00 $488.62 R519680 R-20-4695-0904-C014 1210 BIRCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK C, Lot 14 $255,064.00 $357.09 R418208 R-20-4695-04BA-0010 121 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 10, ACRES 0.1569 $315,696.00 $441.97 R380370 R-20-9916-02AC-0039 121 VILLAGE GLEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 39 $386,743.00 $541.44 R405643 R-20-4695-03BG-0026 121 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 26 $249,098.00 $348.74 R405587 R-20-4695-03BB-0040 121 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK B, Lot 40 $232,722.00 $325.81 R380317 R-20-9916-02AA-0007 121 FAIRFIELD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK A, Lot 7 $291,897.00 $408.66 R475603 R-20-4695-060I-0007 121 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 7, ACRES 0.1515 $260,892.00 $365.25 R532422 R-20-4695-0908-D037 1209 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 37 $353,657.00 $495.12 R530877 R-20-3151-020I-0003 1209 HALF HITCH TRL, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK I, Lot 3 $287,578.00 $402.61 R532449 R-20-4695-0908-O011 1208 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK O, Lot 11 $348,969.00 $488.56 R530871 R-20-3151-020H-0003 1208 HALF HITCH TRL, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK H, Lot 3 $285,851.00 $400.19 R525149 R-20-4695-0906-K023 1207 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK K, Lot 23, ACRES 0.2042 $321,697.00 $450.38 R525158 R-20-4695-0906-L020 1206 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10529 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 6, BLOCK L, Lot 20, ACRES 0.1838 $352,015.00 $492.82 R519681 R-20-4695-0904-C015 1206 BIRCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK C, Lot 15 $255,148.00 $357.21 R532423 R-20-4695-0908-D038 1205 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 38 $376,950.00 $527.73 R530876 R-20-3151-020I-0002 1205 HALF HITCH TRL, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK I, Lot 2 $343,586.00 $481.02 R532450 R-20-4695-0908-O012 1204 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK O, Lot 12 $355,627.00 $497.88 R530870 R-20-3151-020H-0002 1204 HALF HITCH TRL, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK H, Lot 2 $252,712.00 $353.80 R519731 R-20-4695-0904-K024 1203 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 24 $414,357.00 $580.10 R519734 R-20-4695-0904-L021 1202 ROWAN DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK L, Lot 21 $390,465.00 $546.65 R532424 R-20-4695-0908-D039 1201 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 39 $288,077.00 $403.31 R530875 R-20-3151-020I-0001 1201 HALF HITCH TRL, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK I, Lot 1 $323,000.00 $452.20 R532451 R-20-4695-0908-O013 1200 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK O, Lot 13 $347,501.00 $486.50 Page 17 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R530869 R-20-3151-020H-0001 1200 HALF HITCH TRL, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK H, Lot 1 $258,715.00 $362.20 R380311 R-20-9916-02AD-0020 120 SPRING CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK D, Lot 20 $302,912.00 $424.08 R380417 R-20-9916-030B-0015 120 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK B, Lot 15 $315,648.00 $441.91 R405636 R-20-4695-03BG-0019 120 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 19 $241,653.00 $338.31 R418207 R-20-4695-04BA-0009 119 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 9, ACRES 0.1531 $291,807.00 $408.53 R380408 R-20-9916-030A-0034 119 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 34 $276,262.00 $386.77 R380342 R-20-9916-02AC-0011 119 GREEN GROVE, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 11 $325,086.00 $455.12 R426225 R-20-4695-050A-0005 119 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 5 $407,266.00 $570.17 R525202 R-20-4695-0905-B016 119 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10528 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 5, BLOCK B, Lot 16, ACRES 0.1614 $327,724.00 $458.81 R416852 R-20-9916-02CA-0004 118 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7677 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-c, BLOCK A, Lot 4, ACRES 0.2009 $374,371.00 $524.12 R405600 R-20-4695-03BC-0006 118 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 6 $249,247.00 $348.95 R380396 R-20-9916-030A-0022 118 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 22 $273,381.00 $382.73 R426235 R-20-4695-050A-0015 118 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 15 $348,034.00 $487.25 R475586 R-20-4695-060H-0005 118 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 5, ACRES 0.1578 $270,231.00 $378.32 R525211 R-20-4695-0905-F017 118 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10528 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 5, BLOCK F, Lot 17, ACRES 0.2214 $329,074.00 $460.70 R418206 R-20-4695-04BA-0008 117 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 8, ACRES 0.1642 $315,479.00 $441.67 R380369 R-20-9916-02AC-0038 117 VILLAGE GLEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 38 $339,651.00 $475.51 R405642 R-20-4695-03BG-0025 117 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 25 $232,722.00 $325.81 R380404 R-20-9916-030A-0030 117 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 30 $333,629.00 $467.08 R526981 R-20-3151-010B-0006 117 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK B, Lot 6 $240,411.00 $336.58 R380383 R-20-9916-030H-0001 117 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK H, Lot 1 $288,266.00 $403.57 R405588 R-20-4695-03BB-0041 117 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK B, Lot 41 $248,722.00 $348.21 R380316 R-20-9916-02AA-0006 117 FAIRFIELD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK A, Lot 6 $268,523.00 $375.93 R475602 R-20-4695-060I-0006 117 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 6, ACRES 0.1515 $321,459.00 $450.04 R389249 R-20-9916-02BD-0019 116 SPRING CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 19 $347,306.00 $486.23 R380418 R-20-9916-030B-0016 116 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK B, Lot 16 $309,527.00 $433.34 R545971 R-20-4695-0910-R013 116 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 13 $307,373.00 $430.32 R418205 R-20-4695-04BA-0007 115 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 7, ACRES 0.1399 $271,437.00 $380.01 R519698 R-20-4695-0904-E005 115 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK E, Lot 5 $273,595.00 $383.03 R475516 R-20-4695-060B-0009 115 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 9, ACRES 0.1578 $250,693.00 $350.97 R380441 R-20-9916-030J-0004 115 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK J, Lot 4 $347,383.00 $486.34 R380407 R-20-9916-030A-0033 115 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 33 $270,222.00 $378.31 R380341 R-20-9916-02AC-0010 115 GREEN GROVE, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 10 $345,337.00 $483.47 R525201 R-20-4695-0905-B015 115 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10528 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 5, BLOCK B, Lot 15, ACRES 0.1612 $253,275.00 $354.59 R405599 R-20-4695-03BC-0005 114 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 5 $241,653.00 $338.31 R519719 R-20-4695-0904-K004 114 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 4 $299,191.00 $418.87 R380395 R-20-9916-030A-0021 114 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 21 $255,129.00 $357.18 R426236 R-20-4695-050A-0016 114 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 16 $280,676.00 $392.95 R475585 R-20-4695-060H-0004 114 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1578 $219,567.00 $307.39 R525212 R-20-4695-0905-F018 114 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10528 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 5, BLOCK F, Lot 18, ACRES 0.2464 $322,791.00 $451.91 R418204 R-20-4695-04BA-0006 113 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 6, ACRES 0.1214 $261,387.00 $365.94 R380368 R-20-9916-02AC-0037 113 VILLAGE GLEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 37 $296,451.00 $415.03 R405641 R-20-4695-03BG-0024 113 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 24 $259,801.00 $363.72 R526980 R-20-3151-010B-0005 113 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK B, Lot 5 $295,474.00 $413.66 R380427 R-20-9916-030H-0002 113 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK H, Lot 2 $283,621.00 $397.07 R405589 R-20-4695-03BB-0042 113 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK B, Lot 42 $249,247.00 $348.95 R380315 R-20-9916-02AA-0005 113 FAIRFIELD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK A, Lot 5 $297,713.00 $416.80 R475601 R-20-4695-060I-0005 113 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 5, ACRES 0.1535 $311,872.00 $436.62 R476616 R-20-4695-080G-0044 1126 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 44, ACRES 0.251 $257,155.00 $360.02 R476634 R-20-4695-080H-0013 1125 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 13, ACRES 0.1642 $257,155.00 $360.02 R548247 R-20-3152-030E-0008 1124 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 8 $280,669.00 $392.94 Page 18 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R475591 R-20-4695-060H-0010 1123 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 10, ACRES 0.1424 $268,261.00 $375.57 R476615 R-20-4695-080G-0043 1122 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 43, ACRES 0.1952 $279,608.00 $391.45 R476633 R-20-4695-080H-0012 1121 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 12, ACRES 0.1517 $269,411.00 $377.18 R548246 R-20-3152-030E-0007 1120 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 7 $323,465.00 $452.85 R416851 R-20-9916-02CA-0003 112 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7677 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-c, BLOCK A, Lot 3, ACRES 0.2009 $364,954.00 $510.94 R389248 R-20-9916-02BD-0018 112 SPRING CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 18 $310,118.00 $434.17 R380419 R-20-9916-030B-0017 112 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK B, Lot 17 $238,865.00 $334.41 R405637 R-20-4695-03BG-0020 112 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 20 $232,722.00 $325.81 R545972 R-20-4695-0910-R014 112 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 14 $348,387.00 $487.74 R475592 R-20-4695-060H-0011 1119 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 11, ACRES 0.1585 $216,353.00 $302.89 R476614 R-20-4695-080G-0042 1118 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 42, ACRES 0.1504 $250,470.00 $350.66 R532425 R-20-4695-0908-D040 1117 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 40 $351,591.00 $492.23 R476632 R-20-4695-080H-0011 1117 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 11, ACRES 0.1581 $269,411.00 $377.18 R548245 R-20-3152-030E-0006 1116 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 6 $239,575.00 $335.41 R475593 R-20-4695-060H-0012 1115 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 12, ACRES 0.1676 $269,550.00 $377.37 R476613 R-20-4695-080G-0041 1114 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 41, ACRES 0.1377 $238,525.00 $333.94 R532426 R-20-4695-0908-D041 1113 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 41 $365,139.00 $511.19 R548237 R-20-3152-030D-0006 1113 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK D, Lot 6 $321,266.00 $449.77 R476631 R-20-4695-080H-0010 1113 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 10, ACRES 0.1603 $275,552.00 $385.77 R548244 R-20-3152-030E-0005 1112 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 5 $288,199.00 $403.48 R475594 R-20-4695-060H-0013 1111 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 13, ACRES 0.1728 $265,168.00 $371.24 R476612 R-20-4695-080G-0040 1110 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 40, ACRES 0.2166 $253,546.00 $354.96 R418203 R-20-4695-04BA-0005 111 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 5, ACRES 0.1214 $252,347.00 $353.29 R519699 R-20-4695-0904-E006 111 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK E, Lot 6 $322,693.00 $451.77 R475517 R-20-4695-060B-0010 111 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 10, ACRES 0.1578 $313,676.00 $439.15 R380440 R-20-9916-030J-0003 111 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK J, Lot 3 $299,152.00 $418.81 R496817 R-20-4695-090N-0014 111 HUISACHE CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 14 $306,556.00 $429.18 R380406 R-20-9916-030A-0032 111 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 32 $286,668.00 $401.34 R380340 R-20-9916-02AC-0009 111 GREEN GROVE, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 9 $317,754.00 $444.86 R525200 R-20-4695-0905-B014 111 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10528 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 5, BLOCK B, Lot 14, ACRES 0.1601 $302,189.00 $423.06 R532427 R-20-4695-0908-D042 1109 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 42 $354,466.00 $496.25 R548238 R-20-3152-030D-0007 1109 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK D, Lot 7 $273,432.00 $382.80 R476630 R-20-4695-080H-0009 1109 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 9, ACRES 0.1715 $257,155.00 $360.02 R548243 R-20-3152-030E-0004 1108 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 4 $235,271.00 $329.38 R475606 R-20-4695-060I-0010 1108 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 10, ACRES 0.2058 $283,231.00 $396.52 R475595 R-20-4695-060H-0014 1107 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 14, ACRES 0.1641 $250,220.00 $350.31 R476611 R-20-4695-080G-0039 1106 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 39, ACRES 0.211 $283,750.00 $397.25 R532428 R-20-4695-0908-D043 1105 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 43 $352,890.00 $494.05 R548239 R-20-3152-030D-0008 1105 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK D, Lot 8 $252,701.00 $353.78 R476629 R-20-4695-080H-0008 1105 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 8, ACRES 0.1578 $238,018.00 $333.23 R548242 R-20-3152-030E-0003 1104 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 3 $239,171.00 $334.84 R475607 R-20-4695-060I-0011 1104 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 11, ACRES 0.2412 $267,024.00 $373.83 R475596 R-20-4695-060H-0015 1103 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 15, ACRES 0.1856 $303,547.00 $424.97 R532429 R-20-4695-0908-D044 1101 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 44 $375,944.00 $526.32 R548240 R-20-3152-030D-0009 1101 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK D, Lot 9 $274,053.00 $383.67 R476628 R-20-4695-080H-0007 1101 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 7, ACRES 0.1578 $273,342.00 $382.68 R548241 R-20-3152-030E-0002 1100 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S11164 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 3, BLOCK E, Lot 2 $247,332.00 $346.26 R475608 R-20-4695-060I-0012 1100 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 12, ACRES 0.2096 $366,216.00 $512.70 R405598 R-20-4695-03BC-0004 110 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 4 $265,457.00 $371.64 R519718 R-20-4695-0904-K003 110 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 3 $332,724.00 $465.81 R380394 R-20-9916-030A-0020 110 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 20 $278,803.00 $390.32 Page 19 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R426237 R-20-4695-050A-0017 110 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 17 $372,137.00 $520.99 R475584 R-20-4695-060H-0003 110 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 3, ACRES 0.1578 $263,906.00 $369.47 R525213 R-20-4695-0905-F019 110 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10528 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 5, BLOCK F, Lot 19, ACRES 0.2443 $329,074.00 $460.70 R418202 R-20-4695-04BA-0004 109 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1214 $257,833.00 $360.97 R380367 R-20-9916-02AC-0036 109 VILLAGE GLEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 36 $376,198.00 $526.68 R526979 R-20-3151-010B-0004 109 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK B, Lot 4 $299,366.00 $419.11 R380428 R-20-9916-030H-0003 109 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK H, Lot 3 $297,798.00 $416.92 R405590 R-20-4695-03BB-0043 109 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK B, Lot 43 $241,653.00 $338.31 R380314 R-20-9916-02AA-0004 109 FAIRFIELD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK A, Lot 4 $398,539.00 $557.95 R426224 R-20-4695-050A-0004 109 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 4 $354,476.00 $496.27 R475600 R-20-4695-060I-0004 109 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1937 $285,246.00 $399.34 R530850 R-20-3151-020G-0024 1086 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 24 $287,886.00 $403.04 R530849 R-20-3151-020G-0023 1082 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 23 $294,601.00 $412.44 R389247 R-20-9916-02BD-0017 108 SPRING CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 17 $356,345.00 $498.88 R380420 R-20-9916-030B-0018 108 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK B, Lot 18 $275,577.00 $385.81 R405638 R-20-4695-03BG-0021 108 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 21 $244,163.00 $341.83 R545973 R-20-4695-0910-R015 108 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 15 $304,337.00 $426.07 R530848 R-20-3151-020G-0022 1078 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 22 $256,298.00 $358.82 R526992 R-20-3151-010C-0002 1077 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 2 $299,580.00 $419.41 R530802 R-20-3151-020B-0026 1077 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 26 $254,155.00 $355.82 R530847 R-20-3151-020G-0021 1074 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 21 $242,307.00 $339.23 R526993 R-20-3151-010C-0003 1073 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 3 $303,598.00 $425.04 R530801 R-20-3151-020B-0025 1073 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 25 $281,895.00 $394.65 R530846 R-20-3151-020G-0020 1070 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 20 $242,866.00 $340.01 R418201 R-20-4695-04BA-0003 107 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 3, ACRES 0.1214 $260,959.00 $365.34 R519700 R-20-4695-0904-E007 107 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK E, Lot 7 $257,132.00 $359.98 R475518 R-20-4695-060B-0011 107 SYCAMORE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK B, Lot 11, ACRES 0.1578 $256,430.00 $359.00 R380439 R-20-9916-030J-0002 107 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK J, Lot 2 $278,803.00 $390.32 R496818 R-20-4695-090N-0015 107 HUISACHE CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 15 $348,681.00 $488.15 R380405 R-20-9916-030A-0031 107 HICKORY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 31 $261,954.00 $366.74 R380339 R-20-9916-02AC-0008 107 GREEN GROVE, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 8 $338,417.00 $473.78 R525199 R-20-4695-0905-B013 107 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10528 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 5, BLOCK B, Lot 13, ACRES 0.1564 $272,109.00 $380.95 R526994 R-20-3151-010C-0004 1069 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 4 $286,726.00 $401.42 R530800 R-20-3151-020B-0024 1069 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 24 $240,159.00 $336.22 R530845 R-20-3151-020G-0019 1066 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 19 $253,309.00 $354.63 R526995 R-20-3151-010C-0005 1065 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 5 $258,128.00 $361.38 R530799 R-20-3151-020B-0023 1065 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 23 $240,159.00 $336.22 R526974 R-20-3151-010A-0018 1064 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 18 $307,629.00 $430.68 R530844 R-20-3151-020G-0018 1062 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 18 $296,499.00 $415.10 R526996 R-20-3151-010C-0006 1061 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 6 $235,081.00 $329.11 R530798 R-20-3151-020B-0022 1061 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 22 $295,693.00 $413.97 R526973 R-20-3151-010A-0017 1060 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 17 $268,156.00 $375.42 R416850 R-20-9916-02CA-0002 106 WESTBURY LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7677 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-c, BLOCK A, Lot 2, ACRES 0.2294 $305,021.00 $427.03 R405597 R-20-4695-03BC-0003 106 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 3 $247,608.00 $346.65 R519717 R-20-4695-0904-K002 106 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 2 $350,341.00 $490.48 R380393 R-20-9916-030A-0019 106 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 19 $278,354.00 $389.70 R496816 R-20-4695-090N-0013 106 HUISACHE CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 13 $351,640.00 $492.30 R426238 R-20-4695-050A-0018 106 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 18 $320,327.00 $448.46 R475583 R-20-4695-060H-0002 106 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 2, ACRES 0.1578 $293,729.00 $411.22 R530843 R-20-3151-020G-0017 1058 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 17 $294,152.00 $411.81 R532430 R-20-4695-0908-D045 1057 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 45 $427,497.00 $598.50 Page 20 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R526997 R-20-3151-010C-0007 1057 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 7 $256,270.00 $358.78 R530797 R-20-3151-020B-0021 1057 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 21 $242,137.00 $338.99 R526972 R-20-3151-010A-0016 1056 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 16 $320,162.00 $448.23 R530842 R-20-3151-020G-0016 1054 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 16 $271,252.00 $379.75 R526998 R-20-3151-010C-0008 1053 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 8 $240,909.00 $337.27 R526971 R-20-3151-010A-0015 1052 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 15 $237,242.00 $332.14 R530841 R-20-3151-020G-0015 1050 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 15 $252,622.00 $353.67 R418200 R-20-4695-04BA-0002 105 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 2, ACRES 0.1478 $287,769.00 $402.88 R380366 R-20-9916-02AC-0035 105 VILLAGE GLEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 35 $335,720.00 $470.01 R526978 R-20-3151-010B-0003 105 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK B, Lot 3 $241,789.00 $338.50 R380429 R-20-9916-030H-0004 105 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK H, Lot 4 $252,586.00 $353.62 R405591 R-20-4695-03BB-0044 105 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK B, Lot 44 $234,114.00 $327.76 R380313 R-20-9916-02AA-0003 105 FAIRFIELD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK A, Lot 3 $271,877.00 $380.63 R426223 R-20-4695-050A-0003 105 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 3 $282,085.00 $394.92 R532432 R-20-4695-0908-D047 1049 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 47 $287,233.00 $402.13 R526999 R-20-3151-010C-0009 1049 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 9 $291,908.00 $408.67 R532452 R-20-4695-0908-R018 1048 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK R, Lot 18 $339,249.00 $474.95 R526970 R-20-3151-010A-0014 1048 CLOVE HITCH RD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 14 $327,448.00 $458.43 R530840 R-20-3151-020G-0014 1046 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 14 $237,670.00 $332.74 R532433 R-20-4695-0908-D048 1045 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 48 $285,325.00 $399.46 R527000 R-20-3151-010C-0010 1045 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 10 $323,598.00 $453.04 R532453 R-20-4695-0908-R019 1044 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK R, Lot 19 $307,083.00 $429.92 R526969 R-20-3151-010A-0013 1044 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 13 $300,032.00 $420.04 R530839 R-20-3151-020G-0013 1042 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 13 $260,012.00 $364.02 R532434 R-20-4695-0908-D049 1041 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 49 $296,170.00 $414.64 R527001 R-20-3151-010C-0011 1041 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 11 $270,000.00 $378.00 R532454 R-20-4695-0908-R020 1040 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK R, Lot 20 $328,949.00 $460.53 R526968 R-20-3151-010A-0012 1040 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 12 $258,068.00 $361.30 R389246 R-20-9916-02BD-0016 104 SPRING CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 16 $336,776.00 $471.49 R380421 R-20-9916-030B-0019 104 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK B, Lot 19 $311,004.00 $435.41 R545974 R-20-4695-0910-R016 104 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 16 $322,218.00 $451.11 R532435 R-20-4695-0908-D050 1037 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 50 $356,401.00 $498.96 R527002 R-20-3151-010C-0012 1037 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 12 $283,525.00 $396.94 R532455 R-20-4695-0908-R021 1036 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK R, Lot 21 $310,289.00 $434.40 R526967 R-20-3151-010A-0011 1036 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 11 $285,251.00 $399.35 R530838 R-20-3151-020G-0012 1036 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 12 $295,727.00 $414.02 R532436 R-20-4695-0908-D051 1033 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 51 $289,353.00 $405.09 R527003 R-20-3151-010C-0013 1033 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 13 $284,894.00 $398.85 R532456 R-20-4695-0908-R022 1032 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK R, Lot 22 $290,817.00 $407.14 R526966 R-20-3151-010A-0010 1032 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 10 $239,168.00 $334.84 R530837 R-20-3151-020G-0011 1032 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 11 $242,866.00 $340.01 R418199 R-20-4695-04BA-0001 103 VILLAGE PARK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7887 - Georgetown Village Sec 4-b Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 1, ACRES 0.2017 $331,279.00 $463.79 R519701 R-20-4695-0904-E008 103 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK E, Lot 8 $335,321.00 $469.45 R496819 R-20-4695-090N-0016 103 HUISACHE CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9685 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 1 PUD, BLOCK N, Lot 16 $323,716.00 $453.20 R405592 R-20-4695-03BB-0045 103 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK B, Lot 45 $248,254.00 $347.56 R380338 R-20-9916-02AC-0007 103 GREEN GROVE, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK C, Lot 7 $299,225.00 $418.92 R519673 R-20-4695-0904-B012 103 BLUEHAW DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK B, Lot 12 $260,897.00 $365.26 R532437 R-20-4695-0908-D052 1029 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 52 $384,151.00 $537.81 R527004 R-20-3151-010C-0014 1029 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 14 $274,066.00 $383.69 R532457 R-20-4695-0908-R023 1028 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK R, Lot 23 $307,083.00 $429.92 R526965 R-20-3151-010A-0009 1028 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 9 $295,320.00 $413.45 Page 21 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R530836 R-20-3151-020G-0010 1028 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 10 $283,373.00 $396.72 R476604 R-20-4695-080G-0032 1026 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 32, ACRES 0.1635 $250,228.00 $350.32 R532438 R-20-4695-0908-D053 1025 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK D, Lot 53 $388,689.00 $544.16 R527005 R-20-3151-010C-0015 1025 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 15 $324,432.00 $454.20 R532458 R-20-4695-0908-R024 1024 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK R, Lot 24 $419,184.00 $586.86 R526964 R-20-3151-010A-0008 1024 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 8 $268,305.00 $375.63 R530835 R-20-3151-020G-0009 1024 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 9 $329,133.00 $460.79 R476627 R-20-4695-080H-0006 1023 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 6, ACRES 0.1578 $257,787.00 $360.90 R476603 R-20-4695-080G-0031 1022 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 31, ACRES 0.1846 $246,300.00 $344.82 R527006 R-20-3151-010C-0016 1021 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 16 $290,671.00 $406.94 R532459 R-20-4695-0908-R025 1020 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK R, Lot 25 $338,121.00 $473.37 R526963 R-20-3151-010A-0007 1020 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 7 $239,847.00 $335.79 R530834 R-20-3151-020G-0008 1020 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 8 $237,392.00 $332.35 R405596 R-20-4695-03BC-0002 102 VILLAGE COMMONS BLVD, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK C, Lot 2 $242,905.00 $340.07 R519716 R-20-4695-0904-K001 102 TASCATE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK K, Lot 1 $318,518.00 $445.93 R380392 R-20-9916-030A-0018 102 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK A, Lot 18 $312,935.00 $438.11 R405639 R-20-4695-03BG-0022 102 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK G, Lot 22 $247,347.00 $346.29 R426239 R-20-4695-050A-0019 102 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 19 $339,580.00 $475.41 R475582 R-20-4695-060H-0001 102 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 1, ACRES 0.214 $251,047.00 $351.47 R475577 R-20-4695-060G-0001 1019 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 1, ACRES 0.1853 $264,059.00 $369.68 R476626 R-20-4695-080H-0005 1019 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 5, ACRES 0.151 $290,572.00 $406.80 R476602 R-20-4695-080G-0030 1018 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 30, ACRES 0.1908 $256,862.00 $359.61 R527007 R-20-3151-010C-0017 1017 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 17 $301,550.00 $422.17 R532460 R-20-4695-0908-R026 1016 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK R, Lot 26 $411,234.00 $575.73 R526962 R-20-3151-010A-0006 1016 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 6 $243,009.00 $340.21 R475609 R-20-4695-060I-0013 1016 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK I, Lot 13, ACRES 0.2393 $321,066.00 $449.49 R530833 R-20-3151-020G-0007 1016 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 7 $338,260.00 $473.56 R475578 R-20-4695-060G-0002 1015 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 2, ACRES 0.1713 $263,850.00 $369.39 R519678 R-20-4695-0904-C012 1015 BRILEY ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK C, Lot 12 $259,193.00 $362.87 R476625 R-20-4695-080H-0004 1015 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 4, ACRES 0.1603 $295,724.00 $414.01 R519697 R-20-4695-0904-E004 1014 BRILEY ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK E, Lot 4 $304,934.00 $426.91 R476601 R-20-4695-080G-0029 1014 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 29, ACRES 0.1626 $272,054.00 $380.88 R527008 R-20-3151-010C-0018 1013 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 18 $256,044.00 $358.46 R532461 R-20-4695-0908-R027 1012 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK R, Lot 27 $325,254.00 $455.36 R526961 R-20-3151-010A-0005 1012 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 5 $300,458.00 $420.64 R530832 R-20-3151-020G-0006 1012 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 6 $264,002.00 $369.60 R475579 R-20-4695-060G-0003 1011 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 3, ACRES 0.2089 $265,289.00 $371.40 R519677 R-20-4695-0904-C011 1011 BRILEY ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK C, Lot 11 $308,528.00 $431.94 R476624 R-20-4695-080H-0003 1011 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 3, ACRES 0.1566 $286,167.00 $400.63 R519696 R-20-4695-0904-E003 1010 BRILEY ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK E, Lot 3 $274,377.00 $384.13 R476600 R-20-4695-080G-0028 1010 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 28, ACRES 0.1609 $255,478.00 $357.67 R380384 R-20-9916-030J-0001 101 SUMMERS GREEN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK J, Lot 1 $305,107.00 $427.15 R526977 R-20-3151-010B-0002 101 SHEEPSHANK DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK B, Lot 2 $270,310.00 $378.43 R380430 R-20-9916-030H-0005 101 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK H, Lot 5 $320,181.00 $448.25 R405593 R-20-4695-03BB-0046 101 GREENSIDE LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7558 - Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, BLOCK B, Lot 46 $264,018.00 $369.63 R380312 R-20-9916-02AA-0002 101 FAIRFIELD CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6819 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, BLOCK A, Lot 2 $303,462.00 $424.85 R426222 R-20-4695-050A-0002 101 CHESTNUT CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7973 - Georgetown Village Sec 5 Pud, BLOCK A, Lot 2 $381,487.00 $534.08 R527009 R-20-3151-010C-0019 1009 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 19 $288,636.00 $404.09 R532462 R-20-4695-0908-R028 1008 NARANJO DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10718 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 8 PUD, BLOCK R, Lot 28 $409,588.00 $573.42 R526960 R-20-3151-010A-0004 1008 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 4 $296,541.00 $415.16 R530831 R-20-3151-020G-0005 1008 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 5 $238,690.00 $334.17 Page 22 of 23 Attachment III 2020 Assessment Roll QuickRefID Property Number Property Address Legal Description WCAD Total Assessed Value PID Assessment ($0.14/$100) *The proposed method of assessment is based on the value of the real property and real property improvements as determined by the Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD). Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. Public rights-of-way, City of Georgetown property and properties otherwise exempt from ad valorem taxes are exempt from assessment. 2020 Assessment Roll R475580 R-20-4695-060G-0004 1007 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 4, ACRES 0.2595 $259,448.00 $363.23 R519676 R-20-4695-0904-C010 1007 BRILEY ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK C, Lot 10 $285,005.00 $399.01 R476623 R-20-4695-080H-0002 1007 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 2, ACRES 0.1533 $295,430.00 $413.60 R519695 R-20-4695-0904-E002 1006 BRILEY ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK E, Lot 2 $265,415.00 $371.58 R476599 R-20-4695-080G-0027 1006 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 27, ACRES 0.1722 $258,827.00 $362.36 R441434 R-20-4695-070G-0022 1005 ELMWOOD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 22, ACRES 0.3276 $265,876.00 $372.23 R527010 R-20-3151-010C-0020 1005 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 20 $324,441.00 $454.22 R441433 R-20-4695-070G-0021 1004 ELMWOOD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 21, ACRES 0.2601 $245,745.00 $344.04 R526959 R-20-3151-010A-0003 1004 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 3 $257,229.00 $360.12 R530830 R-20-3151-020G-0004 1004 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 4 $293,983.00 $411.58 R441435 R-20-4695-070G-0023 1003 ELMWOOD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 23, ACRES 0.3005 $250,432.00 $350.60 R475581 R-20-4695-060G-0005 1003 CEDAR ELM LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S9186 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 6 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 5, ACRES 0.3368 $268,538.00 $375.95 R519675 R-20-4695-0904-C009 1003 BRILEY ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK C, Lot 9 $305,852.00 $428.19 R476622 R-20-4695-080H-0001 1003 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK H, Lot 1, ACRES 0.1643 $269,166.00 $376.83 R441432 R-20-4695-070G-0020 1002 ELMWOOD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 20, ACRES 0.2181 $271,075.00 $379.51 R519694 R-20-4695-0904-E001 1002 BRILEY ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S10368 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 4, BLOCK E, Lot 1 $265,090.00 $371.13 R476598 R-20-4695-080G-0026 1002 BOXWOOD LOOP, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S9153 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 8 PUD, BLOCK G, Lot 26, ACRES 0.1829 $272,984.00 $382.18 R441436 R-20-4695-070G-0024 1001 ELMWOOD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 24, ACRES 0.2186 $250,321.00 $350.45 R527011 R-20-3151-010C-0021 1001 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK C, Lot 21 $300,193.00 $420.27 R530796 R-20-3151-020B-0020 1001 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK B, Lot 20 $271,262.00 $379.77 R441431 R-20-4695-070G-0019 1000 ELMWOOD DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S8381 - Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, BLOCK G, Lot 19, ACRES 0.2601 $240,309.00 $336.43 R526958 R-20-3151-010A-0002 1000 CLOVE HITCH DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10580 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 1, BLOCK A, Lot 2 $293,596.00 $411.03 R530829 R-20-3151-020G-0003 1000 BOWLINE DR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S10670 - CREEKSIDE AT GEORGETOWN VILLAGE PUD PH 2, BLOCK G, Lot 3 $292,921.00 $410.09 R389245 R-20-9916-02BD-0015 100 SPRING CT, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S7101 - Shell Ranch Sec 2-b, BLOCK D, Lot 15 $329,815.00 $461.74 R380422 R-20-9916-030B-0020 100 ROSEBUD LN, GEORGETOWN, TX 78633 S6897 - Shell Ranch Sec 3, BLOCK B, Lot 20 $355,993.00 $498.39 R545975 R-20-4695-0910-R017 100 BERETTA CIR, GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 S11104 - GEORGETOWN VILLAGE SEC 9 PH 9 & 10, BLOCK R, Lot 17 $292,534.00 $409.55 Page 23 of 23 Georgetown Village Public Improvement District #1 Georgetown Village Public Improvement District #1 August 11, 2020 Georgetown Village Public Improvement District #1 capmetro.org Resolution authorizing the filing of the Assessment Roll for the 2021 Georgetown Village Public Improvement District Service Plan and Assessment Plan, and Setting the public hearing date for the assessment for August 25, 2020 Purpose Georgetown Village Public Improvement District #1 Supplemental services and improvements to be provided for the GVPID including:Pocket parksLandscape areasTrees (maintenance, removal and prep)Sidewalks and trailsAlleywaysDistinctive lighting and signageRecreational facilities Water quality facilitiesAdministrative costs Total estimated cost for the next 5 years is $1,651,237,with an average annual cost of $330,247 Service Plan Georgetown Village Public Improvement District #1 $0.14 per $100 valuation Based on the real property value as determined by the WCAD No change from the current assessment The average residential property value is approximately $294,000; therefore the annual assessment is approximately $411 per year. Levy of Assessment Georgetown Village Public Improvement District #1 Approval of Resolution File Assessment Roll with the City Secretary’s Office for public inspection Schedule public hearing for August 25, 2020 Mail and publish notice of Council’s intent to consider the proposed assessment at a public hearing Adopt Service Plan, Levy of Assessment and Assessment Roll on August 25 (1st Reading) and September 8 (2nd Reading) Next Steps Georgetown Village Public Improvement District #1 Questions Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Department Staff Report 2019-3-PUD Georgetown Senior Living Community Page 1 of 8 Report Date: July 3, 2020 Case No: 2019-3-PUD Project Planner: Michael Patroski, Planner Item Details Project Name: Georgetown Senior Living Community Project Location: 60 Del Webb Blvd within City Council district No. 3. Total Acreage: 13.1501 Legal Description: Lots 5, 6 & 7, Block A, Village Gate at Sun City Final Plat Applicant: MedCore Partners, c/o Chad Suitonu Property Owner: MedCore Partners, c/o Michael Graham Request: Zoning Map Amendment to amend the Seven Strand Planned Unit Development (PUD) Development Plan to allow for a reduction in required parking and to allow certain facility uses to be open to the general public. Amendment to Ord 2015-10. Case History: This is the first public hearing of this request. Planning Department Staff Report 2019-3-PUD Georgetown Senior Living Community Page 2 of 8 Overview of Applicant’s Request The Seven Strand Planned Unit Development (PUD) was initially adopted on February 10, 2015. The Seven Strand PUD’s vision is to create luxury resort style retirement center consisting of multiple retirement buildings housing a maximum of 300 independent living units with integrated amenities to serve exclusively the residents of the development. To facilitate this development, the PUD included exceptions to standard for building height and signage, but established standards above UDC minimums for land uses, setbacks, parking access, and buffering. The Applicant has requested to amend the existing Seven Strand (PUD) to permit the senior living facilities restaurant and salon to be open to the public (Exhibit 5, Letter of Intent). The amendment also requests a reduction in the amount of required parking spaces for the senior living facility. Site Information Location: The subject property is located northeast of the Williams Drive and Del Webb Blvd intersection. Physical and Natural Features: The subject property is undeveloped at this time. It contains little tree coverage and is relatively flat. Future Land Use and Zoning Designations: The subject property has a Mixed Density Neighborhood (MDN) Future Land Use designation (Exhibit 2) and is currently zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) with Local Commercial (C-1) as the base district (Exhibit 3). Surrounding Properties: The majority of the immediately surrounding property is developed with a mix of residential and not- residential uses. Uses within the area include the Sun City neighborhood, rural residences, Walgreens, First Texas Bank, and medical offices and the City’s West Service Center. The current zoning, Future Land Use designation, and existing uses of the adjacent properties to the north, south, east and west are outlined in the table below: DIRECTION ZONING DISTRICT FUTURE LAND USE EXISTING USE North ETJ Neighborhood (NH) Lakewood Estates East Planned Unit Development (PUD) with a base of Residential Single-Family (RS) (Ord No. 95-14 Mixed Density Neighborhood (MDN) Sun City Phase 2 South Planned Unit Development (PUD) with a base of Agriculture (AG) (Ord No. 95-14 Mixed Density Neighborhood (MDN) Del Webb Blvd Sun City Phase 2 West Planned Unit Development (PUD) with a base of Mixed Density Neighborhood (MDN) Walgreens, First Texas Bank, Vacant Lot, and Planning Department Staff Report 2019-3-PUD Georgetown Senior Living Community Page 3 of 8 DIRECTION ZONING DISTRICT FUTURE LAND USE EXISTING USE General Commercial (C-3) and Local Commercial (C-1) (Ord No 95-14) Office Uses. Property History: The subject property was part of the original Sun City Development Agreement and Concept Plan, approved in 1995. Also in 1995, the property was annexed into the City and was zoned Local Commercial (C-1) and Residential Planned (RP) to reflect the Sun City Concept Plan that identified this as a location for an assisted living facility or something similar. In 1997, the 15-acre tract this property was part of was removed from the Sun City Development Agreement and Concept Plan by the Second Amendment thereto. Also in 1997, the property was platted and rezoned (Ordinance No. 97-37) from C-1 and RP to Office and Service Use (RM-3) to allow for an assisted living center; however the development was not pursued. With the adoption of the Unified Development Code (UDC) in 2003 the RM-3 district was transitioned to the Office (OF) zoning district. In 2007, a retirement community project was proposed on the property that was to include living options at various levels of independence. The OF district did not allow the type of development proposed and the property was again rezoned in November 2007. In 2015, 13.1501 acres of the property was rezoned from Local Commercial (C-1) to Planned Unit Development (Ord 2015-10) to depict language and standards for the development of a Senior Living Facility. On June 16, 2020, the Georgetown Senior Living Facility Site Development Plan was approved, Sun City Walgreens Dollar General Grace Fellowship Church Planning Department Staff Report 2019-3-PUD Georgetown Senior Living Community Page 4 of 8 in accordance with Ord 2015-10. The proposed amendment is to permit a reduction in required parking and to permit certain uses within the facility to be open to the general public. Comprehensive Plan Guidance Future Land Use Map: This category includes a blend of single-family and medium- density housing types. Medium density housing options are consistent with and complementary to the traditional single- family neighborhood with emphasis on connectivity and access to neighborhood amenities including schools and parks. Development standards for medium density housing and any nonresidential uses are in place to ensure compatibility through increased setbacks for taller buildings, architectural designs that are consistent with the neighborhood, location of more intense uses and development nearer to the edge of developments, and enhanced landscaping. Additionally, any nonresidential uses are located primarily at arterials and other major roadway intersections and include appropriate buffering and pedestrian orientation to support the surrounding residents. Utilities The subject property is located within the City’s service area for water, wastewater and electric. It is anticipated that there is adequate capacity to serve the subject property at this time. A Utility Evaluation was required and reviewed at time of Site Development Plan to determine capacity and any necessary utility improvements. Transportation The subject property will have access from Williams Drive and Del Webb Blvd. Williams Drive is identified as an existing Major Arterial in the Overall Thoroughfare Plan. Arterial streets provide traffic movement through and between different areas within the city and access to adjacent land uses. Access is more controllable because driveway spacing requirements are much greater and, if safety dictates, overall access can be limited to specific turning movements. Major Arterials connect major traffic generators and land use concentrations and serve much larger traffic volumes over greater distances. Del Webb Blvd is identified as an existing Major Collector in the Overall Thoroughfare Plan. These streets are intended to balance traffic between arterial streets and local streets. These streets tend to carry a high volume of traffic over shorter distances, providing access and movement between neighborhoods, parks, schools, retail areas and the arterial street system. Proposed Zoning district The request is to amend the existing Seven Strand PUD. A PUD is a special purpose zoning district intended to allow flexibility in planning and designing for unique or environmentally sensitive properties and that are to be developed in accordance with a common development scheme. PUD Mixed-Density Neighborhood (MDN) DUA: 5.1-14.0 Target Ratio: 80% nonresidential, 20% residential Primary Use: Variety of single-family home types (detached, duplex, townhome) Secondary Uses: Limited neighborhood-serving retail, office, institutional, and civic uses. Planning Department Staff Report 2019-3-PUD Georgetown Senior Living Community Page 5 of 8 zoning is designed to accommodate various types of development, including multiple housing types, neighborhood and community retail, professional and administrative areas, industrial and business parks, and other uses or a combination thereof. A PUD may be used to permit new or innovative concepts in land use and standards not permitted by zoning or the standards of this Code. In this event, the request is to amend the PUD to allow for certain uses on a section of the PUD, in addition a current requirement is to be replaced. The proposed amendment is to allow for Barber/Beauty Shops and Restaurants/Kitchens to be open to the public and not only accessible by the senior living residence. The proposed amendment is also to revise the current parking count requirement for the property as follows: Existing: Independent Living Retirement Center use shall be: 1 space per dwelling unit + 1 space per each 15 dwelling units or fraction thereof for visitor and employee parking. Proposed: Independent Living use shall be: 1 space per dwelling unit. The Assisted Living shall be: 1 space per 2 beds. The Memory Care use shall be: 1 space per 3.5 beds. No other changes are proposed for this PUD. The PUD Development Plan is attached as Exhibit 4. Intergovernmental and Interdepartmental Review The proposed rezoning request was reviewed by all applicable City Departments to determine the appropriateness of the requested zoning on the subject property. No comments were issued regarding the zoning request. Approval Criteria Staff has reviewed the proposed rezoning request and has found that it complies with the criteria established in UDC Section 3.06.030 for a Zoning Map Amendment, as outlined below: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING)APPROVAL CRITERIA 1. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review and final action. Complies An application must provide the necessary information to review and make a knowledgeable decision in order for staff to schedule an application for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. This application was reviewed by staff and deemed to be complete. 2. The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.Complies The current PUD and proposed amendment are consistent with the Future Land Use of Mixed Density Neighborhood by providing additional variety of housing and commercial uses within the Future Land Use area. Additionally, Land Use Policy #1 of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment is to “Encourage a balanced mix of residential, commercial, and employment uses at varying densities and intensities to reflect a gradual transition from urban to suburban to rural development.” The subject property helps to serve as a residential transition area between the commercial development to the west along Williams Drive and the Residential Single-Family Development to the east. Planning Department Staff Report 2019-3-PUD Georgetown Senior Living Community Page 6 of 8 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING)APPROVAL CRITERIA 3. The zoning change promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and healthful development of the City.Complies The proposed PUD amendment promotes the health, safety and orderly development of the City as the amendments continue to allow the property to be developed as a mixed community with residential and supporting commercial services. While opening the commercial uses to the public may increase the number of trips to the site, the proposed parking count would still provide sufficient parking spaces to accommodate the entire site. As part of the proposed PUD amendment the Applicant provided a parking study conducted by the DeShazo Group, Inc in which they have identified the appropriate parking requirement for the proposed use(s) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) manual. The study concluded that the total appropriate parking requirement for the subject property would be 173 parking spaces. The proposed parking requirements in this PUD amendment would require the site to provide 196 parking spaces, which is 23 additional spaces than the parking study would require. The existing PUD requires 250-265 parking spaces, based on the proposed uses. The approved Site Development Plan for the Georgetown Senior Living, 2019-75-SDP, was approved with a total of 251 parking spaces. Please note that the existing PUD, proposed amendment, and parking study calculate the parking spaces required for facilities that will be opened to the public to comply with the standard UDC calculations. This results in both the beauty salon and restaurant meeting the standard UDC parking requirement and only reducing the total number of required spaces for the senior living facility which includes assisted living and memory care. 4. The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood.Complies The current PUD and proposed amendment are compatible with the conforming uses nearby and character of the neighborhood. The subject property has the base zoning district of Local Commercial (C-1), which is compatible and appropriate adjacent to the Local Commercial (C-1) and General Commercial (C-3) zoning districts to the west. In addition, the senior living facility focus and standards of the Planned Unit Development allow the for the subject property to also be appropriate next to the Residential Single-Family development of Sun City to the east. 5. The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the District that would be applied by the proposed amendment.Complies The current PUD and proposed amendment standards, including but not limited to setbacks, building heights, landscaping, tree preservation, parking requirements and signage, allow for the project to be developed as intended all within appropriate design standards. In addition to the rezoning criteria above, staff has reviewed the request and determined that the proposed request complies the criteria and objectives established in UDC Section 3.06.040 for a Planned Unit Development (PUD), as outlined below: Planning Department Staff Report 2019-3-PUD Georgetown Senior Living Community Page 7 of 8 PLANNEDUNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) APPROVALCRITERIA 1. A variety of housing types, employment opportunities, or commercial services to achieve a balanced community.Complies The current PUD and proposed amendment provide a variety of housing and commercial opportunities through the allowance of a mix of uses including general senior living, assisted living, memory care facilities, theater, entertainment pavilion, salon, restaurant, and dog park. 2. An orderly and creative arrangement of all land uses with respect to each other and to the entire community.Complies The current PUD and proposed amendment’s concept plans, along with the approved Site Development Plan, display an orderly developed site aimed at providing residents and visitors with a resort like setting. The approved site displays advanced landscaping, architectural features, as well as variations in height differential for structures on-site in respect to neighboring properties. In addition, the increase setbacks an buffering against the Single-Family Residential (RS) zoned properties to the east within Sun City minimize the impact this use may have on the adjacent residential homes. 3. A planned and integrated comprehensive transportation system providing for a separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic, to include facilities such as roadways, bicycle ways, and pedestrian walkways. Complies The subject property will have direct access from Del Webb Blvd to the south. Additionally, the approved Site Development Plan, 2019-75-SDP, displays that subject property has a joint access agreement with the neighboring parcel to the west that permits access to Williams Drive. Also featured on the approved SDP is a series of well-integrated ADA sized sidewalks that are displayed throughout the 13.15-acre property as well as providing connectivity to neighboring parcels. The approved SDP was in accordance with the existing Seven Strand PUD. 4. The provisions of cultural or recreational facilities for all segments of the community.Complies The current PUD and proposed amendment includes the provision of recreational facilities and other amenities as accessory uses to the senior living, assisted living, memory care facility, as well as to the visiting general public. 5. The location of general building envelopes to take maximum advantage of the natural and manmade environment.Complies While the subject property is currently vacant with minimal tree coverage, the approved Site Development Plan has provided a well designed and integrated Landscaping Plan throughout the entire property that includes vegetative screening to parking areas and a masonry screening wall to the north and east that are directly adjacent to existing Residential-Single Family development. In addition, the senior living facility and its amenities are set back exceptionally farther than the standard setbacks to provide additional distance the neighboring Residential Single-Family. 6. The staging of development in a manner which can be accommodated by the timely provision of public utilities, facilities, and services.Complies The subject property has been developed with the timely provision of public utilities, facilities and services. Public utilities, facilities, and services were reviewed with the Georgetown Senior Living Site Development Plan, 2019-75-SDP, and will be re-review if any additions or amendments are proposed for the site. Planning Department Staff Report 2019-3-PUD Georgetown Senior Living Community Page 8 of 8 Based on the findings detailed above, the requested PUD amendment meets the approval criteria for a Zoning Map Amendment and PUD. In particular, staff finds that the requested amendment continues to promote a mix of residential and non-residential uses consistent with the Mixed Density Neighborhood Future Land Use designation. The proposed amendment will assist with limiting the amount of impervious cover on site by having a reduction in parking and will help promote connectivity by extending meeting opportunities between the senior facility residents and the general public. Meetings Schedule July 7, 2020 – Planning and Zoning Commission July 28, 2020 – City Council First Reading of the Ordinance August 11, 2020 – City Council Second Reading of the Ordinance Public Notification As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the subject property were notified of the Zoning Map Amendment request (49 notices), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper (June 21, 2020) and signs were posted on-site. To date, staff has received 0 written comments in favor, and 1 in opposition to the request (Exhibit 6). Attachments Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Future Land Use Map Exhibit 3 – Zoning Map Exhibit 4 – Planned Unit Development (PUD) Development Plan Exhibit 5 – Letter of Intent Exhibit 6 – Public Comments Location 2019-3-PUD Exhibit #1 Location 2019-3-PUD Exhibit #1 BO ROS GR W L M D N SAM VE HAND LIMMER LOOP WAY UNIVERSITY AVE 1 7 5 INNER LOOP C R 11 0 EL D B WO OD R D R OCK RIDE LN B E LL GIN R D SO U THW E T N B LV D §¨¦35 §¨¦35 EELLLL 2019-3-PUD Exhibit #3 Zoning The total amount of parking required by the existing PUD is 264 parking stalls as shown in the table to the left. We are requesting a parking count reduction of 68 parking stalls with this PUD amendment application for our Phase I development. We believe this parking count reduction is justified because of our real world experience managing these types of senior living communities, and noting the actual parking consumption. Approximately 7% of our independent living residence will not drive, only half of our assisted living residence will drive, and none of our memory care residence will drive. MedCore Partners, LLC | 4245 North Central Expressway, Suite 310, Dallas, TX 75205 April 17, 2020 Mr. Michael Patroski City of Georgetown 406 W. 8 th St Georgetown, TX 78626 Re:Letter of Intent PUD amendment for 13.15 acres for a senior living community next to Sun City. Dear Mr. Patroski, TM Georgetown, LLC, the ownersof Lots5 7 of the Village Gate at Sun City Final Plat, wish to amend the existing PUD for this property, Ordinance No.2015 10. The existing PUD allows a senior living community and we wish to develop a senior living community. We only request to amend the existing PUD for the below reasons: 1. We wish to reduce the required parking stalls for our community from the 264 stalls required by existing PUD and UDC, to 196 stalls which will be our actual parking demand. We believe the existing PUD contemplates a parking demand for a typical multi family apartment complex, but with senior living facilities, much fewer residence drive than in typical multi family apartment complexes. Thecalculationofhow wederivedour requested196 stallsisshownon ExhibitA. We have also includeda letterfromour facilityoperator, WatermarkRetirement Communities, which supportsthisreducedparkingstallcount. Watermarkisanindustryleader,operatingseniorliving facilities for over30yearsand currently operates63senior livingfacilitiesnationwide. Their deep real world experience tells them the actual parking demand for this facility will be less than 200 stalls. Finally, we have also included a parking study for this Georgetownsenior living community conducted by The DeShazo Group, which supports our request parking count reduction. 2. We would like the city to allow our facilitys restaurant, and salon to be accessed and used by the general citizens of Georgetown, not just the residence of our senior living community. Our wellness center (gym) will only be accessed by our residents and guests. The existing PUD allows alloftheabovementionedusestobeapartofourseniorlivingcommunity,butitlimitsthepeople that can use those amenities to the residence of our senior living community. We want to open up these amenities to all of the citizens of Georgetown, and especially the residence of the adjacent Sun City community. These uses are shown on Exhibit A, outlined in red lines. Per the Citys Application Guideline, we have included the below information as part of this Letter of Intent. Existing zoning district: The existing zoning is PUD, Ordinance No. 2015-10. Proposed base zoning district: We do not wish to change the base zoning Future Land Use and Growth Tier designations: The future land use is per the existing PUD, a senior living community Acreage of property to be rezoned: 13.15 acres Justification and explanation of how the proposal is in compliance with the Citys 2030 Comprehensive Plan. We see no reason why our above request is not in compliance with the Citys 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Cite the goals and policies of the 2030 Plan that will be met by the proposal. We see no reason why our above requests would not met the goals and policies of the 2010 Plan. Explanation of how roads and utilities will serve the property: There is an existing access road from Del Webb Blvd, and we will construct another access road from Williams Dr. Water and sewer utilities are currently stubbed out to our site. Comparison table of proposed development and architectural standards vs. current UDC standards: Please see the attached Exhibit A (Parking Count Reduction) and Exhibit B (Larger Monument Sign) Justification for any deviations from the UDC requirements and proposed mitigations for those deviations: The justification for our parking count reduction request and larger monument sign are included with Exhibit A and Exhibit B and mentioned above. If existing structures or features of property will be utilized, provide a Conceptual Site Layout exemplifying how the structures will meet all applicable development standards of the proposed zoning district (i.e. legal nonconformities per UDC Chapter 14 will not be created): We do not believe this statement is applicable to our application. We will not be utilizing any existing structures or features, the land is a greenfield site. Explanation as to how the request meets the approval criteria outlined in UDC Section 3.06.040: We do not believe this section of the UDC is applicable to our application. We are not trying to establish a PUD, only make minor modifications to the existing PUD. Very truly yours, MedCore Partners, LLC Chad Suitonu, Development Manager The total amount of parking required by the existing PUD is 264 parking stalls as shown in the table to the left. We are requesting a parking count reduction of 68 parking stalls with this PUD amendment application for our Phase I development. We believe this parking count reduction is justified because of our real world experience managing these types of senior living communities, and noting the actual parking consumption. Approximately 7% of our independent living residence will not drive, only half of our assisted living residence will drive, and none of our memory care residence will drive. Ordinance Number: ___________________ Page 1 of 2 Description: Amended Seven Strand Senior Living PUD Case File Number: 2019-3-PUD Date Approved: 8/11/2020 Exhibits Attached ORDINANCE NO. _____________________ An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, amending the Seven Strand Senior Living Planned Unit Development (PUD), for approximately 13.1501 acres (Lots 5, 6 & 7, Block A, Village Gate at Sun City Final Plat), located at 60 Del Webb Blvd for a project to be known as Georgetown Senior Living; repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; including a severability clause; and establishing an effective date. Whereas, an application has been made to the City for the purpose of amending the Official Zoning Map, adopted on the 12th day of June, 2012, for the specific Zoning District classification of the following described real property ("The Property"): Lots 5, 6 & 7, Block A, Village Gate at Sun City Final Plat, located at 60 Del Webb Blvd, as recorded in Document Number 2019111074 of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "The Property"; and Whereas, public notice of such hearing was accomplished in accordance with State Law , signs posted on the Property, and mailed notice to nearby property owners; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a meeting on July 7, 2020, held the required public hearing and submitted a recommendation of approval to the City Council for the requested rezoning of the Property; and Whereas, the City Council, at a meeting on July 28, 2020, held an additional public hearing prior to taking action on the requested rezoning of the Property. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, that: Section 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this Ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance implements the vision, goals, and policies of the Georgetown 2030 Comprehensive Plan and further finds that the enactment of this Ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other policies or provisions of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code. Section 2. The PUD Development Plan for Seven Strand Senior Living Planned Unit Development (PUD) is herby amended in accordance with the attached PUD Development Plan, identified as exhibit A, incorporated herein by reference. Page 2 of 2 Case File Number: 2019-3-PUD Exhibits Attached Section 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. Section 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective in accordance with the provisions of state law and the City Charter of the City of Georgetown. APPROVED on First Reading on the 28th day of July, 2020. APPROVED AND ADOPTED on Second Reading on the 11th day of August, 2020. ATTEST: _________________________ Robyn Densmore, City Secretary THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: ______________________ Dale Ross Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________ City Attorney Ordinance Number: ___________________ Description: Amended Seven Strand Senior Living PUD Date Approved: 8/11/2020 The total amount of parking required by the existing PUD is 264 parking stalls as shown in the table to the left. We are requesting a parking count reduction of 68 parking stalls with this PUD amendment application for our Phase I development. We believe this parking count reduction is justified because of our real world experience managing these types of senior living communities, and noting the actual parking consumption. Approximately 7% of our independent living residence will not drive, only half of our assisted living residence will drive, and none of our memory care residence will drive. 11 Georgetown Senior Living2019-3-PUD City CouncilAugust 11, 2020 22 Item Under Consideration 2019-3-PUD •Second reading of an Ordinance on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to amend the Seven Strand Planned Unit Development (PUD) Development Plan consisting of Lots 5-7, Village Gate at Sun City Final Plat, located at 60 Del Webb Blvd 33 44 Sun City, Phase Dollar General Grace Fellowship Church Box Walgreens 55 Call-Out Box 66 Residential Single-Family (RS) Agriculture (AG) General Commercial (C-3) Local Commercial (C-1) 77 Approved 2019-75-SDP 88 Planned Unit Development (PUD) •Special purposed zoning district •Allows flexibility in planning and design •Can accommodate unique developments or environmentally-sensitive areas to be developed with a common scheme •Can accommodate multiple uses 99 Deviations from Existing PUD Current PUD Proposed Amended PUD All Accessory Uses are permitted by residents only. Barber/Beaty Shop & Restaurant/Kitchens Open to the General Public. Parking: Independent Living Retirement Center use shall be: 1 space per dwelling unit + 1 space per each 15 dwelling units or fraction thereof for visitor and employee parking. Independent Living use shall be: 1 space per dwelling unit. The Assisted Living shall be: 1 space per 2 beds. The Memory Care use shall be: 1 space per 3.5 beds. 1010 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.06.030 Criteria for Rezoning Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review and final action; X The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan;X The zoning change promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and healthful development of the City; X 1111 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.06.030 Criteria for Rezoning Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood; and X The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the district that would be applied by the proposed amendment. X 1212 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.06.040 Criteria for PUDs Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply A variety of housing types, employment opportunities, or commercial services to achieve a balanced community. X An orderly and creative arrangement of all land uses with respect to each other and to the entire community. X A planned and integrated comprehensive transportation system providing for a separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic, to include facilities such as roadways, bicycle ways, and pedestrian walkways. X 1313 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.06.040 Criteria for PUDs Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply The provisions of cultural or recreational facilities for all segments of the community.X The location of general building envelopes to take maximum advantage of the natural and manmade environment. X The staging of development in a manner which can be accommodated by the timely provision of public utilities, facilities, and services. X 1515 Planning &Zoning Commission Action •At their July 7, 2020 meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of the request (7-0). 1616 City Council Action on First Reading •At their July 28, 2020 meeting, the City Council voted in favor of the first reading of the ordinance (6-0) 1818 Second Reading of an Ordinance An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, amending the Seven Strand Senior Living Planned Unit Development (PUD), for approximately 13.1501 acres (Lots 5, 6 & 7, Block A, Village Gate at Sun City Final Plat), located at 60 Del Webb Blvd for a project to be known as Georgetown Senior Living; repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; including a severability clause; and establishing an effective date. Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Department Staff Report 2020-3-ANX QT #4168 Page 1 of 6 Report Date: May 29, 2020 Case No: 2020-3-ANX Project Planner: Michael Patroski, Planner Item Details Project Name: QT #4168 Project Location: Southwest of the intersection of Shell Road and State Highway 195, within City Council district No.4 (upon annexation) Total Acreage: 2.213 Legal Description: 2.213-acre tract of land, out of the W. Roberts Survey No. 4, Abstract 524 Applicant: QuikTrip, c/o David Meyer Property Owner: Shell-Hwy 195 LLC, c/o Michael Wright Request: Zoning Map Amendment to zone the subject property General Commercial (C-3) upon annexation. Case History: This is the first public hearing of this request. The subject property along with 0.939-acres of Shell Road are currently under consideration for Annexation (2020-3-ANX). Planning Department Staff Report 2020-3-ANX QT #4168 Page 2 of 6 Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant has requested to Annex a 2.213-acre tract of land along with 0.939-acres of Shell Road. Upon annexation, the applicant has requested the 2.213-acre property have the zoning district of General Commercial (C-3). Site Information Location: The subject property is currently located at the southwest corner of Shell Road and SH 195. Physical and Natural Features: The subject property is predominantly flat with a slight elevated embankment along both Shell Road and SH 195. The subject property is currently undeveloped with minimal trees. Future Land Use and Zoning Designations: The subject property has an existing Future Land Use designation of Community Center and is currently located within the City of Georgetown’s Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Surrounding Properties: The subject property is directly adjacent to the CubeSmart Self-Storage facility to the south and the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Berry Creek Highlands. The concept plan for the Berry Creek Highlands development identifies High-Density Multi-Family (MF-2) land use designation for the area directly adjacent to the subject property. Further south of the subject property, the area is entitled to be developed with residential subdivisions, to include the Hidden Oaks at Berry Creek and the Enclave at Hidden Oaks subdivisions. The current zoning, Future Land Use designation, and existing uses of the adjacent properties to the north, south, east and west are outlined in the table below: DIRECTION ZONING DISTRICT FUTURE LAND USE EXISTING USE North ETJ Community Center Undeveloped (across SH 195) East Agriculture (AG) Community Center Undeveloped (across Shell Road) South ETJ Community Center Self-Storage Facility West Planned Unit Development (PUD) High-Density Multi-Family (MF- 2) (Ord. 2018-36) Community Center Mixed Density Neighborhood Undeveloped/ Berry Creek Highlands- PUD Planning Department Staff Report 2020-3-ANX QT #4168 Page 3 of 6 Comprehensive Plan Guidance Future Land Use Map: Community Centers (CC) are typically configured as “nodes” of smaller scale at the intersection of arterial roads and other major thoroughfares. These developments provide local retail, professional office, and service-oriented businesses that serve the residents of Georgetown. While typically auto-oriented, pedestrian connections to the surrounding neighborhoods are provided. Well integrated residential developments, which encourage the interaction of residents and businesses, are appropriate and vertical mixed use encouraged. To promote the interaction of integrated and adjacent residential development, these areas emphasize quality building and site design, such as enhanced architectural features, landscaping, and prominent pedestrian facilities. Utilities The subject property is located within the City’s service area for water and wastewater. Additionally, it is located within the Pedernales Electric Cooperative (PEC) service area for electric. It is anticipated that there is adequate water capacity to serve the subject property at this time. Wastewater capacity will be available with the construction of the Berry Creek Highlands development to the north. A Utility Evaluation may be required at time of Site Development Plan to determine capacity and any necessary utility improvements. DUA: 14 or more Target Ratio: 80% nonresidential, 20% residential Primary Use: Small to mid-size retailers Secondary Uses: Medium and high density residential, local restaurants, specialty retailers, professional office, and civic uses CubeSmart Self Storage Berry Creek Highlands PUD (Ord. 2018-36) Planning Department Staff Report 2020-3-ANX QT #4168 Page 4 of 6 Transportation The subject property has an estimated 273’ of frontage along existing major arterial Shell Road and 436’ of frontage along existing freeway SH 195. Arterial streets provide traffic movement through and between different areas within the city and access to adjacent land uses. Access is more controllable because driveway spacing requirements are much greater and, if safety dictates, overall access can be limited to specific turning movements. Major Arterials connect major traffic generators and land use concentrations and serve much larger traffic volumes over greater distances. Freeways and Tollways are controlled access roadways that allow for the movement of traffic through and around the City. This classification includes interstate highways, state highways, tollways and loops. Direct property access is limited as access is not the intended purpose of these facilities. Design characteristics of these facilities include multiple travel lanes, limited access points, high traffic volumes and high traffic speeds. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) will be required at time of Site Development Plan for any development that generates more than two thousand (2,000) average daily trips based upon the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. Proposed Zoning district The General Commercial District (C-3) is intended to provide a location for general commercial and retail activities that serve the entire community and its visitors. Uses may be large in scale and generate substantial traffic, making the C-3 District only appropriate along freeways and major arterials. Permitted uses in this district include, but are not limited to, general retail, hotels, restaurants, and general office. Other uses such as activity center, bar/tavern/pub, college/university, fuel sales, and event facility among others are permitted subject to specific design limitations. Certain land uses, including automotive sales, rental or leasing facilities, require a Special Use Permit (SUP). Exhibit 4 contains a comprehensive list of C-3 district permitted uses and development standards. Intergovernmental and Interdepartmental Review The proposed rezoning request was reviewed by all applicable City Departments to determine the appropriateness of the requested zoning on the subject property. No comments were issued regarding the zoning request. Approval Criteria Staff has reviewed the proposed rezoning request and has found that it complies with the criteria established in UDC Section 3.06.030 for a Zoning Map Amendment, as outlined below: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING)APPROVAL CRITERIA 1. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review and final action. Complies Planning Department Staff Report 2020-3-ANX QT #4168 Page 5 of 6 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING)APPROVAL CRITERIA An application must provide the necessary information to review and make a knowledgeable decision in order for staff to schedule an application for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. This application was reviewed by staff and deemed to be complete. 2. The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Complies The applicant is proposing to zone the subject property General Commercial (C-3) within the Community Centers (CC) Node. Community Centers are intended to serve as nodes for small-scale, well integrated with residential developments to encourage the interaction of residents and businesses. The General Commercial District (C-3) is intended to provide a location for general commercial and retail activities that serve the community and its visitors. In addition, Future Land Use Policy #1 of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment is to encourage a balanced mix of residential, commercial, and employment uses at varying densities and intensities to reflect a gradual transition from urban to suburban to rural development. Having a General Commercial (C-3) zoning district centrally located within a commercial node, particularly at the intersection of two major thoroughfares, would help achieve this Future Land Use Policy as the surrounding area develops. It should also be noted that the subject property is located within an estimated 122.8-acre Future Land Use node of Community Center. The Community Center FLU targeted ratio is 80% non- residential and 20% residential. The vast majority of property within this FLU node is currently undeveloped with the only currently developed property being the adjacent 5.12-acre Self Storage facility. The subject property (2.213-acres) added to the Self-Storage Facility (5.12-acres) would result in the FLU node being an estimated 16% developed non-residential with the remaining 84% of the FLU node undeveloped or minimally developed. Of this 84% vacant land, an estimated 16- acres is intended for High-Density Multi-Family development within the PUD located to the northwest of the subject property. Because of these factors, the Future Land Use designation and the proposed zoning district appear to be compatible. 3. The zoning change promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and healthful development of the City.Complies The requested General Commercial (C-3) zoning district would not adversely affect the heath, safety, or welfare of residents. According to the City of Georgetown’s UDC, General Commercial (C-3) is only appropriate along freeways and major arterials. Thus, the General Commercial (C-3) district at this location, should it be approved, will help facilitate orderly commercial development along SH-198, which is a major highway. In addition, while some of the uses with General Commercial (C-3) may be large and generate substantial traffic, staff does not anticipate uses on the 2.213-acre site to create a disturbance to the general welfare of the community due to the district’s development standards and size of the property. 4. The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood. Complies The subject property is located southwest of the Shell Road and SH 195 intersection. Located along Planning Department Staff Report 2020-3-ANX QT #4168 Page 6 of 6 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING)APPROVAL CRITERIA the subject properties western edge, the property shares approximately 73’ of property boundary with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) that’s concept plan depicts High-Density Multi-Family (MF-2) directly adjacent to the subject property. It is encouraged to have High Density Multi- Family (MF-2) development directly adjacent to General Commercial (C-3) zoning as these two zoning districts display higher intensity and are compatible with one another. The subject property also shares an approximately 568’ boarder with a tract currently located within the ETJ which serves as a Self-Storage Facility. Located across Shell Road is an undeveloped tract zoned Agriculture (AG) and General Commercial (C-3) zoned properties that also share the FLU of Community Centers. With this character of the current area and its intended Future Land Use, staff finds that the proposed zoning district is compatible with the surrounding area. 5. The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the District that would be applied by the proposed amendment. Complies The size and shape of the property allows for a typical commercial floor plan with enough land remaining to meet parking needs, as well as other site improvement requirements such as bufferyards, landscaping, and impervious cover. Based on the finding’s listings above, staff finds that the requested base zoning district of General Commercial (C-3) complies with 5 out of the 5 criteria. The requested zoning district is compatible with adjacent land uses, provides the foundation of transition for the Future Land Use node, and is adequately sized to support the C-3 development standards. Meetings Schedule June 2, 2020 – Planning and Zoning Commission June 23, 2020 – City Council First Reading of the Ordinance July 14, 2020 – City Council Second Reading of the Ordinance Public Notification As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the subject property were notified of the Zoning Map Amendment request (9 notices), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper May 17, 2020 and signs were posted on-site. To date, staff has received 0 written comments in favor, and 0 in opposition to the request. Attachments Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Future Land Use Map Exhibit 3 – Zoning Map Exhibit 4 – Design and development standards of the C-3 Exhibit 5 – Letter of Intent Location 2020-3-ANX Exhibit #1 Location 2020-3-ANX Exhibit #1 BO ROS GR W L M D N SAM VE HAND LIMMER LOOP WAY UNIVERSITY AVE 1 7 5 INNER LOOP C R 11 0 EL D B WO OD R D R OCK RIDE LN B E LL GIN R D SO U THW E T N B LV D §¨¦35 §¨¦35 ¯ 2020-3-ANX Exhibit #3 Zoning April 6th, 2020 The City of Georgetown 406 W 8th St Georgetown, TX 78626 RE: Voluntary Annexation Dear Planning Staff, QuikTrip Corporation respectfully requests the City of Georgetown to accept the Voluntary Annexation of a 2.213-acre tract of land, out of the W. Roberts Survey No. 4, Abstract 524 from the Georgetown Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction into the City Limits of Georgetown, on behalf of the property owner. The requested annexation will help to promote the health, safety and general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, and healthful development of the City. Additionally, QuikTrip requests the City to accept the annexation of the property into the City Limits as zoning: General Commercial (C-3). The location of the property meets the intent of the definition of General Commercial (C-3), as defined in the Unified Development Code 4.04.020 (C), by being located along a major freeway (Hwy 195) and a major arterial (Shell Rd). The requested zoning is compatible with present zonings and uses of nearby properties; adjacent southern property is an operating commercial development and the eastern adjacent property is zoned General Commercial (C-3). The subject property is suitable for the uses permittable by General Commercial (C-3) and is contiguous to current Georgetown City Limits. Furthermore, the requested zoning meets the intent of the newly adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan, in which the property is now designated as a Community Center (CC). The aforementioned property is currently vacant land, therefore, no residents nor qualified voters inhabit the property. QuikTrip reserves the right to pull this annexation application from consideration at any time during the proceedings. QuikTrip®Corporation 2007 Sam Bass Rd Suite 100 Round Rock, TX 78681 (704) 604-3475 With this signed petition for voluntary annexation, the landowner understands that construction of any capital improvements necessary for development on the property will not be the responsibility of the City of Georgetown if approved for annexation; rather, such improvements will occur through non-City financial assistance through the subdivision and construction process. Respectfully, David Meyer, Jr. Real Estate Project Manager- QuikTrip Corp. A Fortune 100 "Best Companies to Work For" 2007 Sam Bass Rd Suite 100 Round Rock, TX 78681 (704) 604-3475 - Direct Line dmeyerjr@quiktrip.com – Email Page 1 of 2 2020-3-ANX Ordinance No. _____________________ Project Name QT #4168 Date Approved: , 2020 Exhibit A,B,C attached Ordinance No. __________________ An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, providing for the extension of certain boundary limits of the City of Georgetown, Texas, and the annexation and initial zoning designation of General Commercial (C-3) for certain territory consisting of 2.213-acres, more or less, in the W. Roberts Survey No. 4, Abstract 524, and a 0.939-acre portion of Shell Road, a right-of- way of varying width described to the Williams County, Texas, as described herein; repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; including a severability clause; and establishing an effective date. Whereas, the owners of the area proposed for annexation requested annexation of the area by the City of Georgetown (“City”), pursuant to Local Government Code Section 43.0671; and Whereas, all of the herein-described property lies within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Georgetown, Texas; and Whereas, the Georgetown City Council approved a Municipal Services Agreement for the subject property on May 26, 2002; and Whereas, the Section 4.03.010 of the City’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) creates procedures for initial zoning of newly annexed territory; and Whereas, all prerequisites of state law and the City Charter have been complied with; Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas that: Section 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Georgetown hereby annexes into the city limits a 2.213-acre tract of land, out of the W. Roberts Survey No. 4, Abstract 524, and a 0.939 acre tract of land, out of the W. Roberts Survey No. 4, Abstract 524, being a portion of the Shell Road right- of-way, as shown in “Exhibit A” and as described in “Exhibit B” of this ordinance (the “Property”). The Property is hereby included in City Council District 4, as it is adjacent to Council District 4 and no other City Council Districts. The City’s official boundary map and City Council Districts map shall be amended accordingly. Section 3. In accordance with the procedures for initial zoning of newly annexed territory described in Section 4.03.010 of the UDC, and for the reasons set forth by City Staff, the City Council hereby finds that a zoning classification of General Commercial (C-3) is appropriate for Page 2 of 2 2020-3-ANX Ordinance No. _____________________ Project Name QT #4168 Date Approved: , 2020 Exhibit A,B,C attached the Property and consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and upon annexation the Property shall have a zoning of General Commercial (C-3). The City’s Official Zoning Map shall be amended accordingly. Section 4. Upon annexation of the Property, the City shall provide to the Property the municipal services set forth in the Municipal Services Agreement attached to this ordinance as Exhibit “C” and by this reference incorporated within it (the “Agreement”), pursuant to the schedule set forth therein. The City shall have no obligation to provide services to the Property not listed in the Agreement. Section 5. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. Section 6. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in accordance with the City Charter. Passed and Approved on First Reading on the rd day of Ju 2020. Passed and Approved on Second Reading on the 1 th day of 2020. Attest: _________________________________ Robyn Densmore, TRMC City Secretary The City of Georgetown: _________________________________ Dale Ross Mayor Approved as to form: ________________________________ City Attorney Location 2020-3-ANX Exhibit #1 Location 2020-3-ANX Exhibit #1 Shell Road &SH 1952020-3-ANX City Council August 11, 2020 Item Under Consideration 2020-3-ANX – Second Reading of an Ordinance of a request for the voluntary annexation of an approximate 2.213-acre tract of land, out of the W. Roberts Survey No. 4, Abstract 524, and a 0.939 acre tract of land, out of the W. Roberts Survey No. 4, Abstract 524, being over and across a portion of Shell Road, a right-of-way of varying width described to Williamson County, Texas, with the initial zoning designation of General Commercial (C-3)upon annexation, for the property generally located southwest of the intersection of Shell Road and State Highway 195 CubeSmart Self Storage Berry Creek Highlands PUD (Ord. 2018-36) Community Center (CC) •Commercial areas serving more than one residential neighborhood •Typically configured as “nodes” at varying scales •Along or at intersections of collector and arterial roadways •May include neighborhood-serving and larger retail commercial uses Examples: •Retail, office, service-oriented business uses •Restaurants, specialty retail, smaller shopping centers DUA: 14 or more Target Ratio: 80% nonresidential, 20% residential Primary Use: Small to mid-size retailers Secondary Uses: Medium and high density residential, local restaurants, specialty retailers, professional office, and civic uses General Commercial (C-3) •Commercial and retail serving entire community •May be large in scale and generate substantial traffic •Appropriate along Arterials and Freeways Dimensional Standards •Max building height = 60’ •Front setback = 25’ •Side setback = 10’ •Rear setback = 10’ •Side setback to residential = 15’ •Rear setback to residential = 25’ •15’ bufferyard adjacent to RS Zoning District •Allowed uses Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.06.030 Criteria for Zoning Map Amendment Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review and final action; X The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan;X The zoning change promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and healthful development of the City; X Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.06.030 Criteria for Zoning Map Amendment Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood; and X The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the district that would be applied by the proposed amendment. X Planning and Zoning Commission •At their June 2, 2020 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously (7-0) in favor of zoning the property General Commercial (C-3) upon annexation. City Council •At their July 28, 2020 meeting City Council voted in favor of the requested (6-0). Annexation Process Municipal Services Agreement Public Hearing & 1st Reading of an Ordinance 2nd Reading of an Ordinance P&Z Public Hearing & Recommendation on Zoning Second Reading of an Ordinance •An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, providing for the extension of certain boundary limits of the City of Georgetown, Texas, and the annexation and initial zoning designation of General Commercial (C-3) for certain territory consisting of 2.213- acres, more or less, in the W. Roberts Survey No. 4, Abstract 524, and a 0.939-acre portion of Shell Road, a right-of-way of varying width described to the Williams County, Texas, as described herein; repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; including a severability clause; and establishing an effective date. Location 2020-5-ANX Exhibit #1 Location 2020-5-ANX Exhibit #1 Ordinance No. _____________________ Page 1 of 2 Enclave at Hidden Oaks Additional Acreage, 0.872 acres 2020-5-ANX Date Approved: August 11, 2020 Exhibit A,B,C attached Ordinance No. __________________ An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, providing for the extension of certain boundary limits of the City of Georgetown, Texas, and the annexation of certain territory consisting of 0.763 acres, more or less, in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 524 and a 0.109 acre portion of right- of-way on Shell Road, as described herein; repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; including a severability clause; and establishing an effective date. Whereas, the owners of the area proposed for annexation requested annexation of the area by the City of Georgetown (“City”), pursuant to Local Government Code Section 43.0671; and Whereas, all of the herein-described property lies within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Georgetown, Texas; and Whereas, the Georgetown City Council approved a Municipal Services Agreement for the subject property on July 14, 2020; and Whereas, the Section 4.03.010 of the City’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) creates procedures for initial zoning of newly annexed territory; and Whereas, all prerequisites of state law and the City Charter have been complied with; Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas that: Section 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Georgetown hereby annexes into the city limits 0.763 acres in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 524 and a 0.109 acre portion of right-of- way on Shell Road, as shown in “Exhibit A” and as described in “Exhibit B” of this ordinance (the “Property”). The Property is hereby included in City Council District 5, as it is adjacent to Council District 5 and no other City Council Districts. The City’s official boundary map and City Council Districts map shall be amended accordingly. Section 3. In accordance with the procedures for initial zoning of newly annexed territory described in Section 4.03.010 of the UDC, and for the reasons set forth by City Staff, the City Council hereby finds that a zoning classification of Agriculture (AG) is appropriate for the Property and consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and upon annexation the Property shall have a zoning of Agriculture (AG). The City’s Official Zoning Map shall be amended accordingly. Ordinance No. _____________________ Page 2 of 2 Enclave at Hidden Oaks Additional Acreage, 0.872 acres 2020-5-ANX Date Approved: August 11, 2020 Exhibit A,B,C attached Section 4. Upon annexation of the Property, the City shall provide to the Property the municipal services set forth in the Municipal Services Agreement attached to this ordinance as Exhibit “C” and by this reference incorporated within it (the “Agreement”), pursuant to the schedule set forth therein. The City shall have no obligation to provide services to the Property not listed in the Agreement. Section 5. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect. Section 6. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in accordance with the City Charter. Passed and Approved on First Reading on the 28th day of July 2020. Passed and Approved on Second Reading on the 11th day of August 2020. The City of Georgetown: Attest: _________________________________ _________________________________ Dale Ross Robyn Densmore, TRMC Mayor City Secretary Approved as to form: _________________________________ Skye Masson City Attorney 1 Enclave at Hidden OaksAdditionalAcreage2020-5-ANX City CouncilAugust 11, 2020 2 Item Under Consideration 2020-5-ANX • Second Reading of an Ordinance for the voluntary annexation of an approximately 0.763-acre tract of land out of the William Roberts Survey, Abstract 524, and a 0.109 acre tract of land, being over and across a portion of Shell Road, a right-of-way of varying width described to Williamson County, Texas, for the property generally located at 3700 Shell Road 3 0.42 miles to SH 195 3.7 miles to Williams Drive 3 4 Hidden Oaks at Berry Creek Enclave at Hidden Oaks Shell Road RV & Boat Storage Calvary Chapel of Georgetown 4 5 Enclave at Hidden Oaks Subject Property 6 Annexation Process Municipal Services Agreement Public Hearing & 1st Reading of an Ordinance 2nd Reading of an Ordinance 7 Tentative Schedule July 14: Municipal Services Agreement July 28: Public Hearing & 1st Reading of Ordinance held at City Council Meeting August 11: 2nd Reading of Ordinance at City Council Meeting 8 City Council Action on First Reading •At their July 28 meeting, the City Council APPROVED the first reading of the ordinance (6-0). 9 Second Reading of the Ordinance •An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, providing for the extension of certain boundary limits of the City of Georgetown, Texas, and the annexation of certain territory consisting of 0.763 acres, more or less, in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 524 and a 0.109 acre portion of right-of-way on Shell Road, as described herein; repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; including a severability clause; and establishing an effective date.